BETA

4 Amendments of José Javier POMÉS RUIZ related to 2008/2186(DEC)

Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 66
66. Notes with concern that, under the European Regional Development Fund from 2000 to 2006, 95.47% of financial corrections were accounted for by Spain (59.07%), Italy (31.97%) and the United Kingdom (4.43%); notes that 24 Member States are responsible for 4.53% of financial corrections; calls on the Commission to bring its control requirements into line with the frequency and seriousness of errors in the Member States most affected; calls also on the Commission to inform Parliament about its response to these high rates of error in the three Member States concerned;deleted
2009/02/24
Committee: CONT
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 67
67. Notes with concern that, under the Cohesion Fund from 2000 to 2006, 95,92% of financial corrections were accounted for by Greece (53.06%) and Spain (42.86%); notes that 12 Member States are responsible for 4.08% of financial corrections; calls on the Commission to bring its control requirements into line with the frequency and seriousness of errors in the Member States most affected; calls also on the Commission to inform Parliament about its response to these high rates of error in the two Member States concerned;deleted
2009/02/24
Committee: CONT
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 68
68. Notes with concern that, under the Social Fund from 2000 to 2006, 84.28% of financial corrections were accounted for by Spain (46.42%) and Italy (37.86%); notes that 25 Member States are responsible for 15.72% of financial corrections; calls on the Commission to bring its control requirements into line with the frequency and seriousness of errors in the Member States most affected; calls also on the Commission to inform Parliament about its response to these high rates of error in the two Member States concerned;deleted
2009/02/24
Committee: CONT
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 121
121. Voices its disappointment at the incorrectadequate information givenforwarded by the Commission in 2005 and 2006 in this area, which is extremely important from a budgetary point of view; acknowledges the efforts made in the meantime as regards transparency on the Commission web site and the annual staff screening report;
2009/02/24
Committee: CONT