BETA

Activities of Krzysztof HETMAN

Plenary speeches (111)

Situation in Hong Kong
2019/07/18
Dossiers: 2019/2732(RSP)
Fight against cancer (topical debate)
2019/09/18
Myanmar, notably the situation of the Rohingya
2019/09/19
Dossiers: 2019/2822(RSP)
Presentation of the Court of Auditors' annual report - 2018 (debate)
2019/10/23
Children rights in occasion of the 30th anniversary of the Convention of the Rights of the Child (debate)
2019/11/13
2020 budgetary procedure: joint text (debate)
2019/11/26
Dossiers: 2019/2028(BUD)
EU response to extreme meteorological events and their impacts: how to protect European urban areas and their cultural heritage (debate)
2019/11/26
EU disability strategy post 2020 (debate)
2019/12/17
Violations of human rights including religious freedoms in Burkina Faso
2019/12/19
Dossiers: 2019/2980(RSP)
Sustainable investment plan, just transition fund and Roadmap on Social Europe (debate)
2020/01/14
Nigeria, notably the recent terrorist attacks
2020/01/16
Dossiers: 2020/2503(RSP)
The new comprehensive EU-Africa strategy (debate)
2020/02/11
Dossiers: 2020/2500(RSP)
Fighting against antisemitism, racism and hatred across Europe (debate)
2020/02/11
Child labour in mines in Madagascar
2020/02/13
Dossiers: 2020/2552(RSP)
The role of cohesion policy in tackling the socio-economic fallout from COVID-19 (debate)
2020/07/10
Dossiers: 2020/2644(RSP)
Covid-19: EU coordination of health assessments and risk classification and the consequences on Schengen and the single market (debate)
2020/09/15
Dossiers: 2020/2780(RSP)
The case of Dr. Denis Mukwege in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
2020/09/17
Dossiers: 2020/2783(RSP)
European Climate Law (debate)
2020/10/06
Dossiers: 2020/0036(COD)
The impact of Covid-19 outbreak on long-term care facilities (debate)
2020/10/08
Eritrea, the case of Dawit Isaak
2020/10/08
Dossiers: 2020/2813(RSP)
Common agricultural policy - support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States and financed by the EAGF and by the EAFRD - Common agricultural policy: financing, management and monitoring - Common agricultural policy – amendment of the CMO and other Regulations (debate)
2020/10/20
Dossiers: 2018/0218(COD)
EU measures to mitigate social and economic impact of Covid-19 (debate)
2020/10/21
Multiannual Financial Framework (including Own Resources), Rule of Law Conditionality Mechanism and the Recovery Fund for Europe (continuation of debate)
2020/11/11
Strengthening media freedom: the protection of journalists in Europe, hate speech, disinformation and the role of platforms (short presentation)
2020/11/23
Dossiers: 2020/2009(INI)
Additional resources in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: REACT-EU (debate)
2020/12/15
Dossiers: 2020/0101(COD)
Social and employment crisis in the COVID-19 pandemic and the EU's response in the Recovery Plan and the MFF (debate)
2021/01/20
Visit of the VPC/HR to Russia in the light of the recent crackdown on protestors and the opposition (debate)
2021/02/09
Equal treatment in employment and occupation in light of the UNCRPD (debate)
2021/03/08
Dossiers: 2020/2086(INI)
InvestEU programme (debate)
2021/03/09
Dossiers: 2020/0108(COD)
Programme for the Union’s action in the field of health for the period 2021-2027 (‘EU4Health programme’) (debate)
2021/03/09
Dossiers: 2020/0102(COD)
Tackling the economic impact of the COVID pandemic by focusing on investment, competitiveness and skills (debate)
2021/03/09
Action Plan for the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights, in preparation of the Social Summit in Porto in May (debate)
2021/03/10
Respecting the partnership principle in the preparation and implementation of national recovery and resilience plans, and ensuring good governance of the spending (debate)
2021/03/11
The human rights situation in the Kingdom of Bahrain, in particular the cases of death row inmates and human rights defenders
2021/03/11
Dossiers: 2021/2578(RSP)
European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) 2021-2027 (debate)
2021/04/27
EU-India relations (continuation of debate)
2021/04/28
Dossiers: 2021/2023(INI)
Erasmus+: the Union Programme for education and training, youth and sport (debate)
2021/05/18
The situation in Chad
2021/05/20
Dossiers: 2021/2695(RSP)
European Parliament’s scrutiny on the ongoing assessment by the Commission and the Council of the national recovery and resilience plans (continuation of debate)
2021/06/08
Dossiers: 2021/2738(RSP)
Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument 2021-2027 – Global Europe (debate)
2021/06/08
European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) 2021-2027 (continuation of debate)
2021/06/08
Dossiers: 2018/0258(COD)
Follow-up of the Porto Social Summit of 7 May 2021 (debate)
2021/06/09
Common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund, the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy 2021-2027 – European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and Cohesion Fund 2021-2027 – Specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) supported by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and external financing instruments 2021-2027 (debate)
2021/06/23
Public sector loan facility under the Just Transition Mechanism (debate)
2021/06/24
Dossiers: 2020/0100(COD)
Situation in Tigray, Ethiopia (continuation of debate)
2021/07/06
A new ERA for Research and Innovation (continuation of debate)
2021/07/07
Dossiers: 2021/2524(RSP)
Sustained price increase of raw and construction materials in Europe (debate)
2021/07/08
Hong Kong, notably the case of Apple Daily
2021/07/08
Dossiers: 2021/2786(RSP)
Fair working conditions, rights and social protection for platform workers - New forms of employment linked to digital development (debate)
2021/09/13
Dossiers: 2019/2186(INI)
The case of human rights defender Ahmed Mansoor in UAE
2021/09/16
Dossiers: 2021/2873(RSP)
EU transparency in the development, purchase and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines (debate)
2021/09/16
Dossiers: 2021/2678(RSP)
EU Road Safety Policy Framework 2021-2030 – Recommendations on next steps towards "Vision Zero" (debate)
2021/10/04
Dossiers: 2021/2014(INI)
Assessing the Union’s measures for the EU tourism sector as the end of the Summer season nears (debate)
2021/10/05
Dossiers: 2021/2816(RSP)
The state of play on the submitted RRF recovery plans awaiting approval (debate)
2021/10/06
The Council's lack of will to move the European cross-border mechanism forward (debate)
2021/10/06
Dossiers: 2021/2886(RSP)
Human rights situation in Myanmar, including the situation of religious and ethnic groups
2021/10/07
The escalating humanitarian crisis on the EU-Belarusian border, in particular in Poland (debate)
2021/11/10
A European strategy for critical raw materials (debate)
2021/11/22
Dossiers: 2021/2011(INI)
Common agricultural policy - support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States and financed by the EAGF and by the EAFRD - Common agricultural policy: financing, management and monitoring - Common agricultural policy – amendment of the CMO and other regulations (debate)
2021/11/23
Dossiers: 2018/0218(COD)
The EU's role in combating the COVID-19 pandemic: how to vaccinate the world (continuation of debate)
2021/11/24
State of the Energy Union (debate)
2021/11/24
Human rights violations by private military and security companies, particularly the Wagner Group
2021/11/25
State of play of the RRF (Recovery and Resilience Facility) (debate)
2021/12/15
Empowering European Youth: post-pandemic employment and social recovery (debate)
2022/01/20
Dossiers: 2021/2952(RSP)
Strengthening Europe in the fight against cancer(debate)
2022/02/15
Dossiers: 2020/2267(INI)
Implementation of the 2021-2027 cohesion policy (debate)
2022/03/07
Dossiers: 2022/2527(RSP)
The deterioration of the situation of refugees as a consequence of the Russian aggression against Ukraine (debate)
2022/03/08
A new EU strategic framework on health and safety at work post 2020 (continuation of debate)
2022/03/09
Dossiers: 2021/2165(INI)
Destruction of cultural heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh
2022/03/10
Dossiers: 2022/2582(RSP)
Need for an urgent EU action plan to ensure food security inside and outside the EU in light of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (debate)
2022/03/23
Dossiers: 2022/2593(RSP)
The Power of the EU – Joint European Action for more affordable, secure and sustainable energy (debate)
2022/03/24
Increased pre-financing from REACT-EU (C9-0127/2022) (Rule 163) (vote)
2022/04/05
Global approach to research and innovation: Europe’s strategy for international cooperation in a changing world (debate) (debate)
2022/04/06
Dossiers: 2021/3001(RSP)
Right to repair (debate)
2022/04/07
Dossiers: 2022/2515(RSP)
Question Time (Commission) Europe’s Energy Autonomy: The strategic importance of renewables and energy interconnections and efficiency
2022/05/03
Question Time (Commission) Europe’s Energy Autonomy: The strategic importance of renewables and energy interconnections and efficiency
2022/05/03
The Commission's proposal for "Attracting skills and talent to the EU", particularly the Talent Partnerships with North African countries (topical debate)
2022/06/08
The human rights situation in Xinjiang, including the Xinjiang police files
2022/06/08
Dossiers: 2022/2700(RSP)
Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
2022/07/04
Dossiers: 2020/0374(COD)
EU action plan for the social economy (debate)
2022/07/05
Dossiers: 2021/2179(INI)
Adequate minimum wages in the European Union (debate)
2022/09/13
Dossiers: 2020/0310(COD)
EU response to the increase in energy prices in Europe (debate)
2022/09/13
Economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU: the 8th Cohesion Report - EU border regions: living labs of European integration (debate)
2022/09/14
Dossiers: 2022/2032(INI)
Radio Equipment Directive: common charger for electronic devices (debate)
2022/10/04
Dossiers: 2021/0291(COD)
Question Time (Commission) Tackling depopulation through cohesion policy instrument
2022/10/04
Question Time (Commission) Tackling depopulation through cohesion policy instrument
2022/10/04
The situation of human rights in Haiti in particular related to gang violence
2022/10/05
Mental health (debate)
2022/10/18
The Human rights situation in Afghanistan especially the deterioration of women´s rights and attacks against educational institutions
2022/11/23
Dossiers: 2022/2955(RSP)
Establishing the Digital Decade Policy Programme 2030 (debate)
2022/11/24
Dossiers: 2021/0293(COD)
A long-term vision for the EU's rural areas (debate)
2022/12/12
Dossiers: 2021/2254(INI)
A need for a dedicated budget to turn the Child Guarantee into reality - an urgency in times of energy and food crisis (debate)
2022/12/13
30th Anniversary of the Single Market (debate)
2023/01/16
The establishment of a tribunal on the crime of aggression against Ukraine (debate)
2023/01/17
Revision of the European Works Councils Directive (debate)
2023/01/19
Dossiers: 2019/2183(INL)
Transparency and targeting of political advertising (debate)
2023/02/01
Dossiers: 2021/0381(COD)
Access to strategic critical raw materials (debate)
2023/02/15
Availability of fertilisers in the EU (debate)
2023/02/16
Dossiers: 2022/2982(RSP)
Adequate minimum income ensuring active inclusion (debate)
2023/03/14
Dossiers: 2022/2840(RSP)
More Europe, more jobs: we are building the competitive economy of tomorrow for the benefit of all (topical debate)
2023/03/15
Cohesion dimension of EU state aid and de minimis rules (debate)
2023/04/20
Dossiers: 2023/2634(RSP)
Ukrainian cereals on the European market (debate)
2023/05/10
Ukrainian cereals on the European market (debate)
2023/05/10
Artificial Intelligence Act (debate)
2023/06/13
Dossiers: 2021/0106(COD)
Ensuring food security and the long-term resilience of EU agriculture (debate)
2023/06/13
Dossiers: 2022/2183(INI)
Quality traineeships in the EU (debate)
2023/06/13
Dossiers: 2020/2005(INL)
Make Europe the place to invest (debate)
2023/06/14
COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned and recommendations for the future (debate)
2023/07/11
Dossiers: 2022/2076(INI)
Consumer credits (debate)
2023/09/11
Dossiers: 2021/0171(COD)
Ukrainian grain exports after Russia’s exit from the Black Sea Grain Initiative (debate)
2023/09/12
Decent Housing for All (topical debate)
2023/10/04

