BETA

5 Amendments of Stefano MAULLU related to 2015/2147(INI)

Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Urges the Commission to overhaul Directive 2010/13/EU1 without delay, doing away with the distinction between linear and non-linear services, encouraging the use of editorially screened content to which and extending its scope to all services for the distribution of audiovisual content, encouraging the use of editorially screened content, introducing guarantees that the unjustified application of the country-of- origin principle applieswill not preclude the attainment of the social and cultural objectives of the relevant regulation and fleshing out the general social objectives of audiovisual regulation; __________________ 1 Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) (OJ L 95, 15.4.2010, p. 1).
2015/10/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for targeted, evidence-based reforms to enhance cross-border access to legally available online content but stresses the importance of not mandating pan- European licences; calls instead for reforms to enable the enhanced portability of legally acquired content to be prioritised; elaborated taking into account the need not to jeopardise cultural diversity and the national footprint of most European players;
2015/09/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 101 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that internet service providers should bear greater responsibility for illegal content made available on the internet and should, along with other actors in the supply chain such as payment providers, play a significant role in tacklingcooperate with content producers and with all other actors in the supply chain, such as payment providers, to support the fight against illegal content made available on the internet. Suggests a review of the role of online service providers and intermediaries in order to clarify their legal status and liability with regard to copyright abuses;
2015/09/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 131 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that the legal thinking behind Directive 93/83/EEC2, based on the principle of contractual autonomy, provides a suitable point of departure for measures to improve cross-border access to content in the digital single market. __________________ 2 Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993 on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable transmission (OJ L 248, 6.10.1993, p. 15).
2015/10/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 141 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that copyright enforcement is important and therefore calls for a moderharmonised approach to the enforcement of intellectual property rights online, particularly with regard to commercial- scale infringement;
2015/09/28
Committee: JURI