Activities of Andrey NOVAKOV related to 2019/2070(DEC)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2018
Amendments (5)
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Environment Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2018 / Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Environment Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Agency for the financial year 2018;
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 2
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2018 / Postpones the closure of the accounts of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2018;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. NotWelcomes that, according to the Agency, substantial progress was made in the sharing of resources on overlapping tasks among other agencies with similar activities; also notes that the Agency shared efforts with other science-based agencies including the European Chemicals Agency and the European Food Safety Authority on issues around human health;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. NoteSupports the suggestion of the Court to publish vacancy notices also on the website of the European Personnel Selection Office in order to increase publicity; understands the Agency’s reply concerning the translation costs triggered by such publication; notes that the Agency publishes vacancy notices on the EU Agencies’ Network website and on social media to increase publicity;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes with concern from the Court’s report that for the provision of Copernicus local land monitoring services, the Agency contracted services for an amount above the ceiling of the governing framework contract but did not formalise it through a contract amendment; notes from the Agency’s reply that it considers that the increase of the budget ceiling was made in accordance with the guidance from the Commission;