1667 Amendments of Nicolas BAY
Amendment 10 #
2021/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Eastern Partnership summit acknowledged the European aspirations and the European chounderlined the need to further strengthen and deepen relations between the EU and the Republice of the partners concerned and encouraged the fullMoldova and is not intended to be a vehicle for promoting implementation of the AAs and their DCFTAs;
Amendment 30 #
2021/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the historicTakes note of the results of the presidential election in 2020 and the parliamentary elections in 2021, whereby the people of the Republic of Moldova gave a strong mandate to pro-reform and pro-European forces; urges the political leadership of the Republic of Moldova to seize this unique opportunity to; underlines the importance for the Republic of Moldova to continue implementing long-overdue reforms and to advance European integration based on common values of democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law;
Amendment 39 #
2021/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to increascontinue its engagement with its Moldovan counterparts and to maximise its political, technical and financial support to the Republic of Moldova during this crucial time in order to give further impetus to progress and to ensure adequate absorption capacity for EU assistancewith due regard for the sovereignty of the Republic of Moldova;
Amendment 68 #
2021/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the ambitious reform agenda of the government of Natalia Gavrilița and the tangible progress already achieved in its implementation, in particular oprogress already achieved in the fight against corruption, in implementing judicial reform, in improving the living standards of the most vulnerable population groups and in improving the business climate in the country; reiterates that sufficient progress in implementing agreed reforms is a key condition for continued EU financial support and the application of the ‘more for more’ principle;
Amendment 79 #
2021/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 87 #
2021/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that, for the time being, Moldova does not have genuine gas supply alternatives and that its attempt to find alternative sources of supply by purchasing gas from Poland and the Netherlands for 0.3 billion lei on a one- off basis has failed;
Amendment 91 #
2021/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the inadmissibility of the weaponisation of the gas supply in order to put political pressure on the Republic of Moldova to change its geopolitical orientat the issue of gas supply, for Moldova as for any other country, must be primarily based on national considerations; urges the Commission to continue providing the Republic of Moldova with the financial and technical support necessstresses, as regards Moldova in particulary, to ensure its resilience against such externalhat its supply arrangements, in terference; calls on the Moldovan authorities to maintain the country’s commitment as a member of the Energy Community to implementing the EU’s Third Energy Package, in particular the unbundling of gas and electricity transmission and distributionms of both cost and effectiveness, must take account of the make-up of its neighbourhood;
Amendment 174 #
2021/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 253 #
2021/2237(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the importance of fighting disinformation, fake news and propaganda, in particular through strategic communication; hopes that the reconstituted Television and Radio Broadcasting Council will effectively carry out its tasks as a media watchdog and address the long-standing shortcomings of the media landscapat the ‘fight against disinformation’ cannot be embodied in a state or parastatal structure and that this issue, assuming that it is of any significance, must remain solely a matter for political and ideological debate;
Amendment 1 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5
Citation 5
Amendment 2 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5
Citation 5
Amendment 12 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 23
Citation 23
Amendment 13 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 23
Citation 23
Amendment 14 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 24
Citation 24
Amendment 15 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 24
Citation 24
Amendment 16 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 28
Citation 28
Amendment 19 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas civil society organisations (CSOs) are non-profit making organisations independent of public institutions and commercial interests, which represent a wide range of worldviews and whose activities contribute to the realisation of EUa diverse set of values and fundamental rights; whereas human rights defenders, activists and informal groups are also key actors in civil society;
Amendment 31 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas freedom of expression has been restricted in some Member States; whereas strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) have also been used to target civil society organisations (CSOs) and human rights defenders; whereas these exert a severe chilling effect oncertain CSOs representing a radical left-wing and liberal ideology have gained significant influence in decision-making at the EU level; whereas these CSOs carry out their work claiming to be independent, but in reality, they serve the political interests of their funders; whereas this significant influence could be used by foreedom of expressionign powers to pursue interference goals;
Amendment 34 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Amendment 35 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
Amendment 40 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
Amendment 43 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas in some Member States, restrictions have been imposed with the deliberate aim of limiting civic space and are accompanied by legal, administrative and fiscal harassment, criminalisation and negative rhetoric aimed at stigmatising and delegitimising CSOs and draining their capacity to carry out their legitimate work; whereas hate speech, harassment and attacks also emanate from non-state actors; whereas CSOs working on women’s rights, including sexual and reproductive health and rights, environmental issues and the protection of minorities and LGBTI rights, as well as those providing assistance to asylum seekers and those involved in search and rescue operationgender equality, environmental issues and the freedom to criticise Islamic fundamentalism, as well as those fighting to prevent Europe from being overrun by migrants, are particularly exposed;
Amendment 53 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas certain Member States have placed restrictions on CSOs’ ability to engage in political activities; whereas in others, accusations that CSOs are political have become tools to stigmatise and delegitimise them; whereas CSOs report discriminatory and restrictive funding practices in certain Member Stateintroduced transparency requirements regarding the funding of CSOs;
Amendment 57 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas policies and practices instilling a chilling effect on civic space have been adopted in certain Member Stsome CSOs may have a significant influence on public life and public debates with the aim of achieving self- censorship and deterring civic actors from exercising their rightshich justify their funding being subject to strict transparency measures, especially if the funding comes from outside the Union;
Amendment 59 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
K a. whereas transparency is a legitimate requirement which is of outmost importance for all European Union institutions, including the European Commission and the European Parliament;
Amendment 65 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K b (new)
Recital K b (new)
K b. whereas the European Union also maintains a transparency register of organizations wishing to influence decision-makers;
Amendment 71 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
Amendment 74 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
Amendment 76 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
Amendment 91 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Asserts the crucial role played by CSOs in the realisation of EU values and fundamental rights, and the implementation of EU policies and strategiesEurope; stresses their key contribution to informed public debate, articulating aspirations present in society, giving a voice to vulnerable and marginalised people, to populations worried about the preservation of their identities, providing expertise in policy- making, promoting active citizenship and acting as schools of democracy and whistleblowers;
Amendment 92 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Asserts the crucial role played by CSOs in the realisation of EUa wide range of values and fundamental rights, and the implementation of EU policies and strategies; stresses their key contribution to informed public debate, articulating aspirations present in society, giving a voice to vulnerable and marginalised people, providing expertise in policy- making, promoting active citizenship and acting as schools of democracy;
Amendment 100 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that for civil society organisations to thrive, civic space must be an enabling and safe environment free from undue interference, intimidation, harassment and chilling effector all kinds of organisations, including organisations that represent traditional values;
Amendment 105 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Warns about the degradation of civic space throughout the EU with policies hampering CSOs’ operations, their access to sustainable funding and their ability to participate in decision- making; condemns any form of harassment, smearing, stigmatisation, criminalisation and scapegoating of CSOincreasing activity of biased radical left-wing CSOs which act as political activist organisations; underlines that these CSOs often have little connection to society and people, but serve as political pressure groups receiving funding from abroad and acting in the political interests of their funders;
Amendment 107 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Condemns far-left organisations using social media to decry advertisers whose adverts appear in the media in order to intimidate them into withdrawing financial support; takes the view that by doing so, these organisations seek to censor and as such undermine freedom of expression and media pluralism;
Amendment 110 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Notes with concern that these biased radical left-wing CSOs are in reality working to create an intolerant environment where only their own views are presented as acceptable, and label everyone else with different views as "extremists";
Amendment 111 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Condemns that CSOs representing traditional values are often squeezed out of the public discourse;
Amendment 113 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 117 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 123 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 134 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1
Subheading 1
An enabling regulatory and political environment free from chilling effects, threats and attackenvironment for all kinds of civil society organisations
Amendment 136 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that the ability of CSOs to act depends on the existence of an enabling legal and political environment, in particular on the exercise of freedom of association, peaceful assembly and expression; urges Member States to guarantee the exercise of these rights in conformity with international standards; highlights the need to ensure that civil society organisations operate in a transparent manner, with special regard to funding;
Amendment 142 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 149 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 165 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 182 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 188 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Subheading 2
Amendment 192 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 199 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Highlights that in case C-78/18 the CJEU confirmed that certain civil society organisations may have a significant influence on public life and public debate having regard to the aims which they pursue and the means at their disposal; expresses concern that this significant influence could be used by foreign powers to pursue interference and destabilization goals;
Amendment 203 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15 b. Underlines that the CJEU judgement in case C-78/18 also confirmed that the objective of transparency and, furthermore, traceability of movements of capital intended for organisations which participate in public life might be regarded as an overriding reason in the public interest;
Amendment 204 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15 c. Underlines that it is a legitimate expectation on the part of society that CSOs should operate in a transparent manner, including the source of their funding, especially those receiving foreign funding;
Amendment 205 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 d (new)
Paragraph 15 d (new)
Amendment 206 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
Amendment 212 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
Amendment 217 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. WelcomesStrongly disapproves of the adoption with an increased budget of the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values Programme; calls on the Commission to actively consult CSOs in the definition of work programmes and funding mechanisms so as to ensure transparency, flexibility and user- friendliness; welcomes re-granting mechanisms in the Union Values strandstop funding campaigns, as it did with the ‘Rights, Equality and Citizenship’ programme, that promote the hijab or other cultural practices that run counter to gender equality and the European identity;
Amendment 227 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
Amendment 234 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Urges the Commission to ensure that EU funds are onlynot awarded to organisations that are strictly independent from any government and fully adhere to EU valuesstaging the invasion of Europe; calls instead for it to support organisations working to prevent this from happening;
Amendment 236 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 241 #
2021/2103(INI)
19. CondemnWelcomes attempts by certain Member States to impose limitations on foreign funding andwith the related political narratives they have promulgated and measures they have taken with the aim of stigmatising CSOsaim of protecting CSOs from any outside interference;
Amendment 248 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
Amendment 253 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
Subheading 3
Civil dialogue and transparent participation in policy- making
Amendment 257 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses the importance of civil dialogue in informed policy-making and; emphasises that the privileged position of CSOs in contact with citizens, and their expertise, confers on them a key role in civil dialoguee need to ensure transparency when it comes to the involvement of CSOs in policy-making;
Amendment 263 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Regrets that civil dialogue often remains an ad hoc process; calls on the Member States to develop coherent policy frameworks that ensure structured, predictable and long-term processes, inclusIs gravely concerned that the European Commission outsources the work on the annual rule of law report to non-elected and ideologically motivated CSOs; highlights that this practice is antidemocratic as it gives participation and systematic review; calls on the Commission to provide recommendationsower to CSOs without any democratic legitimacy; underlines that this leads to unbalanced and biased on the analysis of existing practicereporting and the application of double standards, especially in relation to conservative right-wing governments;
Amendment 272 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Regrets that the European Commission in its annual rule of law report copies the unfounded allegations of politically motivated civil society organisations without any control or fact- checking;
Amendment 277 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. WelcomNotes the attribution to a Commission Vice-President of the responsibility to maintain an open, transparent and regular dialogue with civil society; stresses that civil dialogue should be further operationalisedunderlines that this shall involve dialogue with all kinds of CSOs representing a wide range of views and not only those representing radical left- wing and liberal views; stresses that civil dialogue should always be conducted in a transparent manner;
Amendment 280 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Commission to leverage the definition of national programmes implementing EU funds and the implementation by Member States of EU strategies and action plans to requiresupport Member States to put in place effective and transparent civil dialogue mechanisms;
Amendment 281 #
2021/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Commission to leverage the definition of national programmes implementing EU funds and the implementation by Member States of EU strategies and action plans to require Member States to put in place effective civil dialogue mechanismsstop using EU funds to blackmail Member States that it simply disagrees with ideologically and be open to dialogue;
Amendment 26 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the annual rule of law review cycle is a welcome addition to the tools available to preserve the Union’s values, by addressing the situation in all EU Member States based on four pillars, with a direct bearing on respect for the rule of law; whereas it is intended as a yearly cycle to ensure the rule of law and to prevent problems from emerging or deepeninghas been turned into a political tool and serves as a threat targeting Member States that may refuse to fall into line with the Commission's societal projects;
Amendment 33 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
Amendment 54 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the Commission’'s first annual Rule of Law Report awhich forms part of the wider European rule of law monitoring and enforcement architecture, as it adds an important, potentially preventive tool to the Union’s rule of law toolboxpolitical instrumentalisation of the concept of the rule of law, the intention of which is to standardise lifestyles within the EU by means of the law;
Amendment 71 #
2021/2025(INI)
3. Stresses the potential preventive benefits of the annual Rule of Law Report; considers that a more thorough evaluation is needed to assess whether the report has had a preventive effect; considers that in any event this is clearly not the case as regards the Member States under the Article 7(1) TEU procedure; believes that the 2020 report should have provided more in-depth assessments, stating whether there is a risk of or actual breach of the Union values; considers these assessments necessary to identify follow-up actions and remedial measures and toolsConsiders that the Article 7(1) TEU procedure is the only one that may lawfully be used to manage allegations of breach of the rule of law;
Amendment 111 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 119 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. DecriNotes the fact that the initiation of preliminary ruling proceedings before the Court of Justice of the EU has been declared unlawful in Member States subject to Article 7 of the TEU; is appalled bytakes into account the growing resistance of some Member States to comply with CJEU rulings on the legitimate grounds of sovereignty or unconstitutionality; believes that these developments pose a systemic threat to the Union; considers, therefore, that forthcoming annual reports should consider challenges to the Union’s legal architecture and principles as serious violaconstitute a protest against a change in direction by the Union which seeks to impose one single view of the rule of law and the EU model of society regardless of the legal, constitutional and cultural traditions inof the assessmentMember States;
Amendment 137 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the dedication of a specific chapter to anti-corruption efforts in each country report; points out that while the existence of national anticorruption strategies can be considered progress, their effectiveness on the ground must also be assessed; notes that an assessment of the resilience of the anti-corruption framework to tackle corruption-related risks in the area of public procurement remains largely absent from the 2020 report; invites the Commission to place greater emphasis on the misuse of EU funds, particularly in view of the new conditionality mechanism;
Amendment 167 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Is concerned by the worsening state of affairs as regards freedom of expression and the acceptance of a wide variety of opinions on certain social networks; considers that their monopoly position makes them essential to modern political life and that the arbitrary censorship of legally-held opinions has a serious impact on citizens' freedom of expression; urges the Commission to propose a penalty system for platforms exercising censorship without a court order;
Amendment 195 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 213 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
Amendment 232 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to strengthen the regular, inclusive and structured dialogue with governments and national parliaments, NGOs, professional associations and other stakeholders; notes that three Member States refused to make public their submissions for the 2020 report; calls for transparency in the process and for all submissions to be made public;
Amendment 240 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
Amendment 248 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 255 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
Amendment 268 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Strongly regrets the inability of the Council to make meaningful progress in enforcing Union values in ongoing Article 7 TEU procedures; notes that the Council’s hesitance to apply Article 7 of the TEU effectively is enabling continued divergence from the values provided for in Article 2 of the TEU; calls for a reflection at the Conference on the Future of Europe on a revision of the Article 7 TEU procedure in order to realign the majority requirements of paragraphs 1 and 2 with a view to having super-majorities of four or five for bothHighlights the fact that henceforth the Council is alone in being able to act in ongoing Article 7 TEU procedures;
Amendment 275 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
Amendment 283 #
2021/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
Amendment 300 #
2021/2025(INI)
28a. Reiterates that the people are sovereign in a democracy and that the issue of respect for the rule of law shall not be used to restrict the exercise of power nor to influence the policy stance of democratically elected governments of the Member States when the rule of law is not being seriously and systematically breached, which the Council alone is able to determine through the procedure laid down in Article 7 TEU;
Amendment 39 #
Amendment 40 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The Schengen area without border control at internal borders relies on the effective and efficient application by the Member States of the Schengen acquis. That acquis comprises measures in the area of external borders, compensatory measures for the absence of controls at internal borders and a strong monitoring framework, which together facilitate free movement andntrols at internal borders, which together ensures a high level of security, and justice and protection of fundamental rights, including the protection of personal data.
Amendment 42 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) In order to increase its effectiveness and efficiency, the Schengen evaluation and monitoring mechanism should be enhanced. The revised evaluation and monitoring mechanism should aim at maintaining a high level of mutual trust among Member States by guaranteeing that Member States apply the Schengen acquis effectively following the agreed common standards, fundamental principles and norms, thereby contributing to a well- functioning Schengen areaeffectively border controls.
Amendment 44 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The evaluation and monitoring mechanism should achieve these goals through objective and impartial evaluations that are able to quickly identify deficiencies in the application of the Schengen acquis that could disrupt the correct functioning of the Schengen area, ensure that these deficiencies are swiftly addressed, and provide the basis for a dialogue on the functioning of the Schengen area as a whole. This requires close cooperation between the Member States and the Commission, a balanced distribution of shared responsibilities and maintaining the peer review nature of the system. It also requires a closer involvement of the European Parliament. Given the extent of the changes, Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 should be repealed and replaced by a new Regulation.
Amendment 50 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Evaluation and monitoring activities should be targeted, taking into account the results of previous evaluations and the results of national quality control mechanisms. They should be supported by reinforced cooperation with Union bodies, offices and agencies, their systematic involvement in Schengen evaluations and by improved risk analyses and information sharing. This cooperation and involvement concerns in particular the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (‘Frontex’), the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems (eu-LISA), the Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol), the European Agency for Fundamental Rights and the European Data Protection Supervisor. The cooperation should also become more reciprocal and the agencies should not only be contributors, but also benefit from being involved in the evaluation and monitoring mechanism.
Amendment 53 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Amendment 59 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
Amendment 67 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Evaluation and monitoring activities should be carried out by teams consisting of Commission representatives and experts designated by Member States. These and Commission representatives and expert. These experts and representatives should have appropriate qualifications, including a solidven theoretical knowledge and practical experience. In order to ensure the participation of sufficient number of experienced experts in a faster and less burdensome way, a pool of experts should be established and maintained by the Commission in close cooperation with the Member States. The pool should be the primary source of experts for evaluation and monitoring activities.
Amendment 69 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) More flexibility should be provided as regards the size of the evaluation and monitoring teams in order to increase the efficiency and to reduce administrative burden. Therefore, the Commission should define and adapt the size of the teams depending on the needs and challenges related to each evaluation and monitoring activity. When setting up the teams, geographical balance and rotation should, to the extent possible, be ensured by the Commission and account should be taken of the capacity of national administrations and the need for a variety of profiles. The principle of shared responsibility, predictability and the commitment taken when nominating experts to the pool implies that the experts invited for specific evaluations and their national authorities should respond positively to invitations; turning the invitations down should be duly justified ononly be for serious professional or personal grounds only.
Amendment 73 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Evaluation reports should, as a rule, contain recommendations on how to remedy deficiencies identified (including fundamental rights violations) and be adopted in a single act by the Commission by means of implementing acts through the examination procedure in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/201136 . The consolidation of the report and recommendations within a single document and subject to a single adoption procedure reinforces the intrinsic connection between the evaluation findings and recommendations. In addition, tare adopted by the Commission and recommendations by the Council. The accelerated publication of the recommendations should enable Member States to address the deficiencies faster and more efficiently. At the same time, the use of the examination procedure should ensure Member State’s engagement in the decision-making process leading to the adoption of the recommendations. _________________ 36 OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13.
Amendment 75 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) Nevertheless, gGiven the crucial role of the Council in exerting peer-pressure and the need for political discussion, the Council should adopt recommendations in cases of political importance and general interest for the functioning of the Schengen area. Such cases should be considered to arise where an evaluation concludes that there exists a serious deficiency, in cases of thematic evaluations, or in cases where an evaluation take places for the purposes of verifying whether a Member State bound by the Schengen acquis and for which internal border controls have not been lifted fulfils the conditions to apply the Schengen acquis in full or, in the case of a Member State not bound by the Schengen acquis and that has opted in to apply parts of the Schengen acquis, to verify whether the Member State fulfils the conditions to apply the Schengen acquis in partcontinue to be able to adopt recommendations in all cases.
Amendment 81 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) The evaluation and monitoring mechanism should comprise a robust follow-up and monitoring component which should be ensured by the Commission, in close cooperation with the Council and the European Parliament, without creating a disproportionate burden for the actors involved. Evaluations should be followed up by action plans. While drawing up the action plans, the evaluated Member States should fully take into consideration the funding possibilities provided by the Union and make the best use of these resources. To speed up the process, the Commission should provide observations on the adequacy of the action plans for example in the form of a letter. In order to ensure a timely follow up, if the Commission services do not consider the action plan adequate, the Member State concerned should be required to submit a revised action plan within one month from the receipt of the observations. The frequency of the follow- up reporting by the Member State to the Commission and the Council on the implementation of the action plans should, as a rule, be six months.
Amendment 86 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) It is essential and desirable that the European Parliament and the Council regularly hold discussions at political level in order to raise awareness of the importance of the implementation of the Schengen acquis, hold Member States who persistently breach the common rules accountable, and increase pressure on them to remedy the deficiencies identified. The Commission should provide adequate input to facilitate these discussions including through the adoption of a comprehensive annual report covering the evaluations carried out during the previous year and state of implementation of recommendations, which would be part of the ‘State of Schengen’ report. The European Parliament is encouraged to adopt resolutions and the Council should adopt conclusions to increase pressure on Member States making insufficient progress. The ‘Schengen Forum’, as a unique stage to discuss Schengen at high level with representatives of the European Parliament, Member States and the Commission should provide a platform for informal discussions aiming at better implementation of the Schengen acquied, inter alia, at ensuring the existence and effectiveness of internal border controls.
Amendment 88 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) The evaluation and monitoring mechanism established by this Regulation should fulfil a complementary function of monitoring the effectiveness of the practical implementation of Union policies through peer review. The general power of the Commission to oversee the application of Union law under the control of the Court of Justice of the European Union through infringement procedures should not be affectedon internal border controls.
Amendment 91 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) In view of the particular role entrusted to the European Parliament and to the national parliaments under the last sentence of Article 70 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), as underlined in Article 12, point (c), of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) as regards the national parliaments, the Council and the Commission should fully inform the European Parliament and the national Parliaments of the content and results of the evaluations. In addition, should the Commission submit a proposal to amend this Regulation, the Council would, in accordance with Article 19(7), point (h), of its Rules of Procedure39 , consult the European Parliament in order to take into consideration its opinion, to the fullest extent possible, before adopting a final text. _________________ 39 Council Decision 2009/937/EU of 1 December 2009 adopting the Council's Rules of Procedure (OJ L 325 11.12.2009, p. 35).
Amendment 93 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
Recital 31
Amendment 94 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
Amendment 96 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes an evaluation and monitoring mechanism for the purpose of ensuring that Member States apply the Schengen acquis effectively, thereby contributing to a well-functioning area withouteffectively internal border controls.
Amendment 99 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) verifying the application of the Schengen acquis, i.e. the existence and effectiveness of border controls, in the Member States to which it applies in full as well as in Member States to which, in accordance with the relevant Protocols annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, the Schengen acquis applies in part;
Amendment 103 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) ‘first time evaluation’ means an evaluation to verify whether a Member State bound by the Schengen acquis and for which internal border controls have not been lifted fulfils the conditions to apply the Schengen acquis in full or, in the case of a Member State not bound by the Schengen acquis and that has opted in to apply parts of the Schengen acquis, to verify whether the Member State fulfils the conditions to apply the Schengen acquis in part;
Amendment 118 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be responsible for the establishment of the annual and multiannual evaluation programmes, the drafting of questionnaires, the setting of schedules of visits, the conducting of visits and the drafting of evaluation reports and recommendations. It shall also ensure the follow-up and monitoring activities.
Amendment 123 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. The Commission shall be responsible for making the necessary travel arrangements to and from the visited Member State for the Commission representatives and Member State experts in the teams and, in collaboration with the latter, the necessary on-site visits.
Amendment 126 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 137 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) when it has grounds to consider that a Member State is seriously neglecting its obligations under the Schengen acquis including allegations of serious fundamental rights violations at the external borders.
Amendment 144 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission shall cooperate with relevant Union bodies, offices and agencies which are involved in the implementation of the Schengen acquis as well as with the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.
Amendment 159 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall use the results of relevant mechanisms and instruments, including evaluation and monitoring activities of Union bodies, offices and agencies which are involved in the implementation of the Schengen acquis and of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights as well as of independent national monitoring mechanisms and bodies and others well as national quality control mechanisms in preparing the evaluation and monitoring activities, to improve awareness on the functioning of the Schengen area and to avoid the duplication of efforts and conflicting measures.
Amendment 164 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Amendment 168 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
In the programming and implementation of the evaluations and monitoring activities, the Commission shallcan take into account information provided by third parties, including independent authorities, non- governmental organisations and international organisations.
Amendment 188 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. The Member State experts participating in evaluation and monitoring activities shall have appropriate qualifications, including a solid theoretical knowledge and practical experience in the areas covered by the evaluation and monitoring mechanism, along with sound knowledge of evaluation principles, procedures and techniques, and shall be able to communicate effectively in a common language.
Amendment 208 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
It may include visits to and meetings with national authorities and bodies, non- governmental and international organisations as well as other entities, agencies and bodies involved in, participating in or concerned by the implementation of the Schengen acquis while cooperating with the Member State subject to the evaluation or monitoring activity.
Amendment 215 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 19 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Unannounced visits shall take place without prior notification to the Member State concerned. By way of exception, tThe Commission may notify the Member State concerned at least 24 hours before such visit is to take place when the main purpose of the unannounced visit is a random verificationcheck ofn the implementation of the Schengen acquieffectiveness of internal border controls.
Amendment 227 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 5
Article 21 – paragraph 5
5. The evaluation report shall contain recommendations for remedial actions aimed at addressing the deficiencies and areas for improvement identified during the evaluation and give an indication of the priorities for implementing them. The evaluation report may set deadlines for the implementation ofIt is for the Council to adopt these recommendations. Where the evaluation identifies a serious deficiency, the specific provisions set out in Article 23 shall apply.
Amendment 230 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 6
Article 21 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall transmit the draft evaluation report to the evaluated Member State within four weeks of the end of the evaluation activity. The evaluated Member State shall provide its comments on the draft evaluation report within twofour weeks of its receipt. A drafting meeting shall be held at the request of the evaluated Member State, no later than five working days from the receipt of the comments from the evaluated Member State. The comments of the evaluated Member State may be reflected in the draft evaluation report.
Amendment 234 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. Within two months of the adoption of the evaluation report, the evaluated Member State shall submit to the Commission and the Council an action plan to implement all thethe Council's recommendations included in the evaluation report.
Amendment 238 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 22 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The evaluated Member State shall reportpresents to the Commissionuncil and the Councilmmission on the implementation of its action plan every six months from the adoption of the evaluation report until the Commission considers the action plan is fully implemented. Depending on the nature of the deficiencies and the state of implementation of the recommendations, the Commission may require the evaluated Member State a different reporting frequency.
Amendment 239 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 243 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The evaluated Member State shall take immediate remedial actions including, where necessary, mobilising all available operational and financial means. The evaluated Member State shall inform without delay the Commission and the Member States about the immediate remedial actions taken or planned. In parallel, the Commission shall inform the respective Union bodies, offices and agencies referred to in Article 7 of the serious deficiency in view of their possible support to the evaluated Member State. The Commission shall also inform the Council and the European Parliamentto re-establish effective internal border controls.
Amendment 246 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The evaluated Member State shall provide its comments on the draft evaluation report within fivefteen working days of its receipt.
Amendment 267 #
2021/0140(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 10
Article 23 – paragraph 10
10. If the serious deficiency is deemed to constitute a serious threat to public policy or internal security within the area without internal border controls, or a serious and systematic fundamental rights violation, the Commission, on its own initiative or at the request of the European Parliament or of a Member State, shall immediately inform thereof the European Parliament and the Council.
Amendment 16 #
2020/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to carefully review the policies they enacted during the COVID-19 crisis and to define new mechanisms and protocols for any future emergency spending in order to increase the level of transparency of public spending;
Amendment 29 #
2020/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the criticalNotes the role of civil society organisations in fighting corruption; emphasises that the success of any emergency response greatly depends on the active participation of all actors in societyaccuracy of transparency processes; believes that the current COVID- 19 crisis has highlighted the importance of maintaining a robust system of citizen participation in public decision-making;
Amendment 39 #
2020/2222(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to follow the recommendations of the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) and welcomes the possibility of the EU joining GRECO as a full member.
Amendment 3 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses that organised crime is involved in increasingly sophisticated fraudulent activities, such as cybercrime, which deprive the legal economy of considerable resources, particularly at difficult times like the present; points out that cybercrime costs the EU Member States EUR 265 billion per year1a and has a devastating impact on each EU Member State. _________________ 1a https://www.thehaguesecuritydelta.com/pa rtners/partner/137-europol
Amendment 7 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Points out that there are at least 20 million cases of petty corruption in the Union public sector and that, clearly, this spills over into the Member State public authorities responsible for managing EU funds and other financial interests;
Amendment 8 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that organised criminal groups take advantage of the different laws in individual Member States, and that the development of a harmonised anti-fraud approach at EU level is complicated by differing definitions of organised crime; reiterates therefore its previous calls for the revision of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008, and the need to establish a common definition of organised crime, which should also take into account the use of violence, corruption or intimidation by criminal groups to obtain control of economic activities or public procurement, or to influence democratic processese importance of cooperation among the different judicial systems in the Member States in making the fight against organised crime more effective;
Amendment 17 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 29 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that fraud prevention and the fight against fraud by organised crime should be a priority focus of managing, certifying and audit authorities, as well as being the subject of specialised financial investigations; believes that the fight against organised criminal groups also requires enhanced rules and measures regarding the freezing and confiscation of assets; calls on the Member States to build upon their administrative, judicial and police cooperation in order to trace criminal assets across the EU, so they can be seized and confiscated;
Amendment 9 #
2020/2196(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10
Citation 10
Amendment 32 #
2020/2196(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. ConsiderNotes that in the very concept of Schengen cooperation, that of ensuring the absence of controls at internal borders, has been further challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic, which has been added to the grounds invoked since 2015 for the persistent retention of internal border controls by some Member States; reiterates its condemnation of the maintenance of internal border checks and its view that many of the prolongations are not in line with the rules pertaining to their extension, necessity or proportionality, and arebeginning of the pandemic, rather than recommending the reintroduction of internal border checks by Member States, the Commission has deplored such measures of, and sought to delay restrictions at the external borders of the Schengen area until there were already thousands of confirmed cases on EU therefore unlawfulritory;
Amendment 40 #
2020/2196(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that at the beginning of 2020, just before the pandemic emergency, illegal immigration flows were increasing considerably compared to the same period last year, thereby significantly increasing the health risk within the EU; whereas despite the commonly agreed decision to completely close the external borders of the Schengen area, some Member States have scaled back their efforts to tackle illegal immigration, even carrying out mass regularisations; According to Europol, a ‘loosening of travel and movement restrictions is likely to result in an increasing movement of irregular migrants’, thereby putting the management of the EU’s external borders under pressure;
Amendment 49 #
2020/2196(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Deplores the fact that internal border controlRecalls that Member States are continuing to be introduced by some Member States as a unilateral response to new challenges, before they have given proper consideration to the common European interest in maintaining Schengen as an area without internal border controls; reiterates its call on the Commission to exercise appropriate scrutiny over the application of the Schengen acquis, including through the use of infringement procedures, and underlines the urgent need to enhance mutual trust and cooperation among the Schengen states and appropriate governance for the Schengen areatain sovereignty over border management; recognises, at the same time, that urgent measures are needed to resume national, European and international travel in order to revive the tourism industry;
Amendment 72 #
2020/2196(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 89 #
2020/2196(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Deeply regrets the fact that there have been persistent and serious reports about violence and pushbacks at the external border, as well as the lack of adequate monitoring mechanisms to ensure respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law at the external borders; considers that the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) must be given an enhanced operational role with regard to the monitoring of respect for fundamental rights at the external borderReiterates that an efficient external border management system is closely linked to strict external border control and swift return procedures for illegal third country nationals; Stresses the need for external borders to be managed rigorously as any weaknesses may result in the loss of control over basic public safety management, including health threats;
Amendment 149 #
2020/2196(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that the Commission and the Council have seriously neglected their obligations following the detection of serious deficiencies in the UK’s use of the Schengen Information System during the 2017 evaluation; reminds all actors of its request to immediately disconnectUK, like any non-Schengen country, had no direct access to the Schengen Information System, but limited access; it lost this latter with Brexit, creating risks for all parties because the UK, as expressed in the letters to the Commission and to the Council Presidency of 15 June 2020; recalls its position that ‘as a thirdlso provided a lot of relevant information to its partners; it is therefore in the interest of all parties to country, the UK cannot have access to SIS’inue to cooperate;
Amendment 10 #
2020/2172(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that a number of projects had to be deprioritised in the revised Annual Work Programme for 2019 due to budgetary constraints and that due to the Commission’s request to reduce the staffing levels for Contract Agents (CAs) Europol deferred the recruitment of all CA vacancies in 2019, emphasises that while these reductions should satisfy the principle of financial prudence in spending taxpayer's money, they should not hamper Europol's operations aimed at ensuring the safety of Union citizens;
Amendment 19 #
2020/2172(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Regrets to note again the Court’s finding that there were weaknesses in contract management and ex ante controls linked that the Europol irregularly prolonged the duration of a framework contract for the provision of business travel services by signing an amendment after the contract had expired; notes that this resulted in irregular payment of EUR 32 531 in 2019., emphasises that such irregularities should not happen in the future;
Amendment 3 #
2020/2158(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Deplores the fact that Eurojust was faced with a decrease in its budget from EUR 47 to 44 million (-6.38%) and a slight increase in staff from 238 to 239 (+0.4%) despite a 17% increase in workload compared to 2018; reminds that the workload is expected to increase further due to the new mandate which entered into force in 20191 ; further recalls that the number of coordination centres held in 2019 increased from 17 to 20 (+19%), demonstrating the popularity and utility of this operational tool; stresses the essential role that Eurojust plays in the Union security chain andin fighting serious organised cross-border crime and, therefore, maintains that its budget should match its tasks and priorities in order to enable it to fulfil its mandate; _________________ 1Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust), and replacing and repealing Council Decision 2002/187/JHA https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018 R1727
Amendment 7 #
2020/2152(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the fact that the Court of Auditors (‘the Court’) has declared the transactions underlying the annual accounts of the Agency for the financial year 2019 to be legal and regular in all material respects and that its financial position on 31 December 2019 is fairly presented; deploreaccepts the fact that the budget of the Agency of EUR 30 million decreased in 2019 to EUR 29 million and notes the slight staff increase from 110 to 114 in 2019;
Amendment 4 #
2020/2129(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that globalisation has created interdependencies between societies, where any product results from complex transnational supply and value chains and where decisions taken by European firms impact on peoples’ ability to enjoy human rights and fundamental freedoms worldwide; deplores the fact that globalisation has led to an increasing dependence of European economies, illustrated in particular, in light of the Covid-19 crisis, with regard to China, on medical and pharmaceutical products;
Amendment 35 #
2020/2129(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) highlight the duty of states to protect against human rights abuses within their territories, jurisdictions, or both, by third parties, including businesses; further emphasises that, independently of the ability and willingness of states to fulfil their human rights obligations, businesses have the responsibility to respect human rights wherever they operate and to address adverse human rights impacts with which they are connected, including by enabling providing remedies to victims; notes, however, that in this area companies cannot take the place of the sovereign and regulatory powers of the Member States;
Amendment 59 #
2020/2129(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Deplores the fact that the economic model prioritises employees’ productivity over their mental and physical health; notes, for example, the number of premature births linked to the work of the mothers concerned;
Amendment 65 #
2020/2129(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Urges the Commission to propose UnionCalls for European companies to exercise mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence legislation imposing legal obligations on Union companies and companies domiciled or operating in the Union in; calls on companies from EU Member States, in their recruitment, investment and supply policies, to put in place measures to encourage, in the first place, the use of maternial market and establishing effective monitoring, enforcement and remedy mechanismand human resources in their respective countries, and secondly those from EU Member States;
Amendment 78 #
2020/2129(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 95 #
2020/2129(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Recommends that Union mandatCalls fory due diligence legislation be adopted to require companies to identify and address their impacts with reference to all internationally recognised human rights including, as a minimum, those encompassed by the UDHR, all nine core international human rights treaties, the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and all fundamental ILO conventions, as well as the ECHR and ICESCR, which are binding on Council of Europe member states and also bind Member States as a result of Union law and the common constitutional traditions of the Member States; calls for due diligence with regard to embryo research; calls, in particular, for the creation of chimeric embryos to be firmly and definitively condemned;
Amendment 135 #
2020/2129(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Is of the view that businesses have a responsibility to ensure that their activities do not undermine or harm the protection of human and environmental rights; insists they must not promote, participate or in any manner contribute to, or endorse policies and activities, which can lead to human rights violations; underlines that businesses must do everything possible, within their capacities, to prevent and mitigate the effect of adverse impacts; deplores, in this connection, the fact that companies promote surrogacy even though the practice is prohibited in the majority of European countries;
Amendment 144 #
2020/2129(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Stresses that human rights impacts can be specific to certain rights holders and vulnerable groups due to intersecting factors such as gender, ethnicity, social and employment status, migrant or refugee status, exposure to conflict or violence or other factors; this must be reflected in the due diligence processes, including the human rights impact assessment phase and remedy procedures; stresses that, in accordance with the rights of persons, more specific and enhanced protection should be extended to certain categories of more vulnerable people, such as people with disabilities, the elderly and children;
Amendment 158 #
2020/2129(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Recalls that one of the first human rights is freedom of conscience; recalls that the right to conscientious objection must be protected, particularly in the area of health, and that no one may force an employee to act against his or her conscience;
Amendment 188 #
2020/2129(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. In this context, underlines the importance of the freedom of association and right to collective bargaining, as well as free, prior and informed consent by indigenous communities, while respecting the political and legal sovereignty of the states concerned;
Amendment 211 #
2020/2129(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 44
Paragraph 44
44. InsistStresses that, access to evidence and time limitations can be major pracs with any essentical and procedural barriers faced by victims of human rights abuses in third countries, obstructing their access to effective legal remedies; stresses that that the burden of proof should be shifted from the victims to the company and that the legislation must require companies to disclose all necessary information for interested parties to engage in judicial proceedings and for victims to access remediesrule of criminal procedure, the burden of proof must lie with the applicant, not the defendant;
Amendment 8 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10
Citation 10
Amendment 13 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11
Citation 11
Amendment 14 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 12
Citation 12
Amendment 15 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 13
Citation 13
Amendment 16 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14
Citation 14
Amendment 17 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15
Citation 15
Amendment 18 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16
Citation 16
Amendment 19 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17
Citation 17
Amendment 20 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 18
Citation 18
Amendment 21 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 19
Citation 19
Amendment 22 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 20
Citation 20
Amendment 23 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21
Citation 21
Amendment 25 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 22
Citation 22
Amendment 27 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 23
Citation 23
Amendment 30 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 24
Citation 24
Amendment 34 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 25
Citation 25
Amendment 35 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 26
Citation 26
Amendment 39 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 27
Citation 27
Amendment 40 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 28
Citation 28
Amendment 41 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 29
Citation 29
Amendment 47 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 30
Citation 30
Amendment 48 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 31
Citation 31
Amendment 49 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 34
Citation 34
Amendment 55 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities, as set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU); whereas those values are values which are common to the Member States and to which all Member States have freely subscribed;
Amendment 64 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
Amendment 81 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas breaches of the values referred to in Article 2 TEU may weaken the cohesion of the EuropeaUnion project, the rights of all Union citizens and mutual trust among the Member States;
Amendment 85 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the Commission is preparing to publish an annual rule of law report, to be followed by a Strategy for the Implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and a European Democracy Action Plahas shown a tendency to instrumentalise the principle of the rule of law in an obviously politically driven fashion;
Amendment 90 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas a regulation on the protection of the Union’s budget in case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law in the Member States, once adopted, would become an indispensable tool in saf would raise serious concerns about the political use of such tools towards Member States which are not aligned with the Commission's political vision, particularly reguarding the rule of law within the Unionmigration strategies;
Amendment 94 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas any monitoring mechanism must closely involve stakeholders active in the protection and promotion of democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, including civil society, Council of Europe and United Nations bodies, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, national human rights institutions, national parliaments and local authorities;
Amendment 103 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas many so-called civil society organisations allegedly dedicated to the protection and promotion of democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights are actually ultimately pursuing political goals and therefore should not be considered as legitimate and independent stakeholders and should not be eligible for Union funds; whereas the activities of those organisations can often be described as foreign political interference;
Amendment 107 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas Parliament, the Commission and the Council share political responsibility for upholding Union values, within the limits of the powers conferred on them by the Treaties; whereas an interinstitutional agreement based on Article 295 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) would ensure the necessary arrangements to facilitate the cooperation of the three institutions in that regard; whereas, pursuant to Article 295 TFEU, any of the three institutions may propose such an agreement;
Amendment 112 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. emphasises the urgent need for the Union to develop a robust and positive agenda for protecting and reinforcingrecalls that democracy, and the rule of law and fundamental rights for all its citizens; insists that the Union must remain a champion of freedom and justice in Europe and the worldre core components of the European civilization; stresses that these concepts are protean and can have different yet legitimate acceptations;
Amendment 119 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. regrets the growing and concerning use of the procedure provided for in Article 7 TEU for political and ideological purposes;
Amendment 122 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. warns that the Union isMember States are facing an unprecedented and escalating crisis of its founding values,migration crisis which threatens itsthe long- term survival as a democratic peace project; is gravely concerned by the rise and entrenchment of autocratic and illiberal tendencies, further compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic and economic recession, as well as corruption and state capture, in several Member States; underlines the dangers of this trend for the cohesion of the Union’s legal order, the functioning of its single market, the effectiveness of its common policies and its international credibilityof their identities, traditions and common civilization;
Amendment 141 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. recognises that the Union remains structurally ill-equipped to tackle democratic and rule of law backsliding in the Member States; regrets the inability of the Council to make meaningful progress in enforcing Union values in ongoing Article 7 TEU procedures; notes with concern the disjointed nature of the Union’s toolkit in that fieldalready interferes with national policies on the alleged ground of democratic and rule of law backsliding in the Member States; believes that the Council is adequately enforcing Union values in ongoing Article 7 TEU procedures and insists that open procedures should be concluded shortly;
Amendment 151 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. welcomestakes note of the Commission’s work on the Annual Rule of Law Report; notes, however, that it fails to encompass the areas of democracy and fundamental rights; reiterates the need for a comprehensive monitoring mechanism enshrined in a legal act binding Parliament, the Council and the Commission to a transparent and regularised process, with clearly defined responsibilities, so that the protection and promotion of Union values becomes a permanent and visible part of the Union agendareiterates that a monitoring mechanism enshrined in a legal act binding Parliament, the Council and the Commission would be disproportionate and undemocratic as rule of law cannot be evaluated with quantitative indicators;
Amendment 156 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. proposesrejects the proposal for the establishment of an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights (the ‘Mechanism’), building on Parliament’s 2016 proposal and the Commission’s 2020 Rule of Law Report, to be governed by an interinstitutional agreement between Parliament, the Council and the Commission, consisting of an Annual Monitoring Cycle on Union values, covering all aspects of Article 2 TEU, and applying equally, objectively and fairly to all Member States;
Amendment 160 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 175 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 185 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 197 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. reaffirms the limited role of Parliament, in accordance with Article 7 TEU, in monitoring compliance with Union values; reiterates the call for Parliament to be present in Article 7 hearings when it is Parliament that initiated the procedure; believes that the Mechanism, underpinned by an interinstitutional agreement, will provide the necessary framework for better coordination;
Amendment 203 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 211 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 219 #
2020/2072(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. invites the Commission and the Council to enter without delay intodecline any request for negotiations with Parliament on an interinstitutional agreement in accordance with Article 295 TFEU; considers the proposal set out in the Annex hereto to constitute an appropriate basis for such negotiations;
Amendment 220 #
Amendment 2 #
2020/2042(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas climate change and consequential natural disasters have become common drivers of migration, which will be further exacerbated as the climate crisis worsenthere is recent scientific proof that natural disasters are not being exacerbated by climate change; whereas all the predictions about ‘climate refugees’ have so far been disproven by the facts, as have very many others about the effects of climate change, due to the use of unreliable models and unlikely scenarios;
Amendment 24 #
2020/2042(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas climate-induced migration is strongly related to other factors, including poverty, since when a country lacks the appropriate resources toin non-industrialised societies, environmental factors, as well as the lack of economic resources and appropriate infrastructure for adapting to climate change, this can aggravate poverty and force people to move; whereas climatemay still be a reason for emigration which, inter alia, change is an important risk multiplier for conflict, drought, famine and migration aggravate the risk of conflicts with neighbouring populations on account of resource grabbing;
Amendment 41 #
2020/2042(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that climate migration does not requires a specific normative framework to bridge existingfor humanitarian protection, gaps, via various and complementary methods; highlights the definition of climate migration offered by the IOMiven that such kind of migration is fully covered by the criteria of economic migration;
Amendment 54 #
2020/2042(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Deplores the fact that, while climate migration is a reality that is set to intensify, people who move for long-term, climate change-related reasons have no effective access to protection in the EU; calls on the Member States and the Commission to put in place protection pathways, which include promoting humanitarian visas, temporary protection, authorisation to stay, and regional and bilateral free movement agreements; proposes that a climate passport be issued to persons coming from a country, or part of it, that will become uninhabitable due to climate change as a way to offer them protection from vulnerability and statelessness; proposes that any change in the environment due to climate change be explicitly listed among eligibility criteria for humanitarian protection; calls on the Commission and Member States to put forward such proposals in international forums, in parallel to other EU initiativesReiterates that under international law, emigration on economic grounds does not, by itself, grant the right to humanitarian protection or asylum in a third country; stresses, furthermore, that because ‘climate migration’ as a concept is extremely vague, it is a source for abuse of the humanitarian protection offered by developed countries; reminds the Member States and the Commission that ever vaguer eligibility criteria for humanitarian protection will create ever more incentives for immigration-related illegal commerce, starting with human trafficking;
Amendment 69 #
2020/2042(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 80 #
2020/2042(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. HighlightNotes that the Global Compact on Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration identifiessuggests that climate change as a driver of migration and urges countries to introduce channels and to plan for people who move due to natural disasters and climate changecould be one of the drivers of migration;
Amendment 86 #
2020/2042(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to enhance and betterMember States to coordinate less restrictive legal channels for third-country workers and their families, which would include mobility schemes and preferential access for workers coming from a country, or part of it, affected by climate change;
Amendment 106 #
2020/2042(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 117 #
2020/2042(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that, as part of the reform of the Union’s Migration and Asylum Policy, a comprehensive framework should be establishedthere is no need to establish a specific regulatory framework, which includes climate change -induced migration and displacement as core part of this process.;
Amendment 22 #
2020/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the issue of migration must be prioritised, particularly in view of the latest figures published by FRONTEX2a which show a very slight drop in numbers of arrivals despite this being during a serious health crisis, leading logically to an expectation that migration flows will increase or even explode in the future; reiterates that in a context in which more than half of all asylum applications in the EU are rejected in a final court decision3; takes the view, therefore, that we must, we must therefore focus on making returns more effective by signing readmission agreements and issuing consular laissez- passers; _________________ 2ahttps://frontex.europa.eu/media- centre/news-release/situation-at-eu- external-borders-in-may-detections- rebound-from-record-lows-M5smNj 3 Source: EUROSTAT
Amendment 36 #
2020/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Amendment 46 #
2020/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls on the EU and the Member States to take account of these demographic facts in policies in order to prepare for the unavoidable future migration crisis;
Amendment 73 #
2020/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for the idea of mandatory solidarity in receiving and allocating migrants among Member States, due to figure in the next pact on migration and asylum, to be dropped and for the ban on the principle of mass regularisation by Member States to be included therein;
Amendment 79 #
2020/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Calls on the EU and the Member States to make aid granted to African countries conditional upon agreements on the effective readmission of all illegal immigrants present in the EU who are eligible for return;
Amendment 83 #
2020/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the security, European identity and interests of the European continent and its citizens to be taken into account.