Shadow reports (5)

RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Regional Development Fund and on the Cohesion Fund
2021/06/18
Committee: REGI
Dossiers: 2018/0197(COD)
Documents: PDF(191 KB) DOC(59 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Andrea COZZOLINO', 'mepid': 96880}]
REPORT on economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU: the 8th Cohesion Report
2022/07/19
Committee: REGI
Dossiers: 2022/2032(INI)
Documents: PDF(230 KB) DOC(101 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Constanze KREHL', 'mepid': 1854}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 and Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 as regards additional flexibility to address the consequences of the military aggression of the Russian Federation FAST (Flexible Assistance for Territories) - CARE
2022/09/21
Committee: REGI
Dossiers: 2022/0208(COD)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(48 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Niklas NIENASS', 'mepid': 197465}]
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on liability for defective products
2023/10/12
Committee: IMCOJURI
Dossiers: 2022/0302(COD)
Documents: PDF(321 KB) DOC(140 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Vlad-Marius BOTOŞ', 'mepid': 197668}, {'name': 'Pascal ARIMONT', 'mepid': 24922}]
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on prohibiting products made with forced labour on the Union market
2023/10/26
Committee: IMCOINTA
Dossiers: 2022/0269(COD)
Documents: PDF(780 KB) DOC(346 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Maria-Manuel LEITÃO-MARQUES', 'mepid': 197635}, {'name': 'Samira RAFAELA', 'mepid': 197868}]

Shadow opinions (8)

OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Just Transition Fund
2020/06/29
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2020/0006(COD)
Documents: PDF(304 KB) DOC(214 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Mounir SATOURI', 'mepid': 197500}]
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the public sector loan facility under the Just Transition Mechanism
2020/10/01
Committee: REGI
Dossiers: 2020/0100(COD)
Documents: PDF(223 KB) DOC(167 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Cristina MAESTRE MARTÍN DE ALMAGRO', 'mepid': 197719}]
OPINION on impacts of EU rules on the free movements of workers and services: intra-EU labour mobility as a tool to match labour market needs and skills
2021/01/11
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2020/2007(INI)
Documents: PDF(140 KB) DOC(73 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Morten LØKKEGAARD', 'mepid': 96709}]
OPINION on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the 2030 Policy Programme “Path to the Digital Decade”
2022/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2021/0293(COD)
Documents: PDF(301 KB) DOC(178 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Dragoş PÎSLARU', 'mepid': 197663}]
OPINION Proposal for a Regulation by the European Parliament and the Council on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure, and repealing Directive 2014/94/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
2022/05/02
Committee: REGI
Dossiers: 2021/0223(COD)
Documents: PDF(328 KB) DOC(202 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Bronis ROPĖ', 'mepid': 125214}]
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the internal markets in renewable and natural gases and in hydrogen
2022/11/08
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2021/0425(COD)
Documents: PDF(262 KB) DOC(197 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Maria GRAPINI', 'mepid': 124785}]
Opinion on proposals of the European Parliament for the amendment of the Treaties
2022/12/02
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2022/2051(INL)
Documents: PDF(103 KB) DOC(63 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Dragoş PÎSLARU - President', 'mepid': None}]
OPINION on the EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles
2023/03/29
Committee: IMCO
Dossiers: 2022/2171(INI)
Documents: PDF(135 KB) DOC(52 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Anne-Sophie PELLETIER', 'mepid': 197527}]

Institutional motions (171)

