3 Amendments of Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL related to 2012/2308(INI)
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Asks the Administration for an analysisto present up- to-date figures and information ofn the savings that could be made if Parliament had only onefinancial impact of the multiple seat arrangement, detailing the costs of each place of work; asks that, in order to identify savings for greater efficiency, this should include not only structural costs (buildings, maintenance, security, insurance, energy, environmental impact, travel, logistics, restaurants, etc.) but also ancillary costs;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the relevant services of the European Parliament to make an assessment of the agreement between the authorities in Luxembourg and the European Parliament, especially on the provisions related to the number of staff to be present in Luxembourg, taking into account Parliament's needs; considers that this assessment should include an analysis and comparisons on the most cost-efficient location for Parliament's services, as Parliament might benefit from having some of these outsourced from its' main location;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Agrees that Parliament would be more effective and cost-efficient if it were located in a single place; resolves, therefore, to propose Treaty changes under Article 48 of the TEU; underlines however, given its' historical importance as a symbol of peace and reconciliation in Europe, that a reasonable adequate and viable alternative solution for the current seat in Strasbourg must be sought.