BETA

Activities of Pascal DURAND related to 2022/0051(COD)

Legal basis opinions (0)

Amendments (55)

Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) As regards regulated financial undertakings providing loan, credit, or other financial services, including equity investment services, “value chain” with respect to the provision of such services should be limited to the activities of the clients receiving such services, and the subsidiaries thereof whose activities are linked to the contract in question. Clients that are households and natural persons not acting in a professional or business capacity, as well as small and medium sized undertakings, should not be considered to be part of the value chain. The activities of the companies or other legal entities that are included in the value chain of that client should not be covered.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) Under the due diligence obligations set out by this Directive, a company should identify actual or potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts. In order to allow for a comprehensive identification of adverse impacts, such identification should be based on quantitative and qualitative information. For instance, as regards adverse environmental impacts, the company should obtain information about baseline conditions at higher risk sites or facilities in value chains. Identification of adverse impacts should include assessing the human rights, and environmental context in a dynamic way and in regular intervals: prior to a new activity or relationship, prior to major decisions or changes in the operation; in response to or anticipation of changes in the operating environment; and periodically, at least every 12 months, throughout the life of an activity or relationship. Regulated financial undertakings providing loan, credit, or other financial services, including equity investment should identify the adverse impacts only at the inception of the contract and prior to each funding instalment, including for multi-stage funding projects. When identifying adverse impacts, companies should also identify and assess the impact of a business relationship’s business model and strategies, including trading, procurement and pricing practices. Where the company cannot prevent, bring to an end or minimize all its adverse impacts at the same time, it should be able to prioritize its action, provided it takes the measures reasonably available to the company, taking into account the specific circumstances.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) The value chain should cover activities related to the production of a good or provision of services by a company, including the development of the product or the service and the use and disposal of the product as well as the related activities of establisthed business relationships of the company. It should encompass upstream established direct and indirect business relationships that design, extract, manufacture, transport, store and supply raw material, products, parts of products, or provide services to the company that are necessary to carry out the company’s activities, and also downstream relationships, including established direct and indirect business relationships, that use or receive products, parts of products or services from the company up to the end of life of the product, including inter alia the distribution of the product to retailers, the transport and storage of the product, dismantling of the product, its recycling, composting or landfilling.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) In order to allow companies to properly identify the adverse impacts in their value chain and to make it possible for them to exercise appropriate leverage, the due diligence obligations should be limited in this Directive to established business relationships. For the purpose of this Directive, established business relationships should mean such direct and indirect business relationships which are, or which are expected to be lasting, in view of their intensity and duration and which do not represent a negligible or ancillary part of the value chain. The nature of business relationships as “established” should be reassessed periodically, and at least every 12 months. If the direct business relationship of a company is established, then all linked indirect business relationships should also be considered as established regarding that company.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) In order to ensure that due diligence forms part of companies’ corporate policies, and in line with the relevant international framework, companies should integrate due diligence into all their corporate policies and have in place a due diligence policy. The due diligence policy should contain a description of the company’s approach, including in the long term, to due diligence, a code of conduct describing the rules and principles to be followed by the company’s employees and subsidiaries; a description of the processes put in place to implement due diligence, including the measures taken to verify compliance with the code of conduct and to extend its application to established business relationships. The code of conduct should apply in all relevant corporate functions and operations, including procurement and purchasing decisions. Companies should also update their due diligence policy annually.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
(34) So as to comply with the prevention and mitigation obligation under this Directive, companies should be required to take the following actions, where relevant. Where necessary due to the complexity of prevention measures, companies should develop and implement a prevention action plan. Companies should seek to obtain contractual assurances from a direct partner with whom they have an established business relationship that it will ensure compliance with the code of conduct or the prevention action plan, including by seeking corresponding contractual assurances from its partners to the extent that their activities are part of the companies’ value chain. The contractual assurances should be accompanied by appropriate measures to verify compliance. To ensure comprehensive prevention of actual and potential adverse impacts, companies should also make investments which aim to prevent adverse impacts, provide targeted and proportionate support for an SME with which they have an established business relationship such as financing, for example, through direct financing, low-interest loans, guarantees of continued sourcing, and assistance in securing financing, to help implement the code of conduct or prevention action plan, or technical guidance such as in the form of training, management systems upgrading, and collaborate with other companies.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ‘value chain’ means activities related to the production of goods or the provision of services by a company, including the development of the product or the service and the use and disposal of the product as well as the related activities of upstream and downstream established business relationships of the company. As regards companies within the meaning of point (a)(iv), ‘value chain’ with respect to the provision of these specific services shall only include the activities of the clients receiving such loan, credit, and other financial services, including equity investment, and of other companies belonging to the same group whose activities are linked to the contract in question. The value chain of such regulated financial undertakings does not cover SMEs receiving loan, credit, financing, insurance or reinsurance of such entities;