Amendment 86 #
2020/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for cooperation between the EU, the Member States and the African States to be developed even more and for a massive increase in resources for controlling the external and internal borders to stop the movement of populations towards Europe;
Amendment 119 #
2020/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that the EU is among the first to bear the costs of all destructive policies employed against African nationsdevelopment aid to Africa whose long-term impact has been limited and even damaging, while other players, especially such as China and Russia, are focused onprimarily on their own benefits at the expense of African sovereignty and European securityinterests; urges the European Union and its Member States to change strategy and copy them;
Amendment 146 #
2020/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Shares the opinion that the matter of the security of Africa should eventually be transferred into the hands of Africans and that the EU should assist its African partners in the successful accomplishment of this ultimate goal.; notes that in order to achieve this goal a transitional phase is needed requiring increased investment by the African States themselves and greater support for states such as France that make a substantial contribution to African security and hence to the security of the EU and its Member States;
Amendment 3 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
Amendment 12 #
2020/2023(INI)
Amendment 23 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the EU and its Member States should maintainbe able to defend their funity throughout the negotiations in order to defend the interests of their citizens in the best possible waydamental interests during the negotiations on an agreement with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
Amendment 24 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas France, first and foremost, which has been hit particularly hard by the consequences of the right-of- asylum legislation in force in Great Britain, must be able to defend its interests on the basis, if necessary, of a specific and separate agreement with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
Amendment 25 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
Amendment 37 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomesTakes note of the fact that there is a high level of convergence between the negotiating objectives expressed in its resolution of 12 February 2020 and the negotiating directives adopted by the Council on 25 February 2020; emphasiseregrets that the Commission has Parliament’s full support in negotiating with the UK in accordance with the established directives, as all three institutions broadly share the objectives that these negotiations should achievean exclusive negotiating mandate and calls for it to be exercised directly by the Council;
Amendment 61 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point ii
Paragraph 4 – point ii
(ii) protection of the full integrity and proper functioning of the single market and customs union, the indivisibility of the four freedoms; in particular, the degree of cooperation in the economic pillar should be commensurate with the freedom of movement of people;
Amendment 65 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point iv
Paragraph 4 – point iv
Amendment 68 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point v
Paragraph 4 – point v
(v) continued adherence to democratic principles, human rights and fundamental freedoms, as defined in particular in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ECHR and its protocols, the European Social Charter, and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and other international human rights treaties of the UN and the Council of Europe, and respect for the principle of the rule of law;
Amendment 99 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises the importance of being ready for the UK’s withdrawal from the internal market and the customs union at the end of the transition period on 31 December 2020, regardless of the outcome of the negotiations; stresses that the consequences will be even more significant should no agreement be reached; welcomnotes, in this regard, the Commission’s sector- specific ‘readiness notices’, which seek to ensure that EU industry is ready for the inevitablepotential shock that the UK’s withdrawal from the single market willmight cause;
Amendment 155 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines the fact that the UK must implement all pre-existing EU restrictive measures and sanctions and any decided during the transition period, must support EU statements and positions in third countries and international organisations, and participate on a case- by-case basis in EU militaMember States must be able to conclude bilateral agreements on defence and on defence industry cooperations and civilian missions established under the CSDP, yet without any leading capacity within a new Framework Participation Agreement, while respecting the EU’s decision-making autonomy and the relevant EU decisions and legislation, including on procurement and transfers in the field of defence; asserts that such cooperation is cond directly and exclusively with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, regardless of respective membership of alliance systems or politioncal on full compliance with intand diplomatic coopernational human rights law and international humanitarian law and EU fundamental right institutions;
Amendment 159 #
2020/2023(INI)
12. Takes note that the UK has chosen to establish its future economic and trade partnership with the EU on the basis of a ‘Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement’ as laid down in the UK’s Approach to Negotiations; emphasises that, while the European Parliament is supportive of the EU constructively negotiating a balanced, ambitious and comprehensive FTA with the UK, by its nature an FTA will never be equivalent to ‘frictionless’ trade; shares the Commission’s negotiating position whereby the scope and ambition of an FTA that the EU would agree to is conditional on the UK agreeing to provisions related to the level playing field, given the geographical proximity and integration of markets, as well as on the conclusion of an agreement on fisheries;
Amendment 170 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Points out that, at all events, there must be agreement as soon as possible on fishery provisions so that they are introduced right from the first post- transition period year;
Amendment 207 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 – point vii
Paragraph 13 – point vii
(vii) there should be opportunities for access to public procurement markets beyond WTO Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) commitments, guaranteeing market access for EU companies in strategic sectors at all levels of government and a degree of openness equal to the EU’s public procurement markets; regrets the fact, in this regard, that the UK’s initial negotiating position does not cover public procurementstates must be able to favour domestic or EU enterprises as regards government procurement access;
Amendment 220 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 – point xi
Paragraph 13 – point xi
(xi) in order to safeguard financial and regulatory stability and to ensure the full respect of the EU regulatory regime and standards and their application, prudential carve-out and limitations in the cross- border provisions of financial services are a customary feature of EU trade agreements and, should be included in this one and should be expandable where a Member State so requests;
Amendment 221 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 – point xii
Paragraph 13 – point xii
(xii) ambitious provisions allowing for the development of digital trade, and to address unjustified barriers to trade by electronic means, and ensure an open, secure and trustworthy online environment for businesses and consumers, and regulating cross-border data flows, including principles such as fair competition and ambitious rules for cross- border data transfers, in full compliance with, and without prejudice to, the EU’s current and future data protection and privacy rules; calls on the Commission to state what its position is on the numerous sites located in Gibraltar, to do with on- line gambling in particular, which pose a serious threat to the gambling and betting sector in the EU Member States and, as far as many of them are concerned, fail to provide basic security guarantees;
Amendment 231 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 – point xiii
Paragraph 13 – point xiii
(xiii) as the FTA would lead to customs checks and verification as soon as goods start entering into the single market, affecting global supply chains and manufacturing processes, customs authorities should be strengthened both with regard to personnel and technical equipment, in order to cope with their additional tasks; accordingly, Member States must be able to freely carry out the necessary checks; the operational procedures of the FTA must be aimed at preserving the rules of the Union’s single market for goods and integrity of the customs union, inter alia by establishing a timely and efficient working arrangement between the EU and the UK in this area; it is of utmost importance to safeguard the compliance of the goods with single market rules;
Amendment 290 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Regrets the factNotes that the UK negotiating objectives published on 27 February stated that foreign policy will be determined within a framework of broader friendly dialogue and cooperation between the UK and the EU;
Amendment 299 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 307 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Recalls that both the EU and the UK share principles, values andthe Member States and the UK share interests and a commitment to promoting global prosperity, security and effective multilateralism; stresses that it is in both sides’the interests of all to maintain an ambitious, close and lasting cooperation that serves the security of Europe and its citizens and contributes to global stability, the protection of human rights and peace in line with the objectives and principles set out in Article 21 of the TEU and peace;
Amendment 322 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Underlines the fact that the EU iMember States anre important partners for the UK in foreign and security policy, as the need for common responses to address foreign, security and defence policy challenges is crucial to both sides; encourages the exchange of information and intelligence as well as close cooperation in the areas of illegal immigration, counter-terrorism, space policy, cyberwarfare and chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) defence;
Amendment 340 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Considers that it is in the common interest of the UK and the EU to cooperate on the development of effective and genuinely interoperable defence capabilities, including within the European Defence Agency, and to continue the highly valuable partnerships within NATO and EU programmes on defence and exthe Member States and the UK should be able, where appropriate, to establish partnerships through inter-state bilateral and multilaternal security, such as the European Defence Fund, Galileo andframeworks for defence policy, cyber-security and satellite programmes;
Amendment 346 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
Amendment 352 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
Amendment 374 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Points out that the entire Agreement with the UK as a third country, including provisions on the level playing field, should include the establishment of a coherent and solid governance system as an overarching framework, covering the joint continuous supervision and management of the Agreement as well as dispute settlement and enforcement mechanisms with sanctions and interim measures where necessary with respect to the interpretation and application of the Agreement’s provisions; stresses that this governance system must be placed under the control of the Council;
Amendment 384 #
2020/2023(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
Amendment 34 #
2020/2012(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 63 #
2020/2012(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that for any defence application of AI enabled systems, the UnionMember States should set technical and organisational standards to ensure their resilience against cyber-attacks and digital influence, as well as their compliance with the highest possible trustworthiness standards as regards the collection and exploitation of operational data;
Amendment 114 #
2020/2012(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 26 #
2020/2004(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
Amendment 36 #
2020/2004(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital U
Recital U
Amendment 95 #
2020/2004(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point u
Paragraph 1 – point u
Amendment 104 #
2020/2004(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point aa
Paragraph 1 – point aa
(aa) reaffirm the EU’s continuing commitment to the JCPOA as the best possible means for obtaining assurances of an exclusively peaceful use of nuclear energy by Iran, and as a vital tool for enhancing stability and security in the Middle East; reiterate the EU’s regret over the withdrawal by the US from the JCPOA and the re-impositions of sanctions; call on Iran to return to full compliance with its nuclear-related commitments under the JCPOA and the NPT; call upon the United States to reconsider its position on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) relating to Iran’s nuclear programme, resume its role as a party to the JCPOA and work together with the five other partners to fully implement the Vienna agreement;
Amendment 117 #
2020/2004(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls its commitment to the sovereignty of States; considers that, while non-proliferation is desirable, only States can decide whether they wish to opt for total nuclear disarmament;
Amendment 68 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas poverty and insecurity feed off each other and push young people to migrate to Europe in search of a better life,, thereby increasing the migratory pressure on Europe and putting its way of life in jeopardy, and whereas emigration from Africa impoverishinges African states by depriving them of their best human resources;
Amendment 97 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the EU is also supporting the establishment and operationalisation of the G5 Sahel Joint Force, operating in a region of intense Islamist activity where France, which has been heavily involved since 2012 and has suffered many military casualties, has been given no more than symbolic support by the other Member States;
Amendment 130 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
Amendment 170 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 224 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – introductory part
Paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Considers that the sustainability and effectiveness of EU civilian and military missions in Africa have been hampered by the lack of basic equipment in the countries affected and that it is therefore necessary: that none of them takes place or is the subject of a media communication without their appropriations being properly planned and budgeted;
Amendment 231 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point a
Paragraph 5 – point a
Amendment 239 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point b
Paragraph 5 – point b
Amendment 262 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 284 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 – point a
Paragraph 10 – point a
(a) harmonising training methods and rules of procedure and engagement and ensuring they are unique;
Amendment 339 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses that coordination with the countries of North Africa is desirable as well as an effective contribution to peace and reconciliation in Libya in order to prevent it from becoming a hotspot for the spread of jihadism, arms and human traffickingthe chaos in Libya, the advances made by political Islamism in North Africa and the lack of a relationship of trust with the Algerian regime are a breeding ground for jihadism and trafficking (particularly of humans) and complicate the fight against terrorist groups. Regrets the fact that the initiatives developed by the Kingdom of Morocco for improved cooperation have not been matched by its neighbours;
Amendment 401 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 – introductory part
Paragraph 25 – introductory part
25. Considers that the development of Africa should be focused on:is necessary for the African people, so that EU Member States are no longer inundated by the waves of migrants threatening them and so that African societies can fight against Islamism with their own resources;
Amendment 403 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 – point a
Paragraph 25 – point a
Amendment 413 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 – point b
Paragraph 25 – point b
Amendment 423 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 – point c
Paragraph 25 – point c
Amendment 430 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 – point d
Paragraph 25 – point d
d) ensuring administrative and legal stability and fighting poverty and corruption;eleted
Amendment 468 #
2020/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Considers it essential to provide extraordinary assistance to the regions concerned in view of, since Europe is mired in economic crisis, to make the granting of aid to States addressing the extraordinary challenge presented by the COVID-19 pandemic contingent on the acceptance of other measures, in particular in the area of controls on immigration and the granting of visas to their nationals illegally resident in the EU;
Amendment 153 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) However, it must be noted that there are no effective external borders, which are a prerequisite to the establishment and proper functioning of the Schengen area, and that migrant routes are used by terrorists.
Amendment 159 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The rules governing border control of persons crossing the external borders of the Member States of the Union are laid down in Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Schengen Borders Code)21 as adopted under Article 77(2)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). To further develop the Union’s policy with a view to carrying out checks on persons and efficiently monitoring the crossing of external borders referred to in the first paragraph of Article 77 TFEU, additional measures should address situations where third-country nationals manage to avoid, whether purposely or not, border checks at the external borders, or where third-country nationals are disembarked following search and rescue operations as well as where third-country nationals request international protection at a border crossing point without fulfilling entry conditions. The present regulation complements and specifies Regulation (EU) 2016/399 with regard to those three sets of situations. _________________ 21 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code), OJ L 77, 23.3.2016, p.1.
Amendment 164 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) It is essential to ensure that in those three sets of situations, the third country nationals are screened, in order to facilitate a proper identification and to allow for them being referred efficientlyefficiently and promptly refer them to the relevant procedures which, depending on the circumstances, can be procedures for international protection or procedures respecting Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (the “Return Directive”)22 . The screening should seamlessly complement the checks carried out at the external border or compensate for the fact that those checks have been circumvented by the third country nationals when crossing the external border. _________________ 22 Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, OJ L 348, 24.12.2008, p. 98.
Amendment 170 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Border control is in the interest not only of the Member States at whose external borders it is carried out but of all Member States which have abolished internal border control. Border control should help toprimarily combat illegal migration and trafficking of human beings and to prevent any threat to the Member States’ internal security, public policy, public health and international relations. As such, measures taken at the external borders are important elements of a comprehensive approach to migration, allowing to address the challenge of mixed flows of migrants and persons seeking international protectionensuring safety of the Member States.
Amendment 176 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399, border control consists of border checks carried out at the border crossing points and border surveillance, which is carried out between the border crossing points, in order to prevent third-country nationals from illegally circumventing border checks. In accordance with Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 a person who has crossed a border in an unauthorised manner and who has no right to stay on the territory of the Member State concerned shall be apprehended and made subject to procedures respecting Directive 2008/115/EC. In accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399, border control should be carried out without prejudice to the rights of refugees and persons requesting international protection, in particular as regards non- refoulement.
Amendment 184 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Border guards are often confronted with third-country nationals who are requesting international protection without travel documents or any other documents supporting their claims, both following apprehension during border surveillance and during checks at the border crossing points. Moreover, at some border sections the border guards are confronted with large numbers of arrivals at the same time. In such circumstances, it is particularly difficult to ensure that all relevant databases are consulted and to immediately determine the appropriate asylum or return procedure.
Amendment 191 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure a swift and efficient handling of third-country nationals who try to avoid border checks or who request international protection at a border crossing point without fulfilling the entry conditions or who are disembarked following a search and rescue operation, it is necessary to provide a stronger framework for cooperation between the different national authorities responsible for border control, the protection of public health, the examination of the need for international protection and the application of return procedures.
Amendment 194 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) In particular, the sScreening should help to ensure that the third-country nationals concerned are referred to the appropriate procedures at the earliest stage possible and that the procedures are continued without interruption and delay. At the same timeIn particular, the screening should help to counter the practice whereby some applicants for international protection abscond after having been authorised to enter the territory of a Member State based on their request for international protection, in order to pursue such requests in another Member State or not at all.
Amendment 198 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) With regard to those persons who apply for international protection, the screening shouldmay be followed by an examination of the need for international protection. It shouldmay allow to collect and share with the authorities competent for that examination any information that is relevant for the latter to identify the appropriate procedure for the examination of the application, thusif that would allow for speeding up that examination. The screening should also ensure that persons with special needs are identified at an early stage, so that any special reception and procedural needs are fully taken into account in the determination of and the pursuit of the applicable procedure.
Amendment 202 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The obligations stemming from this Regulation should be without prejudice to the provisions concerning responsibility for examining an application for international protection regulated in Regulation (EU) No XX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Management Regulation] if it is not hampering the security of the external borders.
Amendment 204 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) This Regulation should apply to third-country nationals and stateless persons who are apprehended in connection with the unauthorised or illegal crossings of the external border of a Member State by land, sea or air, except third country nationals for whom the Member State is not required to take the biometric data pursuant to Article 14(1) and (3) of the Eurodac Regulation for reasons other than their age, as well as to persons who have been disembarked following search and rescue operations, regardless of whether they apply or not for international protection. This Regulation should also apply to those who seek international protection at the border crossing points or in transit zones without fulfilling the entry conditions
Amendment 211 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) The screening should always be conducted at or in proximity to the external border, before the persons concerned are authorised to enter the territory. The Member States should apply measures pursuant to national law to prevent the persons concerned from entering the territory during the screening. In individual cases, wWhere required, this may include detention, subject to the national law regulating that matter.
Amendment 215 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Third-country nationals wanting to come to the European Union could also be screened in the Member States' representations abroad.
Amendment 221 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Wherever it becomes clear beyond any doubt during the screening that a third- country national subject to it fulfils the conditions of Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399, the screening should end and the third-country national concerned should be authorised to enter the territory, without prejudice to the application of penalties as referred to in Article 5(3) of that regulation.
Amendment 233 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
Amendment 240 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) In accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399, the fulfilment of entry conditions and the authorisation of entry are expressed in an entry stamp in a travel document. The absence of such entry stamp or the absence of a travel document mayshould therefore be considered as an indication that the holder does not fulfil the entry conditions. With the start of the operation of the Entry/Exit System leading to substitution of the stamps with an entry in the electronic system, that presumption will become even more reliable. Member States should therefore apply the screening to third-country nationals who are already within the territory and who are unable to prove that they fulfilled the conditions of entry into the territory of the Member States. The screening of such third-country nationals is clearly necessary in order to compensate for the fact that they presumably managed to evade entry checks upon arrival in the Schengen area and therefore could have not been either refused entry or referred to the appropriate procedure following screening. Applying the screening could also help in ascertaining, through the consultation of the databases referred to in this Regulation, that the persons concerned do not pose a threat to internal security. By the end of the screening within the territory, the third- country nationals concerned should be subject to a return procedure or, where they apply for international protection, to the appropriate asylum procedure. Submitting the same third-country national to repeated screenings should be avoided to the utmost extent possible.
Amendment 246 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) The screening should be completed as soon as possible, and should not exceed 5 days where it is conducted at the external border and 3 days where it is conducted within the territory of a Member State. Any extension of the 5 days’ time limit should be reserved forIn exceptional situations at, the external borders, where the capacities of the Member State to handle screenings are exceeded for reasons beyond its control such as crisis situations referred to in Article 1 of Regulation XXX/XXX [crisis proposal]limit can be extended if it is necessary for the proper conducting of the screening procedure.
Amendment 251 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) The Member States should determine appropriate locations for the screening at or in close proximity to the external border taking into account geography and existing infrastructures, ensuring that apprehended third-country nationals as well as those who present themselves at a border crossing point can be swiftly submitted to the screening. In any case, the persons under the screening procedure shall not be deemed to be on the territory of a Member State. The tasks related to the screening may be carried out in hotspot areas as referred to in point (23) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council23 . _________________ 23 Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2019 on the European Border and Coast Guard, OJ L 295, 14.11.2019, p. 1.
Amendment 257 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
Amendment 263 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
Amendment 264 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
Amendment 275 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23 a (new)
Recital 23 a (new)
(23a) Member States should be authorised to prevent non-governmental organisations from participating in the screening procedure for illegal migrants trying to enter the European Union.
Amendment 277 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) By the end of the screening, the authorities responsible for the screening should fill in a de-briefing form. The form should be transmitted to the authorities examining applications for international protection or to the authorities competent for return – depending on whom the individual is referred to. In the former case, the authorities responsible for the screening should also indicate any elements which may seem to be relevant for determining whether the competent authorities should submit the application of the third-country national concerned to an accelerated examination procedure or to the border procedure.
Amendment 287 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) A preliminary health examination should be carried out on all persons submitted to the screening at the external borders with a view to identifying persons in need of immediate care or requiring other measures to be taken, for instance isolation on public health grounds. The specific needs of minors and vulnerable persons should be taken into account. If it is clear from the circumstances that such examination is not needed, in particular because the overall condition of the person appears to be very good, the examination should not take place and the person concerned should be informed of that fact. The preliminary health examination should be carried out by the health authorities of the Member State concerned. With regard to third-country nationals apprehended within the territory, the preliminary medical examination should be carried out where it is deemed necessary at first sightThe preliminary health examination should be carried out by the health authorities of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 294 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
Amendment 302 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) Since third-country nationals subject to the screening may not carry or disclose the necessary identity and travel documents required for the legal crossing of the external border, an identification procedure should be provided for as part of the screening.
Amendment 305 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) The Common Identity Repository (“CIR”) was established by Regulation (EU) 2019/817 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Interoperability Regulation)25 to facilitate and assist in the correct identification of persons registered in the Entry/Exit System (“EES”), the Visa Information System (“VIS”), the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (“ETIAS”), Eurodac and in the European Criminal Records Information System for third country nationals (“ECRIS-TCN”), including of unknown persons who are unable to identify themselves. For that purpose, the CIR contains only the identity, travel document and biometric data recorded in EES, VIS, ETIAS, Eurodac and ECRIS-TCN, logically separated. Only the personal data strictly necessary to perform an accurate identity check is stored in the CIR. The personal data recorded in the CIR is kept for noas longer than strictly as it is necessary for the purposes of the underlying systems and should automatically be deleted where the data are deleted from the underlying systems. Consultation of the CIR enables a reliable and exhaustive identification of persons, by making it possible to consult all identity data present in the EES, VIS, ETIAS, Eurodac and ECRIS-TCN in one go, in a fast and reliable manner, while ensuring a maximum protection of the data and avoiding unnecessary processing or duplication of data. _________________ 25 Regulation (EU) 2019/817 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on establishing a framework for interoperability between EU information systems in the field of borders and visa and amending Regulations (EC) No 767/2008, (EU) 2016/399, (EU) 2017/2226, (EU) 2018/1240, (EU) 2018/1726 and (EU) 2018/1861 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Decisions 2004/512/EC and 2008/633/JHA, OJ L 135, 22.5.2019, p. 27.
Amendment 313 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) Given that many persons submitted to the screening may not carry or disclose any travel documents, the authorities conducting the screening should have access to any other relevant documents held by the persons concerned in cases where the biometric data of such persons are not usable or yield no result in the CIR. The authorities should also be allowed to use data from those documents, other than biometric data, to carry out checks against the relevant databases.
Amendment 315 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) The identification of persons during border checks at the border crossing point and any consultation of the databases in the context of border surveillance or police checks in the external border area by the authorities who referred the person concerned to the screening should be considered as part of the screening and should not be repeated, unless there are special circumstances justifying such repetition.
Amendment 324 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
Recital 35
(35) The screening should alsoprimarily assess whether the entry of the third- country nationals into the Union could pose a threat to internal security or to public policy.
Amendment 336 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) Where justified for the purpose of the security check, the screening could also include verification of objects in the possession of third-country nationals, in accordance with national law. Any measures applied in this context should be proportionate and should respect the human dignity of the persons subject to the screening. The authorities involved should ensure that the fundamental rights of the individuals concerned are respected, including the right to protection of personal data and freedom of expression.
Amendment 359 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation establishes the screening at the external borders of the Member States of all third-country nationals who have crossed the external border illegally in an unauthorised manner, of those who have applied for international protection during border checks without fulfilling entry conditions, as well as those disembarked after a search and rescue operation, before they are referred to the appropriate procedure.
Amendment 361 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article premier – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article premier – paragraph 1 a (new)
The purpose of this regulation should be to prevent Europe from being flooded with migrants.
Amendment 371 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
The object of the screening shall be the identification of all third-country nationals subject to it and the verification against relevant databases that the persons subject to it do not pose a threat to internal security. The screening shall also entailinclude health checks, to identify persons posing a threat to public health, and where appropriate, to identify persons vulnerable and in the need of health care as well the ones posing a threat to public health. Those checks shall contribute to referring such persons to the appropriate procedure.
Amendment 379 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article premier – paragraph 4
Article premier – paragraph 4
Amendment 408 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) are disembarked in the territory of a Member State following a search and rescue operationby NGOs.
Amendment 428 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. During the screening, the persons referred to in Article 3, paragraphs 1 and 2 shall notin no circumstances be authorised to enter the territory of a Member State.
Amendment 450 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. In the cases referred to in Article 3, the screening shall be conducted at locations situated at or in proximity to the external borders. However, in any case the persons under the screening procedure shall not be deemed to be on the territory of a Member State.
Amendment 463 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. In the cases referred to in Article 3, the screening shall be carried out without delay and shall in any case be completed within 5 days from the apprehension in the external border area, the disembarkation in the territory of the Member State concerned or the presentation at the border crossing point. In exceptional circumstancesituations, wthere a disproportionate number of third-country nationals needs to be subject to the screening at the same time, making it impossible in practice to conclude the screening within that time- limit, the period of 5 days may be extended by a maximum of an additional 5 days limit can be extended, if it is necessary for the proper conducting of the screening procedure.
Amendment 471 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shallmay notify the Commission without delay about the exceptional circumstances referred to in paragraph 3. They shall also inform the Commission as soon as the reasons for extending the screening period have ceased to exist.
Amendment 476 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5
Article 6 – paragraph 5
5. The screening referred to in Article 5 shall be carried out without delay and in any case shall be completed within 3 days from apprehension. This limit can be extended, if the screening procedure requires it.
Amendment 483 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – point c
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – point c
(c) registration of bone data in the event of any doubt over whether an illegal immigrant is in fact a minor and biometric data in the appropriate databases as referred to in Article 14(6), to the extent it has not occurred yet;
Amendment 505 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7
Article 7
Amendment 511 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Amendment 513 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. EachA Member State shall establish an independent monitoring mechanismbe free to establish a monitoring mechanism outside of their screening procedure at borders.
Amendment 554 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 557 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The Fundamental Rights Agency shall issue general guidance for Member States on the setting up of such mechanism and its independent func, being in favour of mass immigration ing. Furthermore, Member States may request the Fundamental Rights Agency to support them in developing their national monitoring mechanism, including the safeguards for independence of such mechanisms, as well as the monitoring methodology and appropriate training schemto Europe, shall refrain from giving any advice to Member States.
Amendment 566 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 571 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Member States may invite relevant national, international andprevent non- governmental organisations and bodies tofrom participateing in the monitoring of the screening procedure for migrants seeking to enter the European Union.
Amendment 608 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the applicable rules on the conditions of entry for third-country nationals in accordance with Regulation (No) 2016/399 [Schengen Border Code], as well as on other conditions of entry, stay and residence of the Member State concerned, to the extent this information has not been given already;
Amendment 611 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e
Amendment 614 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The information provided during the screening shall be given in a language which the third-country national understands or is reasonably supposed to understand. The information shall be given in writing and, in exceptional circumstances, where necessary, orally using interpretation services. It shall be provided in an appropriate manner taking into account the age and the gender of the person.
Amendment 622 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
Article 8 – paragraph 4
Amendment 627 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. Member States may authorise relevant and competent national, international and non-governmental organisations and bodies to provide third country nationals with information under this article during the screening according to the provisions established by national law.
Amendment 634 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Third-country nationals submitted to the screening referred to in Article 3 shall be always subject to a preliminary medical examination with a view to identifying any needs for immediate care or isolation on public health grounds, unless, based on the circumstances concerning the general state of the individual third-country nationals concerned and the grounds for directing them to the screening, the relevant competent authorities are satisfied that no preliminary medical screening is necessary. In that case, they shall inform those persons accordingly.
Amendment 638 #
2020/0278(COD)
2. Where relevant, it shall be checked whether persons referred to in paragraph 1 are in a vulnerable situation, victims of torture or have special reception or procedural needs within the meaning of Article 20 of the [recast] Reception Conditions Directive.
Amendment 644 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Where there are indications of vulnerabilities or special reception or procedural needs, the third-country national concerned shallmay receive timely and adequate support in view of their physical and mental health. In the case of minors, support shall be given by personnel trained and qualified to deal with minors, and in cooperation with child protection authorities.
Amendment 664 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) biometric data, including DNA testing for age;
Amendment 666 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) bone testing in the event of any doubt over a migrant's minor status.
Amendment 670 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. For the purpose of the identification referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authorities shall query any relevant national databases as well as the common identity repository (CIR) referred to in Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2019/817. The biometric and bone testing data of a third-country national taken live during the screening, as well as the identity data and, where available, travel document data shall be used to that end.
Amendment 760 #
2020/0278(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 84 #
2020/0277(COD)
Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set outRejects the Commission's proposal;
Amendment 88 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
Amendment 95 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) TIn situations of crisis, the Union, in constituting an area of freedom, security and justice, should ensure the absence of internal border controls for persons and frame a common policy on asylum, immigration and external border control, based on solidarity between Member States, which is fair towards third-country nationalnot stand in the way of internal border controls for persons.
Amendment 98 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) The European Union should ensure that there are internal border controls for persons and strengthen the external borders while respecting the sovereignty of the Member States.
Amendment 104 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The comprehensive approach should bring together policies in the areas of asylum, migration management, returns, external border protection and partnership with relevant third countries, recognising that the effectiveness of the overall approach depends on all components being jointly addressed and in an integrated manner. The comprehensive approach should ensure that the Union has at its disposal specific rules to effectively manage migration including the triggering of a compulsory solidarity mechanism and that all the necessary measures are put in place to prevent crisis to happen.
Amendment 115 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Notwithstanding tThe putting in place of the necessary preventive measures, it cannot be can excluded that a situation of crisis or force majeure in the field of migration and asylum arises due to circumstances beyond the control of the Union and its Member States.
Amendment 119 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
Amendment 121 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) This Regulation should contribute to and complete the comprehensive approach by setting out the specific procedures and mechanisms in the field of international protection and return that should apply in the exceptional circumstances of a situation of crisis. It should ensure, in particular, the effective application of the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility and the adaptation of the relevant rules on asylum and return procedures, so that the Member States and the Union have the necessary tools at their disposal including sufficient time to carry out those procedures.
Amendment 128 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) This Regulation should help to stem or stop mass influxes of migrants and facilitate their return.
Amendment 133 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) A mass influxlarge number of persons trying to crossing the border irregularly and within a short period of time may lead to a situation of crisis in a particular Member State. That may also have consequences for the functioning of the asylum and migration system, not only in that Member State but in the Union as a whole, due to unauthorised movements and the lack of capacity in the Member State of first entry to process the applications for international protection of such third- country nationals and must be prevented. It is necessary to lay down specific rules and mechanisms that should enable effective action to address such situationssupport in defence of the border of said Member State.
Amendment 142 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
Amendment 154 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
Amendment 161 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
Amendment 164 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) In order to quickly help alleviate the pressure faced by a Member State in a situation of crisis, the scope of relocation should include all categoriesimmediate assistance in border protection should be given, thus avoiding the need for relocation of applicants for international protection, including persons granted immediate protection, as well as beneficiaries of international protection and irregular migrants. Furthermore, a Member State that provides return sponsorship should transfer the illegally staying third-country national from the benefitting Member State if the person concerned does not return or is not removed within four months, instead of eight months as provided for by Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Management]This will avoid creating a pull factor for uncontrolled mass immigration.
Amendment 181 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) In situations of crisis, Member States might need a wider set of measures in order to manage a mass influx of third- country nationals in an orderly fashion and contain unauthorised movements. Such measures should include the application of an asylum crisis management procedure and a return crisis management procedureorganise an efficient border protection and prevent the entering of a large number of third-country nationals in unauthorised movements.
Amendment 187 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) In order to alleviate pressure on the Member States with external borders, the Union will support effective border protection against illegal migration. An illegal migrant is any third-country national who enters the territory of the Member States without prior approval in the form of a visa or residence permit or who enters a Member State by force, or a person who enters a Member State and does not apply for protection at the first opportunity. A person who wishes to apply for international protection, must do so in a peaceful manner and at the first possible opportunity (at a border post, disembarkation point, or asylum processing facility). Should the third- country national enter a Member State by force or travel through a Member State without applying for protection, any application that is lodged will be denied, the person will be considered as an illegal migrant, and will be detained and returned to his or her country of origin.
Amendment 192 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 b (new)
Recital 12 b (new)
(12b) In order to alleviate pressure on the Member States with external borders, the Union will financially support the building of a physical barrier on those external borders. Physical barriers will help to manage a mass influx of third- country nationals and contain unauthorised movements.
Amendment 217 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) In order to allow Member States to deal with large numbers of applications for international protection in situations of crisis, a longer time limitmore resources should be setapplied for registering the applications for international protection made during such situations of crisis. Such an extension should be without prejudice to the rights of asylum applicants guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Amendment 219 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
Amendment 231 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15 a (new)
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) In a situation of crisis, in view of the possible strain on the asylum system, Member States should prevent entry in their territory of applicants trying to enter from a neighbouring safe third country. The Union can be called upon to support such prevention of entry.
Amendment 236 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) In a situation of crisis, in view of the possible strain on the asylum system, Member States should have the possibility not to authorise the entry in their territory of applicants subject to a border procedure for a longer period of time than the ones set in Article 41 (11) and (13) of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedures Regulation]. However, tThe procedures should be completed as soon as possible and in any event the periods of time should only be prolonged by an additional period not exceeding eight weeks; if those procedures cannot be completed by the expiry of that prolonged period, applicants should be authorised to enter the territory of a Member State for the purpose of completing the procedure for international protectionthoroughly and expeditiously.
Amendment 253 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
Amendment 261 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
Amendment 272 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) In order to provide Member States with additional time needed to deal with the situation of crisis and at the same time ensure an effective and as quick as possible access to the relevant procedures and rights, the Commission should authorise the application of the asylum crisis management procedure and the return crisis management procedure for a period of six months, which could be extended up to a period not exceeding one year. After the expiry of the relevant period, the extended deadlines provided for in the asylum and return crisis management procedures should not be applied to new applications for international protections long as needed.
Amendment 279 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) For the same reasons, the Commission should authorise the application ofMember States can apply derogatory rules as regards the registration deadline for a period not exceeding four weeks, which should be renewable upon a new reasoned request submitted by the Member State concerned. The total period of application should nonetheless not exceed twelve weeks.
Amendment 296 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) In a crisis situation, Member States should have the possibility to suspend the examination of applications for international protection made by displaced persons from third countries who are unable to return to their country of origin, where they would face a high degree of risk of being subject to indiscriminate violence, in exceptional situations of armed conflict. In such a case, immediate protection status should be granted to those persons. Member States should resume the examination of their application one year at the latest from its suspensio. Member States should organise the return to a safe country in the region of origin.
Amendment 303 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
Amendment 322 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) In order to carry out a proper assessment of applications for international protection submitted by beneficiaries of immediate protection, the asylum procedures should resume at the latest after one year from the suspension of such proceduresnot be suspended.
Amendment 355 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) In such situations of force majeure, the Member State concerned shouldmay notify the Commission and, where applicable, the other Member States, of its intention to apply the respective derogations from those time limits, as well as the precise reasons for their intended application, as well as the period of time during which they will be applied.
Amendment 365 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) Where a Member State is no longer facing a situation of force majeure, it should, as soon as possible,may notify the Commission, and where applicable, the other Member States, of the cessation of the situation. The time limits derogating from Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Management] should not be applied to new applications for international protection made or for third- country nationals or stateless persons found to be illegally staying after the date of that notification. Upon such notification, the time limits laid down in Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedures Regulation] should start to apply.
Amendment 366 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
Amendment 379 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
Amendment 390 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
Recital 35
(35) The examination procedure should be used for the adoption of solidarity measures in situations of crisis for authorising the application of derogatory procedural rules, and for triggering the granting of immediate protection status.
Amendment 397 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
Recital 37
(37) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular respect for human dignity, the right to life, the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, the right to asylum and the protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extraditioncluding the right to safety of European citizens. The Regulation should be implemented in compliance with the Charter and general principles of Union law as well as international law, including refugee protection, human rights obligation and the prohibition of refoulement.
Amendment 417 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) an exceptional situation of mass influx, where a large number of third-country nationals or stateless persons arrivinges irregularly in a Member State or disembarked on its territory following search and rescue operationsat the external border of a Member State and requests to enter, being of such a scale, in proportion to the population and GDP of the Member State concerned, and nature, that it renders the Member State’s asylum, reception or return system non-functional and can have serious consequences for the functioning the Common European Asylum System or the Common Framework as set out in Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Management], or
Amendment 430 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. This Regulation does not apply when either the Commission or the Council has taken a decision that finds that a third country is engaging in hybrid warfare against the Union by employing migration as a weapon in order to destabilise a Member State or the Union.
Amendment 439 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2
Article 2
Amendment 484 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Where a Member State considers that it is facing a crisis situation as referred to in Article 1(2), that Member State shall submit a reasoned request to the Commission for the purpose ofmay applying the rules laid down in Articles 4, 5 or 6 as necessary.
Amendment 488 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Amendment 492 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Amendment 497 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission may authorise the application of the rules laid down in Articles 4 and 5 for six months. That period may be extended for a period not exceeding one yearmay take as long as needed.
Amendment 499 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5
Article 3 – paragraph 5
Amendment 505 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 7
Article 3 – paragraph 7
Amendment 509 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 8
Article 3 – paragraph 8
Amendment 530 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4
Article 4
Asylum crisis management procedure 1. In a crisis situation as referred to in Article 1(2), and in accordance with the procedures laid down in Article 3, Member States may, as regards applications made within the period during which this Article is applied, derogate from Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedures Regulation] as follows: (a) By way of derogation from Article 41(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedures Regulation], Member States may in a border procedure take decisions on the merits of an application in cases where the applicant is of a nationality, or, in the case of stateless persons, a former habitual resident of a third country, for which the proportion of decisions granting international protection by the determining authority is, according to the latest available yearly Union-wide average Eurostat data, 75% or lower, in addition to the cases referred to in Article 40(1) of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedures Regulation]; (b) By way of derogation from Article 41(11) and (13) of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedures Regulation], the maximum duration of the border procedure for the examination of applications set out in that Article may be prolonged by an additional period of maximum eight weeks. Following this period, the applicant shall be authorised to enter the Member State’s territory for the completion of the procedure for international protection.rticle 4 deleted
Amendment 549 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) By way of derogation from Article 41a(2) of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedures Regulation], the maximum period during which third- country nationals or stateless persons shall be kept at the locations referred to in that Article may be prolonged by an additional period of maximum eight weekto secure swift and proper returns;
Amendment 559 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) In addition to the cases provided for by Article 6(2) of Directive XXX [recast Return Directive], Member States shall establish that a risk of absconding is presumed in an individual case, unless proven otherwise, when the criterion referred to in Article 6(1), point (f) of Directive XXX [recast Return Directive] is fulfilled or when the applicant, third- country national or stateless person concerned is manifestly and persistently not fulfilling the obligation to cooperate established by Article 7 of that Directive.
Amendment 609 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10
Article 10
Amendment 611 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – title
Article 10 – title
10 Granting of immediateThe need for enhanced border protection status.
Amendment 618 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. In a crisis situation as referred to in Article 1(2)(a), and on the basis of an implementing act adopted by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Article, Member States may suspend the examination of applications for international protection in accordance with Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedures Regulation] and Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Qualification Regulation] in respect of displaced persons from third countries who are facing a high degree of risk of being subject to indiscriminate violence, in exceptional situations of armed conflict, and who are unable to return to their country of orihave travelled through multiple safe countries or left protection facilities in the own region. In such a case, Member States shall grant immediate protection status to the persons concerned, unless they represent a danger to the national security or public order of the Member State. Such status shall be without prejudice to their ongoing application for international protection in the relevantprotect their borders and ensure no such illegal applicant enters the Member State.
Amendment 627 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Amendment 631 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Amendment 636 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
Article 10 – paragraph 4
Amendment 670 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Amendment 678 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Amendment 685 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
Article 11 – paragraph 3
Amendment 691 #
2020/0277(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12
Article 12
Amendment 18 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
Amendment 29 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas it is time to put a permanent end to any plans to enlarge the European Union;
Amendment 31 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
Amendment 38 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
Amendment 51 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
Amendment 82 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Council to put an end to the process initiated in 2003 at the Thessaloniki summit and to scrap any accession processes for the ‘Western Balkan’ countries;
Amendment 129 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i
Paragraph 1 – point i
(i) to enhance the conditionality mechanism and strengthen the reversibility of the accession process by applying objective criteria when deciding whether negotiations should be put on hold or; to suspended; to ensure that the Commission initiates these procedures after thorough evaluation and in response to a proposal from the Member States or the European Parliament negotiations and the associated benefits, in particular financial benefits, at the request of the Member States or the European Parliament, and/or in the event of failure to meet one of these objective criteria;
Amendment 147 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j
Paragraph 1 – point j
(j) to consider introducing qualified majority voting on EU accession issues and maintaining the unanimity rule enshrine the rule of unanimity in the Council for all matters relating the Council only foro EU accession, from the opening anduntil the closing of accession negotiations;.
Amendment 149 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point k
Paragraph 1 – point k
Amendment 182 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
(na) to prevent the opening of new accession negotiations while Europe’s peoples are opposed to them.
Amendment 186 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point o a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point o a (new)
(oa) to tighten the visa regime for Kosovo and to investigate irregularities in Kosovo.
Amendment 217 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point r
Paragraph 1 – point r
(r) to faciliundertatke efforts in all Western Balkan countries to overcome political polarisation and protracted parliamentary boycotts, and to strengthen parliamentary oversight;to respect the democratic processes provided for in the constitutions of the candidate countries
Amendment 228 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point s
Paragraph 1 – point s
(s) to foster electoral reforms that ensure free, fair and transparent elections, in line with international standards; to contribute to the European Parliament’s democracy support programmes in the region; to encourage religion;us freedom wherever it is under threat.
Amendment 255 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point x
Paragraph 1 – point x
(x) to increase EUthe EU candidate countries’ engagement in solving outstanding bilateral issues and to urge the Western Balkan countries to commit to reconciliation and peaceful solutions to longstanding disputes;
Amendment 270 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point y
Paragraph 1 – point y
(y) to urge the Western Balkan countries to increase their efforts in the prosecution of war crimes and the resolution of missing persons cases;, particularly with regard to the links between the UÇK, its former leaders and mass crimes.
Amendment 272 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point z
Paragraph 1 – point z
(z) to promote and actively support the implementation of anti-discriminencourage, in accordance with the values of European civilisation, implementation of policies and to insist on the prosprotecting the weakest, while respecution of hate crimes; to encourage swifter progress towards gender equality, and in tackling discrimination and ensuring social inclusion of ethnic and religious minorities, people with disabilities, Roma and LGBTQI+ people by establishing inclusive policies to protect the fundamental rights of citizens;ng the wishes of countries to promote the societal models chosen by democratically elected leaders.
Amendment 332 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a k
Paragraph 1 – point a k
(ak) to acknowledge the difficulties Western Balkan countries face in managing migration and refugee flows and the substcall for illegal immigration from the Western Balkans, whether direct or indirect, to be combated; to send a warning to the Government of the Republic of Albantial efforts the region has made to provide shelter and humanitarian supplies, primarily with the support of the EU; to implement the agreements between Western Balkan countries and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex), which sends tens of thousands of its nationals to the countries of the European Union as so-called ‘refugees’, and therefore consistently represents one of the main countries of origin for asylum-seekers in France;
Amendment 348 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a n
Paragraph 1 – point a n
(an) to avoid cuts in IPA funding which could slow down EU-related reforms and undermine the Union’s strategic influence in the region;calls for an end to the system of pre-accession payments set out in the IPA III instrument
Amendment 370 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a q
Paragraph 1 – point a q
(aq) to ensure thatcalls for the 2020 EU- Western Balkans Summit will evaluate, reassess and inject new dynamism into the enlargement process and provide a new impetus for the transformation of accto put an end to the accession process or accession prospects of the countries in quesstion countries;
Amendment 374 #
2019/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point aq a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point aq a (new)
(aqa) to ensure that the 2020 EU- Western Balkans Summit will evaluate and reassess the enlargement process, while respecting the Member States’ sovereignty and views on the subject;
Amendment 47 #
2019/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas certain EaP countries chose to pursue a closer political, human and economic integcooperation with the EU by concluding ambitious Association Agreements (AAs) with DCFTAs, as well as visa-free regimes;
Amendment 115 #
2019/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) acknowledge and strive for a continuous transformational impact of EaP policy, in order to bring about political, social, economic and legal change in the three associated partner countrieaccordance with the sovereignty of the nations associated with the Eastern Partnership and their choices as regards political, social, legal and economic orientations;
Amendment 147 #
2019/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) acknowledge that those countries that are undertaking comprehensive reforms and taking action to meet the criteria of Article 49 of the TEU may be eligible for EU membership, through a process of gradual integrationare giving a sign of political and diplomatic friendship, which the European institutions should welcome;
Amendment 184 #
2019/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
Paragraph 1 – point f
Amendment 196 #
2019/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
Paragraph 1 – point g
Amendment 212 #
2019/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h
Paragraph 1 – point h
(h) ensure that the conclusions of the June 2020 Summit include reinforced EU commitments and a pledge from the EaP countries to deliver on their own; ensure that this summit addresses the issue of the migration crisis in order to have a coordinated policy on control of European borders;
Amendment 290 #
2019/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m
Paragraph 1 – point m
Amendment 320 #
2019/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p
Paragraph 1 – point p
(p) adopt a comprehensive infrastructure-building plan with the aim of improving connectivity between the EU and its Eastern European Partners, and among the EaP countries themselves, while ensuring that they are not exploited by any international alliance or institution;
Amendment 362 #
2019/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point r
Paragraph 1 – point r
(r) address the EU’s qualified labour shortages by increasing labour mobility from the EaP countries and providing social guaranteending reliance on migration that plunders the human resources needed for the development of the EaP countries and by launching an ambitious policy to boost birth rates;
Amendment 387 #
2019/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point u
Paragraph 1 – point u
(u) ensure that all EU support programmes include a gender-equality dimensrespect the sovereignty of the associated nations and target the most disadvantaged and vulnerable groups of sociehe national identity of the countries concerned, without imposing on them ideological prejudices, and paying particular attention to the fight against poverty;
Amendment 22 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the twofoldprimary objective of the directive is effective return in line with fundamental rights and the principle of proportionality; whereas in its recommendation on making returns more effective,; welcomes the Commission's focuses on the rate of returns as the primary indicator of the directive’s effectiveness;
Amendment 32 #
2019/2208(INI)
Da. whereas, according to IOM data, around 81,000 African migrants returned to their home nation with the aid of the UN’s International Organization for Migration (IOM) and that such Joint initiative which costed the European Union €357 million was to be considered largely a failure1a; _________________ 1a https://www.euronews.com/2020/06/19/pa ying-for-migrants-to-go-back-home-how- the-eu-s-voluntary-return-scheme-is- failing-the-de
Amendment 45 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates the importance of an evidence-based approach to guide coherent policy-making and well-informed public discourse and calls on the Commission to encourage and support Member States to collect and publish qualitative and quantitative data on the implementation of the directive;
Amendment 47 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes also that, based on figures provided by the EPRS, there were, for example, 511047 illegal border crossings in 2016 and 204734 in 2017; considers that given the nature of illegal border crossings, the real figure is presumably much higher; notes that according to EUROSTAT figures from 2019 only a fraction of those ordered to leave actually returned; notes further that the potential repeated counting of persons ordered to leave several times, whether by different Member States or not, does nothing to reduce the problem but rather illustrates the problems with the current return policy;
Amendment 49 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Notes that in the period November 2017 to 2019, FRONTEX repatriated only 171 people with charter flights at a total cost of EUR 1 380 7541 a; notes further that these figures show that a return policy is virtually non-existent at EU level; _________________ 1a figures based on the reply by Frontex of 12 May 2020 to parliamentary question E-1507/2020 by Filip De Man MEP
Amendment 54 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the Commission’s statement that the return rate decreased from 46 % in 2016 to 37 % in 2017 may not present the full picture, as people who received a return decision were not necessarily returned within the same year, some Member States issue more than one return decision to one person, or to people whose whereabouts are unknown, and return decisions are not withdrawn if the return does not take place owing to difficulties in cooperation with third countries or for humanitarian reasons; recognises, on the other hand, that potential double counting in relation to several return decisions does not reduce the problem, but merely illustrates the problems with the return policy;
Amendment 57 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. StExpresses thaconcerns about the Commission’s statement that the return rate decreased from 46 % in 2016 to 37 % in 2017 may not present the full picture, as people who received a return decision were not necessarily returned within the same year, some Member States issue more than one return decision to one person, or to people whose whereabouts are unknown, and return decisions are not withdrawnas the effective return of third- country nationals who do not have a right to stay ifn the return does not take place owing to difficulties in cooperation with third countries or for humanitarian reasonsUnion is an essential component of an effective asylum policy;
Amendment 64 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of improving the effective implementation of the directive; highlights that such effectiveness should not only be measured in quantitative terms by referring to the return rate, but also in qualitative terms, such as the sustainability of returns and fundamental rights;
Amendment 81 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the importance of ensuring compliance with return decisions and recalls the key principle enshrined in the directive that voluntary returns should be prioritised over forced returns; stresses equally that an effective return policy is essential to keep migration manageable;
Amendment 86 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the importance of ensuring compliance with return decisions and recalls the key principle enshrined in the directive that voluntary returns should be prioritised over forced returnsat voluntary returns should be proposed as a way to avoid unnecessary retention or detention period;
Amendment 96 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Highlights that under Article 7 of the directive, a return decision shall provide for an appropriate period for voluntary departure, which Member States have to extend where necessary, taking into account the specific circumstances of the individual case; stresses that a relatively short period for voluntary departure may hinder or altogether prevent voluntary departure;
Amendment 115 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that a broad definition of the risk of absconding may lead tohelp Member States frequently refraining from granting a period for voluntary departureto manage returns more efficiently; recalls that lifting the voluntary departure period also leads to the imposition of an entry ban, which may further undermine voluntary departure;
Amendment 124 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that return and entry-ban decisions on removal should be individualised, clearly justified with reasons in law and in fact, issued in writing, and complete with information about available remediesshould be swift and effective;
Amendment 131 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights that the directive allows for the temporary suspension of the enforcement of a removal, pending a decision relating to return; underlines the importance of such suspensive effect in cases where there is a risk of refoulement; notes that in most countries, appeal against return is not automatically suspensive, which may diminish protection and increase administrative burdens; notes, however, that most countries only attempt to enforce returns in the event of imminent danger to public order; points out that the procedure is often exhausted or repeated endlessly so as to obtain a residence permit after all; notes that children are conceived during on-going procedures and are subsequently used to invoke humanitarian grounds to obtain a residence permit.
Amendment 133 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights that the directive allows for the temporary suspension of the enforcement of a removal, pending a decision relating to return; underlines the importance of such suspensive effect in cases where there is a risk of refoulement; notes that in most countries, appeal against return is not automatically suspensive, which may diminish protection and increase administrative burdens;
Amendment 141 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 153 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Regrets, however, that once a safe return becomes possible, most Member States often do not replace provisional residence permits with mandatory orders to return; regrets further that, as a result, a temporary residence permit is, de facto, often assimilated to a permanent residence permit;
Amendment 156 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 160 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes with concernWelcomes the widespread automatic imposition of entry bans, which in some Member States are enforced alongside voluntary departure; stresses that this approach risks reducing incentives to comply with a return decision;
Amendment 164 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Is aware that imposing entry bans is necessary in order to stop a carousel of applications, refusals and orders to leave the territory in the different Member States; notes that this results in an enormous administrative burden for the Member States concerned and perpetuates the legal uncertainty of those concerned; considers that the persons concerned are thus not encouraged to build a future in their country of origin;
Amendment 169 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that although the threat of imposition of an entry ban may serve ais an incentive to leave a country within the time period of voluntary departure, once imposed, entry bans actually reduce the incentive to comply with a return decision and may increase the risk of absconding;
Amendment 174 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Recognises that the imposition of entry bans together with orders to leave the territory constitute a necessary two- pronged approach; recognises further that that where this would discourage the person concerned from returning voluntarily, their forced return would be in accordance with Article 16 of Directive 2008/115/EC of 16 December 2008;
Amendment 175 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 185 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 191 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 201 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Considers that the failure to comply with an order to leave the territory voluntarily in and of itself constitutes an objective criterion to decide that there is a risk of absconding;
Amendment 203 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. NoteRecalls that the directive establishes that returnees may lawfully be detained where other less coercive measures cannot be applied; expresses regret that despite the obligation to apply detention as a measure of last resort, in practice, very few viable alternatives to detention are developed and applied by Member States; calls on Member States, as a matter of urgency, to offer viable community-based alternatives to detention;
Amendment 205 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Notes that the directive establishes that returnees may lawfully be detained where other less coercive measures cannot be applied; expresses regret that despite the obligation to apply detention as a measure of last resort, in practice, very few viablecriticises the fact that, even after repeated failures to comply with an order to leave the territory, only in extremely exceptional circumstances are such orders enforced; notes that, given that those concerned have no prospect of a permanent residence permit, reception in the community is no alternatives to detention are developed and applied by Member States; calls on Member States, as a matter of urgen; notes that this last option is only chosen by returnees in order to demonstrate by means of sheer obduracy, to offer viable community-based alternatives to detentionhat they are integrated into the community, for example because they have children in school, and so ultimately obtain a permanent residence permit;
Amendment 215 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Notes that a significant number of children are still detained in the European Union as part of return procedures, which constitutes a direct violation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, as the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child has clarified that children should never be detained for immigration purposes, and detention can never be justified as in a child’s best interests; is aware that these rights have a perverse effect in that parents are encouraged to send their children in advance to the desired country of migration; considers that as a result minors are exposed to greater danger during their journey to and stay in the country of arrival; maintains that it is in the interest of all children to discourage this form of child abuse by parents as much as possible; is also aware that adults often pretend to be minors in order to invoke children's rights;
Amendment 216 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Notes that a significant number of alleged children are still detained in the European Union as part of return procedures, which constitutes a direct violation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, as the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child has clarified that children should never be detained for immigration purposes, and detention can never be justified as in a child’s best interests; stresses that there should be mandatory procedures to detect adults pretending to be children, such as bone age assessments or dental age assessments, in order to be able to put more focus on real children’s best interest;
Amendment 226 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on Member States to ensure the proper implementation of the directive in all its aspects; calls on the Commission to continue monitoring this implementation and take action in the event of non- compliance;
Amendment 228 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 232 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission to ensureonsiders that is the responsibility of thate Member States and Frontex have monitoring bodies in place that are supported by a proper mandate, capacity and competence, a high level of independence and expertise, and transparent procedures; urges the Commission to ensure the establishment of a post-return monitoring mechanism to understand the fate of returned persons, with particular attention for unaccompanied minto enforce the legislation and to ensure the actual return of persons who have been ordered to leave the territorsy;
Amendment 237 #
2019/2208(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Maintains that after arrival in their home countries, returnees are no longer the responsibility of the EU and the Member States but of their countries of origin; maintains further that development aid should be withheld from countries which refuse to take responsibility for their subjects;
Amendment 171 #
2019/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. WelcomNotes Moldovan participation in common security and defence policy (CSDP) missions and operations, cyber security and cyber-crime investigations, as well as Moldova’s cooperation with NATO;
Amendment 273 #
2019/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. WelcomUnderlines the significant increase in Moldovan imports into the EU, as well as the fact that the EU is the largest investor in Moldova; welcomes the Moldovan Parliament’s adoption of the European LEADER approach as the basis for its national rural policy;
Amendment 14 #
2019/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 18 #
2019/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates its full support for Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognised borders and condemns the illegal occupation of the Georgian regions of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali/South Ossetia by the Russian Federation; emphasises that the AA covers the entire territory of Georgia, including its occupied regions, and aims to benefit its whole population; calls on the Russian Federation to fulfil its obligations under the EU-mediated ceasefire agreement of 12 August 2008, notably to withdraw all its military forces from Georgia’s occupied territories and allow the European Union Monitoring Mission (EUMM) unhindered access to the whole territory of Georgia; asks the Commission and the EEAS to enhance their efforts to resolve the conflict peacefully, including through the EUMM and the EU Special Representative for the South Caucasus and the crisis in Georgia; calls on the neighbouring states to abide by their international commitments to Georgia’s territorial integrity; deplores all the diplomatic provocations stirring up tensions in this part of the Caucasus;
Amendment 88 #
2019/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Expresses its concern about recent court cases against opposition politicians, which contributed to a climate of increased mistrust and heightened tensions between the ruling party and the op; recalls that, according to the opposition, the government is still holding several poslition, and led to a polarisation of politics and societycal prisoners in order to prevent them from participating in the election; calls on Georgia to respect the highest standards of judicial independence and fair trial as committed to under the AA;
Amendment 98 #
2019/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 112 #
2019/2200(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Deplores the constant violations by the Russian Federation, which exercises de facto control ofresidual tensions in Adjara, Abkhazia and Tskhinvali/South Ossetia regions, of the fundamental rights of, and the risks they people in these occupied regions, who are being deprived of the freedom of movement and residence, the right to property and the right of access to education in the native language, and reiterates its full support for the right of return of internally displaced persose to the people in these regions;.
