BETA


2006/2114(INI) Accession of Bulgaria

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET VAN ORDEN Geoffrey (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion PETI
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion AFCO
Committee Opinion DEVE
Committee Opinion CULT
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion CONT
Committee Opinion LIBE NASSAUER Hartmut (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion FEMM GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna (icon: PSE PSE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2007/02/13
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2007/01/11
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/11/30
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/11/30
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based the own-initiative report drawn up by Geoffrey van ORDEN (EPP-ED, UK) in response to the Commission's final monitoring report on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania. The resolution was adopted by 505 votes in favour to 65 against with 36 abstentions. Parliament conformed largely to the report voted through by its competent committee, with some amendments:

-whilst welcoming the result of the Presidential elections on 29 October 2006, it deplored at the same time the strong showing of anti-European forces in those election and called on the President to use his second term to address the fears of those Bulgarian citizens being critical about Bulgaria's accession to the EU;

-the clause regarding the energy gap faced by Europe, with increasing reliance on imports of energy from Russia and areas of instability was not adopted by the plenary;

- on the matter of the Kozloduy power plant, Parliament reiterated its calls on the Council and the Commission to ensure that Bulgaria fulfilled its commitments under Article 30 of the Accession Treaty regarding the closure date for units 3 and 4 of the Kozloduy power plant. It also called on the EU institutions to keep their promises regarding the funding of EUR 210 million to Bulgaria for the period 2007 to 2008 for the closure of the Kozloduy power plant.

Documents
2006/11/30
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/11/29
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/11/27
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2006/11/27
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2006/11/23
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Geoffrey van ORDEN ( EPP-ED , UK ) in response to the Commission's final monitoring report on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania . The committee welcomed the confirmation from the Commission and Council that Bulgaria was sufficiently prepared for EU membership on 1 January 2007, but it also noted that there are areas "that require further progress" as far as the political criteria are concerned: the need for maximum transparency in every sector, a stronger role for the Bulgarian Ombudsman, rigorous implementation of measures to improve the training of police investigators, the coordination of anti-corruption policies and a strengthening of inspectorates within the public administration. Moreover, police units specialising in the fight against organised crime, corruption, drugs and human trafficking should be expanded.

MEPs also raised a number of points of concern, such as the conditions in children's homes and other institutional care and the protection of minorities. The latter issue should be included in the newly established cooperation and verification mechanism after accession.

With regard to the economic criteria, the committee expressed concern at "continuing invisible barriers to foreign investors", and urged the Bulgarian government to take measures in order to ensure a "positive investment climate".

The report also looked at Bulgaria 's progress in respect of the 'acquis communautaire'. It welcomed the progress made on the trade in live animals and animal welfare, such as in the transportation and slaughter of animals and the treatment of animal by-products. With regard to energy, the committee recognised the sacrifice that Bulgaria would have to make in closing units 3 and 4 of the Kozloduy nuclear plant and asked the Council to consider a delay of eight months to allow for a review. The report also recognised that "not merely Bulgaria , but countries throughout Europe are facing an energy gap in the years ahead, with increasing reliance on imports of energy from Russia and areas of instability".

Finally, MEPs insisted that after accession Parliament should be further involved in the monitoring process regarding Bulgaria and that it should be fully associated " in any consideration of activation of safeguard clauses".

2006/11/22
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/11/09
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/10/26
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2006/10/04
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/09/26
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

PURPOSE: to present the Commission’s follow-up report on the state of preparedness of Romania and Bulgaria for EU membership.

CONTENT: to recall, in its report of May 2006, the Commission stated that both countries should be prepared for membership by 1 January 2007, provided that they addressed a number of outstanding issues. The Commission indicated that it would report again on the state of preparedness of both countries by early October.

This report outlines the Commission's assessment of both countries' progress since May 2006. It confirms that Bulgaria and Romania have made further progress to complete their preparations for membership, demonstrating their capacity to apply EU principles and legislation from 1 January 2007. They have reached a high degree of alignment. However, the Commission also identifies a number of areas of continuing concern, and also areas where the Commission will initiate appropriate measures to ensure the proper functioning of the EU, unless the countries take immediate corrective action. Both countries are strongly encouraged to make proper use of the months before accession, in order to address the remaining issues.

The report focuses primarily on the areas highlighted in the conclusion of the May 2006 report as needing immediate action or further efforts.

For Bulgaria , these are the justice system, the fight against corruption, police cooperation and the fight against organised crime, money-laundering, integrated administrative control system for agriculture (IACS), transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE), and financial control.

For Romania , these are the justice system and the fight against corruption and IACS, Paying Agencies, TSE and interconnectivity of tax systems.

Many of the challenges set out in the May reports have now been addressed. A number of sectoral issues have been resolved. There has been some progress in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption , money-laundering and organised crime , but further tangible results are needed .

This report identifies those issues which require further work. It draws attention to provisions in the acquis and the Accession Treaty which are designed to safeguard the proper functioning of EU policies and institutions following accession. In line with the findings of this report, the Commission, after consulting the Member States, will set up a mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption, money-laundering and organised crime. For this purpose, benchmarks have been established which refer to the particular circumstances of each country.

The Commission has adopted the necessary legal provisions to ensure the proper management of EU agricultural funds. The report underlines that the existing rules contain the necessary guarantees for the proper management of EU structural funds , and other programmes.

In the area of food safety , some specific measures are in place. At present, certain animals and animal products may not be exported from Bulgaria and Romania to the EU because of the presence of animal diseases. These restrictions will be maintained after accession, if necessary.

In the area of aviation safety , particular measures will be needed for Bulgarian aircraft and carriers.

General conclusions : overall, Bulgaria and Romania have made far-reaching efforts to adapt their legislation and administration to the laws and rules of the European Union. This has largely brought them into line with prevailing standards and practices within the European Union. Sustained support from the European Union will be available for addressing the remaining issues. Sufficient guarantees exist in the acquis and the Accession Treaty to ensure the proper functioning of EU policies and institutions. As a result of the progress made, Bulgaria and Romania will be in a position to take on the rights and obligations of EU membership on 1 January 2007. The Commission looks forward to welcoming Bulgaria and Romania as fully-fledged members of the European Union on this date.

2006/06/22
   EP - GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2006/06/20
   EP - NASSAUER Hartmut (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2006/05/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2006/05/16
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE : to present the monitoring report on the state of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria and Romania in 2007.

