BETA

Activities of Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG related to 2011/2029(INI)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on better legislation, subsidiarity and proportionality and smart regulation PDF (233 KB) DOC (138 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: JURI
Dossiers: 2011/2029(INI)
Documents: PDF(233 KB) DOC(138 KB)

Legal basis opinions (0)

Amendments (15)

Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 18
– having regard to the pamphlet entitled ‘Let's choose growth – Why we need reform to unlock Europe's potential’ published in 2011 by the Government of the United Kingdom,deleted
2011/06/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the Lisbon Treaty provides for the formal involvement of national parliaments in monitoring the application of the principle of subsidiarity,
2011/06/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the Lisbon Treaty has sought to redress the balance of powers between the European institutions, and considers Parliament to be equal with the Council in lawmaking under the ordinary legislative procedure; whereas comitology was replaced by a new distinction between delegated and implementing acts,
2011/06/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas consultations with all interested parties, in particular small and medium- sized enterprises (SMEs) and social partners, are of fundamental importance in the preparation of draft legislation, including impact assessments,
2011/06/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
La. whereas on 1 April 2011 the Regulation on European Citizens' Initiative entered into force,
2011/06/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Invites the Commission, in its role of initiative, to take a wider advantage of regulations as legislative tools which give more legal certainty in comparison to other instruments;
2011/06/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Stresses that the process of reduction of administrative burden and simplyfying of legislation must not lead to lowering of the standards laid down in the current legislation, and therefore consultations with all interested parties, including SMEs and social partners, must be an integral part of the process;
2011/06/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. In particular, calls on the Commission to effectively mainstream multilingualism in the running and publication of the results of public consultations, as a prerequisite for extensive involvement of all the European stakeholders;
2011/06/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Strongly endorses the proposition that where new laws impose a cost on businesses, equivalent cost offsets should be identified, reducing the regulatory burden elsewhere; considers this to be a key aspect of future programmes which will reduce burdens and improve the regulatory framework for businesses as a whole;deleted
2011/06/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls on the Commission to systematically consult with all interested parties including social partners, in order to provide a broad analysis of possible social, economic and environmental impacts of proposed legislation, in conformity with the principle of integrated approach;
2011/06/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Welcomes the wider use of ex-post evaluation of implemented legislation; emphasises, however, that such evaluation should be used for all legislation, not only in key sectors; notes in this regard that implementing and delegated acts should also come under consideration; calls on the Commission to expand ex-post evaluation to all policy areas, and suggests that ‘sunset’ clauses to enforce reviews may be a useful means of guaranteeing that regulations still in force are necessary and proportionate;
2011/06/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Urges the Commission to allocate the necessary human resources to provide technical and legal assistance for citizens initiatives; underlines in particular the need to conform with data protection requirements;
2011/06/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 6 (new) after paragraph 22
European Citizens Initiative
2011/06/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. Calls on the European Commission to establish clear eligibility criteria as well as grounds for refusal for admissibility of initiatives; points out in particular the need to provide citizens with clear information as to the limits of competence of the EU established by the Treaty;
2011/06/01
Committee: JURI
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 c (new)
22c. Calls on the European Commission to define not only the time limits for examining an officially submitted initiative, but also the time limit for the Commission to bring forward a legislative proposal in the event of an initiative being admissible;
2011/06/01
Committee: JURI