Activities of Angel DZHAMBAZKI related to 2020/2013(INI)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law in so far as the EU is affected in the areas of civil and military uses and of state authority outside the scope of criminal justice
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on Artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law in so far as the EU is affected in the areas of civil and military uses and of state authority outside the scope of criminal justice
Legal basis opinions (0)
Amendments (10)
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that the EU should act as a global AI norm-setter inSupports the EU’s endeavours towards further developing its competitive advantages in the global AI sector; welcomes in particular, with regards to the areas of civil and military use and of state authority, withincreased efforts towards an effective strategy aimed at strengthening its influence on shaping global standards and diminishing Europe’s reliance on foreign data, which is essential to algorithm-based technologies; calls on the Commission and the Member States to advocate for broader cooperation within the UN, OECD, G7, G20 and other international fora in order to promote the EU approach to AI, emphasising the fundamental rights, freedoms and values that are enshrined in the EU Treatiexchange of best practices and most up- to-date developments with regards to AI and other next-generation technologies; stresses, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and international human rights law; importance of taking into consideration not only AI technologies but also considering other next- generation technologies, i.e. quantum computing, which are already being considered and represent the next leap of cross-sectoral technological advancements;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that AI has changed and has helped the development of the transport sector through increasmodernisations ing automation and greater integration and connectivity of transport networks; underlines however, that automation and the integration of AI varies not only between transport modes but also between national infrastructures in place throughout the Union; recalls the importance of due care and a human- centric approach for any action aimed towards full automation;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls the continued importance of the human factor even in automated processes; notes the some effects experienced by workers in the automotive industry and the transport sector as a whole, as a consequence of the introduction of AI technologies;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Supports the development and international standardisation of the automation of train operations; encourages the development of automated slot allocation in various transport modes and the use of AI in logistics and other areas of transport, in particular cross-border, where national infrastructures allow for it;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the work of the Single European Sky ATM Research project (SESAR) in the area of unmanned aircraft systems and air traffic management systems, both civil and military; stresses that global interoperability and harmonisation on a technical level constitutes a sine qua non for a safe, functional and secure global air traffic management system; encourages the Commission and the Member States to promote SESAR internationally and to contribute to the work of international organisations such as ICAO or IATA in this regard;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to participate in the international regulatory activities and discussions on autonomous vehicles, especially in the area of safety, while ensuring cooperation among regulators and vehicle manufacturers relevant to the deployment of automated vehicles in road traffic in the EU; calls for standardiseda coherent approach for the gathering and use of geographic input data and stresses the need for accuracy of such data;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Further welcomes any attempts by Member States for improving national infrastructures and supporting the establishment of supervisory mechanisms in order to ensure safety and oversight;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Recalls the current comprehensive discussions in the International Maritime Organization on effectively integrating new and emerging technologies where appropriate, such as autonomous ships, in the regulatory framework; recalls the importance of supporting and complementing where appropriate national efforts aimed towards improving and modernising existing infrastructure and resources, in accordance with Member States;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses how intelligent transport systems mitigate traffic congestion and contribute to improving efficiency and mobility solutions; draws attention to the increased exposure of traditional transport networks to cyber threats; recalls the importance of a human-centric approach and further research and development of cyber-security software and other protective measures to ensure the safety of automated systems;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the efforts to introduce AI systems in the public sector and will support further discussions on AI deployment in transport; calls on the Commission to carry out an evaluation of the use of AI and similar technologies in the transport sector and to compile a non- exhaustive list of high-risk segments in the context of AI systems possibly replacing public decisions in this area;