CONTENT : this monitoring report follows up on the findings of the October 2005 report on the state of preparedness of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Union (please refer to INI/2005/2204 and INI/2005/2205 ). It is based on the detailed assessment contained in the accompanying Monitoring Reports for each country ( SEC(2006)0595 for Bulgaria and SEC(2006)0596 for Romania in procedure reference INI/2006/2115 ).

More specifically, in this report, the Commission:

– reviews, as of end April 2006, developments and the preparedness of both countries in areas previously identified as in need of further improvement;

– examines measures required to remedy any shortcomings that might persist upon accession;

– draws conclusions on the state of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria and Romania.

Conditional accession in 2007 : Bulgaria and Romania have continued to make progress in their preparations for membership. In many areas the countries are generally meeting their commitments or are on track to fulfil the acquis requirements. However, a number of outstanding issues still need to be addressed. Some of these require increased efforts, and in a few cases immediate action is needed.

In the light of the overall progress made by Bulgaria and Romania assessed in the accompanying Monitoring Reports and summarised in this communication, the Commission considers that Bulgaria and Romania should be prepared for membership by 1 January 2007, provided that they address a number of outstanding issues. An impartial, independent and effective justice system properly equipped to fight corruption and organised crime is of paramount importance , as it underpins the functioning of the whole society and economy. In this regard:

- Bulgaria needs to demonstrate clear evidence of results in the fight against corruption, in particular high-level corruption, notably in terms of investigations and subsequent judicial proceedings. It needs to further reform the judiciary, in particular to reinforce its transparency, efficiency and impartiality, and remove any ambiguity regarding its independence;

- Romania needs to continue its efforts and demonstrate further results in the fight against corruption, notably in terms of further investigations and subsequent judicial proceedings. It also needs to consolidate the implementation of the ongoing judicial reforms, and further enhance the transparency, efficiency and impartiality of the judiciary.

Other more specific demands are made of these two countries :

Bulgaria needs to demonstrate clearer evidence of results in the following areas: investigating and prosecuting organised crime networks; implement more effectively and efficiently laws for the fight against fraud and corruption; intensify the enforcement of anti-money laundering provisions; set up a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) in agriculture; build up the necessary rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products; strengthen financial control for the future use of structural and cohesion funds. In addition, Romania needs to: accredit paying agencies for handling common agriculture policy expenditure; set up a proper integrated administration and control system in agriculture; build up the necessary rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products; ensure that the tax administration IT systems are ready for inter-operability with those of the rest of the Union, to enable a correct collection of VAT throughout the EU internal market.

Safeguards and other measures : i t is the responsibility of the authorities of both countries to take all the necessary measures to address the outstanding issues identified in this Report, so as to be able to carry out their obligations under the acquis upon accession. This concerns mainly the areas giving rise to serious concern, but also areas identified in this report as requiring increased efforts.

Failure to do so would lead the Commission to take the necessary preventive or remedial action to safeguard the functioning of EU policies. This part sets out the safeguards and other measures which could be imposed in the event of certain shortcomings not having been adequately addressed upon accession. These are outlined in three broad areas:

Internal market : a certain number of safeguard clauses are provided in this area in the event that Bulgaria or Romania are not able to abide by all its obligations upon accession. The Accession Treaty safeguard can be taken up to three years after accession. Other instruments, such as the infringement procedure, and the enforcement mechanisms for competition rules, may also be applied. This section covers both the four freedoms, and the EU policies on competition, energy, transport, environment, telecommunication, taxation, agriculture and consumer and health protection insofar as they have cross-border effects. Regarding transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, if no progress is made in rendering collection and treatment facilities to be fit, the Commission will take a decision on the basis of the acquis in order to prevent the related animal products awaiting treatment from returning into the feed chain. The EU framework for VAT and excise duties foresees computerised systems interconnected within the EC data systems. Romania's preparations need to be accelerated to ensure that its IT systems are fully operational and ready for interconnection upon accession. Justice, freedom and security : this remains principal problem area. The Accession Treaty provides for safeguard measures for up to three years from accession, in the event that Bulgaria or Romania is not able to abide by its obligations pertaining to judicial co-operation. If implementation of reforms in the justice system is not sufficiently advanced in either country before accession, or if the fight against corruption in the judiciary has not yielded sufficient tangible results, the Commission will establish on the basis of Article 38 of the Act of Accession a mechanism for further monitoring in this area. The mechanism would be in place for up to three years and would require a yearly report to the Commission on progress in implementing reforms in the judiciary and in related law enforcement bodies, and on anti-corruption measures affecting them. The decision establishing the mechanism would contain benchmarks tailored to the specific shortcomings observed in each country, and against which progress will be measured. The Commission would report yearly on the results of the mechanism to the European Parliament and Council. Should either country fail to address shortcomings adequately, the Commission would adopt safeguard measures suspending obligations of the current Member States to automatically recognise judgements or execute warrants issued by that country's courts or prosecutors. Disbursement of EU funds : a Member State needs to offer the necessary guarantees on proper spending of EU funds under shared management, i.e. the Common Agricultural Policy and the Structural and Cohesion Funds. Any shortcoming in this respect may delay the disbursement of funds or give rise to subsequent claims by the Commission for financial corrections or recovery. In the area of agriculture, accredited paying agencies as well as a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) are necessary for handling direct payments to farmers and operators. In Romania, the paying agencies are not fully operational and accredited. A proper IACS is not set up in Bulgaria and Romania. If this is not remedied, in addition to the existing mechanisms, the Commission may take measures based on Article 37 of the Act of Accession to withhold payments to Bulgaria or Romania. Implementation of EU structural actions requires effective programming and monitoring structures, as well as financial management and control systems, including for procurement. Bulgaria's preparations for the control over structural funds expenditure need improvement. If these are not remedied, this would delay the release of payments by the Commission.

Conclusions and subsequent steps : the Commission is firmly committed to ensuring that both countries successfully complete their final preparations for accession. To that end, it has closely monitored the progress made by Bulgaria and Romania and has provided targeted support to help them in their reform efforts. Although both countries can be commended on their achievements, the Commission makes clear that, if shortcomings persist upon accession, it will take the necessary action in its role as guardian of the treaties and propose safeguard measures as mentioned above.

It will report on Bulgaria's and Romania's progress in addressing the outstanding issues no later than early October 2006 . On this basis, the Commission will consider whether the date of their accession to the European Union on 1 January 2007 can be maintained .

