8 Amendments of Emil RADEV related to 2019/2206(INI)
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the Dublin system places a significant burden on a minority of Member States, and primarily those in the front line which, owing to their geographical location, are always the countries of first entry, in particular when influxes of migrants occur; takes the view that the EU therefore needs a solidarity mechanism which makes for fair sharing of burdens and responsibility among Member States, including through relocation on the basis of objective criteria of asylum seekers who are manifestly eligible for asylum;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Urges the introduction, in accordance with international law, of fast- track Dublin procedures at the main points of irregular arrival in the EU, in European reception centres, in order to process asylum applications swiftly, assess their merits, determine the Member State responsible and, where appropriate, return asylum seekers without an unnecessarily prolonged detention period; stresses in this connection the need to make sufficient financial and human resources available to implement fast-track Dublin procedures;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that the protection of fundamental rights must be at the heart of the measures taken to implement the Dublin III Regulation, including the protection of children, among them unaccompanied minors, and victims of trafficking and the most vulnerable;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7а. Considers that a balance should be maintained between the rights and the responsibilities of asylum seekers, without allowing for any privileged treatment towards EU citizens;
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9а. Points out that since different rules apply to movement within the Schengen Area and outside the Schengen Area, the measures taken against secondary movements should also differ;
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that the principle of a single asylum application in the EU is consistently flouted, a state of affairs at odds with the very purpose of the Dublin III Regulation; considers that the competent national authorities should share their relevant information, above all as regards the granting and rejection of asylum applications, on a European database such as Eurodac, in order to speed up procedures and prevent multiple asylum applications, while protecting personal data;
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Takes the view that closer cooperation between national asylum authorities is needed, in order to share information and streamline transfers and above all to prevent abuses such as asylum shopping; proposes that EASO be given the task of drawing up enhanced governance arrangements for the application of the Dublin III Regulation, including a monthly operational dialogue between national authorities, and a platform for the exchange and sharing of information and best practices;
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that some two-thirds of asylum applications are submitted by nationals of safe countries who have arrived in the EU on a visa or visa waiver; considers that these manifestly unfounded applications contribute to the overloading of asylum systems; calls on the Commission and the Member States to make asylum and visa policies more consistent, bearing in mind the specific nature of the country concerned;