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) ‘independent third-party verification’ means verification of the compliance by a company, or parts of its value chain, with human rights and environmental requirements resulting from the provisions of this Directive by an auditor that is accredited in a Member State for conducting certifications that are based on internationally recognised standards that address human rights and environmental matters and which is independent from the company, free from any conflicts of interests, has experience and competence in environmental and human rights matters and is accountable for the quality and reliability of the audit;
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
(38) Under the due diligence obligations set out by this Directive, if a company identifies actual human rights or environmental adverse impacts, it should take appropriate measures to bring those to an end. It can be expected that a company is able to bring to an end actual adverse impacts in their own operations and in subsidiaries. However, it should be clarified that, as regards established business relationships, where adverse impacts cannot be brought to an end, companies should minimise the extent of such impacts. Minimisation of the extent of adverse impacts should require an outcome that is the closest possible to bringing the adverse impact to an end. To provide companies with legal clarity and certainty, this Directive should define which actions companies should be required to take for bringing actual human rights and environmental adverse impacts to an end and minimisation of their extent, where relevant depending on the circumstances.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 421 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
(39) So as to comply with the obligation of bringing to an end and minimising the extent of actual adverse impacts under this Directive, companies should be required to take the following actions, where relevant. They should neutralise the adverse impact or minimise its extent, with an action proportionate to the significance and scale of the adverse impact and to the contribution of the company’s conduct to the adverse impact. Where necessary due to the fact that the adverse impact cannot be immediately brought to an end, companies should develop and implement a corrective action plan with reasonable and clearly defined timelines for action and qualitative and quantitative indicators for measuring improvement. Companies should also seek to obtain contractual assurances from a direct business partner with whom they have an established business relationship that they will ensure compliance with the company’s code of conduct and, as necessary, a prevention action plan, including by seeking corresponding contractual assurances from its partners, to the extent that their activities are part of the company’s value chain. The contractual assurances should be accompanied by the appropriate measures to verify compliance. Finally, companies should also make investments aiming at ceasing or minimising the extent of adverse impact, provide targeted and proportionate support for an SMEs with which they have an established business relationship and collaborate with other entities, including, where relevant, to increase the company’s ability to bring the adverse impact to an end.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 43
(43) Companies should monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their due diligence measures. They should carry out periodic assessments of their own operations, those of their subsidiaries and, where related to the value chains of the company, those of their established business relationships, to monitor the effectiveness of the identification, prevention, minimisation, bringing to an end and mitigation of human rights and environmental adverse impacts. Such assessments should verify that adverse impacts are properly identified, due diligence measures are implemented and adverse impacts have actually been prevented or brought to an end. In order to ensure that such assessments are up-to- date, they should be carried out at least every 12 months and be revised in-between if there are reasonable grounds to believe that significant new risks of adverse impact could have arisen.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 507 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) on obligations for companies regarding actual and potential human rights adverse impacts and environmental adverse impacts, including material impacts on climate change, with respect to their own operations, the operations of their subsidiaries, and the value chain operations carried out by entities with whom the company has an established business relationship and
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 518 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The nature of business relationships as ‘established’ shall be reassessed periodically, and at least every 12 months.deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 521 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. When companies referred to in Article 3, point (a)(iv), provide credit, loan or other financial services, including equity investment, identification of actual and potential adverse human rights impacts and adverse environmental impacts shall be carried out only before providing that service. and prior to each funding instalment, including for multi-stage funding contracts.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 559 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) agriculture, forestry, fisheries (including aquaculture), the manufacture of food products, and the wholesale trade of agricultural raw materials, live animals, animal products, wood, food, and beverages;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii a (new)
(iiia) International shipping
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 591 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) Undertakings and groups as referred to in Article 3, paragraphs 4, and 7 of Directive 2013/34/EU.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 599 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. By way of derogation from paragraph 5, point (b), when companies referred to in Article 3, point (a)(iv), provide credit, loan or other financial services, including equity investment, they shall not be required to terminate the credit, loan or other financial service contract when this can be reasonably expected to cause substantial prejudice to the entity to whom that service is being provided.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 669 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) ‘adverse environmental impact’ means an adverse impact on the environment resulting from the violation of one of the prohibitions and obligations pursuant to the international environmental conventions listed in the Annex, Part II; , or from the failure to comply with obligation under the following:
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 671 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (new)
(i) a violation of the obligations set out in Directive 2008/99/EC (Environmental Crime Directive) of the European Parliament and of the Council,
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 672 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (new)
(ii) Any adverse impact on one of the following environmental categories as defined by Regulation (EU) 2020/852(Taxonomy Regulation): (a) climate change mitigation, including as regards scope 1, scope 2 and, where relevant, scope 3greenhouse gas emissions; (b) climate change adaptation; (c) water and marine resources; (d) resource use and the circular economy; (e) pollution; (f) fauna and flora, nature-related impacts on and risks for biodiversity and ecosystems.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 678 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 7
7. By way of derogation from paragraph 6, point (b), when companies referred to in Article 3, point (a)(iv), provide credit, loan or other financial services, including equity investment, they shall not be required to terminate the credit, loan or other financial service contract, when this can be reasonably expected to cause substantial prejudice to the entity to whom that service is being provided.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 692 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e – introductory part
(e) ‘business relationship’ means a relationship with a contractor, subcontractor or any other legal entities (‘partner’)subsidiaries and commercial relationships of an undertaking throughout its value chain, including suppliers and sub- contractors which are directly linked to the undertaking’s business operations, products or services and any other legal entities (‘partner’) which are under the control of an undertaking.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 699 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e – point i
(i) with whom the company has a commercial agreement or to whom the company provides financing, insurance or reinsurance, or other forms of credit, including private equity and investment.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 705 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) ‘control’ means the possibility for an undertaking to exercise decisive influence on another undertaking, in particular by ownership or the right to use all or part of the assets of the latter, or by rights or contracts or any other means, having regard to all factual considerations, which confer decisive influence on the composition, voting or decisions of the decision making bodies of an undertaking;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 728 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ‘value chain’ means activities related to the production of goods or the provision of services by a company, including the development of the product or the service and the use and disposal of the product as well as the related activities of upstream and downstream established business relationships of the company. As regards companieundertakings within the meaning of point (a)(iv), ‘value chain’ with respect to the provision of these specific services shall only include the activities of the clients receiving such loan, credit, insurance, reinsurance and other financial services and of other companies belonging to the same group whose activities are linked to the contract in question, including private equity and investment. The value chain of such regulated financial undertakings does not cover SMEs receiving loan, credit, financing, insurance or reinsurance of such entities. The downstream value chain of those regulated financial undertakings shall only cover clients that are direct business partners;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 740 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) ‘independent third-party verification’ means verification of the compliance by a company, or parts of its value chain, with human rights and environmental requirements resulting from the provisions of this Directive by an auditorIndependent Assurance Service Provider (IASP) as defined in Article 2 of Directive 2006/43/EC and by an auditor that is registered as a consequence of approval in accordance with Article 3 of Directive 2006/43/EC or accredited in a Member State for conducting certifications that are based on internationally recognised standards that address human rights and environmental matters and which is independent from the company, free from any conflicts of interests, has experience and competence in environmental and human rights matters and is accountable for the quality and reliability of the audit;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 809 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 8
8. Member States shall guarantee the independence of the supervisory authorities and shall ensure that they, and all persons working for or who have worked for them and auditors or accredited experts acting on their behalf, exercise their powers impartially, transparently and with due respect for obligations of professional secrecy. In particular, Member States shall ensure that the authority is legally and functionally independent from the companies falling within the scope of this Directive or other market interests, that its staff and the persons responsible for its management are free of conflicts of interest, subject to confidentiality requirements, and that they refrain from any action incompatible with their duties.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 851 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) a description of the processes put in place to implement due diligence, including the measures taken to verify compliance with the code of conduct and to extend its application to established business relationships;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 861 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States shall ensure that where a company has taken the actions referred to in Article 7(2), point (b) and Article 7(4), or Article 8(3), point (c), and Article 8(5), it shall not be liable for damages caused by an adverse impact arising as a result of the activities of an indirect partner with whom it has an established business relationship, unless it was unreasonable, in the circumstances of the case, to expect that the action actually taken, including as regards verifying compliance, would be adequate to prevent, mitigate, bring to an end or minimise the extent of the adverse impact.deleted
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 874 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In the assessment of the existence and extent of liability under this paragraphNotwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States shall ensure that where a company has taken the actions referred to in Article 7(2), point (b) and Article 7(4), or Article 8(3), point (c), and Article 8(5), due account shall be taken of the company’s efforts, insofar as they relate directly to the damage in question, to comply with any remedial action required of them by a supervisory authority, any investments made and any targeted support provided pursuant to Articles 7 and 8, as well as any collaboration with other entities to address adverse impacts in its value chains.
2022/10/27
Committee: ECON
Amendment 883 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that companies take appropriate measures to identify actual and potential adverse human rights impacts and adverse environmental impacts arising from their own operations or those of their subsidiaries and, where related to their value chains, from their established business relationships, in accordance with paragraph 2, 3 and 4.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 904 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. When companies referred to in Article 3, point (a)(iv), provide credit, loan, assurance, reinsurance or other financial services, including equity and investment, identification of actual and potential adverse human rights impacts and adverse environmental impacts shall be carried out only before providing that service. and prior to each funding instalment, including for multi-stage funding contracts. To that end, they shall take appropriate measures to identify actual and potential adverse human rights impacts and adverse environmental impacts related to the provision of financial services throughout the entire operations chain of the client provided for that service.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 959 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) provide targeted and proportionate support for an SME with which the company has an established business relationship, where compliance with the code of conduct or the prevention action plan would jeopardise the viability of the SME;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1016 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. By way of derogation from paragraph 5, point (b), when companies referred to in Article 3, point (a)(iv), provide credit, loan, assurance, reinsurance or other financial services, including equity and investment, they shall not be required to terminate the credit, loan or other financial service contract when this can be reasonably expected to cause substantial prejudice to the entity to whom that service is being provided.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1054 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) seek contractual assurances from a direct partner with whom it has an established business relationship that it will ensure compliance with the code of conduct and, as necessary, a corrective action plan, including by seeking corresponding contractual assurances from its partners, to the extent that they are part of the value chain (contractual cascading). When such contractual assurances are obtained, paragraph 5 shall apply.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1120 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 7
7. By way of derogation from paragraph 6, point (b), when companies referred to in Article 3, point (a)(iv), provide credit, loan assurance, reinsurance or other financial services, including equity and investment, they shall not be required to terminate the credit, loan or other financial service contract, when this can be reasonably expected to cause substantial prejudice to the entity to whom that service is being provided.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1216 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that companies carry out periodic assessments of their own operations and measures, those of their subsidiaries and, where related to the value chains of the company, those of their established business relationships, to monitor the effectiveness of the identification, prevention, mitigation, bringing to an end and minimisation of the extent of human rights and environmental adverse impacts. Such assessments shall be based, where appropriate, on qualitative and quantitative indicators and be carried out at least every 12 months and whenever there are reasonable grounds to believe that significant new risks of the occurrence of those adverse impacts may arise. The due diligence policy shall be updated in accordance with the outcome of those assessments.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1224 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that companies that are not subject to reporting requirements under Articles 19a, 29a and 2940a of Directive 2013/34/EU report on the matters covered by this Directive by publishing on their website an annual statement in a language customary in the sphere of international business. The statement shall be published by 30 April each year, covering the previous calendar year. that is audited or assured with an assurance in line with the requirements outlined in Directive 2006/43/EC57a. The statement shall be published by 30 April each year, covering the previous calendar year and be drawn up in accordance with the due diligence reporting standards adopted pursuant to Article 29b or where applicable with Article 40b of Directive 2013/34/EU providing those are without prejudice to any Union requirement on those undertakings to conduct a due diligence process. For companies referred to in Article 3 point (a)(iv) or reporting on a voluntary basis, these reporting obligations should be without prejudice of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 to Article 4(3), Article 4(4)57b. _________________ 57a Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts 57b Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability- related disclosures in the financial services sector pursuant
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1260 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1
In order to provide support to companies to facilitate their compliance with Article 7(2), point (b), and Article 8(3), point (c), the Commission shall adopt guidance prior to the first application date of this Directive about voluntary model contract clauses.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1270 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
In order to provide support to companies or to Member State authorities on how companies should fulfil their due diligence obligations, the Commission, in consultation with Member States and stakeholders, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, the European Environment Agency, and where appropriate with international bodies having expertise in due diligence, mayshall issue guidelines prior to the first application date of this directive, including for specific sectors or specific adverse impacts.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1280 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall, in order to provide information and support to companies and the partners with whom they have established business relationships in their value chains in their efforts to fulfil the obligations resulting from this Directive, set up and operate individually or jointly dedicated websites, platforms or portals. Specific consideration shall be given, in that respect, to the SMEs that are present in the value chains of companies.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1301 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. Companies may rely on industry schemes and multi-stakeholder initiatives to support the implementation of their obligations referred to in Articles 5 to 11 of this Directive to the extent that such schemes and initiatives are appropriate to support the fulfilment of those obligations. The Commission and the Member States may facilitate the dissemination of information on such schemes or initiatives and their outcome. The Commission, in collaboration with Member States, mayshall issue guidance for assessing the fitness of industry schemes and multi-stakeholder initiatives.