To conclude, the Commission recalls that the Accession Treaty provides that Bulgaria and Romania will join in 2007 unless the Council decides, upon a recommendation from the Commission, to postpone the accession of either country until 2008. The Council may so decide:

– by qualified majority, if serious shortcomings have been observed in the fulfilment by Romania of one or more of a number of the specific commitments and requirements related to justice and home affairs and competition policy, listed in Annex IX to the Act of Accession, or

– by unanimity, if there is clear evidence that the state of preparations for adoption and implementation of the acquis in Bulgaria or Romania is such that there is a serious risk of either country being manifestly unprepared to meet the requirements of membership by 1 January 2007 in a number of important areas.

2006/05/16
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Details

PURPOSE: to present the 2006 Commission’s monitoring report on the state of preparedness of Bulgaria in light of the accession process.

CONTEXT: t he accession negotiations with Bulgaria were successfully concluded in December 2004. The Accession Treaty was signed in April 2005. Bulgaria and 14 Member States have already ratified it. The Treaty envisages accession on 1 January 2007 unless the Council decides, upon a Commission recommendation, to postpone it until 1 January 2008. Following the conclusion of the negotiations, the European Union decided that it would continue closely to monitor Bulgaria's preparations and achievements and that, to this end, the Commission would continue to submit annual reports on Bulgaria's progress towards accession, together with recommendations, if appropriate.

The Commission presented its first such report in October 2005. This report showed that Bulgaria was already well advanced in preparing for accession. It also identified a number of areas where further efforts were needed to complete preparations. The Commission decided to step up its monitoring activities and report again in spring 2006.

CONTENT: this report reviews Bulgaria's preparations for membership, focusing on the areas in need of further improvement in the light of the three Copenhagen accession criteria. Accordingly, the report contains three main parts:

• The 1 st part assesses political issues which were identified as in need of further improvement.

• The 2 nd part assesses economic issues which were identified as in need of further improvement.

• The 3 rd part assesses where Bulgaria stands in implementing commitments and requirements arising from the accession negotiations.

The report identifies the progress made since October 2005 and the gaps in policies, legislation and implementation which remain to be addressed.

General evaluation

Bulgaria has reached a considerable degree of alignment with the acquis. The October 2005 report concluded that Bulgaria would be ready by accession in a large number of areas. A number of other areas required increased efforts, and 16 areas gave rise to serious concern.

Since then, further progress has been made. Bulgaria should be ready by accession in the following additional areas if the current pace of progress is maintained: public procurement, mutual recognition of industrial product specifications; freedom to provide non-financial services; most agriculture Common Market Organisations; aviation; excise duties; taxation implementing structures; postal services liberalisation; regional policy legislation; chemicals and genetically modified organisms, noise legislation; visa policy; and customs preparations. Progress has also been made in a number of areas, which no longer give rise to serious concern but still require increased efforts to complete preparations: the insurance sector, the protection of intellectual property rights, the paying agency for agriculture, the milk common market organisation, animal diseases control measures, veterinary border inspection posts; animal welfare, trade in live animals and animal products, veterinary aspects of public health; institutional and financial management structures for regional policy, as well as Schengen preparations and the management of the future EU external borders.

Increased efforts are also needed for: mutual recognition of professional qualifications; financial services, information society services, protection of personal data; legislation to fight money laundering; agriculture trade mechanisms; the Common market organisations on wine and alcohol and on beefmeat; legislation in the veterinary and phytosanitary sector; most aspects of fisheries; sea transport; VAT, direct taxation rules; labour law, social dialogue, social inclusion, anti-discrimination policy, the European Social Fund, public health; energy market liberalisation; nuclear energy and nuclear safety, in particular the commitments to early closure and subsequent decommissioning of the reactors of the Kozloduy plant; steel industry restructuring; electronic communications; programming, monitoring and procurement capacity for regional policy; horizontal environmental legislation, water quality, integrated pollution prevention and control, waste management; consumer protection; asylum, judicial co-operation; fight against drugs; protection of the EU's financial interests; and the translation of the acquis into Bulgarian.

The report lists six areas of serious concern , which require urgent action:

§ setting up a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) in agriculture;

§ building-up of rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products;

§ clearer evidence of results in investigating and prosecuting organised crime networks;

§ more effective and efficient implementation of laws for the fight against fraud and corruption;

§ intensified enforcement of anti-money laundering provisions;

§ strengthened financial control for the future use of structural and cohesion funds.

2006/05/16
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2006/05/15
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE : to present the monitoring report on the state of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria and Romania in 2007.

CONTENT : this monitoring report follows up on the findings of the October 2005 report on the state of preparedness of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Union (please refer to INI/2005/2204 and INI/2005/2205 ). It is based on the detailed assessment contained in the accompanying Monitoring Reports for each country ( SEC(2006)0595 for Bulgaria and SEC(2006)0596 for Romania in procedure reference INI/2006/2115 ).

More specifically, in this report, the Commission:

– reviews, as of end April 2006, developments and the preparedness of both countries in areas previously identified as in need of further improvement;

– examines measures required to remedy any shortcomings that might persist upon accession;

– draws conclusions on the state of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria and Romania.

Conditional accession in 2007 : Bulgaria and Romania have continued to make progress in their preparations for membership. In many areas the countries are generally meeting their commitments or are on track to fulfil the acquis requirements. However, a number of outstanding issues still need to be addressed. Some of these require increased efforts, and in a few cases immediate action is needed.

In the light of the overall progress made by Bulgaria and Romania assessed in the accompanying Monitoring Reports and summarised in this communication, the Commission considers that Bulgaria and Romania should be prepared for membership by 1 January 2007, provided that they address a number of outstanding issues. An impartial, independent and effective justice system properly equipped to fight corruption and organised crime is of paramount importance , as it underpins the functioning of the whole society and economy. In this regard:

- Bulgaria needs to demonstrate clear evidence of results in the fight against corruption, in particular high-level corruption, notably in terms of investigations and subsequent judicial proceedings. It needs to further reform the judiciary, in particular to reinforce its transparency, efficiency and impartiality, and remove any ambiguity regarding its independence;

- Romania needs to continue its efforts and demonstrate further results in the fight against corruption, notably in terms of further investigations and subsequent judicial proceedings. It also needs to consolidate the implementation of the ongoing judicial reforms, and further enhance the transparency, efficiency and impartiality of the judiciary.

