Activities of Monika HOHLMEIER related to 2018/0250(COD)
Reports (1)
RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Internal Security Fund
Amendments (10)
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33 a (new)
Recital 33 a (new)
(33a) In light of the transnational nature of Union actions and in order to promote coordinated action to ensure the highest level of security in the Union, decentralised agencies should also be eligible as beneficiaries of Union action, including in the form of grants, consistent with priorities and initiatives identified at Union level by the EU institutions.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
Recital 46
(46) Through these indicators and financial reporting, the Commission and the Member States should monitor the implementation of the Fund in accordance with the relevant provisions of Regulation (EU) No X [CPR] and this Regulation. To adequately fulfil its supervisory role, the Commission must be in a position to establish the amounts actually spent from the Fund in a given year. When reporting the annual accounts of their national programme to the Commission, Member States should therefore distinguish between recoveries, pre-financing payments to final beneficiaries and reimbursements of expenditure that was actually incurred. To facilitate the audit and the monitoring of the implementation of the Fund, the Commission should include these amounts in its annual implementation report for the Fund.
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall ensure that the Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol), the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL), the European Agency for the operational management of large- scale IT Systems (eu-LISA) and the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) are associated to the development of the programmes at an early stage, as regards the areas of their competence. Specifically, Member States shall consult Europol on the design of their actions in particular when including EU policy cycle or EMPACT actions or actions coordinated by the Joint Cybercrime Action Taskforce (J-CAT) in their programmes. Prior to including training in their programmes, Member States shall coordinate with CEPOL in order to avoid overlaps.
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 17 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Union Actions may take the form of grants awarded to the decentralised agencies.
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. The Commission shall carry out aBy the end of 2024, the Commission shall present a mid-term evaluation of this Regulation. The mid- term and a retrospective evaluation of this Regulation, including the actions implemented under this Fundevaluation shall examine the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance and coherence of the Fund. More specifically, it shall include an assessment of: (a) the progress towards the achievement of the objectives of this Regulation, taking into account all relevant information already available, in particular the annual performance reports referred to in article 26 and the output and result indicators set out in Annex VIII to this Regulation; (b) the EU added value of actions and operations implemented under this Fund; (c) the appropriateness of the implementation measures set out in article 3a to address existing and emerging security challenges.
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1a (new)
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1a (new)
This compulsory midterm review shall, as appropriate, be accompanied by a legislative proposal for the revision of this Regulation in accordance with the procedures set out in the TFEU.
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 25 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. By 31 December 2031, the Commission shall carry out a retrospective evaluation of this Regulation. By the same date, the Commission shall submit an evaluation report to the European Parliament and to the Council, which includes the elements listed in paragraph 1 of this article.
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2
Article 25 – paragraph 2
2. The mid-term and the retrospective evaluation shall be carried out in a timely manner to feed into the decision-making process in accordance with the timeline set out Article 40 of Regulation (EU) No [CPR]made publicly available.
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) a breakdown of the annual accounts of the national programme into recoveries, pre-financing to final beneficiaries and expenditure actually incurred;
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – indent 6 a (new)
Annex III – indent 6 a (new)
– actions and networks of national contact points that facilitate the [cross- border] exchange of data acquired by smart surveillance systems such as cameras and other sensors, combined with artificial intelligence algorithms, subject to robust safeguards, including data minimisation and validation by a judicial authority as well as subject to judicial redress;