Activities of Angel DZHAMBAZKI related to 2014/2253(INI)
Legal basis opinions (0)
Amendments (14)
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the Commission's 30th and 31st annual reports on the application of EU law, and notes that, according to these reports, the main fields in which Member States have failed to correctly implement EU law during the year 2012 were transport, protection of health and consumers, protection of the environment, and issues related to the internal market and services, whereas in 2013 the most problematic areas wereis concerned laws on the environment, protection of health and consumers, the Sinternalgle market and services, and transport;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Stresses the importance of strengthening the effectiveness of implementation and infringement proceedings, in particular with regard to the Single Market, and the Single Market for services, due to its huge potential to deliver jobs, growth and competitiveness to the EU;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Notes the importance of monitoring the impact on competitiveness, economic growth and job creation when assessing the application of EU law;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 c (new)
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2 c. Notes that the Parliament could assist in reviewing the implementation of legislation and through its scrutiny of the Commission by stepping up dialogue on implementation and enforcement and by means of implementation reports ;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the decrease in late transposition infringements in 2012 compared to the previous year was mainly due to the fact that there were less directives to transpose in 2012 compared to the previous years; recognises, however, that the statistics for the year 2013 show a real decrease in late transposition infringements, with the number of such infringements reaching a 5-year low at the end of that year, which could be seen as a positive outcome of the introduction in Article 260(3) TFEU of the ‘fast-track' procedure for penalties in cases of non- transposition;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that the EU has been set up as a Union based on the rule of law and respect of human rights (Article 2 TEU), reiterates that careful monitoring of Member States' and EU institutions' acts and omissions is of utmost importance, and expresses its concern at the number of petitions to Parliament and complaints to the Commission concerning problems supposedly resolved byxpresses concern regarding the number of petitions to Parliament and complaints to the Commission;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recognises that the primary responsibility for the correct implementation and application of EU law lies with Member States, but points out that this does not absolve EU institutions of their duty to respect primary EU law when; notes, therefore, the importance of enhancing transposition to avoid 'gold plating', while fully respecting they produce secondary EU law, or decide, implement and imposeinciple of subsidiarity and the prerogatives onf Member States social, economic or other policiesin this regard;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Notes, therefore, with regret that the Council, the Commission and the ECB do not always themselves respect the Treaties, nor do they assist Member States with the correct implementation of EU law, thus by their practice severely undermining popular support for the EU and belief in its legitimacyStresses the importance of Commission assisting Member States with the correct implementation of EU law and in identifying problems encountered when transposing EU legislation; calls for the Commission to publish concerns raised by Member States during the implementation process so that they can be fully addressed;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Highlights that inserting a review clause into each legislative proposal may serve to ensure the monitoring of existing laws but would also give the possibility to cross-check the initial policy objective and achieved results through ex-post impact assessments and thereby identify any necessary corrective measures or the case for withdrawals;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10 b. Notes the role that the introduction of sunset clauses may play in monitoring the application of EU law;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 c (new)
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10 c. Stresses that the support of national parliaments in transposing legislation is essential in improving the application EU law and therefore calls for dialogue with national parliaments to be stepped up, including when subsidiarity concerns have been expressed; notes the crucial role of regular ex-post assessments and the importance of seeking the views of national parliaments to address concerns or complexities of legislation that may not have previously been apparent;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Encourages the EU institutions to assume their duty to respect primary EU law when they create rules of secondary EU law or decide policies in a number of areas, and also to assume their duty to assist, by all means available, EU Member States in their efforts to respect the values and the principles of the Union in times of austerity and budgetary constraintsist Member States in their efforts to transpose EU legislation;