Other more specific demands are made of these two countries :

Bulgaria needs to demonstrate clearer evidence of results in the following areas: investigating and prosecuting organised crime networks; implement more effectively and efficiently laws for the fight against fraud and corruption; intensify the enforcement of anti-money laundering provisions; set up a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) in agriculture; build up the necessary rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products; strengthen financial control for the future use of structural and cohesion funds. In addition, Romania needs to: accredit paying agencies for handling common agriculture policy expenditure; set up a proper integrated administration and control system in agriculture; build up the necessary rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products; ensure that the tax administration IT systems are ready for inter-operability with those of the rest of the Union, to enable a correct collection of VAT throughout the EU internal market.

Safeguards and other measures : i t is the responsibility of the authorities of both countries to take all the necessary measures to address the outstanding issues identified in this Report, so as to be able to carry out their obligations under the acquis upon accession. This concerns mainly the areas giving rise to serious concern, but also areas identified in this report as requiring increased efforts.

Failure to do so would lead the Commission to take the necessary preventive or remedial action to safeguard the functioning of EU policies. This part sets out the safeguards and other measures which could be imposed in the event of certain shortcomings not having been adequately addressed upon accession. These are outlined in three broad areas:

Internal market : a certain number of safeguard clauses are provided in this area in the event that Bulgaria or Romania are not able to abide by all its obligations upon accession. The Accession Treaty safeguard can be taken up to three years after accession. Other instruments, such as the infringement procedure, and the enforcement mechanisms for competition rules, may also be applied. This section covers both the four freedoms, and the EU policies on competition, energy, transport, environment, telecommunication, taxation, agriculture and consumer and health protection insofar as they have cross-border effects. Regarding transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, if no progress is made in rendering collection and treatment facilities to be fit, the Commission will take a decision on the basis of the acquis in order to prevent the related animal products awaiting treatment from returning into the feed chain. The EU framework for VAT and excise duties foresees computerised systems interconnected within the EC data systems. Romania's preparations need to be accelerated to ensure that its IT systems are fully operational and ready for interconnection upon accession. Justice, freedom and security : this remains principal problem area. The Accession Treaty provides for safeguard measures for up to three years from accession, in the event that Bulgaria or Romania is not able to abide by its obligations pertaining to judicial co-operation. If implementation of reforms in the justice system is not sufficiently advanced in either country before accession, or if the fight against corruption in the judiciary has not yielded sufficient tangible results, the Commission will establish on the basis of Article 38 of the Act of Accession a mechanism for further monitoring in this area. The mechanism would be in place for up to three years and would require a yearly report to the Commission on progress in implementing reforms in the judiciary and in related law enforcement bodies, and on anti-corruption measures affecting them. The decision establishing the mechanism would contain benchmarks tailored to the specific shortcomings observed in each country, and against which progress will be measured. The Commission would report yearly on the results of the mechanism to the European Parliament and Council. Should either country fail to address shortcomings adequately, the Commission would adopt safeguard measures suspending obligations of the current Member States to automatically recognise judgements or execute warrants issued by that country's courts or prosecutors. Disbursement of EU funds : a Member State needs to offer the necessary guarantees on proper spending of EU funds under shared management, i.e. the Common Agricultural Policy and the Structural and Cohesion Funds. Any shortcoming in this respect may delay the disbursement of funds or give rise to subsequent claims by the Commission for financial corrections or recovery. In the area of agriculture, accredited paying agencies as well as a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) are necessary for handling direct payments to farmers and operators. In Romania, the paying agencies are not fully operational and accredited. A proper IACS is not set up in Bulgaria and Romania. If this is not remedied, in addition to the existing mechanisms, the Commission may take measures based on Article 37 of the Act of Accession to withhold payments to Bulgaria or Romania. Implementation of EU structural actions requires effective programming and monitoring structures, as well as financial management and control systems, including for procurement. Bulgaria's preparations for the control over structural funds expenditure need improvement. If these are not remedied, this would delay the release of payments by the Commission.

Conclusions and subsequent steps : the Commission is firmly committed to ensuring that both countries successfully complete their final preparations for accession. To that end, it has closely monitored the progress made by Bulgaria and Romania and has provided targeted support to help them in their reform efforts. Although both countries can be commended on their achievements, the Commission makes clear that, if shortcomings persist upon accession, it will take the necessary action in its role as guardian of the treaties and propose safeguard measures as mentioned above.

It will report on Bulgaria's and Romania's progress in addressing the outstanding issues no later than early October 2006 . On this basis, the Commission will consider whether the date of their accession to the European Union on 1 January 2007 can be maintained .

To conclude, the Commission recalls that the Accession Treaty provides that Bulgaria and Romania will join in 2007 unless the Council decides, upon a recommendation from the Commission, to postpone the accession of either country until 2008. The Council may so decide:

– by qualified majority, if serious shortcomings have been observed in the fulfilment by Romania of one or more of a number of the specific commitments and requirements related to justice and home affairs and competition policy, listed in Annex IX to the Act of Accession, or

– by unanimity, if there is clear evidence that the state of preparations for adoption and implementation of the acquis in Bulgaria or Romania is such that there is a serious risk of either country being manifestly unprepared to meet the requirements of membership by 1 January 2007 in a number of important areas.

2005/01/18
   EP - VAN ORDEN Geoffrey (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Van Orden A6-0420/2006 - am. 1 #

2006/11/30 Outcome: -: 303, 0: 146, +: 141
SE NL HU CY EE DK PT AT MT ES LU FI LV SI SK BE IE FR LT EL CZ IT PL DE GB
Total
18
24
19
5
5
13
16
17
4
35
6
12
7
6
12
21
10
57
12
17
20
56
43
89
66
icon: PSE PSE
153

Estonia PSE

For (1)

3

Malta PSE

Abstain (2)

2

Luxembourg PSE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Czechia PSE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
21

Austria NI

1

Slovakia NI

3

Belgium NI

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

France IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

2
icon: UEN UEN
32

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Latvia UEN

2

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
74

Sweden ALDE

2

Netherlands ALDE

4

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1
4

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
222

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3
4

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Van Orden A6-0420/2006 - par. 16/1 #

