BETA

6 Amendments of Lucas HARTONG related to 2011/2318(INI)

Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. WelcomesNotes that the Commission is commitmentted to developing a new generation of sustainable fisheries agreements (SFAs) to promote the conservation of resources, environmental sustainability, good governance and the effectiveness of sectoral support in partner countries by means of strengthening conditionalities;
2012/02/16
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Would like to see the SFAs improve the integration of developingpartner countries in the world economy and encourage investment and the development of the local private sector, including small enterprises and small-scale fisheries, by supporting processing and marketing activities;
2012/02/16
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the allocation for sectoral support in the SFAs boosts the EU’s development cooperation Member States’ objectives and is in line with the signatory country’s national development plan; calls for this allocation not to replace the cooperation on fisheries provided for in other agreements or cooperation instruments but to complement it in a coherent way;
2012/02/16
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to enter into agreements with partner countries solely on the express condition that the EU Member States should benefit from the agreement concerned and certainly not suffer any economic loss;
2012/02/16
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Calls on the Commission to enter into agreements solely with countries where human rights are respected unconditionally, the rule of law is applied in line with internationally recognised laws and democratic governance principles are complied with;
2012/02/16
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Asks the Commission to base any renewal and/or extension of the agreement also on the impact assessment and, where the assessment is negative, not to extend the agreement;
2012/02/16
Committee: DEVE