Activities of Angel DZHAMBAZKI related to 2015/2328(INI)
Legal basis opinions (0)
Amendments (21)
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
Citation 4
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 12
Citation 12
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the structure of a unique programme makes it possible toshows advantages leading to the reach of a critical mass and potentially gives visibility to areas still underestimated and facing the same challenges as regards fragmentation, globalisation, lack of data and difficulties in accessing credit;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the split into two sub- programmes and a Cross-sectoral Strand is still considered useful, given the different nature and specific vocation of culture and media, but requires adjustments and improvement;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas specific actions, such as the European Capitals of Culture, Prizes and the European Heritage Label, should be enhanced and promoted more proactively and efficiently not necessarily through budget increase;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas, althoughknowing that the regulation provides for the establishment of bilateral agreements with third countries with a view to their participation in the programme or parts of it, to date only a few countries have completed the procedure;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas the proportion of successful applicants is 15 % in Culture and 44 % in MEDIA, but even and a bit lower (32 %) in the latter sub-programme if automatic schemes are excluded;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
N. whereas the automatic points system in MEDIA, which is aimed at ensuring ,a level playing field between the Member States, leads to market distortion and heavily penalises countries with high audiovisual production capacity;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the ambitions of the Creative Europe programme and calls for more efficiency and better results;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Asks the Commission to enhance the programme’s consistency with all relevant EU policies and other funding sources for better use of the existing funds;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Notes that Creative Europe is managed by three different entities and expresses concerns about the effectiveness of such a management;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Recommends that better analysis about return on investment should be made, in order to bring more effectiveness to the programme;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 c (new)
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10c. Suggests that through further flexibility of the funds, better efficiency of the projects and the right management in place the results can be improved;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. UrgesSuggests that the Commission to modifyshould further evaluate the automatic points system in order to allowso that a genuine level playing field is not troubled, taking into account the existing national support schemes for the audiovisual industry;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36