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia, notably the situation of environmental activists and Ukrainian political prisoners
2019/07/15
Dossiers: 2019/2734(RSP)
Documents: PDF(154 KB) DOC(56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Situation in Hong Kong
2019/07/15
Dossiers: 2019/2732(RSP)
Documents: PDF(141 KB) DOC(50 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Hong Kong
2019/07/17
Dossiers: 2019/2732(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(57 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia, notably the situation of environmental activists and Ukrainian political prisoners
2019/07/17
Dossiers: 2019/2734(RSP)
Documents: PDF(179 KB) DOC(59 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the proposed criminal code of Indonesia
2019/10/23
Dossiers: 2019/2881(RSP)
Documents: PDF(150 KB) DOC(50 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of LGBTI people in Uganda
2019/10/23
Dossiers: 2019/2879(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Haiti
2019/11/27
Dossiers: 2019/2928(RSP)
Documents: PDF(161 KB) DOC(53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cuba, the case of José Daniel Ferrer
2019/11/27
Dossiers: 2019/2929(RSP)
Documents: PDF(154 KB) DOC(52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of freedoms in Algeria
2019/11/27
Dossiers: 2019/2927(RSP)
Documents: PDF(175 KB) DOC(55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of human rights including religious freedom in Burkina Faso
2019/12/16
Dossiers: 2019/2980(RSP)
Documents: PDF(189 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Afghanistan, notably the allegations of sexual abuse of boys in the Logar Province
2019/12/16
Dossiers: 2019/2981(RSP)
Documents: PDF(141 KB) DOC(44 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of human rights including religious freedoms in Burkina Faso
2019/12/18
Dossiers: 2019/2980(RSP)
Documents: PDF(191 KB) DOC(57 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Afghanistan, notably the allegations of sexual abuse of boys in the Logar Province
2019/12/18
Dossiers: 2019/2981(RSP)
Documents: PDF(154 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Nigeria, notably the recent terrorist attacks
2020/01/13
Dossiers: 2020/2503(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Burundi, notably the case of imprisoned journalists
2020/01/13
Dossiers: 2020/2502(RSP)
Documents: PDF(160 KB) DOC(46 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Nigeria, notably the recent terrorist attacks
2020/01/15
Dossiers: 2020/2503(RSP)
Documents: PDF(161 KB) DOC(55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Burundi, notably freedom of expression
2020/01/15
Dossiers: 2020/2502(RSP)
Documents: PDF(169 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Guinea Conakry, notably violence towards protesters
2020/02/10
Dossiers: 2020/2551(RSP)
Documents: PDF(152 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Child labour in mines in Madagascar
2020/02/10
Dossiers: 2020/2552(RSP)
Documents: PDF(151 KB) DOC(45 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Republic of Guinea, notably violence towards protestors
2020/02/12
Dossiers: 2020/2551(RSP)
Documents: PDF(162 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on child labour in mines in Madagascar
2020/02/12
Dossiers: 2020/2552(RSP)
Documents: PDF(178 KB) DOC(61 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on The humanitarian situation in Mozambique
2020/09/14
Dossiers: 2020/2784(RSP)
Documents: PDF(162 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Dr. Denis Mukwege in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
2020/09/14
Dossiers: 2020/2783(RSP)
Documents: PDF(158 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on The situation in the Philippines, including the case of Maria Ressa
2020/09/14
Dossiers: 2020/2782(RSP)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(47 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the humanitarian situation in Mozambique
2020/09/16
Dossiers: 2020/2784(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in the Philippines, including the case of Maria Ressa
2020/09/16
Dossiers: 2020/2782(RSP)
Documents: PDF(162 KB) DOC(55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Dr Denis Mukwege in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020/09/16
Dossiers: 2020/2783(RSP)
Documents: PDF(158 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Eritrea, the case of Dawit Isaak
2020/10/05
Dossiers: 2020/2813(RSP)
Documents: PDF(151 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The situation of Ethiopian migrants in detention centres in Saudi Arabia
2020/10/05
Dossiers: 2020/2815(RSP)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the "Foreign Agents" Law in Nicaragua
2020/10/05
Dossiers: 2020/2814(RSP)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(46 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ‘Foreign Agents’ Law in Nicaragua
2020/10/07
Dossiers: 2020/2814(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Eritrea, notably the case of Dawit Isaak
2020/10/07
Dossiers: 2020/2813(RSP)
Documents: PDF(176 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The continuous violations of human rights in Belarus, in particular the murder of Raman Bandarenka
2020/11/23
Dossiers: 2020/2882(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Situation in Ethiopia
2020/11/23
Dossiers: 2020/2881(RSP)
Documents: PDF(144 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of human rights in Algeria, in particular the case of journalist Khaled Drareni
2020/11/23
Dossiers: 2020/2880(RSP)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(45 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuous violations of human rights in Belarus, in particular the murder of Raman Bandarenka
2020/11/25
Dossiers: 2020/2882(RSP)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Ethiopia
2020/11/25
Dossiers: 2020/2881(RSP)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the deteriorating situation of human rights in Algeria, in particular the case of journalist Khaled Drareni
2020/11/25
Dossiers: 2020/2880(RSP)
Documents: PDF(166 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, in particular the case of 2012 Sakharov Prize laureate Nasrin Sotoudeh
2020/12/14
Dossiers: 2020/2914(RSP)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the deteriorating situation of human rights in Egypt, in particular the case of the activists of the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR)
2020/12/14
Dossiers: 2020/2912(RSP)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on forced labour and the situation of the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region
2020/12/14
Dossiers: 2020/2913(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(49 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, in particular the case of 2012 Sakharov Prize Laureate Nasrin Sotoudeh
2020/12/16
Dossiers: 2020/2914(RSP)
Documents: PDF(161 KB) DOC(53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on forced labour and the situation of the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region
2020/12/16
Dossiers: 2020/2913(RSP)
Documents: PDF(170 KB) DOC(58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the crackdown on the democratic opposition in Hong Kong
2021/01/18
Dossiers: 2021/2505(RSP)
Documents: PDF(168 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Human rights situation in Turkey, notably the case of Selahattin Demirtas and other prisoners of conscience
2021/01/18
Dossiers: 2021/2506(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Human rights situation in Vietnam, in particular the case of human rights journalists Pham Chi Dung, Nguyen Tuong Thuy et Le Huu Minh Tuan
2021/01/18
Dossiers: 2021/2507(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(45 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Vietnam, in particular the case of human rights journalists Pham Chi Dung, Nguyen Tuong Thuy and Le Huu Minh Tuan
2021/01/20
Dossiers: 2021/2507(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Turkey, notably the case of Selahattin Demirtaş and other prisoners of conscience
2021/01/20
Dossiers: 2021/2506(RSP)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Human rights situation in Kazakhstan
2021/02/08
Dossiers: 2021/2544(RSP)
Documents: PDF(154 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Political situation in Uganda
2021/02/08
Dossiers: 2021/2545(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Rwanda, the case of Paul Rusesabagina
2021/02/08
Dossiers: 2021/2543(RSP)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(48 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Kazakhstan
2021/02/10
Dossiers: 2021/2544(RSP)
Documents: PDF(177 KB) DOC(57 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political situation in Uganda
2021/02/10
Dossiers: 2021/2545(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Rwanda, the case of Paul Rusesabagina
2021/02/10
Dossiers: 2021/2543(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Situation in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo and the assassination of the Italian Ambassador Luca Attanasio and his entourage
2021/03/08
Dossiers: 2021/2577(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in the Kingdom of Bahrain, in particular the cases of death row inmates and human rights defenders
2021/03/08
Dossiers: 2021/2578(RSP)
Documents: PDF(144 KB) DOC(43 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the mass trials against opposition and civil society in Cambodia
2021/03/08
Dossiers: 2021/2579(RSP)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(43 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in the Kingdom of Bahrain, in particular the cases of death row inmates and human rights defenders
2021/03/10
Dossiers: 2021/2578(RSP)
Documents: PDF(169 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the mass trials against the opposition and civil society in Cambodia
2021/03/10
Dossiers: 2021/2579(RSP)
Documents: PDF(160 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo and the assassination of the Italian Ambassador Luca Attanasio and his entourage
2021/03/10
Dossiers: 2021/2577(RSP)
Documents: PDF(163 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on COVID 19 pandemic in Latin America
2021/04/26
Dossiers: 2021/2645(RSP)
Documents: PDF(168 KB) DOC(51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Blasphemy laws in Pakistan, in particular the case of Shagufta Kausar and Shafqat Emmanuel
2021/04/27
Dossiers: 2021/2647(RSP)
Documents: PDF(151 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bolivia and the arrest of former President Jeanine Añez and other officials
2021/04/27
Dossiers: 2021/2646(RSP)
Documents: PDF(151 KB) DOC(47 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the blasphemy laws in Pakistan, in particular the case of Shagufta Kausar and Shafqat Emmanuel
2021/04/28
Dossiers: 2021/2647(RSP)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Bolivia and the arrest of former President Jeanine Añez and other officials
2021/04/28
Dossiers: 2021/2646(RSP)
Documents: PDF(152 KB) DOC(51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the COVID-19 pandemic in Latin America
2021/04/28
Dossiers: 2021/2645(RSP)
Documents: PDF(190 KB) DOC(54 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Chad
2021/05/17
Dossiers: 2021/2695(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Prisoners of war in the aftermath of the most recent conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan
2021/05/17
Dossiers: 2021/2693(RSP)
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Haiti
2021/05/17
Dossiers: 2021/2694(RSP)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(45 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Chad
2021/05/19
Dossiers: 2021/2695(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(50 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Haiti
2021/05/19
Dossiers: 2021/2694(RSP)
Documents: PDF(161 KB) DOC(55 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on prisoners of war in the aftermath of the most recent conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan
2021/05/19
Dossiers: 2021/2693(RSP)
Documents: PDF(161 KB) DOC(55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Sri Lanka, in particular the arrests under the Prevention of Terrorism Act
2021/06/07
Dossiers: 2021/2748(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on The listing of German NGOs as 'undesirable organisations' by Russia and the detention of Andrei Pivovarov
2021/06/07
Dossiers: 2021/2749(RSP)
Documents: PDF(161 KB) DOC(49 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Sri Lanka, in particular the arrests under the Prevention of Terrorism Act
2021/06/09
Dossiers: 2021/2748(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the listing of German NGOs as ‘undesirable organisations’ by Russia and the detention of Andrei Pivovarov
2021/06/09
Dossiers: 2021/2749(RSP)
Documents: PDF(171 KB) DOC(56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran
2021/07/05
Dossiers: 2021/2785(RSP)
Documents: PDF(142 KB) DOC(43 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the death penalty in Saudi Arabia, notably the cases of Mustafa Hashem al-Darwish and Abdullah al-Howaiti
2021/07/05
Dossiers: 2021/2787(RSP)
Documents: PDF(141 KB) DOC(43 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Hong Kong, notably the case of Apple Daily
2021/07/05
Dossiers: 2021/2786(RSP)
Documents: PDF(154 KB) DOC(46 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the death penalty in Saudi Arabia, notably the cases of Mustafa Hashem al-Darwish and Abdullah al-Howaiti
2021/07/07
Dossiers: 2021/2787(RSP)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(58 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Hong Kong, notably the case of Apple Daily
2021/07/07
Dossiers: 2021/2786(RSP)
Documents: PDF(171 KB) DOC(58 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran
2021/07/07
Dossiers: 2021/2785(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of human rights defender Ahmed Mansoor in UAE
2021/09/13
Dossiers: 2021/2873(RSP)
Documents: PDF(140 KB) DOC(43 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Kakuma refugee camp in Kenya
2021/09/13
Dossiers: 2021/2874(RSP)
Documents: PDF(153 KB) DOC(45 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Kakuma refugee camp in Kenya
2021/09/15
Dossiers: 2021/2874(RSP)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(58 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the government crackdown on protests and citizens in Cuba
2021/09/15
Dossiers: 2021/2872(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Paul Rusesabagina in Rwanda
2021/10/04
Dossiers: 2021/2906(RSP)
Documents: PDF(150 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on human rights situation in Myanmar, including the situation of religious and ethnic groups
2021/10/04
Dossiers: 2021/2905(RSP)
Documents: PDF(143 KB) DOC(44 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Myanmar, including the situation of religious and ethnic groups
2021/10/06
Dossiers: 2021/2905(RSP)
