[ParlTrack]

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)

Da. whereas Norway has urgently asked Odense Steel Shipyard to provide 750 staffmembers to help in offshore work in Norway; whereas Maynards Europe and Hilco Industrial Europe have purchased the equipment of the Odense Steel Shipyard,

2011/06/01
Committee: BUDG

Lucas HARTONG

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)

Db. whereas the shipyard closure announcement was already made in August 2009, but nonetheless Odense Steel Shipyard applied for the ESF funding in July 2010, knowing that the shipyard was going to close down,

2011/06/01
Committee: BUDG

Lucas HARTONG

Motion for a resolution
Recital E

E. whereas the application in this specific case does not fulfilsl the eligibility criteria set up by the EGF Regulation,

2011/06/01
Committee: BUDG

Lucas HARTONG

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1

1. Requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF; appreciates in this sense the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following the Parliament's request for accelerating the release of grants, aimed at presenting to the budgetary authority the Commission's assessment on the eligibility of an EGF application together with the proposal to mobilise the Fund; hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be reached in the framework of the upcoming reviews of the Fund;deleted

2011/06/01
Committee: BUDG

Lucas HARTONG

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2

2. Recalls the institutions’ commitment to ensuring a smooth and rapid procedure for the adoption of the decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF, providing one- off, time-limited individual support geared to helping workers who have suffered redundancies as a result of globalisation and the financial and economic crisis; emphasises the role that the EGF can play in the reintegration of workers made redundant into the labour market;deleted

2011/06/01
Committee: BUDG

Lucas HARTONG

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3

3. Stresses that, in accordance with Article 6 of the EGF Regulation, it should be ensured that the EGF supports the reintegration of individual redundant workers into employment; reiterates that assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements, nor measures restructuring companies or sectors; concludes that, because these redundancies could clearly be foreseen, and that this application must be considered more as a state-contribution to end activities and thus is not eligible for EGF funding;

2011/06/01
Committee: BUDG

Lucas HARTONG

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4

4. Notes that the information provided on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF includes information on the complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds; reiterates its call to the Commission to present a comparative evaluation of these data in its annual reports as well;deleted

2011/06/01
Committee: BUDG

Lucas HARTONG

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5

5. Welcomes the fact that following repeated requests from the Parliament, for the first time the 2011 budget shows payment appropriations of EUR 47 608 950 on the EGF budget line 04 05 01; reminds that the EGF was created as a separate specific instrument with its own objectives and deadlines and that therefore deserves a dedicated allocation, which will avoid transfers from other budget lines, as happened in the past, which could be detrimental to the achievement of the various policies objectives;deleted

2011/06/01
Committee: BUDG

Lucas HARTONG

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6

6. ADoes not approves the decision annexed to this resolution;

2011/06/01
Committee: BUDG

9 Amendments of Lucas HARTONG related to 2011/2093(BUD)

ParlTrack - 2011-2024