2006/11/30 Outcome: +: 576, -: 14, 0: 8
DE IT FR GB PL ES NL BE HU CZ AT SE PT DK EL LT FI SK IE LV SI LU EE CY MT
Total
90
58
57
68
44
35
24
20
20
20
17
18
18
13
17
12
12
12
10
7
6
6
5
5
4
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
226

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
157

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
74

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Italy Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
33

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

Ireland UEN

3

Latvia UEN

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2
icon: NI NI
18

United Kingdom NI

4

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

France IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Rapport Van Orden A6-0420/2006 - par. 16/2 #

2006/11/30 Outcome: +: 477, -: 104, 0: 17
DE PL IT GB ES HU BE LT NL EL IE AT SK PT FR DK SE FI CZ SI LV EE LU MT CY
Total
88
44
58
67
34
21
22
12
23
17
10
17
12
18
59
13
18
12
20
6
7
5
6
4
5
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
225
2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
156

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Finland PSE

2

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
73

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
33

Lithuania UEN

2

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Latvia UEN

2
icon: NI NI
21
3

United Kingdom NI

4

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Czechia NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

Poland IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

1

France IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Van Orden A6-0420/2006 - am. 2 #

2006/11/30 Outcome: +: 269, -: 264, 0: 60
AT FR EL ES BE SE PT CY DK EE NL MT DE LU SI IE LT LV IT SK FI PL HU CZ GB
Total
17
57
17
34
19
18
18
5
10
5
24
4
89
5
6
10
12
7
59
12
12
43
21
21
68
icon: PSE PSE
157

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia PSE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland PSE

2

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
21

Austria NI

1
3

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

3

Poland NI

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Austria ALDE

1

Spain ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

France IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

1
icon: UEN UEN
33

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

For (1)

3

Lithuania UEN

2

Latvia UEN

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
226

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

4

Ireland PPE-DE

5

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Rapport Van Orden A6-0420/2006 - cons. F/1 #

2006/11/30 Outcome: +: 510, -: 89, 0: 10
DE GB IT FR PL ES HU BE NL PT EL LT AT SK IE DK FI SI LV EE LU MT CY SE CZ
Total
90
68
59
62
44
34
21
22
24
19
17
12
17
12
11
13
12
6
7
5
6
4
5
18
21
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
229
2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
163

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Finland PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

2

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
74

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: UEN UEN
33

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Latvia UEN

2
icon: NI NI
21

United Kingdom NI

4
3

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

France IND/DEM

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Poland IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Van Orden A6-0420/2006 - cons. F/2 #

2006/11/30 Outcome: +: 473, -: 98, 0: 14
DE IT FR GB ES PL HU BE PT LT SK EL IE AT DK NL FI SI LV EE SE LU MT CY CZ
Total
87
59
57
66
32
43
20
19
19
12
12
16
11
16
13
21
11
6
7
5
18
6
4
4
21
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
217
2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
160

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Finland PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

2

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
72

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Latvia UEN

2
icon: NI NI
15
3

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

4

Poland NI

2

Czechia NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Van Orden A6-0420/2006 - cons. F/3 #

2006/11/30 Outcome: +: 492, -: 100, 0: 13
DE IT PL FR GB ES HU NL PT LT SK EL IE DK BE AT SI LV EE SE FI MT LU CY CZ
Total
89
60
44
59
68
35
21
24
19
12
12
16
11
13
22
17
6
7
5
18
12
4
5
5
21
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
226
2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
4

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
163

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Finland PSE

2

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
73

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Latvia UEN

2
icon: NI NI
21
3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

4

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Czechia NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
17

Poland IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Van Orden A6-0420/2006 - résolution #

2006/11/30 Outcome: +: 505, -: 65, 0: 36
IT PL FR GB ES DE HU BE PT CZ EL LT AT SE SK IE FI NL DK LV SI CY EE LU MT
Total
60
44
60
69
34
89
20
22
19
21
17
12
16
17
12
11
12
24
13
7
7
5
5
6
4
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
227
2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
161

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Finland PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
74

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Netherlands ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
21
3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