Documents: PDF(173 KB) DOC(60 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Paul Rusesabagina in Rwanda
2021/10/06
Dossiers: 2021/2906(RSP)
Documents: PDF(153 KB) DOC(49 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on situation in Somalia
2021/11/22
Dossiers: 2021/2981(RSP)
Documents: PDF(169 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Cameroon
2021/11/22
Dossiers: 2021/2983(RSP)
Documents: PDF(150 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on human rights violations by private military and security companies, particularly the Wagner Group
2021/11/22
Dossiers: 2021/2982(RSP)
Documents: PDF(169 KB) DOC(48 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights violations by private military and security companies, particularly the Wagner Group
2021/11/24
Dossiers: 2021/2982(RSP)
Documents: PDF(178 KB) DOC(59 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Somalia
2021/11/24
Dossiers: 2021/2981(RSP)
Documents: PDF(183 KB) DOC(59 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Cameroon
2021/11/24
Dossiers: 2021/2983(RSP)
Documents: PDF(162 KB) DOC(55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Cuba, namely the cases of José Daniel Ferrer, Lady in White Aymara Nieto, Maykel Castillo, Luis Robles, Félix Navarro, Luis Manuel Otero, Reverend Lorenzo Rosales Fajardo, Andy Dunier García and Yunior García Aguilera
2021/12/10
Dossiers: 2021/3019(RSP)
Documents: PDF(152 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on continuous crackdown on civil society and human rights defenders in Russia: the case of human rights organisation Memorial
2021/12/13
Dossiers: 2021/3018(RSP)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(45 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuous crackdown on civil society and human rights defenders in Russia: the case of human rights organisation Memorial
2021/12/15
Dossiers: 2021/3018(RSP)
Documents: PDF(163 KB) DOC(52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Cuba, namely the cases of José Daniel Ferrer, Lady in White Aymara Nieto, Maykel Castillo, Luis Robles, Félix Navarro, Luis Manuel Otero, Reverend Lorenzo Rosales Fajardo, Andy Dunier García and Yunior García Aguilera
2021/12/15
Dossiers: 2021/3019(RSP)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(53 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political crisis in Sudan
2022/01/17
Dossiers: 2022/2504(RSP)
Documents: PDF(196 KB) DOC(47 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Kazakhstan
2022/01/17
Dossiers: 2022/2505(RSP)
Documents: PDF(173 KB) DOC(48 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of fundamental freedoms in Hong Kong
2022/01/17
Dossiers: 2022/2503(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(48 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political crisis in Sudan
2022/01/19
Dossiers: 2022/2504(RSP)
Documents: PDF(219 KB) DOC(59 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of fundamental freedoms in Hong Kong
2022/01/19
Dossiers: 2022/2503(RSP)
Documents: PDF(171 KB) DOC(59 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Kazakhstan
2022/01/19
Dossiers: 2022/2505(RSP)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(58 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the political crisis in Burkina Faso
2022/02/14
Dossiers: 2022/2542(RSP)
Documents: PDF(151 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the recent human rights developments in the Philippines
2022/02/14
Dossiers: 2022/2540(RSP)
Documents: PDF(143 KB) DOC(44 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the death penalty in Iran
2022/02/14
Dossiers: 2022/2541(RSP)
Documents: PDF(155 KB) DOC(45 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the death penalty in Iran
2022/02/16
Dossiers: 2022/2541(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political crisis in Burkina Faso
2022/02/16
Dossiers: 2022/2542(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent human rights developments in the Philippines
2022/02/16
Dossiers: 2022/2540(RSP)
Documents: PDF(161 KB) DOC(54 KB)
on the Russian aggression against Ukraine
2022/02/28
Dossiers: 2022/2564(RSP)
Documents: PDF(169 KB) DOC(55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of journalists and human rights defenders in Mexico
2022/03/07
Dossiers: 2022/2580(RSP)
Documents: PDF(155 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Destruction of cultural heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh
2022/03/07
Dossiers: 2022/2582(RSP)
Documents: PDF(147 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Myanmar, one year after the coup
2022/03/07
Dossiers: 2022/2581(RSP)
Documents: PDF(155 KB) DOC(48 KB)
on the situation of journalists and human rights defenders in Mexico
2022/03/09
Dossiers: 2022/2580(RSP)
Documents: PDF(158 KB) DOC(51 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the destruction of cultural heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh
2022/03/09
Dossiers: 2022/2582(RSP)
Documents: PDF(158 KB) DOC(53 KB)
Myanmar, one year after the coup
2022/03/09
Dossiers: 2022/2581(RSP)
Documents: PDF(176 KB) DOC(59 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION On human rights situation in North Korea, including the persecution of religious minorities
2022/04/04
Dossiers: 2022/2620(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of the rule of law and human rights in the Republic of Guatemala
2022/04/04
Dossiers: 2022/2621(RSP)
Documents: PDF(153 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on increasing repression in Russia, including the case of Alexey Navalny
2022/04/05
Dossiers: 2022/2622(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(47 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in North Korea, including the persecution of religious minorities
2022/04/06
Dossiers: 2022/2620(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(56 KB)
on the Increasing repression in Russia, including the case of Alexey Navalny
2022/04/06
Dossiers: 2022/2622(RSP)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(57 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on reports of continued organ harvesting in China
2022/05/02
Dossiers: 2022/2657(RSP)
Documents: PDF(162 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on continuous crackdown of political opposition in Cambodia
2022/05/02
Dossiers: 2022/2658(RSP)
Documents: PDF(144 KB) DOC(44 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Osman Kavala in Turkey
2022/05/02
Dossiers: 2022/2656(RSP)
Documents: PDF(140 KB) DOC(43 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the reports of continued organ harvesting in China
2022/05/04
Dossiers: 2022/2657(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(52 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuous crackdown of political opposition in Cambodia
2022/05/04
Dossiers: 2022/2658(RSP)
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(57 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Osman Kavala in Turkey
2022/05/04
Dossiers: 2022/2656(RSP)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(55 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of media freedom and safety of journalists in Georgia
2022/06/06
Dossiers: 2022/2702(RSP)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the instrumentalisation of justice as a repressive tool in Nicaragua
2022/06/06
Dossiers: 2022/2701(RSP)
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Xinjiang, including the Xinjiang police files
2022/06/07
Dossiers: 2022/2700(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(46 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Xinjiang, including the Xinjiang police files
2022/06/08
Dossiers: 2022/2700(RSP)
Documents: PDF(169 KB) DOC(53 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violations of media freedom and the safety of journalists in Georgia
2022/06/08
Dossiers: 2022/2702(RSP)
Documents: PDF(157 KB) DOC(53 KB)
on the instrumentalisation of justice as a repressive tool in Nicaragua
2022/06/08
Dossiers: 2022/2701(RSP)
Documents: PDF(156 KB) DOC(51 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on human rights violations in the context of forced deportation of Ukrainian civilians to and forced adoption of Ukrainian children in Russia
2022/09/12
Dossiers: 2022/2825(RSP)
Documents: PDF(152 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Nicaragua, in particular the arrest of the bishop Rolando Álvarez
2022/09/12
Dossiers: 2022/2827(RSP)
Documents: PDF(149 KB) DOC(45 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on human rights violations in the context of the forced deportation of Ukrainian civilians to and the forced adoption of Ukrainian children in Russia
2022/09/14
Documents: PDF(165 KB) DOC(56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Nicaragua, in particular the arrest of the bishop Rolando Álvarez
2022/09/14
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the media freedom crackdown in Myanmar, notably the cases of Htet Htet Khine, Sithu Aung Myint and Nyein Nyein Aye
2022/10/03
Dossiers: 2022/2857(RSP)
Documents: PDF(142 KB) DOC(44 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION On the situation of human rights in Haiti in particular related to gang violence.
2022/10/03
Dossiers: 2022/2856(RSP)
Documents: PDF(144 KB) DOC(43 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent humanitarian and human rights situation in Tigray, Ethiopia, notably that of children
2022/10/03
Dossiers: 2022/2858(RSP)
Documents: PDF(159 KB) DOC(46 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Media freedom crackdown in Myanmar, notably the cases of Htet Htet Khine, Sithu Aung Myint and Nyein Nyein Aye
2022/10/05
Documents: PDF(182 KB) DOC(56 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent humanitarian and human rights situation in Tigray, Ethiopia, notably that of children
2022/10/05
Documents: PDF(161 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of human rights in Haiti in particular related to gang violence
2022/10/05
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(56 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuing repression of the democratic opposition and civil society in Belarus
2022/11/21
Dossiers: 2022/2956(RSP)
Documents: PDF(142 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the forced displacement of people as a result of escalating conflict in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
2022/11/21
Dossiers: 2022/2957(RSP)
Documents: PDF(161 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Afghanistan especially the deterioration of women´s rights and attacks against educational institutions,
2022/11/21
Dossiers: 2022/2955(RSP)
Documents: PDF(153 KB) DOC(47 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuing repression of the democratic opposition and civil society in Belarus
2022/11/23
Documents: PDF(170 KB) DOC(54 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the forced displacement of people as a result of the escalating conflict in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
2022/11/23
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(50 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human rights situation in Afghanistan, especially the deterioration of women’s rights and attacks against educational institutions
2022/11/23
Documents: PDF(162 KB) DOC(52 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on adequate minimum income ensuring active inclusion
2023/02/08
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2022/2840(RSP)
Documents: PDF(164 KB) DOC(61 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the recent deterioration of the inhuman imprisonment conditions of Alexey Navalny and other political prisoners in Russia
2023/02/13
Dossiers: 2023/2553(RSP)
Documents: PDF(139 KB) DOC(43 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the situation of human rights defenders in Eswatini, notably the murder of Thulani Maseko
2023/02/13
Dossiers: 2023/2551(RSP)
Documents: PDF(139 KB) DOC(43 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the violence against opposition activists in Equatorial Guinea, notably the case of Julio Obama Mefuman
2023/02/13
Dossiers: 2023/2552(RSP)
Documents: PDF(139 KB) DOC(44 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the inhuman imprisonment conditions of Alexei Navalny
2023/02/15
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(46 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation of human rights defenders in Eswatini, notably the murder of Thulani Maseko
2023/02/15
Documents: PDF(145 KB) DOC(46 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on violence against opposition activists in Equatorial Guinea, notably the case of Julio Obama Mefuman
2023/02/15
Documents: PDF(145 KB) DOC(46 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Tunisia: Recent attacks against freedom of expression and association and trade unions, in particular the case of journalist Noureddine Boutar
2023/03/13
Dossiers: 2023/2588(RSP)
Documents: PDF(134 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia: the case of opposition leader Kem Sokha
2023/03/13
Dossiers: 2023/2589(RSP)
Documents: PDF(143 KB) DOC(43 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran: in particular the poisoning of hundreds of schoolgirls
2023/03/13
Dossiers: 2023/2587(RSP)
Documents: PDF(139 KB) DOC(44 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on recent attacks in Tunisia against freedom of expression and association, and against trade unions, in particular the case of journalist Noureddine Boutar
2023/03/15
Documents: PDF(148 KB) DOC(46 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Iran, in particular the poisoning of hundreds of schoolgirls
2023/03/15
Documents: PDF(145 KB) DOC(46 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Cambodia: the case of opposition leader Kem Sokha
2023/03/15
Documents: PDF(145 KB) DOC(45 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the risk of death penalty and execution of singer Yahaya Sharif Aminu for blasphemy in Nigeria
2023/04/17
Dossiers: 2023/2650(RSP)
Documents: PDF(137 KB) DOC(44 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The crackdown on the right to education and education rights activists in Afghanistan, including the case of Matiullah Wesa
2023/04/17
Dossiers: 2023/2648(RSP)
Documents: PDF(137 KB) DOC(44 KB)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on repression in Russia, in particular the cases of Vladimir Kara-Murza and Alexsei Navalny
2023/04/18
Dossiers: 2023/2657(RSP)
Documents: PDF(140 KB) DOC(44 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on repression in Russia, in particular the cases of Vladimir Kara-Murza and Aleksei Navalny
2023/04/19
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(47 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the risk of the death penalty and the execution of singer Yahaya Sharif-Aminu for blasphemy in Nigeria
2023/04/19
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(47 KB)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the crackdown on the right to education and education rights activists in Afghanistan, including the case of Matiullah Wesa
2023/04/19
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(45 KB)