Amendment 9 #
2019/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas Parliament hasand the national parliaments have a duty and responsibility to exercise itstheir democratic oversight of the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) and common security and defence policy (CSDP) and should have the means to fulfil this role;
Amendment 39 #
2019/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas new political forcetwork of terroristic groups are pushing for their own global and regional ambitions with unpredictable consequences for global security;
Amendment 96 #
2019/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for a stronger, united, effective and more strategic European Union, especially given that a new European political cycle has just started and that the EU’s foreign and security policy is subject to changthe establishment of effective cooperation between European countries, based on cooperation between sovereign nations, aimed at establishing a project of political independence for Europe;
Amendment 99 #
2019/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 135 #
2019/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that the European Union has to switch from a responsive to an anticipatory approach and team up with like-minded partners to defend the global rule-based order founded on international law; recalls that the EU’s CFSP is based on partnership and multilateralism, which help to unite the relevant regional and global powers; underlines the urgent need to explore new forms of alliances and find innovative mechanisms for cooperation;
Amendment 156 #
2019/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 171 #
2019/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines that the European Union can only deliver its full potential when speaking with one voice and when decision-making is shifted step by step from the national to the supranational level, taking full advantage of the possibilities offered by the EU institutions and their procedures; stresses that the European Union should use all available means to achieve this goal, including those offered by parliamentary diplomaStresses that only cooperation on the basis of unanimity can be effective and that at no time should a Member State be able to impose its diplomatic and strategic policy;
Amendment 230 #
2019/2136(INI)
Amendment 281 #
2019/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for the strengthening of the EU’EU countries capacity to act autonomously in the area of security and defence; stresses that efficient cooperation with partner organisations such as the UN or NATO is more vital than everthis autonomous action on security requires countries that are members of NATO to leave NATO’s Integrated Command;
Amendment 307 #
2019/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
Amendment 322 #
2019/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Recalls that Article 20(2) of the TEU, which lays down provisions for enhanced cooperation, provides additional possibilities for Member States to move forward with the CFSP and should therefore be usedTEU could allow for a strengthening of the CFSP, but that States would legitimately prefer to develop an independent foreign policy;
Amendment 336 #
2019/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
Amendment 341 #
2019/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls for stronger support to the EU maritime security strategy as freedom of navigation is an increasing challenge; insists that freedom of navigation must be respected at all times; nevertheless considers that priority should be given to the control of both people and goods;
Amendment 342 #
2019/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls for stronger support to the EU Member States ‘maritime security strategy as freedom of navigation is an increasing challenge; insists that freedom of navigation must be respected at all times, because the defence of the European borders, in the respect of freedom of navigation is an increasing challenge;
Amendment 360 #
2019/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
Amendment 15 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes the lasting deterioration in the Union’s strategic environment in the face of multiple challenges directly or indirectly affecting the security of its Member States and citizens: armed conflicts immediately to the east and south of the European continent, jihadist terrorism, cyber attacks, uncontrolled migration, increasing threats to natural resources, climate change, presence of foreign influence networks defending interests contrary to those of the Member States, etc.;
Amendment 30 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considersriticises the fact that instability and unpredictability on the Union’s borders and in its immediate neighbourhood (north Africa, the Middle East, Ukraine, the Caucasus, the Balkans, etc.) pose a direct threat to the security of the continent; stresses the inextricable link between internal and external security; is concerned about some Member States' support for forces causing instability in the immediate neighbourhood (for example, the destruction of Libya, the destabilisation of Egypt and the severance of diplomatic relations with Syria);
Amendment 50 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Deplores the fact that, in this context, some of these actors are deliberately circumventing or attempting to destroy the multilateral mechanisms essential to maintaining peace; criticises the fact that the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on nuclear capacity in Iran has been abandoned, affecting the international credibility of multinational solutions to conflicts;
Amendment 81 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes, in this adverse and volatile context, the belated but real recognition of shared security interests and the growing political will on the part of European countries and the European institutions to act collectively for their security by endowing themselves with greater means to act autonomously;
Amendment 84 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Is convinced that the response to the Union’sMember States' security challenges lies primarily in strengthening its strategic autonomyepping up their cooperation; highlights the strategic instability caused by Turkish diplomacy; is concerned about the return of a number of jihadis to Member States and the Western Balkans;
Amendment 103 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 112 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that the principle of European strategic autonomy is based on the ability of the UnionMember States to strengthen itstheir freedom to assess, take decisions and take action where circumstances so require in order to defend itstheir interests and values, which sometimes coincide;
Amendment 121 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 135 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that the affirmation of European strategic autonomy depends on the establishment of European defence cooperation in the technological, capability, industrial and operational fields; considers that only practical and flexible cooperation based on pragmatic initiatives will make it possible to gradually overcome the difficulties, forge a genuine common strategic culture and shape common responses tailored to the continent’s main security and defence issues; states that these collaborations must, above all, be part of an inter-state cooperation policy;
Amendment 144 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that European strategic autonomy can only be genuinely achieved if Member States demonstrate solidaritycooperation, which is reflected in particular in the needcapacity to prioritise the procurement of European capabilities where equipment is available and competitive; points out that the CJEU explicitly stated in its judgment of 10 March 2005 (Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union) that the concept of Community preference is a political principle rather than a legal principle and cannot therefore be used as a counter-argument against the free-trade dogma that the EU continues to impose; recognises the sovereignty of the Member States in their strategic and military choices, particularly with regard to supplying their armed forces with the requisite equipment;
Amendment 169 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 186 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Notes that the Union currently has a presence on three continents through the deployment of 16 civilian or military missions (10 civilian and six military, of which three are executive and three are non-executive missions); recognises the contribution made by these missions to peace and international security and stability; stresses that their implementation must be accompanied by an overhaul of the instruments laid down in the Lisbon Treaty and introduced in recent years, in order to make them more effective;
Amendment 215 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Notes, however, that the effectiveness of CSDP missions and operations in general is being hampered by an increasing reluctance on the part of Member States and the European institutions to make such missions and operations more robust, both in terms of human resources and their mandates; noteswelcomes the fact that CSDP military operations increasingly tend to be based on armed forces training (EUTM), with no executive dimension;
Amendment 220 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
Amendment 224 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 251 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Notes the decision of 26 September 2019 to extend the EU maritime operation in the Mediterranean (EUNAVFORMED Sophia) by six months to 31 March 2020; deeply deplores the decision temporarily to suspend the navalstresses the urgent need to reach agreement among the Member States; calls for the operation to include the objective of presvence; stresses the urgent need to reach agreement among the Member States and calls for the redeployment of naval assets andting departures and, where necessary, repatriating migrants in their country of departure when it is not possible to repatriate them in their country of origin, as this is the only strategy that will dissuade people from leaving, tackle people-smuggling mafias and save lives; calls for a European 'No Way' policy to be introduced, fuoll implementation of the mandateowing the Australian model, which has proved its worth;
Amendment 262 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
Amendment 272 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Notes the failure of the Union’s battlegroup project; the battlegroups have never been deployed since their creation in 2007, owing in particular to opposition on the part of all the Member States and the complexity of their implementation and funding, which is at odds with the original objective of speed and efficiency;
Amendment 287 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Expects the Union to make effective use of all existing CSDP policy instruments in the areas of diplomacy, cooperation, development, conflict management and peacekeeping; stresses that CSDP military and civilian instruments cannot, under any circumstances, be the only solution to security issues and that a ‘comprehensive approach’ should always be adopted; considers that only the use of all these instruments on the basis of a ‘comprehensive approach’ will provide the flexibility needed to effectively achieve the most ambitious security objectivesCalls for a common European security and defence policy to be based on cooperation among states, with decisions being taken solely on the basis of unanimity;
Amendment 315 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
Amendment 321 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Notes with satisfaction the Commission’s proposal of 2 May 2018 to establish a EUR 13 billion budget line for defence in the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) under the heading of industrial policy; notes that this proposal, which reflects an unprecedented commitment by the Commission, remains subject to the unanimous agreement of the Member States in the next MFF; calls for the funds to be allocated to suitable but not necessarily military cooperation programmes (for example, programmes involving satellites or intelligence cooperation, or tackling cybercrime or terrorism);
Amendment 327 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
Paragraph 41
Amendment 341 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
Paragraph 42
Amendment 347 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
Paragraph 43
Amendment 358 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
Paragraph 45
Amendment 367 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
Paragraph 46
46. Stresses the still virtual nature of the European Defence Fund; points out that that this instrument has not yet been finally approved, with only partial and political agreement having been given in April 2019; stresses the importance of maintaining Parliament’s position concerning the amount of the EDF, the involvement of third countries and the establishment of an appropriate intellectual property policy in relation to security and defence in order to protect research results; draws attention, in that connection, to the highly sensitive and strategic nature of defence research, both for industrial competitiveness and for the strategic autonomy of the Union; calls for the initial lessons learned from the implementation of the EDIDP (in particular concerning the application of derogations for eligible entities), the pilot project and the preparatory action on defence research to be properly taken into account; calls on the Member States to be fully involved in the decision-making process in order to avoid bureaucratic excesses and to ensure that the programmes included address the strategic needs of the CSDP and the Member States; considers that the success of the EDF will depend on its ability to cater for the specific defence needs of the participating states and to guarantee the availability of sufficient budgetary resources, whilst ensuring that industrial know-how is not duplicated, national defence investment is not crowded out and cooperation does not become over- complicated; considers that developing the European defence industry by regulating access for entities controlled by non-EU third parties to projects financed by the Fund is fully consistent with the European ambition of strategic autonomyCalls for the European Defence Fund, in its current configuration (i.e. under the exclusive control of the Commission), to be abolished and calls for it to be managed on a permanent basis by the Council, under the unanimity rule;
Amendment 392 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49
Paragraph 49
49. Is convinced that the Union has a vital interest in creating a safe and open maritime environment which makes for the free passage ofit possible to monitor the transit of both goods and people more closely; notes that most of the strategic assets, critical infrastructure and capabilities are under the control of Member States and that their willingness to enhance cooperation is paramount for European security; reaffirms the Union’s role as a global maritime security provider, and stresses the importance of developing relevant military and civilian capabilities; welcomes in that connection the adoption of the revised EU Maritime Security Strategy Action Plan in June 2018;
Amendment 409 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 51
Paragraph 51
51. Welcomes efforts to strengthen the Union’sMember States’ capacity to address ‘hybrid’ threats, which are combinations of ambiguous posturing, direct and indirect pressure and the involvement of military and non-military capabilities, and are just some of the range of internal and external security challenges facing the Union; notes the reflections on the triggering of the mutual assistance clause with regard to hybrid threats in order to provide the Union with an effective common response;
Amendment 416 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 52
Paragraph 52
52. Recognises the increasingly prominent role of artificial intelligence (AI) in European defence; notes, in particular, the many military applications stemming from AI for managing and simulating operational environments, assisting the decision-making process, detecting threats and processing intelligence; stresses that the development of reliable AI in the field of defence is essential for ensuring European strategic autonomy in capability and operational areas; calls on the Member States to cooperate to that end and calls on the Union to keep up its investment in this area and in particular in disruptive technologies through existing instruments (European Defence Fund, European Innovation Council, future Horizon Europe, Digital Europe programme);
Amendment 432 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 54
Paragraph 54
54. Stresses that the ambition of European strategic autonomy is based on the ability of Europeans to take action to defend their interests, either independently or within an institutionalter-country cooperation framework (NATO, UN);
Amendment 450 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 57
Paragraph 57
57. Draws attention to NATO’s fundamental role in collective defence, as explicitly recognised in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; believes that the EU-NATO partnership is essential for addressing the security challenges facing Europe and its neighbourhood; believes that EU-NATO cooperation should be complementary and takes full account of each of the two institution’s specific features and roleTakes the view that a genuine policy of independence for Europe would imply states that are signatories to the Washington Treaty leaving NATO; is keen for an alliance of European nations to be established to guarantee Europe’s security and the diplomatic and strategic independence of its members; calls for a strategic partnership to be established with Russia and the United States, based on the defence of the common interests of the European nations;
Amendment 459 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60
Paragraph 60
Amendment 476 #
2019/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 61
Paragraph 61
Amendment 1 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
Citation 3 a (new)
– having regard to Article 3 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights which affirms the prohibition on making the human body and its parts as such a source of financial gain,
Amendment 20 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
Citation 11 a (new)
– having regard to Article 21 of the Council of Europe Convention on Human Rights and Biomedecine, known as the Oviedo Convention and entered into force on 1 December 1999, which prohibits the use of human body for financial gain,
Amendment 21 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 12
Citation 12
– having regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child of 20 November 1989 and in particular Article 7(1),
Amendment 35 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15
Citation 15
Amendment 37 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16
Citation 16
Amendment 44 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 22 a (new)
Citation 22 a (new)
– having regard to the EU Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World 2015 condemning all forms of gestational surrogacy,
Amendment 91 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Expresses its deep concern at the escalation in attacks on democracy and the rule of law worldwide in 2018, which reflect the rise of authoritarianism as a political project by consolidated totalitarian regimes, dictatorships and tyrannies, embodying disregard for human rights, repression of dissent, politicised justice and predetermined elections; is of the opinion that countries falling into authoritarian regimthe citizens of those countries become more vulnerable to instability, conflict, and to becoming the victims of corruption and violent extremismce; welcomes the fact that, at the same time, a number of countries have launched peace and democratisation processes, implemented constitutional and judicial reforms, and engaged with civil society in open and public debates with the objective of promoting fundamental freedoms and human rights, including the abolition of the death penalty;
Amendment 134 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the importance of advancing gender equality and women’s rights worldwide; emphasises that, in spite of progress, women and girls continue to suffer discrimination and violence, violence and reproductive exploitation; stresses that many societies still struggle to provide women and girls with equal rights under the law and equal access to education, healthcare, respect of their intimacy and reproductive capacity which encompasses the condemnation of any forms of gestational surrogacy, decent work and political and economic representation;
Amendment 156 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Draws attention to instances of persecution and discrimination based on ethnicity, nationality, class, caste, religion, belief, language, sex, sexual orientation and age, which remain rife in many countries and societies; is seriously concerned at the increasingly intolerant and hate-filled responses targeting people who are the victims of these human rights violations;
Amendment 162 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that the number of persons forcibly displaced in 2018 exceeded 70 million, of whom 26 million were refugees3 ; takes the view that wars, Islamic terrorism, conflicts, political oppression, poverty and food insecurity, uneven economic development conditions and the adverse effects of climate change on the world’s poorest countries in particular, fuel the risks of triggering new conflicts and the further displacement of populations; __________________ 3UNHCR – Global Trends 2018 report (19 June 2019).
Amendment 199 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Highlights that trade and human rights reinforce each other, and that but that though the business community has an important role to play inonly nation-States have the capacity to offering positive incentives in terms of promoting human rights, democracy and corporate responsibility; reminds the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) of the need to make effective use of human rights clauses within international agreements, based on political dialogue, the regular assessment of progress and recourse to the consultation procedure upon request from a party; requests that robust implementation and monitoring mechanisms of human rights clauses be put in place, involving Parliament, local civil society and relevant international organisations, as well as establishing a complaints mechanism for groups of citizens and stakeholders who are affected by human rights violations;
Amendment 228 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for the EU and the Member States to continue to closely monitor developments that negatively affect governance and civil society space worldwide, and to systematically respond, using all appropriate means, to policies and legislative changes led by authoritarian governments, that are aimed at undermining governance based on fundamental democratic principles and at shrinking civil society space; is of the opinion that synergy between the Commission, the EEAS and Parliament should be strengthened in relation to this matter;
Amendment 303 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Strongly supports the EU’s strategic engagement for gender equality and its ongoing efforts to improve the human rights situation of women and girls, in line with the 2030 SDGs; calls on the Commission and the EEAS to further contribute to gender equality and girls’ and women’s empowerment by working closely with international organisations and non-EU countries, in order to develop and implement new legal frameworks regarding gender equality, and to eradicate harmful practices targeted at women and girls, such as child marriage and, female genital mutilation and commercialisation of bodies through gestational surrogacy;
Amendment 335 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Calls for new EU initiatives to prevent and combat child abuse in the world, to rehabilitate conflict-affected children and to provide them with a sheltered environment in which care and education are fundamental; calls for the EU to initiate an international movement to advocate the rights of the child, inter alia by organising an international conference on the protection of children in fragile environments; stresses the importance for a child to know, as far as possible, his biological father and mother;
Amendment 448 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Stresses the urgent need to tackle the root causes of migration flows such as, which lead to major destabilisation in arrival countries, such as Islamic terrorism, wars, conflicts, persecution, networks of illegal migration, trafficking, smuggling and climate change; calls for the external dimension of the refugee crisis to be addressed, including by finding sustainable solutions to conflicts through building cooperation and partnerships with the third countries concerned; insists that the implementation of the Global Compacts on migration and refugees must therefore go hand in hand with the implementation of the UN’s 2030 Agenda as set out in the Strategic Development Goals, as well as with increased investment in developing countries;
Amendment 470 #
2019/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Stresses that the EU should continue to actively support democratic and effective human rights institutions and civil society in their efforts to promote democratisation; positively notes, in this context, the European Endowment for Democracy’s consistent engagement in the eastern and southern neighbourhoods of the EU to promote democracy and respect for fundamental rights and freedoms; recalls that the experience gained and the lessons learned from transitions to democracy in the framework of the enlargement and neighbourhood policies could make a positive contribution to the identification of best practices that could be used to support and consolidate other democratisation processes worldwide;
Amendment 10 #
2018/2855(RSP)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas Facebook revealed the mobile phone number of its users for commercial purposes, which was a clear breach of Facebook’s data-use policy that states: “We do not share information that personally identifies you … with advertising, measurement or analytics partners unless you give us permission”; whereas Facebook has also developed a "conversion pixel" — basically a type of tracking device — within ads displayed on Facebook, which allows advertisers to target users directly with ads and then measure exactly how they respond to them;
Amendment 21 #
2018/2855(RSP)
Recital U
Amendment 22 #
2018/2855(RSP)
Recital V
Amendment 23 #
2018/2855(RSP)
Recital X
X. whereas the Information Commissioner’s Office of the United Kingdom has already issued 23 Information Notices to 17 different organisations and individuals, including Facebook on 23 February 2018, to request provision of information from the organisations in a structured way; while Facebook confirmed on 18 May 2018 that Aggregate IQ created and, in some cases, placed advertisements on behalf of the DUP Vote to Leave campaign, Vote Leave, BeLeave and Veterans for Britain;
Amendment 25 #
2018/2855(RSP)
Recital Z
Amendment 26 #
2018/2855(RSP)
Recital Z b a (new)
Z b a. whereas Facebook has been accused by political representatives, media outlets and a growing part of its employees of having a strong political liberal bias which Mark Zuckerberg did not deny during his audition in front of the US Senate;
Amendment 29 #
2018/2855(RSP)
Paragraph 1
1. Expects all online platforms to ensure full compliance with Union data protection law, namely the GDPR and Directive 2002/58/EC (e-Privacy) and to help users understand how their personal information is processed in the targeted advertising model of only users that opt in for providing this data, and that effective controls are available, which includes greater transparency in relation to the privacy settings, and the design and prominence of privacy notices;
Amendment 32 #
2018/2855(RSP)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Emphasises that it is strictly forbidden for any online platforms to follow and process any non-user’s data;
Amendment 33 #
2018/2855(RSP)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Takes the view that in case the online platform is not able to guarantee a high level of security and protection of personal data, the platform should be banned;
Amendment 34 #
2018/2855(RSP)
Paragraph 3
3. Takes note of Facebook's statement that itFinds it unacceptable that Facebook exclusively uses data of non- Facebook users to create aggregated datasets from which it derives conclusions about how the service is used;
Amendment 39 #
2018/2855(RSP)
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the view that the digital age requires electoral laws to be adapted to this new digital reality and suggests; it remains the sole decision of Member States whether to introduce an obligatory system of digital imprints for electronic campaigning and advertising. Any form of political advertising should include easily accessible and understandable information on the publishing organisation and who is legally responsible for spending so that it is clear who sponsored campaigns, similar to existing requirements for printed campaign materials currently in place in various Member States;
Amendment 51 #
2018/2855(RSP)
Paragraph 11
Amendment 59 #
2018/2855(RSP)
Paragraph 12
Amendment 81 #
2018/2855(RSP)
Paragraph 24
Amendment 98 #
2018/2855(RSP)
Paragraph 33
Amendment 2 #
2018/2271(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
– Stresses that a report on the same subject was rejected by the Parliament on 14 November 2018, therefore proceeding with a new vote in such a short time without any further analysis and substantial modification of the text shows a worrying contempt for the basic principles of democracy;
Amendment 18 #
2018/2271(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Requests the Commission to submit, by 31 March 2019, on the basis of point (a) of Article 77(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), a proposal for a Regulation on establishing a European Humanitarian Visa, followalizes that the introduction of a Humanitarian Visa will not only create an unmanageable administrative burden for consulates and embassies but also preserve fundamental problems regarding secondary movements within the EU, serious deficits ing the recommendations set out in the Annex heretoEU return policies and the security problems resulting from it;
Amendment 25 #
2018/2271(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that Member States should be able to issue a European humanitarian visa to persons seeking international protection, to allow those persons to enter the territory of the Member State issuing the visa for the sole purpose of makUrges the Commission to examine the feasibility of refugee centres outside of the EU in order to offer the necessary protection ing an application for international protection in that Member Stateefficient and controlled manner;
Amendment 31 #
2018/2271(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the accompanying recommendations to the Commission and the Council, and to the national parliaments, the Court of Justice, the European External Action Service, the European Asylum Support Office, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation and the European Union Agency for Fundamental RighUrges the Commission to assess the relations with third countries on the basis of the cooperation in EU return policies and to propose efficient approaches to eliminate deficits.
Amendment 437 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 51 a (new)
Paragraph 51 a (new)
51a. Calls for discussion to determine what should be done with the proceeds of fines imposed under European regulations for unlawful State aid, the object being to ensure that, when fines relate to laws or rulings which allow aggressive tax optimisation, they benefit countries whose public finances have been wrongfully deprived of revenue and not countries which have passed such laws or granted such rulings;
Amendment 685 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4.2 a (new)
Subheading 4.2 a (new)
Amendment 778 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 116 a (new)
Paragraph 116 a (new)
116a. Regrets that the TAXE3 Committee did not have the time to devote more attention to specific cases of financial crime; draws attention, in this regard, to the case of the Kazakh oligarch Mukhtar Ablyazov, sentenced to life in prison in his country for murder and convicted of embezzling an estimated USD 7.5 billion in clients' deposits and pensions from Bank Turan Alem (BTA), of which he was chairman; notes, in this connection, that in the proceedings against him in the United Kingdom, where he first sought exile before fleeing to France, it was found that Mr Ablyazov made extensive use of opaque offshore structures to channel the embezzled funds as well as certain loans granted by EU credit institutions; notes that he was also able to operate under false identities, visibly and with the connivance of certain administrations; recalls that many building projects had to be stopped when the BTA financial support disappeared, as a direct result of the wrongdoing of Mr Ablyazov; notes that Mr Ablyazov has been convicted in the United Kingdom, France and Kazakhstan and is subject to an international arrest warrant issued by Ukraine and Russia; is surprised at the decision of the Council of State of 9 December 2016, given that all Mr Ablyazov’s cassation appeals had been systematically rejected up until 5 October 2016; calls on the authorities of the Member States concerned to implement the necessary legal remedies to ensure that the court decisions can be enforced and the sums recovered.
Amendment 1235 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 200
Paragraph 200
200. WelcomNotes the participation and input of stakeholders as referred to in Annex XX on TAX3 committee hearings;
Amendment 1237 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 201
Paragraph 201
201. Takes note of the persons who refused to participate in TAX3 committee hearings as referred to in Annex XXDeplores the fact that some of the persons referred to in Annex XX refused to participate in TAX3 committee hearings; regrets that no sanctions of any kind could be found for cases where no reason was given for this refusal and asks the institutions to bear this attitude in mind during any future dealings with the persons concerned;
Amendment 1245 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 203 a (new)
Paragraph 203 a (new)
203a. Regrets that the hearings with business representatives were not long enough to be able to go into the details of the tax plans and arrangements set up by these multinationals ; deplores the often insipid and general nature of the answers and presentations, which were often just public relations exercises; recommends supplementing the hearings by Members of the European Parliament with widespread use of the formula whereby a panel of specialist journalists or whistle- blowers confront business representatives, in order to give greater depth and substance to the exchanges;
Amendment 1251 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 204
Paragraph 204
Amendment 1257 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 205
Paragraph 205
Amendment 1269 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 206
Paragraph 206
Amendment 11 #
2018/2111(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas European citizens are protected from discrimination by the Charter of Fundamental Rights that covers sex, race, colour, ethnicity, or social origin, genetic features, language, religion, or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age andor sexual orientation;
Amendment 37 #
2018/2111(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. StressNotes that Article 2 of the TEU has a duty to protect minorities and to guarantee their rights; notes that Article 2 offrames the protection of the rights of persons belonging to minorities as one of the fundamental values of the EU; points out, however, that the TEU framesTreaties, following the approtectionach of minorities as one of the fundamental values of the EUternational law, do not define the term ‘minorities’, which gives rise to legal ambiguity; further notes that Articles 21 (on non- discrimination) and 22 (on cultural, religious and linguistic diversity) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights acquired legally binding form in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU);
Amendment 47 #
2018/2111(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes with concern that there are Member States which do not extend voting rights in European Parliament elections to their nationals, who are European citizens; points out that this limits the diversity of views in the Parliament and mitigates the accountability of the European institutions to European citizensprinciple of universal suffrage;
Amendment 69 #
2018/2111(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 12 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
Citation 4
Amendment 13 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5
Citation 5
Amendment 18 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9
Citation 9
Amendment 29 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the FRA report entitled ‘Violence against women: an EU-wide survey’, published in March 2014, shows thatdidn’t research one of the root causes of violence against women nerelateds to be tackled in all EU Member States, including those which have not yet ratified the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention)religion or ideology such as Islam and need to be tackled in all EU Member States, given the extent of the problem, the severe consequences of violence and the impact it has on women’sEU-citizens’ lives as well as on society as a whole;
Amendment 32 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
Amendment 41 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas freedom of speech and freedom of expression are the cornerstones of our societies and should remain protected at all cost;
Amendment 44 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas in democratic societies, freedom of assembly is one of the instruments by which people can participate in the public debate and bring about social change; whereas media freedom, pluralism and independence are crucial components of the right to freedom of expression and are vital to the democratic functioning of the EU and its Member States; whereas journalists and other media actors in the EU face multiple attacks, threats and pressures from state and non-state actors causing possible self- censorship;
Amendment 47 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
Amendment 54 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides the right to freedom of expression and information, which includes the right of freedom to hold opinions, and to receive and impart information and ideas;
Amendment 56 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas discrimination on grounds of gender is in violation with article 19 TFEU;
Amendment 58 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
Amendment 71 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the arrival in Europe of illegal migrants and asylum seekers continued in 2017; whereas this reality requires real EU solidarity to put in place adequate reception structures for those most in need and most vulnerable; whereas many migrants place their lives in the hands of smugglers and criminals and are vulnerable to violations of their rights, including violence, abuse and exploitation; whereas women and children are at higher risk of being trafficked and sexually abused at the hands of traffickers and there is therefore a need to build and strengthen child protection systems to prevent and respond to violence, abuse, neglect and the exploitation of children, in line with the commitments set out in the Valletta Action Plan are due to the open border policy and Schengen, while many Member States want to be sovereign and in control of their borders as has been proven by reinforced border controls in many Member States and election results in Italy, Hungary, Austria and Bavaria;
Amendment 79 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
Amendment 92 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes with concern that the 2017 FRA paper entitled ‘Challenges to women’s human rights in the EU’ confirms that women and girls experience persistent gender discrimination, sexist hate speech, and genderreligious-based violence and intimidation in the EU, which severely limits their ability to enjoy their rights and to participate on an equal footing in society;
Amendment 94 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 98 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reminds that discrimination on grounds of gender is in violation with article 19 TFEU;
Amendment 100 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 102 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the signing of the EU’s accession toRegrets that the Istanbul Convention signed on 13 June 2017, despite the limitation to only two mandates; regrets that, to date, only 19 Member States have ratified the Convention and calls on the remaining Member States to do so without delay; recognises that when it comes to determining European standards for the protection of women against violence, the Istanbul Convention is the most important point of reference; calls on the Council to swiftly agree on the Code of Conduct, which will govern the implementation of the Convention by the EUoes not include religious-based induced violence;
Amendment 112 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Expresses concern about the risk of misogyny in European societies and its impact on women’s fundamental rights in all spheres of life; calls onwelcomes Member States to address the key obstacles to gender equality in economic empowerment and political participation, including sexual harassment which hampers women’s full participation in the labour market; highlights the fact that gender stereotypes must be tackled from an early age to effectively address the under- representation of women in work, decision making and politics; calls on Member States to appropriately address this issue in school curricula;
Amendment 120 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 148 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes Member States to take adequate measures to safeguard and promote a pluralist, independent and free media landscape in the service of democratic society, including the independence and sustainability of the media, which are crucial elements of a favourable environment for freedom of expression;
Amendment 150 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that public deliberation and debate are the lifeblood of a healthy and functioning democracy and encourages, in this context, the EU and the Member States to take further steps to safeguards and protect freedom of speech and assembly as basic principles of democratic processes; strongly condemns in this regard the increasing restrictions on freedom of assembly, which the authorities have enforced in some cases with violence against protesters; reaffirms the crucial role of these fundamental freedoms in the functiassembly and freedom of speech including the right to publish all opinions in (onling of democratic societies and calls on the Commission to take an active role in promoting these rights in line with international human rights standarde)media as basic principles of democratic processes;
Amendment 155 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Reminds the EU institutions that all citizens have a guaranteed right to freedom of speech; calls on the EU institutions to respect this right of EU citizens to freedom of speech in all their decisions, actions and policies, as a means to thoroughly uphold media pluralism and media freedom;
Amendment 163 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Expresses its concern that few specific legal provisions to ensure the protection of media actors from violence, threats and pressures can be identified at national level in EU Member States; expresses its concern over the precarious working conditions for journalists including non-paid reporters, bloggers or columnists and the amount of psychological violence they witness, which compromises their ability to work appropriately and thus hampers media freedoerefore could threaten media freedom and media pluralism;
Amendment 168 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines the factNotes that whistle- blowing is an essential element in investigative journalism and press freedom, and in this context recalls its resolution of 24 October 2017 on legitimate measurtherefore welcomes Member States to have protection for whistle-blowers acting in the public interest when disclosing the confidential information of companies and public bodies3; __________________ 3in national law accordingly; __________________ 3 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2017)0402. Texts adopted, P8_TA(2017)0402.
Amendment 172 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. WelcomDeplores the Commission’s decision to establish a High Level Expert Group on fake news and online disinformation as this leads to censorship; expresses its concern about the potential threat the notion of fake news could pose to freedom of speech and expression and to the independence of the media, while underlining the negative effects that the spreading of falske news might have on the quality of political debate and on the well-informed participation of citizens in democratic societycoming from the European Institutes;
Amendment 182 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Expresses deep concerns about the obstacles to the workmisbehaviour of human rights defenders, including civil society organisations active in the field of fundamental rights and democracy; recognises the key role of these organisations in making fundamental rights and values a reality for everyone and stresses that such as Oxfam and Save the children, as they should be able to carry out their work in a safe and well- supported environment; is concerned by the closing down of civil society space; calls on the EU and the Member States to address proactively the root caexual abuse is said to be “endemic” in the international aid sector according to the Houses of shrinking civil society space and to uphold their fundamental rightsCommons International Development Committee;
Amendment 184 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Welcomes initiatives of Member States to create and maintain, in law and in practice, a safe and secure environment for journalists and other media actors, enabling them to perform their work in full independence and without undue interference – such as the threat of violence, harassment, financial, economic and political pressure, pressure to disclose confidential sources and materials, targeted surveillance, and the opinion of the ‘EU versus disinformation’;
Amendment 201 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Points out that all EU Member States should address adequately discriminatory or violent reactions against the schooling of migrant and refugee children, both through law enforcement and by promoting mutual understanding and social cohesion; calls on Member States to structurally address respect for diversity, intercultural understanding and human rights, including children’s rights, in regular school curricuhave laws against aggression in national law;
Amendment 223 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 230 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 282 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
Amendment 289 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
Amendment 303 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 312 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
Amendment 316 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Points out that improving the quality, independence and efficiency of national justice systems, in particular judges, prosecutors and lawyers, remains a key priority of the European Union; stresses that there is an urgent need to introduce a gender-sensitive perspective into the Member States’ legal and judicial systems, including the development and institutionalisation of the gender component into training programmes for all judiciary staffremains part of the sovereignty of Member States;
Amendment 333 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
Amendment 347 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 358 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Emphasises that the EU and the Member States should develop credible and effective systems that would make it unnecessary to detain children for asylum or return purposes; stresses the importance of taking the principle of the best interests of the child into consideration in all aspects concerning children as well as of the practical implementation of the right to be heard; recalls that Article 14 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 28 of the United Nations Conventions on the Rights of the Child guarantee the right to education to every child, including migrant and refugee children, both unaccompanied and accompanied and avoiding separated schooling and segregation; stresses that Member States should ensure that migrant and refugee children are effectively supported through linguistic, social and psychological support based on individual assessment of their nepoints out that therefore repeat asylum procedures should be prohibiteds;
Amendment 371 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
Amendment 384 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
Amendment 390 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Whereas the collusion between some NGOs and smuggler networks have been documented, encouraging illegal migration toward Member States;
Amendment 391 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 b (new)
Paragraph 26 b (new)
26b. Stresses the urgent need to restore internal border controls;
Amendment 392 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 c (new)
Paragraph 26 c (new)
26c. Is of the opinion that also NGO's should completely obey the law;
Amendment 396 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
Amendment 402 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Points out that renaming 'illegal migrants' as 'irregular migrants' does not make the act of crossing borders legal;
Amendment 406 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 b (new)
Paragraph 27 b (new)
27b. Is of the opinion that family reunification is a threat to order, security, culture preservation and national identity, without complete acceptance of the norms and values of the host country;
Amendment 408 #
Amendment 409 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
Amendment 412 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
Amendment 413 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
Amendment 415 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
Amendment 39 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the rights of persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic traditionally established European minorities are an integral part of human rights, which are universal, indivisible and independent, and whereas protecting and promoting traditionally established European minority rights is essential for peace, security and stability and for promoting tolerance, mutual respect and understanding and co-operation among all persons living on their territory;
Amendment 47 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the protection of the rights of persons belonging to traditionally established European minorities can help build a sustainable future for Europe and contribute to guaranteeing the respect of the principles of dignity, equality and non- discrimination; whereas benefits are not limited to traditionally established European minorities since this protection and promotion will bring stability, economic development and prosperity to all;
Amendment 71 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the European Union’s cultural heritage is rich and diverse; whereas cultural heritage enriches the individual lives of citizens; whereas Article 3 of the TEU affirms, that ‘the Union shall respect its rich cultural and linguistic diversity, and shall ensure that Europe’s cultural heritage is safeguarded and enhanced’; whereas traditionally established European minorities that have been living together in Europe contribute to this rich, unique and diverse heritage and are an integral part of the European identity;
Amendment 100 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – introductory part
Paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Recalls that while protection of minorities is a part of the Copenhagen criteria, both for the candidate countries and for the Member States, there is no guarantee that candidate states stick to the commitments undertaken under the Copenhagen criteria once they became Member States; recallunderlines that there is no standard for minority rights in Union policy nor a common understanding of who can be considered a member of a minority; notneed for a common Union policy on minority rights; underlines that there is no definition of minorities in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities, nor in the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (FCNM); recommends that, with respect to the principles of subsidiarity, proportionality and non-discrimination, such a definition should be based on the definition, laid down in Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly Recommendation 1201(1993) for an additional protocol on the rights of minorities to the European Convention on Human Rights, of a ‘national minority’ as a group of persons in a state whounderlines that minority rights are already defined by law in the Member States and therefore a Union policy in this field is neither necessary nor justified;
Amendment 105 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – indent 1
Paragraph 1 – indent 1
Amendment 111 #
2018/2036(INI)
Amendment 113 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – indent 3
Paragraph 1 – indent 3
Amendment 118 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – indent 4
Paragraph 1 – indent 4
Amendment 122 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – indent 5
Paragraph 1 – indent 5
Amendment 129 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 132 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Expresses that there is ano need for a legislative proposal on minimum standards of protection of minorities in the EU, nor for improving the situation of minorities in all the Member States and to avoid double standards, while; underlines the importance of respecting the principle of subsidiarity and proportionality, and after carrying out a proper impact assessment; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that their legal systems guarantee that persons belonging to a minority are not discriminated against, and to take and implement targeted protection measures based on relevant international standards;
Amendment 141 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States, while to safeguarding the national citizenship, and calls on the Commission, while promoting the European identity and common values, to safeguard the right ofright of traditionally established national minorities to preserve, protect and develop their own identity, and to take the necessary steps to ensure the effective participation of traditionally established national minorities in social, economic and cultural life and in public affairs;
Amendment 158 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 187 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that traditionally established national minorities are groups of persons belonging to minorities who have been living on the same territory and sharing a common identity, in some instances as a result of border changes, in others as a result of living a long time in an area, whereby they have managed to preserve their identity; calls onwelcomes the Member States and the Commission to protect the cultural and linguistic identity of traditionally established national minorities, and to create conditions for the promotion of that identity; points to the important role that regional and local authorities in the EU can play in protecting traditionally established national minorities, and considers that administrative reorganisation and territorial districting must not have negative consequences for them;
Amendment 199 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that maintaining the European cultural heritage of the EU is a common interest of the Member States; calls on the EU institutions and its Member States to support, enhance and promote the cultural rights of natraditionally established European minorities;
Amendment 201 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 205 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 212 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Highlights the fact that media plays a central role with regard to cultural and linguistic rights; recalls that being able to receive and publish information in a language one can fully understand and communicate in is a precondition for equal and effective participation in public, economic, social and cultural life; notes in this regard that special attention must be given to the needs of persons belonging to natraditionally established European minorities living in rural and remote areas;
Amendment 214 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
Amendment 221 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
Amendment 268 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
Amendment 277 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Notes that the training of teachers and access to textbooks of good quality are essential preconditions for ensuring good quality education for students; notes that a widely recognised problem regarding minority language education that needs to be addressed is the insufficient availability of high-quality teaching material and skilled minority language teachers; notes that multi-dimensional teaching of history should be a requirement in all schools, whether in minority or majority communities;
Amendment 288 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Notes that in addition to its 24 official languages, the EU is home to 60 other languages which are also part of the EUEurope’s cultural and language heritage and which are spoken in specific regions or by specific groups by 40 million people; notes that the multilingualism of the European Union is unique at the level of international organisations; notes that the principle of multilingualism is enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, which obliges the EU to respect linguistic diversity and to support Europe’s rich linguistic and cultural heritage by promoting language learning and linguistic diversity;
Amendment 297 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
Amendment 318 #
Amendment 319 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
Amendment 323 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 – indent 1
Paragraph 30 – indent 1
Amendment 327 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 – indent 2
Paragraph 30 – indent 2
Amendment 331 #
2018/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 – indent 3
Paragraph 30 – indent 3
Amendment 1 #
2018/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Citation 3
Citation 3
Amendment 3 #
2018/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Citation 5
Citation 5
Amendment 10 #
2018/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas justice must be adapnational judicial systems can cooperated to meetrespond to the new challenges faced by the EUStates, in particular in the fight against terrorism;
Amendment 37 #
2018/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 45 #
2018/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 51 #
2018/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 55 #
2018/2009(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 40 #
2018/0331(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) This Regulation aims at ensuring the smooth functioning of the digital single market in an open andecurity of Member States’ citizens in democratic societyies, by preventing the misuse of hosting services for terrorist purposes. The functioning of the digital single market should be improved by reinforcing legal certainty for hosting service providers, reinforcing users’ trust in the online environment, and by strengthening safeguards to the freedom of expression and information.
Amendment 57 #
2018/0331(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The presence of terrorist content online has serious negative consequences for users, for citizens and society at large as well as for the online service providers hosting such content, since it undermines the trust of their users and damages their business models. In light of their central role and the technological means and capabilities associated with the services they provide, online service providers have particular societal responsibilities to protect their services from misuse by terrorists and to help tackle terrorist content disseminated through their services without any prejudice to the freedom of expression and information of Member States’ citizens.
Amendment 96 #
2018/0331(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In order to provide clarity about the actions that both hosting service providers and competent authorities should take to prevent the dissemination of terrorist content online, this Regulation should establish a definition of terrorist content for preventative purposes drawing on the definition of terrorist offences under Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council9 . Given the need to address the most harmful terrorist propaganda online, the definition should capture material and information that incites, encourages or advocates the commission or contribution to terrorist offences, provides instructions for the commission of such offences or promotes the participation in activities of a terrorist group. Such information includes in particular text, images, sound recordings and videos. When assessing whether content constitutes terrorist content within the meaning of this Regulation, competent authorities as well as hosting service providers should take into account factors such as the nature and wording of the statements, the context in which the statements were made and their potential to lead to harmful consequences, thereby affecting the security and safety of persons. The fact that the material was produced by, is attributable to or disseminated on behalf of an EU-listed terrorist organisation or person constitutes an important factor in the assessment. Content disseminated for educational, journalistic or research purposes should be adequately protected. Furthermore, the expression of any kind of views which can be perceived as radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitiveand especially on any kind of political questions should not be considered terrorist content. _________________ 9Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and amending Council Decision 2005/671/JHA (OJ L 88, 31.3.2017, p. 6).
Amendment 115 #
2018/0331(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Hosting service providers should apply certain duties of care, in order to prevent the dissemination of terrorist content on their services. These duties of care should not amount to a general monitoring obligation. Duties of care should include that, when applying this Regulation, hosting services providers act in a diligent, proportionate and non- discriminatory manner in respect of content that they store, in particular when implementing their own terms and conditions, with a view to avoiding removal of content which is not terrorist. The removal or disabling of accesscontent has to be undertaken in the absolute observance of freedom of expression and information and should always involve human verification for the first occurrence of removing or disabling said content.
Amendment 148 #
2018/0331(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) When putting in place proactive measures, hosting service providers should ensure that users’ right to freedom of expression and information - including to freely receive and impart information - is preserved. In addition to any requirement laid down in the law, including the legislation on protection of personal data, hosting service providers should act with due diligence and implement safeguards, including notably human oversight and verifications, where appropriate at least for the first removal of a content, to avoid any unintended and erroneous decision leading to removal of content that is not terrorist content. This is of particular relevance when hosting service providers use automated means to detect or remove terrorist content. Any decision to use automated means, whether taken by the hosting service provider itself or pursuant to a request by the competent authority, should be assessed with regard to the reliability of the underlying technology and the ensuing impact on fundamental rights. The use of automated means to remove terrorist content should only be limited to the replication of content that has already been at least once verified and deleted by a human.
Amendment 159 #
2018/0331(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) In order to ensure that hosting service providers exposed to terrorist content take appropriate measures to prevent the misuse of their services, the competent authorities should request hosting service providers having received a removal order, which has become final, to report on the proactive measures taken. These could consist of measures to prevent the re-upload of terrorist content, removed or access to it disabled as a result of a removal order or referrals they received, checking against publicly or privately-held tools containing known terrorist content. They may also employ the use of reliable technical tools to identify new terrorist content, either using those available on the market or those developed by the hosting service provider. The service provider should report on the specific proactive measures in place in order to allow the competent authority to judge whether the measures are effective and proportionate and whether, if automated means are used, the hosting service provider has the necessary abilities for systematic human oversight and verification for the first removal of a content. In assessing the effectiveness and proportionality of the measures, competent authorities should take into account relevant parameters including the number of removal orders and referrals issued to the provider, their economic capacity and the impact of its service in disseminating terrorist content (for example, taking into account the number of users in the Union).
Amendment 187 #
2018/0331(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) Transparency of hosting service providers' policies in relation to terrorist content is essential to enhance their accountability towards their users and to reinforce trust of citizens in the Digital Single Market. Hosting service providers should publish annual transparency reports containing meaningful information about action taken in relation to the detection, identification and removal of terrorist content.
Amendment 242 #
2018/0331(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) Penalties are necessary to ensure the effective implementation by hosting service providers of the obligations pursuant to this Regulation. Member States should adopt rules on penalties, including, where appropriate, fining guidelines. Particularly severe penalties shall be ascertained in the event that the hosting service provider systematically fails to remove terrorist content or disable access to it within one hour from receipt of a removal order. Non-compliance in individual cases could be sanctioned while respecting the principles of ne bis in idem and of proportionality and ensuring that such sanctions take account of systematic failure. In order to ensure legal certainty, the regulation should set out to what extent the relevant obligations can be subject to penalties. Penalties for non-compliance with Article 6 should only be adopted in relation to obligations arising from a request to report pursuant to Article 6(2) or a decision imposing additional proactive measures pursuant to Article 6(4). When determining whether or not financial penalties should be imposed, due account should be taken of the financial resources of the provider. Member States shall ensure that penalties do not encourage the removal of content which is not terrorist content and should punish abusive removal of legal content made in the name of the present Regulation.
Amendment 251 #
2018/0331(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
Recital 43
Amendment 482 #
2018/0331(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) preventing the re-upload of content which has, through human verification, previously been removed or to which access has been disabled because it is considered to be terrorist content;
Amendment 488 #
2018/0331(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) detecting, or identifying and expeditiously removing or disabling access to terrorist content.
Amendment 577 #
2018/0331(COD)
1. Where hosting service providers use automated tools pursuant to this Regulation in respect of content that they store, they shall provide effective and appropriate safeguards, notably systematic human oversight for the first removal of a content, to ensure that decisions taken concerning that content, in particular decisions to remove or disable content considered to be terrorist content, are accurate and well-founded.
Amendment 126 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Title 1
Title 1
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Council Joint Action n°98/700/JHA, Regulation (EU) n° 1052/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Regulation (EU) n° 656/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) n° 2016/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council A contribution from the European Commission to the Leaders’ meeting in Salzburg on 19-20 September 2018
Amendment 136 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union has been renamed the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (the ‘Agency’) and its tasks have been expanded with full continuity in all its activities and procedures. The key role of the Agency should be to establish a technical and operational strategy as part of the multiannual strategic policy cycle for implementation of European integrated border management, to oversee the effectivmonitor the functioning of border control at the external borders, to carry out risk analysis and vulnerability assessments, to provide increased technical and operational assistance to Member States and third countries through joint operations and rapid border interventions, to ensure the practical execution of measures in a situation requiring urgent action at the external borders, to provide technical and operational assistance in the support of search and rescue operations for persons in distress at sea, to organise, coordinate and conduct return operations and return interventions and provide technical and operational assistance to return activities of third countries.
Amendment 145 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) However, the Union’s framework in the area of control of external borders, returns and asylum. still needs to be further improved. To that end and to further underpin the current and future envisaged operational efforts, the European Border and Coast Guard should be reformed by giving the European Border and Coast Guard Agency a stronger mandate and, in particular, by providing it with the necessary capabilities in the form of a European Border and Coast Guard standing corps of 10 000 operational staff with executive powers to effectively support Member States on the ground in their efforts to protect the external borders, fight secondary movements and significantly step up the effective return of irregular llegal immigrants.
Amendment 148 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) In its conclusions of 28 June 2018, the European Council called for strengthening further the supportive role of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, including in the cooperation with third countries, through increased resources and an enhanced mandate, with a view to ensure the effective control of the external borders and significantly stepping up the effective return of irregular llegal immigrants.
Amendment 153 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) It is necessary to monitor the crossing of the external borders efficiently, address migratory challenges and potential future threats at the external borders, ensure a high level of internal security within the Union, safeguard the functioning of the Schengen area and respect the overarching principle of solidarity. That should be accompanied by the proactive management of migration, including the necessary measures in third countries. In view of what has been stated, it is necessary to consolidate the European Border and Coast Guard and to further expand the mandate of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The Agency should be constituted principally by a European Border and Coast Guard standing corps consisting of 10,000 operational staff.
Amendment 157 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) In order to reflect the further qualitative enhancement of its mandate, in particular by providing it with its own operational arm, the European Border and Cost Guard standing corps of 10,000 operational staff, the Agency formerly known as Frontex should from now on be referred to as and operate exclusively under the name "the European Border and Coast Guard (EBCG) Agency". This change should be reflected in all relevant instances, including its visualisation in the external communication materials.
Amendment 180 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The implementation of this Regulation does not affect the division of competence between the Union and the Member States or the obligations of Member States under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, the International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue, the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and its Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, and the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and other relevant international instruments.
Amendment 181 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) The implementation of this Regulation does not affectimplies the repeal of Regulation (EU) No 656/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council18 . _________________ 18 Regulation (EU) No 656/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing rules for the surveillance of the external sea borders in the context of operational cooperation coordinated by the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (OJ L 189, 27.6.2014, 9. p.93).
Amendment 213 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) The Agency should prepare general and tailored risk analyses based on a common integrated risk analysis model, to be applied by the Agency itself and by Member States. The Agency should, based also on information provided by Member States, provide adequate information covering all aspects relevant to European integrated border management, especially border control, return, irregular secondary movements of third-country nationals within the Union, prevention of cross- border crime including facilitation of unauthorisedillegal border crossings, trafficking in human beings, terrorism and threats of a hybrid nature, as well as the situation in relevant third countries, so as to allow for appropriate measures to be taken or to tackle identified threats and risks with a view to improving the integrated management of the external borders.
Amendment 219 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) Given its activities at the external borders, the Agency should contribute to preventing and detecting serious crime with a cross-border dimension, such as migrant smuggling, trafficking in human beings and terrorism, where it is appropriate for it to act and where it has obtained relevant information through its activities. It should coordinate its activities with Europol as the agency responsible for supporting and strengthening Member States' actions and their cooperation in preventing and combating serious crime affecting two or more Member States. Cross-border crimes necessarily entail a cross-border dimension. Such a cross- border dimension is characterised by crimes directly linked to unauthorisedillegal crossings of the external borders, including trafficking in human beings or smuggling of migrants. That said, Article 1(2) of Council Directive 2002/90/EC19 allows Member States not to impose sanctions where the aim of the behaviour is to provide humanitarian assistance to migrants. _________________ 19 Council Directive 2002/90/EC of 28 November 2002 defining the facilitation of unauthorised entry, transit and residence (OJ L 328, 5.12.2002, p. 17).