4

Belgium NI

3

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

Poland IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Spain Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2006-05-16T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/0
date
2006-05-16T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/1
date
2006-05-16T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/1
date
2006-05-16T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0595/COM_SEC(2006)0595_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0595/COM_SEC(2006)0595_EN.pdf
docs/2
date
2006-05-16T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/2
date
2006-09-26T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0598/COM_SEC(2006)0598_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0598/COM_SEC(2006)0598_EN.pdf
docs/3
date
2006-09-26T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/3
date
2006-10-04T00:00:00
docs
title: PE376.605
committee
FEMM
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0549/COM_COM(2006)0549_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0549/COM_COM(2006)0549_EN.pdf
docs/4
date
2006-10-04T00:00:00
docs
title: PE376.605
committee
FEMM
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-376605_EN.html
docs/6
date
2006-11-22T00:00:00
docs
title: PE378.565
committee
LIBE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/7
date
2006-11-22T00:00:00
docs
title: PE378.565
committee
LIBE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/7/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-378565_EN.html
docs/9
date
2007-02-13T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2007)0329/3
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/9/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13006&j=0&l=en
docs/10
date
2007-02-13T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2007)0329/3
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
events/0/date
Old
2006-05-16T00:00:00
New
2006-05-15T00:00:00
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0549/COM_COM(2006)0549_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0549/COM_COM(2006)0549_EN.pdf
docs/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.605&secondRef=02
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE374.159
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE374.159
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE380.785
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE380.785
docs/6/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.565&secondRef=02
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0420_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0420_EN.html
docs/8/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13006&j=1&l=en
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2006-11-27T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0420_EN.html title: A6-0420/2006
events/3
date
2006-11-27T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0420_EN.html title: A6-0420/2006
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061129&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20061129&type=CRE
events/6
date
2006-11-30T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0511_EN.html title: T6-0511/2006
summary
events/6
date
2006-11-30T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0511_EN.html title: T6-0511/2006
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2005-01-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: NASSAUER Hartmut date: 2006-06-20T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2006-06-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NASSAUER Hartmut group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/18
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna date: 2006-06-22T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/18
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2006-06-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0549/COM_COM(2006)0549_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0549/COM_COM(2006)0549_EN.pdf
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-420&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0420_EN.html
docs/8/body
EC
docs/9/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-420&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0420_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-511
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0511_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2006-05-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0214/COM_COM(2006)0214_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0214 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52006DC0214:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement Commissioner: REHN Olli type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2006-05-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2006-06-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PSE name: GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2006-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: NASSAUER Hartmut body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2006-11-23T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2006-06-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PSE name: GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2006-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: NASSAUER Hartmut body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-11-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-420&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0420/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-11-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061129&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-11-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13006&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-511 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0511/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations commissioner: REHN Olli
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2005-01-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2005-01-18T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/9
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/10
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
FEMM
date
2006-06-22T00:00:00
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: PSE name: GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna
committees/11
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/12
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/12
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
committees/13
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
committees/13
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/14
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
opinion
False
committees/14
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/15
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/15
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
LIBE
date
2006-06-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: NASSAUER Hartmut
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2006-06-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NASSAUER Hartmut group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/16
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/17
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
opinion
False
committees/17
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
committees/18
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2006-06-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/18
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
committees/19
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
opinion
False
committees/19
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
docs
  • date: 2006-05-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0595/COM_SEC(2006)0595_EN.pdf title: SEC(2006)0595 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=595 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to present the 2006 Commission’s monitoring report on the state of preparedness of Bulgaria in light of the accession process. CONTEXT: t he accession negotiations with Bulgaria were successfully concluded in December 2004. The Accession Treaty was signed in April 2005. Bulgaria and 14 Member States have already ratified it. The Treaty envisages accession on 1 January 2007 unless the Council decides, upon a Commission recommendation, to postpone it until 1 January 2008. Following the conclusion of the negotiations, the European Union decided that it would continue closely to monitor Bulgaria's preparations and achievements and that, to this end, the Commission would continue to submit annual reports on Bulgaria's progress towards accession, together with recommendations, if appropriate. The Commission presented its first such report in October 2005. This report showed that Bulgaria was already well advanced in preparing for accession. It also identified a number of areas where further efforts were needed to complete preparations. The Commission decided to step up its monitoring activities and report again in spring 2006. CONTENT: this report reviews Bulgaria's preparations for membership, focusing on the areas in need of further improvement in the light of the three Copenhagen accession criteria. Accordingly, the report contains three main parts: • The 1 st part assesses political issues which were identified as in need of further improvement. • The 2 nd part assesses economic issues which were identified as in need of further improvement. • The 3 rd part assesses where Bulgaria stands in implementing commitments and requirements arising from the accession negotiations. The report identifies the progress made since October 2005 and the gaps in policies, legislation and implementation which remain to be addressed. General evaluation Bulgaria has reached a considerable degree of alignment with the acquis. The October 2005 report concluded that Bulgaria would be ready by accession in a large number of areas. A number of other areas required increased efforts, and 16 areas gave rise to serious concern. Since then, further progress has been made. Bulgaria should be ready by accession in the following additional areas if the current pace of progress is maintained: public procurement, mutual recognition of industrial product specifications; freedom to provide non-financial services; most agriculture Common Market Organisations; aviation; excise duties; taxation implementing structures; postal services liberalisation; regional policy legislation; chemicals and genetically modified organisms, noise legislation; visa policy; and customs preparations. Progress has also been made in a number of areas, which no longer give rise to serious concern but still require increased efforts to complete preparations: the insurance sector, the protection of intellectual property rights, the paying agency for agriculture, the milk common market organisation, animal diseases control measures, veterinary border inspection posts; animal welfare, trade in live animals and animal products, veterinary aspects of public health; institutional and financial management structures for regional policy, as well as Schengen preparations and the management of the future EU external borders. Increased efforts are also needed for: mutual recognition of professional qualifications; financial services, information society services, protection of personal data; legislation to fight money laundering; agriculture trade mechanisms; the Common market organisations on wine and alcohol and on beefmeat; legislation in the veterinary and phytosanitary sector; most aspects of fisheries; sea transport; VAT, direct taxation rules; labour law, social dialogue, social inclusion, anti-discrimination policy, the European Social Fund, public health; energy market liberalisation; nuclear energy and nuclear safety, in particular the commitments to early closure and subsequent decommissioning of the reactors of the Kozloduy plant; steel industry restructuring; electronic communications; programming, monitoring and procurement capacity for regional policy; horizontal environmental legislation, water quality, integrated pollution prevention and control, waste management; consumer protection; asylum, judicial co-operation; fight against drugs; protection of the EU's financial interests; and the translation of the acquis into Bulgarian. The report lists six areas of serious concern , which require urgent action: § setting up a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) in agriculture; § building-up of rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products; § clearer evidence of results in investigating and prosecuting organised crime networks; § more effective and efficient implementation of laws for the fight against fraud and corruption; § intensified enforcement of anti-money laundering provisions; § strengthened financial control for the future use of structural and cohesion funds. type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2006-05-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0598/COM_SEC(2006)0598_EN.pdf title: SEC(2006)0598 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=598 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2006-09-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0549/COM_COM(2006)0549_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0549 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=549 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to present the Commission’s follow-up report on the state of preparedness of Romania and Bulgaria for EU membership. CONTENT: to recall, in its report of May 2006, the Commission stated that both countries should be prepared for membership by 1 January 2007, provided that they addressed a number of outstanding issues. The Commission indicated that it would report again on the state of preparedness of both countries by early October. This report outlines the Commission's assessment of both countries' progress since May 2006. It confirms that Bulgaria and Romania have made further progress to complete their preparations for membership, demonstrating their capacity to apply EU principles and legislation from 1 January 2007. They have reached a high degree of alignment. However, the Commission also identifies a number of areas of continuing concern, and also areas where the Commission will initiate appropriate measures to ensure the proper functioning of the EU, unless the countries take immediate corrective action. Both countries are strongly encouraged to make proper use of the months before accession, in order to address the remaining issues. The report focuses primarily on the areas highlighted in the conclusion of the May 2006 report as needing immediate action or further efforts. For Bulgaria , these are the justice system, the fight against corruption, police cooperation and the fight against organised crime, money-laundering, integrated administrative control system for agriculture (IACS), transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE), and financial control. For Romania , these are the justice system and the fight against corruption and IACS, Paying Agencies, TSE and interconnectivity of tax systems. Many of the challenges set out in the May reports have now been addressed. A number of sectoral issues have been resolved. There has been some progress in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption , money-laundering and organised crime , but further tangible results are needed . This report identifies those issues which require further work. It draws attention to provisions in the acquis and the Accession Treaty which are designed to safeguard the proper functioning of EU policies and institutions following accession. In line with the findings of this report, the Commission, after consulting the Member States, will set up a mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption, money-laundering and organised crime. For this purpose, benchmarks have been established which refer to the particular circumstances of each country. The Commission has adopted the necessary legal provisions to ensure the proper management of EU agricultural funds. The report underlines that the existing rules contain the necessary guarantees for the proper management of EU structural funds , and other programmes. In the area of food safety , some specific measures are in place. At present, certain animals and animal products may not be exported from Bulgaria and Romania to the EU because of the presence of animal diseases. These restrictions will be maintained after accession, if necessary. In the area of aviation safety , particular measures will be needed for Bulgarian aircraft and carriers. General conclusions : overall, Bulgaria and Romania have made far-reaching efforts to adapt their legislation and administration to the laws and rules of the European Union. This has largely brought them into line with prevailing standards and practices within the European Union. Sustained support from the European Union will be available for addressing the remaining issues. Sufficient guarantees exist in the acquis and the Accession Treaty to ensure the proper functioning of EU policies and institutions. As a result of the progress made, Bulgaria and Romania will be in a position to take on the rights and obligations of EU membership on 1 January 2007. The Commission looks forward to welcoming Bulgaria and Romania as fully-fledged members of the European Union on this date. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2006-10-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.605&secondRef=02 title: PE376.605 committee: FEMM type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2006-10-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE374.159 title: PE374.159 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-11-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE380.785 title: PE380.785 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-11-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.565&secondRef=02 title: PE378.565 committee: LIBE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2006-11-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-420&language=EN title: A6-0420/2006 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-01-11T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13006&j=1&l=en title: SP(2007)0054 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2007-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13006&j=0&l=en title: SP(2007)0329/3 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2006-05-16T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0214/COM_COM(2006)0214_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0214 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=214 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE : to present the monitoring report on the state of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria and Romania in 2007. CONTENT : this monitoring report follows up on the findings of the October 2005 report on the state of preparedness of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Union (please refer to INI/2005/2204 and INI/2005/2205 ). It is based on the detailed assessment contained in the accompanying Monitoring Reports for each country ( SEC(2006)0595 for Bulgaria and SEC(2006)0596 for Romania in procedure reference INI/2006/2115 ). More specifically, in this report, the Commission: – reviews, as of end April 2006, developments and the preparedness of both countries in areas previously identified as in need of further improvement; – examines measures required to remedy any shortcomings that might persist upon accession; – draws conclusions on the state of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria and Romania. Conditional accession in 2007 : Bulgaria and Romania have continued to make progress in their preparations for membership. In many areas the countries are generally meeting their commitments or are on track to fulfil the acquis requirements. However, a number of outstanding issues still need to be addressed. Some of these require increased efforts, and in a few cases immediate action is needed. In the light of the overall progress made by Bulgaria and Romania assessed in the accompanying Monitoring Reports and summarised in this communication, the Commission considers that Bulgaria and Romania should be prepared for membership by 1 January 2007, provided that they address a number of outstanding issues. An impartial, independent and effective justice system properly equipped to fight corruption and organised crime is of paramount importance , as it underpins the functioning of the whole society and economy. In this regard: - Bulgaria needs to demonstrate clear evidence of results in the fight against corruption, in particular high-level corruption, notably in terms of investigations and subsequent judicial proceedings. It needs to further reform the judiciary, in particular to reinforce its transparency, efficiency and impartiality, and remove any ambiguity regarding its independence; - Romania needs to continue its efforts and demonstrate further results in the fight against corruption, notably in terms of further investigations and subsequent judicial proceedings. It also needs to consolidate the implementation of the ongoing judicial reforms, and further enhance the transparency, efficiency and impartiality of the judiciary. Other more specific demands are made of these two countries : Bulgaria needs to demonstrate clearer evidence of results in the following areas: investigating and prosecuting organised crime networks; implement more effectively and efficiently laws for the fight against fraud and corruption; intensify the enforcement of anti-money laundering provisions; set up a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) in agriculture; build up the necessary rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products; strengthen financial control for the future use of structural and cohesion funds. In addition, Romania needs to: accredit paying agencies for handling common agriculture policy expenditure; set up a proper integrated administration and control system in agriculture; build up the necessary rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products; ensure that the tax administration IT systems are ready for inter-operability with those of the rest of the Union, to enable a correct collection of VAT throughout the EU internal market. Safeguards and other measures : i t is the responsibility of the authorities of both countries to take all the necessary measures to address the outstanding issues identified in this Report, so as to be able to carry out their obligations under the acquis upon accession. This concerns mainly the areas giving rise to serious concern, but also areas identified in this report as requiring increased efforts. Failure to do so would lead the Commission to take the necessary preventive or remedial action to safeguard the functioning of EU policies. This part sets out the safeguards and other measures which could be imposed in the event of certain shortcomings not having been adequately addressed upon accession. These are outlined in three broad areas: Internal market : a certain number of safeguard clauses are provided in this area in the event that Bulgaria or Romania are not able to abide by all its obligations upon accession. The Accession Treaty safeguard can be taken up to three years after accession. Other instruments, such as the infringement procedure, and the enforcement mechanisms for competition rules, may also be applied. This section covers both the four freedoms, and the EU policies on competition, energy, transport, environment, telecommunication, taxation, agriculture and consumer and health protection insofar as they have cross-border effects. Regarding transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, if no progress is made in rendering collection and treatment facilities to be fit, the Commission will take a decision on the basis of the acquis in order to prevent the related animal products awaiting treatment from returning into the feed chain. The EU framework for VAT and excise duties foresees computerised systems interconnected within the EC data systems. Romania's preparations need to be accelerated to ensure that its IT systems are fully operational and ready for interconnection upon accession. Justice, freedom and security : this remains principal problem area. The Accession Treaty provides for safeguard measures for up to three years from accession, in the event that Bulgaria or Romania is not able to abide by its obligations pertaining to judicial co-operation. If implementation of reforms in the justice system is not sufficiently advanced in either country before accession, or if the fight against corruption in the judiciary has not yielded sufficient tangible results, the Commission will establish on the basis of Article 38 of the Act of Accession a mechanism for further monitoring in this area. The mechanism would be in place for up to three years and would require a yearly report to the Commission on progress in implementing reforms in the judiciary and in related law enforcement bodies, and on anti-corruption measures affecting them. The decision establishing the mechanism would contain benchmarks tailored to the specific shortcomings observed in each country, and against which progress will be measured. The Commission would report yearly on the results of the mechanism to the European Parliament and Council. Should either country fail to address shortcomings adequately, the Commission would adopt safeguard measures suspending obligations of the current Member States to automatically recognise judgements or execute warrants issued by that country's courts or prosecutors. Disbursement of EU funds : a Member State needs to offer the necessary guarantees on proper spending of EU funds under shared management, i.e. the Common Agricultural Policy and the Structural and Cohesion Funds. Any shortcoming in this respect may delay the disbursement of funds or give rise to subsequent claims by the Commission for financial corrections or recovery. In the area of agriculture, accredited paying agencies as well as a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) are necessary for handling direct payments to farmers and operators. In Romania, the paying agencies are not fully operational and accredited. A proper IACS is not set up in Bulgaria and Romania. If this is not remedied, in addition to the existing mechanisms, the Commission may take measures based on Article 37 of the Act of Accession to withhold payments to Bulgaria or Romania. Implementation of EU structural actions requires effective programming and monitoring structures, as well as financial management and control systems, including for procurement. Bulgaria's preparations for the control over structural funds expenditure need improvement. If these are not remedied, this would delay the release of payments by the Commission. Conclusions and subsequent steps : the Commission is firmly committed to ensuring that both countries successfully complete their final preparations for accession. To that end, it has closely monitored the progress made by Bulgaria and Romania and has provided targeted support to help them in their reform efforts. Although both countries can be commended on their achievements, the Commission makes clear that, if shortcomings persist upon accession, it will take the necessary action in its role as guardian of the treaties and propose safeguard measures as mentioned above. It will report on Bulgaria's and Romania's progress in addressing the outstanding issues no later than early October 2006 . On this basis, the Commission will consider whether the date of their accession to the European Union on 1 January 2007 can be maintained . To conclude, the Commission recalls that the Accession Treaty provides that Bulgaria and Romania will join in 2007 unless the Council decides, upon a recommendation from the Commission, to postpone the accession of either country until 2008. The Council may so decide: – by qualified majority, if serious shortcomings have been observed in the fulfilment by Romania of one or more of a number of the specific commitments and requirements related to justice and home affairs and competition policy, listed in Annex IX to the Act of Accession, or – by unanimity, if there is clear evidence that the state of preparations for adoption and implementation of the acquis in Bulgaria or Romania is such that there is a serious risk of either country being manifestly unprepared to meet the requirements of membership by 1 January 2007 in a number of important areas.
  • date: 2006-05-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-11-23T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Geoffrey van ORDEN ( EPP-ED , UK ) in response to the Commission's final monitoring report on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania . The committee welcomed the confirmation from the Commission and Council that Bulgaria was sufficiently prepared for EU membership on 1 January 2007, but it also noted that there are areas "that require further progress" as far as the political criteria are concerned: the need for maximum transparency in every sector, a stronger role for the Bulgarian Ombudsman, rigorous implementation of measures to improve the training of police investigators, the coordination of anti-corruption policies and a strengthening of inspectorates within the public administration. Moreover, police units specialising in the fight against organised crime, corruption, drugs and human trafficking should be expanded. MEPs also raised a number of points of concern, such as the conditions in children's homes and other institutional care and the protection of minorities. The latter issue should be included in the newly established cooperation and verification mechanism after accession. With regard to the economic criteria, the committee expressed concern at "continuing invisible barriers to foreign investors", and urged the Bulgarian government to take measures in order to ensure a "positive investment climate". The report also looked at Bulgaria 's progress in respect of the 'acquis communautaire'. It welcomed the progress made on the trade in live animals and animal welfare, such as in the transportation and slaughter of animals and the treatment of animal by-products. With regard to energy, the committee recognised the sacrifice that Bulgaria would have to make in closing units 3 and 4 of the Kozloduy nuclear plant and asked the Council to consider a delay of eight months to allow for a review. The report also recognised that "not merely Bulgaria , but countries throughout Europe are facing an energy gap in the years ahead, with increasing reliance on imports of energy from Russia and areas of instability". Finally, MEPs insisted that after accession Parliament should be further involved in the monitoring process regarding Bulgaria and that it should be fully associated " in any consideration of activation of safeguard clauses".
  • date: 2006-11-27T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-420&language=EN title: A6-0420/2006
  • date: 2006-11-29T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061129&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-11-30T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13006&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-11-30T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-511 title: T6-0511/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based the own-initiative report drawn up by Geoffrey van ORDEN (EPP-ED, UK) in response to the Commission's final monitoring report on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania. The resolution was adopted by 505 votes in favour to 65 against with 36 abstentions. Parliament conformed largely to the report voted through by its competent committee, with some amendments: -whilst welcoming the result of the Presidential elections on 29 October 2006, it deplored at the same time the strong showing of anti-European forces in those election and called on the President to use his second term to address the fears of those Bulgarian citizens being critical about Bulgaria's accession to the EU; -the clause regarding the energy gap faced by Europe, with increasing reliance on imports of energy from Russia and areas of instability was not adopted by the plenary; - on the matter of the Kozloduy power plant, Parliament reiterated its calls on the Council and the Commission to ensure that Bulgaria fulfilled its commitments under Article 30 of the Accession Treaty regarding the closure date for units 3 and 4 of the Kozloduy power plant. It also called on the EU institutions to keep their promises regarding the funding of EUR 210 million to Bulgaria for the period 2007 to 2008 for the closure of the Kozloduy power plant.
  • date: 2006-11-30T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement commissioner: REHN Olli
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFET/6/34035
New
  • AFET/6/34035
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.20.01 Candidate countries
New
8.20.01
Candidate countries
activities
  • date: 2006-05-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0214/COM_COM(2006)0214_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0214 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52006DC0214:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement Commissioner: REHN Olli type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2006-05-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2006-06-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PSE name: GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2006-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: NASSAUER Hartmut body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2006-11-23T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2006-06-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PSE name: GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2006-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: NASSAUER Hartmut body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-11-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-420&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0420/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-11-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061129&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-11-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13006&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-511 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0511/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2006-06-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PSE name: GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2006-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: NASSAUER Hartmut
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement commissioner: REHN Olli
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
AFET/6/34035
geographical_area
Bulgaria
reference
2006/2114(INI)
title
Accession of Bulgaria
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Strategic initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
8.20.01 Candidate countries