Oral questions (7)

Functioning of the internal market
2019/10/11
Documents: PDF(53 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Effects of the bankruptcy of the Thomas Cook Group
2019/10/14
Documents: PDF(45 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Dual quality of products in the single market
2020/07/09
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Rebuilding European production capacity for active pharmaceutical ingredients
2022/11/16
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Adequate minimum income ensuring active inclusion
2022/11/23
Documents: PDF(47 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Adequate minimum income to ensure active inclusion
2022/11/30
Documents: PDF(48 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Poor sanitary conditions, low levels of security and lack of parking places in rest areas for truck drivers
2023/06/07
Documents: PDF(52 KB) DOC(11 KB)

Written explanations (69)

The UK’s withdrawal from the EU (B9-0038/2019, B9-0039/2019)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem rezolucji w sprawie brexitu. Jestem przekonany, że odejście Wielkiej Brytanii z Unii Europejskiej bez umowy miałoby dramatyczne skutki, w wyniku których ucierpieliby zarówno Europejczycy, jak i obywatele brytyjscy, dlatego też należy podjąć wszelkie możliwe działania, aby takiego scenariusza uniknąć. Proces wyjścia Wielkiej Brytanii z Unii Europejskiej musi być odpowiednio skoordynowany i odpowiedzialnie przeprowadzony, aby zapewnić, by jego potencjalne negatywne skutki były jak najmniej odczuwalne.Uważam, że umowa wynegocjowana wspólnie przez Unię Europejską i Wielką Brytanię jest w stanie zapewnić przeprowadzenie brexitu w sposób uporządkowany i przewidywalny. Przede wszystkim umowa ta chroni prawa obywateli europejskich i brytyjskich, co powinno stanowić dla wszystkich zainteresowanych stron priorytet.
2019/09/18
Employment and social policies of the euro area (A9-0016/2019 - Yana Toom)