Amendment 224 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) The Agency should carry out a vulnerability assessment based on objective criteria, to assess the capacity and readiness of the Member States to face challenges at their external borders and to contribute to the European Border and Coast Guard standing corps and technical equipment pool. The vulnerability assessment should include an assessment of the equipment, infrastructure, staff, budget and financial resources of Member States as well as their contingency plans to address possible crises at the external borders. Member States should take measures to address any deficiencies identified in that assessment. The executive director should identify the measures to be taken and recommend them to the Member State concerned. The executive director should also set a time-limit within which those measures should be taken and closely monitor their timely implementation. Where the necessary measures are not taken within the set time-limit, the matter should be referred to the management board for a further decision.
Amendment 241 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) In cases where there is a specific and disproportionate challenge at the external borders, the Agency should, at the request of a Member State or on its own initiative, organise and coordinate rapid border interventions and deploy both teams from the European Border and Coast Guard standing corps and technical equipment, including from the Rapid Reaction Equipment Pool. Rapid border interventions should provide reinforcement for a limitn agreed period of time in situations where an immediate response is required and where such an intervention would provide an effective response. To ensure the effective operation of such intervention, Member States should make operational staff of the European Border and Coast Guard standing corps available to form relevant teams and provide the necessary technical equipment. The Agency and the Member State concerned should agree upon an operational plan.
Amendment 275 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
Recital 49
(49) When justified by the results of the vulnerability assessment, risk analysis or when a critical impact is attributed to one or more border sections, the executive Director of the Agency should recommend to the Member State concerned to initiate and carry out joint operations or rapid border interventions.
Amendment 279 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
Recital 50
(50) Where control of the external border is rendered ineffective to such an extent that it risks deemed jeopardising the functioning of the Schengen area, either because a Member State does not take the necessary measures in line with a vulnerability assessment or because a Member State facing specific and disproportionate challenges at the external borders has not requested sufficient support from the Agency or is not implementing such support, a unified, rapid and effective response should be delivered at Union level. For the purpose of mitigating these risks, and to ensure better coordination at Union level, the Commissionuncil should identify the measures to be implemented by the Agency and require the Member State concerned to cooperate with the Agency in the implementation of those measures. The Agency should then determine the actions to be taken for the practical execution of the measures indicated in the Commissionuncil decision. An operational plan should be drawn up by the Agency together with the Member State concerned. The Member State concerned should facilitate the implementation of the Commission decision and the operational plan by implementing among others its obligations provided for in Articles 44, 83 and 84. If a Member State does not comply within 30 days with that Commission decision and does not cooperate with the Agency in the implementation of the measures contained in that decision, the Commission should be able to trigger the specific procedure provided for in Article 29 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council21 to face exceptional circumstances putting the overall functioning of the area without internal border control at risk. _________________ 21 Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ L 77, 23.3.2016, p. 1).
Amendment 286 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 51
Recital 51
(51) The European Border and Coast Guard standing corps should be a standing corps composed of 10,000 operational staff being border guards, return escorts, return specialists and other relevant staff. The standing corps should be composed of three categories of operational staff, namely statutory staff members employed by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, staff seconded to the Agency by the Member States for long term durations and staff provided by Member States for short term deployments. The European Border and Coast Guard standing corps should be deployed in the framework of border management teams, migration management support teams or return teams.
Amendment 291 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
Recital 53
(53) Member States should ensure their respective minimum contributions to the European Border and Coast Guard standing corps in accordance with Annexe III for long term secondments and Annex IV for short term deployments. The individual contributions of Member States have been established based on the distribution key agreed during the negotiations in 2016 for the Rapid Reaction Pool and set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1624.This distribution key was proportionally adapted to the size of the European Border and Coast Guard standing corps. These contributions were also set up. The individual contributions of Member States should be set up by the Council based on the needs identified in the multiannual strategic policy cycle and in a proportionate way for the Schengen associated countries.
Amendment 326 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
Recital 71
(71) The Agency should also provide technical and operational assistance to return activities of third countries, in particular when such assistance is justified by the priorities of the irregular llegal immigration policy of the Union.
Amendment 354 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 88
Recital 88
Amendment 371 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 101
Recital 101
Amendment 377 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation establishes a European Border and Coast Guard to ensure European Integrated Border Management at the external borders with a view to managing the crossing of those external borders efficiently, as well as increasing the efficiency of the common return policy as a key component of sustainable migration managementanagement of immigration coming from third countries.
Amendment 381 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
The Regulation addresses migratory challengesissues raised by immigration, including return, and potential future threats at those borders, thereby contributing to addressing serious crime with a cross-border dimension, to ensure a high level of internal security within the Union in full respect for fundamental rights, while safeguarding the free movement of persons within it.
Amendment 404 #
2018/0330(COD)
(19) ‘immigration management support team’ means a team of experts which provide technical and operational reinforcement to Member States, including at hotspot areas or in controlled centres, composed of operational staff from the European Border and Coast Guard standing corps, experts deployed by the [the European Union Agency for Asylum], and from Europol, or other relevant Union agencies as well as from Member States; (Linguistic amendment which applies throughout the text)
Amendment 431 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 31 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 31 a (new)
(31 a) 'principle of non-refoulement' means the prohibition of expulsion or return according to Article 33 of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees.
Amendment 432 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – title
Article 3 – title
European Integrated External Border Management (This amendment applies throughout the text)
Amendment 441 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) search and rescue operations for persons in distress at sea launched and carried out in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 656/2014 andcarried out at the orders of the host Member State, in accordance with international law, taking place in situations which may arise during border surveillance operations at seaoperations at sea provided by this Regulation;
Amendment 460 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
(2) The Agency shall include the European Border and Coast Guard standing corps of 10 000 operational staff as referred to in Article 55.
Amendment 488 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
(1) The Commission and the European Border and Coast Guarduncil shall ensure the effectiveness of European Integrated Border Management through a multiannual strategic policy cycle for the European Integrated Border Management.
Amendment 493 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
Article 8 – paragraph 4
(4) Based on the strategic risk analysis for European Integrated Border Management referred to in Article 30(2), the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 118 developing a multiannual strategic policy for European Integrated Border Management. That delegated act and the vulnerability assessment referred to in Article 33, the Commission shall submit to the Council a proposal for a decision on a multiannual strategic policy for European Integrated Border Management. The Council may amend the Commission’s proposal and adopt the amended text as a Council decision. That decision shall define policy priorities and provide the strategic guidelines for the following four years in relation to the components set out in Article 3.
Amendment 499 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
Article 8 – paragraph 5
(5) In order to implement the delegated actcision referred to in paragraph 4, the Agency shall, by decision of the management board, based on a proposal of the executive director, establish a technical and operational strategy for European integrated border management. The Agency shall take into account, where justified, the specific situation of the Member States, in particular their geographical location. This strategy shall be in line with Article 3 and the delegated actcision referred to in paragraph 4. It shall promote and support the implementation of European Integrated Border Management in all Member States.
Amendment 502 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 6
Article 8 – paragraph 6
(6) In order to implement the delegated actcision referred to in paragraph 4, the Member States shall establish their national strategies for integrated border management through close cooperation between all national authorities responsible for the management of borders and return. Those national strategies shall be in line with Article 3, the delegated actcision referred to in paragraph 4 and the technical and operational strategy referred to in paragraph 5.
Amendment 504 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7
Article 8 – paragraph 7
(7) Forty-two months after the adoption of the delegated actcision referred to in paragraph 4, the Commission shall carry out, with the support of the Agency, a thorough evaluation of its implementation. The results of the evaluation shall be communicated to the Council and the Parliament, and taken into account for the preparation of the following cycle.
Amendment 507 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 8
Article 8 – paragraph 8
(8) Where the situation at the external borders or in the area of return requires a change of the policy priorities, the Commission shall submit to the Council a proposal for a decision amending the multiannual strategic policy for European Integrated Border Management in accordance with the procedure set out in paragraph 4. The Council may amend the Commission’s proposal and adopt the amended text as a Council decision. Also the strategies mentioned in paragraph 5 and 6 shall be adapted where needed.
Amendment 511 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
(1) On the basis of the multiannual strategic policy cycle for European Integrated Border Management referred to in Article 8, the European Border and Coast GuardMember States shall establish an integrated planning for border management and returns.
Amendment 540 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 8
8. provide technical and operational assistance to Member States and third countries in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 656/2014 andrequired by the host Member States in accordance with international law, in support of search and rescue operations for persons in distress at sea which may arise during border surveillance operations at seaoperations at sea carried out according to this Regulation;
Amendment 556 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 16
16. assist Member States in circumstances requiring increased technical and operational assistance to implement the obligation to return irregular llegal immigrants, including, coordination or organisation of return operations;
Amendment 629 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 1
(1) EUROSUR shall apply to border checks at authorised border crossing points, and to the surveillance of external land, sea and air borders, including the monitoring, detection, identification, tracking, prevention and interception of unauthorisedillegal border crossings for the purpose of detecting, preventing and combating illegal immigration and cross- border crime and contributing to ensuring the protection and saving the lives of immigrants.
Amendment 631 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
Article 19 – paragraph 2
(2) EUROSUR shall not apply to any legal or administrative measure taken once the responsible authorities of a Member State have intercepted cross-border criminal activities or unauthorisedillegal crossings by persons of the external borders.
Amendment 643 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) an events layer including all events related to unauthorisedillegal external border crossings, and cross-border crime, and the detection of unauthorised secondary movements;
Amendment 651 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 1
(1) The Agency shall establish and maintain a European situational picture in order to provide the national coordination centres and the Commission with effective, accurate and timely information and analysis, covering the external borders, and the pre-frontier area and unauthorised secondary movements.
Amendment 719 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph -1 (new)
Article 33 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. The aim of the vulnerability assessment is for the Agency to assess the capacity and readiness of Member States to face upcoming challenges, including present and future threats and challenges at the external borders; to identify, especially for those Member States facing specific and disproportionate challenges, possible immediate consequences at the external borders and subsequent consequences on the functioning of the Schengen area; and to assess their capacity to contribute to the European Border and Coast Guard standing corps and Technical Equipment Pool, including the Rapid Reaction Equipment Pool. For the purpose of vulnerability assessment, in the Member States to which the Schengen acquis applies in full as well as in Member States to which, in accordance with the relevant Protocols annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, the Schengen acquis applies in part, the Schengen evaluation mechanism established by Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 shall apply. In the remaining Member States, the provisions referred to this Article shall apply. (Paragraph 4 is moved as first paragraph of the Article.)
Amendment 729 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 4
Article 33 – paragraph 4
Amendment 741 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 7
Article 33 – paragraph 7
7. When necessary the executive director shall, in consultation with the Member State concerned, make a recommendation setting outuggesting the necessary measures to be taken by the Member State concerned and the time limit within which such measures shall be implemented. The executive director shall invite the Member States concerned to take the necessary measures based on an action plan developed by the Member State in consultation with the executive director.
Amendment 753 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1
Article 33 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1
The Executive Director shall monitor the implementation of the recommendations by means of regular reports submitted by the Member States based on the action plans referred to in paragraph 7 of this Articland offer support by the Agency to facilitate the implementation of the measure.
Amendment 754 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2
Article 33 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 761 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 10
Article 33 – paragraph 10
10. Where a Member State does not implement the necessary measures of the recommendation within the time limit referred to in paragraph 7 of this Article, the executive director shall refer the matter to the management board and notify the Commission. The management board shall adopt a decision on a proposal of the executive director setting out the necessary measures to be taken by the Member State concerned and the time limit within which such measures shall be implemented. TThe executive director shall report to the Council and the Commission as regards the implementation of the measures suggested in the drecision of the management board shall be binding on the Member State. If the Member State does not implement the measures within the time limit foreseen in that decision, the management board shall notify the Council and the Commission and further action may be taken in accordance withommendation referred to in paragraph 7 of this Article 43.
Amendment 805 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 37 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) within the framework of operations mentioned in points (a), (b) and (c) of this paragraph and in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 656/2014 and international law, provide the technical and operational assistance torequired by Member States and third countries, in support of search and rescue operations for persons in distress at sea which may arise during border surveillance operations at seaoperations at sea carried out according to this Regulation;
Amendment 815 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1
Article 38 – paragraph 1
1. A Member State may request that the Agency launch joint operations to face upcoming challengethreats, including illegal immigration, present or future threats at its external borders or cross-border crime, or to provide increased technical and operational assistance when implementing its obligations with regard to the control of the external borders.
Amendment 817 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 2
Article 38 – paragraph 2
2. At the request of a Member State faced with a situation of specific and disproportionate challenges, especially the arrival at points of the external borders of large numbers of third-country nationals trying to enter the territory of that Member State without authorisation, the Agency may deploy a rapid border intervention for a limitn agreed period of time on the territory of that host Member State.
Amendment 822 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 3 – point d
Article 39 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) a description of the tasks, powers, responsibilities, including with regard to the respect for fundamental rights, and special instructions for the teams, including on permissible consultation of databases and permissible service weapons, ammunition and equipment in the host Member State;
Amendment 834 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Migration management support teams may be deployed, at the request of a Member State, or upon the initiative of the Agency and with the agreement of the Member State concerned, to provide technical and operational reinforcement to that Member State, in particular at hotspot areas and controlled centres.
Amendment 844 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 3
Article 41 – paragraph 3
3. The Commissionhost Member State shall, in cooperation with the host Member StateCommission and the relevant Union agencies, establish the terms of cooperation for the deployment of the migration management support teams as well as the deployment of technical equipment, and shall be responsible for the coordination of the activities of those teams.
Amendment 863 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 1
Article 42 – paragraph 1
1. The executive director shall, based on the results of the vulnerability assessment or when a critical impact is attributed to one or more external border sections and taking into account the relevant elements in the Member State’s contingency plans, the Agency's risk analysis and the analysis layer of the European situational picture, recommend to the Member State concerned to initiate and carry out joint operations or rapid border interventions or any other relevant actions by the Agency as defined in Article 37.
Amendment 868 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – title
Article 43 – title
Situation at the external borders requiring urgent actionimperative and urgent action (This amendment applies throughout the text)
Amendment 873 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Amendment 876 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) a Member State facing specific and disproportionate challenges at the external borders has either not requested sufficient support from the Agency under Article 38, Article 40, Article 41, Article 42 or is not taking the necessary steps to implement actions under thosen imperative and urgent action is deemed indispensable as a result of the negative reply of a Member State according to Articles 42(2),
Amendment 879 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
the Council, upon proposal by the Commission, and after consulting the Agency, may adopt without delay a decision by means of an implementing act in accordance with the procedure as referred to in Article 117(3), identifying measures to mitigate those risks to be implemented by the Agency and requiring the Member State concerned to cooperate with the Agency in the implementation of those measures.
Amendment 890 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 898 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 43 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. To mitigate the risk of putting in jeopardy the Schengen area, the Commissionuncil decision referred to in paragraph 1 shall provide for one or more of the following measures to be taken by the Agency:
Amendment 913 #
2018/0330(COD)
4. The executive director shall, within two working days from the date of adoption of the Commissionuncil decision referred to in paragraph 1,
Amendment 941 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 8
Article 43 – paragraph 8
8. The Member State concerned shall comply with the Commissionuncil decision referred to in paragraph 1. For that purpose it shall immediately cooperate with the Agency and take the necessary action, in particular by implementing the obligations provided in Articles 44, 83 and 84, to facilitate the implementation of that decision and the practical execution of the measures set out in that decision and in the operational plan.
Amendment 946 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2
Article 43 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 961 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 1
Article 47 – paragraph 1
1. The executive director shall terminathost Member State shall dispose for the termination of the activities of the Agency if the conditions to conduct those activities are no longer fulfilled. The executive director shall inform the Member State concerned prior and shall communicate to the executive director such termination.
Amendment 964 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 2
Article 47 – paragraph 2
2. TIf the conditions to conduct those activities are no longer fulfilled, the Member States participating in a joint operation, rapid border intervention or migration management support team deployment may request that the executive directorhost Member State disposes for the suspension or the terminateion of that joint operation, or rapid border intervention or migration management support team deployment.
Amendment 965 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 4
Article 47 – paragraph 4
Amendment 973 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 5
Article 47 – paragraph 5
5. If the executive directorhost Member State decides to suspend or terminate deployment by the Agency of a migration management support team, the or sheexecutive director shall inform the other relevant agencies active in that hotspot area or controlled centre of that decision.
Amendment 992 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point c
Amendment 1027 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 1
Article 51 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to the competences of Member States as regards issuing return decisions and without entering into the merits of returnsuch decisions, the Agency shall provide technical and operational assistance and ensure the coordination or the organisation of return operations, including through the chartering of aircraft for the purpose of such operations or organising returns on scheduled flights. The Agency may, on its own initiative coordinate or organise return operations.
Amendment 1046 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 6
Article 51 – paragraph 6
6. The executive director shall evaluate the results of the return operations and shall transmit every six months a detailed evaluation report covering all return operations conducted in the previous semester to the Council, to the Parliament and to the management board, together with the observations of the fundamental rights officer. The executive director shall make a comprehensive comparative analysis of those results with a view to enhancing the quality, coherence and effectiveness of future return operations. The executive director shall include that analysis in the Agency's annual activity report.
Amendment 1086 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. A European Border and Coast Guard standing corps of 10 000 operational staff shall be part of the Agency. This standing corps shall be composed of the following three categories of staff in accordance with the annual availability scheme set in Annex I:
Amendment 1092 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
In conjunction with the submission of the proposal for a decision referred to in Article 8(4), the Commission shall submit to the Council a proposal for a decision determining the annual plan of availability for each of the three categories of staff of the European Border and Coast Guard standing corps for the time period corresponding to the strategic political cycle. The Council, acting by a qualified majority, may amend the Commission proposal and adopt the text as amended in the form of a Council decision.
Amendment 1099 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 55 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. OFollowing the Council decision referred to in paragraph 1, on a proposal by the executive director taking into account the Agency's risk analysis, the results of the vulnerability assessment and the multiannual strategic policy cycle, and building on the numbers and profiles available to the Agency through its statutory staff and ongoing secondments, the management board shall decide by 31 March of each year:
Amendment 1104 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 6
Article 55 – paragraph 6
6. TWithin its statutory staff (Category 1), the Agency may recruit up to 4% of the total number of the European Border and Coast Guard standing corps as staff having supportive functions for the establishment of the standing Corps, planning and management of its operations and for the acquisition of the Agency's own equipment.
Amendment 1113 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 – paragraph 2
Article 57 – paragraph 2
2. Each Member State shall be responsible to ensure continuous contributions of operational staff as seconded team members in accordance withCouncil decision referred to in Article 55(1) shall determine the annual contributions of operational staff that each Member State shall be responsible to ensure as seconded team. Such contributions shall not go under those determined in Annex III.
Amendment 1120 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1
Article 58 – paragraph 1
1. In addition to the secondments in accordance with Article 57, by 30 June of each year, the Member States shall also contribute to the European Border and Coast Guard standing corps by nominating border guards and other relevant staff to the national list of operational staff for short-term deployments (Category 3) in accordance with the contributions indicated in Annex IVCouncil decision referred to in Article 55(1) and in accordance with the specific numbers of profiles decided by the Management Board for the following year as referred to in Article 55(4). The national lists of nominated operational staff shall be communicated to the Agency. The payment of the costs incurred by staff deployed under this Article shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Article 46(2).
Amendment 1163 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 63 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 63 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 1165 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 63 – paragraph 6
Article 63 – paragraph 6
6. Where the Agency does not have the required qualified statutory staff, the Member State of registration or the supplier of technical equipment shall provide the necessary experts and technical crew to operate the technical equipment in a legally sound and safe manner. Such experts and technical crew shall count as part of the contribution of that particular Member State to the European Border and Coast Guard standing corps. In such case, technical equipment owned solely by the Agency shall be made available to the Agency upon its request and the Member State of registration may not invoke the exceptional situation referred to in Article 64(8).
Amendment 1179 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 67 – paragraph 2
Article 67 – paragraph 2
2. Member States and the Agency shall establish operational plans for border management and returns. The operational plans of Member States related to border sections with high and critical impact levels shall be established in cooperation with neighbouring Member States and with the Agency. The Agency provides assistance to the Member States according to Article 7. For the activities of the Agency, operational planning for the following year shall be defined in annex to the single programming document referred to in Article 100 and for each specific operational activity through the operational plan referred to in Article 39 and Article 75(3).
Amendment 1196 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point k
Article 69 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point k
Amendment 1229 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 3
Article 72 – paragraph 3
3. The Agency and Member States shall comply with Union law, including norms and standards which form part of the Union acquis, also when cooperation with third countries takes place on the territory of those countries.
Amendment 1236 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 74 – paragraph 2
Article 74 – paragraph 2
2. When doing so, it shall act within the framework of the external action policy of the Union, including with regard to the protection of fundamental rights and the principle of non-refoulement, with the support of, and in coordination with, Union delegations and, where relevant, CSDP missions and operations.
Amendment 1245 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 74 – paragraph 4
Article 74 – paragraph 4
4. Where available, it shall also act within the framework of working arrangements concluded with those authorities in accordance with Union law and policy, in accordance with 77(6). Those working arrangements shall specify the scope, nature and purpose of the cooperation and be related to the management of operational cooperation and may include provisions concerning the exchange of sensitive non-classified information and cooperation in the framework of EUROSUR in accordance with Article 75 (3). Any working arrangements on exchanging classified information shall be concluded in accordance with Article 77(6). The Agency shall comply with Union law, including norms and standards, which form part of the Union acquis.
Amendment 1257 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 75 – paragraph 4
Article 75 – paragraph 4
4. The Agency may provide assistance to return activities of third countries and ensure the coordination or the organisation of return operations, during which a number of returnees are returned from this third country to another third country. Such return operations may be organised with participation of one or more Member States (‘mixed return operations’) or as national return operations, in particular when this is justified by the priorities of the irregular llegal immigration policy of the Union. The participating Member States and the Agency shall ensure that the respect of fundamental rights and the proportionate use of means of constraints are guaranteed during the whole removal operation, notably with the presence of forced return monitors and of third-country forced return escorts.
Amendment 1283 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 78 – paragraph 3
Article 78 – paragraph 3
3. The tasks of the Agency's liaison officers shall include, in compliance with Union law and respecting fundamental rights, establishing and maintaining contacts with the competent authorities of the third country to which they are assigned with a view to contributing to the prevention of and fight against illegal immigration and the return of returnees, including by providing technical assistance in identification of third-country nationals and the acquisition of travel documents. Those liaison officers shall coordinate closely with Union delegations and, where relevant, CSDP missions and operations.
Amendment 1289 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 79 – paragraph 1
Article 79 – paragraph 1
1. The Agency may, with the agreement of the Member States concerned, invite observers of Union institutions, bodies, offices, agencies or international organisations and CSDP missions and operations to participate in its activities, in particular joint operations and pilot projects, risk analysis and training, to the extent that their presence is in accordance with the objectives of those activities, may contribute to the improvement of cooperation and the exchange of best practices, and does not affect the overall safety and security of those activities. The participation of those observers in risk analysis and training may take place only with the agreement of the Member States concerned. As regards joint operations and pilot projects, the participation of observers shall be subject to the agreement of the host Member State. Detailed rules on the participation of observers shall be included in the operational plan. Those observers shall receive appropriate training from the Agency prior to their participation.
Amendment 1297 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 81 – paragraph 2
Article 81 – paragraph 2
2. In performing of its tasks, the European Border and Coast Guard shall ensure that no person is disembarked in, forced to enter, conducted to, or otherwise handed over or returned to, the authorities of a country in contravention of the principle of non-refoulement, or from which there is a risk of expulsion or return to another country in contravention of that principle.
Amendment 1299 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 81 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 81 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
In performing of its tasks the European Border and Coast Guard shall take into account the special needs of children, unaccompanied minors, persons with disabilities, victims of trafficking in human beings, persons in need of medical assistance, persons in need of international protection, and persons in distress at sea and other persons in a particularly vulnerable situation.
Amendment 1307 #
2018/0330(COD)
3. Without prejudice to Article 94(1) as regards statutory staff of the Agency, members of the teams may only perform tasks and exercise powers under direct instructions from and, as a general rule, in the presence of border guards or staff involved in return- related tasks of the host Member State. The host Member State may authorise members of the teams to actMembers of the teams shall act solely upon mandate of the host Member State and on its behalf.
Amendment 1308 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 83 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Members of the teams deployed from the Agency’s statutory operational staff or deployed following secondment for aboth long- term and short- term duration to the Agency by the Member States shall wear, where appropriate, the uniform of the European Border and Cost Guard standing corps while performing their tasks and exercising their powers. Members of the teams deployed from Member States for a short duration shall wear, where appropriate, their own uniform while performing their tasks and exercising their powers.
Amendment 1311 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 83 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
All the members of the teams shall also wear visible personal identification and a blue armband with the insignias of the Union and of the Agency on their uniforms, identifying them as participating in a joint operation, migration management support team deployment, pilot project, rapid border intervention, return operation or return intervention. For the purposes of identification vis-à-vis the national authorities of the host Member State, members of the teams shall at all times carry an accreditation document, which they shall present upon request.
Amendment 1314 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
Article 83 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 1318 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 6
Article 83 – paragraph 6
6. While performing their tasks and exercising their powers, members of the teams shall be authorised to use force, including service weapons, ammunition and equipment, with the consent of the home Member State and the host Member State or, for the Agency's staff with the consent of the Agency and the host Member State, in the presence of border guards of the host Member State and in accordance with the national law of the host Member State. The host Member State may, with the consent of the home Member State or the Agency where appropriate authorise members of the teams to use force in the absence of border guards of the host Member State.
Amendment 1325 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 9
Article 83 – paragraph 9
9. Decisions to refuse entry in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 shall be taken only by border guards of the host Member State or by the members of the teams if expressly authorised by the host Member State to act on its behalf.
Amendment 1327 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 84 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Agency shall, in cooperation with the host Member State, issue a document in the official languages of the host Member State and at least another official language of the institutions of the Union to the members of the teams for the purpose of identifying them and as proof of the holder's rights to perform tasks and exercise powers as referred to in Article 83. The document shall include the following features of each member of the teams:
Amendment 1459 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106
Article 106
Amendment 1472 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 107
Article 107
Amendment 1496 #
Amendment 1497 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 1
Article 108 – paragraph 1
1. The Agency shall, in cooperation with the fundamental rights officer, take the necessary measures to set up a complaints mechanism in accordance with this Article take the necessary measures to monitor and ensure the respect for fundamental rights in all the activities of the Agency under this Regulation.
Amendment 1503 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 2
Article 108 – paragraph 2
2. Any person who is directly affected by the actions of staff involved in a joint operation, pilot project, rapid border intervention, migration management support team deployment, joint return operation or return intervention and who considers him or herself to have been the subject of a breach of his or her fundamental rights due to those actions, or any party representing such a person, may submit a complaint in writing to the Agency may submit a complaint to the judicial authority competent for the territory where such activities have been carried out, in accordance with the relevant national law.
Amendment 1507 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 3
Article 108 – paragraph 3
Amendment 1512 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 4
Article 108 – paragraph 4
Amendment 1518 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 5
Article 108 – paragraph 5
Amendment 1522 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 6
Article 108 – paragraph 6
Amendment 1529 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 7
Article 108 – paragraph 7
Amendment 1534 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 8
Article 108 – paragraph 8
Amendment 1538 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 9
Article 108 – paragraph 9
Amendment 1543 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 10
Article 108 – paragraph 10
Amendment 1548 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 11
Article 108 – paragraph 11
Amendment 1566 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 118
Article 118
Amendment 1567 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 119 – paragraph 1
Article 119 – paragraph 1
1. Regulations (EU) No 1052/2013 isand (EU) No 656/2014 are repealed.
Amendment 1570 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I
Annex I
Amendment 1580 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 6
Annex II – point 6
6. border surveillance including patrolling between border crossing points to prevent unauthorisedillegal border crossings, to counter cross-border criminality and to take measures against persons who have crossed the border illegally, including interception/apprehension;
Amendment 1581 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 7
Annex II – point 7
7. register fingerprints of persons apprehended in connection with the irregularllegal crossing of an external border in EURODAC (category 2) in accordance with Chapter III of the EURODAC Regulation;
Amendment 1583 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – title
Annex III – title
Table with annual contributions of Table with minimum contributions of Member States to be provided to the Member States to be provided to the European Border and Coast Guard standing European Border and Coast Guard standing corps through the long term secondment of corps through the long term secondment of operational staff in accordance with Article operational staff in accordance with Article 57 57
Amendment 1586 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV
Annex IV
Annual contributions of Member States to deleted the EBCG standing corps for short term deployments of operational staff in accordance with Article 58 [...] (*) Liechtenstein will contribute through proportional financial support.
Amendment 1595 #
2018/0330(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex V – part 3 – paragraph 8
Annex V – part 3 – paragraph 8
Any person may report suspected breaches by the Agency's statutory operational staff of the rules on the use of force applicable under this Annex under the complaint mechanism provided for inaccording to Article 1078.
Amendment 125 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) An effective and fair return policy is an essential part of the Union's approach to better manage immigration in all aspects, as reflected in the European Agenda on Migration of May 201511 . __________________ 11 COM(2015) 285 final.
Amendment 127 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) On 28 June 2018, in its conclusions, the European Council underlined the necessity to significantly step up the effective return of irregular migrants, and welcomed the intention of the Commission to make legislative proposals for a more effective and coherent European return policyllegal immigrants.
Amendment 130 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) That European return policy should be based on common standards, for persons to be returned in a humane manner and with full respect for their fundamentalhuman rights and dignity, as well as international law, including refugee protection and human rights obligations. Clear, transparent and fair rules need to be established to provide for an effective return policy which serves as a deterrent to irregular migration and ensures coherence with and contributes to the integrity of the Common European Asylum System and the legal llegal immigration system.
Amendment 130 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
Recital 3
Amendment 139 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) That European return policy should be based on common standards, for persons to be returned in a humane manner and with full respect for their fundamental rights and dignity , as well as international law, including refugee protection and human rights obligations. Clear, transparent and fair rules need to be established to provide for an effective return policy which serves as a deterrent to irregularllegal migration and ensures coherence with and contributes to the integrity of the Common European Asylum System and the legal migration system. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Amendment 140 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) The link between the decision on ending of the legal stay of a third-country national and the issuing of a return decision should be reinforced in order to reduce the risk of absconding and the likelihood of unauthorised secondary movements, in particular when the third-country national poses a risk to public policy, public security or national security, and when he/she has been convicted for a criminal offence, even with a non- definitive sentence. It is necessary to ensure that a return decision is issued immediately after the decision rejecting or terminating the legal stay, or ideally in the same act or decision. That requirement should in particular apply to cases where an application for international protection is rejected, provided that the return procedure is suspended until that rejection becomes final and pending the outcome of an appeal against that rejection.
Amendment 159 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) It is recognised that it is legitimate for Member States to return illegally staying third-country nationals, provided that fair and efficient asylum systems are in place which fully respect the principle of non-refoulement.
Amendment 163 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) To reinforce the effectiveness of the return procedure, clear responsibilities for third-country nationals should be established, and in particular the obligation to cooperate with the authorities at all stages of the return procedure, including by providing the information and elements that are necessary in order to assess their individual situation. At the same time, it is necessary to ensure that third-country nationals are informed of the consequences of not complying with those obligations, in relation to the determination of the risk of absconding, the granting of a period for voluntary departure and the possibility to impose detention, and to the access to programmes providing logistical, financial and other material or in-kind assistance.
Amendment 167 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Where there are no reasons to believe that the granting of a period for voluntary departure would undermine the purpose of a return procedure, voluntary return should be preferred over forced return and an appropriate period for voluntary departure of up to thirty days, depending in particular on the prospect of return, should be granted. A period for voluntary departure should not be granted where it has been assessed that third- country nationals pose a risk of absconding, have had a previous application for legal stay dismissed as fraudulent or manifestly unfounded, or they pose a risk to public policy, public security or national security, or they have been convicted for a criminal offence, even with a non-definitive sentence. An extension of the period for voluntary departure should be provided for when considered necessary because of the specific circumstances of an individual case.
Amendment 172 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) To reinforce the effectiveness of the return procedure, clear responsibilities for third-country nationals should be established, and in particular the obligation to cooperate with the authorities at all stages of the return procedure, including by providing the information and elements that are necessary in order to assess their individual situation. The determination of their real age, through bone or dental tests, is vital in order to verify the truth of their statements on this subject, making it possible to assess their good faith, and to protect genuine unaccompanied minors by distinguishing between them and those making false claims. At the same time, it is necessary to ensure that third-country nationals are informed of the consequences of not complying with those obligations, in relation to the determination of the risk of absconding, the granting of a period for voluntary departure and the possibility to impose detention, and to the access to programmes providing logistical, financial and other material or in-kind assistance.
Amendment 197 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In cases where the principle of non- refoulement is not at stake, appeals against a return decision should not have an automatic suspensive effect. The judicial authorities should be able to temporarily suspend the enforcement of a return decision in individual cases for other reasons, either upon request of the third- country national concerned or acting ex officio, where deemed necessary. Such decisions should, as a rule, be taken within 48 hours. Where justified by the complexity of the case, judicial authorities should take such decision without undue delay.
Amendment 204 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The deadline for lodging an appeal against decisions related to return should provide enough time to ensure access to an effective remedy, while taking into account that long deadlines can have a detrimental effect on return procedures. To avoid possible misuse of rights and procedures, a maximum period not exceeding fivthree days should be granted to appeal against a return decision. This provision should only apply following a decision rejecting an application for international protection which became final, including after a possible judicial review.
Amendment 206 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) The necessary legal aid should be made available , upon request and provided that the specific case has not been deemed inadmissible, to those who lack sufficient resources. National legislation should establish a list of instances where legal aid is to be considered necessary.
Amendment 210 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) The appeal against a return decision that is based on a decision rejecting an application for international protection which was already subject to an effective judicial remedy should take place before a single level of jurisdiction only, since the third-county national concerned would have already had his or her individual situation examined and decided upon by a judicial authority in the context of the asylum procedure.(Does not affect English version.)
Amendment 213 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
Recital 18
Amendment 224 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) Detention should be imposed, following an individual assessment of each case, where there is a risk of absconding, where the third-country national avoids or hampers the preparation of return or the removal process, or when the third country national concerned poses a risk to public policy, public security or national security, or when he/she has been convicted for a criminal offence, even with a non- definitive sentence.
Amendment 225 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In cases where the principle of non-refoulement is not at stake, aAppeals against a return decision should not have an automatic suspensive effect. The judicial authorities should be able to temporarily suspend the enforcement of a return decision in individual cases for other reasons, either upon request of the third- country national concerned or acting ex officio, where deemed necessary. Such decisions should, as a rule, be taken within 48 hours. Where justified by the complexity of the case, judicial authorities should take such decision without undue delay.
Amendment 231 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) To improve the effectiveness of return procedures and avoid unnecessary delays, without negatively affecting the rights of the third-country nationals concerned, the enforcement of the return decision should not be automatically suspended in cases where the assessment of the risk to breach the principle of non- refoulement already took place and judicial remedy was effectively exercised as part of the asylum procedure carried out prior to the issuing of the related return decision against which the appeal is lodged, unless the situation of the third- country national concerned would have significantly changed since.
Amendment 237 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) This Directive should not preclude Member States from laying down effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties and criminal penalties, including imprisonment, in relation to the infringements of immigration rules, provided that such penalties are compatible with the objectives of this Directive, do not compromise the application of this Directive and are in full respect of fundamental rights.
Amendment 247 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) When an illegally staying third- country national is detected during exit checks at the external borders, it may be appropriateis necessary to impose an entry ban in order to prevent future re-entry and therefore to reduce the risks of illegal immigration. When justified, following an individual assessment and in application of the principle of proportionality, aAn entry ban mayshall be imposed by the competent authority without issuing a return decision in order to avoid postponing the departure of the third- country national concerned.
Amendment 251 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) The use of detention for the purpose of removal should be subject to the principle of proportionality with regard to the means used and objectives pursued. Detention is justifHowever, in viedw only to prepare the return or carry out the removal process and if the application of less coercive measures would not be sufficientf the illegal situation of the individuals concerned by return, detention must always remain an instrument available to Member States.
Amendment 261 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) Detention should be imposed, following an individual assessment of each case, where there is a risk of absconding, where the third-country national does not cooperate with all the stages in the removal process, avoids or hampers the preparation of return or the removal process, or when the third country national concerned poses a risk to public policy, public security or national security.
Amendment 266 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) Given that maximum detention periods in some Member States are not sufficient to ensure the implementation of return, a maximum period of detention between three and six months, which may be prolonged, should be established in order to provide for sufficient time to complete the return procedures successfully, without prejudice to the established safeguards ensuring that detention is only applied when necessary and proportionate and for as long as removal arrangements are in progress.
Amendment 267 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) It is necessary and proportionate to ensure that a third country national who was already detained during the examination of his or her application for international protection as part of the asylum border procedure may be kept in detention in order to prepare the return and/or carry out the removal process, once his or her application has been rejected. To avoid that a third country national is automatically released from detention and allowed entry into the territory of the Member State despite having been denied a right to stay, a limited period of time is needed in order to try to enforce the return decision issued at the border. The third- country national concerned may be detained in the context of the border procedure for a maximum period of foursix months and as long as removal arrangements are in progress and executed with due diligence. That period of detention should be without prejudice to other periods of detention established by this Directive. Where it has not been possible to enforce return by the end of the former period, further detention of the third-country national may be ordered under another provision of this Directive and for the duration provided for therein.
Amendment 271 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) Establishing return management systems in Member States contributes to the efficiency of the return process. Each national system should provide timely information on the identity and legal situation of the third country national that are relevant for monitoring and following up on individual cases. To operate efficiently and in order to significantly reduce the administrative burden, such national return systems should be linked to the Schengen Information System to facilitate and speed up the entering of return-related information, as well as to the central system established by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in accordance with Regulation (EU) …/… [EBCG Regulation].
Amendment 275 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
Recital 40
(40) The Union provides financial and operational support in order to achieve an effective implementation of this Directive. Member States should make best use of the available Union financial instruments, programmes and projects in the field of return, in particular under Regulation (EU) …/… [Regulation establishing the Asylum and Migration Fund], as well as of the operational assistance by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency according to Regulation (EU) …/… [EBCG Regulation]. Such support should be used in particular for establishing return management systems and programmes for providing logistical, financial and other material or in-kind assistance to support the return – and where relevantdeemed necessary the reintegration – of illegally staying third- country nationals.
Amendment 284 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 46
Recital 46
(46) The purpose of an effective implementation of the return of third- country nationals who do not fulfil or no longer fulfil the conditions for entry, stay or residence in the Member States, in accordance with this Directive, is an essential component of the comprehensive efforts to tackle irregular llegal immigration and represents an important reason of substantial public interest.
Amendment 307 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
Recital 35
(35) An appeal against a return decision taken in the context of the border procedure should not have an automatic suspensive effect in cases where there is a risk of breach of the principle of non- refoulement, there has been a significant change in the situation of the third- country national concerned since the adoption under the asylum border procedure of the decision rejecting his or her application for international protection, or if no judicial remedy was effectively exercised against the decision rejecting his or her application for international protection adopted under the asylum border procedure.
Amendment 308 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
9a. 'principle of non-refoulement' means the prohibition of expulsion or return according to Article 33 of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees.
Amendment 315 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) Establishing return management systems in Member States contributes to the efficiency of the return process. Each national system should provide timely information on the identity and legal situation of the third country national that are relevant for monitoring and following up on individual cases. To operate efficiently and in order to significantly reduce the administrative burden, such national return systems should be linked to the Schengen Information System, to Eurodac and to all the databases used to identify third country nationals, to facilitate and speed up the entering of return-related information, as well as to the central system established by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in accordance with Regulation (EU) …/… [EBCG Regulation].
Amendment 321 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The objective criteria referred to in point 7 of Article 3 shall include at least one of the following criteria:
Amendment 329 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 44
Recital 44
(44) Application of this Directive is without prejudice to the obligations resulting from the Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951, as amended by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967.
Amendment 334 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 46
Recital 46
(46) The purpose of an effective implementation of the return of third- country nationals who do not fulfil or no longer fulfil the conditions for entry, stay or residence in the Member States, in accordance with this Directive, is an essential component of the comprehensive efforts to tackle irregular migration, based on the principle of deterrence, and represents an important reason of substantial public interest.
Amendment 339 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 47
Recital 47
(47) Member States' return authorities need to process personal data to ensure the proper implementation of return procedures and the successful enforcement of return decisions. The third countries of return are often not the subject of adequacy decisions adopted by the Commission under Article 45 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council18, or under Article 36 of Directive (EU) 2016/68019, and have often not concluded or do not intend to conclude a readmission agreement with the Union or otherwise provide for appropriate safeguards within the meaning of Article 46 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or within the meaning of the national provisions transposing Article 37 of Directive (EU) 2016/680. Despite the extensive efforts of the Union in cooperating with the main countries of origin of illegally staying third-country nationals subject to an obligation to return, it is not always possible to ensure such third countries systematically fulfil the obligation established by international law to readmit their own nationals. Policies involving diplomatic and economic pressure should be applied in order to encourage them to do so. Readmission agreements, concluded or being negotiated by the Union or the Member States and providing for appropriate safeguards for the transfer of data to third countries pursuant to Article 46 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or pursuant to the national provisions transposing Article 36 of Directive (EU) 2016/680, cover a limited number of such third countries. In the situation where such agreements do not exist, personal data should be transferred by Member States' competent authorities for the purposes of implementing the return operations of the Union, in line with the conditions laid down in Article 49(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or in the national provisions transposing Article 38 of Directive (EU) 2016/680. _________________ 18Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119 4.5.2016, p. 1 p. 1. 19 Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 89).
Amendment 351 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k
(k) existence of conviction for a criminal offence, even with a non- definitive sentence, including for a serious criminal offence in another Member State;
Amendment 370 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
However, Member States shall establish that a risk of absconding is presumed in an individual case, unless proven otherwise, when one of the objective criteria referred to in points (k), (l), (m), (n), (o) and (p) of paragraph 1 is fulfilled.
Amendment 380 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b
Amendment 382 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – title
Article 5 – title
5 Non-refoulement, bBest interests of the child, family life and state of health
Amendment 386 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 387 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the duty to remain presenton call and available throughout the procedures;
Amendment 391 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The objective criteria referred to in point 7 of Article 3 shall include at least the following criteria and any other criterion deemed useful by Member States:
Amendment 427 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall issue a return decision immediately after the adoption of a decision ending a legal either illegal stay of a third- country national, including a decision not granting a third-country national refugee status or subsidiary protection status in accordance with Regulation (EU) …/… [Qualification Regulation].
Amendment 448 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the duty to provide all the elements that are necessary for establishing or verifying identity, including age through bone or dental tests;
Amendment 462 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new)
Amendment 475 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The elements referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1 shall include the third- country nationals’ statements and documentation in their possession regarding the identity, nationality or nationalities, age and means of verifying the declared age through a bone or dental test, country or countries and place or places of previous residence, travel routes and travel documentation, and any other element that Member States may deem useful.
Amendment 500 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may impose an entry or stay ban, which does not accompany a return decision, to a third- country national who has been illegally staying in the territory of the Member States and whose illegal stay is detected in connection with border checks carried out at exit in accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399, where justified on the basis of the specific circumstances of the individual case and taking into account the principle of proportionality.
Amendment 518 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 530 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
The granting of such assistance, including its kind and extent, shall be in any case subject to the cooperation of the third- country national concerned with the competent authorities of the Member States as provided for in Article 7 of this Directive.
Amendment 555 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The enforcement of the return decision shall be automatically suspended during the period for bringing the appeal at first instance and, where that appeal has been lodged within the set period, during the examination of the appeal, where there is a risk to breach the principle of non- refoulement. Should a further appeal against a first or subsequent appeal decision be lodged, and in all other cases, the enforcement of the return decision shall not be suspended unless a court or tribunal decides otherwise taking into due account the specific circumstances of the individual case upon the applicant’s request or acting ex officio.
Amendment 562 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
Amendment 567 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point b a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point b a (new)
(ba) the return decision is the consequence of the decision on ending the legal stay that is aggravated by at least one of the following circumstances: - risk of absconding; - application for legal stay dismissed as fraudulent or manifestly unfounded; - the third-country national poses a risk to public policy, public security or national security.
Amendment 589 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Member States mayshall impose an entry ban, which does not accompany a return decision, to a third-country national who has been illegally staying in the territory of the Member States and whose illegal stay is detected in connection with border checks carried out at exit in accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399, where justified on the basis of the specific circumstances of the individual case and taking into account the principle of proportionality.
Amendment 641 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The enforcement of the return decision shall be automatically suspended during the period for bringing the appeal at first instance and, where that appeal has been lodged within the set period, during the examination of the appeal, where there is a risk to breach the principle of non- refoulement. Should a further appeal against a first or subsequent appeal decision be lodged, and in all other cases, the enforcement of the return decision shall not be suspended unless a court or tribunal decides otherwise taking into due account the specific circumstances of the individual case upon the applicant’s request or acting ex officio.
Amendment 649 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Article 22 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Detention shall be for as short a period as possible, which shall in no case exceed foursix months. It may be maintained only as long as removal arrangements are in progress and executed with due diligence.
Amendment 658 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall grant a period not exceeding fivthree days to lodge an appeal against a return decision when such a decision is the consequence of a final decision rejecting an application for international protection taken in accordance with Regulation (EU) …/… [Asylum Procedure Regulation].
Amendment 685 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 690 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 3
Article 18 – paragraph 3
Amendment 693 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 5
Article 18 – paragraph 5
5. Detention shall be maintained for as long a period as the conditions laid down in paragraph 1 are fulfilled and it is necessary to ensure successful removal. Each Member State shall set a maximum period of detention of not less than three months and not more than six monthstheir choosing.
Amendment 697 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 6
Article 18 – paragraph 6
Amendment 746 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 5
Article 22 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall grant a period of time not exceeding 48 hours to lodge an appeal against the return decisions based on a, which shall always be issued at the same time as the final decision rejecting an application for international protection taken by virtue of Article 41 of Regulation (EU) …/… [Asylum Procedure Regulation] at the border or in transit zones of the Member States.
Amendment 747 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 5
Article 22 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall grant a period not exceeding 248 hours to lodge an appeal against the return decisions based on a final decision rejecting an application for international protection taken by virtue of Article 41 of Regulation (EU) …/… [Asylum Procedure Regulation] at the border or in transit zones of the Member States.
Amendment 748 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 750 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Article 22 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 751 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Article 22 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Detention shall be for as short a period as possible, which shall in no case excemaintained four months. It may be maintained onlyat least as long as removal arrangements are in progress and executed with due diligence.
Amendment 16 #
2018/0247(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
–
–
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal..
Amendment 62 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
Amendment 63 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The Council of […] adopted revised guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States to align the text with the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights, with a view to improving Europe's competitiveness and making it a better place to invest, create jobs and foster social cohesion. In order to ensure the full alignment of the ESF+ with the objectives of these guidelines, particularly as regards employment, education, training and the fight against social exclusion, poverty and discrimination, the ESF+ should support Member States, taking account of the relevant Integrated Guidelines and relevant country-specific recommendations adopted in accordance with Article 121(2) TFEU and Article 148(4) TFEU and, where appropriate, at national level, the national reform programmes underpinned by national strategies. The ESF+ should also contribute to relevant aspects of the implementation of key Union initiatives and activities, in particular the "Skills Agenda for Europe" and the European Education Area, relevant Council Recommendations and other initiatives such as the Youth Guarantee, Upskilling Pathways and on Integration of the long- term unemployed.
Amendment 66 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The Union is confronted with structural challenges arising from economic globalisation, the management and financialisation, from which comes the sharp increase of immigration flows, and the increased security threat, clean energy transition, technological change and an increasingly ageing workforce and growing skills and labour shortages in some sectors and regions, experienced especially by SMEs. Taking into account the changing realities of the world of work, the Union should be prepared for the current and future challenges by investing in relevant skills, making growth more inclusive and by improving employment and social policies, including in view of labour mobility.
Amendment 70 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The types of financing and the methods of implementation under this Regulation should be chosen on the basis of their ability to achieve the specific objectives of the actions and to deliver results, taking into account, in particular, the costs of controls, the administrative burden, and the expected risk of non- compliance. For grants, this should include consideration of the use of lump sums, flat rates and unit costs, as well as financing not linked to costs as envisaged in Article 125(1) of the Financial Regulation. To implement measures linked to the socio- economic integration of third country nationalshouseholds living in conditions of absolute or relative poverty, and in accordance with Article 88 of the Common Provisions Regulation, the Commission may reimburse Member States using simplified cost options including the use of lump sums.
Amendment 79 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Support through the ESF+ should be used to promote equal access for all, in particular for disadvantaged groups, to quality, non-segregated and inclusive to quality education and training, from early childhood education and care through general and vocational education and training and to tertiary level, as well as adult education and learning, thereby fostering permeability between education and training sectors, preventing early school leaving, improving health literacy, reinforcing links with non-formal and informal learning and facilitating learning mobility for all. Synergies with the Erasmus programme, notably to facilitate the participation of disadvantaged learners in learning mobility, should be supported within this context.
Amendment 87 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) The ESF+ should support Member States’ efforts to tackle poverty with a view to breaking the cycle of disadvantage across generations and promote social inclusion by ensuring equal opportunities for all, tackling discrimination and addressing health inequalities. This implies mobilising a range of policies targeting the most disadvantaged people regardless of their age, including children, marginalised communities such as the Roma, and the working poor. The ESF+ should promote the active inclusion of people far from the labour market with a view to ensuring their socio-economic integration. The ESF+ should be also used to enhance timely and equal access to affordable, sustainable and high quality services such as healthcare and long-term care, in particular family and community-based care services. The ESF+ should contribute to the modernisdissemination of social protection systems with a view in particular to promoting their accessibility.
Amendment 90 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
Amendment 101 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) The ESF+ should support policy and system reformMember States' policies in the fields of employment, social inclusion, healthcare and long-term care, and education and training. In order to strengthen alignment with the European Semester, Member States should allocate an appropriate amount of their resources of the ESF+ strand under shared management to implement relevant country-specific recommendations relating to structural challenges which it is appropriate to address through multiannual investments falling within the scope of the ESF+. The Commission and the Member States should ensure coherence, coordination and complementarity between the shared- management and Health strands of ESF+ and the Reform Support Programme, including the Reform Delivery Tool and the Technical Support Instrument. In particular, the Commission and the Member State should ensure, in all stages of the process, effective coordination in order to safeguard the consistency, coherence, complementarity and synergy among sources of funding, including technical assistance thereof.
Amendment 112 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) The Member States and the Commission should ensure that ESF+ contributes to the promotion of equality between women and men in accordance with Article 8 TFEU to foster equality of treatment and opportunities between women and men in all areas, including regarding participation in the labour market, terms and conditions of employment and career progression. They should also ensure that the ESF+ promotes equal opportunities for all, without discrimination in accordance with Article 10 TFEU and promotes the inclusion in society of persons with disabilities on equal basis with others and contributes to the implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. These principles should be taken into account in all dimensions and in all stages of the preparation, monitoring, implementation and evaluation of programmes, in a timely and consistent manner while ensuring that specific actions are taken to promote gender equality between women and men and equal opportunities. The ESF+ should also promote the transition from residential/institutional care to family and community-based care, in particular for those who face multiple discrimination. The ESF+ should not support any action that contributes to segregation or to social exclusion. Regulation (EU) No [future CPR] provides that rules on eligibility of expenditure are to be established at national level, with certain exceptions for which it is necessary to lay down specific provisions with regard to the ESF+ strand under shared management.
Amendment 149 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point viii
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point viii
(viii) promoting socio-economic integration of third country nationals and of marginalised communities such as the Romahouseholds living in conditions of absolute or relative poverty;
Amendment 155 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point ix
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point ix
(ix) enhancing the equal and timely access to quality, sustainable and affordable services; modernisingfacilitating the dissemination of social protection systems, including promoting access to social protection; improving accessibility, effectiveness and resilience of healthcare systems and long-term care services;
Amendment 165 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 170 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Member States and, where appropriate the Commission, shall foster synergies and ensure coordination, complementarity and coherence between the ESF+ and other Union funds, programmes and instruments such as Erasmus, and the Asylum and Migration Fund and the Reform Support Programme, including the Reform Delivery Tool and the Technical Support Instrument, both in the planning phase and during implementation. Member States and, where appropriate the Commission, shall optimise mechanisms for coordination to avoid duplication of effort and ensure close cooperation between those responsible for implementation to deliver coherent and streamlined support actions.
Amendment 171 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Amendment 173 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall allocate at least 25% of their ESF+ resources under shared management to the specific objectives for the social inclusion policy area set out in points (vii) to (xi) of Article 4(1), including the promotion of the socio- economic integration of third country nationalshouseholds living in conditions of absolute or relative poverty.
Amendment 185 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11
Article 11
Amendment 196 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2
Article 32 – paragraph 2
Amendment 198 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 40 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Amendment 199 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1
Annex I – paragraph 1
All personal data are to be broken down by gendersex (female, male, 'non binary'). If certain results are not possible, data for those results do not have to be collected and reported.
Amendment 202 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 1 – point 1b – paragraph 1 – indent 4
Annex I – point 1 – point 1b – paragraph 1 – indent 4
— minorities (including marginalised communities such as the Roma)ethnic or linguistic minorities**,
Amendment 41 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
Amendment 62 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – point iii
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – point iii
(iii) increasing the socioeconomic integration of marginalised communities, migrants and disadvantaged groupshouseholds living in conditions of absolute or relative poverty, through integrated measures including housing and social services;
Amendment 56 #
2018/0154(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 –paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Article 1 –paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Regulation (EC) No 862/2007
Recital 9
Recital 9
(-1) Recital 9 is replaced by the following: "(9) This Regulation does notshall cover estimates of the number of persons illegally resident in the Member States. Member States should notall provide such estimates orand data on such persons to the Commission (Eurostat), although they may be included in population stocks due to surveys. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:199:0023:0029:en:PDF). " Or. en (https://eur-
Amendment 39 #
2018/0153(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
–
–
The European Parliament rejects the Commission's proposal.
Amendment 27 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
–
–
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committees on Budgets and on Budgetary Control, as the committees responsible, to propose a rejection of the Commission proposal.
Amendment 40 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1 a) The Commission´s interference in the Member States´ internal affairs is misleadingly presented as protecting the Union´s financial interests.
Amendment 44 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
(2 a) The Treaty defines the Commission as an impartial referee: the Commission however sees itself as a political body, thereby jeopardizing the EU.
Amendment 62 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8 a) Reaffirms its commitment to the overriding principles of cultural identity and national sovereignty, principles that form an indivisible whole with the principle of freedom.
Amendment 69 #
Amendment 116 #
2018/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
(2) The document title ('Identity card') shall appear in the official language or languages of the issuing Member State and at least on; the issuing Member State may add the translation of the document title in one or more other official language of the institutions of the Union.;
Amendment 159 #
2018/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the title of the document in the official language or languages of the Member State concerned; the Member State may andd at least onthe translation of the document title in one or more other official language of the institutions of the Union;
Amendment 161 #
2018/0104(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(d a) the sex of the holder (male or female);
Amendment 43 #
2017/2270(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Requestalises that Commission submit, by 31 March 2019, on the basis of Articles 77(2)(b) and 78(2)(g) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, a proposal for a Regulation on establishing a European Humanitarian Visa, followthe introduction of a Humanitarian Visa will not only create an unmanageable administrative burden for consulates and embassies but also preserve fundamental problems regarding secondary movements within the EU, serious deficits ing the recommendations set out in the Annex to this resolutionEU return policies and the security problems resulting from it;
Amendment 51 #
2017/2270(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that part of the financial implications of the requested proposal should be covered by the general budget of the Union as a practical expression of the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, including its financial implications, between the Member States, in accordance with Article 80 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European UnionUrges the Commission to examine the feasibility of refugee centres outside of the EU in order to offer the necessary protection in an efficient and controlled manner;
Amendment 52 #
2017/2270(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the accompanying recommendations to the Commission and the Council, and to the national Parliaments, the European Court of Justice, the European External Action Service, the European Asylum Support Office, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation and the European Union Agency for Fundamental RighUrges the Commission to assess the relations with third countries on the basis of the cooperation in EU return policies and to propose efficient approaches to eliminate deficits.;
Amendment 5 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Schengen area is a unique arrangement and one of the greatest achievementfailures of the European Union, allowing free movement of people within the Schengen area without controls at internal borders; whereas this has been made possible through a variety of compensating measures, such as re- enforcing the exchange of information through the establishment of the Schengen Information System (SIS) and creating an evaluation mechanism to verify the implementation of the Schengen acquis by Member States and foster mutual trust in the functioning of the Schengen areaterrorists, drugs, illegal weapons and illegal migrants within the Schengen area without controls at internal borders; whereas mutual trust also demands solidarity, judicial and police cooperation in criminal matters and common views on migration, visa and asylum policierespected boundaries such as national borders;
Amendment 17 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas in recent years several factors have impacted the functioning of the Schengen area; whereas these factors include a significant numbers of asylum seekers and irregularillegal migrants with related secondary movements; whereas these factors also include terrorism and a heightened threat to public policy and the internal security of the Member States; whereas several Member States have also reintroduced and subsequently prolonged controls at internal borders since 2014;
Amendment 25 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the permanent reintroduction of border controls would have serious beneficial impacts on citizens’ lives and seriously undermine their trust in European integration; whereas Schengen countries would face tremendous direct operational and investment costs, with crippling effects on their economies; whereas the estimations of those costs alone amount to more than EUR 18 billion per year for cross-border workers, tourists, road freight transporters and public administeveryday security and be the natural consequence of their lack of trust in European integrations;
Amendment 33 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
Amendment 38 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
Amendment 40 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. Whereas the collusion between some NGOs and smuggler networks have been documented, encouraging illegal migration toward Member States;
Amendment 47 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes the effectiveness of the measures taken at the external borders, such as Hungary’s fence, and the creation of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex); notes the efforts of the Agency in implementing the new regulation, especially through joint operations in the field of border surveillance and return, and by supporting the Member States particularly affected by migratory pressure; sees the importance of the newly introduced vulnerability assessment mechanism in uncovering weaknesses at the common external borders and preventing crises; emphasises the concerted efforts and cooperation between agencies and oasks the Commission to fully use Frontex’s capacities, especially in helping Member States to send back all illegal migrants to their stakeholders in organising the ‘Hotspot’ approachhome countries or partnered third countries which agreed to accept them, based on the Australian “No Way” policy;
Amendment 62 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises the support and capacity-building measures taken in the countries of origin to address the root causes of irregular migration; considers it crucial that adequate maritime search-and- rescue-and-send-back aspects and capabilities are embedded into all operational planning and execution, as provided for in Regulation (EU) No 656/2014;
Amendment 101 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 110 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that the current state of Schengen and the issues it has encountered are not due to problems in the structure and construction of Schengen itself but ratherand also to the connected fields of the acquis, such as shortcomingirresponsabilities in the area of the Common European Asylum System, including the Dublin Regulation, and especially the lack of control of the external borders;
Amendment 128 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. CondemnWelcomes the continued reintroduction of internal border checks as this undermines the basic principles of the Schengen area, and expresses doubts about the lawfulness of some prolongations of controls; is also of the opinion that Member States have not taken the proper measures to ensure cooperation with other affected Member States to minimise the effects of these measures, nor have they provided enough information on the results of such controls, therefore hindering the analysis by the Commission and scrutiny by Parliament; considers the economic, political and social impacts of this practice to be detrimental to the unity of the Schengen area and harmful to the prosperity of European citizenallow Member States to protect their citizens with effectiveness; recalls that Member States have’ other tools available, namely targeted police controls, as recommended by the Commissionre not sufficient as demonstrated by the recent wave of islamic terror strikes;
Amendment 142 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. AppreciatDeplores, as part of efforts to restore the normal functioning of Schengen, the proposal to amend the Schengen Borders Code; recalls that these changes should merely reflectwill not be sufficient given the new challenges and diffuse threats to internal security and should notrather be a further avenue for prolonging interdefinitively restoring national border controls; considers that these steps are to be made carefully in order not to inflict irreversible damage on the basic idea of free movemen utopic idea of free movement is an obvious failure and should be put to rest;
Amendment 152 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses that all the Member States should do their utmost to ensure a high level of control at their external borders, as enshrined in the Treaties, by allocating sufficient resources through staffing and, expertise, establishing the necessary command and control structures and formulating up-to-date risk analyses in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 for all tiers of command to facilitate effective operationsand a border fence such as the one in Hungary or a “No Way” policy based on the Australian model;
Amendment 158 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Considers that cooperation at national level between different law enforcement services, the military, border guards and customs is often inadequate, resulting in fragmented situational awareness and low effectivenesswithout the slightest doubt the best way to ensure both national and common security while respecting each Member States’ sovereignty;
Amendment 169 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses the urgent need to address the identified critical shortcomings without delay in order to return to the normal functioning of Schengen withoutrestore internal border controls;
Amendment 179 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
Amendment 210 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Member States to ensure swift return procedures once a return decision has been issued; calls on the Member States to take specifevery time an illegal migrant is detected, as illegally crossing a border is a crime which steps to ensure adequate infrastructure, accommodation and living conditions for arriving asylum seekers, especially taking into consideration the needs of unaccompanied minors and families with minors; calls on hould not be taken lightly; recalls that because of Schengen any illegal migrant who successfully violates the external borders of the EU is then free to travel to another Member States to bring their detention facilities into line with the requirements so as to meet capacity demand, and to increase the use of alternative measures to detention, potentially with harmful intentions as it has been witnessed numerous times; stresses that every single successful illegal migrant gives hope to others and accentuate the whole migration crisis;
Amendment 224 #
2017/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
Amendment 4 #
2017/2216(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. WelcomDeplores the progress made in the Council in 2016 on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), which led to the agreement between 20 Member States on the basis of the enhanced cooperation procedure provided for in Article 86 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; hopes that all Member States will eventually participate in this initiative; recalls that the role of the EPPO will be to investigate, prosecute and bring to court the perpetrators of criminal offences affecting the EU’s financial interests, as defined in the PIF Directive;
Amendment 10 #
2017/2216(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 14 #
2017/2216(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 10 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 a (new)
Citation 15 a (new)
- having regard to the fact that the EU is making frightening steps towards deciding what opinions are allowed according to the EU and thereby threatening freedom of speech for EU citizens by enabling censorship and EU propaganda;
Amendment 13 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 18
Citation 18
Amendment 19 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 22 a (new)
Citation 22 a (new)
- having regard to the fact that propaganda is spread to eliminate political incorrectness from Brussels;
Amendment 20 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 23 a (new)
Citation 23 a (new)
- having regard to the fact that the EU stated their plans to combat 'euroscepticism' in the Union in the EU for Citizens report and the current developments of the suggestion of an EU media quality mark where chair De Cock Buning proactively researches 'fake news' with her taskforce, is demonstrating that freedom in the EU is under serious threat;
Amendment 24 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the rights to freedom of expression and freedom of opinion are fundamental human rights and indispensable conditions for the full development of the person, for the realisation of the principles of transparency and, accountability and for the fulfilment of other human rights and fundamental freedomsdiscovery of truth; therefore should we safeguard these precious rights of freedom of expression and freedom of opinion at all cost and not allow the EU to judge what is the truth;
Amendment 36 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas freedom of speech and freedom of expression are the cornerstones of our societies and should remain protected at all cost;
Amendment 64 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
Amendment 71 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
H a. whereas Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides the right to freedom of expression and information, which includes the right of freedom to hold opinions, and to receive and impart information and ideas;
Amendment 74 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas, recalling the Council of Europe, whistleblowing is a fundamental aspect of freedom of expression and plays a central role in deterring and preventing wrongdoing, and in strengthening democratic accountability and transparency; whereas the adequate protection of whistleblowers at EU, national and international level is a precondition for ensuring the effectiveness of such a role;
Amendment 91 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls onWelcomes the Member States to take adequate measures to safeguard and promote a pluralist, independent and free media landscape in the service of democratic society, including the independence and sustainability of public service media and communitythe media, which are crucial elements of a favourable environment for freedom of expression;
Amendment 101 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls onReminds the EU institutions to guarantee full implementation of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in all their decisions, actions and policies, as a means to thoroughly uphold media pluralism and media freedom; asks the Commission, in this regard, to introduce human rights impact assessments for the evaluation of its legislative proposals and to present a proposal for the establishment of an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights in line with the relevant Parliament resolutionhat all citizens have a guaranteed right to freedom of speech; calls on the EU institutions to respect this right of EU citizens to freedom of speech in all their decisions, actions and policies, as a means to thoroughly uphold media pluralism and media freedom;
Amendment 108 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Expresses its deep concern at the abuses, crimes and deadly attacks still being committed against journalists and media workers in the Member States; urges the Member States to do their utmost to prevent such violence, to ensure accountability and avoid impunity and to guarantee that victims and their families have access to the appropriate legal remedies; calls on the; welcomes Member States, moreover, to fully implement Council of Europe Recommendation CM/Rec(2016)4 on the protection of journalism and safety of journalists and other media actors;
Amendment 118 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on theWelcomes initiatives of Member States to create and maintain, in law and in practice, a safe and secure environment for journalists and other media actors, enabling them to perform their work in full independence and without undue interference – such as the threat of violence, harassment, financial, economic and political pressure, pressure to disclose confidential sources and materials, and targeted surveillance; highlights the importance of taking a gender-sensitive approach when considering measures to address the safety of journalists, and the opinion of the 'EU versus disinformation';
Amendment 121 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the importance of ensuring adequate working conditions for journalists and media workers, in full compliance with the requirements of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Social Charter, as a means to avoid undue internal and external pressure, dependency, vulnerability and instability, and hence the risk of self- censorship; highlights that independent journalism cannot be guaranteed and fostered by the market alone; asks the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to promote and elaborate new socially sustainable economic models aimed at financing and supporting quality and independent journalism;
Amendment 135 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that the participation in democratic processes is founded, first and foremost, on effective and non- discriminatory access to information and knowledge; calls for the EU and its Member States to develop adequate policies to attain universal access to the internet and to recognise internet access – including net neutrality – as a fundamental righwelcomes initiatives of the EU Member States to guarantee freedom of access to the internet and to recognise the neutrality of the internet;
Amendment 150 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 154 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Deplores the broad and extremely imprecise scope of the Code of Conduct on Countering Illegal Hate Speech Online, promoted by the Commission, and the large margin of manoeuvre left to private companies to determine what constitutes ‘illegality’, which could potentially leads to censorship and arbitrary restrictions on freedom of expression; stresses that such censorship and attempts to limit freedom of expression are already happening in Germany and may occur in France soon too;
Amendment 173 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Recognises that the new digital environment has exacerbated the problem of the spread of disinformation, or the so- called ‘fake’ or ‘false’ news; recalls, however, that this is not a new phenomenon, nor is it restricted to the online sphere; stresses the importance of effective systems of self-regulation which are based on the principles of accuracy and transparency and which provide for proper obligations and instruments regarding source verification and fact checkingnabled citizens to discover the truth about various issues that before where only to be found in newspapers and books; stresses the importance of maintaining a citizens' fundamental right of freedom of speech and free access to pluralistic and diverse media, including self-published opinions such as blogs;
Amendment 181 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Stresses the importance of media pluralism and media freedom and that by allowing the EU to judge what is the truth and what is not the truth is threatening the freedom civilians have in the Union;
Amendment 194 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 197 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Reminds the EU institutions that Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights gives EU citizens the right of freedom to hold opinions, and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers;
Amendment 216 #
2017/2209(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Deplores the fact that the monopoly position of certain social media enterprises is being enforced by some Member States who are assigning them with a special duty to provide so-called ‘uncensored’ and ‘unbiased’ information;
Amendment 3 #
2017/2179(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the budgets of Frontex and EASO increased significantly throughout 2016; recognises that these agencies weare confronted with costly administrative and operational challenges; notes that as a result they faced problems absorbing additional Union funds granted throughout 2016 leading to considerable cancellations and/or carry-overs as well as difficulties to comply to budgetary and financial rules due to illegal migration;
Amendment 10 #
2017/2179(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Acknowledges that EASO, eu- LISA and to a much lesser extend EMCDDA did not fully comply with public procurement principles and rules laid down by the Financial Regulation; notes that for EUeu-LISA, Frontex and EMCDDA the Court also identified weaknesses in monitoring contract implementations; highlights also the very significant weaknesses of EASO Internal Controls; welcomes however the commitment of these three Agencies to improve themselves and take the necessary corrective measurdeems it necessary that misconduct must result in organizational measures and personnel consequences;
Amendment 5 #
2017/2178(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Is concernedDeplores that the public procurement procedure launched for the further development and maintenance of the VIS system (EUR 192 million six year contract) without precisely defining the services requested required tenderers to have access to the Biometric Matching Service technology developed by one single company with no obligations to provide commercial access to tenderers; calls on the Agency to avoid being locked- in to any vendors as this would be detrimental to its long term financial interests, damaging the cost-effectiveness of procurement procedures and limiting competition; urges the Agency to conclude agreements with multiple suppliers and to define the services required precisely;
Amendment 10 #
2017/2178(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. NotDeplores that the Agency amended the construction contract for its premises in Strasbourg (EUR 21.2 million) to proceed with advance payments in order to increase its budget consumption; points out that by November 2016 the Agency had paid the full contract amount although less than half of the work had been completed; requests the Agency to better assess the necessity of taking such financial risks as the use of financial guarantees does not cover all financial risks;
Amendment 12 #
2017/2178(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. RegretsFinds it unacceptable that in 2016 the Agency received and accepted supplies amounting to EUR 2.8 million without having budget and contracts in place for it; requests the Agency to better adhere to public procurement procedures;
Amendment 4 #
2017/2177(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights that in order to cover its support to Member States of first entry, in particular for the registration and interviewing of asylum applicants and for the relocation schemeillegal migrants and for the failing relocation scheme that has not been agreed by all Member States, the budget of the European Asylum Support Office (‘the Office’) increased by an absurdly exorbitant 273 %; underlines the fact that the Office’s staff also increased by only 34 % and that34 % while far fewer experts from Member States have been deployed to Member States of first entry than actually needed;
Amendment 6 #
2017/2177(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 5 #
2017/2169(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. NotDeplores the 10 % staff and budget increases of Europol in 2016 following the decision to entrust Europol with new tasks; notes the high implementation rates for commitment (99,8 %) and payment appropriations (91,0 %);
Amendment 10 #
2017/2169(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. AcknowledgeRejects the ever-increasing demand for Europol’s services from Member States; regretwelcomes, in that context, the fact that the tight ICT resources available have resulted in a re-prioritisation of core systems development activities, project delays and have also triggered an exploration of further outsourcing possibilities with the increased risks that that implies to make them more efficient and effective;
Amendment 2 #
2017/2164(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. HighlightDeplores that the mandate of Frontex was considerably extended with a budget increase of 75 % versus 18 % for its staff; notes in this context, the Court of Auditors' conclusions that the annual accounts of the Agency fairly present its financial position on 31 December 2016 and that its transactions are legal and regular;
Amendment 13 #
2017/2164(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 16 #
2017/2164(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 19 #
2017/2164(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 1 #
2017/2163(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 2 #
2017/2163(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Points outDeplores that the budget and the staff of CEPOL increased by about 22% in 2016; notes in that context that carry-overs of committed appropriations were a high for Title II (expenditure for support activities) at 140 055 euro, i.e. 30 % and mainly related to IT consulting and IT related goods and services ordered late in the year;
Amendment 6 #
2017/2163(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 9 #
2017/2163(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 3 #
2017/2155(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 6 #
2017/2155(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 1 #
2017/2150(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 2 #
2017/2150(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. WelcomDeplores the high budget execution rate of the Centre, with commitment and payment appropriation reaching respectively 99.95 % and 95.64 % and consumption of carry-over credits reaching 94%; notes howeverwelcomes that the budget of the Centre decreased by 17% in 2016 compared to 2015;
Amendment 9 #
2017/2150(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. StresseCondemns that the Centre did not respect the ceiling of a framework contract, which was signed in 2012 with a maximum amount for signing specific contracts of EUR 250 000, as by the end of 2015 the total payments made under this contract amounted to EUR 382 181; calls on the Centre to improve the procedure for monitoring framework contracts;
Amendment 1 #
2017/2149(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 3 #
2017/2149(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes with concern that, as in 2015, carry-overs of committed appropriations were too high for Title III (operating expenditure) at EUR 5,2 million, i.e. 68 %; acknowledges that this year, as in the previous year, this simply reflects the multi-annual nature of the Agency’s activities and stresses that these should be reduced;
Amendment 9 #
2017/2149(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 11 #
2017/2149(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 13 #
2017/2144(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. EncouragNotes the growing contribution of the EDPS to solutions driving innovation and enhancing privacy and data protection, especially by increasing transparency, user control and accountability in big data processing; calls for effective actions maximising benefits of new technologies ensuring full respect for all the fundamental rights;
Amendment 17 #
2017/2144(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. WelcomNotes the aim of the Agency, as set out in the Strategy for its mandate, to make data protection as simple and effective as possible for all involved;
Amendment 1 #
2017/2136(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 3 #
2017/2136(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 7 #
2017/2136(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Reminds that special instruments were used extensively in 2015, 2016 and 2017 to respond notably to the humanitarian situation faced by asylum- seekers in the EU and that there is therefore a risk that the amounts left until the end of the current MFF may not be sufficient to respond to unexpected events that may occur before 2020; requests the Commission to solve this structural issue in the next MFFand illegal migrants in the EU;
Amendment 10 #
2017/2136(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 14 #
2017/2136(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. StressDeplores that only one third of the projects examined had a performance measurement system with output and result indicators linked to the operational programme objectives, while the majority of the projects met their output objectives at least partially; highlights that for 42 % of the projects it was not possible to identify and measure a specific contribution to the overall programme objectives since no result indicators or targets were defined at project level.
Amendment 13 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3
Citation 3
Amendment 84 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
Amendment 122 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the dangers faced by refugee and migrant children include separation from their families, detention, sexual and gender-based violence, exploitation and physical and psychological damagerights of children must be respected according to national law of the Nation States;
Amendment 132 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
Amendment 152 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the systematic use of states of emergency and border controls does very little to deter terrorists, who have all, thus far, been long-term residents of EU Member Stateose who have been long-term residents of EU Nation States but follow radical Islam, must be observed and the right to residence inside the EU must be revoked if a threat to the national security of any Nation State exists;
Amendment 160 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
Amendment 170 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
Amendment 188 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
Amendment 208 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Asserts that neitherthe concept of national sovereignty norand subsidiarity can justify or legitimise the systematic refusal on the part of a Member State to comply with the principles of governance which inspired the introductory articles of the European Treafor all Nation States must be respected at all times;
Amendment 220 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 228 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 242 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that in its resolution of 25 October 20161 it recommends the establishment of a European mechanism for democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights; points out that this mechanism would be central to the coordinated European approach to governance which is currently lacking; _________________ 1_________________ 1 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0409. Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0409.
Amendment 245 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 299 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Takes the view, therefore, that a clear distinction should be drawn between migrants who can legitimately claim refugee status and those who cannot; calls for migrants to be identified and for their requests for entry into the EU to be processed before they comebefore attaining entry into the EU;
Amendment 309 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Strongly condemns the upsurge in the trafficking of human beings in Africa and towards Europe, the perpetrators of which – including official and governmental players, as well as NGO's – should be made to feel the full force of the law;
Amendment 320 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Takes the view that the existing legal channels should be available for migration, including from Africa, but not for all the men and women hoping to come to Europe; takes the view that the best way to protect the rights of persons who cannot legally enter Europe would be to bring about the rapid and robust development of Africa, which Europe could promote by stepping up its involvement on the African continof Nation States that are already available for migration are sufficient;
Amendment 356 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 444 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Takes the view that particular attention should be paid to the situation of women and the rights of women in the EU, be they immigrants, victims of abuse or modern slavery, alone or accompanied by children; points out that the EU and the Member States must set an example in this regard;
Amendment 462 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 480 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
Amendment 596 #
2017/2125(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 22 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Notes that mass migration policy enforced by the EU is never the solution to solve the demographic challenges
Amendment 46 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Draws attention to the fact that the Africa-EU Migration and Mobility Dialogue should facilitate mobility and free movement of people in Africa and between Africa and the EU on the basis of a well-managed rights-based approach including safe and legal channels for migration;concrete actions for the revival of the African continent,
Amendment 70 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recognises the strategic potential of the African diaspora world-wide in terms of both financial remittances ans often a trauma for the local development of African countries, the development of a country can not be based non- a financial values, as regards capacity to build and promote peace, democracy, good governance and social stabilityremittance system and Europe should not support such a development model;
Amendment 2 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that the structure of the new multiannual financial framework (MFF) must correspond to the top five political priorities of the EU; calls for more coherence betweebudgetary restraint in the funding of the EU budget and its objectives, if needed by breakby lowering the 1 % glass ceiling of Member State GDP contributions and/or by adapting and reducing the EU’s objectives in line with a strict interpretation of the principal of subsidiarity as enshrined in article 5.3 of the TEU;
Amendment 6 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recommends separating the asylum, border and justice programmes into three comprehensive MFF headings corresponding to clear EU objectives in the framework of ‘Solidaecurity’, ‘Security’ and ‘Respect for the Rule of LawImproved Returns’ and ‘Reintroduction of Internal Border Controls by Member States’, which are understandable and identifiable by EU citizens;
Amendment 9 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 20 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 25 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 49 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to propose clear and strict rules for financially sanctioningstop interfering with Member States "failing to comply with ‘the rule of law’".
Amendment 198 #
2017/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) The Austrian and Italian governments have demonstrated to be very effective in protecting their national borders against illegal migrants.
Amendment 52 #
2017/0145(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
–
–
The European Parliament rejects [the Commission proposal].
Amendment 47 #
2017/0144(COD)
Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set outRejects the Commission proposal;
Amendment 52 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) This objective presupposesuggests the exchange of information extracted from criminal records between the competent authorities of the Member States. Such an exchange of information is organised and facilitated by the rules set out in Council Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA20 and by the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS) which has been established by Council Decision 2009/316/JHA21. _________________ 20 Council Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA of 26 February 2009 on the organisation and content of the exchange of information extracted from the criminal record between Member States (OJ L 93, 7.4.2009, p. 23). 21 Council Decision 2009/316/JHA of 6 April 2009 on the establishment of the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS) in application of Article 11 of Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA (OJ L 93, 7.4.2009, p. 33).
Amendment 60 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
Amendment 64 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) The European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) established by Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council22 to identify the Member State(s) holding information on previous convictions of third country nationals (ʻECRIS-TCN system’) should not be entrusted with the task of developing and operating another new inefficient centralised ECRIS-TCN system, given its lack of experience with managing other large scale systems in the area of justice and home affairs. IMoreover, its mandate should be amended to reflect these new taskrejected as it is the exclusive right of any nation state to ensure, manage and control their own justice system and national security, including their national security systems. _________________ 22 Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 establishing a European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (OJ L 286 1.11.2011, p. 1).
Amendment 67 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
Amendment 84 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Member States shouldare free to decide whether they desire to create records or not in the ECRIS-TCN system regarding convicted third country nationals as soon as possible after their conviction was entered into the national criminal record.
Amendment 89 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Improving the circulation of information on convictions should assist Member States in their implementation of Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA, which obliges the Member States to take account of previous convictionmay assist Member States in the course of new criminal proceedings.
Amendment 95 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
Amendment 99 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
Amendment 101 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
Amendment 105 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
Amendment 110 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Since tThe objective of this Regulation, namely to enable the rapid and efficient exchange of criminal record information on third country nationals, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can rather, by reason of the necessary synergy and interoperability, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objec by own initiative.
Amendment 112 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
Amendment 116 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
Amendment 117 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) establishes ano new system to identify the Member State(s) holding information on previous convictions of third country nationals (’ECRIS-TCN system’);
Amendment 127 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point h
Amendment 134 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point p
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point p
Amendment 136 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Amendment 137 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Amendment 170 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Amendment 193 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Amendment 212 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Amendment 218 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
Article 11 – paragraph 3
Amendment 220 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4
Article 11 – paragraph 4
Amendment 223 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5
Article 11 – paragraph 5
Amendment 228 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6
Article 11 – paragraph 6
Amendment 229 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 7
Article 11 – paragraph 7
Amendment 231 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 8
Article 11 – paragraph 8
Amendment 234 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 11
Article 11 – paragraph 11
Amendment 235 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 12
Article 11 – paragraph 12
Amendment 236 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 15
Article 11 – paragraph 15
Amendment 266 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
Article 18 – paragraph 2
Amendment 268 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Amendment 272 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2
Article 21 – paragraph 2
Amendment 292 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3
Article 26 – paragraph 3
Amendment 294 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4
Article 26 – paragraph 4
Amendment 303 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 5
Article 30 – paragraph 5
Amendment 306 #
2017/0144(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 3
Article 31 – paragraph 3
Amendment 61 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes with concern that, since the transposition of the EPO Directive, only seven EPOs have been issued by the Member States, although thousands of national protection orders have been requested and issued in the Member States in recent years20; _________________ 20 The EPRS’s study on the ‘European Protection Order Directive 2011/99/EU – European Implementation Assessment’ reports that ‘it has been estimated that in 2010 over 100 000 women residing in the EU were covered by protection measures related to gender-based violence’.
Amendment 65 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Deplores that the Commission did not submit a report to Parliament and Council on the application of the EPO Directive by 11 January 2016; calls onorders the Commission to meet its reporting obligations as set out in the directive;
Amendment 69 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. RecCalls the obligation foron the executing state to recognise the EPO with the same priority as the issuing state in spite of the various complexities and legal challenges involved;
Amendment 72 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Is concerned that there is a significant gap between coordination and communication among the Member States when an EPO is executed; calls on the Member States to improve and jointly enhance cooperation and communication in relation to the EPO as this would set in motion much more efficient procedures and simultaneous cross-border action among the Member Statesstep up their cooperation in this area;
Amendment 82 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to set up a European Registry System to collect information on EPOs from all Member Staincluded on National Registry Systems;
Amendment 85 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to publish the full list of competent authorities responsible for issuing and recognising EPOs and of central authorities transmitting and receiving EPOs in the Member States, and to make the list easily accessible to enable protected persons and victim support organisations to request EPOs or to settle related issues; calls on the Member States to strengthen their national and local institutions and competent authorities to enhance the accessibility and applicability of the EPO in a manner conducive to EPOs being issued;
Amendment 102 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 107 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. UnderlinesCalls on the Member States to do their utmost to ensure that translation and interpretation services need to bare available and free of charge for victims when a cross- border instrument in criminal matters such as the EPO is being executed;
Amendment 112 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Deplores the shortage of special measures implemented by thsome Member States for victims in vulnerable situations or victims with specific needs; calls, therefore, on the Member States to adopt special guidelines and measures that will facilitate the EPO for victims in vulnerable situations or victims with specific needs;
Amendment 117 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to fix a clearset a precise and short timeframdeadline for the competent authorities of the Member States when issuing EPOs in order to avoid increasing the uncertainty of protected persons, and, for the sake of achieving the same goal, to instruct the competent authorities to provide sufficient information to the victims during the process of taking a decision on their EPO requestto issue European Protection Orders;
Amendment 124 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
Amendment 132 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 134 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
Amendment 137 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
Amendment 140 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
Amendment 144 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
Amendment 149 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
Amendment 154 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
Amendment 160 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Calls on the Member States to launch long-term awareness-raising and intersectional sensitising campaigns on both gendersex-based violence and the available instruments of protection with the involvement of relevant NGOs;
Amendment 162 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
Amendment 165 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
Amendment 167 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
Amendment 169 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Welcomes the signing, on 13 June 2017, of the EU’s accession to the Istanbul Convention, which follows a holistic, comprehensive and coordinated approach, placing the rights of the victim at the centre, and which should be fully connected with the EPO; underlines the importance of this instrument in overcoming one of the barriers to the application of EPOs, namely the lack of recognition of stalking as a criminal offence across all Member States;
Amendment 170 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. Calls on the Member States to fully enforce the Istanbul Convention and to allocate adequate financial and human resources to preventing and combating violence against women and gendersex-based violence, including by empowering women and girls, protecting victims and enabling them to be awarded compensation;
Amendment 173 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
Paragraph 37
Amendment 176 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
Paragraph 38
Amendment 177 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
Amendment 180 #
2016/2329(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
Amendment 39 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas there is still a systematic underreporting of incidences or perpetrators of domestic violence in the EU, particularly in cases involving minorities, LGBT persons, antisemitic offences and gender-basand religiously, in particular anti-Semitic and anti-Christian motivated violence in the EU;
Amendment 59 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I – indent 4
Recital I – indent 4
- ensuring equal accessibility for all victims to victim support services, particularly in the cases of LGBT victims and victims of hate crimes and honour- related crimes;
Amendment 75 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
I a. whereas the common European approach on supporting and protecting victims was irreparably damaged by the German government and its dishonourable treatment of the victims of the Breitscheidplatz terror-act;
Amendment 201 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on all Member States to tackle impunity at all times as not doing so could have a severe impact the psychological recovery process of the victim, particularly if national legal authorities express understanding towards foreign cultures by mitigating the penalty;
Amendment 60 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the consideration of BiH’s EU membership application by the Council and looks forward to the Commission’s opinion on the merits of the application for membership; calls on competent BiH authorities at all levels, but in accordance with their respective constitutional remits, to cooperate and coordinate in participating in the Commission’s Opinion process by providing a single set of replies to the Commission’s inquiries;
Amendment 84 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the agreement on setting upestablishing a coordination mechanism for EUuropean matters; calls on both the state and entities to ensure effective cooperation and communication between all leveltiers of government and with the EU, in order to facilitate the alignment and implementation of the acquis, and to provide satisfactory replies to the Commission’s inquiries throughout the Opinionassessment process; calls for the role and capacities ofon the Directorate for European Integration to be further enhanced with a view to it assuming fully its coordinating functions within the implementation of the SAA and, overall, in the accession processand all bodies in BiH and in entities responsible for integration to play their part in the accession process in accordance with the coordination mechanism;
Amendment 91 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Regrets that the Rules of Procedure of the SAPC have still not been adopted and it therefore could annot be properly constituted; calls for the adoption of procedural rules compatible with the constitutional structure of BiH;
Amendment 108 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 132 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Regrets that a high number of constitutional court decisions are not being implemented, including in particular the decision on the RS day, which was contested in the referendum held on 25 September 2016; emphasises that respect for the rule of law and the country’s constitutional framework is of paramount importance for advancing on the EU path;
Amendment 3 #
2016/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that voluntary, inclusive and consensus-oriented standardisation processes have been effective; considers it vital to retain voluntary national standards;
Amendment 23 #
2016/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises the strategic importance of ICT standardisation and calls on the Commission to support an EU and Member State presence in international ICT fora;
Amendment 35 #
2016/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. WelcomNotes the ICT priority areas as the essential technology building blocks on which equally important areas such as eHealth, smart and efficient energy use, intelligent transport systems and advanced manufacturing will rely;
Amendment 54 #
2016/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Asks the Commission and the Member States to rationalise the number of platforms and coordination mechanisms;
Amendment 81 #
2016/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines the importance of agile standardisation processes, with appropriate involvement of manufacturing industries, SMEs, trade unions and NGOs;
Amendment 89 #
2016/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. UrgesCalls for the Joint Initiative to better align research and innovation with standard-setting priorities;
Amendment 95 #
2016/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights the fact that timelyit is crucial to delivery is crucialmmediately;
Amendment 101 #
2016/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the CommissionMember States to develop with international partners an agenda for closer cooperation based on specific areas of common interest;
Amendment 124 #
2016/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the CommissionMember States to ensure the efficient settlement of disputes, to support return on investment and to ensure wide access to standardised technology;
Amendment 128 #
2016/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. AsksInsists that the Commission to update Parliament regularly on the progress of ICT standardisation.
Amendment 2 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Firmly believes that development and human rights are interdependent, and that respect for and protection and fulfilment of human rights are prerequisites for reducing poverty and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)can be interdependent;
Amendment 17 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Takes the viewNotes that human rights must be a cross-cutting feature in the achievement of all goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda; calls for a human-rights- sensitive SDG indicator framework to be are often used for partisan purposes and also lead to the destabilished at national and international level to ensure strong transparency and accountability in this regardation of African countries for the benefit of external powers;
Amendment 29 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the paramount importance of SDG 16; stresses that respect for human rights, consolidation of the rule of law, good governance and stability should be key objectives of all EU external policies, on condition that they are not subject to a policy of double standards which actually serves war aims;
Amendment 45 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that the introduction of a human-rights-based approach (HRBA) in EU development policy aimed at integrating human rights principles into EU operational activities for development; calls for greater dissemination of the HRBA toolbox among our partners, and for its implementation to be closely monitored by the Commissiohas often served partisan war policies and that each Member State is sovereign;
Amendment 55 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls the crucial importance of the principle of Policy Coherence for Development (PCD), as enshrined in Article 208 TFEU; insists on strengthening coherence and coordination among all EUthe Member States’ external policies and instruments while implementing the HRBA; calls for the EU not to commit new expenditure in this area, but to commit to supporting the effective policies of the Member States;
Amendment 67 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Council, the Commission and the Member States to include natural human rights systematically in political dialogues conducted with developing countries, while respecting their sovereignty;
Amendment 73 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 84 #
2016/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 6 #
2016/2147(INI)
B. whereas, in negotiating H2020 and the current Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), Parliament asked for EUR100 billion euros rather than the EUR 77 billion agreed and the budget seems very limited if H2020 is to fully explore excellence potential;
Amendment 13 #
2016/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the economic and financial crisis was a determining factor in the design of H2020, and new current challenges (such as peopulism, inequalities, migration andles’ growing rejection of the EU, the wave of migration sweeping across the European countries and Islamic terrorism) and new political and economic paradigms are likely to shape the next research programme;
Amendment 15 #
2016/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the Framework Programme (FP) must be founded on European values, scientific independence, openness, diversity, high European ethical standards, social cohesion and equal access by citizens to the solutions and answers it provides;
Amendment 33 #
2016/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the evaluation of FP7 and monitoring of H2020 shows that the EU FP for research is a hugrelative success15; _________________ 15 With over 130 000 proposals received, 9 000 grants signed, 50 000 participations and EUR 15.9 billion of EU funding.
Amendment 67 #
2016/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Emphasises the importance of basic research, which should not be neglected in favour of the applied sciences; points out that science should benefit everyone and that basic research is essential and paves the way for future discoveries which could have practical applications; stresses that an overly commercial approach to research would stifle creativity by preventing the launch or financing of projects, which could turn out to be invaluable;
Amendment 85 #
2016/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines that several Member States are not respecting their national R&D investment commitments; calls for the earmarking of Structural Funds for R&D activities, especially investments in capacity building, infrastructure and salaries, asks that the 3 % of GDP target be met, and hopes that this can be raised to 4 % in the not too distant future;
Amendment 97 #
2016/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Confirms that ‘excellence’ should remain the key criterion across the three pillars, while noting that it is only one of the three evaluation criteria, alongside ‘impact’ and ‘quality and efficiency of the implementation’; calls for the reweighting of these criteria and invites the Commission to set out additional sub- criteria by adding ‘SSH integration and geographical balance’ under ‘impact’ and ‘project size’ under ‘efficiency of the implementation’;
Amendment 185 #
2016/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Recognises the importance of incorporating research and entrepreneurship skills into Member States’ primary and high school education systems in order to encourage young people to develop these skills, as R&D should be viewed in structural rather than cyclical or temporal terms; calls on the Member States and the Commission to enhance employment stability for young researchers; calls on the CommissionMember States to provide new increased levels of support for young researchers, such as a new funding scheme for early- stage researchers with less than three years of experience after PhD completion;
Amendment 202 #
2016/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
Amendment 240 #
2016/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
Amendment 249 #
2016/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Welcomes the Open Science pilot funding as a first step towards an Open Science Cloud; recognises the relevance of e- infrastructures and supercomputing, the need for public and private sector stakeholders and civil society to be involved and the importance of citizen science in ensuring that society plays a more active part in the definition of the problems; calls for a scientific metadata structure and procedures for the generation of such data in order to feed the European OSC and ensure data exploitation; calls on the Commission and the public and private research community to explore new models that integrate private cloud resources and public e-infrastructures and the launch of citizen agendas in science and innovation;
Amendment 264 #
2016/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Welcomes the success of H2020 and the 1:11 leverage factor; notes the oversubscription and the challenges that lie ahead, and calls for a budgetary increase of EUR 100 billion for FP9;
Amendment 285 #
2016/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
Amendment 317 #
2016/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to look for a solution to the research deficiencies facing convergence regions in some Member States, in application of the principle of additionality; regrets that financial allocations from the Structural and Investment Funds can lead to a reduction in national expenditure in regions where they apply, but insists that these must be additional to national public expenditure; calls also on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that investment in R&D is not accounted for as investment in relation to deficit objectives;
Amendment 351 #
2016/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
Amendment 9 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas in its communication ‘Promoting cultural and creative sectors for growth and jobs in the EU’1, the Commission recognises the key role of cultural and creative industries (CCIs)2 for the social and economic development of the EU, whereas those industries are generating an increasing number of jobs (that are difficult or impossible to relocate), and whereas they are economically robust and are catalysts for innovation; __________________ 1 COM(2012)537 final. 2 Referred to in the Commission communication as: architecture, archives and libraries, artistic crafts, audio-visual (including film, television, video games and multimedia), cultural heritage, design (including fashion design), festivals, music, performing and visual arts, publishing and radio.
Amendment 15 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas CCIs have dual value, as they preserve and promote cultural and linguistic diversity, and strengthen Europeanthe national and regional identityies of the Member States, while sustaining social cohesion and contributing substantially to investment, growth, innovation and employment in the EU economy of the EU Member States;
Amendment 27 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas cultural diplomacy can be a tool with which Member States can strengthens the bilateral relations between European and third countries and, builds bridges between societies and contribute to better mutual understanding;
Amendment 33 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas CCIs contribute to Europe’sthe ‘soft power’ of European countries in their role as ambassadors of European valuecivilisation and its component parts – such as culture, creativity, quality, pluralism, excellence, and craftsmanship – on the world stage;
Amendment 44 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas CCIs in the EU employ 2.5 times more people than automotive manufacturers and five times more than the chemical industry, whereas those jobs are part of the development of a knowledge economy and pave the way for social and environmental renewal, whereas there is however a need to tackle the issue of the sustainability of jobs in the creative industry as well as in the audiovisual sector, music, art and entertainment;
Amendment 49 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas employment in the cultural sector is unlikely to be offshored, as it is connected to specific cultural and historical competences; whereas CCIs contribute significantly and more than any other sector to youth employment and have proved to be most resilient during the post- 2008 economic crisis, also to youth employment, and proved to be most resilient in the wake of the 2008 economic crisis, whereas account must nevertheless be taken of the report published in 2010 by Tera Consultants, with the backing of the Avignon Forum, which showed that between 2008 and 2011 the creative industries lost more than 185 000 jobs and around EUR 10 billion, principally as a result of digital piracy, and whereas action needs to be taken to combat such piracy, which is undermining our creative industry;
Amendment 58 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the CCIs comprise a majority of small and micro-companies and whereas the cultural and creative sector (CCS) companies with lessfewer than 9nine employees account for more than 90 % of the workforce of those sectors, and whereas there is a particular need to give priority support to these small and medium-sized companies in the policies pursued, as they guarantee lasting, stable jobs in the EU;
Amendment 65 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas CCIs play a key role in reindustrialising Europe, are a driver for growth and are in a strategic position to trigger innovative spill-overhifts in other industrial sectors, such as tourism, education, retail, and digital technologies, and whereas there is however a need to encourage interaction and exchange between those various sectors, and develop territories and creative territorial marketing so as to ensure that the creative industry can also be a driver for development in local communities;
Amendment 75 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas among the different sources of EU funding, only Creative Europe and the European Fund for Strategic Investment mention CCIs as a specific priority; whereas, furthermore, those funds are still struggling to prove their effectiveness when it comes to the provision of funding for SMEs in the creative and cultural industries, as within the ‘culture’ strand of the Creative Europe programme, only 20% of projects could ultimately be funded between 2014 and 2015, with only 11% of those projects proving successful;
Amendment 83 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas despite the fact that more creative content is being consumed today than ever before, in particular on services such as user-uploaded content platforms and content aggregation services, the cultural and creative sector has not seen a comparable increase in revenues from this increase in consumption, owing in particular to competition from a number of major multinationals in the industry, which all too often benefit from unfair taxation arrangements giving them an advantage over very small enterprises and SMEs in the industry;
Amendment 91 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas the latest study commissioned by the Commission2 takes into account in its definition of CCIs also the creativity-driven high-end industries; whereas fashion and high-end industries rely on a strong cultural and creative input, contribute to preserve the European centuries-old savoir faire of the peoples of Europe and draw on a cultural heritage and traditions that cannot be replicated by others; __________________ 2 Study reference to be completed once published. Please note that all figures mentioned in this report are based on this study.
Amendment 94 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas CCI national estimates are rarely comparable as Member States are still using different definitions of the CCI; whereas there is a need to promote an exchange of best practices and freely encourage the Member States to enhance their cooperation, particularly as regards combating counterfeit and pirated products and services;
Amendment 100 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
N. whereas in 2013 international trade in counterfeit and pirated goods amounted to up to 2.5 % of world trade and up to 5 % of imports in the EU, which represents EUR 85 billion, whereas that is causing serious damage to the creative industries, and whereas it has led to the loss of almost 400 000 jobs in the sector over the past 10 years and to losses of revenue running into several billion euros;
Amendment 106 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the CommissionEncourages the Member States to develop a coherent and long-term industrial policy framework for the CCS, and on the EU to includeemphasises, with that in mind, that the Commission can play a role in disseminating best practices from the Member States in this area and act as a forum for the sharing of best practices between nations; points out that the EU ought to take account of the development, promotion and protection of national CCIs in its strategic goals and overall political priorities;
Amendment 118 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls onPoints out that the Commission to design its future policicould provide statistics that make it possible to compare the different situations in the Member States based on the following definition of CCIs: ‘cultural and creative industries are those industries that are based on cultural values, individual creativity, skills and talent with the potential to create wealth and jobs through generating value from intellectual property. They include the following sectors relying on cultural and creative inputs: architecture, archives and libraries, artistic crafts, audio-visual (including film, television, video games and multimedia), cultural heritage, design, creativity-driven high-end industries and fashion, festivals, music, performing arts, books and publishing, radio and visual arts’;
Amendment 127 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Emphasises, nevertheless, that seeking to change the scope of a common definition (in particular by giving it a political role) is risky in that it might be broader or more restrictive than national definitions, which establish the legal and political framework for CCIs at Member State level; points out, in addition, that some national definitions provide a higher level of protection for SMEs in the sector and that the common definition could jeopardise that protection for SMEs;
Amendment 130 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to identify specific indicators in order to monitor and analyse the cultural, economic and societal impact of its policies andrelevant national policies and existing European regulatory proposals related to the CCS, and to possibly identifyupdate alternative data sources with a view to complementing and improving official statistics;
Amendment 154 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that technology and infrastructure rely on the content provided by creators; calls, therefore, on the Commission to establishMember States to establish, if necessary, a legal framework for the value chain in the digital age that takes into account the specificities of the sector and leads to an improvement in the, or protection of, the fair remuneration of authors and creators;
Amendment 176 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Asks the Commission, in view of the upcoming copyright reform, to create legal solutions which will suit creators, right holders and consumers alike in order, and therefore to mtake clear that liability exemptions can only apply to genuinely neutral and passive online service providers and not to services that play an active role in distributing, promoting and monetising content at the expense of creatorsinto account, as regards the taxation of online platforms, the country of destination principle rather than the country of origin principle, which is only beneficial to large companies, often enabling them to avoid tax when it comes to funding audiovisual production;
Amendment 194 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Notes that, ultimately, the country of origin principle can, via tax dumping, weaken both creators and their creations at national level;
Amendment 200 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Highlights that piracy and counterfeiting remain a serious concern for CCIs and citizens alike; stresses that these illicit activities can cause safety and health concerns that need to be addressed and seriously hamper innovation and therefore also the availability of legal goods and services of the creative industries to all citizens;
Amendment 213 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Recommends considering the introduction of tougher sanctions and the promotion of a system of guarantees on traceability as a deterrent for counterfeiters, as well as increasing the damages and compensation awarded to right holders; calls on the EU and the Member States to launch awareness-raising campaigns against piracy and counterfeiting; stresses, finally, the need to involve all digital actors in the fight against online counterfeiting and urges the EU, Member States and third countries to cooperate more closely to protect creative industries and to track organised piracy networks more easily: emphasises, lastly, the cost and revenue losses for Member State budgets due to these illegal activities;
Amendment 229 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, in their respective spheres of competences, to promote cross-sectorial cooperation by establishing ‘learning labs’, creative hubs, co-working spaces, networking programmes and cultural and creative clusters and networks at regional, national, European and international level in order to foster interaction between micro-, small, medium and large enterprises in the CCS, traditional craftsmanship, research centres, universities, investors and policy makers; asks, moreover, for support for the development of new business models, products and services through strategic partnerships and for support for the activities of business incubators; calls, finally, for the interests and profits from the innovations of the creative industry to be promoted within the financial sector in order to develop the creative sector and view it as a growth engine for the economy;
Amendment 251 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that creative skills need tocan be learnt from an early age in order to lay the foundations for the continuous renewal of creative talents; encourages the Member States, but that the acquisition of such skills should not adversely affect but rather complement the basic reading, writing and mathematical skills; encourages the Member States, in conformity with Article 6 TFEU, which identifies education as a national prerogative, to improve their training, learning and qualification systems, enabling students in cultural and arts disciplines to acquire comprehensive training;
Amendment 270 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Highlights the potential of CCIs regarding youth employment and reindustrialisation; calls on the Commission and the Member States to include the CCIs in the Youth Employment Initiative and to provide funds to facilitate careers and training in this sectormake it easier, by simplifying the rules and/or providing tax incentives, for SMEs in the cultural and creative sectors to hire young people and offer them work/training contracts ; points out that as regards youth employment, the Youth Employment Initiative has not had the effects hoped for as in some Member States the youth unemployment rate remains very high (50.1% in Greece) and in other countries such as France has even increased since the introduction of the Youth Employment Initiative (22.8% in 2014 as against 21.5% in 2011);
Amendment 280 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Adds furthermore that funding opportunities for training in this sector already exist, notably through the European Structural and Investment Funds, and that it is thus a question of optimising their management and distribution in order to reach an optimal level of efficiency;
Amendment 283 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to secure the preservation of the traditional European savoir-faire of the peoples of Europe, preserving and promoting the craft trades linked to the CCS and to re-valorise vocational training and a highly skilled workforce in order to attract talents;
Amendment 290 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Is concerned about the potential implications of the future Treaty on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) since the US, unlike the EU, is not a signatory to the Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions (UNESCO); calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure compliance with the terms of this Convention in the context of the TTIP negotiations;
Amendment 303 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Encourages the Members States, in conformity with Article 6 TFEU and where necessary depending on the national situation, to promote cross- sectorial approaches between different areas in formal education and in non- formal learning; recommends the creation within higher education institutions of joint programmes between arts and culture, science, engineering, technology, business and other relevant fields; stresses the need to support centres of excellence;
Amendment 309 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Encourages the Members States to promote cooperation between artistic schools and businesses in the field of CCS; recommends the development, but especially the monitoring, of work- learn trajectories; stresses that public authorities at national level must make efforts to simplify the administrative and fiscal regulations so as to encourage SMEs to engage in training and then hiring apprentices; suggests that it should also be possible to introduce specific incentives for businesses that give priority to local and national production tied to a particular cultural heritage;
Amendment 323 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Emphasises the role which chambers of skilled trades and craft trades, chambers of commerce, entrepreneur networks and associations can play in developing such cooperation between higher education and enterprises in the cultural and creative sector;
Amendment 338 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Notes that participation in all EU funded programmes is open to CCIs, but that this participation should still to be considered below its potential; asks the CommissionMember States as a first step to create a one stop shop – e.g. a website – highlighting different funding opportunities for CCIs, as this would increase awareness and accessibility of funding for CCIs;
Amendment 351 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission to fully exploit potential synergies existing between EU policies, so as to effectively userationalise the management of the funding available under EU programmes - such as Horizon 2020, the Connecting Europe Facility, Erasmus +, Creative Europe and COSME - and the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIFs), which are often poorly used, which results in a substantial loss for potential investments seeking to support more high-quality projects in the field of CCIs;
Amendment 364 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Notes that the Guarantee Facility within Creative Europe is one of the ways to address the pressing need for accessing loan financing for innovative and sustainable projects in the CCS; stresses the need to increasecommunicate more effectively on the budget of Creative Europe and the Guarantee Facility to effectively support European cultural and creative expressions and diversify the beneficiaries of funding in order to enable European SMEs, primarily, to benefit from more funding; recalls, finally, the declared objective of supporting more than 10 000 SMEs;
Amendment 374 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the EIB to address the lack of EFSI funding to CCIs by investigating possible interaction with Creative Europe and the Guarantee Facility in order to provide fit-for-purpose loans for CCIs; takes note, however, that on 30 June 2016, the European Commission and the European Investment Fund (EIF) submitted an initiative worth EUR 121 million in order to provide guarantees for CCIs through financial institutions and that this facility is intended to encourage bank lending worth over EUR 600 million over the next six years;
Amendment 382 #
2016/2072(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Considers that in order to improve access to finance in the CCIs it is necessary to develop expertise in assessing the value of intangible assets which could be used as collaterals, so as to provide crucial information for these sectors, for example, business models and specific credit risk assessments;
Amendment 59 #
2016/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the Commission communication entitled ‘An EU strategy for liquefied natural gas and gas storage’; believes that an internal-state energy market which fully integrates LNG and gas storage will play a significant role in achieving the ultimate objective of a resilient Energy Union;
Amendment 101 #
2016/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines that priority should be given to market-based solutionsolutions founded on the interest of the peoples and the will of their governments and to the utilisation of existing LNG infrastructure on a regional level;
Amendment 129 #
2016/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. SupportNotes the Commission proposal in the ongoing revision of the Security of Supply Regulation to review the existing reverse flow exemptions on interconnectors and endorses the increased rolecalls for the Member States to play an increased role in the management and decision-making of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) in the process;
Amendment 145 #
2016/2059(INI)
13. Emphasises the importance of the work of regional high-level groups, such as the Central East South Europe Gas Connectivity (CESEC), Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan (BEMIP) and South-West Europe high level groups; believes that this type of voluntary-based regional coordination is highly effective and welcomes the facilitating role of the Commission in these arrangements, and at the same time stresses the need for pragmatic and timely execution of the approved action plans and urges the Member States to undertake a close follow-up of the implementation;
Amendment 151 #
2016/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the importance of finding cost efficient energy supply options to increase supply security in the Member States on the periphery of the EU, such as Cyprus, Malta and Ireland, which are not well connected to the internal-state energy market; notes that this solution cannot be based on private investment, given the high costs of the infrastructure to be installed in view of its low profitability;
Amendment 175 #
2016/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Expresses concern atNotes the proposed doubling of capacity of the Nord Stream pipeline, and theits effects this would have on energy security and, diversification of supply sources and the principle of solidarity among Member States; highlights that the project runs contrary tois directly in line with the underlying principles of a fully integrated, secure, competitive and sustainable Energy Union and as such should not benefit from the EU’s financial support or from derogations from EU lawthe Energy Union, as it is the result of the desire of private monopoly stakeholders and, therefore, is the result of EU legislation, of Germany's desire to achieve hegemony and monopolise this liberalised internal market, and of Poland's policy of non-cooperation towards the Russian gas stakeholders in the Yamal-Europe 2 gas pipeline construction project;
Amendment 185 #
2016/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Considers that if, contrary to European interests, Nord Stream 2 were to be built, the importance of enabling access to LNG terminals and completingon of the North-South Gas Corridor in central and south-eastern Europe will significantly increaseould be even more at risk than today;
Amendment 188 #
2016/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Regrets that Member States’ interests are being undermined by geopolitical considerations that stem essentially from historical resentment; regrets that foreign powers are seeking to cut the countries of Europe off from a natural and reliable partner, Russia, in favour of an increased dependency on US shale gas and on LNG from Qatar;
Amendment 201 #
2016/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Insists that the completion of the intStresses that speeding up libernal gas market and the elimination of regulatory obstacles would greatly improve the liquidity of gas markets; urges stakeholders to finalise the network code on rules regarding harmonised transmission tariff structures for gas as soon as possibleisation will greatly strengthen the hold that transnational oligopolies will have on gas markets;
Amendment 229 #
2016/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Notes the emerging global trend for increasing liquefaction capacity and its expected positive effect on the European gas markets;
Amendment 231 #
2016/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. UrgInvites the Commission and the European External Action Service to actively pursue the approved EMember States to cooperate in defining and implementing their energy Ddiplomacy Action Plan and to promote a rule-based, transparent and well- functioning global gas marketthe supply security of each Member State for the benefit of the security of all;
Amendment 236 #
2016/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Stresses the necessity of eliminating all barriers to global free trade of LNG; urges, reinforcing this context, US policy makers to increase investment certainty by introducing clear criteria and deadlines in the authorisation process for gas exports to non-FTA countrie energy independence of European states;
Amendment 71 #
2016/0412(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) When adopting Directive 2014/42/EU, the European Parliament and the Council stated that an effective system of freezing and confiscation in the European Union is inherently linked to well-functioning mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders. Considering the need tof putting in place a comprehensiveEuropean system for freezing and confiscation of proceeds and instrumentalities of crime, the European Parliament and the Council called on the Commission to present a legislative proposal on mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders.
