8 Amendments of Emil RADEV related to 2019/2208(INI)
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital Г
Recital Г
D. whereas disaggregated and comparable data relating to the implementation of the directive is often not collected or publicly available in the different Member States;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital Г a (new)
Recital Г a (new)
Aa. whereas efficient returns are a key component of migration management which can have a positive impact both for the asylum system and for secondary movements;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates the importance of an evidence-based common approach to guide coherent policy-making and well-informed public discourse and calls on the Commission to urge and support Member States to collect and publish open-code qualitative and quantitative data on the implementation of the directive;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the need for a common approach to EU cooperation with third countries and a common approach to cooperation within the EU; the common approach with third countries could include, inter alia, the use of levers focusing on the implementation of incentives that link the application of those incentives to the implementation of commitments in the field of returns and readmission; the common approach within the EU could include, inter alia, support to front-line countries, cooperation between Member States in the field of the identification of illegally- staying persons and the issuance of travel documents, and in the reception of persons;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of significantly improving the effective implementation of the directive; highlights that such effectiveness should not only be measured in quantitative terms by referring to the return rate, but also in qualitative terms, such as the sustainability of returns and fundamental rights;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that return and entry-ban decisions on removal should be individualised, clearly justified with reasons in law and in fact, issued in writing, and complete with information about available remedies and the relevant deadlines;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Notes with regret the limited use of Article 6(4) of the directive; is concerned about the failure of Member States to issue a temporary residence permit where return has proven not to be possible; underlines the fact that facilitating the granting of residence permits to individuals who cannot return to their country of origin could help to prevent protracted irregular stays and facilitate individuals’ social inclusion and contribution to society;
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission to ensure that Member States and Frontex have monitoring bodies in place that are supported by a proper mandate, financing, capacity and competence, a high level of independence and expertise, and transparent procedures; urges the Commission to ensure the establishment of a post-return monitoring mechanism to understand the fate of returned persons, with particular attention for unaccompanied minors;