Tegoroczne sprawozdanie w sprawie politycznych strategii społecznych i na rzecz zatrudnienia w strefie euro po raz kolejny przedstawia nam mieszany obraz europejskich rynków pracy i spójności społecznej. Z jednej strony ogólna sytuacja stopniowo się poprawia i wzrost wskaźników zatrudnienia, także wśród młodzieży, można uznać już za stały trend. Z drugiej strony kolejny już rok z rzędu widzimy utrzymujące się braki i niedopasowanie w umiejętnościach. Nie tylko stwarza to problemy pracodawcom, którzy pozostają z nieobsadzonymi wakatami, ale także hamuje wzrost gospodarczy i utrudnia reintegrację osób długotrwale bezrobotnych na rynkach pracy.W związku z tym chciałbym podkreślić potrzebę transformacji naszych systemów edukacji i szkolenia, aby odpowiedzieć na to coraz większe wyzwanie. Uczenie się przez całe życie powinno stać się rzeczywistością, aby każdy Europejczyk miał szansę partycypować w dynamicznie zmieniających się rynkach pracy. Mam nadzieję, że ta kwestia będzie jednym z priorytetów zarówno dla państw członkowskich, jak i dla nowej Komisji Europejskiej.
2019/10/10
Effects of the bankruptcy of Thomas Cook Group (RC-B9-0118/2019, B9-0118/2019, B9-0119/2019, B9-0120/2019, B9-0121/2019, B9-0122/2019, B9-0124/2019)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem rezolucji w sprawie negatywnego wpływu bankructwa Thomasa Cooka na sektor turystyczny, ponieważ podzielam obawy, jakie towarzyszyły obywatelom Unii Europejskiej w czasie, gdy dziesiątki tysięcy turystów zakończyło w sposób nagły i nierzadko stresujący swoje wakacyjne podróże.Unia Europejska słynie z wysokiego standardu ochrony naszych konsumentów i uważam, że w chwili obecnej, gdy proces powrotów został zakończony sprawnie, najważniejsze jest, aby wszyscy poszkodowani otrzymali odpowiednie odszkodowanie. W tym celu należy korzystać z przepisów uchwalonych w dyrektywie w sprawie zorganizowanych podróży, wakacji i wycieczek z 2015 roku.Oczywiście musimy też zastanowić się, jakie skutki długofalowe może mieć to bankructwo na miejsca pracy i ogólną kondycję branży turystycznej w UE oraz jak zminimalizować ryzyko powstania podobnej sytuacji. Jestem zdania, że Europejski Fundusz Dostosowania do Globalizacji jest instrumentem, który może odegrać tu ważną rolę we wsparciu branży.
2019/10/24
Enabling the digital transformation of health and care (B9-0239/2019)

Transformacja cyfrowa opieki zdrowotnej i społecznej bez wątpienia niesie za sobą ogromny potencjał, nie tylko w zakresie poprawy jakości życia pacjentów, ale także i ułatwienia pracy pracowników służby zdrowia czy też opiekunów. Pozwoliłaby ona lekarzom poprawić efektywność całego procesu leczenia oraz zmniejszyłaby obciążenia biurokratyczne, zaś pacjenci skorzystaliby m.in. na ułatwieniach w dostępie do usług medycznych.Niemniej jednak transformacja cyfrowa tego obszaru musi zostać przeprowadzona w taki sposób, by w jej efekcie nie ograniczyć dostępu do usług medycznych. Musimy bowiem pamiętać, że w dalszym ciągu aż 44% Europejczyków nie posiada podstawowych umiejętności cyfrowych. Dodatkowo, nie wszystkie europejskie gospodarstwa domowe posiadają dostęp do internetu, w szczególności zaś problematyczna jest przepaść cyfrowa między obszarami miejskimi i wiejskimi. Uważam zatem, iż niezbędne jest, by Komisja wzięła pod uwagę powyższe czynniki przy przeprowadzaniu transformacji cyfrowej.
2019/12/18
Situation of human rights and democracy in Nicaragua (RC-B9-0251/2019, B9-0251/2019, B9-0252/2019, B9-0253/2019, B9-0254/2019, B9-0255/2019)

Nikaragua przykuła uwagę świata w marcu zeszłego roku. Rozpoczęły się wtedy masowe protesty obywateli wobec polityki rządu i prezydenta Ortegi. Wielotysięczne demonstracje były brutalnie tłumione przez rządzących. Zaczęto stosować represje wobec działaczy opozycyjnych. Wielu z nich skazano na wysokie kary więzienia. Mimo prowadzonych negocjacji sytuacja w kraju nadal jest trudna.Aby mogła ona się poprawić i ustabilizować, niezbędne jest podjęcie pilnych działań naprawczych przez rząd Nikaragui. Po pierwsze musimy domagać się od rządu zaprzestania represjonowania działaczy opozycyjnych i natychmiastowego zwolnienia więźniów politycznych. Po drugie niezbędne jest poszanowanie swobód obywatelskich, w tym wolności zgromadzeń i demonstracji, wolności słowa, a także umożliwienie funkcjonowania organizacji pozarządowych i społeczeństwa obywatelskiego. Wreszcie musimy też wezwać rząd Nikaragui do zaprzestania ataków na media i dziennikarzy i ograniczania obywatelom dostępu do informacji. Tylko spełnienie tych postulatów pozwoli na ponowne wprowadzenie demokratycznego ładu i zażegnanie kryzysu. Parlament powinien monitorować sytuację w Nikaragui, a w przypadku braku reakcji rządu – podejmować dalsze kroki.
2019/12/19
Annual report 2018 on the human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union's policy on the matter (A9-0051/2019 - Isabel Wiseler-Lima)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem sprawozdania na temat praw człowieka i demokracji na świecie oraz polityki UE w tym zakresie. UE jest globalnym liderem w walce o prawa człowieka. Aby dalej wypełniać tę rolę w obliczu rosnących wyzwań, musimy kontynuować współpracę z ONZ i innymi organizacjami międzynarodowymi. Ważne jest też nasze wsparcie dla organizacji społeczeństwa obywatelskiego, które borykają się z naciskami i represjami ze strony władz.Omawiane dzisiaj sprawozdanie zwraca m.in. uwagę na coraz częściej dostrzegalne zagrożenia w sferze cyfrowej. Dezinformacja, masowa inwigilacja czy manipulacja to tylko niektóre z nich. Zgadzam się, że UE powinna włączyć się w dialog z państwami trzecimi, aby powstrzymać represyjne działania w sieci ora tworzenie przepisów, które pod pozorem walki z cyberprzestępczością i terroryzmem wykorzystują takie metody wobec ogółu społeczeństwa lub opozycji.Należy kontynuować nasze dotychczasowe działania i finansową pomoc na rzecz demokratyzacji i praw człowieka. Wartości te muszą znaleźć się w centrum relacji UE z innymi państwami i stanowić ich fundament. Naszym następnym krokiem powinno być przyjęcie ambitnego planu działania dotyczącego praw człowieka i demokracji na następne 5 lat.
2020/01/15
A safety net to protect the beneficiaries of EU programmes: setting up an MFF contingency plan (A9-0099/2020 - Jan Olbrycht, Margarida Marques)

Panie Przewodniczący! Głosowałem za przyjęciem sprawozdania w sprawie planu awaryjnego, gdyż uważam, że w obecnej sytuacji zapewnienie ciągłości finasowania w unijnym budżecie po 2020 roku jest absolutnie jednym z naszych priorytetów.Pandemia koronawirusa i spowodowana nią recesja gospodarcza sprawiły, że Unia Europejska musi przedefiniować swoje priorytety na kolejne siedem lat. Wsparcie lokalnych przedsiębiorców, ochrona i tworzenie nowych miejsc pracy, powrót na ścieżkę wzrostu to obecnie największe wyzwania, przed jakimi stoi gospodarka Unii Europejskiej. Wspólny budżet unijny od samego początku kryzysu stanowił wsparcie w tych działaniach. Dlatego tak ważne jest, aby nawet w sytuacji gdy nowe porozumienie w sprawie wieloletnich ram finansowych nie zostanie na czas wynegocjowane, zapewniona została ciągłość finansowania. Nie możemy w obecnej sytuacji pozwolić sobie na ryzyko przerwania wsparcia, które z Unii Europejskiej otrzymują przedsiębiorcy, rolnicy czy pracownicy ochrony zdrowia.Komisja Europejska musi wobec tego najpóźniej do 15 czerwca przedstawić plan awaryjny, który to zapewni. Obecne programy powinny być przedłużone o rok lub nawet dwa, także po to, by dobrze przygotować nowe wieloletnie ramy finansowe.
2020/05/13
Macro-financial assistance to enlargement and neighbourhood partners in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic crisis

. – Obecny kryzys związany z pandemią COVID-19 ma negatywny wpływ na stabilność finansową i gospodarczą regionów objętych procesem rozszerzenia i polityką sąsiedztwa. W tej sytuacji Unia Europejska powinna podjąć zdecydowane i szybkie działania, aby wesprzeć gospodarki tych krajów. Dlatego też głosowałem za udzieleniem pomocy makrofinansowej 10 krajom partnerskim Unii Europejskiej.Pomoc makrofinansowa Unii to instrument wykorzystywany w sytuacjach nadzwyczajnych, a obecna sytuacja zdecydowanie do nich należy. Jak wskazano we wniosku, pomoc ta ma zostać przekazana w formie pożyczek dla krajów potrzebujących wsparcia. Jej atutem jest po pierwsze szybkość reakcji, a po drugie preferencyjne warunki jej udzielenia takie jak stosunkowo niskie stopy oprocentowania czy długi okres zapadalności. Jednocześnie przekazane w ten sposób środki zdecydowanie pomogą naszym partnerom poradzić sobie z bieżącymi trudnościami gospodarczymi i zaspokoją ich pilne potrzeby w zakresie finansowania zewnętrznego. Wpłynie to na zwiększenie stabilności gospodarczej państw objętych procesem rozszerzenia i polityką sąsiedztwa oraz pomoże im skuteczniej zareagować na kryzys związany z COVID-19 i walczyć ze skutkami pandemii.Jest to o tyle ważne, że pomoc makrofinansowa ma dotyczyć państw, z którymi Unia Europejska pozostaje w bliskich wzajemnych stosunkach i współpracuje na wielu płaszczyznach. Decydując się na udzielenie im pomocy w tej wyjątkowo trudnej sytuacji, pokazujemy, że nasi długoletni partnerzy i sąsiedzi mogą liczyć na nasze wsparcie i solidarność. Proponowane wsparcie wzmocni ponadto zaangażowanie rządów, które z niego skorzystają, w realizację niezbędnych reform i przyczyni się do zacieśnienia ich stosunków z Unią Europejską.
2020/05/15
EU disability strategy post 2020 (B9-0123/2020)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem rezolucji dotyczącej europejskiej strategii na rzecz osób niepełnosprawnych na okres po roku 2020, gdyż uważam, że Europa potrzebuje spójnego, całościowego podejścia w tej kwestii. Wyzwania, z jakimi mierzą się na co dzień osoby z niepełnosprawnościami, są wciąż ogromne. I choć strategia na lata 2010–2020 pokazała, że zintegrowane podejście może przynieść dobre rezultaty, to unaoczniła też, jak wiele jeszcze przed nami. Dlatego uważam, że nowa strategia musi stawiać sobie ambitne cele. Włączenie osób z niepełnosprawnościami w życie społeczne i umożliwienie im podjęcia pracy powinno pozostać naszym priorytetem. Jednocześnie powinniśmy pracować nad zapewnieniem wsparcia dla opiekunów osób z niepełnosprawnościami.Mam nadzieję, że przyjęcie tej rezolucji będzie jasnym sygnałem dla Komisji Europejskiej, aby prace nad strategią nabrały nowej dynamiki, i zostanie ona zaprezentowana w nadchodzących miesiącach bez zbędnej zwłoki.
2020/06/18
Tourism and transport in 2020 and beyond (RC-B9-0166/2020, B9-0166/2020, B9-0175/2020, B9-0177/2020, B9-0178/2020, B9-0180/2020, B9-0182/2020, B9-0184/2020)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem rezolucji w sprawie stopniowego przywracania usług turystycznych w UE. Pandemia koronawirusa spowodowała ogromnie straty prawie we wszystkich gałęziach gospodarki, jednak najdotkliwiej dotknęła ona sektora turystyki, powodując straty sięgające nawet 90% dochodów i zagrażając utratą aż blisko 6,5 miliona miejsc pracy.Pandemia nie została jeszcze pokonana i tym samym cały czas naszym obowiązkiem jest przestrzeganie rygoru sanitarnego, aby chronić zdrowie i życie Europejczyków, jednak zwalniające tempo zachorowań pozwala na stopniowe przywracanie turystyki i gastronomii. W działaniach tych musimy jednak zachować właściwy balans pomiędzy z jednej strony potrzebą, zarówno ekonomiczną, jak i psychiczną, uruchomienia na nowo tej gałęzi gospodarki, a z drugiej koniecznością zapobieżenia ponownej eskalacji pandemii.Niewątpliwie ważne jest przywracanie zaufania obywateli do korzystania z usług turystycznych i gastronomicznych, ale zaufanie to musi być poparte realnym zwiększeniem bezpieczeństwa. W tym kontekście ważne jest utworzenie systemu wczesnego ostrzegania, który informowałby turystów o zagrożeniach w miejscach pobytu, czy też unijnego znaku sanitarnego, gwarantującego najwyższe standardy bezpieczeństwa.Ponadto musimy zapewnić szczególne wsparcie przedsiębiorstwom z sektora turystyki i gastronomii, w szczególności MŚP i małym firmom rodzinnym, aby pomóc im w przetrwaniu tego niezwykle trudnego okresu.
2020/06/19
Exceptional temporary support under EAFRD in response to the COVID-19 outbreak (amendment of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013) (C9-0128/2020 - Norbert Lins)

Pandemia COVID-19 miała ogromny negatywny wpływ na wiele gałęzi europejskiej gospodarki. Jednym z najciężej dotkniętych przez spowodowany nią kryzys sektorów jest bez wątpienia sektor rolnictwa. Ograniczenia w przemieszczaniu się, a także czasowe zamknięcie sklepów, targowisk i restauracji spowodowały wiele trudności ze zbyciem produktów rolnych, a co za tym idzie – mniejsze wpływy ze sprzedaży. Rolnicy, a także małe wiejskie przedsiębiorstwa borykają się więc z problemami z płynnością, a część z nich stoi na krawędzi bankructwa.Obecny kryzys to sytuacja bezprecedensowa, a zaistniałe okoliczności wymagają podjęcia nadzwyczajnych środków stanowiących wsparcie dla podmiotów najbardziej dotkniętych kryzysem. Dlatego też głosowałem za przyjęciem rozporządzenia zmieniającego rozporządzenie (UE) nr 1305/2013 w odniesieniu do szczególnych działań mających zapewnić nadzwyczajne tymczasowe wsparcie w ramach EFRROW w odpowiedzi na epidemię COVID-19. Wsparcie to przyjmie formę jednorazowej pomocy finansowej dla rolników i MŚP działających w sektorze przetwórstwa, wprowadzania do obrotu lub rozwoju produktów rolnych, które borykają się z problemami finansowymi na skutek pandemii. Taka jednorazowa, nadzwyczajna pomoc pozwoli przedsiębiorstwom na utrzymanie płynności i zaspokoi ich najpilniejsze bieżące potrzeby i zobowiązania.
2020/06/19
International and domestic parental abduction of EU children in Japan (B9-0205/2020)

. ‒ Głosowałem za rezolucją w sprawie międzynarodowych i wewnątrzkrajowych uprowadzeń rodzicielskich dzieci z UE w Japonii. Niestety fakt uprowadzeń rodzicielskich dzieci z UE w Japonii stał się zauważalną tendencją. Prawo rodziców, których dzieci uprowadzono, do kontaktów ze swoimi dziećmi jest w Japonii poważnie ograniczone. W tej sytuacji w centrum naszej uwagi bezwzględnie musi stać jedno – dobro dziecka.Ograniczanie lub uniemożliwianie kontaktów jednego rodzica z dzieckiem może zdecydowanie negatywnie odbić się na jego rozwoju i samopoczuciu, a także jest naruszeniem jego podstawowych praw. Uważam, że przegłosowana rezolucja to ważny i potrzebny komunikat, że jako Unia Europejska nie możemy się na taką sytuację zgodzić. Jest ona niczym innym jak wezwaniem Japonii do egzekwowania zobowiązań, które kraj ten podjął, przystępując do konwencji haskiej i ratyfikując Konwencję ONZ o prawach dziecka. Należy zdecydowanie wzywać władze japońskie do zastosowania się do zaleceń międzynarodowych i do wprowadzenia niezbędnych zmian w systemie prawnym Japonii, np. poprzez stworzenie możliwości pieczy wspólnej lub naprzemiennej.Zgadzam się także, że rodzice potrzebują dostępu do rzetelnej informacji dotyczącej prawa rodzinnego i praw dziecka w krajach trzecich, a także trudności, jakie mogą oni napotkać. Uważam, że zaproponowane utworzenie platformy wsparcia informacyjnego udzielanego rodzicom uczestniczącym w transgranicznych sporach rodzinnych może w istotny sposób w tym pomóc.
2020/07/08
The rights of persons with intellectual disabilities in the COVID-19 crisis (B9-0204/2020)