Amendment 76 #
2016/0412(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) This Regulation should apply to all confiscation orders imposed by a court following proceedings in relation to a criminal offence and all freezing orders issued with a view to possible subsequent confiscation. It should therefore cover all types of orders covered by Directive 2014/42/EU, as well as other types of orders issued without final conviction within the framework of criminal proceedings. This Regulation should not apply to freezing and confiscation orders issued within the framework of civil or administrative proceedings.
Amendment 79 #
2016/0412(COD)
(14) This Regulation should cover confiscation and freezing orders related to offences covered by Directive 2014/42/EU, as well as orders related to other offences. The offences should therefore not be limited to the areas of particularly serious crime with a cross-border dimension, as Article 82 TFEU does not require such limitation for measures laying down rules and procedures for ensuring mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters.
Amendment 103 #
2016/0412(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the mMutual recognition and execution of freezing and confiscation orders, cannot be is achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of its scale and its effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordancemeasures that must comply with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union . In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
Amendment 138 #
Amendment 142 #
2016/0412(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 28
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 28
Amendment 172 #
2016/0412(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The executing authority shall take the decision on the recognition and execution of the confiscation order without delay and, without prejudice to paragraph 5, no later than 30 daytwo months after the executing authority has received the confiscation order.
Amendment 147 #
2016/0408(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In order to maintain theprovide an efficient exchange of supplementary information concerning the action to be taken specified in the alerts, it is appropriate to reinforce the functioning of the SIRENE Bureaux by specifying the requirements concerning available resources, user training and the response time to the inquiries received from other SIRENE Bureaux.
Amendment 164 #
2016/0408(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Fingerprints found at a crime scene, with particular attention to the terrorism acts, should be allowed to be checked against the dactylographic data stored in SIS if it can be established to a high degree of probability that they belong to the perpetrator of the serious crime or terrorist offence. Serious crime should be the offences listed in Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA45 and ‘terrorist offence’ should be offences under national law referred to in Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA46 . _________________ 45 Council Framework Decision (2002/584/JHA) of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (0J L 190, 18.07.2002, p. 1). 46 Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3).
Amendment 194 #
2016/0408(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36 a (new)
Recital 36 a (new)
(36 a) Takes the view that the open border policy of the European Union is an incentive and encourages more migrants attempting to cross the Mediterranean Sea;
Amendment 196 #
2016/0408(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
Recital 37
Amendment 200 #
2016/0408(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37 a (new)
Recital 37 a (new)
(37 a) Recalls that, since the establishment of the Schengen Area, the EU has become an area without borders; stresses that the current need of Member States is to return to the protection of national borders by sovereign nation states;
Amendment 117 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
Amendment 149 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
12. Notably for large installations, building automation and electronic monitoring of technical building systems have proven to be an effective replacement for inspections. The installation of such equipment should be considered as the most cost-effective alternative to inspectionsadjunct to inspections, as they also have in large non- residential and multifamily buildings of a sufficient size that allow a payback of less than three years. The current possibility to opt for alternative measures is therefore deleted. For small scale installations, the documentation of the system performance by installers and the registration of this information in the databases on energy performance certification will support the verification of compliance with the minimum requirements set for all technical building systems and reinforce energy performance certificates (EPC) role. In addition, existing regular safety inspections and programmed maintenance work will remain an opportunity to provide direct advice on energy efficiency improvements.
Amendment 165 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
Recital 13
13. To ensure their best use in building renovation, public-sector and private- sector financial measures related to energy efficiency should be linked to the depth of thequality of renovation, which should be assessed by comparing energy performance certificates (EPCs) issued before and after the renovationorks.
Amendment 261 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 2 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 2 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. In their long-term renovation strategy referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall set out a roadmap with clear milestones and measures to deliver on the long-term 2050 goal to decarbonise their national building stock, with specific milestones for 2030. When drawing it up, the Member States are called upon to consult organisations representing employees and businesses (smaller traders, SMEs and large companies) in the sectors involved in the strategy in order to integrate the adaptation and development of training for workers and the unemployed to suit the jobs involved and they ways in which they evolve.
Amendment 271 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 2 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 2 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
‘2. In their long-term renovation strategy referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall set out a roadmap with clear milestones and measures to deliver on the long-term 2050 goal to decarbonise their national building stock, with specific milestones for 2030improve the energy performance of their national building stock as set out in 2030, in line with the long-term 2050 goal.
Amendment 363 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
‘2. Member States shall ensure that in all new non-residential buildings and in all existing non-residential buildings undergoing major renovation with more than tena number of parking spaces, at least one of every ten is equipped with a recharging point within the meaning of Directive 2014/94/EU on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure17, which is capable of starting and stopping charging in reaction to price signals. This requirement shall apply to all non- residential buildings, with more than tena number of parking spaces, as of 1 January 2025. __________________ 17five years from the date of adoption of this Directive. __________________ 17 OJ L 307, 28.10.2014, p. 1. OJ L 307, 28.10.2014, p. 1.
Amendment 367 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Member States may decide not to set or apply the requirements referred to in the previous subparagraph to buildings owned andor occupied by small and medium-sized enterprises as defined in Title I of the Annex to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003.
Amendment 392 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that newly built residential buildings and those undergoing major renovations, with more than ten parking spaces, can include the pre- cabling to enable the installation of recharging points for electric vehicles for every everyat least one of the parking spaces.
Amendment 400 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 4
Article 8 – paragraph 4
Amendment 424 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 6
Article 8 – paragraph 6
Amendment 458 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 10 – paragraph 6
Article 10 – paragraph 6
‘6. Member States shall link their financial measures for energy efficiency improvements in the renovation of buildings to the energy savings achieved due to such renovation. These savings shall be determined by comparing energy performance certificates issued before and after renovation.’;
Amendment 499 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b – introductory part
(b) paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 5 are deleted and replaced by the following:
Amendment 507 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 14 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 539 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a a (new)
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 542 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b – introductory part
(b) paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 5 are deleted and replaced by the following:
Amendment 586 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 23 – paragraph 2
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 5, 8 and 22 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of timefive years from [date of the entry into force…].
Amendment 590 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by XXXX [Please insert the date 124 months following the date of entry into force] at the latest. They shall immediately communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
Amendment 620 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Directive 2010/31/EU
Annex I – point 3 – point a – point iii
Annex I – point 3 – point a – point iii
Amendment 621 #
2016/0381(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b b (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b b (new)
Directive 2010/31/EU
Annex I – point 3 – point f a (new)
Annex I – point 3 – point f a (new)
(bb) in point 3, the following point fa is inserted: ‘embodied energy in building materials and elements;’
Amendment 97 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council9 is an element to progress towards the Energy Union, under which energy efficiency should be treated as an energy source in its own right. The 'energy efficiency first'makes a contribution to the application of the ‘energy efficiency first’ principle. That principle should be taken into account when setting new rules for the supply side and other policy areas. The Commission should ensure that energy efficiency and demand side response can compete on equal terms with generation capacity. Energy efficiency needs to be considered whenever energy system relevant planning or financing decisions are taken. Energy efficiency improvements need to be realised whenever it is more cost-effective than equivalent supply-side solutions. This should help to exploit the multiple benefits of energy efficiency for Europe's societyies, in particular for citizens and businesses. __________________ 9 Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC (OJ L 315, 14.11.2012, p. 1).
Amendment 115 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) There are no binding targets at national level in the 2030 perspective. The need for the Union to achieve its energy efficiency targets at EU level, expressed in primary andor final energy consumption, in 2020 and 2030 should be clearly set out in the form of a binding 30 % target. This clarification at Union level should not restrict Member States as their freedom is kept to set their national contributions based on either primary or final energy consumption, primary or final energy savings, or energy intensity. Member States should set their national indicative energy efficiency contributions taking into account that the Union’s 2030 energy consumption has to be no more than 1 321 Mtoe of primary energy and no more than 987 Mtoe of final energy. This means that primary energy consumption should be reduced by 23 % and final energy consumption should be reduced by 17 % in the Union compared toby means of comparison with 2005 levels. A regular evaluation of progress towards the achievement of the Union 2030 target is necessary and is provided for in the legislative proposal on Energy Union Governance.
Amendment 152 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 a (new)
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) Public investment in long-term energy efficiency, such as renovation of buildings or replacement of meters, is vital not only for the purpose of attaining energy and climate targets but above all to revive the economy, employment and internal demand in the Union, particularly in those Member States hardest hit by the economic crisis and austerity policies. Such investment ought therefore not to be included in accounting under the Stability and Growth Pact;
Amendment 155 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Member States are required to achieve a cumulative end-use savings requirement for the entire obligation period, equivalent to 'new' savings of 1.5 % of annual energy sales. This requirementA contribution to energy saving could be madet by new policy measures that are adopted during the new obligation period from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2030 or by new individual actions as a result of policy measures adopted during or before the previous period, but in respect of which the individual actions that trigger energy savings are actually introduced during the new period.
Amendment 162 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) In order to attain primary energy saving targets, services on the energy efficiency market should be provided in a competitive and transparent context in order to guarantee that the final consumer will enjoy the benefits, in terms of reduced costs and better quality of service, associated with energy efficiency measures. The energy efficiency market should ensure non-discriminatory access for the various economic actors, particularly SMEs, guaranteeing their participation on equal terms with vertically integrated operators and overcoming the positions of competitive advantage that have been established for businesses operating in the distribution or sale of energy. To this end, integrated operators should offer third parties the same conditions and the same instruments as they use to provide energy efficiency services.
Amendment 232 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
Amendment 255 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive establishes a common framework of measures to promote energy efficiency within the Union in order to ensure that the Union’s 2020 20% headline targets and its 2030 30% binding27% headline targets on energy efficiency are met and paves the way for further energy efficiency improvements beyond those dates. It lays down rules designed to remove barriers in the energy market and overcome market failures that impede efficiency in the supply and use of energy, and provides for the establishment of indicative national energy efficiency targets and contributions for 2020 and 2030.’;
Amendment 287 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Each Member State shall set an indicative national energy efficiency target for 2020, based on either primary or final energy consumption, primary or final energy savings, or on energy intensity. Member States shall notify those targets to the Commission in accordance with Article 24(1) and Annex XIV, Part 1. When doing so, they shall also express those targets in terms of an absolute level of primary energy consumption and final energy consumption in 2020 and shall explain how, and on the basis of which data, thie calculations hasve been calculatedmade.
Amendment 291 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new)
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point -a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point -a (new)
(-a) primary or final energy consumption levels, or energy intensity levels, in the year 2005;
Amendment 292 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Amendment 312 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point d
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point d
(d) development of all sources of renewable energies, nuclear energy, carbon capture and storage, and energy storage; and
Amendment 331 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 4
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. Each Member State shall set indicative national energy efficiency contributions towards the Union’s 2030 target referred to in Article 1 paragraph 1(1) in accordance with Articles [4] and [6] of Regulation (EU) XX/20XX [Governance of the Energy Union]. When setting those contributions, Member States shall take into account that the Union’s 2030 energy consumption has to be no more than 1 321 Mtoe of primary energy and no more than 987 Mtoe of final energy. Member States shall notify those contributions to the Commission as part of their integrated national energy and climate plans in accordance with the procedure pursuant to Articles [3] and [7] to [11] of Regulation (EU) XX/20XX [Governance of the Energy Union].’;
Amendment 348 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 5
Article 5
(2a) Article 5 is replaced by the following: Article 5 Article 5 Exemplary role of public bodies’ buildings 1. Without prejudice to Article 7 of Directive 2010/31/EU, each Member State shall ensure that, as from 1 January 2014, 3% of the total floor area of heated and/or cooled buildings owned and occupied by its central government is renovated each year to meet at least the minimum energy performance requirements that it has set in application of Article 4 of Directive 2010/31/EU. The 3% rate shall be calculated on the total floor area of buildings with a total useful floor area over 500 m2 owned and occupied by the central government of the Member State concerned that, on 1 January of each year, do not meet the national minimum energy performance requirements set in application of Article 4 of Directive 2010/31/EU. That threshold shall be lowered to 250 m2 as of 9 July 2015. Where a Member State requires that the obligation to renovate each year 3% of the total floor area extends to floor area owned and occupied by administrative departments at a level below central government, the 3% rate shall be calculated on the total floor area of buildings with a total useful floor area over 500 m2 and, as of 9 July 2015, over 250 m2 owned and occupied by central government and by these administrative departments of the Member State concerned that, on 1 January of each year, do not meet the national minimum energy performance requirements set in application of Article 4 of Directive 2010/31/EU. When implementing measures for the comprehensive renovation of central government buildings in accordance with the first subparagraph, Member States may choose to consider the building as a whole, including the building envelope, equipment, operation and maintenance. Member States shall require that central government buildings with the poorest energy performance be a priority for energy efficiency measures, where cost- effective and technically feasible. 2. Member States may decide not to set or apply the requirements referred to in paragraph 1 to the following categories of buildings: (a) buildings officially protected as part of a designated environment, or because of their special architectural or historical merit, in so far as compliance with certain minimum energy performance requirements would unacceptably alter their character or appearance; (b) buildings owned by the armed forces or central government and serving national defence purposes, apart from single living quarters or office buildings for the armed forces and other staff employed by national defence authorities; (c) buildings used as places of worship and for religious activities. 3. If a Member State renovates more than 3% of the total floor area of central government buildings in a given year, it may count the excess towards the annual renovation rate of any of the three previous or following years. 4. Member States may count towards the annual renovation rate of central government buildings new buildings occupied and owned as replacements for specific central government buildings demolished in any of the two previous years, or buildings that have been sold, demolished or taken out of use in any of the two previous years due to more intensive use of other buildings. 5. For the purposes of paragraph 1, by 31 December 2013, Member States shall establish and make publicly available an inventory of heated and/or cooled central government buildings with a total useful floor area over 500 m2 and, as of 9 July 2015, over 250 m2, excluding buildings exempted on the basis of paragraph 2. The inventory shall contain the following data: (a) the floor area in m2; and (b) the energy performance of each building or relevant energy data. 6. Without prejudice to Article 7 of Directive 2010/31/EU, Member States may opt for an alternative approach to paragraphs 1 to 5 of this Article, whereby they take other cost-effective measures, including deep renovations and measures for behavioural change of occupants, to achieve, by 2020, an amount of energy savings in eligible buildings owned and occupied by their central government that is at least equivalent to that required in paragraph 1, reported on an annual basis. For the purpose of the alternative approach, Member States may estimate the energy savings that paragraphs 1 to 4 would generate by using appropriate standard values for the energy consumption of reference central government buildings before and after renovation and according to estimates of the surface of their stock. The categories of reference central government buildings shall be representative of the stock of such buildings. Member States opting for the alternative approach shall notify to the Commission, by 31 December 2013, the alternative measures that they plan to adopt, showing how they would achieve an equivalent improvement in the energy performance of the buildings within the central government estate. 7. Member States shall encourage public bodies, including at regional and local level, and social housing bodies governed by public law, with due regard for their respective competences and administrative set-up, to: (a) adopt an energy efficiency plan, free-standing or as part of a broader climate or environmental plan, containing specific energy saving and efficiency objectives and actions, with a view to following the exemplary role of central government buildings laid down in paragraphs 1, 5 and 6; (b) put in place an energy management system, including energy audits, as part of the implementation of their plan; (c) use, where appropriate, energy service companies, and energy performance contracting to finance renovations and implement plans to maintain or improve energy efficiency in the long term.
Amendment 352 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7 – title
Article 7 – title
Article 7 Energy savings obligationContribution in terms of energy savings (This amendment applies throughout the text.)
Amendment 381 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (new)
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Member States may provide a cumulative contribution in terms of new energy savings per year from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2030, commensurate with the contributions referred to in Article 3(4); (All references to paragraph 1(b) are changed accordingly into references, within paragraph 1, to the above subparagraph 1a.)
Amendment 382 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 465 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) for the calculation of the amount of energy savings required for the period referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1 Member States may make use of points (a), (b), (c), (d) and (de) of paragraph 2;
Amendment 489 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7a – paragraph 2
Article 7a – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall designate, on the basis of objective and non- discriminatory criteria, obligated parties among energy distributors and/or retail energy sales companies operating in itstheir territory and may in, excludeing transport fuel distributors orand transport fuel retailers operating in itstheir territory. The amount of energy savings needed to fulfil the obligation shall be achieved by the obligated parties among final customers, designated by the Member State, independently of the calculation made pursuant to Article 7(1), or, if Member States so decide, through certified savings stemming from other parties as described in point (b) of paragraph 5.
Amendment 496 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 (new)
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7a – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 7a – paragraph 4 a (new)
Amendment 541 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 7b a (new)
Article 7b a (new)
(4) The following Article 7ba is inserted: ‘Article 7ba Provision of energy efficiency services Member States shall ensure that services on the energy efficiency market are provided in a transparent competitive context in order to enable the final consumer to enjoy the benefits, in terms of lower costs and better quality of service, associated with energy efficiency measures. To that end, Member States shall: (a) ensure that businesses, particularly SMEs, have non-discriminatory access to the market in energy efficiency services, thereby enabling them to participate on equal terms with vertically integrated operators and overcoming the positions of competitive advantage established for distributors or sellers of energy; (b) adopt every act necessary to ensure that integrated operators offer third parties the same conditions and means as they employ to provide energy efficiency services.’
Amendment 542 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 544 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 9 – title
Article 9 – title
Amendment 545 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 590 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 9a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 9a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 592 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 10
Article 10
Amendment 613 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 11 – title
Article 11 – title
Amendment 620 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new)
Directive 2012/27/EU
Article 20 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 20 – paragraph 7 a (new)
(11a) In Article 20, the following paragraph 7a is added: ‘7a. Investment by Member States in measures to improve energy efficiency within the meaning of this Directive and Directive 2010/31/EU shall not be taken into account for the purposes of the Stability and Growth Pact.’
Amendment 634 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by XXXX [Please insert the date 124 months following the date of entry into force] at the latest. They shall immediately communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
Amendment 638 #
2016/0376(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex – point 1 – point a
Annex – point 1 – point a
Directive 2012/27/EU
Annex IV – footnote 3
Annex IV – footnote 3
Amendment 214 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) This Regulation sets out the necessary legislative foundation for a reliable and transparent Governance that ensures the achievement of the objectives and targets of the Energy Union through complementary, coherent and ambitious efforts by the Union and its Member States, while promoting the Union's Better Regulation principles.
Amendment 238 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The goal of a resilient Energy Union with an ambitious climate policy at its core is to give UnioEuropean consumers, both households and businesses, secure, sustainable, competitive and affordable energy, which requires a fundamental transformation of Europe's energy system. That objective can only be achieved through coordinated action, combininga combination of both legislative and non-legislative acts at Union and national levelcoordinated among the Member States.
Amendment 285 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
Amendment 290 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
Amendment 305 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Therefore, the main objective of the Energy Union Governance should be to enable the achievement of the objectives of the Energy Union and in particular the targets of the 2030 Framework for Climate and Energy. This Regulation is therefore linked to sectorial legislation implementing the 2030 targets for energy and climate. While Member States need complete flexibility to choose policies that are best- matched to their national energy mix and preferences, that flexibility ishould be compatible with further market integration, increased competition, the attainment of climate and energy objectives and the gradual shift, which is compatible with growth, towards a low-carbon energy economy.
Amendment 314 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) The transition to a low-carbonenergy economy requires changes in investment behaviour and incentives across the entire policy spectrum. Achieving greenhouse gas emissionfuel import reductions requires a boost to efficiency and innovation in the European economy and in particular should also lead to improvements of air quality and an increase in Member States’ independence and resilience.
Amendment 321 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) As greenhouse gases and air pollutants largely derive from common sources, policy designed to reduce GHGsenergy efficiency policy can have co-benefits for air quality that could offset some or all of the near-term costs of GHG mitigation. As data reported under Directive 2001/81/EC18 of the European Parliament and the Council represent an important input for the compilation of the GHG inventory and the national plans, the importance of compilation and reporting of consistent data between Directive 2001/81/EC and the GHG inventory should be recognised. __________________ 18Directive 2001/81/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on National Emission Ceilings for certain pollutants (OJ L 309, 27.11.2001, p. 22).
Amendment 325 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) In line with the Commission's strong commitment to Better Regulation, tThe Energy Union Governance should result in a significant reduction of administrative burden for the Member States, the Commission and other Union Institutions and it should help to ensure coherence and adequacy of policies and measures at Union and national level with regard to the transformation of the energy system towards a low-carbonenergy economy.
Amendment 338 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) The achievement of the Energy Union objectives should be ensured through a combthe coordination of Union initiatives and coherent national policies set out in integrated national energy and climate plans. Sectorial Union legislation in the energy and climate fields sets out planning requirements, which have been useful tools to drive change at the national level. Their introduction at different moments in time has led to overlaps and insufficient consideration of synergies and interactions between policy areas. Current separate planning, reporting and monitoring in the climate and energy fields should therefore as far as possible be streamlined and integrated.
Amendment 352 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) A mandatoryn optional template for the national plans should be established to ensureso that all national plans arcan be sufficiently comprehensive and to facilitate comparison and aggregation of national plans, while at the same time ensuring sufficient flexibility to Member States to set out the details of national plans reflecting national preferences and specificities.
Amendment 366 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) Regional cooperation is key to ensure an effective achievement of the objectives of the Energy Union. Member States should get the opportunity to comment on other Member States' plans before they are finalised to avoid inconsistencies and potential negative impacts on other Member States and ensure that common objectives are met collectively. Regional cooperation in elaborating and finalising national plans as well as in the subsequent implementation of national plans should be essential to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of measures and foster market integration and energy security.
Amendment 403 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) Under the UNFCCC, the Union and its Member States are required to develop, regularly update, publish and report to the Conference of the Parties national inventories of anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of all greenhouse gases using comparable methodologies agreed by the Conference of the Parties. The GHG inventories are key to enabling the tracking of progress with the implementation of the decarbonisation dimension and for assessing compliance with the legislation in the field of climate, in particular Regulation [OP: act number XXX on binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions by Member States from 2021 to 2030 for a resilient Energy Union and to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement and amending Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council on a mechanism for monitoring and reporting greenhouse gas emissions and other information relevant to climate change]25 ("Regulation [ ] [ESR]") and Regulation [OP: act number XXX on the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework and amending Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council on a mechanism for monitoring and reporting greenhouse gas emissions and other information relevant to climate change] ("Regulation [ ] [LULUCF]")26. __________________ 25 26OJ L […], […], p. […]. 25 OJ L […], […], p. […]. OJ L […], […], p. […]. 26 OJ L […], […], p. […].
Amendment 407 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) In order to limit administrative burden on the Member States, and the Commission, the latter online reporting platform should be establish an online reporting platformed to facilitate communication and promote cooperation. That should ensure timely submission of reports and facilitate improved transparency on national reporting. The e- reporting platform should complement, build on and benefit from existing reporting processes, databases and e-tools, such as those of the European Environment Agency, Eurostat, the Joint Research Centre and the lessons learned from the Union's Eco-Management and Audit Scheme.
Amendment 409 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) In view of the collective achievement of the objectives of the Energy Union Strategy, it will be essential for the Commission to assesspublish national plans and, based on progress reports, their implementation. For the first ten-year period, this concerns in particular the achievement of the Union-level 2030 targets for energy and climate and national contributions to those targets. Such assessment should be undertaken on a biennial basis, and on an annual basis only where necessary, and should be consolidated in the Commission's State of the Energy Union reports and to suggest to the Member States how they should be coordinated.
Amendment 416 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) Aviation has impacts on the global climate as a result of the release of CO2 as well as of other emissions, including nitrogen oxides emissions, and mechanisms, such as cirrus cloud enhancement. In the light of the rapidly developing scientific understanding of those impacts, an updated assessment of the non-CO2 impacts of aviation on the global climate is already foreseen in Regulation (EU) No 525/2013. The modelling used in this respect should be adapted to scientific progress. Based on its assessments of such impacts, the Commission could consider relevant policy options for addressing them.
Amendment 421 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) To help ensure coherence between national and Union policies and objectives of the Energy UnionMember State policies, there should be an on-going dialogue between the Commission and the Member States. As appropriate, the Commissionuncil should issue recommendations to Member States including on the level of ambition of the draft national plans, on the subsequent implementation of policies and measures of the notified national plans, and on other national policies and measures of relevance for the implementation of the Energy Union. Member States should take utmost account of such recommendations and explain in subsequent progress reports how they have been implemented.
Amendment 437 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
Recital 35
(35) Should the ambition of integrated national energy and climate plans or their updates be insufficient for the collective achievement of the Energy Union objectives and, for the first period, in particular the 2030 targets for renewable energy and energy efficiency, the Commissionuncil should take measures at Union level in order to ensure the collective achievement of these objectives and targets (thereby closing any 'ambition gap'). Should progress made by the Union towards these objectives and targets be insufficient for their delivery, the Commission should, in addition to issuing recommendations, take measures at Union level or Member States should take additional measures in order to ensure achievement of these objectives and targets (thereby closing any 'delivery gap'). Such measures should take into account early ambitious contributions made by Member States to the 2030 targets for renewable energy and energy efficiency when sharing the effort for collective target achievement. In the area of renewable energy, such measures can also include financial contributions by Member States to a financing platform managed by the Commission, which would be used to contribute to renewable energy projects across the Union. Member States' national renewable energy targets for 2020 should serve as baseline shares of renewable energy from 2021 onwards. In the area of energy efficiency, additional measures can in particular aim at improving the energy efficiency of products, buildings and transport.
Amendment 442 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) The Union and the Member States should strive to provide the most up-to- date information on their greenhouse gas emissions and removals. This Regulation should enable such estimates to be prepared in the shortest timeframes possible by using statistical and other information, such as, where appropriate, space-based data provided by the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security programme and other satellite systems.
Amendment 446 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) Member States and the Commission should ensure close cooperation on all matters relating to the implementation of the Energy Union and this Regulation, with close involvement of the European Parliament. The Commission should as appropriate assist Member States in implementing this Regulation, particularly with regard to the establishment of the national plans and associated capacity building.
Amendment 452 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
Recital 39
(39) Member States should ensure that integrated national energy and climate plans take into consideration the latestare the subject of country-specific recommendations issued in the context of the European Semester.
Amendment 454 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
Recital 40
(40) The European Environment Agency should assist the CommissionMember States, as appropriate and in accordance with its annual work programme, with their assessment, monitoring and reporting work.
Amendment 455 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
Recital 41
Amendment 457 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
Recital 42
Amendment 459 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
Recital 43
Amendment 476 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) ensure the timeliness, transparency, accuracy, consistency, comparability and completeness of reporting by the Union and its Member States to the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement secretariat.
Amendment 532 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. By 1 January 2019 and every ten years thereafter, each Member State shall notify to the Commissionpublish an integrated national energy and climate plan. The plans shall contain the elements set out in paragraph 2 and Annex I. The first plan shall cover the period from 2021 to 2030. The following plans shall cover the ten- year period immediately following the end of the period covered by the previous plan.
Amendment 592 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4
Article 3 – paragraph 4
Amendment 596 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 1 – point i
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 1 – point i
i. the Member State's binding national target for greenhouse gas emissions and the annual binding national limits pursuant to Regulation [ ] [ESR];
Amendment 656 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point 1 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point 1 – paragraph 1
the indicative national energy efficiency contribution to achieving the Union's binding energy efficiency target of 30% in 2030 as referred to in Article 1(1) and Article 3(4) of Directive 2012/27/EU [version as amended in accordance with proposal COM(2016)761], based on either primary or final energy consumption, primary or final energy savings, or energy intensity.
Amendment 687 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point 1
(1) national objectives with regard to increasing the diversification of energy sources and supply from third countries;
Amendment 691 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point 2
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point 2
(2) national objectives with regard to reducing energy import dependency from third countries;
Amendment 714 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d – point 3
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d – point 3
(3) national objectives related to other aspects of the internal-state energy market such as market integlong-term contractiong and couplingoperation agreements between national operators, including a timeframe for when the objectives should be met;
Amendment 743 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e – point 3
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e – point 3
Amendment 845 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. By 1 January 2018 and every ten years thereafter Member States shall prepare and spubmit to the Commissionlish a draft of the integrated national energy and climate plan referred to in Article 3(1).
Amendment 850 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The Commissionuncil may issue recommendations on the draft plans to Member States in accordance with Article 28. Those recommendations shall in particular set out:
Amendment 865 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Amendment 880 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Without prejudice to any other Union law requirements, Member States shall ensure that the public isand stakeholders in the economy are given early and effective opportunities to participate in the preparation of draft plans referred to in Article 9 and attach to the submission of their draft integrated national energy and climate plan to the Commission a summary of the public’s viewsa summary of the views of the public and other parties consulted. In so far as the provisions of Directive 2001/42/EC are applicable, consultations undertaken in accordance with that Directive shall be deemed to satisfy also the obligations to consult the public under this Regulation.
Amendment 916 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall, well before spubmittlishing their draft integrated national energy and climate plan to the Commission pursuant to Article 9(1), identify opportunities for regional cooperation and consult neighbouring Member States and the other Member States expressing an interest. Member States shall set out in their draft integrated national energy and climate plans the results of such regional consultation, including where applicable how comments have been taken into account.
Amendment 919 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall facilitate cooperation and consultation among the Member States on the draft plans submitted to it under Article 9 in view of their finalisationwhen the latter so request.
Amendment 929 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Commissionuncil shall assess the integrated national energy and climate plans and their updates as notifipublished pursuant to Articles 3 and 13. It shall assess in particular whether:
Amendment 936 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the plans comply with requirements of Articles 3 to 11 and the Commission recommendations issued pursuant to Article 28.
Amendment 950 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. By 1 January 2023, and every 10 years thereafter, Member States shall submit to the Commissionuncil a draft update of the latest notified integrated national energy and climate plan referred to in Article 3 or confirm to the Commissionuncil that the plan remains valid.
Amendment 956 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. By 1 January 2024, and every 10 years thereafter, Member States shall notify to the Commissionuncil an update of the latest notified integrated national energy and climate plan referred to in Article 3, unless they have confirmed that the plan remains valid pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article.
Amendment 994 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall prepare and report to the Commissionuncil by 1 January 2020 and every 10 years thereafter their long- term low emission strategies with a 50 years perspective, to contribute to:
Amendment 1051 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to Article 23, by 15 March 2021, and every two years thereafter, each Member State shall report to the Commissionuncil on the status of implementation of the integrated national energy and climate plan by means of integrated national energy and climate progress reports covering all five key dimensions of the Energy Union.
Amendment 1060 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Amendment 1064 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 5
Article 15 – paragraph 5
5. Where the Commissionuncil has issued recommendations pursuant to Article 27(2) or (3), the Member State concerned shall include in its report referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article information on the policies and measures adopted, or intended to be adopted and implemented, to address those recommendations. Such information shall include a detailed timetable for implementation.
Amendment 1067 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. By 15 March 2021, and every two years thereafter, Member States shall report to the Commissionuncil information on:
Amendment 1069 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall report the most up-to-date projections available. Where a Member State does not submit complete projection estimates by 15 March every second year, and the Commissionuncil has established that gaps in the estimates cannot be filled by that Member State once identified through the Commission’s quality assurance or quality control procedures, the Commission may prepare estimates as required to compile Union projections, in consultation with the Member State concerned.
Amendment 1070 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. A Member State shall communicate to the Commissionuncil any substantial changes to the information reported pursuant to paragraph 1 during the first year of the reporting period, by 15 March of the year following the previous report.
Amendment 1077 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. By 15 March 2021, and every two years thereafter, Member States shall report to the Commissionuncil information on their national climate change adaptation planning and strategies, outlining their implemented or planned actions to facilitate adaptation to climate change, including the information specified in Part 1 of Annex VI.
Amendment 1082 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall make available to the public the reports submitted to the Commissionuncil pursuant to this Article.
Amendment 1083 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4
Article 17 – paragraph 4
Amendment 1193 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
By 15 March 2021, and every year thereafter (year X), Member States shall report to the Commissionuncil:
Amendment 1194 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. As of 2023, Member States shall determine and report to the Commissionuncil final greenhouse gas inventory data by 15 March each year (X) and preliminary data by 15 January each year including the greenhouse gases and the inventory information listed in Annex III. The report on the final greenhouse gas inventory data shall also include a complete and up-to- date national inventory report.
Amendment 1195 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 4
Article 23 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall report to the Commissionuncil the preliminary and the final national inventory data, by 15 January and 15 March respectively in the years 2027 and 2032, prepared for their LULUCF accounts for the purpose of the compliance reports in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation [ ] [LULUCF].
Amendment 1196 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 5
Article 23 – paragraph 5
Amendment 1197 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 6
Article 23 – paragraph 6
Amendment 1206 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. By 31 October 2021 and every second year thereafter, the Commissionuncil shall assess, in particular on the basis of the integrated national energy and climate progress reports, of other information reported under this Regulation, of the indicators and of European statistics where available:
Amendment 1240 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2
Article 25 – paragraph 2
2. In the area of renewable energy, as part of its assessment referred to in paragraph 1, the Commissionuncil shall assess the progress made in the share of energy from renewable sources in the Union’s gross final consumption on the basis of a linear trajectory starting from 20 % in 2020 and reaching at least 27 % in 2030 as referred to in Article 4(a)(2)(i).
Amendment 1250 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
In the area of energy efficiency, as part of its assessment referred to in paragraph 1, the Commissionuncil shall assess progress towards collectively achieving a maximum energy consumption at Union level of 1 321 Mtoe of primary energy consumption and 987 Mtoe of final energy consumption in 2030 as referred to in Article 6(1)(a).
Amendment 1251 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Article 25 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Amendment 1267 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 25 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. By 31 October 2021 and every year thereafter, the Commissionuncil shall assess, in particular on the basis of the information reported pursuant to this Regulation, whether the Union and its Member States have made sufficient progress towards meeting the following points:
Amendment 1270 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 5
Article 25 – paragraph 5
5. By 31 October 2019 and every four years thereafter, the Commissionuncil shall assess the implementation of Directive 2009/31/EC.
Amendment 1274 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 6
Article 25 – paragraph 6
Amendment 1275 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 7
Article 25 – paragraph 7
Amendment 1300 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. If, on the basis of its assessment of the integrated national energy and climate plans and their updates pursuant to Article 12, the Commissionuncil concludes that the targets, objectives and contributions of the national plans or their updates are insufficient for the collective achievement of the Energy Union objectives and, in particular, for the first ten-years period, for the Union's 2030 targets for renewable energy and energy efficiency, it shall take measures at Union level in order to ensure the collective achievement of those objectives and targets. With regard to renewable energy, such measures shall take into consideration the level of ambition of contributions to the Union's 2030 target by Member States set out in the national plans and their updates.
Amendment 1309 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. If, on the basis of its assessment pursuant to Article 25(1)(b), the Commissionuncil concludes that insufficient progress is made by a Member State towards meeting the targets, objectives and contributions or implementing the policies and measures set out in its integrated national climate and energy plan, it shall issue recommendations to the Member State concerned pursuant to Article 28. In issuing such recommendations, the Commissionuncil shall take into consideration ambitious early efforts by Member States to contribute to the Union's 2030 target for renewable energy.
Amendment 1322 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3
Article 27 – paragraph 3
3. If, on the basis of its aggregate assessment of Member States' integrated national energy and climate progress reports pursuant to Article 25(1)(a), and supported by other information sources, as appropriate, the Commissionuncil concludes that the Union is at risk of not meeting the objectives of the Energy Union and, in particular, for the first ten-years period, the targets of the Union's 2030 Framework for Climate and Energy, it may issue recommendations to all Member States pursuant to Article 28 to mitigate such risk. The Commissionuncil shall, as appropriate, takpropose measures at Union level in addition to the recommendations in order to ensure, in particular, the achievement of the Union's 2030 targets for renewable energy and energy efficiency. With regard to renewable energy, such measures shall take into consideration ambitious early efforts by Member States to contribute to the Union's 2030 target.
Amendment 1338 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
If, in the area of renewable energy, without prejudice to the measures at Union level set out in paragraph 3, the Commissionuncil concludes, based on its assessment pursuant to Article 25(1) and (2) in the year 2023, that the linear Union trajectory referred to in Article 25(2) is not collectively met, Member States shall ensure by the year 2024 that any emerging gap is covered by additional measures, such as:
Amendment 1369 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) making a financial contribution to a financing platform set up at Union level, contributing todevelopment agency, based on national development banks, set up at Union level by means of an intergovernmental agreement, contributing to energy efficiency and renewable energy projects and managed directly or indirectly by the CommissionMember States;
Amendment 1416 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1
Article 28 – paragraph 1
1. The Commissionuncil shall as appropriate issue recommendations to Member States to ensure the achievement of the objectives of the Energy Union.
Amendment 1437 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1
Article 29 – paragraph 1
1. By 31 October every year, the Commissionuncil shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a State of the Energy Union report.
Amendment 1439 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point e
Amendment 1451 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 5
Article 30 – paragraph 5
5. Where a Member State does not submit the inventory data required to compile the Union inventory by 15 March, the Council, with the support of the Commission, may prepare estimates to complete the data submitted by the Member State, in consultation and close cooperation with the Member State concerned. The Commission shall use, for that purpose, the guidelines applicable for preparing the national greenhouse gas inventories.
Amendment 1452 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 6
Article 30 – paragraph 6
Amendment 1453 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1
Article 31 – paragraph 1
1. In 2027 and 2032, the Council, with the support of the Commission, shall carry out a comprehensive review of the national inventory data submitted by Member States pursuant to Article 23(3) of this Regulation with a view to monitoring Member States’ greenhouse gas emission reductions or limitations pursuant to Articles 4, 9 and 10 of Regulation [ ] [ESR] and their reduction of emissions and enhancement of removals by sinks pursuant to Articles 4 and 12 of Regulation [ ] [LULUCF] and any other greenhouse gas emission reduction or limitation targets set out in Union legislation. Member States shall participate fully in that process.
Amendment 1455 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 3
Article 31 – paragraph 3
Amendment 1456 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 4
Article 31 – paragraph 4
Amendment 1459 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. By 1 January 2021, Member States and the Commission shall operate and seek to continuously improve national and Union systems respectively, for reporting on policies and measures and for reporting on projections of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks. Those systems shall include the relevant institutional, legal and procedural arrangements established within a Member State and the Union for evaluating policy and making projections of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks.
Amendment 1460 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2
Article 32 – paragraph 2
2. Member States and the Commission respectively shall aim to ensure the timeliness, transparency, accuracy, consistency, comparability and completeness of the information reported on policies and measures and projections of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks, as referred to in Article 16, including the use and application of data, methods and models, and the implementation of quality assurance and quality control activities and sensitivity analysis.
Amendment 1461 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3
Article 32 – paragraph 3
Amendment 1464 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 4
Article 33 – paragraph 4
Amendment 1468 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Member States shall cooperate and coordinate fully with each other and with the Union in relation to obligations under this Regulation, in particular concerning:
Amendment 1470 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the process related to the Commissionuncil recommendations and addressing those recommendations pursuant to Article 9(2) and (3), Article 15(5), Article 26(1) and Article 27(2) and (3);
Amendment 1471 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The European Environment Agency shall assist the Commission in its work as regards the decarbonisation and energy efficiency dimensions to comply with Articles 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 24, 25, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 34 in accordance with its annual work programme. That shall include assistance to the Member States, as required, with:
Amendment 1472 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) preparing estimates or complementing the ones available to the European CommissionCouncil for data on projections not reported by the Member States;
Amendment 1473 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) compiling data, wherever available taken from European statistics and appropriate in terms of timing, as required for the State of the Energy Union report to the European Parliament and the Council prepared by the Commissionuncil;
Amendment 1474 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36
Article 36
Amendment 1478 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
Article 37 – paragraph 1
1. The Commissionuncil shall be assisted by an Energy Union Committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 and work in the respective sectorial formations relevant for this Regulation.
Amendment 1482 #
2016/0375(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – title
Article 38 – title
Amendment 1496 #
Amendment 70 #
2016/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point c
(c) When appropriate, tThe Commission services mayshall issue a biennial report describing the specific situation concerning the criteria listed in point (b) in a certain country or a certain sector. Such report and the evidence on which it is based may be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector. Interested parties shall have ample opportunity to supplement, comment or rely on the report and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used. The determinations made shall take into account all of the relevant evidence on the file.
Amendment 189 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The need for the regulatory framework for electronic communications to be consistently applied in all Member States is essential for the successful development of an internal market for electronic communications throughout the Union and the promotion of access to, and take-up of, very high capacity data connectivity, of competition in the provision of electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities and of the interests of the citizens of the Union. In view of market and technological developments, which often entails an increased cross-border dimension, and to the experience so far in ensuring a consistent implementation in the electronic communications field, it is necessary to build on the work of BEREC and the BEREC Office and further develop them into a fully-fledged agencyn agency that is independent of the Commission.
Amendment 193 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) The agency should be governed and operated in line with the principles of the Joint Statement of the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission of 19 July 2012 on decentralised agencies (‘Common Approach’)28fully independently of the European Commission. Due to the established image of BEREC and the costs that a modification of its name would entail, the new agency should retain the name of BEREC. _________________ 28Joint Statement of the Parliament, Council and the Commission on decentralised agencies of 19 July 2012.
Amendment 197 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) BEREC, as a technical body with expertise on electronic communications and composed of representatives from NRAs and the Commission, is best placed to be entrusted with tasks such as deciding on certain issues with a cross-border dimension, contributing to efficient internal market procedures for draft national measures (both as regards market regulation and assignments of rights of use for radio spectrum), providing the necessary guidelines to NRAs in order to ensure common criteria and a consistent regulatory approach, and keeping certain registries at Union level. This is without prejudice to the tasks established for NRAs, which are closest to the electronic communications markets and their local conditions. In order to carry out its tasks, the agency would require adequate financial and human resources and would also continue the pooling of expertise from NRAs.
Amendment 204 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Compared to the situation in the past where both a Board of Regulators and a Management Committee were running in parallel, having a single board giving general orientations for the activities of BEREC, deciding on regulatory and operational as well as on administrative and budgetary management matters should help improving the efficiency, coherence and performance of the agency. To this end, the Management Board should carry the relevant functions and should consist, in addition of two representatives of the Commission, of the Head, or otherwise a member of the collegiate body, of each NRA, who are protected by dismissal requirements.
Amendment 206 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) In the past the appointing authority powers were exercised by the Vice-Chair of the Management Committee of the BEREC Office. The Management Board of the new agency should delegate relevant appointing authority powers to the Executive DirectorSecretary-General, who would be authorised to sub-delegate those powers. This would contribute to an efficient management of the BEREC staff as well as to ensuring that the Management Committee, as well as the Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson, can concentrate on their functions.
Amendment 212 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The role of the Executive DirectorSecretary-General, who would be the legal representative of BEREC, is crucial for the adequate functioning of the new agency and the implementation of the tasks assigned to it. The Management Board should appoint him/her on the basis of a list drawn up by the Commission following an open and transparent selection procedureuncil in order to guarantee a rigourous evaluation of the candidates and a high level of independenceconfer specific legitimacy on him/her resting on the Member States. It is necessary that the Executive DirectorSecretary-General has a sufficiently long mandate in order to ensure stability and delivery of a long-term strategy for the agency.
Amendment 224 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) As BEREC is not competent for taking decisions with a binding effect, it is necessary to ensure that any natural or legal person subject to, or concerned by, a decision of BEREC has the right of appeal to a Board of Appeal, which is part of the agency but independent from its administrative and regulatory structure. As the decisions issued by the Board of Appeal are intended to produce legal effects towards third parties, an action for review of their legality may be brought to the General Court. In order to ensure uniform conditions as regards the rules of procedure of the Board of Appeal, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council 33. _________________ 33 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
Amendment 233 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) As a Union decentralisedn independent agency, BEREC should operate within its mandate and the existing institutional framework. It should not be seen as representing a Union position to an outside audience or as committing the Union to legal obligations.
Amendment 253 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) assist, advise and cooperate with the Commission as well as NRAs, on request or on its own initiative, on any technical matter within its mandate, and assist and advise the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council on request;
Amendment 259 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 263 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
Amendment 271 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d
Amendment 276 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. Without prejudice to compliance with relevant Union law, NRAs shall comply with any decision and take the utmosttake account of anythe opinions, guidelines, recommendations and best practices adopted by BEREC with the aim of ensuring athe correct implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications within the scope referred to in Article 1(2).
Amendment 299 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
– an Executive DirectorA Secretary-General, which shall exercise the responsibilities set out in Article 9;
Amendment 302 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 4
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 4
Amendment 305 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Management Board shall be composed of one representative from each Member State and two representatives of the Commission, all with voting rights. Each NRA shall be responsible for nominating its respective representative amongst the Head or members of the collegiate body of the NRA.
Amendment 312 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) give the general orientations for BEREC’s activities and adopt each year BEREC’s single programming document by a majority of two-thirdsthrough the unanimous approval of members entitled to vote, taking into account the opinion of the Commission and in accordance with Article 15;
Amendment 313 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) adopt, by a majority of two-thirdsthrough the unanimous approval of members entitled to vote, the annual budget of BEREC and exercise other functions in respect of BEREC’s budget pursuant to Chapter III;
Amendment 316 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point m
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point m
(m) appoint the Executive DirectorSecretary-General and where relevant extend his/her term of office or remove him/her from office in accordance with Article 22;
Amendment 318 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point o
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point o
Amendment 325 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The Executive DirectorSecretary-General of BEREC shall take part in the deliberations, without the right to vote.
Amendment 326 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to Articles 5(1) (a) and (b) and 22(8), the Management Board shall take decisions by a majority of two-thirds of members with voting rights.
Amendment 328 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall not take part in the voting.
Amendment 332 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter 2 – section 2 – title
Chapter 2 – section 2 – title
Amendment 334 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – title
Article 9 – title
Responsibilities of the Executive DirectorSecretary-General
Amendment 338 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The Executive Director shall manage BEREC. The Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall take care of the administrative management of BEREC. The Secretary-General shall be accountable to the Management Board.
Amendment 342 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to the powers of the Commission and the Management Board, the Executive DirectorSecretary- General shall be independent in the performance of his/her duties and shall neither seek nor take instructions from any government, institution, person or body.
Amendment 345 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. The Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall report to the European Parliament on the performance of his/her duties when invited to do so. The Council may invite the Executive DirectorSecretary-General to report on the performance of his/her duties.
Amendment 348 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. The Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall be the legal representative of BEREC.
Amendment 352 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. The Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall be responsible for the implementation of BEREC’s tasks. In particular, the Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall be responsible for:
Amendment 353 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point c
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point c
(c) preparing,, in coordination with the NRAs, the single programming document and submitting it to the Management Board;
Amendment 354 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point f
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point f
(f) preparing an action plan following- up conclusions of internal or external audit reports and evaluations, as well as investigations by the OLAF and reporting on progress twice a year to the Commission and regularly to the Management Board;
Amendment 356 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point g
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point g
(g) protecting the financial interests of the Union by applying preventive measures against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities, by carrying out effective checks, and, if irregularities are detected, by recovering amounts wrongly paid and, where appropriate, by imposing effective, proportionate and dissuasive administrative measures, including financial penalties;
Amendment 357 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6
Article 9 – paragraph 6
Amendment 364 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The Management Board shall appoint the members of the working groups, which may be participated in by experts from the NRAs, the Commission, BEREC staff and the NRAs of third countries participating in the work of BEREC.
Amendment 365 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In the case of the working groups which are set up to carry out the tasks referred to in the third indent of Article 2(1)(d), their members shall be appointed from the lists of qualified experts provided by the NRAs, the Commission and the Executive Director.
Amendment 367 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
In the case of the working groups which are set up to carry out the tasks referred to in the second indent of Article 2(1)(d), their members shall be appointed exclusively from the lists of qualified experts provided by the NRAs and the Executive Director.
Amendment 369 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. The working groups shall be coordinated and moderated by a member of the staff of BERECan NRA, who shall be designated according to the internal rules of procedure.
Amendment 371 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11
Article 11
Amendment 374 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12
Article 12
Amendment 375 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13
Article 13
Amendment 376 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14
Article 14
Amendment 378 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Each year, the Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall draw up a draft programming document containing annual and multiannual programming (‘single programming document’) in line with Article 32 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 and taking into account guidelines set by the Commission38. _________________ 38Commission Communication on the guidelines for programming document for decentralised agencies and the template for the Consolidated Annual Activity Report for decentralised agencies (C(2014) 9641).
Amendment 379 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
The Management Board shall subsequently adopt the single programming document taking into account the opinion of the Commission. It shall forward it to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, as well as any later updated version of that document.
Amendment 383 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. The draft estimate of BEREC’s revenue and expenditure shall be sent by the Executive Director to the CommissionSecretary-General to the Council and the Member States by 31 January each year. The information contained in the draft estimate of BEREC’s revenue and expenditure and in the draft single programming document referred to in Article 15(1) shall be coherent.
Amendment 384 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 4
Article 16 – paragraph 4
4. The Commissionuncil shall send the draft estimate to the budgetary authority together with the draft general budget of the Union.
Amendment 385 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. The Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall implement BEREC’s budget.
Amendment 386 #
2016/0286(COD)
2. Each year the Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall send to the budgetary authority all information relevant to the findings of evaluation procedures.
Amendment 387 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. On receipt of the Court of Auditors’ observations on BEREC’s provisional accounts, BEREC’s accounting officer shall draw up BEREC’s final accounts under his/her own responsibility. The Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall submit the final accounts to the Management Board for an opinion.
Amendment 388 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5
Article 19 – paragraph 5
5. The Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall, by 1 July following each financial year, send the final accounts to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, together with the Management Board’s opinion.
Amendment 389 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 7
Article 19 – paragraph 7
7. The Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall send the Court of Auditors a reply to its observations by 30 September. The Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall also send this reply to the Management Board.
Amendment 390 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 8
Article 19 – paragraph 8
8. The Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall submit to the European Parliament, at the latter’s request, any information required for the smooth application of the discharge procedure for the financial year in question, in accordance with Article 165(3) of Financial Regulation 39. _________________ 39 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (OJ L 298, 26.10.2012).
Amendment 391 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Article 20 – paragraph 1
The financial rules applicable to BEREC shall be adopted by the Management Board after consulting the Commission. They shall not depart from Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 unless such a departure is specifically required for BEREC’s operation and the Commission has given its prior consent.
Amendment 393 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. The Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall be engaged as a temporary agent of BEREC in accordance with Article 2(a) of the Conditions of Employment of Other servants.
Amendment 394 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The Executive DirectorSecretary-General shall be appointed by the Management Board, from a list of candidates proposed by the Commission, following an open and transparent selection procedureuncil, by unanimous decision.
Amendment 396 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of concluding the contract with the Executive DirectorSecretary-General, BEREC shall be represented by the Chairperson of the Management Board.
Amendment 398 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3
Article 22 – paragraph 3
3. The term of office of the Executive DirectorSecretary- General shall be five years. By the end of that period, the Commission shall undertake an assessment that takes into account an evaluation of the Executive Director’s performance and BEREC’s future tasks and challengesManagement Board shall submit an evaluation of the Secretary- General’s performance. This evaluation shall be forwarded to the Council and the European Parliament.
Amendment 400 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4
Article 22 – paragraph 4
4. The Management Board, acting on a proposal from the Commission thatfollowing consultation of the European Parliament and the Council, and takesing into account the assessment referred to in paragraph 3, may extend the term of office of the Executive DirectorSecretary-General once, for no more than five years.
Amendment 402 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5
Article 22 – paragraph 5
5. The Management Board shall inform the European Parliament if it intends to extend the Executive Director’s term of office. Within one month before any such extension, the Executive DirectorEuropean Parliament and the Council shall have two months from the date of receipt of the evaluation referred to in paragraph 3 in which to give their opinion. By default, it will be deemed positive. The Secretary-General may be invited to make a statement before the competent committee of the Parliament and to answer questions put by its members. within this period.
Amendment 403 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 6
Article 22 – paragraph 6
6. An Executive DirectorSecretary-General whose term of office has been extended may not participate in another selection procedure for the same post at the end of the overall period.
Amendment 404 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 7
Article 22 – paragraph 7
7. The Executive DirectorSecretary-General may be removed from office only upon a decision of the Management Board acting on a proposal from the Commissionuncil or the European Parliament.
Amendment 406 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 8
Article 22 – paragraph 8
8. The Management Board shall reach decisions on appointment, extension of the term of office or removal from office of the Executive Director on the basis of a two- thirds majoritySecretary-General by the unanimous approval of its members with voting rights.
Amendment 411 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3
Article 24 – paragraph 3
3. BEREC shall be represented by the Executive DirectorSecretary-General.
Amendment 412 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
To this end, BEREC may, subject to prior approval by the Commission, establish working arrangements. These arrangements shall not create legal obligations incumbent on the Union and its Member States.
Amendment 416 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Article 28 – paragraph 2
2. Members of the Management Board, the Executive Director, members of the Board of Appeal, seconded national expertsSecretary-General, other staff not employed by the BEREC Office and experts participating in working groups shall comply with the confidentiality requirements under Article 339 of the Treaty, even after their duties have ceased.
Amendment 417 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 30 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Where information is not available or is not made available by the NRAs in a timely fashion or in circumstances where a direct request by BEREC would prove more efficient and less burdensome, BEREC may address a duly justified and reasoned request to other authorities or directly to the relevant undertakings providing electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities, with the prior agreement of the NRA of the country in question.
Amendment 418 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 30 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 423 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Members of the Management Board, the Executive DirectorSecretary-General, seconded national experts and other staff not employed by BEREC shall each make a declaration indicating their commitment and the absence or presence of any direct or indirect interest which might be considered prejudicial to their independence.
Amendment 424 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The declarations shall be accurate and complete, made in writing and updated whenever necessary. The declarations of interests made by the members of the Management Board and the Executive DirectorSecretary- General shall be made public.
Amendment 426 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2
Article 31 – paragraph 2
2. Members of the Management Board, the Executive DirectorSecretary-General, seconded national experts, other staff not employed by BEREC and experts participating in working groups shall each accurately and completely declare, at the latest at the start of each meeting, any interest which might be considered prejudicial to their independence in relation to the items on the agenda, and shall abstain from participating in the discussion of and voting upon such points.
Amendment 427 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36
Article 36
Amendment 432 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
Article 37 – paragraph 1
1. The necessary arrangements concerning the accommodation to be provided for BEREC in the host Member State and the facilities to be made available by that Member State as well as the specific rules applicable in the host Member State to the Executive DirectorSecretary-General, members of the Management Board, BEREC staff and members of their families shall be laid down in a Headquarters Agreement between BEREC and the Member State where the seat is located, concluded after obtaining the approval of the Management Board and no later than two years after the entry into force of this regulation.
Amendment 435 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1
Article 38 – paragraph 1
1. No later than five years from the day of entry into force of this regulation, and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall perform an evaluation in compliance with the Commission guidelinesManagement Board shall forward an evaluation report to the Council and the European Parliament to assess BEREC’s performance in relation to its objectives, mandate, tasks and location(s). The evaluation shall, in particular, address the possible need to modify the mandate of BEREC, and the financial implications of any such modification.
Amendment 436 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 2
Article 38 – paragraph 2
2. Where the CommissionEuropean Parliament or the Council considers that the continuation of BEREC is no longer justified with regard to its assigned objectives, mandate and tasks, ithey may propose that this regulation be amended accordingly or repealed.
Amendment 437 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 3
Article 38 – paragraph 3
Amendment 439 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
With effect from [the date of entry into force of this regulation] and until the Executive DirectorSecretary-General takes up his/her duties following his/her appointment by the Management Board in accordance with Article 22, the Administrative Manager appointed on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009 shall, for the remaining period of his/her term of office, act as interim Executive DirectorSecretary-General with the functions provided for in this regulation. The other conditions of the Administrative Manager’s contract shall remain unchanged.
Amendment 440 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
As interim Executive DirectorSecretary-General, he/she shall exercise the appointing authority powers. He/she may authorise all payments covered by appropriations entered in BEREC’s budget after approval by the Management Board and may conclude contracts, including staff contracts, following the adoption of BEREC’s establishment plan.
Amendment 441 #
2016/0286(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 39 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The contract of employment of the Administrative Manager appointed on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009 shall be terminated at the the end of his/her term of office or the day when the Executive DirectorSecretary-General takes up his/her duties following his/her appointment by the Management Board in accordance with Article 22, whichever is the earlier.
Amendment 6 #
2015/2353(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes the considerable long-term impact of EFSI on the EU budget; believes that EFSI invests in projects that are not the same as those targeted by the H2020- affected budget lines and CEF; stresses therefore that, if the EU is to reach its research and innovation targets, the unanimously agreed level of financing of these programmes needs to be fully restored; recalls, in this context, that CEF in the area of energy and telecom has high political priority for the Energy Union and the Digital Union; takes the view that the EFSI should be funded not by means of further contribution to the budget on the part of the Member States, but through an across-the-board increase in the customs duties set in the Common External Tariff;
Amendment 33 #
2015/2353(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Points out that Union funding, because it is linked to size-based parameters and not macroeconomic fundamentals and because it is designed to address structural not short-term problems, cannot offer effective protection against economic shocks, such as those triggered by the financial crisis of 2007- 2008;
Amendment 34 #
2015/2353(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. EmphasisNotes that Union funding can actually trigger and catalyse actions that Member States are unable to carry out on their own and create synergies and complementarities with Member States’ activities; encourages Member States to better explore ar, although intended as an instrument to offset imbalances between Member States, in practice magnifies those imbalances, in that the provision of funding is based on the twin principles of co-financing and conditionality; takes the view that Union funding can thus be seen as a particularly subtle means inby which the EU is not taking actionexercises control over Member State policies and spending;
Amendment 46 #
2015/2352(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses the importance of maintaining that flexibility, which enables each operator to choose the instrument best suited to the circumstances of each project;
Amendment 47 #
2015/2352(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Considers that the ‘holding firms accountable for all damage and loss caused by offshore accidents’ must in all circumstances prevent the possibility of speculative claims being made; moreover, any rules on class action should allow Member States the possibility of applying the option provided for in their own national system (opt-in or opt-out);
Amendment 84 #
2015/2323(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the aim of the Third Energy Package to provide a truly competitive and consumer-friendly retail energy market has not yetcan never been realised, as evidenced by low levels of consumer switching and satisfaction across the EU, persisten; stresses that privatisation, competitive tendering and deregulation will result in both domestic and business users paying increasingly high energy bills, and that thigh levels of market concentration, and the failure to reflect falling wholesale costss will lead to more energy poverty and to multinational oligopolies earning substantial profits to the detriment of equality of access and investment in rnetail pricesworks and generating capacity;
Amendment 18 #
2015/2276(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. WelcomeCondemns the work to provide the EU with autonomy in governmental satellite communications (GOVSATCOM), since these must be carried out via the Member States’ governmental network; calls on the Commission to makpropose, on the basis of beneficiaries’ needs and requirements, a cost-benefit evaluation of different solutions: a system relying on current capabilities with the possibility of integrating future capabilities or the creation of new capacities through a dedicated system; stresses that the final decision should take account ofrests with the Member States and must be taken solely in their interests of beneficiaries and in the interest of Europeand industry; considers that the Space Surveillance and Tracking (SST) framework could provide a governance model;
Amendment 28 #
2015/2276(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points to the development of SST as a step towards security in space; considers that SST should become an EU programme with its own budgetmust remain a programme of the ESA and its member countries; invites the CommissionMember States to assess the need to take account of space weather and near-Earth objects and to come up with the next steps for SST in order to prepare industry;
Amendment 35 #
2015/2276(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the strategic importance of independent access to space and the need for dedicated EU action; calls on the Commission, in collaboration with the European Space Agency andfor committed Member States; calls on the Commission to abandon its plans to turn the European Space Agency into a subsidiary body and appeals to the Member States, to coordinate planned institutional needs, so that industry can anticipate demand, to support launch infrareject any moves to bring the ESA under the EU institutional umbrella and instead to preserve the ESA’s struicture and to promote R&D, particularly in breakthrough technologiesly intergovernmental character, which has been the key to its success since it was established;
Amendment 49 #
2015/2276(INI)
5. Stresses the need for better coordination of EUthe space capacities of Member States, with the necessary system architectures and procedures to ensure a proportionate level of security, including data security; considers that EUMember States’ space capacities dedicated to security and defence could be managed by a specific operational service coordination centre within the ESA.
Amendment 24 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas it is only states that have the capacity and the responsibility towards their people to determine their country's energy supply policy; whereas security of supply is the state’s first duty, which implies the freedom to negotiate supply contracts;
Amendment 40 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the Member States are exclusively competent for defining their energy mix, their supply policy and the status of their public electricity and gas services, and the Commission must not encroach upon this competence by passing EU laws that discriminate against certain energy resources to the advantage of others;
Amendment 84 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the future vision of the Energy Union must be one in which Member States recognise that they depend on each other to deliver secure energy to their citizens, based on true solidarity and trust, and in which the Energy Union speaks with one voiceMember States must guarantee secure energy to their citizens, and whereas the Energy Union, as an inter- state cooperation body, has no legitimacy to speak in global affairs;
Amendment 123 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas many countries are heavily reliant on a single supplier, including some that rely entirely on Russia for their natural gas and others that heavily rely on Northern Africa, which leaves them vulnerable to supply disruptions, whether these are caused by political or commercial disputes resulting from the Union’s policy and interference by the USA, or by infrastructure failure;
Amendment 134 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas the 2006 and 2009 gas disputes between Russia and transit-country Ukraine, provoked by foreign interference by NATO and the USA in Ukraine's internal policies, left many EU countries with severe shortages;
Amendment 148 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
Amendment 150 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
O. whereas ex-post assessment and verification of all energy-related agreements as regards compliance with EU law is already possible through, inter alia, competition and energy regulations; whereas insufficient ex-ante compliance checks at national and EU level lead to severe market distortionssuch regulations should cease, leaving states their freedom in accordance with the subsidiarity principle, so as to restore to them their exclusive competence in the field of energy;
Amendment 168 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital P
Recital P
P. whereas 30 million European jobs are at risk owing to the US shale gas boom, as energy-intensive industries move operations to the US, where energy costs are far lower, and whereas no protectionist measures have been undertaken by the Commission and the Council to counter this unacceptable dumping;
Amendment 191 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital T
Recital T
T. whereas a more economically and physically integrated single market in energy could result in efficiency gains of some EUR 50 billion; lead to an economic and social disaster, as an end to the public monopoly on these strategic industries would encroach on national and territorial cohesion; whereas opening these markets in the interest of short-term gains would create energy insecurity as a result of the fluctuations and variations in prices manipulated by speculative finance;
Amendment 201 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital U
Recital U
Amendment 211 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital V
Recital V
V. whereas the external dimension of EU energy policy needs more coherence and has not yet tapped its full potential to contribute in terms of security of energy supply and the Union’sEU energy policy should not have an external dimension, which is the sole prerogative of states; whereas such a policy can only exist thanks to enhanced comopetitivenesration between states;
Amendment 219 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital W
Recital W
W. whereas the European Energy Security Strategy identified 33 infrastructure projects which areit considers essential to improve security of supply and to better connect energy markets; whereas such a network can only be established in order to enhance the national energy independence of states;
Amendment 238 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Y
Recital Y
Y. whereas diversification of supplies, the completion of the internal energy market, more efficient energy consumption, the development of indigenous energy resources and R&D activities are the key drivers of the Energy Union;
Amendment 255 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomeRejects the Commission communication entitled ‘A Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward- Looking Climate Change Policy’;
Amendment 268 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to actively pursue the diversification of supply (energy sources, suppliers and routes); to this end, calls on the Commission to promote the construction of the relevant energy infrastructure priority corridors, as specified in Annex I to the trans- European energy networks (TEN-E) regulation and Part II of the Annex I to the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) regulation, such as the Southern Gas Corridorprovide support to those states which seek it in the diversification of their energy sources, suppliers and supply routes;
Amendment 293 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that all EU infrastructure projects aimed at diversifying energy sources, suppliers and routes must be fully in line with EU legislation and EU energy security prioritiesthe wishes of the states concerned;
Amendment 305 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the fact that energy suppliers coming from third countries must be subject to the EU acquis while operating on the common market, and calls on the Commission to enforce EU law by all means available in order to allow energy to flow freely in the EU and prevent distortions in the international legislation while operating on a national market;
Amendment 308 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that it is of upthe utmost importance to the EU to end the isolation of some Member States from the internal energy market, as demonstrated by the gas stress tests carried out by the Commission; calls on the Commission, in this regard, to carry out such tests every two yearsend the energy dependency of some Member States, as demonstrated by the gas stress tests carried out by the Commission;
Amendment 346 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to support those Member States that wish tonot to interfere in the negotiateion of energy contracts on a voluntary basis by introducing a common negotiating mechanism, and stresses that the functioning of such a mechanism must be subject to compliance with the EU internal market acquis and with EU competition and World Trade Organisation rulesand therefore, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity and the enhanced cooperation mechanism, to allow states full sovereignty in managing their energy supply and energy security;
Amendment 358 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that greater transparency of intergovernmental agreements could be achieimproved by strengtheneliminating the role of the Commission in energy-related negotiations involving one or more Member States and third countries, including by having the Commission participate in those negotiations if there is a risk of abuse of a dominant position by one supplier; notes that; considers furthermore that the Commission should not carry out ex-ante andor ex-post assessments andor draw up both a positive and a negative list of agreement clauses, such as export ban and destinationany list of agreement clauses;
Amendment 378 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that all future intergovernmental energy agreements with non-EU parties must be discussed with the Commission ahead of signing in order to make sure that they comply with EU legislationshall lie outside the competence of the Commission, falling instead under states’ full sovereign competence; rejects, in particular with, the Third Energy Package, which usurps states’ strategic prerogatives;
Amendment 380 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 389 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to refrain from prepareing draft contract templates and guidelines includingand, in particular, any indicative list of abusive clauses in order to create a reference for competent authorities and companies in their contracting activities;
Amendment 394 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that, in order to ensure a level playing field and strengthen the bargaining position of EU companies vis-à- vis external suppliers, key features ofstates, as the contracts should be aggregated and regularly published so as to establish a transparent benchmark which can be referred to by competent authorities and companies in their future negotiations, whilst protectingly guarantors in the long term, must be accorded their sovereign prerogatives and freedom, and the confidentiality of sensitive information must be protected;
Amendment 401 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 446 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that the Union can reduce its dependency on particular suppliers and fuels by maximising its use of indigenous sources of energy, including conventional and unconventional low-emission fossil fuels and renewables, and therefore stresses that no fuel or technology contributing to energy security and climate goals should be discriminated against; considers nonetheless that the environmental and health consequences of hydraulic fracturing are too serious for shale gas and shale oil to be seen as serious alternatives to conventionally extracted gas and oil;
Amendment 447 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that the Union can reduce its dependency on particular suppliers and fuels by maximising its use of indigenous sources of energy, including conventional and unconventional low-emission fossil fuels and renewables, and therefore stresses that no fuel or technology contributing to energy security and climate goals should be discriminated against as a matter of principle;
Amendment 463 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Believes that indigenous resources, both conventional and unconventional, which have the potential to increase the EU’s energy security of supply should be fully tapped and that unnecessary regulatory burdens on the entities willing to invest in these fields must be avoidedin a prudent manner;
Amendment 483 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Commission to facilitate the effective use ofmake the existing EU funding schemes, including the European Fund for Strategic Investments, so as to support investment in the development of Europe’s indigenous energy resources, based on a technology-neutral approachavailable to national strategic investment funds and public development banks so as to give states the means of financing and enhancing energy resources to meet their development needs;
Amendment 491 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission, and in particular DG TRADE, to continue to press for a dedicated energy chapter within the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), with a view to removing US export restrictions on both crude oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) and eliminating protectionist measure to terminate the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations;
Amendment 504 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen the Energy Community through, inter alia, better implementation and enforcement of EU law, enhancing its institutions and implementing key infrastructure projects in order to ensure better integration with the EU energy market and security of supply mechanisms and, in particular, supporting the Russian Blue Stream gas pipeline project;
Amendment 515 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Believes that the future Energy Union must establish a free flow of energy across EU countries as the fifth European freedom alongside free movement of people, goods, capital and servicesexists only in full cooperation with states and with respect for their sovereignty;
Amendment 541 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses that the backbone of the future Energy Union must be a fully functioning internal energy markets that delivers secure, competitive and sustainable energy to enable EU countries’ companies and consumers to access gas and electricity in the most efficient and cost-effective way possible;
Amendment 567 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Believes at the same time that market- based mechanisms must be complemented by tangible and ambitious solidarity mechanisms, such as more efficient EU crisis management, better use of LNG and gas storage and virtual capacity reserve mechanisms to be enshrined in EU legislation, including the Security of Gas Supply Regulation, which, to this end, must be reviewed as soon as possible;
Amendment 583 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Stresses the need for full implementation and enforcement of existing EU energy legislation and for a swift adoption of ambitious European network codes and guidelinesthe total abolition of existing EU energy legislation, which must go hand in hand with strengthenansforming the competences of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E) and the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO-G) into inter- governmental agencies founded on the principle of free cooperation on a voluntary, project-by-project basis;
Amendment 615 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses that a properly designed future model of the electricity market in the EU must aim at a more market-based and optimal, from the point of view of networkintegration of renewable energy sources while maintaining national public monopolies which are the only guarantees of people's security, integration of renewable energy sources the long term;
Amendment 644 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to concentrate their efforts on driving projects of common interest (PCIs) forward, with a view to achieving a pan- European ‘super grid’ with the capacity to transmit power across EU countries from multiple sources and therefore capable of diverting energy from surplus to deficit areas, thereby allowing the market to instantly respond to interruptions of supply wherever they occuriding EU countries to become independent in terms of energy;
Amendment 679 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Supports regional approaches where there are particular regional challenges or opportunities, or where acting regionally could speed up market integrationthe achievement of energy independence by states, including through the cremutualisation of regional hubs to enhance market liquiditythe funding of electricity production infrastructure;
Amendment 704 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Stresses the need to create adismantle the existing legislative framework that empowers consumers and makes them active participants in the market as investors and stakeholders; notes that consumers’ involvement can be strengthened through, inter alia, energy cooperatives and micro-generation and enhanced transparency of prices and consumeand restore to states the freedom to maintain the public monopolies on electricity and gas that are necessary for their economic, social and territorial cohesion and for their national industrial strategy; notes that maintaining regulated tariffs for cthoices; points out that such initiatives could contribute to reducing energy prices and help address serious social problems, such as fuel povertyse states that wish it is the best way of defending the interests of both individual and industrial consumers;
Amendment 782 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Notes that improvements in energy- efficiency pursued on a cost-effective basis and strategic action by states and public finance institutions will make a key contribution to energy security, competitiveness and the achievement of climate objectives; stresses, however, that gains in energy efficiency cannot replace diversification of energy supply;
Amendment 804 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Believes that it will be important to avoid over-prescriptiveany legislation that can constrain domestic policy choices about how best to promote energy efficiency within a national context;
Amendment 32 #
2015/2110(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that people’s right to decide on their own food and agriculture systems is the solution to combating criminal activities that cause hunger and poverty; urges the international community to actively confront financial speculation on foodstuffs, such as purchases at low prices in vast agricultural areas and land grabbing by large multinational agro companies, taking into consideration the detrimental impact on small producers; encourages the organisation of short supply chains between local producers and consumers in order to promote regional agriculture which is more sustainable and profitable from the point of view of land use, plant protection products and the local economy;
Amendment 35 #
2015/2110(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 9 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls for the European Union's trade policy to be inspired by the Havana Charter of 24 March 1948, Articles 3 and 4 of which provide that no country should maintain a persistent structural surplus or deficit in its balance of payments;
Amendment 31 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses the need for targeted protectionism to be applied to strategic industrial sectors;
Amendment 35 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of preventing the EU’s trading partners from engaging in anti-competitive practices, including social or environmental dumping, or the dumping of cheap products in Europe, as this could de-stabilise European industry; calls to this end for the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy procedures to be speeded up and for the estimated harm done to European industry to be evaluated in such a way as to have the strongest deterrent effect possible;
Amendment 59 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to encourage European research bodies to engage more actively with potential partners outside the EU; , while at the same time cautioning against possible industrial espionage targeting European strategic industries;
Amendment 1 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Heading 1
Heading 1
on the strategic military situation in the Black Sea Basin following the illegal annexreunification of Crimea bywith Russia
Amendment 2 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- in the light of the United Nations charter,
Amendment 5 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10
Citation 10
Amendment 16 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Black Sea Basin is one of the world’s most strategic regions, of key importance both to the EU and its Member States and to Russia, in particular with regard to ensuring their security and defence, and to the EU Neighbourhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership; whereas all existing protracted conflicts in the Republic of Moldova (Transnistria), Georgia (South Ossetia and Abkhazia) and between Armenia and Azerbaijan (Nagorno- Karabakh) are located in the Black Sea Basin;
Amendment 23 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the European Council has strongly condemned the Russian Federation’s annexaincorporation of Crimea and Sevastopol into the Russian Federation, while the Crimean people, through the decisions of the institutions of Crimea and Sevastopol and will not recognise itits independent Republic, elected democratically and in accordance with Ukrainian legislation, confirmed by the referendum of 16 March 2014, in accordance with the United Nations charter, exercised their right of self- determination; whereas restrictions on trade between the EU and Crimea have been imposed as a consequence;
Amendment 25 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas the Ukrainian Government has in de facto terms acknowledged this incorporation by not breaking off its diplomatic relations with the Russian Federation, by voluntarily evacuating its armed forces from this territory, by establishing a migratory and customs border with Crimea and by maintaining its economic and financial relations, including in the defence sector, with Russia;
Amendment 26 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas NATO has condemned the Russian Federation’s military escalation in Crimea, its illegal and illegitimate annexation of Crimea and its continued and deliberate destabilisation ofis the cause of the military escalation with the Russian Federation in Crimea, through destabilisation operations led by the United States of America, in particular through its private military companies, in eastern Ukraine in violation of international law;
Amendment 33 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the military balance in the Black Sea Basin has shifted following the illegal annexation of Crimea, with Russia now unlawfully controllingNATO's Sea Breeze manoeuvres in the territory of Crimea from 2004 to 2010, which were perceived by the local population, the local Crimean institutions and Russia as real provocations; whereas Russia now provides security for the hundreds of kilometres of the Crimean coastline and the adjacent waters facing NATO and EU maritime borders; whereas Russia has fuelled aggressive actions on Ukrainian territory;
Amendment 41 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas prior to the illegal annexationreunification of Crimea with Russia, Russian land and air forces in Crimea were minimalsubstantial (as many as 25 000 troops) and concerned mainly with the defence of Sevastopol – main base of the Russian Black Sea Fleet – and two adjacent naval bases; whereas through a military build-up in Crimea and in the Black Sea Basin following the annexation, Russia has moved to create an of defensive joint striking force comprising the navy and land and air forces;
Amendment 47 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas Russia has acceleratplanned the expansion and modernisation of theits Black Sea Fleet following the annexreunification; whereas the Black Sea Fleet modernisation plan is one of the most ambitious parts of the Russian State Arms Procurement programme for 2011-2020; whereas in December 2014 the Russian Government approved a new military doctrine which considers NATO as a main security threat to Russia; whereas this document was signed following the decisions of the NATO summits in Chicago and Newport, where it was resolved, in particular, to create an anti-missile barrier covering the whole of the European part of Russia and following resolutions S 2277 and H.S. 758, adopted in July and December 2014 by the United States Congress, which depict Russia as an ‘aggressor country’ which had invaded Ukraine, and which call for preparation for a war against Russia, proposing the militarisation of Eastern Europe and of the Baltic States;
Amendment 55 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas Turkey is a NATO ally, a naval power, an active regional foreign policy player and a key partner for the EU, not least in matters concerning energy and border security; whereas it has illegally occupied northern Cyprus since 1974; whereas Turkey’'s strategic locsituation is also of high relevance to the other major thenables the countries of NATO and the EU to overlook this serious breach of international order relat facing both NATO and the EU, the self-proclaimed Daesh (Islamic State)ing to a Member State of the European Union;
Amendment 61 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the EU, NATO and the US have condemned the ‘treaty’ signed in November 2014 between Russia and the sReparatist authorities inublic of Abkhazia and have reaffirmed their support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Georgia;
Amendment 71 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas since the occupation by Russian forces,for 23 years Crimea hwas been, under Ukrainian sovereignty, the scene of human rights abuses, affecting in particular Crimean Tatarin particular in the field of linguistic rights, of which both the Tatars and the 101 ethnic groups comprising the people of Crimea were victims;
Amendment 74 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Firmly supports the non-recognition of Russia’s annexfree determination of the people of Crimea; reiterates its commitment to the independence and sovereignty of Ukraine and to the non- violability of borders; fully supportsdoes not accept the European Council’s conclusions that the EU will not recognise the illegal annexation offact that Crimea and Sevastopol belong to the Russian Federation;
Amendment 83 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes with concern that the annexation of Crimea has precipitated a significant change in the strategic landscape of the Black Sea Basin and the adjacent arethat the new status of Crimea has seen the strategic landscape of the Black Sea Basin and the adjacent area find a position of balance between Russian power, Turkish power and the presence of the United States of America; warns that by occupycontrolling the entire peninsula, Russia has gained a very important launching pad facing both west (Transnistria and the Danube Mouths), the Balkans and south (the Eastern Mediterranean), where it has establishehad a permanent naval task force, and that the illegal annexation of since 1783 and the creation of the Russian Black Sea Fleet; notes that Crimea offers Russia a ‘southern Kaliningrad’, another outpost directly bordering on NATO, this time at sea. Notes that this new situation is the result of NATO's offensive policy in the region, inaugurated by the illegal bombings against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1999;
Amendment 98 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that the change in the strategic landscape, and the evolving military situation in the Black Sea Basin, are indicative of broader, systemic challenges to European security; believes that the EU and the Member States must have a security response to these challenges, engage in negotiation with Russia and the countries of the Collective Security Treaty Organisation on the subject of a new European security architecture, as was proposed by the Russian President Dmitri Medvedev in 2008, and engage in negotiation in relation to a free trade area between the Eurasian Economic Union, Ukraine and the European Union, as Vladimir Putin proposed in his article in Izvestia of 3 October 2011, a plan which the Commission rejected out of hand;
Amendment 107 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Is deeply concerned aboutNotes the current defensive and offensive military build-up of Russia in the Black Sea, and the planned expansion and modernisation of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, involving the addition of six new modern diesel submarines of the Rostov-on-Don type and six new frigates of the Admiral Grigorovich type; notes that the positioning of ofdefensive air force assets, and the upgrading of Crimean military infrastructures, will enhance Russia’s offensive military posture and its ability to project power beyond its territory;
Amendment 114 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes with concern that Russia has considerably bolstered its air and naval defences in the Black Sea Basin, deploying new naval defence (anti-ship) missiles (with a range of 600 km, able to reach the Bosphorus) and ensuring that Russian fighter planes control about three quarters of the Black Sea Basin airspace (by practically tripling the number of airports in Crimea); notes, in this regard, that Russia has bolstered its capabilities in both strategic and tactical terms: strategically, long-range bombers, capable of carrying cruise missiles, and reconnaissance aviation operating close to the western shores of the Black Sea, can penetrate deep into Central Europe; tactically, two naval infantry brigades – potentially supported by Mistral-type helicopter carriers – pose a significant potential landing threat;
Amendment 123 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that potential Russian deployment of dual-capable weapon systems in Crimea place in doubt Russia’s good intentions when it comes to achieving progress on the multilateral nuclear disarmament agenda in the forthcoming Non-Proliferation Treaty review, undermining the efforts already made in that direction, this policy being merely the result of the United States of America's exit from the ABM Treaty and the deployment in Europe of NATO's anti-missile shield, directed against Russia;
Amendment 127 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Regards the recent close overflights by Russian fighter aircrafts of NATO warships and exploration platforms in the Black Sea as a clear indication of a more aggressive Russian posture in the Black Sea Basin and warns of a heightened risk of escalation;
Amendment 133 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Is deeply concerned by the extremely serious situation in eastern Ukraine – where war is leading to the destabilisation of Ukraine and, caused by a failure to comply with the agreements of 21 February 2014 signed by the heads of the then opposition parties, the foreign ministers of France, Germany and Poland, by the bregion as a whole – including the apparent move to establish a land corridor linking Russian territory with Crimea through separatist-controlled territory alongach by the Rada of Articles 108, 110, 112 and 126 of the Ukrainian Constitution in its decisions of 22 February 2015 (overthrow of President Yanokovich) and of 24 February 2015 (overthrow of the judges of the Constitutional Court), and by the refusal, in March and April 2014, by the Kiev Government, to negotiate a suitable status for the political, economic, social and cultural features of the Lugansk and Donetsk regions, led to the wdestern shore of the Azov Sea (Mariupol)abilisation of the country and the entire region;
Amendment 144 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. CondemnEndorses the fact that Russia is providing direct and indirect support to the separatist actions, thereby facilitating the continuation of war;local populations, in particular through the acceptance of 1 200 000 refugees in its concerned by the reports of war crimes committed in the region controlled by Russia-backed separatists; urges Russiterritory and the despatch of 14 humanitarian convoys to the conflict zone; urges Russia and the United States of America to use itstheir influence to halt the hostilities;
Amendment 149 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Condemns the direct support provided by the Ukrainian Government and by the regional authorities of Dnipropetrovsk to the armed militias, consisting of openly nationalistic and extremist militants called the special ‘Donbas’ battalion, the special ‘Aidar’ battalion, the special ‘Sytch’ battalion, the special ‘Azov’ regiment, the special ‘Dnipro-1’ battalion, the special ‘Dnipro-2’ battalion, the ‘Pravy Sektor’ Ukrainian volunteer corps and 40 other bands of this type; condemns the repeated breaches of human rights and the war crimes committed by these armed bands against the civilians of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions, and in particular those highlighted in Report EUR 50/040/2014 of 8 September 2014 by the NGO Amnesty International; demands that the Ukrainian Government dissolve and disarm these armed bands which have no place in a democracy, where only the police and armed forces legally established and controlled by the civil power can legally bear arms, make arrests and undertake police operations;
Amendment 151 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Urges the Commission and the IMF to block the financial aid given to Ukraine, since it is being used to finance the war conducted by this country against the populations of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions, a war which is falsely called an ‘antiterrorist operation’;
Amendment 156 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines that the relationship with Russia, being a major actor in the international system, should be cooperative rather than conflictual in the long run; is of the view, however, that in the short and medium term, owing to a lack of trust following Russia’s latest actions, any resumption of cooperation should continue to rely, firstly, on the strong strategic reassurance offered by NATO to its eastern members and, secondly, on the fact that there can be no political solution based on accepting the illegal annexation of Crimeaany resumption of cooperation should continue to rely on NATO's withdrawal from eastern Europe;
Amendment 164 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Expresses hope that the Minsk ceasefire agreement reached on 12 February 2015 will hold and thereby provide the time for a negotiated political solution with the de facto authorities of the Lugansk and Donetsk regions in the political and economic context given by the Minsk agreements;
Amendment 172 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Believes that, in the event that Russia does not honour the Minsk ceasefire agreement, and continues the destabilisation of eastern Ukraine and the illegal annexation of Crimea, the sanction regime should be continued and even strengthen Russia will honour this agreement, as shown by the OSCE observer mission's reports, which noted the withdrawal of the heavy weapons by the insurgents, together with a general cessation of hostilities, except for a few very localised incidents; the sanction regime must consequently be lifted;
Amendment 184 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the implementation of the EU energy policy aimed at promotingcontribution of Russia to energy security for all Member States; urges the Member States to take the steps needed to ensure the security of oil and gas exploitation and transportation activities in the Black Sea region, particularly by negotiating the restart of the ‘South Stream’ project;
Amendment 190 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Is concerned that the benefits of oil and gas exploitation and transportation in the Black Sea are increasingly dependent on the level of militarisation triggered by the illegal annexAmerican provocation ofs in Crimea by Russia and the subsequentagainst Russia, leading to a build-up of its capabilities in the area;
Amendment 201 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Ccalls on Russia to continue to respect the rights of the local population in Crimea, especially the native Crimean Tatars, thousands of whom have left their homeland for fear of persecution and have sought refuge iGreeks, Armenians and Germans, of whom the Russian Government has recognised, by Presidential Decree No 268 of 21 April 2014, the status of unjustly oppressed people and has consequently taken measures for their total rehabilitation, together with compensation measures which the Ukrainian Government had until now never implemented; is very content that the Crimean Tatars have had their language recognised as an official language of the Crimean Republic by Article 10 of the Constitution of ther regions in Ukraine Crimean Republic of 11 April 2014, which gives it a status of official language in this territory pursuant to Article 68 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation;
Amendment 210 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Ukrainian Government to use all means at its disposal to investigate and prosecute war crimes committed on its territory, specifically the massacres committed by the pro-government militants in Odessa on 2 May 2014, and by the members of the special ‘Azov’ Battalion in Mariupol on 9 May 2014;
Amendment 218 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Calls on the Ukrainian Government to cease the attacks on freedom of expression, and the pressures against the independent press, particularly against the newspaper ‘Vesti’, which was the subject of two vexatious searches in May and September 2014, and two attacks on its premises in July 2014; calls for the lifting of the administrative sanctions adopted by the Ukrainian State Committee of Television and Radio Broadcasting against the ‘Inter’ and ‘112’ television channels and against the ‘Vesti’ radio channel, together with the prohibition of broadcasting of the television channel of the CIS, ‘Mir’, and of 15 Russian television channels in Ukrainian territory in July 2014;
Amendment 232 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses the critical importance ofat coordinating with NATO and the United States is counter- productive as the Black Sea Basin is a key component of Euro-Atlantic security; welcomes the commitment of NATO to support regional efforts of Black Sea littoral states aimed at ensuring security and stabilpean and Eurasian security; calls on the OSCE to enlarge the scope of its efforts related to Black Sea security;
Amendment 239 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
Amendment 248 #
2015/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Underlines that NATO should preserve it’s general naval and air superiority in the Black Sea Basin and maintain its capacity to monitor the areby its nature exacerbates tensions with Russia;
Amendment 13 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas, in reaction to and despite Russia’s aggression against the report of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia headed by the Swiss diplomat Heidi Tagliavini and funded by the European Union established in September 2009 that the Georgian and violation of its territorial integrity in 2008, the EUuthorities were responsible for triggering the conflict by initiating bombardments of civilian targets in the capital of South Ossetia, Tskhinvali, on the night of 7 to 8 August 2008; whereas, despite that conflict, Russia and Georgia opted for an increased cooperation model as a way to appease Russia; whereas, in line with this, rather than takimposing restrictive measures,ciprocal sanctions, they launched or deepened a series of generous initiatives for deeper cooperation –, such as the common spaces, the Partnership for Modernisation, the negotiations on a New EU-Russia Agreement, and the Human Rights dialogue – have been launched or deepened; ;
Amendment 30 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas Russia has – by illegally annexing Crimea and waging an undeclared war against Ukraine, with the direct participation of Russian military units, and by deliberately destabilising this neighbouring sovereign and independent country – profoundly and for a long time damaged its relationship with the EU by jeopardising the basic principles of Europe’s security order and by breaking its international commitments, notably under the United Nations Charter, the Helsinki Final Act and the Budapest Memorandumthe attachment of Crimea and Sevastopol to the Russian Federation was the result of a sovereign and democratic referendum vote by the people of Crimea, through the decisions of the institutions of their Autonomous Republic whose members were elected democratically and in accordance with Ukrainian legislation; whereas that attachment was also confirmed by the referendum procedure of 16 March 2014, which accorded with the United Nations Charter, particularly with regard to the right of self- determination; whereas restrictions on trade between the EU and Crimea were subsequently imposed;
Amendment 49 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas Russiathe United States, particularly through the lever of NATO, is the instigator of and, directly or indirectly, party to a number of ‘frozen conflicts’ in its neighbourhood – in Transnistria, South Ossetia, Abkhasia, and Nagorno Karabakh – that constitute serious impediments to the development and stability of the neighbouring countries concerned;
Amendment 70 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas in reaction to Russia’s covert military invasion of Ukrainethe armed conflict raging in Ukraine following the attachment of Crimea and Sevastopol to the Russian Federation, the EU has adopted a stage-by-stage series of restrictive measures; whereas similar sanctions have been adopted by a number of other countries in reaction to Russia’s aggression;
Amendment 78 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas these restrictive targeted measures are, even if their initial aim was not to directed againsly target the Russian people but aim, are having at stimulating a change in Russian policy towards, and actions in, the common neighbourhood; whereas the sanctions could be lifted, partially or fully, as soon as Russia commits itself to implementing, fully and honestly, the provisions of the Minsk agreements and the return of Crimea to Ukraine; whereas the sanctions will be strengthened should Russia chose to do otherwise and refrain from taking any positive step to change its policyevere impact on the everyday life of the population; whereas, furthermore, it is often the most vulnerable people, such as women and children, who pay the price for this policy which the European Union is conducting towards Russia; whereas the sanctions are also having adverse repercussions, both for citizens of the Russian Federation and for those of the Member States of the European Union, although the Minsk accords should have led to a stage-by- stage lifting of the sanctions;
Amendment 100 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the EU has firmly supported Russia’s accession and participation in different international organisations and fora, such as the G8, the G20 and the WTO; whereas this strategy of including Russia in international decision-making bodies has not had the results expected but instead created tensions owing to Russia’s habit of breaching rules, e.g. its non- compliance with WTO standards and obligations (by introducing a number of discriminatory measures against individual EU Member States and other countries in its neighbourhood), its failure to implement more than a thousand judgements of the European Court of Human Rights, etc.the habit adopted by the United States and the European Union of calling into question Russia’s sovereignty, for example by failing to respect its strategic choices in the field of trade or the decisions taken by Russian judicial institutions, in which respect Western States seem to be abandoning the principle of the independence of the administration of justice;
Amendment 125 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas Russiathe United States has developed policies and instruments for, and became an active user of, a new type of hybrid warfare, particularly in the actions carried out in Nicaragua between 1979 and 1989, for which it was condemned by the International Court of Justice on 27 June 1986, deliberately blurring the lines between military/paramilitary activity and political activism, employing a mix of weaponised information (information deliberately altered and aired to inflict damage to societal, political and institutional structures), using professional instigators of insurgency in foreign countries, targeting local minority- language groups abroad for destabilisation, controlling information space and combining cyber warfare with military means;
Amendment 138 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas the intrusions of RussUkrainian jet fighters into the airspace of EU and NATO members states jeopardise the safety of civilian flights, as may have been the case on 17 July 2014 with the possible destruction by the Ukrainian army of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 (Boeing 777- 200ER);
Amendment 142 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas the World Media Freedom Index 2014 ranks the Russian FederationUnited States at 14846th place out of 180; whereas the financing of state-controlled medi, an abrupt fall of 13 places, which, for a State aspiring to the rank of the greatest power in the world and a coutlets has been significantly widened and increasedntry of liberty, is relatively worrying;
Amendment 166 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates that, in the light of Russia’s direct and indirect involveits commitment into the war in Ukraine, amounting to a deliberate violation of the core of the democratic principles and values sustained by the EU and widely shared intfundamental principle of self-determination of peoples, the EU can only note the attachment of Crimea and Sevastopol to the Russian Federnationally, the EU cannot; accordingly, the EU has no alternative but to envisage a return to ‘business as usual’ in its strategic relations with Russia; calls for a critical re-assessment by the EU of its relations with Russia, and for the drafting, as promptly as possible, of a soft-power contingency plan to counter the aggressive and divisive policies conducted by Russia against the EU andneighbourhood policy, particularly the aggressive and bellicose positions that it has adopted towards Russia, which, in a multipolar world, its partnersa major pole of influence;
Amendment 191 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that at this point, Russia, because of its actions, can no longer be treated as, or considered,Russia must remain a ‘strategic partner’ for the EU; points out that strategic partnerships are only conceivable with countriorganisations and/or States that do not jeopardise the international order, which is based on democracy,as NATO is currently doing by seeking to destabilise all opponents of American strategic imperialism; reminds the United States and NATO Member States therefore that they have undertaken to respect state sovereignty (including the choice of internal constitutional order and foreign policy orientation), the inviolability of state borders, respect for the rule of law and the principles of international trade, and mutual trust;
Amendment 219 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Is deeply concerned by the fact that Russia now openly positions itself, and acts, not as a partner of, but as a rival to the international democthe United States and the European Union are now banishing from the international scene anyone who does not approve without debate their political, economic and strategic communityapproaches, seeking to challenge the current international order, and is in the process of redrawing borders within Europewhich is supposedly based on multilateralism, and that they are in the process of redrawing borders within Europe to the detriment of all their statements of principles, as the borders claimed for Ukraine were established in 1954 in violation of the internal legislation of the USSR; is extremely worried by the tendency of the RussiaWestern authorities to systematically denigrate liberal democracy and to consider democratic neighbouring countri(in the United States and the European Union) to systematically denigrate States which do not make the same political choices as a threat to their own ruley advocate;
Amendment 237 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that EU-Russia relations must henceforth be based on the rule of law and on preconditionedrespect for the principle of sovereign equality between States and on dialogue, whereby the EU would be ready to relaunch cooperation with the authorities in Moscow on the condition that Russia unambiguously and without pretence ich complies with the principle of reciprocity, which ought to encourage the EU to relaunch cooperation with the authorities in Moscow, which will agree to engage in dialogue only on the condition that NATO Member Staktes its share of responsibility and fullyand Ukraine implements the Minsk Agreements in good faith; stresses that in order to ensure that such athe dialogue –with Russia ifs renewed (for which the return of Crimea to Ukraine would be a prerequisite) – is not conducted at the expense of European values, standards and intauthorities of the European Union and its Member States would have to note the attachment of Crimea and Sevastopol to the Russian Federnational commitments), it would be necessary to specify very clearly the EU’s expectations of RussiaUkraine, along with the retaliatory measures it would take should RussiaUkraine not keep to its commitments;
Amendment 268 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Commends thNotes that the efforts to achieve solidarity and the unity mademonstrated by the Member States in the context of RussiaUkraine’s undeclared war against Ukraine, allowing the adoption and further extension of responsive measures; calls on thRussia must not lead to a negation of the principle of pluralism, which is fundamental to any organisation which claims to be Mdember States to consider as an absolute priority the preservation of this unity; reiterates that unity and solidarity amongst the Member States, as well as between the EU and the Eastern Partnership countries, is essential for ensuring the effectiveness of the EU’s policies and its ability to withstand external challenges and pressurocratic, and that the Union and its institutions must therefore respect the freedom of opinion and expression of all those who do not share its views on the Ukraine conflict; reiterates that efforts to achieve unity and solidarity amongst the Member States must not be to the detriment of respect for the principle of sovereignty of the Member States with regard to their foreign policies and diplomatic approaches;
Amendment 297 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines, in this regard, that the strengthening of internal policies, notably through closer integrestoration of the sovereignty of States, notably through the priority assigned to intergovernmental cooperation, is the keystone of an efficient and successful EU external policy; calls, therefore, on the Member States to carry on with, and intensify theirEuropean Union to initiate efforts towards, the effective elimination of decision-making bottlenecksany federalist temptation and theo consolidation of common policie the competences of the Member States, with the aim of minimisrestoring the vulnerabilities of these policies and maximising their resilienclegitimacy of the European Communities in so far as possible, in particular in the areas of trade, financial services and transactions, migration, energy, external borders management, information and cyber security;
Amendment 308 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Firmly supports the swift creation of a robust European Energy Union, specifically the interconnection of national energy networks in order to reduce considerably the dependence of individual Member States on external energy suppliers; is of the firm conviction that the challenges to and vulnerability of European solidarity, and the exposure of individual Member States, to the illegitimate use of energy as a political and diplomatic bargain chip can only be combatted efficiently through the full implementation of the Third Energy package and the completion of a transparent, integrated, synchronised and resilient European internal energy marketidea that Member States should remain responsible for the field of energy, each State having its own needs in this regard; is of the firm conviction that the challenges to and vulnerability of European solidarity, its lack of legitimacy and the challenges of energy security which Member States must meet can only be combatted efficiently through respect for that sovereignty;
Amendment 332 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the total irrelevance of the suspension of cooperation with Russia in the defence sector, and calls on the Member States to refrain from taking any decisions that could jeopardise this united posiUnion to respect the sovereignty of the Member States with regard to their foreign policies and diplomatic relations; is therefore of the view that, notwithstandbearing in mingd their undisputable bilateral nature, agreements in the field of defence cooperation between some Member States and Russia should not be assessed carefully at EU levelby the EU, with a view to definensuring an appropriatach which respects the aind consistent approach; calls for the EU’s cooperation with NATO to be consolidated further; ependence of Member States; considers that it is a matter for each Member State to determine its strategic approach to defence, particularly its place inside or outside NATO, which it should do in the light of the specific concerns and the respective interests of each sovereign nation;
Amendment 351 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Is deeply concerned by the ever growing restrictions on free media, the tightening of online media control, the use of coercion to curb impartial reporting and the erosion of journalistic standards in Russiathe Member States of the European Union, as well as the increasing monopoly on the information made available to Russian-language audiences abroad by state-owned media outlets; deplores that Russian state- controlled mediapublic opinion by media outlets controlled by Atlanticist propaganda concerning the Ukraine crisis; deplores that European media controlled by American orthodoxy have become players in the EU information sphere without keeping to the norms of independent journalism, including the rejection of hate speech;
Amendment 373 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Renews its call for the development of EU reconnaissance capabilities of weaponised information and the preparation of information contingency plans, including the strengthening of analytical and monitoring capabilities, especially in the Russian language, in order to be able to identify, and respond swiftly and appropriately to, purposefully biased information; calls on the Commission to earmark without delay adequate funding for concrete projects aimed at countering RussiAmerican propaganda within the EU and abroad; calls on the Commission and the Member States to devise as well a mechanism for the collection, monitoring and reporting of financial, political or technical assistance provided by Russiathe United States to political parties and other organisations within the EU, with a view to assessing its involvement in, and influence over, political life and public debate in the EU;
Amendment 386 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the EU to provide support to grass-roots projects aimed at developing high journalistic standards, freedom of the media, and unbiased and trustworthy information in Russiathe territory of its Member States, and at deconstructing Atlanticist propaganda within the EU and the Eastern Partnership countries; supports the initiative to develop Russian- languageindependent media channels, with a view to providing a credible and accessible alternative to biased information for Russian-speaking minorities in the EUcitizens of the EU Member States and in the Eastern Partnership countries;
Amendment 400 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Reiterates that uncompromising respect for the rule of law is a core and founding principle of the EU, and rejects past attempts to put forward pragmatic interpretations of the rules to accommodate Russiathe United States or Ukraine as a trade partner; calls, therefore, on the strict, swift and unconditional application of the rule of law – in the event of any breach of the rules – and of the principle of free and fair competition, including in the proceedings against Gazpromthe Privat group;
Amendment 420 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Expresses its deep concern for the state of human rights and the rule of law in RussiaUkraine, and strongly condemns the crackdown on independent civil society and the persistent and multiform repression of activists, political opponents and critics of the regime, which has in some cases led to their murder (Anna Politkovskaya, Natalya Estemirova, Boris Nemtsov, Sergey Magnitsky, Alexander Litvinenko, and othersthe demonstrators who responded to the murder of Paulina, a young girl crushed by a Ukrainian armoured vehicle in Konstantynivka on 16 March 2015); demands that all assassinations of political activists, journalists and whistle blowers be investigated properly and independently; reiterates its call on the Council to deliver on its commitment to defend these principles, and to adopt restrictive measures for the officials involved in the well-documented Magnitsky casein response to the opaque financial movements observed around the circle of Prime Minister Arseny Yatseniuk, but also of President Poroshenko, whose commercial organisations are profiting amply from the war as suppliers of the Ukrainian armed forces;
Amendment 446 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the importanceat it is not the role of the European Union to finance Atlanticist propaganda in Russia by means of ‘continued political and financial support’ to independent civil society activists, media and NGOs; encourages the EU to reach out to Russian officials and civil society organisations that are inclined to develop an alternative vision of political and diplomatic relations with the EUensure that civil society organisations within the territory of the Member States are genuinely independent;
Amendment 39 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Targets for the recycling of plastic packaging waste for 202530 have been set taking into account what was technically feasible at the time of the revision of the Directive; the Commission may propose revised levels of the targets for plastics for 2030 based on a review of progress made by Member States towards reaching those targets, taking into account the evolution of the types of plastics placed on the market and the development of new recycling technologies and the demand for recycled plastics.
Amendment 44 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Member States should, for the purposes of calculating whether the preparation for re-use and recycling targets are achieved, be able to take into account products and components that are prepared for re-use by recognised preparation for re- use operators and deposit-refund schemes. To ensure harmonised conditions fFor those calculations, the CommissionMember States will adopt detailed rules on the determination of recognised preparation for re-use operators and deposit-refund schemes and on the collection, verification and reporting of data.
Amendment 51 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Implementation reports prepared by Member States every three years have not proved to be an effective tool for verifying compliance and ensuring good implementation, and are generating unnecessary administrative burden. It is therefore appropriate to repeal provisions obliging Member States to produce such reports and for compliance monitoring purposes use exclusively the statistical data which Member States report every three years to the Commission.
Amendment 55 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) In order to supplement or amend Directive 94/62/EC, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of Articles 6a(2), 6a(5), 11(3), 19(2) and 20. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and the Council.
Amendment 71 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
(2) Article 4(1) is amended as follows: (a) the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: "Member States may, in addition to the measures to prevent the formation of packaging waste taken in accordance with Article 9, implement other preventive measures." (b) in the second subparagraph of Article 4(1), the first sentence is replaced by the following:
Amendment 94 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
Amendment 98 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g
Amendment 117 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i – point -i (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i – point -i (new)
(-i) 55% of plastic;
Amendment 146 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 6a – paragraph 2
Article 6a – paragraph 2
2. In order to ensure harmonised conditions for the application of paragraph 1(b) and (c) and of Annex IV, the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 21aMember States shall establishing minimum quality and operational requirements for the determination of recognised preparation for re-use operators and deposit-refund schemes, including specific rules on data collection, verification and reporting.
Amendment 152 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 6a – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 6a – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the weight of materials or substances that are not subject to a final recycling process and that are disposed or subject to energy recovery remains below 10% of the total weight to be reported as recycledthe maximum threshold of impurities acceptable to operators carrying out a final recycling process, as set out in Annex Va of Directive 2008/98/EC.
Amendment 155 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 6 a – paragraph 5
Article 6 a – paragraph 5
5. For the purposes of calculating whether the targets laid down in Article 6(1)(f) to (i) have been achieved Member States may take into account the recycling of metals that takes place in conjunction with incineration in proportion to the share of the packaging waste incinerated provided that the recycled metals meet certain quality requirements. Member States shall use the common methodology established in accordance with Article 11a(6) of Directive 2008/98/EC.
Amendment 158 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 6 b – title
Article 6 b – title
Amendment 159 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 6 b – paragraph 2 – introductory sentence
Article 6 b – paragraph 2 – introductory sentence
2. The reports referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made publicly available and shall include the following:
Amendment 160 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 6 b – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 6 b – paragraph 2 – point b
Amendment 173 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 12 – paragraph 3a – subparagraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 3a – subparagraph 1
3a. Member States shall report the data concerning the attainment of the targets laid down in Article 6(1)(a) to (i) for eachevery three calendar years to the Commission. They shall report this data electronically within 18 months of the end of the reporting yearthree years period for which the data are collected.
Amendment 174 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 12 – paragraph 3a – subparagraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 3a – subparagraph 2
The data shall be reported in the format established by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 3d. The first reporting shall cover data for the period from 1 January [enter year of entry into force of this Directive + 1 year] to 31 December [enter year of entry into force of this Directive + 13 years].
Amendment 179 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 12 – paragraph 3 c
Article 12 – paragraph 3 c
3c. The Commission shall review the data reported in accordance with this Article and publish a report on the results of its review. The report shall cover an assessment of the organisation of the data collection, the sources of data and the methodology used in Member States as well as the completeness, reliability, timeliness and consistency of that data. The assessment may include specific non- binding recommendations for improvement. The report shall be drawn up every three years.
Amendment 187 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 20
Article 20
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 21a necessary to deal with any difficulties encountered in applying the provisions of this Directive, in particular, to inert packaging materials placed on the market in very small quantities (i.e. approximately 0.1 % by weight) in the Union, primary packaging for medical devices and pharmaceutical products, small packaging and luxury packaging.
Amendment 190 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 21a – paragraph 2
Article 21a – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 6a(2), Article 11(3), Article 19(2) and Article 20 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of timefive years from [enter date of entry into force of this Directive].
Amendment 191 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 21a – paragraph 3
Article 21a – paragraph 3
3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 6a(2), Article 11(3), Article 19(2) and Article 20 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
Amendment 192 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 21a – paragraph 5
Article 21a – paragraph 5
5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 6a(2), Article 11(3), Article 19(2) and Article 20 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
Amendment 194 #
2015/0276(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [insert date eighteenthirty-six months after the entry into force of this Directive] at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
Amendment 85 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) To ensure that recycling targets are based on reliable and comparable data and to enable more effective monitoring of progress in attaining those targets, the definition of municipal waste in Directive 2008/98/EC should be in line with the definition used for statistical purposes by the European Statistical Office and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, on the basis of which Member States have been reporting data for several years. The definition of municipal waste in this Directive is neutral with regard to the public or private status of the operator managing waste.
Amendment 91 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Member States shcould put in place adequate incentives for the application of the waste hierarchy, in particular, by means of financial incentives aimed at achieving the waste prevention and recycling objectives of this Directive, such as landfill and incineration charges, pay as you throw schemes, extended producer responsibility schemes and incentives for local authorities.
Amendment 96 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) In order to provide operators in markets for secondary raw materials with more certainty as to the waste or non-waste status of substances or objects and promote a level playing field, it is important to establish at the Union level harmonized conditions for substances or objects to be recognised as by-products and for waste that has undergone a recovery operation to be recognised as having ceased to be waste. Where necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market or a high level of environmental protection across the Union, the Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts establishing detailed criteria on the application of such harmonized conditions to certain waste, including for a specific use.
Amendment 106 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Waste prevention is the most efficient way to improve resource efficiency and to reduce the environmental impact of waste. It is important therefore that Member States can take appropriate measures to prevent waste generation and monitor and assess progress in the implementation of such measures. In order to ensure a uniform measurement of the overall progress in the implementation of waste prevention measures, common indicators should be established.
Amendment 125 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Large differences exist between Member States with respect to their waste management performance, particularly as regards recycling of municipal waste. In order to take account of those differences, those Member States which in 2013 recycled less than 20% of their municipal waste according to Eurostat data should be given additional time to comply with the preparing for re-use and recycling targets established for 2025 and 2030. In light of average annual progression rates observed in Member States over the past fifteen years, those Member States would need to increase their recycling capacity at levels that are well-above past averages to meet those targets. In order to ensure that steady progress towards the targets is made and that implementation gaps are tackled in due time, Member States that are given additional time should meet interim-targets and establish an implementation plan.
Amendment 128 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Member States should, for the purposes of calculating whether the preparation for re-use and recycling targets are achieved, be able to take into account products and components that are prepared for re-use by recognised re-use operators and by deposit-refund schemes and the recycling of metals that takes place in conjunction with incineration. In order to ensure a uniform calculation of this data, the CommissionMember States will adopt detailed rules on the determination of recognised preparation for re-use operators and deposit-refund schemes, on the quality criteria for recycled metals and on the collection, verification and reporting of data.
Amendment 130 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In order to ensure better, timelier and more uniform and timelier implementation of this Directive and anticipate implementation weaknesses, an early warning system progress estimation report should be established to detect shortcomings and allow taking action ahead of the deadlines for meeting the targets.
Amendment 149 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) To reduce regulatory burdens on small establishments or undertakings, simplification of registration requirements for small establishments or undertakings collecting or transporting small quantities of non-hazardous waste should be introduced. The threshold for quantities of such waste may need to be adapted by the Commission.
Amendment 151 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Implementation reports prepared by Member States every three years have not proved to be an effective tool for verifying compliance and ensuring good implementation, and are generating unnecessary administrative burdens. It is therefore appropriate to repeal provisions obliging Member States to produce such reports. Instead compliance monitoring should be exclusively based on the statistical data which Member States report every three years to the Commission.
Amendment 161 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) In order to supplement or amend Directive 2008/98/EC, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of Articles 5(2), 6(2), 7(1), 11a(2), 11a(6), 26, 27(1), 27(4), 38(111a(3)(b), 38(2) and 38(3). It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and the Council.
Amendment 163 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of Directive 2008/98/EC, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in respect of Articles 9(4), 9(5), 33(2), 35(5) and 37(6). Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council19 . __________________ 19 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28/02/2011, p. 13).
Amendment 171 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 3 – point 1a – subparagraph 1 - introductory wording
Article 3 – point 1a – subparagraph 1 - introductory wording
1a. "municipal waste" means waste from households, as well as other waste which, because of its nature and composition, is similar to waste from household;
Amendment 192 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point f
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point f
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 3 – point 17a
Article 3 – point 17a
17a. "final recycling process" means the recycling process which begins when no further mechanical sorting operation is needed and waste materialsconsidered to have ceased to be waste in accordance with Article 6 enter a production process and are effectively reprocessed into products, materials or substances;
Amendment 212 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
3. Member States shallmay make use of adequate economic instruments to provide incentives for the application of the waste hierarchy.
Amendment 215 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall report to the Commission the specific instruments put in place in accordance with this paragraph by [insert date eighteenthirty-six months after the entry into force of this Directive] and every five years following that date.
Amendment 221 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Amendment 225 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a – point i a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a – point i a (new)
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 - point c
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 - point c
(ia) point (c) is replaced by the following: '(c) the substance or object fulfils the technical requirements for the specific purposefinal recycling process and meets the existing legislation and standards applicable to products; and'
Amendment 226 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a – point ii
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 227 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Amendment 231 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – first sentence
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – first sentence
1. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a toMember States shall establish the list of waste.
Amendment 264 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 8a – paragraph 2
Article 8a – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the waste holders targeted by the extended producer responsibility schemes established in accordance with Article 8, paragraph 1, are informed about the available waste collection systems and the prevention of littering. Member States shallmay also take measures to create incentives for the waste holders to take part in the separate collection systems in place, notably through economic incentives or regulations, when appropriate.
Amendment 275 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 8a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1– point a – introductory wording
Article 8a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1– point a – introductory wording
(a) cover the entirefollowing costs of waste management for the products it puts on the Union market, including all the following:
Amendment 291 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 8a – paragraph 6
Article 8a – paragraph 6
6. Member States shall establish a platform to ensure a regular dialogue between the stakeholders involved in the implementation of extended producer responsibility, including private or public waste operators, local authorities and, where applicable, recognised preparation for re-use operators and packaging sector.'
Amendment 292 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 8a – paragraph 7
Article 8a – paragraph 7
7. Member States shall take measures to ensure that extended producer responsibility schemes that have been established before [insert date eighteenthirty-six months after the entry into force of this Directive], comply with the provisions of this article within twenty-four months of that date.
Amendment 295 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording
1. Member States shallmay take measures to prevent waste generation. These measures shallmay:
Amendment 337 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 4
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission may adopt implementing acts toMember States shall establish indicators to measure the overall progress in the implementation of waste prevention measures. In order to ensure uniform measurement of the levels of food waste, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act toMember States shall establish a common methodology, including minimum quality requirements. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 39(2).
Amendment 356 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall take measures to promote high quality recycling and, to this end, shall set up separate collection of waste where technically, environmentally and economically practicable and appropriate to meet the necessary quality standards for the relevant final recycling sectorprocesses and to attain the targets set out in paragraph 2.
Amendment 368 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b a (new)
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory wording
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory wording
Amendment 369 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point d
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c
Amendment 389 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Estonia, Greece, Croatia, Latvia, Malta, Romania and Slovakia may obtain five additional years for the attainment of the targets referred to in paragraph 2(c) and (d). The Member State shall notify the Commission of its intention to make use of this provision at the latest 24 months before the respective deadlines laid down in paragraphs 2(c) and (d). In the event of an extension, the Member State shall take the necessary measures to increase the preparing for re-use and the recycling of municipal waste to a minimum of 50% and 60% by weight, by 2025 and 2030 respectively30.
Amendment 399 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11a – paragraph 2
Article 11a – paragraph 2
2. In order to ensure harmonised conditions for the application of paragraph 1(b) and (c) and of Annex VI, the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 38aMember States shall establishing minimum quality and operational requirements for the determination of recognised preparation for re-use operators and deposit-refund schemes, including specific rules on data collection, verification and reporting.
Amendment 404 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11a – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 11a – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the weight of materials or substances that are not subject to a final recycling process and that are disposed or subject to energy recovery remains below 10% of the total weight to be reported as recycledthe maximum threshold of impurities acceptable to operators carrying out a final recycling process, as set out in Annex Va. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a to establish the thresholds of impurities per waste stream.
Amendment 412 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11a – paragraph 6
Article 11a – paragraph 6
6. In order to ensure harmonised conditions for the application of paragraph 5, the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a establishing a commonFor the application of paragraph 5, Member States shall establish a methodology for the calculation of the weight of metals that have been recycled in conjunction with incineration, including, the quality criteria for the recycled metals.
Amendment 416 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11b – Title
Article 11b – Title
Amendment 418 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11b – paragraph 2 – introductory wording
Article 11b – paragraph 2 – introductory wording
2. The reports referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made publicly available and shall include the following:
Amendment 420 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 11b – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 11b – paragraph 2 – point b
Amendment 448 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 26 –paragraph 2
Article 26 –paragraph 2
Amendment 451 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 27 – paragraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a settingMember States shall set out technical minimum standards for treatment activities which require a permit pursuant to Article 23 where there is evidence that a benefit in terms of the protection of human health and the environment would be gained from such minimum standards.
Amendment 453 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point b
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 27 – paragraph 4
Article 27 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a settingMember States shall set out the minimum standards for activities that require registration pursuant to points (a) and (b) of Article 26 where there is evidence that a benefit in terms of the protection of human health and the environment or in avoiding disruption to the internal market would be gained from such minimum standards.
Amendment 459 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point a
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Member States shallmay establish waste prevention programmes setting out waste prevention measures in accordance with Articles 1, 4 and 9.
Amendment 464 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 37 – paragraph 1
Article 37 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall report the data concerning the implementation of Article 9(4), Article 11(2)(a) to (d) and Article 11(3) for eachevery three calendar years to the Commission. They shall report this data electronically within 18 months of the end of the reporting yearthree year period for which the data are collected. The data shall be reported in the format established by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 6. The first reporting shall cover the data for the period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 20202.
Amendment 465 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 37 – paragraph 2
Article 37 – paragraph 2
Amendment 470 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 37 – paragraph 5
Article 37 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall review the data reported in accordance with this Article and publish a report on the results of its review. The report shall assess the organisation of the data collection, the sources of data and the methodology used in Member States as well as the completeness, reliability, timeliness and consistency of that data. The assessment may include specific non-binding recommendations for improvement. The report shall be drawn up every three years.
Amendment 474 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 38 – paragraph 1
Article 38 – paragraph 1
Amendment 475 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 477 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a to specify the application of the formula for incineration facilities referred to in point R1 of Annex II. Local climatic conditions mayshall be taken into account, such as the severity of the cold and the need for heating insofar as they influence the amounts of energy that can technically be used or produced in the form of electricity, heating, cooling or processing steam. Local conditions of the outermost regions as recognised in the third subparagraph of Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and of the territories mentioned in Article 25 of the 1985 Act of Accession mayshall also be taken into account.
Amendment 479 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 38 – paragraph 2
Article 38 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 38a to amend Annexes I to Va in the light of scientific and technical progress.
Amendment 483 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 38a – paragraph 2
Article 38a – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt the delegated acts referred to in Articles 5(2), 6(2), 7(1), 11a(2), 11a(6), 26, 27(1), 27(4), 38(111a(3)(b), 38(2) and 38(3) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of timefive years from [enter date of entry into force of this Directive].
Amendment 484 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 38a – paragraph 3
Article 38a – paragraph 3
3. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 5(2), 6(2), 7(1), 11a(2), 11a(6), 26, 27(1), 27(4), 38(111a(3)(b), 38(2) and 38(3) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
Amendment 485 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23
Directive 2008/98/EC
Article 38a – paragraph 5
Article 38a – paragraph 5
5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 5(2), 6(2), 7(1), 11a(2), 11a(6), 26, 27(1), 27(4), 38(111a(3)(b), 38(2) and 38(3) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
Amendment 487 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
(25) Annexes Va and VI isare added in accordance with the Annex to this Directive.
Amendment 489 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [insert date eighteenthirty-six months after the entry into force of this Directive] at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
Amendment 490 #
2015/0275(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex -I (new)
Annex -I (new)
Directive 2008/98/EC
Annex Va (new)
Annex Va (new)
The following Annex is added: “ANNEX Va Thresholds of impurities per waste stream for the purpose of Article 11a(3)(b) [...]”
Amendment 19 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
Recital 3
Amendment 45 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In order to ensure better, timelier, and more uniform and timelier implementation of this Directive and anticipate implementation weaknesses, an early warning system progress estimation report should be established to detect shortcomings and allow taking action ahead of the deadlines for meeting the targets.
Amendment 46 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Implementation reports prepared by Member States every three years have not proved to be an effective tool for verifying compliance and ensuring correct implementation, and are generating unnecessary administrative burden. It is therefore appropriate to repeal provisions obliging Member States to produce such reports and for compliance monitoring purposes use exclusively the statistical data which Member States report every three years to the Commission.
Amendment 79 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 5a – title
Article 5a – title
Amendment 80 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 5a – paragraph 2 – introductory sentence
Article 5a – paragraph 2 – introductory sentence
2. The reports referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made publicly available and shall include the following:
Amendment 81 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 5a – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 5a – paragraph 2 – point b
Amendment 89 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall report the data concerning the implementation of Article 5(2) and (5) for eachevery three calendar years to the Commission. They shall report this data electronically within 18 months of the end of the reporting yearthree years period for which the data are collected. The data shall be reported in the format established by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 5. The first reporting shall cover the data for the period from 1 January [enter year of transposition of this Directive + 1 year] to 31 December [enter year of transposition of this Directive + 13 years].
Amendment 94 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 15 – paragraph 4
Article 15 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall review the data reported in accordance with this Article and publish a report on the results of its review. The report shall cover an assessment of the organisation of the data collection, the sources of data and the methodology used in Member States as well as the completeness, reliability, timeliness and consistency of that data. The assessment may include specific non- binding recommendations for improvement. The report shall be drawn up every three years.
Amendment 103 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 1999/31/EC
Article 17a – paragraph 2
Article 17a – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt the delegated acts referred to in Article 16 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of timefive years from [enter date of entry into force of this Directive].
Amendment 108 #
2015/0274(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [insert date eighteenthirty-six months after the entry into force of this Directive] at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
Amendment 26 #
2015/0272(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Implementation reports prepared by Member States every three years have not proved to be an effective tool for verifying compliance and ensuring correct implementation, and are generating unnecessary administrative burden. It is therefore appropriate to repeal provisions obliging Member States to produce such reports and for compliance monitoring purposes use exclusively the statistical data which Member States report every three years to the Commission.
Amendment 43 #
2015/0272(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2000/53/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 1a
Article 9 – paragraph 1a
1a. Member States shall report the data concerning the implementation of Article 7(2) for eachevery three calendar years to the Commission. They shall report this data electronically within 18 months of the end of the reporting yearthree years period for which the data are collected. The data shall be reported in the format established by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 1d. The first report shall cover the data for the period from 1 January [enter year of transposition of this Directive + 1 year] to 31 December [enter year of transposition of this Directive + 13 years].
Amendment 46 #
2015/0272(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2000/53/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 1c
Article 9 – paragraph 1c
1c. The Commission shall review the data reported in accordance with this Article and publish a report on the results of its review. The report shall assess of the organisation of the data collection, the sources of data and the methodology used in Member States as well as the completeness, reliability, timeliness and consistency of that data. The assessment may include specific non-binding recommendations for improvement. The report shall be drawn up every three years.
Amendment 58 #
2015/0272(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 2000/66/EC
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall draw up a report on the implementation of this Directive and its impact on the environment and the functioning of the internal market by the end of 2016[enter year of entry into force + 1 year] at the latest.
Amendment 74 #
2015/0272(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2012/19/EU
Article 16 – paragraph 5a
Article 16 – paragraph 5a
5a. Member States shall report the data concerning the implementation of Article 16(4) for eachevery three calendar years to the Commission. They shall report this data electronically within 18 months of the end of the reporting yearthree years period for which the data are collected. The data shall be reported in the format established by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 5d. The first report shall cover the data for the period from 1 January [enter year of transposition of this Directive + 1 year] to 31 December [enter year of transposition of this Directive + 13 years].
Amendment 77 #
2015/0272(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2012/19/EU
Article 16 – paragraph 5c
Article 16 – paragraph 5c
5c. The Commission shall review the data reported in accordance with this Article and publish a report on the results of its review. The report shall cover an assessment of the organisation of the data collection, the sources of data and the methodology used in Member States as well as the completeness, reliability, timeliness and consistency of that data. The assessment may include specific non- binding recommendations for improvement. The report shall be drawn up every three years.
Amendment 80 #
2015/0272(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [insert date eighteenthirty-six months after the entry into force of this Directive] at the latest. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
Amendment 321 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The Investment Committee shall be composed of six independent experts and the Managing Director. Independent experts shall have a high level of relevant market experience in project finance and be appointed by the Steering Board for a renewable fixed term of three years. Of these experts, three must have significant experience in a national development bank.
Amendment 475 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall develop, update and disseminate, on a regular and structured basis, information on current and future investment projects in their territory. To achieve this, Member States are invited to set up national strategic investment agencies with responsibility for detecting, planning and prioritising long- term investments by mobilising public and private partnerships to support sustainable development.
Amendment 9 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the fact that the economic crisis has seriously damaged economic, social and territorial cohesion, resulting in huge differences between Member States; recalls that since the onset of the crisis over 3.8 million jobs have been lost in manufacturing in the EU1; considers, however, that the current crisis is systemic and that there is an urgent need for the EU to abandon the ultraliberal ‘model’; __________________ 1 Industrial Scoreboard 2013, Commission Staff Working Document, p.6.
Amendment 10 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the fact that the economic crisis has seriously damaged economic, social and territorial cohesion, resulting in huge differences between Member States; recalls that since the onset of the crisis over 3.8 million jobs have been lost in manufacturing in the EU1 and that most of them have been lost because of unfair competition without protection at our borders; __________________ 1 Industrial Scoreboard 2013, Commission Staff Working Document, p.6.
Amendment 18 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines the fact that the industrial sector constitutes one of the cornerstones of economic and social cohesion in Europe since nearly 80 % of European exports depend on the industrial sector and industry accounts for 80 % of expenditure on R&D in Europe2; observes, however, that the EU exposes our industries to fierce competition by obstinately rejecting any economic protectionism and imposing severe constraints, to which competition is not subject; __________________ 2 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2014)0014, For a European Industrial Renaissance, p.3.
Amendment 31 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that austerity measures in several European countries, which are the consequence of the mistaken policies of the Troika, are having a negative impact on industrial structures, resulting in a fall- off in investment and more difficult access to credit for manufacturers;
Amendment 45 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that all the new projects and investments promoted by EU funds should have an local employment clause that includes the obligation to create new and non- precarious jobs, to which employees should be recruited locally;
Amendment 47 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that all the new projects and investments promoted by EU funds should have an employment clause that includes the obligation to create new and non- precarious jobs; considers that, to this end, investment should, as a priority, be channelled into profitable and productive projects;
Amendment 58 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 68 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for more social and public investments by States, without which it will be impossible to reach the target of raising industry’s contribution to GDP to as much as 20 % by 2020; recalls that all investments and projects should enhance environmental protection.
Amendment 72 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for more social and public investments, particularly in the field of R&D, without which it will be impossible to reach the target of raising industry’s contribution to GDP to as much as 20 % by 2020; recalls that all investments and projects should enhance environmental protection and promote sustainable development.
Amendment 74 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 83 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for an inclusive industrial strategy , based on States, that will tackle unemployment and secure more growth, more jobs with enhanced workers’ rights, and access to public health and education as one of the means of achieving the economic, social and territorial cohesion that is needed in the EU; considers that the ultimate goal should be sustainable development and a high quality of life, together with prosperity and decent work for everyone.
Amendment 85 #
2014/2245(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for an inclusive industrial strategy, based on viable, long-term projects, that will tackle unemployment and secure more growth, more jobs with enhanced workers’ rights, and access to public health and education as one of the means of achieving the economic, social and territorial cohesion that is needed in the EU; considers that the ultimate goal should be sustainable development and a high quality of life, together with prosperity and decent work for everyone.
Amendment 85 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for clear-cut objectives and time- frames to be laid down with a view to making data – whether relating to the sea- floor or to the water column and living resources – more accessible and more fully interoperable and for information about seas and oceans to be supplied to the public, whilst safeguarding the confidentiality of any data that are of strategic importance to Member States (relating to defence, security, the economy);
Amendment 107 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Points out that the Member States have a key role to play in developing the blue economy and urges the Commission to support and encourage all forms of cooperation between Member States and with non-EU countries (Union for the Mediterranean, Organisation of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation), for example joint programming initiatives;
Amendment 122 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Considers the shortage of qualified professionals in various fields of study and activity – including, though not confined to, researchers, engineers, and technicians, to be a huge hurdle that could prevent the blue economy from fully realising its potential; maintains that this shortcoming is closely bound up with the growing disengagement and disinvestment by Member States in the spheres of science and education and with the decline in the professional status and social standing of several of the professions concerned, and therefore calls for these two trends to be reversed without delay; believes that working with the private sector in drawing up plans for training engineers and technicians could go a long way towards achieving this objective;
Amendment 146 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Urges the Commission to support the efforts of Member States to promote specialisation strategies with a view to creating and exploiting value chains linked to the many and varied blue economy activities; considers that the development of clusters or ‘hyperclusters’ implies that Member States must play an active role in fostering synergies within and between sectors;
Amendment 147 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Urges the Commission to support the efforts of Member States to promote specialisation strategies with a view to creating and exploiting value chains linked to the many and varied blue economy activities; considers that the development of clusters or ‘hyperclusters’ implies that Member States must play an active role in fostering synergies between sectorsbringing together economic and social players to form synergies between sectors, as part of an overall strategic vision;
Amendment 171 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls for more active support for modernisation and sustainable development of the fisheries sector, laying emphasis on small-scale fisheries and seeking to make fishing gear more selective and reduce the environmental impact of fishing, in addition to providing more effective ways to combat illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing; maintains that scientific fisheries-related data forming a basis for political decision- taking should be made public in their entirety;
Amendment 181 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Believes that, for reasons to do with energy consumption, merchant shipping, compared with other ways of carrying goods, is increasingly assuming decisive importance; calls for resources to be channelled in order to support innovation in this sector with a view to improving energy efficiency, diversifying primary energy sources, and reducing noxious emissions; requests that a tax on CO2 emissions be levied, at the borders of the Union, on international freight carriers, so as to once again include, in the price of imported goods, the costs of the negative effects caused by these activities;
Amendment 187 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Points to the strategic importance of shipbuilding and ship-repairing and their links to other sectors – including the steel industry, merchant shipping, fisheries, and cruise tourism; considers that a commitment to technological innovation and a high degree of specialisation, which could lead to gains in added value, could create contexts less exposed to international competition and might help toby aspiring towards a reverse in the downturn that the sector has been undergoing; maintains that specific support should be provided to revitalise and modernise the European shipbuilding and special steels industries industry in its different forms;
Amendment 188 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Points to the strategic importance of shipbuilding and ship-repairing and their links to other sectors – including merchant shipping, fisheries, and cruise tourism; considers that a commitment to technological innovation and a high degree of specialisation, which could lead to gains in added value, could create contexts less exposed to international competition and might help to reverse the downturn that the sector has been undergoing; maintains that specific support should be provided to revitalise and modernise the European shipbuilding industry in its different forms, including tariff and non-tariff protectionist measures;
Amendment 217 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Considers marine- and ocean-related biotechnology to be a highly diversified sector which, taken as a whole, has immense potential from the point of view of engendering and applying new knowledge and creating new products and processes with high added value (new materials, foods, pharmaceutical ingredients, etc.); draws attention to the education and training requirements related to this sector, implying a need for Member States to shoulder a large measure of responsibility together with the private sector, and for international cooperation to be pursued on a similarly comprehensive scale;
Amendment 5 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Believes thatAcknowledges that, in a world which has now become multilateral, the United States is one of the EU’s key strategic partnpartners among others; stresses that the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is the most significant recent EU-US project and will reinvigorate the transatlantic partnership as a whole, beyond its trade aspects; emphasises that its successful conclusion is of high geopolitical importance at a moment when the US is pivoting to Asia and concluding the Trans-Pacific Partnershipconstitutes a danger to European businesses which, in the event of the project’s coming to fruition, would face unfair competition because of the lack of protectionism for our industries, whereas the United States pursues such a policy; emphasises that its successful conclusion would be a serious geopolitical threat to the independence of the Member States at a moment when the US is already seeking to restrict our sovereignty through NATO; underlines that the TTIP willould have a posinegative impact on jobs and growth for the two economies of the EU Member States, which have both been hit by the crisis due to the treatment of international finance by the United States;
Amendment 16 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to maintain the objective of including a specific energy chapter halt the TTIP negotiations immediately, as their only outcome will be to make Europe an economic, financial and political vassal of the USA; concluding the TTIP which could signifis agreement would mean an irreversible loss of economic antly increase the EU’s energy securityd political sovereignty for the states of Europe;
Amendment 20 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to maintain the objective of including a specific energy chapter in the TTIP which could significantly increase the EU’s energy securitydrop the disastrous TTIP project, which the peoples of Europe do not want because they sense that it could threaten their vital interests;
Amendment 29 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes the TTIP’s strategic importance in strengthening and shaping global trade and economic governance based on the values shared by the EU and the US, particularly in an increasingly multipolar worlderror, as TTIP would merely strengthen the principle of global economic governance, which stands for a desire to destroy national sovereignty, first in the economic sphere, which will result in the triumph of an unbridled liberalism which would be contrary to the survival and the interests of peoples; notes that its impactthis wourld go beyond the bilateral implications by facilitatingvernance project is clearly evident in the desire to promote the establishment of common regulations and rules that could later be adopted at global level, to the detriment of all historical, political and geopolitical realism and of democracy;
Amendment 39 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Requests that the Commission ensure a policy of frNotes that in all previous examples of agreements between the USA and the European Union, from the SWIFT agreement to the PNR agreement, the end result has been an imbalanced text giving extraterritorial application to US law; the cases that have been trade with respect to fuels, including LNG and crude oilaken against European companies such as BNP Paribas and Alstom have illustrated the US conception of the rule of law and of relations with Europe – namely that US law should apply unilaterally and extraterritorially with no scope for negotiation except about how to bow to the interests of the USA and its multinationals;
Amendment 50 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights that the conclusion of the TTIP creates the prospect of a broadglobal economic space, which would include third countries with which the EU and the US have close trade and economic relationill also subject EU Member States to unfair competition from third countries; observes that this is the case because the EU and the US have close trade and economic relations with these countries, which are subject to far more flexible rules and standards, whether on health, safety or social aspects;
Amendment 51 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Requests that the Commission ensureshould not adopt a policy of free trade with respect to fuels, including LNG and crude oil;
Amendment 62 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 66 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the EU’s energy supply largely depends on foreign sources; emphasises the considerable contribution Member States’ energy supply ought to depend on strategic choices and bilateral agreements made by each nation state in the light of its own interests; emphasises the fact that the TTIP could damakge to the EU’s energy supply diversification and to its energy security by, inter alia, lifting licensing requirements for US gas exportshe energy security of the Member States while, incidentally, compelling European undertakings to assume a risk by, inter alia, lifting licensing requirements for US gas exports, whereas for example certain European undertakings refuse to exploit shale gas or certain Member States reject this practice;
Amendment 72 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to work on transatlantic harmonisation ofmaintain national and, under the principle of subsidiarity, European standards and regulations that define the principles of public support for different energy sources; calls on the Commission not to give way to US demands;
Amendment 79 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that, in reality, this agreement shouldhas the aim of completing a further stage in the process of subjection of the peoples of Europe to the United States of America; sees evidence of this in the Commission’s desire for TTIP to be accompanied by a deepeningn intensification of transatlantic parliamentary cooperation, and that the strengthening of trade and investment links through the TTIP should lead in the future to an enhanced political framework to improve global cooperation between the EU and the USwhich in reality is intended to result in the establishment of a globalised world government under the control of the United States, the European and Eurasian project being abandoned as part of a confrontation between blocs;
Amendment 85 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 96 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the fact that the Commission is taking steps aiming to improve the transparency of theExpresses its scepticism about the new desire displayed by the Commission to take steps aiming to improve the transparency of the negotiations; points out that, at the same time, citizens, who are supposedly living in a democratic system – that is, a system where they have access to the information required as a basis for taking decisions – do not in this case have access to the documents concerning the negotiations; notes that, furthermore, peoples’ elected representatives are subject to a very strict and rigid procedure for consulting them; recalls, therefore, the antidemocratic character of an agreement negotiated by oligarchs without any public consultation procedure, despite the fact that the peoples of Europe will the first to suffer the damaging consequences of the agreement; calls on the Commission to completely and definitively halt the TTIP negotiations.
Amendment 97 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Points to the huge differentials between the USA and the EU in energy prices but also in per capita CO2 emissions; calls on the Commission, therefore, to provide energy-intensive sectors in the EU, including the chemicals industry, with appropriate measures maintaining current tariff rates over the longest possible period after the entry into force of the TTIP; if the TTIP comes into force; points out that the USA, concerned primarily with the relentless pursuit of its own interests, has refused to ratify the Kyoto Protocol;
Amendment 118 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 138 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 140 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Requests that the Commission facilitate more active participation of EU Member State firms in US public procurement as this can contribute to stimulating private- sector innovation and to the emergence of new, high-growth innovative companies and sectors; points out that the United States is determined to protect its public procurement markets, of which only 30% are currently open to foreign companies (on account of the 1933 Buy American Act), compared with 95% of European public procurement markets;
Amendment 160 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 170 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Reminds the Commission, while welcomingremaining doubtful about the potential benefits of regulatory alignment and mutual recognition, including the establishment of common principles in standards and technical specifications in the area of ICT, about the importance of maintaining high levels of safety and security, for both producers and consumers;
Amendment 185 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 186 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Reminds the Commission, regarding ICT services, that it is of particular importance that the TTIP ensure a level playing field with equal access for EU service companies to the US market and with an obligation on US service providers to respect the rules applicable to EU companies when providing services in Europe or to European customers.; points out that the United States is determined to protect its public procurement markets, of which only 30% are currently open to foreign companies (on account of the 1933 Buy American Act), compared with 95% of European public procurement markets; doubts whether the United States is prepared to comply with the rules applicable to EU companies when providing services in Europe or to European customers;
Amendment 187 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Reminds the Commission, regarding ICT services, that it is of particular importance that the TTIP ensure a level playing field with equal access for EU service companies to the US market and with an obligation on US service providers to respect the rules applicable to EU companies when providing services in Europe or to European customers.; points out that the United States is determined to protect its public procurement markets, of which only 30% are currently open to foreign companies (on account of the 1933 Buy American Act), compared with 95% of European public procurement markets; doubts whether the United States is prepared to comply with the rules applicable to EU companies when providing services in Europe or to European customers;
Amendment 205 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 – point a (new)
Paragraph 8 – point a (new)
(a) urges the Commission, even though it has not been elected, to listen to the people it claims to serve, rather than the multinationals to whose demands it continues to bow;
Amendment 24 #
2014/2223(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the prioritisation of the three pillars of sustainability (economic, social and environmental) as a strong basis from which to support resource efficiency, increase competitiveness, boost employment and strengthen forestry’s role in the green economy; calls for due account also to be taken of the aesthetic, symbolic and heritage-related aspects of Europe’s forests;
Amendment 62 #
2014/2223(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for due account also to be taken of the aesthetic, symbolic and heritage- related aspects of Europe’s forests.
Amendment 3 #
2014/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
– having regard to the judgment of 2 February 2012 of the Court of Justice of the European Union, which compelled the Union to revoke the only protectionist measures it has ever adopted, namely the antidumping duties on shoes originating in China and Vietnam, whose adoption had been approved by Parliament in 2006,
Amendment 37 #
2014/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas the dogma of free movement of goods and capital condemns most family businesses in the European Union, in the short or medium term, to disappear in the face of competition from businesses outside the European Union which are not subject to the same rules – social, on safety or health, and environmental;
Amendment 40 #
2014/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H b (new)
Recital H b (new)
Hb. whereas the adoption of protectionist measures at European Union level is a necessary condition for the survival of most family businesses;
Amendment 42 #
2014/2210(INI)
Hc. whereas the euro, a ‘one-size fits all’ currency, is a significant brake on the growth of SMEs, particularly those which are family businesses;
Amendment 45 #
2014/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that family businesses demonstrate a high degree of social responsibility towards their staff and that they generally take a more sustainable and longer-term approach to the economic future of the business (by acting as ‘honourable businessmen’) than non- family businesses and thus make an important contribution to Europe’sthe competitiveness of the Member States of the European Union and create and maintain jobs;
Amendment 103 #
2014/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that 35% of those companies that do not invest in foreign markets fail to do so because of their lack of knowledge of foreign markets; calls on the Commission and the Member States therefore to provide smaller family businesses in particular with information about opportunities for internationalisation and ensure that they have access to a better exchange of experience and good practices; calls on the Member States, furthermore, to provide support services for businesses that intend to invest internationally, for example by providing them with information or export credit guarantees and by removing trade barriers;
Amendment 134 #
2014/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission and Parliament to revoke the deletion by the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997 of Article 44(2) of the Treaty of Rome, which provided for ‘the development of a natural preference between Member States’; calls therefore on the European Union to re- establish Community preference in the field of farm products and to adopt the requisite protectionist measures to enable SMEs which are family businesses to compete with businesses outside the European Union;
Amendment 143 #
2014/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Stresses that the euro, a ‘one-size fits all’ currency, is a significant brake on the growth of SMEs, particularly those which are family businesses;
Amendment 190 #
2014/2210(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to strive to strengthen entrepreneurship throughout the EU and to create an environment for business excellencereview its strategy and finally to adopt the requisite protectionist measures to enable SMEs which are family businesses to compete with businesses outside the European Union;
Amendment 78 #
2014/2208(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the importance of creating industrial synergies for recycling and of helping companies to discover how their energy, waste and by-products can serve as resources for others; points to the urgent need to ban the export of recyclable metal waste, including aluminium waste; calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote approaches such as those taken in the UK as part of the National Industrial Symbiosis Programme;
Amendment 88 #
2014/2208(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the role of environmental tax reform (switching taxation away from labour and towards pollution and resources) in providing the right signals for investment in resource efficiency, and calls for progress in this area to be pursued by the Member States as part of the European Semester process; calls, by way of European environmental protectionism, for imports to be made subject to a tax calculated according to the negative environmental externalities, not least the carbon footprint, and for the resulting revenue to be earmarked to finance recycling policies and to offset the cost differential created by the environmental regulations applying to European industries;
Amendment 29 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the EU’s prosperity and security require a rational use of energy and a stable, suitable, affordable and sustainable energy supply;
Amendment 54 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas from the experience of 2006 and 2009, when Russia was obliged to cut off gas supply to Ukraine, it is clear that the disruptions experienced in some of the central and eastern European Member States evidenced the risks existing to security ofafter gas had been diverted in that country, it is clear that an energy security policy involving in particular the countries of central and eastern Europe is needed in order to guarantee energy supply;
Amendment 55 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas from the experience of 2006 and 2009, when Russia cut off gas supply to Ukraine, it is clear that the disruptions experienced in some of the central and eastern European Member States evidenced the risks existing to security of energy supply through Ukraine;
Amendment 146 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that equal energy security, competitiveness and sustainability in a fully integrated energy market constitute the main pillars for the creation of an Energy Union, which can be achieved by pooling resources, connecting networks, ensuring unified energy market regulation and establishing uni, under the subsidiarity principle, it is for Member States to define their energy security standards, take account of the special features of the energy sector in their economies and develop energy diplomacy in line with their needs, these issues underpinning European cooperation arrangements in the energy field negotiating positions vis-à-vis third countriwhich respect and accommodate each country's rules;
Amendment 191 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises that the Energy Union, in addition to ensuring security of supply, should adopt a comprehensive approach focusing on key pillars such as achievement of a fully integrated internal energy market, moderation of energy demand, decarbonisdiversification of the energy mix, and research and innovation;
Amendment 209 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 – paragraph -a (new)
Paragraph 7 – paragraph -a (new)
Maintains that the primary aim of efforts to establish a European Energy Union should be to secure the greatest possible savings on energy supplies for individuals, families and businesses; takes the view that efficient, stable and unbroken energy supplies should be secured primarily by applying the principles of competitiveness and value for money to supplies and infrastructure;
Amendment 264 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Acknowledges that the role of local authorities of European cithave a role to play, within their countries, in increasing energy efficiency through cogeneration, modernisation of district heating systems, increasing the use of cleaner public transport, encouraging more active travel models and renovation of buildings is also undoubtedly an important contribution to energy independence, while noting that, given the current policy of austerity, that role is difficult to play;
Amendment 375 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Emphasises that it is essential to increase the participation of European industry and technologythe Member States’ industry and research sector in the entire energy production chain, which includes not only raw materials but also generation, transportation and distribution, since these are crucial elements for decreasing the EU’s dependence on energy importsenergy dependence, aware that these programmes require the Member States and undertakings to formulate cooperation strategies, and urges the EU institutions to assess their state aid and competition legislation so as not to hamper industrial policy in this area;
Amendment 568 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Calls for the development of well- integrated and competitive regional electricity and gas markets – including, where necessary, capacity markets – covering all parts of the Ungreater prudence in wishing to impose a pure market commercial logic on sectors that are governed by a long- term nation;al demands that the Commission act decisively against all instances of anti-competitive behaviour and barriers to market entry and exitvelopment strategy that is not subject to a short-term yield logic with negative externalities;
Amendment 673 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
Paragraph 37
37. Emphasises that energy must be made affordable to all citizens of the EU; considers that avoiding unnecessary consumption, efficiency improvements and sustainable energy investment, particularly in buildings, would enable many households to escape energy poverty Member States; to this end calls for an assessment of the impact of EU energy policy, which has weakened energy security through free competition and has created an energy gap for example by totally or partially dismantling the price framework mechanism through deregulation;
Amendment 690 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
Paragraph 38
38. StresseConsiders that dependence on one single supplier of energy resources, with is the resulting lack of competition of geographical constraints, can impede economic growth and endanger security at national and EU level, and that, therefore, all projects for diversifying energy suppliers must be implemented consistentlyd that the wish to diversify sources must take account of those constraints, taking the Member States’ and the EU’s interests into account, without subjection to power games outside Europe;
Amendment 710 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 a (new)
Paragraph 39 a (new)
39a. Stresses that energy diversification should not be an end to itself but should seek to ensure, first and foremost, the reliability of sources and the value for money and continuity of supplies;
Amendment 714 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Expresses the opinion that Russia can no longer be considered a reliable partner as it explicitly questions EU law, including at the World Trade Organisation, and uses energy supply for political purposes; stresses, therefore, that more attention should be concentrated on the development and furTakes the view that relations with Russia should be improved and that the EU should work more closely with that country on energy issues; believes that Russia is currently the EU’s most suitable global partner for gas supplies and the one that can be most relied on to provide ther expansion of the gas supply infrastructure with Norway, the Southern Gas Corridor and the Mediterranean gas hubnergy supply volumes and continuity that the EU requires;
Amendment 716 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Expresses the opinion that Russia can no longer be considePoints out that the Member States must of course give mored a reliable pattention to furtnher as it explicitly questions EU law, including at the World Trade Organisation, and uses energy supply for political purposes; stresses, therefore, that more attention should be concentrated on the development and further expansion of the gas supply infrastructure with Norway, the Southern Gas Corridor and the Mediterranean gas hubexpansion of the gas supply infrastructure from Norway, the Southern Gas Corridor and the Mediterranean gas hub, but they must take account of the limited reserves in these areas and the fact that the instability in the south could undermine these states’ reliability as suppliers or alternative supply routes; calls for the privileged relationship with Russia as a reliable, stable supplier to be maintained;
Amendment 718 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Expresses the opinion that Russia can no longer be considered ais currently the EU’s most reliable global partner as it explicitly questions EU law, including at the World Trade Organisation, and uses energy supply for political purposes; stresses, therefore,in terms of availability and continuity of supply and also thate more attention should be concentrated on the development and further expansion of the gas supply infrastructure with Norway, the Southern Gas Corridor and the Mediterranean gas hubst economically advantageous in terms of price; points out that no other supplier can provide the same volume of gas at a lower price;
Amendment 736 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 a (new)
Paragraph 40 a (new)
40a. Calls on the Ukrainian Government to make concerted efforts to put a stop to unlawful siphoning off of Russian gas deliveries to the EU on its territory; calls on the Ukrainian authorities to abide by the financial commitments entered into with Russian suppliers and to pay off their country’s debts without outside help; stresses that this unlawful behaviour and Ukraine’s failure to abide by the supply agreements concluded with its Russian suppliers have caused serious harm to the EU;
Amendment 764 #
Amendment 765 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
Paragraph 43
43. Affirms the overarchmaing principles of solidarity between all Member States; stresses that energy security of supply is a matter of collective action and concerns all Member States, despite differing scales of vulnerability to supply shocks; s in the context of a just conflict but also that states have the right not to be drawn into conflicts associated with the irresponsible policies of EU countriesses; thatus no Member State shall by its action or inaction jeopardise theould engage in actions that undermine the energy security of another EU Member State or of the EU as a wholes and thus the EU;
Amendment 788 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
Paragraph 46
46. Invites the CommissionMember States to analyse the potential structure of a collective purchasing mechanism and its impact on the functioning of the internal gas market and contribution to ensuring security of gas supply; notes that since there are several models of collective purchasing mechanisms, further work needs to be done to determine the bestmost suitable market- based models applicable for EU regions and the suppliers concerned;
Amendment 795 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
Paragraph 47
47. Takes the view that the main condition for the creation of the future European Energy Union is the completion of an integrated EU internal energy market, which requires full implementation of the Third Energy Package and the existence of a strongn external dimension for an EU energy policy that is based on close coordination of positions and speaking with one voicein relations with third countries;
Amendment 803 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
Paragraph 48
48. Highlights the need to enhance the EU’sMember States’ ability to speak with one voice in order to deliver a more coherent energy diplomacy in partner countries and in multilateral fora; notes in this regard that the mandatory participation of the Commission as an observer in negotiations for intergovernmental agreements, as well as both ex ante and ex post evaluation of the negotiated agreements, should be required in order to minimise the possibility of non- conformity with EU lawindependently about energy, without Atlantic considerations;
Amendment 805 #
2014/2153(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
Paragraph 48
48. Highlights the need to enhance the EU’s ability to speak with one voiceMember States’ ability to coordinate their positions in order to deliver a more coherent energy diplomacy in partner countries and in multilateral fora; notes in this regard that the mandatory participation of the Commission as an observer in negotiations for intergovernmental agreements, as well as both ex ante and ex post evaluation of the negotiated agreements, should be required in order to minimise the possibility of non- conformity with EU law;
Amendment 77 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. In each year beginning in 2021, a number of allowances equal to 126% of the total number of allowances in circulation in year x-2, as published in May year x-1, shall be placed in the reserve, unless this number of allowances to be placed in the reserve would be less than 100 million.
Amendment 109 #
2014/0011(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Directive 2002/87/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 3 letter (g)
Article 10 – paragraph 3 letter (g)
3a. Article 10(3)(g) is replaced by the following:: "(g) to finance research and development in energy efficiency and clean technologies in the sectors covand subsectors referred by this Directive;" to in Article 10a(15) of this Directive;" Or. it (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32009L0029)
Amendment 187 #
Amendment 188 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
Amendment 194 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Whilst the European Public Prosecutor's Office should have exclusive competence to investigate and prosecute crimes affecting the Union's financial interests, Eurojust should be able to support national authorities when they are investigating and prosecuting these forms of crime in accordance with the Regulation establishing the European Public Prosecutor's Office.Eurojust should be able to support national authorities when they are investigating and prosecuting crimes affecting the Union's financial interests
Amendment 215 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
Amendment 218 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
Amendment 224 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. Eurojust shall exercise its tasks at the request of the competent authorities of the Member States or on its own initiative.
Amendment 271 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
Article 12 – paragraph 3
Amendment 280 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point d
d) ensure adequate follow-up to the findings and recommendations stemming from the internal or external audit reports, evaluations and investigations, including those of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) and the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF);
Amendment 286 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 7
Article 16 – paragraph 7
Amendment 288 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 8
Article 16 – paragraph 8
Amendment 299 #
2013/0256(COD)
f) preparing an action plan following- up on the conclusions of the internal or external audit reports, evaluations and investigations, including those of the European Data Protection Supervisor and OLAF and reporting on progress twice a year to the Executive Board, the Commission and the European Data Protection Supervisor;
Amendment 317 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 7
Article 24 – paragraph 7
Amendment 318 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 8
Article 24 – paragraph 8
Amendment 395 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 2
Article 42 – paragraph 2
Amendment 396 #
2013/0256(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 3
Article 42 – paragraph 3