7 Amendments of Tom VANDENKENDELAERE related to 2016/2247(INI)
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the capital and liquidity ratios of EU banks have steadily improved over the last years; whereas risks to financial stability nevertheless remain; whereas the current situation calls for caution when introducing regulatory changes;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that there are risks associated with sovereign debt; notes, however, that modifying its prudential treatment could have a significant effect on the financial sector, which calls for caution in reform efforts; awaits with interest the results of the international work on this issue; considers that, in the end, a better regulatory framework, be it European or international, will be needed; underlines the importance that the Basel agreement to be reached in January be fully complied with;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that national options and discretions are hindering the creation of a level playing field between Member States; welcomes the ECB guidance and regulation harmonising the exercise of some of these within the Banking Union; looks forward to the upcoming amendments to the CRR as a means of closing the most significant oneis convinced that such harmonisation should be done in parallel to the further completion of the Banking Union; looks forward to the upcoming discussions on the CRR amendments;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls the need to clarify the objectives of Pillar 2 and its place within the stacking order of capital requirements; is of the view that the use of capital guidance is a relevant way forward in order to balance financial stability concerns with flexibility needs; underlines however that this should not result in a demonstrable reduction of Pillar 2 requirements;
Amendment 280 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls the need to adhere to State aid rules in the context of bank resolution; takes the view that enough flexibility is embedded within the current framework to address specific situations and mightcould be better exploited, in particular in the case of preventive measures involving the use of DGS funds;
Amendment 373 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Is aware of the potentialclear benefits of an EDIS; is nevertheless of the opinion that appropriate risk reduction measures are an indispensable counterparty to its establishment in order to prevent moral hazard, and that such measures should preferably precedego hand in hand with risk sharing;
Amendment 431 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Welcomes the establishment of loan facility agreements between the SRF and the Banking Union Member States; is of the opinion, nevertheless, that this solution is not sufficient to do away with the bank-sovereign vicious circle and that the work on a common fiscal backstop for the SRF, which should be fiscally neutral over the medium term, should continue step by stebe speeded up;