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1320 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that companies referred to in Article 2(1), point (a), and Article 2(2), point (a), shall adopt a plan to ensure that the business model and strategy of the company are compatible with the transition to a sustainable economy and with the limiting of global warming to 1.5 °C in line with the Paris Agreement. This plan shall under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change adopted on 12December 2015 (the ‘Paris Agreement’) and the objective of achieving climate neutrality by 2050 as established in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and, where relevant, the exposure of the undertaking to coal-, oil- and gas-related activities. This plan shall include implementing actions and related financial and investment plans and, in particular, identify, on the basis of information reasonably available to the company, the extent to which climate change is a risk for, or an impact of, the company’s operations. Where applicable, it shall be designed according to requirements referred to in Article 19a, 29b and 40b of Directive 2013/34/EU.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1341 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall designate one or more supervisory authorities to supervise compliance with the obligations laid down in national provisions adopted pursuant to Articles 6 to 11 and Article 15(1) and (2) (‘supervisory authority’) and ensure the supervisory authorities designated are sufficiently resourced to supervise the measures set out in this Directive.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1352 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 8
8. Member States shall guarantee the independence of the supervisory authorities and shall ensure that they, and all persons working for or who have worked for them and auditors or expertaccredited experts under internationally recognised standards on human rights and environment matters acting on their behalf, exercise their powers impartially, transparently and with due respect for obligations of professional secrecy. In particular, Member States shall ensure that the authority is legally and functionally independent from the companies falling within the scope of this Directive or other market interests, that its staff and the persons responsible for its management are free of conflicts of interest, subject to confidentiality requirements, and that they refrain from any action incompatible with their duties.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1358 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the supervisory authorities have adequate powers and resources to carry out the tasks assigned to them under this Directive, including the power to request information and carry out investigations related to compliance with the obligations set out in this Directive and with the obligations set out in Article 1 of Directive 2013/43/EU when it is deemed necessary to fulfil the obligation of this directive.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1381 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 5 – point b a (new)
(ba) to exclude undertakings listed in the register referred to in Article 21 paragraph 8a from participating public procurement tender processes;
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1385 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 5 – point c a (new)
(ca) to put in place dissuasive sanction for companies referred to in Article 2 in order to refraining them from entering into new or from extending existing business relationships with a third- country company that is listed in the public register referred to in Article 21 paragraph 8a.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1465 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. The European Network of Supervisory Authorities shall keep and make publically available a register of third-country undertakings that do not comply with the requirements of this Directive. The competent supervisory authority shall list third-country undertakings that do not comply with the sanctions they may face in accordance with Article 20. Supervisory authorities shall make publically available the information necessary to identify European and third-country undertakings that failed to comply with the due diligence requirement referred to in Article 4.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1468 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 21 a (new)
Article 21a Revenues The revenues generated by the application of pecuniary sanctions referred to in Article 20(3) shall be accrued against the costs of the operation and maintenance of national supervisory authorities. Any revenue remaining after covering these costs shall constitute internal assigned revenue in accordance with Article 21(5) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Those remaining revenues shall be assigned to cover the costs of the operation and maintenance of the European Network of Supervisory Authorities and to the Union budget.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1496 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States shall ensure that wthere a company has taken the actions referred to in Article 7(2), point (b) and Article 7(4), or Article 8(3), point (c), and Article 8(5), it shall not be liable for damages caused by an adverse impact arising as a result of the activities of an indirect partir liability regime as referred to in this article is such that undertakings that prove that they took all due care in liner with whom it has an established business relationship, unless it was unreasonable, in the circumstances of the case, to expect that the action actually taken, including as regards verifying compliance, would be adequate to prevent, mitigate, bring to an end or minimise the extent of the adverse impactthis Directive to avoid the harm in question, or that the harm would have occurred even if all due care had been taken, are not held liable for that damage.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1507 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In the assessment of the existence and extent of liability under this paragraphNotwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States shall ensure that where a company has taken the actions referred to in Article 7(2), point (b) and Article 7(4), or Article8(3), point (c), and Article 8(5), due account shall be taken of the company’s efforts, insofar as they relate directly to the damage in question, to comply with any remedial action required of them by a supervisory authority, any investments made and any targeted support provided pursuant to Articles 7 and 8, as well as any collaboration with other entities to address adverse impacts in its value chains.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1584 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 28 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 11 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of 5 years from … [date of entry into force of this Directive]. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the 5-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of timean identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1701 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part II – point 12 a (new)
12a. Violation of the greenhouse gas emissions reduction objectives of the Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework on Climate Changes
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI