BETA

3061 Amendments of Tiziana BEGHIN

Amendment 11 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
– having regard to the main outcomes and recommendations of 'Study on Geothermal plants and applications emissions: overview and analysis – Final report'10a, _________________ 10a Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2020, ISBN 978-92- 76-04112-2, doi: 10.2777/755565
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 14 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 c (new)
– having regard to 'The heat pump wave 2023', Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2023, ISBN 978-92-68-04870-2, doi: 10.2760/27877, JRC13404510c _________________ 10c https://op.europa.eu/en/publication- detail/-/publication/94cf1914-10b1-11ee- b12e-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/ https://op.europa.eu/en/publication- detail/-/publication/94cf1914-10b1-11ee- b12e-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 15 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 b (new)
– having regard to the results of the regional project PATOS-2 – Particolato Atmosferico in Toscana. Linea di ricerca 7. Individuazione di marker specifici delle centrali geotermoelettriche, Università degli Studi di Firenze 2 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra - Università degli Studi di Firenze 3 Museo di Storia Naturale - CNR Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, sezione di Firenze 4 - Department of Science Facilities the Natural History Museum, London, Regione Toscana, 2015,10b _________________ 10b https://flore.unifi.it/retrieve/handle/2158/1 017014/86438/2015RelazioneFinalePatos- DST.pdf
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 17 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 d (new)
– having regard to the 'District heating and cooling in the European Union Overview of markets and regulatory frameworks under the revised Renewable Energy', Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2022, ISBN 978-92-76-52343-7, doi: 10.2833/962525, (including the related 7 Annexes)10d _________________ 10d https://op.europa.eu/en/publication- detail/-/publication/4e28b0c8-eac1-11ec- a534-01aa75ed71a1/language-en and https://energy.ec.europa.eu/publications/d istrict-heating-and-cooling-european- union_en
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 18 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 e (new)
– having regard to 'Studio geostrutturale, idrogeologico e geochimico ambientale dell’area amiatina', Università di Siena, 200810e _________________ 10e https://www.regione.toscana.it/documents/ 10180/726542/Studio+geostrutturale.pdf/6 3ecc29a-7f82-40b2-b610-cdfc7f17b562
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 27 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas geothermal energy technologies are included in net-zero technologies in the European Commission Net Zero Industry Act legislative proposal and heat pumps and geothermal energy technologies are categories deemed strategic net-zero technologies for Europe in the Net Zero Industry Act Annex;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 32 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the industry estimates that geothermal can supply more than 25 % of the heating and cooling consumed in Europe and over 10 % of its electrical power, giving an important contribution in the process of becoming more resilient and strategically autonomous in energy as well as in the fight against energy poverty;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 56 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the development of technologies has broadened the area suitable for cost-efficient geothermal projects and their scope; stresses the potential of ubiquitous low-temperature, shallow geothermal resources that are available in all Member States;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 77 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Believes the potential of geothermal brines raw materials mining should be further investigated to enhance and strengthen EU's geopolitical and economic resilience in raw materials and compounds secure supply chains, particularly strategic and critical raw materials;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 78 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Recognizes that geothermal energy is a non-intermittent renewable energy source that can play a pivotal role in the development of stable local renewable based energy systems, thereby enhancing the EU's energy, geopolitical and economic resilience;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 83 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Draws attention to geothermal solutions that are able to store excess wind and solar power for subsequent use in heating, cooling and power production, and their crucialsupport role for the development and stability of renewable-based energy systems;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 86 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the potential of cascaded use, where the same geothermal fluid is used for multiple purposes; stresses the need to foster cross-industry synergies between geothermal and other sectors, including agriculture (e.g, the greenhouses heating and cooling in the agricultural and floriculture sector, as well as the agri-food processing supply chain) and through shared use of sites, infrastructure, data and workforce skills;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 91 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Underlines that technical solutions for exploiting shallow geothermal resources can be adapted and are already in use in certain Member States to harness the heating and cooling potential of sewer systems, aqueducts, and reservoirs;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 108 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that national and EU-wide measures for geothermal energy should be based on an assessment of the geothermal potential of Europe, taking into account the diverse geological and climate conditionshallow and deep geothermal resources, underlying rocks, geothermal fluids even within adjacent areas, and an estimate of the cost-efficiency, financial risks, CapEx and OpEX of deploying geothermal solutions; in different climate conditions for heating and cooling only and/or electrical energy production.
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 119 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that public resistance and fear about the exploitation of geothermal energy remains a challenge: is convinced that duly maintaining high environmental standards and transparency, and avoiding any conflicts of interest, could help in overcoming distrust;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 122 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Acknowledges, on the other hand, that public concern to direct and indirect emissions and environmental and health consequences of geothermal projects are in several cases entirely justified because of scientific evidence and findings available in existing literature pointing at: – power plant and soil direct and indirect emission of gases (including Non- Condensable Gases) and fine-particles, containing inter alia:heavy metals, ammonia, ozone, sulphur oxide, hydrogen sulphide, mercury, arsenic, radon, hydrogen, methane and carbon dioxide climate-altering gases; – freshwater contamination; – groundwater over-exploitation, including the amount of water necessary in reinjection processes to compensate the volume reduction of exploited and cooled geothermal fluids; – induced or increased site-specific subsidence and/or seismicity. Additionally, the anthropogenic emissions due to geothermal activity of many potentially harmful substances contained in geothermal emissions are not preassessed and/or not monitored routinely or at all.
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 129 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Public concerns and fears can be further reinforced by: – lack of transparency of deep geothermal exploitation operations; – conflicting findings or interpretations in assessment studies and monitoring reports due also to the absences of specific and harmonized geothermal appropriate LCA methodologies; – lack of environmental data monitoring, collecting and reporting, or not uniform and/or not harmonized data collecting methodologies;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 132 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. Points at the fact that environmental performances and human health impacts of geothermal energy exploitation can vary extremally widely, from 'almost zero' for shallow resources to significant potential harms for deep resources exploitation, depending on specific deep geothermal technologies used, population density, the presence of industrial and residential settlements, underground rocks and geothermal fluids characteristics. Therefore the diversity and peculiarity of each area, even within geographically adjacent areas, should be carefully and duly evaluated based on both adapted existing LCA and specific geothermal appropriate LCA methodologies, including the pre- assessment of soil, air and freshwater geochemical background, followed by monitoring of resulting geochemical baseline after the development of deep geothermal applications;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 156 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that for areas with insufficient subsurface data, governments can play a role in funding geothermal resource mapping and exploratory drilling; welcomes the fact that some Member States have already taken steps in this direction; calls for EU funding to support this data collection with a view to creating an EU-wide atlas of geothermal potential, in particular for surface geothermal potential, which is the most scalable option;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 177 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Expresses concern that while geothermal heat pumps (GHPs) are currently the most efficient heat pumps, producing more heat for less electricity in cold climates compared to air source heat pumps, their much higher upfront drilling and installation costs tend to discourage their selection; calls on the Member States to explore possible financial incentives to bridge this gap, also taking into account that the use of GHPs represents an ideal synergy for reducing energy poverty, the development of heating and cooling districts, and renewable energy communities;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 190 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on the Commission to consider setting up dedicated research and industrial development funds for total reinjection and closed loops binary technologies, and in particular for closed loops utilizing underground heat exchange, thus potentially addressing many of environmental and climate issues and health risks in existing deep geothermal EU plants utilizing open loops technologies and surface heat exchangers. Moreover, calls on the Commission to evaluate a progressive EU and Member States' ban of support mechanisms and incentives for any additional open loop geothermal energy production and/or capacity.
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 194 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Calls on Member States to fully make use of existing European funding opportunities to support re-skilling of the workforce, in particular but not limited to transition areas, with a view to new job opportunities arising from a widespread exploitation of the shallow geothermal energy potential;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 200 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that the requirements of mining laws designed for large-scale mining projects are difficult to uphold in much smaller-scale geothermal projects; calls on the Member States to review and simplify existing mining laws, where necessary, or to develop dedicated permitting rules for geothermal; asks the Commission to provide guidelines to ensure the requisite level of coherence, intervening to address the fragmentation of national, regional, and municipal regulations, and distinguishing shallow geothermal from deep geothermal energy and the type of technologies used;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 220 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Notes that permits for geothermal installations must be made extensible to covering the extraction of lithium or the production of hydrogenand any other potential raw materials and compounds (e.g., phosphate and nitrates) or production of renewable hydrogen and ammonia from existing capacity under the same lease;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 257 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 7
Territories in transition: hydrocarbon and mining industry, skills and assets repurpose
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 276 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Member States to make use of existing European funding opportunities to support the re-skilling of the workforce in transition areas, with a view to capitalising on the jobs arising from geothermal projects;Notes notes that oil and gas industry skills can be applied to the geothermal sector;
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 288 #

2023/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Notes that public resistance remains a challenge for geothermal projects, particularly on the basis of environmental concerns such as the possible contamination of ground waters, gas emissions or water over-exploitation; expresses the opinion that maintaining high environmental and transparency standards can serve as an efficient way of overcoming distrust;deleted
2023/10/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
– having regard to the European Parliament Report of 3 October 2018 on "'Distributed ledger technologies and blockchains: building trust with disintermediation" and in particular its paragraphs 22 and 23
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 9 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the EU is committed to improving its industrial and technological competitiveness in the global market and, reduce its dependency from third countries and lead in the green and digital transitions and thus recognises the need to reinforce its position through sustained support for the growth of start-ups and scale-ups;
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 33 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Is worried that the failure to adopt proper definitions hinders the effectiveness of existing policies and legislation; notes that, although start-ups and SMEs have some overlapping interests, they differ substantially once they enter the fundraising and growth phase, growth and maturity phase; moreover, start-ups encompass elements of uncertainty and high risk of failure, and rely on ecosystems and different class of investors; believes, therefore, that simply classing start-ups as SMEs, without a clear division, limits their growth, access to markets and investment opportunities;
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 38 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Is convinced that dedicated definitions will increase the opportunities for support through measures that are tailored to the specific features of start-ups and scale-ups and boost their access to European capital markets and private investors; calls on the Commission to develop a comprehensive European start- up and scale-up strategy that addresses the challenges faced by individual innovators, founders, start-ups and scale-ups in the EU;
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 48 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop comprehensive policies, regulations and strategies that are aligned with the European start-up and scale-up initiative and foster a favourable environment for start-ups and scale-ups, encompassing access to finance, regulatory simplification and/or regulatory ladders, talent retention and acquisition, and support for de-risking and internationalisation;
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 91 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Urges the Commission to enhance the funding mechanisms for start-ups and scale-ups, including public procurement and the provision of grants, loans and seed and venture capital, and to explore the possibility of establishing a dedicated European start-up and scale-up fund;
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 95 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Encourages the European Investment Fund and national development banks to increase their investments in start- ups and scale-ups, particularly those operating in emerging and, high-potential sectorsand technology sectors, in particular in the fields of EU energy and climate resilience and digital transformation;
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 102 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for the establishment of dedicated start- up-friendly regulations and frameworks that facilitate the growth, scalability and cross-border operations of start-ups and scale-ups, while ensuring consumer protection, data privacy and fair competition;
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 112 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Recommends the promotion of public-private partnerships, collaboration between start-ups and established companies, and the creation of innovation clusters to foster knowledge transferand financially support knowledge and technology transfer activities, research and development, as well as access to new technology markets;
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 119 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Member States and the Commission, where applicable, to establish entrepreneur-friendly tax regimes, incentives and simplified administrative procedures, including cross-border procedures, to attract and retain talent and digital nomads1a, incentivise investment and encourage entrepreneurship; _________________ 1a Digital nomads are people, often start- uppers, creatives and innovators, who travel freely while working remotely using technology and the internet. Although digital nomads enjoy advantages in freedom and flexibility, they also face challenges include maintaining international health insurance with coverage globally, abiding by different local laws including payment of required taxes and obtaining work visas. They very rarely have access to retirement benefits and unemployment insurance.
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 128 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Urges the Commission and the Member States to support initiatives that promote digital skills, open innovation, cooperation, knowledge sharing, exemplary cases as a driver for innovation, company training, corporate venture capital, entrepreneurship and mentorship at all levels of education, equipping individuals with the necessary knowledge, culture, and competencies to thrive in the digital age thus improving the economic and social resilience of the UE;
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 130 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Acknowledges that individuals with innovative and disruptive ideas often face significant financial barriers when starting their businesses, including the challenge of accessing adequate funding; Calls on the Commission and Member States to recognize the challenges encountered by individuals with innovative and disruptive ideas in starting businesses and startups, especially financial difficulties and limited access to initial funding. Therefore, urges them to explore and evaluate the possibility of developing programs and initiatives that facilitate access to funding for individual entrepreneurs, including measures that simplify the funding application processes and reduce administrative barriers, to promote and support initiatives aimed at creating a more favourable entrepreneurial environment for individual innovators, including disseminating information on funding opportunities, providing technical assistance, establishing support networks, and to examine best practices within the EU and in other countries in the field of support for individual entrepreneurship in order to identify effective strategies to address financial challenges.
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 148 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Recommends the establishment of regional start-up ecosystems that support local entrepreneurship, accelerators, venture builders, innovation hubs and incubators, and leverage each region’s strengths and resources;
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 153 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Encourages the Commission to consider further measures to open up government and public sector data sets, in line with international standards and supporting open data, enabling real-time data insights that empower better decision- making and drive innovation for start-ups and scale-ups;
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 164 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls for the development of efficient and transparent mechanisms to facilitate access to public procurement contracts, based on sustainability criteria, resilience and reduced use of critical raw materials, for start-ups and scale-ups, encouraging their participation in the provision of innovative solutions to public sector challenges;
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 177 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Calls on the Commission to assess the suitability of CE standards and certification processes, as well as the associated costs of access to harmonized standards, in relation to the establishment and growth of start-ups, scale-ups and EU-funded initiatives, including cascade funded SMEs. This assessment should encompass products created using additive manufacturing/3D printing (such, but not limited to, as spare parts, medical devices, toys, construction materials, and 3D printed buildings) and other digital production methods. Moreover, it should investigate the feasibility of introducing regulatory or legislative "sandboxes." Additionally, the evaluation should include an impact analysis of current regulations' effects on market entry for products utilizing digital manufacturing technologies, particularly focusing on, but not limited to, additive manufactured products. This should address the barriers hindering the full exploitation of the remarkable adaptability and cost-efficiency offered by digital manufacturing systems for product customization and "digital craftsmanship";
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 180 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23b. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the use of blockchain and other Distributed Ledger Technologies for advanced EU Intellectual Property protection and certification procedures and standards, with the goal of harmonizing the different present and future legal frameworks among the Member States. Takes note of EUIPO, the European Union Intellectual Property Office, launching the first blockchain- based service for public institutions to protect intellectual property in April 2021 and introducing this innovation in its Strategic plan 2025.
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 181 #

2023/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 c (new)
23c. Highlights the necessity of aligning, modernizing, and customizing intellectual property protection procedures and regulations to accommodate technological developments and the fast changing environment in which start-ups and scales up operates. Underlines in particular the adaptability, traceability, and royalty management opportunities of both digital and physical products enabled by digital manufacturing and craftsmanship, design, and traceability systems.
2023/10/13
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 29 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Regarding external aspects, , in particular regarding emerging markets and developing economies, the EU will aim to ensure functioning global value chains and promote collaborative efforts among countries by seeking win-win partnerships for sharing best practices, technology transfer, and joint research and development initiatives, in the framework of its Global Gateway strategy, which. Such partnerships contribute to the diversification of ithe EU’s raw materials supply chain as well as to partner countries’ efforts to pursue twin transition and develop local value addition., and could accelerate the net-zero transition across industries
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 40 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) To fulfill those commitments, collaborating with third countries, the Union should envisage consumer awareness and demand campaigns aiming to shift consumer preferences towards sustainable products and services. Raising consumer awareness about the environmental impact of products, promoting sustainable consumption patterns, and providing clear information about the carbon footprint of goods and services in the Union trade partnerships could also drive the demand for low- carbon alternatives;
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) The higher energy prices after the unjustified and unlawful military aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine, gave a strong impetus to accelerate the implementation of the European Green Deal and reinforce the resilience of the Energy Union by speeding up the clean energy transition and ending any dependence on fossil fuels exported from the Russian Federationird countries. The REPowerEU plan35 plays a key role in responding to the hardships and global energy market disruption caused by the invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation. That plan aims to accelerate the energy transition in the European Union, in order to increase the use of renewable energy and to reduce the Union’s gas and electricity consumption and to boost investments in the deployment of energy efficient and low carbon neutral solutions. That plan sets inter alia the targets to double solar photovoltaic capacity by 2025 and to install 600 GW of solar photovoltaic capacity by 2030; to double the rate of deployment of heat pumps; to produce 10 million tonnes of domestic renewable hydrogen and e-fuels, from power-to-gas (P2G) to power-to-liquid (P2L), by 2030; and to substantially increase production of biomethane. The plan also sets out that achieving the REPowerEU goals will require diversifying the supply of low carbon energy equipment and of critical raw materials, reducing sectoral dependencies, overcoming supply chain bottlenecks and expanding the Union’s clean energy technology manufacturing capacity. As part of its efforts to increase the share of renewable energy in power generation, industry, buildings and transport, the Commission proposes to increase the target in the Renewable Energy Directive to 45% by 2030 and to increase the target in the Energy Efficiency Directive to 13%. This would bring the total renewable energy generation capacities to 1236 GW by 2030, in comparison to 1067 GW by 2030 envisaged under the 2021 proposal and will see increased needs for storage through batteries to deal with intermittency in the electricity grid. Similarly, policies related to the decarbonisation of the road sector, such as Regulation (EU) 2019/631 and Regulation (EU) 2019/1242 will be strong drivers for a further electrification of the road transport sector and thus increasing demand for batteries. _________________ 35 Communication of 18 May 2022 from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, REPowerEU Plan, COM/2022/230 final, 18.05.2022.
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 68 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) In addition, the Communication on the Green Deal Industrial Plan for the Net- Zero Age42 sets out a comprehensive approach to support a clean energy technology scale up based on four pillars. The first pillar aims at creating a regulatory environment that simplifies and fast-tracks permitting for new net-zero technology manufacturing and assembly sites and facilitates the scaling up of the net-zero industry of the Union. The second pillar of the plan is to boost investment in and financing of net-zero technology production, through the revised Temporary Crisis and Transition Framework adopted in March 2023 and the creation of a European Sovereignty fund to preserve the European edge on critical and emerging technologies relevant to the green and digital transitions. The third pillar relates to developing the skills needed to make the transition happen and increase the number of skilled workers in the clean energy technology sector. The fourth pillar focuses on trade and the diversification of the supply chain of critical raw materials. That includes engaging in partnerships with other countries, international organizations, or industry associations to develop joint strategies, share information, and coordinate efforts to enhance supply chain resilience, creating a critical raw materials club, working with like-minded partners to collectively strengthen and map supply chains and, implementing traceability systems and transparency, diversifying away from single suppliers for critical input, encouraging investment in downstream activities, and engaging in market research. _________________ 42 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Green Deal Industrial Plan for the Net-Zero Age, COM/2023/62 final, 01.02.2023.
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 74 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) Council Decision 2014/115/EU approved in particular the amendment to the World Trade Organisation Agreement on Government Procurement (the ‘GPA’)46 . The aim of the GPA is to establish a multilateral framework of balanced rights and obligations relating to public contracts with a view to achieving the liberalisation and expansion of world trade and to encourage its member countries to adopt green procurement policies that prioritize sustainable and environmentally-friendly goods and services. For contracts covered by the European Union’s Appendix I to the GPA, as well as by other relevant international agreements by which the Union is bound, including free trade agreements and the Article III:8(a) of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade of 1994 for procurement by governmental agencies of products purchased with a view to commercial resale or with a view to use in the production of goods for commercial sale, contracting authorities and contracting entities should not apply the requirements of Article 19 (1) point (d) to economic operators of sources of supply that are signatories to the agreements. _________________ 46 Council decision 2014/115/EU of 2 December 2013 on the conclusion of the Protocol Amending the Agreement on Government Procurement, (OJ L68, 7.3.2014, p. 1).
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 76 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30 a (new)
(30a) The WTO GPA promotes the use of international standards and guidelines in government procurement. By aligning procurement practices with internationally recognized standards, such as those related to greenhouse gas emissions or sustainable product certifications, governments could drive the adoption of net-zero industry solutions and create a level playing field for suppliers.
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 113 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Regarding external aspects, in particular regarding emerging markets and developing economies, the EU will aim to ensure functioning global value chains and promote collaborative efforts among countries including by seeking win-win partnerships for sharing best practices, technology transfer and joint research and development initiatives, in the framework of its Global Gateway strategy, which. Such partnerships contribute to the diversification of its raw materials supply chain as well as to partner countries’ efforts to pursue twin transition and develop local value addition. This shall be done in accordance with the ‘do no significant harm’ principle within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 and with the Conflict Minerals Regulation (Regulation EU 2017/821).
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 122 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) The higher energy prices after the EU´s sanctions due to the unjustified and unlawful military aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine, gave a strong impetus to accelerate the implementation of the European Green Deal and reinforce the resilience of the Energy Union by speeding up the clean energy transition and ending any dependence on fossil fuels exported from the Russian Federationird countries. The REPowerEU plan35 plays a key role in responding to the hardships and global energy market disruption caused by the invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation. That plan aims to accelerate the energy transition in the European Union, in order to increase the use of renewable energy and to reduce the Union’s gas and electricity consumption and to boost investments in the deployment of energy efficient and low carbon neutral solutions. That plan sets inter alia the targets to double solar photovoltaic capacity by 2025 and to install 600 GW of solar photovoltaic capacity by 2030; to double the rate of deployment of heat pumps; to produce 10 million tonnes of domestic renewable hydrogen by 2030; and to substantially increase production of biomethane. The plan also sets out that achieving the REPowerEU goals will require diversifying the supply of low carbon energy equipment and of critical raw materials, reducing sectoral dependencies, overcoming supply chain bottlenecks and expanding the Union’s clean energy technology manufacturing capacity. As part of its efforts to increase the share of renewable energy in power generation, industry, buildings and transport, the Commission proposes to increase the target in the Renewable Energy Directive to 45% by 2030 and to increase the target in the Energy Efficiency Directive to 13%. This would bring the total renewable energy generation capacities to 1236 GW by 2030, in comparison to 1067 GW by 2030 envisaged under the 2021 proposal and will see increased needs for storage through batteries to deal with intermittency in the electricity gridof some of the renewable energy sources in the electricity grid, as well as to strenghten the energy distribution capacity at local level. Similarly, policies related to the decarbonisation of the road sector, such as Regulation (EU) 2019/631 and Regulation (EU) 2019/1242 will be strong drivers for a further electrification of the road transport sector and thus increasing demand for batteries. _________________ 35 Communication of 18 May 2022 from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, REPowerEU Plan, COM/2022/230 final, 18.05.2022.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 134 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘net-zero technologies’ means renewable energy technologies66 ; electricity and heat storage technologies; heat pumps; grid technologies; renewable fuels of non-biological origin technologies; sustainable alternative fuels technologies67 ; electrolysers and fuel cells; advanced technologies to produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle, small modular reactors, and related best-in-class fuels; carbon capture, utilisation, and storage technologies; and energy- system related energy efficiency technologies. They refer to the final products, specific components and specific machinery primarily used for the production of those products. They shall have reached a technology readiness level of at least 8. _________________ 66 ‘renewable energy' means ‘renewable energy’ as defined in Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources 67 ‘sustainable alternative fuels’ means fuels covered by the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on ensuring a level playing field for sustainable air transport, COM/2021/561 final and by the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and Council on the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport COM/2021/562 final.
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 139 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The net-zero transformation is already causing huge industrial, economic, and geopolitical shifts across the globe, which will become ever more pronounced as the worldgovernments, industries and the civil society advances in its decarbonisation efforts. The road to net zero translates into strong opportunities for the expansion of Union’s net-zero industry, making use of the strength of the Single Market, by promoting investment in technologies in the field of renewable energy technologies , electricity and heat storage technologies, heat pumps, grid technologies, renewable fuels of non- biological origin technologies, electrolysers and fuel cells, fusion, small modular reactors and related best-in-class fuels, carbon capture, and utilisation, and storage technologies, and energy-system related energy efficiency technologies and their supply chains, allowing for the decarbonisation of our economic sectors, from energy supply to transport, buildings, agriculture and industry. A strong net zero industry within the European Union can help significantly in reaching the Union’s climate and energy targets effectively, as well as in supporting other Green Deal objectives, while creating jobs and growth.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 141 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) To meet the 2030 climate and energy targets, energy efficiency needs to be prioritised. Saving energy is the cheapest, safest and cleanest way to meet those targets. ‘Energy efficiency first’ is an overall principle of EU energy policy and is important in both its practical applications in policy and investment decisions as well as for social innovation. Therefore, it is essential to expand the Union’s manufacturing capacity for energy efficient technologies, such as heat pumps and smart grid technologies, that help the EU reduce and control its energy consumption.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 146 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The Union’s decarbonisation objectives, security of energy supply, digitalisation of the energy system and electrification of demand, for example in mobility and the need for fast recharging points, require an enormous expansion of electricity grids in the European Union, both at transmission level and at distribution level. At transmission level, high-voltage direct current (HVDC) systems are needed to connect offshore and onshore renewable energies both between Member States and between the EU and third countries; while at distribution level, connecting electricity providers and managing demand-side flexibility builds on investments in innovative grid technologies, such as electric vehicles smart charging (EVSC), energy efficiency building and industry automation and smart controls, advanced meter infrastructure (AMI) and home energy management systems (HEMS). The electricity grid needs to interact with many actors or devices based on a detailed level of observability, and hence availability of data, to enable flexibility, smart charging and smart buildings with smart electricity grids enabling demand side response from consumers and the uptake of renewables including through energy communities and energy sharing initiatives. Connecting the net-zero technologies to the network of the European Union requires the substantial expansion of manufacturing capabilities for electricity grids in areas such as offshore and onshore cables, substations and transformers.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 148 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) ‘net-zero regulatory sandbox’ means a scheme that enables undertakings to test innovative net-zero technologies, excluding nuclear fusion, in a controlled real-world environment, under a specific plan, developed and monitored by a competent authority.
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 170 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) To achieve the 2030 objectives a particular focus is needed on some of the net-zero technologies, also in view their significant contribution towards the path to net zero by 2050. These technologies include solar photovoltaic and solar thermal technologies, onshore and offshore renewable technologies, battery/storage technologies including flywheels and gravity storage systems, heat pumps and geothermal energy technologies, electrolysers and fuel cells, sustainable biogas/biomethane, carbon capture and storageutilisation technologies, and grid technologies. These technologies play a key role in the Union’s open strategic autonomy, ensuring that citizens have access to clean, affordable, secure energy. Given their role, these technologies should benefit from even faster permitting procedures, obtain the status of the highest national significance possible under national law and benefit from additional support to crowd-in investments.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 176 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) business support services, including but not limited to corporate tax declaration, local tax laws, labour law with a particular focus on SMEs.
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 178 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) In 2020 the European Commission adopted an EU strategy for energy system integration. It set out a vision on how to accelerate the transition towards a more integrated energy system, one that supports a climate neutral economy at the least cost across sectors. It encompasses three complementary and mutually reinforcing concepts: first, a more ‘circular’ energy system, with energy efficiency at its core; second, a greater direct electrification of end-use sectors; third, the use of renewable and low-carbon neutral fuels, including hydrogen and e-fuels from power-to-gas (P2G) to power-to-liquid (PtL), for end- use applications where direct heating or electrification are not feasible, not efficient or have higher costs. Considerations related to energy system integration refer to solutions for fully integrating all the electricity generated by renewable energy installations into the wider energy system. This means, for instance, adopting technical solutions that allow for the integration of surplus electricity generated by renewable electricity installations, including through storage in its various forms and demand- side management.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 181 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The development of carbon capture and storage solutions for industry is confronted with a coordination failure. On the one hand, despite the growing CO2 price incentive provided by the EU Emissions Trading System, for industry to invest into capturing CO2 emissions making such investments economically viable, they face a significant risk of not being able to access a permitted geological storage site. On the other hand, investors into first CO2 storage sites face upfront costs to identify develop and appraise them even before they can apply for a regulatory storage permit. Transparency about potential CO2 storage capacity in terms of the geological suitability of relevant areas and existing geological data, in particular from the exploration of hydrocarbon production sites, can support market operators to plan their investments. Member State should make such data publicly available and report regularly in a forward-looking perspective about progress in developing CO2 storage sites and the corresponding needs for injection and storage capacities above, in order to collectively reach the Union-wide target for CO2 injection capacity.deleted
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 187 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) While the development of net-zero strategic technologies is fundamental to achieve carbon neutrality, nature-based solutions for carbon sequestration, such as biological carbon sequestration through rewilding initiatives, also have great potential in helping the EU achieve its climate goals and should be supported and further researched.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 189 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) A key bottleneck for carbon capture investments that are today increasingly economically viable is the availability of operating CO2 storage sites in Europe, which underpin the incentives from Directive 2003/87/EC. To scale up the technology and expand its leading manufacturing capacities, the EU needs to develop a forward-looking supply of permanent geological CO2 storage sites permitted in accordance with Directive 2009/31/EU36 . By defining a Union target of 50 million tonnes of annual operational CO2 injection capacity by 2030, in line with the expected capacities needed in 2030, the relevant sectors can coordinate their investments towards a European Net-Zero CO2 transport and storage value chain that industries can use to decarbonise their operations. This initial deployment will also support further CO2 storage in a 2050 perspective. According to the Commission’s estimates, the Union could need to capture up to 550 million tonnes of CO2 annually by 2050 to meet the net zero objective37 , including for carbon removals. Such a first industrial-scale storage capacity will de- risk investments into the capturing of CO2 emissions as important tool to reach climate neutrality. When this regulation is incorporated into the EEA Agreement, the Union target of 50 million tonnes of annual operational CO2 injection capacity by 2030 will be adjusted accordingly. _________________ 36 Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the geological storage of carbon dioxide and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 (Text with EEA relevance), (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 114). 37 In depth analysis in support of the Commission Communication (2018/773) A Clean Planet for all. A European long- term strategic vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy.deleted
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 196 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) By defining CO2 storage sites that contribute to the Union’s 2030 target as net-zero strategic projects, the development of CO2 storage sites can be accelerated and facilitated, and the increasing industrial demand for storage sites can be channelled towards the most- cost-effective storage sites. An increasing volume of depleting gas and oil fields that could be converted in safe CO2 storage sites are at the end of their useful production lifetime. In addition, the oil and gas industry has affirmed its determination to embark on an energy transition and possesses the assets, skills and knowledge needed to explore and develop additional storage sites. To reach the Union’s target of 50 million tonnes of annual operational CO2 injection capacity by 2030, the sector needs to pool its contributions to ensure that carbon capture and storage as a climate solution is available ahead of demand. In order to ensure a timely, Union-wide and cost- effective development of CO2 storage sites in line with the EU objective for injection capacity, licensees of oil and gas production in the EU should contribute to this target pro rata of their oil and gas manufacturing capacity, while providing flexibilities to cooperate and take into account other contributions of third parties.deleted
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 199 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) it puts into place measures to attract, upskill or reskill a workforce required for net-zero technologies, including through apprenticeships, in close cooperation with social partners; and ensuring equal opportunities for individuals from different backgrounds, including gender, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status; it also puts into place measures to prioritize the health and safety of the workforce by implementing appropriate measures to mitigate workplace hazards and ensure compliance with occupational health and safety regulations.
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 201 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iv a (new)
(iva) it encourages sustainable practices throughout its supply chain including collaborating with suppliers and ensuring similar environmental standards and best practices. It may also include criteria such as responsible sourcing of raw materials and the use of sustainable transportation methods.
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 208 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to obligations provided for in Union law, Member States shall grant net-zero strategic projects the status of the highest national significance possible, where such a status exists in national law, and be treated accordingly in the permit-granting processes including those relating to environmental assessments and if national law so provides, to spatial planning.
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 223 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The Commission and Member States may provide administrative support to net-zero strategic projects to facilitate their rapid and effective implementation, including by providing:
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 225 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) assistance to EU project promoters in third countries to highlight the local economic, social, and environmental benefits of the projects, through comprehensive and transparent public education campaign, to further increase the public acceptance of the project.
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 229 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) At the same time, net-zero technology products will contribute to the Union’s resilience and security of supply of clean energy. A secure supply of cleanand affordable energy which is a prerequisite for economic development, as well as for public order and security while safeguarding the economic sustainability of welfare systems and improving citizens’ health especially through better air quality. Net-zero technology products will also yield benefits to other strategically important economic sectors, such as farming and food production by securing access to clean energy and machinery at competitive prices, thus contributing sustainably to EU food security and to providing an increasing outlet for bio- based alternatives through circular economy. In the same way, the fulfilment of the Union’s climate ambitions will translate both into economic growth and social well-being.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 249 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) In addition, the Communication on the Green Deal Industrial Plan for the Net- Zero Age42 sets out a comprehensive approach to support a clean energy technology scale up based on four pillars. The first pillar aims at creating a regulatory environment that simplifies and fast-tracks permitting for new net-zero technology manufacturing and assembly sites and facilitates the scaling up of the net-zero industry of the Union. The second pillar of the plan is to boost investment in and financing of net-zero technology production, through the revised Temporary Crisis and Transition Framework adopted in March 2023 and the creation of a European Sovereignty fund to preserve the European edge on critical and emerging technologies relevant to the green and digital transitions. The third pillar relates to developing the skills needed to make the transition happen and increase the number of skilled workers in the clean energy technology sector. The fourth pillar focuses on trade and the diversification of the supply chain of critical raw materials. That includes creating a critical raw materials club, working with like-minded partners to collectively strengthen supply chains and diversifying away from single suppliers for critical input, , in accordance to Regulation (EU) … / … [add footnote with publication references of the Critical Raw Materials Regulation]. _________________ 42 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Green Deal Industrial Plan for the Net-Zero Age, COM/2023/62 final, 01.02.2023.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 254 #

2023/0081(COD)

Article22a Net-Zero Industrial Partnerships 1. Without prejudice to existing trade, preferential and investment agreements between the Union and the third countries, the Commission shall enter into Net-Zero Industrial Partnerships with third countries; 2. Net-Zero Industrial Partnerships shall have the following objectives: - foster collaboration among companies, industry associations, research institutions, and governmental organizations, - facilitate trade among participants, including by favouring necessary investments within the Union and in third countries, - encourage collaboration along the global supply chain to determine emissions reduction holistically, by engaging suppliers, contractors, and other stakeholders to implement sustainable practices, promote transparency, and improve the environmental performance of the global value chain, - engage in policy advocacy to support the development and implementation of supportive regulations, incentives, and frameworks within Partner countries, supporting the net-zero transition and creating a favourable business environment for sustainable industrial practices, including for SMEs, - establish transparent reporting mechanisms to track progress and partners' accountability, - enhance resilience and sustainability of the supportive value chains, and guaranteeing a level playing field.
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 268 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) Council Decision 2014/115/EU approved in particular the amendment to the World Trade Organisation Agreement on Government Procurement (the ‘GPA’)46 [1]. The aim of the GPA is to establish a multilateral framework of balanced rights and obligations relating to public contracts with a view to achieving the liberalisation and expansion of world trade and to encourage its member countries to adopt green procurement policies that prioritize sustainable and environmentally frienly goods and services. For contracts covered by the European Union’s Appendix I to the GPA, as well as by other relevant international agreements by which the Union is bound, including free trade agreements and the Article III:8(a) of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade of 1994 for procurement by governmental agencies of products purchased with a view to commercial resale or with a view to use in the production of goods for commercial sale, contracting authorities and contracting entities should not apply the requirements of Article 19 (1) point (d) to economic operators of sources of supply that are signatories to the agreements. _________________ 46[1] Council decision 2014/115/EU of 2 December 2013 on the conclusion of the Protocol Amending the Agreement on Government Procurement, (OJ L68, 7.3.2014, p. 1).
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 269 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30 a (new)
(30a) The WTO GPA promotes the use of international standards and guidelines in government procurement. By aligning procurement practices with internationally recognized standards, such as those related to greenhouse gas emissions or sustainable product certifications, governments could drive the adoption of net-zero industry solutions and create a level playing field for suppliers.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 279 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) Households and final consumers are an essential part of the Union’s demand for net-zero technologies final products and public support schemes to incentivize the purchase of such product by households, in particular for energy poor and vulnerable low- and lower middle-class income households and consumers, are important tools to accelerate the green transition. Under the solar rooftop initiative announced in the EU solar strategy52 , Member States should for instance set-up national programmes to support the massive deployment of rooftop solar energy. In the REPowerEU plan, the Commission called Member States to make full use of supporting measures which encourage switching to heat pumps. Such support schemes set up nationally by Member States or locally by local or regional authorities should also contribute to improving the sustainability and resilience of the EU net-zero technologies. Public authorities should for instance provide higher financial compensation to beneficiaries for the purchase of net-zero technology final products that will make a higher contribution to resilience in the Union, especially when used in energy communities and energy sharing initiatives promoted or participated in by public authorities . Public authorities should ensure that their schemes are open, transparent and non-discriminatory, so that they contribute to increase demand for net- zero technology products in the Union. Public authorities should also limit the additional financial compensation for such products so as not to slow down the deployment of the net-zero technologies in the Union. To increase the efficiency of such schemes Member States should ensure that information is easily accessible both for consumers and for net-zero technology manufacturers on a free website. The use by public authorities of the sustainability and resilience contribution in schemes targeted at consumers or households should be without prejudice to State aid rules and to WTO rules on Subsidies. _________________ 52 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions : EU Solar Energy Strategy, COM(2022) 221 final, 18.05.2022.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 288 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) The Commission should also assist Member States in the design of schemes targeted at households and consumers to build synergies and exchange best practices, as well as to facilitate the diffusion of energy communities and energy sharing initiatives. The Net-Zero Europe Platform should also play an important role in accelerating the implementation of the sustainability and resilience contribution by Member States and public authorities in their public procurement and auctioning practices. It should issue guidance and identify best practices on how to define the contribution and use it, providing concrete and specific examples.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 301 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall support the Commission in the implementation of the cooperation measures set out in the Net- Zero Industrial Partnership. Net-Zero Industrial Partnerships will have the objective of facilitating trade among participants, including by favouring necessary investments within the Union and in third countries, enhancing resilience and sustainability of the supportive value chains, and guaranteeing a level playing field.deleted
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 311 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1
1. The Platform shall be composed Member States, representative of the European Parliament and of the Commission. It shall be chaired by a representative of the Commission.
2023/06/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 314 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
(45) Member States can provide support from cohesion policy programmes in line with applicable rules under Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council57 to encourage the take up of net-zero strategic projects in less developed and transition regions, in accordance with the ‘do no significant harm’ principle within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, through investment packages of infrastructure, productive investment in innovation, manufacturing capacity in SMEs, services, training and upskilling measure, including support to capacity building of the public authorities and promoters. The applicable co-financing rates set in programmes may be up to 85% for less developed regions and up to 60% or 70% for transition regions depending on the fund concerned and the status of the region but Member States may exceed these ceilings at the level of the project concerned, where feasible under State aid rules. The Technical Support Instrument can help Member States and regions in preparing net-zero growth strategies, improve the business environment, reducing red tape and accelerating permitting. Member States should be encouraged to promote the sustainability of net-zero strategic projects by embedding these investments in European value chains, building notably on interregional and cross border cooperation networks. _________________ 57 Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy (OJ L 231, 30.6.2021, p. 159).
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 332 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) A European Sovereignty Fund financed by EU common debt would provide a structural answer to the investment needs. It will help preserving a European edge on critical and emerging technologies relevant to the green and digital transitions, including net-zero technologies. This structural instrument will build on experience of coordinated multi-country projects under the IPCEIs and seek to enhance all Member States’ access to such projects, thereby safeguarding cohesion and the Single Market against risks caused by unequal availability of State Aids.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 335 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
(48) To overcome the limitations of the current fragmented public and private investments efforts, facilitate integration and return on investment, the Commission, and Member States should better coordinate and create synergies between the existing funding programmes at Union and national level as well as ensure better coordination and collaboration with industry and key private sector stakeholders including SMEs. The Net-Zero Europe Platform has a key role to play to build a comprehensive view of available and relevant funding opportunities and to discuss the individual financing needs of net-zero strategic projects.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 350 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
(50) At the same time, the unpredictability, complexity and at times, excessive length of national permit- granting processes undermines the investment security needed for the effective development of net-zero technologies manufacturing projects. Therefore, in order to ensure and speed up their effective implementation, Member States should apply streamlined and predictable permitting procedures. In addition, Net-Zero Strategic Projects should be given priority status at national level to ensure rapid administrative treatment and urgent treatment in all judicial and dispute resolution procedures relating to them, without preventing competent authorities to streamline permitting for other net-zero technologies manufacturing projects that are not Net- Zero Strategic Projects or more generally. Such positive discrimination should occur particularly for projects carried out by SMEs.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 354 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 51
(51) Given their role in ensuring the Union’s security of supply for net-zero technologies, and their contribution to the Union’s open strategic autonomy and the green and digital transition, responsible permitting authorities should consider Net- Zero Strategic Projects to be in the public interest. Based on its case-by-case assessment, a responsible permitting authority may conclude that the public interest served by the project overrides the public interests related to nature and environmental protection and that consequently the project may be authorised, provided that all relevant conditions set out in Directive 2000/60/EC, Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC63 are met and in accordance with the ‘do no significant harm’ principle within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/85263a. _________________ 63 Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7–25). 63a Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (OJ L 198, 22.6.2020, p. 13–43)
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 358 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52
(52) In order to reduce complexity and increase efficiency and transparency, project promoters of net-zero technologies manufacturing projects should be able to interact with a single national authority responsible for coordinating the entire permit granting process and issuing a comprehensive decision within the applicable time limit. To that end, Member States should designate a single national competent authority. Depending on a Member State’s internal organisation, it should be possible for the tasks of the national competent authority s to be delegated to a different authority, subject to the same conditions. To ensure the effective implementation of their responsibilities, Member States should provide their national competent authority, or any authority acting on their behalf, with sufficient personnel and resources. Where a Member State lacks sufficient resources to comply with this provision, the Commission shall offer technical and financial support.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 363 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
(53) In order to ensure clarity about the permitting status of Net-Zero Strategic Projects and to limit the effectiveness of potential abusive litigation, while not undermining effective judicial review, Member States should ensure that any dispute concerning permit granting process is resolved in a timely manner. To that end, national competent authorities should ensure that applicants and project promoters have access to a simple dispute settlement procedure and that Net-Zero Strategic Projects are granted urgent treatment in all judicial and dispute resolution procedures relating to them while ensuring full respect for the rights of defence.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 370 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
(55) Net-zero technology manufacturing projects undergo lengthy and complex permitting procedures of 2-7 years, depending on the Member State, technology and value chain segment. Considering the size of required investments – in particular for gigafactory- size projects which are needed to reach the expected economies of scale – inadequate permitting creates an additional and often detrimental barrier to increase net-zero technology manufacturing capacity in the Union. In order to provide project promoters and other investors with the security and clarity needed to increase development of net-zero technologies manufacturing projects, Member States should ensure that the permit-granting process related to such projects does not exceed pre-set time limits. For Net Zero Strategic Projects the length of the permit- granting process should not exceed twelve months for facilities with a yearly production output of more than 1 GW, and 9 months for those with a yearly production output of less than 1 GW. For all other net-zero technology manufacturing projects, the length of the permit-granting process should not exceed eighteen months for facilities with a yearly production output of more than 1 GW, and twelve months for those with a yearly production output of less than 1 GW. For net-zero technologies for which the GW metric is not relevant, such as grids and carbon capture and storage (CCS) or carbon capture and usageutilisation (CCU) technologies, the upper limits of the aforementioned deadlines should apply. For the expansion of existing production lines, each of the aforementioned time limits should be halved.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 374 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 56
(56) In addition, given the importance of Net Zero Strategic Projects for the Union’s energy supply certain administrative restrictions should be partly lifted or simplified to speed up their implementation, without prejudice to ensuring fair and transparent process.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 381 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 62
(62) Net-zero regulatory sandboxes can be an important tool to promote innovation in the field of net-zero technologies and regulatory learning. Innovation needs to be enabled through experimentation spaces as scientific outcomes need to be tested in a controlled real-word environment. Regulatory sandboxes should be introduced to test innovative net-zero technologies in a controlled environment for a limited amount of time It is appropriate to strike a balance between legal certainty for participants in the Net- Zero regulatory sandboxes and the achievement of the objectives of Union law. As Net-Zero regulatory sandboxes must in any case comply with the essential requirements on Net-Zero technology laid out in Union and national law, it is appropriate to provide that participants , who comply with the eligibility requirements for Net-Zero regulatory sandboxes and who follow, in good faith, the guidance provided by the competent authorities and the terms and conditions of the plan agreed with those authorities, are not subject to any administrative fines or penalties without prejudice to any due compensatory damages rightfully claimed by third parties including individuals, local communities and SMEs. This is justified as the safeguards in place will, in principle, ensure effective compliance with Union or Member State law on the Net- Zero technology supervised in the regulatory sandboxes. The Commission will publish a Guidance for Sandboxes document in 2023 as announced in the New European Innovation Agenda to support Member States in preparing the net zero technology sandboxes. Those innovative technologies could eventually be essential to achieve the Union’s climate neutrality objective, ensure the security of supply and resilience of the Union’s energy system, and consequently enter the scope of strategic net-zero technologies.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 406 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
(71) The Union should aim to diversify international trade and investments in net- zero technologies and to promote globally high social and environmental standards should be done in accordance with the ‘do no significant harm’ principle within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 and in close cooperation and partnership with like-minded countries. Similarly, stronger research and innovation efforts to develop and deploy net-zero technologies should be pursued in close cooperation with partner countries in an open but assertive approach.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 416 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes the framework of measures for innovating and scaling up the manufacturing capacity of net-zero technologies in the Union to support the Union’s 2030 target of reducing net greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55 % relative to 1990 levels and the Union’s 2050 climate neutrality target, as defined by Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, and to ensure the Union’s access to a secure and sustainable supply of net-zero technologies needed to safeguard the resilience of the Union’s energy system and enhance its ability to bring health, social and economic benefits for its citizens, as well as to contribute to the creation of quality jobs.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 497 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘net-zero technologies’ means renewable energy technologies66 ; electricity and heat storage technologies; heat pumps; grid technologies; renewable fuels of non-biological origin technologies; sustainable alternative fuels technologies67 ; electrolysers and fuel cells; advanced technologies to produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle, small modular reactors, and related best-in-class fuels; carbon capture, utilisation, and storagecarbon capture and utilisation technologies; and energy- system related energy efficiency technologies. They refer to the final products, specific components and specific machinery primarily used for the production of those products. They shall have reached a technology readiness level of at least 8. _________________ 66 ‘renewable energy' means ‘renewable energy’ as defined in Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources 67 ‘sustainable alternative fuels’ means fuels covered by the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on ensuring a level playing field for sustainable air transport, COM/2021/561 final and by the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and Council on the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport COM/2021/562 final.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 558 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) ‘net-zero strategic project’ means a net-zero technology manufacturing project located in the Union that complies with the criteria set out in Article 10. CCS and nuclear-based technology projects cannot be considered net-zero strategic projects;
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 579 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point q
(q) ‘CO2 injection capacity’ means the annual amount of CO2 that can be injected in an operational geological storage site, permitted under Directive 2009/31/EC, with the purpose to reduce emissions or increase carbon removals, in particular from large scale industrial installations and which is measured in tonnes per annum;deleted
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 586 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point q a (new)
(qa) ‘Carbon Capture and Utilisation (CCU) technologies’ means a range of technologies and applicationd through which CO2 is captured and used either directly (i.e. not chemically altered) or indirectly (i.e. transformed) into various products, including synthetic fuels, chemicals and building aggregates, increasing its circularity and potentially reducing its concentration in the atmosphere.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 630 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Project promoters shall be allowed to submit any documents relevant to the permit-granting process exclusively in electronic form.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 707 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
In exceptional cases, where the nature, complexity, location or size of the proposed project so requires, competent authorities may extend the time limits referred to in paragraph 1 and 2 by a maximum of 12 months before their expiry and on a case-by-case basis.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 711 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Where competent authorities consider that the proposed project raises exceptional risks for the health and safety of workers or of the general population, and where additional time is necessary to establish that adequate safeguards are put in place, they may extend those time limits by a further 69 months, before their expiry and on a case-by-case basis.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 866 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) relevant evidence related to the fulfilment of the criteria laid down in Article 10(1) or (2);
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 923 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) 18 months for all necessary permits to operate a storage site in accordance with Directive 2009/31/EC.deleted
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1003 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16
Union level objective of CO2 injection An annual injection capacity of at least 50 million tonnes of CO2 shall be achieved by 2030, in storage sites located in the territory of the European Union, its exclusive economic zones or on its continental shelf within the meaning of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and which are not combined with Enhanced Hydrocarbon Recovery (EHR).Article 16 deleted capacity
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1008 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
An annual injection capacity of at least 50 million tonnes of CO2 shall be achieved by 2030, in storage sites located in the territory of the European Union, its exclusive economic zones or on its continental shelf within the meaning of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and which are not combined with Enhanced Hydrocarbon Recovery (EHR).deleted
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1030 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17
Transparency of CO2 storage capacity 1. By 3 months from the entry into force of this Regulation, Member States shall: (a) make publicly available data on areas where CO2 storage sites can be permitted on their territory. (b) oblige entities holding an authorisation as defined in Article 1, point 3, of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council71 on their territory to make publicly available all geological data relating to production sites that have been decommissioned or whose decommissioning has been notified to the competent authority. (c) For the purposes of point (a), the data shall include at least the information requested in the Commission Notice on the Guidance to Member States for the update of the 2021-2030 National Energy and Climate Plans. 2. By six months from the entry into force of this Regulation and each year thereafter, each Member State shall submit to the Commission a report describing: (a) CO2 capture projects in progress and an estimation of the corresponding needs for injection and storage capacities; (b) CO2 storage projects in progress on its territory, including the status of permitting under Directive 2009/31/EC, expected dates for Final Investment Decision (FID) and entry into operation; (c) the national support measures that could be adopted to prompt projects referred to in points (a) and (b). _________________ 71 Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorizations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons (OJ L 164, 30.6.1994, p. 3).Article 17 deleted data
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1080 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18
[...]deleted
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1204 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the tender’s contribution to resilience, taking into account the proportion of the products originating from a single source of supply, as determined in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council72 , from which more than 650% of the supply for that specific net-zero technology within the Union originates in the last year for which data is available for when the tender takes place. _________________ 72 Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1).
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1291 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2
2. The additional financial compensation granted by authorities in accordance with paragraph 1, due to the application of the criteria referred to in Article 19(2) (b) (c) and (d) shall not exceed 15 % of the cost of the net-zero technology final product for the consumer. In the case of subsidizing schemes for a specific product, appropriate market surveillance must be put in place in the Member State with an adequate sanctioning mechanism against operators introducing an unjustified increase in costs to final consumers.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1310 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Chapter V – title
V Enhancing skills for quality job creation and social innovation
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1326 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) develop learning programmes, content and materials for training and education of citizens and communities aiming to promote sustainable consumption patterns, raise consumer awareness and provide clear information about the environmental impact of products, as well as facilitate social innovation towards more sustainable consumer choices and behaviors.
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1553 #

2023/0081(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – table 1
1. Solar photovoltaic and solar thermal technologies 2. Onshore wind and offshore renewable technologies 3. Battery/storage technologies 4. Heat pumps, heat recovery ventilation (HRV) and geothermal energy technologies 5. Electrolysers and fuel cells 6. Sustainable biogas/biomethane technologies 7. Carbon Capture and storageutilisation (CCSU) technologies 8. 8. Grid Grid technologies 8a. Low carbon building and insulation technologies .
2023/06/23
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 49 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) Access to raw materials is essential for the Union economy and the functioning of the internal market. There is a set of non-energy, non-agricultural raw materials that, due to their high economic importance and their exposure to high supply risk, often caused by a high concentration of supply from a few third countries, are considered critical. Given the key role of many such critical raw materials in realising the green and digital transitions, and in light of their use for defence and space applications, demand will increase exponentially in the coming years and decades. At the same time, the risk of supply disruptions is increasing against the background of rising geopolitical tensions and resource competition. Furthermore, if not managed properly, increased demand for critical raw materials could lead to negative environmental, economic and social impacts. Considering these trends, it is necessary to take measures to ensure access to a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials to safeguard the Union's economic resilience and open strategic autonomy.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 54 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Firstly, in order to effectively ensure the Union's access to a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials, that framework should include measures to decrease the Union's growing supply risks by strengthening Union capacities along all stages of the strategic raw materials value chain, including extraction, refining, processing and recycling, towards benchmarks defined for each strategic raw material. Secondly, as the Union will continue to rely on imports, the framework should include measures to increase the diversification of external supplies of strategic raw materials through the conclusion of preferential trade agreements with third countries. Thirdly, is necessary to provide measures to reinforce the Union’s ability to monitor and mitigate existing and future supply risks. Fourthly, the framework should contain measures to increase the circularity and sustainability of the critical raw materials consumed in the Union, including reinforcing research and development of alternative materials and technical solutions as well as refinement, production and recycling processes.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 64 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) To strengthen Union capacities along the strategic raw materials value chain, benchmarks should be set to guide efforts and track progress. The aim should be to increase capacities for each strategic raw material at each stage of the value chain, while aiming to achieve overall capacity benchmarks for extraction, processing and recycling of strategic raw materials. Firstly, the Union should increase the use of its own geological resources of strategic raw materials and build up capacity to allow it to extract the materials needed to produce at least 10 % of the Union's consumption of strategic raw materials. Keeping in mind that extraction capacity is highly dependent on the availability of Union geological resources, the achievement of this benchmark is dependent on such availability. Secondly, in order to build a full value chain and prevent any bottlenecks at intermediate stages, the Union should in addition increase its processing capacity along the value chain and be able to produce at least 40 % of its annual consumption of strategic raw materials. Thirdly, it is expected that in the coming decades a growing share of the Union's consumption of strategic raw materials can be covered by secondary raw materials, which would improve both the security and the sustainability of the Union’s raw materials supply. Therefore, Union recycling capacity should be able to produce at least 10% for each strategic raw material as well as 25 % of the Union’s annual aggregated consumption of strategic raw materials. These benchmarks refer to the 2030 time horizon, in alignment with the Union's climate and energy targets set under Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council29 and the digital targets under the Digital Decade30 , which they underpin. Furthermore, quality jobs, including skills development and job-to- job transitions, will address risks in the sectoral labour market and help ensure the EU’s competitiveness. _________________ 29 Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1). 30 Decision (EU) 2022/2481 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 establishing the Digital Decade Policy Programme 2030 (OJL 323, 19.12.2022, p. 4–26 )
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 81 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) In order to ensure the sustainability of increased raw material production, new raw materials projects should be implemented sustainably in accordance with the ‘do no significant harm’ principle within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. To that end, the Strategic Projects receiving support under this Regulation should be assessed taking into account international instruments covering all aspects of sustainability highlighted in the EU principles for sustainable raw materials31 , including ensuring environmental protection, socially responsible practices, including respect for human rights such as the rights of women, and transparent business practices. Projects should also ensure engagement in good faith as well as comprehensive and meaningful consultations with local communities, including with indigenous peoples. To provide project promoters with a clear and efficient way of complying with this criterion, compliance with relevant Union legislation, international standards, guidelines and principles or participation in a certification scheme recognised under this Regulation should be considered sufficient. _________________ 31 European Commission, Directorate- General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, EU principles for sustainable raw materials, Publications Office, 2021, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2873/27875
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 91 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The volatile prices of several strategic raw materials, exacerbated by limited means to hedge them on forward markets, create an obstacle both for project promoters to secure financing for strategic raw material projects as well as for downstream consumers looking to secure stable and predictable prices for key inputs. In an effort to reduce uncertainty over future prices for strategic raw materials, it is necessary to provide for the setting up of a system that enables both interested off- takers and promoters of Strategic Projects, including SMEs, to indicate their buying or selling bids and to bring them in contact if the respective bids are potentially compatible.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 97 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
(49) Critical raw materials sold on the Union market are often certified regarding the sustainability of their production and supply chain. Certification can be obtained in the context of a broad range of public and private certification schemes available with varying scopes and stringency, creating the potential for confusion regarding the nature and veracity of claims made about the relative sustainability of critical raw materials placed on the Union market based on such certification. The Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing acts recognising certification schemes that should be considered comprehensive and trustworthy, providing a common basis for authorities and market participants for assessing the sustainability of critical raw materials in accordance with the ‘Do No Significant Harm’ principle within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. Recognition should be given only to certification schemes that cover a broad range of sustainability aspects, including environmental protection, human rights including labour rights and business transparency, and which contain provisions for independent third party verification and monitoring of compliance. To ensure efficient procedures, promoters of projects applying to be recognised as Strategic Projects should be allowed to rely on participation in a recognised scheme to show that their project is implemented sustainably.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 102 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
(55) In order to support the implementation of tasks pertaining to the development of Strategic Projects and their financing, exploration programmes, monitoring capacities or strategic stocks and to advise the Commission appropriately, a European Critical Raw Materials Board should be established. The Board should be composed of Member States and of the Commission, while being able to ensure participation of other parties as observers. To develop the necessary expertise for the implementation of certain tasks, the Board should establish standing sub-groups on financing, exploration, monitoring and strategic stocks, that should act as a network by gathering the different relevant national authorities, economic operators and, when necessary, consult industry, including SMEs, academia, civil society and other relevant stakeholders. TAlthough non-binding, the Board’s advice and opinions should be non-binding andtaken into due consideration and prioritised by the Commission. However, the absence of such an advice or opinion should not prevent the Commission from performing its tasks under this Regulation.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 105 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of this Regulation is to improve the functioning of the internal market by establishing a framework to ensure the Union's access to a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials in accordance with the ‘do no significant harm’ principle within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 107 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. To achieve the general objective referred to in paragraph 1, this Regulation aims toshall:
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 108 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
(a) strengthen the different stages of the strategic raw materials value chain with a view to ensure that, by 2030, and in the following decades, Union capacities for each strategic raw material have significantly increased so that, overall, Union capacity approaches or reaches the following benchmarks:
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 111 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii
(iii) Union recycling capacity, including for all intermediate recycling steps, is able to produce at least 150% of the Union's annual consumption of each strategic raw material as well as 25% of the Union's aggregated consumption of strategic raw materials.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 113 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) Access to raw materials is essential for the Union economy and the functioning of the internal market. There is a set of non-energy, non-agricultural raw materials that, due to their high economic importance and their exposure to high supply risk, often caused by a high concentration of supply from a few third countries, are considered critical. Given the key role of many such critical raw materials in realising the green and digital transitions, and in light of their use for defence and space applications, demand will increase exponentially in the coming years and decades. At the same time, the risk of supply disruptions is increasing against the background of rising geopolitical tensions and resource competition. Furthermore, if not managed properly, increased demand for critical raw materials could lead to negative environmental, economic and social impacts. Considering these trends, it is necessary to take measures to ensure access to a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials to safeguard the Union's economic resilience and open strategic autonomy.
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 117 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) diversify the Union's imports of strategic raw materials with a view to ensure that, by 2030, the Union's annual consumption of each strategic raw material at any relevant stage of processing can rely on imports from several third countries, none of which provide more than 650% of the Union's annual consumption;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 121 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Firstly, in order to effectively ensure the Union's access to a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials, that framework should include measures to decrease the Union's growing supply risks by strengthening Union capacities along all stages of the strategic raw materials value chain, including extraction, refining, processing and recycling, towards benchmarks defined for each strategic raw material. Secondly, as the Union will continue to rely on imports, the framework should include measures to increase the diversification of external supplies of strategic raw materials through the conclusion of preferential trade agreements with third countries. Thirdly, is necessary to provide measures to reinforce the Union’s ability to monitor and mitigate existing and future supply risks. Fourthly, the framework should contain measures to increase the circularity and sustainability of the critical raw materials consumed in the Union, including reinforcing research and development of alternative materials and technical solutions as well as extraction, refinement, production and recycling processes.
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 139 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 51 a (new)
(51a) ‘loudspeaker’ is an electroacoustic transducer that converts an electrical audio signal into sound. It consists of various components, such as a diaphragm or cone, voice coil, magnet or permanent magnet, and enclosure, which work together to produce sound waves;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 143 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 62
(62) ‘Strategic Partnership’ means a commitment between the Union and a third country to increase cooperation related to the raw materials value chain that is established through abinding and non- binding instruments setting out concrete actions of mutual interest.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 151 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) To strengthen Union capacities along the strategic raw materials value chain, benchmarks should be set to guide efforts and track progress. The aim should be to increase capacities for each strategic raw material at each stage of the value chain, while aiming to achieve overall capacity benchmarks for extraction, processing and recycling of strategic raw materials. Firstly, the Union should increase the use of its own geological resources of strategic raw materials and build up capacity to allow it to extract the materials needed to produce at least 10 % of the Union's consumption of strategic raw materials. Keeping in mind that extraction capacity is highly dependent on the availability of Union geological resources, the achievement of this benchmark is dependent on such availability. Secondly, in order to build a full value chain and prevent any bottlenecks at intermediate stages, the Union should in addition increase its processing capacity along the value chain and be able to produce at least 40 % of its annual consumption of strategic raw materials. Thirdly, it is expected that in the coming decades a growing share of the Union's consumption of strategic raw materials can be covered by secondary raw materials, which would improve both the security and the sustainability of the Union’s raw materials supply. Therefore, Union recycling capacity should be able to produce at least 10% for each strategic raw material as well as 25 % of the Union’s annual aggregated consumption of strategic raw materials. These benchmarks refer to the 2030 time horizon, in alignment with the Union's climate and energy targets set under Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council29and the digital targets under the Digital Decade30, which they underpin. Furthermore, quality jobs, including skills development and job-to- job transitions, will address risks in the sectoral labour market and help ensure the EU’s competitiveness. _________________ 29 Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1). 30 Decision (EU) 2022/2481 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 establishing the Digital Decade Policy Programme 2030 (OJL 323, 19.12.2022, p. 4–26 )
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 158 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the project would be implemented sustainably, when based in a Member State or in a third country, would be implemented sustainably in accordance with the ‘do no significant harm’ principle within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, in particular as regards the monitoring, prevention and minimisation of environmental impacts, the use of socially responsible practices including respect of human and labour rights, quality jobs potential and meaningful engagement with local communities and relevant social partners, and the use of transparent business practices with adequate compliance policies to prevent and minimise risks of adverse impacts on the proper functioning of public administration, including corruption and bribery;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 166 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) for projects in third countries that are emerging markets or developing economies, the project would be mutually beneficial for the Union and the third country concerned by adding economic and social value in that country, reaching the benchmark established in Article 1(2)(b), and should be coherent with the Regulation (EU) 2017/821 (Conflict Minerals Regulation).
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 176 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) Information on sustainability performance and key metrics, such as greenhouse gas emissions, water usage, waste generation, and social impacts;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 183 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) In order to ensure the sustainability of increased raw material production, new raw materials projects should be implemented sustainably in accordance with the ‘do no significant harm’ principle within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. To that end, the Strategic Projects receiving support under this Regulation should be assessed taking into account international instruments covering all aspects of sustainability highlighted in the EU principles for sustainable raw materials31, including ensuring environmental protection, socially responsible practices, including respect for human rights such as the rights of women, and transparent business practices. Projects should also ensure engagement in good faith as well as comprehensive and meaningful consultations with local communities, including with indigenous peoples. To provide project promoters with a clear and efficient way of complying with this criterion, compliance with relevant Union legislation, international standards, guidelines and principles or participation in a certification scheme recognised under this Regulation should be considered sufficient. _________________ 31 European Commission, Directorate- General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, EU principles for sustainable raw materials, Publications Office, 2021, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2873/27875
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 192 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. With regard to the environmental impacts addressed in Articles 6(4) and 16(1)(c) of Directive 92/43/EEC, Article 4(7) of Directive 2000/60/EC and Article 9(1)(a) of Directive 2009/147/EC, Strategic Projects in the Union shall be considered as being of public interest, including when promoting environmental protection, social justice and ethical trade practices, or serving public health and, safety and economic interest, and may be considered as having an overriding public interest provided that all the conditions set out in those Directives are fulfilled.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 198 #

2023/0079(COD)

9. The project promoter shall establish and regularly update a dedicated project website or a dedicated and well visible section of the company's main website with relevant information about the Strategic Project, including information on the environmental, social and economic impacts and benefits associated with the Strategic Project. The website shall be freely accessible to the public and shall be available in a language or languages that can be easily understood by the local population.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 201 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. By [OP please insert: 3 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], Member States shall designate one national competent authority which shall be responsible for facilitating and coordinating the permit-granting process for critical raw material projects, including its environmental assessment, and provide information on the elements referred to in Article 17.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 236 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The volatile prices of several strategic raw materials, exacerbated by limited means to hedge them on forward markets, create an obstacle both for project promoters to secure financing for strategic raw material projects as well as for downstream consumers looking to secure stable and predictable prices for key inputs. In an effort to reduce uncertainty over future prices for strategic raw materials, it is necessary to provide for the setting up of a system that enables both interested off- takers and promoters of Strategic Projects, including SMEs, to indicate their buying or selling bids and to bring them in contact if the respective bids are potentially compatible.
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 269 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) alternative supplies for raw materials
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 270 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) trade in waste, scrap and secondary raw materials
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 274 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) where the raw material concerned is sustainably extracted, processed or recycled;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 277 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c
(c) factors that might affect supply, including but not limited to the geopolitical situation, trade disputes, environmental restrictions, conservation measures, sustainability standards, logistics, energy supply, workforce or natural disasters;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 282 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States, after consulting relevant stakeholders and SMEs representatives, shall identify key market operators along the critical raw materials value chain established in their territory and shall:
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 283 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
(49) Critical raw materials sold on the Union market are often certified regarding the sustainability of their production and supply chain. Certification can be obtained in the context of a broad range of public and private certification schemes available with varying scopes and stringency, creating the potential for confusion regarding the nature and veracity of claims made about the relative sustainability of critical raw materials placed on the Union market based on such certification. The Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing acts recognising certification schemes that should be considered comprehensive and trustworthy, providing a common basis for authorities and market participants for assessing the sustainability of critical raw materials in accordance with the ‘Do No Significant Harm’ principle within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. Recognition should be given only to certification schemes that cover a broad range of sustainability aspects, including environmental protection, human rights including labour rights and business transparency, and which contain provisions for independent third party verification and monitoring of compliance. To ensure efficient procedures, promoters of projects applying to be recognised as Strategic Projects should be allowed to rely on participation in a recognised scheme to show that their project is implemented sustainably.
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 290 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
(55) In order to support the implementation of tasks pertaining to the development of Strategic Projects and their financing, exploration programmes, monitoring capacities or strategic stocks and to advise the Commission appropriately, a European Critical Raw Materials Board should be established. The Board should be composed of Member States and of the Commission, while being able to ensure participation of other parties as observers. To develop the necessary expertise for the implementation of certain tasks, the Board should establish standing sub-groups on financing, exploration, monitoring and strategic stocks, that should act as a network by gathering the different relevant national authorities, economic operators and, when necessary, consult industry, including SMEs, academia, civil society and other relevant stakeholders. TAlthough non-binding, the Board’s advice and opinions should be non-binding andtaken into due consideration and prioritised by the Commission. However, the absence of such an advice or opinion should not prevent the Commission from performing its tasks under this Regulation.
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 295 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) set minimum amounts of demanded material without prejudice to the ability of small market actors to participate in the system, taking into account the aggregate needs of SMEs, the expected number of interested participants and the need to ensure a manageable amount of participants.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 303 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of this Regulation is to improve the functioning of the internal market by establishing a framework to ensure the Union's access to a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials in accordance with the ‘do no significant harm’ principle within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852.
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 309 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. To achieve the general objective referred to in paragraph 1, this Regulation aims toshall:
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 311 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
(a) strengthen the different stages of the strategic raw materials value chain with a view to ensure that, by 2030, and in the following decades, Union capacities for each strategic raw material have significantly increased so that, overall, Union capacity approaches or reaches the following benchmarks:
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 316 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 4
4. The national measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be designed so as to avoid barriers to trade, export restrictions and distortions of competition in conformity with the TFEU.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 318 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii
(iii) Union recycling capacity, including for all intermediate recycling steps, is able to produce at least 150% of the Union's annual consumption of each strategic raw material as well as 25% of the Union's aggregated consumption of strategic raw materials.
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 321 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. From [OP please insert: 3 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], any natural or legal person that places on the market magnetic resonance imaging devices, wind energy generators, industrial robots, motor vehicles, light means of transport, cooling generators, heat pumps, electric motors, loudspeakers, including where they are integrated in other products, automatic washing machines, tumble driers, microwaves, vacuum cleaners or dishwashers shall ensure that those products bear a conspicuous, clearly legible and indelible label indicating:
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 335 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) ensure that any such measure is not prepared, adopted or applied with a view to or with the effect of creating unnecessary obstacles to international trade and customs procedures, and is no more trade- restrictive than necessary to achieve the Union’s climate, social and environmental objectives, having regard to the ability of third-country suppliers to comply with such a declaration such that aggregate trade flows and critical raw materials costs are not disproportionately affected;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 338 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) diversify the Union's imports of strategic raw materials with a view to ensure that, by 2030, the Union's annual consumption of each strategic raw material at any relevant stage of processing can rely on imports from several third countries, none of which provide more than 650% of the Union's annual consumption;
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 349 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii
(iii) improving cooperation along the critical raw materials value chain between the Union and partner countries; by harmonizing regulatory frameworks, standards and certificates, promoting investment, encouraging public-private partnerships and exploring sector-specific collaboration;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 403 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
2. Each Member State shall appoint a high-level representative to the Board and the European Parliament shall appoint its representatives to the Board. Where relevant as regards the function and expertise, a Member State may appoint different representatives in relation to different tasks of the Board. Each member of the Board shall have an alternate.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 412 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 30 a (new)
(30a) 'small and medium-sized company' means, in accordance with Annex I, Article 2(1) of Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003, any company that had less than 250 employees on average and had a net worlwide turnover of less or equal to EUR 50 milion, and/or an annual balance sheet total not exceeding EUR 43 million in the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been prepared;
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 415 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) a subgroup bringing together industry representatives from the strategic sectors involved, with particular attention to the representatives of national SMEs.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 419 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 42
(42) ‘motor vehicle’ means any type- approved vehicle of the M or N categories in the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2018/858and N categories, including subcategories ORV, SPV, ORV-SPV, in the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2018/858; T and C categories in the meaning of Regulation (EU) 167/2013; L categories in the meaning of Regulation (EU) 168/2013; ships and boats as well as aircrafts and helicopters;
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 420 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 51 a (new)
(51a) ‘loudspeaker’ is an electroacoustic transducer that converts an electrical audio signal into sound. It consists of various components, such as a diaphragm or cone, voice coil, magnet or permanent magnet, and enclosure, which work together to produce sound waves;
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 483 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the project would be implemented sustainably, when based in a Member State or in a third country, would be implemented sustainably in accordance with the ‘do no significant harm’ principle within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, in particular as regards the monitoring, prevention and minimisation of environmental impacts, the use of socially responsible practices including respect of human and labour rights, quality jobs potential and meaningful engagement with local communities and relevant social partners, and the use of transparent business practices with adequate compliance policies to prevent and minimise risks of adverse impacts on the proper functioning of public administration, including corruption and bribery;
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 496 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) for projects in third countries that are emerging markets or developing economies, the project would be mutually beneficial for the Union and the third country concerned by adding value in that country, reaching the benchmark established in Article 1(2)(b), and should be coherent with the Regulation (EU) 2017/821 (Conflict Minerals Regulation).
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 565 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 9
9. The project promoter shall establish and regularly update a dedicated project website or a dedicated and well visible section of the company's main website with relevant information about the Strategic Project, including information on the environmental, social and economic impacts and benefits associated with the Strategic Project. The website shall be freely accessible to the public and shall be available in a language or languages that can be easily understood by the local population.
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 588 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7
7. Member States shall ensure that the national competent authority referred to in paragraph 1 has a sufficient number of qualified staff and sufficient financial, technical and technological resources necessary, including for up- and re-skilling, for the effective performance of its tasks under this Regulation. Where a Member State lacks sufficient resources to comply with this provision, the Commission shall offer technical and financial support.
2023/05/26
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 689 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission, in accordance with the standing sub-groups established in point (da) of Article 35(6), shall monitor supply risk related to critical raw materials. That monitoring shall cover at least the evolution of the following parameters:
2023/05/30
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 726 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States, after consulting relevant stakeholders and SMEs representatives, shall identify key market operators along the critical raw materials value chain established in their territory and shall:
2023/05/30
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 747 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) set minimum amounts of demanded material without prejudice to the ability of small market actors to participate in the system, taking into account the aggregate needs of SMEs, the expected number of interested participants and the need to ensure a manageable amount of participants.
2023/05/30
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 821 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. From [OP please insert: 3 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], any natural or legal person that places on the market magnetic resonance imaging devices, wind energy generators, industrial robots, motor vehicles, light means of transport, cooling generators, heat pumps, electric motors, loudspeakers, including where they are integrated in other products, automatic washing machines, tumble driers, microwaves, vacuum cleaners or dishwashers shall ensure that those products bear a conspicuous, clearly legible and indelible label indicating:
2023/05/30
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 925 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
2. Each Member State shall appoint a high-level representative to the Board and the European Parliament shall appoint its representatives to the Board. Where relevant as regards the function and expertise, a Member State may appoint different representatives in relation to different tasks of the Board. Each member of the Board shall have an alternate.
2023/05/30
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 945 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) a subgroup bringing together industry representatives from the strategic sectors involved, with particular attention to the representatives of national SMEs.
2023/05/30
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 958 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 3(2), Article 4(2), Article 5(2), Article 20(2), Article 27(12), Article 28(2) and Article 30(1) and (5) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of eight years from [OP please insert: one month after the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the six- year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.
2023/05/30
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 961 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 3
3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 3(2), Article 4(2), Article 5(2), Article 20(2), Article 27(12), Article 28(2) and Article 30(1) and (5) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect on the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
2023/05/30
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 965 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 6
6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 3(2), Article 4(2), Article 5(2), Article 20(2), Article 27(12), Article 28(2) and Article 30(1) and (5) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period may be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
2023/05/30
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 974 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1
By 12 months after entry into force of the Regulation, Member States shall lay down common rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented equally. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Member States shall, without delay, notify the Commission of those rules and of those measures and shall notify it, without delay, of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
2023/05/30
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1042 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Section 1 – paragraph 1 – point p a (new)
(pa) Aluminium
2023/05/30
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 212 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) On 25 February 2015 the Commission presented a Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward- Looking Climate Change Policy that proposed to put citizens at its core, where citizens take ownership of the energy transition, benefit from new technologies to reduce their bills, participate actively in the market, and where vulnerable consumers are protected. As the price crisis has demonstrated, local ownership of production of renewable energy has the potential to contribute to long-term security of supply at the local level, and to provide citizens with the ability to control the cost of the renewable energy they consume. It is thus essential to ensure that citizens are able to take ownership of local potential for production and storage of renewable energy as well as access local infrastructure and obtain a grid connection. Citizens may do so individually or collectively, particularly through municipalities and locally controlled renewable energy communities and citizen energy communities. Supporting such initiatives will help to end dependency on imported fossil fuels, lower consumers energy bills, achieve a decentralised, flexible and decarbonised power system, alleviate energy poverty and empower citizens and communities in the energy transition.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 283 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) However, to the extent that the limitation to set out direct price support schemes in the form of two-way contracts for difference narrows down the types of direct price support schemes that Member States can adopt as regards renewable energy sources, it should be limited to low carbon, non-fossil fuelrenewable energy technologies, with low and stable operational costs and to technologies which typically do not provide flexibility to the electricity system, while excluding technologies that are at early stages of their market deployment. This is necessary to ensure that the economic viability of generation technologies with high marginal costs is not jeopardised and to maintain the incentives of the technologies which can offer flexibility to the electricity system to bid in the electricity market based on their opportunity costs. In addition, the limitation to set out direct price support schemes in the form of two-way contracts for difference should not apply to emerging technologies for which other types of direct price support schemes may be better placed to incentivise their uptake. The limitation should be without prejudice to the possible exemption for small-scale installations and demonstration projects pursuant to Article 4 (3) of (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and consider the specificities of renewable energy communities in accordance with Article 22 (7) of that Directive.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 322 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
(41) The connection of new generation and demand installations, in particular renewable energy plants, often faces delays in grid connection procedures. One of the reasons for such delays is the lack of available grid capacity at the location chosen by the investor, which implies the need for grid extensions or reinforcements to connect the installations to the system in a safe manner. A new requirement for electricity system operators, both at transmission and distribution levels, to publish and update information on the grid capacity available in their areas of operation would contribute to decision- making by investors on the basis of information of grid capacity availability within the system and thus to the required acceleration in the deployment of renewable energy. Such information requirement shall also support the decisions of local actors interested in the uptake of self-consumption from community-owned energy production as well as help Member States and Local Authorities to better allocate investments to finance necessary network reinforcements, especially in distribution network, to allow local production and supply of energy. Overall, supporting such investments will also ensure a more successful and democratic energy transition, increasing public acceptance ensuring that the EU can meet its climate and energy targets.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 324 #

2023/0077(COD)

(42) Furthermore, to tackle the problem of lengthy reply times on requests for connection to the grid, transmission and distribution system operators should provide clear and transparent information to system users about the status and treatment of their connection requests, including estimated grid connection costs where relevant, as well as publicly available timelines and procedures. Transmission and distribution system operators should endeavour to provide such information within a period of threewo months from the submission of the request.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 325 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42 a (new)
(42a) Renewable energy communities and citizen energy communities, particularly those that organise themselves as cooperatives, are part of the social and solidarity economy and represent a type of non- commercial market actor in the energy system. In line with the United Nations (UN) General Assembly's resolution on promoting the social and solidarity economy for sustainable development of 27 March 2023, energy communities engage in economic, social and environmental activities to serve the collective and/or general interest and are based on principles of voluntary cooperation and mutual aid, democratic and participatory governance, autonomy, and primacy of people and social purpose over capital in the distribution and use of surpluses and/or profits resulting from their activities. Nevertheless, their specific characteristics in terms of size, ownership structure, non-commercial purpose and number of projects, hampers their ability to compete on an equal footing with larger commercial market actors, particularly when it comes to access to finance and navigation of administrative procedures, including approval of installations for production of renewable energy and obtaining a grid connection. Measures to offset the disadvantages relating to the specific characteristics of renewable energy communities and locally-controlled citizen energy communities include ensuring access to sites for installations to produce renewable energy, particularly those intended for self-consumption or local supply, ensuring access to a grid connection, and provision of technical and financial support to ease their participation in the system.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 326 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
(43) During the energy crisis, consumers have been exposed to extremely volatile wholesale energy prices and had limited opportunities to engage in the energy market. Consequently, many households, have been facing difficulties when paying their bills. Vulnerable consumers and the energy poor are the hardest hit28, but middle-income households have also been exposed to such difficulties. It is therefore important to update consumer rights and protections, allowing consumers to benefit from the energy transition, take ownership of renewable energy production, decouple their electricity bills from short term price movements on energy markets and rebalance the risk between suppliers and consumers. It is also important to ensure that local communities, including final households, public authorities, renewable energy communities and locally- controlled citizen energy communities, as well as SMEs that are not already active in the energy sector, are able to utilise nearby grid infrastructure and sites for production in order to meet their collective consumption needs. _________________ 28 Particular groups are more at risk of being affected by energy poverty or more susceptible to the adverse impacts of energy poverty, such as women, persons with disabilities, older persons, children, and persons with a minority racial or ethnic background.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 332 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
(45) When suppliers’ do not ensure that their electricity portfolio is sufficiently hedged changes in wholesale electricity prices can leave them financially at risk and, result in their failure, passing on costs to consumers and other network users. Hence, it should be ensured that suppliers are appropriately hedged when offering fixed price contracts. An appropriate hedging strategy should take into account the suppliers' access to its own generation and its capitalisation as well as its exposure to changes in wholesale market prices. The specificities of SME suppliers, such as cooperatives having smaller supply volumes and aiming at serving collective or general interest rather than generating profits, should be accounted for when considering potential hedging requirements for suppliers. This shall ensure that such requirements do not constitute a disproportionate barrier to SME suppliers entering and operating in the energy market.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 336 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
(46) Consumers should be able to choose the supplier and third party service provider that can facilitate energy sharing which offers them the price and service which best suits their needs. Advances in metering and sub- metering technology combined with information and communication technology mean that it is now technically possible to have multiple suppliers for a single premises. If they so wish, customers should be able to use these possibilities to choose a separate supplier notably for electricity to power appliances such as heat pumps or electric vehicles which have a particularly high consumption or which also have the capability to shift their electricity consumption automatically in response to price signals. Moreover, with fast- responding dedicated metering devices which are attached to or embedded in appliances with flexible, controllable loads, final customers can participate in other incentive-based demand response schemes that provide flexibility services on the electricity market and to transmission and distribution system operators. Overall, such arrangements should contribute to the increased uptake of demand response and to consumer empowerment allowing them to have more control over their energy use and bills, while providing to the electricity system additional flexibility in order to cope with demand and supply fluctuations.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 337 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
(49) Energy sharing can create resilience against the effects of high and volatile wholesale market prices on consumers’ energy bills, empowers a wider group of consumers that do not otherwise have the option of becoming an active customer due to financial or spatial constraints, such as energy poor and vulnerable consumers, and leads to increased uptake of renewable energy by mobilising additional private capital investments and diversifying remuneration pathways. With the integration of appropriate price signals and storage facilities, electricity sharing can help lay the foundation to help tap into the flexibility potential of smaller consumers, making sure that the ownership of the shared production from renewable installations and energy storage facilities, regardless of whether a third party owns the production installation, always stay with the local actors that participate in the energy sharing projects. Furthermore, the third party should remain subject to the instructions of the active customers participating in the energy sharing initiative. To ensure that third parties attached to integrated undertakings do not utilize energy sharing to lock consumers into using their or their other integrated enterprises’ services, active customers should be able to exercise the right to switch service providers or supplier, regardless of which party owns the production installation used for energy sharing.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 341 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50 a (new)
(50a) There is a need to make it easier for non-professional and non-commercial market actors to successfully navigate obtaining relevant licenses and approvals or authorisations. This should be facilitated by allocating local space so that energy communities can install renewable energy production, obtain a grid connection, and maintain access to the grid to share energy locally. In easing the ability of energy communities to share energy with each other, public authorities and relevant transmission and distribution system operators should streamline the administrative process for energy community sharing projects, provide a dedicated window or contact point, so that they can access information and register their projects, and receive technical assistance.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 344 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 51
(51) Energy sharing operationalises the collective consumption of self-generated or stored electricity injected into the grid by more than one jointly acting active customers. Member States should put in place the appropriate IT infrastructure to allow for the administrative matching within a certain timeframe of consumption with self-generated or stored renewable energy for the purpose of calculating the energy component of the energy bill and netted energy that will not be accounted for. The output of these facilities should be distributed among the aggregated consumer load profiles based on static, variable or dynamic calculation methods that can be pre-defined or agreed upon by the active customers.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 360 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/943
Recital 4
(-1) Recital 4 is amended as follow: "(4) This Regulation establishes rules to ensure the functioning of the internal market for electricity and includes requirements related to the development of renewable forms of energy and environmental policy, in particular specific rules for certain types of renewable power- generating and energy storage facilities, concerning balancing responsibility, dispatch and redispatching, as well as a threshold for CO2 emissions of new generation capacity where such capacity is subject to temporary measures to ensure the necessary level of resource adequacy, namely, capacity mechanisms. " Or. en (32019R0943)
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 361 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2019/943
Recital 18
(-1 a) Recital 18 is amended as follow: "(18) Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/631 (9) sets out the requirements for grid connection of power-generating facilities to the interconnected system, in particular with respect to synchronous power-generating modules, power park modules and offshore power park modules. Those requirements help to ensure fair conditions of competition in the internal electricity market, to ensure system security and the integration of electricity from renewable sources and energy storage, and to facilitate Union-wide trade in electricity. Articles 66 and 67 of Regulation (EU) 2016/631 set out rules for emerging technologies in electricity generation " Or. en (32019R0943)
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 365 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2019/943
Article 1– point b
(b) set fundamental principles for well- functioning, integrated electricity markets, which allow all resource providers and electricity customers non-discriminatory market access, enable the development of forward electricity markets to allow suppliers and consumers to hedge or protect themselves against the risk of future volatility in electricity prices, empower consumers, promoting energy sharing and local ownership of production and supply from renewable energy sources and storing facilities, ensure competitiveness on the global market, enhance flexibility through demand response, energy storage and other non- fossil flexibility solutions, ensure energy efficiency, facilitate aggregation of distributed demand and supply, and enable market and sectoral integration and market- based remuneration of electricity generated from renewable sources;
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 368 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2019/943
Article 1 – point e
(e) support long-term investments in development of renewable energy generation and enablestorage capacity and of transmission and distribution networks to fulfil the future needs of electric mobility, heat pump buildings cooling and heating, local energy production, sharing and self consumption, thus facilitating electrification and decarbonisation, and enabling consumers’ to make their energy bills less dependent from fluctuations of short-term electricity market prices, in particular fossil fuel prices in the medium to long-term.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 623 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Regulation (EU) 2019/943
Article 19a, paragraph 1
1. Member States shall facilitate power purchase agreements (‘PPAs’) with a view to reaching the objectives set out in their integrated national energy and climate plan with respect to the dimension decarbonisation referred to in point (a) of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, while preserving competitive and liquid electricity markets. Member States shall make sure that PPAs are accessible to SME market actors, including citizen energy communities and renewable energy communities, in particular by implementing a framework to facilitate the access to financing.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1014 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2019/943
Article 50 – paragraph 4 a
Transmission system operators and distribution system operators shall publish in a clear and transparent manner, information on the capacity available for new connections in their respective areas of operation, including in congested areas if flexible energy storage connections can be accommodated, and update that information regularly, at least quarterly.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1018 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2019/943
Article 50 – paragraph 4 a
Transmission system operators and distribution system operators shall also provide clear and transparent information to system users about the status and treatment of their connection requests. They shall provide such information within a period of threewo months from the submission of the request . Member States shall ensure that penalties apply to instances where transmission system operators and distribution system operators do not comply with the obligations specified in this article;
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1021 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2019/943
Article 50 – paragraph 4 b (new)
4aa. Member States shall ensure that transmission system operators and distribution system operators develop procedures to guarantee that available grid connection capacity is made accessible to satisfy local interest in the uptake of community-owned generation and energy storage systems, particularly when the production is intended for self- consumption and energy sharing by, or between, the members or shareholders.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1039 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Recital 10
(-1) Recital 10 is replaced by the following "(10) Consumers have an essential role to play in achieving the flexibility necessary to adapt the electricity system to variable and distributed renewable electricity generation. Technological progress in grid management and the generation of renewable electricity has unlocked many opportunities for consumers. Healthy competition in retail markets is essential to ensuring the market-driven deployment of innovative new services and products that address consumers' changing needs and abilities, while increasing system flexibility. However, the lack of real-time or near real- time information provided to consumers about their energy consumption has prevented them from being active participants in the energy market and the energy transition. By empowering consumers and providing them with the tools to participate more in the energy market, including participating in new ways, such as the information about the advantages of purchasing of ‘energy smart products’, it is intended that citizens in the Union benefit from the internal market for electricity and that the Union's renewable energy targets are attained " Or. en (32019L0944)
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1040 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point -1 a (new)
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Recital 10
(-1 a) Recital 10 is replaced by the following: "(10). Consumers have an essential role to play in achieving the flexibility necessary to adapt the electricity system to variable and distributed renewable electricity generation and storage. Technological progress in grid management and the generation and storage of renewable electricity has unlocked many opportunities for consumers. Healthy competition in retail markets is essential to ensuring the market-driven deployment of innovative new services that address consumers' changing needs and abilities, while increasing system flexibility. However, the lack of real-time or near real- time information provided to consumers about their energy consumption has prevented them from being active participants in the energy market and the energy transition. By empowering consumers and providing them with the tools to participate more in the energy market, including participating in new ways, it is intended that citizens in the Union benefit from the internal market for electricity and that the Union's renewable energy targets are attained. " Or. en (32019L0944)
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1041 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point -1 b (new)
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Recital 23
(-1b) Recital 23 is replaced by: "(23) Public service obligations in the form of price setting for the supply of electricity should be used without overriding the principle of open markets in clearly defined circumstances and beneficiaries and should be limited in duration. Such circumstances might occur for example where supply is severely constrained, causing significantly higher electricity prices than normal, or in the event of a market failure where interventions by regulatory authorities and competition authorities have proven to be ineffective. This would disproportionately affect households and, in particular, vulnerable and energy poor customers who typically expend a higher share of their disposable income on energy bills compared to high-income consumers. In order to mitigate the distortive effects of public service obligations in price setting for the supply of electricity, Member States applying such interventions should put in place additional measures, including measures to prevent distortions of price setting in the wholesale market. Member States should ensure that all beneficiaries of regulated prices are able to benefit fully from the offers available on the competitive market when they choose to do so. To that end, those beneficiaries need to be equipped with smart metering systems and have access to dynamic electricity price contracts. In addition, they should be directly and regularly informed of the offers and savings available on the competitive market, in particular relating to dynamic electricity price contracts, and should be provided with assistance to respond to and benefit from market-based offers. " Or. en (32019L0944)
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1042 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point -1 c (new)
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Recital 43
(-1c) Recital 43 is replaced by the following: "(43) Distributed energy technologies and consumer empowerment have made community energy an effective and cost- efficient way to meet citizens' needs and expectations regarding energy sources, services and local participation. Community energy offers an inclusive option for all consumers to have a direct stake in producing, consuming or sharing energy. Community energy initiatives focus primarily on providing affordable energy of a specific kind, such as renewable energy, for their members or shareholders rather than on prioritising profit-making like a traditional electricity undertaking. By directly engaging with consumers, community energy initiatives demonstrate their potential to facilitate the uptake of new technologies and consumption patterns, including smart distribution grids and demand response, in an integrated manner. Community energy can also advance energy efficiency at household level and help fight energy poverty through reduced consumption and lower supply tariffs. Community energy also enables certain groups of household customers to participate in the electricity markets, who otherwise might not have been able to do so. Where they have been successfully operated such initiatives have delivered economic, social and environmental benefits to the community that go beyond the mere benefits derived from the provision of energy services. This Directive aims to recognise certain categories of citizen energy initiatives at the Union level as ‘citizen energy communities’, in order to provide them with an enabling framework, fair treatment, a level playing field and a well-defined catalogue of rights and obligations. Household customers should be allowed to participate voluntarily in community energy initiatives as well as to leave them, without losing access to the network operated by the community energy initiative or losing their rights as consumers. Access to a citizen energy community's network should be granted on fair and cost-reflective terms. The right to implement peer to peer and to share energy through direct set off of production and consumption should be fully granted to energy communities and active customers, regardless of the self- dispatching or central dispatching model adopted by TSOs for imbalance settlement and in case of use of virtual sharing configurations." Or. en (32019L0944)
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1043 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point -1 d (new)
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Recital 61
(-1d) Recital 61 is replaced by the following: "(61)Distribution system operators have to cost-efficiently integrate new electricity generation, especially installations generating and storing electricity from renewable sources, and new loads such as loads that result from heat pumps and electric vehicles. For that purpose, distribution system operators should be enabled, and provided with incentives, to use services from distributed energy resources such as demand response and energy storage, based on market procedures, in order to efficiently operate their networks and to avoid costly network expansions. Member States should put in place appropriate measures such as national network codes and market rules, and should provide incentives to distribution system operators through network tariffs which do not create obstacles to flexibility or to the improvement of energy efficiency in the grid. Member States should also introduce network development plans for distribution systems in order to support the integration of installations generating and storing electricity from renewable energy sources, facilitate the development of energy storage facilities and the electrification of the transport sector, and provide to system users adequate information regarding the anticipated expansions or upgrades of the network, as currently such procedures do not exist in the majority of Member States. " Or. en (32019L0944)
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1044 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point -1 e (new)
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Recital 86
(-1e) Recital 86 is replaced by the following: "(86) Regulatory authorities should also be granted the power to contribute to ensuring high standards of universal and public service obligations in accordance with market opening, to the protection of vulnerable and energy poor customers, and to the full effectiveness of consumer protection measures. Those provisions should be without prejudice to both the Commission's powers concerning the application of competition rules, including the examination of mergers with a Union dimension, and the rules on the internal market, such as the rules on the free movement of capital. The independent body to which a party affected by the decision of a regulatory authority has a right to appeal could be a court or another tribunal that is empowered to conduct a judicial review. " Or. en (32019L0944)
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1046 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
(8) ‘active customer’ means a final customer, or a group of jointly acting final customers, who participates in flexibility or energy efficiency schemes or sells self- generated electricity or who consumes or stores electricity generated within its premises located within confined boundaries or self- generated or shared electricity within other premises located within the same bidding zone, or who sells self-generated electricity or participates in flexibility or energy efficiency schemes, provided that those activities do not constitute its primary commercial or professional activity provided that those activities do not constitute its primary commercial or professional activity. The household customers living in the same housing unit should be necessarily considered as jointly acting final customers.”;
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1055 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a
(10a) ‘energy sharing’ means the self- consumption by active customers, including members of energy communities, of renewable energy either:
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1057 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a – point a
(a) generated or stored offsite or on sites between them by aone or more facilityies they own, lease, rent in whole or in part; ordirectly or through energy communities
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1058 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a – point b (new)
(aa) own, lease, rent in whole or in part, or have requested a third party to build, or maintain, and directly manage on their behalf, to the purpose of enabling and facilitating the energy sharing within the same distribution network area or, where permitted by a Member State, within a neighbouring distribution network area; or
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1059 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a – point b
(b) the right to which has been transferred to them by anotherone or more active customer whether free of charge or for a prices located within the same bidding zone, whether free of charge or for a price, informally through an over the counter arrangement, or through peer- to-peer trading of renewable energy.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1061 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 b
(10b) ‘peer-to-peer trading’ of renewable energy means peer-to-peer trading as defined in point (18) of Article 2 of Directive (EU) 2018/2001. Rights to renewable energy peer-to-peer trading should always be fully granted regardless of the self-dispatching or central dispatching model adopted by TSOs for imbalance settlement.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1063 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Article 2 – 58 a (new)
(24aa) ‘energy smart products’ means all products and appliances, including those subject to the article 16 point (3) paragraph ‘d’ of EU regulation 2017/1369, which can be activated by users to interact with other products, appliances and systems, including the energy grid itself and electricity market price signals. Energy smart products are able to self-regulate or switch their power consumption patterns, in order to maximize the uptake and self- consumption of renewable energy, lowering the consumers bills and further enabling the active customers to participate to flexibility mechanisms and services.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1066 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Article 2 – 60 a (new)
(24ab) ‘energy poverty’ means a household’s inability, linked to non- affordability, to meet its basic energy supply needs and a lack of access to essential energy services to guarantee basic levels of comfort and health, a decent standard of living and health, including adequate heating, hot water, cooling, lighting, and energy to power appliances, in the relevant national context, existing social policy and other relevant policies, caused by one or a combination of the following factors: insufficient disposable income, high energy expenditures and poor energy efficiency of homes; as defined in provisional agreement of "energy efficiency directive recast 2021/0203(COD)" art 2 point (48)
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1067 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Article 2 – 60 b (new)
(24ac) 'energy poor customers’ means final customer of electricity who is in energy poverty, including energy poor households.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1070 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Recital 86
(1a) Recital 86 is replaced by "(86)Regulatory authorities should also be granted the power to contribute to ensuring high standards of universal and public service obligations in accordance with market opening, to the protection of vulnerable customers, and to the full effectiveness of consumer protection measures. Those provisions should be without prejudice to both the Commission's powers concerning the application of competition rules, including the examination of mergers with a Union dimension, and the rules on the internal market, such as the rules on the free movement of capital. The independent body to which a party affected by the decision of a regulatory authority has a right to appeal could be a court or another tribunal that is empowered to conduct a judicial review. " Or. en (32019L0944)
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1074 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that all customers are free to purchase electricity from the supplier of their choice. Member States shall ensure that all customers are free to have more than one electricity supply contract at the same time, and that for this purpose customers are entitled to have more than one metering and billing point covered by the single connection point for their premises and may have more than one energy dispatcher. These requirements shall also apply to energy sharing. To this effect, Member States shall ensure that all the subjects entitled to energy sharing are free to choose their own supplier regardless of the market actor that is facilitating the activity on their behalf. Vice versa, Member States shall ensure that the subjects entitled to energy sharing are free to choose a third party facilitator, regardless of their supply contract and of the ownership of the renewable energy production and storage installations. The requirements established by the Member States for retail energy suppliers do not apply to energy communities, which are always allowed to sell energy to their members without disproportionate obligations and in any case without any requirement concerning corporate capital and financial and economic capacity.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1118 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Article 15 a – paragraph 1
1. All households, small and medium sized enterprises and public bodies have the right to participate in energy sharing as active customers or through energy communities.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1123 #

2023/0077(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Article 15 a – paragraph 1– point a (new)
(-a) This right shall not apply to large enterprises or private undertakings if energy production constitutes part of their primary or professional activity.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1124 #

2023/0077(COD)

(a) Active customers and self- consumers, acting individually or jointly, as well as energy communities members, shall be entitled to share renewable energy between themselves based on private agreements or through a legal entity.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 127 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22 a (new)
(22a) In order to ensure the balanced participation of all stakeholders, the Commission should establish an ad hoc forum made up of Member State representatives and the other parties involved, such as industry (including SMEs and craft enterprises), trade unions, traders, retailers, importers, environmental protection groups and the consumer organisation. The Commission should consult this forum so as to give it a say in preparing detailed design-for- recycling criteria for each packaging category.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 155 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
(54) In order to safeguard the functioning of the internal market, it is necessary to ensure that packaging from third countries entering the Union market comply with this Regulation, whether imported as self-standing packaging or in a packaged product. In particular, it is necessary to ensure that appropriate conformity assessment procedures have been carried out by manufacturers with regard to that packaging. Importers should therefore ensure that the packaging they place on the market comply with those requirements and that documentation drawn up by manufacturers are available for inspection by the competent national authorities. Appropriate support should be provided to non-professional importers, and particularly micro-companies and small enterprises, in order to ensure these obligations are fulfilled.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 201 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 137
(137) It is necessary to provide for sufficient time for economic operators to comply with their obligations under this Regulation, and for Member States to set up the administrative infrastructure necessary for its application. The application of this Regulation should therefore also be deferred to a date where those preparations can reasonably be finalised. Particular attention should be paid to facilitate compliance by SMEs with their obligations and requirements under this Regulation, including through guidance to be provided by the Commission to facilitate compliance by economic operators, with a focus on SMEmicro-companies and SMEs and sectors heavily impacted by the new requirements.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 349 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 a (new)
Article 6a Packaging and packaging waste forum The Commission shall ensure that, when drawing up the delegated and/or implementing acts, it maintains a balanced participation of Member State representatives and all stakeholders, such as industry (including SMEs and craft enterprises), trade unions, traders, retailers, importers, environmental protection groups and consumer organisations. These parties shall, in particular, help to establish design-for-recycling criteria for the various types of packaging and recycling output criteria based on the criteria and parameters listed in Table 2 of Annex II for the packaging categories listed in Table 1 of that annex. To that end, the Commission shall establish a working group, known as the ‘Packaging and packaging waste forum’, in which these parties shall meet.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 457 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
From [OP: Please insert the date = 42 months after the entry into force of this Regulation], packaging shall be marked with a label and/or a QR code or other type of digital labelling containing information on its material composition. This obligation does not apply to transport packaging. However, it applies to e- commerce packaging.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 482 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Labels referred to in paragraphs 1 to 3 and/or the QR code or other type of digital data carrier referred to in paragraph 2s 1 to 3 shall be placed, printed or engraved visibly, clearly legibly and indelibly on the packaging. Where this is not possible or not warranted on account of the nature and size of the packaging, they shall be affixed to the grouped packaging.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 484 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Where the information referred to in paragraphs 1 to 3 can be communicated digitally via the packaging or a label affixed thereto, the following requirements shall apply: (a) user data must not be collected or traced; (b) the information must not be displayed alongside other sales or marketing information.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 498 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Member States shall provide tools to support non-professional importers, and particularly importing micro- companies and small enterprises, in order to ensure that the obligations laid down in this article are fulfilled.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 536 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3
3. Member States mayust exempt economic operators from point 3 of Annex V if they comply with the definition of micro-company in accordance with rules set out in the Commission Recommendation 2003/361, as applicable on [OP: Please insert the date = the date of entry into force of this Regulation], namely farms and agricultural businesses engaged in direct sales activities in farmers’ markets regulated by national or regional law, and where it is not technically feasible not to use packaging or to obtain access to infrastructure that is necessary for the functioning of a reuse system.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 538 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Economic operators shall be exempt from the application of point 3 of Annex V if: (a) by 2030, they are able to demonstrate a collection and recycling rate for these packaging formats of at least 85% by weight, on the basis of the predominant packaging material; or (b) they qualify as a micro-companies or small enterprises in accordance with the rules laid down in Commission Recommendation 2003/361, as applicable on [OP: please insert the date = the date of entry into force of this regulation].
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 552 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Economic operators shall be exempt from the requirement in paragraph 1a, provided that, by 2030, the packaging material listed in Annex II: (a) reaches a minimum recycling rate of 90% at EU level, as calculated in Article 47; and (b) is recycled at scale within the meaning of Article 6(6).
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 559 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The final distributor, with the exception of the economic operators referred to in Article 22(3), making available on the market within the territory of a Member State in sales packaging cold or hot beverages filled into a container at the point of sale for take-away shall ensure that:
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 576 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. A final distributor, with the exception of the economic operators referred to in Article 22(3), that is conducting its business activity in the HORECA sector and that is making available on the market within the territory of a Member State in sales packaging take- away ready-prepared food, intended for immediate consumption without the need of any further preparation, and typically consumed from the receptacle, shall ensure that:
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 655 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Economic operators shall be exempt from the requirement in paragraph 8, provided that, by 2030, the packaging material listed in Annex II: (a) reaches a minimum recycling rate of 90% at EU level, as calculated in Article 47; and (b) is recycled at scale within the meaning of Article 6(6).
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 693 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 12 – subparagraph 2
This obligation applies to pallets, boxes, excluding cardboard, trays, plastic crates, intermediate bulk containers, drums and canisters, of all sizes and materials (excluding paper and cardboard), including flexible formats.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 706 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 13 – subparagraph 2
This obligation applies to pallets, boxes, excluding cardboardtrays, plastic crates , intermediate bulk containers, and drums and canisters, of all sizes and materials (excluding paper and cardboard), including flexible formats.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 714 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Packaging needed to increase the shelf life of products, and therefore to combat food waste, protect the environment and ensure the efficient use of raw materials, shall be excluded from the scope of this article.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 821 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 62 – paragraph 1
1. By [OP: Please insert the date = 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Failure to comply with the requirements of Articles 21 to 26 shall be sanctioned by an administrative fine imposed on the relevant economic operator. At least 30% of the sums collected from those fines shall be added to the budgets of the local authorities required to carry out the inspections and checks provided for in this regulation.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 824 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 62 a (new)
Article 62a Incentivising of checks The Member States shall encourage the introduction of reward mechanisms (incentives and bonuses) for operators that carry out the checks and inspections provided for in this regulation.
2023/05/25
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 107 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) The eradication of forced labour is a priority for the Union. Respect for human dignity and the universality and indivisibility of human rights are firmly enshrined in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union which prohibits slavery, servitude, forced or compulsory labour and human trafficking. Article 5(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights provide that no one is to be required to perform forced or compulsory labour. Article 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights recognises the right for every worker to fair and just working conditions which respect his or her health, safety and dignity. The European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly interpreted Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights as requiring Member States to penalise and effectively prosecute any act maintaining a person in the situations described set out in Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights.19 _________________ 19 For instance paras. 89 and 102 in Siliadin v. France or para. 105 in Chowdury and Others v. Greece.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 111 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) Nine Member States have not yet ratified the Protocol to the ILO Convention No. 29 on the access to appropriate and effective remedies which are necessary to safeguard and compensate workers affected by forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 112 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) Through its policies and legislative initiatives the Union seeks to eradicate the use of forced labour. It is inherently linked to the promotion of decent working conditions, such as the right to organise and take collective action, social dialogue, freedom of association, collective bargaining, sustainable business conduct and social protection. The Union promotes due diligence in accordance with international guidelines and principles established by international organisations, including the ILO, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (hereinafter “OECD”) and the United Nations (hereinafter “UN”), to ensure that forced labour does not find a place neither in the value chains of undertakings established in the Union. , nor in goods and services that are to be made available on the Union market or to be exported.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 120 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) Forced labour has a distinct impacrt on vulnerable and marginalised groups such as children, women, persons with disabilities, migrants, refugees or indigenous people.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 149 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) Any person, whether it is a natural or legal person, or any association not having legal personality, should be allowed to submit information to the competent authorities when it considers that products made with forced labour are placed and made available on the Union market and, where relevant, to be informed of the outcome of the assessment of their submission. In order to facilitate exchange of information between relevant authorities as well as submission of information, the Commission shall ensure the creation of a dedicated online platform;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 211 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Competent authorities that establish that economic operators violated the prohibition, should without delay prohibit the placing and making available of such products on the Union market and their export from the Union, and require the economic operators that have been investigated to withdraw the relevant products already made available from the Union market and have them recycled, destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including Union legislation on waste management.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 240 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) The Commission should issue guidelines in order to facilitate the implementation of the prohibition by economic operators, with a specific attention for SMEs, relevant stakeholders and competent authorities. Such guidelines should include guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour and complementary information for the competent authorities to implement the prohibition. The guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour should build on the Guidance on due diligence for Union businesses to address the risk of forced labour in their operations and supply chains published by the Commission and the European External Action Service in July 2021. The guidelines should be consistent with other Commission guidelines in this regard and relevant international organisations’ guidelines. The reports from international organisations, in particular the ILO, as well as other independent and verifiable sources of information should be considered for the identification of risk indicators.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 261 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) Where the competent authorities conclude that a product corresponds to a decision establishing a violation of the prohibition, they should immediately inform customs authorities which should refuse its release for free circulation or export. The product should be recycled, destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including legislation on waste management, which excludes re-export in case of non-Union goods.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 274 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
(44) To ensure effective enforcement of the prohibition, it is necessary to establish a network aimed at structured coordination and cooperation between the competent authorities of the Member States and, where appropriate, experts from customs authorities, and the Commission. That network should also aim at streamlining the practices of the competent authorities within the Union that facilitate the implementation of joint enforcement activities by Member States, including joint investigations, facilitate capacity building activities and, where appropriate, with the authorities of third countries involved or Commission representation offices, support advertisment campaigns and foresee trainings to inform workers of their rights. That administrative support structure should allow the pooling of resources and maintain a communication and information system between Member States and the Commission, thereby helping to strengthen the enforcement of the prohibition.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 306 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) ‘due diligence in relation to forced labour’ means the efforts by economic operator to implement, throughout its supply chain, mandatory requirements, voluntary guidelines, recommendations or practices to identify, prevent, mitigate or, bring to an end or remediate the use of forced labour with respect to products that are to be made available on the Union market or to be exported;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 311 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) ‘value chain’ means activities related to the production of goods or the provision of services by a company, including the development of the product or the service and the use and disposal of the product as well as the related activities of upstream and downstream established business relationships of the company;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 316 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) ‘making available on the market’ means any supply of a raw or processed product for storage, distribution, consumption or use on the Union market in the course of a commercial activity, whether in return for payment or free of charge and in the case where the product is offered for sale online or through other means of distance sales, the making available on the market is deemed to take place when the offer for sale is targeted at users in the Union;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 323 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ‘product’ means any product that can be valued in money and is capable, as such, of forming the subject of commercial transactions, both offline and online, whether it is extracted, harvested, produced or manufactured, including working, refining or processing related to a product at any stage of its supply chain;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 331 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ‘product made with forced labour’ means a product for which forced labour has been used in whole or in part at any stage of its extraction, harvest, production or, manufacture or storage, including working or processing related to a product at any stage of its supply chain;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 336 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) ‘economic operator’ means any natural or legal person, including online intermediation platforms, or association of persons who is placing or making available products on the Union market or exporting products;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 351 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point n
(n) ‘substantiated concern’ means a well-founded reason, evidence or proof, based on objective and verifiable information, for the competent authorities to suspect that products were likely made with forced labour;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 366 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Economic operators shall not place or make available on the Union market, offline or online, products that are made with forced labour, nor shall they export such products.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 375 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) submissions made by natural or legal persons or any association or relevant stakeholders not having legal personality pursuant to Article 10;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 378 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
(eb) the size and capacity of the economic operators questioned;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 383 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. In their assessment of the likelihood that economic operators violated Article 3, competent authorities shall focus on the economic operators involved in the steps of the value supply chain as close as possible to where the risk of forced labour is likely to occur and take into account the size and economicgeographical area from which the product or part of it is originated, the size, the economic and human resources of the economic operators, the quantity of products concerned, as well asnd the scale of suspected forced labour.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 390 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Before initiating an investigation in accordance with Article 5(1), the competent authority shall request from the economic operators under assessment information on actions taken to identify, prevent, mitigate or, bring to an end and remediate risks of forced labour in their operations and value chains with respect to the products under assessment, including on the basis of any of the following:
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 395 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) due diligence guidelines or recommendations of the UN, ILO, OECD or other relevant international organisations and social partners;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 403 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Economic operators shall respond to the request of the competent authority referred to in paragraph 3 within 1530 working days from the day they received such request. Economic operators may provide to competent authorities any other information they may deem useful for the purposes of this Article.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 411 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. Within 3015 working days from the date of receipt of the information submitted by economic operators pursuant to paragraph 4, the competent authorities shall conclude the preliminary phase of their investigation as to whether there is a substantiated concern of violation of Article 3 on the basis of the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 and the information submitted by economic operators pursuant to paragraph 4.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 442 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the products as well as the geographical area from which the product or any of its part subject to the investigation;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 464 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) take into account the size and, the economic and human resources of the economic operators, the quantity of products concerned, as well as the scale of suspected forced labour.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 466 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Economic operators shall submit the information within 1530 working days from the request referred to in paragraph 3 or make a. A justified request for an extension of that time limit may be granted in case the economic operator is a MSME or a SME.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 472 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. When deciding on the time limits referred to in this Article, competent authorities shall consider the size and economic resources of the economic operators concerned.deleted
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 504 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) a prohibition to place or make the products concerned available on the Union market, offline and online, and to export them;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 510 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) an order for the economic operators that have been subject to the investigation to withdraw from the Union market the relevant products that have already been stored or placed or made available on the market;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 518 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point c – point i (new)
(i) recycle the products concerned;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 536 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – point c
(c) that any product remaining with the economic operator concerned is recycled or disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law at the expense of the economic operator.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 562 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) all relevant information and in particular the details allowing the identification of the product, to which the decision applies, including details about the manufacturer or producer and the product suppliers in different geographical areas, if applicable;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 566 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) where available and applicable, information required under customs legislation as defined in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 592 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) any decision to prohibit storing, placing and making available of the products on the market and their export, as well as to order the withdrawal of the products already stored, placed or made available on the market and their disposal referred to in Article 6(4);
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 618 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 a (new)
Article10a Remediation 1. The Commission, after consulting the competent authorities, shall ensure access to remedy and effective remediation to victims with ad-hoc funds or through disposition within preferential trade agreement with third countries concerned whenever violations of Article 3 occur. 2. Member States shall ensure access to remedy and effective remediation to victims whenever violations of Article 3 fall under the scope of their territory and/or jurisdiction. 3. Competent authorities should determine, in consultation with relevant stakeholders, such as trade unions and non-governmental organization, as well as with social partners and international organizations, the appropriate remediation, prevention of future reoccurrence and financial or non- financial compensation measures. 4. Competent authorities and the Network shall engage with relevant stakeholders, including persons that have been or are at risk of being subjected to forced labour and their representatives, prior to lifting any prohibition.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 620 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall call upon external expertise to provide an indicative, non-exhaustive, verifiable and regularly updated database of forced labour risks in specific production sites, geographic areas or with respect to specific products and services including with regard to forced labour imposed by state authorities. The database shall be based on the guidelines referred to in Article 23, points (a), (b) and (c), and relevant external sources of information from, amongst others, international organisations and third country authorities. , trade unions, relevant stakeholders, social partners, NGOs, labour and worker cooperatives and third country authorities. The customs authorities' data such as origin, places of storage and transportation points of the products entering or leaving the Union market are crucial risk indicators. The Commission shall improve the cooperation among customs authorities through direct campaigns and ongoing trainings.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 630 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Commission shall ensure the necessary technical support to economic operators, in particular SMEs, to facilitate the use of the database and take measures to avoid any unnecessary administrative burden in the operation of the database;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 638 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall ensure that the database is made publicly available and easy accessible by the external expertise at the latest 124 months after the entry into force of this Regulation.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 644 #

2022/0269(COD)

3. Economic operators storing, placing or making available on the Union market or exporting products which are not mentioned in the database referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, or which come from areas that are not mentioned in that database, shall also be required to comply with Article 3. It shall be the responsibility of the economic operator concerned to demonstrate that its product or service was manufactured or provided without using forced labour and that any use of forced labour was remediated. The database shall include an archive of previous decisions and shall be regulary reviewed and, if necessary, updated.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 659 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6
6. Member States shall confer on their competent authorities the power to impose penalties in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Commission in Article 23 and in accordance with Article 30.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 738 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour, which shall take into account applicable Union legislation setting out due diligence requirements with respect to forced labour, guidelines and recommendations from international organisations and social actors, as well as the size and , the economic and human resources of economic operators;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 753 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) specific guidance for NSMEs and SMEs on how to collect and submit information and on possible measures to effectively prevent, mitigate and put to an end the use of forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 754 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new)
(ec) guidance on minimum rules which do not hinder Member States from choosing appropriate and balanced sanctions.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 770 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(ca) monitor the recycle, destruction or the redirection of products, which were refused for release for free circulation, storage or export, to be used in the interest of the public;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 773 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point e
(e) promote and facilitate collaboration to explore possibilities for usinguse new technologies for the enforcement of this Regulation and the traceability of products;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 777 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point f – point i (new)
i) promote information campaigns with authorities of third countries involved and with the EU delegations and Missions on the premises as well as assist and support trainings for workers of those geographical areas on their rights;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 787 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall support and encourage cooperation between enforcement authorities through the Network and participate inchair the meetings of the Network.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 800 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. In order to facilitate effective implementation and enforcement of this Regulation, the Commission mayshall as appropriate cooperate, engage and exchange information with, amongst others, authorities of third countries, international organisations, civil society representatives and business organisations. International cooperation with authorities of third countries shall take place in a structured way as part of the existing dialogue structures with third countries or, if necessary, specific ones that will be created on an ad hoc basis.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 812 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. The Member States shall lay down the ruCommission, according to the guidelines set down in Article 23, shall lay down general principles onf penalties applicablewhich Member States shall apply to non- compliance with a decision referred to in Article 6(4) and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented equally in accordance with EU and national law.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 51 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) Furthermore, the Russian military aggression against Ukraine has placed some Member States in the direct neighbourhood of a war zone, with all the difficulties that the proximity to the war front implies, including accidental civilian casualties in the border area, massive movement of people fleeing the war, organisation of shipment of military and humanitarian aid; at the same time, Southern European Member States are particularly exposed to multifaceted threats and the immediate and long-term negative impacts of instability in the EU’s immediate neighbourhood;
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 71 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Reinforcing the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base should therefore be at the core of those efforts. Indeed difficulties and gaps still exist and the European defence industrial base remains highly fragmented, lacking sufficient; this, in turn, causes inefficiencies in the use of taxpayers money, undermined possibilities to lunch collaborative actions, and reduced inter- operability of products.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 94 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The Short Term Instrument should offset the complexity and risks associated with such joint actions while allowing economies of scale in the actions undertaken by Member States to reinforce and modernise the European Technological and Industrial Base, increasing thereby the Union’s capacity resilience and security of supply. Incentivizsing common procurement would also result into diminished costs in terms of exploitation, maintenance and withdrawal of the systems; the instrument should ensure the participation of suppliers from all Member States and all type of companies independently from their size, thus guaranteeing a level-playing-field and exploiting the benefits of economies of scale, as well as supporting technological innovation and efficiency in the whole cycle of production of defence equipment.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 109 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) The Instrument ishould preserve and enhance coherentce with existing collaborative EU defence-related initiatives such as in the European Defence Fund as well as, the Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO), and generates synergies with other EU programmes.the Coordinated Annual Review on Defence (CARD), and the Capability Development Plan (CDP), and generates synergies with other EU programmes, including those that can finance programmes that can foster the cross- fertilisation between the civilian and the military domain despite the fact that they might not be specifically intended for defence-related initiatives The Instrument is fully coherent with the ambition and the findings of the Strategic Compass, with this document that should serve as a basis for the revision of the CDP and, whenever appropriate and with the aim of avoiding unnecessary duplications, it should act in coordination with the goals and priorities of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which remains the cornerstone of European security architecture.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 116 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) Member States that participate in the common procurement of defence products under the Instrument should have a right to invite candidate countries, notably Ukraine, Moldova and the Western Balkan countries, as well as associated countries to participate in the action. To this end, the Member States should authorise a procurement agent to enter into an agreement for procuring additional quantities of the defence product with those third countries. Such an agreement would benefit the EDTIB as those countries’ participation would provide better economies of scale and scope, higher demand and interoperability at the technical level, common training, cross-servicing and maintenance, which would provide a foundation for the later inclusion of their defence industries in the EDTIB. It would also strengthen the candidate countries’ defence capabilities for facing the multifaceted threats emanating from all strategic direction.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 141 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) Where the Union grant takes the form of financing not linked to costs, the Commission should determine in the work programme the funding conditions for each action, in particular (a) a description of action involving cooperation for common procurement with a view to addressing the most urgent and critical capacity needs, (b) the milestones for the implementation of the action, (c) the rough order of magnitude expected from the common procurement and (d) the maximum Union contribution available; in this regard, In order to boost interoperability among the Armed Forces of EU Member States, financing for common procurement through EDIRPA should be given primarily to those consortia that see the participation of a higher Number of Member States.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 168 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
(5a) ‘defence products’ mean products awarded in the fields of defence and security, within the meaning of Article 2 of Directive 2009/81/EC, as well as medical supplies and medical support equipment in order to replenish, and, if considered to be necessary in light of the changed security situation, to expand stockpiles depleted as a result of the response to the Russian military aggression against Ukraine; the list set out in the aforementioned Directive has to be interpreted in a broad way in the light of the evolving character of technology, procurement policies and military requirements. For the purpose of this regulation, defence products should also cover products which, although initially designed for civilian use, are later adapted to military purposes;
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 198 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The objectives shall be pursued with an emphasis on strengthening and developing the Union defence industrial base to allow it to address in particular the most urgent and critical defence products needs, especiallyincluding those revealed or exacerbated by the response to the Russian aggression against Ukraine, taking into account the work of the Defence Joint Procurement Task Force as well as the need to respond adequately to the multifaceted threats emanating from every strategic direction, taking into account the Joint Communication JOIN(2022) 24 final of the Commission and the High Representative of 18 May 2022 on the Defence Investment Gaps Analysis and Way Forward and the work of the Defence Joint Procurement Task Force this can be achieved through the replenishment of stockpiles and the reinforcement of overall defence capabilities.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 221 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The agreement between the participating Member States and the procurement agent referred to in Article 8(2) of this Regulation may authorise the procurement agent to invite and enter into an agreement for procuring additional quantities of the defence product subject to the common procurement with candidate countries. Such additional procurement arrangements shall be without prejudice to the applicable provisions of Union law and any relevant international obligations of the participating Member States. Whenever appropriate, participation to the instrument should also be opened to other third countriues in accordance with the rules and conditions already set out for the participation in PESCO projects.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 231 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The level of EU contribution for each action must not exceed the 15 percent of the estimated value of the common procurement and is capped at 15 percent of the amount referred to in Article 4 (1). Furthermore, the EU contribution shall be defined by the following factors: (a) the strategic value of the procured defence equipment and the added value in terms of interoperability; (b) the complexity of the common procurement; (c) the number of Member States, candidate countries, and associated countries to each action, or the expansion of already existing consortia to other Member States, candidate countries, or associated countries.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 308 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. The work programme shall set out the minimum financial size of the joint procurement actions and determine the indicative amount of financial support for actions carried out by the minimum number of Member States as referred to in point c) of Article 7 paragraph 1 as well as incentives for procurement of higher value and inclusion of additional Member States, candidate countries, or associated countries.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 316 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. The report shall build on consultations of Member States and key stakeholders and shall, in particular, assess the progress made towards the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 3. , and shall, in particular, evaluate the contribution of the Instrument to the: (a) creation of new cross-border cooperation between Member States, candidate countries, or associated countries; (b) increased interoperability among EU Member States armed forces; (c) participation of SMEs and mid-caps in the action, as contractors or subcontractors in the supply chain; (d) strengthening of the EDTIB throughout the Union and ensuring a level-playing field for suppliers from all the Member States; (e) replenishment of stockpiles that have been depleted, including as a result of the response to the unprovoked and unjustified military aggression against Ukraine; (f) replacement of obsolete systems, including Soviet era defence legacy systems still in use with Union solutions.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 67 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation only applies to craft and industrial products listed under the combined nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/8724 _________________ 24 Council Regulation (EEC) N0 2685/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff Regulation (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987 p.1), and hence excludes agrifood products.
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 70 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘craft products’ means products produced either totalmainly by hand or with the aid of manual tools or by mechanical means, whenever the ith a direct and indirect manual contribution, where know-how is the most important component of the finished product;
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 71 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) ‘p'Producer group' means any association, irrespective of its legal form, mainly composed of producers or processors, manufacturers, processors or any other operator working with the same product;
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 73 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) 'production step' means : ‘any stage of production, processing or preparation covered by the product specification, up to the point, where the product is in a form to be placed on the internal market;
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 75 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) 'producer' means an operator engaged in any production step of a product the name of which is protected as a geographical indication, including processing or development activities, covered by the product specification;
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 88 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii a (new)
(iiia) the principal production stages
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 118 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 7
7. The Office shall retain documentation related to the registration of a geographical indication in digital or paper form for the period of validity of the geographical indication, and in case of cancellation or rejection for 10 years thereafter.
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 120 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the amendment includes a change in the name, or in the use of the name,
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 122 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) where no product has been placed on the market under the geographical indication for at least a consecutive period of 73 years.
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 124 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) assessment of the production conditions and the actual link between the product and its geographical origin
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 143 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 2
2. In the case of craft and industrial products originating in the Union that are marketed under a geographical indication, the Union symbol referred to in paragraph 1 mayust appear on theany labelling and on advertising material. The geographical indication shall be in the same field of vision as the Union symbol.
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 144 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 3
3. The abbreviation ‘PGI’ corresponding to the indication ‘protected geographical indication’ mayust appear on theany labelling of, or on advertising material for, products designated by a geographical indication of craft and industrial products.
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 146 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 5
5. After the submission of a Union application for the registration of a geographical indication, producers may indicate on the labelling, and in the presentation, of the product that an application has been filed in compliance with Union law.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 148 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 6
6. The Union symbol indicating the protected geographical indication and the Union indication ‘protected geographical indication’ and the abbreviation ‘PGI’ as relevant, mayust appear on theany labelling or on advertising material only after the publication of the decision on registration in accordance with Articles 24 and 25.
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 151 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 7
7. Where an application is rejected, any products labelled in accordance with paragraph 4 mayust be marketed until the stocks are exhaustedwithdrawn from the market.
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 152 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 8 – point b
(b) armorial bearings, flags or text, graphics or symbols referring to the Member State or the region in which that geographical area of origin is located.
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 157 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) develop activities related to ensuring production systems and compliance of a product designated by a geographical indication with its product specification;
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 164 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 3
3. Where self-declarations are used competent authorities shallmust carry out random controls. In the event of breaches, Member States shall take all necessary measures to remedy the situation.
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 167 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 1
This Regulation shall enter into force onand apply from the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. It shall apply from 1 January 2024.
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 63 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) Semiconductors are at the core of any digital device: from smartphones and cars, through critical applications and infrastructures in health, energy, communications and automation to most other industry sectors. While semiconductors are essential to the functioning of our modern economy and society, the Union has witnessed unprecedented disruptions in their supply. The current supply shortage is a symptom of permanent and serious structural deficiencies in the Union’s semiconductor value and supply chain. The disruptions have exposed long-lasting vulnerabilities in this respect, notably a strong third-country dependency in manufacturing, packaging, testing, assembly and design of chips.
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 69 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) A framework for increasing the Union’s resilience in the field of semiconductor technologies should be established, stimulaattracting investment, enhancing production capacities, strengthening the capabilities of the Union’s semiconductor supply chain, and increasing cooperation and consultations among the Member States and, the Commission and relevant third countries.
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 72 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) This framework pursues two objectives. The first objective is to ensure the conditions necessary for the competitiveness and innovation capacity of the Union and to ensure the adjustment of the industry to structural changes due to fast innovation cycles and the need for sustainability. The second objective, separate and complementary to the first one, is to improve the functioning of the internal market by laying down a uniform Union legal framework for increasing the Union’s resilience and security of supply in the field of semiconductor technologies and its global market share.
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 84 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The achievement of these objectives will be supported by a governance mechanism. At Union level, this Regulation establishes a European Semiconductor Board, composed of representatives of the Member States and chaired by the Commission. The European Semiconductor Board will provide advice to and assist the Commission on specific questions, including the consistent application of this Regulation, facilitating cooperation among Member States and exchanging information on issues relating to this Regulation, involving and consulting, where necessary, relevant third countries. The European Semiconductor Board should hold separate meetings for its tasks under the different chapters of this Regulation. The different meetings may include different compositions of the high-level representatives and the Commission may establish subgroups.
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 126 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) Semiconductors are at the core of any digital device: from smartphones and cars, through critical applications and infrastructures in health, energy, communications and automation to most other industry sectors. While semiconductors are essential to the functioning of our modern economy and society, the Union has witnessed unprecedented disruptions in their supply. The current supply shortage is a symptom of permanent and serious structural deficiencies in the Union’s semiconductor value and supply chain. The disruptions have exposed long-lasting vulnerabilities in this respect, notably a strong third-country dependency in manufacturing, packaging, testing, assembly and design of chips.
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 131 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) A framework for increasing the Union’s resilience in the field of semiconductor technologies should be established, stimulaattracting investment, enhancing production capacities, strengthening the capabilities of the Union’s semiconductor supply chain, and increasing cooperation and consultations among the Member States and, the Commission and relevant third countries.
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 136 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) This framework pursues two objectives. The first objective is to ensure the conditions necessary for the competitiveness and innovation capacity of the Union and to ensure the adjustment of the industry to structural changes due to fast innovation cycles and the need for sustainability. The second objective, separate and complementary to the first one, is to improve the functioning of the internal market by laying down a uniform Union legal framework for increasing the Union’s resilience and security of supply in the field of semiconductor technologies and its global market share.
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 155 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The achievement of these objectives will be supported by a governance mechanism. At Union level, this Regulation establishes a European Semiconductor Board, composed of representatives of the Member States and chaired by the Commission. The European Semiconductor Board will provide advice to and assist the Commission on specific questions, including the consistent application of this Regulation, facilitating cooperation among Member States and exchanging information on issues relating to this Regulation, involving and consulting, where necessary, relevant third countries.. The European Semiconductor Board should hold separate meetings for its tasks under the different chapters of this Regulation. The different meetings may include different compositions of the high-level representatives and the Commission may establish subgroups.
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 160 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) setting up a coordination mechanism and consultations between the Member States and, the Commission and relevant third countries for monitoring the supply of semiconductors and crisis response to semiconductor shortages.
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 176 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new)
(17 a) (17a) ‘serious disruption’ means a situation that might occur in the case of natural disasters, interruptions in global logistics, shortages in raw material supply or geopolitical constraints.
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 182 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point 1
(1) building up an innovative and transparent virtual platform, available across the Union, integrating existing and new design facilities with extended libraries and Electronic Design Automation (EDA) tools;
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 194 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. For the purpose of implementing eligible actions and other related tasks funded under the Initiative a European Chips Infrastructure Consortium (‘ECIC’) mayshall be established under the conditions set out in this Article.
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 204 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) facilitating the transfer of expertise and knowhow between Member States and regions encouraging exchanges of skills, knowledge and good practices and encouraging joint programmes involving international partners and attracting international high skilled talent;
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 230 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) identify and monitor early warning indicators identified pursuant to Article 16;
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 249 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall, after consulting the European Semiconductor Board, assessmapping critical factors, trends and events and assess effective and potential risks that may disrupt, compromise or negatively affect the supply and the global value chain of semiconductors (Union risk assessment). In the Union risk assessment, the Commission shall identify early warning indicators.
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 255 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. When monitoring the semiconductor value chain pursuant to Article 15, Member States shall identify and monitor the early warning indicators identified by the Commission.
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 256 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall identify key market actors along the semiconductor supply chains in their national territory, taking into account the following elements:
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 258 #

2022/0032(COD)

(d) the impact a disruption of supply of the service or good provided by the market actor may have on the Union’s semiconductor supply chain and, dependent markets and on the global value chain involved.
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 268 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission mayshall, after consulting the European Semiconductor Board, limit the measures provided for in Articles 21 and 22 to certain critical sectors the operation of which is disturbed or under threat of disturbance on account of the semiconductor crisis.
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 294 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3
3. The European Semiconductor Board shall support the Commission in international cooperation, including information gathering and crisis assessment, in line with international obligations, involving, where appropriate, relevant third countries and within relevant international fora.
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 307 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 a (new)
Article 26 a International cooperation 1. The Commission, assisted by the European Semiconductor Board, shall enter into consultations or cooperation, on behalf of the Union, with relevant third countries with a view to identify the availability of raw materials, intermediate products; to assess the effect of trade policies, tariffs, export restrictions, trade barriers and other trade related measures, and the effect of business closures, delocalisation or acquisitions of key market actors. 2. The Commission, after consulting relevant third countries, should seek cooperative solutions to address future supply chain disruptions, in compliance with international obligations and within, where appropriate, relevant international fora. 3. The Commission shall include collaboration in the field of semiconductors and along the entire semiconductor supply chain, in all future investment and trade agreements of the Union with relevant third countries.
2022/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 339 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) setting up a coordination mechanism and consultations between the Member States and, the Commission and relevant third countries for monitoring the supply of semiconductors and crisis response to semiconductor shortages.
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 389 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new)
(17 a) ‘serious disruption’ means a situation that might occur in the case of natural disasters, interruptions in global logistics, shortages in raw material supply or geopolitical constraints;
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 403 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point 1
(1) building up an innovative and transparent virtual platform, available across the Union, integrating existing and new design facilities with extended libraries and Electronic Design Automation (EDA) tools;
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 446 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. For the purpose of implementing eligible actions and other related tasks funded under the Initiative a European Chips Infrastructure Consortium (‘ECIC’) mayshall be established under the conditions set out in this Article.
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 470 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) facilitating the transfer of expertise and knowhow between Member States and regions encouraging exchanges of skills, knowledge and good practices and encouraging joint programmes; involving international partners and attracting international high skilled talent
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 599 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) identify and monitor early warning indicators identified pursuant to Article 16;
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 627 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall, after consulting the European Semiconductor Board, assessmapping critical factors, trends and events and assess effective and potential risks that may disrupt, compromise or negatively affect the supply and the global value chain of semiconductors (Union risk assessment). In the Union risk assessment, the Commission shall identify early warning indicators.
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 636 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. When monitoring the semiconductor value chain pursuant to Article 15, Member States shall identify and monitor the early warning indicators identified by the Commission.
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 640 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, shall identify key market actors along the semiconductor supply chains in their national territory, taking into account the following elements:
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 641 #

2022/0032(COD)

(d) the impact a disruption of supply of the service or good provided by the market actor may have on the Union’s semiconductor supply chain and, dependent markets and on the global value chain involved.
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 671 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission mayshall, after consulting the European Semiconductor Board, limit the measures provided for in Articles 21 and 22 to certain critical sectors the operation of which is disturbed or under threat of disturbance on account of the semiconductor crisis.
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 752 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3
3. The European Semiconductor Board shall support the Commission in international cooperation, including information gathering and crisis assessment, in line with international obligations involving, where appropriate, relevant third countries and within relevant international fora.
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 775 #

2022/0032(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 a (new)
Article 26 a International Cooperation 1. The Commission, assisted by the European Semiconductor Board, shall enter into consultations or cooperation, on behalf of the Union, with relevant third countries with a view to identify the availability of raw materials, intermediate products; to assess the effect of trade policies, tariffs, export restrictions, trade barriers and other trade related measures, and the effect of business closures, delocalisation or acquisitions of key market actors. 2. The Commission, after consulting relevant third countries, shall seek cooperative solutions to address future supply chain disruptions, in compliance with international obligations and within, where appropriate, relevant international fora. 3. The Commission shall include collaboration in the field of semiconductors and along the entire semiconductor supply chain, in all future investment and trade agreements of the Union with relevant third countries.
2022/10/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 17 #

2021/2177(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
E a. whereas India has decided to refrain from condemning Russia's military attack on Ukraine at the United Nations by abstaining on a resolution by the Security Council;
2022/04/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 20 #

2021/2177(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
E b. whereas the current negotiating mandate is more than 10 years old;
2022/04/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 27 #

2021/2177(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Calls on the Council to adopt a new negotiating mandate covering the need to have a wide-ranging trade agreements covering not only market access and import-export tariffs but also regulatory topics, technical and sanitary standards, intellectual property, public procurement, investment, services, raw materials, digital and e-commerce, labour and human rights and environmental challenges;
2022/04/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 48 #

2021/2177(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that the existing negotiating mandate is out of date and not comprehensive and broad enough for negotito respect the need of a new generations to restart; takes the view, however, that an addendum is necessaryrade agreement; takes the need to have a new negotiating mandate or , if not possible, an addendum to ensure that the prospective comprehensive trade agreement contains as integral parts thereof a dedicated chapter fors on SMEs, a dedicated chapter on raw materials to remove all export duties on raw materials,on raw materials and an ambitious and enforceable trade and sustainable development chapter aligned with the Paris Agreement;
2022/04/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 96 #

2021/2177(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – point vi
vi. a robust chapter on high-level protection for intellectual property rights (IPR), which should facilitate a non- restrictive and swift patent application process and, the rapid and effective enforcement of IPR standards and the protection of EU geographical indications (GIs);
2022/04/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 138 #

2021/2177(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Reminds the need to conclude an agreement on geographical indications (GIs) as a priority for the EU farming and agro-food sectors. Welcomes the leaders' commitment to concluding a separaten agreement on geographical indications, be itas soonest; calls on the Commission to verify the possibility to have a stand- alone agreement or integrated within then GIs before the conclusion of the negotiations for a comprehensive trade agreement; with India;
2022/04/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 73 #

2021/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Acknowledges that the recent reforms in the football transfer market, including the establishment of a clearing house, a licensing system for agents, caps on agents’ commissions are in the right direction; urges the relevant sport authorities to ensure the prompt implementation of these reforms;
2021/09/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 26 #

2021/2048(REG)

Parliament's Rules of Procedure
Rule 214 – interpretation – paragraph 2
In all cases, in order to guarantee that non-attached Members must be guaranteedhave access to information, in accordance with the principle of non- discrimination, through the supply of information and the presence of a member ofey may appoint one non-attached member as an observer. The Chair can give the non- attached Members’ secretariat at coordinator meetings acting as an observer the opportunity to express his or her view.
2021/06/01
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 7 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Identifies trade policy as a strategic geopolitical tool for the transatlantic agenda; highlights the need to identify joint actions based on shared interests, common international standards and values in order to contribute to a global sustainable and inclusive economic recovery; stresses that ‘workers and wages’ and, more resilient and responsible supply chains, the fight against climate change, a safe digital connectivity and the countering of anticompetitive practices should be at the core of such an agenda;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 21 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the US support for the new Director-General of the WTO, the US’s return to the Paris Agreement, the WTO tariff rate quota agreement and the temporary suspension of Airbus Boeing tariffs waiting to find a permanent solution;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 25 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the need to work together to fully recover the WTO's appellate body and asks a concrete commitment of the current US administration to appoint the judge and restore its functions;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 28 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recognises at the same time that some diverging interests remain; in this regard, urges both sides to resolve bilateral disputes; urges the US to remove unilateral trade measures and refrain from taking further ones; urges th, jointly agreeing to new measures to address overcapacity ; urges the immediate removal of section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminium; calls for a rapid and lasting solution on aircraft subsidies; addresses the concerns on the safety of the data transfer through the EU-US Privacy Shield agreement; reinforces bilateral cooperation in the manufacture and distribution of COVID- 19 vaccines; in this regards, advocate to work together for an efficient TRIPS waiver to demonstrate global leadership towards defeating the current pandemic and ensure trade flows in raw materials;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 48 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for enhanced cooperation on WTO reform, including reinstating the appellate body,supporting the WTO Trade and Health Initiative and regulating trade in health products, setting an ambitious environmental agenda, and agreeing on concrete deliverables for the 12th WTO Ministerial Conference (MC12); encourages both sides to stick to multilateral agreements;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 56 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Advocates a joint strategic approach towards China through the EU- US dialogue on China, recently created, addressing the roots of unfair trade practices and overcapacity, tackling industrial subsidies and their consequences on critical sectors such as steel and aluminium, state-owned enterprises and human rights concerns;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 82 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. While promoting dialogue and common action, calls on the Commission to assertively promote the EU’s interests and react to US unwarranted duties, extraterritorial sanctions and market barriers; wishes to find a proper solution at the up-coming EU-US Summit in July;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 89 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Encourages both sides to find a framework for joint action and look for selective agreements; calls for the developing of commons standards and a forward-looking strategic dialogue aiming to create a stronger regulatory, green and digital partnership throughvia the Trade and Technology Council a; in this regard, underlines the need to find a coordinated approach to critical and emerging technologies, a carbon border adjustment mechanism and digital and global taxes.
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Considers that other trade and investment agreements with regional partners, including Taiwan, should not be held hostage to the suspension of the CAI ratification;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 65 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the conclusion at the political level of the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI); recalls that the CAI has to be considered in the context of a strengthened EU toolbox of unilateral measures; underlines it will thoroughly scrutinise the agreement, including its sustainable development section which should provide effective sanctions, and take stock of the human rights context, before determining its position; Reminds that conditions and pre-ratification commitments must be met before Parliament can give its consent to the CAI, notably a clear timetable for China’s ratification and implementation of key International Labour Organisation (ILO) Conventions and the lift of the baseless and arbitrary sanctions imposed by the Chinese Government on EU entities and individuals;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 75 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Reiterates the possibility to support effective and prompt trade-related measures, such as exclusion from public procurement, to prevent the import of goods issued from forced labour such as exclusion from public procurement and to assess the respect of human rights in the full supply chain of goods imported from Xinjiang region;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 82 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Calls on the Commission to advance its work on the proposed mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence Framework which should be treated as a matter of urgency;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 93 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the entry into force of the EU-China Agreement on geographical indications, and reiterates the importance of effective implementation of the Agreementand enforcement of the Agreement on each other's market through cooperation and promotions projects; Reminds the need to support and promote European GIs products on the Chinese market without any obstacles; Welcomes the expansion of the current EU-China GIs agreement to additional 350 GI names from both sides.
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 95 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Asks the immediate removal of any obstacles imposed by Chinese authorities to European Consortia of Food and Beverage to hinder the promotion of European Geographical Indications products; Calls on the Chinese authorities to review its amended law on non-profit organizations introducing the obligation of legal Chinese representative for promotional activities in China, including Consortia of Food and Beverage; Underlines that these obstacles will have serious repercussions in terms of visibility and protection of European GIs exacerbating a situation already critical due to the Covid-19 pandemic;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 8 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the new EU Action Plan on Critical Raw Materials and stresses that EU trade policy can play a key role as a vehicle for improving EU access to these materials while promoting sustainable standards, good governance and responsible sourcing; notes that the COVID-19 outbreak has exposed the lack of resilience of global value chains for certain key products, showing the need for more robust, sustainable and resilient supply chains for critical raw materials;
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 20 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that demand for raw materials is projected to double by 2050, given the important and ongoing transition to a green and digital economy, and that the EU is highly reliant on non-EU countries for critical raw materials, making diversified sourcing essential to increase the EU’s security of supply; calls, therefore, on the Commission to diversify the supply sources of critical raw materials as much as possible, and reduce current reliance on a few countries by not only developing mining capabilities but also processing, refining and recycling facilities; calls on the Commission to focus also on securing supplies by establishing strategic stocks and appropriate stockpiling of critical raw materials in Europe, particularly in light of the uncertainties linked to the evolution of the geopolitical situation worldwide and the potential trade tensions with rich non- EU producer countries;
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Acknowledges the need to push for a diversification and security of supply to achieve the open strategic autonomy on this critical sector; in this regard, reiterates to the Commission the importance to avoid promoting and financially supporting the development of deep sea mining;
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 40 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines that future EU free trade agreements (FTAs) should include a specific focus on raw materials chapter, as announce in the Trade for All strategy by the Commission, to ensure compliance with international commitments, to eliminate export restrictions and to comply with the current rules for pre and post establishment for foreign direct investments; calls on the Commission to further enhance the enforcement of FTAs to ensure that commitments and obligations on sourcing of critical raw materials are met by trading partners, in full respect with the rights of communities affected by extractive activities, as well as the social and environmental consequences of trade; calls on the Commission to strengthen cooperation on sustainable sourcing of raw materials with third countries under existing EU policies and instruments, including enlargement, neighbourhood, development and cooperation policies;
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines that the Commission's plan does not mention how local communities will be involved in the decision-making; asks the Commission to fully engage with local communities and stakeholders prior to mining projects approval and licensing;
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 f (new)
3f. Calls on the Commission to identify obstacles, and investment opportunities at all stages of the raw materials value chain while trying to minimise the environmental and social impact;
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 61 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) The modern interconnected world economy creates an increased risk of, and opportunity for, economic coercion, as it provides countries with enhanced, including hybrid, means to deploy such coercion. It is desirable that the Union contribute to the creation, development and clarification of international frameworks for the prevention, correction and elimination of situations of economic coercion.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 65 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Whilst always acting within the framework of international law, it is essential that the Union possess an appropriate instrument to deter and counteract economic coercion by third countries in order to safeguard its rights and interests and those of its Member States. This is particularly the case where third countries take measures affecting trade or investment that interfere in the legitimate sovereign choices of the Union or a Member State by seeking to prevent or obtain the cessation, modification or adoption of a particular act by the Union or a Member State. Such measures affecting trade or investment may include not only actions taken on, and having effects within, the territory of the third country, but also actions taken by the third country, including through entities directly or indirectly controlled or directmanaged by the third country and physically or virtually present in the Union, that cause harm to economic activities in the Union.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 83 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The Commission should examine whether third-country measures are coercive, on its own initiative or following information received from any source, including legal and natural persons or a Member State or the European Parliament. Following this examination, the Commission should determine in a decision whether the third-country measure is coercive. The Commission should communicate any affirmative determination to the third country concerned, together with a request that the economic coercion cease and a request, where appropriate, that any injury be repaired.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 94 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) In pursuing the objective of obtaining the cessation of the measure of economic coercion, Union response measures consisting of restrictions on foreign direct investment or on trade in services should only apply with regard to services supplied, or direct investments made, within the Union by one or more legal persons established in the Union which are owned or directly or indirectly controlled by persons of the third country concerned where necessary to ensure the effectiveness of Union response measures and in particular to prevent their avoidance. The decision to impose any such restrictions will be duly justified in implementing acts adopted pursuant to this Regulation in the light of the criteria specified in this Regulation.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 107 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules and procedures in order to ensure the effective protection of the interests of the Union and its Member States where a third country seeks, through measures affecting trade or investment, to coerce the Union or a Member State into adopting or refraining from adopting a particular act. This Regulation provides a framework for the Union to respond in such situations with the objective to deter, correct or have the third country desist from such actions, whilst permitting the Union, in the last resort, to counteract such actions.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 159 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
- counteracting with appropriate actions
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 168 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall enter into consultations or cooperation, on behalf of the Union, with any other country affected by the same or similar measures of economic coercion or with any interested third country, with a view to obtaining the cessation of the coercion. This may involve, where appropriate, coordination in relevant international fora and coordination in the different type of responses to the coercion.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 143 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
This Regulation lays down rules regarding the placing and making available on the Union market, as well as the export from the Union market, of cattle, pigs, poultry, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, soya, maize, rubber and wood (“relevant commodities”) and products, as listed in Annex I, that contain, have been fed with or have been made using relevant commodities (“relevant products”), with a view to
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 147 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) minimising the Union’s contribution to all forms of deforestation and forest degradation worldwide
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 154 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘deforestation’ means the conversion of forest to agricultural and to other land uses, whether human-induced or not;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 158 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) ‘forest’ means land spanning more than 0,5 hectares with trees higher than 5 meters and a canopy cover of more than 10%, or trees able to reach those thresholds in situ, excluding agricultural plantations and land that is predominantly under agricultural or urban land use and including peatlands and ecosystems;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 165 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘forest degradation’ means management and harvesting operations that are not sustainable and cause a substantial reduction or loss of the biological orwealth or the economic productivity and complexity of forest ecosystems, resulting in the long-term reduction of forests quality and of the overall supply of benefits from forest, which includes wood, biodiversity and other products or services;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 176 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
(a) that the relevant commodities and products, including those used for or contained in relevant products, were produced on land that has not been subject to deforestation after December 31, 202015, and
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 180 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b
(b) that the wood has been harvested from the forest without inducing forest degradation after December 31, 202015;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 394 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – table – row 6a (new)
Maize 100510 Maize seed 151521 Crude Maize oil 15152190 Crude maize oil (excl. for technical or industrial uses)
2022/03/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 395 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – table – row 6a (new)
Poultry 0105 Live poultry Meat of Poultry
2022/03/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 396 #

2021/0366(COD)

Rubber 40011000 natural rubber latex 40012100 smoked sheets of natural rubber
2022/03/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 108 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The Union's common commercial policy shall be guided by the principles and pursue the objectives set out in the general provisions on the Union's external action, laid down in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU). For that purpose, the Union should ensure that its commercial policy is conducted in close coordination with other external policies, and that regular contact with partner countries foreseen in the framework of the various instruments of the external action duly follow up on the obligations and issues identified in the implementation of the Union's trade relations and trade-related instruments.
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 111 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) The Union's common commercial policy is to be consistent with and to consolidate the objectives of the Union policy in the field of development cooperation, laid down in Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in particular the eradication of poverty and the promotion of human rights, sustainable economic, social, and environmental development and good governance in the developing countries. It is to comply with World Trade Organisation (‘WTO’) requirements, in particular with the Decision on Differential and More Favourable Treatment, Reciprocity and Fuller Participation of Developing Countries (the ‘Enabling Clause’), adopted under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (‘GATT’) in 1979, under which WTO Members may accord differential and more favourable treatment to developing countries.
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 114 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) The general objectives of the GSP are to support eradication of poverty in all its forms, in line with Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development Goal 17.12, to encourage exports diversification from GSP beneficiary countries and to promote the sustainable development agenda, while averting harm to EU industry’s interests. The 2018 GSP Mid- term Evaluation and the 2021 supporting Study for the Impact Assessment underpinning this Regulation concluded that the GSP framework under Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 has delivered on these main objectives, which were at the core of the 2012 overhaul of Council Regulation (EC) No 732/200815 . _________________ 15 Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 of 22 July 2008 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences from 1 January 2009 and amending Regulations (EC) No 552/97, (EC) No 1933/2006 and Commission Regulations (EC) No 1100/2006 and (EC) No 964/2007 (OJ L 211, 6.8.2008, p. 1).
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 123 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Those objectives remain relevant in the current global context and they are consistent with the analysis and perspective of the recent Commission Communication Trade Policy Review “An Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy”16 (‘TPR’). According to the TPR, the Union has a “strategic interest to support the enhanced integration into the world economy of vulnerable developing countries” and it “must fully use the strength provided by its openness and the attractiveness of its Single Market” to support multilateralism and to ensure adherence to universal values. For GSP specifically, the TPR notes its important role in “promoting respect for core environment, human and labour rights” and sets the objective for the GSP “to further increase trading opportunities for developing countries to reduce poverty and create jobs based on international values and principles”. Moreover, the scheme should assist beneficiaries in recovering from the COVID-19 impact and in re- building their economies in a sustainable and diversified manners, including with respect to international human rights, labour, environmental and good governance standards. Coherence should be ensured between the GSP and its objectives and the assistance provided to beneficiary countries, in line with Union’s Policy Coherence for Development (PCD), which constitutes a key pillar of Union’s efforts to enhance the positive impact and increase effectiveness of development cooperation17 . _________________ 16 COM(2021) 66 final, 18 February 2021 17 Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU concerning PCD reads: “The Union shall take account of the objectives of development cooperation in the policies that it implements which are likely to affect developing countries”.
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 131 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) By providing preferential access to the Union market, the scheme should assist developing countries in their efforts to reduce poverty and achieve and promote good governance and sustainable development by helping them to generate additional revenue through international trade, which can then be re-invested for the benefit of their own development and, in addition, to diversify their economies. The scheme's tariff preferences should focus on less competitive products originating from those developing countries that have greater development, trade and financial needs.
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 146 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance (GSP+) is based on the integral concept of sustainable development, as recognised by international conventions and instruments such as the 1986 UN Declaration on the Right to Development, the 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, the 1998 International Labour Organisation (ILO) Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, the 2000 UN Millennium Declaration, the 2002 Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development, the ILO Centenary Declaration for the Future of Work of 2019, the Outcome Document of the UN Summit on Sustainable Development of 2015 "Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development", the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Consequently, the additional tariff preferences provided for under the special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance should be granted to those developing countries which, due to a lack of diversification, are economically vulnerable, have ratified core international conventions on human and labour rights, climate and environmental protection and good governance, and commit to ensuring the effective implementation and to collaborate on the monitoring thereof. The special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance should help those countries to assume the additional responsibilities resulting from the ratification and effective implementation of these conventions. The list of conventions relevant for GSP should be updated to better reflect the evolution of core international instruments and standards and take a proactive approach to sustainable development in keeping with the Sustainable Development Goals and Agenda 203018 . In this regard, the following conventions are added: the Paris Agreement on Climate Change (2015) – replacing the Kyoto Protocol; the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD); the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (OP-CRC-AC); ILO Convention No 81 on Labour Inspection; ILO Convention No 144 on Tripartite Consultation; and the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime; the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court; the Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention of 1930, the Occupational Safety and Health convention No 155, and the Promotional Framework for Occupational safety and health convention No 187. _________________ 18 United Nations (2015). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our World: the Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1), available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post 2015/transformingourworld
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 180 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) The reasons for temporary withdrawal of the arrangements under the scheme should include serious and systematic violations of the principles laid down in international conventions concerning core human rights (including certain principles of international humanitarian law enshrined in those conventions), labour rights, climate and environmental protection, and good governance,so as to promote the objectives of those conventions. Tariff preferences under the special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance should be temporarily withdrawn if the beneficiary country does not respect its binding undertaking to maintain the ratification and effective implementation of those conventions or to comply with the reporting requirements imposed by the respective conventions, or to maintain the effective implementation of the plan of action provided in its request to benefit from the arrangement; or if the beneficiary country does not cooperate with the Union's monitoring procedures as set out in this Regulation. The temporary withdrawal should continue until the reasons justifying it no longer apply. In situations characterised by an exceptional gravity of the violations, the Commission should have the power to respond rapidly by adopting measures within a shorter timeline. Under the Union’s zero tolerance approach for child and forced labour the reasons for temporary withdrawal should include exports of goods made by internationally prohibited child and forced labour, as well as forced labour including slaveryinvoluntariness, slavery, under threats and prison labours, as identified in the relevant Conventions in Annex VI.
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 184 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25 a (new)
(25 a) Temporary withdrawal of the arrangements should be considered as a last-resort measure. Whenever the record of compliance with the relevant obligations set out in this Regulation seriously deteriorates, the Commission and the EEAS should step up dialogue with the beneficiary countries and launch a process of enhanced engagement where countries commit to actions through the implementation of targeted roadmaps leading to discernible progress generally in the short term or, whenever issues are more complex and sensitive, over the medium term. After the launch and during the overall duration of the withdrawal procedure, beneficiary countries should be given the possibility to start engaging anytime. Whenever the enhanced engagement is extended into a second year, the Commission should add the country onto a public list, with a view to providing predictability and maximising leverage.
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 199 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
(9 a) ‘sensitive products’ means goods whose excessively-high utilisation rate by standard GSP beneficiary countries referred to in Article 1(2) could negatively impact the market for basic primary and processed goods and affect the ability and capacity of Union industries to manufacture or process them in the medium and long-run; processed agri- food products, such as rice and sugar, considered for the purposes of this definition are products obtained with basic raw materials whose origin or place of origin is in one of the Member States;
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 213 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)
(12 a) 'directly competing products' means a product which, after or prior to an industrial transformation, can be compared to another product;
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 305 #

2021/0297(COD)

Where an EBA beneficiary country no longer fulfils the economic, environment and social conditions referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 36, to amend Annex I in order to remove the country from the EBA arrangement following a transitional period of three years as from the date on which the EBA beneficiary country no longer fulfils the economic, environment and social conditions referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 309 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The preferential arrangements referred to in Article 1(2) may be withdrawn temporarily, in respect of all or of certain products and/or sectors originating in a beneficiary country, for any of the following reasons:
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 313 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) failure to ratify the conventions listed in Annex IV following the obligation to present a reasonable timetable for those ratifications,
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 316 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) serious shortcomings in customs controls on the export or transit of drugs (illicit substances or precursors), or related to the obligation to readmit the beneficiary country’s own nationals or serious failure to comply with international conventions on antiterrorism or anti-money laundering;
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 343 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall provide the beneficiary country concerned with every opportunity to cooperate during the monitoring and evaluation period of six months from the date of publication of the noticmonitoring and evaluation period will be of six months from the date of publication of the notice. During this period, the Commission shall provide the beneficiary country concerned with every opportunity to cooperate.
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 350 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
8. Within sixtwo months from the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 4, point (b), the Commission shall decide:
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 367 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. Where a product originating in a beneficiary country of any of the preferential arrangements referred to in Article 1(2) is imported in volumes or at prices which cause, or threaten to cause, serious difficulties to Union producers of products obtained in the Union in like or directly competing products, normal Common Customs Tariff duties on that product may be wholly or partially reintroduced.
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 369 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. 'Products obtained in the Union' means the primary basic products, processed products and other goods of Union producers. Processed agri-food products are products obtained with raw materials whose origin or place of origin is ascertained in one of the Member States of the European Union.
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 371 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. For the purpose of this Chapter, 'directly competing products' means a product which, after or prior to an industrial transformation, can be compared to another product.
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 379 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
On duly justified grounds of urgency relating to deterioration of the economic or financial situation of Union producers of products obtained in the Union, and where delay might cause damage which would be difficult to repair, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 39(4) to reintroduce normal Common Customs Tariff duties for a period of up to 12 months.
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 383 #

2021/0297(COD)

II Safeguards in the Textile, Footwear, Leather Agriculture and Fisheries Sectors
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 387 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Without prejudice to Section I of this Chapter, on 1 January of each year, the Commission, on its own initiative and in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 39(2), shall adopt an implementing act in order to remove the tariff preferences referred to in Articles 7 and 12 with respect to the products from GSP sections S-11a8a, S-8b, S-11a, S-11b and S-11b2a or to products falling under Combined Nomenclature codes 1006 1701, 2207 10 00, 2207 20 00, 2909 19 10, 3814 00 90, 3820 00 00, 38249956, 38249957, 38249992, 38248400, 38248500, 38248600, 38248700, 38248800, 38249993, and 38249996 and 43021980 where imports of such products, originate in a beneficiary country and their total value:
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 394 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) for products falling under Combined Nomenclature codes 2207 10 00, 2207 20 00, 2909 19 10, 3814 00 90, 3820 00 00, and 38249956, 38249957, 38249992, 38248400, 38248500, 38248600, 38248700, 38248800, 38249993, and 38249996 exceeds the share referred to in point 1 of Annex IV of the value of Union imports of the same products from all countries and territories listed in Annex I, columns A and BC, during a calendar year
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 398 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) for products falling under Combined Nomenclature codes 1006 and 1701 exceeds the share referred to in point 2 of Annex IV of the value of Union imports of the same products from all countries and territories listed in Annex I, column C, during a calendar year;
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 402 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) for products under GSP sections S- 11a8a, S-8b, S-11a, S-11b and S-11b2a exceeds the share referred to in point 3 of Annex IV of the value of Union imports of products in GSP sections S-11a8a, S-8b, S-11a, S-11b and S-11b2a from all countries and territories listed in Annex I, columns A and B, during a calendar year.
2022/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 407 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to EBA beneficiary countries, nor shall it apply to countries with a share for the relevant products referred to in paragraph 1 not exceeding 6 % of total Union imports of the same products.
2022/02/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 422 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – subheading 1
Modalities for the application of Article 8 and Article 29
2022/02/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 428 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 1
1. Article 8 and Article 29 shall apply when the percentage share referred to in paragraph 1 of thatose Articles exceeds 470 %.
2022/02/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 430 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 2
2. Article 8 shall apply for each of the GSP sections S-2a, S-3 and S-5 of Annex III, when the percentage share referred to in paragraph 1 of that Article exceeds 17,5 %.0 %. Article 29 shall apply for products falling under Combined Nomenclature codes 1006 and 1701 when the percentage share referred to in paragraph 1 of that Article exceeds 10%
2022/02/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 437 #

2021/0297(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 3
3. Article 8 shall apply for each of the GSP sections S-11a8a, S-8b, S-11a, S-11b and S-11b2a of Annex III, when the percentage share referred to in paragraph 1 of that Article exceeds 372 %.
2022/02/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 161 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) Whilst the ultimate objective of the CBAM is a broad product coverage, it would be prudent to start with a selected number of sectors with relatively homogeneous products where there is a risk of carbon leakage. Union sectors deemed at risk of carbon leakage are listed in Commission Delegated Decision 2019/70842 . _________________ 42 Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2019/708 of 15 February 2019 supplementing Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the determination of sectors and subsectors deemed at risk of carbon leakage for the period 2021 to 2030 (OJ L 120, 8.5.2019, p. 2).
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 167 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) The use of the first criterion allows listing the following industrial sector in terms of cumulated emissions: iron and steel, refineries, cement, organic basic chemicals, pesticides and fertilisers.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 170 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31 a (new)
(31 a) The Commission should foresee an immediate application of CBAM after the transitional period for sectors, included in this Regulation, having a higher expositions to carbon leakage and impacts on climate, namely cement, steel, iron and pesticides, bypassing the phasing out of the EU ETS schemes.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 171 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31 b (new)
(31 b) The scope of the CBAM should be extended to agricultural products after the phasing-in period. Meanwhile, the Commission should monitor the stability of the Union agricultural markets and foresee the viability of agricultural production as effect of the implementation of the CBAM certificates for the sectors involved
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 182 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35 a (new)
(35 a) Cement should have apriority in the CBAM phasing-in because of its high exposition to carbon leakage compared to the other sectors involved.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 187 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
(41) The embedded declared emissions should be verified by a person accredited by a nationalEuropean accreditation body appointed in accordance with Article 4(1) of Regulation No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council43 or pursuant to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/206744 . _________________ 43 Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93 (OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30). 44 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067 of 19 December 2018 on the verification of data and on the accreditation of verifiers pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC ofby the European Commission in accordance with the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 334, 31.12.2018, p. 94).
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 190 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
(44) In order to give the authorised declarants flexibility in complying with their CBAM obligations and allow them to benefit from fluctuations in the price of EU ETS allowances, the CBAM certificates should be valid for a period of two years from the date of purchase. The authorised declarant should be allowed to re-sell to the national authorityEuropean Commission a portion of the certificates bought in excess. The authorised declarant should build up during the year the amount of certificates required at the time of surrendering, with thresholds set at the end of each quarter.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 221 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55 a (new)
(55 a) In order to fulfil the European Union ambitious policy on climate action and to achieve its 2030 GHG emissions reduction target, all CBAM revenues should have a clear climate earmarking. The revenues of the correct application of CBAM should return to producers to help investments in cleaner technologies, the development of environmental and climate projects and if necessary in the form of tax reductions or lump sum transfers for those sectors highly exposed to price volatility as agriculture;
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 269 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 11
(11) ‘competent authority’ means the authority, designated by each Member Stateor established by the European Commission in accordance with Article 11 of this Regulation;
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 328 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Each Member StateThe European Commission shall designate the competent authority to carry out the obligations under this Regulation and inform the Commission thereofin consultation with the Parliament and the Council.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 330 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall make available to the Member States a list of all competent authorities and publish this information in the Official Journal of the European Union.deleted
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 335 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall require that competent authoritiesy exchanges any information that is essential or relevant to the exercise of their functions and duties.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 336 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – title
CommissionMember States
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 341 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
The CommissionMember States shall assist the competent authoritiesy in carrying out theirits obligations under this Regulation and coordinate their activities.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 345 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. The competent authority of each Member State shall establish a national registry of declarants authorised in that Member State in the form of a standardised electronic database containing the data regarding the CBAM certificates of those declarants, and to provide for confidentiality in accordance with the conditions set out in Article 13.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 357 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. If irregularities are identified as a result of the controls carried out under paragraph 2, the Commission shall inform the Member State or Member States concerned for further investigation in order toand correct the identified irregularities.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 398 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 a (new)
Article 24 a Usage of revenue from the sales of CBAM certificates 1. To meet the Union objectives and international commitments, such as those under WTO agreements and the Paris Agreement, revenues generated from the sale of CBAM certificates, or the equivalent in financial value of these revenues, shall be used to: - cover the cost of administration of the CBAM competent authority; - tackle climate change in least developed countries (LDCs), inter alia, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, to adapt to the impacts of climate change, to fund research and development for mitigation and adaptation in these countries; - finance EU producers projects or investments in cleaner technologies; - foresee tax reductions or lump sum transfers for those sectors highly exposed to price volatility such as agriculture; 2. To ensure transparency of the use of revenues generated from the sale of CBAM certificates the Commission shall, on a yearly basis, report to the European Parliament and the Council on how the revenues from the sale of CBAM certificates, or the equivalent in financial value of these revenues, from the previous year has been used and how this has contributed to tackling climate change in LDCs.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 470 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall collect the information necessary with a view to extending the scope of this Regulation to indirect emissions and goods other than those listed in Annex I, including agriculture and food sectors, and develop methods of calculating embedded emissions based on environmental footprint methods.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 477 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
2. Before the end of the transitional period, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Regulation. The report shall contain, in particular the effects of the measures on the Union market and in particular SMEs, the depth analysis of Union competitiveness, the volume of Union imports as results of the application of this Regulation, the assessment of the possibilities to further extend the scope of embedded emissions to indirect emissions and to other goods at risk of carbon leakage than those already covered by this Regulation, including agriculture and food sectors, as well as an assessment of the governance system and. It shall also contain the assessment of the possibility to further extend the scope to embedded emissions of transportation services as well as to goods further down the value chain and services that may be subject to the risk of carbon leakage in the future.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 511 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) Articles 32 to 345 shall apply until 31 December 2025.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 515 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) Article 35 shall apply until 28 February 2026.deleted
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 534 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I a (new)
Pesticides CN CODE 380891 insecticide carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that EU trade policy has a major role to play in the transition towards more sustainable agri-food systems from an environmental, social and economic point of view, in line with the Paris Agreement and the European Green Deal; is of the view that trade policy is an integral part of the implementation of the Farm to Fork Strategy and that it is necessary in order to protect the quality of European products, enabling European producers to compete with the global supply of food products;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the EU internal market is the world’s biggest importer and exporter of agri-food products; is convinced that the EU should use this position to sdetermine the benchmark in terms of standards for sustainable food systems, based on the precautionary principle, environmental protection, respect for human rights, combating food waste, and animal welfare;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 49 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that sustainable production should become a key characteristic of EU agri-food products, expanding the concept of qualitypromoting to that end the role that the concept of quality of European production systems plays in relation to socialety and the environmental aspects, guaranteeing producers proper recognition of their work, including on overseas markets, by means of an active promotion policy on the part of the Union;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 76 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to pursue the objectives of the Farm to Fork Strategy through the development of Green Alliances in all relevant bilateral, regional and multilateral forums, including the UN Food Systems Summit 2021;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 92 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises the importance of ambitious and enforceable Trade and Sustainable Development chapters in trade agreements to promote biodiversity, foster more sustainable agri-food production and stop EU-driven global deforestation; urges support for developing countries to promote food security and alignment with European standards for sustainability and respect for human rights; stresses the importance of using an effective system of sanctions in the event of non-compliance with those standards;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 102 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Emphasises that European production standards must be complied with in trade and when importing agri- food products from third countries; stresses that agri-food products that do not comply with the main EU standards in terms of environmental and health protection and animal welfare should not be allowed onto the internal market; takes the view that the Commission should establish clear and common compliance rules for importers and, in the event of non-compliance, provide for import duties;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 106 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Emphasises the importance of the traceability of the entire production process in order to provide consumers with detailed information on the provenance of agricultural products through an effective sustainability labelling system and the use of new digitalisation systems, including the use of tools such as blockchain in order to certify traceability; considers it essential, to that end, that the Commission ensure uniform customs controls on food products at all points of entry into EU territory;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 110 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Stresses the importance of providing effective support to small farmers to enable full compliance with sustainability standards, taking into account the possible impact of those standards on food losses and waste, and to make it easier for them to gain access to overseas markets;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 112 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5d. Stresses the importance, moreover, of the agri-food sector and geographical indications (GIs) in trade agreements, which require a necessary reform process in the light of the sustainability criteria set out in the Farm to Fork Strategy, but which must also be protected and supported on overseas markets;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 113 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 e (new)
5e. Calls on the Commission to include, in existing trade agreements and in those under negotiation, the chapter on the sustainability of food systems so as to commit to and establish a resilient and sustainable food system with all its trading partners;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 126 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the risk of putting the EU agri-food sector at a competitive disadvantage in the absence of global convergence of standards, and of leading to increased costs for consumers; calls on the Commission to present a comprehensive impact assessment of the targets envisaged in the Strategy, as well as proportionate measures to maintain the competitiveness of the EU agri-food sector and ensure reciprocity of standards, a level playing field and effective monitoring;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 14 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Stresses that a stronger participation by SMEs in global markets creates opportunities and enhance productivity, by accelerating innovation, facilitating spill-overs of technology and know-how.
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Reminds that engaging in international markets can be expensive and unaffordable for most of the European SMEs without appropriate tools and support. Asks the Commission to facilitate SMEs access to finance for new investment, information, skills and technology, helping to increase their international competitiveness and their ability to face trade costs not only through free trade agreements but also through effective and operative desk in our trade partners;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Encourages the Commission to fully support SMEs in overcoming all tariff and non-tariff barriers that prevent their access to third- country markets; requests the inclusion of an SME chapter in every trade agreement; underlines the need for the effective enforcement of trade agreements as a priority task of the Chief Trade Enforcement Officer; reminds the importance to have harmonized and simplified custom procedures to help micro and SMEs to enter into export markets;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2020/2131(INI)

2 a. In this regard, reminds the Commission that all SMEs chapters in Trade agreements should tackle the most common obstacles for European micro and SMEs such as the limited information about the working of the foreign markets, and in particular difficulties in accessing export distribution channels and in contacting overseas customers; costly product standards and certification procedures, and, in particular, a lack of information about requirements in the foreign country; unfamiliar and burdensome customs and bureaucratic procedures; and poor access to finance and slow payment mechanisms.
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 34 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Reminds that SMEs are not always aware of trade preferences in force foreseen by the relevant trade agreements; Calls the Commission to better inform on active trade arrangements and preferences both directly and involving Member States;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 38 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to be more active in its support of national and regional export agencies in order to allow SMEs to overcome the information gap and take better advantage of trade agreements; opines, in this respect, that the Commission could set up an SME internationalisation platform to monitor progress and to facilitate the role of trade fairs and exhibitions as an effective tool to help SME access in global markets;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 51 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Reminds the importance played by the the rise of global value chains(GVCs) and the digital transformation, offering new opportunities for SMEs to integrate into the global economy. Calls on the Commission to continue its work on GVCs focusing on tools to help European SMEs to specialise in specific segments of production and improve their export basket.
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 56 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to strengthen the EU’s safeguard and trade defence instruments in order to better protect European industry, in particular when it affects sectors with a majority of SMEs. Asks, in this regard, that the Commission foresees a more immediate and direct mechanism for SMEs to lodge their complaints in case of unfair trade practices.
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 63 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Calls for the Commission to speed up investigations in sectors where SMEs are preeminent.
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 6 #

2020/2077(INI)

1. Stresses that trade policy is an essential tool for implementing the circular economy and the EU’s sustainability agenda globally; underlines that increased recycling can reduce the EU’s reliance on imports of raw materialslimit the environmental threats occurring as a result of over- consumption, reduce the EU’s reliance on imports of raw materials, including Critical Raw Materials (CRM) and Secondary Raw Materials (SRM), and points to the need to decouple economic growth from resource use in order to ensure the long- term sustainability of global value chains and accelerate sustainable development in third countries;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 14 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Reminds that recyclable materials have become a tradeable commodity, often exported to third countries for reprocessing;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets the lack of international and European standards on waste quality as this hinders a viable trade policy that is conducive to the circular economy; calls on the Commission to present harmonised standards on waste quality and a legal definition of recyclable waste, and to include these in future FTAs and in trade policies that fully integrate sustainable development concerns;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 48 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to identify and abolish barriers that prevent or restrict market access for circular products from outside the EU and to investigate the possibilities and benefits of reducing tariffs on certainrecycled products in order to encourage the development of the circular economy and suppor the remanufacturing business;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 62 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Regrets the underusing role of trade agreements as a tool to progress sustainable circular economic integration; reminds, in this regard, that only two out of the existing EU FTAs explicitly mention the circular economy;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 1 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Underlines the importance to adapt the EU industry strategy to the new economic scenario after covid-19 outbreak considering its adverse effects on EU competitiveness and strategic autonomy; reminds the need to find effective solution to reduce the current unfair trade practices and the rise of counterfeiting halting the productivity of EU companies on the global market;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 6 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Takes note of the Commission’s initiatives to support European SMEs’ access to international markets; stresses, however, that SMEs have to deal with too many regulations and burdens, lack of information and excessive bureaucracy; stresses that SMEs are kept at a competitive disadvantage by investing in climate neutrality to comply with the Green Deal while trying to remain competitive and thrive on export markets; calls, in this regard, for strengthened measures to support SME financing, to encourage their innovation and to find a solution for the current disruption of SMEs global value chains caused by the current covid-19 outbreak;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 23 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to focus on domestic productivity within Europe, in order to establish less dependence on vulnerable supply chains in core industry sectors such as the tech and telecommunications, critical infrastructures, medical products and pharmaceuticals sectors, especially in times of global crisis, and to remain competitive on the global markets; Welcomes, in this regard, the creation of a strategic investment facility proposed in the recovery package and asks the Council to support it as essential for the open strategic autonomy needed by our industry;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to work towards effective and opuncil to resume the talks and find a swift agreement on the International pProcurement that allows the EU to take swiftInstruments as a fundamental tool to guarantee reciprocity, tmargketed and compelling measures and increase leverage to negotiate reciprocity and market opening opening, level playing field to EU operators and to support EU companies access to global markets;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 77 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to strengthen the screening of foreign direct investment, helping those countries without an effective system to put in place balanced measures and to protect access to strategic industries, health care, infrastructure, key enabling technologies, or any other assets in the interests of security and cybersecurity.; highlights the importance of better coordination and exchange of information between Member State activities, with a focus on coherence, effectiveness and transparency in order to improve EU competitiveness;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 84 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. calls on the Commission to review the current strategy having into consideration the need to have a long- term approach where digitalisation, services, manufacture, environmental and labour rights are interlinked and functional for the enhancing of EU companies competitiveness in international markets; Reminds that a proposal for Global Supply chains strategy should be considered as support of EU industry strategy;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 86 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Reminds the importance of digitalisation as pivot instrument to strengthen EU industry and its position on the international market; calls, in this regard, on the Commission to continue negotiations on e-commerce despite the current pandemic difficulties;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 87 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7 c. Calls on the Commission to consider a possible introduction of "Buy European Act" to support European manufacturers, especially SMEs, facing the increasing degree of competition stemming from emerging countries in particular; Stresses that "Buy European Act" shall be necessary in the absence of a strong International Procurement Instrument; reminds, in this regard, that EU industry strategy is always been too much focused on services rather than manufacturing sectors which still represents the majority of EU SMEs;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 1 #

2020/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the COVID-19 pandemic has revealed in the starkest possible terms the vital role played by functioning global supply chains for medical products, and in particular for medicines and treatments; emphasises that an open, transparent, rules-based trading system is fundamental to ensuring the global availability of medicines and guaranteeing an easy distribution and use;
2020/05/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 7 #

2020/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Recalls the need to step up medicine production capacities in Europe ensuring the adequate availability of needed pharmaceuticals and limiting delivery bottlenecks;
2020/05/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 8 #

2020/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Asks the Commission and Member States to allocate resources to support the reconversion of chemical plants in the EU for the production of active pharmaceutical ingredients in order to decrease dependency on third countries;
2020/05/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 10 #

2020/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises that the EUe lack of independence of medical products supply chains within the Union underlying the dependsency on a narrow set of countries for a large proportion of its imports of active pharmaceutical ingredients and chemical raw materials such as China and India; stresses that this over- reliance can pose a risk when limitations in production capacity, safety, excess demand or protectionist measures threaten the proper functioning of global supply chains and potentially undermine the availability of medicines in the EU; calls on the Commission to present a long-term strategy focused on ensuring the EU’s open strategic autonomy in health and reliable tools to check and increase the quality, safety, origin and compliance with the EU regulatory framework and avoid counterfeiting;
2020/05/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2020/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the EU is a leading global exporter of pharmaceutical products; notes that the protection and enforcement of IP rights in free trade agreements (FTAs) and at the WTO is crucial to the development of new medicines and treatments; underlines that the flexibilities provided in the TRIPS agreement can be used to address potential supply shortages in exceptional circumstances and solve the current problems related to the use of compulsory licencing;
2020/05/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2020/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that a broad network of FTAs together with a functioning multilateral trading system constitute the best way of guaranteeing that multiple sources of manufacturing for essential medicines are available and easily checked against any counterfeiting in order to fully comply with regulatory standards convergein Europe and globally;
2020/05/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 49 #

2020/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Strongly encourages all countries to join the WTO’s Pharmaceutical Tariff Elimination Agreement; calls for its scope to be extended to all pharmaceutical and medicinal products; stresses that medical products should be exempted from retaliation in trade disputes and easily accessible;
2020/05/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 63 #

2020/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines that a complete repatriation of medical supply chains is not possible in a global economy; urges the Commission and the Member States to work with the EU’s partners, the WHO and WTO, on establishing an international framework that can prevent the breakdown of supply chains and limit resort to protectionist measures during health crises especially considering the lack of EU medicine production facilities.
2020/05/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 33 #

2020/2058(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Stresses the necessity to improve the climate objectives in line with a target of climate neutrality by 2040; in order to ensure continuous progress towards the achievement of climate neutrality, any transport infrastructure projects financed by the EU budget must, upon independent assessment, be deemed consistent with the 2030, 2050 and possibly 2040 climate objectives and coherent with the EU objective of building a fully renewables- based, highly resource and energy- efficient, climate-neutral and circular economy; in this view, the assessment of the effects of projects must take in account the green house gas emissions during their whole life cycle, such as those occurring in the construction and operational phase and including indirect emissions in a project’s value chain;
2020/06/16
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 46 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan (SEIP) as central in ensuring the success of the Green Deal and the transition towards a more sustainable and resilient economyhighly energy and resource efficient, fully renewable-based, net zero GHG and toxic free economy by 2040;
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 80 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the Commission’s European Recovery Plan with the European Green Deal at its heart; endorses the underlying principle that public investments will respect the oath to ‘do no harm’; emphasises that national recovery and resilience plans should put the EU on the path to a 50 % to 55 65% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 compared to 1990 and climate neutrality by 20540;
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 87 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the success of the EU’s aim to achieve climate neutrality will depend on the adequacy of the financing and its respect of the do no harm principle in order to stop the financing of polluting sectors and live up to the EU’s legal obligation under the Paris Agreement to align financial flows with its objectives and phase out fossil fuel subsidies;
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 133 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Wishes to see it ensured that funding from the SEIP, at EU and national level, goes towards the policies and programmes with the highest potential to contribute to the fight against climate change, to reverse the loss of biodiversity and accelerate the transition to a sustainable food system inline with the “Farm to Fork” strategy and looks forward to the Commission’s upcoming climate tracking methodology using appropriately the criteria established by the EU taxonomy;
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 164 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for the phasing-out of public and private investments in highly polluting and harmful industries for which economically feasible alternatives are available, while fully respecting the rights of Member States to choose their energy mix; asks that, by 30 June 2021, Member States are preparing national strategies to phase out all direct and indirect support for fossil fuels as well as environmentally harmful subsidies in order to improve consistency and credibility of the EU in preserving biodiversity and natural ecosystems and to boost the transition towards clean energy systems and a climate neutral and circular economy;
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 211 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines the fact that, in order to meet its obligations under the Paris Agreement, the EU’s contribution to the climate objectives should be underpinned by an ambitious share of climate-related expenditure in the EU budget, going beyond the levels of targeted spending shares of at least 25 % over the MFF 2021- 2027 period and of 340% as soon as possible and at the latest by 2027;
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 273 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that the Innovation Fund and the Modernisation Fund should make a significant contribution to the sustainable transition,transition towards a highly energy and resource efficient, fully renewable-based, net zero GHG and toxic free economy by 2040 and welcomes in particular the fact that the Modernisation Fund is designed to support investments to improve energy efficiency in 10 lower-income Member States and is therefore an important tool in ensuring a just transition;
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 319 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Stresses that the path to climate neutrality should require a contribution from all economic sectors to reduce their emissions to close to zero and asks the Commission to establish an instrument based on the polluter pays principle;
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 330 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes the efforts of the European Investment Bank (EIB) to revise its energy lending policy and to devote 50 % of its operations to climate action and environmental sustainability; calls on the EIB to commit to the sustainable transition towards climate neutrality while taking into account the different energy mixes of Member States and devoting particular attention to the sectors and regions most affected by the transition; notes the recent statement made by EIB President Werner Hoyer that the Bank has exhausted the lending space, and that a strengthening of the EIB’s capital base is necessary in order to carry on with the ambitious projects underpinning the transition to a sustainable economy;
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 379 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Recalls the statement of the ECB President that the ECB is supporting the development of a taxonomy as a way of facilitating the incorporation of environmental considerations in central bank portfolios; calls on the ECB to evaluate the feasibility of includinge sustainability criteria in its collateral framework and its annual stress testing exercise, while assessing ways to guide lending towards energy transition investments and to rebuild a sustainable economy in the aftermath of the COVID- 19 crisis;
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 438 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. In order to confront greenwashing and ultimately support the achievement of the objectives set out by the Green Deal, the Commission shall submit, by June 2021, a legislative proposal to the European Parliament and the Council establishing a Union-wide ban on advertising, sponsorship or any other promotional activities funded by companies deriving the majority of their income from fossil fuel extraction and supply;
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 454 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Calls for the introduction of an enabling framework for public sustainable investments to achieve the goals set out in the European Green Deal, but stresses that whatever financing model is chosen must not undermine the sustainability of public finance in the EU; supports the commitment by EVP Dombrovskis to explore how taxonomy can be used in the public sector; calls for public support for airlines to be used in a sustainable and efficient manner; and on the EU not to support the proposal put forward in the context of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) to change the baseline from which the emissions growth of the sector will be measured, which could see airlines pay nothing for their climate impact until 2024;
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 467 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Recalls that, according to the Commission’s own calculations, a conservative estimate of additional investments needed to reach the EU’s current 2030 climate and environmental policy goals would stand at around €470bn per year; notes that the EU’s fiscal rules, which are currently suspended, would render these investments impossible owing to the requirement to respect the deficit relative to GDP rule; calls for the introduction of a European golden rule to exclude public investment to promote environmental sustainability from structural deficit calculations;
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 478 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Recalls that the European Semester is a framework for EU Member States to coordinate their budgetary and economic policies; believes that it could facilitate the implementation of the European Green Deal, the European Pillar of Social Rights and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); believes that the SDGs should be at the heart of EU’s policy making process;deleted
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 557 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Wishes it to be ensured that all contribute equitably to the post-corona recovery and the transition to a sustainable economyeconomy towards a highly energy and resource efficient, fully renewable-based, net zero GHG and toxic free economy by 2040; seeks an intensified fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance and aggressive tax planning; calls on the Commission to create a blacklist of EU Member States facilitating tax avoidance; calls for EU-level coordination to avoid aggressive tax planning by individuals and corporates; seeks in this context an ambitious strategy for business taxation for the 21st century;
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 565 #

2020/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Considers green and sustainable public procurement to be a crucial driver of industrial transformation; calls on the Commission to study how to fully use the leverage of public expenditure and investment to create markets for carbon neutral and resource efficient products and services and achieve policy objectives, including by making environmental and social criteria mandatory in public procurement; calls also on the Commission to push for a more ambitious International Procurement Instrument that provides for reciprocity and mutual standards;
2020/07/03
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 4 #

2020/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights that, while there are a number of dynamic middle income countries on the African continent, its economic development is still relatively weak in comparison to other parts of the world; stresses that many of its countries will therefore face almost insurmountable challenges caused by the COVID-19 crisis and the effects of climate change; calls on the Commission to plan and enable strong and effective health diplomacy towards African countries in order to facilitate the export of medical devices and personal protective equipment and to support the easy exchange of doctors and health operators among the countries;
2020/06/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 19 #

2020/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the announcement from the G20 on a temporary moratorium on debt repayments for the weakest developing countries; acknowledges that more needs to be done as huge sums are owed by poor countries to developed countries' private banks and investors; stresses the need to work for cancelling the debts by enforcement and not leaving it to any voluntary action;
2020/06/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 23 #

2020/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights that while the European Union still has important economic ties with African states, and that China hasremains the largest investor in Africa, China is remaining a strong systemic rival and keeping on intensifiedying its economic engagement in Africathe region and creating a difficult investment climate and business environment for EU companies;
2020/06/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 49 #

2020/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to reform its current version of its strategy entitled ‘Towards a comprehensive Strategy with Africa’ with a view to addressing the needs of the African regions in the wake of this health and economic crisis in particular in the infrastructure sectors such as renewable energy, windmills and solar panels where EU has expertise and better standards than China; points out the role of digitizing food and agriculture to face the current Covid-19 pandemic in the continent and underlines the need to support investments in order to make smallholder crops and livestock more productive, improve nutrition and help empower women farmers;
2020/06/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 54 #

2020/2041(INI)

6. Calls on the Commission to support Africa in its ambitions for a cWelcomes the African Continental fFree tTrade area by making the necessary adjustments in order to implement its Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) and make them fit the project of the Continental Free Trade AreaAgreement, in force since May 2019, which created a significant momentum for the continental integration; stresses the importance to increase intra- African trade, diversify exports, improve sustainability, product safety and quality, and a kevel playing field;
2020/06/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 79 #

2020/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for a concrete proposal that establishes common initiatives on a renewable energy supply on the African continent reminding the need to ensure easy access to electricity, to focus on resilient infrastructures, clear, sustainable and secure energy access;
2020/06/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 81 #

2020/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Stresses the need to address the challenges of nutrition and food security by boosting the current agri-food systems, helping food affordability in this pandemic situation, promote local sustainable production and intra-Africa exchange which provide, at the same time, direct employments and income particularly in rural areas, reducing poverty and immigration;
2020/06/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 83 #

2020/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Emphasises the need for substantial sustainable investments that enable leapfrogging in the African states; reminds the role played by a value-adding private sector to stimulate PP investments and economic diversification, recalls the need to help SMEs which are suffering from a lack of public and political support, transparent regulatory framework, lack of level-playing field and rising of unauthorized companies; in this regard, underlines the role of European Business organisations to work closely with their African counterparts through ad-hoc platforms and initiatives to increase trade fair and exhibition systems;
2020/06/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 91 #

2020/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines that empowering civil society, organizations, academia and think tanks and thereby including a social counterpart in investment and sustainable development, is a vital aspect of EU policies and intensifying cooperation towards and with the African states.;
2020/06/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 39 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the EU’s draft text of the Agreement on the New Partnership with the United Kingdom, published on 18 March 2020, which proposes a comprehensive agreement for a deep and close partnership, covering not only free trade in goods and services but also mutually satisfactory ways to prevent distortions and unfair competitive advantages, including those related to the agriculture sectors, SPS and state aid, and to establish a favorable climate for the development of trade in investment;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 48 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the UK has submitted various draft texts to the EU which – unlike the EU’s text – are not public and cover, inter alia, a trade agreement including annexes, an air transport agreement, an aviation safety agreement and an agreement on civil nuclear energy cooperation via Euratom; Rejects, in this regard, any piecemeal approach for the negotiations;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 52 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Invites the Commission and the Council to pursue the objectives provided in art. 21 of TEU, with special attention to the safeguard of values, fundamental rights and interests, security, independence and integrity of the Union as a whole, the strengthening of international security, the preservation and improvement of the quality of the environment and the sustainable management of global natural resources;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 64 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point ii
(ii) protection of the full integrity and proper functioning of the single market and customs union as well as market surveillance mechanisms, the indivisibility of the four freedoms; in particular, the degree of cooperation in the economic pillar should be commensurate with the freedom of movement of people;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 67 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point iv
(iv) the safeguarding of the EU legal order and the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in this respect as the ultimate body for interpreting of EU law;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 69 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point vi
(vi) a level playing field, ensuring equivalent standards in social, labour, agriculture, food security, animal welfare, SPS, environmental, competition and State aid policies, including through a robust and comprehensive framework on competition and State aid control;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 74 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point vii
(vii) the precautionary principle, the principle that environmental damage should as a priority be rectified at source, and the polluter pays principle should be considered as the core of the negotiations and fully implemented;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 76 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point x
(x) the right balance between rights and obligations, including, where appropriate, commensurate financial contributions or sanctions which should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and have a real and deterrent effect;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 93 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Reminds the importance of including guarantees on respecting international climate change commitments and in particular the Paris agreement as essential elements in any future deal;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 111 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Calls, in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic, for an extension of the transition period in accordance with Article 132, in order to minimize the risks of not reaching an agreement;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 125 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Stresses that no agreement will be possible if the negotiators will fail to comply with what has been established under Part Two of the Withdrawal Agreement, namely the adoption of a comprehensive and reciprocal approach to grant full protection of the rights of EU- 27 citizens living in the UK and of UK citizens living in the EU-27;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 166 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Takes note that the UK has chosen to establish its future economic and trade partnership with the EU on the basis of a ‘Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement’ as laid down in the UK’s Approach to Negotiations; emphasises that, while the European Parliament is supportive of the EU constructively negotiating a balanced, ambitious and comprehensive FTA with the UK, by its nature an FTA will never be equivalent to ‘frictionless’ tradeits support for a balanced, ambitious and comprehensive FTA with the UK; shares the Commission’s negotiating position whereby the scope and ambition of an FTA that the EU would agree to is conditional on the UK agreeing to provisions related to the level playing field, given the geographical proximity and, the economic interdependence and connectedness, the integration of markets, as well as on the conclusion of an satisfactory agreement on fisheries;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 176 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Reminds, in this regard, the need to avoid customs duties on goods originating in the other party and to guarantee smoothly procedures for customs check, especially for SMEs, while safeguarding the compliance of goods with internal market and the relevant product rules;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 182 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 – point i
(i) reciprocal arrangement for mutually beneficial market access for goods, services, public procurement, recognition of professional qualifications, product rules and traceability and where relevant foreign direct investment to be negotiated in full compliance with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 188 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 – point iii
(iii) while striving for the widest possible trade in goods, the Commission should evaluate possible quotas and, tariffs or the exclusion for the most sensitive sectors as well as the need for safeguard clauses to protect the integrity of the EU single market and national productions; reiterates, moreover, that for instance with respect to food and agricultural products, accesaccess for all goods to the single market is conditional on strict compliance with all EU laws and standards, particularlyrules; for instance, with respect to food and agricultural products, stresses the need to comply with the current legislations and standards in the fields of food safety, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), pesticides, geographical indications, animal welfare, labelling and traceability, sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) standards, and human, animal and plant health;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 194 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 – point iii a (new)
(iii a) Reminds, in this regard, the importance to guarantee a bilateral cooperation mechanisms for the mutual recognition by both parties of any new GIs approved after the transition period or provide appropriate transitional provisions to avoid a harmful legal vacuum.
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 214 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 – point ix
(ix) an overarching chapter on the needs and interests of micro-enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with regard to market access facilitation issues including, but not limited to, compatibility of technical standards, exchange of information on applicable legislations, and simplified and streamlined customs procedures along with harmonised controls with the aim of preserving and generating concrete business opportunities and fostering their internationalisation; notes that the UK’s approach to the negotiations does not include specific provisions reflecting these objectives;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 226 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 – point xii
(xii) ambitious and appropriate provisions allowing for the development of digital trade, and to address unjustified barriers to trade by electronic means, and ensure an open, secure and trustworthy online environment for businesses and consumers, and regulating cross-border data flows and exchange, including principles such as fair competition and ambitious rules for cross- border data transfers, in full compliance with, and without prejudice to, the EU’s current and future data protection and privacy rules;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 246 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – introductory part
16. Recalls its determination to prevent any kind of ‘dumping’ in the framework of the future EU-UK relationship; considers that a key outcome of the negotiations is to guarantee a level playing field through robust commitments and binding and enforceable provisions on:
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 266 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Points out that these provisions should ensure that standards are not lowered, while empowering both parties to modify commitments over time to lay down higher standards or include additional areas; stresses, moreover, that commitments and provisions should be enforceable by autonomous interim measures, a solid dispute settlement mechanism and, remedies and possible sanctions, with a view to dynamic alignment;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 275 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Reiterates the need to maintain high standards, clear traceability and a level playing field in the areas of medicinal products, medical devices, food safety and labelling, and veterinary, phytosanitary, and environmental policy and standards;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 310 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Recalls that both the EU and the UK share principles, values and interests and a commitment to promoting global prosperity, security and effective multilateralism; stresses that it is in both sides’ interest to maintain an ambitious, close and lasting cooperation that serves the security of Europe and it citizens and contributes to global stability, a rule-based international order, the protection of human rights and peace in line with the objectives and principles set out in Article 21 of the TEU;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 325 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Underlines the fact that the EU is an important partner for the UK in foreign and security policy, as the need for common responses to address foreign, security and defence policy challenges is crucial to both sides; encourages the timely and reciprocal exchange of information and intelligence as well as close cooperation in the areas of counter- terrorism, space policy, cyberwarfare and chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) defence;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 341 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Considers that it is in the common interest of the UK and the EU to cooperate on the development of effective and genuinely interoperable defence capabilities and to promote joint effectiveness of Armed Forces while preserving their respective strategic autonomy and freedom of action, including within the European Defence Agency, and to continue the highly valuable partnerships within NATO and EU programmes on defence and external security, such as the European Defence Fund, Galileo and cyber-security programmes;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 357 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Encourages the UK to participate in EU crisis management operations and in CSDP missions and operations, through the signing of a framework participation agreement, as well as in projects under Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO), where invited to participate and with the corresponding rights and obligations of third countries and based on effective reciprocity;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 373 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Points out that the entire Agreement with the UK as a third country, including provisions on the level playing field, should include the establishment of a single coherent and solid governance system as an overarching framework, covering the joint continuous supervision and management, implementation and review of the Agreement as well as dispute settlement and enforcement mechanisms with sanctions and interim measures where necessary with respect to the interpretation and application of the Agreement’s provisions, as well as a for a for regular dialogue between the parties so as to provide strategic direction;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 4 #

2020/1998(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that in its resolution of 19 June 2020 on general guidelines for the preparation of the 2021 budget, Parliament stressed that the primary focus of the 2021 budget should be to mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak and support the recovery, built on the European Green Deal and digital transformation; stresses the importance of a rapid and effective answer to the needs of European citizens that are suffering the most important economic crisis in the last 70 years; calls the Institutions for a fast agreement in order to start a real economic recovery of the situation;
2020/10/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 37 #

2020/1998(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Recalls the request to propose new own resources, in particular related to the internal market, in order to progressively reduce the direct contribution from the Member States by easing the pressure on their budgets; invites the Commission to work towards the establishment of a financial transaction tax acceptable to all EU members as a potential basis for a new own resource for the EU budget; invites the Council to open a discussion to this issue and to set up a realistic roadmap;
2020/10/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 49 #

2020/1998(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the crucial role of the Connecting Europe Facility in fostering the development of a high-performance trans- European network, supporting energy projects in the shift towards a climate- neutral economy with security of supply, and buttressing the digital transition, including the up-skilling and re-skilling of Union workers; proposes therefore major increases, in particular for the transport and energy strands and calls for a comprehensive analysis of the financed projects in order to establish what are the effective priorities and not to finance projects with negative environmental impact;
2020/10/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 62 #

2020/1998(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Regrets that the Commission did not propose the creation of a dedicated line for tourism due to the current situation; calls for a quick direct and undirect support to this sector, in particular to SMEs;
2020/10/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 157 #

2020/1998(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 63 a (new)
63 a. Regrets the continuous increases in the Parliament budget; considers necessary, in order to give a signal to the European citizens, to identify savings in the administrative expenditures; calls for a serious revision of the priorities due to the current situation and invites the General Secretary to identify more source of savings for the 2021;
2020/10/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 129 #

2020/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The financing and investment operations should be aligned with current policy priorities of the Union such as the European Green Deal and the Strategy on shaping Europe’s digital future. Safeguarding employment and support to cross-border activities should also be targeted.
2020/08/27
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 138 #

2020/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) In order to circumvent potential conflicts of interest and maximise the effect on the real economy and on employment, companies that benefit from EFSI financing through the solvency support window should be subject to restrictions on dividend payments, senior pay and share buy-backs during the period of the guarantee.
2020/08/27
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 143 #

2020/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) In order to ensure accountability to European citizens, the EIB should regularly report to the European Parliament and the Council on the progress, impact and operations of the Solvency Support Instrument, in particular as regards the number of operation conducted, the geographical and sectoral coverage and the social impact, including clear indications on the aggregate share of employment retained or created in the firms obtaining solvency support. At the request of the European Parliament, the Chair of the Steering Board and the Managing Director should participate in hearings and reply to questions within a fixed period. The Commission should report annually on the situation of the guarantee fund.
2020/08/27
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 186 #

2020/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part
The operations concerned shall be consistent with Union policies, including the European Green Deal9 , the European Pillar of Social Rights and the Strategy on shaping Europe’s digital future10 , as well as supporting an inclusive and symmetric recovery in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, and support any of the following general objectives:’ _________________ 9 COM(2019)640 final. 10 COM(2020)67 final.
2020/08/27
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 209 #

2020/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 7 a (new)
(14a) in Article 9, the following paragraph is added: ‘7a. Beneficiaries that receive EFSI financing shall not make dividend payments, non-mandatory coupon payments or buy back shares. The remuneration of any member of the management of a beneficiary that receives EFSI financing shall not go beyond the fixed part of that members’ remuneration on 31 December 2019. For a person becoming a member of the management on or after the granting of EFSI financing, the applicable limit shall be the lowest fixed remuneration of any member of the management on 31 December 2019. Bonuses or other variable or comparable remuneration elements shall not be paid under any circumstances.’
2020/08/27
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 230 #

2020/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 29 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 19 – paragraph 2 a (new)
- (29a) In Article 19, the following paragraph is added: "For operations under the solvency support window, beneficiaries and financial intermediaries that are companies having a consolidated net turnover of or exceeding EUR 50 000 000 shall draw up on annual basis and make publicly available, free of charge, a report on income tax information. Broken down by tax jurisdiction and for each jurisdiction in which the undertaking operates, the report shall comprise the following: (a) the name of the company and, where applicable, the list of all its subsidiaries, a brief description of the nature of their activities and their respective geographical location; (b) the number of employees on a full-time equivalent basis; (c) fixed assets other than cash or cash equivalents; (d) the amount of the net turnover, including a distinction between the turnover made with related parties and the turnover made with unrelated parties; (e) the amount of profit or loss before income tax; (f) the amount of income tax accrued (current year) which is the current tax expense recognised on taxable profits or losses of the financial year by undertakings and branches resident for tax purposes in the relevant tax jurisdiction; (g) the amount of income tax paid which is the amount of income tax paid during the relevant financial year by undertakings and branches resident for tax purposes in the relevant tax jurisdiction; (h) the amount of accumulated earnings; (i) stated capital; (j) details of public subsidies received and any donations made to politicians, political organisations or political foundations; (k) whether company, subsidiaries or branches benefit from preferential tax treatment, from a patent box or equivalent regimes."
2020/08/27
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 232 #

2020/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 31 – point 2 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Annex II – Section 2 – point b – paragraph 1
(b) The EU guarantee shall be granted to support, directly or indirectly, the financing of new operations. In the infrastructure field, greenfield investments (asset creation) should be encouraged. Brownfield investments (extension and modernisation of existing assets) may also be supported. Under the Solvency Support Window, financing shall aim at improving the equity base of companies and their solvency. The terms of the financing should avoid distorting competition between companies and be designed in ways that prevent market concentration. As a rule, the EU guarantee shall not be granted for supporting refinancing operations (such as replacing existing loan agreements or other forms of financial support for projects which have already partially or fully materialised), except under the Solvency Support Window or in exceptional and well-justified circumstances where it is demonstrated that such a transaction will enable a new investment of an amount at least equivalent to the amount of the transaction and that would fulfil the eligibility criteria and general objectives laid down in Article 6 and Article 9(2) respectively.
2020/08/27
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 242 #

2020/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 31 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Annex II – Section 6 – point d – indent 5
– Companies targeted by funds, special purpose vehicles or investment platforms shall be encouragrequired to comply, to the extent possible, with minimum high- level social and environmental safeguards in line with guidance provided by the Steering Board. Such guidance should include adequate provisions for avoiding undue administrative burdens, taking into account the size of companies and including lighter provisions for SMEs. Companies with a certain level of exposure to a pre-defined list of environmentally harmful activities, in particular the sectors covered by the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), shall be encouragrequired to put in place, in the future, green transition plawithin a specified time frame, green transition plans, including measures to reduce carbon emissions. Companies shall also be encouraged to advance in their digital transformation. Technical assistance shall be available to assist companies for the purpose of these transitions.
2020/08/27
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 125 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) At Union level, the European Semester of economic policy coordination (‘European Semester’), including the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights, is the framework to identify national reform priorities and monitor their implementation. Member States develop their own national multiannual investment strategies in support of those reforms. Those strategies should be presented alongside the yearly National Reform Programmes as a way to outline and coordinate priority investment projects to be supported by national and/or Union funding.deleted
2020/09/22
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 203 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Currently, no instrument foresees direct financial support linked to the achievement of results and to implementation of reforms and public investments of the Member States in response to challenges identified in the European Semester, and with a viewthe priority actions that are necessary to havinge a lasting impact on the productivity and resilience of the economy of the Member States.
2020/09/22
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 349 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) To ensure its contribution to the objectives of the Facility, the recovery and resilience plan should comprise measures for the implementation of reforms and public investment projects through a coherent recovery and resilience plan. The recovery and resilience plan should be consistent with the relevant country- specific challenges and priorities identified in the context of the European Semester, with the national reform programmes, the national energy and climate plans, the just transition plans, and the partnership agreements and operational programmes adopted under the Union funds. To boost actions that fall within the priorities of the European Green Deal and the Digital Agenda, the plan should also set out measures that are relevant for the green and digital transitions. The measures should enable a swift deliver of targets, objectives and contributions set out in national energy and climate plans and updates thereof. All supported activities should be pursued in full respect of the climate and environmental priorities of the Union.
2020/09/22
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 366 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Where a Member States is exempted from the monitoring and assessment of the European Semester on the basis of Article 12 of Regulation (EU) 472/201311 , or is subject to surveillance under Council Regulation (EC) No 332/200212 , it should be possible that the provisions of this regulation are applied to the Member State concerned in relation to the challenges and priorities identified by the measures set out under the regulations thereof. __________________ 11 12deleted OJ L 140 of 27.5.2013. OJ L 53 of 23.2.2002.
2020/09/22
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 377 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) To inform the preparation and the implementation of the recovery and resilience plans by Member States, the Council should be able to discuss, within the European Semester,and the European Parliament should be able to discuss the state of recovery, resilience and adjustment capacity in the Union. To ensure appropriate evidence, this discussion should be based on the Commission’s strategic and analytical information available in the context of the European Semestercollected by the Commission and, if available, on the basis of the information on the implementation of the plans in the preceding years.
2020/09/22
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 406 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) In order to ensure the national ownership and a focus on relevant reforms and investments, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission a recovery and resilience plan that is duly reasoned and substantiated. The recovery and resilience plan should set out the detailed set of measures for its implementation, including targets and milestones, and the expected impact of the recovery and resilience plan on growth potential, job creation and economic and social resilience; it should also include measures that are relevant for the green and the digital transitions; it should also include an explanation of the consistency of the proposed recovery and resilience plan with the relevant country-specific challenges and priorities identified in the context of the European Semester. Close cooperation between the Commission and the Member States should be sought and achieved throughout the process.
2020/09/22
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 427 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) The Commission should assess the recovery and resilience plan proposed by the Member States and should act in close cooperation with the Member State concerned. The Commission will fully respect the national ownership of the process and will therefore take into account the justification and elements provided by the Member State concerned and assess whether the recovery and resilience plan proposed by the Member State is expected to contribute to effectively address challenges identified in the relevant country-specific recommendation addressed to the Member State concerned or in other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission in the European Semester; whether the plan contains measures that effectively contribute to the green and the digital transitions and to addressing the challenges resulting from them; whether the plan is expected to have a lasting impact in the Member State concerned; whether the plan is expected to effectively contribute to strengthen the growth potential, job creation and economic and social resilience of the Member State, mitigate the economic and social impact of the crisis and contribute to enhancing economic, social and territorial cohesion; whether the justification provided by the Member State of the estimated total costs of the recovery and resilience plan submitted is reasonable and plausible and is commensurate to the expected impact on the economy and employment; whether the proposed recovery and resilience plan contains measures for the implementation of reforms and public investment projects that represent coherent actions; and whether the arrangement proposed by the Member State concerned are expected to ensure effective implementation of the recovery and resilience plan, including the proposed milestones and targets, and the related indicators.
2020/09/22
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 488 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) A Member State should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the recovery and resilience plan within the period of implementation, where objective circumstances justify such a course of action. The Commission should assess the reasoned request and take a new decision within fourtwo months.
2020/09/22
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 508 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) For effective monitoring of implementation, the Member States should report on a quarterly basis within the European Semester procesbiannual basis on the progress made in the achievement of the recovery and resilience plan. Such reports prepared by the Member States concerned should be appropriately reflected in the National Reform Programmes, which should be used as a tool for reporting on progress towards completion of recovery and resilience plans.
2020/09/22
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 1080 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. When assessing the recovery and resilience plan and in the determination of the amount to be allocated to the Member State concerned, the Commission shall take into account the analytical information available on the Member State concerned available in the context of the European Semester as well as the justification and the elements provided by the Member State concerned, as referred to in Article 15(3), and any other relevant information including, in particular, the one contained in the National Reform Programme and the National Energy and Climate Plan of the Member State concerned and, if relevant, information from technical support received via the Technical Support Instrument.
2020/09/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 1095 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) whether the recovery and resilience plan is expected to contribute to effectively address challenges identified in the relevant country-specific recommendations addressed to the Member State concerned or in other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission in the European Semester;deleted
2020/09/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 1272 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point c – point 1
(1) as regards completion of the investment, the investment period by which the investment project must be implemented shall end no later than sevennine years after the adoption of the decision;
2020/09/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 1275 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point c – point 2
(2) as regards completion of reforms, the period by which the reforms must be implemented shall end no later than fourive years after the adoption of the decision.
2020/09/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 1350 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Upon completion of the relevant agreed milestones and targets indicated in the recovery and resilience plan as approved in the implementing act of the Commission, the Member State concerned shall submit to the Commission a duly justified request for payment of the financial contribution and, where relevant, of the loan tranche. Such requests for payment may be submitted by the Member States to the Commission on a biannualquarterly basis. The Commission shall assess, within two months of receiving the request, whether the relevant milestones and targets set out in the decision referred to in Article 17(1) have been satisfactorily implemented. For the purpose of the assessment, the operational arrangement referred to in Article 17(6) shall also be taken into account. The Commission may be assisted by experts.
2020/09/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 1393 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – title
Reporting by the Member State in the European Semester
2020/09/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 1398 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
The Member State concerned shall report on a quarterly basis within the European Semester procesbiannual basis on the progress made in the achievement of the recovery and resilience plans, including the operational arrangement referred to in Article 17(6). To that effect, the quarterly reports of the Member States shall be appropriately reflected in the National Reform Programmes, which shall be used as a tool for reporting on progress towards completion of the recovery and resilience plans.
2020/09/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 1479 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
4. For the purpose of the reporting on the activities referred to in paragraph 2, the Commission may use the content of the relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission under the European Semester as appropriate.deleted
2020/09/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 30 #

2020/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) Project co-financing costs which Member States incur in applying the Regulation should be excluded from the calculation of national public deficits within the context of the Stability and Growth Pact.
2020/07/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 91 #

2020/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 92 b – paragraph 12 – point d
(d) the derogation provided in the second sub-paragraph of Article 65(10) setting the eligibility date of 1 February 2020 for operations for fostering crisis response capacities in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak;deleted (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
2020/07/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 373 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. In order to ensure continuous progress towards the achievement of climate neutrality set out in Articles 1 and 2, the Commission and the Member States shall fully take into account the obligations set out in the Article 3(b) of the Directive 2011/92/EU on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment as with a view to address the green house gas emissions of public and private projects during their whole life cycle, such as those occurring in the construction and operational phase and including indirect emissions in a project’s value chain. In addition, any energy and transport infrastructure projects shall, upon independent assessment, be deemed consistent with the 2030, 2050 and possibly 2040 climate objectives and coherent with the EU objective of building a fully renewables-based, highly resource and energy-efficient, climate-neutral and circular economy.
2020/06/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 11 #

2019/2214(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. regrets that the 2021 preliminary draft estimates have therefore been set at EUR 2.110.467.628, a 3,52% increase over the 2020 budget; deplores the fact that Parliament's budget has increased steadily year on year during the last parliamentary term and calls, therefore, for Parliament to set as the main objective for its own budget that of curbing its own costs as much as possible and seeking significant savings, in order to send out a message of solidarity with EU citizens;
2020/03/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 53 #

2019/2214(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Takes note of the ongoing practice of the year-end ‘mopping-up transfer’ to contribute to current building projects; highlights that this ‘mopping-up transfer’ takes place systematically on the same chapters, titles and, often, exactly on the same budgetary lines; considers that such a legal practice risks being perceived as a programmed over- evaluation of these, in order to generate funds for the financing of Parliament’s building policy; disapproves the practice of using the year-end 'mopping up transfer' to contribute to current building projects considering that it exists contradiction between the transparency of building projects within the Parliament's budget and incentivises over-budgeting in certain areas; calls for a reflection on the financing of key investments in the building policy;
2020/03/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 61 #

2019/2214(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Recalls the need to find a solution for a single seat for the Parliament in order to optimise parliamentary and institutional work and reduce significant political and financial costs and the carbon footprint; emphasises the annual environmental impact of the geographic dispersion is estimated to be between 11 000 to 19 000 tonnes of CO2 emissions; underlines the negative public perception caused by this dispersion and calls, therefore, for practical steps to be taken quickly to establish a single seat for Parliament, in order to prevent any further waste of public money; deplores the fact that over a single parliamentary term the costs generated by Parliament's geographic dispersion can amount to as much as EUR 1 billion;
2020/03/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 88 #

2019/2214(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33 a. Emphasizes that Parliament's Drivers' Service should be used by Members exclusively for journeys to Parliament's premises from the airport/station or vice versa (primary journeys) and that Parliament minivans and minibuses should be used only for this purpose; recalls that in Belgium Members can use trains free of charge; regrets that the Parliament's cars are moving monthly to Strasbourg and back with no passengers and invites the General Secretariat to evaluate a way to give the opportunity to share these cars during the monthly transfers;
2020/03/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 99 #

2019/2214(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)
35 a. Calls for a reduction of at least 20% in Members' monthly salaries, daily allowances and emoluments, including the general expenditure allowance, with a view to sending out a message of solidarity with EU citizens;
2020/03/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 103 #

2019/2214(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Recalls Article 27(1) and (2) of the Statute for Members which states that “the voluntary pension fund set up by Parliament shall be maintained after the entry into force of this Statute for Members or former Members who have already acquired rights or future entitlements in that fund” and that “acquired rights and future entitlements shall be maintained in full”; calls upon the Secretary-General and the Bureau to fully respect the Statute for Members; and to establish with the pension fund a clear plan for Parliament assuming and taking over its obligations and responsibilities for its Members’ voluntary pension scheme, evaluating savings where possible; supports the request from the Bureau to instruct the Secretary-General to investigate ways to ensure a sustainable financing of the Voluntary Pension Fund in accordance with the provisions of the Statute for Members while ensuring full transparency; stresses the importance to find a solution which does not impose a further financial burden on European taxpayers; stresses the need of a revision on the Statute for Members, in order to bring the pension entitlements of Members into line with the social security systems for ordinary citizens of individual Member States, as regards both the calculation of the amount and the age- and contribution-related requirements which entitle them to a pension;
2020/03/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 126 #

2019/2214(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42 a (new)
42 a. regrets the proposed increase of 5,3 % of the expenditure of the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations and the Committee of Independent Eminent Persons; calls for all expenditure relating to European political parties and political foundations to be discontinued and stresses the fact that they should become totally reliant on own resources, ceasing to be financially dependent on Parliament's budget;
2020/03/12
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 30 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Insists that the EU budget is vital to respond to the challenges the Unionfacing its facingcitizens and reflects the degree of ambition of the Member States and the institutionneed for effective and efficient spending on sustainable development in not only economic but also social and environmental terms;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 46 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Deplores the lack of attention given to the call by IPCC scientists, in their latest report, for radical action to catch up with the ecological transition, in the light of their warning that CO2 concentration increased three times faster in 2018-2019 than in the 1960s; underlines the fact that there are only a few years left to prevent climate change and its environmental impact from getting irreversibly out of control;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 67 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Is concerned about the risk of a new financial crisis, as highlighted by international financial institutions, in the light of rising global public and private debt (322 % of the world’s GDP); is worried about the potential social and political consequences of such a crisis – projected by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to be ten times harsher than in the aftermath of 2008 – if the EU is not equipped with neweffective tools to protect social cohesion;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 94 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the Commission’s proposals for the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan, notably the Just Transition Fund; stresses that these are deeply linked to the negotiations on the next MFF and therefore imply a strong and credible MFF; stresses that financing for any new initiatives should be calculated in addition to the Commission’s original proposal and thus result in higher MFF ceilings without, however, increasing national contributions to the EU budget, being achieved instead through additional own resources;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 96 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the Commission’s proposals for the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan, notably the Just Transition Fund; stresses that these are deeply linked to the negotiations on the next MFF and therefore imply a strong and credible MFF; stresses that financing for any new environmental initiatives should be calculated in addition to the Commission’s original proposal and thus result in higher MFF ceilings;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 102 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes, however, that in order to attain the 40 % GHG emissions reduction target by 2030, the Commission has estimated that it will be necessary to bridge a funding gap of at least EUR 500 billion every year, including social adaptation measures; considers that this funding gap is strongly underestimated even for the 40 % target, not to mention the 55 % target, and is yet to be addressed at EU or national level; stresses the urgent need for another quantum leap in political and financial efforts in order to achieve these objectives; believes that introducing genuine new own resources is key to bridging this gap; considers that a just transition requires just funding; considers it necessary also to exclude green investments from the calculation of the budget deficit in line with the constraints of the Stability and Growth Pact;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 168 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Aims to set binding biodiversity and climate mainstreaming targets and to fix the latter to at least 30 % for 2021; reiterates its call on the Commission to lay down clear eligibility criteria of a stringent and comprehensive methodology for defining and tracking relevant climate and biodiversity expenditure; calls on the Commission to abandon all subsidies and investments for fossil fuels;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 178 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Believes that it is essential to maintain the current level of expenditure for the common agricultural policy and opposes any reduction in this area; calls on the Commission to provide for the extension of payments until 2022 if a timely agreement on the next MFF is not reached;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 191 #

2019/2213(BUD)

11b. Calls for support measures in the most affected areas, as well as for production sectors that have sustained economic losses inflicted by the Coronavirus epidemic;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 40 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that due to the COVID-19 crisis, it is of paramount importance for the protection of EU citizens that the safety of all products needed to tackle the emergency is the highest, especially for medical and protective equipment, including products from outside the EU; calls, therefore, on the Commission and Member States to strengthen their coordinated actions within the product safety and anti-counterfeiting framework;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 59 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to redefine the term ‘product’, the term ‘defect’ and the issues pertaining to damage liability and reverse burden of proof, as part of the revision of the GPSD so that it reflects the complexity of emerging technologies, including stand- alone software and software or updates which entail substantial modification to the product leading to a de facto new product;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 89 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Encourages the Commission to develop measures, such as risk-based assessment schemes and conformity assessment mechanisms, where they do not yet exist, to ensure the safety and security of products with embedded emerging technologies, and to provide support to micro-enterprises and SMEs to reduce the burden such measures can create;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 131 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Is convinced that the cybersecurity of connected devices can compromise product safety and protection of user privacy, and that thiese aspects needs to be addressed in the revision of the relevant rules;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 152 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Encourages Member States to increase the resources and expertise of their market surveillance authorities, to enhance cooperation among them, including at cross-border level, improve the efficiency and effectiveness of checks, paying particular attention to online markets, and properly staff custom authorities so as to be able to identify unsafe products, in particular from third countries, trace their origin, identify their supply chain and prevent their circulation in the internal market;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 179 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses that products directly purchased by consumers from non-EU economic operators must be subject to effective controls checking their origin, quality and conformity with the EU’s regulatory framework; calls on market surveillance authorities to undertake adequate checks on these products;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 185 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Asks the Commission to cooperate with the regulatory authorities of third countries, to exchange market surveillance- related information on dangerous and potentially dangerous products with them, and to include market surveillance in all bilateral trade agreements, so that companies from outside the EU which sell goods and services on the internal market are subjected to the same requirements as EU companies;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 194 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Urges the Commission to improve, at European and international level, cooperation between consumer protection, market surveillance and customs authorities so as to enable the swift transfer of information on unsafe productguarantee uniform controls at all points of entry to the Union and to enable the swift transfer of information on unsafe products, as well as quality controls on products from non-EU countries;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 241 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Asks the Commission to evaluate the necessity of requiring online platforms to put in place effective and appropriate safeguards to tackle the appearance of advertisements for unsafe products and to provide consumers with reliable information, guaranteeing the quality and safety of products sold online;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 260 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Emphasises that traceability along the supply chain is key to improving the safety of products, whether on traditional markets or sold online, since clear and reliable information on products empowers consumers, including persons with disabilities, to make informed choices, and allows market surveillance authorities to carry out their activities; asks the Commission to update the rules for the traceability requirements of non- harmonised products accordingly, in order to make stating the geographical origin of non-agricultural products obligatory;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 265 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Considers that a label stating unambiguously the geographical origin of a given product and how it has been manufactured, would protect companies, jobs and consumers, as it would lessen the likelihood of fraud and counterfeit goods;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 268 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Asks the Commission to evaluate how distributed ledger technology and blockchain could enhance the safety of products by improving product traceability throughout the supply chain, including through their standardisation; the development of solid and reliable electronic information would make checks by market supervisory authorities simpler and more effective;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 278 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Notes that consumers respond poorly to recalls, and that unsafe products continue to be used even though they have been recalled; asks the Commission to publish guidelines on recall procedures, including a check list with concrete requirements, in order to increase the number of consumers reached, while taking into account that recalls can create considerable challenges for micro- enterprises and SMEs;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 282 #

2019/2190(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Asks retailers, online marketplaces and consumer associations to play a greater role in recalls of unsafe products purchased online or offline by ensuring adequate and reliable information is available to consumers;
2020/05/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 7 #

2019/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to ensure that EU competition policy promotes fair competition and reciprocal trading conditions at EU and global level with the further aim of strengthening our own industry in the EU; calls, therefore, for unfair trading practices to be addressed effectively by making full use of the available instruments, developing new, effective policies and tools and tackling the distortive effects of foreign state ownership and subsidies in the internal market, in particular where EU funding is involved, through a new legal instrument that would allow appropriate actions to deal with non-EU companies benefitting from these supports; welcomes, against this backdrop, the new Commission’s intention to strengthen the foreign direct investment screening mechanism, and calls for discussions on the EU’s international procurement instrument to be resumed;
2019/12/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Takes note of Council’s position on the DB, cutting EUR 1,51 billion in commitment appropriations compared to the Commission’s proposal; considers that the Council’s cuts flatly contradict the Union’s priorities, are not justified by absorption capacity and are s they are not based on a real assessmeant to revert all the specific increases requeof needs; considers that the cuts need to be accompanied by a spending review to avoid wasted and obtained by Parliament in previous budgetary yearsfunding for projects that do not have any real economic, environmental or social added value; decides therefore, as a general rule, to restore appropriations on all lines cut by the Council to the level of the DB, for both operational and administrative expenditure, and to take the DB as the starting point to build its position upon;
2019/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 57 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Highlights the crucial role of the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) in fostering the development of a high- performance trans-European network that is sustainable and interconnected across the areas of transport, energy and ICT infrastructure and significantly contributes to the transition towards a climate-neutral society; considers that funding should focus on goals that guarantee real added value for the Member States, especially at social and environmental level, bearing geographically disadvantaged areas in mind as a priority, and should not be used to fund projects known to be controversial; proposes therefore to increase the funding for CEF-Transport and CEF- Energy by a total amount of EUR 545 million in commitment appropriations above DB levels;
2019/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 120 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Restores DB levels for administrative expenditure lines, including administrative and research support expenditure in Headings 1 to 4; considers that all the admistrative expenditures related to the European Institutions should be reduced as much as possible through an efficient and economical optimization of the EU costs and asks to renegotiate the current EU Institutions' rent contracts in order to reduce the costs; proposes an increase of EUR 5,5 million in commitment appropriations above DB related to a Conference on European Democracy/Future of Europe.
2019/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 125 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 a (new)
36 a. Calls for a reduction of 20 % of Members' monthly salaries that would represent an ethical signal to European citizens, considering the huge gap between the privileges of those who are engaged in politics and the difficult economic and social moment which ordinary citizens are facing;
2019/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 29 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) To this end, the Union should be able to expeditiously suspend obligations relating to goods, services or in the sector of intellectual property rights under international trade agreements, including regional or bilateral agreements, when effective recourse to a binding dispute settlement mechanism is not possible because the third country has rendered it impossible for the Union to do so.
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 37 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Finally, the review clause of Regulation (EU) No 654/2014 should be renewed for another five-year period and should cover the application of the proposed amendment.
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 40 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Regulation (EU) No 654/2014
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(-1) In the first paragraph of Article 1, point (a) is replaced by the following: (a) responding to breaches by third countries of international trade rules which affect the Union's interests, with a view to seeking a satisfactoryn adequate solution that restores benefits for the Union's economic operators;
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 654/2014
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(-1a) In the first paragraph of Article 1, point (b) is replaced by the following: (b) rebalancing concessions or other obligations in the trade relations with third countries, when the treatment accorded to goods and services from the Union is altered in a way that affects the Union's interests.
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 42 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 654/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) "concessions or other obligations" means tariff concession-1b) In the first paragraph of Article 2, point (b) is replaced by the following: (b) "concessions or other obligations" means tariff concessions, commitments in the sector of intellectual property rights or services or any other benefits that the Union has committed itself to applying in its trade with third countries by virtue of any kind of international trade agreements to which it is a party;
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 654/2014
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a a
(aa) following the circulation of a WTO panel report upholding, in whole or in part, the claims brought by the European Union, if an appeal under Article 17 of the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding cannot be completed and if the third country has not agreed to interim appeal arbitration under Article 25 of the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding;
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 48 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 654/2014
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d
(ba) point (d) is replaced by the following: (d) in cases of modification of concessions or commitments by a WTO member under Articles XXVIII of the GATT 1994 and Article XXI of the GATS, where no compensatory adjustments have been agreed.
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 50 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b b (new)
(bb) the following point (da) is inserted: (da) in the event of the adoption by a third country of trade measures constituting a clear breach of international law and harming the commercial interests of the Union;
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 51 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b c (new)
Regulation (EU) No 654/2014
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new)
(bc) the following point (db) is inserted: (db) in the event of the adoption by a third country of policy measures constituting a clear breach of its obligations under the Trade and Sustainable Chapter of trade agreements to which it is a party;
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 53 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 654/2014
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b b
(bb) where measures are taken to restrict the trade with a third country in situations under Article 3(aa) or Article 3(bb) or Article 3(e) or (f), such measures shall be commensurate to the nullification or impairment of the Union’s commercial interests caused by the measures of that third country;
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 654/2014
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(2a) In Article 5(1), the following point is inserted: (ba) the suspension of commitments or other obligations in the in the sector of intellectual property rights and services;
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 58 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 654/2014
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c
(2b) In Article 7(2), point (c) is replaced by the following: (c) in cases of modification of concessions or commitments by a WTO member under Article XXVIII of the GATT 1994 or Article XXI of GATS, when the third country concerned accords adequate and proportionate compensation to the Union after the adoption of an implementing act under Article 4(1).
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 654/2014
Article 10 – paragraph 1
By 1 March 2025 at the latest... [three years after the entry into force of this amending Regulation], the Commission shall review the scope of this Regulation, taking into account in particular the amendments to the scope having effect from [date of entry into force of this amending Regulation], the commercial policy measures that may be adopted, as well as its implementation, and shall report its findings to the European Parliament and the Council.
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 62 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – point i
Regulation No 654/2014
Article 10 – paragraph 2
(i) in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2 the first sentence is replaced by the following: ‘In acting pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission shall undertake a review aimed at envisaging under this Regulation additional commercial policy measures suspending concessions or other obligations in the field of trade in services. ’deleted
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2019/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the EU and the US have the largest bilateral trade and investment relationship, enjoy the most integrated economic relationship in the world, and share important values and political and economic interests, despite the current trade tensions;
2019/11/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #

2019/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the US, based on the WTO arbitration decision circulated on 2 October 20198 [1], declared its willingness to impose, in retaliation for illegal EU subsidies granted to the aircraft manufacturer Airbus, tariffs on USD 7.5 billion worth of EU imports also of agricultural and industrial items in addition to aircraft;, jeopardizing most of the EU agricultural sectors with tariff of 25% rather than the industrial one, including aircraft with tariff of 10% ;[1] European Communities and Certain Member States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft: Recourse to Article 7.9 of the SCM Agreement and Article 22.7 of the DSU by the United States of 4 October 2019 (WT/DS316/42). __________________ 8European Communities and Certain Member States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft: Recourse to Article 7.9 of the SCM Agreement and Article 22.7 of the DSU by the United States of 4 October 2019 (WT/DS316/42).
2019/11/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 10 #

2019/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes this agreement with the US on the allocation of a share in the TRQ for high-quality beef as a solution to a longstanding trade dispute, as it sets a positive exampleregrets that once again agriculture is a core element of a negotiated solutions between the EU and third partners such as the US;
2019/11/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2019/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes and aAcknowledges the fact that, while it remains unclear whether any compensation has been foreseen, other WTO members that export beef to the EU agreed to support this agreement by accepting that the vast majority of the quota would be allocated to the US; Hopes that this decision is not based on further opening of beef sectors in the current trade agreements negotiations with those countries;
2019/11/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2019/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of finding negotiated solutions, such as this agreement, to dilute trade tensions between the EU and the US but regrets that despite EU efforts, the US has shown no intention to lift current tariffs on EU steel and aluminium ;
2019/11/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 34 #

2019/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the US to work with the EU on a fair and balanced solution for our respective aircraft industries in order to prevent the, through an effective agreement taking duly account of the current EU state aid measures and those ones used in third countries aircraft industries. Reminds the need to prevent any mutual imposition of countermeasures as a result of the longstanding Airbus/Boeing dispute which could undermine EU suppliers;
2019/11/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 38 #

2019/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. CRemembers the EU has done all in its power to ease tensions and calls on the US to revoke the additional tariffs on steel and aluminium, and olives, and to withdraw its threat to impose additional tariffs on cars and car parts;
2019/11/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 1 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Deplores the woeful lack of rigour displayed by the Commission in pursuing serious and systematic infringements of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 directly brought to its attention in almost 200 specific and detailed NGO reports forwarded to it since 2007;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 2 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Draws attention to the multitude of parliamentary questions and letters of complaint submitted by Members of the European Parliament and addressed to the Commission, highlighting the systematic infringements of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 which result in severe suffering and hardship for animals during transport; strongly criticises the statistics provided by the Commission on compliance with Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 as regards the transport of live animals to third countries, which have been drawn up without any systematic checks on animal transport vehicles;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 3 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Points out that the most frequent infringements of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 concern the insufficient space given to animals in transport vehicles and overcrowding, the failure to respect drinking and feeding intervals and journey times and resting periods for animals, the inadequacy of ventilation and watering devices, transport in extreme temperatures, transport of unsuitable animals and insufficiency of bedding and feed;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 4 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Notes with great concern that during long journeys animals are watered with contaminated water that is unfit for consumption and often have no access to water because of malfunctioning or badly located watering devices, or insufficient water that is not commensurate with the species and size of the animals being transported;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 8 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that Regulation 1/20051 hasmay hadve a positive impact on the welfare of animals during transport; welcomes and takes note of the Commission's guidelines on the subject, but notes that severe problems still persist; observes that enforcement of ; highlights, however, that severe and widespread problems still persist withe regulation would appear to be the primary concern of those involved in its implementationard to its proper enforcement;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 8 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that the reported infringements of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 concerning inadequate ventilation systems in animal transport vehicles for long journeys attest the presence of extreme temperatures inside the vehicles, far exceeding the legal limits, causing terrible suffering to the animals; points out that, in some cases, the sensors monitoring the temperatures inside the animal transport vehicles have been found to have been tampered with; calls on the competent authorities to refrain from approving a journey log when temperatures in the places of departure or destination, or along the route, are forecast to exceed 30°C;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 12 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls for Member States, when detecting infringements of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005, to provide the notifications laid down in Article 26 in a detailed and systematic manner; calls on the Member States receiving such notifications to act effectively and in a consistent and timely manner to prevent the repetition of such infringements; takes the view that, where feasible, the competent authorities of the Member States should attach to the notifications photos of the relevant infringements;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 14 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that the most common breaches of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 are caused by overcrowding, insufficient headroom, failure to provide the required stops for rest, food and water, inadequate ventilation and watering devices, transport in extreme heat, transport of unfit animals and insufficient bedding;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 15 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Takes the view that the shortcomings in the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 are a clear example of the need to put greater efforts into preventing serious incidents that have a significant impact on animal welfare and prosecuting those who infringe the law;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 15 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Regrets that, in breach of the provisions of Annex I, Chapter II, point 1.2 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005, during transport, animals are given insufficient space, forcing them to stand in unnatural positions for long periods of time and with inadequate ventilation;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 16 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Is of the opinion that where Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 stipulates that animals should be unloaded at a control post, before approving a journey log the competent authorities should verify, and receive confirmation, that the organiser has made a reservation at the control post;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 17 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Calls on the competent authorities of the Member States to carry out systematic inspections on intra-EU consignments of animals and on all consignments destined for third countries upon loading; stresses that, at the time of loading, the competent authorities should check that the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 concerning the health conditions of animals and the space and height of the compartment have been complied with, that ventilation and water systems work properly and are appropriate for the size and species transported, and that sufficient feed and bedding are transported;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 18 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e. Takes the view that the competent authorities, in cases in which Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 requires that animals be unloaded for a 24-hour rest in a third country, should only approve journey logs if they can establish whether the organiser has found a place for such a rest that provides facilities equivalent to those of a control post and, in any case, that is able to respect the welfare of the animals in full; calls for official veterinarians at EU exit points to check whether the vehicles provide enough space for animals, and that there is no overcrowding, that sufficient bedding, water and feed is provided and that the ventilation and watering devices work properly;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 19 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Deplores the lack of rigour displayed by the Commission in pursuing the systematic infringements of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 which are explained in detail in the 200 or so reports sent to it by non-governmental organisations since 2007;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 22 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Recalls the numerous parliamentary questions, letters and complaints sent by Members of the European Parliament to the Commission, highlighting the systematic infringements of the regulation and condemning the unacceptable conditions of stress, pain, anguish and suffering of live animals transported within the Union and to third countries;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 23 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Reiterates its call for the transport time of animals destined for slaughter and fattening to be limited to eight hours, with due consideration for loading and unloading times, and waiting times at borders; takes the view that many of the severe problems related to the lengthy transport of live animals, in particular from the EU to third countries, would be solved by a shift to the transport of meat or carcasses;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 24 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Strongly criticises the statistics drawn up by the Commission on compliance with the regulation as regards the journeys made to transport live animals to third countries and stresses that they have been drawn up without any systematic checks on animal transport vehicles;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 27 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. Welcomes Special Report No 31/20181 a of the European Court of Auditors, which clearly identifies compliance with legislation on long- distance transport of live animals and the transport of unfit animals as issues that have not yet been resolved; _________________ 1a Report No 31/2018 of the European Court of Auditors: ‘Animal welfare in the EU: closing the gap between ambitious goals and practical implementation’.
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 27 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Strongly deplores the uneven and poor enforcement of the regulation in many Member States, which are failing to effectively and uniformly monitor and sanction persistent violations of EU law, thereby allowing some transporters to operate illegally; greatly concerned at the failure of many Member States to make proper and effective use of the powers conferred on them under Article 26 of Regulation No 1/2005, including the power to call on the transporter in question to introduce arrangements to avoid any recurrence of the irregularities detected, carry out additional inspections and, in particular, require the presence of a veterinarian when the animals are being loaded and suspend or revoke the transporter's permit or the type-approval certificate for the form of transport used; calls on the Commission, in view of the lack of harmonisation of controls and sanctions across the Member States, to consider revising the current provisions in order to ensure that effective and dissuasive sanctioning mechanisms are uniformly introduced and imposed across the EU;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 28 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 f (new)
1f. Expresses concern over journeys in which animals are watered with contaminated water that is unfit for consumption and journeys in which animals are deprived of access to water because of malfunctioning or badly located watering devices; stresses that vehicles used for the transport of live animals should ensure that sufficient water is supplied during journeys, and in any case, the amount supplied should be appropriate for the specific requirements of the animals being transported and for the number of those animals;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 29 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 g (new)
1g. Stresses that infringements are often due to the inadequacy of the ventilation systems of vehicles used for the road transport of live animals over long distances; points out that in these situations, animals are forced into small spaces which have extreme temperatures, well beyond the range of temperatures and tolerance limits set out in the regulation;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 29 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that ineffective coordination between the authorities at border inspection posts, coupled with the inadequacy of operational structures and procedures have led to unjustified waiting times for animal transport vehicles which, given the extreme internal temperatures and lack of ventilation, have had a devastating impact on animal welfare, in clear violation of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 30 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 h (new)
1h. Is concerned about cases in which tampering with temperature control sensors inside vehicles used for the transport of live animals has been detected, and calls on the competent authorities not to approve journey logs when temperatures in the places of departure and destination, or during the journey, are forecast to be higher than 30 °C;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 31 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 i (new)
1i. Regrets that compartments for animals do not always provide sufficient space to ensure there is adequate ventilation inside vehicles used for the transport of live animals and that natural movements for animals are prevented in all circumstances in which animals are forced to take up unnatural positions for long periods, in clear violation of the technical rules set out in Article 6 and Annex I, Chapter II, point 1.2 of the regulation;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 32 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 j (new)
1j. Regrets the infringements of the regulation that concern the failure to properly apply the rules concerning unweaned animals, such as calves, lambs, kids and foals which are still on a milk diet, and unweaned piglets, and calls for the introduction of more detailed measures to ensure that the welfare of these animals is fully protected when they are being transported;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 34 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for consistent and full compliance with the case law established by the EU Court of Justice, Including Case C-424/13 of 23 April 2015, in which the Court ruled that, for the transport of animals involving a long journey commencing in EU territory and continuing outside it to be authorised at the place of departure, the transporter shall be required to submit a true and accurate travel log for the purpose of verifying compliance with Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 in the territory of the EU and of the third countries in question; if this is not the case, the authorities responsible shall be empowered to require modification of the transport arrangements to ensure compliance with the Regulation for the duration of the journey;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 40 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that the Commission, while aware of the fact that certain Member States are failing to report cases where the internal temperatures of vehicles used for animal transport exceed 35°C, has officially stated that it does not perform systematic checks on internal vehicle temperatures, making it impossible obtain an accurate picture of animal transport conditions;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 41 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Insists thatCalls for the transport time of animals destined for slaughter and fattening to be limited to eight hours, taking account of transport conditions and loading time, irrespective of whether this takes place on land or at sea;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 43 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Considers it of the utmost importance that the authorities issuing type-approval certificates for animal transport vessels adhere consistently and in full to Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005; calls for the competent authorities to scrupulously and systematically inspect animal transport vessels prior to loading to ensure that they are suitable for the type and number of animals to be transported and provide all necessary guarantees to ensure their welfare;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 45 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Expresses its serious concern about failure by the authorities to comply with their obligation to inspect the animals prior to loading to ensure that they are fit to continue their journey on the transport vessel; considers that the authorities must not approve travel logs if they indicate the use of ports that do not have the necessary facilities for systematic inspection of the animals;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 46 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. Deeply regrets that the loading of animals onto ships frequently involves great cruelty such as the use of electric sticks and prods, as well as loading facilities that fail to provide full guarantees regarding animal welfare.
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 47 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 e (new)
7e. Believes that the presence of qualified and independent veterinarians should be mandatory during the transport of animals by ship, that the deaths of any animals en route should be reported and registered and that specific and detailed action plans should be drawn up to deal with any emergencies that adversely affecting the animals' wellbeing;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 48 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 f (new)
7f. Expresses its concern at non- compliance with Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 regarding the transport of unweaned animals; considers it necessary to adopt more detailed and incisive measures to ensure that all specific needs regarding this type of transport are met;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 49 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Urges the Member States to check a proportion of transports at loading, including all loadings to destinations in non-EU countries, as it is at loading that many problems can be detected and remedied before the start of the journey;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 49 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 g (new)
7g. Deplores the failure to set up a European Parliament committee of inquiry into the wellbeing of animals during transport inside and outside the EU, as requested by 223 MEPs, the decision having been taken without plenary vote in Parliament, thus infringing the basic principles of democracy, openness and transparency that regarding EU decision-making processes;
2018/09/21
Committee: PETI
Amendment 55 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Deplores the often lengthy delays at borders and the increased pain and distress for animals that they cause; calls on the Member States and the Commission to improve this situation; which, for the live animals transported involve stress, pain and distress which should be avoided; calls on the Member States and the Commission to resolve the issue of delays by improving coordination and cooperation between the authorities responsible for implementing the regulation; calls on the competent authorities not to approve journey logs for exports to Turkey until facilities are built on the Turkish side of the border where, in the event of delays, animals can be unloaded and provided with food, water, rest and veterinary care;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 73 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that enforcement is particularly difficul(Does not affect wthen different Member States are responsible for approving journey logs; calls on all those Member States which discover breaches to notify the other Member States involved, as required by Regulation 1/2005; English version.)
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 75 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Urges the competent authorities of the Member State to act in accordance with Article 26 in case of any infringements of the Regulation by notifying without delay the competent authorities in the other concerned Member States, as the competent authority of the place of departure, the authority which granted the authorisation to the transporter or the certificate of approval of the means of transport and, where the driver is involved in the failure to observe the requirements of the Regulation, the one that issued the driver's certificate of competence;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 77 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Takes the view that, in cases in which the regulation stipulates that animals should be unloaded at a control post, before approving a journey log the competent authorities should ascertain that the organiser has made a reservation at the control post;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 80 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on the Member States to make a full use of the enforcement measures foreseen by Article 26 the Regulation, according to which the competent authorities shall require a transporter to establish systems to prevent the recurrence of observed breaches, subject a transporter to additional checks, in particular requiring the presence of a veterinarian at loading of the animals, suspend or withdraw the authorisation of the transporter or the certificate of approval of the means of transport concerned in case of infringements;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 88 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. StresseRegrets that the total number of checks carried out by national competent authorities pursuant to Regulation 1/2005 has fallen, despite the number of consignments in the EU containing live animals having increased; calls on the Member States to ensure adequatesystematic and widespread controls for live animal transport;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 97 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States and transporters to strictly abide by the Court of Justice's ruling which concluded that Regulation 1/2005 should apply to cases of exports to non-EU countries2; calls on the Member States to carry out further controls;(Does not affect the English version.)
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 98 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Takes the view that, in those cases in which the regulation stipulates that animals should be unloaded for a 24-hour rest period in a third country, the competent authorities should only be able to approve journey logs where it can be ascertained that the organiser has found a place for such a rest period, equipped with facilities equivalent to those of a control post and which, in any case, are able to ensure the welfare of the animals;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 101 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Calls for the competent authorities of the Member States to ensure that official veterinarians are present at Union exit points, having the task of checking that vehicles used to transport animals contain compartments with sufficient space to avoid overcrowding, that there is bedding, feed and water in amounts that are appropriate for the species and number of animals being transported and that the ventilation and fresh water systems for the animals work properly;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 105 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Commission and the Member States to offer incentives to farmers to slaughter their animals at the nearest slaughter facility in order to prevent lengthy animal transportation times which cause unnecessary levels of stress, pain, anguish and suffering which have a substantial impact on the welfare of the live animals transported; calls on the Commission to present innovative solutions in this regard;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 120 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Recognises that many livestock vessesels used to transport live animals should not have been approved as they are ntot ally unfit to carry animalsthem; calls on the Member States not to approve or renew the approval of livestockuthorise the transport of live animals on vessels thatwhich do not meet the requirements of Regulation 1/2005; and not to renew such authorisation;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 125 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Is concerned about the infringements of the regulation caused by the failure to carry out inspections, or the carrying out of perfunctory inspections, prior to the loading of live animals onto vessels transporting livestock by sea, and by the loading of animals onto vessels using cruel instruments and practices such as the use of sticks and electric prods, or through the use of loading facilities that are unsuitable for the movement of animals;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 130 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Considers it necessary to make it compulsory for veterinarians to be present on board ships used for the transport of livestock by sea, to report and keep count of the number of animals that die during sea journeys and to draw up emergency plans to deal with any situations at sea that might have a negative impact on the welfare of the animals being transported;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 132 #

2018/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Deplores the failure to set up a European Parliament committee of inquiry into the transport of live animals within Union territory and to third countries, as requested by 223 MEPs; regrets that this request was not put to the vote by the European Parliament in plenary and that the principles of democracy, publicity and transparency – which should always inform the work of the EU institutions and, in this case, the European Parliament’s internal decision- making processes – have therefore been disregarded;
2018/11/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 12 #

2018/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas despite important exceptions such as the Trade Facilitation Agreement, WTO trade reform have lagged since the 2000s;
2018/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 14 #

2018/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the Appellate Body of the WTO is approachinged the minimum number of judges it needs to function, asfter the United States is blocking the appointment of new members; whereas this deadlockending of the term of Judge Shree Baboo Chekitan Servansing, leaving only three judges appointed; whereas this deadlock, caused by the US administration, could lead to the collapse of a system that is essential to managing disputes among the world’s most powerful trading nations;
2018/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2018/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Expresses its utmost concern over the fact that severalonly three posts on the Appellate Body remain vacantfilled, severely constraining the work of this crucial body by threatening to undermineing the current and proper functioning of the dispute settlement process, and calls firmly on the United States to resolve this situation in a way that allows for the expeditious replenishment of vacant Appellate Body seats; invites the Commission to come forward with concrete proposals on how to resolve the deadlock by addressing some of the concerns that have been raised, for example through transitional rules for outgoing members or changes to the length of terms on the Appellate Body or to the maximum time allowed before the publication of a report or to flexible and adaptable adjudicative procedures to the diverse nature of dispute;
2018/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 35 #

2018/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Shares the view that, as a way to address the root causes of the current crisis, it is necessary for the WTO to develop newbetter distinguishing the activities to develop a flexible rules to address current gaps in the rulebook in order to level the playing as regards subsidies and state-owned enterprises, investment market access and regulatory barriers to services and investment and to monitor the implementation, administration and operation of existing agreements; believes that in order to remain relevant, the WTO also needs to address new challenges in areas such as: e- commerce; digital trade; global value chains; public procurement; domestic regulation for services; micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs); and greater compatibility between trade, labour and environmental agendas; welcomes, in this regard, the joint statements that were adopted in Buenos Aires on e-commerce, domestic regulation, investment facilitation and women’s economic empowerment, as well as the work that has been done on these issues since then;
2018/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 50 #

2018/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Is convinced that the current differentiation between developed and developing countries does not reflect the economic reality and the effective situation in the WTO and that this has been an obstacle to advancing the Doha Round, to the detriment of countries most in need; urges advanced developing countries to take up their share of responsibility and make contributions commensurate to their level of development and (sectoral) competitiveness;
2018/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 61 #

2018/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Considers that serious consideration should be given to the issue of categorisation or sub-categorisation, not only for developing countries but also of all other WTO members, with a view to a possible differentiated application of existing agreements;
2018/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 68 #

2018/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the role trade can play for development, the importance of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), of the Paris Agreement commitments in the fight against climate change, and of the role which trade can play in contributing towards their achievement; underlines that beyond the negotiations on fisheries subsidies, the WTO must now define the more concrete action that needs to be taken in this regard;
2018/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 73 #

2018/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses that transparency is a key element in ensuring a stable and predictable trading and investment environment; believes it is important to enhance transparency by increasing incentives for WTO members to comply with notification requirements, reducing their complexity and burdens and by providing capacity building if needed, while wilful non-compliance should be challenged;
2018/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 77 #

2018/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls onUrges the WTO members to ensure democratic legitimacy and transparency by strengthening the parliamentary dimension of the WTO, and to support a memorandum of understanding establishing a formal working relation with the Parliamentary Conference on the WTO; stresses, in this regard, the need to ensure that parliamentarians have betterfull access to trade negotiations and are involved in the formulation and implementation of WTO decisions, and that trade policies are properly scrutinised in the interests of their citizens;
2018/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas EFP schemes involving workers in consultation and decision- making have benefits for the company in terms of sustainable governance, social dialogue and other aspects such as recruitment, retention, absenteeism, motivation and skills development;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas EFP can help SMEs with respect to business continuity by addressing company succession problemand generational renewal problems, especially in family businesses;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas EFP must not become a way of passing on the business risk to employees;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas EFP may not be used to reduce the social and employment rights acquired by employees and must not replace normal basic pay or other forms of contribution, such as pension schemes;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas participation in the EFP should remain voluntary for employees, while not affecting their mobility; whereas the advantages and disadvantages of each scheme should be clearly explained to the person concerned;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
La. whereas EFP might not be suitable for all companies or employees and the matter should therefore be given very careful consideration before such a scheme is adopted;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Q a (new)
Qa. whereas information about the economic situation of the company concerned as well as information about the attached risks should be available to the workers concerned at all times;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on Member States to provide for EFP-based incentive schemes to reward the productivity of individual employees, including the use of tax cuts;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that, to avoid administrative and development costs associated with implementing EFP in corporations and SMEsSMEs, above all, there are outsourcing options, but these need to be promoted;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses that greater transparency is needed in EFP schemes: information about the economic situation of the company concerned and information about the attached risks should be available to the workers concerned at all times;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that the decision to join EFP schemes should be totally voluntary and based on the informed consent of an employee, fully aware of his or her entitlements, obligations and risks, of the situation of the company and of the taxation effects when joining the scheme and the conditions which apply when he or she leaves the company or the scheme;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 105 #

2018/2053(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that EFP benefits should always be complementary to the contractual remuneration andshould not replace normal basic remuneration or any other form of contribution, but should be complementary to all social and contractual rights;
2018/06/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the economic and strategic importance of this agreement, as the EU and Vietnam share a common agenda and common values –designed to stimulate growth and employment, boost competitiveness, fight against poverty and make progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs);
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 97 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the importance of ensuring effective and reliable controls, including through enhanced customs cooperation in Europe, to prevent the agreement becoming a gangway for the entry into Europe for goods from other countries;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 98 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Regrets that, once again, agricultural products, especially certain sensitive products such as rice and cereals, are subject to a duty-free quota of 80 000 tonnes for the first seven years only; recalls in this connection the implementation of the safeguard clauses for rice in the case of Cambodia and Myanmar and the importance of monitoring the consequences of the agreement regarding rice production trends in Vietnam;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 133 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines that the EVFTA includes a robust, comprehensive and binding chapter on Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD) dealing with labour and environmental matters; stresses that the TSD chapter is designed to contribute to broader EU policy objectives, notably on inclusive growth, the fight against climate change and more generally in upholding EU values; emphasises that it is also an instrument for development and social progress in Vietnam to support Vietnam innecessary to ask Vietnam to step up its efforts to improve labour rights and to enhance protection at work and protection of the environment, given that these are also instruments for development and social progress in that country;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 135 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Points out that, in the event of non-compliance with the binding clauses of the chapter on Trade and Sustainable Development, the agreement only provides for appropriate measures to be taken and not suspension of the agreement itself; calls, therefore, on the Commission to provide more clarification and to ensure suspension of the agreement in the event of serious infringements of human rights and environmental clauses;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 149 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Stresses that a number of major challenges remain, especially in the area of human rights and freedom of expression;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 190 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Regrets the absence of a chapter dedicated to SMEs, which represent some 40 % of Vietnamese GDP and form the backbone of the European economy; reminds the Commission of its commitment to include an ad-hoc chapter on SMEs in all trade agreements;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 208 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Acknowledges the institutional and legal link between the FTA and the PCA, which should ensures that human rights are placed at the core of the EU-Vietnam relationship; calls on the Commission to monitor closely the implementation of binding human rights commitments;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 8 #

2018/0258(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The 2 140 customs offices17 that are present over the external borders of the European Union need to be properly equipped to ensure the operation of the customs union. The need for harmonized, adequate and equivalent customs controls is ever more pressing not only by reason of the traditional function of customs to collect revenue but also increasingly by the necessity to significantly reinforce the control of goods entering and exiting Union’s external borders in order to ensure both safety and security. However, at the same time, those controls on the movement of goods across the external borders should not impair but rather facilitate legitimate trade with third countries. __________________ 17 Annex of the Annual 2016 Report of the Customs Union Performance available on: https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/annu al-activity-report-2016-taxation-and- customs-union_en.
2018/11/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 11 #

2018/0258(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) There is currently an imbalance in the performance of customs control by Member States. This imbalance is due both to geographic differences between Member States and in, their respective capacities and resources. The ability of Member States to react to challenges generated by the constantly evolving global business models and supply chains depend not only on the human component but also on the availability of modern and reliable customs control equipment. The provision of equivalent customs control equipment is therefore an important element in addressing the existing imbalance. It will improve equivalence in the performance of customs controls throughout Member States and thereby avoid the diversion of the flows of goods towards the weakest, and different administrative cultures, but in some cases it is also due to a precise intention by custom authorities to favour their entry point at the detriment of other EU poinrts.
2018/11/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 14 #

2018/0258(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2 a) The ability of Member States to react to challenges generated by the constantly evolving global business models and supply chains depend not only on the human component but also on the availability of modern and reliable customs control equipment. The provision of equivalent customs control equipment is therefore an important element in addressing the existing imbalance. It will improve equivalence in the performance of customs controls throughout Member States and thereby avoid the diversion of the flows of goods towards the weakest points.
2018/11/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 16 #

2018/0258(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 b (new)
(2 b) The Parliament expressed grave concerns on the imbalances of customs controls at different Union entry points in its 2016/2075 Resolution of 7 april 2017 on the evaluation of external aspects of the customs performance and management as a tool to facilitate trade and fight illicit trade;
2018/11/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 18 #

2018/0258(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
(3 a) There is no system in place for identifying and monitoring differences in customs controls and how customs authorities treat economic operators. Therefore beneficiaries of actions under this instrument may be subject to comparative monitoring by the Commission;
2018/11/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 20 #

2018/0258(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) Supporting the creation of an harmonized, adequate and equivalent level of customs controls at the Union’s external borders allows maximising the benefits of the customs union. A dedicated Union intervention for customs control equipment correcting current imbalances would moreover contribute to the overall cohesion between Member States. In view of the challenges facing the world, in particular the continued need to protect the financial and economic interests of the Union and its Member States while easing the flow of legitimate trade, the availability of modern and reliable control equipment at the external borders is indispensable.
2018/11/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 53 #

2018/0258(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. The Commission may, where deemed appropriate especially on data security grounds, limit the financing under this Instrument to the purchase of equipment manufactured in the European Union;
2018/11/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 54 #

2018/0258(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. The Instrument may finance up to 8100% of the total eligible costs of an action.
2018/11/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 55 #

2018/0258(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Any funding in excess of that ceiling shall only be granted in duly justified exceptional circumstances.deleted
2018/11/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 65 #

2018/0258(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. The Commission shall verify and compare the quality of customs controls between entry points that are beneficiaries of actions under this fund;
2018/11/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 68 #

2018/0258(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. The Commission shall report yearly to the European Parliament competent committee on the implementation and effectiveness of this fund. The report shall also include a comparison of efficacy of customs controls between the entry points beneficiaries of this fund;
2018/11/14
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1 #

2018/0256M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
– having regard to the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2625 on the right and definition of the people or the authority and legitimacy to represent the people;
2018/11/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #

2018/0256M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 12 a (new)
– having regard to its Legal Service opinion (SJ-0506-18)
2018/11/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 19 #

2018/0256M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas there is nolittle information available that would enable the EU customs authorities to determine whether products exported from Morocco originate in Western Sahara;
2018/11/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 84 #

2018/0256M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses, on the basis of talks with various local economic actors and elected and civil society representatives held in the territory or during meetings at the European Parliament, that some partiesthe majority of parties consulted express their consent to the agreement by defending their right to economic development, while others consider that the settlement of the political conflict should precede the granting of trade preferences;
2018/11/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 108 #

2018/0256M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Is convinced that, notwithstanding the outcome of the peace process, the local population will profit from economic development and the spill-over effects created in terms of investment in infrastructure, employment, health and education;
2018/11/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 113 #

2018/0256M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Acknowledges the existing investment in green technologies, the renewables sector and the circular economy, such as in the seawater desalination plant, and encourages further work in this direction;
2018/11/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 116 #

2018/0256M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Endorses business initiatives by young Sahrawis, many of whom are women, and highlights their need for extended export opportunities in order to allow for further investment in sectors with high employment demand, such as agriculture, fisheries and infrastructures;;
2018/11/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 121 #

2018/0256M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Warns of the adverse effects of a permanent withdrawal of tariff preferences on products from the non-autonomous territory of Western Sahara, and the message this sends to the younger generation investing or willing to invest in the area, and its potential to develop the territory; underlines the risk of activities being relocated to regions in Morocco where they would benefit from the preferences;
2018/11/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 128 #

2018/0256M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Is convinced that an EU presence through trade and investment is preferable to withdrawal when it comes to engagement in promoting and monitoring of human rights and individual freedoms, and demands a rigorous dialogue with Morocco part on these issues;
2018/11/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 141 #

2018/0256M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Is deeply concerned that it is basically impossible to identify whichStresses the necessity to have reliable information on products are exported from the non- autonomous territory of Western Sahara;
2018/11/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 156 #

2018/0256M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Emphasises that a key criterion for Parliament is to ensure that there will be a mechanism in place to technically traceexchange reliable information between Morocco and the EU on products exported from Western Sahara so that Member States customs authorities have a clear indication of their originto the EU; calls on the EU and Morocco to swiftly present a viable solution to this end; expects the corrective measures laid down in the agreement to be used in that regard;
2018/11/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 166 #

2018/0256M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Encourages the EU and Morocco to return swiftly to good trade relations, to unlock the ratification of the Agreement on GIs and to aim for progress in the DCFTA negotiations;
2018/11/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 40 #

2018/0232(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
(3 a) The European Parliament expressed grave concerns on the imbalances of custom controls at different Union entry points in its resolution of 16 May 2017 on the evaluation of external aspects of the customs performance and management as a tool to facilitate trade and fight illicit trade.
2018/11/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 43 #

2018/0232(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) In order to support the process of accession and association by third countries, the Programme should be open to the participation of acceding and candidate countries as well as potential candidates and partner countries of the European Neighbourhood Policy if certain conditions are fulfilledprovided that they respect principles and values contained in the Treaties of the Union. It may also be open to other third countries, in accordance with the conditions laid down in specific agreements between the Union and those countries covering their participation to any Union programme.
2018/11/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 48 #

2018/0232(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Information Technology (IT) capacity building actions are set to attract the greatest part of the budget under the Programme. Specific provisions should describe, respectively, the common and national components of the European electronic systems. Moreover, the scope of actions and the responsibilities of the Commission and the Member States should be clearly defined. In order to ensure coherence and coordination of IT capacity development actions, the Programme foresees that the Commission develop and update a Multiannual Strategic Customs Plan ('MASP-C'), with the aim of creating an electronic environment which ensures consistency and interoperability of the customs of the Union.
2018/11/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 52 #

2018/0232(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The Programme has the general objective to support the customs union and customs authorities to protect the financial and economic interests of the Union and its Member States, to ensure security and safety within the Union and to protect the Union from unfair and illegal trade and frauds, while facilitating legitimate business activity.
2018/11/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 55 #

2018/0232(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The Programme has the specific objective to support the preparation and uniform implementation of customs controls, legislation and policy as well as customs cooperation and administrative capacity building, including human competency and the development and operation of European electronic systems.
2018/11/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2018/0232(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Programme shall be open to the following third countries, provided that the principles and rights enshrined in the European Treaties and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union are respected:
2018/11/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 64 #

2018/0232(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) IT capacity building actions, in particular the development and operation of European electronic systems, in order to harmonize controls at Union level and to reduce customs clearance times;
2018/11/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 68 #

2018/0232(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The external experts shall be selected by the Commission and the Member States based on their skills, experience and knowledge relevant to the specific action, avoiding any potential conflict of interest.
2018/11/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 73 #

2018/0232(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(e a) the coordination and comparative analysis of custom controls carried out at different entry points in the Union.
2018/11/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 77 #

2018/0232(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
4. No later than 31 March of each year, the Member States shall submit to the Commission annual progress reports on the implementation of the Multi-Annual Strategic Plan for Customs referred to in paragraph 1 covering the period 1 January to 31 December of the preceding year. Those annual reports shall be based on a pre-established formatformat previously established by the Commission in cooperation with the Member States.
2018/11/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 52 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) The substantial body of Union legislation underpins the functioning of the internal market. This concerns, in particular, competitiveness, standardisation, conformity assessment, consumer protection, market surveillance and food chain regulation but also rules concerning business, trade and financial transactions and the promotion of fair competition providing for a level playing field essential for the functioning of the internal market.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 55 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Still, barriers to the proper functioning of the internal market remain and the new obstacles emerge. Adopting rules is only a first step, but making them work is as important. This is ultimately a matter of citizens' trust in the Union, in its capacity to deliver, and in its ability to create jobs and growthprosperity and quality jobs, while protecting the public interest. Or. it (Technical note: this amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 57 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) In order not to place further burdens on the budgets of the Member States, national contributions to the Union budget should be deducted from the deficit calculation. Furthermore, it is essential that the contributions of individual Member States to the financing of the Union budget for the period 2021- 2027 are not increased compared to the resources allocated in the 2014-2020 multiannual plan. Instead, the necessary resources should be found for the implementation of the programme through a thorough spending review, allowing actions to be taken to identify and rationalise expenditure and programmes that have had little benefit for citizens, so as to channel resources from inefficient sectors with no real added value towards efficient sectors.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 63 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) It is therefore appropriate to establish a Programme for the internal market and for consumer protection, standardisation processes, product monitoring and safety, competitiveness of enterprises, including micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, the protection of the health and safety of humans, animals and plants throughout the food chain, and European statistics (the 'Programme'). The Programme should be established for the duration of seven years from 2021 to 2027.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 67 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The Programme should support the design, implementation and enforcement of Union legislation underpinning the proper functioning of the internal market. The Programme should support the creation of the right conditions to empower all actors of the internal market: businesses, citizens including consumers, civil society and public authorities. To that end, the Programme should aim to ensure the competitiveness of businesses, notably SMEsmicro and SMEs, including those in the tourism sector, but also supporting the enforcement of consumer protection and safety rules and by raising the awareness of businesses and individuals by providing them with the right tools, knowledge and competence to make informed decisions and strengthen their participation in Union’s policy- making. Furthermore, the Programme should aim to enhance regulatory and administrative cooperation, notably through exchange of best practices, building of knowledge and competence bases, including the use of strategic public procurement. The Programme should also aim to support the development of high- quality international standards that underpin the implementation of Union legislation. This also includes standard setting in the field of financial reporting and audit, thereby contributing to the transparency and well-functioning of the Union’s capital markets and to enhancing investor protection. The Programme should support rulemaking and standard setting also by ensuring the broadest possible stakeholder involvement. The objective of the Programme should also be to support the implementation and enforcement of Union legislation providing for a high level of health for humans, animals and plants along the food chain and the improvement of the welfare of animals. (Technical note: this amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitateOr. it corresponding changes throughout.)
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 72 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) A modern internal market promotes competition and benefits consumers, businesses and employees. Making better use of the ever evolving internal market in services should help European businesses create jobs and grow across borders, offer wider choice of services at better prices, and maintain high standards for consumers and workers. To achieve this, the Programme should contribute to the removal of remaining barriers, and to ensure a regulatory framework that can accommodate new innovative business models, including collaborative economy models, especially those with social objectives.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 76 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Regulatory obstacles in the internal market have been removed for many industrial products through prevention mechanisms, the adoption of common rules and, where no such Union rules exist, through the principle of mutual recognition. In areas where no Union legislation exists, the principle of mutual recognition means that goods that are lawfully marketed in one Member State enjoy the right to free movement and can be sold in another Member State, always in accordance with the highest European standards and the precautionary principle. However, inadequate application of mutual recognition makes it harder for companies to access markets in other Member States. Despite the high degree of market integration in the area of goods, this leads to lost opportunities for the economy at large. The Programme should therefore aim to improve the application of mutual recognition in the area of goods and to reduce the number of illegal and non- compliant goods entering the market. by strengthening market surveillance and implementing specific provisions on product traceability, so as to identify the country in which they were manufactured and to contribute to the fight against fraud. To ensure that only safe and compliant goods are available in the internal market, it is essential to train staff in online investigations, create points of contact for cooperation with major sales and social media platforms, and cooperate with payment service providers.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 78 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) New regulatory and enforcement challenges relate to a rapidly changing environment of the digital revolution, concerning issues such as cybersecurity, data protection and privacy, internet of things or artificial intelligence. Should damage occur, stringent rules on product safety and liability are essential to ensure a policy response that allows European citizens, including consumers and businesses, to benefit from such rules. The Programme should therefore contribute to the rapid adaptation and enforcement of a Union product liability regime which fosters innovation.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 82 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Placing on the market of products that are not compliant with Union law puts those who comply at disadvantage and may endanger consumers. Many entrepreneurs disregard the rules either through lack of knowledge or intentionally to gain a competitive advantage. Market surveillance authorities are often underfunded and constrained by national boundaries, while entrepreneurs trade at Union or even global level. In particular, in the case of e-commerce, market surveillance authorities have great difficulties in tracing non-compliant products imported from third countries and identifying the responsible entity within their jurisdiction. The Programme should therefore seek to strengthen product compliance by providing the right incentives to entrepreneurs, intensifying compliance checks and promoting closer cross-border cooperation among enforcement authorities, including through spot checks, which should include anonymous checks by market surveillance authorities, imposing effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties, and promoting closer cross-border cooperation among enforcement authorities following a risk-based approach and taking the precautionary principle into account. The Programme should also contribute to the consolidation of the existing framework for market surveillance activities, encourage joint actions of market surveillance authorities from different Member States, improve the exchange of information and promote convergence and closer integration of market surveillance activities, insuring the implementation of rules in specific sectors of particular concern to consumers, such as type approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 87 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Product safety is a common concern. The conformity assessment bodies verify whether products meet the safety requirements before they are placed on the market. It is therefore of paramount importance that the conformity assessment bodies are reliable and competent. The Union has put in place a system of accreditation of the conformity assessment bodies, verifying their competence, impartiality and independence. The main challenge is now to keep the accreditation system in line with the latest state of the art and to ensure that it is applied with the same stringency across the Union. The Programme should therefore support measures to ensure that conformity assessment bodies continue fulfilling the regulatory requirements and to enhance the European accreditation system, in particular in new policy areas, by supporting the uniformity of checks and sanctions, as well as the European co-operation for Accreditation (EA) referred to in Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council48 and by supporting the creation of a European database of defective products and related accidents.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 89 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) As consumer markets know no borders with the development of online trade and travel services, it is important to ensure that consumers residing in the Union can benefit from adequatethe same level of protection when importing goods and services from economic operators based in third countries, compared to the goods and services offered by operators located within the internal market. The Programme should therefore allow supporting cooperation with relevant bodies located in key trading third country partners of the Union where necessary.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 92 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) Public procurement is used by public authorities to ensure value for public money spent and to contribute to a more innovative, sustainable, inclusive and competitive internal market. Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council49, Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council50 and Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council51 provide the legal framework for the integration and effective functioning of the public procurement markets representing 14 % of Union’s gross domestic product, to the benefit of public authorities, businesses as well as citizens, including consumers. The Programme should therefore support measures to ensure a wider uptake of strategic public procurement, the professionalisation of public buyers, improved access to procurement markets for SMEs, facilitate the division of tenders into lots for large infrastructure works and ensure that the practice of maximum reductions is eliminated and that the most economically advantageous tender is respected in award procedures, so as to take due account of qualitative elements such as environmental considerations, social factors and innovation. The Programme should also aim to ensure increase of transparency, integrity and better data, boosting the digital transformation of procurement and promotion of joint procurement, through strengthening a partnership approach with the Member States, improving data gathering and data analysis including through development of dedicated IT tools, supporting exchange of experiences and good practices, providing guidance, pursuing beneficial trade agreements, strengthening cooperation among national authorities and launching pilot projects.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 96 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) In order to meet the objectives of the Programme and to facilitate the lives of citizens and businesses, high-quality user- centric public services need to be put in placethat are increasingly digitally orientated and fully accessible need to be put in place, in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies. This implies that public administrations will need to start working in new ways, bring down silos between the different parts of their administrations, and to engage in the co-creation of these public services with citizens and businesses. Moreover, tIn addition, it is essential to introduce an effective system for evaluating the performance of public administration as a whole and of its staff and management, also by involving users. The continuous and steady increase of cross-border activities in the internal market requires provision of up-to- date information on the rights of businesses and citizens, but also information explainadministrative formalities to be completed, as well as on the rights of businesses and citizens, including the rights of businesses with respect to creditors in the event of late payment and the rights of citizens ing the administrative formalitiesevent of the purchase of unsafe or non-compliant products, as well as their right to take part in a class action. In addition, provision of legal advice and helping to solve problems which occur at cross national level becomes essential. Furthermore, connecting national administrations in a simple and efficient manner as well as evaluating how the internal market works on the ground is necessary. The Programme should therefore support the following existing internal market governance tools: the Your Europe Portal which should be a backbone of the upcoming Single Digital Gateway, Your Europe Advice, SOLVIT, the Internal Market Information system and the Single Market Scoreboard in order to improve citizens' daily lives and businesses' ability to trade across borders.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 103 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The Programme should also promote the correct and full implementation and application of the Union legal framework for combating corruption, anti-money laundering and countering terrorism financing by the Member States and the development of future policies to address new challenges in the field. It should also support the relevant activities of the international organisations of European interest, such as the Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism of the Council of Europe.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 109 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Many of the Union's competitiveness problems involve SMEs' difficulties in obtaining access to finance because they struggle to demonstrate their credit-worthiness and have insufficient collateral. It is therefore essential to support programmes that aim to reduce payment delays, so as to support the development of businesses, particularly SMEs. Additional financing challenges arise from SMEs' need to stay competitive by engaging e.g. in digitization, internationalization and innovation activities and skilling up their workforce. Limited access to finance has a negative effect on businesses creation, growth and survival rates, as well as on the readiness of new entrepreneurs to take over viable companies in the context of a business succession.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 110 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24 a (new)
(24a) In the application of this Regulation, the Commission should consult all relevant stakeholders, including public and private organisations representing SMEs. Particular attention should be paid to micro enterprises, enterprises engaged in craft activities, the self-employed, the liberal professions and social enterprises. Attention should also be paid to young entrepreneurs and female entrepreneurs, as well as to entrepreneurs belonging to socially disadvantaged or vulnerable groups such as people with disabilities and the elderly.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 111 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) The policy objectives of this Programme will be also addressed through financial instruments and budgetary guarantee under the SME window of the InvestEU Fund, provided that overly risky operations are avoided. Financial support should be used to address market failures or sub- optimal investment situations, in a proportionate manner and actions should not duplicate or crowd out private financing or distort competition in the internal market. Actions should have a clear European added value.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 112 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) The Programme should provide effective support for SMEs, including those in the tourism sector, throughout their life-cycle. It should build on the unique knowledge and expertise developed with regard to SMEs and industrial sectors and on a long experience in working with European, national and regional stakeholders. This support should build on the successful experience of the Enterprise Europe Network as a one-stop-shop to improve SMEs competitiveness and develop their business in the Single Market and beyond. The Network plans to continue delivering services on behalf of other Union programmes, notably for the Horizon2020 programme, using the financial resources of these programmes. Also the mentoring scheErasmus programme for newyoung entrepreneurs should remain the tool to enable new or aspiring entrepreneurs to gain business experience by matching with an experienced entrepreneur from another country and thus allow strengthening entrepreneurial talents. The Programme should further strive to grow and extend its geographical coverage and thus offer wider range of matching possibilities to entrepreneurs in complementarity with other Union initiatives where relevant, and should be able to respond to new challenges for SMEs in the single market, such as those posed by digitalisation.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 114 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) Clusters are a strategic tool for supporting the competitiveness and scaling-up of SMEs as they offer favourable business environments. Joint Cluster Initiatives should achieve critical mass to accelerate the growth of SMEs. By connecting specialised eco-systems, clusters create new business opportunities for SMEs and integrate them better in European and global strategic value chains. Support should be provided for the development of transnational partnership strategies and the implementation of joint activities, supported by the European Cluster Collaboration Platform. Sustainable partnering should be encouraged with continuation funding if performance and participation milestones are reached. Direct support to SMEs should be channelled through cluster organisations for the following: uptake of advanced technologies, new business models, low- carbon and resource-efficient solutions, in order to facilitate the transition to a zero- carbon economy by 2050, creativity and design, skills upgrading, talent attraction, entrepreneurship acceleration, and internationalisation. Other specialised SME support actors should be associated to facilitate industrial transformation and implementations of smart specialisation strategies. The Programme should thus contribute to growth and build linkages with the Union's (digital) innovation hubs and investments made under Cohesion Policy and Horizon Europe. Synergies with the Erasmus programme can also be explored.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 115 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) Creativity and innovation are crucial for the competitiveness of the Union's industrial value chains. They represent catalysts for industrial modernisation and contribute to smart, inclusive sustainable growth. However, uptake by SMEs is still lagging behind. The Programme should therefore support targeted actions, networks and partnerships for creativity-driven innovationinnovation based on digital innovation and creativity throughout the societal and industrial value chain.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 118 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) A well-functioning common financial reporting framework is essential for the internal market, for the effective functioning of the capital markets and for the realisation of the integrated market for financial services in the context of the Capital Markets Union.deleted
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 120 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) The Union contributes to ensuring a high level of consumer protection, empowering consumers and putting them at the heart of the internal market by supporting and complementing Member States’ policies in seeking to ensure that citizens when acting as consumers and prosumers can fully reap the benefits of the internal market and that, in so doing, their safety and legal and economic interests are properly protected by means of concrete actions. The Union has also to ensure that consumer and product safety laws are properly and equally enforced on the ground and that businesses enjoy a level playing field with fair competition in the internal market. Moreover, it is necessary to empower, encourage and assist consumers in making sustainable choices, thus contributing to a sustainable, energy and resource efficient and circular economy.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 125 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) The Programme should aim to raise the awareness of consumers, businesses, civil society and authorities on Union consumer and safety laws and to empower consumers and their representative organisations at national level and at the Union level notably by supporting the Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs (BEUC) which is the long established and recognised NGO representing consumer interests in relation to all relevant Union policies, and the European Association for the Co- ordination of Consumer Representation in Standardisation (ANEC) which represents consumers interest in relation to standardisation issues. In doing so, particular attention should be given to new market needs regarding the promotion of sustainable consumption and the prevention of vulnerabilities as well as challenges created by the digitisation of the economy or the development of new consumption patterns and business models, such as the collaborative economy and social entrepreneurship. The Programme should support the development of relevant and exhaustive information on markets, policy challenges, emerging issues and behaviours, and the publication of the Union consumer scoreboards.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 127 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) The Programme should support national competent authorities, including those responsible for monitoring product safety, who cooperate notably via the Union’s rapid alert system for dangerous products. It should also support the enforcement of Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council58 and Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 regarding consumer protection and product safety, and the Consumer Protection Cooperation network and international cooperation between the relevant authorities in third countries and in the Union. The Programme should also aim to ensure access for all consumers and traderpromote information campaigns for consumer rights, in particular in cases of involving the purchase of products and services and in cases of fraud and unfair commercial practices, and should aim to ensure access for all consumers and traders to the process for participating in a class action, as well as to quality out of court dispute resolution and online dispute resolution and information on redress possibilities.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 129 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
(40) The fitness check of Union consumer and marketing law carried out by the Commission in May 2017 exposed the need to better enforce rules and facilitate redress when consumers have been harmed by breaches to consumer laws. As a result the Commission adopted a "New Deal for Consumers" in April 2018 to ensure, inter alia, the equal treatment of consumers across the internal market in relation to dual quality standards, stronger enforcement capacities of Member States, enhanced product safety, including through effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions, increased international cooperation and new possibilities for redress notably through representative actions by qualified entities, and to bring standards up to date with the digital age by requiring platforms where products and services are sold or traded to be much more transparent to users about a range of key data. The Programme should aim to support consumer policy with awareness raising and knowledge building, capacity building and exchange of best practices of the consumer organisations and consumer protection authorities, networking and development of market intelligence, strengthening the evidence base on the functioning of the internal market for consumers, IT systems and communication tools, inter alia.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 131 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
(41) Citizens are particularly affected by the functioning of financial services markets. These are a key component of the internal market and require a solid framework for regulation and supervision which ensures not only financial stability and a sustainable economy, but also provides a high level of protection to consumers and other financial services end users, including retail investors, savers, insurance policyholders, pension fund members and beneficiaries, individual shareholders, borrowers and SMEs. It is important to enhance their capacity to participate in policy making for the financial sector and to understand its development.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 136 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
(45) The general objective of Union law in the food chain area is to contribute to a high level of health for humans, animals and plants along the food chain, to support the improvement of the welfare of animals, to contribute to a high level of protection and information for consumers and a high level of protection of the environment, including the preservation of biodiversity, while improving the sustainability of European food and feed productions, increasing quality standards across the Union, enhancing the competitiveness and the quality of the products of the Union food and feed industry and favouring the creation of jobs.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 141 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) Official controls carried out by the Member States are an essential tool for verifying and monitoring that relevant Union requirements are being implemented, complied with and enforced. The effectiveness and efficiency of official control systems is vital for maintaining a high level of safety for humans, animals and plants along the food chain whilst ensuring a high level of protection of the environment and of animal welfare, including upstream of industrial processes, while monitoring and minimising the impact of environmental determinants on human health, animal health and the food chain. Union financial support should be made available for such control measures. In particular, a financial contribution should be available to Union reference laboratories in order to help them bear the costs arising from the implementation of work programmes approved by the Commission. Moreover, since the effectiveness of official controls also depends on the availability to the control authorities of well trained staff with an appropriate knowledge of Union law, the Union should be able to contribute to their training and relevant exchange programmes organised by competent authorities.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 144 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
(55) The Agreement on the European Economic Area provides for cooperation in the fields subject to the Programme between the Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and the countries of the European Free Trade Association participating in the European Economic Area, on the other. Provision should also be made to open the Programme to participation by other countries, including the neighbouring countries of the Union and countries which are applying for, are candidates for or are acceding to, membership of the Union, provided that they respect the principles and the values contained in the Union Treaties. In addition, in the field of European statistics, the Programme should be open to Switzerland in accordance with the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on cooperation in the field of statistics64.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 147 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 70
(70) Finally, food chain actions such as veterinary and phytosanitary measures in case of animal and plant health crises could be complemented by market based interventions from the Union’s Common Agriculture Policy programming established by Regulation (EU) […] of the European Parliament and of the Council78, as well as by measures to monitor and address the level of environmental determinants.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 151 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 74
(74) To ensure regular monitoring and reporting, a proper framework for monitoring the actions and results of the Programme should be put in place from the very beginning, including through the committees dealing with the individual work programmes. Such monitoring and reporting should be based on indicators, measuring the effects of the actions under the Programme against pre-defined baselines.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 155 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 81
(81) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council90 governs the processing of personal data carried out in the Member States in the context of this Regulation and under the supervision of the Member States competent authorities. Regulation (EC) 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council91 governs the processing of personal data carried out by the Commission within the framework of this Regulation and under the supervision of the European Data Protection Supervisor. Any exchange or transmission of information by competent authorities is to comply with the rules on the transfer of personal data as laid down in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and in Regulation XXX [Regulation on privacy and electronic communications] and any exchange or transmission of information by the Commission is to comply with the rules on the transfer of personal data as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 162 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation establishes the programme for improving the functioning of the internal market and the competitiveness of enterprises, including particular micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, including those in the tourism sector, and the framework for financing of development, production and dissemination of European statistics within the meaning of Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 (the 'Programme').
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 168 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to improve the functioning of the internal market, and especially to protect and empower citizens, consumers and businesses, in particular micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), by enforcement of Union law, facilitation of market access, promoting a level playing field through fair competition between enterprises, standard setting, and by promoting human, animal and plant health and animal welfare; as well as to enhance cooperation between the competent authorities of Member States and between the competent authorities of Member States and the Commission and the decentralised Union agencies;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 170 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to provide high-quality, comparable and reliable statistics on the European Union which underpin the design, monitoring and evaluation of all the Union policies and help policy makers, businesses, academia, citizens and media to make rapid and informed decisions and actively participate in the democratic process.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 174 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) making the internal market more effective, facilitating the prevention andof market disparities which create inequalities between companies and damage competition, promoting the removal of obstacles, supporting the development, implementation and enforcement of the Union law in the areas of the internal market for goods and services, public procurement, market surveillance as well as in the areas of company law and contract and extra- contractual law, anti-money laundering, free movement of capital, financial services and competition, including the development of governance tools, promoting market surveillance, implementing specific provisions on product traceability so as to identify the country in which they were manufactured and contributing to the fight against fraud;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 179 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) improving the competitiveness of enterprises with special emphasis on SMEs, including those in the tourism sector, and achieving additionality through the provision of measures that provide various forms of support to SMEs, access to markets including the internationalisation of SMEs, favourable business environment for SMEs, the competitiveness of sectors, the modernisation of industry and the promotion of entrepreneurship;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d – point i
(i) empowering, assisting and educating consumers, businesses and civil society; ensuring a high level of consumer protection, especially for the most vulnerable consumers, sustainable consumption and product safety and healthiness, notably by supporting competent enforcement authorities and consumer representative organisations and cooperation actions, both between Member States and with third countries, in order to combat fraud more effectively, particularly in the online sales sector, by implementing specific provisions on product traceability, so as to identify their country of origin and increase consumer confidence in digital transactions; ensuring that all consumers have access to redress and; provision of adequate information on markets and consumers; must also be ensured;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 186 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d – point ii
(ii) enhancing the participation of consumers, other financial services end- users and civil society in financial services policy-making; promoting a better understanding ofand a secure use of the opportunities given by the financial sector;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 190 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) contributing to a high level of health and safety for humans, animals and plants along the food chain and in related areas, including by preventing and eradicating diseases and pests, and to support the improvement of the welfare of animals as well as a sustainable food production and consumption, including through monitoring and addressing environmental determinants;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 199 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6
6. Resources allocated to Member States under shared management may, at their request, be transferred to the Programme. The Commission shall implement those resources directly in accordance with point (a) of Article 62(1) of the Financial Regulation or indirectly in accordance with point (c) of that Article. Where possible tThose resources shall be used for the benefit of the Member State concerned.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 200 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) The programme shall be open to countries described by points (b), (c) and (d) provided that the principles and rights enshrined in the European treaties and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union are respected.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 204 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) creation of the right conditions to empower all actors of the internal market, including businesses, citizens and con, consumers, prosumers, civil society and public authorities through transparent information and awareness raising campaigns, best practice exchange, promotion of good practices, exchange and dissemination of expertise and knowledge and organization of trainings;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 211 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) support for the effective enforcement and modernisation of the Union legal framework and its rapid adaptation to the ever-changing environment, including through data gathering and analyses; studies, evaluations and policy recommendations; organization of demonstration activities and pilot projects; promoting digital literacy among citizens and companies; communication activities; development of dedicated IT tools ensuring transparent, fair and efficient functioning of the internal market, including through the efforts to combat fraud, particularly in online markets, by implementing specific provisions on product traceability.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 214 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) promotion of information campaigns for consumer rights, in particular in cases of involving the purchase of products and services and in cases of fraud and unfair commercial practices; facilitation of the process participating in a class action and access to quick and efficient out-of-court dispute resolution.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 216 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) facilitating the growth of businesses, including skills development, especially digital skills, and industrial transformation across manufacturing and service sectors, including the tourism sector;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 217 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point e
(e) supporting the competitiveness of enterprises and whole sectors of the economy, and supporting SMEs' uptake of innovation, with a particular focus on collaborative economy models, including social entrepreneurship and e-commerce models, and value chain collaboration through strategically connecting ecosystems and clusters, including the joint cluster initiative;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 218 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point f
(f) fostering an entrepreneurial business environment and entrepreneurial culture, including the mentoring scheErasmus programme for newyoung entrepreneurs and supporting start- ups, business sustainability and scale- ups.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 220 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)
(fa) supporting programmes that aim to reduce payment delays, so as to encourage the development of European businesses, particularly SMEs.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 229 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point g – point i
(i) the competent authorities of the Member States and their affiliated entities, including environmental protection authorities, the European Union Reference Laboratories and the European Union Reference Centres referred to in Articles 92, 95 and 97 of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council98 and international organisations;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 231 #
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 237 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The Programme shall be implemented by work programme(s) referred to in Article 110 of the Financial Regulation. Work programmes shall set out, where applicable, the overall amount reserved for blending operations. The work programmes shall be drawn up by the specific reference committees, bringing together experts from the Member States and acting in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 and established by the individual basic acts. They shall set out in detail a description of the actions to be financed, the objectives of those actions and the amount allocated to each action. The programmes shall also set out the method and timing of implementation of each action and the indicators that will be used to monitor the actual correspondence with the expected results.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 245 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. The interim evaluation of the Programme shall be performedcarried out once there is sufficient information available about the implementation of the Programme, but no later than fourthree years after the start of the Pprogramme implementation.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 246 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a The Commission shall monitor the implementation and management of each work programme on an annual basis and shall publish on its web portal a report on the actual implementation of the supported actions, including an assessment of the costs and benefits of the individual actions.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 249 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall communicate and publish on its online portal the conclusions of the evaluations accompanied by its observations, to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 259 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be assisted by the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Healthin each work programme by the specific reference committees established by Article 58 of Regulation (ECU) No 1782/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council99. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/201111 and established by the individual basic acts.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 262 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. The recipients of Union funding shall operate in a transparent manner, acknowledge the origin and ensure the visibility of the Union funding (in particular when promoting the actions and their results), by providing coherent, effective and proportionate targeted information to multiple audiences, including the media and the public.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 265 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point 1.3 – point 1.3.1
1.3.1. Protection measures taken in the case of a direct threat to the health status of the Union as a result of the occurrence or development, in the territory of a third country, a Member State or an OCT, of one of the animal diseases and zoonoses listed in Annex III as well as protection measures, or other relevant activities, taken in support of the plant health status of the Union, such as the adoption of multiannual plans based on best agronomic practices;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 266 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point 1.3 – point 1.3.4 a (new)
1.3.4a measures to combat epidemic and environmental emergencies resulting from the harmful impact of environmental determinants.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 267 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point 2.3 – point b a (new)
(ba) investigations for specific periods of time with the aim of monitoring and counteracting the level of environmental determinants in situations of threat to the food supply chain;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 268 #

2018/0231(COD)

(ea) additional protection measures to limit the spread of environmental determinants that have not yet been eradicated to other areas;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 270 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 7
7. Activities supporting a sustainable food production and consumption, in particular at local level.
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 271 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – indent 1
– providing high-quality statistics and disaggregated data underpinning the Excessive Deficit Procedure, Reform Support Programme and the Union's annual cycle of economic monitoring and guidance;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 272 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – indent 2
– providing and where necessary, enhancing the Principal European Economic Indicators (PEEIs), also including data for monitoring the Social Progress Index and of the Genuine Progress Indicator;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 273 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – indent 8
– providing high quality, timely and reliable statistics to support the European Pillar of Social Rights and the Union Skills Policy, including statistics on the labour market, and employment, with disaggregated data for precarious contracts and good quality jobs, statistics on education and training, income, living conditions, poverty, inequality, social protection, undeclared work and satellite accounts on skills;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 274 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – indent 15
– providing key environmental statistics and indicators including on waste, water, biodiversity, forests, land use and land cover and environmental determinants, as well as climate-related statistics and environmental economic accounts, with particular focus on climate change, the Paris Agreement, the ‘energy efficiency first’ principle and the transition to a carbon neutral economy by 2050;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 276 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – indent 19
– providing timely, disaggregated and comprehensive statistical indicators on regions, including the Union outermost regions, cities and rural areas to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of territorial development policies, including technical assistance, and to evaluate the territorial impacts of sectoral policies;
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 277 #

2018/0231(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 29 a (new)
(29a) Borreliosis infection [Lyme disease]
2018/11/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 87 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) As the main EU instrument for investing in human capital and skills, the ESF+ plays a key role in promoting social and territorial cohesion. The ESF+ should provide support to improving the quality, effectiveness and labour market relevance of education and training systems in order to facilitate the acquisition of key competences notably as regards digital skills which all individuals need for personal fulfilment and development, employment, social inclusion and active citizenship. The ESF+ should help progression within education and training and transition to work, support lifelong learning and employability, and contribute to competitiveness and societal and economic innovation by supporting scalable and sustainable initiatives in these fields. This could be achieved for example through work-based learning and apprenticeships, lifelong guidance, skills anticipation in cooperation with industry, up-to-date training materials, forecasting and graduate tracking, training of educators, validation of learning outcomes and recognition of qualifications.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The ESF+ should support Member States’ efforts to tackle poverty with a view to breaking the cycle of disadvantage across generations including through minimum income schemes in line with principle 14 of the European Pillar of Social Rights and promote social inclusion by ensuring equal opportunities for all, tackling discrimination and addressing health inequalities. This implies mobilising a range of policies targeting the most disadvantaged people regardless of their age, including children, marginalised communities such as the Roma, and the working poor, the homeless and all other people facing multiple social challenges. The ESF+ should promote the active inclusion of people far from the labour market with a view to ensuring their socio- economic integration. The ESF+ should be also used to enhance timely and equal access to affordable, sustainable and high quality services such as healthcare and long-term care, in particular family and community-based care services. The ESF+ should contribute to the modernisation of social protection systems with a view in particular to promoting their accessibility and coverage, including for people in atypical situations.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 127 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) The ESF+ should contribute to the reduction of poverty by supporting national schemes aiming to alleviate food and material deprivation and promote social integration of people at risk of poverty or social exclusion and the most deprived. With a view that at Union level at least 4% of the resources of the ESF+ strand under shared management supports the most deprived, Member States should allocate at least 24% of their national resources of the ESF+ strand under shared management to address the forms of extreme poverty with the greatest social exclusion impact, such as homelessness, child poverty and food deprivation. Due to the nature of the operations and the type of end recipients, it is necessary that simpler rules apply to support which addresses material deprivation of the most deprived.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The ESF+ should support policy and system reforms in the fields of employment, social inclusion, healthcare and long-term care, and education and training. In order to strengthen alignment with the European Semester, Member States should allocate an appropriate amount of their resources of the ESF+ strand under shared management to implementthose relevant country-specific recommendations relating to structural challenges which it is appropriate to address through multiannual invewhich are consistments falling within the scoprationale of the ESF+. The Commission and the Member States should ensure coherence, coordination and complementarity between the shared- management and Health strands of ESF+ and the Reform Support Programme, including the Reform Delivery Tool and the Technical Support Instrument. In particular, the Commission and the Member State should ensure, in all stages of the process, effective coordination in order to safeguard the consistency, coherence, complementarity and synergy among sources of funding, including technical assistance thereof, always taking into account the objectives of economic, social and territorial cohesion set out in article 174 TFEU.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 151 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) To ensure that the social dimension of Europe as set out in the European Pillar of Social Rights is duly put forward and that a minimum amount of resources is targeting those most in need Member States should allocate at least 2530% of their national ESF+ resources of the ESF+ strand under shared management to fostering social inclusion.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 167 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) In the light of persistently high levels of youth unemployment and inactivity in a number of Member States and regions, in particular affecting young people who are neither in employment, nor in education or training, it is necessary that those Member States continue to invest sufficient resources of the ESF+ strand under shared management towards actions to promote youth employment including through the implementation of Youth Guarantee schemes. Building on the actions supported by the Youth Employment Initiative in the 2014-2020 programming period targeting individual persons, Member States should further promote employment and education reintegration pathways and outreach measures for young people by prioritising, where relevant, long-term unemployed, inactive and disadvantaged young people including through youth work. Member States should also invest in measures aimed at facilitating school-to-work transition as well as reforming and adapting employment services with a view to providing tailor-made support to young people. Member States concerned should therefore allocate at least 102% of their national resources of the ESF+ strand under shared management to support youth employability.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) In accordance with Article 174 and 349 TFEU and Article 2 of Protocol No 6 to the 1994 Act of Accession, the outermost regions and the northern sparsely populated regions are entitled to specific measures under common policies and EU programmes. Due to the permanent constraints these regions require specific support.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 228 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50 a (new)
(50a) Given the diversity of the level of development in the regions and different social realities across Europe, the degree of flexibility of the ESF+ should be sufficient to take the regional and territorial specificities into account.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 229 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50 b (new)
(50b) Investments co-financed by the ESF+, in particular if related to measures aimed at social inclusion, should be deemed exempt from deficit and debt calculations in order to improve the investment capacity of the Member States.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 243 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)
(12a) "minimum income scheme" means a support scheme which provides a safety net for those who cannot work or access a decent job and are not eligible for social insurance;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 259 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
(15a) "social inclusion measures" means a process by which efforts are made to combat poverty and social exclusion, to ensure equal opportunities, and to create conditions enabling full and active participation in the society;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 286 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
The ESF+ shall support, complement and add value to the policies of the Member States to ensure equal opportunities, access to the labour market, fair working conditions, social protection and inclusionin the spirit of the Pillar of Social Rights to ensure equal opportunities in line with principles 2 and 3, access to the labour market in line with principle 4, fair working conditions in line with principles 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, social protection and inclusion in line with principles 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19 and 20, and a high level of human health protection. in line with principle 16.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 366 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point ix
(ix) enhancing the equal and timely access to quality, sustainable and affordable services; modernising social protection and social inclusion systems, including promoting access to social protection and ensuring minimum income schemes; improving accessibility, effectiveness and resilience of healthcare systems and long-term care services;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 393 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Investments co-financed by the ESF+, in particular if related to social inclusion, shall be qualified as eligible investments for the application of the flexibility clause and shall be excluded from the assessment of the Member States’ budgetary position under either Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 and Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 425 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall concentrate the ESF+ resources under shared management on interventions that address the challenges identified in their national reform programmes, in the European Semester as well as in the relevant country-specific recommendations adopted in accordance with Article 121(2) TFEU and Article 148(4) TFEU, and take into account and that comply with the principles and rights set out in the European Pillar of Social Rights.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 441 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Member States and, where appropriate the Commission, shall foster synergies and ensure coordination, complementarity and coherence between the ESF+ and other Union funds, programmes and instruments such as Erasmus, the European Regional Development Fund, the Asylum and Migration Fund and the Reform Support Programme, including the Reform Delivery Tool and the Technical Support Instrument, both in the planning phase and during implementation. Member States and, where appropriate the Commission, shall optimise mechanisms for coordination to avoid duplication of effort and ensure close cooperation between those responsible for implementation to deliver coherent and streamlined support actions.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 456 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall allocate at least 2530% of their ESF+ resources under shared management to the specific objectives for the social inclusion policy area set out in points (vii) to (xi) of Article 4(1), including the promotion ofArticle 4(1), including modernising social protection systems also through minimum income schemes, promoting social integration of people at risk of poverty or social exclusion, addressing material deprivation, fostering active inclusion and promoting the socio- economic integration of third country nationals.;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 470 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall allocate at least 24% of their ESF+ resources under shared management to the specific objective of addressing social inclusion of the most deprived and/or material deprivation set out in point (xi) of Article 4(1).
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 480 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Member States having a rate of young people aged 15 to 29 not in employment, education or training above the Union average in 2019 on the basis of Eurostat data, shall allocate at least 102% of their ESF+ resources under shared management for the years 2021 to 2025 to targeted actions and structural reforms to support youth employment and school-to-work transition, pathways to reintegrate into education or training and second chance education, in particular in the context of implementing Youth Guarantee schemes.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 486 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
When programming the ESF+ resources under shared management for 2026 and 2027 at mid-term in accordance with Article [14] of [the future CPR], Member States having a rate of young people aged 15 to 29 not in employment, education or training above the Union average in 2024 on the basis of Eurostat data, shall allocate at least 102% of their ESF+ resources under shared management for the years 2026 to 2027 to these actions.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 506 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall ensure adequate participation of regional and local authorities, social partners and civil society organisations in the delivery of employment, education and social inclusion policies supported by the ESF+ strand under shared management.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 591 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The food and/or basic material assistance may be provided directly to the most deprived persons or indirectly through electronic vouchers or cards, provided that they can only be redeemed against food and/or basic material assistance as set out in Article 2(3) and are not replacing any existing social benefits.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 596 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4
4. The delivery of food and/or material assistance mayshall be complemented with re-orientation towards competent services and other accompanying measures aiming at the social inclusion of the most deprived persons.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 610 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. (a) Priorities addressing material deprivation shall use common output and result indicators, as set out in Annex II to this Regulation to monitor progress in implementation. These programmes may also use programme-specific indicators. (b) Priorities addressing social inclusion shall use common output and result indicators, as set out in Annex II (1) to this Regulation to monitor progress in implementation. These programmes may also use programme specific indicators.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 708 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 3
3. The ESF+ Committee shall include one representative from each of the organisations representing workers' organisations and, employers' organisations and civil society organizations at Union level.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) In its ‘Reflection Paper on Harnessing Globalisation’20 the Commission identifies the combination of trade related globalisation and technological change as the major drivers of an increased demand for skilled labour and a reduced number of jobs that require lower qualifications. Despite the overall tremendous advantages of more open trade and further integration of world economies, these negative side effects need to be tackled. As the current benefits of globalisation are already unequally distributed among people and regions, causing a significant impact on those adversely affected, there is a danger that theAppropriate means are therefore needed to address these negative side effects, which are driven by ever faster evolving technological advances will further fuel these effects. Therefore, in line with the principles of solidarity and sustainability, it will be necessary to ensure that the benefits of globalisation will be shared more fairly by reconciling economic openinganticipate such negative effects of globalisation and technological advance withand improve social protection systems. __________________ 20 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publicatio ns/reflection-paper-harnessing- globalisation_en.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 105 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) The Commission carried out a mid- term evaluation of the EGF to assess how and to what extent the EGF achieves its objectives. The EGF proved to be effective, attaining a higher reintegration rate of displaced workers than in the previous programming period. The evaluation also found that the EGF generated European added value. This is particularly true in terms of its volume effects, meaning that EGF assistance not only increases the number and variety of services offered, but also their level of intensity. Moreover, EGF interventions have high visibility and demonstrate the EU added value of the intervention directly to the general public However, several challenges were identifiedopen to improvement in several respects. On the one hand, the mobilisation procedure was considered to be too long. Furthermore, many Member States reported problems putting together the extensive background analysis of the event that triggered the redundancies. The main reason that keeps Member States that would have had a potential EGF case from applying are financial and institutional capacity problems. On the one hand, it could simply be a lack of manpower – Member States currently can ask for technical assistance only if they implement an EGF case. Since redundancies can happen unexpectedly, it would be important that Member States are ready to react immediately and can submit an application without any delays. Furthermore, in certain Member States, more profound institutional capacity building efforts seem necessary in order to ensure an efficient and effective implementation of EGF cases. The threshold of 500 displaced jobs was criticized as being too high, especially in lesser populated regions26. __________________ 26 COM (2018) 297 final and accompanying SWD (2018) 192 final.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) To provide effective support for workers, the specificities of the services sector should also be taken into account, in which the impact of potential crises has been delayed in comparison with that in the industrial sector. In order to provide adequate protection for these workers and self-employed workers it is necessary to provide for different protection measures, and, where market disruption could potentially become more marked, undertakings in the service sector should be permitted to apply for preventive funding.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Displaced workers and self- employed persons whose activity has ceased should have equal access to the EGF independently of their type of employment contract or employment relationship. Therefore, displaced workers as well as self-employed persons, be they under fixed-term or open-ended contracts, or temporary agency workers, as well as self-employed persons – including owner-managers of micro and small enterprises – whose activity has ceased should be regarded as possible EGF beneficiaries for the purposes of this Regulation.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 127 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) When drawing up the coordinated package of active labour market policy measures, Member States should favour measures that will significantly contribute to the employability of the beneficiaries. Member States should strive towards the reintegration into sustainable, high-quality employment of the largest possible number of beneficiaries participating in these measures as soon as possible within the six-month period before the final report on the implementation of the financial contribution is due.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 155 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
The EGF shall contribute to a better distribution of the benefits of globalisation and technological advance by helping displaced workers adapt to structurpurpose of the EGF shall be to help workers who have been displaced from the labour market to adapt to structural change dictated by globalisation and technological change. As such, the EGF shall contribute to the implementation of the principles defined under the European Pillar of Social Rights and enhance social and economic cohesion among regions and Member States.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of the programme is to demonstrate solidarity with and offer support to displaced workers with fixed-term or open-ended contracts, temporary agency workers and self- employed persons whose activity has ceased in the course of unexpected major restructuring events, referred to in Article 5.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 163 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The specific objective of the EGF is to offer assistance in case of unexpected major restructuring events, particularly those caused by globalisation-related challenges, such as changes in world trade patterns, trade disputes, financial or economic crises, the transition to low- carbon economy or as a consequence of digitisation or automation. In exceptional circumstances, the EGF may support socio-economic redeployment in regions and/or geographical areas or occupational sectors which have been particularly affected from an employment point of view. Particular emphasis shall lie on measures that help the most disadvantaged groups.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) 'displaced worker' means a worker, including a temporary agency worker, whose employment is ended prematurely by redundancy, or whose contract is not renewed, due to economic reasons;
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) 'self-employed person' means a person, including the owner of a business, who employed fewer than 105 workers;
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 190 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) ‘restructuring' means any labour market phenomenon producing redundancies which have a significant impact on the economy of a given territory.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 227 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The coordinated package of services shall be drawn up in consultation with the targeted beneficiaries or their representatives, or and the social partners.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Within ten working days of the date of submission of the application, or, where applicable, of the date on which the Commission is in possession of the translation of the application, whichever is the later, the Commission shall acknowledge receipt of the application and inform the Member State of any additional information it requires in order to assess the application.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 235 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. On the basis of the information provided by the Member State, the Commission shall complete its assessment of the application’s compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution, within 640 working days of the receipt of the complete application or, where applicable, of the translation of the application. Where the Commission is unable, exceptionally, to comply with that deadline, it shall provide a written explanation setting out the reasons for the delay.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 242 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point d a (new)
(da) identification, where appropriate, of the potential effects on businesses in the service sector in the region (or effects on various economic sectors present in the region);
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 246 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point f a (new)
(fa) a detailed description facilitating the quantification of the preventive budget requested under point (da);
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 262 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall, on the basis of the assessment carried out in accordance with Article 9 and in particular taking into account the number of targeted beneficiaries, the proposed measures and the estimated costs, evaluate and propose as quickly as possible, within the deadline set in Article 9(4), the amount of a financial contribution from the EGF, if any, that may be made within the limits of the resources available.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 265 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. Where, on the basis of the assessment carried out in accordance with Article 9, the Commission concludes that the conditions for a financial contribution under this Regulation are not met, it shall immediately notify the applicant Member State in addition to any other EGF stakeholder.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 268 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. The performance reporting system shall ensure that data for monitoring programme implementation and quantitative and qualitative results are collected efficiently, effectively and in a timely manner. To that end, proportionate reporting requirements shall be imposed on Member States.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 271 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the type of measures and mainthe results obtained, explaining the challenges, lessons learned, synergies and complementarities with other EU funds and indicating, whenever possible, the complementarity of measures with those funded by other Union or national programmes in line with the EU Quality Framework for anticipation of change and restructuring;
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 272 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the results of a beneficiary survey conducted within six months afterof the end of the implementation period, which shall cover the perceived change in the employability of beneficiaries, or for those who already found employment, more information on the quality of employment found, such as the change in working hours, level of responsibility or change of salary level in comparison to previous employment, and the sector in which the person found employment and break down this information by gender, age group and education level;
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2018/0189(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) In order to ensure that additional or future geographical indications protected and registered in the Union are registered in the International Register, it is appropriate to authorise the Commission, at a later stage, to file applications for the international registration of such additional geographical indications, on its own initiative or, in case of non-agricultural geographical indications, at the request of a Member State or of an interested group of producers or, in exceptional cases, at the request of a single producer.
2018/11/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 6 #

2018/0189(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) It appears equitable that the fees to be paid under the Geneva Act and the Common Regulations under the Lisbon Agreement and the Geneva Act for filing an application with the International Bureau for the international registration of a geographical indication as well as the fees to be paid in respect of other entries in the International Register and for the supply of extracts, attestations, or other information concerning the contents of that international registration should be borne by the Member State in which the geographical indication originates. This should be without prejudice to any decision by the Member State to seek reimbursement of those fees from the group of producers or single producer using the geographical indication for which international registration is sought.
2018/11/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 7 #

2018/0189(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
For the purpose of this Regulation, appellations of origin, including “designations of origin” as defined by Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 and Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, and geographical indications, are henceforth both referred to as 'geographical indications, agricultural and non- agricultural ones'.
2018/11/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 8 #

2018/0189(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Upon the accession of the Union to the Geneva Act, the Commission shall file with the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization ('the International Bureau') applications for the international registration of geographical indications protected and registered under Union law and pertaining to products originating in the Union, or at the request of a Member State or of an interested group of producers, in case of non- agricultural geographical indications pursuant to Article 5(1) and (2) of the Geneva Act.
2018/11/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 10 #

2018/0189(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
In order to establish the list referred to in the second paragraph, the Commission shall take into account, in particularamong others, the following:
2018/11/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2018/0189(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Following the accession of the Union to the Geneva Act, the Commission may on its own initiative or at the request of a Member State or of an interested group of producers or of the single producer using a geographical indication, agricultural and non-agricultural ones, protected and registered in the Union, adopt implementing acts in order to file an application for international registration of a geographical indication protected and registered under Union law and pertaining to a product originating in the Union with the International Bureau.
2018/11/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2018/0189(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Following the accession of the Union to the Geneva Act, the Commission may on its own initiative orshall, at the request of a Member State or of an interested group of producers or of the single producer using a geographical indication protected and registered in the Union, adopt implementing acts in order to file an application for international registration of a geographical indication protected and registered under Union law and pertaining to a product originating in the Union with the International Bureau.
2018/11/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 14 #

2018/0189(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
In order to assess whether or not to file an application for international registration, the Commission shall take into account the criteria set out in the third paragraph of Article 2. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 13(2).
2018/11/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2018/0189(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
This is without prejudice to any decision by a Member State to seek reimbursement of the amounts referred to in the first paragraph from the group of producers or single producer using the geographical indication for which international registration is sought.deleted
2018/11/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2018/0135(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1
(1) The Own Resources System of the Union must ensure adequate resources for the orderly development of the policies of the Union, subject to the need for strict budgetary discipline. The development of the Own Resources System can and should also participate, to the greatest extent possible, in line with the principle of budgetary financing embodied in the Treaties. The development of the Own Resources System must first and foremost participate in the development of the policies of the Union. Or. it (NOTE: the text comes from COM(2018)0325)
2020/07/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 46 #

2018/0135(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) New ways of financing the European budget should be explored in line with Article 311 TFEU. The Commission must therefore continue to submit proposals for new Own Resources, especially in the framework of the internal market, to progressively reduce direct contributions from Member States, thereby easing the pressure on their budgets. It should accordingly continue its efforts to introduce a financial transaction tax acceptable to all EU Members as a possible means of generating new Own Resources for the EU budget.
2020/07/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 73 #

2018/0135(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 8
(8) The Union considers as a priority to achieve its emission reduction target of at least 40% between 1990 and 2030 as committed under the Paris Climate Agreement. The European Union Emissions Trading System is one of the main instruments put in place to implement this objective and generates revenue through the auctioning of emission allowances. Considering the harmonised nature of the European Union Emissions Trading System as well as the funding provided by the Union to foster mitigation and adaptation efforts in the Member States, it is appropriate to introduce a new Own Resource for the EU budget in this context. This Own Resource should be based on the allowances to be auctioned by Member States, including transitional free allocation to the power sector, while simultaneously encouraging emissions reduction in line with the Green Deal recommendations and the Paris Agreements. In order to take account of the specific provisions for certain Member States provided for in Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council20, allowances redistributed for the purposes of solidarity, growth and interconnections as well as allowances dedicated to the Innovation Fund and the Modernisation Fund should not be counted for determining the Own Resource contribution. _________________ 20Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32). Or. it (NOTE: the text comes from COM(2018)0325)
2020/07/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 87 #

2018/0135(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 10
(10) It is necessary to avoid that Member States which benefit from corrections are confronted with a significant and sudden increase in their national contributions. It is therefore necessary to provide for temporary corrections in favour of Austria, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden by means of lump sum reductions to their Gross National Income-based contributions during a transitional period. Those corrections should be phased out by the end of 2025. deleted Or. it (NOTE: the text comes from COM(2018)0325)
2020/07/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 128 #

2018/0135(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Austria shall benefit from a gross reduction in its annual Gross National Income-based contribution of EUR 110 million in 2021, EUR 88 million in 2022, EUR 66 million in 2023, EUR 44 million in 2024, and EUR 22 million in 2025. Denmark shall benefit from a gross reduction in its annual Gross National Income-based contribution of EUR 118 million in 2021, EUR 94 million in 2022, EUR 71 million in 2023, EUR 47 million in 2024, and EUR 24 million in 2025. Germany shall benefit from a gross reduction in its annual Gross National Income-based contribution of EUR 2 799 million in 2021, EUR 2 239 million in 2022, EUR 1 679 million in 2023, EUR 1 119 million in 2024, and EUR 560 million in 2025. The Netherlands shall benefit from a gross reduction in its annual Gross National Income-based contribution of EUR 1 259 million in 2021, EUR 1 007 million in 2022, EUR 755 million in 2023, EUR 503 million in 2024, and EUR 252 million in 2025. Sweden shall benefit from a gross reduction in its annual Gross National Income-based contribution of EUR 578 million in 2021, EUR 462 million in 2022, EUR 347 million in 2023, EUR 231 million in 2024, and EUR 116 million in 2025. Those amounts shall be measured in 2018 prices and adjusted to current prices by applying the most recent Gross Domestic Product deflator for the Union expressed in euros, as provided by the Commission, which is available when the draft budget is drawn up. Those gross reductions shall be financed by all Member States. deleted Or. it (NOTE: the text comes from COM(2018)0325)
2020/07/20
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 17 #

2018/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The Union regularly concludes trade agreements (‘Agreements’) with third countries which mayand grants preferential treatment which should include bilateral safeguard clauses. It is necessary to lay down the procedures to guarantee the effective application of the safeguard clauses that will have been agreed with the countries concerned.
2018/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 25 #

2018/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Close monitoring of sensitive products, if any, should facilitate a timely decision concerning the possible initiation of an investigation and subsequent application of measures. Therefore the Commission should regularly monitor imports of sensitive products, if any, from the date of provisional application or entry into force of the Agreements, if there is no provisional application. Monitoring should be extended to other sectors upon a duly justified request made by the relevant industry or stakeholders or by the European Parliament.
2018/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 36 #

2018/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down provisions for the implementation of the bilateral safeguard clauses and other mechanisms on the temporary withdrawal of tariff preferences or other preferential treatment contained in the Agreements concluded between the Union and a third country referred to in the Annex.
2018/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 37 #

2018/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘bilateral safeguard clause’ means a provision set out in an Agreement between the Union and one or more third countries concerned referred to in the Annex on the temporary or definitive suspension of tariff preferences;
2018/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 38 #

2018/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) ‘Union industry’ means the Union producers as a whole of the like or directly competitive products, operating within the territory of the Union, or Union producers whose collective output of the like or directly competitive products constitutes a major proportion of the total Union production of those products, or, where a like or a directly competitive product is only one of several products that are made by the Union producers, the Union industry shall be defined in relation to the specific operations that are involved in the production of the like or directly competitive product;
2018/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2018/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) ‘serious injury’ means a significant overall impairment to the position of Union industry or to a productive sector in a Member State;
2018/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2018/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) ‘threat of serious injury’ to the position of Union industry means serious injury that is clearly imminent;
2018/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 53 #

2018/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall monitor weekly the evolution of import statistics of sensitive products, if any, mentioned in Annex in respect of each Agreement. For that purpose, the Commission shall cooperate and exchange data on a regular basis with Member States and the Union industry.
2018/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 55 #

2018/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Upon a duly justified request by the Union industry concerned, other relevant stakeholders or the European Parliament, the Commission may extend the scope of the monitoring to other sectors, if any, than those mentioned in the Annex.
2018/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 63 #

2018/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. An investigation shall be initiated by the Commission upon request by a Member State, by any legal person or any association not having legal personality acting on behalf of the Union industry, by the European Parliament, or on the Commission's own initiative, where there is sufficient prima facie evidence, as determined on the basis of factors referred to in Article 6(5).
2018/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 71 #

2018/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 8
8. The Commission shall, as soon as the necessary technical framework is in place, ensure password-protected online access to the non-confidential file (the online platform), which it shall manage and through which all information which is relevant and is not confidential within the meaning of Article 12 shall be disseminated. Interested parties, Member States and the European Parliament shall be granted access to that platform.
2018/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 72 #

2018/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 9
9. The Commission shall hear interested parties, in particular where they have made a written application within the period laid down in the notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union, demonstrating that they are likely to be affected by the outcome of the investigation and that there are special reasons for them to be heard orally. The Commission shall hear interested parties on further occasions if there are special reasons therefor. The Commission shall facilitate the access to the investigation for micro, small and medium enterprises through appropriate helpdesks.
2018/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 76 #

2018/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) in such increased quantities, in absolute terms or relative to Union or a Member State production, and under such conditions as,
2018/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 82 #

2018/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. Provisional safeguard measures shall not apply for more than 200 calendar days, unless an investigation to impose definitive safeguard measures is still ongoing.
2018/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 38 #

2018/0093M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that negotiations were originally concluded in 2012 and regrets the longthat a delay in bringing forward the agreement for ratificationwas caused by a necessary clarification on EU competences on trade by the Court of Justice of the EU;
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 71 #

2018/0093M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the fact that around 190 EU geographical indications will be protected as of the entry into force of the agreement, with the possibility of adding more at a later stage, in view of the fact that Singapore is the fifth largest market in Asia for EU food and drink exports;Recalls that the FTA with Singapore does not offer direct protection for the 196 EU GIs included in the Annex to the Intellectual Property chapter and that the EU GIs will need tobe examined and pass through an opposition period, according to the registration procedure in Singapore, in order to be protected.
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 73 #

2018/0093M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Underlines that the GIs registration procedure could be applied only once the implementing legislation on GIs will be adopted and the Singaporean registry for GIs be put in place. Calls on the Singapore Authorities to set up and put into force the register before the ratification of the Agreement;
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 74 #

2018/0093M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Invites the Commission to continue to work intensively with the Singaporean Authorities in order to ensure that all EU GIs will be protected in line with the terms of protection laid down in the FTA without any exception or limitation (including annexes or footnotes);
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 15 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the Union and Japan share fundamental values such as respect for human rights, democracy and the rule of law, and a strong commitment to sustainable development and a, climate change and a legal enforceability of the rules- based WTO system;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 23 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the agreement achieves a high degree of trade liberalisation aiming to liberalise for the EU 99 % of tariff lines and 100 % of imports and for Japan 97 % of tariff lines and 99 % of imports
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 70 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes in particular the ambitious level of tariff liberalisation, and underlines the importance to combined them with measures to safeguard the most sensitive agricultural and non- agricultural products, through duty-free quotas, reduced dutiesduties, transitional or staging periods; points out that the EU tariff on automobiles will be phased out over seven years;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 82 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that Japan will, notably, grant non-discriminatory access for EU suppliers to the procurement markets of 48 cities, remove the ‘operational safety clause’, which has in practise prevented EU rail suppliers to access the Japanese market, and maximise transparency in tendering for public contracts; Reminds Japan commitment to equally treat EU companies and Japanese State-owned enterprises on the service market;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 100 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Highlights the fact that the agreement promotes best practices for providing safe and high-quality food and products for consumers; calls on both partners to mainstream consumer protection in the implementation of the agreement; Reminds that around 85% of agri-food products will be allowed to enter Japan entirely duty-free.
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 109 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the commitment to the effective implementation of the Paris Agreement to combat climate change and of other multilateral environmental agreements, as well as to the sustainable management of forests (including fighting illegal logging) and fisheries (combating illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing); regrets the non-binding, low- level commitments on fighting illegal logging; calls on both parties to cooperate closely under the sustainable development chapter to exchange best practices and to strengthen the enforcement of legislation in these matters;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 129 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Highlights the fact that the agreement includes the commitment to pursue the ratification of fundamental ILO conventions; regrets that Japan has not yet ratified two ILO core conventions (on discrimination and on the abolition of forced labour) and expects, in light of commitments made in the EPA, concrete progress on the part of Japan towards the ratification of these conventions; Express its concerns on Japan's continued application of the death penalty;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 155 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Underlines the fact that the EPA maintains the right of Member State authorities to define, provide and regulate public services at local, regional or national level, despite its negative list approach, and that it does not prevent governments from bringing any privatised service back in to the public sector; regrets the negative list approach in the services liberalization chapter;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 160 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Regrets that the agreement does not include a specific chapter on Consumer Protection, which should be included in all future trade agreements.
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 167 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Believes that market access commitments in cross-border services, including e-commerce, maritime transport, postal services, cyber security, energy and telecommunications, will give a boost to trade in services while safeguarding the pursuit of legitimate policy objectives;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 178 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes key innovative elements such as dedicated chapters to enhance benefits for SMEs andtrough special clauses committing both parties to transparency about market access and to share relevant information. Points out that it is the first agreement containing a specific chapter on Corporate Governance aiming to promote corporate social responsibility based on the principles of the G20 and the OECD;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 188 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses that regulatory cooperation is voluntary and that it by no means limits the right to regulate; recalls that corresponding provisions must be implemented in full respect of the prerogatives of the co-legislators; welcomes the fact that the regulatory cooperation chapter clearly states that the principles established in the TFEU, such asand in particular the precautionary principle, must be fully respected;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 200 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Takes note that negotiations continue on a separate investment agreement and reiterates that it is unacceptable to return to the old, private ISDS mechanisinclude an investment court system or investor-state dispute settlement clause in this agreement; reminds the willingness of EU civil society to exclude the use of such a system;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 226 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to monitor closely the proper implementation of the agreed removal of the NTMs, as well as the management of SPS measures, tariff-rate quotas for agricultural products, and tolabelling of goods. Asks the Commission to systematically report back to Parliament;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 82 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) A European Labour Authority (the ‘Authority’) should be established in order to help strengthen fairness and trust in the Single Market. To that effect, the Authority should support the Member States and the Commission in strengthening access to information for individuals and employers about their rights and obligations in cross- border labour mobility situations as well as access to relevant services, support compliance andpromote cooperation between the Member States to ensure the effective application of the Union law in these areas, and mediate and facilitate a solution in case of cross-border disputes or labour market disruptionputes.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The Authority should perform its activities in the areas of cross-border labour mobility and social security coordination, including free movement of workers, posting of workers and highly mobile servicethe posting of workers. It should also enhance cooperation between Member States in tackling undeclared work, letterbox companies and the phenomenon of bogus self-employment. In cases where the Authority, in the course of the performance of its activities, becomes aware of suspected irregularities, including in areas of Union law beyond its scope, such as violations of working conditions, health and safety rules, or the employment of illegally staying third-country nationals, it should be able to report them and cooperate on these matters with the Commission, competent Union bodies, andcompetent national authorities where appropriate.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 105 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) The Authority should contribute to facilitating the free movement of workers governed by Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council39, Directive 2014/54/EU of the European Parliament and the Council40 and Regulation (EU) 2016/589 of the European Parliament and the Council41. It should facilitatefacilitate access to information with regard to the posting of workers governed by Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and the Council42 and Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and the Council43 , including by supporting the enforcement of those provisions implemented through universally applicable collective agreements in line with the practices of Member States. It should also help the coordination of social security systems governed by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and the Council44, Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council45, Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 of the European Parliament and the Council46 ; as well as Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/7147 and Council Regulation (EC) No 574/7248. __________________ 39 Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (OJ L 141, 27.5.2011, p. 1). 40 Directive 2014/54/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 April 2014 on measures facilitating the exercise of rights conferred on workers in the context of freedom of movement for workers (OJ L 128, 30.4.2014, p. 8). 41 Regulation (EU) 2016/2016 of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 April 2016 on a European network of employment services (EURES), workers’ access to mobility services and the further integration of labour markets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 492/2011 and (EU) No 1296/2013 (OJ L 107, 22.04.2016, p. 1). 42 Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ L 18, 21.1.1997, p. 1). 43 Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’) (OJ L 159, 28.05.2014, p. 11). 44 Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, (OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p.1, corrigendum OJ L 200, 7.6.2004, p. 1). 45 Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems, (OJ L 284, 30.10.2009, p. 1). 46 Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 extending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by these Regulations solely on the ground of their nationality (OJ L 344, 29.12.2010, p. 1). 47 Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ L 149, 5.7.1971 p. 2). 48 Council Regulation (EC) No 574/72 of 21 March 1972 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons, and to their families moving within the Community (OJ L 74, 27.3.1972, p. 1).
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The establishment of the Authority should not create new rights and obligations for individuals or employers, including economic operators or non-profit organisations, as the activities of the Authority should cover them to the extent to which they are covered by the Union law within the scope of this Regulation. Increased cooperation with the Authority should not place an excessive administrative burden on employers, and in particular on micro, small and medium-sized enterprises.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) To ensure they can benefit from a fair and effective internal market, the Authority should promote opportunities for individuals and employers to be mobile or provide services and recruit anywhere within the Union. This includes supporting the cross-border mobility of individuals by facilitating access to cross- border mobility services, such as the cross-border matching of jobs, traineeships and apprenticeships and by promoting mobility schemes such as 'Your first EURES job' or 'ErasmusPRO’. The Authority should also contribute to improving transparency of information, including on rights and obligations stemming from Union law, and access to services to individuals and employers, in cooperation with other Union information services, such as Your Europe Advice, and taking full advantage and ensuring consistency with the Your Europe portal, which will form the backbone of the future single digital gateway53. __________________ 53 Regulation [Single Digital Gateway – COM(2017)256]deleted
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 145 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) For these purposes, the Authority should cooperate with other relevant Union initiatives and networks, in particular the European Network of Public Employment Services (PES)54, the European Enterprise Network55, the Border Focal Point56 and SOLVIT57, as well as with relevant national services such as the bodies to promote equal treatment and to support Union workers and members of their family, designated by Member States under Directive 2014/54/EU, and national contact points designated under Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council58 to provide information on healthcare. The Authority should also explore synergies with the proposed European services e-card59, notably with regard to those cases in which Member States opt for the submission of declarations regarding posted workers through the e-card platform. The Authority should replace the Commission in managing the European network of employment services (‘EURES’) European Coordination Office established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 2016/589, including the definition of user needs and business requirements for the effectiveness of the EURES portal and related IT services, but excluding the IT provision, and the operation and development of the IT infrastructure, which will continue to be ensured by the Commission. __________________ 54 Decision No 573/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on enhanced cooperation between Public Employment Services (PES) (OJ L 159, 28.5.2014, p. 32). 55 European Enterprise Network, https://een.ec.europa.eu/ 56 to the Council and the European Parliament, Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions, COM(2017) 534. 57 September 2013 on the principles governing SOLVIT (OJ L 249, 19.9.2011, p. 10). 58 Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare (OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 45). 59 COM(2016) 824 final and COM(2016) 823 final.deleted Communication from the Commission Commission Recommendation of 17
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 177 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) In order to keep track of emerging trends, challenges, or loopholes in the areas of labour mobility and social security coordination, the Authority should develop an analytical and risk assessment capacity. This should involve carrying out labour market analyses and studies, as well as peer reviews. The aAuthority should monitor potential imbalances in terms of skills and cross-border labour flows, including their possible impact on territorial cohesion. The Authority should also support the risk assessment referred to in Article 10 of Directive 2014/67/EU. The Authority should ensure synergies and complementarity with other Union Agencies or services or networks. This should include seeking input from SOLVIT and similar services on recurring problems encountered by individuals and businesses in the exercise of their rights in the areas under the scope of the Authority. The Authority should also facilitate and streamline data collection activities provided for by the relevant Union laws within its scope. This does not entail the creation of new reporting obligations for Member States.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 188 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The Authority should provide a platform forssistance in resolving disputes between Member States in relation to the application of Union law that falls within its scope. It should build on dialogue and conciliation mechanisms that are currently in place in the area of social security coordination, which are valued by Member States60 and their importance is recognised by the Court of Justice61. Member States should be able to refer cases tocontact the Authority for mediationin order to receive assistance according to standard procedures put in place for this purpose. The Authority should only deal with disputes between Member States, while individuals and employers facing difficulties with exercising their Union rights should continue to have at their disposal the national and Union services dedicated to dealing with such cases, such as the SOLVIT network to which the Authority should refer such cases. The SOLVIT network should also be able to refer to the Authority for its consideration cases in which the problem cannot be solved due to differences between national administrations. __________________ 60 Council, Partial general approach of 26 October 2017 on the proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems and regulation (EC) No 987/2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 13645/1/17. 61 Case C-236/88 EU:C:1990:303, paragraph 17; Case C-202/97 EU:C:2000:75, paragraphs 57-58; Case C- 178/97 EU:C:2000:169, paragraphs 44-45; Case C-2/05 EU:C:2006:69, paragraphs 28-29; Case C-12/14 EU:C:2016:135, paragraphs 39-41; Case C-359/16 EU:C:2018:63, paragraphs 44-45.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 196 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) To facilitate the management of labour market adjustments, the Authority should facilitate cooperation among relevant stakeholders in order to address labour market disruptions affecting more than one Member State, such as cases of restructuring or major projects impacting employment in border regions.deleted
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 208 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The Member States and the Commission should be represented on a Management Board, in order to ensure the effective functioning of the Authority. The composition of the Management Board, including the selection of its Chair and Deputy-Chair, should respect the principles of gender balance, experience and qualification, as well as the utmost transparency. In view of the effective and efficient functioning of the Authority, the Management Board, in particular, should adopt an annual work programme, carry out its functions relating to the Authority’s budget, adopt the financial rules applicable to the Authority, appoint an Executive Director, and establish procedures for taking decisions relating to the operational tasks of the Authority by the Executive Director. Representatives from countries other than Union Member States, which are applying the Union rules within the scope of the Authority, may participate in the meetings of the Management Board as observers.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 210 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) Without prejudice to the powers of the Commission, tThe Management Board and the Executive Director should be independent in the performance of their duties and act in the public interest.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 218 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) To guarantee its full autonomy and independence, the Authority should be granted an autonomous budget, with revenue coming from the general budget of the Union, any voluntary financial contribution from the Member States and any contribution from third countries participating in the work of the Authority. In exceptional and duly justified cases it should also be in the position to receive delegation agreements or ad hoc grants, and to charge for publications and any service provided by the Authority.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 223 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27 a (new)
(27a) The decision on the seat of the Authority should involve the European Parliament, fully respecting its role as co-legislator, and should be based on objective and substantive criteria, which should exclude random methods such as the drawing of lots and should ensure full transparency throughout the decision- making process.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 226 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) Within the framework of their respective competences, the Authority should cooperate with other agencies of the Union, in particular those established in the area of employment and social policy, building on their expertise and, maximising synergies and avoiding duplication, thus achieving financial savings: the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound), the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop), the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU- OSHA), and the European Training Foundation (ETF), as well as, as regards the fight against organised crime and trafficking in human beings, with the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust).
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 252 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) Since the objectives of this Regulation to support the free movement of workers and services and to contribute to strengthening fairness in the internal market cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States acting in an uncoordinated manner, but can rather, by reason of the cross-border nature of thoseat activitiesy and the need for increased cooperation between Member States, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordfull compliance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve thoseat objectives.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 318 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) mediate and facilitate a solution in cases of cross-border disputes between national authorities or labour market disruptions.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 353 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) coordinate and supportprovide assistance in concerted and joint inspections, in accordance with Articles 9 and 10;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 365 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) mediate in disputesfacilitate a solution between Member States' authorities on the application of relevant Union law, in accordance with Article 13;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 371 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) facilitate cooperation between relevant stakeholders in the event of cross-border labour market disruptions, in accordance with Article 14.deleted
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 390 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6
The Authority shall improve the availability, quality and accessibility of information offered to individuals and employers to facilitate labour mobility across the Union, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 589/2016 on EURES and Regulation [Single Digital Gateway – COM(2017)256]. To that end, the Authority shall: (a) the rights and obligArticle 6 deleted Informations of individuals in cross-border labour mobility situations; (b) the labour mobility of individuals, including through guidance on access to learning and language training; (c) employers on labour rules, and the living and working conditions applicable to workers in cross-border labour mobility situations, including posted workers; (d) complying with the obligations on the dissemination of and access to information relating to the free movement of workers as laid down in Article 6 of Directive 2014/54/EU, and to the posting of workers as laid down in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU; (e) improving the accuracy, completeness and user-friendliness ofprovide relevant information on promote opportunities to support provide relevant national information services, in accordance with the quality criteria laid down in Regulation [Single Digital Gateway – COM(2017)256]; (f) support Member States in streamlining the provision of information and services to individuals and employers pertaining to cross-border mobility on a voluntary basis, while fully respecting Member States' competences.to support Member States in support Member States in
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 436 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7
Access to cross-border labour mobility 1. services to individuals and employers to facilitate labour mobility across the Union. To that end, the Authority shall: (a) initiatives supporting the cross-border mobility of individuals, including targeted mobility schemes; (b) of job, traineeship, and apprenticeship vacancies with CVs and applications for the benefit of individuals and employers, particularly via EURES; (c) initiatives and networks, such as the European Network of Public Employment Services, the European Enterprise Network and the Border Focal Point, in particular to identify and overcome cross- border obstacles to labour mobility; (d) facilitate cooperation between competent services at the national level designated in accordance with Directive 2014/54/EU to provide information, guidance and assistance to individuals and employers on cross-border mobility, and the national contact points designated in accordance with Directive 2011/24/EU to provide information on healthcare. 2. EURES European Coordination Office and ensure that it fulfils its responsibilities in accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2016/589, except for the technical operation and development of the EURES portal and related IT services, which shall continue to be managed by the Commission. The Authority, under the responsibility of the Executive Director as set out in Article 23(4)(k), shall ensure that this activity fully complies with requirements of the applicable data protection legislation, including the requirement to appoint a Data Protection Officer, in accordance with Article 37.rticle 7 deleted services The Authority shall provide promote the development of enable the cross-border matching cooperate with other Union The Authority shall manage the
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 498 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point e
(e) report to the Commission on a quarterly basis about unresolved requests between Member States, and if considered necessary, refer those to mediation in accordance with Article 13.deleted
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 587 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. An agreement for setting up a joint inspection ('the joint inspection agreement') between the participating Member States andwith the support of the Authority shall set out the conditions for carrying out such an exercise. The joint inspection agreement may include provisions which enable joint inspections, once agreed and planned, to take place at short notice. The Authority shall establishprepare a model agreement.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 619 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. Staff of the Authority may participate in a concerted or joint inspection with the prior agreement of the Member State on whose territory they wiall bthe providing their assistance to the inspectionarticipating Member States.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 639 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6
6. Information on concerted and joint inspections shall be included in quarterly reports to be submitted to the Management Board. Those reports shall be made public and shall contain information about those cases where the authority of a Member State does not participate in or conduct the concerted or joint inspection referred to in paragraph 1. A yearly report on the inspections supported by the Authority shall be included in the Authority's annual activity report.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 643 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 7
7. In the event that the Authority, in the course of concerted or joint inspections, or in the course of any of its activities, becomes aware of suspected irregularities in the application of Union law, including beyond the scope of its competences, it shall report those suspected irregularities to the Commission and authorities in the Member State concerned, where appropriate.deleted
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 702 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – title
MediationDisputes between Member States
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 705 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. In the event of disputes between Member States regarding the application or interpretation of Union law in areas covered by this Regulation, the Authority may perform a mediation rolhelp resolve the dispute.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 714 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. UponAt the request of oneall of the Member States concerned by a dispute, the Authority shall launch a mediation procedure before its Mediation Board set up for that purpose in accordance with Article 17(2). The Authority may also launch a mediation procedure on its own initiative before the Mediation Board, including on the basis of a referral from SOLVIT, subject to the agreement of all Member States concerned by thatmay provide assistance with a view to resolving the dispute.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 730 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. When presenting a case for mediation byapplying to the Authority, Member States shall ensure that all personal data related to that case is anonymised and the Authority shall not process the personal data of individuals concerned by the case at any point in the course of the mediation procedure.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 736 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. Cases in which there are ongoing court proceedings at national or Union level shall not be admissible for mediationassistance by the Authority.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 743 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5
5. Within three months of the conclusion of the mediation by the Authority, the Member States concerned shall report to the Authority on measures they have taken in order to follow-up on it or on the reasons for not taking action in the event that they did not follow-up.deleted
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 749 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6
6. The Authority shall report to the Commission on a quarterly basis about the outcomes of the mediation cases it handles.deleted
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 757 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14
At the request of the national authorities, the Authority may facilitate cooperation between relevant stakeholders in order to address labour market disruptions affecting more than one Member State, such as large-scale restructuring events or major projects impacting employment in border regions.Article 14 deleted Cooperation in case of cross-border labour market disruptions
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 774 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
The Authority shall establish cooperation arrangements with other decentralised Union agencies where appropriate, in order to ensure coordination, promote synergies and avoid duplications in their activities for the sake of resource and cost efficiency.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 785 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The Authority may set up working groups or expert panels with representatives from Member States and/or from the Commission, or external experts following selection procedures, for the fulfilment of its specific tasks or for specific policy areas, including a Mediation Board in order to fulfil its tasks in accordance with Article 13 of this Regulation, and a dedicated group for the purpose of handling financial matters related to the application of Regulations (EC) No 883/2004 and (EC) No 987/2009, as referred to in Article 8(2) of this Regulation.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 825 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4
4. The term of office for members and their alternates shall be four years. That term shall be extendable once only.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 894 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
4. The Stakeholder Group shall be composed of six representatives of Union- level social partners equally representing trade unions and employers organisations, and two representatives of the Commission, and the Union sectoral organisations that participate in the Committee of Experts on Posting of Workers and the European Platform to enhance cooperation in tackling undeclared work.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 970 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49
Regulation (EU) 2016/589
Articles 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 14, 29
[...]deleted
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2018/0040(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The full entry into force of the Union Custom Code will help ensuring harmonised custom controls throughout the Union territory, therefore reducing frauds and port-shopping and should be a priority for the Commission and Member States.
2018/09/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 19 #

2018/0040(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The Commission, after having consulted Member States and economic operators, therefore proposes that work should continue after 31 December 2020 on two groups of systems. A first group consists of existing electronic systems that must be upgraded to take account of certain requirements of the Code, such as the harmonisation of the requirements on data to be input into the systems. This group consists of three trans-European systems (the system dealing with Entry Summary Declarations, the system dealing with external and internal transit and the system dealing with goods taken out of the customs territory of the Union) as well as the National Export System (including the export component of the national Special Procedures System). The second group consists of three new trans-European electronic systems (the systems concerning guarantees for a potential or existing customs debt, the customs status of goods and centralised clearance). The Commission, in partnership with the Member States, hasshould drawn up a detailed timetable with a view to deploying those systems over a period up to the end of 20252. The Commission should also ensure that the delayed activation of those systems does not negatively affect the set- up of other electronic systems by 31 December 2020.
2018/09/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 23 #

2018/0040(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) In line with the new planning for the development of the electronic systems, the period laid down in the Code during which means for the exchange and storage of information, other than the electronic data-processing techniques referred to in Article 6(1) of the Code, may be used on a transitional basis, should also be extended to 20252 as regards those two groups of electronic systems.
2018/09/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 26 #

2018/0040(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 952/2013
Article 278 – paragraph 2
2. Means other than the electronic data-processing techniques referred to in Article 6(1) may be used on a transitional basis, until 31 December 20252 at the latest, where the electronic systems which are necessary for the application of the following provisions of the Code are not yet operational:
2018/09/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 36 #

2017/2277(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas ageing is one of the main European social challenges; whereas there is thus a need for policies to foster active ageing and promote employability, employment and enabling people to stay active for longerit is necessary to review pension systems, since raising the pensionable age is not the right answer to the problem;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2017/2277(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the reintegration of workers into labour markets is also deeply interconnected with the rising incidence of chronic diseases, disabilities and mental health disorders, as well as injuries and illnesses, particularly when it comes to what are considered arduous jobs;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2017/2277(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas many SMEs cannot always afford to invest in sickness and accident prevention with a view to improving health and safety at work;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2017/2277(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that there is a strong case forit essential to improvinge the management of sickness absence in the Member States as well as for making workplaces more adaptable to chronic conditions and disabilities;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2017/2277(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Takes the view that the forthcoming EU Strategic Framework on Health and Safety at Work post 2020 should further prioritise investments through EU funds aimed at prolongmoting healthier working lives and supporting recruitment and return to work;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2017/2277(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Considers that Member States should provide for incentives and rewards in line with the budgetary impact of investments by undertakings in protection and safety at the workplace.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2017/2277(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Encourages Member States to engage fully in the forthcoming 2020-2022 EU-wide campaign on the prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and to find innovative legislative and non- legislative solutions; calls for the active involvement of the Member States in the dissemination of information provided by the EU-OSHA;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 138 #

2017/2277(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the need to ensure specific safeguards on return to work after accident or illness for all categories of workers, including self-employed workers and independent professionals with no protection in such cases;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2017/2277(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Takes the view that the Member States should take a positive and work- oriented approach to workers with disabilities, older workers and those who have suffered an illness, focusing on early evaluation of the individual’s remaining capabilities and the adaptation of the workplace, taking into account the person’s occupational profile and socio-economic situation; encourages Member States to improve provisions in their social security systems that would guarantee adequate support, also during illness, and favour the system of return to work;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 163 #

2017/2277(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Urges the Commission and Member States in this connection to develop innovative solutions such as teleworking and smart working;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that China is a major global trade player and that this could represent a good opportunity for EU businesses, especially in the current context of EU- US trade relation;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 20 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. NotDeplores that EU outward foreign direct investment in China has steadily decreased since 2012, while China’s investment in the EU has grown exponentially over the past years because of the opening of EU market and the lack of a common economic strategy among Member states;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 82 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Expresses concern about the number of restrictions that European companies continue to face in China, especially in sectors covered bythe agriculture and food sectors, welcomes the ‘Made in China 2025 plan and the way it changes Chinese manufacturing and technologies but reminds the importance to reduce government subsidies;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 102 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Notes that the current Geographical indication agreement with China represent a first step in the right direction but reminds the need to further cooperate in the field of SPS measures in order to reduce burdens to EU exporters;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 30 #

2017/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the EU and the US to pool resources to fight unfair trade policies and practices, while respecting the dispute settlement process in the WTO and avoiding unilateral actions; deeply regrets, therefore, the uncertainty in the international trading system caused by the US’s reliance on instruments and policy tools (e.g. Section 232 from 1992, Section 301 from 1974) created before the creation of the WTO and its dispute settlement system and call for the Commission to respond firmly should they be used as a way to curb EU exports;
2018/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 34 #

2017/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Expects the Commission not to negotiate the weakening of EU regulatory framework as a tool to appease tension with the US;
2018/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 7 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that in the post- industrial era far-reaching changes to society and the advanced character of the EU economy, as well as digitalisation, automation and robotisation of the EU labour market, has increased demand for high-level qualifications and skills, while demand for low-level qualifications and skills has decreasedith the result that training has to be geared to highly specialised and creative jobs;
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that skills mismatch and, widening inequalities brought about by austerity policies and non-expansionary economic policies, the hollowing-out of the European manufacturing sector and skills shortages are responsible for both unemployment and unfilled job vacancies3; considers that these worrying phenomena should be tackled by modernising education systems, making education systems cooperate more closely with labour market actors and focusing more on training in soft and transversal skills to accommodate future skills needs; takes the view that social protection systems which provide a guaranteed minimum income for those lacking sufficient resources and promote social inclusion by encouraging people to participate actively in the labour market and society are also essential if these phenomena are to be addressed; __________________ 3 http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/events- and-projects/projects/assisting-eu- countries-skills-matching
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Points out that the skills mismatch can be addressed by means of expansionary economic policies and investments which create large numbers of jobs, for example in the renewables sector and in landscape preservation (hydrogeological instability and earthquake preparedness);
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. In this regard, welcomnotes the Commission communication on ‘A New Skills Agenda for Europe’ (COM(2016)0381), which proposes solutions for skills mismatch and shortages and for finding the right system of skills recognition;
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Emphasises that so-called traditional jobs are certainly not about to disappear and that not investing in them would betray a lack of strategic vision;
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Emphasises that poverty and social exclusion are among the main reasons why pupils drop out of school;
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make vocational and educational training more visible and enhance its quality and attractiveness, and to promote dual education, work-based learning and reality-based learning at every level and form of education, including universities, in order to ensure stronger ties between the education and labour markets; calls for the policy of apprenticeships and entrepreneurship for young people to be developed, to make their entry into the labour market smoother;
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Emphasises that courses which combine periods of classroom study and practical traineeships must on no account give rise to precarious employment or the exploitation of cheap labour; stresses, in that connection, that the traineeship hours should be reduced, made optional and effected only in reputable craft businesses and workshops which are prepared to offer high-quality training;
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2017/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Recalls the importance of life-long learning in developing adult skills and qualifications to ensure people’s active participation in the labour market through upskilling and reskilling and reintegrate the long-term unemployed.
2018/03/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2017/2193(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to conclude and publish as soon as possible its assessments of the potential impact of such a trade deal, with a view to being able to thoroughly evaluate possible gains and losses from the enhancement of the EU- New Zealand trade and investment relationships, in particular to check the market access for EU agriculture products and its volume, for the benefit of citizens, farmers and businesses on both sides, including in the outermost regions and the overseas countries and territories;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 58 #

2017/2193(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Council to authorise the Commission to start negotiations for a trade and investment agreement and an investment protection agreement with New Zealand on the basis of the outcome of the scoping exercise and with clear targets and having consulted the relevant stakeholders on specific sensitive sectors;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 65 #

2017/2193(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the Council to clearly distinguish between an agreement on trade and the liberalisation of foreign direct investment (FDI), only containing issues under EU exclusive competence, and a second agreement on investment protection, including on FDI and non-direct investment, which would be subject to an Investment Court System;deleted
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 75 #

2017/2193(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to conduct negotiations as transparently as possible and fully respect best practice as established in other negotiations; requests that the Council make the negotiating mandate publicwelcomes the Commission decision to release the draft negotiating mandate although believes it should be updated according to the European Parliament requests and taking into account the Brexit;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 104 #

2017/2193(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point a
a) Real market access opportunities for both sides to each other’s goods and services market through the elimination of regulatory barriers: nothing in the agreement however should prevent either side from regulating to achieve legitimate national policy objectives; considering in this respect that no EU trade agreement has ever privatised in public services, such as water, education, health and social services, nor decreased our high European health, food, consumer, environmental, animal welfare, labour and safety standards, nor constrained public funding of the arts, audiovisual and culture, education, and health and social services;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 124 #

2017/2193(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point d
d) A separate chapter taking into account the needs and interests of SMEs with regard to free market access information and facilitation issues in order to generate concrete business opportunities;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 139 #

2017/2193(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point g
g) A balanced outcome in the agriculture and fisheries chapters which gives due consideration to the interests of all European producers and consumers, for instance by introducing appropriate transitional period and effective quotas in the most sensitive sectors; considers that only then can it boost competitiveness and be beneficial to both consumers and producers such as sheepmeat, beef and dairy products; a particular attention should be given to the organic sector and envisages the possibility to have a dedicated part in the market access chapter;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 152 #

2017/2193(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point g a (new)
g a) an easy applicable safeguard clause to better factor in respect for seasonal cycles of production of sensitive agriculture goods in Europe, particularly for sensitive products;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 14 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
G a. Whereas Australia has different procurement legislations, policies and procedures for its federal, state, territory and local governments;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to conclude and publish, as soon as possible, its assessments of the potential impact of such a trade deal, with a view to being able to evaluate thoroughly the possible gains and losses from the enhancement of the EU- Australia trade and investment relationships, in particular to check the market access for EU agriculture products and its possible volume, for the benefit of citizens, farmers and businesses on both sides, including in the outermost regions and the overseas countries and territories having high sensitive local production;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 50 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Council to authorise the Commission to start negotiations for a trade and investment agreement and an investment protection agreement with Australia on the basis of the outcome of the scoping exercises and, with clear targets and having consulted the relevant stakeholders on specific sensitive sectors;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 56 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Welcomes the Commission decision to emphasise that green box payments are not trade distortive and should not be targeted by anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures as it happened for Italian canned tomatoes;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 59 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the Council to clearly distinguish between an agreement on trade and the liberalisation of foreign direct investment (FDI), only containing issues under exclusive EU competence, and a second agreement on investment protection, including on FDI and non-direct investment, which would be subject to an Investment Court System;deleted
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 69 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to conduct negotiations as transparently as possible and fully respecting best practice as established in other negotiations; requests that the Council make the negotiating mandate publicwelcomes the Commission decision to release the draft negotiating mandate although believes it should be updated according to the European Parliament resolution requests and taking into account the Brexit;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 80 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that an FTA must lead to genuine market openness, and trade facilitation on the groundat the customs and on the ground, fair regulatory cooperation and possible sanctions for the disrespect of sustainable development demands;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 84 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Emphasises that an ambitious agreement must address, in a meaningful way, investment, trade in goods and services (drawing on recent Parliament recommendations as regards reservations of policy space and sensitive sectors), e- commerce, public procurement, energy, state-owned enterprises, competition, regulatory issues such as sanitary and phytosanitary barriers, geographical indications, SMEs as well as technology research;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 89 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Stresses the importance to have strong data protection provisions in the text of the agreement;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 102 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point a
a) Real market access opportunities for both sides to each other’s agriculture and manufacturing goods and services market through the elimination of regulatory barriers: nothing in the agreement, however, should prevent either side from regulating to achieve legitimate national policy objectives; considering, in this respect, that no EU trade agreement has ever privatised in public services, such as water, education, health and social services, nor decreased our high European health, food, consumer, environmental, animal welfare, labour and safety standards, nor constrained public funding of the arts and culture, audiovisual, education, and health and social services;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 119 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point c
c) Significant concessions on national and sub-national public procurements guaranteeing market access for European companies in strategic sectors and the same degree of openness as that of the EU’s public procurement markets;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 123 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point d
d) A separate chapter taking into account the needs and interests of SMEs with regard to free market access information and facilitation issues in order to generate concrete business opportunities;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 133 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point e
e) Comprehensive provisions on investment taking into account recent policy developments, such as, for example, the CJEU opinion of 16 May 2017the lack of Australian and EU citizens and businesses interest in the ICS;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 136 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point f
f) Enforceable measures covering the recognition and protection of intellectual property rights, including geographical indications (GIs) for agricultural and foodstuff products, and for wines and spirits; reminds that this is a prerogative for the EU agriculture sector;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 140 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point g
g) A balanced outcome in the agriculture and fisheries chapters which gives due consideration to the interests of all European producers and consumers, for instance by introducing appropriate transitional period and effective quotas in the most sensitive sectors; considers that only then can it boost competitiveness and be beneficial to both consumers and producers such as beef and veal, dairy products, sugar and cereals; reminds the Commission to take account of the current Brexit negotiations when deciding which quotas and what concessions to be offered; a particular attention should be given to the organic sector for which the possibility to have a dedicated part in the market access chapter should be envisaged;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 155 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point g a (new)
g a) Binding Sustainable development chapter raising, in particular, Australia commitments on carbon emissions, solid waste, clean energy, biodiversity conservation and climate change goals;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 158 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point g b (new)
g b) An easy applicable safeguard clause to better factor in respect for seasonal cycles of production of sensitive agriculture goods in Europe, particularly for sensitive products;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 167 #

2017/2192(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Looks forward to the launch of negotiations with Australia and to following them closely and contributing to their successful outcome; reminds the Commission of its obligation to inform Parliament immediately and fully at all stages of the negotiations (both before and after the negotiating rounds); is committed to addressing the legislative and regulatory issues that may arise in the context of the negotiations and the future agreement; reiterates its fundamental responsibility to represent the citizens of the EU, and also looks forward to facilitating inclusive and open discussions during the negotiating process with relevant stakeholders;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 1 #

2017/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas one of the targets of the goal of good health and well-being set out in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is to achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, and safe, effective and affordable medicines and vaccines of good quality for allwhen all too often Member States cut disability-related social benefits and health services, undermining the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities ( UN CRPD ) and further increasing levels of poverty and social exclusion;
2017/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 40 #

2017/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on Member States to refrain from cutting disability-related social benefits, community-based services, health services and training and education programmes that will undermine the UN CRPD and further increase the level of poverty and social exclusion;
2017/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 13 #

2017/2083(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Ca. Whereas the number of young people aged 15-24 in Africa, which is expected to rise to 246 million, will represent a resource economic development all over the continent;
2017/09/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 17 #

2017/2083(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C b (new)
Cb. Whereas fair and responsible trade and investments can help creating the 18 million new jobs per year needed in sub- saharan Africa to absorb the growing labour force;
2017/09/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 38 #

2017/2083(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Commission to support African countries integration in global and regional trade through critical infrastructures building, access to energy, access to financial services and business training;
2017/09/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 51 #

2017/2083(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to help African countries develop and integrate regional value chains to allow different countries to contribute to the production of intermediate and finalised products;
2017/09/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 52 #

2017/2083(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Calls on the Commission to put in place and promote investments in skills development, technical and vocational training and higher university education addressed to the African youth;
2017/09/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 53 #

2017/2083(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Calls for the European Union and African States to work together to develop a strategy to increase Africa's agricultural competitiveness addressing rural development issues, constraints linked to sanitary and phytosanitary measures and access to micro-financing with a view to boosting intra-continental trade in agricultural goods, protecting the livelihoods of small farmer holders and ensuring food security;
2017/09/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 54 #

2017/2083(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the EU to support Africa’s ambitions of creating a genuine intra- African market andand its Member States to support existing regional integration initiatives, including a CFTA, through the tool of Aid for Trade, which should help facilitate the establishment or development of domestic productive capacity, reduce income inequality in Africa and assist with economic diversification and technology transfers; asks the Commission to avoid taking steps which might hinder these ambitions;
2017/09/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 28 #

2017/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the digital economy requires a rules-based framework, including modern trade rules which can reconcile the rapid changes in the market with the rights of consumers;
2017/10/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 54 #

2017/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas private companies are increasingly setting norms and standards in the digital economy, which will have a direct impact on citizens and consumers, as well as on domestic and international trade;
2017/10/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 59 #

2017/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas in recent years various companies operating on the digital market have often exploited differences in taxation in the European Union in order to avoid taxation of their profits in the Member States where they have in reality been generated;
2017/10/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 61 #

2017/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H b (new)
Hb. whereas in the digital single market threats are on the increase, and whereas cybersecurity is vital in order to create a legal and secure environment for digital trade;
2017/10/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 64 #

2017/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H c (new)
Hc. whereas digital trade must also aim to promote the growth of SMEs and start-ups, and not only of multinationals;
2017/10/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 66 #

2017/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that the EU, as a community of values and the world’s biggest exporter of services, should set the standards in international rules and agreements on digital trade flows based on threefour elements: (1) ensuring market access for digital goods and services in third countries, (2) ensuring that trade rules create tangible benefits for consumers and (3) promoting respect for fundamental rightstransparency regarding what is being offered, (3) promoting respect for fundamental rights and (4) ensuring that the digital single market and trade that is conducted in and through it avoid, in so far as possible, the spread of commercial practices that are unfair (such as fraud or counterfeiting), illegal (the deep web, trafficking in arms or drugs) or may finance terrorism or other associated forms of trade;
2017/10/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 78 #

2017/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Considers that reducing transaction costs (such as commission, additional charges, direct or indirect fees or similar practices) is vital as a way of promoting the development of digital trade, ensuring the transparency of transactions and genuinely improving consumer choice;
2017/10/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 96 #

2017/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that the ability to access, collect, process and transfer data has become a prerequisite for every type of company that delivers goods and services internationally, but that all these operations require a good deal of attention from the point of view of privacy and security, particularly in the case of sensitive data; expresses its concern that users should be informed transparently both about the way in which the data are stored or processed and whether they are sold to third parties, to enable users to give their explicit consent to the processing of their personal data;
2017/10/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 109 #

2017/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to draw up ambitious rules for cross-border data transfers, including through FTAs, in full compliance with, and without prejudice to, the EU’s security, data protection and privacy rules, with particular reference to sensitive data;
2017/10/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 165 #

2017/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission to encourage signatories of trade agreements to bring pressure to bear on mobile providers to make both international roaming fees and the fees applied to international calls and messages transparent, fair, reasonable and consumer- oriented; calls on the Commission to support policies that promote cost-oriented retail prices for roaming services with a view to reducing prices, promoting transparency and preventing commercial practices that are unfair or at all events negative from the point of view of consumers;
2017/10/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 176 #

2017/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Strongly supports the further mainstreaming of digital technologies and services in the EU’s development policy; calls on the Commission to stimulate public-private partnerships to increase investments in digital infrastructure in the Global South; urges the Commission to make investments in broadband infrastructure in developing countries conditional upon respect for a free, open and secure internet; calls on the Commission to use trade agreements to improve digital rights; reiterates that digital trade could also be a resource for public administrations and thus support the development of e-government;
2017/10/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 179 #

2017/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Stresses that the development potential of digital trade and the scope for increases in it must not reduce the tax burden on companies operating in this domain; calls on the Commission to assess whether businesses which provide comparable services in the traditional economy and on online platforms can be subject to similar tax obligations, and is convinced that profits should be taxed in the Member State in which the economic activity takes place and profits are generated;
2017/10/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 183 #

2017/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Recalls the need to develop adequate solutions, policies and infrastructure to promote mobile internet access in order to rein in costs to consumers and at the same time allow as many people as possible access to the benefits of the digital market, including from mobile devices;
2017/10/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 185 #

2017/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20c. Considers that the fight against internet fraud and online counterfeiting should be important priorities for the harmonious development of digital trade, and that the Commission should encourage cooperation between the Member States in this area;
2017/10/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 9 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the financial and economic crisis caused the youth unemployment rate to rise from 15 % in 2008 to a peak of 24 % in early 2013, with this average rate masking huge divergences across Member States and regions; whereas youth unemployment rates in 2013 stayed close to 10 % in Germany, Austria and the Netherlands while peaking at close to or well over 40 % in Italy, Spain, Croatia and Greece; whereas, moreover, the unemployment rates of young people not in education, employment or training (NEETs) have reached alarming levels;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas mobility has added value only if it is pursued on a voluntary basis and not when it is dictated by a lack of professional opportunities in one’s home country;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas, having peaked at 24 % in 2013, the youth unemployment rate in the EU-28 has steadily dropped, reaching below 17 % in 2017;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas a quick mobilisation of funds was sought by frontloading the YEI budget for 2014 and 2015, a decision taken belatedly since the crisis had already begun in 2008 and its effects ought to have been anticipated;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas the YG is designed to achieve the sustainable integration of NEETs into the labour market by offering an individualised approach, leading to a good-quality offer and enhancing young people’s employabilityment, while in a broader context helping to address skills mismatches on the (regional) labour market;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas in 2015 the International Labour Organisation (ILO) estimated the cost of implementing the YG throughout the EU-28 to be EUR 45 billion; whereas the YEI for the 2014-2020 programming period was endowed with a modest budget of EUR 6.4 billion, with the aim of complementing national funding and not replacing it- resources which in any case should be used in an effective and targeted manner in order to optimise the results for which they are allocated;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas in its recently published second Special report on the YEI and the YG, conducted on the basis of a seven Member State sample, the ECA voiced concerns that limited progress had been made with YG implementation, with results falling far short of initial expectations;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. NoteRegrets the significant divergence in economic performance in terms of both economic and employment growth across the EU-28; urgdeplores the Member States that continue to lag behEU economic policies which impose upon Member States austerity and constraints, which are leadindg to implement the necessary structural reforms in order to catch up with other EU economiesa progressive impoverishment of citizens, an increase in unemployment - particularly youth unemployment - and the dismantling of the welfare state; notes that it is sound and expansive economic policies, which are ultimately a Member State responsibility, that create jobs;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that the YEI aims to complement national funding and not to replace it; stresses that the YEI budget cannot and was never meant to shoulder on its own the ambition of offering all young people a good-quality offer within a period of four months of becoming unemployed or leaving formal education;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need for the YEI to be a driver for policy reform in particular and for better coordination in the fields of employment and education, especially in those Member States experiencing high rates of youth unemployment, with a view to ensuring that those Member States introduce integrated, comprehensive and long-term approaches to tackling youth unemployment which enhance the employabilityment of young people and lead to sustainable employment, as opposed to having a range of fragmented (existing) policies, which often target NEETs who are relatively easy to integrate anyway;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Takes the view that in order to be truly effective, the strategy to be adopted in order to boost youth employment should provide for round-table discussions involving those concerned, while assessing the territorial context in which it will have to be applied and providing for targeted training that is able to meet the needs of businesses whilst balancing them with the aspirations and skills of young people; the same strategy should ensure high-quality training and total transparency in the allocation of funding to training agencies, including through careful monitoring of its use;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on Member States to take all necessary precautions to avert the danger that work placements and the instruments made available by the YG might be used improperly to bypass the issue of illegal undeclared work;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 195 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for a discussion about the future status of the YEI which does not question its continuation but addresses the question of transforming it from a crisis instrument into a more permanent, main EU financing instrument for tackling youth unemployment, and which establishes a co- financing requirement in order to underline the primary responsibility of the Member States; points out, moreover, that to make this instrument into a structural measure, all the weak points and errors still contained therein need to be remedied;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 199 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that ongoing efforts to tackle youth unemployment and increase YEI funding are highly necessary, though insufficient;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2017/2036(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges that EU-Cuban relations, especially in the area of bilateral trade, take a new start with the signing of the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (PDCA), which can provide new possibilities and commitments for both signatorWelcomes the inclusion in the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (PDCA) of a chapter in trade and trade cooperation aiming to create a more predictable and transparent environment for local and European economic operators, increasing their economic capacity to follow Cuban development path and create new jobs and opportunities;.
2017/05/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 30 #

2017/2036(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the need to modernisze the Cuban economic system with regard to trade liberaliszation, foreign direct investment, diversification of exports mainly in infrastructures and agro-food industry, foreign direct investment mainly in tourism sector, economic and financial investments, and transactions, technological innovation and overall market freedoms; emphasises the importance of the cuentapropistas, and of private initiatives, for the Cuban economy and agricultural sector to support micro and small enterprises;
2017/05/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 33 #

2017/2036(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Deplores the decision to classify Cuba as an Upper-Middle-Income Country and calls on the Commission to explore the possibility to grant EU's Generalised Scheme of Preferences to Cuba in order to support sensitive exports to the EU;
2017/05/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2017/2036(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Emphasises the need of diversification of exports from Cuba beyond the traditional products and asks the Commission to create ad-hoc trade desks in order to exchange practices and provide Cuban exporters with the necessary knowledge to improve the access of goods onto the EU market;
2017/05/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 47 #

2017/2036(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Strongly calls on Cuba to ratify and comply with the regulations of the International Labour Organization (ILO), and to proscribe all forms of labour exploitation, in particular wage confiscation; is highly concerned about Welcomes Cuba decision to ratify in 2015 last fundamental International Labour Organization (ILO) Conventions (n.182) and asks for further current situation of workers in Cuba and the breach of WTO and ILO convenommitments regarding their implementations;
2017/05/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 50 #

2017/2036(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the role of the World Customs Organization (WCO) providing strategic support to the Cuban Aduanas General de la República (AGR) under the Mercator Programme in order to evaluate preparedness for implementing the WTO TFA. Stresses the importance for AGR to be pro-active in the implementation of the TFA and asks the Commission to assist Cuba in this process;
2017/05/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 6 #

2017/2035(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. Notes that the EU is Kazakhstan’s main trade and investment partner and that bilateral trade has slowed considerably over the past years; believes that economic diversification, liberalisation, investments in sustainable development, tackling corruption and opening up to foreign direct investment (FDI) could be important means to further develop and strengthen trade and economic relations; calls on the Commission to assist the Kazakh authorities in implementing the EPCA effectively in these fields; notes that regulatory approximation is an important enabler to facilitate the development of bilateral trade relations;
2017/09/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 7 #

2017/2035(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. Notes that the EU is Kazakhstan’s main trade and investment partner and that bilateral trade has slowed considerably over the past years; believes that economic diversification, liberalisation, investments in research, education, vocational training and sustainable development, tackling corruption and opening up to foreign direct investment (FDI) could be important means to further develop and strengthen trade and economic relations; calls on the Commission to assist the Kazakh authorities in implementing the EPCA effectively in these fields;
2017/09/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2017/2035(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital G
G. Calls on the Council and the Commission to use the EU’s leverage to pressure and assist the Kazakh authorities to implement the core ILO conventions effectively and to ensure respect for human rights, good governance, the rule of law and the role of trade unions.
2017/09/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 40 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas greater international competition has not proven to reduce the scope for employers to discriminate against female workers;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 52 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas country-specific and sector-specific assessments are of great importance; whereas women tend to be more concentrated in low-wage, or low- status forms of formal and informal employment than men, leading to abuses on the workplace, gender segregation in types of occupations and activities and gender gaps in wages and working conditions;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 59 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas, especially in the textile sector in development countries, women are almost totally employed in low-level positions and seldom occupy middle and upper level ones;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 107 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas gender issues and women rights are not sufficiently taken into account by the sustainable impact assessments of trade agreements;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 108 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas studies have shown that women are more likely to participate to international trade as wage workers than as self-employed workers;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 198 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines that the same risks may equally come from a Multilateral Investment Court;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 231 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Asks the Commission to invest in professional training for women working in development countries;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 281 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Believes that sustainable impact assessment should estimate the impact of trade agreements on women in each sector of the economy by means of, among others, gender-disaggregated statistics;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 282 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Calls on the Commission to promote female entrepreneurship in developing countries, focusing especially in those where women, compared to men, face greater constraints in access to credit, infrastructure and productive assets;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 335 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls for the Commission to help set up partnerships between female entrepreneurs in the EU and their counterparts in developing countries;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 13 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas most global companies which are valued at more than USD 1 billion are listed platform companies;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas all collaborative economies are identified by resource sharing, the active empowerment of citizens, innovation and the intensive use of information and communication technologies (ICTs);
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes the need to ensure that self- employed workers and professionals who work for platform companies receive professional-level pay and certain time frames for payment;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls on the Commission and on Member States to open up non-exclusive, experimentation-oriented spaces for collaborative economies while fostering digital connectivity and literacy;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the need to ensure adequate social security for self-employed workers, who are key players in the digital labour market; stresses, safety guarantees for the customers of collaborative economies and cohabitation synergies with traditional business models; stresses, in addition, that freedom of association and collective action are fundamental rights which must apply to all workers;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for, with particular reference to working conditions and labour costs, regarding both employees and the self- employed, the adoption and immediate implementation of rules which ensure a level playing field, including anti- dumping measures, between platform companies based in non-EU countries and traditional companies based in the Member States;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Stresses the importance of teleworking and smartworking in connection with the collaborative economy and advocates, in this regard, the need to place these ways of working on an equal footing with traditional ones;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the need to adopt and implement specific, more effective anti tax avoidance rules for platform companies which provide services and/or sell goods on the territory of the European Union;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines that constant accessibility represents a serious health and safety risk in the platform economin the platform economy, ‘value is produced by interaction rather than hours of presence’ and constant accessibility represents a serious risk to ‘well-being’ and to health and safety; advocates the establishment of a ‘right to log off’.
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 a (new)
- having regard to the references made to digital skills in the Commission communication of 18 April 2016 entitled 'Digitising European Industry',
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 21 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 a (new)
- having regard to European Economic and Social Committee opinion SOC/546 of 22 February 2017,
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 71 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas according to the latest PIAAC study by the OECD, about 70 million Europeans lack basic skills such as reading, writing and numeracy, which represents an obstacle to those people finding a decent job and living standard; whereas, furthermore, more than 20% do not know how to work on a computer;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 72 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas more than 30% of highly qualified young people are in jobs that do not match their skills and aspirations, while 40% of European employers say they are unable to find people with the skills they require in order to grow and innovate;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 154 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Member States to address the issue of population ageing by encouraging the development of skills of relevance to health, well-being and sickness prevention;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 162 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Believes that coordinated action is required in order to counter the ‘brain drain’ by identifying appropriate means of making use of the skills available, with a view to guarding against the loss of human capital by Member States;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 240 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Believes that, in order to anticipate future skills needs, social partners, and education and training, providers must be strongly involved at all levels, in particular in designing, implementing and evaluating vocational qualification programmes, which provide an real and effective transition from formal education to work- based learning;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 300 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Points to the need to identify the skills required for new-technology jobs and promote the acquisition of the digital skills sought by mid-cap, micro, small and medium-sized businesses; draws attention in particular to the fact that, in the digital era, the acquisition of skills takes place in a context of swift change that can destabilise jobs markets and to the consequent need for lifelong learning to help people adjust to change;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 367 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Reiterates the importance of vocational education and training (VET) for enhancing employability and clearing the pathway to professional qualifications for young people; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that VET is made more relevant and is tailored to labour market needs by making them an integral part of the education system, and to guarantee high qualification standards and quality assurance in this regard and thus avoid the sort of distortions that have occurred in connection with the Youth Guarantee scheme;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 460 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Is of the opinion that the proposed ‘up-skilling pathways’ will make a tangible difference only if lessons - including in some cases negative ones - are learned from the implementation of the Youth Guarantee;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 499 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 a (new)
40a. Calls on the Commission to take action to harmonise qualifications and promote uniform recognition in the various Member States of skills that have been acquired;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 179 #

2017/0354(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Where a competent authority of a Member State has reasonable doubts as regards goods which the economic operator claims are lawfully marketed in another Member State, the competent authority shall contact the competent authority of the other Member State and the relevant economic operator without delay and shall carry out an assessment of the goods.
2018/05/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 214 #

2017/0354(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. This Article applies if an economic operator affected by an administrative decision has submitted the decision to the Internal Market Problem Solving Network (SOLVIT) and, during the SOLVIT procedure, the Home Centre, the Lead Centre or the economic operator asks the Commission to give an opinion to assist in solving the case, after the economic operator affected has been informed by SOLVIT whether or not the case falls within its remit.
2018/05/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 219 #

2017/0354(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall, within three monthen weeks of receipt of the request referred to in paragraph 1, enter into communication with the relevant economic operator or operators and the competent authorities who took the administrative decision in order to assess the compatibility of the administrative decision with the principle of mutual recognition and this Regulation.
2018/05/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 229 #

2017/0354(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. Following completion of its assessmentWithin two months of receipt of the request referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission mayshall issue an opinion identifying concerns that should, in its view, be addressed in the SOLVIT case and, where appropriate, making recommendations to assist in solving the case.
2018/05/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 235 #

2017/0354(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission's opinion shall be sent to the supervisory authorities and all interested parties, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 11 and in compliance with Regulation 765/2008, and considered during the SOLVIT procedure referred to in paragraph 1.
2018/05/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 251 #

2017/0354(COD)

1. The Union mayshall finance the following activities in support of this Regulation:
2018/05/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 138 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) This Regulation should cover products that are subject to the Union harmonisation legislation listed in the Annex. The legislation listed in the Annex should cover all Union harmonisation legislation concerning manufactured products other than food, feed, medicinal products for human and veterinary use, living plants and animals, products of human origin and products of plants and animals relating directly to their future reproduction. This will ensure a uniform framework for market surveillance of those products at Union level. Several instruments of Union harmonisation legislation on products need to be amended in consequence, in particular to remove references to certain provisions of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008. If new Union harmonisation legislation is adopted in the future, it will be for that legislation to provide whether this Regulation is also to apply to that legislationall products marketed in the Union. This will ensure a uniform framework for market surveillance of those products at Union level.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 153 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) Ensuring product identification and traceability throughout the entire supply chain will help to identify economic operators and to take effective corrective measures against unsafe products, such as targeted recalls. Product identification and traceability will thus ensure that consumers and economic operators obtain accurate information regarding unsafe products, which will enhance confidence in the market and avoid disrupting trade unnecessarily. Products should therefore bear information enabling them, their manufacturer and, where applicable, their importer to be identified. Manufacturers should also produce technical documentation regarding their products, for which they may choose the most appropriate and cost-efficient form, for example electronic form. Moreover, economic operators must be able to identify the operators who supplied them with a product and those to whom one of their products has been supplied.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 154 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 b (new)
(14b) The indication of origin is additional to the basic traceability requirements concerning the name and address of the manufacturer. In particular, the indication of the country of origin helps to identify the actual place of manufacture if the manufacturer cannot be traced or if the address supplied is different from that of the actual place of manufacture. This information can facilitate the task of the market surveillance authorities in identifying the actual place of manufacture and makes it possible to contact the authorities of the country of origin in the framework of bilateral or multilateral cooperation on consumer product safety with a view to appropriate subsequent monitoring.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 174 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation lays down rules and procedures for the provision of compliance information about certain products that are the subject of Union acts harmonising the conditions for the marketing of those productson the compliance of products marketed in the European Union. It establishes a framework for cooperation with economic operators in relation to such products.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 178 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
It is intended to ensure that only safe and compliant products are placed on the market and also provides a framework for the market surveillance of such products to ensure that those products fulfil requirements providing a high level of protection of public interests such as health and safety in general, health and safety in the workplace, the protection of consumers, protection of the environment and security.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 182 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation applies to all products that are subject to the Union harmonisation legislation set out in the Annex to this Regulation (‘Union harmonisation legislation’)marketed in the European Union.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 225 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. The identity and contact details of the manufacturer and the person responsible for compliance information with respect to the product shall be indicated on or identifiable from information indicated on the product, its packaging, the parcel or an accompanying document.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 231 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4a Traceability of products 1. The Commission may stipulate that economic operators should establish, or join, a traceability system for certain products, product groups and product categories they have placed on the market or made available there which may pose a serious risk to the safety and health of persons due to their specific characteristics or specific conditions of distribution or use. 2. The traceability system shall entail the collection and storage of electronic data enabling a product and the economic operators in the supply chain to be identified, as well as the placing on the product, its packaging or its accompanying documents of a unique barcode, hologram, chip or other data carrier enabling access to that data.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 234 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 b (new)
Article 4b Indication of origin 1. Manufacturers and importers shall ensure that products bear an indication of the country of origin of the product or, where the size or nature of the product does not allow it, that indication is to be provided on the packaging or in a document accompanying the product. 2. For the purpose of identifying the country of origin referred to in paragraph 1, the non-preferential origin rules set out in Articles 60 to 63 of Regulation (EEC) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code shall apply. 3. Where the country of origin referred to in paragraph 2 is a Member State of the Union, manufacturers and importers may refer to the Union or to a particular Member State.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 249 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7
Compliance partnership arrangements 1. A market surveillance authority may enter into a partnership arrangement with an economic operator established in its territory under which the authority agrees to provide the economic operator with advice and guidance in relation to the Union harmonisation legislation applicable to the products for which the economic operator is responsible. The arrangement shall not cover the provision of conformity assessment activities that are entrusted to notified bodies under the Union harmonisation legislation. 2. If a market surveillance authority enters into a partnership arrangement under paragraph 1, it shall enter that fact in the system referred to in Article 34, along with details of the scope of the arrangement and the names and addresses of itself and of the economic operator. 3. If a market surveillance authority enters into a partnership arrangement under paragraph 1, other market surveillance authorities shall inform that authority of any temporary measure taken by them against the economic operator, and any corrective action taken by the economic operator, in relation to compliance with the applicable Union harmonisation legislation. 4. A market surveillance authority that enters into a partnership arrangement under paragraph 1 may charge the economic operator fees representing the costs reasonably incurred by the authority in the exercise of its functions under paragraphs 1 and 2.Article 7 deleted
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 274 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Consumers must be informed, through an online portal, of rights relating to non-compliant products which they have acquired, such as the right to obtain a replacement for a product or to receive compensation, the right of recourse and contacts from which all appropriate information can be obtained.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 280 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) procedures for monitoring any accidents or any harm to the health or safety of end-users which are suspected of having been caused by such products. The data collected on such accidents or harm should be stored in a European database developed by the Commission;
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 293 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that their market surveillance authorities and single liaison office have the necessary resources, including sufficient budgetary and other resources, such as staffing resources, expertise, procedures and other arrangements for the proper performance of their duties.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 305 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Market surveillance authorities shall perform controls as part of their activities set out in paragraph 1, on a risk- based approach, taking into account the precautionary principle and, as a minimum, the following factors:
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 341 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall draw up a national market surveillance strategy, as a minimum, every 3 years. The strategy shall promote a consistent, comprehensive and integrated approach to market surveillance and enforcement of Union harmonisation legislation within the territory of the Member State, including market surveillance of products sold on line, and shall include all sectors and stages of the product supply chain, including imports and digital supply chains.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 346 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) the sectors prioritised for the surveillance of products sold online, such as training of staff in online investigations, the establishment of contact points for cooperation with the largest sales platforms and social media, and cooperation with providers of services in return for payment;
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 354 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall confer on their market surveillance authorities the powers of market surveillance, including the market surveillance of products sold online, investigation and enforcement necessary for the application of this Regulation and for the application of the Union harmonisation legislation set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 375 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point g
(g) the power to purchase products as test purchases, including on line and under a cover identity, in order to detect non- compliance and obtain evidence;
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 400 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Market surveillance authorities shall perform appropriate checks on the characteristics of products on an adequate scale, by means of documentary checks and, where appropriate, physical and laboratory controls on the basis of a representative sample that takes due account of the priorities set by the Union Product Compliance Network .
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 420 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Market surveillance authorities shall take measures without delay to recall or withdraw products which present a serious risk or to prohibit the making available of them on the market. They shall inform the Commission of such measures without delay, in accordance with Article 19.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 447 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. At the request of an applicant authority, the requested authority shall supply within 30 days any information that the requested authority deems relevant to establish whether a product is non- compliant and to ensure that the non- compliance can be brought to an end.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 451 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4
4. The requested authority shall reply to the request under paragraph 1 using the procedure and within the time limits specified by the Commission under paragraph 5.deleted
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 453 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the time limits, standard forms and further details of the procedure to be used for making and responding to requests for information under paragraph 1. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 63.deleted
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 470 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
The Commission must ensure that the number of checks carried out and the checking techniques used in the Union are uniform at every customs office.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 472 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3
3. Products subject to Union harmonisation legislation that are to be placed under the customs procedure ‘release for free circulation’ shall be subject to controls performed by the authorities designated under paragraph 1. They shall perform those controls in a uniform manner at every point of entry into the Union on the basis of risk analysis in accordance with Articles 46 and 47 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 477 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) type of check carried out;
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 479 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall draw up a report each year by 30 June, containing the information submitted by the Member States for the previous calendar year, including a comparative analysis of customs operations and enforcement procedures in force in the Member States. The report shall be published in the system referred to in Article 34.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 486 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the identityname, registered trade name or registered trade mark and the contact details, including the postal address, of a person responsible for compliance information with respect to the product is not indicated or identifiable in accordance with Article 4(5);
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 502 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 3
3. Market surveillance authorities and the customs authorities shall exchange information on the type of customs checks performed, the status of the authorised economic operators and their record of compliance related to product safety. The information exchanged shall also be communicated, where appropriate, to the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF).
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 514 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission mayust attend the meetings of the administrative coordination groups.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 515 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. The Commission shall ensure that requirements relating to cooperation between surveillance authorities are complied with and that authorities take account of reports from stakeholders concerning cases of non- compliance.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 525 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall develop and maintain an information and communication system for the collection and storage of information, in a structured form, on issues relating to the enforcement of Union harmonisation legislation. The Commission, single liaison offices, and authorities designated in accordance with Article 26(1) shall have access to that system. The results of market surveillance checks, including detailed information on non-compliant products, the economic operators responsible and the penalties imposed, shall be published in a European database developed by the Commission.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 549 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the financial situation of small and medium-sized enterprises;deleted
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 560 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 62 – paragraph 1
By [31 December 2024] and every fivthree years thereafter, the Commission shall shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation against the objectives it pursues and present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the European Economic and Social Committee..
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 563 #

2017/0353(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 62 – paragraph 2
The report shall assess whether this Regulation achieved its objectives, in particular with regard to reducing the number of non-compliant products on the Union market, ensuring effective and efficient enforcement of Union harmonisation legislation within the Union, improving cooperation between competent authorities and strengthening the controls on products entering the Union market, whilst taking into account the impact on business and in particular on small and medium-sized enterprises. In addition, the evaluation should also assess the effectiveness of the market surveillance activities that receive Union financing in the light of the requirements of Union policies and legislation and the ability to ensure a high level of compliance and safety of related products and of products with integrated artificial intelligence systems.
2018/05/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 37 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Draft legislative resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A8-0205/2015),
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Draft legislative resolution
Citation 4 b (new)
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A8-0247/2016),
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) The Council has chosen not to take into consideration the clear and explicit guidance provided by Parliament in 2015 and 2016 on the proposal for a Council decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States, weakening cooperation between the Union institutions and thus strengthening the 'democratic deficit' as far as citizens are concerned.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1
(1) Member States and the Union are to work towards developing adevelop an effective and coordinated strategy for employment and particularly for promoting a skilled, trained and adaptable workforce and labour markets responsive to economicn inclusive labour market and a skilled and trained workforce responsive to economic, social and environmental change, and with a view to achieving the objectives of full employment and social progress objectives set out in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union. Member States, taking into account national practices related to the responsibilities of management and labour, are to regard promoting employment as a matter of common concern and coordinate their action in this respect within the Council.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
(2) The Union is to combat all forms of poverty, social exclusion and discrimination and promote social justice and protection, as well as equality between women and men. In defining and implementing its policies and activities, the Union is to take into account requirements linked to the promotion of a high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against poverty and social exclusion, and a high level of education and training.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 3
(3) In accordance with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Union has developed and implemented policy coordination instruments for fiscal, macroeconomic and structural policies that have had adverse effects in certain Member States, resulting in insecurity, poverty and inequality. As part of these instruments, the present Guidelines for the Employment Policies of the Member States, together with the Broad Guidelines for the Economic Policies of the Member States and of the Union set out in Council Recommendation (EU) 2015/1184, form the Integrated Guidelines for Implementing the Europe 2020 strategy. They are to guide policy implementation in the Member States and in the Union, reflecting the interdependence between the Member States. The resulting set of coordinated European and nationalobjective is to implement socially responsible policies and reforms are to constitute, so as to obtain an appropriate overall economic and social policy mix which should achieveith positive spill-over effects for all Member States.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
(4) The Guidelines for the Employment Policies are consistent with the Stability and Growth PactEuropean Pillar of Social Rights, the existing European Union legislation and various EU initiatives, including the Council recommendation on establishing a Youth Guarantee1, the Council Recommendation on the integration of the long-term unemployed into the labour market2, the Council Recommendation on Upskilling Pathways3 and the proposal for a Council Recommendation on a European Framework for Quality and Effective Apprenticeships4. _________________ 1 2 3OJ C 120, 26.4.2013, p. 1. OJ C 120, 26.4.2013, p. 1. 2 OJ C 67, 20.2.2016, p. 1. OJ C 67, 20.2.2016, p. 1. 3 OJ C 484, 24.12.2016, p. 1. OJ C 484, 24.12.2016, p. 1. 4 COM/2017/0563 final – 2017/0244 (NLE).
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) To ensure a more democratic decision making on the integrated guidelines, which affect the citizens and labour markets across the Union, it is important that both the employment guidelines and the broad economic guidelines are decided upon by the European Parliament and the Council.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
(5) The European Semester combines the different instruments in an overarching framework for integrated multilateral surveillance of economic, budgetary, employment and social policies and aims to achieve the Europe 2020 targets, including those concerning employment, education and poverty reduction, as set out in Council Decision 2010/707/EU5. Since 2015, the European Semester has been continuously reinforced and streamlined, notablyimproved in order to strengthen its employment and social focus and to facilitate more dialogue with the Member States, social partners and representatives of civil society. _________________ 5However, much still remains to be done to achieve the goals set for it. _________________ 5 OJ L 308, 24.11.2010, p. 46. OJ L 308, 24.11.2010, p. 46.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 6
(6) The European Union’s recovery from the economic crisis is supporting positive labour market trends, but important challenges and disparities in economic and social performance remain between and within Member States. The crisis underscored the close interdependence of the Member States' economies and labour markets. Ensuring that the Union progresses to a state of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and, accompanied by sustainable and quality job creation is the key challenge faced today. This requires coordinated, ambitious and effective policy action at both Union and national levels, in accordance with the TFEU and the Union's provisions on economic governance. Combining supply- and demand-side measures, such policy action should encompass a boost to investment, especially in the circular economy and the green economy, a renewed commitment to appropriately sequenced structuralocially responsible reforms that improve productivity, growth performance, social cohesion and economic resilience in the face of shocks and the exercise of fiscal responsibility, while taking into account their employment and social impact.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 7
(7) Reforms to the labour market, including the national wage-setting mechanisms, should follow national practices of social dialogue and allow the necessary opportunity for a broad consideration of socioeconomic issues, including improvements in competitiveness, sustainable and quality job creation, life-long learning and training policies as well as real incomes.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 12
(12) The Employment Committee and the Social Protection Committee should monitor how the relevant policies are implemented in the light of the guidelines for employment policies, in line with their respective Treaty-based mandates. These committees and other Council preparatory bodies involved in the coordination of economic and social policies should work together closely, with the European Parliament to ensure democratic accountability.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part 1 – paragraph 1
Member States should facilitate the creation of sustainable quality jobs, including by reducing the bureaucratic barriers that businesses face in hiring people, by promoting entrepreneurship and self-employment and, in particular, by supporting the creation and growth of micro and small enterprises. Member States should actively promote the social economy and the green economy and the circular economy and foster social innovation.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Member States should cut red tape in order to ease the burden on small and medium-sized enterprises, as they contribute significantly to job creation.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part 1 – paragraph 3
The tax burden should be shifted away from labour toMember States should endeavour to reduce the tax burden on labour, in favour of other sources of taxation that are less detrimental to employment and growth such as fossil fuels taxation, for example, taking account of the redistributive effect of the tax system, while protecting revenue for adequate social protection and growth- enhancing expenditure, including investment in public services.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part 2 – paragraph 1
In the context of technological, environmental and demographic change, Member States, in cooperation with social partners, should promote productivity and employability through an appropriate supply of relevant knowledge, cross- cutting skills and competences throughout people's working lives, responding to current and future labour market needs. Member States should make the necessary investment in both initial and continuing education and training, including non- formal and informal learning. They should work together with social partners, education and training providers and other stakeholders to address structural weaknesses in education and training systems, to provide innovative, quality and inclusive education, training and life-long learning. They should ensure the transfer of training entitlements during professional transitions. This should allow everyone better to anticipate and adapt to labour market needs and successfully manage transitions, thus strengthening the overall resilience of the economy to shocks.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part 2 – paragraph 4
Tax reforms to shift taxes away from labour should aim to remove barriers and disexcessive bureaucracy and provide incentives tofor participation in the labour market, in particular for those furthest away from the labour market. Member States should support an adapted work environment for people with disabilities, including targeted financial support actions and services that enable them to participate in the labour market and in society.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part 2 – paragraph 5
Barriers to participation and career progression should be eliminated to ensure gender equality and increased labour market participation of women, including through equal pay for equal work. The reconciliation of work and family life should be promotguaranteed, in particular through access to long-term care and affordable qualityaffordable quality services, such as long-term care and early childhood education and care. Member States should ensure that parents and other people with caring responsibilities have access to suitable family leaves and flexible working arrangements, such as teleworking and smart working, in order to balance work and private life, and promote a balanced use of these entitlements between women and men.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 139 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part 3 – paragraph 3
Member States should provide the unemployed with adequate unemployment benefits of reasonable durationsufficient duration to enable recipients to find a new job, in line with their contributions and national eligibility rules. Such benefits should not constitute a disincentive to a quickbe accompanied by incentives for a swift return to quality employment.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part 3 – paragraph 4
The mobility of learners and workers should be promotedensured as a fundamental right and as a matter of free choice with the aim of enhancing employability skills and exploiting the full potential of the European labour market. Barriers to mobility in education and training, in occupational and personal pensions and in the effective recognition of qualifications and skills should be removed. Member States should take action to ensure that administrative procedures are not a blocking or complicating factor for workers from other Member States in taking up active employment. Member States should also prevent abuses of the existing rules and address potential ‘brain drain’ from certain regions.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 154 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part 4 – paragraph 1
Member States should combat all forms of discrimination and promote inclusive labour markets, open to all, by putting in place effective measures to promote equal opportunities for under-represented groups in the labour market. They should ensure equal treatment regarding employment, social protection, education and access to goods and services, regardless of gender, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part 4 – paragraph 2
Member States should modernisimprove social protection systems to provide effective, efficient and adequate social protection throughout all stages of an individual's life, fostering social inclusion and upward social mobility, incentivising labour market participation and addressing inequalities, including through the design of their tax and benefit systems. The improvement and modernisation of social protection systems should lead to better accessibility, sustainability, adequacy and quality.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 172 #

2017/0305(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part 4 – paragraph 6
In a context of increasing longevity and demographic change, Member States should secure the sustainability and adequacy of pension systems for women and men, providing equal opportunities for workers and the self-employed, of both sexes, to acquire pension rights, including through supplementary schemes to ensure living in dignity. Pension reforms should not be supported by measures that extend working lives and subsequently raise the effective retirement age, such as limiting early exit from the labour market and increasing the statutory retirement age to reflect life expectancy gai. It is necessary to give workers greater freedom of choice, within certain limits, regarding age and seniority in employment to be reached before retirement, encouraging an intergenerational handover to a younger intake as a means of reducing working hours for those who are close to retirement. This provides a way of encouraging youth employment, while preparing older workers for retirement and ensuring a transfer of knowledge and experience between generations. Members States should establish a constructive dialogue with the relevant stakeholders, and allow an appropriate phasing in of the reforms.
2018/03/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) Foreign direct investment contributes to the Union's growth, by enhancing its competitiveness, creating and maintaining jobs and economies of scale, bringing in capital, technologies, innovation, expertise, and by opening new markets for the Union's exports and guaranteeing reciprocity. It supports the objectives of the Commission's Investment Plan for Europe and contributes to other Union projects and programmes.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 83 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Pursuant to the international commitments undertaken in the World Trade Organisation, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, and in the trade and investment agreements concluded with third countries, the Union and Members States may adopt restrictive measures relating to foreign direct investment on the grounds of securityeconomic security and Union security, defence or public order, subject to certain requirements.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 87 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Several Member States have put in place measures according to which they may restrict the movement of capital between Member States and between Member States and third countries on grounds of public policy or public security. Those measures reflect Member States' objectives and stakeholders' concerns with respect to foreign direct investment, and result in a number of different measures in terms of scope and procedure. Other Member States which do not have such mechanisms should follow the best practices of those who have such mechanisms in place.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 93 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) There is currently no comprehensive framework at EU-level for the screening of foreign direct investments on the grounds of economic security and Union security or public order.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 108 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The framework for the screening of foreign direct investment shouldall provide the Member States and the Commission with the means to address risks to security or public order in a comprehensive manner, and to adapt to changing circumstances, whilst maintaining the necessary flexibility for Member States to screen foreign direct investments on grounds of security and public order taking into account their individual situations and national circumstances.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 114 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) A broad range of investments which establish or maintain lasting and direct and indirect links between investors from third countries and undertakings carrying out an economic activity in a Member State should be covered.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 130 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) In determining whether a foreign direct investment may affect security or public order, Member States and the Commission should be able to consider all relevant factors, including the effects on critical and strategic infrastructure, technologies, including key enabling technologies, military defence, borders infrastructures and inputs which are essential for security or the maintenance of public order, and the disruption, loss or destruction of which would have a significant impact in a Member State or in the Union. In that regard, Member States and the Commission should also be able to take into account whether a foreign investor is controlled directly or indirectly (e.g. through significant funding, including subsidies) by the government of a third country.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 147 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) A mechanism which enables Member States to cooperate and assist each other where a foreign direct investment in one Member State may affect the economic and national security or public order of other Member States should be set up. Member States should be able to provideforward their comments ton a Member State in which the investment is planned or has been completedplanned or a completed investment to the Commission, irrespective of whether the Member States providing comments or the Member States in which the investment is planned or has been completed maintain a screening mechanism or are screening the investment. The comments of Member States should also be forwarded to the Commission. The Commission should also have the possibility, where appropriate, to issue an opinion to the Member State in which the investment is planned or has been completed, irrespective of whether this Member State maintains a screening mechanism or is screening the investment and irrespective of whether other Member States have provided comments.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 155 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) Furthermore, the Commission shouldall have the possibility to screenutinize foreign direct investments likely to affect projects and programmes of Union interest on grounds of economic and Union security or public order. This would give the Commission a tool to protect projects and programmes which serve the Union as whole and represent an important contribution to its economic growth, jobs and competitiveness. This should include in particular projects and programmes involving a substantial EU funding or established by Union legislation regarding critical and strategic infrastructure and borders, critical technologies, defence or critical inputs. For greater clarity, an indicative, but not exhaustive, list of projects or programmes of Union interest in relation to which foreign direct investment can be subject to a screening by the Commission should be listed in an Annex.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 164 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) Where the Commission considers that a foreign direct investment is likely to affect projects or programmes of Union interest on grounds of economic and Union security or public order, the Commission should have the possibility toall address an opinion to the Member States in which such investment is planned or completed within a reasonable timeframe. The Member States shouldall take utmostduly account of the opinion and provide an explanation to the Commission if they do not follow this opinion, in compliance with their duty of sincere cooperation under Article 4(3) TEU. The Commission should also have the possibility to request from those Member States the information necessary for its screening of such investment.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 174 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) In order to facilitate the cooperation with other Member States and the screening of foreign direct investment by the Commission, Member States should notify their screening mechanisms and any amendment thereto to the Commission, and should report on the application of their screening mechanisms on a regular basis. For the same reason, Member States that do not have a screening mechanism should also report on the foreign direct investments that took place in their territory, their borders, on the basis of theall information available to them.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 185 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) The communication and cooperation at Member State and Union level should be enhanced through the establishment of contact pointsa coordination group for the screening of foreign direct investments in each Member State.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 199 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation establishes a framework for the screening by the Member States and the scrutiny of Commission of foreign direct investments in the Union on the grounds of economic security and Union security or public order.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 207 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
1 a. "foreign government-controlled transaction" means any foreign direct investment that could result in the control of any legal or moral person engaged in interstate commerce by a foreign government or an entity controlled by or acting on behalf of a foreign government
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 231 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission may screenshall scrutinize foreign direct investments that are likely to affect projects or programmes of Union interest on the grounds of economic security and Union security or public order.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 243 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. Projects or programmes of Union interest shall include in particular those projects and programmes which involve a substantial amount or a significant share of EU funding, or which are covered by Union legislation regarding critical and strategic infrastructure, borders, critical technologies, defense or critical inputs. An indicative list of projects or programmes of Union interest is included in Annex 1.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 245 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Relevant stakeholders may report to the Commission through appropriate channels any concern or information on critical investment in a Member State and suggest its screening.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 255 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – indent 1
- critical infrastructure, whether physical or virtual, including energy, transport, water distribution, media, communications, data storage, space or financial infrastructure, as well as sensitive facilitiesfinancial services and markets, health as well as sensitive facilities and any security and defense infrastructure;
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 266 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
- critical technologieand strategic technologies, critical components, including artificial intelligence, robotics, semiconductors, technologies with potential dual use applications, cybersecurity, aerospace, defense, space or nuclear technology;, raw materials, next-generation IT, high-end numerical control machinery and robotics, agriculture machinery; ,
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 275 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – indent 3
- the security and continuity of supply of critical inputs of, inter alia, rare materials, water, energy and agriculture; or
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 280 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – indent 4
- access to sensitive data and information or the ability to control sensitive information.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 288 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
In determining whether a foreign direct investment is likely to affect economic and Union security or public order, Member States and the Commission mayshall take into account: - whether theit is a foreign investor isgovernment- controlled by the government of a third country,transaction, including through significant funding and subsidies, extended credit and lending issued by state-owned financial institutions, which may directly or indirectly incfluding through significant fundingence the decision-making process; - whether such investment could lead to the establishment or consolidation of a monopolistic structure or could undermine the functioning of the Union value chains based on strategic industries.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 295 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
In scrutinising foreign direct investment the Commission may consider whether reciprocity exists and whether the same sectors in the investors' country of origin have a similar opening.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 302 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Member States may maintain, amend orreinforce, adopt measures necessary to prevent circumvention of the screening mechanisms and screening decisions.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 308 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall establish timeframes for issuing screening decisions and make them publicly available. Such timeframes shall allow them to take into account the comments of Member States referred to in Article 8 and the opinion of the Commission referred to in Articles 8 and 9.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 330 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(c a) screening decision subjecting foreign government-controlled transaction
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 333 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Member States that do not maintain screening mechanisms shall provide the Commission with an annual report covering foreign directs investments that took place in their territory and external borders, on the basis of information available to them.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 340 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall inform the Commission and th, which will update other Member States within 5 working days from the start of the screening, of any foreign direct investments that are undergoing screening within the framework of their screening mechanisms, within 5 working days from the start of the screening. As part of the information, and when applicable, the screening Member States shall endeavour to indicate whether it considers that the foreign direct investment undergoing screening is likely to fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 352 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Where a Member State considers that a foreign direct investment planned or completed in another Member State is likely to affect its securityeconomic and national security, defence or public order, it mayshall provide comments to the Member State where the foreign direct investment is planned or has been completed. The comments shall be forwarded to the Commission in parallelCommission within 5 working days where explaining how such foreign direct investment affects its territory.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 355 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. Where the Commission considers, after examining all the information provided by the relevant Member State, that a foreign direct investment is likely to affect securityeconomic and national security, defence or public order in one or more other Member States, it mayshall issue an opinion addressed to the Member State in which the foreign direct investment is planned or has been completed. The Commission may issue an opinion irrespective of whether other Member States have provided comments. The Commission shall systematically assess the market compatibility of foreign direct investment operations notified by the Member States, including screening of the degree of state influence and state aid
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 368 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission or a Member State which duly considerswhen considers, on basis of the comments and opinions provided under paragraph 2, that a foreign direct investment is likely to affect its security or public order may request additional information from the Member State where the foreign direct investment is planned or has been completed, anyd share this information necessary to provide comments referred to in paragraph 2, or to issue the opinion referred to in paragraph 3with other Member States in appropriate fora.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 381 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 6
6. The Member States where the foreign direct investment is planned or has been completed shall give due consideration to the comments of the other Member States referred to in paragraph 2 and toand the opinion of the Commission referred to in paragraph 3.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 386 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7
7. Cooperation between Member States pursuant to this Article shall take place through the contact pointscoordination group referred to in Article 12.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 390 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – title
9 Framework for Commission screenutingy
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 398 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Where the Commission considers that a foreign direct investment is likely to affect projects or programmes of Union interest on grounds of security or public order, the Commission mayshall issue an opinion addressed to the Member State where the foreign direct investment is planned or has been completed.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 408 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission mayshall request from the Member State where the foreign direct investment is planned or has been completed any information necessary to issue the opinion referred to in paragraph 1.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 426 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the information requested by the Commission and other Member States pursuant to Articles 8(4) and 9(2) is made available to the Commission and the requesting Member States without undue delay.without undue delay while taking into account the sensitivity of the information and guaranteeing confidentiality. Commission shall ensure to forward such information to Member States within 10 days after the receiving of this information
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 435 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) The value of the foreign direct investment and its possible impact;
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 442 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) The funding of the investment and its legal source, on the basis of information available to the Member State.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 451 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – title
Contact pointsInvestment screening coordination Group
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 452 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Each Member State shall appoint a foreign direct investment screening contact point ('FDI screening contact point') for the screening of foreign direct investment. The FDI screening contact point shall be part of a coordination group composed of the Commission and other Member States shall involve these FDI screening contact points on all issues related to. The task of the coordination group shall be discussing all issues related to the inward foreign direct investment policies of the Union and the implementation of this Regulation.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 471 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I a (new)
European Defence Industrial Development Programme
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 474 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I b (new)
Connecting Europe Facility
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 106 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a – point i
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – point a
(i) point (a) is deleted;replaced by the following: “(a) undertakings engaged in the occupation of road haulage operator solely by means of motor vehicles or combinations of vehicles the permissible laden mass of which does not exceed 3.5 tonnes and that engage solely in national transportation.”
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 1 – paragraph 6
(b) the following paragraph 6 is added: ‘ 6. Article 3(1)(b) and (d) and Articles 4, 6, 8, 9, 14, 19 and 21 shall not apply to undertakings engaged in the occupation of road haulage operator solely by means of motor vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes or combinations of vehicles with a permissible laden mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes. Member States may, however: (a) require those undertakings to apply some or all of the provisions referred to in the first subparagraph; (b) first subparagraph for all or some categories of road transport operations.';deleted lower the limit referred to in the
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 123 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) in Article 3, paragraph 2 is deleted;
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 5 – point a
(a) have premises suitable for carrying out the undertaking’s activities, in which it keeps its core business documents in paper and/or electronic format, in particular its commercial contracts, accounting documents, personnel management documents, labour contracts, documents containing data relating to postings, driving time and rest and any other document to which the competent authority must have access at any time in order to verify compliance with the conditions laid down in this Regulation;
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 5 – point a a
(aa) the following point is added: (aa) have parking areas that are proportionate to the size of its own vehicle fleet;
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 151 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point iii (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 6 – point b – point xii a (new)
(xiia) cabotage;
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 16 – paragraph 5
5. Without prejudice to paragraphs 1 and 2,(ba) paragraph 5 is replaced by the following: “5. Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the national electronic registers are interconnected and accessiinteroperable throughout the Community through the national contact points defined in Article 18. Accessibility through national contact points and interconnection shall be implemented by 31 December 2012 in such a way that a competent authority of any Member State is able to consult the national electronic register of any Member State. Union and are connected to the portal referred to in Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 in such a way that the data referred to in paragraph 2 are directly accessible to all the competent authorities and control bodies of all the Member States.” Or. it (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32009R1071)
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b b (new)
6. Common rules concerning the implementation of paragraph 5, such as the format of the data exchanged, the technical procedures for electronic consultation of the national electronic registers of the other Member States and the promotion of the interoperability of(bb) paragraph 6 is replaced by the following: "6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 24 to establish and update common rules to ensure that the national electronic registers are fully interconnected and interoperable, both among themse registerslves and with other relevant databases, shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 25(2) and for the first time before 31 December 2010. Those common rules shall determine which authority is r portal referred to in Regulation (EU) No 165/2014, in such a way that a competent authority or control body in any Member State is able to directly access the national electronic register of any Member State as stipulated in paragraph 5. Those common rules shall include rulesp onsibl the for access to data and further use and updmat of the data exchanged, the technical procedures for electronic consultationg of data after access and, to this effect, shall includethe national electronic registers of the other Member States and the interoperability of these registers, in addition to specific rules concerning access to data, data logging and data monitoring. " Or. it (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32009R1071)
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 217 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009
Article 3
(2a) Article 3 is replaced by the following: “International carriage shall be carried out subject to possession of a Community licence, of a smart tachograph in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 and, if the driver is a national of a third country, in conjunction with a driver attestation. " Or. it (http://eur- lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:300:0072:0087:EN:PDF)
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 225 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Once the goods carried in the course of an incoming international carriage from another Member State or from a third country to a host Member State have been delivered, hauliers referred to in paragraph 1 shall be allowed to carry out, with the same vehicle or, in the case of a coupled combination, the motor vehicle of that same vehicle, cabotage operations in the host Member State or in contiguous Member States. The last unloading in the course of a cabotage operation shall take place within 5three days from the last unloading in the host Member State in the course of the incoming international carriage.'; The vehicles referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall return to the Member State of origin within two weeks, at the latest, of the time of exit from that Member State.
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 250 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(5a) In Article 9, paragraph 1, the following point is added: “(ea) the minimum rates of pay and paid annual leave, as stipulated in points (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.”
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 261 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009
Article 10 a – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall organise checks in such a way that, as from 1 January 2020, in every calendar year at least 2 5% of all cabotage operations performed in their territory are checked. They shall increase the percentage to at least 3 10% from 1 January 2022. The basis for the calculation of that percentage shall be the total cabotage activity in the Member State in terms of tonnes- kilometres in year t-2, as reported by Eurostat.
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 270 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009
Article 14 a – paragraph 1
Member States shall provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions against consignors, freight forwarders, contractors and subcontractors for non- compliance with Chapters II and III, where they knowingly commission transport services which involve infringements of this Regulation.
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Drivers engaged in long-distance international transport operations spend long periods away from their home. The current requirements on the regular weekly rest unnecessarily prolong those periods. It is thus desirable to adapt the provision on the regular weekly rest in such a way that it is easier for drivers to carry out transport operations in compliance with the rules and to reach their home for a regular weekly rest, and be fully compensated for all reduced weekly rest periods. It is also necessary to provide that operators organise the work of drivers in such a way that these periods away from home are not excessively long. When a driver chooses to spend this rest period at home, the transport undertaking should provide the driver with the means to return.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) For this purpose, certified locations with suitable facilities to ensure optimal rest for drivers, as well as the safety of their vehicles and freight, should be provided.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) To enhance cost-effectiveness of enforcement of the social rules the potential of the current and future tachograph systems should be fully exploited. Therefore the functionalities of the tachograph should be improved to allow for more precise positioning, in particular during international transport operations. A road transport GNSS portal should be set up providing officials carrying out roadside or remote checks with real-time access to all data transmitted by smart tachographs.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(-1) In Article 2, paragraph 1, the following point is added: “(aa) of goods between two Member States irrespective of tonnage, or”
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 3 – point h
(1) in Article 3, the following point (h) is replaced by the following: “(h) vehicles or combinations of vehicles used for the non-commercial carriage of goods;"deleted
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 105 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
(a) in paragraph 6, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: “6. driver shall take at least: (a) or (b) at least 45 hours and two reduced weekly rest periods of at least 24 hours. For the purposes of point (b), the reduced weekly rest periods shall be compensated by an equivalent period of rest taken en bloc before the end of the third week following the week in question.deleted In any four consecutive weeks a four regular weekly rest periods, two regular weekly rest periods of
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 a – introductory part
8a. The regular weekly rest periods and any weekly rest of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for previous reduced weekly rest shall not be taken in a vehicle. They shall be taken in a suitable accommodation, with adequate sleepanitary fittings and sanitary facilitiesoptimum sleeping facilities for the driver;
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 a – point b
(b) at the driver's home or at another private location chosen by the driver.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 b
8b A transport undertaking shall organise the work of drivers in such a way that the drivers are able to spend at least one regular weekly rest period or a weekly rest of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for reduced weekly rest at home within each period of three consecutive weeks."or another location of the driver's choosing after each period of two consecutive weeks. The driver shall inform the transport undertaking no later than one month before such rest period if it will be taken in a place other than the driver’s home. When a driver chooses to take this rest at home, the transport undertaking shall provide the driver with the means to return home.”;
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 151 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 c (new)
(ca) in Article 8, the following paragraph is inserted: “8c Paragraph 8a of this Article shall not apply when the regular weekly rest periods, reduced weekly rest periods and any weekly rest of more than 45 hours, taken in compensation for previous reduced weekly rest, are taken in suitably equipped locations certified as meeting the requirements set out by the Commission through delegated acts, provided that the vehicle is stationary and has suitable sleeping facilities for each driver. For this purpose, such delegated acts must include the specifications to be met by certified locations so as to ensure optimal rest for drivers, as well as the safety of their vehicles and freight.”;
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 10 – paragraph 1
(6a) in Article 10, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: “1. A transport undertaking shall not give drivers it employs or who are put at its disposal any payment, even in the form of a bonus or wage supplement, related to distances travelled and/or the amount of goods carried if that payment is of such a kind as to endanger road safety and/or encourages infringement of this Regulation.”;
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 167 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Regulation (EU) 165/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
(-1) In Article 2, paragraph 2, the following point is added: “(ha) ‘smart tachograph’ means a digital tachograph using a global navigation satellite positioning system (GNSS), automatically determining its position in accordance with this Regulation;";
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point -1 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 165/2014
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point h b (new)
(-1a) In Article 2, paragraph 2, the following point is added: “(hb) ‘road transport GNSS portal’: an online platform collecting all data from smart tachographs for the purposes of this Regulation;”;
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 165/2014
Article 9 a (new)
(1a) The following Article is added “Article 9a 1. In addition to data exchange under Article 9, transport undertakings shall ensure that the full set of data referred to in Article 4(3) and Article 8(1) is automatically transmitted in real time through secure communication channels from the smart tachograph to the GNSS portal as referred to in Article 33a . 2. The data transmitted shall be stored and used in accordance with Article 33a.”;
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 177 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 165/2014
Article 33 a (new)
(1b) The following article is inserted: “Article 33a Road transport GNSS portal 1. In order to facilitate the exchange of information and cooperation between the competent authorities of the Member States that implement or enforce the Union legal acts listed in Article 7(1), the Commission shall create and maintain a GNSS portal containing data regarding transport operations and drivers’ activities transmitted in accordance with Article 9a. The Commission shall ensure the connection of that portal with the TACHOnet messaging system referred to in Article 31, the Internal Market Information System (IMI) established by Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 and the registers referred to Regulation (EU) No 1071/2009. 2. Within 18 months of entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 41a, in order to supplement this Regulation by laying down rules and specifications for the road transport GNSS portal, and the conditions for its use, ensuring the archiving of data transmitted and their consultation in real time by each control authority responsible, road transport GNSS portal interoperability with the systems and registers referred to in paragraph 1, as well as a system of data analysis and automatic notification of any breaches of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, Regulation (EU) No 165/2014, Directive 2002/15/EC, Regulations (EC) No 1071/2009 and No 1072/2009, Directive 92/106/EEC and the Directive [on the posting of drivers].”;
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 165/2014
Article 34 – paragraph 7
“7. The driver shall enter in the digital tachograph the symbols of the countries in which the daily working period started and finished, as well as where and when the driver has crossed a border in the vehicle on arrival at the suitfirst available stopping placearea. Member States may require drivers of vehicles engaged in transport operations inside their territory to add more detailed geographic specifications to the country symbol, provided that those Member States have notified those detailed geographic specifications to the Commission before 1 April 1998.".
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 181 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
(2a) The following article is inserted: “Article 41a Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 33a(5) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from … [the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the five-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 33a(5) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. Before the adoption of a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law Making of 13 April 2016. 5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 33a(5) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of [two months] of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.”
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) Such balanced criteria should be based on a concept of a sufficient link of a driver with a territory of a host Member State. Therefore, a time threshold should be established, beyond whichTo that end, the minimum rate of pay and the minimum annual paid holidays of the host Member State shall apply in case ofould be applied to both international transport operations. This time threshold should not apply toand cabotage operations, as defined by Regulations (EC) No 1072/200918 and (EC) No 1073/200919 since the entire transport operation is taking place in a host Member State. As a consequence the minimum rate of pay and the minimum annual paid holidays of the host Member State should apply to cabotage irrespective of the frequency and dura, irrespective of the frequency and duration of the operations carried out by a driver. Where operations are conducted in more than one Member State on the same day, the conditions of the operations carried out by a driverMember State most favourable for the driver should apply. __________________ 18 Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 72). 19 Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services, and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p.88)
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) In order to ensure effective and efficient enforcement of the sector-specific rules on posting of workers and to avoid disproportionate administrative burdens for non-resident operators sector, specific administrative and control requirements should be established in the road transport sector, taking full advantage of control tools such as the digitalInternal Market Information System (IMI), the GNSS portal for road transport and the smart tachograph.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 and to draw up a standard payslip for posted drivers, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13 b (new)
(13b) In order to ensure full compliance with social legislation and pending the establishment of the European Labour Authority, the competent control authorities should have access to and verify all data transmitted through the IMI and the GNSS portal.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall ensure that transporters use smart tachographs, in line with Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014, in vehicles used for international transport or cabotage as defined by Regulations (EC) No 1072/2009 and (EC) No 1073/2009. These smart tachographs shall transmit all data in real time to the portal referred to in Regulation (EU) No 165/2014, which shall at all times be available for consultation by the control authorities.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall not apply points (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC to drivers in the road transport sector employed by undertakings referred to in Article 1(3)(a) of that Directive, when performing international carriage operations as defined by Regulations 1072/2009 and 1073/2009 where the period of posting to their territory to perform these operations is shorter than or equal to 3 days during a period of one calendar month.deleted
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 189 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
When the period of posting is longer than 3 days, Member States shall apply points (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC for the entire period of posting to their territory during the period of one calendar month referred to in the first subparagraph.deleted
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 206 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States shall not apply the provisions of Directive 96/71/EC or Directive 2014/67/EU to transit times less than or equal to two consecutive days within the same Member State.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 212 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. For the purposes of the calculation of the periods of posting referred to in paragraph 2: a) than six hours spent in the territory of a host Member State shall be considered as half a day; b) or more spent in the territory of a host Member State shall be considered as a full day; c) periods of availability spent in the territory of a host Member State shall be considered as working period.deleted a daily working period shorter a daily working period of six hours breaks and rest periods as well as
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 238 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Member States shall apply the provisions of Directive 96/71/EC and Directive 2014/67/EU to international transport and cabotage operations as defined by Regulations (EC) No 1072/2009 and (EC) No 1073/2009.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 242 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. For the purposes of Article 3(1), first subparagraph, points (b) and (c) of Directive 96/71/EC, where operations are conducted in more than one Member State on the same day, the conditions of the Member State most favourable for the driver shall apply.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 251 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Member States may onlyshall impose the following administrative requirements and control measures:
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 252 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) an obligation for the road transport operator established in another Member State to send a posting declaration and any updates thereto to the national competent authorities at the latest at the commencement of the posting, in electronic form. The road transport operator shall be required to send and/or update that declaration in electronic form via the Internal Market Information System (IMI), established by Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012, in an official language of the host Member State or in EnglishEuropean Union, containing only the following information:
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 267 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a – point iii
(iii) the anticipated number and the identities of posted drivers and the documents proving that they are employed by the road transport operator;
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 268 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a – point iii a (new)
(iiia) information regarding driving licences held by posted workers;
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 280 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a – point vi a (new)
(via) the identity and address of the consignee;
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 310 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point e
e) an obligation for the driver to make available, where requested at the roadside control, in paper or electronic form, a copy of payslips for last two months; during the roadside check, the driver shall be allowed to contact the head office, the transport manager or any other person or entity which may provide this copy;deleted
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 321 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point f
(f) an obligation for the road transport operator to deliver, after the period of posting, in paper or electronic form, copies of documents referred to in points (b), (c) and (e), at the request ofc) within one month of being asked to do so by the authorities of the host Member State within a reasonable period of time;
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 328 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point f a (new)
(fa) an obligation for the road transport operator to send a copy of the payslip for the month of posting within two months from the end of the posting. This documentation shall be provided in electronic form via the Internal Market Information System (IMI) introduced under Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012, in one of the official languages of the European Union.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 331 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. For the purposes of paragraph 4(fa), the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, draw up a standard payslip for posted drivers. The payslip should contain at least the following information: (a) The number of hours worked by the driver in a given month, broken down by Member State; (b) Minimum hourly or daily pay for each Member State in which the driver has worked in a given month. These implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure under Article 2a(2). The use of this standard payslip shall be without prejudice to national rules governing payslips.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 337 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. The control authorities shall verify whether the data sent via the Internal Market Information System (IMI) established by Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012, matches the data transmitted by the smart tachographs to the portal referred to in Regulation (EU) No 165/2014.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 355 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 a (new)
Article 2a Committee procedure 1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee pursuant to Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. 2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, the provisions of Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) Work-life balance policies should promote women’s participation in the labour market, closing the gender pay gap and reducing the poverty that is increasingly affecting women.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) Member States should also provide protection for those categories of workers who practise a profession or are self- employed or entrepreneurs.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) This Directive should apply to all workers who have employment contracts or other employment relationships, including atypical contracts. As is currently the case under Clause 2(3) of the Annex to Directive 2010/18/EU, this should include contracts relating to employment or employment relationships of part-time workers, fixed-term contract workers or persons with a contract of employment or employment relationship with a temporary agency.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) In order to encouragestablish a more equal sharing of caring responsibilities between women and men, the right to paternity leave for fathers to be taken on the occasion of the birth or adoption of a child should be introduced. In order to take account of differences among Member States, the right to paternity leave should be irrespective of marital or family status as defined in national law.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) Member States should take specific measures whereby all benefits under this Directive will be applicable when parents are making a lengthy stay abroad in order to complete an international adoption procedure.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) In order to provide greater possibility for parents to use parental leave as their children grow up, the right to parental leave should be granted until the child is at least twelve years old. Member States should be able to specify the period of notice to be given by the worker to the employer when applying for parental leave and to decide whether the right to parental leave may be subject to a certain period of service, taking into particular account the requirements of micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises. In view of the growing diversity of contractual arrangements, the sum of successive fixed- term contracts with the same employer should be taken into account for the purpose of calculating the period of service. To balance the needs of workers with those of employers, Member States should also be able to decide whether they define ifdetermine whether the employer may be allowed to postpone the granting of parental leave under certain circumstances. In such cases, the employer should provide justification for the postponement. Given that flexibility makes it more likely that second parents, in particular fathers, will take up their entitlement to such leave, workers should be able to request to take parental leave on a full-time or part-time basis or in other flexible forms. It should be up to the employer whether or not to accept such a request for parental leave in other flexible forms other than full-time. Member States should also assess ifdapt the conditions and detailed arrangements of parental leave should be adapted to the specific needs of parents in particularly disadvantaged situations.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) In order to provide greater opportunities to remain in the work force for men and women carrying ofor elderly family members and/or other relatives in need of care, workers with a seriously ill or dependaent relative should have the right to take time off from work in the form of carers’ leave to take care of that relative. To prevent abuse of that right, proof of the serious illness or dependency may be required prior to granting of the leave. To simplify leave requests, however, carers should be required to furnish such proof once only under a simplified standard procedure.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 181 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) Member States should encourage subsidised home care arrangements by supporting ‘independent living’ projects which give persons requiring assistance the option of seeking help from qualified professionals; both men and women would thus be able to combine their working lives more easily with caring for elderly relatives, or for those who have a disability and/or are in need of support.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 210 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) In order to encourage working parents and carers to remain in the work force, those workers should be able to adapt their working schedules to their personal needs and preferences. Working parents and carers should therefore be able to request flexible working arrangements, meaning the possibility for workers to adjust their working patterns, including through the use of remote working arrangements, flexible working schedules, or a reduction in working hours, for caring purposes. In order to address the needs of workers and employers, with the proviso that the necessary safeguards should always be in place in order to avert all forms of abuse. In order to address the needs of workers and employers, and of micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises in particular, it should be possible for Member States to limit the duration of flexible working arrangements, including a reduction in working hours. While working part-time has been shown to be useful in allowing some women to remain in the labour market after having children, long periods of reduced working hours may lead to lower social security contributions translating into reduced or non-existing pension entitlements. The ultimate decision as to whether or not to accept a worker’s request for flexible working arrangements should lie with the employer. Specific circumstances underlying the need for flexible working arrangements can change. Workers should therefore not only have the right to return to their original working patterns at the end of a given agreed period, but should also be able to request to do so at any time where a change in the underlying circumstances so requires.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 214 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) Member States should provide working parents with suitable childcare facilities and services that are of high quality and affordable for all income groups.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 261 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30 a (new)
(30a) Member States should provide for tax relief and/or incentives to help micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises comply with the terms of this Directive.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 278 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1
This Directive applies to all workers, men and women, who have an employment contract or employment relationship as defined by law, collective agreements and/or practice in force in each Member State.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 289 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) "paternity leave" means paid leave from work for fathers to be taken on the occasion of the birth or adoption of a child;
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 294 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) “parental leave” means leave from work on the grounds of the birth or, adoption or award of custody of a child to take care of that child;
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 297 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) “parental leave” means paid leave from work on the grounds of the birth or adoption of a child to take care of that child;
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 381 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that fathers have the right to take paternity leave of at least ten working days on the occasion of the birth or adoption of a child.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 402 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that workers have an individual right to parental leave of at least four months to be taken before the child reaches a given age which shall be at least twelve. Member States shall ensure that protection measures are also applied to the self-employed, professionals and entrepreneurs.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 429 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall establish the period of notice to be given by workers to employers when exercising the right to parental leave. In doing so, Member States shall take into account the needs of both employers, in particular those in micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, and workers. Member States shall ensure that the worker's request specifies the intended beginning and end of the period of leave.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 430 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(3a) Member States shall take specific measures to ensure that all benefits provided for by this Directive apply when parents go abroad for a protracted period in order to complete an international adoption procedure.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 447 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. Member States mayshall define the circumstances in which an employer, following consultation in accordance with national law, collective agreements and/or practice, may be allowed to postpone the granting of parental leave by a reasonable period of time on the grounds that it would seriously disrupt the good functioning of the establishment. Employers shall justify any postponement of parental leave in writing.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 492 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Member States shall adopt financial measures and incentives to promote subsidised home care arrangements which provide for the use of qualified operators. The financial incentives must be calculated on the basis of the worker’s reference income.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 519 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1
In accordance with national circumstances, such as national law, collective agreements and/or practice, and taking into account the powers delegated to social partners, Member States shall ensure that workers exercising the rights to leave referred to in Article 4, 5 or 6 will receive a payment or an adequate allowance at least equivalent to what the worker concerned would receive in case of sick leave. With regard to self-employed workers, professionals and entrepreneurs, Member States shall make provision for adequate safeguards to provide a minimum level of support for the family unit for the period of leave.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 534 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that workers with children up to a given age, which shall be at least twelve, and carers, have the right to request flexible working arrangements for caring purposes. The duration of such flexible working arrangements may be subject to a reasonable limitationWherever possible, Member States shall also provide for instruments such as teleworking and target-oriented work. For the duration of such flexible working arrangements, provision shall be made for all necessary protective measures to prevent all forms of abuse.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 548 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States may make provision for tax relief and/or incentives to help micro, small and medium-sized enterprises comply with the terms of this Directive.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 558 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Employers shall consider and respond to requests for flexible working arrangements referred to in paragraph 1, taking into account the needs of both employers and workers. Employers shall justify in writing any refusal of such a request.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 571 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 a (new)
Article 9a Socio-educational facilities and services Member States shall ensure that public socio-educational facilities and services for early childhood are in place and are tailored to the needs of the population. Member States shall also encourage the provision of supplementary services, in addition to kindergartens, such as family nurseries (or ‘Tagesmutter’), local nurseries, play areas and child-parent centres. Member States shall ensure that workers who fall within the most disadvantaged income brackets also have access to those facilities and services.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 646 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 a (new)
Article 16a Non-regression The implementation of this Directive shall not be sufficient grounds for regression in relation to the situation which already prevails in each Member State and in relation to the general level of protection of workers in the areas to which it applies. Member States and/or the social partners may maintain or introduce more favourable provisions for workers than those set out in this Directive.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 648 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that the provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive, together with the relevant provisions already in force relating to the subject matter as set out in Article 1 of this Directive, are brought by all appropriate means to the attention of the persons concerned throughout their territory, also through the Single Digital Gateway.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 665 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. On the basis of the information provided by Member States pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report in which it reviews the application of this Directive, including gender-specific data on the take-up of the different types of leave set out in this Directive and their impact on micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2017/0004(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) Directive 2004/37/EC aims to protect workers against risks to their health and safety from exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at the workplace and lays down minimum requirements to that effect including limit values, on the basis of the available scientific and technical data, which are regularly revised in the light of the scientific data that is progressively acquired. For better health and safety protection, it is vital that Member States record and provide epidemiological data covering the past three decades on the incidence of cancer and of all diseases associated with exposure to carcinogens or mutagens, and the relevant mortality rate for workers in different industrial sectors.
2017/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2017/0004(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) For some carcinogens and mutagens it is necessary to consider other absorptionpossible exposure pathways, including the possibility of penetration through the skin, in order to ensure the best possible level of protection for workers.
2017/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2017/0004(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) The Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (‘the CommitteeSCOEL’)55 assists the Commission, in particular, in evaluating the latest available scientific data and in proposing occupational exposure limit values for the protection of workers from chemical risks, to be set at Union level pursuant to Council Directive 98/24/EC56 and Directive 2004/37/EC. Other sources of scientific information, adequately robust and in the public domain were also considered. __________________ 55 Commission Decision 2014/113/EU of 3 March 2014 on Setting up a Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits for Chemical Agents and repealing Decision 95/320/EC (OJ L 62, 04.03.2014, p. 18). 56 Council Directive 98/24/EC of 7 April 1998 on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work (fourteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (OJ L 131, 05.05.1998, p. 11).
2017/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2017/0004(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) In accordance with the recommendations of the Committee, where available,SCOEL and having heard the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work (ACSH), this Directive establishes skin notations and/or limit values for the inhalation route of exposure are established in relation to a referenc, for an exposure period of eight-hoursa daily time-weighted average of eight hours (long-term exposure limit values) and, for certain carcinogens or mutagens, to shorterfor a reference periods, in general of fifteen minutes time-weighted average (short-term exposure limit values), to take account ofin order to limit, as much as possible, the effects arising from short- term exposure.
2017/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2017/0004(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) Compliance with the exposure limits set out in the Directive should be guaranteed, where technically possible, by replacing the carcinogenic or mutagenic chemical with an alternative substance. Where that is not possible, provision should be made for the use of processing systems in which the chemical agent is confined, or work organisation patterns (work shifts in the manufacturing process) that are such as to ensure compliance with the limit values, together with the adoption of the required individual protection devices.
2017/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2017/0004(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 b (new)
(5b) In particular, in order to encourage conversion and the elimination of carcinogenic or mutagenic risks, individual Member States should provide for relief that is proportionate to the budgetary impact of the investments made by employers, so as to protect company competitiveness in the EU on an essentially level playing field and provide an incentive for companies to convert.
2017/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2017/0004(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 c (new)
(5c) In transposing the Directive, Member States could draw up a list of activities which, owing to the fact that they relate to small and micro enterprises, or because of the products manufactured and restricted size, are automatically considered to comply with the limits laid down by the Directive, subject to prior official verification.
2017/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2017/0004(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) Given that this Directive concerns the workers' health at their workplacehealth at the workplace and provides for maximum limits for exposure to carcinogens and mutagens, the deadline for its transposition should be two years. In the national legislative provisions that transpose the directive, provision should also be made for a maximum period of 2 years within which owners should upgrade their facilities, in proportion to the complexity and extent of the measures required.
2017/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2017/0004(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States, in order not to harm small and medium-sized enterprises, with regard to the need to radically transform their production activities due to the introduction of new parameters and standards, and to facilitate infrastructure modernisation, shall grant such enterprises a tax credit amounting to 75% of the cost they will incur for modernisation and adaptation to EU standards. The tax credit shall be automatically granted following the payment of the amounts relating to the facility upgrading expenditure and may be subject to transfers of claim.
2017/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2017/0004(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Member States, when transposing this Directive, may provide for a period of two years within which to enable workplaces to adapt to the requirements attached hereto.
2017/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2016/2323(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Strongly supports the furthupports a proper development and enhancement of inter- operability of European infrastructure networks; considers that the financing of the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) is vital to achieving these objectives, andmust aim at objectives which ensure a real added-value for the Member States and should not be used to finance projects marked out by a controversial realization; calls on the Commission to ensure an appropriate focused level of funding in 2018;
2017/02/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6
— having regard to the Commission recommendation of 16 November 2016 for a Council recommendation on the economic policy of the euro area (COM(2016)0726),deleted
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 7
— having regard to the Commission communication of 16 November 2016 entitled ‘Towards a positive fiscal stance for the euro area’ (COM(2016)0727),deleted
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8
— having regard to the Commission report of 16 November 2016 entitled ‘Alert Mechanism Report 2017’ (COM(2016)0728),deleted
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10
— having regard to the Commission communication of 16 November 2016 entitled ‘2017 Draft Budgetary Plans: Overall Assessment’ (COM(2016)0730),deleted
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 19
— having regard to the Commission proposal of 26 November 2015 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the establishment of the Structural Reform Support Programme for the period 2017 to 2020 and amending Regulations (EU) No 1303/2013 and (EU) No 1305/2013 (COM(2015)0701),deleted
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 20
— having regard to the Commission communication of 21 October 2015 on steps towards completing Economic and Monetary Union (COM(2015)0600),deleted
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 31
— having regard to the Five Presidents’ Report of 22 June 2015 on ‘Completing the Economic and Monetary Union’,deleted
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 33
— having regard to its resolution of 26 October 2016 on ‘The European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2016 priorities’3 , _________________ 3 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0416.deleted
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas if the current trends continue, the Europe 2020 employment rate target of 75 % could not in fact be reached;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the long-term unemployment rate (relating to unemployment of more than one year) fell by 0.7 % in the year to the first quarter of 2016, to 4.2 % of the labour force; whereas the very long-term unemployment rate (relating to unemployment of more than two years) fell to 2.6 % of the labour force; whereas nevertheless the number of long- term unemployed remains too high, at around 10 million; whereas the level of unemployment and its social consequences differ between European countries and whereas it is essential to take into account specific microeconomic circumstances;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas there are a number of positive developments in the EU, signalling the resilience and recovery of the European economy;deleted
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) has already approved 69 projects in 18 countries and signed 56 operations, and this is expected to lead to more than 22 EUR billion in investment and to involve around 71 000 SMEs; whereas these projects do not provide quality and sustainable jobs and whereas there is a need of further public investments free of budgetary constraints;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the fact that in the Annual Growth Survey 2017 emphasis is placed on the importance of ensuring social fairness as a means ofthat could stimulatinge more inclusive growth, as well as on creatinge jobs and enhancinge skills and on the need to strengthen competitiveness, innovation and productivity;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that the implementation of the Youth Guarantee should be strengthened at national, regional and local level, and stresses its importance for school-to-work transitions; notes that so far the aims of the Youth Guarantee Scheme have not been achieved in many Member States; in this regards urges the Commission to carry out impact studies with a view to determining precisely what results have been achieved so far and to take additional measures, in the form of more stringent oversight and monitoring mechanisms, the sharing of best practices and the organisation of workshops which bring together all the actors concerned, designed to make this instrument more effective
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the increase in the employment rate; encouragesCalls on the Member States to make further efforts in order to reach the Europe 2020 employment rate target of 75 %;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that matching skills and qualifications with demand and job opportunities is a precondition for creating a competitive EU labour market; calls on Member States to better align education and training with labour market needs across the EU; takes the view that mutual recognition of qualifications will be beneficial for overcoming the gap between skills shortages on the European labour market and jobseekers, especially young people; underlines in this regards the importance of evaluating the different employment situations in the Member States in order to ensure their specificity and peculiarities;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 208 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines that insufficient investment in education, and especially in digital skills, may undermine Europe’s competitive position and the employability of its workforcement; calls on the Member States to prioritise comprehensive training in digital skills, while at the same time maintaining high standards in the traditional education, and to take into account the shift towards the digital economy in the context of upskilling and retraining;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 221 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that micro-enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) are important for sustainable and inclusive development and job creation; calls on the Commission and the Member States to give greater consideration to the interests of MSMEs in the policy-making process; notes nevertheless that European constraints on budget policies, excessive fiscal pressure, inadequate public spending and unnecessary administrative burden have an impact on SMEs' job creation potential;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 244 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Member States to make more active use of the European Structural and Investment Funds in support of the implementation of the country- specific recommendations;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 248 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Highlights that European funds and programmes such as Erasmus for Entrepreneurs, the European Employment Services (EURES), the programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (COSME), the programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI) and the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) have the potential to facilitate access to financing and boost investment and, therefore, entrepreneurship; regrets nevertheless that these instruments are not implemented properly and therefore are not efficient yet; recalls the importance of the partnership principle, the bottom-up approach and adequate resource allocation; calls on the Commission to ensure the close monitoring of the use of EU funds;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 264 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Highlights the importance of the EFSI insofar as it permitsTakes note of the non-achieved targets of the EFSI that it should have improved social and economic convergence of Member States and their regions within the Union; calls on the Commission to ensure that Member States are fully using the possibility of accessing this fund; calls on the Commission to monitor and control investments under the EFSI and to measure their economic and social impact;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 274 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Points out to the Member States, in view of the ageing of Europe’s citizens, the need to ensure the sustainability, safety, adequacy and effectiveness of social security systems over the coming decades; encourages the Member States, therefore, to develop strategies to ensure that more people can continue to be active participants in society;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 294 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. WelcomNotes that in the AGS 2017 emphasis is placed on the need to promote tax and benefit reforms aimed at improving work incentives and making work pay, as tax systems can also contribute to combating income inequalities and poverty; underlines, however, that today the different tax and fiscal systems create social dumping, delocalization and unfair competition:
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 311 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Member States to set minimumefficient social standards;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 316 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes the involvement in the European Semester process of the social partners, the national parliaments and other relevant stakeholders from civil society; reiterates that social dialogue must be pursued in all phases of the Semester;deleted
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2016/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission, in close cooperation with the managing authorities, to monitor regularly that all legal provisions as regards information and communication are being implemented thoroughly in order to ensure transparency and the widespread dissemination of information about the achievements of the Funds; in order to improve the communication of the results and make it more effective, provision should also be made for the creation of a specific item in the budget, but without this involving any increase in the overall budget;
2017/03/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2016/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to evaluate what has not worked in the past in order to correct in a constructive manner the errors that have been committed and to improve the way in which Cohesion Policy functions; in 2015, 30% of Europeans2 a declared that the impact of projects co-financed by the EU had been negative while another 30% claimed that the funds had been allocated to the wrong projects; __________________ 2 a Flash Eurobarometer 423 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/source s/docoffic/official/reports/eurobarometer/ 423/citizen_awareness_summary_en.pdf
2017/03/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2016/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve the visibility of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) by communicating the European added value of the projects, particularly in terms of job creation and social integration, including through information events for all citizens and targeted training sessions with and for European project stakeholders;
2017/03/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2016/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to adopt instruments able to assess not only the quantity but also the quality of the jobs created, as precarious types of employment without adequate safeguards or contracts that involve the exploitation of workers contribute to a negative perception of the cohesion policies;
2017/03/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2016/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Member States to devote an appropriate share of ESF resources to strengthening the institutional capacity of public authorities and stakeholders in Member States where neededthere have been most cases of irregularities and the municipalities do not participate in calls for tenders; suggests finding suitable forms of cooperation at all levels so as to ensure that competent officials are committed without conflicts of interest to achieving an overall improvement in administrative capacity; calls on the Commission to assess the improvements made by the Member States in this respect.
2017/03/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2016/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2017 on the evaluation of external aspects of customs performance and management as a tool to facilitate trade and fight illicit trade;
2017/06/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 94 #

2016/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
La. whereas differences in customs practices hamper the detection of abuses along the production chain;
2017/06/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 102 #

2016/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Believes that further integration of the EU into global value chains must not be to the detriment of the European social and regulatory model and the promotion of sustainable growth;
2017/06/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 131 #

2016/2301(INI)

5. Acknowledges the smart mix of regulatory and voluntary action, but recalls that voluntary corporate social responsibility (CSR) creates unfair competition for suppliers that have chosen to comply with international labour and environmental standards; reiterates its call for the systematic inclusion of binding and enforceable rules, associated sanctions, remedies and independent monitoring mechanisms which may also be applied at the behest of civil society;
2017/06/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 184 #

2016/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – point c
(c) including standstill clauses fixing a minimum level for social, environmental and safety, safety and animal welfare standards in all EU FTAs;
2017/06/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 191 #

2016/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – point d
(d) including provisions on cooperation into promote tax transparency and the fight against money laundering, tax evasion and tax avoidance in FTAs;
2017/06/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 222 #

2016/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for improvedthe unblocking of the mandatory labelling legislation on the origin of products entering the EU market, or for other legislation to be brought forward that ensures full traceability;
2017/06/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 232 #

2016/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Member States to disclose to the public upon request, on the internet, the customs data collected from parties trading in products or goods imported into the EU;
2017/06/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 263 #

2016/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Reiterates its call forthe harmonisation and strengthening of import and supply chain controls to ensure that only child labour-free products and those not resulting from other forms of modern slavery enter the EU market;
2017/06/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 21 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the root cause of shrinking demand is the economic and financial crisis that has been rampant in the euro area for over a decade;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the Oxfam Annual Report has noted that 8 people own as much as the poorest half of the world's population, in other words what those 8 own amounts to the combined wealth of 3.25 billion people (in 2015 the richest numbered 62); whereas there needs to be a step change in applying new means of redistributing wealth to combat poverty, for example citizen's income;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas inequalities increased in Member States between 2008 and 2014 in terms of household disposable income, mainly in Mediterranean countries such as Spain, Italy, Greece, Portugal, or Cyprus19; _________________ 19 Eurofound (2017) Income inequalities and employment patterns in Europe before and after the Great Recession.
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas the level of inequality is shapdetermined by institutions and political interventions;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Affirms that growing inequalities threatenare constantly undermining the future of the European project, erodeing its legitimacy and have damaged, and are continuing to damage, trust in the EU as an engine of social progress;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Commission and the Member States to evaluate the performance and outcomes of economic policy coordination, taking into account, given the failure of economic policy coordination, to evaluate the performance and outcomes of the evolution of social progress and social justice in the EU; warns that the European Semester hasand the structural reforms imposed by the EU have not only not been successful in the achievement of these aims and, but have in creducingased the inequalities;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates its call for the establishment of an authentic European Pillar of Social Rights and the building of a deeper and fairer social dimension of the EMU, with the necessary legislative, institutional and financial means being devoted to guaranteeing true social progress;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 154 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to broaden the scope of the Europe 2020 Strategy to include the fight against inequality among its goals, – still nowhere near to being achieved – which should be aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take measures to counteract wage reductions and implement safeguards for workers in order to revitalise domestic demand and facilitate the redistribution of wealth within the EU:
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 188 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to raiseassess the funding level of the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) for the period 2017-2020 to least EUR 21 billion, including young people under 30; calls on the Commission to ensure better implementation of the Youth Guarantee, taking into account the latest findings of the European Court of Auditors’ report on use of the YEI. and to bring careful and continuous monitoring to bear on the funds used, so as to make for the utmost transparency;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 239 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Expresses its concern regarding the negative effects of increasing automation due to the delay in adapting legislation, which threatens to exert downward pressure, given that taxing robots and a guaranteed income for all citizens would be the only ways to contain the downward pressure that automation is exerting on social protection systems and wages, especially affecting low- and medium-skilled workers;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 342 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Considers that international trade has been an engine for growth in many countries, but also can be perceived asturn into a source of inequalities; calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote fairer international trade agreements that respectinsist on compliance with European labour market regulations, while protecting quality employment and workers’ rights and ensuring; considers that such agreements should go hand in hand with intra-European and national mechanisms for the compensation of workers and sectors negatively affected;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 358 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Calls onUrges the Commission and the Member States to step upmake every possible effort in the fight against child poverty, ensuring the coordinated implementation of the Investment in Children Initiative through the Child Guarantee scheme;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. having regard to Special Report No 5/2017 of the European Court of Auditors entitled ‘Youth unemployment - have EU policies made a difference? An assessment of the Youth Guarantee and the Youth Employment Initiative’, and noting in particular that, three years on from the adoption of the Council recommendation, the Youth Guarantee has yet to fulfil expectations;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the implementation of the Youth Guarantee has not yielded uniform results, and in some circumstances it has been difficult to pinpoint and assess the contribution it has made;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2016/2242(INI)

1a. Recommends that the Commission identify and disseminate good monitoring and reporting practices, so that the results from the Member States can be communicated consistently and reliably, and assessed seamlessly, including as regards quality; in particular, regular quality statistics should be provided enabling Member States to frame more realistic and effective youth policies, including through the monitoring of participants leaving the Youth Guarantee system, so as to keep to a minimum the number of participants dropping-out of the programme and not gaining from it;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. SPoints out that all stakeholders must play a key role and be more proactive as regards those persons furthest from the labour market, and involve them more efficiently and effectively; stresses that preventive interventions and structural reform efforts by the Member States are needed in order to reap the benefits of the YG and ensure the success of school-to-work transitions of young people; stresses in this regard the importance of training PES personnel, capacity building and cooperation with NGOs, where relevant;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Member States and Commission to assess any shortcomings and conduct market analyses before rolling out the systems provided for under the Youth Guarantee, thereby avoiding worthless training courses and the exploitation of trainees on traineeships that will lead nowhere;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recommends that Member States ensure that what they are offering is of good quality; for example, the proposals made should match the participants’ profiles and meet employment demand so as to enable sustainable and potentially long-term integration into the job market itself;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that a more diversified approach in the provision of services to different groups within the youth population is needed in order to avoid ‘cherry-picking’ and discriminatory selection; calls for a stronger outreach to young people facing multiple barriers (e.g. young people with disabilities);
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to devise targeted strategies aimed at the NEET population, and to ensure the provision of follow-up data to assess the long-term sustainability of outcomes from a standpoint of quality and quantity;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2016/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that any current and new economic activityies should be carried out in a sustainable way in order not to undermine the Arctic’s natural heritage and with full respect for the Indigenous communities and preserving the Arctic as a peaceful and demilitarized area;
2016/11/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 15 #

2016/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines the necessity to involve the local communities of the Arctic in sustainable economic activities and in decision making processes in order to avoid radical changes in their traditions and living standards;
2016/11/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 20 #

2016/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Recalls the need to avoid any further investment in technologies and research aiming at the exploitation of natural resources in those international waters that will become exploitable as result of ice melting;
2016/11/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 26 #

2016/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Takes note of Canada’s commitments in the trade and environment chapter of CETA, in particular on sustainable fisheries and trade in forest products and asks the Commission to regularly check and report on this situation;
2016/11/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2016/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to include substantive trade and environmental provisions in TTIP, which can contribute to preserving Alaska’s natural environment, including on fisheries and forestry;deleted
2016/11/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 36 #

2016/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Takes note of the conclusion of a free trade agreement between Iceland and China, and will monicalls on the Commission tor closely monitor the effects it may have on the sustainable economic development not only of the Icelandic side of the Arctic but also on the EU internal market avoiding the entry of goods hampering EU competitiveness and consumer safety;
2016/11/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 40 #

2016/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Recallgrets that no free trade agreement has been concluded between EU and Russia, and that therefore the EU has no effective bilateral instrument with which to influence trade and investment in the Russian Arctic. Calls on the Commission to investigate the possibility to redeem negotiations and asks the Council to lift the current sanctions.
2016/11/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #

2016/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission and the Council to promote the creation of an International Arctic Sanctuary aimed at preserving natural environment, local economic and social activities from further distress that might result in increasing natural resources exploitation in international waters.
2016/11/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas recent mass leaks revealing corruption, such as the Panama Papers and SwissLeaks affairs, or the avoidance of rules on labour law leading in certain cases to precarious employment, confirm the importance of the role played by whistle- blowers in defending the public interest;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital D
D. whereas concerns have often been raised that whistle-blowers face hostility and exclusion at their place of work, rather than being viewed positively, and are subjected not only to harassment but also to intimidation up to and including threats to their life;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas economic intelligence can be cross-border in scope and whereas whistle-blowers play a major role in bringing to light illegal acts carried out in other countries against national economic interests;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for action, including in school and university programmes, to change the public perception of whistle- blowers by highlighting their positive role as an early warning mechanism to prevent abuses and corruption and to enable public scrutiny of state action;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Urges the introduction of effective arrangements for protecting anyone who reports wrongdoing at the workplace, such as harassment, job blackmail, illegal recruitment and dismissal practices, pay discrimination and any other form of law- breaking;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Calls for measures to protect workers to include arrangements for safeguarding people’s anonymity and the confidentiality of information, where appropriate by means of encryption, and penalties for anyone failing to meet their obligations in this area;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Points to the dangers of excluding whistle-blowing workers from career progression and of retaliation by colleagues at their workplace, and the dampening effect this has on those who may come across wrongdoing, and calls for everything possible to be done to put an end to behaviour of this kind;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Urges the Member States to pass legislation encouraging people to report illegal acts and wrongdoing by establishing an awards system including arrangements for paying whistle-blowers a percentage of any sums recovered by the public or private organisation involved;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls the importance of devising instruments to ban any form of retaliation, whether this be active dismissal or passive measures such as the blocking of promotion, and of taking action through the courts wherever this is necessary;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls that proper and effective legislation is needed; encourages Member States to develop legislative instruments that protect those who report justified and proven breaches of conduct to public authorities;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the importance of urging Member States to implement rules protecting whistle-blowers in both the public and the private sectors;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Urges the relevant authorities to lay down a best-endeavours obligation in connection with arrangements for receiving and dealing with reports that are put in place by both employers and the authorities themselves.
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that palm oil accounts for about 40 % of global trade in all vegetable oils and that the EU, with around 7 million tonnes per year, is the second largest global importer; notes with concern that around half of the forest area illegally cleared to support EU imports has been used for palm oil production; calls on the Commission, in this connection, to reduce the amount of imported palm oil from third countries by applying different customs duty schemes for certified sustainable palm-oil products taking into consideration certification systems such as RSPO-next and fully meeting the sustainability requirements set up by the Palm Oil Innovation Group (POIG);
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD),
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 6 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
- having regard to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES),
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 7 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 b (new)
- having regard to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP),
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 11 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Commission in this regard to initiate a reform of the Harmonized System (HS) Nomenclature at the World Customs Union (WCO) that would allow a distinction between certified sustainable and unsustainable palm oil and its derivatives;
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 21 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that Malaysia and Indonesia are the main producers of palm oil, with an estimated 85-90 % of global production, and that the growing demand for this commodity puts pressure on land use and has significant effects on local communities, health and climate change; stresses, in this context, that the EU- Indonesia as well as other Free Trade Agreements should not cover palm oil and its derivatives within the current negotianegotiations and should foresee binding sustainable development chapters covering deforestation and core ILO conventions;
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 28 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas companies trading in palm oil are generally unable to prove with certainty that the palm oil in their supply chain is not linked to deforestation;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 33 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas there are no reliable data available in producer countries on the areas of land given over to the cultivation of oil palms, whether it be authorised or not, and this obstacle, from the outset, detracts from the measures taken to certify the sustainability of palm oil;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 37 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas precious tropical ecosystems, which cover a mere 7% of the Earth’s surface, are under increasing pressure from deforestation and the establishment of oil palm oil plantations, which are resulting in, for example, the massive forest fires, which frequently affect the rainforest; whereas the deforestation caused by the establishment of oil palm plantations is leading to the drying up of rivers, soil erosion, the loss of groundwater, the pollution of waterways and the destruction of rare natural habitats, and even causing ecosystems to stop providing basic ecosystem services, which is having a major impact on the global climate; whereas the deforestation caused by the establishment of oil palm plantations is one of the factors contributing the most, and dangerously, to the loss of the basic ecosystem services provided by tropical forests, which is having a major impact on the climate, biodiversity, the conservation of natural resources and, lastly, the preservation of the global environment for present and future generations;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 38 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the importance of improving the situation through appropriate certification, easily accessible for SMEs, confirming that the palm oil in question has been produced without undue harm to the environment and society and that the product is effectively and transparently traceable throughout the entire supply chain;
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ban EU imports of biodieselfuels derived from palm oil and palm oil derivatives as well as EU imports of palm oil and palm oil derivatives for the production of biofuels; asks the Commission to introduce a mandatory labelling scheme for biodieselfuels ingredients and their origins, and for other palm oil products; reiterates the importance of the complete phase-out of the use of biofuels derived by vegetable oils;
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 56 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas demand for palm oil will, according to estimates, double by 2050; whereas new plantations are constantly being established and existing on, since the 1970s, 90% of the growth in palm oil production has been concentrated in Indonesia and Malaysia; whereas, according to the FAO, these countries will contribute significantly to the growth in total production of vegetable oils in developing countries, expanded in Indonesia, Malaysia and other Asian countries, as well as in Africa and Latin America; stimated to be 15.9 million tonnes in 2030 and 14.2 million tonnes in 20501 a; whereas, moreover, oil palm cultivation is taking off also in other Asian countries, as well as in Africa and Latin America, where new plantations are constantly being established and existing ones expanded; _________________ 1a http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/ap106e/ap 106e.pdf (FAO, World Agriculture Towards 2030/2050 - The 2012 Revision)
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 63 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Is concerned by the fact that 18% of all illegally produced palm oil enters the EU market and asks the Commission to take immediate measures to identify and curb this trade;
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 64 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Emphasises that legislation to stop import of illegal forest-risk commodities is urgently needed; recalls that similar measures concerning timber, fisheries and conflict minerals have already been agreed;
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 64 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas the loss of natural habitats in the form of rainforests is endangering the survival of a large number of species (e.g. the Sumatran rhinoceros, the Sumatran tiger and the Bornean orangutan)poses the greatest threat to the survival of the Sumatran rhinoceros, the Sumatran tiger and the Bornean orangutan, in addition to other animal and plant species which, alongside these, are included on the red list of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as critically endangered species, interpreted as being an observed, estimated, inferred or suspected population size reduction of more than 80% over the last 10 years or three generations;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 69 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas the heavy use of palm oil is primarily due to its low cost, which is made possible by the increase in the number of oil palm plantations in deforested areas; whereas, in addition, the use of palm oil in the food industry is in keeping with a model of mass, unsustainable production and consumption, which runs counter to the use and promotion of organic, high- quality, zero-food-mile ingredients and products;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 77 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Is fully aware of how complex the issue of palm oil is and notes the need to operate on the basis of thea collective, shared responsibility of many actors, be they the EU andbetween the EU, the Member States, international organisations, Member States,the governments of producer countries, in which palm oil is cdigenous people, national and multivnated and indigenous people, private businesses, or NGOs;ional businesses involved in producing, distributing and processing palm oil, consumer associations and NGOs; is convinced, moreover, that all of these actors must necessarily play a part in resolving this problem;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 86 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. NotHopes that palm oil canmay be cultivated responsibly and canfrom an environmental point of view, by avoiding deforestation and the establishment of plantations in replacement of peatlands and other fragile ecosystems, and that this may, at the same time, make a real contribution to the economicsustainable development of a country, provided that no deforestation occurs, that no plantations are established on peatlands, and that the rights ofproducer countries whilst respecting the rights of local people and indigenous communities; points out, in this regard, that the economic benefits deriving from the production of and trading in palm oil can genuinely contribute towards the development of a producer country only if they are fairly distributed among all stakeholders, starting with the local people and indigenous communities are respected;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 100 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes the existence of various types of voluntary certification schemes, including RSPO, ISPO and MPOCC, and welcomrecognises their development towards the sustainable cultivation of palm oilcontribution to the sustainable cultivation of palm oil; nevertheless points out that such voluntary certification schemes suffer from certain factors that limit their reliability from the outset, such as the incomplete knowledge of the concessions issued or scheduled for the cultivation of palm oil in producer countries, and the lack of permanent monitoring and control of compliance with certification requirements;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 117 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on all stakeholders in RSPO and other voluntary certification systems to agree on a common definition of 'deforestation' and on the need to attain the target of 'zero deforestation' as quickly as possible;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 120 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls foron national and multinational companies that cultivate palm oil to use the High Carbon Stock (HCS) approach when developing their plantations; draws attention to the need to create a comprehensive land-us in a lawful manner, which is to say respecting the plan that will take into account the land used by local communities for the cultivation of food, peatlands and high conservation value (HCV) land, and will respect the right of communid rights of the indigenous populations and local communities and fulfilling the highest environmental standards and, above all, not damaging primary forests or peatlands; Calls on European companies that produce or use large quantities of palm oil to contribute actively to attaining the objectives to use the land on the basis of ‘free prset in the multilateral environmental agreements on climate actiorn and informed consent’ (FPIC)the protection of biodiversity;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 125 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Draws attention to the need to create a palm oil cultivation strategy that will take into account the land used by local communities for the cultivation of food, peatlands and high conservation value (HCV) land, and will respect the right of communities to use the land on the basis of ‘free prior and informed consent’ (FPIC); points out that mapping in producer countries, including through the use of satellite and geospatial technologies, is the only way to survey oil palm concesssions, assess the impact of that monoculture on natural resources, the environment and the countryside, to pinpoint the areas at greatest risk in terms of habitat continuity, to frame targeted strategies for forestation, reforestation and the creation of ecological corridors for the protection of endangered species, and in a realistic sense to improve voluntary certification systems;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 128 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on the European Union to support the efforts that must be made to map oil palm cultivation in producer countries and calls on the Commission and Member States to endorse the need, as part of the dialogue with those countries, to impose a freeze on the area under oil palm cultivation, including by introducing a moratorium on new concessions, in order to safeguard the remaining rainforest;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 131 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Points out that the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) also views the mapping and monitoring of concessions, supported by an appropriate regulatory framework, as the only instruments that will enable the sustainable management of palm oil production, protection of the remaining rainforest and the framing of strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and conserve biological diversity in producer countries 8 a; _________________ 8a http://www.unep.org/pdf/Dec_11_Palm_P lantations.pdf
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 132 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Calls on the European Union and Member States to support the initiatives aimed at acknowledging and assessing the non-monetary value of the ecosystem services provided by forests, help achieve the global objectives on forests established by the United Nations Forum on Forests (UNFF)2 a and facilitate the negotiation of the multilateral agreement on forests, which should be legally binding and help safeguard forest ecosystems, protecting them from other competing forms of land use and use of natural resources; _________________ 2a http://www.un.org/esa/forests/
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 134 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for the EU to continue to initiapromote voluntary partnership agreements, such as FLEGT; notes that a similar approach could also be taken with regard to palm oil, and that it could lead to improved controls on the palm industry in countries of destination; and calls on the Commission to step up the FLEGT negotiations currently in progress such as, for example, the one with Malaysia;5 a considers it particularly important that the EU undertake to initiate these agreements in the countries where illegal logging and the sale of products relating to this are linked directly or indirectly to deforestation with a view to creating new oil palm plantations; notes that an approach similar to FLEGT could also be taken with regard to palm oil, and that it could lead to improved controls on the palm industry in countries of destination; _________________ 5a http://www.euflegt.efi.int/vpa The EU has concluded FLEGT agreements with Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Ghana, Indonesia, Liberia and Congo and is negotiating such agreements with Côte d'Ivoire, DRC, Gabon, Guyana, Honduras, Laos, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam.
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 145 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the EU to create, as a supplementary element of voluntary partnership agreements, follow-up legislation on such agreements with regard to palm oil along the lines of the EU Timber Regulation; points out at the same time that only partial data is currently available on the implementation of that Regulation and, in particular, that precise information is still not available on fulfilment of the obligations contained therein in respect of due diligence, monitoring and verification, and effective implementation of the ban on the sale of illegally-harvested timber4 a ; urges the Commission therefore to devote more energy to the practical implementation of the Timber Regulation, in order to better gauge its effectiveness and ascertain whether and to what extent it can be taken as a model for a new EU legislative act designed to prevent the sale in the EU of palm oil that is non-sustainable or produced in an unlawful manner in the countries of origin; _________________ 4ahttp://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/IT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:520 16DC0074&from=EN;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 149 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the non-profit sector, to launch information campaigns and to provide consumers with comprehensive information on the environmental and social consequences of the reckless cultivation of palm oil; calls on the Commission to ensure that information confirming that a product is not linked to deforestation is provided to consumers by means of a special indication on the product; calls on the Commission and Member States to support research into the effects of palm oil consumption on human health, and particularly on children's health, since it is often used as an ingredient in many processed food products;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 175 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 – indent 2
- has not given rise to social problems oreconomic, social and environmental conflicts,
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 178 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 – indent 2 a (new)
- does not cause a loss in biodiversity, commencing with endangered animal and plant species ,
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 180 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 – indent 3 a (new)
- is not produced in such a way as to infringe the human rights of the local populace,
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 193 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to strengthen environmental measures in its trade agreements with a view to preventing palm oil-related deforestation; considers also that, to ensure consistent Union external action in the fields of environmental protection and development cooperation in line with the objectives set out in Articles 191 and 208 TFEU, this issue should also be addressed in partnership and cooperation agreements and association agreements with the third countries concerned in the context of discussions relating to the environment and development chapters thereof 3a ;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 203 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to increase import duties on palm oil that is directly linked to deforestation and that does not reflect the real costs associated with the environmental burden; notes that this instrument will require the involvement of certification schemesproduced in a manner directly or indirectly connected with deforestation, reflecting more accurately the real costs associated with the environmental burden in particular the impact on biodiversity, the reduction in the number of plants that function as carbon sinks and CO2 combustion emissions; notes that this instrument will require the involvement of certification schemes; asks the Commission also to consider the introduction and application of non- discriminatory tariff and non-tariff barriers based on the carbon footprint of this product;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 229 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to support activities aimed at creatensure that EU policies, including the EU common commercial policy, are established and conducted ing a synergy between the CAP and policies whose objective is to reduce deforestation (REDD+, Biodiversity Strategy); calls on the Commission to assess the potmanner consistent with programmes to combat deforestation in developing countries, such as REDD +; calls on the Commission and the Member States to undertake to ensure that such afforestation and reforestation programmes, as well as being technically and scientifically feasible and resulting in measurable benefits, are implemented in such a way as to respect fully the human rights of local communities and indigenous populations; calls on the Commission and the Member States also to ensure that the environmential consequences of reformproblems related to deforestation caused by palm oil are also discussed ing the CAP for countries outside the EU27, as this has the potential to lead tolight of the objectives set by the European Union Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, which should be an integral part of the Union's external action in this area; calls on the Commission to ensure that CAP reform does not lead directly or indirectly to a further massive deforestation;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 242 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that Member States have an opportunity to support steps aimed at establishing the sustainable cultivation of palm oil by ratifyupholding the Amsterdam Declaration;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 251 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission to push for the use of palm oil as a component of biodiesel to be phased out by 2020 at the latestnotes with concern that 46% of total palm oil imported by the EU is used for the production of biodiesel and that this involves the use of about one million hectares of tropical soils; notes the existence of major imbalances within the Union, with Italy and Spain obtaining over 90% of biodiesel from palm oil and the Netherlands exporting almost 100% of this product to other Member States and third countries; recalls Special Report 18/2016 of the EU Court of Auditors, which concluded that, because of weaknesses in the Commission’s recognition procedure and in the subsequent supervision of voluntary schemes, the EU certification system for the sustainability of biofuels is not fully reliable7a; asks the Commission to act therefore to ensure that the use of palm oil as an ingredient for biodiesel is banned as soon as possible and in any case by 2020;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 56 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas there is as yet no body of rules governing independent contracts and VAT identification numbers, meaning that such employment does not enjoy any form of protection;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Understands standard employment to mean full-time, or part-time regular employment on the basis of open-ended contracts, and non- standard or atypical forms of employment to include, i.a., marginal part-time work, temporary agency work, fixed-term contract work, zero-hour contracts, internships that are not part of an education programme, and informal or undeclared work;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Where the choice to engage in forms of part-time work is one made by worker, it is necessary to ensure that such employment is economically and socially sustainable;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses the need to adopt counter- cyclical economic policies designed to protect workers’ purchasing power, in accordance with the constitutional traditions of the Member States;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that any form of contract liable to exacerbate a worker’s situation must be penalised uniformly in a manner to be established in line with the Member States’ legal systems;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that digitisation has transformed, and will continue to transform, the world of work, but this cannot serve to justify wage deflation mitigated by one-off payments; in actual fact, the levels of under-employment cannot be attributed to the technological revolution, but rather to the Ordoliberal policies implemented by the EU;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 235 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the importance of labour inspectorates and the social partners in safeguarding workers’ rights, defining decent wages and incomes in accordance with Member States’ laws and practices, and in providing consultation and guidance to employers; strongly underlines that labour inspectorates should focus on the goal of monitoring and improving working conditions, and should not be used as migration control mechanisms; strongly condemns the practice of companies to employ migrants without securing their full rights and benefits; calls therefore for an increase in the number of labour inspectorates in order to ensure effective monitoring of the situation;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 272 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines the need for deficit- financed public investments promoting upwards convergenceexpanding sectors of the economy, which seek primarily to achieve the largest possible multiplier effect, the social cohesion of the Union and the creation of decent work;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2016/2149(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that notwithstanding the fact that the Lisbon Treaty has further expanded the areas of trade policy in which the EU has exclusive competence, the evolution of trade policy and Opinion 2/15 of the European Court of Justice on the EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (FTA) prescribe that FTAs that include provisions relating to non-direct investments and investor-State dispute settlement as well as other provision that do not fall within the exclusive competence of the EU cannot be concluded by the EU alone without the approval of Member States;
2017/06/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 8 #

2016/2149(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on national governments to ensure that adequate information is given to parliamentarians in a timely manner during the negotiation process, in order to ensure an efficient and inclusive decision- making process through the automatic publication of the negotiating mandates;
2017/06/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2016/2149(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Encourages the use of interparliamentary working groups on trade, in particular in relation to the field of consumer protection, employment and the environment.
2017/06/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Is surprised that, instead of the report required by Article 16(3) of the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR), the Commission has presented only a communication, which therefore has no binding effect, regarding negotiations of partnership agreements (PAs) and operational programmes (OPs);
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Is of the opinion that the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIFs) must be used to boost quality jobs, sustainable growth and development and shared prosperity across Europe, with a special focus on supporting the most vulnerable groups in society and promoting greater employment through a circular economy and renewable energies;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Believes it is necessary, in making use of ESIFs, to separate cofunding from the Stability and Growth Pact;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that 6 million unemployed young people are to benefit from the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) – which will help them find jobs or improve their skills and qualifications – now that YEI has been integrated into 34 ESF programmes in the 20 eligible Member States; is concerned, however, about the delayed start to the implementation of the YEI and at the way in which the Youth Guarantee is being implemented in certain regions; urges Member States to intensify their efforts to ensure that the results envisaged are achieved successfully and that the initiative is implemented correctly and with no covert exploitation of young workers; calls in particular for account to be taken of the real needs of the business community in using ESIFs to meet training requirements, so as to create real employment opportunities;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Regrets that that progress towards the Europe 2020 employment and anti- poverty goals have not been met; expresses particular concern that the worst results are being obtained from less developed regions or regions in transition;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Urges the Commission to seek constant monitoring of the use of ESIFs so as to ensure their effectiveness and transparency;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Asks the Commission to support the role of ESIFs in the promotion of research and innovation in micro, small and medium-sized enterprises;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Recommends that the Commission actively commit to ESIFs for job creation in a low carbon economic environment with reduced pollutant emissions;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that only rarely do ESF- supported measures generate revenue directly, and that grants are therefore the appropriate tool for their implementation, while certain financial instruments, such as loans and guarantees, could be a useful complementary tool for certain ESF interventions with a possible leverage effect;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission also to seek to harmonise definitions and rules so to achieve greater coherence between the various funds and instruments.
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes thatEmphasizes the need to move beyond voluntary initiatives, as they are not adequately addressing issues such as child labour, health and safety, wages, social security and, working time and integration of people with disability;
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Encourages the EU initiative to promote skills training, including training as micro-entrepreneurs, which contributes to economic and social development and women’s empowerment;
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Recognises existing efforts on management and worker training in health and safety, labour law and gender equality as fundamental to improving workers’ rights, and calls on the flagship initiative to develop a dedicated platform for sharing best practice on worker and management/worker training, focusing in particular on middle management positions;
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes the importance of increasing gender balance in management positions as the predominance of men at the management level is one reason behind the high rate of sexual harassment experienced by women workers;
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Emphasises the importance of training new labour inspectors to international conventions and standards, local labour laws and appropriate inspection techniques;
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Believes that responsibility should extend throughout the entire supply chain, and with the implementation, among others, of an information system using a public online database linking the actors along the supply chain to provide the needed traceability; commends existing efforts to this effect; believes, however, that the EU is best placed to develop a common framework through legislation on mandatory due diligence and supply chain transparency; recommends that regulation should come in addition to and in support of voluntary initiatives, and that information gathered as a result of EU action should be publicly available.
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Believes that the new Flagship Initiative should bear in mind the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the country-specific recommendations (CSRs) demonstrate the differences that exist between Member States; argues that the Member States should continue to give priority to reforms that will strengthen their economic recovery, making a commitment to investment, implementing structural reforms and taking an approach based on fiscal and budgetary responsibilityinvestments, excluding them from budgetary constraints in order to ensure economic recovery and the creation of new jobs;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that economic growth should guarantee a positive social impact; welcomes the introduction of the three new social indicators in the macroeconomic imbalances procedure; reiterates the call for these to be placed on an equal footing with existing economic indicators, thereby guaranteeing that internal imbalances are better assessed and making structural reforms more effective; calls, in this connection, for a social imbalances procedure to be introduced;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for a strong commitment to promoting the Juncker Plan (EFSI) in Member States with a low level of participation;deleted
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that to date, the Juncker Plan (EFSI) has not achieved its intended results, as the projects it has financed concern exclusively major infrastructure, which does not create sustainable and lasting employment; highlights the fact, moreover, that there is a need for measures and investment for existing infrastructure that is currently obsolete, which needs to be secured and modernised;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Recognises the significant progress made by the Member States in implementing structural reforms, while nevertheless taking the view that further progress is necessary:deleted
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that the European Pillar of Social Rights (EPSR) cannot be limited to a declaration of principles or good intentions but must consist of real matter (legislation, policy-making mechanisms and financial instruments), delivering positive impact on citizens’ lives in the short term and enabling support for European construction in the 21st century by effectively upholding social rights and Treaty objectives, strengthening cohesion and upward convergence, and helping to complete EMUwith the priority and urgent objective of resolving the poverty problem affecting 120 million European citizens today;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 196 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that the EPSR should equip European citizens with stronger means to keep control over their lives andto enable them to live a dignified life and realise their aspirations and to make markets work for wellbeing and sustainable development;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 253 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the enactment of a directive on fair working conditions for all forms of employment, ensuring for every worker a core set of enforceable rights, including equal treatment, social protection, protection in case of dismissal, health and safety protection, provisions on working time and rest time, freedom of association and representation, collective bargaining, collective action, access to training, and adequate information and consultation rights; underlines that this directive should apply to employees as well as to all workers in non-standard forms of employment, such as fixed-term work, part-time work, on-demand work, self-employment, crowd-working, internship and/or traineeship; requestcommends that the EU acquis be updated accordingly so as to apply to all workers;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 329 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point b
b. for work intermediated by digital platforms, a definition of employment that is lessnot dependent on full cumulation of the relevant criteria;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 500 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Is aware that rising life expectancy and workforce shrinking pose a challenge to the sustainability of pensions systems and to intergenerational fairness; reaffirms that the best response is to increase the overall employment rate; considers that pensionable ages should reflect, besides life expectancy, other factors including labour market trends, the economic dependency ratio, the birth rate and differences in job arduousness; disagrees, therefore, with the policies being pursued in the Member States under the guidance of the Commission aimed at arbitrarily raising the pensionable age;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 519 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Insists that all workers should be covered by insurance against involuntary unemployment or part-time employment, coupled with job-search assistance and investment in (re)-training; as such instruments are a key means of combatting the rise in poverty;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 577 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. ConsidersFirmly believes that access to quality and affordable long-term care services, including home-based care, to beis a right that should be upheld with the help of suitably qualified professionals employed under decent conditions; believes that low- income households shouldmust therefore be targeted by adequate public services and tax deductions; repeats its call for legislation on carers’ leave accompanied by adequate remuneration and social protection;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 586 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Firmly believes it is necessary to ensure that persons with disabilities can enjoy the right to determine their own life style by guaranteeing they can lead an independent life and providing them with the requisite assistance through the granting of professional status to trained carers providing quality services;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 605 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to create the conditions to guarantee all EU citizens basic social rights, such as the right to housing, and to contribute to ensuring that the universal concept of human dignity is reflected at every moment in the life of every individual;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 624 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Stresses that one possible solution is to reduce mortgage or rent payments for families living in inadequate housing as an incentive and means of enabling them to spend money on refurbishing and improving their home instead; also urges the Commission and the Member States to establish in law that a primary residence is immune from seizure, thereby making it mandatory to protect EU citizens’ right to housing;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 627 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Points out that 22 348 834 households (representing around 11% of the EU population) spend over 40% of their disposable income on meeting housing costs; notes that as part of the European Semester, excessive household costs have been singled out as a societal trend to be monitored, and that 21 924 491 households (representing around 10.8% of the EU population) are finding it difficult to keep their homes at an acceptable temperature; calls therefore on the Commission and Member States to urgently identify, implement and continue measures that enable them to meet those costs, including housing allowances;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 670 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Expresses strong concern at the country-specific recommendations issued by the Commission and the impact these have had in guiding the labour reforms that have destabilised the job market in the Member States;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 725 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Points out that secure professional transitions require adequate investment, both in the institutional capacity of public employment services and to assist individual job-search and upskilling; stresses that these objectives can only be achieved by freeing public investment from budgetary constraints;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 736 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for full implementation of the Youth Guarantee for all people under 30 and of the recommendation on the long- term unemployed; highlights these as important structural reforms and social investments that are in need of adequate financing; points out, however, that initiatives such as the Youth Guarantee must be put into effect with a comprehensive understanding of the employment regions in which they are to be implemented; this means redefining the role of job centres – i.e. to assist users, taking into account all their specific circumstances, to update skills and to focus attention on developing sectors through direct contact with businesses in order to ascertain the competences that the latter require potential employees to possess;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 780 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls onUrges the Commission to set out new concrete measures to ensure non- discrimination and equal opportunities;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 816 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. EIs extremely concerned about the ‘brain drain’ problem and emphasises that labour mobility within the EU is a right whose exercise must be supported but which should not be forced on workers by poor conditions in their home regions, and should not undermine host countries’ social standards;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 857 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – introductory part
26. CIs extremely concerned about the social impact of the economic policies pursued at EU level and considers that the objective of upward social convergence should be underpinned by a set of targets, building on the Europe 2020 strategy and the Sustainable Development Goals and serving to guide the coordination of economic, employment and social policies in the EU; believes that these targets could also form part of the Convergence Code currently being discussed for the euro area, and cshould be based on the following indicators which are directly affected by public policies not covered by budgetary restrictions:
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 936 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls for a rebalancing ofsubstantial policy shift in the European Semester so that the existing scoreboard of key employment and social indicators and the new Convergence Code are directly taken into account in formulating CSRs and the euro area recommendation as well as for the activation of EU instruments; urges a stronger role for the Macroeconomic Dialogue with social partners; considers ‘macro-social surveillance’ to be of great importance for avoiding that economic imbalances are reduced at the expense of worsening the employment and social situation;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 958 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls for a ‘silver rule’ on social investment to be applied when implementing the Stability and Growth Pact, namely to consider certain public social investments having a clear positive impact on economic growth (e.g. childcare or education and training) as being eligible for favourable treatment when assessing government deficits and compliance with the 1/20 debt rule;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 992 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 – introductory part
30. Reiterates its call for the raising ofto review the MFF 2014-20 ceilings in order to cope with increased needs; calls, in particular, for:
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 997 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 – point a
a. the strengtheningbetter implementation of the Youth Employment Initiative;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1003 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 – point b
b. an increase in the volummore effective use of the European Social Fund, the EGF and the FEAD;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1033 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Calls on the Commission and the EIB to refocus the EFSI on job creation and social investment and adapt its risk/return requirements accordingly, and in particular to boost investment in SMEs and micro-enterprises operating in green and blue economy and social and circular economy sectors;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1045 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – introductory part
32. Considers that the specific dynamics of economic adjustment within the euro area call for the development of two financial instruments, within the euro area’s fiscal capacity, that would be particularly relevant for the implementation of the EPSR: to be essential;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1057 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point a
a. a fund for renewed structural convergence, supporting the implementation of socially just reforms and investments that are necessary for increasing the growth potential of crisis- affected areas and restoring upward social convergence, including for implementation of the Youth Guarantee, Skills Guarantee and Child Guarantee;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1074 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point b
b. a European unemployment insurance scheme, complementing national schemes in cases of severe cyclical downturn and helping prevent the translation of an asymmetric shock into structural disadvantage;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2016/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the EU Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking which will play a crucial role in combating the alarming rise in the illegal trade in wildlife which destabilizes economies and communities that depend on wildlife for their livelihoods, threatens peace and security of fragile regions of EU trade partners by strengthening illicit routes; underlines, in particular, Priority 2 concerning the implementation and enforcement of the relevant existing rules and legal frameworks;
2016/09/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2016/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for the better use of existing resources, the use of up-to-date technology and, adequate training for customs authorities in source, transit and destination countries, especially developing countries, in order to successfully combat the illegal trade in wildlifea stronger international cooperation and public- private partnerships in order to successfully combat the illegal trade in wildlife, in particular expanding ivory trade controls, closing existing loopholes and finding common sanctions with EU trade partners;
2016/09/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 27 #

2016/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the inclusion of provisions ensuring the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity in the EU-Vietnam free trade agreement (FTA) and insists on including wildlife protection provisions in all future EU EPAs and FTAs, including, but not limited to, those with the US and Japan; calls on the Commission to include the analysis of these provisions in its implementation reports;
2016/09/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 10 #

2016/2075(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the current fragmentation of custom control policies between theand prosecution proceedings between EU Member States (MS) creates additional administrative and time burdens as well as a, distortion of internal trade flows and preferential access points for wrongdoers;
2017/02/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 15 #

2016/2075(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the proposed directive for a Union legal framework for customs infringements and sanctions does not take into due account the current differences between the Member States’ criminal and administrative sanctions, allowing operators to make strategic choices when importing from third countr within MS causing distortion in third countries operators strategic choices and ineffective deterrents to illegal trade activities;
2017/02/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2016/2075(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas effective customs cooperation between the Member States' customs administrations, police forces and judicial authorities, with third countries and at multilateral level, plays a vital role, given the significant trade volumes, and is a cornerstone in the fight against illicit trade and in the protection of EU intellectual property rights (IPR);
2017/02/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2016/2075(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas illegal trade flows and contraband activities with high revenues and considerable financial impact in most cases contribute to the financing of criminal organisations active in terrorism, drug trafficking, counterfeit, fire arms, money laundering and human trafficking;
2017/02/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 34 #

2016/2075(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to work closely with the Member States to ensure efficient implementation of the new system set by the UCC, avoiding divergent practices among the Member States during the transition period and developing benchmark analysis and information on customs operations and enforcement procedures in force in the Member States;
2017/02/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #

2016/2075(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Invites the Commission to continue cooperation with the Member States and relevant trade stakeholders further to develop customs simplifications while ensuring appropriate and harmonised control at EU borders in order to guarantee EU security, safety, respect of environmental requirements and health regulations and economic interests, with a particular effort regarding IPR protection and the fight against illicit trade;
2017/02/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 58 #

2016/2075(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Commission to coordinate and cooperate with customs and, other border agencies on the ground and stakeholder in a better way, within the EU as well as with its trade partners on data sharing, in particular as regards recognition of custom controls and trusted trade partners;
2017/02/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 65 #

2016/2075(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Invites the Commission to present a communication on b"Better practises on custom control forand trade rules enforcement" in the interim period, in order to bolster convergence between control and enforcement bodies, highlight best practices and results, and analyse the counterfeiting trade flows at border points;
2017/02/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 74 #

2016/2075(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Reminds the Commission how third countries most frequently source of illegal trade activities, including China, Thailand and Belarus shall be subject to accurate scrutiny within the wider framework of a risk assessment analysis on external aspects of customs operation;
2017/02/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 81 #

2016/2075(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Requests the Commission to work closely with the Member States and the World Custom Organisation (WCO) in addressing the existing gaps in the customs control systems by ensuring that illicit trade is tackled using more systematically co-ordinated risk-based controls based on harmonised criteria and interoperable IT systems, with timely and appropriate support provided by other competent authorities; recalls, in this regard, the importance of ensuring inquiry powers to all EU customs and border agencies, and of guaranteeing appropriate training to their operators;
2017/02/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 97 #

2016/2075(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Encourages the Commission and the Council to ensure an early adoption of the Sanction Directive with a view to enabling, within the Customs Union, a level playing field and equal treatment of trade stakeholders infringing customs rules; furthermore, invites the Commission to further develop an accurate cost-benefit analysis on the implications connected to the harmonisation of the enforcement of criminal sanctions in place in the Member States to combat illicit trade activities;
2017/02/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 5 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that the main aim of projects financed under the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) should be to create growth and a dynamic labour market in Europeinclusive growth, development and a dynamic, inclusive and non- precarious labour market in Europe that preserves the dignity of workers, and hence to enhance the well-being of EU citizens;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to help SMEs and micro- enterprises to tap into funding more easily, so as to increase their capacity to implement projects and afford them better access to advisory services and technical support; recommends that SMEs and micro-enterprises should be given access to information on the funding that is available;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to engage more actively in consultation at local level, especially in cooperation with national investment banks; believes that the EFSI should focus in particular on business startup projects and projects to reduce unemployment, without funding only large projects, which in many cases are not a suitable means of meeting the objectives set;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Believes that the EFSI should be used primarily to fund businesses that have adopted a code of practice on safeguarding the dignity of workers and protecting the environment;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Considers it disappointing that the Commission’s assessment of the EFSI has failed to record the number of jobs created to date under the Fund; recommends that a careful and accurate analysis should be carried out so that the necessary changes may be made;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to lay down more clear-cut investment priorities and to draw up projects in collaboration with the European Investment Advisory Hub; calls on the Commission to work in closer cooperation with Member States in the European Semester process in order to help them begin as soon as possible to implement the recommendations, in particular by carrying out economic and social reforms, thus removing national barriers to investmentgeared to safeguarding the social and cultural heritage and landscape of local areas, and, to this end, to draw up relevant projects in collaboration with the European Investment Advisory Hub.
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission´s communication on ‘An Aviation Strategy for Europe’; stresses that action, however, that a greater effort is needed to reinforce the social agenda and maintain high-quality jobs in aviation; believes that ensuring a level playing field in the sector is crucial;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Iexpresses it concern at increasing recourse to precarious forms of employment and insists that direct employment must remain the usual form of employment in aviation in order to ensure safety;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission to introduce a regulatory framework with a safeguard clause regarding job retention following a change of service provider;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls on the Commission to ensure that working conditions for staff, especially pilots, are such as to prevent safety standards being compromised as a result of excess fatigue;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need to prevent and clamp down on social dumping and possible illegal use of foreign workers on board EU-registered planes;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Asks the Commission to clarify the provisions so that a distinction can be drawn between employees and self- employed workers to combat 'bogus self employment'; stresses, in this regard, that low-cost airlines in particular use self- employment contracts for pilots, which often provide for the employment of pilots at the end of their careers, who are often hired through temporary agencies based outside the EU; calls for strict rules to clamp down on any such occurrence;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. reiterates that any agreement on aviation must include respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms enshrined in the European Social Charter and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to invest in lifelong education and training in all parts of the aviation value chain, especially in view of the impact of innovation and digital technology in all parts of the aviation value chain; calls on the Commission and the Member States also to support the research and training specifically relating to the development of advanced and highly specialised skills;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Member States to establish appropriate penalties to curb violations of the principle of equal pay for the same work and for work of equal value;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to adopt measures to reduce inequalities, in financial terms, between minimum and maximum ('gold- plated') pensions, by increasing minimum pensions and decreasing maximum pensions;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase investments in services for 'baby citizens', so that mothers are not forced to take career breaks;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 182 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Deplores the Commission and its common tendency to ask Member States to gradually raise the pensionable age, which does not allow for generational turnover or a work-life balance, even more so when it comes to the more arduous jobs, which are often done precisely by women;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 197 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Recommends that the first of the three pension pillars should be promoted in order to eliminate pension inequalities, particularly gender-based ones, and that the practice of private pension schemes should be avoided, making it a voluntary option and not a practice to be prioritised;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2016/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that trade plays a key role in energy security, and that strong energy partnerships, reinforced by the inclusion of energy chapters in the EU’s trade agreements, are essential tools; considers it to be of key importance that the EU’s trade agreementpolicies enhance the EU’s energy diversification and reduce its dependence on imported energy from too few suppliers; recalls that diversification of suppliers should be taken into consideration in trade negotiations regarding LNG; stresses that the European Union should explore new partnerships, reviewing the existing ones and developing specific energy talks with other partners; underlines the need to increase transparency in the international negotiations regarding LNG;
2016/07/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 21 #

2016/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that in order to meet the current challenges and implement its energy and climate change objectives in the context of global constraints in those policy fields, the EU and its Member States must, on the basis of existing legal frameworks, also take common action on the international stage by raising energy security and sustainability issues in international trade forums; at the same time, the European Union should support and promote energy efficiency in order to reduce the need of LNG imports;
2016/07/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2016/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the need to ensure the highest environmental standards in the planning, construction and use of liquefied natural gas (LNG)Considering the current infrastructures, it should be avoided the construction of new ones preferring to increase the efficiency of the existing infrastructures; stresses the need to ensure the highest environmental standards in the planning, construction and use of liquefied natural gas (LNG); recalls the need to involve the local communities and to rely on realistic assessments in any case of construction or planning of new infrastructures; highlights that many assessments and estimates about the future consumption of LNG have been greatly exaggerated, as also noted by the European Court of Auditors; asks therefore the Institutions to assess the methodologies used in order to evaluate in a realistic way the issue of LNG;
2016/07/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 33 #

2016/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that in order to promote the transition towards a low-carbon society, we need to reduce drastically our dependence on fossil fuels and to focus more resources and investments on renewable energies;
2016/07/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 38 #

2016/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that it is estimated that gas imports to the EU will rise until 2030, even if gas demand within the EU simultaneously stays stagnant or declines; stresses that moderating energy demand and promoting energy efficiency, renewable and local energy sources are among the most effective tools for reducing dependence on external energy; recalls that the EU has significant LNG import excess capacity overall, but that this capacity is not evenly distributed in geographical terms; recalls that the existing terminals and storage capacity in the European Union is overabundant;
2016/07/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 26 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Regards universal access to medicines as essential, all the more so because the economic crisis in Europe has made such access even more of a problem, in particular for the most vulnerable groups in society; urges, therefore, that these groups should be guaranteed access to medicines;
2016/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Urges that access to medicines should be guaranteed for people in all countries, not just in those with effective innovation policies; points out that innovation does not always serve to ensure that medicines are more readily available, and indeed may have the opposite effect;
2016/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Urges that universal access to medicines should not be contingent on price, which should reflect a fair balance between the cost of research, industry growth and the need for sustainable welfare systems; urges that a balance should be maintained at all times between research, development and sustainability, with a view to combating the pharmaceutical oligopolies which determine the price of medicines, even when the prices in question are unsustainable for many health systems, and in so doing create vast areas in which people are denied access to medicines;
2016/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates that part of the reason why businesses are becoming less competitive and why welfare spending is so high is that EU rules – including rules on drug pricing – are too burdensome.; points out that price of most medicines is out of proportion to the cost of manufacturing them; emphasises, in that connection, that firms' competitive position should have no bearing on the final price of medicines;
2016/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Points out that it is the pharmaceutical industry which is pressing for the enforcement of the rules on patents and thus preventing the use of generic drugs, which are cheaper and could thus be made more widely available; calls for information and awareness-raising campaigns to encourage the use of generic drugs;
2016/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
– having regard to the EU textual proposal for a trade and sustainable development chapter in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), in particular Articles 10 to 16 thereof,deleted
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6
– having regard to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), in particular Articles XX(a) and (g) thereof,
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 34 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that only an integrated approach to wildlife crime can ultimately be successful in curtailing and eliminating the illegal trade, and that the EU must lead efforts in tackling not only supply-side issues, including development issues on the ground in third countries, but also demand for illegal products in domestic markets, including on the internet;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 35 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls that under WTO law, countries are permitted to introduce exceptions to the general rules of the GATT in Article XX(g) in order to regulate exhaustible natural resources and in Article XX(a) in order to protect public morality; underlines that the WTO Appellate Body has broadly interpreted this'exhaustible natural resources' to include living species that may be vulnerable to depletion, and that WTO jurisprudence has specifically evidenced inclusion of species in CITES annexes as evidence of their exhaustibility; underlines also that the WTO Appellate Body has broadly interpreted 'public morality' to include concerns regarding animal protection;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 42 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission to investigate to what extent EU legislation on wildlife trade is uniformly applied in different EU customs by operators responsible for controls;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to work on information sharing and capacity building, including specific training, for custom operators;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Highlights the importance of ensuring the private sector’s involvement in the fight against wildlife trafficking, including the engagement of online marketplaces and social media;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls for stricter controls by cargo shipping agencies and airlines, that are well placed to recognise illegal wildlife trade;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 51 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Recognises the role civil society organisations can play in supporting the fight against wildlife trafficking both in Europe and in third countries;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 53 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to engage with non- governmental organisations in reducing trafficking and demand of wildlife products, among others, by means of campaigns aimed at raising awareness especially in countries where this demand is higher;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that the existing domestic legal framework remains sufficient at this stageis sound, and that the challenge for EU Member States remains the implementation and enforcement of the existing rules, rather than wholesale legal changes that could, rather, create instability and further problems with implementation; nevertheless, strongly believes that supplementary legislative provisions are needed in order to prohibit the making available and placing on the market, transport, acquisition and possession of wildlife that has been illegally harvested or traded in third countries;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 64 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. WelcomeSuggests the Commission’s proposal for a to include chapters on trade and sustainable development in TTIPall trade agreements under negotiations, as part of its ongoing commitment to ensure sustainable development; notes that up till now the US has sought in its trade agreements, notably the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), to negotiate higher standards covering trade in wildlife than the EU ha including wildlife conservation and animal welfare protection; believes, however, that including wildlife conservation in the sustainable development chapter of a trade agreement must not preclude the inclusion of animal protection provisions in other chapters of future trade agreements;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 68 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Emphasise the importance of making sustainable development chapters in trade agreements enforceable by submitting them to State to State dispute settlement provisions and to foresee a similar mechanism that can be triggered by Civil Society Organisations;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 73 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Supports an approach to EU trade policy that not only prioritises the issue of combating the illegal wildlife trade but includes in all future agreements binding and enforceable provisions aimed at its reduction and ultimate elimination;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 74 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines that nothing in EU trade policy should prevent the EU or its trading partners from taking decisions that are necessary for the promotion of protection of wildlife and natural resources, provided that such measures continue to be in pursuit of legitimate public policy objectives and do not represent arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 79 #

2016/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls for the full and immediate ban at European level of trade, export or re-export within and outside the EU of ivory, including 'pre-Convention' ivory in a manner compliant with WTO law;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 11 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for an effective post-Cotonou framework adapted to global challenges, based on ownership by the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries and in line with the Sustainable Development Goals; stresses that a revised general framework agreement, together with the regional Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) and other trade instruments, must support fair and sustainable trade, more equitable distribution and, ultimately, sustainable development and poverty reduction;
2016/06/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the post-Cotonou process should offer a framework within which to discuss trade issues with all the ACP countries, considering the idea of opening the ACP Group to all LDCs and small and vulnerable economies of the region; calls for a strengthening of trade cooperation, with a values-driven approach and improved Policy Coherence for Development; believes that regional integration, inclusive growth, job creation, the development of the private sector and regional integration, especially micro and small enterprises must be central in a future economic partnership;
2016/06/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 39 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Reminds the importance to better coordinate our trade policy with other regional organization such as the Africa Union and CARIFORUM while reinvigorate EU trade ties with ACP countries;
2016/06/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 40 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Reminds the current challenges regarding natural resources that could attract interests of third countries such as China;
2016/06/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Calls for a balanced Post-Cotonou framework that should take into consideration and better explore the agro- food sector where the ACP could still play a key role in the increasingly complex area of non-tariff measures and SPS;
2016/06/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 42 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Reminds the new challenges to be further explored such as fisheries, extractive sectors, security and tourism;
2016/06/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e. Stresses the need to support the creation of a Continental Free Trade Area in Africa, as booster of stability, regional integration, local growth, employment and innovation and to face the current challenges such as migration and climate change;
2016/06/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 f (new)
3f. Believes that a post-Cotonou framework should consider the need for applying special and differential treatment to services negotiations with the ACP in strategic sectors including business services, construction and related services, health and education services, recreational, cultural and sporting services, and tourism services;
2016/06/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 g (new)
3g. Reminds that ACP trade policy with the EU needs to be tailored to be compatible with ACP national, regional and multilateral priorities mainly;
2016/06/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 46 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 h (new)
3h. Considers it is highly important for the Post-Cotonou framework to introduce trade facilitation measures in order to expand the intra-African exchange of industrial and agriculture products;
2016/06/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 54 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that trade unions and civil society involvement is a must throughout the implementation of the EPAs and the post- Cotonou process; notes the importance of a renewed ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly and defends strong parliamentary oversight of the future framework; asks for results-oriented monitoring of ACP-EU cooperation, especially with regard to trade and sustainable development;
2016/06/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 58 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls the Financing for Development commitments; calls for the EU to ensure more and effective funding for Aid for Trade to support the ACP countries' efforts to move up the global value chain.value chain and which should help to facilitate the establishment or development of domestic productive capacity, reduce income inequality in ACP countries and assist with economic diversification and technology transfers;
2016/06/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 66 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls likewise on the EU to upgrade its support to helping resource-rich countries to implement the EITI principles of greater transparency and accountability in the oil, gas and mining sectors;
2016/06/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 33 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the Customs Union must be modernised and trade relations strengthened within the framework of the values and principles of the Treaties of the European Union, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and in line with the ambitions of the Trade for All strategy;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 38 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas careful democratic and parliamentary monitoring of negotiations can boost their impact and increase the likelihood of the negotiations having a positive effect on Turkish and European civil society;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 40 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E c (new)
Ec. whereas Turkey is not currently complying with the provisions governing the Customs Union with regard to the Republic of Cyprus;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E d (new)
Ed. whereas the lack of a functional mechanism for resolving disputes is objectively limiting the development of the potential of the Customs Union and its practical operation;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 42 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E e (new)
Ee. whereas closer cooperation between the EU and Turkey when it comes to sharing information during the decision-making stages of drawing up European trade legislation could be a means to accelerate Turkey’s adaptation to the European acquis;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E f (new)
Ef. whereas differences remain in the way that the Union and Turkey draw up free trade agreements with third countries;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E g (new)
Eg. whereas legal certainty and the independence of the judiciary are needed to boost trade exchanges and promote foreign investments, and whereas the current situation in Turkey risks undermining the credibility of important sectors of the Turkish administrative and legal system;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E h (new)
Eh. whereas aligning Turkish legislation with European legislation requires a series of structural reforms in areas such as public procurement, state aid, agricultural subsidies, competitiveness, transparency, and anti- corruption strategies;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 46 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E i (new)
Ei. whereas the transport of goods by road is currently regulated by bilateral agreements between Turkey and Member States, and whereas two multilateral regulatory systems are in place: the Multilateral Quota System (MQS), which is managed by the International Transport Forum, and the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC) permit system;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 47 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E j (new)
Ej. whereas the internal road transport market in the European Union is already affected by a number of issues, particularly social and security problems, and whereas those issues cause significant damage to companies and workers operating in the sector when it comes to social dumping and illegal cabotage;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 48 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E k (new)
Ek. having regard to the latest position of the European Parliament on the process of Turkey’s adhesion to the EU;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 49 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E l (new)
El. whereas if their positions, political objectives and value systems diverge considerably, Turkey and the European Union could come up with new forms of cooperation;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 80 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point v
(v) the agreement on the modernisation of the Customs Union and the strengthening of trade relations between the EU and Turkey will have to be applied fully and equally to all Member States without any exceptions, not even temporary exceptions;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 117 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point vi
(vi) in order to enablesure that Turkey tois become more involved intter informed about the decision- making process related to the EU's trade policy, and provided there is significant progress in terms of convergence and legislative harmonisation, it would be helpful to allow Turkey access as an observer;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 133 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) the liberalisation of the sectors that are not currently included in the Customs Union should take place in a progressive and binding manner, by measuring its impact on businesses, particularly SMEs, workers, consumers and the environment. To that end, parliamentary institutions, both at EU level and nationally, can play an active role in liaising and holding talks with stakeholders and civil society;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 136 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point ii a (new)
(iia) as part of the Sustainability Impact Assessment, and with a view to increasing the transparency and democratic legitimacy of the negotiating process, the Parties must push for the European Parliament to be actively involved in the monitoring of stakeholders and other interested parties, whether Turkish or European;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 140 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iii
(iii) negotiations should focus on the active promotion of decent work for all and of female entrepreneurship, and the effective fight against national practices which seek to undermine the social and environmental substance of work for the purpose of promoting domestic production and attracting foreign investment;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 145 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iv
(iv) the liberalisation of agricultural products should be conditional upon reform of Turkish legislation on grants and export subsidies in order to avoid distortionary effects on the CAP system. Special consideration should be given to the impact on small-scale farmers regarding those categories of product that are vulnerable to competition, and the protection of Geographical Indications should be guaranteed;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 152 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point v
(v) the lack of harmonisation of plant health rules is a major barrier to trade in agricultural products; removal of that barrier should, however, be contingent upon compliance with the high quality standards applied by the EU, also taking into account the risk of fraudood fraud and imports of products that pose a potential risk to consumer health;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 160 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point vi
(vi) owing to its importance and impact, the services sector should be liberalised on the basis of stringent transparency criteria, full reciprocity, non-discrimination and legislative harmonisation and according to the positive list criterion, with the exclusion of audiovisual services and services of general economic interest;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 164 #

2016/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point vii
(vii) in areas such as the digital economy, telecommunications, postal services and financial services, attention should be paid to aspects relating to data protection; iIn the transport sector, the current quota system should be maintained, which is based on authorisation regimes currently in force, should be maintained, as changes to the system could have a negative social and environmental impact on the sector and on security within the European Union;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas in all industrialised countries the structure and organisation of work are changing radically, as working hours are being reduced in terms of both hours and days worked, and the place of work is increasingly the worker's home;
2016/06/14
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 128 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the reduction of working hours does not necessarily entail reduced productivity;
2016/06/14
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 144 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that workers live up to their full potential when they are content and can decide when and where to do their work;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 173 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. WelcomNotes the Commission’s approach to work-life balance policies as key in addressing socio-economic challenges; calls on the European Social Partners to come forward with an agreement on a comprehensive package of legislative and non-legislative measures regarding the reconciliation of professional, private and family life; calls on the Commission to put forward a proposal for such a package in the context of the announced European pillar of social rights, should it not be possible for an agreement between the social partners to be reached;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 190 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to implement economic policies and measures that support the weakest and most vulnerable types of families, particularly families with children, single mothers, fathers who are divorced and/or separated with children, and families in which one or more members have a disability;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 199 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to step up protection against discrimination and unlawful dismissal related to work-life balance and to ensure access to justice and legal action; calls on the Member States, on the one hand, to introduce measures to support businesses in their efforts to combat discrimination, and, on the other, to take steps themselves to clamp down on discrimination;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 250 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the Commission to adopt a post-2015 Gender Equality Strategy and to implement it through the European Semester, including the Annual Growth Survey and the country-specific recommendations;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 265 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to implement economic policies and measures that support families with children, divorced and/or separated mothers and fathers, and vulnerable family units in general, as these are the most fragile and vulnerable types of families;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 353 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Urges the Member States to invest in, and guarantee access to free services for individuals facing poverty and social exclusion and to ensure the availability of and universal access to affordable and high-quality early childhood education and care, along with services providing care to the elderly and dependant cares, by, for example, increasing public expenditure on care services and incentivising employer contributions to care costs, including by making better use of EU funds, and calls for the MFF revision to be used to invest in social infrastructure;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 382 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Stresses the importance of improving protection for older workers who lose their jobs before they become eligible for a pension; stresses the importance of implementing policies and measures to help older workers find new jobs;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 390 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Points out the high levels of working poor throughout Europe, with people having to work more and longer, even combining several jobs, in order to earn a decent income; calls on the Member States and social partners to develop measures ensuring adequate wages for all workers, and to close the gender pay gap and to introduce a minimum wage that guarantees dignified living conditions;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 399 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Supports ‘smart working’ and working from home, but rejects a shift from a culture of presence to a culture of permanent availability; calls on the Member States, when developing smart working policies, to ensure these do not impose an additional burden on the worker; stresses the need to strengthen, in such cases, the concept of ‘working to targets’ to prevent abuse of these new forms of work;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 419 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Points out that excessive working hours and insufficient rest periods, as well as the disproportionate output required, are major factors in increased levels of occupational accidents and diseases; calls on the Commission to initiate infringement proceedings against Member States who are failing to implement the Working Time Directive; recommends, to this end, close monitoring of takeovers and/or sales of companies with the aim of countering the trend towards the weakening of the provisions in employment contracts on working hours and rest periods;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 458 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop and implement policies that also give disadvantaged workers access to training and paid study opportunities, including in Member States other than their own;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 9 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recommends that operators and customers become computer literate, that digital services be fully operational where rationalisation plans exist for post offices, and that jobs be safeguarded, particularly existing jobs;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Is of the view that the overall volume of mail has fallen sharply, a phenomenon which has been exacerbated by the substitution of paper mail by digital tools (e-substitution), in addition to the economic crisis;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to carry out monitoring activities to verify, and subsequently curb, the exploitation of the situation of bogus self-employed workers; urges the Commission and the Member States, more generally, to prevent the flexibility of employment contracts from having a negative impact on workers;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Takes the view that a universal service should be provided to all users throughout a national territory, including the harder- to-access areas such as rural or mountain areas, where the supply of the service is loss-making and should be compensated;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Draws attention to a number of instances of unfair competition, the casualties of which have been workers in the sector; in this regard, calls on the Commission and the Member States to punish, in an appropriate manner, any conduct which could be regarded as unfair competition, to the detriment of workers;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Believes that a balance should be struck between free competition, consumer requirements, sustainability of the universal service and its financing, and the maintenance of jobs;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Stresses that in order to ensure there is a level playing field in terms of competition, existing obstacles and barriers need to be removed, such as the differences in VAT treatment between the universal operator and the other private companies that are competing for the operation of postal services, or the fact that some essential services such as the forwarding of judicial documents, remain the sole responsibility of the universal operator;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Recommends that public tender procedures for the awarding of postal services by government departments be monitored, in order to counter the direct award of contracts and thereby comply with EU legislation;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Points out that the rationalisation of services is becoming increasingly frequent, in particular as regards the gradual closure of numerous post offices, the reduction of opening hours with a consequent reduction in the number of jobs, the ongoing insecurity of employment contracts and the loss of quality in the service;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Notes that services are becoming increasingly internalised, resulting in a reduction in the number of delivery agencies and major job losses;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure clarity regarding the terminology in EU law, the term “posting” should only be used for the posting of workers within the meaning of Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services34. In addition, to achieve consistency in treatment between employed and self-employed persons it is necessary that the special rules for the determination of applicable legislation in the cases of workers who are temporarily posted or sent to another Member State should apply consistently to both employed and self-employed persons. __________________ 34 OJ L 018, 21.01.1997 p. 1. OJ L 018, 21.01.1997 p. 1.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) In the area of unemployment benefits, the rules on the aggregation of periods of insurance should be applied uniformly by all Member States. With the exception of cross-border workers referred to in Article 65(2), the rules on the aggregation of periods for the purpose of conferring entitlement to unemployment benefits should be subject to the condition that an insured person has most recently completed at least threone months of insurance in that Member State. The previously competent Member State should become competent for all insured persons who do not satisfy this condition, while taking into account the period of insurance completed by the person in the Member State of last activity for the purposes of calculating aggregated periods of insurance. In this case, registration with the employment services of the Member State of most recent insurance should have the same effect as registration with the employment services of the Member State, where the unemployed person had been previously insured.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Following the recommendations in the EU Citizenship Report 201335, there is a need to extend the minimum duration of export of unemployment benefits from three to six monthsto the entire period of entitlement in order to improve the opportunities for unemployed persons moving to another Member State to look for work and their chances for reintegration into the labour market and to address skills mismatches across borders. __________________ 35 COM(2013) 269 final. COM(2013) 269 final.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) There is a need to ensure greater parity of treatment for frontier and cross- border workers by ensuring frontier workers can choose where to receive unemployment benefits from the Member State of last activity provided that they have worked in that Member State for at least the past twelve months.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 267 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
1. A person who pursues an activity as an employed person in a Member State on behalf of an employer which normally carries out its activities there and who is posted within the meaning of Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services46 or sent by that employer to another Member State to perform work on that employer's behalf shall continue to be subject to the legislation of the first Member State, provided that the anticipated duration of such work does not exceed 24[...] months and that the person is not posted or sent to replace another employed or self-employed person previously posted or sent within the meaning of this Article and has worked for at least three months in the first Member State in the period before being posted. __________________ 46 OJ L 018 , 21.01.1997 p. 1.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 273 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
2. A person who normally pursues an activity as a self-employed person in a Member State who goes to pursue a similar activity in another Member State shall continue to be subject to the legislation of the first Member State, provided that the anticipated duration of such activity does not exceed 24[...] months and that the person is not replacing another posted employed or self-employed person and has worked for at least three months in the first Member State in the period before being posted.".
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 347 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17
2. The Administrative Commission shall draw up a, after appropriately consulting the social partners concerned and all relevant stakeholders, shall draw up an exhaustive and detailed list of long-term care benefits which meet the criteria contained in Article 1 (vb) of this Regulation, specifying which are benefits in kind and which are benefits in cash.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 363 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 61 – paragraph 1
1. Except in the cases referred to in Article 65(2), the application of Article 6 shall be conditional on the person concerned having most recently completed a period of at least threone months of insurance, employment, or self- employment in accordance with the legislation under which the benefits are claimed.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 371 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 61 – paragraph 2
2. Where an unemployed person does not satisfy the conditions for the aggregation of periods in accordance with paragraph 1 because the total duration of his or her most recently completed periods of insurance, employment or self- employment in that Member State is less than threone months that person shall be entitled to unemployment benefits in accordance with the legislation of the Member State where he or she had previously completed such periods under the conditions and subject to the limitations laid down in Article 64a.”.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 385 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 64 – paragraph 1 – point c
(a) In pParagraph 1(c) the word “three” shall be replaced by “six” and the words “of three months up to a maximum of six months” shall be replaced by the words “of six months upis amended as follows: “(c) unemployment benefits are extended to the end of thtire period of that person's entitlement to benefits”;entitlement;”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 391 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 64 – paragraph 2
(aa) paragraph 2 is deleted;
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 396 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 64 – paragraph 3
(b) In paragraph 3, the word “three” shall be replaced by “six” and the words “a maximum of six months” shall be replaced by the words “the end of the period of entitlement to benefits” is deleted.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 513 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 1 – point 2 – point e a
(ea) ‘fraud’ means any intentional act or omission to act, in order to obtain or receive social security benefits or to avoid to pay social security contributions, contrary to the law of a Member State, the basic Regulation or the implementing Regulation;”.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 516 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 2 – paragraph 5
5. When a person's rights or obligations to which the basic and implementing Regulations apply have been established or determined, the competent institution may request the institution in the Member State of residence or stay to provide personal data about that person, while fully respecting privacy requirements. The request and any response shall concernbe limited to information which enables the competent Member State to identify any inaccuracy in the facts on which a document or a decision determining the rights and obligations of a person under the basic or implementing Regulation is based. The request can also be made where there is no existing doubt about the validity or accuracy of the information contained in the document or on which the decision is based in a particular case. The request for information and any response must be justifiable, necessary and proportionate.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 528 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) When receiving such a request, the issuing institution shall reconsider the grounds for issuing the document and, if necessary, withdraw it or rectify it, within 215 working days from the receipt of the request. Upon detection of an irrefutable case of fraud committed by the applicant of the document, the issuing institution shall withdraw or rectify the document immediately and with retroactive effect.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 560 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. “1. For the purposes of the application of Article 12(1) of the basic Regulation, a ‘person who pursues an activity as an employed person in a Member State on behalf of an employer which normally carries out its activities there and who is posted within the meaning of the Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services52 or sent by that employer to another Member State’ shall include a person who is recruited with a view to being posted or sent to another Member State, provided that, immediately before the start of his employment, the person concerned ihas already been subject, for a period of at least three months, to the legislation of the sending Member State in accordance with Title II of the basic Regulation.”. __________________ 52where the employer is established, in accordance with this Title.”. __________________ 52 OJ L 018, 21.01.1997 p. 1. OJ L 018, 21.01.1997 p. 1.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 589 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 19 – paragraph 4
4. Where necessary for the exercise of legislative powers at national or Union level, relevant information regarding the social security rights and obligations of the persons concerned shall be exchanged directly between the competent institutions and the labour inspectorates, immigration or tax authorities of the States concerned, while ensuring full respect for privacy; this may include the processing of personal data for purposes other than the exercise or enforcement of rights and obligations under the basic Regulation and this Regulation in particular tofor the sole purpose of ensureing compliance with relevant legal obligations in the fields of labour, health and safety, immigration and taxation law. Further details shall be laid down by decision of the Administrative Commission.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) It should be clarified that a new category may only be added if a spirit drink has a significant market share in at least one Member State or if a significant part of its production is exported to a third country. Moreover, the name chosen for the new category shall either be a widely used name or, where this is not possible, be of a descriptive nature, in particular, by referring to the raw material used for the production of the spirit drink or to the geographical area of provenance.
2017/07/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 28 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council13 does not apply to spirit drinks. Rules on protection of geographical indications of spirit drinks should therefore be laid down. Geographical indications identifying spirit drinks as originating in the territory of a country, or a region or locality in that territory, where a given quality, reputation, traditional method of processing and production or other characteristic of the spirit drink are essentially attributable to its geographical origin should be registered by the Commission. _________________ 13 Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1).
2017/07/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 37 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) a spirit drink has a significant market share in at least one Member State or a significant part of its production is exported to a third country;
2017/07/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The sales denominations referred to in paragraph 1 supplemented by the term 'flavour' or any other similar terms may only be used to refer to flavourings that imitate a spirit drink for their use in the production of a foodstuff other than a beverage. Geographical indications shall not be used to describe flavourings.
2017/07/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 47 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. The indication of the country or territory of origin of the ingredients of spirit drinks shall not be required for spiritwhere they constitute at least 25% of the drinks.
2017/07/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 48 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) The measures applicable to spirit drinks constitute a special case compared with the general rules laid down for the agri-food sector.The special features are to be sought in this instance in the fact that traditional production methods are continuing to be kept alive, in the close link with the agricultural sector, in the use of high-quality products, and in the commitment to protecting consumer safety, which the spirit drinks sector is promising never to abandon.
2017/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 51 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) It should be clarified that a new category may only be added if a spirit drink has a significant market share in at least one Member State or is exported in significant quantities to a third country. Moreover, the name chosen for the new category shall either be a widely used name or, where this is not possible, be of a descriptive nature, in particular, by referring to the raw material used for the production of the spirit drink.
2017/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 52 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) any misuse, imitation or evocation, even if the true origin of the product or service is indicated or if the protected name is translated or accompanied by an expression such as ‘style’, ‘type’, 'sort', ‘method’, ‘as produced in’, ‘imitation’, ‘flavour’, ‘like’ or similar;
2017/07/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 54 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) any other false or misleading indication as to the provenance, origin, ingredients, nature or essential qualities of the product, on the inner or outer packaging, advertising material or documents relating to the product concerned, and the packing of the product in a container liable to convey a false impression as to its origin;
2017/07/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 56 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council13 does not apply to spirit drinks. Rules on protection of geographical indications of spirit drinks should therefore be laid down. Geographical indications identifying spirit drinks as originating in the territory of a country, or a region or locality in that territory, where a given quality, reputation, traditional method of processing and production, or other characteristic of the spirit drink areis essentially attributable to its geographical origin, should be registered by the Commission. _________________ 13 Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1).
2017/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 63 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall scrutinise by appropriate means any application that it receives pursuant to Article 21, in order to check that it is justified and that it meets the conditions of this Chapter. This scrutiny should not exceed a permust be completed within six months of receptiodn of 12 monthsthe application. Where this period is exceeded, the Commission shall indicate in writing to the applicant the reasons for the delay.
2017/07/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 65 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Without prejudice to Article 18, the Commission may adopt implementing acts granting a transitional period of up to fivetwo years to enable spirit drinks originating in a Member State or a third country the name of which contravenes Article 18(2) to continue to use the designation under which it was marketed on condition that an admissible statement of opposition under Article 21(3) or Article 24 shows that the registration of the name would jeopardise the existence of:
2017/07/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 75 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission may, having carried out the appropriate checks, shall, on its own initiative or at the request of any natural or legal person having a legitimate interest, adopt implementing acts to cancel the registration of a geographical indication in the following cases:
2017/07/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 75 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘geographical indication’ means an indication which identifies a spirit drink as originating in the territory of a country, or a region or locality in that territory, where a given quality, reputation, traditional method of processing or production, or other characteristic of that spirit drink is essentially attributable to its geographical origin;
2017/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 79 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall adopt implementing acts, without applying the procedure referred to in Article 44(2), establishing and maintaininga publicly accessible updated an electronic register of geographical indications of spirit drinks recognised under this scheme (‘the Register’) that is transparent, exhaustive, updated and easily accessible to the public.
2017/07/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 83 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3
Geographical indications of spirit drinks produced in third countries that are protected in the Union pursuant to an international agreement to which the Union is a contracting party may be entered in the Register as geographical indications in a separate section.
2017/07/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 92 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2
2. For a period of up to two years following the entry into force of this Regulation, the CommissThe Commission, at the request of the Member State of registration, by means of implementing acts, may, on its own initiative, cancel the protection of geographical indications referred to in Article 20 of Regulation (EU) No 110/2008 if they do not comply with point (6) of Article 2(1). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 44(2).
2017/07/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 94 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1
1. In order to take account of the specificities of the production in the demarcated geographical area, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 43 concerning: (a) the additional criteria for the demarcation of the geographical area; and (b) the restrictions and derogations related to the production in the demarcated geographical area.deleted
2017/07/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 100 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 5, 16, 38, 41 and 46(2) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate five-year period of time from the entry into force of this Regulation.
2017/07/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 106 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) a spirit drink has a significant market share in at least one Member State or is exported in significant quantities to a third country;
2017/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 133 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. The indication of the country or territory of origin of the ingredients of spirit drinks shall not be required for spiritwhere they make up at least 25% of a drinks.
2017/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 154 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) any misuse, imitation or evocation, even if the true origin of the product or service is indicated or if the protected name is translated or accompanied by an expression such as ‘style’, ‘type’, ‘method’, ‘as produced in’, ‘imitation’, ‘flavour’, ‘like’ or similar;Does not affect the English version.)
2017/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 157 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) any other false or misleading indication as to the provenance, origin, nature, ingredients, or essential qualities of the product, on the inner or outer packaging, advertising material or documents relating to the product concerned, and the packing of the product in a container liable to convey a false impression as to its origin;
2017/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 180 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission may, on its own initiative or, having carried out the appropriate checks, shall, at the request of any natural or legal person having a legitimate interest, adopt implementing acts to cancel the registration of a geographical indication in the following cases:
2017/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 186 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall adopt implementing acts, without applying the procedure referred to in Article 44(2), establishing and maintaining a publicly accessible updatedn electronic register of geographical indications of spirit drinks recognised under this scheme (‘the Register’) that is transparent, exhaustive, updated, and readily accessible to the public.
2017/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 18 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In the light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriatSuch systemic or macro distortions determine to ca larify the circumstances in whichge extent whether prices and costs are significantly distortions affecting to a considerable extent free market forces may be deemed to exist. In particular, it is appropriate to clarify that this situation may be deemed to exist, inter alia, when reported prices or costs, including the costs of raw materials, are not the result of free market forces because they are affected by governmented in companies and sectors. The assessment of systemic distortions is particularly important in the case of heterogeneous sectors composed by a high share of small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) where evidence of sector specific distortions are the most difficult to find. The existence of one or more significant distortions in the economy as a whole or in the relevant sector of the economy of the exporting country should lead automatically to the use of undistorted intervenation. It is further appropriate to clarify that in considering whether or not such a situation exists regard may be had, inter alia, to the potential impact of the following: the market in question is to a significant extent served by enterprises which operate under the ownership,al, third country or Union prices, costs or benchmarks for each and every factor of production in the construction of the normal value. If an exporting producer from a country or a sector in which there exists one or more significant distortions conclusively demonstrates that it is not directly or indirectly affected by any significant distortion and that its costs of one or more individual factors of production are not distorted, those costs should be used in the constrol or policy supervision or guidance of the authuction of its normal value. The absence of distoritieson of thean exporting country; state presence in firms allowing the state to interfere with respect to prices or costs; public policies or measures discriminating in favour of domestic suppliers or otherwise influencing free market forces; and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectivesproducer's costs of a given factor and the reliability thereof should be assessed, inter alia, by reference to the quantities involved, their proportion in relation to the total costs of that factor, and actual use in production. Such individual findings should not influence the normal value of other exporting producers and consequently should not be extrapolated to the whole country or sector regardless of the application of Article 17. It is further appropriate to provide that the Commission services may issue a report describing the specific situation concerning these criteria in a certain country or a certain sector; that s. The report should cover both sector/company specific and macro/systemic distortions, the latter being of particular importance for sectors with high share of SMEs The Union industry should be consulted during the report drafting process. Such report and the evidence on which it is based mayshould be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector; and that interested parties should have ample opportunity to comment on the report and. In accordance with its role, the European Parliament should monitor the report drafting process. On the request of the European Parliament or in the case of a change of circumstances in a specific country or sector, the Commission should update the report. The determinations made as to the evidxistence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used. f market - economy distorting practices for a country or sector should take into account all of the relevant evidence on the file and should be made definitively by the Commission no later than three months following initiation of an investigation. Interested parties should be given 10 days to comment on these determinations.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 23 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In the light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriate to clarify the circumstances in which significant distortions affecting to a considerable extent free market forces may be deemed to exist. In particular, it is appropriate to clarify that this situation may be deemed to exist, inter alia, when reported prices or costs, including the costs of raw materials, are not the result of free market forces because they are affected by government intervention. It is further appropriate to clarify that in considering whether or not such a situation existsGiven the need to promote and defend international trade based on the principles of fairness, sustainability and fair competition and in the light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriate to clarify the circumstances in which significant distortions may be deemed to exist where an exporting country implements practices which distort the market economy in such a way as to make the use of domestic prices and production costs inappropriate, including the costs of raw materials, energy and other production factors. To that end, it is appropriate to clarify that in considering the actual behaviour of an exporting country, regard mayshould be had, inter alia, to the potential impact of to the following criteria: a high degree of government influence over the foallowing: the market in question is to a significant extent served bycation of resources and decisions of enterprises, which operate under the ownership, control or policy supervision or guidance of the authorities of the exporting country; state presence in firms allowether directly or indirectly (public bodies), for example through the use of state-fixed prices, or discrimination in the tax, trade or currency regimes; state- induced distortions ing the state to interfere with respect to prices or costs; public policies or measures discriminating in favour of domestic suppliers or otherwise influencing free market forces; and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public pooperation of enterprises linked to privatisation and the use of non-market trading or compensation systems (such as barter trade); the lack of a transparent and non- discriminatory company law which ensures adequate corporate governance (application of international accounting standards, protection of shareholders, public availabilicty objectives. It is further appropriate to provide that the Commission services may isf accurate company information); the lack of a coherent, effective and transparent set of laws which ensure a report describingthe respect of property rights and the sopecific situation concerning these criteria in a certain country or a certain sector; that such report and the evidence on which it is based may be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector; and that interested parties should have ample opportunity to comment on the report and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used. ration of a functioning bankruptcy regime; the lack of a genuine financial sector which operates independently from the state and which in law and practice is subject to sufficient guarantee provisions and adequate supervision; control by the national industry of over 40% of the global market share in a specific sector, which could be a sign of abuse of dominant position; non-compliance with international and European social, tax and environmental standards and any other criterion or fact which the Commission considers to be appropriate with a view to evaluating the existence of significant distortions.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 30 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) It is further appropriate to recall that costs should normally be calculated on the basis of records kept by the exporter or producer under investigation. However, where there are significant distortions in the exporting countr exporting country implements practices which distort the market economy with the consequence that costs reflected in the records of the party concerned are artificially low, such costs mayshould be adjusted or established on any reasonable basis, including information from other representative markets or from international prices or benchmarks, as long as they are undistorted, or from markets in the European Union. In the light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriate to further clarify that, for the purposes of applying the provisions introduced by this regulation, due account should be taken of all relevant evidence, including relevant assessment reports regarding the circumstances prevailing on the domestic market of the exporting producers and the evidence on which they are based, which has been placed on the file, and upon which interested parties have had an opportunity to comment. This is especially the case when, in the exporting country, there is no equivalent to European social and environmental standards or where there is production overcapacity in one or more sectors which has a major impact on prices and costs. Possible information or evidence regarding the existence of practices which distort the market economy may also be provided by stakeholders, such as industries and trade unions. This information should be taken into consideration when decisions are made with regard to the production or updating of reports.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 42 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) In applying the rules, it is essential in order to maintain the balance of the rights and obligations which the WTO Agreements, including Protocols, establish that the Union take account of how they are interpreted and applied by the Union's major trading partners.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point a
(a) In case it is determined, when applying this provision or any other relevant provision of this Regulation, that it is not appropriate to use domestic Such systemic or macro distortions determine to a large extent whether prices and costs are significantly distorted in companies and sectors. The assessment of systemic distortions is particularly important in the case of heterogeneous sectors composed by a high share of small and medium sized enterpricses and costs in the exporting country due to t(SMEs) where evidence of sector specific distortions are the most difficult to find. The existence of one or more significant distortions, in the normal value shall be constructed on the basis of costs of production and sale reflecting undistorted prices or benchmarks. For this purpose, the sources that may be used include undistorted international prices, costs, or benchmarks, or corresponding costs of production and sale in an appropriate representative country with a similar level of economic development as economy as a whole or in the relevant sector of the economy of the exporting country shall lead automatically to the use of undistorted international, third country or Union prices, costs or benchmarks for each factor of production in the construction of the normal value. If exporting producers from a country or a sector in which there exists one or more significant distortions clearly demonstrate that their industry as a whole is not directly or indirectly affected by any significant distortion, their costs shall be used in the construction of the normal value. If an exporting producer from a country or a sector in which there exists one or more significant distortions clearly demonstrates that its costs of one or more individual factors of production relate to imports from countries without significant distortions and are not distorted, as assessed pursuant to the following paragraph, those costs shall be used in the construction of its normal value. The absence of distortion of an exporting producer's costs of a given factor and the reliability thereof shall be assessed, inter alia, by reference to the quantities involved, their proportion in relation to the total costs of that factor, and actual use in production. Such individual findings shall not influence the normal value of other exporting country, provided the relevant cost data are readily available. The constructed normal value shall include a reasonable amount for producers and consequently shall not be extrapolated to the whole country or sector regardless of the application of Article 17. With regard to the various elements described above, the Commission shall set deadlines for the submission of evidence in order to allow the respect of both the rights of defence of all interested parties and the overall procedural deadlines. Further evidence relating to individual factors of production can be accepted by the Commission after those deadmlinistrative, selling and general costs and for profits. es only if it is possible to be properly and adequately verified by the Commission, and other parties would have sufficient time to comment.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point a
(a) In case it is determined, when applying this provision or any other relevant provision of this Regulation, that if an exporting country implements practices which distort the market economy in such a way as to cause significant dis not appropriate to usetortions of its domestic prices and production costs, in the exporting country due to the existence of significant distortions, the normal value shall be constructed on the basis of costs of production and sale reflecting undistorted prices or benchmarks. For this purpose, the sources that may be used includecluding the costs of raw materials, energy and other production factors, the normal value shall be constructed on the basis of undistorted international prices, costs, or benchmarks, or of the corresponding costs of production and sale in an appropriate representative country with a similar level of economic development as the exporting country, provided the relevant cost data are readily available, including those of the Union, provided that the relevant cost data are readily available. Indirect environmental costs such as carbon dioxide emissions shall be taken into account and estimated as a part of the total cost for the same amount as in Europe; where there is no cooperation from the exporting country, the maximal cost will be applied. The constructed normal value shall include a reasonable, undistorted amount for administrative, selling and general costs and for profits.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 66 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point b
(b) Significant distortions for the product concerned within the meaning of point (a) may be deemed to exist, inter alia, when reported priIn assessing the actual behaviour of an exporting country within the meaning of point (a), regard should be had to the following criteria: a high degree of government influences or costs, including the costs of raw materials, are not the result of free market forces as they are affected by government intervention. In considering whether or not significant distortions exist regard may be had, inter alia, to the potential impact of the following: the market in question is to a significant extent served by enterprises which operate under the ownership, controlver the allocation of resources and decisions of enterprises, whether directly or indirectly (public bodies), for example through the use of state-fixed prices, or discrimination in the tax, trade or currency regimes; state- induced distortions in the operation of enterprises linked to privatisation and the use of non-market trading or compensation systems (such as barter trade); the lack of a transparent and non- discriminatory company law which ensures adequate corporate governance (application of international accounting standards, protection of shareholders, public availability of accurate company information); the lack of a coherent, effective and transparent set of laws which ensure the respect orf policy supervision or guidance of the authorities of the exporting country; state presence in firms allowing the state to interfere with respect to prices or costs; public policies or measures discriminating in favour of domestic suppliers or otherwise influencing free market forces; and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectiveroperty rights and the operation of a functioning bankruptcy regime; the lack of a genuine financial sector which operates independently from the state and which in law and practice is subject to sufficient guarantee provisions and adequate supervision; control by the national industry of over 40% of the global market share in a specific sector, which could be a sign of abuse of dominant position; non-compliance with international and European social, tax and environmental standards and any other criterion or fact which the Commission considers to be appropriate with a view to evaluating the existence of significant distortions.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 80 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point c
(c) When appropriate, tThe Commission services mayshall issue a detailed report describing the specific situation concerning the criteria listed in point (b) in a certain country or a certain sector. For those countries for which a substantial number of anti- dumping cases have been opened, the report shall be completed and adopted before the entry into force of this Regulation. The report should cover both sector/company specific and macro/systemic distortions, the latter being of particular importance for sectors with high share of SMEs. The Union industry shall be consulted during the report drafting process. Such report and the evidence on which it is based mayshall be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector. Interested parties shall have ample opportunity to supplement, comment or rely on the report and the evidence on which i the absence of a report the Commission shall use any available information or data to establish the existence of one or more significant distortions and use the methodology referred to in point (a) if the relevant requirements are met. At the initiation of an investigation related to imports from a country or sector in which the Commission has well-founded indications of the possible existence of significant distortions, the Commission shall make a provisional determination as to the existence of significant dis based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used. The determinations madetortions for that country or sectors and inform the parties of the investigations. The definitive determinations made as to the existence of significant distortions for a country or sector shall take into account all of the relevant evidence on the file and shall be made by the Commission no later than 45 days following initiation of an investigation. Interested parties shall be given 10 days to comment on these determinations. Any determination that significant distortions exist in a given country or sector shall stake into account all of the relevant evidence on the file. nd as long as sufficient evidence has not conclusively shown that that country or sector is not anymore affected by significant distortions and shall remain in effect until revoked. In accordance with its role, the European Parliament shall monitor the report drafting process. On the request of the European Parliament or on the Commission's own initiative when the circumstances in a specific country or sector have changed, the Commission shall update the report.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 103 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 1036/2016
Article 2 – paragraph 6 a – point d
(d) The Union industry may rely on the report referred to in point (c) for the calculation of normal value when filing a complaint in accordance with Article 5 or a request for a review in accordance with Article 11. When the conclusions of the report show the existence of one or more significant distortions, the report pursuant to point (c) shall constitute sufficient evidence in order to justify the calculation of the normal value pursuant to the methodology referred to in point (a). In any event, no additional burden shall be imposed on the Union industry.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 136 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
In the case of a transition fromWhere existing anti-dumping measures are based on a normal value calculated pursuant to the former Articles 2(7)(a) or 2(7)(b), to a normal value calculated pursuant tohe methodology of paragraphs 1 to 6a of Article 2, the reasonable period of time shall be deemed to elapse on the date on which the first expiry review following such transition is initi shall not replace the original methodology used for the determination of the normal value until the date on which the first expiry review of those measures, following the entry into force of Regulation ..., is terminated.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 140 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4 a
In the case of a transition fromWhere existing anti-dumping measures are based on a normal value calculated pursuant to the former Articles 2(7)(a) or 2(7)(b), to a normal value calculated pursuant tohe methodology of paragraphs 1 to 6a of Article 2, any review pursuant to this paragraph shall be deferred to the date on which the first expiry review following such transition is initi shall not replace the original methodology used for the determination of the normal value until the date on which the first expiry review of those measures, following the entry into force of Regulation ..., is terminated.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 154 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
This Regulation shall apply to all decisions on the initiation of proceedings, and to all proceedings, including original investigations and review investigations, initiated, on or after the date on which this Regulationinvestigations under Article 5 of Regulation 1036/2016 initiated, on or after the date on which this Regulation enters into force. For all other investigations, this Regulation shall apply from the date on which the first expiry review of the relevant measures, following the entersry into force of Regulation...., is terminated.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #

2016/0308(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal.
2017/01/31
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 16 #

2016/0308(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
-
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
2017/02/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 53 #

2016/0308(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – table 1 – row 4
09.6752 2002 Tomatoes prepared or 5 000 preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid deleted
2017/01/31
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 55 #

2016/0308(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – table 1 – row 4
09.6752 2002 Tomatoes prepared or 5 000 preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid Deleted
2017/02/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 64 #

2016/0308(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – table 1 – row 3
3102 10 10 Urea, whether or not in aqueous solution, containing more 3% than 45% by weight of nitrogen on the dry anhydrous product (excl. that in pellet or similar forms, or in packages with a gross weight not exceeding 10 kg) deleted
2017/02/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 67 #

2016/0308(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – table 1 – row 3
3102 10 10 Urea, whether or not in aqueous solution, containing more 3% than 45% by weight of nitrogen on the dry anhydrous product (excl. that in pellet or similar forms, or in packages with a gross weight not exceeding 10 kg) deleted
2017/01/31
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 66 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) As a result, it is also appropriate to revise the definition of dual-use items, and to introduce a definition of cyber- surveillance technology. It should also be clarified that assessment criteria for the control of exports of dual-use items should be publicly available and easily accessible and include considerations regarding their possible misuse in connection with acts of terrorism or human rights violations.
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 71 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Transmission of dual-use software and technology by means of electronic media, fax or telephone to destinations outside the Union should also be controlled. In order to limit the administrative burden for exporters and the competent authorities of the Member States, the definition of export should however be revised to exclude transmissions which do not pose a grave risk of proliferation or other misuse covered by this Regulation.
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 96 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Outreach to the private sector, in particular to SMEs, and transparency are essential elements for an effective export control regime. It is therefore appropriate to provide for the continued development of guidance to support the application of this Regulation and for the publication of an annual report on the implementation of controls, in line with current practice.
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 98 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Each Member State should determine effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties applicable in the event of breach of the provisions of this Regulation. These penalties should be, as far as possible, harmonised between the Member States to ensure coherence of application of this Regulation. It is also appropriate to introduce provisions to tackle specifically instances of illicit trafficking of dual-use items in order to support effective enforcement of controls.
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 100 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28 a (new)
(28a) Whereas harmonisation of custom controls should be sought as different custom practices in the Union may impact trade in dual-use items;
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 113 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
(b) cyber-surveillance technology which can be used for the commission of serious violations of human rights or international humanitarian law, or can pose a threat to international security or the essential security interests of the Union and its Member States.
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 153 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22 a (new)
(22a) 'Serious human rights violations' shall be understood to encompass the right to privacy, the freedom of expression, the freedom of association, the right to non-discrimination, the right to life, the freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention and the freedom from torture, inhuman treatment and degrading treatment which are most commonly violated by surveillance. Relevant factors in the assessment shall be: (a) the character, nature and consequences of the actual violation in question; (b) systematic and/or widespread violations of human rights underlining the seriousness of the human rights situation; (c) whether the competent bodies of the United Nations, the Union or the Council of Europe or others have established that serious violations of human rights have taken place in the recipient country, or (d) the adequacy of domestic legal safeguards in the recipient country to prevent human rights abuses.
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 172 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) for use by natural or legal persons complicit in or responsible for directing or committing serious violations of human rights or international humanitarian law in situations of armed conflict or internal repression in the country of final destination, as identified by relevant public international institutions, or European or national competent authorities, and where there is evidence of the use of this or similar items for directing or implementing such serious violations by the proposed end-user;
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 180 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) for use in connection with acts of terrorism and international espionage.
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 188 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Authorisations for the export of non-listed items shall be granted for specific items and end-users. The authorisations shall be granted by the competent authority of the Member State where the exporter is resident or established or, in case when the exporter is a person resident or established outside the Union, by the competent authority of the Member State where the items are located. The authorisations shall be valid throughout the Union. The authorisations shall be valid for one year, and may be renewed by the competent authority. Authorizations shall be denied where exports violate the right to privacy through the arbitrary interception of communications.
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 226 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall examine risk assessments conducted by businesses under Article 4(2) and also independently examine the risks posed by dual-use items, and shall impose an authorization requirement if a dual-use item poses a risk to human rights, as defined in Article 4(1)(d).
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 227 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall notify the Commission and the other Member States of any measures adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 immediately after their adoption and indicate the precise reasons for the measures. They shall also make this information publicly available by means of readily accessible media, such as a dedicated website.
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 228 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States shall disclose information regarding the adopted measures, listing approvals or denials of exports and the volume, value, nature of equipment and destination of their trade in dual-use items;
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 259 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. The competent authorities of the Member States shall process requests for individual or global authorisations within a period of time to be determined by national law or prachirty days after the duly filled application has been received, if more time is needed by the competent authority proper justification shall be provided to the applicant in reasonable ticme. The competent authorities shall provide to the Commission all information on the average times for processing applications for authorisations relevant for the preparation of the annual report referred to in Article 24(2).
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 285 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall not grant an individual or global export authorisation or an authorisation for brokering services or technical assistance under this Regulation where there is evidence of use of the a dual-use item or technology in connection with violation of human rights, including violation of the right to privacy and arbitrary interception of communication. They shall also prohibit the transit of such items or technology through the Union territory;
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 377 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Section B – part 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 4
- Turkey.deleted
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 384 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Section C – part 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 20
- Turkeydeleted
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 390 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Section D – part 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 19
- Tunisia, Turkey
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 395 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Section E – part 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 7
- Turkeydeleted
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 398 #

2016/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Section F – part 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 3
- Turkeydeleted
2017/05/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Citation 1
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 151 and 153(2)a thereof,
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) As the three so-called tripartite agencies, the European Foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions (Eurofound), the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) and the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) address issues related to the labour market and working environment and vocational education and training and skills, close coordination among the three Agencies is required and ways to enhance efficiency and synergies should be exploitso that the work of the Agencies does not overlap where they have similar fields of interest, while ways to enhance efficiency and synergies should be exploited and any duplication among Agencies, as well as between them and the Commission, concerning their mandates, objectives and activities should be avoided. In addition, where relevant, the Agency should seek to engage in efficient cooperation with the European Commission’s and the European Parliament’s in-house research capacities.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) There are already organisations at international, EU and national level providing analysis and knowledge on social, employment and work related policies (such as the Economic and Social Committees and the ILO). In order to obtain the maximum benefit, it is appropriate that Eurofound establish links with national bodies (tripartite where possible). It is also important that the Agency has very close functional links with the EU Committees on Employment (EMCO) and Social Protection (SPC), to ensure coordination and synergies, and that cooperates with the ILO in areas of common interest.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The objectives of the Agency shall be to increase and disseminate knowledge to assist the Commission, other EU institutions and bodies, Member States and civil society organisations, including the social partners in shaping and implementing policies aimed at theing to develop and pursue ideas on the medium and long-term improvement of living and working conditions, in supporting employment policies and in promoting the dialogue between management and labour.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The objectives of the Agency shall be to increase and disseminate knowledge to assist the Commission, other EU institutions and bodies, Member States and social partners in shaping and implementing policies aimed at the improvement of living and working conditions, in supporting employment policies and in promoting the dialogue between management and labour, with a commitment to raising the tempo of its own activities so they are permanently in step with those of the institutions concerned, and in particular the competent committees of the European Parliament.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) undertake or commission studies and carry out research on relevant socio- economic developments and related policy issues, with a commitment to continually modernising its investigative means so as to obtain an increasingly broad sample of interlocutors that is as representative a possible;
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. In carrying out its tasks, the Agency shall maintain a close dialogue particularly with specialised bodies, whether public or private, public authorities and workers’ and employers’ organisations as well as with national tripartite bodies, where they exist. The Agency, without prejudice to its own aims, shall ensure cooperation with other European Union Agencies aimed at avoiding overlaps and promoting synergy and complementarity in their activities, in particular with the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training and, where relevant, with other EU Agencies. The Agency shall cooperate as closely as possible with specialised institutions, foundations and bodies in the Member States and, where appropriate, at international level with the ILO and the OECD in related matters.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) onine members representing the Government from each Member StateMember State governments; places shall be distributed on a rotating basis every two years in an order equivalent to the order of the Presidencies of the Council of the European Union;
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) onine members representing the employers’ organisations from eachthe Member States;
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) onine members representing the employees’ organisations from eachthe Member States;
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) threewo members representing the Commission.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) two independent experts appointed on the proposal of the European Parliament;
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
All members referred to in points (a)-(d a) shall have voting rights.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
The members referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) shall be appointed by the Council on the basis of lists of candidates submitted by the Member States, the European employers’ and employees’ organisations respectively. The European Parliament and the Commission shall appoint the members who are to represent ithem.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The members of the Management Board shall be appointed only after they have signed a declaration that they have no conflicts of interests.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. The term of office for members and their alternates shall be four years. That term shall be extendabletwo years. After those two years, their place shall be taken by another member to ensure a balanced and alternating representation between representatives, Member State by Member State. The Member of the Management Board shall ensure that the general interests of the Union and of Eurofound are defended, and a balanced position maintained among the Member States. Upon the expiry of their term of office or in the event of their resignation, members shall remain in office until their appointments are renewed or until they are replaced.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. A representative of Cedefop and a representative of EU-OSHA shall have observer status at the meetings of the Management Board in order to enhance the efficiency of the three tripartite agencies and synergies between them, and to avoid overlaps in their activities.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) in accordance with paragraph 2, exercise, with respect to the staff of the Agency, the powers conferred by the Staff Regulations on the Appointing Authority and by the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants on the Authority Empowered to Conclude a Contract of Employment (“the appointing authority powers”);deleted
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The Management Board shall adopt, in accordance with Article 110 of the Staff Regulations, a decision based on Article 2(1) of the Staff Regulations and on Article 6 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants, delegating relevant appointing authority powers to the Executive Director and defining the conditions under which this delegation of powers can be suspended. The Executive Director shall be authorised to sub- delegate those powers.deleted
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Where exceptional circumstances so require, the Management Board may, by way of a decisiona majority of two-thirds of the members entitled to vote, temporarily suspend the delegation of the appointing authority powers to the Executive Director and those sub-delegated by the latter and exercise them itself or delegate them to one of its members or to a staff member other than the Executive Directorconferred by the Staff Regulations to the Executive Director and give them to another Senior Member of the Management of the Agency for a temporary period.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 155 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Executive Director shall manage the Agency. The Executive Director shall be accountable to the Management Board. The Executive Director shall exercise, with respect to the staff of the agency, the powers conferred by the Staff Regulations on the Appointing Authority and by the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants on the Authority Empowered to Conclude a Contract of Employment (“the appointing authority powers”).
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – point j
(j) preparing the Agency’s draft statement of estimates of revenue and expenditure and implementing its budget, as part of the Agency’s programming document.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. The Management Board can decide on the languages to be used by the Agency in its internal functioning.deleted
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 189 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3
3. The translation services required for the functioning of the Agency shallmight be provided by the Translation Centre of the bodies of the European Union or other translation services.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 195 #

2016/0256(COD)

1. No later than 5 years after the date referred to in Article 37, and every 5 years thereafter, the Commission shall perform an evaluation in compliance with the Commission guidelines to assess the Agency’s performance in relation to its objectives, mandate and tasks. The European Parliament and the Management Board shall be consulted in the evaluation. The evaluation shall, in particular, address the possible need to modify the mandate of the Agency, and the financial implications of any such modification.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2016/0222(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) An applicants do not have the right to choose the Member State of app who has not complied with the oblicgation. An of applicant must applyying for international protection in the Member State either of first entry or, in case of legal presence, in the Member State of legal stay or residence. An applicant who has not complied with this obligation is less likely, following a determination of the Member State responsible under Regulation (EU) No XXX/XXX [Dublin Regulation], to be allowed to stay in the Member State where the application was made and consequently more likely to abscond. His or her whereabouts should therefore be closely monitorState of first entry may seek permission to stay from the State where the application was lodged.
2017/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2016/0222(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
(34) In order to promote the self- sufficiency of applicants and to limit wide discrepancies between Member States, it is essential to provide clear rules on the applicants’ access to the labour market and to ensure that such access is effective, by not imposing conditions that effectively hinder an applicant from seeking employment. Member States should also take effective steps to ensure that the entry of applicants for international protection does not lead to wage dumping. Labour market tests used to give priority to nationals or to other Union citizens or to third country nationals legally resident in the Member State concerned should not hinder effective access for applicants to the labour market and should be implemented without prejudice to the principle of preference for Union citizens as expressed in the relevant provisions of the applicable Acts of Accession.
2017/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2016/0222(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The Member States shall ensure that the rules concerning alternatives to detention, such as regular reporting to the authorities, the deposit of a financial guarantee, or an obligation to stay at an assigned place, are laid down in national law’ enforcement of the rules referred to in Articles 8, 9, and 10 of this Directive shall not conflict with the principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
2017/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2016/0222(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
The equal treatment guaranteed by Member States may not be employed as a means of curtailing rights in general or lowering wage levels in particular.
2017/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 179 #

2016/0222(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)
(ga) has seriously breached the law of the Member State to which he or she has made an application for protection;
2017/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2016/0205(NLE)

Draft legislative resolution
Citation 4
– having regard to Rule 99(1), first and third subparagraphs, Rule 99(2), and Rule 108(7)99(4), second subparagraph, of its Rules of Procedure,
2016/12/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 5 #

2016/0205(NLE)

Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1
1. GDeclines to gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement;
2016/12/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) In order to combat wage dumping, this Directive should provide, for third-country national highly skilled workers, the same salary thresholds as those provided for the same categories of worker in the Union, also in order to prevent the pursuit of competitiveness through the devaluation of labour.
2017/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) EU Blue Card rules, against the background of the single currency, could lead to an increase, even for ‘higher professional qualifications’, of wage imbalances within the Union; accordingly, the thresholds set by individual Member States should reproduce the minimum and maximum salary levels that apply, or would apply, to a Union worker from the same profession or the same sector in the Member State concerned.
2017/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) A lower salary threshold should be laid down for specific professions where it is considered by the Member State concerned that there is a particular lack of available workforce and where such professions belong to major group 1 or 2 of the ISCO ("International Standard Classification of Occupation") classification.deleted
2017/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) A lower salary threshold should also be laid down to benefit third-country nationals during a certain period after their graduation. This period should be granted each time that the third-country national reaches a level of education relevant for the purposes of this Directive, namely levels 6, 7 or 8 of ISCED 2011, or levels 6, 7 or 8 of EQF, according to the national law of the Member State concerned. It should apply whenever the third-country national applies for an initial or renewed EU Blue Card within three years from the date of obtaining the qualifications and in addition, when that third-country national applies for a first renewal of the EU Blue Card and the initial EU Blue Card was issued for a period shorter than 24 months. After these grace periods – which may run in parallel – have elapsed the young professionals can be reasonably expected to have gained sufficient professional experience in order to fulfil the regular salary threshold.deleted
2017/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) The conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of highly skilled employment, including the eligibility criteria related to a salary threshold should be defined. It should not aim to determine salaries and therefore should not derogate from the rules or practices at Member State level or from collective agreements, and should not be used to constitute any harmonisation in this field. This Directive should fully respect the competences of Member States, particularly on employment, labour and social matters.deleted
2017/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. In addition to the conditions laid down in paragraph 1, the gross annual salary resulting from the monthly or annual salary specified in the work contract or binding job offer shall not be inferior to the salary threshold set and published for that purpose by the Member States. The salary threshold set by the Member States shall be at least 1.0 times but not higher than 1.4 times the average gross annual salarywages which apply, or would apply, to a Union worker from the same profession or the same sector in the Member State concerned.
2017/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. By way of derogation from paragraph 2, and for employment in professions which are in particular need of third-country national workers and which belong to major groups 1 and 2 of ISCO, the salary threshold shall be 80 percent of the salary threshold set by the Member State concerned in accordance with paragraph 2.deleted
2017/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
By way of derogation from paragraph 2, as regards third-country nationals who have obtained a higher education qualification not more than three years before submitting the application for an EU Blue Card, the salary threshold shall be 80 percent of the salary threshold set by the Member State concerned in accordance with paragraph 2. The period of three years shall reapply after the attainment of each level of higher education qualifications.deleted
2017/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The salary threshold referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall apply whenever an application for a first EU Blue Card or a renewal is submitted during that period of three years. Where the EU Blue Card issued during the period of three years is renewed after the three years period has elapsed, the salary threshold referred to in paragraph 2 shall apply. However, where the first EU Blue Card issued during the period of three years was issued for less than 24 months, the lower salary threshold referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall apply upon the first renewal.deleted
2017/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2016/0176(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to the criteria for admission set out in Article 5, EU Blue Card holders may engage in self-employed activity, under the same conditions as citizens of the Union, in parallel to the activity in highly skilled employment. In circumstances where their labour market situation undergoes serious disturbances, Member States may restrict the pursuit of self-employed activity by EU Blue Card holders.
2017/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 147 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) In order to prevent that applicants with inadmissible claims or who are likely not to be in need of international protection, or who represent a security risk are transferred among the Member States, it is necessary to ensure that the Member where an application is first lodged verifies the admissibility of the claim in relation to the first country of asylum and safe third country, examines in accelerated procedures applications made by applicants coming from a safe country of origin designated on the EU list, as well as applicantexamines in accelerated procedures applications made by applications presenting security concerns.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 161 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) In order to ensure full respect for the principle of family unity and for the best interests of the child, the existence of a relationship of dependency between an applicant and his or her child, sibling or parent on account of the applicant’s pregnancy or maternity, state of health or old age, should become a binding responsibility criterion. When the applicant is an unaccompanied minor, the presence of a family member or relative on the territory of another Member State who can take care of him or her should also become a binding responsibility criterion. In order to discourage secondary movements of unaccompanied minors, which are not in their best interests, in the absence of a family member or a relative, the Member State responsible should be that where the unaccompanied minor first has lodgedis present when his or her application for international protection is lodged, unless it is demonstrated that this would not be in the best interests of the child. Before transferring an unaccompanied minor to another Member State, the transferring Member State should make sure that that Member State will take all necessary and appropriate measures to ensure the adequate protection of the child, and in particular the prompt appointment of a representative or representatives tasked with safeguarding respect for all the rights to which they are entitled. Any decision to transfer an unaccompanied minor should be preceded by an assessment of his/her best interests by staff with the necessary qualifications and expertise.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 167 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) Assuming responsibility by a Member State for examining an application lodged with it in cases when such examination is not its responsibility under the criteria laid down in this Regulation may undermine the effectiveness and sustainability of the system and should beis exceptional. Therefore, a Member State should be able to derogate from the responsibility criteria only on humanitarian grounds, in particular for family reasons, before a Member State responsible has been determined and examine an application for international protection lodged with it or with another Member State, even if such examination is not its responsibility under the binding criteria laid down in this Regulation.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 174 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) In order to ensure that the aims of this Regulation are achieved and obstacles to its application are prevented, in particular in order to avoid absconding and secondary movements between Member States, it is necessary to establish clear obligations to be complied with by the applicant in the context of the procedure, of which he or she should be duly informed in a timely manner. Violation of those legal obligations should lead to appropriate and proportionate procedural consequences for the applicant and to appropriate and proportionate consequences in terms of his or her reception conditions. In line with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the Member State where such an applicant is present should in any case ensure that the immediate material needs of that person are covered.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 184 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) A personal interview with the applicant should be organised in order to facilitate the determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection unless the applicant has absconded or the information provided by the applicant is sufficient for determining the Member State responsible. As soon as the application for international protection is lodged, the applicant should be informed in particular of the application of this Regulation, of the lack of choice as to which Member State will examine his or her asylum application; of his or her obligations under this Regulation and of the consequences of not complying with themrights under this Regulation, in particular the opportunity to provide information on any family members or persons with other family connections in other Member States, and of his or her obligations under this Regulation and of the consequences of not complying with them. The information given to the applicant must be clear and concise and in a language that he or she understands.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 192 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) The Member State which is determined as responsible under this Regulation should remain responsible for examination of each and every application of that applicant, including any subsequent application, in accordance with Article 40, 41 and 42 of Directive 2013/32/EU, irrespective of whether the applicant has left or was removed from the territories of the Member States. Provisions in Regulation (EU) 604/2013 which had provided for the cessation of responsibility in certain circumstances, including when deadlines for the carrying out of transfers had elapsed for a certain period of time, had created an incentive for absconding, and should therefore be removed.deleted
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 227 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) A key based on the size of the population and of, on the economy of the Member States, including their growth and employment rates, should be applied as a point of reference in the operation of the corrective allocation mechanism in conjunction with a threshold, so as to enable the mechanism to function as a means of assisting Member States under disproportionate pressuremost exposed to migration flows. The application of the corrective allocation for the benefit of a Member State should be triggered automatically where the number of applications for international protection for which a Member State is responsible exceeds 150% of the figure identified in the reference keyand in a way that is binding on all the Member States. In order to comprehensively reflect the efforts of each Member State, the number of persons effectively resettled to that Member State should be added to the number of applications for international protection for the purposes of this calculation.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 236 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) WhenIn applying the allocation mechanism applies, the applicants who lodged their applications in the benefitting Member State should be allocated to Member States which are below their share of applications on the basis of the reference key as applied to those Member States. Appropriate rules should be provided for in cases where an applicant may for serious reasons be considered a danger to national security or public order, especially rules as regards the exchange of information between competent asylum authorities of Member States. After the transfer, the Member State of allocation should determine the Member State responsible, and should become responsible for examining the application, unless the overriding responsible criteria, related in particular to the presence of family members, determine that a different Member State should be responsible.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 284 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52
(52) In order to assess whether the corrective allocation mechanism in this Regulation is meeting the objective of ensuring a fair sharing of responsibility between Member States and of relieving disproportionate pressure on certain Member States, the Commission should review the functioning of the corrective allocation mechanism and in particular verify that the threshold for the triggering and cessation of the corrective allocationmechanism effectively ensures a fair sharing of responsibility between the Member States and a swift access of applicants to procedures for granting international protection in situations when a Member State is confronted with a disproportionate number of applications for international protection for which it is responsible under this Regulation.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 287 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation lays down the criteria and mechanisms for determining the single Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (‘the Member State responsible’).
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 304 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g – indent 2
- the minor children of couples referred to in the first indent or of the applicant, on condition that they are unmarried and regardless of whether they were born in or out of wedlock or adopted as defined under national law,
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 311 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g – indent 3
- the father, mother or, when the applicant is a minor and unmarried, the father, mother or, another adult responsible for the applicant, whether by law or by the practice of the Member State where the adult is present,
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 317 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g – indent 4
- whenthe father or mother of the beneficiary of international protection is a minor and unmarried, the father, mother or, if the applicant is a minor, another adult responsible for him or her whether by law or by the practice of the Member State where the beneficiary is present,
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 325 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g – indent 5 a (new)
- the aunt or uncle or grandparent of the beneficiary of international protection, if they are present in the territory of a Member State, regardless of whether the applicant and/or the beneficiary was born in or out of wedlock or adopted as defined under national law;
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 333 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point k
(k) “representative”‘guardian’ means a person or an organisation appointed by the competent bodies in order to assist and represent an unaccompanied minor in procedures provided for in this Regulation with a view to ensuring the best interests of the child and exercising legal capacity for the minor where necessary. Where an organisation is appointed as a representative, it shall designate a person responsible for carrying out its duties in respect of the minor, in accordance with this Regulation;
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 340 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o
(o) ‘benefitting Member State’ means the Member State benefitting from the corrective allocation mechanism set out in Chapter VII of this Regulation and carrying out the allocation of the applicant;
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 372 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) examine whether the application for international protection is inadmissible pursuant to Article 33(2) letters b) and c) of Directive 2013/32/EU when a country which is not a Member State is considered as a first country of asylum or as a safe third country for the applicant; andeleted
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 374 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b – point i
(i) the applicant has the nationality of a third country, or he or she is a stateless person and was formerly habitually resident in that country, designated as a safe country of origin in the EU common list of safe countries of origin established under Regulation [Proposal COM (2015) 452 of 9 September 2015]; ordeleted
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 381 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. Where the Member State considers an application inadmissible or examines an application in accelerated procedure pursuant to paragraph 3, that Member State shall be considered the Member State responsible.
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 388 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5
5. The Member State which has examined an application for international protection, including in the cases referred to in paragraph 3, shall be responsible for examining any further representations or a subsequent application of that applicant in accordance with Article 40, 41 and 42 of Directive 2013/32/EU, irrespective of whether the applicant has left or was removed from the territories of the Member States.deleted
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 395 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Where a person who intends to make an application for international protection has entered irregularly into the territory of the Member States, the application shall be made in the Member State of that first where he or she is presentry. Where a person who intends to make an application for international protection is legally present in a Member State, the application shall be made in that Member State.
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 411 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The Member State in which the applicant is obliged to be present shall continue the procedures for determining the Member State responsible even when the applicant leaves the territory of that Member State without authorisation or is otherwise not available for the competent authorities of that Member State.deleted
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 418 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. The applicant shall not be entitled to the reception conditions set out in Articles 14 to 19 of Directive 2013/33/EU, with the exception of emergency health care, during the procedures under this Regulation in any Member State other than the one in which he or she is required to be present.deleted
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 424 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. As soon as an application for international protection is lodged within the meaning of Article 21(2) in a Member State, its competent authorities shall inform the applicant of the application of this Regulation, in particular the opportunity to provide information regarding the presence of family members or any other family relations in other Member States and of the obligations set out in Article 4 as well asnd the consequences of non-compliance set out in Article 5 , and in particular:
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 434 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) of the objectives of this Regulation and the consequences of making another application in a different Member State as well as the consequences of leaving the Member State where he or she is obliged to be present during the phases in which the Member State responsible under this Regulation is being determined and the application for international protection is being examined, in particular that the applicant shall not be entitled to the reception conditions set out in Articles 14 to 19 of Directive 2013/33/EU in any Member State other than the one where he or she is required to be present, with the exception of emergency health careapplication for international protection is being examined;
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 438 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) the opportunity to provide information regarding the presence of family members or any other family relations in other Member States;
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 454 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) where applicable, of the allocation procedure set out in Chapter VII.
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 462 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall be provided in writing in clear, concise language, and in a language that the applicant understands or is reasonably supposed to understand. Member States shall use the common leaflet drawn up pursuant to paragraph 3 for that purpose.
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 486 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. The personal interview shall be conducted in a language that the applicant understands or is reasonably supposed to understand and in which he or she is able to communicate. Where necessary, Member States shall have recourse to an interpreter who is able to ensure appropriate communication between the applicant and the person conducting the personal interview.
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 495 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. The Member State conducting the personal interview shall make a written summary thereof which shall contain at least the main information supplied by the applicant at the interview. This summary may either take the form of a report or a standard formrecord it in full using audiovisual equipment. The Member State shall ensure that the applicant and/or the legal advisor or other counsellor who is representing the applicant have timely access to the summaryaudiovisual recording.
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 498 #

2016/0133(COD)

1. The best interests of the child shall be athe primary consideration for Member States with respect to all procedures provided for in this Regulation.
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 499 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Each Member State where an unaccompanied minor is obliged to be present shall ensure that a representativeguardian represents and/or assists the unaccompanied minor with respect to the relevant procedures provided for in this Regulation. The representativeguardian shall have the qualifications and, expertise and independence to ensure that the best interests of the minor are taken into consideration during the procedures carried out under this Regulation. Such representative, and the guardian must have received appropriate training in this area. Such a guardian shall have access to the content of the relevant documents in the applicant’s file including the specific leaflet for unaccompanied minors. Through implementing measures, the Commission shall lay down the requirements and procedures for the training of guardians.
2017/04/25
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 536 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The criteria for determining the Member State responsible shall be applied only once, in the order in which they are set out in this Chapter.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 547 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The Member State responsible shall be that where a family member of the unaccompanied minor is legally present, provided that it is in the best interests of the minor. Where the applicant is a married minor whose spouse is not legally present on the territory of the Member States, the Member State responsible shall be the Member State where the father, mother or other adult responsible for the minor, whether by law or by the practice of that Member State, or sibling is legally present.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 555 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. In the absence of a family member or a relative as referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3, the Member State responsible shall be that where the unaccompanied minor first has lodged his or her application for international protectionis staying, unless it is demonstrated that this is not in the best interests of the minor.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 584 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15
Where it is established, on the basis of proof or circumstantial evidence as described in the two lists mentioned in Article 25(4) of this Regulation, including the data referred to in Regulation [Proposal for a Regulation recasting Regulation (EU) No 603/2013], that an applicant has irregularly crossed the border into a Member State by land, sea or air having come from a third country, the Member State thus entered shall be responsible for examining the application for international protection.Article 15 deleted Entry
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 610 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
By way of derogation from Article 3(1) and only as long as no Member State has been determined as responsible , each Member State may decide to examine an application for international protection lodged with it by a third-country national or a stateless person based on family grounds in relation to wider family not covered by Article 2(g) , even if such examination is not its responsibility under the criteria laid down in this Regulation.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 617 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The Member State which decides to examine an application for international protection pursuant to this paragraph shall become the Member State responsible and shall assume the obligations associated with that responsibility. Where applicable, iIt shall inform the Member State previously responsible, the Member State conducting a procedure for determining the Member State responsible or the Member State which has been requested to take charge of the applicant.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 621 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The Member State in which an application for international protection is made and which is carrying out the process of determining the Member State responsible may, at any time before a Member State responsible has been determined , or the Member State responsible, may, at any time before a decision regarding the substance is taken, request another Member State to take charge of an applicant in order to bring together any family relations, on humanitarian grounds , even where that other Member State is not responsible under the criteria laid down in Articles 10 to 13 and 18. The persons concerned must express their consent in writing.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 623 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 a (new)
Article 19a Cessation of responsibilities 1. Where a Member State issues a residence document to the applicant, the obligations specified in Article 20(1) shall be transferred to that Member State. 2. The obligations specified in Article 20(1) shall cease where the Member State responsible can establish, when requested to take charge or take back an applicant or another person as referred to in Article 20(1)(c) or (d), that the person concerned has left the territory of the Member States for at least three months, unless the person concerned is in possession of a valid residence document issued by the Member State responsible. An application lodged after the period of absence referred to in the first subparagraph shall be regarded as a new application giving rise to a new procedure for determining the Member State responsible. 3. The obligations specified in Article 20 (1)(c) and (d) shall cease where the Member State responsible can establish, when requested to take back an applicant or another person as referred to in Article 20 (1)(c) or (d), that the person concerned has left the territory of the Member States in compliance with a return decision or removal order issued following the withdrawal or rejection of the application. An application lodged after an effective removal has taken place shall be regarded as a new application giving rise to a new procedure for determining the Member State responsible.
2017/04/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 773 #
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 782 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1
1. The allocation mechanism referred to in this Chapter shall be applied for the benefit of a Member State, where that Member State is confronted with a disproportionate number ofan applicant is present, in which he or she has submitted an applications for international protection for which it is the Member State responsible under this Regulationand who has no family ties in any EU Member State.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 788 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 applies where the automated system referred to in Article 44(1) indicates that the number of applications for international protection for which a Member State is responsible under the criteria in Chapter III, Articles 3(2) or (3), 18 and 19, in addition to the number of persons effectively resettled, is higher than 150% of the reference number for that Member State as determined by the keyautomatically on the basis of the automated system referred to in Article 3544(1).
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 805 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 4
4. The automated system shall inform Member States, the Commission and the European Union Agency for Asylum once per weekyear of the Member States' respective shares in applications for which they are the Member State responsible.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 806 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 5
5. The automated system shall continuously monitor whether any of the Member States is above the threshold referred to in paragraph 2, and if so, notify the Member States and the Commission of this fact, indicating the number of applications above this threshold.deleted
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 809 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 6
6. Upon the notification referred to in paragraph 5, the allocation mechanism shall apply.deleted
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 812 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 a (new)
Article 34 a Family reunification procedure 1. Where the applicant states that he or she has family links in one of the Member States, the Member State which has received the application for international protection shall, within 30 days of the registration of the application for international protection, carry out a check on the information provided by the applicant, before applying the allocation mechanism referred to in Article 34(1). 2. If, on the basis of that check, the applicant’s statements prove to be well- founded, the relevant Member State shall transfer the applicant to the Member State in which he or she has declared he or she has family links. 3. If the Member State to which the applicant is transferred ascertains that the applicant has made false declarations, that Member State shall apply the allocation mechanism referred to in Article 34(1).
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 821 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1
1. For the purpose of the correctiveallocation mechanism, the reference number for each Member State shall be determined by a key.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 824 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the size of the population (540 % weighting);
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 828 #
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 837 #
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 854 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1
1. Where the threshold referred to in Article 34(2) is reached, tThe automated system referred to in Article 44(1) shall apply the reference key referred to in Article 35 to those Member States with a number of applications for which they are the Member States responsible below their share pursuant to Article 35(1) and notify the Member States thereof.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 857 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2
2. Applicants who lodged their application in the benefitting Member State after notification of allocation referred to in Article 34(5) shall be allocated to the Member States referred to in paragraph 1, and these Member States shall determine the Member State responsiblebecome responsible for examining the application for international protection.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 864 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 3
3. Applications declared inadmissible or examined in accelerated procedure in accordance with Article 3(3) shall not be subject to allocation.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 868 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 a (new)
Article 36 a Determination of the Member State of allocation 1. On the basis of the reference key referred to in Article 35, the automatic system referred to in Article 44(1) shall indicate the Member State of allocation responsible for examining the application for international protection, taking into account the following criteria: (a) Member States which have received the lowest number of applications for international protection; (b) Applicant’s skills, including spoken language skills; (c) Applicant’s cultural and social ties.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 885 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – title
Financial solidarityConsequences of failure to comply with the allocation mechanism
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 887 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
1. A Member State may, at the end of the three-month period after the entry into force of this Regulation and at the end of each twelve-month period thereafter, enter in the automated system that it will temporarily not take part in the correctivThe allocation mechanism set out in Chapter VII of this Regulation as a Member Stateshall apply ofn allocation and notify th mandatory basis to theall Member States, the Commission and the European Union Agency for Asylum.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 894 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2
2. The automated system referred to in Article 44(1) shall in that case apply the reference key during this twelve- month period to those Member States with a number ofFailure to comply with the obligations arising from the applications for which of they are the Member States responsible below their share pursuant to Article 35(1), with the exception of the Member State which entered the information, as well as the benefitting Member State. The automated system referred to in Article 44(1) shall count each application which would have otherwise been allocated to the Member State which entered the information pursuant to Article 36(4) for the sharellocation mechanism referred to in Chapter VII shall result in the suspension of commitments and payments in relation to the national and regional operating programmes of thate Member State involved.
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 902 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 3
3. At the end of the twelve-month period referred to in paragraph 2, the automated system shall communicate to the Member State not taking part in the corrective allocation mechanism the number of applicants for whom it would have otherwise been the Member State of allocation. That Member State shall thereafter make a solidarity contribution of EUR 250 000 per each applicant who would have otherwise been allocated to that Member State during the respective twelve-month period. The solidarity contribution shall be paid to the Member State determined as responsible for examining the respective applications.deleted
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 911 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt a decision in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 56, lay down the modalities for the implementation of paragraph 3.deleted
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 918 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 5
5. The European Union Agency for Asylum shall monitor and report to the Commission on a yearly basis on the application of the financial solidarity mechanism.deleted
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 974 #

2016/0133(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43
The automated system shall notify the Member States and the Commission as soon as the number of applications in the benefitting Member State for which it is the Member State responsible under this Regulation is below 150 % of its share pursuant to Article 35(1). Upon the notification referred to in paragraph 2, the application of the corrective allocation shall cease for that Member State.Article 43 deleted Cessation of corrective allocation
2017/05/05
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 37 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) Employers are under a legal obligation to inform workers about risks to their health and safety from exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at the workplace and to provide relevant training.
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) The limit values should be revised when necessary in the light of scientific data. It is also necessary to obtain full epidemiological data on the incidence of cancer and the mortality rate from it, and corresponding data for all diseases and conditions correlated with exposure to carcinogens or mutagens among workers in the various sectors of industry for the past three decades.
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) Member States should be under a legal obligation to check in advance the biological effects of all substances, including new chemical molecules, used in production processes, through the agencies already established in cooperation with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) Total confinement of operations entailing dispersion in the air of dust and fibres which have fibrotic, carcinogenic and mutagenic effects should be compulsory. Only where it is impossible to ensure such technical prevention is it, however, desirable to provide individual protection equipment (such as single-use suits, caps, gloves, goggles and masks) which complies with the most stringent safety standards.
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 b (new)
(3b) In the event of exposure to carcinogens or mutagens, organisational arrangements should be made at work, including for rotation of teams, so as to permit clearance.
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) The legal protection conferred by this Directive is intended to be established in the form of general standards, setting out fundamental principles, which will therefore be applied to all substances classified as carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 2004/37/EC
Article -1 (new)
(-1) The following Article is inserted: ‘Article -1 Ban on the use of carcinogens or mutagens Member States shall undertake to introduce within 10 years a total ban on the use of carcinogens or mutagens, replacing them with alternative substances which are not harmful to the health and safety of workers.’
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Citation 2
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 53(1) and 62, 62, 151 and 153(1)(a) and (b) thereof,
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) According to Article 3 TEU, the Union shall promote social justice and protection. Article 9The TFEU gives the Union the task to promote a high level of employment, to guarantee an adequate social protection and to combat social exclusion as well as supporting and complementing measures by the Member States to improve the working environment and protect the safety and health of workers and their working conditions.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) A better definition of the concept of posted workers is needed to ensure greater legal certainty within the institution and prevent avoidance.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 238 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) Laws, regulations, and national practices, including administrative provisions or collective agreements applicable in Member States may ensure that subcontracting does not confer on undertakings the possibility to avoid rules guaranteeing certain terms and conditions of employment covering remuneration. Where such rules on remuneration exist at national level, the Member State may apply them in a non-discriminatory manner to undertakings posting workers to its territory provided that they do not disproportionately restrict the cross-border provision of services.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 274 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 96/71/CE
Article 2 – paragraph 1
–1) Article 2, paragraph 1, is amended as follows: "1. For the purposes of this Directive, ‘posted worker’ means a worker who, for a limited period of at least three months, carries out his work in the territory of a Member State other than the State in which he normally works and has a social security legislation attestation (A1) issued by the competent authority of the sending Member State, in accordance with Articles 11 to 16 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 341 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2 a – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a.. For the purpose of paragraph 2, there may be no more than three replacements of posted workers performing the same task at the same workplace.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 390 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/CE
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of this Directive, remuneration means all the elements of remuneration rendered mandatory by national law, regulation or practice (e.g. administrative provisions), collective agreements or arbitration awards which have been declared universally applicable and/or, in the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements or arbitration awards to be of universal application, other collective agreements or arbitration awards within the meaning of paragraph 8 second subparagraph, in the Member State to whose territory the worker is postedif the Member State to whose territory the worker is posted so decides, by: – collective agreements or arbitration awards which are generally applicable to all similar undertakings in the geographical area and in the profession or industry concerned, and/or – collective agreements which have been concluded by the most representative employers’ and employees’ organisations at national level and which are applied throughout their national territory, provided that they are applied in respect of the undertakings referred to in Article 1(1) in such a way as to ensure equal treatment as regards pay between those undertakings and undertakings under this subparagraph that are in a similar situation, and that a Member State wishing to make use of collective agreements of this kind that have not been declared universally applicable has notified the Commission that the obligation to publish the relevant information on the single national website referred to above has been met.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2016/0039(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Where the conditions in paragraph 3 are continuously notnot fully met, the Commission shall temporarily suspend or cancel the disbursement of the Union's macro- financial assistance. In such cases, it shall inform the European Parliament and the Council of the reasons for that suspension or cancellation.
2016/04/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 26 #

2016/0031(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 16
(16) A permanent exchange of information on intergovernmental agreements at Union level should enable best practices to be developed. On the basis of those best practices, the Commission, where appropriate in cooperation with the European External Action Service as regards the Union’s external policies, should develop optional modelad hoc model positive and negative clauses to be used in intergovernmental agreements between Member States and third countries to assist in the legal definition of those agreements. The use of such model clauses should aim to avoid conflicts of intergovernmental agreements with Union law, in particular internal energy market rules and competition law, and conflicts with international agreements concluded by the Union. Their use should be optional, and it should be possible to adapt their content to any particular circumstance.
2016/07/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomesTakes the view that the Single Market Strategy (SMS), which will may help to inject new life into Europe’s economies by opening up borders and removing barriers for goods and services;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to combat fiscal and social dumping which creates unfair competition between the economies of individual countries within the EU, causing intolerable imbalances which, with the opening of borders and removal of barriers for goods and services, are likely to widen, to the detriment of the quality of those goods and services, not to mention jobs and working conditions; believes that this is the only way in which the single market will be able to withstand the competition from non-EU countries and prevent the social safety net from becoming ever smaller, leading to huge job losses;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that barriers to doing business across borders are barriers to growth and job creation; calls, however, for due account to be taken of the fact that in the single market, reciprocal arrangements are vital for preventing unfair competition and social dumping;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take measures to facilitate and implement 'smart working', in order to improve the productivity and quality of life of workers and their families, especially in a digital single market;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the potential of the collaborative economy for job creation and a more inclusive labour market across Member States; believes that a country-by-country taxation principle needs to be establishedmmon consolidated corporate tax base for businesses needs to be established and that, given the natural adjustments in individual countries, the Commission and the Member States should take the necessary measures to achieve equal rights and conditions, including pay and tax, for all workers in the European Union;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to support the reduction of the burden of taxation and social security contributions on labour, for both the employed and self-employed, in order to increase the purchasing power of workers, employees and the self-employed, and their families, and improve the competitiveness of SMEs, micro-enterprises and innovative start-ups;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. WelcomTakes the opportunitviesw that the SMS can offers to SME fresh opportunities to SMEs, micro-enterprises and innovative start- ups; believes that developing the right business environment by improving private venture capital frameworks for SMEs and fully applying the ‘Think Small First’ principle across the single market, facilitating access to credit, reducing the tax burden, red tape and tax obligations for SMEs is crucial for growth and job creation;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. WelcomNotes the Commission’s support for dual education systems; stresses the importance of ensuring that the SMS does not in any way undermine dual education systems;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to support job creation in the collaborative economy by developing appropriate safeguards, while at the same time providing a platform that will allow entrepreneurs to grow, innovate and create jobs.; calls on the Commission, in addition, to promote specific support for entrepreneurs in order to provide them with the ideal conditions for achieving the objectives of growth, innovation and job creation;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses in this regard the need to increase, in an effective manner, the information on EU funds available to SMEs, micro-enterprises and innovative start-ups; points out, moreover, that to ensure the quality of the use of EU funds it is essential to implement a system to supervise and monitor the use of those resources;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that the post-electoral revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) must address the new political challenges facing the EU; underlines that reallocaconsiders that substantial addition ofal funds for emergencies is not a sustainable solution; insisting is needed at EU level to address humanitarian challenges, develop a new common European asylum system, promote integration and prevent discrimination, racism and xenophobia; believes that, in the existing resource commitments for achieving the Union’s strategic objectiveslight of the unprecedented migration crisis, current MFF ceilings for 2014-2020 have proved inadequate; notes that the Asylum, Migration and Integreater economic, social and territorial cohesionion Fund (AMIF) is already virtually exhausted; recalls that extensive use has already been maintainedde of MFF flexibility mechanisms;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses the importance for the achievement of EU strategic objectives of increasing public spending for education, training, research and development in all Member States, easing budgetary constraints in Europe to ensure effective tools for integration without removing employment opportunities and combating poverty and social exclusion;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that the employment rate in the EU currently stands at 69.2 %, which is well below the Europe 2020 target, and calls for increased public investment, free of budgetary constraints, in job creation and skills;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3a. Insists on the continuation of the Youth Employment Initiative and calls for the resources for this initiative to be provided until 2020; stresses the need to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of these investments, given the limited results achieved by the programmes implemented to date;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that new legislation on EURES and the European platform for tackling undeclared work will draw on Employment and Social Innovation programme resources and insists that adequate funding for this programme be guaranteed in the EU budget; notes, with regard to EURES initiatives to deal with unemployment, that it is necessary to ensure that labour mobility is organised on a voluntary basis and underpinned by appropriate social guarantees;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that the resources of the European Social Fund (ESF) and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived are not sufficient to address the unprecedented flow of refugees and that competition for scarce funds may lead to social conflict; insists that the ESF share amount to 25 % of the total cohesion budget,calls therefore on the Commission to increase the European Social Fund allocation to 25 % of the cohesion policy budget as part of the revision of the multiannual financial framework; insists that no reductions in the national envelopes for ESF measures be made and that sufficient cash flow be provided annually for payments from the EU budget;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises that the policies for poverty reduction and social inclusion among vulnerable groups have failed to produce the expected results and calls for increased financial aid to social services and the social economy; points out that Member States should introduce, as a possible poverty reduction measure and in accordance with national practices, a minimum income proportionate to their specific social and economic circumstances;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses the material and cultural poverty and the deterioration of major European suburbs; notes the need to increase funding for qualitative improvements so as to increase the economic, cultural and social integration of European citizens living in such areas, especially the more vulnerable sections of society;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas Article 194 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union specifically upholds the right of a Member State to determine the conditions for exploiting its energy resources, whilst also upholding regard for solidarity and environmental protectionits Article 11 specifically establishes that environmental protection requirements must be integrated into the definition and development of the Union's policies and activities, and its Article 191 establishes as objectives of the environmental policy the protection of human health, and the prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources, among others;
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 6 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas conventional indigenous sources of oil and gas contribute significantly to Europe's currrepresent ena vergy needs and are crucial at present for our energy security and energy diversitysmall and continuously declining share of world oil and gas proved reserves which is better to carefully conserve underground;
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 10 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the potential unconventional European sources of gas and oil, and especially gas and oil captured in shale formations, to be extracted by hydraulic fracturing, remain extremely uncertain –as the 2011-2015 experience in Poland has soundly demonstrated–, due to greater depths than expected, high clay contents, and geological barriers of significant complexity, and furthermore it is met by strong reserves, when not outright opposition, of many European citizens and Member states, due to environmental and other impacts and triggered earthquakes;
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 15 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas there is already an extensive body of international law and international conventions which govern the seas, including European waters, although they have a limited preventive capacity, as demonstrated by a decades-long record of environmental disasters linked to offshore spills caused worldwide by the extractive industry;
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 22 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Underscores the fact that the Member States already have the world's best-performing offshore safety regimes and that overregulation in this area would seriously harm the competitiveness of theirthe strict respect of existing regulation in this area is a constraint to be respected in any circumstance by their extractive industries;
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 28 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that, as regards 'liability for offshore accidents and their consequences, the Offshore Safety Directive (OSD) channels it unequivocally to offshore licensees, i.e. the individual or joint holders of authorizations for oil/gas prospection, exploration, and/or production operations issued in accordance with Directive 94/22/EC1 . It also makes the licensees strictly liable for any environmental damage resulting from their operations'; however, there are founded doubts about this condition being sufficient, since it has been stated unequivocally by the same Directive that no existing financial security instruments, including risk pooling arrangements, can accommodate all possible consequences of major accidents; moreover, although the OSD contains specific provisions for liability and compensation-related issues, it does not put in place a comprehensive EU framework for liability, since it neither deals with liability for civil damage (i.e. caused to natural or legal persons, including bodily injury, property damage and economic loss, both consequential and pure), nor addresses criminal liability for offshore accidents, arising out of committing a criminal act qualified as such by the law. _________________ 1 OJ L 164, 30.6.1994, p. 3.
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 38 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines that the Commission itself has highlighted that liability for civil damage (i.e. third party damage, or 'traditional damage') from offshore oil and gas operations in the European Economic Area (EEA) is still poorly understood; at the same time, it highlights that the expectations of the public, civil society and some authorities are high, but there is no coherent perspective on the kinds of claims that would be permissible, nor how to manage such claims effectively in the case of major accidents – particularly accidents that cross boundaries;
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 41 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that there is a 'broad variety of financial security products available to hedge oil and gas companies’ operating risk. These range from self-insurance options, to third-party insurance, to mutual schemes such as the Offshore Pollution Liability Association Ltd (OPOL), to alternative risk transfer mechanisms and others'; this notwithstanding, none of them is able to fully protect the Member states from the combined consequences of the challenging insolvency and transboundary problems that can demonstrably arise from major offshore incidents;
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 44 #

2015/2352(INI)

4a. Highlights that the consequence of such an incident is likely to be a socialization of the incident's costs to local communities, the State and other businesses dependent on the marine economy; such externalization can be further composed by the complexity of the existing international legal framework, which makes it difficult to advance successful transboundary damage claims;
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 49 #

2015/2352(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Concludes that there is no need to give consideration to further legislation until the Commission has published its report on implementation of the OSD., while respecting the deadlines established for the Commission to publish its report on implementation of the OSD, due for July 2019, it is of the utmost importance for the Union to pursue actively during this period the research about how a comprehensive EU's framework for liability should be put in place, as a necessary complement to the regulatory process, in order to better protect possible damaged parties, and to better reflect European societal values;
2016/06/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 3 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes the impact of the second cycle of the Youth Strategy (2013-2015) in providing a flexible framework for cross- sectoral involvement; values the structured dialogue with youth organisations in this regardemphasises the importance of developing the multilevel dialogue instrument in order to match stakeholders and their requirements; points out that any measure to boost youth employment is effective if it fosters dialogue between the education and training sector, businesses and young people;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the importance of the Youth Strategy, given the EU’s alarmingly high youth unemployment and NEET rates; stresses that the next cycle (2016-2018) should contribute to the two objectives of the Youth Strategy by focusing on youth unemployment, education, training and the transition to the labour market; emphasises the need to discontinue austerity policies, in particular in those countries where levels of youth unemployment are highest;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Urges the Commission and the Member States to implement expansionist economic policies which offer greater leeway in the area of public investment in education, training and high-quality apprenticeships;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to combat early school-leaving by adequately informing students about future labour market opportunities and qualitative apprenticeships; points out that the poverty affecting many families is one of the main causes of early school-leaving, so that the latter can be reduced by tackling the former;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that employment and entrepreneurship constitute one of the eight priorities identified in the EU Youth Report (2010-2018); points out that, if the potential offered by youth entrepreneurship is to be exploited, all the obstacles which prevent young people from developing their ideas, their potential and their attitudes must be done away with; stresses that youth work and non-formal learning play a vital role in developing young people’s potential, including entrepreneurial skills;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Member States to implement fully the Erasmus+ programme, thereby fostering further cross-border career and labour mobility; emphasises that labour mobility makes sense only if it is voluntary; points out that fostering mobility must not serve to encourage the brain drain;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that thus far the aims of the Youth Guarantee Scheme have not been achieved in many Member States; urges the Commission to carry out impact studies with a view to determining precisely what results have been achieved thus far and to take additional measures, in the form of more stringent oversight and monitoring mechanisms, the sharing of best practices and the organisation of workshops which bring together all the actors concerned, designed to make this instrument more effective;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on all the Member States to introduce a minimum guaranteed income in order to offer young people who have finished school and university the resources they need to live decently until they find work;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2015/2349(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas technological advances, new business models and digitalisation have transformed the transport sector significantly in recent years, with major impacts on working conditions and employment in the sector; whereas the economic crisis and labour market deregulation have further worsened working conditions in many Member States;
2016/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2015/2349(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the need for a regulatory environment that encourages investment and access to financing, and fosters sustainable growth and quality jobs within small transport businesses; points out that investment programmes such as the EFSI regrettably cannot have a positive long- term impact on employment levels;
2016/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2015/2349(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes the opportunities of the collaborative economy and the Digital Single Market for job creation and more inclusive growth within small transport businesses; voices concern, nonetheless, at the lack of common ground, which could hamper full implementation of the Digital Single Market; stresses, however, that the collaborative economy must not lead to an avoidance of tax and social contributions, nor to non-compliance with employment and social legislation; recommends that the utmost transparency should be maintained in this connection and that inspections should be carried out to ensure that the rules are being followed, with appropriate penalties being imposed on anyone failing to do so;
2016/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2015/2349(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Is concerned about the rise of precarious employment, bogus self- employment, undeclared work and social dumping; calls on the Member States to guarantee fair competition and ensure decent working conditions and the highest possible level of social protection for all workers; recommends full enforcement of worker health and safety rules, in order to create an environment in which high- quality work can be performed in decent conditions;
2016/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2015/2349(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Is concerned about the misuse of subcontracting in the transport sector to circumvent working and employment standards; calls on the Commission and the Member States to introduce and strengthen laws on joint and several liability; and to establish ongoing monitoring arrangements and lay down appropriate penalties for anyone failing to comply with the rules;
2016/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2015/2349(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the development of new working time models that enable workers to improve their work-life balance; stresses, however, the importance of monitoring compliance with mandatory driving and resting times as well as working hours; recommends enforcement of the rules on cabotage and calls for new technology to be used in order to make sure that the rules on driving and rest periods are followed;
2016/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2015/2345(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considering the current geopolitical context, in which NGOs are playing a fundamental role in assisting and managing refugees and displaced persons, hopes that the Commission will increase the financial support it provides to these NGOs;
2016/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2015/2345(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that EU programmes such as the EaSI, ESF and FEAD cannot be implemented without NGO involvement;deleted
2016/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2015/2345(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure the independence of social NGOs and to provide funding to contribute to the independent assessment of policies; believes it would be appropriate therefore to create a European database of NGOs and monitoring tools to verify their transparency and their operations in order to prevent any form of misconduct; calls for funding also to be guaranteed for small NGOs and recently-established NGOs;
2016/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2015/2345(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. deplores the total lack of information on access to funding for NGOs; stresses the need to provide guidance and information to NGOs and other partners entitled to this, while simultaneously conducting careful and precise monitoring;
2016/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2015/2345(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that many NGOs, and especially the smaller ones, have difficulties in accessing ESF funding and are disproportionately burdened by the complexity of programmes and reporting requirements; calls therefore on the Commission and Member States to step up support in this areato simplify bureaucratic procedures with a view to reducing the burdens on European social NGOs; also recommends that mentoring facilities be arranged to ensure they are able to participate in these programmes;
2016/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2015/2345(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to focusbolster social NGO funding programmes so that they focus on operational grants beyond one year, in order to ensure continuity and sustainability, while also introducing instruments for projects of one year or less;
2016/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2015/2345(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Regrets that sometimes under the EaSI only public administration bodies can apply for funding as the lead partner; calls therefore on the Commission to put forward a proposal to adapt the regulations so that NGOs can also be the lead partnerules and the programmes in such a way as to establish a measure through which NGOs can also be the lead partner, while ensuring that a mechanism exists for 100% funding of the project;
2016/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 34 a (new)
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a European Platform to enhance cooperation in the prevention and deterrence of undeclared work (A8-0172/2015)
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 34 b (new)
- having regard to its legislative resolution of 8 July 2015 on the proposal for a Council decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States,
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas unemployment has been diminishing since 2013 thanks to supportive macroeconomic policies and the impact of structural reforms; whereas it nevertheless remains too high, currently affecting 9.9 % of active citizens, i.e. 23 million Europeans, about half of them being long-term unemployed;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas in order to reduce unemployment it is essential to take into account specific microeconomic circumstances and outline structural reforms whose social impact must be assessed before they enter into force;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas many young people do either enroll for additional graduate studies in an effort to escape unemployment or leave their home country to seek jobs in other Member States; whereas these two cases are not covered by national statistics on youth unemployment; whereas the actual unemployment rate might therefore be higher than the official one;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas about 20 % of active citizens in the EU have only basic skills while 39 % of companies have difficulty finding staff with the required skills, whereas low educational level is one of the key causes of young people becoming NEETs; whereas it is essential to identify the root causes of early school leaving and determine whether the increase of unemployment among parents is likely to lead to an increase in early school leaving cases;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas although atypical or non- standard forms of employment do not in themselves constitute precarious work, it is more likely to be found where contracts of this nature apply, albeit such contracts account for a minority of existing employment relationships; whereas it is necessary to provide for effective control measures in order to address abuse of atypical or non-standard forms of employment;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas one of the five Europe 2020 targets aims at reducing by at least 20 million the number of people in or at risk of poverty and social exclusion; whereas almost 123 million people in the EU are in this situation; whereas in 2013 26.5 million children in the EU28 were at risk of falling into poverty or social exclusion; whereas the Europe 2020 targets have not yet been reached so that an immediate review of the EU2020 strategy is needed;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas public debt remains too high in many Member States (the highest figures being for Greece at 167.8 % and Italy at 136 %), impeding growth and making the entire Union more vulnerable to crises; whereas asymmetric shocks have hit mainly those Members States most affected by the economic crises, while even other countries are increasingly showing similar symptoms;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas in the next 10 to 15 years 90 % of the world’s growth will come from outside the EU; whereas it is essential to implement industrial and market policies able to increase the global competitiveness of the EU and therefore guaranteeing sustainable and socially inclusive employment;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) has already approved 69 projects in 18 countries, and signed 56 operations (with total financing under EFSI of around EUR 1.4 billion ), and this is expected to lead to more than 22 EUR billion in investment and to involve around 71 000 SMEs; whereas these projects involve mostly great infrastructure, while SMEs and micro-enterprises are usually excluded by these funds in spite of their importance as backbone of European economy and generator of quality jobs;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
M a. whereas it is essential to review the posting of workers Directive in order to tackle social dumping cases;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the fact that the Commission’s Annual Growth Survey (AGS) underlines the need to pay more attention to social fairness in the context of the new macroeconomic adjustment programmes, adding three social indicators (activity rate, youth unemployment and long-term unemployment) in the 2016 Alert Mechanism Report; stresses that the need to invest in social development is not just a means of guaranteeing that economic growth and convergence can be achieved, but must also be a specific target in itself;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that good and quality jobs constitute an essential pillar for social fairness, promoting human dignity; believes that in this sense employment and growth must be placed at the centre of EU policies, especially for youth, as a way to construct a more sustainable social European Union; urges Member States to implement and increase policies for youth employment by taking into account young people's aspirations and matching these policies with the actual needs of the job market;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the Commission´s proposal to enhance the Youth Guarantee at national, regional and local level, and stresses its importance for school-to-work transitions; stresses the need to guarantee suitable forms of collaboration between public and private employment services; regrets however that in some Member States the Youth Guarantee has failed to deliver the expected results; calls for an improvement of this instrument by implementing multi- level actions among all the relevant parties (young people, enterprises and educational institutions);
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. calls on the Commission to ensure the close monitoring of the use of EU funds;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 181 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Stresses that long-term unemployed lack often even the minimum financial resources to meet the most basic needs of daily life; believes therefore that professional requalification should be preceded and paralleled by financial measures such as minimum income, which will enable long-term unemployed to meet the most urgent needs of daily life while struggling for their professional requalification;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 183 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that the integration of long-term unemployed individuals is crucial for their self-confidenceurvival and future development and is key to fighting poverty and guaranteeing the sustainability of national social security systems;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 238 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Member States to gradually shift taxes from labour to otherless detrimental sources, and to implement tax rules that foster incentives to entrepreneurship and employment creation, especially for highly qualified young people, in order to boost research and innovation projects within European enterprises; urges Member States to cut red tape in order to promote youth entrepreneurship;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 256 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Member States to modernise their current social protection systems, in order to guarantee their sustainability in the face of expected ageingtaking ageing into account; considers that pension schemes should be linked not only to life expectancy but also to other social and labour factors, while not jeopardising the sustainability of public finances;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 266 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Member States to examine the persistence of low fertility rates in the EU; calls on the Commission to promote family-friendly policies that enhance parents’ capacity to ensure their children’s wellbeing; encourages the Member States to consider applying more favourable fiscal differentiation in line with the number of children in a family; calls on the Commission to provide families with assistance not only by means of financial support but also in the form of high quality services;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 276 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the need to promote sustainable and inclusive growth leading to the creation of more and better jobs and tangible prospects for young people in particular, in order to respond to the internal and external challenges facing the EU;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 282 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to focus on SMEmicro, small and medium size enterprises as a fundamental key for sustainable and inclusive development; urges the Member States to implement tax schemes that favour innovative start-ups and the facilitation of job creation by SMEs, and to develop mechanisms that might impel such enterprises to achieve or operationalise in an international dimension; underlines therefore the need to implement comprehensive and homogeneous industrial policies at the EU level in order to enable it to face the challenges posed by non-EU competitors;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 295 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Points out that enterprises in the social economy face as many difficulties as traditional enterprises in obtaining public or private financing; underlines the need to give them more support, especially as regards access to the different forms of financing, such as European funds; underlines also the need to cut red tape in order to support social enterprises;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 306 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. WelcomNotes the resultsintroduction of the EFSI in the first year of its implementation and its role of rewarding the best projects at European level; calls on the Commission to ensure that all Member States make use of the possibility of accessing this fund;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 311 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Points out that investment priorities must be oriented to infrastructural projects where these are clearly needed in order to ensure social fairness or enhance sustainable growth; calls on the Commission to require both a prior presentation of the expected social and economic outcomes of any EU-funded investment project and its subsequent monitoring and evaluation; highlights nonetheless the short-term sustainability of these jobs as well as the heavy impact produced on the environment by these projects;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 316 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses, taking into account Member States’ difficulties in fully using European funds, that the EU must guarantee proper and better use of its investments, which need to be matched to its priorities, as well as the efficient management of its resources, and must also cut red tape with regard to access, implementation and evaluation; calls on the Commission to ensure the close monitoring of the use of EU funds;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 320 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. WelcomNotes the Commission’s call on Member States to increase their social investments, especially in healthcare, childcare, housing support and rehabilitation services; calls on enterprises and other eligible beneficiaries to make better use of the investment mechanisms provided by European funds and projects having direct application; calls furthermore on the Commission to ensure that EU recommendations are properly implemented by Member States;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 333 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Agrees on the need to develop a process of upward economic and social convergence in order to foster social and economic cohesion between Member States and their regions, but points out that this must be viewed as a goal of a common project in which social dialogue plays a key role; underlines the necessity to involve all the relevant stakeholders so that their needs are prioritized;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 351 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Stresses that the Europe 2020 strategy still maintains its pertinence, and calls on the Member States to reinforce its implementation on the groundtargets have not yet been reached, while the living conditions of many EU citizens keep worsening; asks the Commission and the Council to more closely monitor its global and national implementation; considers it necessary to start projecting a post-Europe 2020 scenario;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 359 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Member States to implement and monitor more efficient forms of social protection systems and income support, in order to ensure that these systems offer a minimum standard of living for the unemployed and those at risk of social exclusion, while guaranteeing that such mechanisms do not perpetuate social dependency and constitute an incentive to education or entering the job market; calls therefore on Member States to set levels of minimum income in accordance with national practice and proportionate to the social and economic situation;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 368 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Member States to implement the necessary measures for the inclusion of refugees; points out however that these measures can be effective only if shared and implemented equally by all Member States; stresses that such an approach will require the allocation of funds that, in so fragile a situation, cannot be provided solely by Member States; calls on the Commission to provide the funding required to develop such a strategy as part of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF);
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 384 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to work together on removing the obstacles to fair labour mobility, ensuring that EU mobile workers are noteither exploited nor treated abusively;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 399 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. WelcomeRegrets the Commission recommendation on the euro area, which consolidates the joint analysis and definition of strategies of the social and economic dimensions of Member States under EMU, stressis still based on the dogma of fiscal consolidation, the irreversibility of the single currency and the neoliberal policy prescriptions, which clearly fail to support economic growth, employment and convergence ing the need for these criteria to be reconciledeuro area, thereby prolonging the never-ending economic and social crisis;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 417 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. WelcomNotes the fact that the Commission has clearly distinguished a European and a national phase with regard to the European Semester; stresses the need for closer coordination between the European institutions in the design, implementation and evaluation of the European strategy for growth; calls on the Commission to establish a clear agenda in this respect, also involving the social partners and the national parliaments;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 425 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Believes that, in order to match European and national policies on growth and guarantee their suitability on the ground, it is crucial to strengthen the role of the social partners at both European and national level; stresses that, in order to progress with upward convergence and balance competitiveness and fairness, social dialogue must be pursued in all the phases of the Semester; reminds however that the social dialogue is important but not sufficient in order to actually implement growth and employment oriented policies, while an immediate exemption from existing budgetary rules concerning productive investments and minimum income is essential;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2015/2327(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that Erasmus+ iscould be one of the key drivers of growth, employment, competitiveness and social cohesion in that it contributes to improving European education and training systems and employability, and provides Europeans with an opportunity to acquire transversal and transferable sets of skills and competences via studies, training and work experience abroad;
2016/10/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2015/2327(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that, despite clear improvements problems still persist in recognition and validation systems in education and VET, problems still persist; calls for specific targets such as the implementation of a fully operational credit transfer system and recognition, and for validation of competences acquired through non-formal and informal learning.;
2016/10/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2015/2327(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses the requirement to support, either financially or by means of tax incentives, SMEs that offer vocational training under the Erasmus+ programme;
2016/10/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2015/2327(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Stresses the need to increase awareness of the Erasmus+ instrument as a means of improving an individual’s own skills, giving them an added dimension which should ensure the right approach to this instrument for the purpose of guaranteeing its effectiveness, eliminating the risk of turning it merely into a life experience;
2016/10/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2015/2327(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Recommends that this instrument should not provide a smoother route to a brain drain, but rather create opportunities to develop and supplement one’s own skills with a view to subsequently deploying them at home; considers that mobility has added value if and only if it is pursued on a voluntary basis and not if it is dictated by a lack of opportunities in the home country;
2016/10/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2015/2327(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Recalls that at a time of particular crisis of the fundamental values of the EU, the Erasmus+ instrument can provide a fundamental opportunity to promote integration, understanding and solidarity among young people; calls therefore for the integration of young people to be promoted by means of awareness of different cultures and traditions and their mutual and crucial respect;
2016/10/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the Alpine countries (Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Slovenia, and Switzerland) and the EU have signed the Alpine Convention for the sustainable development and protection of the Alps;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 7 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas in order to give effect to the principles laid down in the Framework Convention and to the initiatives to be implemented at the practical level, a number of protocols have been adopted, setting out specific measures on a range of subjects including transport, tourism, soil conservation, spatial planning, sustainable development, and nature conservation and landscape protection;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 8 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas the Alpine Region for the purposes of EUSALP has a population of roughly 72 million European citizens and encompasses vast lowland areas, but the Alpine Region as defined in the Alpine Convention, which has also been ratified by the EU, has a population of only 6 million, living mainly in mountain areas;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 26 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas financial resources should mainly be channelled towards, and invested in, the development of local connectivity, in promoting small town centres, facilitating the accessibility of tourist facilities and, ensuring essential health services, and protecting the environment and natural resources, including water resources;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 30 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the Commission action plan is intended to make for more sustainable transport connectivity, both within the EUSALP Alpine Region and with other parts of Europe, by promoting intermodality and interoperability in passenger and freight transport so as to achieve the aims of the TEN-T trans- European transport networks and shift traffic from road to rail;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 31 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas the EU Strategy for the Alpine Region is seeking to enhance public transport and high-speed Internet connectivity, protect the environment and water in particular, raise the status of bottom-up local and cross-border governance models, and aid SMEs;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 32 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C c (new)
Cc. whereas the balance to be struck between transport infrastructure and regional conservation has for decades been marked out as the main challenge and a goal for the international community of states and regions belonging to the Alpine Region;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 33 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C d (new)
Cd. whereas in its communication on the EU Strategy for the Alpine Region points both to the need to reduce the impact of transport across the Alps, so as to preserve the Alpine environmental heritage, and to the importance of implementing a strategy to bring about better environmental conditions for the population;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 34 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C e (new)
Ce. whereas the new base tunnel on the Turin to Lyon Alpine route, though financed by European funds, does not comply with the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 (TEN-T) or Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 (CEF), given that there are no bottlenecks involved, and whereas the same route is already served by a newly modernised railway line that will be able to cope with the expected increase in freight and passenger transport demand;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 34 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas in its communication on the EU Strategy for the Alpine Region the Commission points both to the need to reduce the impact of transport across the Alps, so as to preserve the Alpine environmental heritage, and to the importance of implementing a strategy to deliver a healthier and better preserved living environment for local people;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 40 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Urges the Commission to refrain from implementing and/or financing infrastructure projects that might prove harmful to the environment, natural resources, and public health, and points to the need to save the financial resources of the EU and Member States by making optimum use of existing infrastructure;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 40 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas, although EU funding was provided for the project, the new base tunnel on the Turin to Lyon Alpine route does not comply with the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 (TEN-T) and Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 (CEF), given that there are no bottlenecks involved, and whereas the same route is already served by a newly modernised railway line that will be able to cope with the expected increase in freight and passenger transport demand;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 46 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to redefine transport planning and promote, as a matter of priority, a policy to develop transport infrastructure that is sustainable, inclusive and non-invasive for the region, preserving the latter and promoting it in terms of tourism, social cohesion and regional development, bearing in mind that, for planning purposes, priority should be given not to ensuring the shortest or fastest transport routes but to minimising the environmental impact thereof;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 51 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Considers that the new base tunnel on the Turin-Lyon alpine route is detrimental to health, the environment and the region itself, as well as being uneconomic; calls on the Commission and the Member States to bear in mind that the already existing railway line has recently been upgraded and is able to meet anticipated freight and passenger requirements;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 64 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Member States forming part of the alpine region to cooperate in ensuring that transit fees are as uniform as possible and in line with European standards, especially for those countries that are compelled by their geographic location to cross others;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 64 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Insists on the involvement of Parliament in theEUSALP governing bodies of the EUSALPance and decision-making;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 72 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Points out that climate change is particularly significant for regions such as the Alps, whose morphology and natural habitats are particularly vulnerable; calls on the Commission and Member States accordingly to introduce sustainable transport policies in line with the Paris COP21 targets;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 74 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on the Commission to ensure easy and convenient access to documents both for European citizens and for the institutions, in order to ensure transparency regarding the use of public funds, and stresses that, in cases where access is being sought for reasons relating to health and the environment, this must always take priority over any considerations whatsoever relating to competition or commercial data privacy protection;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 75 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to invest in tourism infrastructure and to facilitate sustainable access via public transport to tourist destinations such as ski resorts., focusing on structures designed for passive energy efficiency coupled with low environmental impact and made using sustainable energy sources and local materials such as stone, as well as natural fibres (wood, hemp, etc.) for heat insulation, and to facilitate sustainable access via public transport to tourist destinations such as ski resorts, encouraging the use of transport powered by alternative energy sources with a view to preserving the environment and cutting pollutant emissions;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 78 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission to ensure easy and convenient access to documents both for European citizens and for the institutions, in order to ensure transparency regarding the use of public funds, and stresses that, in cases where access is being sought for reasons relating to health and the environment, this must always take priority over any considerations whatsoever relating to competition or commercial data privacy protection;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 82 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Member States to repair and improve old disused trails for use by tourists, upgrading them and bringing them back into service, so as to prevent them from being abandoned and allowed to fall into disrepair and possibly hydrogeological destabilisation;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 85 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Calls on the Member States to promote interconnections and intermodal transport suited to the nature of the region concerned; calls on the to focus in particular on the TEN-T ports, stepping up their operations and their role in providing the alpine region with access to the Mediterranean;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 87 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the EIB, in cooperation with the Commission, to examine the possibility of setting up an investment platform for the Alpine region that would enable mobilisation of funding from public and private sources; calls for the creation of a pipeline project for the region which would attract investors;deleted
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 88 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Calls on the Member States and regions to ensure that less accessible areas can be also be reached and emergency assistance provided and that healthcare and first aid units are provided for areas where the transport situation is less favourable, taking into account their distance from major hospitals;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 91 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5d. Calls on the Member States to step up cooperation and collaboration so as to improve exchanges of good practice;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 92 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Considers that innovation and new technologies, driven by smart specialisation strategies and financed by existing EU funding sources (e.g. the ERDF, the ESF, COSME, Horizon 2020 or Erasmus +), could help generate quality jobs and catalyse the establishment, upscaling and clustering of SMEs, which could, in turn, reverse the depopulation trend in Alpine areas; points, in particular, to the need to put forward examples of best practice in areas such as teleworking, e-commerce and the use of digital marketing channels that can help to diversify the macro-region's economy;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 93 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 e (new)
5e. Calls on the Member States and regional authorities to protect and preserve wildlife parks and reserves in the alpine region, devoting more attention to transport sustainability and imposing draconian and closely monitored air pollution limits;
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 94 #

2015/2324(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 f (new)
5f. Expresses its concern at the possibility of rail and road freight traffic stoppages being imposed by certain countries in a bid to contain the migration problem, which would have serious economic implications for the entire alpine region; calls on the Commission accordingly to monitor the situation with a view to ensuring the free movement of passengers and goods and preventing any possible harm to the transport sector.
2016/03/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 117 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Supports the diversification of tourism supply by such means as tourist theme parks and routes, food and wine tourism and sporting tourism, in order to prolong the tourist season, enhance the competitiveness and sustainability of tourist destinations, and promote new tourist activities that are better adapted to climate change and to the area's cultural and historical specificities;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 123 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Points to the urgent need to bring a halt to the intensification of land use, not least by implementing policies promoting urban renewal and sustainable tourism facilities, such as 'alberghi diffusi';
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 130 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses the importance of improving transport and energy connectivity among the participating countries, including local, regional and cross-border transport and intermodal connections with the hinterland, also in order to attract new residents, assessing first and foremost, however, whether existing networks can be renovated and/or expanded;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 138 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Underlines the importance of connecting transport routes with other parts of Europe and the relevance of interconnections with TEN-T corridorneed to make optimum use of existing infrastructure and save the financial resources of the Union and the Member States; calls on the participating countries to focus their efforts on implementing projects that are covered by the current TEN-T networknot harmful to health, the environment and local development;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 143 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Maintains that the financing of new transport infrastructure should be conditional upon the modernisation and full exploitation of existing infrastructure, which is often under-utilised;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 144 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Considers that the new base tunnel on the Turin-Lyon alpine route is particularly detrimental to health, the environment and the region itself, as well as being uneconomic; calls on the Commission and the Member States to bear in mind that the already existing railway line has recently been upgraded and is able to meet anticipated freight and passenger requirements;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 159 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Expresses its concern at the possibility of rail and road freight traffic stoppages being imposed by certain countries in a bid to contain the migration problem, which would have serious economic implications for the entire Alpine region; calls on the Commission accordingly to monitor the situation with a view to ensuring the free movement of passengers and goods and preventing any possible harm to the transport sector;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 174 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Stresses the importance of ensuring that measures are planned and implemented with a view to preventing hydrogeological risk and making the mountain areas of the macro-region safe, especially in those areas subject to frequent mudslides, landslides and flooding because of their specific geomorphology and/or indiscriminate human activity;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 179 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. Takes the view that, because of its typical features and abundance of natural beauty, its history and landscape, the Alpine region could become a development model based on the concept of respect for the environment, its ecosystem and its cultural heritage, in which to experiment best practices, adopt indices to measure not only economic, but also social progress, and in which common goods, such as water, air, the forests and soil, are protected;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 180 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 c (new)
22c. Stresses the need to promote and support small and medium-sized mountain farms which, by using traditional techniques and production methods that exploit natural resources – such as pastures and different types of forage crops – in an integrated and sustainable way, produce products which have special quality characteristics, but which, on average, have higher costs and lower profits than intensive crops or farms;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 181 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 d (new)
22d. Points out that the Alps, after the Mediterranean Sea, are the second biodiversity hotspot in Europe and one of the major sources of water for the continent, and must be protected from their current extensive exploitation, from land use and pollution and from the consequences of climate change, by considerably increasing conservation activities;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 186 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Stresses the importance of identifying the sources and types of air pollution that are typical of the Alpine macro-region, such as industrial and diesel engine emissions in the Po Valley in northern Italy and woody biomass combustion, in order to take effective action by means of specific policies to drastically reduce them;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 189 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23b. Considers it a matter of priority, in addition, to reduce emissions of persistent organic pollutants in the macro-region from both diffuse sources, such as transport, and point sources, such as industrial installations and incinerators, as well as those from the combustion of woody biomass for electricity production;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 190 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 c (new)
23c. Stresses the importance of healthy and stable mountain forests for the mountain ecosystem and for the vital protection they provide against avalanches, landslides and flooding;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 194 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses the importance of supporting the development of the most efficient renewable energies in the region, from hydro through solar and wind to the sustainable use of forest woodsuch as hydropower, solar and wind energy;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 197 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Recommends a sustainable use of forest timber which does not entail any reduction of the forest area or increase in atmospheric particulate matter;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 209 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the participating countries to continue their efforts to diversify energy supply sources and to develop the renewable sources available, such as solar and wind energy, within the energy production mix; underlines the sustainability and competitiveness of hydropower plantsmall (mini, micro and pico) hydropower plants compared to large ones; calls on the participating countries to contribute to the setting-up of well-functionmodernisation of existing electricity infrastructure networks in the macro- region;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 211 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Stresses that diversifying energy supply sources will not only improve the energy security of the macro-region, but will also bring more competition, with important benefits for the economic development of the region; calls for priority to be given, in the specific implementation of the macro-regional strategy, to developing renewable energy sources, promoting the self-generation of energy and improving energy efficiency in all sectors;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 214 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Stresses the importance of energy transport infrastructure being adequate for producing and consuming local energy, along the lines of smart grids;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 215 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Supports investment in energy infrastructure for both the production and the transport of electricity and gas, in line with the TEN-E network and in implementation of the concrete projects mentioned in the list of Projects of Energy Community Interest (PECIs);deleted
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 217 #

2015/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Urges Member States to actively involve and consult all stakeholders in the decision-making procedures concerning the macro-region, particularly local communities, which must be able to exercise their right to protect their environment and health when these are endangered by economic activities and infrastructure projects that are even only potentially dangerous and polluting;
2016/04/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 30 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. having regard to the need to analyse the causes of the refugee crisis in order to take effective and immediate action; whereas, furthermore, the main causes of the refugee crisis are conflicts and whereas resolving them could drastically reduce the number of refugees, making it possible for them to return to their own countries;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the number of asylum seekers and refugees recorded in Europe in 2014 and 2015 is unprecedented; whereas, according to the Commission’s forecasts, among others, this number is likely to increase significantwill increase exponentially in the coming years6; _________________ 6 http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/eu/fo recasts/2015_autumn_forecast_en.htm
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the working-age population in the EU is projected to decline by 7.5 million by 2020; whereas projections on the development of labour market needs in the EU point to emerging and future shortages in specific fields;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the action plan and political declaration adopted at the EU-Africa summit on migration, held in Valletta on 11 and 12 November 2015, did not result in practical, decisive action;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas the refugee emergency can only be tackled by means of a united commitment by all Member States;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the need for the EU to base its immediate response to the situation on solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, as stated in Article 80 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and on a holistic approach that takes into account safe and legalon fair sharing of responsibility under a mandatory allocation arrangement along the lines that the Commission is proposing, and on a holistic approach that establishes legal access routes in order to thwart the criminal organisations exploiting migrationnts and full respect fojeopardising their safety and their fundamental rights and values; ;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Takes note of the high degree of heterogenelack of clarity in the use of the term refugee in public and political discourse; stresses the importance of clearly identifying refugees in accordance with the legal definition enshrined in the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951, as amended by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967, and in EU legislation, in particular the Qualifications Directive7; _________________ 7 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/ENIT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32011 L0095&from=EN.
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2015/2321(INI)

3. Points out that a person eligible for subsidiary protection is a third country national or a stateless person who does not qualify as a refugee but who likewise faces a real risk of suffering, torture ofr inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment or a civilian facing a serious and individual threat to his or her life by reason of indiscriminate violence in situations of international or internal armed conflict (see Qualifications Directive);
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that significant differences exist in the times and modalities of processing requests for international protection within Member States; highlights that slow and excessively bureaucratic procedures may hinder refugees’ access to the labour market, as well as the activation of EU programmes and the use of funds in this field; points to the urgent need to establish a common asylum system to standardise recognition procedures and arrangements; recommends that the necessary measures be taken to support those Member States which, for geographical reasons, are involved more intensively in initial reception;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Also calls for effective steps to be taken outside European territory both to ensure that those who are entitled can reach host countries safely and with a view to managing applications for international protection and containing undefined migration flows and hence preventing persons from entering Europe when they are not entitled to do so;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Points to the importance of differentiating between emergency measures and measures to be taken in the medium to long term in order to cope effectively with disparate needs;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Reiterates the importance of recognising the gender dimension ofwhen determining refugee status determination9, the needs of women who apply for international protection and the specific social inclusion and labour market integration challenges that women face; calls for gender to be fully mainstreamed into all policies and procedures relating to asylum and migration; _________________ 9 EP Draft Report: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDo c.do?pubRef=- %2F%2FEP%2F%2FNONSGML%2BCO MPARL%2BPE- 571.702%2B01%2BDOC%2BPDF%2BV0 %2F%2FEN
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that granting refugees access to the labour market is important to guaranteeing their survival and restoring their human dignity and self-worth and is also cost-efficient, as it would allow them to be self-sufficient and to gain economic independence, which is an essential step for their inclusion into society, and a responsible approach towards public finances, easing the cost borne by Member States while also enabling them to become active fiscal contributors, which is generally considered beneficial for their individual growth, development and self- esteem; maintains that if refugees are to be integrated into the labour market in a genuinely sustainable and effective way, the social and economic state of host countries needs to be assessed in order to ensure that integration will not further exacerbate already difficult situations;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that early intervention is crucial to allow for successfulguarantee social inclusion and integration of refugees into the labour market;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 167 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights the fact that labour market conditions within host countries are a determining factor for the successful and durable integration of refugees; stresses that unemployment in the EU, in particular youth and long-term unemployment, is still at alarming levels, and that the Commission and the Member States shouldmust continue to prioritise policies and investments aimed at quality job creation and economic growth;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses the need for further EU- funded programmes and for increased public investment in order to facilitate, as a matter of priority, the integration of EU citizens into the labour market, not least in order to forestall social tensions, in particular in areas where unemployment is highest;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Regards it as essential that refugees should be guaranteed effective assistance, not only linguistically, but also through the work of cultural mediators, who can provide proper liaison between the refugees and the host Member State;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 202 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Highlights the fact that expansive public fiscal policies, covering the extraordinary investments in social inclusion and labour market integration measures and programmes, are likely to have a positive effect on national GDPs in the short term, while medium- or long-term impacts on public finances will depend on the effectiveness of these measures; urges, therefore, that fiscal constraints should not apply to public policies of this kind;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 203 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes, in thiCalls context, the Commission’s decision not to take into account the budgetary impact of the exceptional inflow of refugees related to extraordinary expenditures forincurred by Member States under the preventive and corrective arm of the Stability and Growth Pactin dealing with the exceptional inflow of refugees when assessing possible temporary deviations from the SGP requirements10; _________________ 10http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP- 15-6067_en.htm of the Stability and Growth Pact;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 212 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Emphasises, in that connection, that the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund has used up all its resources; urges, therefore, that the fund should be retained when the MFF is revised;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 213 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Deplores the Commission's decision to grant Turkey EUR 3 billion to manage refugees on the EU's borders; criticises, further, the failure to involve the European Parliament in that decision;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 249 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. SupportNotes the Commission’s efforts in updating the European Agenda on Migration, in particular by revising the Dublin III Regulation; underlines the positive impact that intra-EU mobility of refugees would have on addressing labour shortages and refugees’ inclusion into the labour market; believes that the mobility of refugees within the EU is a good thing if account is taken, on the one hand, of the need to provide for family reunification and, on the other, of the needs of the labour market in the various Member States; stresses that further efforts are necessary to create a truly uniform Common European Asylum System and a comprehensive and sustainable legal migration policy in the EU to meet labour market demand in terms of skills, in which social inclusion and active integration policies play a central role;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 256 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Deplores the fact that the Commission had to adopt 40 infringement decisions against many Member States for having failed to implement key policies of the Common European Asylum System, including letters of formal notice to 19 Member States for not having taken the necessary measures to transpose the Reception Conditions Directive, which lays down essential standards on matters such as access to employment, vocational training, schooling and education of minors, food, housing, healthcare, medical and psychological care and provisions for disadvantaged persons; urges the Member States to rectify this situation, in compliance with the principles of solidarity, fair share of responsibility and sincere cooperation as enshrined in the Treaties; underlines the failure of the Dublin system that means that Member States are unable to implement the provisions of the Convention itself; criticises in this regard the establishment of 'hotspots' that have the sole purpose of making Greece and Italy EU refugee camps outside the context of a genuine, fully-fledged common asylum system;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 262 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. WelcomesNotes13 President Juncker’s statement in the State of the Union 2015 address13 affirming his support for granting asylum seekers access to the labour market while their applications are being processed; 13 http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home- affairs/what-we-do/policies/european- agenda-migration/proposal- implementation- package/docs/communication_on_managin g_the_refugee_crisis_en.pdftp://europa.eu/ rapid/press-release_SPEECH-15- 5614_en.htm
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 267 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Points out that a lengthy processing of international protection applications, and a failed registration of refugees at their arrival, not only impedes timely and legal access of refugees and asylum seekers to the labour market but also generates the conditions for the development of undeclared work practices and forms of severe labour exploitation; stresses the need to support those Member States which are in the front line in managing the practices of asylum seekers;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 320 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Encourages the Member States to shorten the processing time of applications for international protection and to extend early intervention measures such as language training, skills assessment and civic integration courses in particular to those asylum seekers who have good prospects of being granted international protection; urges the Commission to support Member States with specific and effective measures that help to streamline the processing of applications, making use of specific and appropriate professionals skills;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 329 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Calls on the Member States to ensure early and easy access to quality training, including internships, in order to ensure full integration into our societies and the labour market, taking into consideration the refugees’ existing skills and competences, talents and know-how; recalls that the first barrier that refugees have to overcome is language; recommends therefore effective measures that enable them not only to learn and understand the language of the host country, but also to promote a process of mutual familiarisation between different cultures in order to avoid the spread of xenophobic and racist sentiments; emphasises that education systems are the main tool not only of linguistic but also of cultural integration;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 350 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Commission to put forward a revision of the Blue Card Directive, by taking into account the extraordinary conditions with which refugees and asylum seekers are faced, as well as the needs of the EU labour market, in particular by looking at the scope and the rules on intra-EU mobility of the directive; recalls that this tool has been virtually unused so far; calls, therefore, on the Commission to propose not only a revision but also a concrete model for its effective use;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 374 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to intensify diplomatic relations and to take all necessary economic and social measures to allow the stabilisation of the countries of origin of refugees so that they can remain in their own countries or return there;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that in order to ensure better conditions for job creation for the SME sector Member States must address the following problems, which are unequally present in different regions: skills scarcity and brain drain; regulatory burdens and regulatory uncertainty; the shadow economy; and the de facto privileged position of multinational corporations (MNCs); and the disparity in fiscal conditions between Member States, which leads to social dumping;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that, with a view to balancing supply and demand in employment, Member States should reform their education systems to take account of the changed social context with regard to the importance of teaching and learning one or more languages and technological innovations;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Takes the view that tackling the above-mentioned structural problems would result, inter alia, in fairer competition and the extension of the social contribution and tax base to a higher number of economic operators, leading to lower labour and administrative costs and thus creating better condition for job creation; and ensuring fair competition between Member States and fairer market conditions;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that labour costsEuropean constraints on budget policies, austerity, excessive fiscal pressure and inadequate public spending have an impact on SMEs’ job creation potential and competitiveness;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses, however, that lowering labour costs by reducing workers’ protection is not a correct means of achieving lower unemployment, and that, in addition, reducing workers’ rights induces higher skills outflows and jeopardises their job security, exposing SMEs to shortages of skilled workers;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Considers, what is more, that radical change is required in economic policy, through public investment in sectors deemed strategic by each Member State, as the main means to initiate a virtuous circle that would have the following outcomes: an upward adjustment of wages, an increase in domestic demand and an increase in the number of people in employment;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Is concerned at the growing phenomenon of bogus self-employment across the EU, which canshould not be considered in positive terms as contributing to the ‘growing number of micro- enterprises’, but, rather, undermines the image of entrepreneurship;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses, in this regard, the fact that so far the promised effects of this investment plan have yet to be seen; also stresses that it is not investment in major infrastructure that generates new jobs, but practical opportunities offered to SMEs;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses, in this regard, that so far, training and information on such opportunities is almost non-existent, in comparison to actual needs and the many opportunities that these funds could create;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Takes the view that the artificial academisation of specific professions is not helpful if one wishes to tackle the problem of skills scarcities in SMEs; believes that vocational training, and especially dual systems operated in cooperation with SMEs, should be given more public support; recommends, however, that it is taken into account that the cultural value of teaching should be guaranteed and protected;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 154 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that apprenticeship schemes within SMEs should be promoted by Member States, including through financial incentives; urges that apprenticeships and traineeships be considered equal to any other type of work, and benefit from the same treatment;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Member States to provide for and impose the requisite sanctions for any kind of abuse by employers of their trainees or apprentices;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 174 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the ‘Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs’ programme, which helps provide aspiring European entrepreneurs with the skills necessary to start and/or successfully run a small business; recommends, what is more, that ongoing support should be provided with a view to giving added value to youth entrepreneurship and making it an effective tool for creating high-quality jobs;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 203 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Takes the view that reducing the regulatory and administrative burden, together with improving the quality of regulation and enforcement, constitute the right way to lower SMEs’ costs, including labour costs, in order to increase their job creation potential; recommends, at the same time, that a robust regulatory framework should be established with a view to ensuring that the regulation is not only high quality but also sustainable, and also guarantees vital safeguards for workers;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 221 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Member States to review the rules affecting SMEs and to introduce measures based on the ‘Think Small First’ principle, in order to remove the bureaucratic obstacles with which SMEs are confronted and achieve a high level of regulatory certainty as a precondition for job stability and quality;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 228 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Takes the view that a stable regulatory environment is an essential prerequisite for job perennity and job creation in SMEs; considers that this regulatory certainty must encompass, among other elements, contract law and fiscal and social regulation, as well as tax rulings and also legal certainty and procedural effectiveness; recommends, in this regard, that the participation and involvement of workers in this process should be stepped up in order to include everyone;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 232 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Considers that, in addition to stability, the intrinsic clarity of rules is key to ensuring the continuity and creation of jobs; calls on the Member States, therefore, to adopt laws that achieve this goal and, as a result, legal certainty;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 244 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider that SMEs face specific obstacles and should therefore be exempted fromrelieved of excessively burdensome administrative procedures, while always ensuring that they provide their employees with the necessary health and safety standards;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 248 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Considers that SMEs should enjoy favourable tax treatment for two specific reasons: to remedy the inherent inequalities between SMEs and multinationals; to make it possible to use additional resources, together with public investment, to create jobs;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 264 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Emphasises the need to bring together business developers and business incubators, with a view to making start- ups an important tool for creating lasting jobs and to keeping potential within companies, discouraging ‘the sale of an important idea’ for pure profit;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 296 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Notes that in some cases EU competition policy results in privileging that mostly benefits big market operators that are characterised by greater economic efficiency than SMEs;, stresses in this regard the need for specific measures for SMEs in order to curb their market diseconomies, thus enabling their internationalisation and boosting their job creation potentialto protect SMEs with regard to tax matters, specifically employment tax; in addition, calls on the Commission and the Member States to assess very carefully and consequently take action on future trade agreements or those already in force, such as TTIP, TiSA, CETA, and MES for China; believes that making these decisions without involving the European Parliament, the only body that is democratically elected by European citizens, would put at serious risk the economy, productivity and employment throughout the European Union; recommends, therefore, considering this prospect as opening the EU up to the serious risk of unfair competition, the deterioration of social guarantees and a huge loss of jobs, thereby making the paradigm of social dumping more than just symbolic;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 304 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Notes that the negative impact of the relocation phenomenon, caused by the differing economic situations in Member States, is now apparent; recommends that not only should this impact be assessed, but also transparent and clear recommendations should be put in place to enable SMEs to make choices which are shrewd and sustainable in the long term;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 311 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to combat fiscal and social dumping which creates unfair competition between the economies of Member States, causing intolerable imbalances which, with the opening of borders and removal of barriers for goods and services, are likely to grow, to the detriment of the quality of those goods and services, not to mention jobs and working conditions; believes that this is the only way that the single market will be able to withstand the competition from third countries and prevent the social safety net from becoming ever smaller, leading to huge job losses;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 317 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Takes the view that overregulated and bureaucratic economic systems induce higher labour costs, which represent a higher financial burden for SMEs than for big companies owing to the differences in business volumes; points out that falling salaries are brought about by the current monetary policies, which do not allow public investment to exceed budgetary ceilings and therefore have an effect on salaries;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 321 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Notes that in regions where economic development is focused on attracting foreign direct investment (FDI), MNCs are treated preferentially in both legislative and tax matters; believes that these practices shouldmust be examined with a view to ensuring a level playing field for SMEs and restoring their employment creation capacities; calls for firm, decisive action by the Commission with a view to tackling so-called ‘tax engineering’ by certain Member States, in order to ensure equal conditions for SMEs;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 335 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Takes the view thatCalls for new EU regulations and agreements with third countries shouldto take into account the EU regions’ specific structural differences in the SME sector, assessing the impact of future rules on employment perspectives;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 339 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Commission to conduct an impact assessment regarding the implications of the future TTIP agreement for jobs in the SME sector in all Member States;deleted
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 346 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Deplores the current negotiations on future trade agreements, for example, TTIP, CETA and the decision to grant China MES, as it considers that these agreements would cause significant and uncombatable damage to European SMEs ;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 353 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Encourages SMEs to promote teleworking and smartworking, which are effective tools for reducing companies’ material costs and enabling workers to balance their professional and personal lives better;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 357 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Calls on the Commission to develop and launch an application for smartphones and tablets that provides information on European funding;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 358 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 b (new)
30b. Calls on the Member States to foster the inclusion of people with disabilities in SMEs;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
– whereas full transparency underpins citizens' trust in EU institutions, contributes to developing an understanding of the rights deriving from the legal system of the Union and awareness and knowledge of the EU decision-making process, including the correct implementation of administrative and legislative procedures,
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 7 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 b (new)
– whereas the right of access to documents is a fundamental right, protected by the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Treaties and implemented by Regulation 1049/2001, with the aim, in particular, of ensuring that this right can be exercised as easily as possible and of promoting good administrative practices regarding access to documents by ensuring democratic scrutiny of the activities of the institutions and ensuring that they comply with the rules enshrined in the Treaties,
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 10 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that the actions of the institutions and EU policies have to be based on participatory democracy, thus ensuring compliance with the principles of full transparency, sharing, and informing citizens accurately and in good time and where possible on direct democracy, ensuring that decisions are taken as openly and as close to the citizens as possible, and thus in compliance with the principles of full transparency, sharing, and informing citizens accurately and in good time; when citizens’ participation in the decision-making process takes the form of public consultations, the institutions must take account of the outcome of those consultations;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 14 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that it is the duty of the institutions to carry on a continuing open, transparent dialogue with citizens, associations representing them and civil society, so as to enable citizens themselves to bring scrutiny directly to bearand effectively to bear on the legitimacy and effectiveness of governance, on measures taken and on the different stages of decision-taking, and to allowing them to become more activeclosely and directly involved in the decision- making process – and on the legitimacy and effectiveness of governance and measures taken;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 16 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that transparency and full access to documents held by the institutions have to be the rule, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, and that, as has already been laid down by the precedents consistently set by the EU Court of Justice, exceptions to that rule have to be properly interpreted, taking into account that there is ane overriding public interest in disclosure and in the requirements of democracy, the closer involvement of citizens in the decision- making process, the legitimacy of governance, efficiency and accountability to citizens;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 19 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that in order to bring about a legitimate, accountable democratic political system complying with the rule of law, citizens must have the right to know about, and scrutinise,: – the actions of their representatives, once the latter have been elected or appointed to a public office; – the decision-making process, (including any documents circulated, individuals involved, votes cast, etc.); – the way in which public money is apportioned and spent, and the ensuing outcomes;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 25 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Deplores the fact that it is still difficult for citizens to gain access to information held by EU institutions, the reason being that there is no effective citizen-oriented interinstitutional policy geared to facilitating access to documents for citizens and based on complete and genuine transparency, communication, and direct democracy; urges the institutions to take a proactive attitude by disclosing as many of their documents as possible in as simple and accessible a way as possible for the public, having documents translated into all of the EU official languages, and establishing proper, simple and inexpensive information access arrangements, including digitally and electronically, allowing for the needs of people with disabilities;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 33 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Urges all the institutions, pending its desired revision, to apply Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 in the proper manner; calls in particular on the Council, in particularcluding its preparatory bodies, to revise its rules, with a view to ensuring that all discussions, documents, and information are made public, and to produce transcripts of its public meetings; calls for Parliament to publish transcripts of, as well as the papers for and information on, meetings of its working groups, including coordinators’ meetings; calls also for meetings of the so-called Eurogroup to be placed on a formal footing so that transcripts of, as well as the papers for and all other information on, those meetings may be published in keeping with the public interest in transparency, which must take precedence over any exceptions intended to safeguard the decision-making process;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 41 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that, as a result of the entry into force of the TEU and the TFEU, the right of access to documents covers all EU institutions, bodies, and agencies; believes, therefore, that the substance of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 should be updated as a matter of urgency and its substance amended in the light of the Treaty provisions and the relevant case law of the EU Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights; believes, in particular, that it is essential to broaden the regulation's scope to include all the European institutions it currently does not cover, such as the European Council, the European Central Bank, the Court of Justice and all the EU bodies and agencies;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 43 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the Treaty of Lisbon has done away with the reference to safeguarding the efficiency of legislative decision- taking; believes therefore that this exception, which still appears in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, is no longer admissible as it is incompatible with the new constitutional setup;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 54 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s inquiry into the transparency of the legislative process, with a particular focus on ‘trilogues’, the established practice by which most EU legislation is adopted; urges the Ombudsman to make full use of her powers of investigation under the Treaties, with a view to enhancing the transparency of legislative and non- legislative work within the EU;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 58 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Points out that the use of trilogues is not consistent with the legislative procedure laid down in the Treaty and that conciliation committees may be used only at third reading as a last resort, in cases where Parliament and the Council are unable to reach agreement on a Commission legislative proposal;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 67 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the institutions involved to amend their own rules of procedure so as to ensure in future that negotiations will be transparent and, to that end, to allow meetings to be held in public and webstreamed and to arrange for agendas, minutes, and the main issues discussed to be published;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 74 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Welcomes the Commission’s intention of proposing an interinstitutional agreement establishing a mandatory interinstitutional register of interest group representatives operating within the institutions and calls for that matter to be given the highest priority; calls for that register to contain detailed information showing who is lobbying on behalf of whom, for what purpose and with what resources and funding; stresses that the register system should apply across the board and that the register should therefore be established and governed by a specific regulation, as an interinstitutional agreement is not the right legal instrument to use for this purpose;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 77 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Also calls on Parliament and the Council to follow the Commission practice, as established by the decision of 25 November 2014, by publishing information about contacts between lobbyists and Members of Parliament, their office staff, and their advisers, and between lobbyists and Member State representatives working at the Council; believes also that uniform, effective penalties should be laid down in order to deal with any abuses;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 80 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on all the institutions to publish information about the contacts of interest group representatives with their officials, including those of non-managerial level;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 82 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Points out that, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and in order to guarantee full democratic and transparent parliamentary control, access should likewise be granted to documents produced when powers are delegated (delegated acts), since these make up a substantial portion of European legislation, for which reason adequate and transparent parliamentary and democratic control ought to be fully guaranteed; in this context, particularly deplores the lack of transparency of the European supervisory authorities (EBA, EIOPA, ESMA) because of the lack of involvement of the co-legislators; considers it disappointing that no single register of delegated actsall second-level legislation has yet been established and calls on the Commission to set one up without delay;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 85 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Notes that international agreements have binding force and an impact on EU legislation and points to the need for negotiations to be transparent throughout the entire process, implying that the institutions should be obliged to publish the negotiating brief conferred on the Commission simultaneously with its approval and before the negotiations begin; considers it regrettable that negotiations are secret and citizens have no access to information, but only to documents communicated to the press, thus giving rise to speculation and misconceptions about the negotiations; maintains that the public should be given access to all of the parties’ relevant negotiating documents, including documents on which the parties have already reached agreement, with the exception of those which are to be classified, with a clear justification on a case-by-case basis, in keeping with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 88 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Points out to the Commission that it is required under Article 207 TFEU to inform Parliament fully and immediately at every stage while negotiations are taking place, and calls on the Council to consult Parliament before drafting the negotiating brief;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 91 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls for all documents relating to non-legislative procedures, such as binding measures, measures relating to internal organisation, administrative or budget documents or documents of a political nature (such as conclusions, recommendations or resolutions), to be rendered readily, and if possible directly, accessible in accordance with the principle of proper administration;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 94 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Deplores the lack of transparency regarding infringement procedurletters of formal notice and infringement procedures against Member States; calls in particular for documents sent by the Commission to Member States in connection with such procedures, and the related replies, to be made accessible to the public; calls furthermore for information on the execution of judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union to be published proactively;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 96 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Believes that full data transparency and accessibility are essential to prevent and combat any abuse and fraud; in this context, calls on the Commission to make it compulsory to publish particulars of all recipients of money from the Structural Funds, including subcontractors;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 99 #
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 100 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 – point 1 (new)
(1) Notes that in a change to its policy on transparency the ECB now publishes the minutes of meetings of the ECB Governing Council, but regrets that the ECB is still lagging far behind the world’s other central banks in this regard; awaits the implementation of further major measures to improve the transparency of its communication channels;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 101 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 – point 2 (new)
(2) Believes that considerable progress can still be made through publication of the minutes of Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) meetings; hopes furthermore that in the future all documents concerning decisions taken in the Asset Quality Review process will be made public to guarantee a level playing field across the EU; hopes too that transparency requirements will also be applied to the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) due to start on 1 January 2016;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 102 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 – point 3 (new)
(3) Is disappointed with the transparency policy applied by the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD); recalls that the ECB’s new transparency policy allows it to establish confidentiality procedures in order to keep secret internal investigations into irregularities such as corruption, infiltration by organised criminal groups or maladministration; calls for a prompt review of their transparency policies and asks in particular that the EIB make public information on its beneficiaries and on the subcontractors who benefit from its funding;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 103 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 – point 4 (new)
(4) Is critical of the lack of transparency within some institutions that have taken crucial economic decisions affecting EU citizens, such as the Eurogroup and the Ecofin Council configuration; emphasises the urgency of making these meetings public and transparent, and calls for the relevant institutions to release the documents concerned; is critical of the mismanagement of the ‘Greek crisis’ and calls attention to the fact that the Troika operated outside the limits laid down in the Treaties; is critical too of the failure to publish documentation on decisions relating to the European Stability Mechanism (ESM); asks that the Troika’s modus operandi be assessed to clarify the responsibilities attributable to the institutions involved and ensure democratic legitimacy in the adoption and implementation of the rescue programmes;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 106 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Selection of staff for the EU institutions, agencies and other bodies
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 107 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point 1 (new)
(1) Regrets that the procedures for selecting EU institution staff are not fully transparent and calls in particular for the Staff Regulations to be revised, particularly with reference to ‘Annex III - Competitions’;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 108 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point 2 (new)
(2) Considers that competitions for entry to the European civil service ought to be entirely based on criteria of openness and transparency in order to combat corruption and conflicts of interest;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 109 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point 3 (new)
(3) Considers it essential that the EU agencies apply a common policy on conflicts of interest; notes that in some cases the policy applied to date includes provisions concerning publication of the CVs and declarations of interests of the Director and of senior management; observes with concern however that the obligation to publish CVs and declarations of interest does not apply to experts; calls on the agencies to extend this obligation to experts;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 110 #

2015/2287(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point 4 (new)
(4) Is disappointed by the lack of transparency in the appointment of EFSI managers; calls for transparency in appointment procedures and for information on CVs and declarations of interests to be made public;
2015/12/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 4 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the objective of the EGF is to contribute to smart, inclusive and sustainable economic growth and the promotion of sustainable employment;deleted
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was set up to provide support for workers made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the EGF was set up to address short-term emergencies, unlike the European Social Fund (ESF), which also provides support for workers made redundant but is intended to address long- term structural imbalances, in particular by means of lifelong learning programmes;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas to date the economic crisis has hit small businesses, with fewer than 500 workers, hardest;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the current EGF aims not only to support redundant workers but also to demonstrate solidarity towards those workers;deleted
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the ex-post evaluation of the EGF and the first biennial report; notes that the Commission complies with its reporting obligation; considers that these and other reports contribute toare not enough to ensure the transparency and efficiency of the EGF;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the functioning of the EGF has been improved by reforms to the regulation, but that more still needs to be done; notes that the improvements made have simplified procedures for Member State access to the EGF and that this should result in greater use being made of the fund by Member States; points out, nonetheless, that the Commission should have made provision for all documents relating to EGF funding operations to be made public, in order to enhance transparency and democratic accountability;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the reduced appropriations earmarked for the EGF in the annual budget have been sufficient to provide the necessary assistance to date on the basis of the access limits laid down in the rules governing the fund; emphasises however that in the eventview of athe significant increase in applications the appropriations should continuewill not be enough to ensure the effective functioning of the EGF;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Observes theConsiders it regrettable that there was a significant increase in the number of applications during the derogative period 2009-2011, which allowed applications on the basis of crisis- related criteria; stresses that the adverse effects of the economic crisis are still far from behind us, and that, as a result, the number of applications will increase still further;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. SupportUrges the Commission’s work on to developing standardised procedures for EGF applications and management using the functionalities of the electronic data exchange system (SFC), which allows for the simplification of applications for Member States and speeds up the processing of applications; calls on the Commission to ensure that the system also allows for better and improved reportingso that funding can be provided swiftly and thus have the greatest possible impact; points out that, according to the Court of Auditors report, the average length of EGF approval proceedings is 41 weeks; acknowledges, nonetheless, the efforts made by the Commission to cut waiting times and the fact that, under the current rules, the duration of some parts of those proceedings cannot be shortened;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to better anticipate the effects of trade policy decisions on the EU labour market; opposes any initiative to consider the EGF, in its current form, as an intervention tool for jobs lost in the European Union as a result of trade strategies decided at EU level, including future trade agreements or those already in place, for example the TTIP, the TiSA, the CETA, and MES; maintains that granting market economy status to non-EU countries which do not satisfy the Commission’s five criteria could have a disastrous effect on European industry’s ability to remain competitive on the market;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Points out that some Member States have not set quantitative reintegration targets and that in some cases public or private employment services have not systematically differentiated between the EGF and the ESF and other national measures; calls on the Commission to provide, annually, a full assessment of the results achieved for each EGF operation and also to supply data on rejected EGF applications and the reasons for the rejections;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes the conclusion of the Court of Auditors with regard to the lengthy EGF approval procedure; expects that the more timely procedure introduced in the current regulation has improved the situation; strongly recommends that all Member States start implementing the measures as soon as their applications are sent to the Commission, and is pleased that many Member States already do so;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission to equip itself with appropriate means of gathering exact information about the effects of the EGF and beneficiaries’ perceptions of their quality, thus enabling it, at a later stage, to take such corrective action as might be necessary;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the fact that positive outcomes other than re-employment and skills updating were experienced by beneficiaries, including psychological benefits such as improved self-esteem, greater feelings of empowerment and increased motivation;deleted
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Points out, however, that a high percentage of beneficiaries consider their new employment to be inferior to their previous employment and that, as the Court of Auditors has noted, the extent to which aims have been achieved cannot be gauged in overall terms, as there are no systematic data on which to base the assessment; recommends, therefore, that the Commission employ every appropriate means in order to gather exact information about the effects of the EGF and their quality with a view, at a later stage, to taking such corrective action as might prove necessary;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Notes that information on the characteristics of new employment was difficult to obtain; however, a survey carried out as part of the ex-post evaluation produced mixed results, with 35% stating the quality of new employment was better or far better, 24% stating it was the same and 41% stating it was worse or far worse;deleted
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Points to the need for searching assessment of the abuse of the EGF by companies which transfer their operations, resulting in unfair competition and with it social dumping; considers that in such cases every necessary step should be taken to prevent practices of this kind by imposing effective rules whereby, for example, relocating firms would be obliged to redeploy workers;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. WelcomNotes the fact that just 6% of EGF funds were spent on administrative and management costs;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that the most significant aspect of cost effectiveness as identified in the stakeholder consultations wasshould be the number of re-employed workers who are nowable to paying taxes and social security contributions instead of drawing on unemployment or other social benefitcontributions;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Notes the proposal in the ex-post evaluation that a counterfactual impact evaluation is an important element in understanding the added value of the EGF; noteregrets that such an evaluation is not yet in place;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. WelcomNotes the conclusion from the Court of Auditors that the EGF delivered EU added value when used to co-finance services for redundant workers or allowances not ordinarily existing under Member States’ unemployment benefit systems; stresses that certain Member States have no social protection provisions, such as a minimum income, sufficient to meet the needs of workers who have lost their jobs;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 123 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Regrets the fact that one third of EGF funding compensates national workers’ income support schemes with no EU added value; notes the restriction in the current regulation where such costs are capped at 35 % and believes that this cap should be lowered; notes that income support measures were identified in all cases examined in the Court’s report, and that these measures represented 33 % of the total amounts refunded under the EGF; points out that the new EGF regulation limits the costs of special provisional measures, such as job-search allowances and recruitment incentives for employers, to 35 % of the total cost of the coordinated package and that EGF- backed initiatives are not a substitute for passive social protection measures by Member States under their national systems.
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Is satisfied withNotes the conclusion that, generally, Member States effectively coordinated the EGF with ESF and national labour market measures and that no instances of overlap or double-funding of individuals was detected during the Court of Auditors audit; points out that the Member States generally did not set quantitative reintegration objectives, and that in certain cases public or private employment services did not systematically differentiate between the EGF, the ESF and other national measures when collecting reintegration data; asks the Commission to provide, annually, a full assessment of the results achieved for each EGF intervention, and to provide data regarding EGF requests not approved at Commission level and the reasons for this;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 151 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Believes that, in the context of a number of complicating factors such as potential data omissions, regional and national specificities, different macro- and micro-economic circumstances, small sample sizes and certain necessary assumptions, the Commission’s methodological approach is largelyshould be rigorous and transparent, taking measures to remedy the shortcomings that complicate such an approach;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Is concernedStresses that the Court of Auditors report concludes that no quantitative re- integration objectives were set and that existing data is not adequate to assess the effectiveness of the measures in re- integrating workers into employment; recommends therefore that the Member States set quantitative re-integration objectives and systematically differentiate between EGF, ESF and other national measures specifically designed for workers affected by mass redundancies; the Member States should furthermore distinguish between the two main types of EGF measures, i.e. active labour market measures and income support paid to workers, as well as providing more detailed information on the measures accessed by individual participants in order to allow a more accurate cost-benefit analysis of different measures;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Recommends that more regular peer reviews, cross-national exchanges or partnering of new EGF cases with previous EGF cases, where possible, be implemented in order to exchange good practices and implementing experiences;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls foron the EU to ratify the Optional Protocol to the CRPD;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Asks the Commission to proposefor an update of the declaration of competence in light of the Concluding Observations, to be repeated periodically with the formal involvement of disability organisations and the European Parliament;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to set up a structured dialogue with disability organisations; recommends, in addition, that the opinion of, and information provided by, disability organisations be taken into due consideration when proposals are drawn up;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to involve as much as possible national, regional and local organizations of persons with disabilities in the programming of Operational programmes in the context of ESI Funds; stresses moreover the importance of guaranteeing full accessibility of people with disabilities to Erasmus +, Youth Guarantee and EURES initiatives;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to review the European Disability Strategy and to develop a comprehensive EU CRPD strategy with a clear timeframe, benchmarks and indicators; advocates that benchmarks and indicators should not be general ones, but should be specific and precise;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to take steps to combat all forms of discrimination, including multiple and intersectional discrimination based on disability, with special regard to women and children with disabilities and to those whose disabilities change over time; calls furthermore on the Commission to improve and strengthen the provisions of Directive 2010/18/EU regarding the conditions of eligibility and detailed rules for granting parental leave to those who have children with a disability or serious or long-term incapacitating illness;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the need to provide for a uniform system of sanctions throughout the EU to punish any behaviour, wherever it might be, that is in breach of the CRPD or that involves unequal treatment on grounds of disability;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that the European Union should take appropriate measures to ensure that all persons with disabilities deprived of their legal capacities can exercise all the rights enshrined in EU Treaties and legislation such as access to justice, to goods and services, including banking and employment and healthcare, as well as voting and consumer rights;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Regrets the fact that in many Member States there are still school buildings with architectural barriers that constitute an odious form of discrimination against children and young people with disabilities; calls on the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to increase available funding to ensure that architectural barriers in schools and universities are banished forever;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Is concerned about the lack of accessibility of the EU-wide 112 emergency number, which is causing unnecessary deaths and injuries; stresses that accessibility must be improved for people with disabilities and calls upon Member States to take urgently all the necessary steps to ensure a high-quality emergency service for persons with disabilities;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to finance start-ups which operate in the field of security and safety for persons with disabilities through technological innovation;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to ensure that employment- related rights and services, including reasonable accommodation in the context of the Employment Equality Directive, are portable and in line with the freedom of movement for persons with disabilities; recommends, moreover, that the right to free movement for persons with disabilities be guaranteed by all Member States;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls for all possible measures to be taken to ensure that persons with disabilities are integrated into the labour market in accordance with their 'disability ID cards' and function cards to ensure that legal requirements are complied with and to prevent workers with disabilities from having to perform tasks that are not appropriate for their condition;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Points out that in order to prevent persons with disabilities from being made redundant, it is vital to allow them to perform their work in accordance with specific legislation; recommends, moreover, that proper controls be implemented, in addition to cooperation with job centres and companies, in order to prevent persons with disabilities from being marginalised from the labour market and in order to harness their full potential;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Stresses that with regard to the European Structural and Investment Funds, too, it should be affirmed that transparency principles should govern the entire procedure, from the allocation of funds to their actual use;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Member States to prevent or alleviate poverty, vulnerability and social exclusion among persons with disabilities and their families in the context of a European Pillar of Social Rights; recalls that the UNCRPD committee in its concluding observations highlighted the disproportionately adverse and retrogressive effect the austerity measures in the EU have been producing on the adequate standard of living of persons with disabilities, thus suggesting the provision of a minimum social protection floor, to be introduced in accordance with national practice;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 143 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on Member States to refrain from cuts on disability-related benefits, community-based services, health services, training and education programmes that will undermine the UNCRPD and will increase even more the level of poverty and social exclusion;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Urges the Commission and the Member States, once again for the purpose of combating the social exclusion of persons with disabilities and their families, to promote, on the basis of common rules, measures to combat the poverty faced by many families of disadvantaged individuals, with reference to clear indicators on which to base the necessary care;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Urges all the EU Member States to properly acknowledge the key role of family caregivers, ensuring them a proper social and economic recognition and implementing measures of direct material support, such as protection of pension entitlements or subsidies that reduce the full cost of service for carers; calls on the Commission to carry out a study aimed at analysing the legal status, or the lack thereof, of family caregivers in all Member States;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Calls on the EU institutions to facilitate smart working among employees with disabilities;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Calls on the EU and Member States to deliver effective measures aimed at tackling segregation and rejection of students with disabilities in schools and learning environments, making all the necessary efforts to ensure they fully enjoy their right to inclusive and quality formal, non-formal and informal education, including accommodation and support needed;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that Erasmus and other mobility programmes may have fostered European integration and may have strengthened the idea of citizenship; notes that these programmes may have had an indirect impact on employment; points out that mobility in the context of vocational education and training (VET) is fundamental tocould be a useful tool in the fight against unemployment, enhances employability and reduces the skills gap;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Notes that, in the current economic climate, characterised as it is by a high rate of youth unemployment and by a disparity between the demand and supply of skills, mobility programmes in the fields of education and professional training must be more closely tailored to the specific requirements of the job market;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that, despite improvements toe efforts to improve the arrangements for the recognition of diplomas, credits, skills certificates, competency accreditations and acquired expertise in the context of VET, a legal basis applicable throughout the EU is needed;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. uUrges that the manufacturing sector, including SMUs and micro-enterprises, should be more closely involved in the framing, implementation and funding of VET mobility programmes; believes that, with their actual occupational needs being taken into account; believes that only through establishing flexible and constructive dialogue between training centres and firms willcan it be ensured that VET is a success;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the tools developed by the Commission, such as Ploteus and Eures, which offer information about VET and mobility, but deplores the fact that they are little known and little used; calls therefore for these tools to be implemented so that they constitute a genuine opportunity to find a new job or study placement, rather than merely being a last resort for citizens faced with a lack of prospects in their own country;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, in response to the demands of the labour market, to publicise and raise awareness of the Erasmus+ programme and other tools aimed at promoting mobility in VET, and of the Ploteus and Eures portals, in particular among SMUs;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes pilot projects such as that recently approved by Parliament, entitled ‘European framework for the mobility of apprentices’, as the basis for a specific mobility programme in the context of VET; recommends also that tools such as apprenticeships and traineeships are not used to provide a temporary and low-cost workforce;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2015/2255(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas social dumping has a greater impact in social and cultural environments in which there is little knowledge of workers’ rights and in which women have greater difficulty in entering the labour market;
2015/12/17
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 13 #

2015/2255(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas so many migrant women and girls arriving in Europe are forced to accept inadequate working conditions in economic and social conditions that vary from country to country and are often inappropriate for the work done;
2015/12/17
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 22 #

2015/2255(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Member States to adopt specific measures with the aim of professionalising and qualifying, in a harmonised manner, work such as housekeeping, which today is often done illegally, also because of a cultural heritage that hinders change;
2015/12/17
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 26 #

2015/2255(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Expresses concern about the impact that bilateral and multilateral agreements, such as TTIP and TiSA, might have on social standards in the labour market in Europe, particularly for women, and calls for specific safeguards to be provided in this regard against all forms of social dumping;
2015/12/17
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 35 #

2015/2255(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States always to take into consideration, in their laws, the social impact of the harmonisation of existing rules and the implementation of new provisions, in order to eliminate all forms of social dumping, with specific reference to aspects relating to women;
2015/12/17
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 36 #

2015/2255(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls on the Commission to carry out ex ante assessments of the impact that structural reforms have in Europe on social and labour conditions, with clear reference to aspects relating to women;
2015/12/17
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 37 #

2015/2255(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make provision for equal minimum salaries throughout Europe, for various types of work, in order to prevent social dumping;
2015/12/17
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 46 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the structural employment market reforms called for by the EU have resulted in casualisation and social security cuts in some Member States;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas there is a growing trend toward using vouchers instead of regular employment contracts, which is unfair and, very often, illegal and leads to increased job insecurity;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas there is a need to verify the state of implementation and the benefits of applying Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas we do not yet know which Member States have correctly implemented Directive 2014/67/EU on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 183 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on Member States to increase and improve the efficiency of the staffing levels and resources of their labour inspectorates and their liaison offices, in particular for interpretation and translation;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 217 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Urges Member States to foster exchanges of information between labour inspectors and, following proper training, with the European body of cross-border labour inspectors, and to create a joint database of ‘letter box companies’, their holding companies and their commercial partners; (Information-exchange and data-sharing in the European Union are an essential precondition to combating all illegal activity.)
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 229 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the implementation by Member States of electronic systems for the registration of the prior declaration of posting missions; recommends, in that connection, appropriate training to create an effective system and avoid further burdensome red tape;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 244 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for a directive based on ILO Convention No. 189 concerning decent work for domestic workers; urges, in that connection, that this directive should provide for appropriate training and information on the rights and obligations of this category of workers;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 256 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Takes the view that the competent authorities should be able to suspend the provision of services in cases of serious breaches of legislation on postings; considers that the amount of the fines should exceedbe no less than double the employees' contributions; (The original wording of the article provides for penalties that are higher than employees' contributions;, without setting a minimum which, in principle, could also be a higher but nominal amount, and thus not constitute a deterrent for breaching the rules.)
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 292 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Recalls its appeal for the creation of 'a forgery-proof European social security card (...) on which could be stored all the data needed to verify the bearer’s employment relationship'11; wishes all the information associated with the worker's postings to feature on this card; calls, further, for all the information and data to be processed in the interests of the workers and in a manner consistent with their right to privacy; __________________ 11 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDo c.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA- 2014-0012+0+DOC+XML+V0//FR
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 304 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for a public list to be drawn up of enterprises responsible for serious breaches of EU legislation;, and of members of the board of directors, members of the board of statutory auditors, associated companies and their commercial partners; (The enterprise list alone is not an adequate instrument, given that companies can easily be dissolved and replaced with another company.)
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 312 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on Member States to combat social dumping by imposing penalties that are not less than double the profit made from breaching European Union legislation, for which the company guilty of the breaches, the members of its board of directors, the members of its board of statutory auditors, and its associated companies should jointly and severally liable; (Deterrent and punitive penalties should be significant and, not just the company, but also those responsible for their administration, including de facto, and supervision should be jointly and severally liable.)
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 379 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that the notion of 'minimum wage' contained in Directive 96/71/EC should be revised to ensure equal pay for posted workers and local workers in similar positions; stresses the need to respect the collective agreements of the host country and to ensure, through the revision of Regulations (EC) No. 883/2004 and (EC) No. 987/2009, the payment of gross earnings corresponding to the remuneration paid by the employer before the deduction of taxes and social security contributions payable by employees and withheld by the employer; recalls that specific postings bonuses should be paid on top of remuneration; stresses that the notion of ‘minimum wage’, like that of equal pay for posted workers and local workers in similar positions, are conditions that can be guaranteed by applying homogeneous economic and tax rules, which are the primary condition for fighting unfair competition and therefore social dumping;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 437 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for increased controls on the implementation of working time and rest times in transport; calls for the introduction of automatic digital records and the development of 'smart tachographs' for all means of transport, including inland waterway transportrecommends that, in the event of acquisitions or the transfer of company property, it is clearly stated which requirements are not disregarded but carried over into the new contracts; calls for the introduction of automatic digital records and the development of 'smart tachographs' for all means of transport, including inland waterway transport; stresses that instruments such as ‘smart tachographs’ and ‘GNSS systems’ used on all means of transport guarantee constant traceability in real time of the vehicle, in particular freight vehicles; recalls the desire expressed in its resolution of 3 July 2012 on road transport that 'by 2020 all vehicles which are not exempted from the application of this Regulation in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 (...) with a smart tachograph’12 ; __________________ 12 www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?t ype=TA&reference=P7-TA-2012- 0271&language=FR&ring=A7-2012- 0195#BKMD-7 (Regulations on working time, driving times, rest times and cabotage are often circumvented by transport companies looking to maximise profits to the detriment of their workers. Nonetheless, there are no effective instruments available to police authorities for carrying out the necessary checks. GNSS monitoring systems may be used to this end to check that the law is being abided by, with real time checks and the collection of data and information. These GNSS systems are also compatible with the GALILEO and EGNOS systems, which can ensure added benefits in terms of the precision and accuracy of data.)
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 460 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls for the creation of a European transport agency bringing together existing agencies; takes the view that at the very least, a specific road transport agency is neededessential, recalling that this sector is heavily affected by social dumping;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 464 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on Members States and the Commission to mobilise the instruments and economic resources necessary for fighting, particularly in the shipping and air transport sectors, the phenomena of exceeding the maximum number of hours of work per day and the failure to respect the minimum number of rest hours, including weekly days of rest and public holidays; (In many Member States, staff (such as sailors and flight crews in Italy) are forced to work long hours without a break: the failure to respect working hours seriously impairs the safety of the workers and the means of transport, and - of course - constitutes a harmful form of unfair competition.)
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 475 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Asks the Commission to clarify the provisions so that a distinction can be drawn between employees and self- employed workers to combat 'bogus self employment'; stresses, in this regard, that low-cost airlines in particular use self- employment contracts for pilots, which often provide for the employment of pilots at the end of their careers, who are often hired through temporary agencies based outside the EU; recommends to this end to establish, where this is the case, urgent regulations limiting the abuse of this practice; emphasises that airline pilots and train drivers cannot be considered to be independent of the companies for which they work;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 480 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Recommends that the Commission carefully monitors acquisitions by airlines from outside the EU to provide for urgent regulations in this area to fight the largely widespread phenomenon of ‘selling off’ social safeguards in exchange for economic conditions that only appear to be more advantageous; calls on the Commission to ensure that the social safeguards provided for by the contracts of workers from the European Union are the ‘conditio sine qua non’ for these acquisitions;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 481 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Recommends to the Commission that a national collective agreement be drawn up and applied correctly in all Member States in cooperation with the social partners, to guarantee certain rules on rest times and suitable social safeguards, above all in the event of acquisitions by airlines outside the EU;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 500 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Believes that the rules on cabotage are currently not sufficiently precise or harmonised at European level, which facilitates the practice of some road operators of engaging in permanent cabotage; wishes cabotage operations to be subject to mandatory prior notification; calls for the European register to be made accessible to the police forces of Member States so that they may carry out the appropriate checks;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 520 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the need for a new regulation on ground-handling at airports to ensure mandatory social and wage protection for workers in the event of new calls for tenders or the partial loss of work; supporttresses, in this regard, the need for the social guarantees provided for in old contracts to be upheld whatever changes may take place in these companies; recommends the introduction of rules to ensure the effective implementation of laws with regard to airlines with 'operational bases' on the territory of a Member State; calls for the clarification of the definition of 'home base' to protect the social rights of cabin crews, in particular their rest periods;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 538 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on Member States to review their laws to eliminate precarious contracts called 'zero hour contracts' or 'pay-to-fly contracts'; believes that precarious working conditions are an additional safety risk; stresses that competitiveness should not come at the price of ‘selling off’ social safeguards for workers and the quality of services;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 550 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission to submit, shortly, a proposal for a directive on requirements with regard to the crews of vessels providing regular cargo, passenger and ferry services operating between Member States so that the conditions applicable on board a vessel are those of the State applying the most favourable standards for workers to guarantee the best economic and social conditions for the workers themselves;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 563 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission, drawing on the US Jones Act, to take the necessary measures to ensure that vessels carrying goods between two European ports are built in Europe, fly a European flag and are owned by a European company; calls for the law that is applicable to be associated with the country in which the vessel owner is based and recommends that the main economic and tax regulations applied to vessel owners be based on transparency and the clamping down on any practices that expose these regulations to corruption;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 578 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Commission to draw up, rapidly, proposals to combat unfair competition in the digital and sharing economy; also recommends transparency in establishing where the persons concerned are to pay their tax contributions;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 609 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Noting the significant fall in the employment rate caused by the economic and financial crisis and in light of the progress in robotics and artificial intelligence and, therefore, the inevitable further fall in the number of jobs, proposes to the European Commission a change in the paradigm that puts the emphasis on ‘income’ rather than ‘work’ and, as a result, pursues the objective of guaranteeing a ‘minimum citizens’ income’ throughout the European Union that guarantees a free and dignified life; (We are on the brink of a new social and economic revolution that will lead to a decrease in jobs, and not only in the manufacturing sector. Politics must guide this ‘revolution’ with a clear change in the paradigm.)
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 620 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Recalls the Commission's commitment to proposing a basis of minimum social rights; emphasises that the establishment of criteria for comparing the various national social systems cannot provide such a basis, but can only serve as a preliminary analytical framework; hopes, therefore, that we can move, as quickly as possible, from words to a concrete proposal in this area;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 642 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Desires that wage floors be established, possibly in the form of a minimum wage; emphasises that this instrument should be set up on the basis of legislation or convention, in accordance with national practices, with due respect for the role of the social partners; believes that these wage floors should represent at least 6070 % of the average national wagewage in the European Union; calls on the Commission to consult the social partners with a view to introducing, where appropriate, a minimum wage in some border areas associated with highly mobile workers; (The threshold of 60% is also too low for fighting social and wage dumping, and should not be calculated on the basis of the average national wage, but on that of the EU.)
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 664 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Supports the development of unemployment benefit arrangements as a mechanism for absorbing asymmetric social shocks within the euro area; stresses the need to accompany social stabilisers with effective employment policies that have the main aim of creating quality jobs;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 675 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Calls on the Commission to increase economic resources and the number of instruments aimed at fighting speculation through the abuse of subcontracting agreements and, therefore, the subsequent suppression of the rights and safety of workers; (in certain cases, subcontracting, like the failure to respect working hours, constitutes a reprehensible speculative instrument.)
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 701 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to carefully consider the proposal to grant market economy status (MES) to China, and then act accordingly; believes that making this decision without involving the European Parliament, the only body that is democratically elected by European citizens, would put the economy, productivity and employment throughout the European Union at serious risk; therefore recommends considering this prospect as opening us up to the serious risk of unfair competition, the dumbing down of social guarantees and a huge loss of jobs, making the paradigm of social dumping more than just symbolic;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for all ILO core labour standards to be a compulsory element of EU trade agreements such as TiSA from the outset and stresses the need to ensure that TiSA includes comprehensive provisions aiming at the effective ratification, implementation and enforcement of the core conventions of the ILO and the Decent Work Agenda, with a commitment to promote higher levels of protection of labour and environmental standards and to combat all forms of social dumping;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the TiSA negotiations are aimed at achieving better flows and access to services and stronger international regulation, not lower domestic regulation;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the right of the State to organise and regulate the provision of services, taking account of social and environmental criteria as well as the public interest, must be retained in full, and calls for services of general interestdefined in details by the agreement and retained in full, advocates for a positive list approach to be followed both for market access and national treatment, and calls for services of general interest including, but not limited to, education, health, water supply, energy and social security to be excluded from the agreement, irrespective of whether they are provided or funded privately or publicly, in part or entirely;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas any trade agreement must be a reciprocal market opener for ourEU and third countries' companies abroad and a safety net for our citizens at home;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 55 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Rejects negotiations on the further liberalisation of services provided across EU borders so long as no EU minimum income scheme and EU-wide cooperation exists to maintain working conditions in accordance with the respective laws on labour and social affairs and collective agreements;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Asks for a clear definition of the workers included under the annex on Mode 4;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Expects the agreement, and especially the Annex on Mode 4, to contain provisions aimed at preventing exploitative labour relations for foreign workers and a safety clause allowing TiSA members to apply the necessary safeguards should pressure be put on domestic wages or should the rights of domestic workers be endangered;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas trade in services iscould be an engine for jobs and growth in the EU;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 76 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Expects the agreement not to foresee a standstill clause and to include a clause making it possible to revise the liberalisation of services, particularly in the event of infringements of labour and social standards;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for an increase in budget and scope of the European Globalisation Fund and for a Union minimum income scheme in order to face the adjustment and long term costs of the liberalisation of services in term of unemployment;
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for the immediate publication of all documents relevant to TiSA in order to improve the transparency of the negotiations, and urges that the European social partners be permitted to participate transparently in the negotiating process.
2015/10/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas the horizontal reservation for a wide range of public services is not able to adequately protect public services, since, in some Member States, many services of general interest, in particular social services, health and education, are in part privately funded;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 108 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas citizens’ trust in EU’s trade policy is a must, which can only be restored by ensuring the highest level of transparency, by maintaining constant dialogue with civil society, and stakeholders and by setting clear guidelines in the negotiations;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 121 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas data protection is not an economic burden, but a source of economic growth; whereas restoring trust in the digital world is crucial; whereas data flows are indispensable to trade in services if properly regulated;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 130 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas the judgement of the European Court of Justice in the Safe Harbour case C-362/14 will have an impact on international agreements on the transfer of personal data; whereas this judgement underlines the importance to require higher data protection standard from the parties in order to ensure the protection of privacy;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 134 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K b (new)
Kb. whereas the draft US text on e- commerce for TiSA would undermine EU rules and safeguards for the transfer of personal data to third countries, exposing the privacy and security of information to serious risks;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 137 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K c (new)
Kc. whereas Parliament reserves the right to express its opinion after consulting any future text proposals and drafts of the TiSA agreement;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 146 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point i
i. to consider theat TiSA negotiations asmay be a stepping-stone towards renewed ambitions at WTO level, paying the utmost attention at the same time to the threat posed by bilateral and plurilateral negotiations to the multilateral WTO framework;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 159 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
ii. to reiterate its support forthe importance of a comprehensive and balanced agreement, which should unleash the untapped potential of a more integrated global services market, while fully guaranteeing compliance with the EU acquis; to shape regulate globalisation and to create international standards, while fully and legally preserving the right to regulate and the exclusion of all public services; to secure increased market access for European services suppliers in key sectors of interest, while accommodating specific carve-outs for sensitive sectors;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 174 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point iii
iii. to push for multilateralisation by crafting GATS-compatible provisions and by accepting new parties conditional on their acceptance of the agreed rules and level of ambitions; to incentivise wider participation in the talks by granting interested parties observer status; to note that both the highest barriers and the highest growth potential regarding trade in services are to be found in the BRICS and the MINT countries; to recognise the importance of those countries for the EU, as export destinations with a rising middle class, as sources of intermediate inputs and as key hubs in global value chains; to open the way for thea committed participation of China;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 184 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point iv
iv. to carry out the negotiations on a preferential basis and to limit the benefits of the agreement to TiSA parties until it is multilateralised and supported by WTO dispute-settlement mechanism relying on cross-retaliation;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 191 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point vi
vi. to ensure synergies between bilateral, plurilateral andconsistency with multilateral agreements currently being negotiated, as well as with single market developments;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 196 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point vii a (new)
viia. to ensure that TiSA includes, if not multilateralised, an annex incentivising the ratification, implementation and enforcement of the core conventions of the ILO and the Decent Work Agenda, with a commitment to promote higher levels of protection of labour and environmental standards and to combat all forms of social dumping;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 204 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point viii
viii. to publish a comprehensive sustainability impact assessment and, once the negotiations are finalised, to update it accordingly, taking specific account of its impact on citizens, the environment, SMEs and workers; to request Parliament’s research services to publish a comprehensive and informative study of the scope and potential sectorial impact of the TiSA negotiations;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 214 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point viii a (new)
viiia. to oppose any mechanism or procedure allowing a foreign service provider to obtain the revision of an administrative decision, even when non- discriminatory;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 230 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point i
i. to exclude public servicservices of general economic interest and cultural services from the scope of the negotiationsirrespective of whether they are privately or publicly provided or funded from the scope of the negotiations including, but not limited to, education, health, water supply, financial services, energy and social security, and to seek the further opening of foreign markets in telecommunications, transport and professional services;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 233 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point i a (new)
ia. to consider that the right of the State to organise and regulate the provision of services, taking account of social and environmental criteria as well as the public interest, must be defined in details by the agreement and retained in full;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 255 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point iv
iv. to acknowledgensure that standstill and ratchet clauses do not apply to market access commitmentsand national treatment commitments; to negotiate national treatment on the basis of a positive list approach;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 262 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point v
v. to undertake limited commitments in Mode 1 so as to avoid regulatory arbitrage and social dumping; to ensure that European rules are fully respected when a company provides a service from abroad to European consumersand enforceable over third countries service providers, providing a service from abroad to European consumers; to include provisions guaranteeing easy access to redress for consumers, if necessary, after the purchase of a service;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 279 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point vii
vii. to take a cautious approach in Mode 4, asking for a clear definition of the workers included under the annex on Mode 4; while bearing in mind that the EU has an offensive interest in the inward and outward movement of highly-skilled labour; to acknowledge that the labour clause maintains the legal obligation of foreign service providers to comply with EU and Member State social and labour legislation, as well as with collective agreements; to enter into ambitious commitments for those cases which underpin Mode 3 commitments;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 287 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point viii
viii. to acknowledge that by means of limitations and exemptions, each Party retains the sovereign right to choose which sectors to open to foreign competition and to what extent;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 305 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point x
x. to introduce an unequivocal 'gold standard' clause, which could be included in all trade agreements and would clarify thatreplace the public utilities clause appliesnd apply to all modes of supply and to any services considered as public services irrespective of whether they are jointly provided or funded by private companies and by European, national or regional or local authorities;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 313 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xi
xi. to ensure, in line with Article 167(4) TFEU and with the UNESCO Convention on the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions, that the parties preserve their right to adopt or maintain any measure with respect to the protection or promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity; to explicitly exclude audiovisual services, both online and offline, media and publishing from the scope of the agreement, irrespective of the technology or distribution platform used;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 323 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point -i (new)
-i. to consider that Parliament expresses serious concern over the draft TiSA agreement, which would seriously undermine the Union's provisions and safeguards concerning the protection and transfer to third countries of the personal data of its citizens;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 326 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point i
i. to ensure cross-border data flows in compliance with the universal right to privacy, to prevent geoblocking practices and to uphold the principle of open governance of the internet;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 332 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point i a (new)
i a. to ensure that the negotiations concerning the transfer of personal data outside the Union can continue only if full compliance with EU data protection legislation is guaranteed; points out that personal data may be processed only in Europe and that all rules relating to the transfer of data to third countries are exceptions to that principle and must meet certain conditions; in particular, the third country must ensure an appropriate level of protection and ensure that EU citizens have at least the same opportunities to appeal and the same procedural rights as provided by EU law in the event of any unlawful use of their personal data;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 340 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
ii. to acknowledge that data protection is not a trade barrier, but a fundamental right, enshrined in Article 39 TEU and Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as well as in Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and ensure that the agreement guarantees full respect for these rights through a legally binding clause; to acknowledge that GATS Article XIV, which fully exempts the existing and future EU legal framework for the protection of personal data from these negotiations, will be replicated in the TiSA core text;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 344 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point ii a (new)
iia. to further ensure that the existing and future EU legal framework for the protection of personal data is fully exempted from the agreement through the inclusion of a comprehensive and unambiguous self-standing horizontal provision;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 348 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iii
iii. to ensure that European citizens' personal data flow globally in full compliance with the data protection and security rules in force in Europe; to ensure that citizens remain in control of their own data; to ensure that personal data transferred to third countries are deleted after a certain amount of time; to ensure that EU citizens have a 'right to be forgotten' even if their personal data is transferred to third countries; to oppose any attempt to limit the powers of European and national supervisory bodies which protect personal data; to reject, therefore, any 'catch-all' provisions on data flows which are disconnected from any reference to the necessary compliance with data protection standards; to mirror the language used in the WTO Understanding on financial services;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 352 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iii a (new)
iii a. to ensure that TiSA signatories respect the principle of open and non- discriminatory internet access for service providers;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 361 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point v
v. to recognise that broadband competition and digital innovation is aare drivers of economic growth and productivity in the entire economy; to recognise the need for data flows; to seek, therefore, a comprehensive prohibition of forced data localisation requirements;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 369 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point vi
vi. to ensure that the provisions of the final agreement are consistent with existing and future legislation at EU level, including the Connected Continent PackageEU regulatory framework for electronic communications, the General Data Protection Regulation and the 16 measures embedded in the communication on the Digital Single Market; to safeguard net neutrality and to guarantee that the EU retains its ability to limit the transfer of data from the EU to third countries where the rules of the third party do not meet EU adequacy standards and where alternative avenues, such as binding corporate rules or standard contractual clauses, are not used by companies;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 374 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point vi a (new)
vi a. to insist that any requirements for the localisation of data processing equipment and establishment be in line with EU rules on data transfers; to cooperate with parties in the appropriate settings with the view to adopt adequate high data protection standards;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 380 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point vii
vii. to address persistent regulatory asymmetries regarding the telecommunications sector, by preventing parties from imposing foreign equity caps, by laying down pro-competitive wholesale access rules for incumbent operators’ networks, by providing clear and non- discriminatory rules for licensing, by guaranteeing the independence of regulators, and by supporting an extensive definition of telecommunications services covering all types of network; and ensuring a level playing field for all operators and that non-EU companies from oligopolistic markets do not take advantage of the fragmentation of the EU market;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 381 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point vii
vii. to address persistent regulatory asymmetries regardpromote competition ing the telecommunications sector for the benefit of users and end-users, by preventing parties from imposing foreign equity caps, by laying down pro-competitive wholesale access rules forto open incumbent operators' networks, by providing clear and non- discriminatory rules for licensing, and by guaranteeing the independence of regulators, and by supporting an extensive definition of telecommunications services covering all types of network;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 384 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point viii
viii. to strongly support provisions on international mobile roaming; to increase publicly available information regarding retail rates in the short run; to establish affordable international roaming markets and to seek to include measures to decrease prices of international calls and messages; to make the case for maximum caps in the long run; to push for online consumer protection, in particular vis-à-vis unsolicited commercial electronic messages;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 419 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point vi
vi. to guarantee full visa reciprocity and to strive for the mutual recognition of training, academic levels and professional qualifications, in particular in the architectural, accounting and legal sectors, while ensuring the competence of the supplier and thus the quality of the services provided;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 421 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point vi a (new)
via. to oppose to Turkey request for an annex on the facilitation of patient mobility, since it raises unnecessary costs for national healthcare systems and creates unfair competition among parties; to remind that health services are not a commercial service and should be excluded from the scope of this agreement;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 422 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point -i (new)
-i. to suspend TiSA negotiations as long as risks exist on the stability of the economic, social and financial system, therefore extending the precautionary principle to sensitive sectors whose opening may entail risks for financial and economic stability;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 423 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point -i a (new)
-ia. to make sure financial services are excluded from TiSA negotiations through the general exclusion clause, as the market for those services is already excessively open;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 424 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point -i b (new)
-ib. to ensure that, in the area of financial services, no new commitments will be taken on that would jeopardise EU financial regulation, and that EU and Member States regulators retain the ability to authorise or deny any new financial product and service, as well as to reinforce the regulation and supervision of the financial and banking sectors;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 427 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point i
i. to aim at reinforcing financial stability, ensuring adequate protection for consumers, including their data privacy, and guaranteeing fair competition between financial services providers;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 441 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point iii
iii. to replicate the GATS prudential carve- out so as to allow parties to deviate from their trade commitments when this is necessary for prudential reasons; promote the inclusion of a safeguard clause based on a broad, clear and unambiguous definition of prudential measures, including restrictive measures aimed at fighting financial speculation and block access and circulation of toxic financial products; to ensure therefore to Member States the full right to adopt restrictive measures in contrast with TiSA when justified by the general interest and by the need to pursue economic and social objectives, including but not limited to, the protection of consumers and the end users of financial services, to preserve financial stability, the efficiency of fiscal controls and to minimise social costs;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 446 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point iv
iv. to ensure that this agreement does not limit the EU’s ability to ban certain financial products, including new financial services, in line with its regulatory framework or the right of the EU and Member States to prevent the transfer of financial personal data to third countries, in order to ensure the protection of privacy and personal data as a fundamental right;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 447 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point iv a (new)
iva. to ensure that the TiSA in no way hinders the global financial system reform agenda, but, rather, fosters a valuable discussion on concrete initiatives to prevent financial and economic instability, to develop regulatory best practices for the regulation of financial services and to fight against tax havens, tax elusion and tax evasion;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 448 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point iv b (new)
ivb. to urge the negotiating parties to establish a binding high-level framework for the minimum regulation of financial services based on the G20 financial sector reform agenda and on the recommendations of international bodies such as the FSB and IOSCO;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 455 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point v a (new)
va. to request a thorough ex-ante independent impact assessment to evaluate the economic and social effects of further financial liberalisation under TiSA;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 457 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point v b (new)
vb. to refrain from further commitments on market access for financial services until an impact assessment of past liberalisations of financial services on the real economy, unemployment, inequalities and financial stability has been carried out;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 462 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – point i
i. to ensure a high level of ambition in the transport sector, which is critical to the development of global value chains; to increase the speed, reliability, security and interoperability of transport services, to the benefit of business customers and individual users;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 471 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – point ii
ii. to seek improved access to foreign markets and a reduction in anti-competitive regulatory practices, most importantly those which are harmful to the environment and reduce the efficiency of transport services, while ensuring public authorities right to regulate over transport and guarantee public transportation; to address restrictions in the cabotage sector and to avoid carriers returning empty from their host country, in particular in the Annex on maritime transport;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 490 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g – point i
i. to fully preserve European, national and local authorities’ right to regulate by rejecting the TiSA annex on domestic regulation;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 508 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g – point iii
iii. to recognise that theGATS Article VI.4 on domestic regulation chapter is necessary to prevs been challenged by different pParties from implementing disguised trade barriers and imposing unnecessary burdens on foreign companies, in particular when they apply for different types of permitdue to its sensitive nature being more trade-oriented rather than useful for public utility and to preserve the right to regulate of national authorities;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 512 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g – point iii a (new)
iiia. to consider that in the Annex on Domestic regulation the concept of 'discriminating regulation' may reduce the scope of action of the National and Regional legislator and calls thus for a clear definition of the terms 'objective' and 'not more burdensome than necessary' when referred to measures of general application affecting trade in services;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 542 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h – point i a (new)
ia. to acknowledge that an increase in budget and scope of the EGF as well as other mechanism to support income are necessary as TiSA and other international trade agreements will displace EU workers across sectors;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 550 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h – point ii
ii. to endeavour to includeoppose the inclusion of a regulatory chapter on government procurement with a view to maximising the participation of European companies in foreign tenders; to deplore the lack of transparency regarding non-European calls for tenders and to denounce the lack of reciprocity in this area, as illustrated by the preferential treatment granted to domestic companies in several countries; to encourage the ratification and implementation of the WTO Government Procurement Agreement and its 2011 revision; to and to ensure that any upcoming commitment will not overcome locall upon the Member States to reinvigorate discussions on the proposed international public procurement instrumentor national laws;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 561 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i – point i
i. to ensure the highest level of transparency, dialogue and accountability, to publish all negotiating texts and to ensure that the European Parliament and National Parliaments have immediate access to the final and intermediate results of any impact assessment;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 568 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i – point ii
ii. to ensure that the mall Members of Parliament’s Committee on International Tradethe European Parliament receive all the negotiating documents related to TiSA;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 588 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i – point v
v. to encourage the Member States to involve more their national parliaments and regional authorities to keep them adequately informed about the ongoing negotiations and the EU position;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 592 #

2015/2233(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
to withdraw from TiSA negotiations if the European Parliament recommendations are not respected and followed during the negotiations;
2015/11/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 23 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the austerity policies implemented by both the Commission and the Member States, in addition to the economic crisis of the past few years, have affected women in particular, exacerbating their state of poverty and increasingly excluding them from the labour market;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 26 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas 123 million people are currently at risk of poverty in Europe and the number of women is permanently higher than that of men, with some 65.1 million women against 58.8 million men;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 28 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas poverty has a different impact on women and men; whereas, unemployment rates being equal, women are more likely to fall below the poverty line than men;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 49 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas, very often, women who intend to set up a business have difficulty in gaining access to credit because traditional financial intermediaries are reluctant to grant loans, as they consider women entrepreneurs to be more exposed to risk and less inclined to make their businesses grow and to make profitable investments;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 58 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas women often take the responsibility for the care of elderly or ill family members as well as for children, resulting in their lower participation in the labour market, also through long periods of inactivity, which consequently diminishes their overall income; whereas the establishment of high-quality childcare services and facilities at affordable prices reduces the risk of impoverishment; whereas few Member States have achieved or surpassed the Barcelona objectives;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 70 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the introduction of a minimum income would enable women living in poverty to have some basic support for their living expenses and to be able to look after their children and loved ones;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 75 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas behind female poverty there is often a lack of education and meritocracy as regards access to jobs, which means that women, despite being better educated than men, have greater difficulties in entering the labour market and finding tasks that are commensurate with their skills, thus remaining unemployed;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 102 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas investing in policies to support women not only reduces the poverty of the women themselves but also improves their families' living conditions, in particular those of their children;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 121 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Deeply deplores the austerity policies pursued by the European Union which, together with the economic crisis, are helping to increase the rate of poverty, particularly among women;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 128 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to develop and utilise the available financial instruments, including the Social Investment Package, to meet the Barcelona objectives; calls, in this context, for the Social Fund and the ERDF to be improvoptimised, for priority to be given, in the use of social investments and the EFSI regulation, to the establishment of public and private childcarchildcare and assistance facilities, and for the flexibility mechanism introduced in the context of the Stability and Growth Pact to be used for financing of childcare and assistance facilities; proposes the creation of a specific line in the EU budget to fundat the Commission allocate specific resources, through a co- financing mechanism, to promote incentives for specific areas where there is a shortage of childcare and assistance facilities and where the female employment rate is extremely low;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 132 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote policies to facilitate access to credit, also through microcredit instruments, in order to support and develop female entrepreneurship;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 144 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Regrets that the proposal to revise the directive on maternity leave has been withdrawn and believes that specific measures need to be taken in all Member States to improve the work-life balance for women;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 150 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for there to be a move towards the individualisation of rights in social equity polictroduction of an income tax splitting system for families, which takes into account family sizes, in order to promote greater social equity;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 171 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Member States to monitor the rights of female workers, who increasingly work in low-paid jobs and are victims of discrimination;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 173 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Points out that there are new categories of women in poverty, consisting of young professional women, especially in certain Member States whose tax policies do not take into account the difficulties encountered by these categories, and which therefore condemn a large portion of young female graduates to a precarious working life and an income that rarely manages to rise above the poverty line (the 'new poor');
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 211 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that in all Member States the risk of poverty and social exclusion among children is strongly linked to their parents’ level of education, and in particular to that of their mothers, and their parents’ situation in the labour market and their social conditions; stresses the need to establish a fsupport, with targeted programmework of support fors, the ongoing education of teenage mothers, for whom leaving school early is a first step towards poverty;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 216 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on the Member States to promote policies to strengthen and improve education, especially university education, and to invest more in training, in lifelong learning programmes and information campaigns, ensuring that meritocracy prevails in the subsequent integration of women into the labour market;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 223 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that the absence of a partner income is a major contributing factor to the poverty trap and to the social exclusion of women; notes the often precarious situation of divorced women who are heads of household,to whom judges have granted custody of children and for whom an adequate level of maintenance should be defined;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 243 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Points out that the new technologies should be regarded as a fundamental tool for creating new jobs and as an opportunity to bring women out of poverty;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 247 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Points out that promoting free access to the Internet can remove all discrimination between those who have the economic means to access the Internet and those who do not, enabling women to obtain a better work-life balance, by teleworking, for example;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 260 #

2015/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Encourages the Member States and the Commission to collect gender-segregated statistics in order to develop exchanges of best practice on legislative and budgetary instruments for combating poverty;
2016/02/25
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 47 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets the strong market orientation of the EU’s agricultural policies and its negative effect on rural incomes and employment, as evidenced by the liberalisation of the dairy sector; condemns the negative impact on agricultural labour of free trade agreements such as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, the free trade agreement with Morocco and the future agreement with Tunisia; believes that the impact of free trade agreements on agriculture should be borne equally by Member States;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Takes the view that the Commission should take greater account of the impact of trade policy decisions on European agriculture;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for a stronger role for social partners in the development and implementation of agricultural policy, in addition to the combating of gangmaster systems, in order to create quality jobs, ensure adequate health and safety conditions and foster the social integration of rural workers, in particular migrant workers;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the importance of training and skill formation for farmers and agricultural workers, particularly for young people entering the workforce and in order to be able to adapt to changes in agriculture and food production, moving towards greater sustainability and a reduction in the use of pesticides;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2015/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the potential of cohesion policy to improve employment opportunities and sustainable and inclusive growth, thereby contributing tofostering poverty reduction and social inclusion;
2015/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2015/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. WelcomNotes the Commission’s vision of CLLD and ITI as instruments and delivery mechanisms for empowering local communities and developing local economy and social entrepreneurship as well as instruments designed for smooth and efficient spending of the available funds by local actors; considers it necessary in this regard to transmit accurate information regarding specific funds and to strengthen information desks in order to provide adequate technical support to those who wish to use the funds; stresses, in addition, the importance of carefully and constantly monitoring resources, with an ex ante analysis to assess the sectors requiring greater funding in order to create quality employment and an ex-post analysis aiming to monitor the effectiveness of the results achieved;
2015/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2015/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission to organise appropriately publicised information seminars, in order to ensure that as many people as possible know about these opportunities; hopes, moreover, to see the establishment of appropriate information tools such as regularly updated mailing lists and smartphone applications;
2015/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2015/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the importance of incentivising sectors such as the green economy and the social economy, which can bring added value in terms of sustainable and inclusive employability;
2015/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 27 October 2015, entitled ‘Commission Work Programme 2016 – No time for business as usual’ (COM(2015)610),
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the "chronic poor", often long-term unemployed, but sometimes employed on low salaries and whereas single people living alone with children who are not in employment or who are working less hours on average than the primary earner are consistently identified as among the most vulnerable groups;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. considering that there are as yet no established indicators of absolute poverty;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
A b. whereas bad or inadequate housing greatly reduces chances to lead a normal life; whereas living for extended period of time in low-quality housing can affect physical health;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
A b. considering that one possible solution is to reduce mortgage or rent payments for families living in inadequate housing, so that they can spend money on refurbishing and improving their home instead;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
A c. whereas quality of housing (including appropriate insulation, etc.) of groups in vulnerable situations has decreased during the crisis, because of inability to fund maintenance;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 b. calls on the Commission and the Member States to create the conditions to guarantee all EU citizens basic social rights, such as the right to housing, and to contribute to ensuring that the universal concept of human dignity is reflected in every single moment of the life of every single person;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. calls for the Commission and the Member States to establish in law that a primary residence is immune from seizure, in order to provide mandatory protection for EU citizens’ right to housing;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. invites the Commission to present in 2016 in the context of the announced social pillar an EU framework directive on adequate minimum income; which would enable every EU citizen to meet basic personal needs, such as food, clothing and housing, and guarantee them resources and social assistance sufficient to lead a life compatible with human dignity and thus to lift them out of poverty;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. calls on the Member States to ensure a more efficient and targeted use of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) by national, regional and local authorities in order to tackle energy poverty; while it is desirable for these funds to be used to combat energy poverty, it is vital to constantly and carefully monitor the spending thereof, to ensure that the money is being used effectively;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 127 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls on the Commission to map the problem of homelessness, as well as fuel poverty in the EU, and in particular winter deaths amongst people living in cold homes; and to support the Member States in developing solutions;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 3 a (new)
- ensuring that the Member States, in collaboration with the relevant local authorities, make unallocated social housing available to poor families, establishing an agreement by which the tenants carry out necessary refurbishments to the property instead of paying rent;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 4 a (new)
- ensuring a balance between supply and demand, since the productivity-pay gap is the principal cause of recession, unemployment and, consequently, increasing poverty;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 174 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. stresses that initiatives such as the Youth Guarantee must be put into effect with a comprehensive understanding of the employment regions in which they are to be implemented; this means redefining the role of job centres, i.e. to assist users, to take account of all the specific circumstances of these users, to update skills and to focus attention on developing sectors through direct contact with businesses, in order to ascertain the competences that the latter require potential employees to possess
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 201 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. cCalls on the Commission and the Member States to develop, adopt and implement an EU framework to reduce poverty and social exclusion in line with the Europe 2020 Strategy, consisting of concrete measures and actions, including energy poverty;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 203 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop, adopt and implement an EU framework to reduce poverty and social exclusion in line with the Europe 2020 Strategy, consisting of concrete measures and actions, including energy poverty, housing exclusion and homelessness;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 222 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. stresses that a decent income is a fundamental element for being able to live your life in dignity; recalls that 16.7 % of the population in the EU 28 in 2013 were at-risk-of-poverty after social transfers, and that today, these people are more often than not also at risk of absolute poverty; invites the Commission to present in 2016 in the context of the announced social pillar an EU framework directive on adequate minimum income;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 235 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. recommends that an EU framework directive on minimum income should specify which criteria Member States’ minimum income schemes would need to meet so as to lift people out of poverty; considers that such a framework would need to be rights-based, address the level of income, the non-discriminatory, efficient and easy access and the take-up, targeting especially those groups, who currently are excluded from or at risk of exclusion from minimum income schemes;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 246 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that minimum income schemes should prevent and lift households out of severe material deprivation and allow for an income above the poverty threshold; recalls that a minimum income is a key instrument for delivering on Article 9 TFEU guaranteeing adequate social protection as well as on the fundamental right to decent living conditions, participating in society and protection of human health. Yet, the issue is not only income, but also access to services. In several countries people with debt problems have been left without insurance coverage and unable to pay for healthcare services;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 251 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Given that 22, 348,834 households (approximately 11% of the EU population) spend more than 40 % of disposable income on housing ; that the European Semester has identified housing cost overburden as a 'social trend to watch' ; and that 21,942,491 households (approximately 10.8% of the EU population) experience difficulty maintaining adequate household temperature, calls on the European Commission and the Member States to urgently identify, implement and maintain policy measures that enable households to meet housing costs, including housing allowances;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 273 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. recalls that poor households spend the largest share of their income on housing, utilities and food; stresses that one dimension of household expenditure of poor households – the cost of energy and the related issue of energy poverty lacks an in-depth assessment at Union level; calls on the Commission to improve internal cooperation so as to better link the energy policypolicies at all levels and the poverty policy;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 311 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. stresses that, while such investments are necessary, measures are considered to support families who do not yet have a home;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 314 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17 b. stresses also the need to monitor the use of funds and to simplify information and access to these resources;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 316 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 c (new)
17 c. considers deplorable financial speculation concerning natural resources and energy sources, particularly those that are non-relocatable, such as hydroelectric power, for example, and, consequently, calls for the Commission and the Member States to take the necessary steps to reduce energy costs sustained by poor families, for example by using revenue obtained from the imposition of appropriate taxation;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 321 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. stresses that stakeholders have identified two major obstacles in targeting energy poverty via the ESI Funds: firstly, relating to project size, where smaller beneficiaries are faced with funds intended for larger scale projects such as the Cohesion Fund; secondly, that operational programs do not make full use of the option to orient the ESI Funds towards energy poverty;deleted
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 324 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. recalls that targeting beneficiaries who work with or who are part of poor households requires certain pre- conditions, which are better met in the ESI Funds but less so in larger funds like the ERDF;deleted
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 338 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. recalls finally that energy policy alone will not effectively combat the issue of household expenditure; recalls that only a policy implemented with cooperation between the various players involved will allow decisive action to be taken against poverty;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 357 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24 a. reiterates that energy must be ‘clean’, economical and accessible to all, and for these reasons, the Commission and the Member States must increase investment in research into ‘clean’ energy.
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Urges the Commission and its agencies, at the same time, to gather, update and disclose the practices adopted to circumvent legislation on worker representation, and on the independence of the latter, at supervisory board level;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Urges the Council, the Commission and the Member States to protect and ensure the independence and impartiality of workers' representatives at supervisory board level in order to prevent instances of corruption and illegal behaviour; condemns the use of trade unions as a springboard for political careers;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 195 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission in all legislative acts on European company law to provide that the place of a company’s registered offices must be identical with its actual place of business so as to prevent the circumvention of the requirement regarding employee representation on supervisory boards, such as would be possible under the proposal for single- member private limited liability companies (SUP), and, instead of this proposal, to submit a proposal for a directive on the cross-border transfer of the registered office, as decided by the European Parliament22; , considering that such transfers are not part of the more widespread phenomenon of relocation that leads on the one hand to job losses, and on the other hand to social dumping; __________________ 22 Resolution of 10 March 2009 with recommendations to the Commission on the cross-border transfer of the registered office of a company.
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 225 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Believes that workers’ representatives on European supervisory boards shouldmust have a say in all fundamental decisions of a company and oversee the management board, without interfering in the management’s right to manage the company; calls on the Commission to frame rules that ensure proper circulation of information and allow workers to participate in full knowledge of the facts in making key company decisions;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 250 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Recommends that appropriate guarantees be adopted to ensure the independence and impartiality of workers’ representatives at supervisory board level;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 269 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Recommends, with respect to the number of worker representatives sitting on the supervisory boards of companies, including direct or indirect subsidiaries and affiliates with more than 50 employees25, that half the number ofsufficient seats on the supervisory board should be reserved for workers or their representatives; __________________ 25 In Sweden from 50 workers.
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 280 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Is convinced that such a directive would have to be furnished with effective enforcement mechanisms in order to reduce cases of circumvention, avoidance and abuse; the possibility of introducing penalties for such practices should also be considered;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2015/2220(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recognises the importance of the Central Asian region for strategic relations withcloser strategic relations between the Central Asian region and the EU and insists on the strengthening of trade ties and exchanges between the two regions; calls for the EU’s role in the region to be more proactive than in the past in response to the growing regional influence of Russia and China;
2015/11/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 8 #

2015/2220(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Urges the Commission to forge closer political and diplomatic ties with Turkmenistan, and hopes that the PCA can be speedily concluded and an EU delegation office opened in Ashgabat;
2015/11/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2015/2220(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recognises that Central Asia is a strategic partner for the EU in its attempts to diversify the sources of its energy supply and ensure energy security; believes that the future EU-Central Asia strategy must have a wider vision in the energy field, which should also extend to countries like Azerbaijan and Iran and, in the long term, Mongolia;
2015/11/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2015/2220(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that the economic diversification of the region provides added value in terms of regional development, stability and security; considers it essential to modernise infrastructure, transport and interconnections, particularly in rural areas; takes the view that environmental rehabilitation and sustainable development have equal priority in the context of the development of the region and are also important aspects of cooperation with the European Union;
2015/11/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 19 #

2015/2220(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Welcomes Kyrgyzstan’s request for application of the GSP+ arrangements and hopes that Tajikistan and Uzbekistan will follow its example;
2015/11/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2015/2220(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for continued efforts to support the modernisation of the economy of these countries and to help them create a favourable environment for foreign investment by strengthening the rule of law, reducing bureaucratic burdens and administrative interference in enterprises, reforming the judicial system to ensure the protection of foreign investment, and fighting corruption and providing training;
2015/11/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 25 #

2015/2220(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Welcomes the increase in macrofinancial assistance, and calls for this instrument to be employed on the basis of stringent cost-benefit criteria and detailed impact assessments which focus on spillover effects;
2015/11/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 27 #

2015/2220(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the EU, working with the Member States, should continue to promote specific regional integration and confidence-building policies, but also reward positive steps made by individual Central Asian states or groups of countries through increased cooperation. takes that view that EU measures should be geared to the needs and specific characteristics of each country; emphasises the need to deepen political dialogue and foster confidence-building measures among the countries in the region;
2015/11/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2015/2220(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Emphasises that education and vocational training, like investment and economic development, are fundamental to social and democratic progress in the countries of Central Asia and among their citizens; takes the view that cooperation with Europe in that area must be based on a targeted, proven instrument, such as Erasmus+;
2015/11/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 17 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that whilst it is impossible to hold back the digital revolution, it is possible to shape its course to the advantage of our companies, by promoting digital literacy among the broad section of the population that still has few, if any, computer skills;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that employment and social policy need to keep pace with the digitalisation of society, without neglecting instruments such as a guaranteed basic income for citizens, which are vital for providing decent support for people who are trying to return to the labour market;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to undertake a thorough assessment of the impact which digitalisation will have on the number and types of jobs available and to gather information on new forms of employment, such as crowdsourcing and crowdworking; calls on the Commission to promote greater social security for the category of freelance workers, who are the real key players in crowdsourcing;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that as job and skills profiles become more complex, new demands are being placed on training and further education, with a special focus on school- age generations; emphasises the importance of social dialogue in efforts to bring course content up to date and to develop a European skills strategiesy;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the establishment of the Europe-wide grand coalition for digital jobs, and encourages businesses to join in order to address the issue of geo-blocking and territorial discrimination;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 139 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that the digitalisation-driven trend towards more flexible working practices mayis likely to also give rise to precarious forms of employment to which current standards as regards social security, working time, working location, worker participation and employment protection no longer apply; calls for self-employed persons with quasi-employee status to be placed on an equal footing with employed persons under employment law;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the need to develop employee data protection measures which cover new forms of data collection (relations between humans and robots), since these data are increasingly being put at risk by new forms of cybercrime;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2015/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that anticompetitive practices and monopolies can constitute barriers to trade which distort trade and investment flows, in order to be effective, competition policy needs to regulate the conduct of international entities, businesses and governments in such a way as to prevent trade and investment from giving rise to anti-competitive, oligopolistic and monopolistic practices that are damaging to domestic competition;
2015/10/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 10 #

2015/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the European Union should make greater efforts to monitor the implementation of trade agreements in order to assess, inter alia, whether competition rules are being complied with and, whether the obligations to which trading partners have committed themselves are being completely complied with and fulfilled and whether there is genuine reciprocity;
2015/10/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2015/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Supports the competition policy initiatives of the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), the OECD and the OECDICN1 and their efforts to improve worldwide cooperation in the field of competition policy; _______________ 1International Competition Network.
2015/10/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2015/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to support developing countries in their efforts to promote fair competition and ensure that appropriate safeguards are put in place;
2015/10/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2015/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Points out that internationalising competition policy is an extremely difficult task in view of the many disparities between anti-trust systems, both in formal terms and in terms of the effectiveness of the oversight exercised; calls on the Commission to help developing countries to fill the legal vacuum in this area, with due regard for their social and economic makeup, by establishing common principles and rules that can remove both public barriers and private restrictions;
2015/10/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #

2015/2132(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that adequate appropriations should be allocated to the trade-related budget lines to enable the Commission to pursue its ambitious trade agenda aimed at creating growth and jobs across Europe and attaining the Union’s wider international goals as well as to step up its efforts regarding the monitoring of the implementation and the effects of trade agreements, ensuring that adequate funding is available for both ex ante and ex post impact assessments for the trade agreements currently being negotiated or those already ratified;
2015/07/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2015/2132(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Is concerned that many Union citizens equate globalisation with a loss of European output and jobs; points toWelcomes the increasing role of NGOs in shaping public opinion on trade-related matters due to the lack of, stresses the need for an effective Union communication strategy; emphasises the need for an increase in the Commission’s information and communication budget to allow for better engagement with citizens; calls on the Commission to present a study on the funding sources and the impact of NGO to inform and allow for better engagement with citizens and with civil society organisations active in trade issues;
2015/07/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 17 #

2015/2132(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the slightNotes the increase in commitments for the Instrument for Macro-Financial Assistance and the European Neighbourhood Instrument; is concerned, however, that these increases will not be sufficient to respond to the needs in the Eastern and Southern neighbourhood, including possible further assistance programmes for UkraineEuropean Neighbourhood Instrument and the Development Cooperation Instrument; welcomes the increase in payments for these two instruments, which is necessary in order to make them fully effective and to honour the commitments already made; notes the increase in commitment appropriations for the Instrument for Macro-Financial Assistance; takes the view, however, that this instrument should not be used to impose the Union’s interests on third countries;
2015/07/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2015/2132(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Notes the moderate increase in appropriations for the Partnership Instrument; recalls the programme objective to foster international trade and investment opportunities of European SMEs; stresses the importance of economic and technical support for SMEs to help them become more international; calls on the Commission to assess and improve the existing tools regarding their efficiency and effectiveness and to ensure sufficient controls and oversight of all activities. , such as European business centres, for example.
2015/07/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 26 #

2015/2132(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the importance of increasing funding for customs policies in order to deal with the large volume of customs declarations and address the need to promote computerisation, facilitate legitimate trade and meet the expectations of stakeholders regarding the protection of their interests; points out, in this regard, that the absence of effective, harmonised customs systems is resulting in a severe disruption of European trade, which is weakening European competitiveness and undermining the safety of citizens.
2015/07/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2015/2128(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes the problems of smuggling, trafficking and other forms of illegal and illicit trade, which are further compounded by the lack of uniformity in customs checks and procedures in the Member States and not only have an impact on Member States’ collection of customs duties and consequently on the EU budget, but are also strongly associated with organised international crime, threats to consumers and negative effects on the functioning of the single market, and which undermine a level playing field for all competing companies; requests, therefore, better coordination between the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), customs authorities and market surveillance authorities in order not only to combat these problems but also to curb the trade in products that infringe intellectual property laws in the EU;
2015/11/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2015/2128(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the key role played byCalls for prudence in the use of funds intended for the EU’s macro-financial assistance (MFA) programme in encouraging reform in the EU’s closest trading countries; requests that the Commission continue to report to Parliament and the Member States with a view to ensuring that all funds are spent in full compliance with the basic regulation.
2015/11/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 2 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to establish, in cooperation with the EEAS, a framework for annual reporting by the EIB on its operations outside of the EU with regard to compliance with the general principles guiding Union external action as referred to in Article 21 TEU and the EU Strategic Framework and Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy; calls, with regard to investments outside the EU, for a report which goes into greater detail about possible losses and about how and in what cases the guarantee instrument has been used;
2015/11/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 9 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the EIB to pay greater attention to the impact its operations have on human rights and, to further develop its policy on social standards into a human rights policy in the area of banking and to improve the ex-post controls, especially to assess if the economic, social and environmental actions of EIB are in line with the EEAS directives;
2015/11/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 17 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the EIB public consultation on climate action and believes that the EIB can further strengthen its position as leader in the climate field; looks forward to the update of the EIB climate strategy outside of the EU, with the expectation of an action plan phasing out lending to non-renewable energy projects and an increase of its target for climate action to 40% of its portfolio;
2015/11/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 31 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Recommends to the EIB internal Complaints Mechanism Office to launch an investigation on the transparency, effectiveness and development impacts of the intermediated lending of the EIB, and for the Bank to act on the outcomes of this investigation, leading to a list of criteria for the selection of financial intermediaries;
2015/11/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 33 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Asks the EIB to refrain from cooperation with financial intermediaries having a negative track record in terms of transparency, tax evasion or aggressive tax planning practices, or use of other harmful tax practices such as 'tax rulings' and abusive transfer pricing, fraud, corruption or environmental and social impacts, or with no substantial local ownership;
2015/11/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 46 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the EIB, in the context of the ex-ante assessment of undertakings which are the subject of judicial investigations, to update its policies on anti-money laundering and on combating the financing of terrorism and organised crime, including the establishment of a new responsible taxation policy, starting with a review of its policy on non-cooperative jurisdictions (NCJ policy) in 2016.
2015/11/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 5 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
– having regard to the European Social Charter adopted in the Council of Europe and to the social and employment rights enshrined in it,
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas all 28 Member States have transposed the Employment Equality Directive and, despit whereas, given the differences oin its transposition and implementation, have gaistudies need valuable experienceto be compiled in order to give a true picture of the position regarding the application of Directive 2000/78/EC in the Member States;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas, as well as implementing Directive 2000/78/EC, all Member States should be encouraged to adopt legislation establishing social security and welfare schemes for persons suffering discrimination, combined with measures aimed at removing the obstacles preventing them from taking up employment;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas it is essential to remove the obstacles which, by limiting freedom and equality, are impeding the full development of the human person and preventing workers from genuinely participating in the political, social, and economic organisation of their Member States;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Hopes that all Member States will remove the natural, social, and economic obstacles which are preventing the principle of equality from finding substantive expression and are restricting the freedom of European citizens;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage smart working models enabling people with a disability to work at home, with all of the resulting advantages in terms of quality of life and productivity;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 136 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Considers that European funding and state investment intended for the training of workers with disabilities should be channelled towards SMEs that allow workers to follow courses leading to employment;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 169 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Notes that, thanks to policy changeas a result of policy decisions in recent years, people aged 55- 64 make up an increasing share of workers; regrets, however, that the employment rate for this group has increasedpension policies dictated by austerity measures are compelling ageing workers too slowly and remains below 50% in the EU19; is concerned about how the digital market will affect employment, in particular for people over 50, and about how little prepared the EU and the Member States are to address this issuremain in employment too long, at the expense of the quality of their personal and family lives; points out in addition that, again as a result of policy decisions, workers in the 45 to 55 age group have been forced out and are unable to re-enter employment, not least because of discrimination on account of their age; __________________ 19 Businesseurope , ‘Position paper on Promoting diversity in employment and workplaces’, Nov. 2013.
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 192 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Hopes that investment in development and digital and soft skills will be channelled first and foremost towards SMEs which have their own in- house training schemes and retrain older employees;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 238 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Highlights that lack of comparable equality data makes it more difficult to prove the existence of discrimination; calls on the Member States to collect equality data in a systematic way and with the involvement of national social partners and equality bodies and national courts;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 266 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Maintains that proceedings have to conclude within a reasonable time and, not least by imposing severe penalties, serve to guarantee the confidentiality of the personal data of victims of discrimination while naming and shaming employers;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 267 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 b (new)
27b. Calls, as regards cases of discrimination and/or mobbing and/or stalking at the workplace, for rules to be adopted to protect whistle-blowers and their privacy;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 275 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Welcomes the fact that sanctions provided for by Member State anti- discrimination laws are generally in line with the Employment Equality Directive; also points to the important role of specialised public anti-discrimination bodies in resolving problems related to penalties and appeals; is concerned, however, that, in terms of the level and amount of compensation awarded, national courts tend to apply the lower scale of sanctions provided for by law23; __________________ 23 EPRS, op. cit. EPRS, op. cit.
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 292 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32a. Believes that national and international associations should be set up with the aim of removing the economic and social obstacles preventing the principle of equality from being translated into reality;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 297 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to support the study of civic and human rights education in primary and secondary schools;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 300 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 b (new)
33b. Urges the Member States, not least given the increase in migration, to guarantee the principle of equal treatment for migrants;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 301 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 c (new)
33c. Urges the Member States to establish appropriate schemes enabling prisoners who have served their sentence to re-enter the labour market:
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 306 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34a. Calls on the Member States to seek to bring about an exchange of best practice to help fight discrimination at work;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas good health is a fundamental and inalienable individual right that has positive value in itself;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the right to health is in the basic interest of society;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas workers’ health depends on prevention, primary prevention consisting of a healthy lifestyle in a healthy working environment;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the economic crisis and austerity policies have eroded company earnings and assets, particularly in the case of SMEs, leaving less funding available for health and safety at work;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas there is a significant diversity between Member States regarding the extent to which they are addressing the occupational safety and health issues at the workplace;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. WelcomNotes that many important fields of action are identified in the EU OSH strategic framework; stresses, in this context, that more concrete and harmonised legislative measures should be included in the framework, following the 2016-review;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls onUrges the Commission to define and apply quantitative reduction targets at EU level for occupational diseases and accidents at work following the 2016- review of the OSH strategic framework and to rely on the latest research findings when reviewing the framework;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 147 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses the need of a safe and healthy working environment, particularly in more dangerous sectors such as agriculture, construction and industry, that is to say the sectors in which fatal accidents and serious work-related illnesses are known to occur;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Stresses the need for specific measures to counter the effects of the crisis by assisting companies seeking to improve safety and health at work;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that national OSH strategies are essential and contributes to improvements in OSH in the Member States and stresses that regular reporting on progress made should be encouraged; considers it necessaryessential to continue to initiate and coordinate policies at EU level on a harmonised basis with a view to ensuring a high level of occupational health and safety for all workers;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to ensure that national OSH strategies are fully transparent and open to input from social partners, encouraging the sharing of good practices and increasing social dialogue as a means of improving working conditions and industrial relations;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 172 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Member States to incorporate quantitative, qualitative and measurable targets into their national strategies;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 179 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Urges the Member States to provide training for staff to increase the awareness on health and safety issues;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 192 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Acknowledges the importance of taking into account the situation, specific needs and lack of compliance by micro and small enterprises in the implementation of OSH measures at company level; notes that the economic crisis has eroded company earnings and assets, particularly in the case of SMEs, leaving less funding available for health and safety at work; encourages the Commission, EU-OSHA and the Member States to continue developing practical tools and guidelines, which improve the compliance of SMEs with OSH requirements;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 200 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Encourages the Commission and Member States to develop standard procedures with a view to simplifying compliance by SMEs with OSH requirements;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 208 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Ccalls on the Member States and social partners to take initiatives to upgrade the skills of health and safety representatives and managers; calls on the Commission to draw up guidelines for the active involvement of employees in implementing preventive OSH measures; urges the Commission to provide managers and workers with the appropriate tools for such initiatives;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 211 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses the need to consider the health and psychological wellbeing of workers arising from restructuring and the introduction of new technologies and working practices;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 215 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Points out that a precondition for good OSH management and performance is fully documented risk assessment, based on scientific data, which allows for appropriate preventive measures to be put in place;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that ensuring a level playing- field across the EU and eliminating unfair competition and social dumping is crucial; stresses that labour inspectorates play a key role in enforcing workers’ rights to a safe and healthy working environment; cCalls on the Member States to follow the ILO recommendation of astep up the human and financial resources allocated to labour inspectorates and accordingly increase substantially the number of inspectors, while earmarking more European funding for constantly more effective monitoring instruments; (The ILO-recommended minimum of one labour inspector pfor every 10 000 workers and to increase staffing and resources available to labour inspectorates;. is totally inadequate. According to the Commission, there are around 20 000 inspectors in the EU (one for every 9 000 workers) carrying out 1 500 000 inspections annually, in other words one inspection per worker every 24 years, assuming that they work 365 days a year! These figures are clearly ridiculous.)
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 246 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. WelcomNotes efforts to improve the quality of the regulatory framework; reminds the Commission, however, that the submission of OSH directives to the REFIT exercise and modifications of legislation should be transparent, involve social partners and must under no circumstances result in reductions in occupational health and safety;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 260 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Commission to strengthen and improve the legislative framework designed to tackle undeclared work, which frequently exposes workers to dangerous and unhealthy working conditions;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 272 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Stresses the need to introduce more stringent rules for the protection of workers, taking into account not only exposure periods but also the mix of chemical and/or toxic substances to which they are exposed;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 279 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Emphasises the need to considerably step up funding earmarked for the safe removal of asbestos in all Member States, abandoning austerity measures that have obstructed the necessary corrective action;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 280 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Urges the Member States to compensate workers exposed to asbestos;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 317 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop and implement a programme for systematic monitoring of psychosocial risks, including stress; calls on the Commission and the Member States also to monitor compliance with maximum working hours with a view to ensuring health and safety as well as productivity;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 362 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Despite their crucial place in the economy, there has been little research and few data available on micro and small companies, particularly in terms of the implementation of fundamental workers' rights, such as health and safety at work; in that respect calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase efforts in order to collect reliable data to improve the quality of work and employment;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 375 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Urges the Commission to include agreements, conventions and standards regarding safety and health at work in all partnership negotiations, in particular the ongoing TTIP deliberations with the United States;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Insists that sustainability impact assessments including human, social and environmental rights for any trade policy initiative are conducted, allowing not only for an ex-ante but also for an ex-post evaluation;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Rejects any further liberalisation of the GATS Mode 4 commitments; recalls that Mode 4 commitments must only apply to the movement of highly skilled professionals;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that labour standards, including the eight fundamental International Labour Organisation conventions, must be equ have to be an essential part of EU-trade agreements and must be equally and horizontally implemented in all chapters of trade agreements, and that these agreements must include a revision clause allowing a party to leave the agreement or to suspend commitments in the event of infringements of labour and social standards;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to include not only legally binding but also enforceable Sustainable Development chapters in all EU trade and investment agreements;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that the Domestic Advisory Groups handling the infringements of social clauses of trade agreements must have sufficient financing and that they must consist of a balanced representation of labour and business organisations from civil society; calls on the Commission to take measures to improve the work of the DAGs such as providing financial resources, prior information and the possibility of using more advanced media in order to facilitate civil society participation;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Opposes granting MES to China as it is not fulfilling, for the time being, the EU five technical criteria for defining a market economy;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2015/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Commission to improve policy coherence for development in trade policy, in particular as it relates to public health. Urges the Commission to develop a comprehensive "access to medicines-policy" across policy areas such as trade, development, research and innovation and public health, which support the effective implementation and realisation of Sustainable Development Goal 3;
2016/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 152 #

2015/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Calls on the Council to meet their commitments to the Doha Declaration by ensuring that the Commission's mandate explicitly excludes pharmaceutical-related TRIPS-plus provisions which negatively affect public health and access to medicines, such as data exclusivity, patent extensions and limitation of grounds for compulsory licenses within the framework of future bilateral and regional trade agreements with developing countries or when developing countries engage in accession to the WTO;
2016/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 166 #

2015/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that trade policy must ensure a transparent production process throughout the value chain, as well as compliance with fundamental environment, social and safety, safety and animal welfare standards; stresses the need for mandatory due diligence throughout the supply chain; welcomes the Commission’s desire to work closely with the ILO and the OECD to develop a global approach to improving working conditions in the garment sector and invites the Commission to propose legislation on due diligence standards for the textile supply chain; calls on the Commission to ensure the welfare of live animals exported outside the EU according to EU legislation and animal welfare standards of the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE); underlines the importance of identifying and assessing new sectoral or geographic opportunities for additional responsible supply chain partnerships; looks forward to the Commission’s upcoming communication on CSR;
2016/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 180 #

2015/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Believes that new technologies and the internet provides new tools for traceability of products along the supply chain;
2016/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 251 #

2015/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Underlines, in the context of the current talks on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and the EU- Japan FTA, as well as of the other negotiations the EU is undertaking or will launch, the high importance of focusing on core sensitive issues such as the protection of geographical indications (GIs) and public procurement when negotiating FTAs;
2016/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 271 #

2015/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Commission to start as early as possible negotiations for an investment agreement with Taiwan in parallel with the one with China; underlines that, in the context of the migration challenges, special focus should be put on the post-Cotonou framework and on supporting the creation of a Continental Free Trade Area for Africa, integrating regional economies and boosting local growth, employment and innovation; asks for further impetus to be given to negotiating FTAs with both Australia and New Zealand;
2016/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 302 #

2015/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Calls on the Commission not to take any measures without a prior deep and comprehensive impact assessment tackling all the possible effects and consequences on employment, growth and the environment; urges the Commission to take into account the results of the counter public consultations launched by several Members of the Parliament in order to define the best option to follow; urges the Commission not to move to the "standard methodology" (i.e. starting the normal value determination from Chinese prices and costs) in relation to imports from China; to maintain separate anti- dumping rules for imports from countries to which the WTO applies special rules and to coordinate with its major trading partners on how best to ensure that all provisions of Section 15 of China's Protocol of Accession to the WTO other than subparagraph 15 (a)(ii) are able to be given full meaning under their domestic laws;
2016/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 341 #

2015/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
37. Is aware that the inclusion of provisions relating to financial services in trade agreements has raised concerns regarding their potential negative effects where money laundering, tax fraud, tax evasion and avoidance are concerned; supports the Commission in its fight against corruption; insists that clauses onan Anti- corruption, money laundering and tax fraud Chapter shall be included in all trade and investment agreements and their clauses fully incorporated in public procurement negotiations;
2016/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 365 #

2015/2105(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42 a (new)
42a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that dispute settlement clauses exclude pharmaceutical intellectual property from their scope;
2016/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 1 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. Whereas the development of robotics will bring positive effects forbenefits to the European Union economy butand also forto the daily life of individuals; whereas, however, at the same time it involves structural risks which it would be unwise to ignore; whereas all robotics and, artificial intelligence technology and related innovative disciplines have to be developed, monitored and used with due regard for the law and fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFR), in particular for the rights of human dignity, data and metadata protection, privacy, liberty and security;
2016/10/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 2 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas robot-human teams could be 85 %1 more productive than either on its own; and robots by enhancing capabilities of humans will reduce risks of human errors, while a significant number of existing jobs are considered to be at risk of automation over the next twenty years; __________________ 1 According to research from MIT following joint experience with Carmakers BMW and Mercedes-Benz.
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 3 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas the Union holds a leading position in industrial robotics, with a share of more than 25 %2 of supply and use; and whereas maintaining that leading position and share is therefore an industrial strategy priority; __________________ 2 http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon20 20/en/h2020-section/robotics.
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 6 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas more substance needs to be given to the Commission’s work to establish and achieve industrial policy, research, economic and legal objectives in the field of robotics within the framework of the completion of the digital single market, as this is a strategic means of adapting European society to the needs of the 21st century;
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 7 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. takes view that the impact of automated vehicles on enhancing transport safety might potentially be a major one, since human errors are currently responsible for about 90% of road accidents; notes however that it will be impossible for automated vehicles to eliminate all accidents, which raises questions of responsibility for car accidents and generates, amongst other things, the need for new insurance models and new insurance funds;
2016/10/07
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 11 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas the great influx of robotics and various AI applications will have a systemic impact on our productive and industrial organisation, as determined by new features that make it qualitatively different from the current organisation;
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 12 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. it is important to call on the Commission to develop an analysis of the challenges and structural opportunities in employment inherent in the constant technological growth and to accompany such growth with an appropriate legislative framework which is easy to revise;
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Recital B c (new)
Bc. whereas these new features will have consequences for every member of the public, not only in terms of energy and the environment, but also in terms of social and political organisation, and whereas these therefore necessitate action by the public authorities in respect of the productive and industrial system which may differ qualitatively from the action currently taken;
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 15 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that robotics plays a key role in improving the competitiveness and productivity of the European economyEuropean reindustrialisation, in helping to reverse the trend towards relocation and in improving the competitiveness and productivity of the economy, and therefore in developing a society that is less tied to working time, thereby freeing up more human and financial resources for personal improvement and the intellectual, creative and social aspects of shared lives; calls on the Commission to promote a pro- innovation policy in robotics, facilitating integration of technologies in value chains, and to assess the need to modernise legislation or develop European guidelines to ensure a joint approach in robotics, essential for companies to scale up in Europe;
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 16 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the identification of guiding ethical rules and principles for the design, engineering and use of robots and, artificial intelligence are needednd related innovative disciplines is vital to complement the current European legal framework;
2016/10/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 20 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that robotics and, artificial intelligence and related innovative disciplines, especially those with built-in autonomy and the possibility of self- learning and even evolving self- modification, should be subjected to thea structured body of primary robotics laws or principles, such as a principle that a robot may do not harm to a human being and must obey a human being; these principles should also be in compliance with the rights and principles enshrined in the CFR, in particular human dignity, the respect for private and family life, the protection of personal data, the freedom of expression and information, equality and non-discrimination, solidarity, and citizens’ rights and justice;
2016/10/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 21 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that robotics, like any other technological innovation, must be subject to in-depth preventive assessment to identify, along with its evident benefits, its potential risks; special attention must also be awarded to identifying any long- term structural risks, such as the possible increase in technological unemployment, and the social consequences thereof on the welfare system, or the possible increase in industrial concentration;
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 25 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. notes that automated vehicles can play an important role in developing sustainable transport (for example, through the potential for making savings in emissions) and calls on the Commission and Member States to pay attention to upcoming technical progress in the field of renewable technologies and to ease the diffusion of fast recharging automated stations fed from fully decarbonised and denuclearised electricity sources;
2016/10/07
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 28 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that innovation in robotics and artificial intelligence require digital infrastructure that provides ubiquitous connectivity; calls for foresight and forecast studies to be conducted to help quantify, for preventive reasons, these connectivity requirements in the medium and long term; calls on the Commission to set a frameworkestablish a road map that will meet the connectivity requirements for the various programmes, including in the field of robotics, planned for the Union’s digital future;
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 31 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas at the same time the development of robotics and AI may result in a large part of the work now done by humans, not only manual but also intellectual work, being taken over by robots, so raising concerns about the future of employment and the viability of social security systems if the current basis of taxation is maintained, creating the potential for increased inequality in the distribution of wealth and influence;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 35 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. education must pave the way for the next generation to be able to live fully productive lives in a world which will be changed by robotisation and automation, focusing on training initiatives for jobs with creative and non-repetitive content;
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas robotics and AI that can perform similar tasks to those performed by humans should be used mainly to support and boost the abilities of man, as opposed to trying to replace the human element completely;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 37 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Strongly believes that interoperability between systems, devices and cloud services, which must be based on security and privacyfundamental rights by design, are essential for enabling real time data flows enabling robots to become more secure, flexible and autonomous; asks the Commission to promotedefine the role of the European research and innovation system in promoting an open environment, from open standards and innovative licensing models, to open platforms and transparency, in order to avoid lock-in in proprietary systems that restrain interoperability;
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 37 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. calls on the Commission and Member States to conduct further research to assess the safety and environmental implications of automated vehicles, and invites them to create a knowledge-sharing system to record the outcomes of tests and pilot schemes; since the act of driving itself will become a complex technical exercise, it is of the utmost importance that such a knowledge-sharing system is conceived to protect the privacy of data contributed by consumers using automated vehicles;
2016/10/07
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 37 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to ensure that any Union legislation on robotics and, artificial intelligence and related innovative disciplines will include rules on privacy and data protectionand metadata protection, taking into account the rapid developments in this area, the requirement to follow principles of privacy by design and by default as well as principles of proportionality and necessity regarding the processing of data; calls and metadata; calls, among other things, for the review of rules, principles and criteria regarding the use of cameras and sensors in robots and, artificial intelligence and related innovative disciplines in accordance with the Union legal framework for data protection;
2016/10/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 43 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that data access is key to innovation in machine learning algorithms; calls on the Commission to implement an ambitious strategy on Open and free flow of datarespecting fundamental rights rules is central to innovation in machine learning algorithms and to their scientific and industrial exploitation; calls on the Commission to implement an ambitious strategy on Open and free flow of data, under which the protection afforded by the public authorities ensures that SMEs, start-ups and academic and citizens’ organisations can participate on an equal footing with major transnational organisations; points out that such data access calls for a thorough overhaul of the current regulatory framework applicable to copyright;
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 46 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. underlines that automated cars will require a high level of safe interaction with the transport infrastructure and that the high volume of data will need to be securely transferred in real time between automated vehicles and such infrastructure; such unprecedented volume of data raises significant questions about the value that can be created with it, and about how it must be shared between entrepreneurs, government, consumers contributing the data and society as a whole;
2016/10/07
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 48 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines that the free flow of data within the European Union is a basis for the digital economy and is essential for the development of robotics; highlights that high security of robotics and artificial intelligence systems and related innovative disciplines as a whole, including their internal data and metadata systems and data flows, is crucial for the adequate utilisation of robots and, artificial intelligence and related innovative disciplines; stresses that a high level of safety, security and privacy of data used for the communication between people and robots and artificial intelligence and related innovative disciplines, together with high quality of voiceperformance by recognition systems, has to be ensured; calls on the Commission and Member States to support and incentivise the development of the necessary technology, including security by design and channels of communication; urges, therefore, that appropriate monitoring technologies and procedures be included in any operating plan, accompanied, where necessary, by thorough ex-post audits carried out by independent ethics consultants or similar bodies;
2016/10/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 51 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the increasingly widespread use of social media and smartphones, which are constantly collecting and generating data, is causing the volume of data produced all over the world, so-called ‘Big Data’, to grow exponentially, and whereas 90% of the data in circulation today has been generated in the last two years;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 56 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Calls on the Commission to increase its support in the mid-term review of the MFF for the Horizon 2020 funded SPARC programme and to promote a collaborative environment between national and European institutions, the research community, standardisation bodies and the private sector;
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 58 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines that whenin the event that personal data or metadata are processed bythrough the use of RPAS, whether by public authorities for law enforcement purposes or by private or public entities for other purposes laid down by the law, the right to the protection of private life and the right to the protection of personal data as enshrined in Article 7 and 8 CFR and Article 16 TFEU apply and the Union legal framework for data protection must be fully complied with;
2016/10/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 59 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Any legislative initiative, in any field, on robotics and artificial intelligence should provide legal certainty without stifling innovation, in a manner compatible with the aims of the whole of European society and with the benefits which it expects these new technologies to have for all its members, without exception;
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 63 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. points out that, whilst robotics and artificial intelligence promise real advantages in the short and medium term in terms of effectiveness and economy not only for production and trade but also in areas where human intelligence hitherto meant there were only humans (whose work will be increasingly unnecessary), there is a danger of the number of jobs in the field of robotics not increasing to match the number of jobs which are expected to be lost; insists on the importance of a change of paradigm with a view to shifting the focus from work to income, pursuing the objective of having a minimum income for citizens;
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. underlines that it is necessary to focus on ensuring and strengthening the security of IT regarding automated carvehicles;
2016/10/07
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 69 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Considers that the Commission should open a debate on the transformative effects that the widespread use of robotics and AI systems is predicted to have on social protection systems, with the aim of establishing which innovations in European distribution and solidarity mechanisms will be needed to maintain – or even improve – our social protection standards, at all stages of people’s lives and regardless of their employment status;
2016/09/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 74 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that appropriate legislation should be accompanied by encouragement of a soft law framework,, in specific areas where relevant studies show that the development of regulation would be premature, by encouragement of a soft law framework, which may be made up, among other elements, of a code of conduct or public-private partnerships, in order to ensure the cooperation of the industry and robotic designers with public authorities and all the other stakeholders; believes that such instruments should focus on practical solutions to ensure privacy and human dignity, privacy and data and metadata protection, the security and ethics of the robotics industry, and the proper use of robots and artificial intelligence and other related innovative disciplines on a daily basis;.
2016/10/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 79 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Commission to develop and adopt a comprehensive plan for studies on the possible consequences which invasive technologies will have on civil liberties and fundamental rights;
2016/10/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 80 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Calls on the Commission to create an action plan to facilitate the democratisation of citizens’ access to robotics, artificial intelligence and other related innovative disciplines;
2016/10/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 82 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Calls on the Commission and Member States, in view of the possible structural risks that might arise in the decades ahead, to place greater emphasis on policies that are representative of social rights, such as the citizens’ income;
2016/10/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 84 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. Calls on Member States and the Commission to increasingly promote digital teaching and training in policies relating to the right to study;
2016/10/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 85 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. calls on the Commission to develop European infrastructural standards to allow the diffusion of autonomous vehicles and a road map to implement them;
2016/10/07
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 87 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. an answer must be found to the question of which areas might see restrictions or a ban on total, also in the form of tax disincentives on automation, in order to safeguard employment levels, taking into account demographic changes and sustainability and any unintended social consequences.
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 e (new)
7e. Calls on the Commission to carry out studies examining more deeply the possible correlation, in the years ahead, between automation and migration.
2016/10/11
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 88 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. invites the Commission to study the potential economic and social consequences of robotics and automation in the tourism sector and related industries;
2016/10/07
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 90 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. calls on the Commission to study the potential economic and social consequences of robotics and automation over the full life cycle of transport systems, including active and preventive maintenance, fleet management, temporary storage (e.g. parking systems for city vehicles), and dismantling and other operations guaranteeing a smooth flow of the corresponding materials into the circular economy;
2016/10/07
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 146 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Considers that companies that manufacture robots should also record in this register the algorithms used to programme intelligent machines;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 161 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Considers it essential, in the development of robotics and AI, to guarantee that humans have control over intelligent machines at all times;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 163 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Considers that when developing new intelligent machines, designers should always include status indicators that provide the user with information in real time, insofar as this is compatible with the design brief;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 165 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Considers that in preservation of the fundamental principle of transparency, and to allow us to understand and be aware at all times of the decisions taken by intelligent machines, any robotic application capable of performing similar tasks to those performed by humans should be equipped with a ‘black box’ which records data on every transaction carried out by the machine, including the logic that contributed to its decisions;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 166 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Highlights that the algorithms used to programme intelligent machines should be put together in line with a clear and precise code of ethics, which also allows robots capable of learning to respect ethical principles in the tasks they perform;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 176 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that to uphold these fundamental rights, ethics committees with special powers should be set up, perhaps as part of a European agency, and those committees should be able to take a holistic approach to the entire robotics research and development ecosystem;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 188 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Considers that the use of robotics and AI for the purposes of warfare should be strongly limited and regulated;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 189 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Considers that special care should be taken in preparing robots or AI to perform tasks in positions of authority, for example performing the functions of the police, prison wardens/guards or security guards, teachers or any other state or civil servant role;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 190 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Considers that special attention should be paid to the use or creation of anthropomorphised intelligent machines that can forge emotional bonds with man, causing an emotional attachment or deception;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 191 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. Considers that special attention should be paid to robots that represent a significant threat to confidentiality owing to their placement in traditionally protected and private spheres and because they are able to extract and send personal and sensitive data;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 220 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that, in the development of any EU policy on robotics, privacy and data protection, including metadata protection, guarantees are embedded in line with the principles of necessity and proportionality; calls, in this regard, on the Commission to foster the development of standards for the concepts of privacy by design and privacy by default, informed consent and encryption;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 295 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Calls on the Commission to develop an analysis of the employment challenges and structural opportunities inherent in constant technological growth, and to accompany such growth with a suitable legislative framework which is easy to keep up-to-date;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 296 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23b. Highlights the importance of foreseeing changes to society following the new industrial revolution in robotics, and the need to start considering changing the working hours/income paradigm, creating new employment sustainability models, including through the introduction of a minimum citizens’ income;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 324 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Considers, in any case, that responsibility must always lie with a human and never a robot;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 331 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Considers that, as is the case with the insurance of motor vehicles, such an insurance system could be supplemented by a fund in order to ensure that reparation can be made for damage in cases where no insurance cover exists; this fund should be endowed by an annual fixed percentage to be paid by any private company that wishes to invest in the robotics sector; calls on the insurance industry to develop new products that are in line with the advances in robotics;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 338 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 – point a a (new)
aa) introducing a suitable instrument for consumers who wish to collectively claim compensation for damages deriving from the malfunction of intelligent machines from the manufacturing companies responsible;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 342 #

2015/2103(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 – point b
b) ensuring that a compensation fund, endowed by an annual fixed percentage paid by any private company that wishes to invest in the robotics sector, would not only serve the purpose of guaranteeing compensation if the damage caused by a robot was not covered by an insurance – which would in any case remain its primary goal – but also that of allowing various financial operations in the interests of the robot, such as investments, donations or payments made to smart autonomous robots for their services, which could be transferred to the fund;
2016/10/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 15 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas there is little chance of the 75 % employment rate target set in the Europe 2020 strategy being achieved for women (it currently stands at 63.5 %) by 2020; withouthereas, moreover, there is a need for proactive policies designed to help women enter the job market, especially policies that promote a better work-life balance;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Considers it regrettable that there are disparities between the transposition measures of the directive in the field of application, thus creating systems that benefit workers to varying degrees depending on their employment sector (public or private) and the length of their contract; recommends, to that end, that all possible measures be taken to enable the directive to be binding, in a uniform manner, on both the public and private sectors;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the fact that some Member States have transposed the provisions of the directive beyond the minimum field of application, enabling freelance workers, apprentices, same-sex couples and parents of adopted children to benefit; recommends, where this is not yet the case, that the necessary measures be adopted to extend these provisions to such categories, to ensure legal certainty across the EU;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls for the adoption by the Member States of family social policies which provide for the application of all the benefits included in the directive in the event of a prolonged stay abroad by parents seeking to complete an international adoption procedure; (Parents who wish to carry out an international adoption must be supported by the EU institutions and by individual Member States.)
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes the importance of adopting measures to avoid inequalities between workers who have access to parental leave and those who do not benefit from such leave; stresses, therefore, the importance of providing for adequate penalties in case of discriminatory conduct; (The enjoyment of parental leave must not be a reason for discrimination, or be to the detriment of working life).
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the need to guarantee favourable conditions for the return to work of those who have enjoyed a lengthy period of parental leave;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes the flexibility the directive grants to the Member States to define forms of parental leave – part-time or full-time – and the working and notice periods established as conditions for granting parental leave; welcomes the initiatives introduced by the Member States to give workers as much flexibility as possible in this area, ensuring that parental leave ties in with their professional and personal circumstances, but believes that any choices made to cede some of the decision- making power to employers should not undermine the target of increasing the taking of parental leave; urges the Commission to monitor carefully the implementation of the directive in the Member States so as to ensure that the flexibility offered by it is not abused; considers the principle of sharing good practices to be a useful means of achieving this objective;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Member States to adopt family policies that promote teleworking so as to facilitate optimum work-life balance; (Teleworking should be encouraged since it facilitates an ideal work-life balance.)
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Strongly deplores the fact that the proposed revision of the directive on maternity leave was withdrawn just before the publication of the roadmap ‘New start to address the challenges of work-life balance faced by working families’ and the fact that, in the context of this roadmap, the Commission does not at this stage intend to publish a final report on the implementation of the directive on parental leave; urges the Commission to consider appropriate and urgent revision of that directive;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls for greater consistency between national laws in order to guarantee the same rights to all parents within the EU and stresses that, to ensure the economic well-being of families, Member States must ensure them a decent income, at least in the early years of children’s lives; (Different treatment in different Member States is a breach of the fundamental principle of equality and spawns unfair competition between Member States. Those who take parental leave must be sure of an adequate family income, so as to encourage fathers in particular to take parental leave also.)
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase benefits and protection for fathers and mothers of children with disabilities (Families including children with disabilities should be given assistance, especially of a financial nature, in view of the greater hardship they face in terms of both time and financial resources.)
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 182 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to implement social policies that can encourage and facilitate parenthood where the low birth-rate in Europe is mainly attributable to the current adverse economic and social conditions;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Believes that, alongside legislative measures to promote work-life balance, the Member States, with the financial backing of the various EU instruments, should focus on introducing high-quality, accessible childcare facilities, provided free of charge to families that are poor and at risk of social exclusion, with a view to meeting the Barcelona objectives;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomAcknowledges the fact that the Commission has adopted an ambitious European migration agenda; urges the European Council to show the same level of ambition and to support the Commission by deedtaking practical measures designed to achieve shared objectives on the basis of the principles of solidarity and the fair distribution of responsibilities among all the Member States;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that as regards the medium term, the issue being raised by Europe’s current refugee crisis is the integration of refugees into European society; calls on the Commission, therefore, to opt for a plan geared towards social and occupational integration of refugees, not forgetting, however, that this can only be achieved by implementing immediately policies which actually tackle the issue of refugees, and that their social and occupational integration must be brought about in a manner fully consistent with human rights;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Maintains that labour market data have to be taken into account in the permanent relocation mechanism for refugees in order to ensure that it will not worsen the social and economic situation for refugees’ home territories and their populations, taking account of the fact that the social and economic insecurity of these territories and their populations is a factor which is quite separate from the current refugee emergency; with that aim in view, calls on the Commission, in agreement with the Council, to strengthen the measures providing for a proportional distribution of refugees among the Member States, taking into consideration actual employment opportunities in these countries, to facilitate better integration of refugees;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Emphasises that poverty in the European Union must be tackled in a way which puts the needs of European citizens first, but which also creates conditions in which every human being can lead a life of dignity, with all their basic needs met;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4 Points out that, in the Commission’s view, there is nothing to prevent European funds, including the European Social Fund, from being used to help integrate refugees; calls on fund managing authorities, however, to use the funds as rationally and effectively as possible without damaging other recipients and to ensure that their use is carefully and constantly monitored; calls on the Commission, in that connection to introduce a European funds traceability mechanism to ensure that they are used properly;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission, in consultation with the Member States, to set up a system to speed up diploma equivalence and the recognition of skills, thereby helping refugees and migrants to integrate socially; maintains that refugees and migrants must receive language training as soon as they arrive in the country to which they have been relocated, and highlights the importance of support staff, such as cultural mediators, in both the recognition and integration phases; emphasises, moreover, the fundamental role of schools in ensuring the healthy development of the children of refugees; points out that intellectual and cultural poverty is often no less serious than material poverty and social exclusion;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Points out to the Commission that illegal work by migrants constitutes a danger; notes that under the ‘Sanctions’ Directive1 and the ‘Seasonal Workers’ Directive2, employers can be punished for exploiting migrant labour; calls on the Commission, however, to work towards a more integration-oriented system serving to encompass all aspects of this problem; highlights the need to provide refugees with adequate protection, in order to eliminate the abuse of migrant labour; __________________ 1 Directive 2009/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 providing for minimum standards on sanctions and measures against employers of illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ L 168, 30.6.2009, p. 24). 2 Directive 2014/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the conditions of entry and stay of third-country nationals for the purpose of employment as seasonal workers (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 375).
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that when they sign an asylum-seeker’s employment contract, the employee and the employer are both running a risk to the extent that the application for asylum might be rejected; considers that this could also jeopardise the Commission’s aims regarding the policy of return to the home country; urges the Commission to introduce an appropriate verification tool to avert any such risk;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls for maternity protection guarantees to be put in place, said guarantees then also encompassing employment protection and salary protection from the start of pregnancy through to the infant’s upbringing;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on Member States to strictly enforce legislation on protecting the health of domestic workers and carers, as well as regulations regarding occupational injuries and disease;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses how important it is to ensure the professionalisation of the sector as well as specific training for individuals working with elderly people and children, so as to foster the creation of quality jobs and bring better working conditions and access to training;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 172 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recommends stepping up labour inspections so as to clamp down on any violations of the legislation on working time and rest breaks;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the lack of skills is due to the impact of the economic crisis that is affecting families and their opportunities to give their children an appropriate, high-quality education, which very often means that they leave school prematurely;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas austerity policies are leading to substantial public spending cuts in the Member States, in particular in the education sector;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas, in order for the Youth Guarantee to achieve effective results, it is vital to assess the real employment needs of young people and the real sectors offering future work opportunities, such as the social economy and the green economy, backed up by constant and careful monitoring not only of the projects concerned but also of the agencies that provide them, drawing up regular reports on the progress of this measure to combat youth unemployment;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that skillsthe development and dissemination of knowledge and skills is one of the key elements of integrated employment and social policies;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Encourages Member States to make all necessary efforts to ensure that education is accessible and free of charge;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that European funds, when used in a more efficient and strategic manner, can be an extraordinary tool for the growth and development of universities and businesses; calls for greater financial resources to be used to spread information on European financing instruments and to broaden, in universities and businesses, the knowledge and skills that are necessary for seeking funds, studying and managing funding projects;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Stresses that in order to guarantee that EU funds are used properly, it is paramount that a supervisory and monitoring system be implemented in order to ascertain how those funds are being used;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for an EU award for the best projects in combating youth unemployment, which could be linked to the pan-European contest ‘European Youth Award’ and to the European Prize ‘For youth employment in the Social Economy’; calls on the Commission to give visibility to such initiatives in order to raise awareness and to become closer to citizens’ needs; emphasises, moreover, that the encouragement of crowdfunding measures is an incentive to develop young people’s entrepreneurial skills and that such measures should be implemented at the university stage;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the key role of enterprises, including SMEs and micro-enterprises, in job creation; stresses the need to provide education for entrepreneurship on every level, including pre-school education, by including in curricula the development in a safe environment (through games, simulations and youth projects) of the practical skills needed in starting and managing businesses;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 127 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that the promotion of entrepreneurship is an important factor in promoting an active approach towards one’s own carrier; believes that it is the responsibility of public bodies, the education sector, banks, businesses and the media to promote entrepreneurship;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Reiterates the importance of taxation for encouraging entrepreneurship and youth employment and therefore calls for austerity policies to be superseded in order to enable Member States to significantly reduce the tax burden on businesses and labour;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that training in the workplace and high-quality apprenticeships, when they are not exploited in order to have a casual, low-cost workforce, are ways of improving youth access to the labour market and a better use of these opportunities could enlarge the pool of potential candidates for vacancies and also improve their preparedness for work;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 172 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Points out, in addition, that in order to reduce the risk of early school-leaving, it is vital to move beyond austerity policies;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses that a smooth transition from education to employment should be promoted by linking education with practical training and providing high- quality internships, where they are not exploited as a low-cost labour force, as stipulated in the European Quality Charter on Internships and Apprenticeships as well as through the recognition of qualifications gained during formal and non-formal education;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 226 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Recalls that the effective implementation of the Youth Guarantee can help to improve the employability of young people by overcoming educational deficits and by providing skills relevant to the market needs and can offer valuable work experience that can facilitate the establishment of successful businesses; points out, to that end, that it is vital to assess the real employment needs of young people and the real sectors offering future work opportunities, such as the social economy and the green economy, backed up by constant and careful monitoring not only of the projects concerned but also of the agencies that provide them, drawing up regular reports on the progress of this measure to combat youth unemployment;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 228 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Stresses the need to simplify administrative measures for implementing the Youth Guarantee and the urgency of removing any red tape that might limit its effectiveness;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 256 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Points out that effective forms of social protection are vital, first and foremost a minimum income;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 261 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
GNew generation Y, new opportunities, new challenges
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 268 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Notes that young people, raised in an era of rapid technological progress have not only potential, talents and skills but also values and priorities that differ from the previous generation, and therefore it is worthwhile stressing the need for programmes and initiatives that would bridge the gap between generations while helping to understand the younger generation’s assets, which include multitasking, creativity, readiness to change and teamwork; stresses that education and training systems should be flexible enough to allow for the full development of the skills and talents of those people; emphasises moreover that recruitment and employment services staff should be well trained and equipped with skills that would give them a better understanding of Gthe new generation Y; stresses that job offers and recruitment strategies should be adjusted with a view to the potential of Gthe new generation Y;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2015/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. WelcomNotes the efforts of the Civil Society Forum and of the internal advisory groups set up in accordance with the provisions set out in the chapter on trade and sustainable development; recalls that both parties are obliged to uphold, promote and implement commitments on core labour rights in their laws and practices; points out, therefore, the importance of maintaining an open and inclusive dialogue with civil society and trade union organisations;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2015/2059(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 – point d a (new)
(da) the option of introducing a binding anti-corruption chapter, as negotiated in the new trade agreements between the Union and third countries;
2016/12/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 9 #

2015/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that it would be highly recommended for the European Union to adopt legislation on non-agricultural GIs, in order to increase the distinctiveness and, fully exploit the potential of protected products, provide consumers with reliable information on their place and/or method of production and preserve the know-how and jobs relating to them;
2015/05/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2015/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the recognition of protection of non-agricultural GIs is both a defensive and offensive interest in the framework of the common commercial policy and it can be an effective tool in countering imitation and counterfeit products and in ensuring fair competito support micro, small and medium-sized businesses and manufactures (SMEs) preventing unfair competition, counterfeiting and misleading imitation; recognising unitary protections of non-agricultural GIs would also contribute to build social capital in the region of production;
2015/05/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2015/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Underlines that the absence of a harmonised and coherent EU system of GI protection for non-agricultural products negatively affects the EU's capacity to negotiate the issue bilaterally with EU trading partners such as the US and Canada, and multilaterally within the WTO;
2015/05/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2015/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Is of the opinion that the creation of a single EU-level protection of non- agricultural GIs that includes a registration schemecommon definitions, registration procedures and costs, as well as scope of protection and enforcement means recognised at EU level, without lowering the standards of protection already existing in somefifteen Member States, would be the best way to be more effective both within the EU and in negotiations with third countries;
2015/05/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 47 #

2015/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Recalls that a better protection of extended GIs needs to be compatible with the existing European and international legal framework and meet both economic and stakeholders needs. In this regards is of the opinion that a future strategy on GIs should determine whether the specificities of non-agricultural products would justify adding other exceptions to those set out in Articles 22-23-24 of the TRIPS agreement and whether such protection would match the safeguards already provided to agricultural GIs at EU level;
2015/05/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 48 #

2015/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Considers that a coherent strategy on a broader GIs protection should include a review on the current functioning of EU customs and the need to harmonise control operations putting in place common systems to check compliance with legal requirements and prevent the entry and distribution of counterfeited goods;
2015/05/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 49 #

2015/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Stress the importance to find an appropriate link between a potential GIs system for non-agricultural products and international trademark law to avoid any legal uncertainty and confusion. In this regards, recalls the need to have a particular attention for future patents, design, trademark registration for non- agricultural GIs when exported to third countries;
2015/05/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 9 #

2015/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls that the EU payments under ESIF programmes are based on specific eligibility criteria linked to the level of development of EU regions; believes therefore that the decisions regarding reprogramming or suspension of payments based on other criteria related to the deficit and debt levels contradicted the principles of proportionality and equal treatment as well as the rationale behind this funds;
2015/06/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2015/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Believes that the decisions regarding reprogramming or suspension of ESI funds may worsen the economic and social situation in those countries who are already facing difficulties, by hindering the capability of the local and regional authorities to provide public services and raise investment for jobs and growth;
2015/06/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2015/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the fact that reprogramming or suspension as regulated in Article 23 of the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR) could undermine social and economic convergence between regions and jeopardise goals pursued by ESI funds, especially in countries with deep macroeconomic and social imbalances; asks the Commission to use the mechanism only when Member States have persistently failed to take effective action to address its requests to reprogramme funding and giving due consideration to the unemployment rate or the impact on the economies of the Member States concerned; stresses that local and regional authorities shall not be punished for the mistakes made at the national level of administration;
2015/06/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2015/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to establish a timescale for the lifting of the suspension under Article 23(8) of the CPR;
2015/06/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas this instrument is still not well known to potential beneficiaries, as demonstrated by the fact that the volumes of microcredit granted have fallen short of the predetermined target;
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission to provide greater publicity and information concerning the instrument and the means of access to it;
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Recommends that the procedure for access to the instrument be simplified and that agreements between MFIs and the EIF be more flexible and easier to understand, allowing smaller MFIs to enter the market quickly;
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Encourages the Commission to strengthen its dialogue with microfinance actors (MFIs, banks or non-banks, networks such as the European Microfinance Network) regarding the design of the products to be offered under Union-funded programmes, and to step up its partnerships with non-bank actors;
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Encourages the EIF to investigate compliance by MFIs with the European Code of Good Conduct for Microcredit Provision and to check that they always offer sustainable interest rates;
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls for it to be checked that the intermediaries do not offer different instruments when the conditions applicable under Progress are more favourable to beneficiaries;
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas a recent study authorised by the European Commission has revealed that less than 30 % of the ICT sector workforce is female, and that only 3 % of female graduates have a degree in ICT, with respect to 10 % of male graduates1 a; __________________ 1ahttps://ec.europa.eu/digital- agenda/en/news/women-active-ict-sector
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 15 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
A b. whereas only 9 % of developers in Europe are women, only 19 % of bosses in the ICT and communications sectors are female (with respect to 45 % in other services sectors) and women represent just 19 % of entrepreneurs (with respect to 54 % in other services sectors)2 a ; __________________ 2ahttps://ec.europa.eu/digital- agenda/en/news/women-active-ict-sector
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 29 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Member States to organise digital literacy courses to facilitate the entry into ICT companies of women who, for various reasons, do not possess these specific skills; points out that failure to implement this policy adequately would result in further discrimination regarding access for women to this sector;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that appropriate training courses are organised so as to provide women with suitable skills in the IT sector;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Calls on the Commission to ensure that any EU funding for women’s digital literacy is closely, constantly and continually monitored so as to prevent any misuse thereof and ensure that it is effectively deployed;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Demands a regular exchange of best practices among all relevant stakeholders, including particular social partners, to discuss the implementation of the gender aspect in the Digital Agenda; calls on the Commission to address this issue in its 2016 work programme initiative ‘New start for working parents’;;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
F a. whereas women face numerous difficulties in integrating in the ICT sector, causing them greater levels of stress and contributing increasingly to the so-called ‘leaky pipeline’ phenomenon in which they leave the sector mid-career;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 52 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
G a. whereas digitalisation favours the promotion of direct democracy via the web, thereby permitting women to be more involved in politics and improving their access to information;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 53 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to identify new forms of sustainable and inclusive employment especially for women and, providing special forms of protection and security for the most vulnerable groups, such as single mothers, women with disabilities and those living in poverty and therefore at risk of social exclusion; calls on them also to safeguard fundamental workers’ rights and the social protection of employees in order to combat precarious working conditions and possible forms of exploitation;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G b (new)
G b. whereas the partnership of digitalisation and direct democracy provides women with more opportunities to get involved directly, outside of traditional political schemes, and participate fully and in a comprehensive manner;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 61 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
H a. whereas 18 % of women in Europe have suffered some form of ill-treatment since adolescence as a result of knowledge made public on the internet, and there have been nine million victims of online violence in Europe;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 67 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that the gender pay gap continues for self-employed women and women working in the ICT sector; calls on the Member States to regulate accordingly contracts for self-employed workers; stresses also that the principle of equal pay for equal work in the same workplace to ensure just and fair wages is being challenged;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the opportunity for a better work-life balance for women in the digital age; emphasises the risks posed by constant accessibility (e.g. burnout); advocates, therefore, a ‘right to log off’ for workers, as well as suitable support for the prevention and treatment of risks arising from employment in the digital sector;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that distance working also helps women achieve a better work-life balance in the digital era, enabling them to reconcile the demands of the workplace with need to devote due attention to the wellbeing of their families;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that the demand for new skills, particularly in the ICT field, needs to be tackled through training as well as through further education and lifelong learning, in the interests of promoting digital literacy and tackling the existing gender gap in order to enlarge the pool of highly qualified candidates; recommends that digital literacy where needed be added to traditional training courses, thereby bringing essential content into line with new labour market requirements.
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make better use of the considerable potential that digitalisation has at all levels of political participation and the inclusion of women in decision- making processes; highlights the major opportunities that digitalisation holds with respect to access to information, decision-making processes, transparency and greater government accountability;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 101 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to promote digitalisation in politics in order to ensure proper direct democracy and the direct involvement of women and citizens, thereby overcoming out-dated schemes and obstacles that cause difficulties for women attempting to establish themselves in electoral and institutional environments;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 102 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Calls on Member States to adopt online voting methods for electoral consultations, in order to eliminate logistical barriers which remain even today, particularly for women, and to reduce the costs of building polling stations, thereby furthermore circumventing the need to use public facilities and interrupt the services provided therein, such as school activities;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 108 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Calls on Member States to consult their citizens directly on legislative decisions by means of digital solutions, thereby enabling women to promote the public’s interests with greater energy and in the process overcome the gap that exists between men and women in relation to public administration;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 126 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Considers that access to free broadband for all would grant increased possibilities for women to access the labour market, in addition to a series of further advantages with regards to environmental, economic and social matters, and would contribute to social inclusion for persons with low and very low income;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 133 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls on Member States to invest in digital working practices that would enable women to more readily and effectively reconcile their private life with their working life and more smartly manage their time, thanks to teleworking;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 146 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Emphasises the value of women being able to access online training courses to improve their personal qualifications, in light of logistical travel issues and/or economic difficulties in accessing more expensive classroom courses, with the same results being achieved;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 156 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to implement programmes targeted at parents in order to familiarise them with the ICT technologies used by their children, thereby improving adults’ awareness of the potential encounters and relationships that can occur online, and reducing the generational gap that exists with regards to the ICT sector;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 192 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Emphasises the fact that the rapid diffusion of smartphones and increasing internet access amongst children, girls and women represents, on the one hand, an optimum source of emancipation and knowledge, but on the other hand poses the risk that these tools will be used to expose girls to harmful sexist insults (that are, in some cases, difficult to erase) and blackmail, with so-called revenge porn being one outcome of this; highlights therefore the need to increase measures to protect women and girls from cyber abuse;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 201 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24 a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to promote free and anonymous support services with female staff that can be accessed via the internet and/or by telephone, available to women who become trapped in a web of online grooming and are blackmailed and forced to suffer violence and abuse, scarring them for the rest of their lives;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 217 #

2015/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26 a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to tighten monitoring of internet grooming by terrorist groups which recruit young women and force them into marriage or prostitution in third countries;
2015/12/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 32 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Member States to use existing EU-level funding resources to support initiatives pursuing links with businesses and offering entrepreneurship education to low-income young peopleso as to encourage young people to develop creativity, initiative and a sense of responsibility, ensuring that they have the necessary knowledge and abilities to start up and manage new businesses; calls on the Member States also to offer entrepreneurship education and business culture to young people, especially those in the low-income bracket, school dropouts, young people in danger of long-term unemployment and young people with disabilities;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Member States to be proactive in simplifying the regulatory frameworks of social businesses, promote them and monitor the quality of the employment practices of such businesses and promote socially responsible practices in traditional businesses in a bid to increase youth employment;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Member States to offer micro-scholarships and micro-loans schemes to innovative students in secondary and tertiary education respectively in order to start their own ventures or projects;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Member States to improve the entrepreneurial culture within tertiary education by establishing the conditions to support the creation of new companies based on academic research (spin-offs), reducing the bureaucratic burden involved in establishing such companies and promoting the benefits of commercialising research; in this context, schools and universities should provide the time, space and recognition for initiatives by young people so as to give them the necessary confidence to undertake new projects that may in time prove useful for setting up independent businesses;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 232 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Citation 1 a (new)
Having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in particular Articles 21 and 26 thereof,
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 244 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Due to the differences in national accessibility requirements, individual professionals, SMEs and micro-enterprises in particular are discouraged from entering into business ventures outside their own domestic markets. The national, or even regional or local, accessibility requirements that Member States have put in place currently differ as regards both coverage and level of detail. Those differences negatively affect competitiveness and growtheconomic development, due to the additional costs incurred in the development and marketing of accessible products and services for each national market.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 270 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) In some situations, cthe accessibility of the built environment is a prerequisite for persons with disabilities, to enable them to actually be able to use the related services. Common accessibility requirements of the built environment would facilitate the free movement of the related services and of persons with disabilities. Therefore, this Directive enables Member States to includes the built environment used in the provision of the services under the scope of this Directive, ensuring compliance with the accessibility requirements set in Annex X.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 280 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
(26) Most jobs in the Union are provided by SMEs and micro-enterprises. They have a crucial importance for future growtheconomic development, but very often face hurdles and obstacles in developing their products or services, notably in the cross- border context. It is therefore necessary to facilitate the work of the SMEs and micro- enterprises by harmonising the national provisions on accessibility while maintaining the necessary safeguards.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 283 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) The manufacturer havingsupplies detailed knowledge of the design and production process is best placed to carry out, assisting in the implementation of the complete conformity assessment procedure. The obligations for conformity assessment should rest with the manufacturerrelevant market surveillance authority, in cooperation with the organisations representing persons with disabilities.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 284 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
(32) Importers should ensure that products from third countries entering the Union market comply with the accessibility requirements of this Directive and in particular that, providing all the necessary information to the relevant market surveillance authority to enable appropriate conformity assessment procedures haveto been carried out by manufacturers with regard to those products.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 293 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 50
(50) A safeguard procedure should be set up which applies only in the event of disagreement between Member States over measures taken by a Member State under which interested parties are informed of measures intended to be taken with regard to products not complying with the accessibility requirements of this Directive. It should allow market surveillance authorities, in cooperation with organisations representing persons with disabilities and the relevant economic operators, to act at an earlier stage in respect of such products.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 299 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii a (new)
(iiia) payment terminals;
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 346 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The following self-service terminals: Automatic Teller Machines, ticketing machines and, check-in machines and payment terminals shall comply with the requirements set out in Section II of Annex I.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 365 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 10
10. Member States may decide, in the light of national conditions,shall ensure that the built environment used by clients of passenger transport services, including the environment that is managed by service providers and by infrastructure operators as well as the built environment used by clients of banking services, and customer services centres and shops under the scope of telephony operators shall, complyies with the accessibility requirements of Annex I, section X, in order to maximise theirits use by persons with functional limitations, including persons with disabilities.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 371 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 9
9. Manufacturers shall, further to a reasoned request from a provide the competent national authority, provide it with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of the product, in a language which can be easily understood by that authority. They shall cooperate with that authority, at its request, on any action taken to eliminate the risks posed by products which they have placed on the market and to ensure compliance with the requirements referred to in Article 3.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 372 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) further to a reasoned request from a competent national authority, provide thatprovide a competent national authority with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of a product;
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 373 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 9
9. Importers shall, further to a reasoned request from a provide the competent national authority, provide it with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of a product in a language which can be easily understood by that authority. They shall cooperate with that authority, at its request, on any action taken to eliminate the risks posed by products which they have placed on the market.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 374 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6
6. Distributors shall, further to a reasoned request from a provide the competent national authority, provide it with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of a product. They shall cooperate with that authority, at its request, on any action taken to eliminate the risks posed by products which they have made available on the market.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 376 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. Service providers shall, further to a reasoned request from a competent authority, provide it provide the competent national authority with all information necessary to demonstrate the conformity of the service with the accessibility requirements referred to in Article 3. They shall cooperate with those authorities, at their request, on any action taken to bring the service in conformity with those requirements.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 388 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 5
5. The assessment of whether compliance with accessibility requirements regarding products or services imposes a fundamental alteration or disproportionate burden shall be performed by the economic operatorrelevant market surveillance authority, which, in cooperation with organisations representing people with disabilities, shall apply a time-bound procedure and clear- cut benchmarks for the assessment.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 406 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States, in cooperation with organisations representing people with disabilities, shall establish, implement and periodically update adequate procedures in order to:
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 411 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Where, on completion of the procedure set out in Article 19(3) and (4), objections are raised against a measure taken by a Member State, or where the Commission considers a national measure to be contrary to Union legislation, the Commission shall without delay enter into consultation with the Member States, organisations representing people with disabilities, and the relevant economic operator or operators and shall evaluate the national measure. On the basis of the results of that evaluation, the Commission shall decide whether the national measure is justified or not.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 430 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. They shall apply those provisions fprom [… insert date -gressively, in step with the life cycle of a product or service, and, in any event, no later than six years after the entry into force of this Directive].
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 5 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Olive oil is Tunisia’s main agricultural export product to the European Union and the olive oil industry is an important part of the country’s economyhas varying impacts on the markets of individual Member States, and the olive oil industry is an important part of both Tunisia’s economy and that of the European Union.
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 8 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) The Union can best support Tunisia’s economy, in accordance with the objectives set out in the European Neighbourhood Policy and in the Euro- Mediterranean Agreement, by providing an attractive and reliable market for Tunisia’s exports of olive oil. This requires autonomous trade measures allowing for the import of this product into the Union on the bas, which is already in plentiful supply. In order to preserve this balance it is not desirable to abolish ofr a duty free tariff quotamend the current customs regime.
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) In their Decision No 534/2014/EU1a, the European Parliament and the Council have already granted EUR 300 million to the Republic of Tunisia. _______________ 1a Decision No 534/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 providing macro- financial assistance to the Republic of Tunisia (OJ L 151, 21.5.2014, p. 9)
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) In order to prevent fraud, the envisioned autonomous trade measures should be subject to compliance by Tunisia with the Union’s relevant rules regarding the origin of products and the procedures related thereto, including the mandatory requirement for clear labelling of origin and product classification, as well as to Tunisia’s effective administrative cooperation with the Union.
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 20 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The specific autonomous trade measures established by this Regulation are intended to alleviate the difficult economic situation, which Tunisia is currently facing, due to the terrorist attacks. Those measures should, without damaging the European agricultural sector. The new quota will include a substantially increased tariff concession and the measures concerned are therefore be limited in time and be without prejudice tocannot serve as a precedent in the negotiations between the Union and Tunisia on the establishment of a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), which are to started in October 2015. An extension of the application period may be contemplated at the end of this period if warranted by the market situation or progress in the DCFTA negotiations.
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) In view of the severe damage done to Tunisia’s economy, and in particular its tourism sector, by the terrorist attack in Sousse on 26 June 2015, and the need to take measures to alleviate Tunisia’s economic situation in the short term, it was considered to be appropriate to provide for an exception to the eight-week period referred to in Article 4 of Protocol No 1 on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union, annexed to the Treaty on European Union, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,deleted
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 27 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) In a spirit of collaboration between institutions, civil society and producers, the Union institutions should commit to more closely involve stakeholders through consultation in order to monitor the impact of these measures;
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
An annual duty free tariff quota of 35 000 tons is opened for imports into the Union of virgin olive oil originating in Tunisia and falling within CN codes 1509 10 10 and 1509 10 90, wholly obtained in Tunisia and transported directly from Tunisia to the Union.
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 35 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Entitlement to the benefit of the import tariff quota referred to in Article 1 of this Regulation shall be subject to compliance by Tunisia with the sanitary and phytosanitary conditions laid down by the Union, with the rules regarding the origin of products and with the procedures related thereto, provided for in Protocol No 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement.
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 36 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
The annual tariff quota referred to in Article 1 of this Regulation shall be made available only after the exhaustion of the volume of the annual olive oil duty free tariff rate quota provided for in Article 3(1) of Protocol 1 to the Euro- Mediterranean Agreement.deleted
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 37 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
The annual tariff quota referred to in Article 1 of this Regulation shall be made available only after the exhaustion of the volume of the annual olive oil duty free tariff rate quota provided for in Article 3(1) of Protocol 1 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement, subject to an assessment of the Union olive oil market in order to anticipate possible compensatory measures for Union producers.
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 40 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall administer the tariff rate quota in accordance with Article 184 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 and by establishing monthly import licences to be issued in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1918/2006.
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Where the Commission finds that there is sufficient evidence of a failure by Tunisia to comply with the conditions set out in Article 2, it may adopt an implementing act suspending in whole or in partentirely the preferential arrangements provided for in Article 1. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 6(2).
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 47 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5a Impact assessment The Commission shall carry out an impact assessment of the new tariff quota before presenting any proposal for extension of this Regulation’s application period. The impact assessment shall be forwarded to the European Parliament, the Member States and the Council and shall be made public.
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 51 #

2015/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from 1 January 2016 until 31 December 20176.
2015/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2015/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 was adopted with the objective of eliminating obstacles to the functioning of the internal market due to differences in national measures regulating trade in seal products. Those measures were adopted in response to public moral concerns about the animal welfare aspects of the killing of seals and the possible presence on the market of products obtained from animals killed in a way that causes excessivby using cruel practices which cause pain, distress, fear and other forms of suffering. Such concerns were supported by scientific evidence showing that of a sample of seals killed by hunters, some 42% were skinned alive and a further 40% were repeatedly beaten before dying. These studies therefore prove that a genuinely humane killing method cannot be consistently and effectively applied and enforced in the specific conditions in which seal hunting takes place. In order to achieve that objective, Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 introduced, as a general rule, a prohibition of placing on the market of seal products. __________________ 2 Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on trade in seal products (OJ L 286, 31.10.2009, p 36).
2015/04/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2015/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) At the same time, seal hunting is an integral part of the culture and identity of the Inuit and other indigenous communities and makes a major contribution to their subsistence. For those reasons, seal hunts traditionally conducted by Inuit and other indigenous communities do not raise the sam, if prohibited during reproduction periods and carried out with the sole aim of supporting communities in a sustainable way, mitigate the public moral concerns as therelating to hunts conducted primarily for commercial purposes. Moreover, it is broadly recognised that the fundamental and social interests of Inuit and other indigenous communities should not be adversely affected, in accordance with United Nations Declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples and other relevant international instruments. For those reasons, by way of exception, Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 allows the placing on the market of seal products which result from hunts traditionally conducted by Inuit and other indigenous communities and which contribute to their subsistence.
2015/04/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2015/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) In order to enable the subsistence of the Inuit people and indigenous communities the Union should promote alternatives to hunting for the benefit of the conservation and management of marine resources as part of its development policy.
2015/04/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 25 #

2015/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) A genuinely humane killing method cannot be effectively and consistently applied in the hunts conducted by the Inuit and other indigenous communities, just like in the other seal hunts. Nonetheless, it is appropriate, in light of the objective pursued by Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009, to make the placing in the Union market of products resulting exclusively from hunts by the Inuit and other indigenous communities conditional upon those hunts being conducted in a sustainable manner which reduces pain, distress, fear or other forms of suffering of the animals hunted to the extent possible, while having regard to the traditional way of life and the subsistence needs of the Inuit and other indigenous communities. T. It would be appropriate for the exception granted in respect of seal products resulting from hunts conducted by Inuit and other indigenous communities shouldto be limited to hunts that contribute solely to the subsistence need of those communities and are therefore not conducted primariurely for commercial purposes. Thus, the Commission should be enabled to limit, if necessary, the quantity of seal products placed on the market under that exception in order to prevent the use of the exception by products resulting from hunts which are conducted primarily for commercial purposes.
2015/04/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 28 #

2015/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009No exemption should be granted which also allows, by way of exception, the placing on the market of seal products where the hunt is conducted with the sole purpose of sustainable management of marine resources. While recognizing the importance of hunts for the purpose of sustainable management of marine resources, in practice, however, these hunts may be difficult to distinguish from the large hunts conducted primarily for commercial purposes. This may lead to unjustified discrimination between the seal products concerned. Therefore, this exception should no longer be provided for. This is without prejudice to the right of Member States to continue regulating hunts conducted for the purposes of management of marine resources.
2015/04/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 34 #

2015/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
1. The placing on the market of seal products shall be allowed only where the seal products result exclusively from hunts conducted by Inuit and other indigenous communities, provided that the following conditions are all satisfied:
2015/04/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 36 #

2015/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the hunt has been traditionally been conducted by the community for its subsistence;
2015/04/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 40 #

2015/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the hunt contributes to the subsistence of the community and is not conducted primariurely for commercial reasons;
2015/04/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 42 #

2015/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) hunting is prohibited during reproduction periods and until weaning;
2015/04/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2015/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) the hunt is conducted in a manner which reduces pain, distress, fear or other forms of suffering of the animals hunted to the extent possible taking into consideration the traditional way of life and the subsistence needs of the community.
2015/04/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 49 #

2015/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1
1a. The Commission shall draw up an economic and environmental impact assessment in which it defines the impact this Regulation is having on the economic and social subsistence of the Inuit and other indigenous communities, evaluates its implementation and any infringements and, in the event of any negative effects, decides whether to develop economic conversion programmes in environmentally sustainable sectors such as tourism.
2015/04/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 25 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The economic and financial crisis has led to a lowering of the level of investments within the Union. Investment has fallen by approximately 15% since its peak in 2007. The Union suffers in particular from a lack of investment as a consequence of market uncertainty regarding the economic future and the fiscal constraints on Member States. This lack of investment slowsacts as a brake on economic recovery and negatively affects job creation, long-term growth prospects and , competitiveness and the scompetitiveness. for maintaining an adequate social safety net, which in some Member States has led to absolute poverty.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) The European fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) will be based on existing EU resources and will not raise public "fresh" money, apart from an extra EUR 5 billion from EIB.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Comprehensive action is required to reverse the vicious circle created by a lack of investment. Structural reforms and fiscal responsibility are necessary preconditions forIn order to stimulatinge investment. Along with a renewed impetus towards investment financing, these preconditions can contribute, it is necessary to take measures which can help to establishing a virtuous circle, where investment projects help support long-term, high-quality employment and demand and, leading to a sustained increase in growth potential.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) social investments are needed in order to face the economic stagnation, deflation and high unemployment in the EU, namely investments in people, providing them with skills and supporting conditions for the creation of sustainable, inclusive and quality jobs.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Throughout the economic and financial crisis, which persists to this day in many Member States, the Union has made effortssought to promote growth, in particular through initiatives set out in the Europe 2020 strategy that put in place an approach for smart, sustainable and inclusive growthwhose goals in terms of combating unemployment and poverty have not yet been attained. The European Investment Bank ('EIB') has also sought to strengthened its role in instigating and promoting investment within the Union, partly by way of an increase in capital in January 2013, but has allocated only insubstantial resources to micro enterprises and SMEs. Further action is required to ensure that the investment needs of the Union are addressed and that the liquidity available on the market is used efficiently and channelled towards the funding of viable investment projecteconomically and environmentally viable investment projects with the emphasis on start-ups with innovative projects and micro enterprises.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) smaller scale projects do not only generate financial returns but promote also social spill-overs creating the conditions for sustainable, inclusive and environmentally friendly growth.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) The European Council on 18 December 2014 concluded that "fostering investment and addressing market failure in Europe is a key policy challenge" and that "The new focus on investment, coupled with Member States' commitment to intensifying structural reforms and to pursuing growth-friendly fiscal consolidation, will provide the foundation for growth and jobs in Europe and calls for setting upalled for ‘the setting-up of a European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) in the EIB Group with the aim to mobilise 315 billion euro in new investments between 2015 and 2017".
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The investment environment within the Union shouldmust be improved by removing barriers to investment, reinforcing the Single Market and by enhancing regulatory predictabilicertainty. The work of the EFSI, and investments across Europe generally, should benefit from this accompanying work.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The purpose of the EFSI shouldmust be to help resolve the difficulties in financing and implementing productive investments in the Union and to ensure increased access to financing. It is intended that increased access to financing shouldmust be of particular benefit to small and, medium enterprises. It is also appropriate to extend the benefit of such increased access to financing toand micro enterprises, as well as mid- cap companies, which are companies having up to 3000 employees. Overcoming Europe's current investment difficulties shouldmust contribute to strengthening the Union's economic, social and territorial cohesion.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The EFSI shouldmust support strategic investments with high economic and social value added contributing to achieving Union policy objectives, guaranteeing high-quality employment and adequate levels of social protection, which will be attained by supporting small, medium and micro enterprises and young start-ups which submit innovative projects that cannot always be financed using the funds currently available.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Many small, medium and mediumicro enterprises, as well as mid-cap companies, across the Union require assistance to attract market financing, especially as regards investments that carry a greater degree of risk. The EFSI shouldmust help these businesses to overcome capital shortages by allowing the EIB and the European Investment Fund ('EIF') to provide direct and indirect equity injections, as well as to provide guarantees for high-quality securitisation of loans, and other products that are granted in pursuit of the aims of the EFSI.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The EFSI should be established within the EIB in order to benefit from its experience and proven track record and in order for its operations to start to have a positive impact as quickly as possible. The work of the EFSI on providing finance to small, medium and mediumicro enterprises and small mid-cap companies should be channelled through the European Investment Fund ('EIF') to benefit from its experience in these activities.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The EFSI shouldmust target projects delivering high societal and economic value. In particular, the EFSI should target projects that promote high-quality job creation, inclusive long- term growth and, competitiveness and social inclusion. The EFSI should support a wide range of financial products, including equity, debt or guarantees, to best accommodate the needs of the individual project. This wide range of products should allow the EFSI to adapt to market needs whilst encouraging private investment in the projects. The EFSI should not be a substitute for private market finance but should instead catalyse private finance by addressing market failures so as to ensure the most effective and strategic use of public money. The requirement for consistency with State aid principles should contribute to such effective and strategic use.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) The EFSI should target projects with a higher risk-return profile than existing EIB and Union instruments to ensure additionality over existing operations. The EFSI should finance projects across the Union, includingparticularly in the countries most affected by the financial crisis. The EFSI should only be used where financing is not available from other sources on reasonfavourable terms.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 136 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The EFSI should target investments that are expected to be economically, socially and environmentally sustainable and technically viable, which may in some cases entail a high degree of appropriate risk, whilst still meeting the particular requirements for EFSI financing.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 150 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Decisions on the use of the EFSI support for infrastructure and large mid- cap projects should be made transparently by an Investment Committee. The Investment Committee shouldmust be composed of independent experts who have been appropriately selected in accordance with the principle of accountability and are knowledgeable and experienced in the areas of investment projects. The Investment Committee should be accountable to a Steering Board of the EFSI, who should supervise the fulfilment of the EFSI's objectives. To effectively benefit from the experience of the EIF, the EFSI should support funding to the EIF to allow the EIF to undertake individual projects in the areas of small, medium and mediumicro enterprises and small mid-cap companies.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) Provided that all relevant eligibility criteria are fulfilled, Member States may use European Structural Investment Funds to contribute to the financing of eligible projects that are supported by the EU guarantee. The flexibility of this approach should maximise the potential to attract investors to the areas of investment targeted by the EFSI.deleted
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) In accordance with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Infrastructure and project investments supported under EFSI shouldmust be consistent with State aid rules. To that end, the Commission has announced that it will formulate a set of core principles, for the purpose of State aid assessments, which a project will have to meet to be eligible for support under the EFSI. If a project meets these criteria and receives support from the EFSI, the Commission has announced that any national complementary support, will be assessed under a simplified and accelerated State aid assessment whereby the only additional issue to be verified by the Commission will be the proportionality of public support (absence of overcompensation). The Commission has also announced that it will provide further guidance on the set of core principles with a view to ensuring an efficient use of public funds.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 169 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) Given the need for urgent action within the Union, the EIB and the EIF may have financed additional projects, outside of their usual profile, in the course of 2015 before the entry into force of this Regulation. In order to maximise the benefit of the measures provided for in this Regulation, it shouldmust be possible for such additional projects to be included within the EU guarantee coverage in the event that they fulfil the substantive criteria set out in this Regulation.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) EIB financing and investment operations supported by the EFSI shouldmust be managed in accordance with the EIB’s own rules and procedures, which must be transparent and generally endorsed, including appropriate and reliable control measures and measures taken to avoid tax evasion, as well as with the relevant rules and procedures concerning the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and the Court of Auditors, including the Tripartite agreement between the European Commission, the European Court of Auditors and the European Investment Bank.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 174 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) The EIB should regularlymust, at predetermined regular intervals, evaluate activities supported by the EFSI with a view to assessing their relevance, performance and impact and to identifying aspects that could improve future activities. Such evaluations shoulmust necessarily be published and contribute to accountability and analysis of sustainability.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 181 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) Alongside the financing operations that will be conducted through the EFSI, a European Investment Advisory Hub ('EIAH') shouldmust be created. The EIAH should provide strengthened support for project development and preparation across the Union, by building on the expertise of the Commission, the EIB, national promotional banks and the managing authorities of the European Structural and Investment Funds. This should establish a single point of entry for questions related to technical assistance for investments within the Union. It must be transparent and independent.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 182 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) The guarantee fund is intended to provide a liquidity cushion for the Union budget against losses incurred by the EFSI in pursuit of its objectives. Experience on the nature of investments to be supported by the EFSI indicates that a ratio of 50% between the payments from the Union budget and from the Union's total guarantee obligations would be adequate.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) To partially finance the contribution from the Union budget, the available envelopes of the Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2014-2020, provided by Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council2, and the Connecting Europe Facility, provided by Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council3, should be reduced. Those programmes serve purposes that are not replicated by the EFSI. However, the reduction of both programmes to finance the guarantee fund is expected to ensure a greater investment in certain areas of their respective mandates than is possible through the existing programmes. The EFSI should be able to leverage the EU guarantee to multiply the financial effect within those areas of research, development and innovation and transport, telecommunications and energy infrastructure compared to if the resources had been spent via grants within the planned Horizon 2020 and Connecting Europe Facility programmes. It is, therefore, appropriate to redirect part of the funding presently envisaged for those programmes to the benefit of EFSI. __________________ 2 Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing Horizon 2020 - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) and repealing Decision No 1982/2006/EC (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 104). 3Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Connecting Europe Facility, amending Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 680/2007 and (EC) No 67/2010 (OJ L 348, 20.12.2013, p. 129).deleted
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) Within the Union, there are a significant number of potentially viable projects that are not being financed due to a lack of certainty and transparency with respect to such projects. Often, this is because private investors are not aware of the projects or have insufficient information to make an assessment of the investment risks. The Commission and the EIB, with support from the Member States, which should supply appropriate information about projects that could potentially receive support, must promote the creation of a transparent pipeline of current and future investment projects in the Union suitable for investment. This 'project pipeline' shouldmust ensure that information is made publicly available regarding investment projects on a regular and structured basis to ensure that investors have reliable information on which to base their investment decisions.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) Member States have also begun work at national level on establishing and promoting project pipelines for projects of national significance. The information prepared by the Commission and the EIB shouldmust provide links to the accompanying national project pipelines.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 195 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) Although the projects identified under the project pipeline may be used by the EIB in the identification and selection of EFSI supported projects, the project pipeline should have a broader scope of identifying projects across the Union. This scope may include projects that are capable of being fully financed by the private sector or with the assistance of other instruments provided at European or national level. The EFSI shouldmust be able to support financing and investment to projects identified by the project pipeline, but there should be no automaticity between inclusion on the list and access to EFSI support and the EFSI be conferred with discretion to select and support projects that are not included on the list.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 199 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) To ensure accountability to European citizens, the EIB shouldmust regularly report to the European Parliament and the Council on the progress and impact of the EFSI.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 200 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34 a (new)
(34a) Union citizens and national members authorities should be aware of the activities and funds allocated from the EFSI, stresses the need for transparency and public disclosure of documents to be guaranteed.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 201 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) In order to ensure an appropriate coverage of the EU guarantee obligations and to ensure the continued availability of the EU guarantee, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission with respect to the adjustment of the amounts to be paid in from the general budget of the Union and to amend Annex I accordingly. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Counciit is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 203 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely to support investments in the Union and to ensure increased access to financing for companies having up to 3000 employeesmall, medium and micro enterprises and companies having up to 3000 employees, innovative start-ups and high-risk projects, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States by reason of the disparities in their fiscal capacity to act but can rather, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives,
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 210 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The purpose of the EFSI shall be to support public and private investments in the Union and to ensure increased access to financing for companies having up to 3000 employees, with a particular focus on small and medium enterprises, through the supply of risk bearing capacity to the EIB ('EFSI Agreement')small, medium and micro enterprises, in addition to those having up to 3000 employees, innovative start-ups and high-risk projects. One of the main objectives of the EFSI shall be to promote and ensure sustainable, inclusive and long-term growth, the creation of quality jobs and social inclusion in the European Union.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 219 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. If a Member State intends to contribute to the EFSI budget, it must be given the guarantee that the funds paid will be earmarked for projects concerning its national territory.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 222 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
The EFSI Agreement shall provide that remuneration attributable to the Union from EFSI supported operations shall be provided following the deduction of payments due to calls on the EU guarantee and, subsequently, costs in accordance with the third subparagraph of paragraph 2 and with Article 5(3).deleted
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 226 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. The EFSI Agreement shall provide for the creation of a European Investment Advisory Hub ('EIAH') within the EIB. This Hub must be transparent and independent. The EIAH shall have as its objective to build upon existing EIB and Commission advisory services in order to provide advisory support for investment project identification, preparation and development and act as a single technical advisory hub for project financing within the Union. This shall include support on the use of technical assistance for project structuring, use of innovative financial instruments, use of public-private partnerships and advice, as appropriate, on relevant issues of EU legislation.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. Member States that become parties to the EFSI Agreement shall be able to provide their contribution, in particular, in the form of cash or a guarantee acceptable to the EIB. Other third parties shall be able to provide their contribution only in cash.deleted
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 237 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The EFSI Agreement shall provide that the EFSI shall be governed by a Steering Board, which shall determine the strategic orientation, the strategic asset allocation and operating policies and procedures, including the investment policy of projects that EFSI can support and the risk profile of the EFSI, in conformity with the objectives under Article 5(2). The Steering Board shall elect one of its members to be Chairperson. This Steering Board must be unequivocally transparent, independent and democratic.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 243 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. For as long as the only contributors to the EFSI are the Union and the EIB, the number of members and votes within the Steering Board shall be allocated based on the respective size of contributions in the form of cash or guarantees. Steering Board members from the Commission shall include representatives with proven expertise in employment and social policies.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 249 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
No decision of the Steering Board shall be adopted if the Commission or the EIB votes against it.deleted
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 255 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
The Managing Director and the Deputy Managing Director shall be appointed by the Steering Board on a joint proposal of the Commission and the EIB for a renewable, subject to the prior binding opinion of the European Parliament, in accordance with principles of transparency, independence and democracy, for a fixed term of three years.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 266 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The Investment Committee shall be composed of six independent expertsexperts elected on the basis of principles of transparency, independence, competence and democracy, and the Managing Director. Independent experts shall have a high level of relevant market experience in project finance and be appointed by the Steering Board for a renewable fixed term of three years. A specialist in social policies shall be appointed among the independent experts of the Investment Committee. This expert shall be responsible for assessing the social impact of the projects submitted to ensure that the projects that are funded support EU objectives.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 278 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
2. The EU guarantee shall be granted for EIB financing and investment operations approved by the Investment Committee referred to in Article 3(5) or funding to the EIF in order to conduct EIB financing and investment operations in accordance with Article 7(2). The operations concerned shall be consistent with Union policies, contribute to achieving the objectives of EU2020 and support any of the following general objectives:
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 291 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) providing financial support for the companiessmall, medium and micro enterprises, in addition to those having up to 3000 employees, innovative start-ups and high- risk projects, referred to in Article 1(1), including working capital risk financing.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 307 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
3. In accordance with Article 17 of the Statute of the European Investment Bank, the EIB shall charge the beneficiaries of the financing operations to cover its expenses related to the EFSI. Without prejudice to sub-paragraph 2 and 3, nNo administrative expenditure or any other fees of the EIB for financing and investment activities conducted by the EIB under this Regulation shall be covered from the Union budget.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 308 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Provided that all relevant eligibility criteria are fulfilled, Member States may use European Structural and Investment Funds to contribute to the financing of eligible projects in which the EIB is investing with the support of the EU guarantee.deleted
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 312 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The resources of the guarantee fund provided to it under paragraph 2 shall be directly managed by the Commission, subject to the prior binding opinion of the European Parliament, and invested in accordance with the principle of sound financial management and follow appropriate prudential rules.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 313 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 17 adjusting the target amount provided for in paragraph 5 by a maximum of 10% to better reflect the potential risk of the EU guarantee being called.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 317 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission and the EIB, with support from the Member States and of the European Parliament,, shall promote the creation of a transparent pipeline of current and potential future investment projects in the Union. The pipeline is without prejudice to the final projects selected for support according to Article 3(5).
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 320 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission and the EIB shall develop, update and disseminate, on a regular and, structured and transparent basis, information on current and future investments which significantly contribute to achieving EU policy objectives.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 324 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall develop, update and disseminate, on a regular and, structured and transparent basis, information on current and future investment projects in their territory.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 327 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. The EIB, in cooperation with the EIF as appropriate, shall report semi-annually to the Commission on EIB financing and investment operations under this Regulation. The report shall include an assessment of compliance with the requirements on the use of the EU guarantee and the key performance indicators established pursuant to Article 2(1)(g). The report shall also include statistical, financial and accounting data on each EIB financing and investment operation and on an aggregated basis. The report shall be drawn up in accordance with the principles of transparency, independence and sharing.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 328 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The EIB, in cooperation with the EIF as appropriate, shall report annuallyevery six months to the European Parliament and to the Council on EIB financing and investment operations. The report shall be made public and include:
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 339 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(fa) an assessment of the contribution to the Union's social objectives, in particular regarding quality job creation and the Europe 2020 Strategy targets for employment, education and poverty reduction.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 341 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. For the purposes of the Commission's accounting and reporting of the risks covered by the EU guarantee and management of the guarantee fund, the EIB, in cooperation with the EIF as appropriate, shall provide the Commission every year:
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 342 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. The EIB shall provide to the Commission upon requesand the European Parliament any additional information necessary to fulfil the Commission's obligations in relation to this Regulation.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 343 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. The EIB, and EIF as appropriate, shall provide the information referred to in paragraphs 1 to 4 at their own expense.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 345 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. At the request of tThe European Parliament, shall ask the Managing Director shallto participate in a hearing of the European Parliament on the performance of the EFSI.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 346 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The Managing Director shall reply orally or in writing to questions addressed to the EFSI by the European Parliament, in any event within five weeks of receipt of a question.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 347 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. At the request of the European Parliament, tThe Commission shall report to the European Parliament on the application of this Regulation.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 348 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
At the latest [PO insert date: 182 months after the entry into force of this Regulation] the EIB shall evaluate the functioning of the EFSI. The EIB shall submit its evaluation to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission; and shall review it every two years.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 349 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
At the latest [PO insert date: 182 months after the entry into force of this Regulation] the Commission shall evaluate the use of the EU guarantee and the functioning of the guarantee fund, including the use of endowments according to Article 8(9). The Commission shall submit its evaluation to the European Parliament and the Council and shall review it every two years.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 350 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. By 30 JuneDecember 20187 and every threewo years thereafter:
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 352 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
3. The EIB, in cooperation with the EIF as appropriate, shall contribute to and provide the necessary information for the Commission evaluation and report under paragraph 1 and 2 respectively.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 353 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
4. The EIB and EIF shall on a regular basis, in accordance with the timetable laid down in this Regulation, provide the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission with all their independent evaluation reports which assess the practical results achieved by the specific activities of the EIB and EIF under this Regulation.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 355 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 5
5. At the latest [PO insert date threewo years after the entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Regulation accompanied by any relevant proposal.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 356 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
In accordance with its own transparency policies on access to documents and information, the EIB shall make publicly available on its website up-to-date information relating to all EIBeach individual financing and investment operations and how ithey contributes to the general objectives referred to in Article 5(2).
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 357 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The EIB shall provide up-dated information on its website on the total expected cost of each project and of the cost of it so far, of the names of the economic operators involved in each project and of the funds allocated to them as well as information on the expected return from each project, contributing to the general objectives referred to in Article 5 (2) and an evaluation of this return compared to the most up-dated data.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 358 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. The EIB shall notify OLAF promptly and provide it with the necessary information when, at any stage of the preparation, implementation or closure of operations subject to the EU guarantee, it has grounds to suspect that there is a potential case of fraud, corruption, money laundering or any other illegal activity that may affect the financial interests of the Union.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 359 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
OLAF mayshall carry out investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections, in accordance with the provisions and procedures laid down in Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council5(5), Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/966(6) and Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/957 (7) in order to protect the financial interests of the Union, with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption, money laundering or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union in connection with any operations supported by the EU guarantee. OLAF mayshall transmit to the competent authorities of the Member States concerned information obtained in the course of investigations. __________________ 5 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 September 2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999 (OJ L 248, 18.9.2013, p. 1). 6 Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities' financial interests against fraud and other irregularities (OJ L 292, 15.11.1996, p. 2). 7 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 1).
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 360 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Where such illegal activities are proven, the EIB shall undertake any recovery efforts with respect to its operations supported by the EU guarantee.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 361 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. Financing agreements signed in relation to operations supported under this Regulation shall include clauses allowing exclusion from EIB financing and investment operations and, if necessary, appropriate recovery measures in cases of fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity in accordance with the EFSI Agreement, EIB policies and applicable regulatory requirements. The decision whether to apply an exclusion from the EIB financing and investment operation shall be taken in accordance with the relevant financing or investment agreement.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 364 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Articleonly after its limited and defined remit has been established unequivocally.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 365 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 8(6) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of threone years from the entry into force of this Regulation. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the three-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of eachone-year period.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 366 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4
4. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneousmediately to the European Parliament and to the Council.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 367 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 5
5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 8(6) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2015/0005(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) On 28 December, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted a law in respect of measures to stabilise the balance of payments of Ukraine in accordance with Article XII of the General Agreement on tariffs and trade 1994, which provides for the temporary increase of import duties by 5-10 % for 12 months having damaging effects on the unilateral trade preferences with the Union;
2015/02/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 19 #

2015/0005(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 23 a (new)
(23a) High levels of corruption among Ukraine's top officials represents a major obstacle for foreign investment in the country. The private business interests of Ukrainian oligarchs have been influential in policy-making processes, forcing SMEs out of the market.
2015/02/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2015/0005(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. The release of the Union's macro- financial assistance shall be managed by the Commission in a manner consistent with the agreements or understandings reached between the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Ukraine, and with the key principles and objectives of economic reforms set out in the EU- Ukraine Association Agreement, which requires that the preferential treatment granted to Ukraine is conditional upon Ukraine abstaining from introducing new duties, and the EU-Ukraine Association Agenda agreed under the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP). The Commission shall regularly inform the European Parliament and the Council of developments regarding the Union's macro-financial assistance, including disbursements thereof, and shall provide those institutions with the relevant documents in due time.
2015/02/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 26 #

2015/0005(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. A pre-condition for granting the Union's macro financial assistance shall be that Ukraine respects effective democratic mechanisms – including a multi-party parliamentary system and the implementation of the anti-corruption legislation as amended – and the rule of law, and guarantees respect for human rights.
2015/02/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 11 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
paragraph 1
1. Notes that many Member States still have large deficits and that there is a need, in this regard, considers the signs of slowdown that are arriving even from the German economy – which has been a driving force over the years – to be very dangerous; considers it necessary to develop fiscal responsibility programmes that are fully compatible with quality job creation, economic growth and welfare state sustainability; calls on the Commission, which has already received the national budget proposals for 2016, and within the framework of COM(2015)00121, to provide a flexible process of fiscal responsibility at national level that allows for the adoption of socially responsible and economically efficient policies aimed at decent job creation; __________________ 1 COM(2015)0012, ‘Making the best use of the flexibility within the existing rules of the SGP’.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Maintains that the current situation proves that EU austerity policies have failed utterly, given that the economic and social aims embodied in the Treaty have been disregarded; calls, therefore, for an immediate review of all rules imposing unreasonable fiscal constraints on Member States;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out, moreover, that the country- specific recommendations (CSR) should include a recommendation for a moratorium on mortgage payments and on current account debt for households and businesses in difficulty, a ban on distraining people’s first (main) homes and a reduction in the tax burden, especially in relation to the first (main) home;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. WelcomNotes the fostering of a European investment policy aimed at boosting growth and job creation; calls, therefore, for growth-enhancing measures to be taken into consideration, one possibility being to factor out investment in support of research and economic development, excluding it from calculation of the ratio of government deficit to gross domestic product under the Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure; considers it regrettable, however, that Parliament’s call3 to promote social investment not only in pursuit of financial profit but also with the aim of promoting a positive social impact has been neglected; stresses, in this regard, the need to implement forms of control and monitoring where investments are made, in order to address the problem of corruption; __________________ 3 Resolution of 11 March 2015 (Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0068), paragraphs 10 and 18.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Takes note of the recommendations on the need to move forward within new labour reforms, and calls for such reforms, if carried out, to guarantee social protection, social dialogue and to ensure necessary political consensus in order to be sustainable and effective; considers it regrettable that many labour reforms have not ensured the required balance between flexibility and security, resulting in, for example, the exclusion of millions of workers from collective bargaining; calls for labour reforms capable of reducing fragmentation, putting an end to insecurity and increasing the productivity and competitiveness of our economy while ensuring decent jobs and living wages through investment in human capital; stresses in this regard that in order to improve the quality of work, teleworking outside the main place of work should be promoted and working hours should be reduced whilst maintaining the same pay;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) have warned of the social (in-work poverty) and economic (depressed internal demand) problems caused by the wage devaluation that has occurred in recent years; stresses in this regard that pay increases are vital for boosting internal demand; considers it regrettable that there is no reference to the importance of increasing wages, especially in those countries where wages are below the poverty threshold; recalls that minimum wages differ substantially between Member States (Bulgaria EUR 184/month, Luxembourg EUR 1 923/month), and reiterates its request for a study4 on this issue; __________________ 4 Resolution of 11 March 2015 (Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0068), paragraphs 10 and 47.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that some labour reforms have introduced new contractual formulas that, according to the Commission, have increased precariousness in the labour markets; of particular concern are some Member States whose rates of temporary employment are over 90 % for new contracts, which particularly affects young people and women and which, according to the OECD1, is one of the direct causes of increasing inequality; calls on the Commission to check whether these reforms are in keeping with EU legislation on labour contracts; __________________ 1 OECD report ‘In it together: Why less inequality benefits all’, 21 May 2015.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take note of the IMF2 report on the causes and consequences of inequality, which states that the increase in the income gap is negatively affecting economic growth, development and the potential for job creation; calls for effective action on labour taxation, labour markets and redistributive policies to facilitate greater and upward economic and social convergence; points out that the tax burden should be shifted from labour to other forms of taxation that are less harmful to employment and growth; __________________ 2 IMF report ‘Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality: A Global Perspective’, June 2015.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that high rates in long-term unemployment in the EU, especially in some Member States, are resulting in an increasing number of workers losing their benefits before finding a new job; considers it regrettable that many Member States have limited access to such benefits or have reduced the amount available and/or the eligibility period for them; stresses the need to address the problem of skills mismatch and skills obsolescence as a mean to tackle long-term unemployment; considers it important to maintain a balance between adequate social protection and adequate incentives for active job searching; calls for a specific study on such incentives at EU level, and calls on the Member States to guarantee minimum income schemes to avoid pockets of social exclusion and ensure a minimum income to families;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the reduction in youth unemployment rates, but points out that they are still at alarming levels and not necessarily based on net job creation; stresses that job insecurity and underemployment have also risen and that 43 % of young people work in precarious conditions with involuntary part-time contracts or as bogus self-employed workers; notes the Commission decision to release EUR 1 billion as advance funding for the Youth Guarantee scheme, but stresses the absolute need to recommend that this resource be used effectively, in order to meet the genuine needs of young people; calls, moreover, for these funds to be carefully and continuously monitored;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Takes the view that fresh alternatives to bank financing are necessary, by investing in the development of innovative funding channels such as crowdfunding and microcredit;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Considers it regrettable that, although the Commission has acknowledged that ‘poverty and marginalisation have increased’5, there is no reference in the CSR to the fight against poverty, and that no comprehensive strategy to fight it has been prepared; __________________ 5to that end, points out that one of the goals of the EU 2020 strategy is to promote social inclusion by reducing poverty, aiming to lift at least 20 million people out of the risk of poverty and exclusion; considers it necessary, therefore, to step up efforts to achieve that goal; __________________ 5 COM(2015)0250 final. COM(2015)0250 final.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Stresses that while SMEs constitute the backbone of job creation in the Union, they continue to face major difficulties in gaining access to financing, and are worryingly over-indebted due also to the excessive fiscal pressure; stresses the importance of investments aiming to develop SMEs, microenterprises, innovative start-ups and business promoting green employment;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Regrets that the Commission has not included in the CSR the importance and the job potential of the green economy, which, according to the Commission estimates, could create five million jobs by 2020 in the energy efficiency and renewable energy sectors, provided that ambitious climate and energy policies are put in place;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the average number of children per woman in the EU is lower than the threshold of generation renewal, the economic crisis has been a factor in the reduction of the birth rate and life expectancy could grow by an additional five years by 2050;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Considers it essential that the initiatives launched as part of EY 2012 be followed up and transformed into a strong political commitment followed by concrete action to ensure social inclusion and the well-being of all generations, supporting appropriate working conditions and facilitating relations between social workers and social enterprises;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Strongly rejects the consideration of active ageing policies solely as an instrument to maintain the employability of older workers, and calls onurges the Member States to make all the necessary assessments before raising the mandatory pension age;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses the importance of encouraging the exchange of knowledge between generations and emphasises the need to implement fiscal, employment and social laws to facilitate the generational turnover: a 50% youth unemployment rate is indecent for any civilised country;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to study the worrying problem of unemployment among people over the age of 50 and, in conjunction with the Member States, to develop effective tools for reintegrating such workers into the labour market through the upgrading of skills and through policies that encourage lifelong learning, in addition to increasing public spending and implementing economic and statistical models for measuring the effectiveness of public investment at regional level;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve the targeting of funds for active ageing, together with the effectiveness of funds absorption; further calls onurges the Commission to explore the feasibility and added value of a new European financial instrument to address the problem of reintegrating dismissed middle-aged workers;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Commission to assess the feasibility and added value of a new EU financial instrument to provide a minimum income for all EU citizens below the poverty line;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 151 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Takes the view that older people should be a fully fledged part of society and that their participation in daily life should be supported; considers, furthermore, that it is vital to actively encourage a structured dialogue between young and elderly people should be actively encouraged, which would provide a mutual enrichment stemming from the different respective experiences, in order to create an optimal working environment and high-quality employability;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 183 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Stresses the importance of social enterprises that help to provide services for the elderly and look after their health and participation in society;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2014/2247(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the fact that, with effect from 20141, Regulation 1303/20131/EU contains new elements intended to help the disadvantaged: it makes it compulsory to dismantle institutions with large staff complements, and, in promoting social inclusion and combating poverty and all forms of discrimination, to switch from institutional services to community-based services, and incorporated marginalised communities, which may face growing challenges and increasingly lag behind other groups in a knowledge-based society, particularly in relation to education and training; notes furthermore that, in order to create appropriate forms of social inclusion, it is necessary to remove the causes of exclusion, such as the high rates of unemployment which cause poverty at every level, early school- leaving, and loss of skills which are needed to cope with the challenges presented by a constantly evolving labour market, which, in combination, do not permit cohesion of marginalised communities; __________________ 1 Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006.
2015/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2014/2247(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Draws the attention of Member States and the Commission to the fact that after 2020, even though there will be fewer and fewer people of working age, active inclusion policies will nonetheless be needed for these people and there will be ever greater competition for jobs, while the private sector will provide fewer and fewer jobs for those who are currently relatively low-skilled, which will require a new approach and not only long-term strategies but also short-term measures, such as forms of income support to prevent social exclusion of the most vulnerable groups, to facilitate relations between school, university and undertakings and to prevent permanent unemployment and a lasting increase in it, inter alia because of the high level of youth unemployment;
2015/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2014/2247(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Points out to the Commission that the services sector will undergo a significant transformation in the near future, primarily as a result of accelerating automation, but also because of the wider use of online tools and solutions, so that even jobs in which medium-skilled labour is employed will come under pressure, where at present people from marginalised groups find work; ; services, on the other hand, in seeking to provide appropriate forms of support, must retain their public connotation and be accessible for all, particularly the most vulnerable people; even jobs in which medium-skilled labour is employed will come under pressure, where at present people from marginalised groups find work, and it will therefore be necessary to provide increasing resources for training; where changes in forms of employment require retraining to develop new skills, everybody must be guaranteed the opportunities afforded by such education and training instruments, and access to them, with particular reference to marginalised groups;
2015/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2014/2247(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on Member States, while budgeting prudently and ensuring macroeconomic balanceand microeconomic balance, taking particular account of the social impact of economic measures, to provide more funding and to take effective, focused measures to ensure that disparities in development within geographical regions are not passed on in the form of social inequalities and inequalities of opportunity which already manifest themselves at the free primary and secondary education levels; nor should this be allowed to happen at later stages either, which must retain a connotation of quality and accessibility for all; nor should this be allowed to happen at later stages either; calls, therefore, for the use of funds to be monitored constantly in order to ensure that it is efficient, useful and produces good results.
2015/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas in its 2015 report the European Environment Agency has pointed out that current measures are insufficient to achieve aims related to biodiversity conservation, reduction in the use of fossil fuels, and combating climate change and averting its impact on human health and the environment;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas there are not enough incentives in the form of positive discrimination on the market for products and businesses with EU environmental certification and not enough economic advantages to be gained from green public procurement;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas according to the European Environment Agency, the green goods and services sector grew by more than 50% between 2000 and 2011, generating over 1.3 million jobs that have benefited the EU’s export balance and its economic competitiveness;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas soil protection to prevent and counteract hydrogeological instability is a sector that could absorb a substantial green labour force;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the Ecolabel, EMAS, GPP, and similar schemes help to create green jobs;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas SMEmicro, small, and medium- sized enterprises are important generators of employment and have led the way in many ‘green’ sectors, but may face particular difficulties in fulfilling the job potential of the transition;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas Eurobarometer data on green work in SMEs show that energy saving, waste reduction, and lowering raw material consumption are measures which have come to be economically advantageous;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Member States to encourage policies aimed at protecting and upgrading public buildings in order to increase energy efficiency and reduce consumption;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission to set up a data bank listing training courses, job offers, and best practice related to the promotion of green employment;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on Member States to integrate sustainable development, and environmental competences and skills, into training and education systems, by encouraging research centres to develop technologies, projects and patents for green products, in collaboration with new green companies; in this regard it would be advisable to encourage exchanges of ideas between research centres and networks of companies and professionals; recalls the importance of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) skills;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on the Member States to abolish direct and indirect subsidies for the production, storage, and distribution of fossil fuels;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 151 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Commission to honour its commitment to propose more ambitiou, as soon as possible, a revision of waste legislation to cover upstream reduction, design of goods for reuse and recycling, new recycling targets, and redefinition of the criteria for calculating the quantity of material actually recycled; this waste legislation thatshould makes full use of the significant job potential of the circular economy without delay; calls on the Commission, moreover, to consider introducing criteria to provide incentives for companies which have a virtuous and environmentally sustainable waste disposal cycle;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 192 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Calls on the Member States to invest part of the proceeds from auctions of ETS greenhouse gas emission allowances with a view to establishing policies to assist climate change adaptation and protect biodiversity and sensitive habitats and, in so doing, to generating green employment;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23b. Calls on Member States to introduce targeted subsidies and/or tax exemptions for the supply of goods and services that offer high environmental added value and for start-ups in particular;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 201 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Calls on the Commission to channel assistance from the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) towards micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises which invest in production systems or service provision that help to support the circular green economy;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 4 June 2013 on the Commission Communication 'Toward Social Investment for Growth and Cohesion - including implementing the European Social Fund 2014-2020';
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 8 March 2011 on reducing health inequalities in the EU;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
F a. whereas large families with a single income are more at risk of poverty and social exclusion, which is due to degrading wage policies and social protection systems as a consequence of the financial and economic crisis;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. Whereas there remain financial, administrative and other practical barriers to education for marginalised groups of children; and spending on education expenses, especially as regards school materials and transportation, is essentially borne by households in most countries;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. Whereas, even in countries where the right to health is enshrined in law, there are many children who do not have access to a family doctor or dentist, and some children that have extremely limited access to services beyond emergency care;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
K a. whereas the European Parliament endorses the European Commission Recommendation 'Investing in children: Breaking the Cycle of Disadvantage' which proposes a comprehensive policy framework for tackling child poverty and promoting child well-being based on three pillars of access to adequate resources; access to quality services; and children's participation in society and decision- making, and which recognises children as rights holders;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recommends that Member States increase the quantity, amounts, scope and effectiveness of the social support specifically directed to children, but also to parents (such as unemployment benefits) and to promote labour laws that guarantee social rights and security to families and fight precarious employment; and the phenomenon of the working poor; Considers as useful a combined strategy of direct and specific action on cases of extreme poverty, defining appropriate indicators and criteria to identify such cases, i.e. levels of income and access to basic necessities. A strategy should be implemented in individual Member States through the European Social Fund and national and regional resources earmarked for social policies and inclusion.
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recommends that Member States increase the quantity, amounts, scope and effectiveness of the social support specifically directed to children, but also to parents (such as unemployment benefitsa guaranteed minimum income) and to promote labour laws that guarantee social rights and security to families and effectively fight precarious employment; and undeclared work;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Recommends that Member States implement or enhance universal implement or enhance universal welfare benefits targeting children as welfare benefits targeting children as an intrinsic right of the child; an intrinsic right of the child, in particular focussing on specific cases in some Member States where child poverty levels are particularly high and thus require direct action to be taken in the short term.
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to refrain from recommending reformulations and cuts in the public services of Member States, from promoting flexible labour relations and the privatisation of public services, especially healthcare and education, which have led unequivocally to the weakening of the social rights of children;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Asks the Commission to emphasise the need for investment in free, public education by pinpointing specific education methods for the most vulnerable social groups, such as immigrants or people with disabilities of various kinds. Considers that education can be a key priority in ensuring that children acquire the skills which will enable them to access skilled, well-paid jobs, enabling them to build their own way out of poverty.
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 174 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Urges Member States to implement and monitor plans for alleviating child poverty, putting the focus on the intrinsic rights of children, and setting targets for reducing poverty and child social exclusion; Considers moreover that the very definition of poverty should be seen through the prism of both monetary and economic factors, linked to meeting basic needs, and aspects linked to access to culture, sport and free time in general.
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 203 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Recommends that Member States' national budgets contain visible and transparent provisions for costs to combat child poverty and to fulfil their duty to protect children, including through an increase in public spending with a view to attaining such objectives;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 242 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recommends that Member States guarantee all children access to free, quality public education at all ages, including early childhood, and establish appropriate teacher-student and student- company ratios;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 300 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Recommends that the Commission and Member States develop statistical methods that integrate multidimensional indicators in measuring poverty to take into account the limitations of relative poverty measurements and the work of the UNDP, UNICEF and the OECD, going beyond the AROPE indicator; Considers it useful, given the limitations encountered thus far in meauring relative poverty and the subsequent identification of efficient policies and strategies, to develop (including through collaborations with research institutes and universities who have produced studies on the multidimensional phenomenon of child poverty) statistical indicators, appropriate analyses to determine the quality of services and care provided to children in the EU and their wellbeing and to identify the limitations of previously adopted anti- poverty plans. Considers it necessary to encourage the participation of individuals and groups which are directly concerned, i.e. stakeholders, families and children. Considers it desirable, in addition, to promote awareness-raising campaigns directed at these groups vis-à-vis the possibilities and conditions of access to the measures implemented to fight child poverty and, addressing a wider audience, provide information on the phenomenon itself, thus being able to raise awareness of the issue.
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 307 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Considers it necessary to draw up specific strategies, to be implemented in individual Member States, seeking to measure and compare the extent of gambling, in particular online gambling. This is an increasingly recurring phenomenon in families affected by poverty and has serious economic and social ramifications which have negative consequences, especially for children.
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas, as a consequence of the economic and financial crisis, levels of poverty and social exclusion have increased, as hasve youth unemployment and long-term unemployment;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas increasing the employment rate in the 20-64 age range from 69% to at least 75% and reducing by 25% the number of people in Europe living below national poverty thresholds, taking more than 20 million people out of poverty, are targets of the EU 2020 Strategy which have not so far been attained;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas social innovation refers to new ideas, whether they be products, services or social organisation models, designed to meet new social and environmental demands and challenges, such as the ageing population, balancing work and family life, managing diversity, youth unemployment and climate change, the need to create an employment model different to that which has been created so far;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. having regard to the need to provide training and retraining for the long-term unemployed in the social sector in order to afford them new opportunities in an innovative environment such as that of the social economy;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas the social economy, and in particular training and placement enterprises, offer job opportunities for people who are furthest away from the labour market, such as people with disabilities, the long-term unemployed and the most vulnerable groups;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that, in order to strengthen entrepreneurial skills, professionalisation, the conditions enabling social economy enterprises to develop and grow and the creation of social innovation poles, it is vital to promote exchanges with other innovative social enterprises, with schools, with the academic world and with social investors, also taking into account the points of view of the social partners, who are the prime dialogue partners who should be consulted;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Recognises that the EU is a long way away from achieving the targets set in the 2020 Strategy, particularly those relating to employment, innovation and, poverty reduction and social exclusion, and that the social economy contributes to a sustainable, smart and inclusive economic model in line with the objectives of the 2020 Strategy;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Noting that the EU has not attained the targets of the EU 2020 Strategy, calls for the review of the Strategy to devote ample attention to the social economy as an instrument for attaining those targets, particularly reducing poverty and social exclusion;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on Member States to include measures to promote social entrepreneurship and social innovation in their national Youth Guarantee schemes; stresses furthermore how the Youth Guarantee must be structured;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the reform of the Public Procurement Directive, which includes social clauses and criteria in order to promote social inclusion and social innovation, inter alia; urges the Member States to include social clauses and criteria in public procurement procedures, to reduce administrative burden, to simplify procedures and to take increasingly strong measures against corruption;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the adoption of the regulation on European social entrepreneurship funds and calls for the European Social Fund to assign a specific budget heading to social investment;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Highlights the need to support social economy enterprises with sufficient financial resources at local, regional, national and EU level, creating a virtuous circle among the various enterprises; considers it necessary to improve access to financing for the social economy through various forms of financing, such as European funds, risk capital funds, micro- credit and crowdfunding;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls on Member States to reinforce public services (for example health and education) through local authorities, using them as a driving force to improve the quality of services so as to provide job opportunities and raise the level of the services provided with the aim of reducing poverty and social exclusion;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls on Member States to equip employment centres to provide effective information to those who intend to work in the social enterprise sector;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls on the Commission to create communication platforms which facilitate the circulation of information on social economies, exchanges of best practices, sharing of opportunities and knowledge and exchanges of the various experiences;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Commission and Member States to promote the creation of business incubators for social economy enterprises, to promote relations between schools, universities and social enterprises and to increase public social spending;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on Member States to take account of best practice with regard to adapting national tax systems to favour social enterprises and social investment and to reduce the tax burden on social enterprises and on workers;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the European economy and labour market face considerable difficulties in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, the austerity policies and the consequent economic slowdown;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that in the wake of the European economic crisis a number of Member States are struggling with high unemployment levels (EU28: 9.9 %) as well as public debt; is further concerned that youth unemployment rates (EU28: 21.4 %) are generally much higher, especially in some countries where it reaches half of the young labour force;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the importance of human development, career flexibility and self- responsibility; recalls in this respect that investment is needed to actively support employability and prevent skills depletion among the unemployed; emphasises that such measures should be combined with reforms in pension and social welfare systems that encourage more people toin order to develop employment opportunities for older and younger workers;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Stresses that the circular economy has the potential to create millions of jobs across the EU and lead to sustainable and inclusive growth
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls the importance of theat mobility of workers for a competitive labour market, and stresses the need to reduce the administrative and linguistic barriers that are liable to restrain it; encourages raising of awareness of and further improvement of the EU-wide EURES job portalshould be ensured as an opportunity for those wishing to seek employment in other Member States, not as an obligation caused by a lack of job opportunities in their home country, with an aim of exploiting the full potential of the European labour market;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 232 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Recalls that there are currently 2 million unfilled vacancies in the EU and that there should be systems to match demand and offer in the labour market at the European level, such as a European vacancy database; emphasises the need for labour mobility in the Union in order to fill this gap, and reiterates the importance of ERASMUS+ and EURES in this respectat mobility must remain voluntary and not a necessity in order to find a job;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 241 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Recalls the importance of the mobility of highly skilled workers from third countries in the light of the demographic challengesat mobility remains only one of the many potential responses to labour market mismatches and that its eventual side-effects such as brain-drain should be minimised;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 279 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Underlines the importance of support measures for SMEs and micro-enterprises, in order to reduce the administrative and financial barriers to their establishment and operation as well as facilitating the hiring of qualified labour and training of employees; in that respect, stresses that the tax burden should be shifted away from labour to other sources of taxation that are less detrimental to employment and growth, while protecting adequate social protection.
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point -i a (new)
(-i a) to consider the deep differences between the EU and US labour markets, to acknowledge that TTIP will displace 1.3 million workers across Europe and to put in place all necessary measures to face prolonged and substantial adjustment costs on the labour market;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point -i a (new)
(-i a) to acknowledge that the econometric model used in many impact assessment studies to estimate gain and losses from TTIP, inter alia on employment, is based on non-realistic assumptions such a full mobility of workers in Europe and does not allow for calculation of net employment gain/losses;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9
– having regard to the Commission report of 13 January 2015 on the online public consultation on investment protection and investor-to-state dispute settlement (ISDS) in the TTIP (SWD(2015)0003), whose result showed clear contrariety to the inclusion of ISDS in TTIP,
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point i
(i) to ensurereject TTIP unless it is proven that TTIPit will make a significant positive contribution to creating more and better jobs in Europe and the US and set ambitious global trade standards for sustainable development and labour;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point ii
(ii) to ensure that TTIP includes comprehensive provisions on labour laws and policies that are consistent with the core ILO Conventions and, the Decent Work Agenda and European and national labour law, with a commitment to promote higher standards and, furthermore, to ensure that where disputes arise labour provisions will have a conditional dimension;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point ii a (new)
(ii a) to reject any agreement that might pose a threat to labour standards in Europe and lead to social dumping;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas an ambitious agreement with the US maywill not support the reindustrialisation of Europe and, as energy prices will continue to be lower in the US, and will not help achieve the 2020 target for an increase of the EU’s GDP generated by industry from 15 % to 20 %; whereas it has the potential to create opportunities especially fordamage SMEs, which will suffer more from non-tariff barriers (NTBs) thanfrom unprotected competition by larger companies; whereas an agreement between the two biggest economic blocs in the world has the potential to create standards, norms and rules which will be adopted at a global level, which third countries would serhave to the advantage of third countries as welladapt to;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 62 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point iv
(iv) to ensure that civil society cantizens and civil society are better informed, more closely involved in the negotiations and able to make a meaningful contribution to implementing relevant TTIP provisions;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point v
(v) to take immediate steps to safeguard the right of EU governments to legislate, organise, set quality and safety standards for, manage and regulate public services; therefore to reject the treaty if it will contain provisions on investors-state dispute settlement (ISDS) and to carefully consider its approval in light of the provisions on regulatory cooperation;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas it is acknowledged that TTIP will have considerable effects on intra-EU trade, reducing trade flows between all EU countries even by 40% in some cases; whereas this may lead to further European disintegration and will strike particularly the 87% of non- exporting SMEs in Europe which rely extensively on domestic and intra-EU trade;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 85 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point vi
(vi) to ensure that the specific challenges faced by SMEs including uneven competition with bigger US companies and trade diversion effects of TTIP are fully taken into account;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point vi a (new)
(vi a) to consider that TTIP will negatively impact intra-EU trade and therefore reduce SMEs market shares in Europe;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas deep differences exist between the EU and US labour markets; whereas it is necessary to acknowledge that TTIP will displace 1.3 million workers across Europe and to put in place all necessary measures to face prolonged and substantial adjustment costs on the labour market;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 113 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point viii
(viii) to guaranteeexclude from thate agreement on any dispute-settlement mechanism must take into accountfollowing the results of the public consultation on investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), must be fully transparent and democratically accountable and must not hinder legislators from passing laws in the area of employment policyto acknowledge that such a mechanism creates discriminations between foreign and domestic investors;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas many economic impact studies on TTIP should be taken with caution as they are built on computable general equilibrium economic models with verexcessively optimistic results and equally optimistic predictions about the capacity of the EU and the US to reduce regulatory barriers to trade; whereas the Commission cherry-picked some of these results to support its argument for TTIP; whereas TTIP alone will noteither resolve economic problems in the EU, nor by itself make European households richer and no false hopes and expectations should be raised in that respect,;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 123 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas many economic impact studies on TTIP should be taken with caution as they are built on computable general equilibrium economic models with verexcessively optimistic results and equally optimistic predictions about the capacity of the EU and the US to reduce regulatory barriers to trade; whereas other studies based on different economic models comes to opposite conclusions; whereas the TTIP alone will noteither resolve economic problems in the EU nor by itself make European households richer and no false hopes and expectations should be raised in that respect;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 129 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point ix
(ix) to take stepsrequest to embed a ‘positive listing’ approach in the agreement and to make sure public services are excluded from the scope of TTIP;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point x
(x) to ensure that statistical projections on job losses/gains, and on sectors, affected in each Member State are constantly updated so that timely intervention can be undertaken by the Commission to support affected sectors, regions or Member States.
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the wellbeing of ordinary citizens, workers and consumers has to be the benchmarkand the development of our societies must be the main aim for a trade agreement; whereas TTIP should be a model for a good trade agreement responding to these requirements; whereas the effects of this Treaty should not be limited to the macro- economic level but should have a positive and concrete impact on the living conditions of the citizens of our countries;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 152 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) should not be taken as a benchmark for TTIP because, among others, it is based on a negative list approach, it includes non-satisfactory provisions on ISDS and it failed to protect many European geographical indications;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 187 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas President Juncker has clearly reiterated in his Political Guidelines that – while the EU and the US can go a significant step further in recognising each other’s product standards and working towards transatlantic standards – the EU will not sacrifice its safety, health, animal health, social and data protection standards or our cultural diversity, recalling that the safety of the food we eat and the protection of Europeans’ personal data are non- negotiable;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 191 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas the European Parliament in its resolution of 23 May 2013 has taken a clear stance for the exclusion of cultural and audiovisual services from the scope of the negotiations of TTIP, including those provided online, but at no point in the negotiating mandate it is clearly stated that cultural services and products should be considered and treated differently from other commercial services and products;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 193 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H b (new)
Hb. whereas in its answer to written question E-009607/2014 the Commission states that 'Audiovisual services' are not classified as 'culture' and that "the EU does not lay down a definition of 'cultural services' for the purposes of its trade agreements and that the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Agreement (TTIP) is no exception to this rule";
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 194 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H c (new)
Hc. whereas in Europe PDO/PGI product designations are governed by strict specifications regarding quality and origin, while in the United States they represent no more than 'common names' that may be freely used without any restrictions;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 208 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas the Commission must keep in mind that in response to its public consultation on ISDS in TTIP, EU citizens requested the complete removal of ISDS from TTIP and not its reform;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 222 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas the Commission has held many more meetings with industry representatives than with civil society organisations (CSOs) and refuses to make the minutes of those meetings public;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 235 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas the ratification procedure for an agreement with such wide-ranging implications needs to include a referendum stage in each member State or at European level;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 236 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Addresses, in the context of the ongoing negotiations on TTIP, the following recommendations to the Commission:Requests that the Commission suspends the ongoing negotiations on TTIP
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 248 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) to ensure that TTIP negotiations lead to a deep, comprehensive, ambitious, balanced and high-standard trade and investment agreement that would promote sustainable growth, support the creation of high-quality jobs for European workers, directly benefit European consumers, increase international competitiveness, and open up new opportunities for EU companies, in particular SMEs, without lowering EU standards, food safety and protection of geographical indications; the content of the agreement is more important than the speed of the negotiations;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 249 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) to ensure that transparent TTIP negotiations lead to a deep, comprehensive, ambitious, balanced and high-standard trade and investment agreement that would promote sustainable growth, support the creation of high-quality jobs for European workers, directly benefit European consumers, increase international competitiveness, and open up new opportunities for EU companies, in particular SMEs; the content of the agreement is more important than the speed of the negotiations;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 312 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) to ensure that the market access offers in the different areas are equally ambitious and transparent and reflect both parties’ expectations, as market access for industrial goods, agricultural products, services and public procurement is equally important in all cases and a balance is needed between the different proposals for these areas;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 315 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point i a (new)
(ia) to consider the use of economic indicators that will measure any imbalances generated by the opening up of the market;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 351 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point iii a (new)
(iiia) to ensure that no harmonisation is pursued in the sector of telecommunication services as it may be detrimental to the interests of European customers;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 370 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point iv
(iv) to increase market access for services according to the ‘positive list approach’ whereby services that are to be opened up to foreign companies are explicitly mentioned and new services are excluded while ensuring that possible standstill and ratchet clauses only apply to non- discrimination provisions and allow for enough flexibility to bring services back into public control; to ensure that TTIP is not based on a "negative list approach" nor on a "mixed approach";
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 373 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point iv a (new)
(iva) to enshrine in the text of the treaty the right of governments to protect and develop public services and their freedom to regulate the organisation, financing and modes of provision of these services;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 374 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point iv b (new)
(ivb) to reaffirm that services with a cultural component will not be included in the agreement, especially since there is no previously known and shared definition of culture, cultural services and products for the purposes of this agreement;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 380 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point v
(v) the negotiations should meaningfully address the current US restrictions on maritime and air transport services owned by European businesses, including in relation to foreign ownership of airlines and reciprocity on cabotage, as well as maritime cargo screening; to this aim, the abrogation of the "Jones Act" should be considered a prerequisite for TTIP;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 383 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point v a (new)
(va) to ensure respect of safety, environmental, data protection and privacy standards with regards to the transport sector and to ensure reciprocity and transparency in the negotiations;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 386 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point v b (new)
(vb) to safeguard the European public transport sector and to foresee a special carve-out for this sector in TTIP;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 407 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point vi
(vi) to ensure an adequate carve-out of sensitive services such as public services and public utilities (including water, health, social security systems and education) allowing national and local authorities enough room for manoeuvre to legislate in the public interest; a joint declaration reflecting negotiators’ clear commitment to exclude these sectors from the negotiations would be very helpful in this regard; furthermore a clear exclusion of all social security systems should be a precondition for TTIP;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 434 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point vii
(vii) to combine market access negotiations on financial services with convergence in financial regulation on the highest level without lowering current EU financial regulations, in order to support the introduction of necessary regulation to prevent financial crises and in order to support ongoing cooperation efforts in other international forums, such as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 463 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point ix
(ix) to ensure that European competition law is properly respected particularly in the digital world; to ensure that private companies can fairly compete with state- owned or state-controlled companies; to ensure that state subsidies to private companies should be regulated and subject to a transparent control system; to ensure that "net neutrality" can positively contribute to a more fair and free market; to ensure that collusion in price-fixing and the abuse of dominant market position is avoided and punished through some specific laws;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 483 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point x a (new)
(xa) to keep in mind that the EU has not laid down a definition of 'cultural services' in TTIP and that a shared and precise definition of culture, cultural services and cultural products is necessary for the purposes of this agreement. Such definition needs to be made public as soon as possible;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 532 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xiv
(xiv) to ensure that the negotiations on rules of origin aim at reconciling the EU and US approaches, since there is no clear European legislation on goods imported from third countries; given the conclusion of the negotiations for the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between EU and Canada and the potential upgrade of the EU-Mexico free trade agreement, the possibility and scope of cumulation will need to be considered;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 556 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point i
(i) to ensure that the regulatory cooperation chapter promotes an effective, pro- competitive economic environment through the facilitation of trade and investment while developing and securing high levels of protection of health and safety, consumer, labour, animal health and environmental legislation and of the cultural diversity that exists within the EU; negotiators on both sides need to identify and to be very clear about which regulatory measures and standards are fundamental and cannot be compromised, which ones can be the subject of a common approach, which are the areas where mutual recognition based on a common high standard and a strong system of market surveillance and traceability of agricultural and industrial goods is desirable and which are those where simply an improved exchange of information is possible, based on the experience of one and a half years of ongoing talks;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 578 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) to base negotiations on SPS and TBT measures on the key principles of the multilateral SPS and TBT agreements; to aim in the first place at increasing transparency and openness, strengthening dialogue between regulators and stakeholders and strengthening cooperation in international standards- setting bodies; to recognise, in negotiations on SPS and TBT measures, the right of both parties to manage risk in accordance with the level either deems appropriate in order to protect human, animal or plant life or health; to respect and uphold the sensitivities and fundamental values of either side, such as the EU’s precautionary principle and to make commitments to respect the precautionary principle conditional to the approval of TTIP;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 600 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iii a (new)
(iiia) to ensure that clear and unambiguous language is used in the regulatory cooperation chapter, to make sure that no form of regulatory cooperation will be used to circumvent legitimate and democratic decision- making processes, to reduce the level of protection of European citizens or to prevent legislators from deciding for the public interest;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 627 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point i
(i) to combine negotiations on market access and regulatory cooperation with the establishment of ambitious rules and disciplines, inter alia on sustainable development, energy, SMEs, investment, transparency in state subsidies, price- fixing, abuse of dominant market position, competition between private companies and state-owned/state controlled-companies and intellectual property;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 647 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point iii
(iii) to ensure that labour and environmental standards are not limited to the trade and sustainable development chapter but are equally included in other areas of the agreement, such as investment, trade in services, regulatory cooperation and public procurement and to ensure through the use of clear and unambiguous language that no provision in the agreement will lower European environmental and food safety standards, in particular to oppose any agreement that may, even in theory, grant access to the EU market to GMOs, chlorine-treated poultry and hormone-treated beef;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 654 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point iv a (new)
(iva) to put in place mechanisms to support workers displaced by the effect of TTIP and to tackle the loss of net jobs in Europe;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 657 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point iv b (new)
(ivb) to take into account the effect of delocalisation of European enterprises to the US where more attractive conditions for production exist and to consider that many European enterprises will relocate their R&D departments to the US, leading to a reduction of EU capacity to innovate;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 658 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point iv c (new)
(ivc) to reject any agreement that might pose a threat to labour standards in Europe and lead to social dumping;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 690 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point vii
(vii) to ensure that in course of the negotiations the two sides examine ways to facilthe agreement does not include a specific chapter on energy, as different studies including one commissioned by the ITRE commitate natural gas and oil exports, so that TTIP would abolish any existing export restrictions on energy between the two trading partners, thereby supporting a diversification of energy sourcee demonstrate that the USA will not contribute to energy security in Europe mainly because of ceilings on energy exports, while exports of US gas will lead to price increase on EU markets;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 729 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xi a (new)
(xia) to ensure that the priorities and concerns of SMEs and crafts are fully taken into account in the TTIP negotiations by means of thorough impact assessments and targeted public consultations, ensuring the widest participation of the relevant stakeholders in all 28 Member States, since many SMEs rely on domestic and intra-EU demand and will be hit by the trade diversion effects of TTIP;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 766 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiv
(xiv) to ensure that foreign investors are treated in a non-discriminatory fashion and have a fair opportunity to seek and achieve redress of grievances, which can be achieved without the inclusion of an ISDS mechanism that has been strongly opposed by a vast majority of respondents to a public consultation held by the European Commission who requested its complete removal from TTIP and not its reform; such a mechanism is not necessary in TTIP given the EU’s and the US’ developed legal systems; a state-to- state dispute settlement system and the use of national courts are the most appropriate tools to address investment disputes;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 800 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xv
(xv) to ensure that TTIP includes an ambitious Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) chapter that includes strong protection of precisely and clearly defined areas of IPR, including enhanced protection and recognition of European Geographical Indications (GIs), and reflects a fair and efficient level of protection such as laid outing a stronger level of protection than CETA, safeguarding EU producers from the indiscriminate use of "European sounding" denominations in the EU’sUS, and the US’s free trade agreement provisions in this areaensuring common labelling standards to make sure consumers are properly informed, while continuing to confirm the existing flexibilities in the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), notably in the area of public health;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 829 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point i
(i) to continue ongoing efforts to increase transparency in the negotiations by making more negotiation proposals available to the general public, as requested, among others, by the European Ombudsman;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 848 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point iii
(iii) to promote an even closer engagement with the Member States with the aim of forging their active involvement in better communicating the scope and the possible benefits of the agreement for European citizens and in order to ensure a broad, fact-based public debate on TTIP in Europe with the aim of exploring the genuine concerns surrounding the agreement;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 856 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point iv
(iv) to reinforce itsimplement a continuous and transparent engagement with citizens, civil society organisations and a wide range of stakeholders, including, business, environmental, agricultural, consumer, labour and other representatives, throughout the negotiation process; encourages all stakeholders to participate actively and to put forward initiatives and information relevant to the negotiations;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 857 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point iv
(iv) to reinforce its continuous and transparent engagement withinvolving a wide range of stakeholders, including business, environmental, agricultural, consumer, labour, civil society and other representatives, throughout the negotiation process; encourages all stakeholders to participate actively and to put forward initiatives and information relevant to the negotiations;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 862 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point iv a (new)
(iva) provide detailed and regular updated information to EU citizens about the latest developments on TTIP also via social networks, mass media and other communication channels.
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 863 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) to ensure that the list of TTIP documents available on the Commission's dedicated trade policy website is accessible, comprehensive, exhaustive and thorough;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 23 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the EU needs to make a decisive change in an economic policy that has allowed the Union to drift away from the EU 2020 targets, and that has increased the risks of secular stagnation and deflation; whereas the EU is worryingly losing weight in the world economy, while most other countries are showing solid signs of recovery; whereas in October 2014 the IMF estimated that the probability of a recession in the euro area had increased and would reach 35-40% at year’s end;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas in spite of mild improvements, the unemployment rate remains historically high, with 25 million people out of work; whereas long-term unemployment is worryingly high, and 12 million people have been unemployed for more than a year (up 4 % over the previous year); whereas the labour market situation is particularly critical for young people, regardless of their level of education;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas the lack of adequate social protection schemes, such as citizenship and minimum wage, increases poverty and social exclusion;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
F a. whereas austerity measures have caused a wider recession, business closures and job losses and have led to diminished employment protection, dismantled labour rights, increased poverty risks and income inequality;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
H a. whereas the diverse fiscal policies in the European Union are often forcing SMEs to close or to delocalize, causing job losses and mandatory labour mobility;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to introduce a much-needed, expansionary economic economic and fiscal policy to boost smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and to create quality jobs; stresses that low inflation is already increasing real interest rates as well as real public and private debt, which, together with high unemployment, depresses growth and increases poverty;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. WelcomNotes the fact that one of the three main pillars of the Commission’s strategy for 2015 is investment, and calls for its plan to be implemented without delay; considers it a step forward that Member States’ contributions to such a plan are excluded from deficit targets;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses that while SMEs constitute the backbone of job creation in the EU, they continue to face major difficulties in gaining access to financing, and they are worryingly over-indebted due also to the excessive fiscal pressure; welcomes the Commission’s new recommendations on SME’s access to finance, involving a new approach to insolvency and business failure; calls for further efforts to improve debt-restructuring schemes as a means to this end;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the measures announced by the Commission to boost job creation in SMEs by unlocking alternatives to bank loans to SMEs, and to improve the regulatory and fiscal framework in order to enhance long-term investment in SMEs; calls for these measures to be implemented without delay;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 250 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Is concernedRegrets that the Commission’s strategy to regain competitiveness has been more focused on reducing costs than on raising productivity via investments in human capital; stresses that more than 20 Member States have reduced their education expenditures in relative terms (as percentages of their GDPs), thereby jeopardising their growth, job potential and competitiveness;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 271 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Recalls that decent wages are important not only for social cohesion, but also for maintaining a strong economy and a productive labour force; calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for a European framework for minimum wages with a view to reducing wage inequalities and, limiting nominal imbalances in competitiveness and achieving the EU2020 poverty reduction targets;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 312 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission to propose a European framework introducing fix minimum standardrequirements for the implementation of Youth Guarantees covering young people aged 25-30 and concrete measures to raise public awareness; calls on the Member States to use the available budget efficiently and to implement the Youth Guarantees without delay; calls for the available budget to be increased during the promised mid-term review of the MFF in accordance with ILO recommendations;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 324 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Stresses that, according to the Commission, despite high unemployment rates there are 2 million job vacancies in the EU, and that only 3.3 % of the active population works in another Member State; recalls that divergences in labour mobility rates range up to 10 percentage points, notably in those Member States hardest hit by the crisis; Notes though that mobility should be voluntary and not a necessity in order to find a job;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 337 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Given the number of workers, particularly young people, who are now leaving their countries of origin for other Member States in search of employment opportunities, there is an urgent need to develop appropriate measures to guarantee that no worker is left uncovered by social and labour rights protection; calls, in this regard, on the Commission and the Member States to further improve on a voluntary basis EU labour mobility while upholding the principle of equal treatment and safeguarding wages and social standards; calls on each Member State to establish social and employment policies for equal rights and equal pay at the same place of work;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 352 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Reiterates its warning of the socioeconomic challenges facing the Union and the risks to its sustainability and its stable growth potential posed by a reversal in regional convergence; recalls that more than 122 million EU citizens are at risk of poverty or social exclusion, including in- work poverty and child poverty, and that19% of children in the EU are currently estimated to be at risk of poverty, these levels are unacceptable and need to be reduced immediately; calls for a true ‘social pillar’ to be implemented within the EMU as part of the process of improving economic governance mechanisms;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 357 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Regrets that there are no indicators and clear definitions of absolute poverty, which concerns many EU countries;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 419 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Points out that emerging new forms of poverty – such as in-work poverty compounding difficulties such as e.g. paying mortgages, or high utility prices creating energy poverty – have resulted in an increase in the number of evictions, foreclosures and homeless people; calls on the Commission and the Member States to implement integrated policies favouring social and affordable housing, protection of the first residence from, effective prevention policies aimed at reducing the number of evictions, and policies tackling energy poverty;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 429 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Reminds the Commission that in order to ensure both the sustainability and the adequacy of pensions, pension reforms need to be accompanied by policies that: limit access to early retirement schemes and other early exit pathways; develop employment opportunities for older workers without impeding the social rights of young workers, in order to contribute to a sustainable pension system and to ensure high quality health care; guarantee access to life-long learning; introduce tax benefit policies offering incentives to stay in work longer; and support active healthy ageing; stresses that pension reforms require national political and social cohesion, and should be negotiated with the social partners in order to be successful;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital -Aa(new)
(Often, cousins carry on the business of two or more brothers – their parents – and sometimesAa. whereas ‘family’ means relatives up to the fourth degree of kinship and whereas relatives who do not cohabit, separated spouses and common-law partners are also considered to be family members; Or. it separated or common-law partners carry on running a business together)
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital -A a (new)
Aa. whereas family businesses can also take the form of corporations and whereas work in a family business is not free of charge;
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
(Labour income needs to be distingu1a. Takes the view that the earnings of family members should be regarded as labour income also for social security purposes and that family members should also be covered by the social safety nets established forom company income, for both tax and socialies in crisis; Or. it security purposes).
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes with concern that the financial crisis and subsequent recession have dealt a heavy blow to European micro- enterprises and SMEs, many of which are family businesses, and highlights the importance of a favourable regulatory framework to support healthy restructuring and thus job retention;
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Considers it appropriate to allow the sale of the participating interest in a family firm to external partners who could strengthen the company and ensure its continuity, provided that the other family members always have the right of pre-emption;
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Considers it advisable to harmonise at EU level the rules for transferring family businesses to heirs and/or to family members who are interested in maintaining employment levels and developing the company, through tax breaks to ensure continuity and in any case providing for cash compensation for those heirs or family members who are not interested in the business;
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Considers it advisable to encourage the entry of professional external managers to improve the management of the family business;
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2014/2208(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the circular economy has the potential to generate millions of new jobs across Europe, resulting in net job creation;
2015/04/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas an excessive and unsustainable use of resources is the root cause of various environmental hazards, such as climate change, desertification, deforestation and loss of biodiversity; whereas the global economy uses the equivalent of 1.5 planets’ worth of resources to produce global output and absorb waste and this figure is estimated to reach the equivalent of two planets’ worth of resources by the 2030s;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 33 #

2014/2208(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Believes that investing on landfills and waste incineration diverts resources that can be invested on job creating activities such as waste prevention, re-use, repair and preparation for re-use; calls for the Commission to ensure that funding under EU cohesion policy targets circular economy activities and is not provided to landfills and waste incineration;
2015/04/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2014/2208(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes the importance of training and re-qualifying workers especially in resource-efficient sectors and the importance of social dialogue on the circular economy agenda;
2015/04/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the cancellation of environmentally harmful subsidies, including direct and indirect subsidies to fossil fuels, would substantially reduce GHG emissions, help in the fight against climate change and allow the uptake of the circular economy;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 49 #

2014/2208(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. CStrongly believes that the shift to a circular economy requires decisive action and incentives by both Member States and the EU; calls on the Member States and the EU to put in place a regulatory environment and fiscal incentives that encourage the development of a circular economy, such as establishing a legislative framework for reuse, repair and preparation for reuse, elaborating legal definitions of "waste" that do not prevent reuse of materials, reducing or lifting taxation on renewable resources, including labour, and differentiating VAT rates in accordance with the waste hierarchy.
2015/04/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas waste prevention, waste hierarchy and the cascading use of materials should be promoted as important principles to foster a resource- efficient and sustainable management of resources;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 100 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Points out that stimulating the market for recovered materials is necessary to allow the uptake of the circular economy; therefore, envisages measures, such as zero rate or reduced VAT for reused and recycled products as well as products with a minimum recycled content;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 132 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that by 2050 the EU’s use of resources needs to be sustainable; this includes fully implementing a cascading use of resources, sustainable sourcing, a waste hierarchy, creating a closed loop on non-renewable resources, using renewables within the limits of their renewability and phasing out toxic substances;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 149 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Commission to develop and introduce by 2019 a lead indicator and a number of sub-indicators on resource efficiency, including ecosystem services; these binding indicators should measure resource consumption, including importsed and exports, ated goods in the EU, Member State and industry level, and take account of the whole lifecycle of products and servicesenvironmental impacts (such as air pollution, water pollution, solid waste, embodied energy), take account of the whole lifecycle of products and services, and include tools to facilitate prioritisation of resources whose use should be cascaded;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 192 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Points out that the amount of resources used by a product over its lifetime isas well as its reusability and recyclability are largely determined during the design phase;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 209 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Urges the Commission to propose a review of the Ecodesign Directive by the end of 2016, incorporating the following important changes: broadening the scope to cover all main product lines; gradually including all relevant resource-efficiency features in the mandatory requirements for product design, such as minimum threshold of recycled content; introducing a mandatory product passport based on these requirements and reporting on the energy needed to manufacture the product; implementing self- monitoring and third-party auditing to ensure that products comply with these standards; and defining horizontal requirements on, inter alia, reusability and recyclability;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 249 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the introduction of a certificate of origin, sustainability and legality wherever applicable to raw materials, as it is already existing for timber products following Regulation (EU) No 995/2010;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 274 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Urges the Commission to submit the announced proposal on the review of waste legislation by the end of 2015 and to include the following points: setting extended producer responsibility requirements; endorsing the ‘pay-as-you- throw-principle’ prioritising separate collection schemes in order to facilitate the development of business based on the reuse of secondary raw materials; introducing separate reuse targets; increasing recycling targets to at least 70 % of municipal solid waste, based on the output of recycling facilities, using the same harmoniseand setting recycling targets for other type of waste whenever possible using the same clear and harmonised definitions and method for all Member States with externally verified statistics; introducing a ban on landfilling and incineration (with or without energy recovery) of recyclable and biodegradable waste by 2025 and a ban on all landfilling and incineration by 2030; introducing mandatory fees on landfilling and incineration;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 320 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the Commission for greater transparency and better controls to avoid shipping of waste to countries with lower environmental and social standards than those in the EU;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 355 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Commission to propose the full implementation of the circular economy principles and requirements in the building sector and to further develop the policy framework on resource efficiency in buildings; this includes developing indicators, standards and methods as regards land use and urban planning, architecture, structural engineering, construction, maintenance, adaptability, energy efficiencyand carbon efficiency of construction materials and construction methods, renovation and reuse and recycling; targets and indicators on sustainable buildings should also include green infrastructure, such as green roofs;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 377 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls on the Commission, in the framework of the Construction Products Regulation, to prepare a common and sound basis for environmental product declaration (EPD) of building products;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 391 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls on Member States to prioritize renovation of existing building and, when this is not possible, to promote demolition methods which allow material recovery to be reused or recycled; urges Member States to set mandatory national demolition waste plans;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 430 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Commission to establish a permanent resource-efficiency platform which includes representatives from all sectors of the economy, both public and private and civil society, to encourage and facilitate the application of the latest research findings, the exchange of best practices and the emergence of new industrial synthesis and industrial ecosystems;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 451 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Stresses that all EU funding, including funding through EFSI, Horizon 2020, cohesion funds and the EIB, must be mobilised to promote resource efficiency and, circular economy and to phase out hazardous substances; urges the Commission and Member States to abolish all environmentally harmful subsidies, including direct and indirect subsidies to fossil fuels to reduce GHG emissions, help in the fight against climate change and allow the uptake of the circular economy;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 464 #

2014/2208(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Urges the Commission to examine whether existing legislation is hindering the circular economy or the emergence of new business models, such as a lease economand lending economy for goods and services; calls on Member States to support a community based non-profit shared economy and property;
2015/05/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 33 #

2014/2160(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that Member States must commit themselves to overcoming the reluctance to employ women in the private sector and to encouraging entrepreneurship among women;
2015/04/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2014/2160(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Takes the view that gender equality should be promoted through investments in infrastructure to provide assistance, in services for families and by incentivising legislation on parental and paternity leave and flexible working hours;
2015/04/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2014/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the decline in the EU unemployment rate, from 20.8 % in the first quarter of 2010 to 12.1 % in the third quarter of 2013; notes that these figures do not reflect the situation in all Member States and do not take into account the divergences among different regions and Member-states; points out that youth unemployment is still alarming: in September 2013 the youth unemployment rate was 23.5% in the EU28 and 24,1% in the euro area, highlights the worrying differences between Member- States (7,7% in Germany and 57,3% in Greece in July 2013);
2014/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2014/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the slightly positive rate of job creation in some Member States in the fourth quarter of 2013 and the increase in compensation per employee in almost all non-euro area Member States; Stresses that euro area Member States should also benefit from this increase in order to boost the demand and enhance job creation; Stresses that austerity measures and the painful budgetary adjustments, is not the way to achieve this.
2014/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2014/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Agrees with the ECB’s recommendation that growth-friendly fiscal consolidation over the medium term should ensure compliance with the fiscal compact, while at the same time boosting potential growth and generating employment opportunities;deleted
2014/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2014/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines that monetary policy could be an important tool to boost the EU economy, believes that the ECB should make use of it in order to give liquidity to the EU real economy, increase demand and enhance quality investments and sustainable job creation;
2014/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2014/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the ECB’s call for continuous improvement of the institutional setting of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), and reiterates in this context its call for ex ante coordination of major economic reform plans; Stresses that this should only be done in a way that ensures democratic accountability and transparency;
2014/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2014/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the ECB’s call on Member States to carry out the necessary labour market reforms, in particular through increasing flexibility and optimising the conditions for businesses to create jobs;deleted
2014/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2014/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the factNotes that the pattern of reduced working hours appears to have reversed by the end of 2013, indicating a possible gradual improvement in the labour market; stresses, nonetheless, that this development does not reflect the real situation on the labour market;
2014/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2014/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes the results of the first wave of the Eurosystem Household Finance and Consumption Survey, and stresses the importance of this survey for the monitoring of the euro area’s economic and social structure. , in view of the imperative need to highlight the stagnation and crisis from which the internal market is suffering;
2014/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2014/2153(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that in order to meet global energy challenges, maintain economy competitiveness and implement its energy and climate change objectives, the EU must also take common action on the international stage, in particular by examining options that may contemplate the introduction of home rebate mechanisms or border carbon adjustment measures in order to ensure a level playing field with EU trade partners and competitors that do not abide by EU environmental standards;
2015/02/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 14 #

2014/2153(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates that energy is a basic human need; insists, therefore, that the EU’s energy security strategy should ensure affordable access to energy for all and should strengthen public control and regulation; at the same time, the decision- making processes concerning the major energy infrastructures should involve the local communities directly interested;
2015/02/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 23 #

2014/2153(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that trade plays a key role in energy security, and that strong energy partnerships on renewable sources and consumption reduction policies, reinforced by energy chapters included in the EU’s trade agreements, are essential tools; considers it of key importance to reduce dependency on imported energy; and believes that the sale of strategic assets in the Union, such as gas trading platforms, would affect it negatively; recalls also the importance to have strong trade defence instruments in order to prevent dumping situation and restore fair competition with trade partners and competitors.
2015/02/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2014/2153(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Diversification of gas supply sources and routes is certainly a useful strategy for spreading risks, but it cannot eliminate them. Moreover, it is arguable how certain the delivery of gas supply diversification in terms of energy security can be. Generally, it will be less certain than that of a strategy focused on energy efficiency efforts and domestic production of renewables. Therefore some programs of "energy education" should be promoted, in order to reduce the waste of energy and optimize its consumption.
2015/02/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 78 #

2014/2153(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Energy security within the European Union can be effectively achieved not only with the funding of new infrastructures and facilities, but also supporting the optimization of current technologies, the research and development of new solutions and encouraging the use of renewable energies and renewable energy technologies. (This is new paragraph 8)
2015/02/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 31 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that in order to promote economic growth and competitiveness in the EU are dependent on closing the gapit is necessary to ensure there is a correlation between women’s educational attainment and their participation and position in the labour market;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Considers that there is resistance to employing women in the private sector and serious discrimination in favour of male candidates at the time of recruitment;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that the unequal division of family responsibilities is at the root of the unequal position of women in the labour market; draws attention to the fact that many women do not return to work after pregnancy; stresses that reconciliation of home and work duties is a key condition for gender equality which should be promoted by investment in care infrastructure and, in services to households and by incentives to encouragement of men’s participation in domestic labour through legislation on parental and paternity leave and flexible working time arrangements;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. SDraws attention to the fact that only 33% of corporate executive and managerial positions are filled by women and stresses the need for transparency and greater gender balance in recruitment for decision-making positions;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the importance of encouraging the employment of women and of ensuring greater social protection of businesswomen;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Highlights the high levels of undeclared work and false self-employment which negatively impact on women’s social security and the EU’s GDP levels; calls for the creation of incentives for employers and workers to move from the informal to the formal economy.;
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #

2014/2152(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Regrets that the Commission intends to withdraw the proposal for a directive on maternity leave, thus delaying the creation of a harmonised legislative and welfare framework.
2015/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Is pleased withDeplores the fact that the European economic governance framework, which, by has failed to coordinatinge policies more closely in order to prevent major imbalances, and hence to fosters smart, sustainable and inclusive growth in line with the targets set by the Europe 2020 strategy, which to date have not yet been met;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. WelcomNotes the Commission’s initiative to conduct an initial review of the framework’s effectiveness with a view to assessing the effective and uniform application of governance rules by the Member States and by the Commission; also suggests that the review presents an opportunity for an exchange of views on the ways in which the framework could be deepened and on such adjustments as might need to be made;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the European Semester to be strengthened and deepened as an effective way of preventing a crisis: with this in mind, welcomes the Commission’s proposal to focus its action not only on budget responsibility but also on investment and structural reform in order to link the market economy with social progress, and urges the Commission to call for practical action by Member States to eradicate the absolute poverty with which many of them are afflicted;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Proposes that joint meetings between the EPSCO Council and the Ecofin Council be held with a view to promoting coordinated socio-economic policies geared towards strengthening competitiveness in Europe, eliminating endemic unemployment, and giving growth and jobs a sustainable boost;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that the social indicators scoreboard in the Alert Mechanism Report is important in order to identify, in advance, the social impact of measures designed to correct macroeconomic imbalances, the object being to ensure that no instruments or measures will be implemented without taking into account the social situation in the Member States and the differences existing from one country to the next; calls on the Commission to assess its scope and effectiveness;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to implement the country-specific recommendations so as to support growth and jobs, first and foremost through provision for citizen’s income and a basic income guarantee; calls on the Commission to submit to the European Parliament an annual assessment of the progress made as regards the effective implementation of those recommendations, and points out that the assessment could be included as an annex to the Annual Growth Report;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls onUrges the Commission, in tandem with the EIB, to make it easier for SMEs – the main sources of jobs in Europe – to access financing from the European Fund for Strategic Investments, in connection with the European Investment Fund;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. With a view to improving the effectiveness and focus of budget policies, callurges on the Member States to press ahead with their efforts to modernise their labour markets and social security systems, for instance by making provision for citizen’s income and a basic income guarantee; with this in mind, encourages them to share best practices;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. So as to address the urgent situation with regard to youth unemployment, encourages Member States to use the available resources in an effective and focused way via the introduction of the youth employment initiative, thereby boosting demand and supply on the single market; and recommends that cross-border mobility be supported via the development of the EURES portal as a vector for youth employment;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2014/2075(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Regrets that the Commission has not appropriately assessed all the economic effects of Preferential and Free Trade Agreements; strongly recommends the Commission to address the deficiencies found by the Court, including in ex ante and ex post evaluations;
2014/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 6 #

2014/2075(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Criticises the fact that the Commission failed to submit to the Court of Auditors in good time the impact assessments concerning the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), and urges the Commission to remedy that failing, given the importance of such ex ante assessments for negotiations on trade agreements;
2014/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2014/0279(COD)

Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Adopts its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal. , stressing that these measures are proposed as part of an exceptional package, in response to the specific situation in Ukraine. They should not constitute a precedent for the Union's trade policy with other countries;
2014/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 5 #

2014/0279(COD)

Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the tariff preferences provided for in this Regulation are permitted by a waiver granted by the World Trade Organisation under Article I and Article XIII of GATT. In case the World Trade Organisation grants such a waiver after 1 November 2014, it shall apply from such later date on which the waiver takes effect. The Commission shall publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union to inform operators of the date on which the waiver is granted by the World Trade Organization. If after 1 November 2014 the date specified shall be the date from which the tariff preferences apply.
2014/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2014/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 374/2014
Article 7 – paragraph 2
It shall apply until 31 December 2015. This Regulation is subject to a waiver being granted by the World Trade Organization allowing the tariff preferences provided for therein and therefore it shall apply from the date on which the waiver takes effect until 31 December 2015. The Commission shall publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union to inform operators of the date on which the waiver is granted by the World Trade Organization
2014/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 77 #

2014/0124(COD)

Draft legislative resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission Communication COM(2007)628 on ‘stepping up the fight against the undeclared work’
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The undeclared economy is considerable in size, being equivalent to 18,4% of the GDP of the EU and it is a phenomenon which is believed to represent up to 30% of the GDP of countries such as Greece and Portugal;
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 138 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 7 b (new)
(7b) According to a Eurofound report, the more the current austerity measures and the subsequent reduction in taxes and labour market deregulation the bigger the undeclared economy; In that respect stresses that there is uncertainty about the trends of undeclared work and the situation of social and health protection rights of workers during the crisis;
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 7 c (new)
(7c) Quantifying undeclared work at the EU level is very complex as undeclared work exists within the EU to varying degrees and across different sectors;
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 143 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 8
(8) Stresses that preventing and deterring undeclared work falls primarily under the responsibility of the member-states and that national authorities play a crucial role in preventing, tracking and sanctioning undeclared work. A wide range of policy approaches and measures to tackle undeclared work have been introduced across the Member States. Member States have also concluded bilateral agreements and carried out multilateral projects on certain aspects of undeclared work. The Platform will not prevent the application of bilateral agreements or arrangements concerning administrative cooperation.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 12
(12) The Platform should make use of all relevant sources of information, in particular studies, bilateral agreements concluded between Member States and multilateral cooperation projects and create synergies between existing EU level instruments and structures to maximise the deterrent or preventive effect of these measures. The operational coordination of actions of the Member States could take the form of joint trainings, peer reviews and solutions for data sharing. European campaigns or common strategies could increase the awareness of undeclared work. Stresses that policies and strategies to raise awareness of undeclared work, exists to varying degrees among all member-states;
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 200 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) There is no ‘one size fits all’ solutions as laws and practises differ widely across member-states and sectors; Believes that policy measures will need to be ‘tailored’ to fit the particular circumstances in the different, countries, regions and sectors.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 351 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) Develop tools, with a view to securing a stable and predictable legal framework, like avoiding excessive taxation in labour, using methods like tax incentives and simplified systems for the payment of tax and social security obligations in order to give employers' incentives to refrain from undeclared work practices;
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 355 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) Establish tools, for instance a knowledge bank of different practices/measures, including bilateral agreements used in the Member States to deter and prevent undeclared work, in order to identify new possibilities for political initiatives;
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 398 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 2
(2) In appointing theia senior representatives and a substitute, Member States shouldall involve all public authorities having a role in the prevention and/or deterrence of undeclared work, and the regularization of jobs in a domestic or cross-border context, such as labour inspectorates, social security authorities, tax authorities, employment services and migration authorities, hereinafter referred to as ‘enforcement authorities’. They mayshall also, in accordance with national law and/or practice, involve the social partnevolve the social partners and the other relevant actors.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 439 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
(1a) The Commission should ensure that duplication of the Platform with existing instruments, initiatives or forms of cooperation at national or European level, is avoided;
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 443 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) elect its chair and two vice-chairs among the members of the Platform who shall constitute the board of the Platform, this board shall be elected for a duration of 1 year with the possibility of being re- elected.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 447 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new)
(4a) The Platform is accountable at EU level to the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council (EPSCO) and to the competent committee of the European Parliament.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24 a (new)
(24a) No provision of this directive should be interpreted in such a way to favour tax elusion and tax evasion in Member States;
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) Societas Unius Personae (SUP) referred to in Article 6. On condition that the company is incorporated by a natural person, that the company does not exceed the limits defined in Article 3.1 of Directive 2013/34/EC and that it demonstrates that it is actively operating in at least two Member States or that it will do so within a year from registration.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘single-member company’ means a company whose shares are held by a single person;, that is incorporated by a natural person, that does not exceed the limits defined in Article 3(1) of Directive 2013/34/EU and that demonstrates it is actively operating in at least two Member States or it will do so within a year from registration.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8
An SUP may be incorporated by a natural or legal personperson at a single seat on condition that a share capital of at least 3000 EUR is provided for.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 205 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Where in accordance with the applicable national law, a single share of an SUP is owned by more than one person, those persons shall be regarded as one member in relation to the SUP. They shall exercise their rights through one representative and shall notify the management body of the SUP, without undue delay, of the name of that representative and any change thereto. Until such notification, the exercise of their rights in the SUP shall be suspended. The owners of the single share shall be jointly and severally liable for the commitments made by the representative.deleted
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 207 #

2014/0120(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The share capital of an SUP shall be at least EUR 13000. In Member States in which the euro is not the national currency, the share capital shall be at least equivalent to one unitthe same sum of that Member States’ currency.
2015/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2014/0005(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) The promotion of goods prohibited under this Regulation or national law takes place at Union trade fairs and exhibitions in several Members States.
2015/06/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 19 #

2014/0005(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 b (new)
(6b) The promotion by companies takes place in several Members States of a range of goods currently not prohibited by this Regulation but which are inappropriate for use by law enforcement officials and which could facilitate torture or other cruel, degrading or inhuman treatment or punishment, including certain direct contact electric shock devices.
2015/06/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 21 #

2014/0005(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The existing Regulation has failed to adequately control a further range of goods including restraint chairs, acoustic devices and millimetre wave weapons.
2015/06/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2014/0005(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 1
This Regulation lays down Union rules governing trade with third countries in goods that could be used for the purpose of capital punishment or for the purpose of torture or other cruel, degrading or inhuman treatment or punishment, and governing also the provision of brokering services and, the supply of technical assistance related to such goods, the commercial promotion and marketing of such goods, also via internet.
2015/06/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 27 #

2014/0005(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 2 – point f
(aa) Point (f) is replaced by the following: "(f) 'technical assistance' means any technical support related to repairs, development, manufacture, testing, maintenance, assembly, use or any other technical service, and may take forms such as instruction, advice, training, transmission of working knowledge or skills or consulting services. Technical assistance includes verbal forms of assistance and assistance provided by electronic means;" (This amendment seeks to amend a provision within the existing act – Article 2(f) – that was not referred to in the Commission proposal.)Or. en
2015/06/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2014/0005(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 2 – point 1
(l) “broker' means any natural person, resident or national of a Member State, or legal person or partnership resident or established in a Member State of the Union that carries out services defined under point (k) from the Union into the territory of a third country or outside the Union by a non EU-based subsidiary of an EU company;
2015/06/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 34 #

2014/0005(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 4 b (new)
(3a) The following Article is added: 'Article 4b' Prohibition of commercial promotion and marketing Commercial promotion, marketing and e- commerce activities within the Union by Union or non-Union registered companies and individuals for the purposes of transfer of goods listed in Annex II shall be prohibited.
2015/06/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 36 #

2014/0005(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 6 – paragraph 1a (new)
-1 In Article 6, the following paragraph is inserted: (1a) The competent authority, taking into account all relevant evidence, shall conduct, along with Member States, appropriate promulgation activities in order to ensure that all companies promoting security equipment and those organising trade fairs and other events where such equipment is promoted, are made aware of the fact that such equipment could be used for torture and other cruel, degrading or inhuman treatment or punishment and that it could eventually be prohibited to expose and be devoid of the authorisations.
2015/06/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 47 #

2014/0005(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. For customs risk management purposes, the customs authorities shall share relevant information through a rapid alert system, in accordance with Article 4g of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93. *
2015/06/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 55 #

2014/0005(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 - paragraph 1 - point 15 b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Annex II – point 2.2a (new)
Paragraph 2.2a shall be inserted to Annex II: - prisoner hoods intended for law enforcement purposes - detainee/prisoner control pliers
2015/06/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2014/0005(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – points 1.7.a to 1.7.e (new)
points 1.7.a to 1.7.e is inserted to Annex IIIa: 1.7.a hydromorphone 1.7.b midazolam 1.7.c pancuronium bromide 1.7.d rocuronium bromide 1.7.e vecuronium bromide
2015/06/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 58 #

2014/0005(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II - Part 2
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Annex IIIb (new)
Benindeleted
2015/06/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 59 #

2014/0005(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II - Part 2
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Annex IIIb (new)
Liberiadeleted
2015/06/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #

2014/0005(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II - Part 2
Regulation (EC) 1236/2005
Annex IIIb (new)
Madagascardeleted
2015/06/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 61 #

2014/0005(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II - Part 2
Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005
Annex IIIb (new)
Mongoliadeleted
2015/06/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 47 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The free movement of workers is a keyone of the element tos in the development of a more integrated Union labour market which allows worker mobility from high unemployment areas to areas characterised by labour shortages. It may also contributes to finding the right skills for vacant positions and overcoming bottlenecks in the labour market.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Member States should establish Coordination Offices at national and regional level to provide general support and assistance to all organisations on their territory operating for EURES and support the cooperation with their counterparts in the other Member States and with the European Coordination Office. Those Coordination Offices should in particular have the task of dealing with complaints and problems with job vacancies, and verify compliance issues as regards voluntary and fair labour mobility within the Union.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
b) actions by and between Member States to facilitate the achievement of a balance between supply and demand in the labour market of the Union, with a view to promote a high level of employment, guaranteeing suitable forms of protection for those deciding to leave their own country;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c
c) the functioning of a European network of employment services between Member States and the Commission, involving also the social partners;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 183 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) effective promotion of the EURES network at European level through intensive communication efforts by the Commission and, in particular, the Member State governments, using instruments ensuring wide dissemination and usability;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 186 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) "the public employment services" are the organisations of the Member States, as part of relevant ministries, public bodies or corporations falling under public law, that are responsible for implementing active labour market policies and providing employment services in the public interest and in the interest of wider social protection;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 187 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) "employment services" means any legal or natural person, lawfully operating in a Member State, which provides services for job seekers to getfind employedment in line with their training and for employers to recruit qualified workers;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 195 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the "common IT platform" means the IT infrastructure and related platforms set up, monitored and widely shared at European level for the purpose of clearance;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 196 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) "placement" by employment services of a worker with an employer or "recruitment" of a worker for an employer means the provision of services to mediate between supply and demand with the objective of filling a job vacancy and tailored to the requirements of both sides;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 220 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) the duly selected social partners representing both workers and employers;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 250 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Labour market policy, including support measures of all kinds, shall remain a Member State competence and shall seek to safeguard domestic employment in line with social guarantees, including mobility-related support.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 254 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) the operation and development of a European job mobility portal, 'the EURES portal', and related IT services made useable and accessible, including systems and procedures for the exchange of job vacancies, job applications, CVs, and supporting documents such as skills passports and the like, and other information, in cooperation with other relevant Union information, advisory services or networks, and initiatives;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 255 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) information and communication activities, through platforms reaching all possible users;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 264 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the analysis of geographic and occupational mobility, taking account of the different situations in the Member States;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 270 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the monitoring and evaluation of EURES activity using not only economic but also social indicators, and its employment performance, in co-operation with EURES Members;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 285 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) organisation of the work for EURES in the Member State, including in particular the delivery of support services in accordance with Chapter IV;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 288 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The National Coordination Office also organises and verifies the implementation at national level of the horizontal support activities provided by the European Coordination Office as referred to in Article 6, where appropriate in close cooperation with the European Coordination Office and other National Coordination Offices. Those horizontal support activities are in particular:
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 290 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the provision of pre-training activities relating to EURES activity, the selection and training of staff for participation in the common training programme and in mutual learning activities;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 327 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Where appropriate, tThe National Coordination Office may validate and disseminate the information in cooperation with other information and advisory services and networks and appropriate bodies at national level, including those referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2013/.../EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on measures facilitating the exercise of rights conferred on workers in the context of freedom of movement for workers22. ______________ 22 COM (2013) 236 final.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 331 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. The National Coordination Office promotes the collaboration with stakeholders such as career guidance services, universities, chambers of commerce and organisations involved in apprenticeships and traineeships schemes, as well as the social partners involved.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 344 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. Each Member State ensures that its National Coordination Office gets the qualified staff and other resources necessary to carry out its tasks as defined under this Regulation.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 357 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall set up a system based on harmonised criteria to authorise EURES Partners to participate in the EURES network, monitor their activities and their compliance with national and Union law when applying this Regulation. This system shall be transparent, proportionate and respect the principles of equal treatment for applicant organisations and due process of law.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 358 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall set up a system to authorise EURES Partners to participate in the EURES network, monitor their activities and their compliance with national and Union law when applying this Regulation. This system shall be transparent, proportionate and, endorsed by the social partners and shall respect the principles of equal treatment for applicant organisations and due process of law.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 386 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7
7. To amend the Annex, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 33.deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 392 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 8
8. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, adopt a template for the description of the national system and procedures for sharing information on national systems between Member States. Those implementing acts shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 34(2).deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 402 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to contribute toincrease the pool of job vacancies in accordance with Article 14(1), paragraph (a);
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 405 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to contribute toincrease the pool of job applications and CV’s in accordance with Article 14(1), paragraph 1(b);
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 412 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. EURES Partners designate one or more contact points, such as placement and recruitment offices, call centres, self- service tools and the lik, various communication platforms that are accessible to as many users as possible, where workers and employers can get support with clearance and/or access to support services in accordance with this Regulation. The contact points may also be based on staff exchange programmes, the detachment of liaison officers or involve common placement agencies.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 416 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
a) the functioning of the national hub referred to in Article 15(5) through a fee or in another form;deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 425 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall decide on the modalities for these contributions in their national systems on the basis of the principle of proportionality and transparency, taking into account factors such as the administrative capacity of the EURES Partner and its degree of participation in the EURES network as referred to in paragraph 1.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 426 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States mayshall delegate to their public employment services general tasks or activities relating to the organisation of the work under this Regulation, such as the development and running of the national systems for authorising EURES Partners or the preparation and distribution of the basic information referred to in Article 20.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 430 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Member States mayshall entrust the provision of support services referred to in Articles 21 to 23 to their public employment services, provided that the latter participate in the EURES network, either as a EURES Partner authorised pursuant to Article 8 and the Annex to this Regulation or as a EURES Partner on the basis of the exemption in paragraph 3 or their employment ministries.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 431 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Member States may check and monitor the activities of EURES Members’ and EURES Partners’ compliance with this Regulation.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 432 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. For a maximum period of five years from the date of application of this Regulation, Member States may exempt from a review into the application of Article 8 and the Annex to this Regulation those public employment services which were at the time of the entry into force of this Regulation part of the EURES network in accordance with Commission Implementing Decision 2012/733/EU and/or, where appropriate, Commission Decision 2003/8/EC. Member States shall inform the Commission of the exemptions granted.deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 467 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) shall not make any distinction according to the nature and duration of contracts nor the recruitment intentions of employers, but shall provide appropriate and relevant information;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 469 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point b
b) may exclude job vacancies which due to their nature or to national rules are only open to citizens of a specific country.deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 484 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 7
7. To enable the matching of offers of employment with applications for employment each Member State shall provide the information referred to in paragraph 1 according to a uniform, shared and transparent system.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 492 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall put in place a national hub that is appropriately shared and accessible at all levels to allow for the transfer to the EURES portal of information on job vacancies, job applications and CV’s made available by any organisation that is willing to share this information also on the EURES portal.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 499 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall develop a European classification of skills, competences, qualifications and occupations, taking account of and not discriminating against the clear and obvious specific characteristics of all interested parties. This classification is the tool facilitating on line job application across borders for the European Union by performing job matching, identifying skills shortages, recognising qualifications and providing career guidance on the EURES portal.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 538 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 5
5. Support services for workers as set out in Articles 20, 22 and 23 and the assistance with registration on the EURES portal referred to in Article 17(1) and (2) are free of charge.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 540 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 6
6. Support services for employers referred to in Articles 21 and 22 and the assistance with registration on the EURES portal referred to in Article 17(2) may be subject to fee. Any fee charged, cannot differentiate between the fees levied for EURES services and those applicable to other comparable services provided by the organisation concerned.deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 544 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 7
7. The EURES Partners concerned shall clearly indicate to workers and employers the range of support services they provide, where and how those services are accessible and the conditions under which access is provided, using their information channels which should be as accessible as possible. That information is published on the EURES portal.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 547 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that all workers and employers requesting client services from employment services receive or are made aware of basicappropriate information on mobility support available at national level which
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 560 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
1. The EURES Partners concerned proactively offer all workers seeking employment the opportunity to access the services defined in this Article. Where appropriate, tThis offer is repeated during the job search process.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 562 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. If wn orkders are interested in to give further assistance, the EURES Partners concerned provide information and guidance on individual employment opportunities and in particular offer them the following services:
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 573 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) where requested, to provide assistance with the drawing up of job applications and CVs to ensure conformity with the European technical standards and formats referred to in Articles 14(8) and 16(5);
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 575 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) where necessary, to provide assistance with the uploading of such job applications and on relevant national job search portals and the EURES portal;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 577 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) where appropriate, to include follow- up on possible intra- EU placement as part of the individual action plan;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 579 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) where appropriate, to refer to another EURES Partner.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 582 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3
3. If workers are interested in furtherThe EURES Partners provide workers with full assistance and, where there is a reasonable likelihood of an intra-EU placement, the EURES Partners concerned providealso with further job search assistance, consisting of services such as the selection of suitable vacancies, assistance with drawing up job applications and CV's and providing translations and/or obtaining clarifications on specific job vacancies in other Member States.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 597 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) where requested, to provide information and guidance on the formulation of individual job requirements in a job vacancy understandable to a European audience;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 599 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) where requested, to provide assistance on the formulation of the job vacancy in conformity with the European technical standards and formats referred to in Articles 14(8) and 16(5);
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 600 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) where necessary, to provide assistance with the registration as an employer on the EURES portal;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 602 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) where appropriate, to refer to another EURES Partner.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 605 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2
2. If employers are interested in furtherThe EURES Partners provide employers with full assistance and, where there is a reasonable likelihood of an intra- EU recruitment, the EURES Partners concerned providealso with further assistance, consisting of such services as the pre-selection of suitable candidates and assistance with providing translations and/or obtaining clarifications on specific job applications.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 614 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. The EURES Partners concerned shall provide, upon request of workers and employers, with general information on post- recruitment assistance and about where to obtain post- recruitment assistance such as training on intercultural communication, language courses and support with integration.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 618 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2
2. By derogation from Article 18(5), EURES Partners may offer the assistance referred to in paragraph 1 to workers against a fee.deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 637 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3
3. Upon request of workers, frontier workers and employers, the EURES Partners concerned shall provide general information on the rights related to social security and undertake to refer those requests for specific information to the competent authorities and, if applicable, to other bodies supporting workers exercising their rights in the framework of the freedom of movement.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 648 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
The Commission and the Member States monitor and publicise labour mobility flows and patterns in the Union on the basis of Eurostat statistics and the available national data.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 651 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Each Member State shall, in particular, collect and analyse information, from quoted sources that are made available to the public, on:
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 656 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) the needs and tendencies of the labour market in order to create possible synergies between employers and universities or professional training institutes to address the problem of mismatch between skills and vacancies;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 657 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) EURES activities at national level; in order to identify new possibilities for political initiatives;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 662 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3
3. Taking into account the exchange of information and the joint analysis, Member States shall develop mobility policies as an, once they have adopted all the measures which facilitate integrnal part of their employmentemployment, may also develop mobility policies. These mobility policies provide the framework on the basis of which Member States carry out the programming referred to in Article 28.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 664 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. All organisations participating in the EURES network referred to in Article 4 shall share and exchange information on the situation in the Member States concerning living and working conditions, administrative procedures and the rules applicable to workers from other Member States, thus giving necessary guidance to workers and employers.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 673 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4
4. TAll the representatives of the social partners at Union level participating in the EURES Coordination Group shall be consulted on the draft work programmes.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 677 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) information and guidance provided by the social partners, who are vital for evaluation;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 684 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Taking into account the information gathered as referred to in this Chapter, the European Commission shall submit every two years a report to the European Parliament, the Council, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee on labour mobility within the Union and the services provided to workers to facilitate the exercise of the freedom of movement in accordance with Article 46 TFEU.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 685 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – subparagraph 1
The European Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, the Council, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee an ex-post evaluation on the operation and effects of this Regulation fivone years after its entry into force.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The free movement of safe and wholesome food is an essential aspect of the internal market and contributes significantly to the health and well-being of citizens, as well as benefitting their social and economic interests. Differences between national laws concerning the safety assessment and authorisation of novel foods may hinder the free movement of such food, thereby creating unfair conditions of competition including for agri-food industry and in particular for SMEs.
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 17 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) A high level of protection of human health and of consumers’ interests and the effective functioning of the internal market should be assured in the pursuit of Union food policies, whilst ensuring transparency and stimulating innovation and creativity within the agri-food SMEs and applying the standards laid down in Union legislation to all food, including those imported from third countries.
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Novel foods should be authorised and used only if they fulfil the criteria laid down in this Regulation. Novel foods should be safe and their use should not mislead the consumer. Therefore, where a novel food is intended to replace another food, it should not differ from that food in a way that would be nutritionally less advantageous for the consumer. When a novel food comes from third countries, the scope of its use and its composition should not pose a safety risk to human health when exposed to a different climatic conditions and environment.
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Novel foods are subject to the general labelling requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision of food information to consumers and other relevant labelling requirements in Union food law. In certain cases it may bet is necessary to provide for additional labelling information, in particular regarding the description of the food, its source and origin or its conditions of use to ensure that consumers are sufficiently informed of the nature of the novel food, including those coming from third countries.
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 42 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) The Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and should take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. Those penalties should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and should help to ensure a level playing field.
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 49 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) ‘traditional food from a third country’ means novel food, other than the novel food as referred to in point (a)(i) to (iii), which is derived from primary production and processed derivatives as defined in Regulation 178/2002, with a history of safe food use and significant consumption in a third country;
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 52 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) ‘history of safe food use in a third country’ means that the safety of the food in question has been confirmed with compositional data and from experience of continued use and significant consumption for at least 25 years in the customary diet of a large part of the population of a third country, prior to a notification referred to in Article 13;
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 54 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) ‘the applicant’ means the Member State, the third country, or the interested party, who may represent several interested parties, or an SME, who has submitted an application in accordance with Article 9 or 15 or a notification in accordance with Article 13 to the Commission;
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall establish and update a Union list of novel foods, which shall include a list of novel food from third countries, authorised to be placed on the market within the Union in accordance with Articles 6, 7 and 8 (‘the Union list’).
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 61 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Union list shall be made public.
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 85 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) documented data demonstrating the history of safe food use and significant consumption in a third country;
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 87 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) where applicable, the conditions of use and specific labelling requirements, which do not mislead the consumer.
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 89 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. Where no reasoned safety objections are made in accordance with paragraph 2 within the time-limit laid down in that paragraph, the Commission shall authorise the placing on the market within the Union of the traditional food concerned and update without delay the list of traditional food from third countries included in the Union list.
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 105 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and shall ensure a level playing field. Member States shall notify those provisions to the Commission by …26 at the latest and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them. __________________ 26 Publications Office: please insert date: 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 108 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 a (new)
Article 29a Reporting Five years after entry into force and in the light of experience gained, the Commission shall forward to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the implementation of this regulation and, in particular, of article 3 and 8, accompanied, where appropriate, by any proposal.
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 109 #

2013/0435(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 b (new)
Article 29b The report shall be made public.
2014/10/10
Committee: INTA
Amendment 9 #

2013/0433(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Title
Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the cloning of animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine and, equine, poultry, rabbit and fish species kept and reproduced for farming purposes
2015/04/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 10 #

2013/0433(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Title
Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the cloning of animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine and equinell species kept and reproduced for farming purposes
2015/04/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2013/0433(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Currently animals of bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine and equine species are likely to be cloned for farming purposes. The scope of this Directive should therefore be limited to the use of cloning for farming purposes of those five species.deleted
2015/04/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 21 #

2013/0433(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Currently animals of bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine and, equine, poultry, rabbit and fish species are likely to be cloned for farming purposes. The scope of this Directive should therefore be limited to the use ofconcern cloning for farming purposes of those five species.
2015/04/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 23 #

2013/0433(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) Agricultural and food products obtained from animal clones or their descendants, especially products from third countries in which such practices are permitted, cannot easily be recognised on the European market, owing to a lack of a mandatory traceability and labelling system.
2015/04/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2013/0433(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4 b (new)
(4b) EU citizens disapprove of cloning for agricultural and commercial purposes, for reasons relating to ethics, food safety and animal health protection, and therefore are entitled to be appropriately informed about the products they purchase and consume, especially with a view to trade agreements with countries in which cloning practices and the marketing of cloned products are permitted.
2015/04/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2013/0433(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2
It shall apply to animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine and, equine, poultry, rabbit and fish species ('the animals') kept and reproduced for farming purposes.
2015/04/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 33 #

2013/0433(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2
It shall apply to all animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine and equine species ('the animals') kept and reproduced for farming purposes.
2015/04/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 35 #

2013/0433(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point a
(a) animals "kept and reproduced for farming purposes" means animals kept and reproduced for the production of food, wool, skin or fur or for other farming purposes. It shall not include animals kept and reproduced exclusively for other purposes such as research, the production of medicinal products and medical devices, the preservation of rare breeds or endangered species, sporting and cultural events;
2015/04/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2013/0433(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point b
(b) the placing on the market and import of animal clones and embryo clones, descendants of animal clones, germinal products of animal clones and of their descendants, and food from animal clones and their descendants.
2015/04/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #

2013/0433(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point b
(b) the placing on the market and import of animal clones and embryo clones, descendants of animal clones, germinal products of animal clones and of their descendants.
2015/04/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 52 #

2013/0433(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4
Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and, dissuasive and ensure a level playing field. Member States shall notify those provisions to the Commission by [date for transposition of the Directive] at the latest and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.’
2015/04/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2013/0432(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) Consequently, customs infringements and sanctions follow 28 different sets of legal rules. As a result of that, a breach of Union customs legislation is not treated the same way throughout the Union and the sanctions that may be imposed in each case differ in nature and severity depending on the Member State that is imposing the sanction, leading to losses of revenue for the Member States and trade distortions.
2016/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2013/0432(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) That disparity of Member States' legal systems affects not only the optimal management of the customs union, but also prevents that a level playing field is achieved for economic operators in the customs union, who are already subject to different sets of rules in the 28 Member States, because it has an impact on their access to customs simplifications and facilitations.
2016/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 15 #

2013/0432(COD)

(17) In order to facilitate the investigation of customs infringements, the competent authorities should be allowed to temporarily seize any goods, means of transport or any other instrument used in committing the infringement and use an early warning system to notify the other competent authorities of the 28 Member States of the infringement.
2016/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2013/0432(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1a Trade Facilitation In accordance with the WTO agreement on trade facilitation, the Member States shall work together to set up an early warning system which can be used to notify the 28 Member States without delay of investigations into customs infringements and of established infringements in such a way as to facilitate trade, prevent illegal goods from entering the internal market and improve the effectiveness of checks.
2016/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2013/0432(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – point a
(a) where the customs infringement relates to specific goods, a pecuniary fine from 1 % up tof 5 % of the value of the goods;
2016/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 23 #

2013/0432(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – point b
(b) where the customs infringement is not related to specific goods, a pecuniary fine from EUR 152 500 up to EUR 7 500.
2016/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 25 #

2013/0432(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – point a
(a) where the customs infringement relates to specific goods, a pecuniary fine up tof 15 % of the value of the goods;
2016/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 27 #

2013/0432(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – point b
(b) where the customs infringement is not related to specific goods, a pecuniary fine up tof EUR 22 500.
2016/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 30 #

2013/0432(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – point a
(a) where the customs infringement relates to specific goods, a pecuniary fine up tof 30% of the value of the goods;
2016/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 31 #

2013/0432(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – point b
(b) where the customs infringement is not related to specific goods, a pecuniary fine up tof EUR 45 000.
2016/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2013/0432(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Each year the Commission shall publish details of the sanctions imposed by the 28 Member States for the customs infringements referred to in Articles 3 to 6 of this Directive. In addition, economic operators found to have committed repeated customs infringements as referred to in Article 5 of this Directive shall have their names included in a public list forwarded to the competent customs authorities throughout the Union.
2016/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2013/0390(COD)

Draft legislative resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
- having regard to the agreement reached by the European Social Partners,
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2013/0390(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The "blue" economy represents about 5,4 million jobs and generates a gross added value of almost EUR 500 billion per year.
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2013/0390(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 b (new)
(7b) It is necessary to safeguard the social rights of people working in the “blue” economy and to ensure a level playing field within the Union.
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2013/0390(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) The European social partners in the sectors concerned have reached an agreement.
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2013/0390(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 b (new)
(8b) The maritime sector has a great potential for innovation and growth and should be made more attractive to young people.
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2013/0157(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The provisions governing providers of port services, including subcontractors, laid down by the competent national authority shall take precedence over those drawn up by the managing body of the port.
2015/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2013/0157(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the compliance with local, national, Union and international environmental requirements. laid down by law and in keeping with best practice, innovation and scientific progress in the area of greater environmental and energy efficiency.
2015/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2013/0157(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. The managing body of the port shall treat providers of port services, including subcontractors, impartially and equally and shall act in a prompt and transparent manner.
2015/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2013/0157(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The restrictions laid down by the competent national authority shall take precedence over those imposed by the managing body of the port.
2015/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2013/0157(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. the need to guarantee the health and safety of workers and the provision of safe, environmentally sustainable port operations and services which do not have an adverse impact on the surrounding environment.
2015/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2013/0157(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to national and Union law including collective agreements between social partners, the managing bodies of the port may at Union, national, regional or local level, the Member State shall require the designated provider of port services appointed in accordance with the procedure established by Article 7, in the case where this provider is different from the incumbent providercluding its subcontractors, to uphold rights as regards the information and consultation of pwort services,kers and to grant staff previously taken on by the incumbent provider of port services, irrespective of whether they perform their tasks on board vessels or on land for the services in question, the rights to which they would have been entitled if there had been a transfer within the meaning of Directive 2001/23/EC.
2015/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2013/0157(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. Where mManaging bodies of the port shall require all providers of port services and subcontractors to comply with certainall social and labour standards as regards the provision of relevant port serviceslaid down in Union or national law, including in applicable collective agreements. To this end, tender documents and port service contracts shall list the staff concerned and give transparent details of their contractual rights and the conditions under which employees are deemed to be linked to the port services.
2015/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2013/0157(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt, where necessary, delegated acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 21 concerning common classifications of vessels, fuels and types of operations according to which the infrastructure charges can vary and common charging principles for port infrastructure charges.
2015/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2013/0157(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21
1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 14 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 14 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 14 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of 2 months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by 2 months at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council.1 deleted Exercise of the delegation
2015/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Citation 2 a (new)
Having regard to the directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and in particular its Article 18
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 76 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) When assessing whether restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or practices exist in a third country, the Commission should examine to what degree laws on public procurement and concessions of the country concerned ensure transparency in line with international standards in the field of public procurement and preclude any discrimination against Union goods, services and economic operators. In addition, it should examine to what degree individual contracting authorities and/or contracting entities maintain or adopt discriminatory practices against Union goods, services and economic operators. and/or to what degree public contracts economic operators of third countries comply with applicable obligations in the fields of environmental, social and labour law established by Union law, national law, collective agreements or by the international environmental, social and labour law provisions listed in Annex X of the Directive 2014/24/EU
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 80 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) In view of the fact that the access of third country goods and services to the public procurement market of the Union falls within the scope of the common commercial policy, Member States and their contracting authorities and contracting entities should not be able to restrict the access of third country goods or services to their tendering procedures by any other measure than those provided for in this Regulation or by relevant Union law, national law or collective agreements.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 82 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) The Commission should be able, on its own initiative or at the application of interested parrequests made by interested parties, relevant stakeholders, contracting authorities, entities or a Member State, to initiate at any time an investigation into restrictive procurement measures or practices allegedly adopted or maintained by a third country. . Such investigative procedures should be without prejudice to Regulation (EU) No 654/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council .
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 83 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) If the existence of a restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measure or practice in a third countryWhere the Commission has, on the basis of available information or after having consulted with relevant stakeholders, reasons to believe that a third county has adopted or maintains a restrictive procurement or concession practices, it should initiate an investigation. If the existence of such measure or practice is confirmed, the Commission should invite the country concerned to enter into consultations with a view to improving the tendering opportunities for Union economic operators, goods and services in respect of public procurement in that country.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 85 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) It is of the utmost importance that the investigation is carried out in a transparent manner and within reasonable timeframe. A report on the main findings of the investigation should therefore be publicly available.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 88 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) If the consultations with the country concerned do not lead to sufficientconcrete improvements to the tendering opportunities for Union economic operators, goods and services within a reasonable timeframe, the Commission should be able to adopt, where appropriate, price adjustment restrictive measures applying to tenders submitted by economic operators originating in that country and/or including goods and services originating in that country.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 91 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) Such measures should be applied only for the purpose of the evaluation ofto exclude those tenders comprising goods or services originating in the country concerned. To avoid circumvention of those measures, it may also be necessary to target certain foreign-controlled or owned legal persons that, although established in the European Union, are not engaged in substantive business operations that have a direct and effective link with the economy of at least one Member State . Appropriate measures should not be disproportionate to the restrictive procurement practices to which they respond and should apply until sufficient improvements are registered.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 96 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Price adjustment measures should not have a negative impact on on-going trade negotiations with the country concerned. Therefore, wWhere a country is engaging in substantive negotiations with the Union concerning market access in the field of public procurement, the Commission may suspend the measures during the negotiations.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 97 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) In order to simplify the application of a price adjustmentthe restrictive measure by contracting authorities or contracting entities, there should be a presumption that all economic operators originating in a targeted third country with which there is no agreement on procurement will be subject to the measure, unless they can demonstrate that less than 50% of the total value of their tender is made up of goods or services originating in the third country concerned.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 98 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) Member States are best placed to identify the contracting authorities or contracting entities, or categories of contracting authorities or contracting entities, which should apply the price adjustment measure. To ensure that an appropriate level of action is taken and that a fair distribution of the burden among Member States is achieved, the Commission should take the final decision, based on a list submitted by each Member Stat which should apply the restrictive measure. Where necessary, the Commission may establish a list on its own initiative.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 101 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) It is imperative that contracting authorities and contracting entities have access to a range of high-quality products meeting their purchasing requirements at a competitive price. Therefore contracting authorities and contracting entities should be able not to apply price adjustmentto set aside measures limiting access of non-covered goods and services in case there are no Union and/or covered goods or services available which meet the requirements of the contracting authority or contracting entity to safeguard essential public needs, for example in the fields of water supply, health and public safety, or where the application of the measure would lead to a disproportionate increase in the price or costs of the contract.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 104 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) Regular reporting by the Commission should make it possible to monitor the application and, to underline sectors where reciprocity is achieved, to assess the efficiency of the procedures established by this Regulation and, where appropriate, to revise it.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 105 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
It provides for the possibility of applying price adjustmentrestrictive measures to certain tenders for contracts for the execution of works or a work, for the supply of goods and/or the provision of services and for concessions, on the basis of the origin of the economic operators, goods or services concerned. .
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 109 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 5
5. Member States and their contracting authorities and contracting entities shall not apply restrictive measures in respect of third country economic operators, goods and services beyond those provided for in this Regulation or by relevant Union law, national law or collective agreements.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 113 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ‘restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measure or practice’ means any legislative, regulatory or administrative measure, procedure or practice, or combination thereof, adopted or maintained by public authorities or individual contracting authorities or contracting entities in a third country, that result in a serious and recurrent impairment oflack of reciprocity in the access of Union goods, services and/or economic operators to the public procurement or concession market of that country.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 115 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
(h a) "Interested parties" means relevant stakeholders, individual contracting authorities and entities excluding municipalities with less than 100.000 inhabitants
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 121 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Where tThe Commission considers it to be in the interest of the Union, it may at any time, on its own initiative or upon application of interested parties, relevant stakeholders, individual contracting authorities, contracting entities or a Member State, initiate an investigation into alleged restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or pratices.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 122 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
If an investigation is initiated, the Commission shall publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union, inviting interested parties, relevant stakeholders, individual contracting authorities, contracting entities and Member States to provide all relevant information to the Commission within a specified period of time.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 123 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The assessment by the Commission of whether the alleged restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or practices have been adopted or are maintained by the third country concerned shall be made on the basis of the information supplied by interested parties and Member States, of facts collected by the Commission during its investigation, or both. The assessment shall be carried out in a transparent manner and concluded within a period of eightfive months after the initiation of the investigation. In duly justified cases, this period may be extended by four months.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 129 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. The Commission may terminate consultations if the country concerned undertakes international commitments or specific obligations in the fields of environmental, social and labour law agreed with the Union in any of the following frameworks:
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 137 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) The objectives of improving the access of Union economic operators to the public procurement and concessions markets of certain third countries protected by restrictive and discriminatory procurement measures or practices and of preserving equal treatment of operators and equal conditions of competition within the internal market require to refer to the non-preferential rules of origin established in the EU customs legislation, so that contracting authorities and contracting entities know whether goods and services are covered by the international commitments of the Union.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 139 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Tenders more than 50 % of the total value of which is made of goods and/or services originating in a third country, may be subject to a price adjustmentrestrictive measure where the third country concerned adopts or maintains restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or practices.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 139 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The origin of a good should be determined in accordance with Article 22s 59 to 262 of Council Regulation (EECU) No 2913/199218 952/20135of the European Parliament and of the Council. _________________ 18Council 5Regulation (EECU) No 2913/1992 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ L 302, 9.10.1992269, 10.10.2013, p. 1)
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 142 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Price adjustmentRestrictive measures shall only apply to contracts with an estimated value equal to or above EUR 5.000.000 exclusive of value-added tax.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 145 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The price adjustment measure shall specify the penalty of up to 20% to be calculated on the price of the tenders concerned. It shall also specify any restrictions to the scope of application of the measure, such as those relarestrictive measure adopted pursuant to paragraph 1 may be limited to:
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 149 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Contracting authorities and contracting entities on the list adopted pursuant to Article 9 shall apply the price adjustmentrestrictive measures to the following:
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 150 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) In the light of the overall policy objective of the Union to support small and medium-sized enterprises, this Regulation should also not apply to tenders submitted by SMEsautonomous SMEs, as defined by Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, established in the Union and in engaged in substantive business operations entailing a direct and effective link with the economy of at least one Member State.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 153 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – title
Withdrawal or suspension of price adjustmentrestrictive measures
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 154 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission may decide, by implementing act, to withdraw the price adjustmentrestrictive measure or suspend its application for a period of time if the country concerned takes satisfactoryufficient remedial or corrective actions.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 154 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) On the contrary, this Regulation should also apply to tenders where SMEs established in the Union are committed to subcontract more than 10% of the total value of the contract to economic operators originating in a third country.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 155 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Where the remedial or corrective actions taken by the third country concerned are rescinded, suspended or improperly implemented, the Commission may reinstate the application of the price adjustmentrestrictive measure, at any time, by means of an implementing act.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 156 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – title
Application of price adjustmentrestrictive measures
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 157 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Contracting authorities and contracting entities on the list adopted pursuant to Article 9 shall apply price adjustmentrestrictive measures to the following:
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 158 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b – paragraph 2
Contracting authorities and contracting entities shall not apply price adjustmentrestrictive measures to tenders referred to in point (a) where the tenderers can demonstrate that less than 50 % of the total value of their tender is made of goods and services originating in the third country concerned.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 159 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b – paragraph 3
The price adjustment measure shall apply only for the purpose of the evaluation and ranking of the price component of the tenders. It shall not affect the price due to be paid under the contract which will be concluded with the successful tenderer.deleted
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 160 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) When assessing whether restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or practices exist in a third country, the Commission should examine to what degree laws, rules and measures on public procurement and concessions of the country concerned ensure transparency and access in line with international standards in the field of public procurement and preclude any discrimination against Union goods, services and economic operators. In addition, it should examine to what degree individual contracting authorities or contracting entities maintain or adopt discriminatory practices against Union goods, services and economic operators.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 161 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. When contracting authorities and contracting entities conduct a procurement or a concession procedure that is subject to a price adjustment measure they shall include that informationin the contract notice they publish pursuant to Article 49 of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 69 of Directive 2014/25/EU or in the concession notice they publish pursuant to Article 31 of Directive 2014/23/EU. The Commission may adopt implementing acts in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 14(3) adapting the standard forms for contract or concession notices adopted under Directives 2014/23/EU, 2014/24/EU, and 2014/25/EU.deleted
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 162 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. Contracting authorities and contracting entities shall inform unsuccessful tenderersof the award of a contract or a concession based on the application of a price adjustment measure adopted or reinstated pursuant to this Regulation.deleted
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 163 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Where a price adjustmentrestrictive measure is applied, contracting authorities and contracting entities shall require tenderers to provide information on the origin of the goods and/or services contained in the tender, and on the value of the goods and services originating in the third country concerned as a percentage of the total value of the tender. They shall accept self- declarations from tenderers.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 163 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) In view of the fact that the access of third country goods and services to the public procurement market of the Union falls within the scope of the common commercial policy, Member States and their contracting authorities and contracting entities should not be able to restrict the access of third country goods or services to their tendering procedures by any other measure than those, whether the related country is not respecting social and environmental standards and conventions, to their tendering procedures in full respect of measures provided for in this Regulation.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 165 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12
[...]deleted
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 169 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) The Commission should be able, on its own initiative or at the application of the European Parliament or of other interested parties or a Member State, to initiate at any time an investigation into restrictive procurement measures or practices allegedly adopted or maintained by a third country. . Such investigative procedures should be without prejudice to Regulation (EU) No 654/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council .
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 172 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
By 31 December 2018 and aAt least every three years thereafter , theafter its entry into force, Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Regulation and on progress made in international negotiations regarding access for Union economic operators to public contract or concession award procedures in third countries undertaken under this Regulation. To this effect, Member States shall upon request provide the Commission with appropriate information.
2018/03/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 180 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) If the existence of a restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measure or practice in a third country is confirmed, the Commission should invite the country concerned to enter into consultations with a view to eliminating any restrictive, discriminating measures or practices and improving the tendering opportunities for Union economic operators, goods and services in respect of public procurement in that country.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 184 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) It is of the utmost importance that the investigation is carried out in a transparent, coherent and non- discriminatory manner. A report on the main findings of the investigation should therefore be publicly available.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 186 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) If the consultations with the country concerned do not lead to sufficientthe removal of restrictive measures, along with the effective implementation of international social and environmental standards, having as effect a sufficient and a fair improvements to the tendering opportunities for Union economic operators, goods and services within a reasonable timeframe, the Commission should be able to adoptdecide, where appropriate, price adjustment measure applying to tendersthe exclusion of tenders (IPI measures) submitted by the economic operators originating in that country and/or including goods and services originating in that country.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 207 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Price adjustment measures should not have a negative impact on on-going trade negotiations with the country concerned. Therefore, where a country is engaging in substantive negotiations with the Union concerning market access in the field of public procurement, the Commission may suspend the measures during the negotiations.deleted
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 209 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Price adjustmentIPI measures should not have a negativedirect impact on on-going trade negotiations with the country concerned. Therefore, where a country is engaging in substantive negotiations with the Union concerning market access in the field of public procurement, the Commission may suspend the measures duringafter the conclusion of the negotiations.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 212 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) In order to simplify the application of a price adjustment measure by contracting authorities or contracting entities, there should be a presumption that all economic operators originating in a targeted third country with which there is no agreement on procurement will be subject to the measure, unless they can demonstrate that less than 50% of the total value of their tender is made up of goods or services originating in the third country concerned.deleted
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 220 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) Member States are best placed to identify the contracting authorities or contracting entities, or categories of contracting authorities or contracting entities, which should apply the price adjustmentIPI measures. To ensure that an appropriate level of action is taken and that a fair distribution of the burden among Member States is achieved, the Commission should take the final decision, based on a list submitted by each Member State. Where necessary, the Commission may establish a list on its own initiative.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 226 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) It is imperative that contracting authorities and contracting entities have access to a range of high-quality products meeting their purchasing requirements at a competitive price. Therefore contracting authorities and contracting entities should be able not to apply price adjustmentthe measures limiting access of non-covered goods and services in case there are no Union and/or covered goods or services available which meet the requirements of the contracting authority or contracting entity to safeguard essential public needs, for example in the fields of public health and public safenational security, or where the application of the measure would lead to a disproportionate increase in the price or costs of the contract.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 230 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) In case of misapplication of the IPI measures by contracting authorities or contracting entities of exceptions to price adjustment measures limiting access of non-covered goods and services, the Commission should be able to apply the corrective mechanism of Article 3 of Council Directive 89/665/EEC20 or Article 8 of Council Directive 92/13/EEC21 . In addition, contracts concluded with an economic operator by contracting authorities or contracting entities in violation of price adjustmentIPI measures limiting access of non-covered goods and services should be ineffective. _________________ 20Council Directive 89/665/EEC on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts (OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 33). 21Council Directive 92/13/EEC coordinating the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of Community rules on the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors (OJ L 76, 23.3.1992, p. 14).
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 234 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) The examination procedure should be used for the adoption of implementing acts regarding the adoption, withdrawal, or suspension or reinstatement of a the price adjustmentIPI measure.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 239 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) In accordance with the principle of proportionality, it is necessary and appropriate for achievement of the basic objective of establishing a common external policy in the field of public procurement to lay down common rules on the treatment of tenders which include goods and services not covered by the international commitments of the Union. This Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the objectives pursued, in accordance with the fourth paragraph of Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union,deleted
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 246 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
It provides for the possibility of applying price adjustment measures tofor the Commission to exclude, by means of implementing acts, certain tenders for contracts for the execution of works or a work, for the supply of goods and/or the provision of services and for concessions, on the basis of the origin of the economic operators, goods or services concerned. .
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 254 #

2012/0060(COD)

3. This Regulation shall apply to the award of contracts for the supply of goods and/or services and to the award of works and services concessions. It shall only apply where the goods or services are procured for governmental purposes. It shall not apply where the goods are purchased with a view to commercial resale or with a view to use in the production of goods for commercial sale. It shall not apply where the services are purchased with a view to commercial resale or with a view to use in the supply of services for commercial sale or in case of pre-commercial procurements.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 257 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. This Regulation shall apply only with regard to restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures, rules or practices implemented by a third country in respect of purchases of non- covered goods and services. The application of this Regulation shall be without prejudice to any international obligations of the Union.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 266 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Member States and their contracting authorities and contracting entities may apply restrictive measures in respect of third country economic operators, goods and services if the country is not respecting international social and environmental standards and conventions. The Commission shall create and update a list of third countries having restrictive measures in their public procurements and concessions listing their adoption and implementation of International social and environmental standards and Conventions for the disposal of Members States and their contracting authorities and contracting entities.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 289 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ‘restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measure or practice’ means any legislative, regulatory or administrative measure, procedure or practice, or combination thereof, adopted or maintained by public authorities or individual contracting authorities or contracting entities in a third country, that result in a serious andbreach of international social and environmental standards and conventions and leading to recurrent impairment of access of Union goods, services and/or economic operators to the public procurement or concession market of that country.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 305 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
(ha) 'sub-contracting' means delegating the part execution of a contract by a third party;
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 306 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. 'IPI measure' means a measure adopted by the Commission under the terms of this Regulation, by means of implementing acts, excluding the access of third country economic operators and/or goods and services into the Union procurement market; IPI measure may apply to economic operators and/or goods and services originating in countries not implementing international social and environmental standards and conventions as indicated by the Commission;
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 317 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b – point i
(i) if the service is not provided through a commercial presence within the Union, the country under the laws of which the legal person is constituted or otherwise organised and in the territory of which the legal person is engaged in substantive business operations;
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 342 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Tenders submitted by SMEs28 established in the Union and engaged in substantive business operations entailing a direct and effective link with the economy of at least one Member State, shall be exempted from this Regulation. unless they are committed to subcontract more than 10% of the total value of the contract to economic operators originating in a third country adopting or maintaining restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or practices; _________________ 28As defined in the Commission recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 346 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Chapter 3 – title
Investigations, consultations and price adjustmentIPI measures
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 353 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Where the Commission considers it to be in the interest of the Union, it may at any time, on its own initiative or upon application of the European Parliament or of relative interested parties or a Member State, initiate an investigation into alleged restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or practices.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 371 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. When the Commission has concluded its investigation, it shall make publicly available a report recording its main findings and advise possible actions.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 378 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Where it is found as a result of an investigation that restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or practices have been adopted or maintained by a third country and the Commission considers it to be in the Union interest, the Commission s hall invite the country in question to enter into consultations. Those consultations shall aim at ensuring that Union economic operators, goods and services can participate in tendering procedures for the award of public procurement or concession contracts in that country on conditions no less favourable than those accorded to national economic operators, goods and services, in conformity with the international social and environmental standards and conventions, of that country and also with a view to ensuring the application of the principles of transparency, fair and equal treatment.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 379 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 - point ii
ii) decide, by implementing act, to impose a price adjustment measureexclude tenders from the related countries pursuant to Article 8.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 381 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 - point a a (new)
(aa) adoption and implementation of satisfactory remedial and/or corrective measures;
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 382 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 - point c
(c) Expansion of its market access commitments undertaken under the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement or under a bilateral agreement concluded with the Union.deleted
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 383 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The consultations may also be terminated in cases where the restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or practices are still in place at the time these commitments are undertaken, as long as they include detailed provisions relating to the phasing-out of such measures or practices within a reasonable period of timethree months.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 391 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – title
Price adjustmentIPI measures
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 395 #

2012/0060(COD)

Tenders more than 50 % of the total value of which is made of goods and/or services originating in a third country, may be subject to a price adjustment measureshall be excluded where the third country concerned adopts or maintains restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or practices.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 397 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Tenders made of goods and/or services originating in a third country, may be excluded where the third country concerned does not adopt and implement international social and environmental standards and conventions.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 399 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Price adjustmentIPI measures shall only apply to contracts with an estimated value equal to or above EUR 510.000.000 exclusive of value-added tax. for good, services, works and concessions
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 405 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The price adjustment measure shall specify the penalty of up to 20% to be calculated on the price of theIPI measure shall be applied to tenders concerned. It shall also specify any restrictions to the scope of application of the measure, such as those related to:
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 415 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Contracting authorities and contracting entities on the list adopted pursuant to Article 9 shall apply the price adjustmentIPI measure to the following:
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 445 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – title
Withdrawal or suspension of price adjustmentIPI measures
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 446 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission may decide, by implementing act, to withdraw the price adjustmentIPI measure or suspend its application for a period of time if the country concerned takes satisfactory remedial or corrective actions or undertakes serious commitments to end the measure or practice in question.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 447 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Where the remedial or corrective actions taken by the third country concerned are rescinded, suspended or improperly implemented, the Commission may reinstate the application of the price adjustmentIPI measure, at any time, by means of an implementing act.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 452 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – title
Application of price adjustmentIPI measures
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 453 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Contracting authorities and contracting entities on the list adopted pursuant to Article 9 shall apply price adjustmentIPI measures to the following:
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 458 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 –subparagraph 3
The price adjustment measure shall apply only for the purpose of the evaluation and ranking of the price component of the tenders. It shall not affect the price due to be paid under the contract which will be concluded with the successful tenderer.deleted
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 459 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. When cContracting authorities and contracting entities shall not conduct a procurement or a concession procedure that is subject to a price adjustment measure they shall include that information in the contract notice they publish pursuant to Article 49 of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 69 of Directive 2014/25/EU or in the concession notice they publish pursuant to Article 31 of Directive 2014/23/EU. The Commission may adopt implementing acts in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 14(3) adapting the standard forms for contract or concession notices adopted under Directives 2014/23/EU, 2014/24/EU, and 2014/25/EUIPI measure.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 460 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. Contracting authorities and contracting entities shall inform unsuccessful tenderers of the award of a contract or a concession based on the application of a price adjustment measure adopted or reinstated pursuant to this Regulation.deleted
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 462 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Where a price adjustment measure isIPI measures are applied, contracting authorities and contracting entities shall require tenderers to provide information on the origin of the goods and/or services contained in the tender, and on the value of the goods and services originating in the third country concerned as a percentage of the total value of the tender. They shall accept self- declarations from tenderers.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 469 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Contracting authorities and contracting entities may decide not to apply the price adjustmentIPI measure with respect to a procurement or a concession procedure if:
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 472 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) there are no alternative Union and/or covered goods or services supplier available which meet the requirements of the contracting authority or contracting entity; or
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 490 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Where a contracting authority or contracting entity intends not to apply a price adjustmentIPI measure , it shall indicate its intention in the contract notice that it publishes pursuant to Article 49 of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 69 of Directive 2014/25/EU or in the concession notice pursuant to Article 31 of Directive 2014/23/EU. It shall notify the Commission no later than ten calendar days after the publication of the contract notice.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 500 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) the ground on which the decision not to apply the price adjustmentIPI measure is based, and a detailed justification for the use of the exception;
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 506 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
In the event that a contracting authority or contracting entity conducts a negotiated procedure without prior publication, under Article 2 of Directive 2014/24/EU or under Article 50 of Directive 2014/25/EU and decides not to apply a price adjustmentIPI measure , it shall indicate this in the contract award notice it publishes pursuant to Article 50 of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 70 of Directive 2014/25/EU or in the concession award notice it publishes pursuant to Article 32 of Directive 2014/23/EU and notify the Commission no later than ten calendar days after the publication of the contract award notice.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 516 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Contracts concluded with an economic operator in violation of price adjustmentthe IPI measures adopted or reinstated by the Commission pursuant to this Regulation shall be ineffective.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA