15 Amendments of Helga TRÜPEL related to 2008/2055(INI)
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the institutions should ensure that the calendar of the next financial framework allows for democratic legitimacy and matching of the Commission and Parliament mandates, duration of the MFF with the length of the Commission and Parliament mandates, starting with a transitional MFF in 2012 ending at 31 December 2016, based on the five year strategic programme of the new Commission, to be presented in 2010,
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas the designation of a new Commission and the hearings due to take place in this context should be an opportunity for the newly elected Parliament to examinquestion and evaluate the new Commissioners on their respective policy priorities and the budgets deemed necessary for that purpose,
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas the mid-term evaluation of the ongoing legislative programmes, due in 2010- 2011, should represent a major basis for a future assessment of ongoing programmes and future prioritiesforms the basis for the assessment of the budgetary needs and improvement of ongoing programmes and future priorities and should be duly taken into account for the financial programming of the period 2012-2016,
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls its awareness of the fact that a number of deficits remained unresolved in the final agreement; stresses that the need for additional financing for EU political priorities, notably for Galileo, the EIT and the food facility arose and a solution was found by means of the existingrecourse to the instruments of the IIA of 17 May 2006; believes that further adjustments within the current MFF and IIA based on a sufficient and ambitious review, as well as already foreseeable needs will be necessary;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that a distinction should be made between the review of certain programmes within the current MFFfor the period 2012-2016 or even before, based on: - the mid-term evaluation of legislation to take place in 2010-2011 - the new, and challenges such as energy and climate change and other policies linked to the new competences provided by the Treaty of Lisbonthat require an urgent reform of the financial framework such as the economic and financial crisis, energy and climate change and developments on the world scene and the preparation of the new MFFMFF starting in 2017;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that the current context of economic slowdown should not be used as a pretext to delay but, on the contrary, be seen as an opportunity to increase investments in green technologies;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 − indents 2 and 3
Paragraph 7 − indents 2 and 3
-assessment of the mid-term evaluation , possible adjustments and prolongation of the current programmes as provided for by legislation (2010-2011), and prolongation until 2015 of certain programmes, allowing a phase-inllowing a phase- in of aligning the duration of the MFF with the mandates of the next Parliament and the Commission, -preparation of the next MFF after 2013 (2015)6; this phase will be the responsibility of the new Parliament elected in 2014;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Confirms its position of March 2007 in which it stressed that "the political link between the reform of revenue and a review of expenditure is inevitable and perfectly reasonable"; believes that the two processes should be run in parallel with the aim to merge in a global and integrated reform for a new system of EU financing and spending at the latest for the MFF starting in 20157, which would imply that the preparatory work, including ratification, is done beforehand;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Stresses the need for policy coherence in this respect and points to the need to carry out a climate change proofing of all major programmes including agriculture, cohesion programmes, transport and energy networks, and development programmes;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b.Reiterates the need for a radical shift of agricultural policy towards an integrated rural development policy, duly co-financed at national level, with social and environmental conditioning of aid that is aimed at delivering public goods and services to society;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Underlines the potential of education, culture and youth programmes in bringing Europe closer to its citizens and fostering culture diversity as well as mutual understanding, apart from the role that education plays in reaching the Lisbon targets and in matching skills with the new challenges and opportunities that arise from the financial and economic crisis and climate change;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Recalls that heading 4 "The EU as a global partner" remains chronically underfinanced; asks the Commission to make proposalsunderlines the need for a long-term perspective financing for CFSP/ESDP in order to secure the means dedicated to this policy area andto help reach the MDG´s, for commitments resulting from an international climate change agreement independent from development aid, for preventing conflicts and promoting human rights and fundamental freedoms, for a credible neighbourhood policy and for CFSP/ESDP to avoid recurrent and endless negotiations with the Council during the annual budgetary procedures; is in favour of providing additional means for Defence Policy;