. ‒ Głosowałem za rezolucją w sprawie praw osób z niepełnosprawnością intelektualną w dobie kryzysu związanego z pandemią COVID-19. Czas pandemii był czasem wymagającym podjęcia szczególnych, często restrykcyjnych działań. Jest to zrozumiałe, zważywszy na powagę sytuacji. Działania takie powinny jednak zawsze uwzględniać prawa podstawowe wszystkich obywateli. Jak widać, mimo szczerych intencji, w przypadku osób z niepełnosprawnością intelektualną nie zawsze te prawa były zagwarantowane. Niekiedy odmawiano im leczenia, często były one całkowicie odizolowane od swoich bliskich bez możliwości odwiedzin czy powrotu do domu, a w niektórych sytuacjach z kolei ośrodki opieki dziennej były zamykane, przez co pozostawiono rodziny osób z niepełnosprawnościami bez wsparcia i przerzucono na nie cały ciężar opieki praktycznie z dnia na dzień. Pandemia COVID-19 była pierwszym tego typu wyzwaniem dla współczesnej Europy, ale niekoniecznie ostatnim. Teraz jest moment na wyciągnięcie wniosków z mijającego kryzysu, abyśmy mogli lepiej przygotować się na podobne zagrożenia w przyszłości.Zgadzam się, że potrzebujemy wspólnych protokołów na wypadek możliwych przyszłych nadzwyczajnych sytuacji kryzysowych, a także, że niezbędne jest wypracowanie strategii w sprawie niepełnosprawności na okres po roku 2020 z uwzględnieniem takich nadzwyczajnych zdarzeń. Komisja i państwa członkowskie powinny także na bieżąco monitorować, czy usługi medyczne są świadczone wszystkim pacjentom z poszanowaniem ich praw, bez dyskryminowania żadnej z grup.
2020/07/08
Just Transition Fund (A9-0135/2020 - Manolis Kefalogiannis)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem sprawozdania na temat Funduszu Sprawiedliwej Transformacji, ponieważ jestem zdania, że państwa Unii Europejskiej potrzebują wsparcia w tym ogromnym wyzwaniu, jakim jest ograniczenie emisji CO2 i przejście na gospodarkę neutralną klimatycznie. Skala wyzwań, jakie stoją przed regionami uzależnionymi od paliw kopalnych, jest ogromna. Regiony węglowe muszą nie tylko przejść zmiany technologiczne i infrastrukturalne, ale także stawić czoła wyzwaniom społecznym.Dlatego uważam, że fundusz będzie stanowił realne wsparcie dla regionów uzależnionych od węgla tylko w przypadku, gdy jego budżet będzie odpowiednio wysoki. Dlatego popieram zwiększenie środków do 25 mld euro w cenach z 2018 r. Istotne jest, by środki te pochodziły z nowej alokacji, a nie transferów wewnątrzbudżetowych. Polityka spójności może oczywiście stanowić dodatkowe wsparcie dla transformacji energetycznej. Powinno to się jednak odbywać na zasadzie dobrowolności (o czym będzie decydowało każde państwo indywidualnie), a nie obowiązkowych transferów. Ważne jest także, by fundusz uwzględniał różne uwarunkowania poszczególnych państw członkowskich i poziom ich uzależnienia od węgla. Dlatego też głosowałem za umożliwieniem finansowania z funduszu także infrastruktury gazowej, która może stanowić środek przejściowy w tej transformacji.Mam nadzieję na szybkie porozumienie z Radą podczas rozmów trójstronnych, tak by fundusz mógł jak najszybciej być dostępny dla beneficjentów.
2020/09/16
Situation in Belarus

Głosowałem za przyjęciem rezolucji w sprawie sytuacji na Białorusi.Wybory na Białorusi nie były ani wolne, ani demokratyczne, a organizowane w odpowiedzi na nie pokojowe demonstracje były agresywnie tłumione przez białoruskie władze. Jasne jest, że tak przeprowadzone wybory nie mogą zostać uznane i że należy zdecydowanie potępić wszelkie akty przemocy wobec białoruskich obywateli. Pytanie jednak, co dalej w kwestii Białorusi powinna zrobić Unia Europejska.Przede wszystkim musimy dzisiaj mówić jednym głosem. Na forum Wspólnoty podjęto już temat sankcji wobec wysokich białoruskich urzędników. Powinny one objąć też byłego prezydenta Łukaszenkę.Ponadto UE powinna dokonać przeglądu swoich dotychczasowych relacji z Białorusią. Warunkiem wstępnym dialogu na linii UE–Białoruś musi być przeprowadzenie ponownych wyborów z zachowaniem demokratycznych standardów i zaprzestanie przemocy przez aparat państwa.Istnieje też potrzeba wsparcia dla organizacji społeczeństwa obywatelskiego i niezależnych mediów. Ich nieskrępowane działanie jest warunkiem funkcjonowania zdrowej demokracji.Musimy z bliska monitorować sytuację na Białorusi i reagować na wszelkie przejawy łamania praw człowieka.
2020/09/17
The European Forest Strategy - The Way Forward (A9-0154/2020 - Petri Sarvamaa)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem sprawozdania w sprawie europejskiej strategii leśnej, gdyż uważam, że stanowi ono wyważoną propozycję pomiędzy koncentracją na gospodarczych i społecznych aspektach leśnictwa, a zapewnieniem lasom należytej ochrony i wzmocnieniem ich roli w odniesieniu do przeciwdziałania zmianom klimatu. Niewątpliwie nie sposób nie docenić ogromnej roli lasów w życiu społecznym i gospodarczym Europejczyków. Tak wiele mówimy o konieczności osiągnięcia europejskich ambitnych celów w zakresie klimatu, energii i środowiska. Nikt chyba nie ma wątpliwości, że neutralności klimatycznej nie jesteśmy w stanie osiągać bez zdrowych lasów, dlatego też należy położyć nacisk na zwiększanie lesistości w Unii Europejskiej poprzez zalesianie i wspieranie odporności ekosystemów leśnych.Lasy stanowią też bardzo ważny sektor gospodarki, dając, w sposób pośredni i bezpośredni, zatrudnienie ponad 3 milionom obywateli. W moim przekonaniu należy tworzyć zachęty dla biznesu do dalszego, zrównoważonego i długoterminowego inwestowania w tę gałąź gospodarki, tworząc tym samym nowe miejsca pracy dla społeczności lokalnej i przeciwdziałając odpływowi ludności wiejskiej. Zgadzam się też ze sprawozdawcą, że nowa strategia leśna UE powinna stanowić skuteczne narzędzie koordynacji polityk i sektorów powiązanych z lasami, zarówno na poziomie Unii Europejskiej, jak i w powiązaniu z politykami leśnymi państw członkowskich.
2020/10/07
Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee (B9-0310/2020)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem rezolucji w sprawie Gwarancji dla Młodzieży, ponieważ uważam, że także w obliczu pandemii COVID-19 młodzi ludzie potrzebują szczególnego wsparcia w wejściu i powrocie na rynek pracy.Obserwujemy niestety, że już dziś bezrobocie wśród młodzieży znajduje się znacznie powyżej ogólnej średniej unijnej, a wszelkie analizy wskazują, że będzie ono jeszcze rosnąć. Dlatego też tak ważne jest, aby instrument Gwarancji dla Młodzieży wzmocnić i przeznaczyć na niego odpowiednio wysokie środki budżetowe. Dotychczasowa realizacja programu nie zawsze spełniała założenia i pokładane w nim nadzieje. Jestem jednak zwolennikiem utrzymania tego instrumentu i naszej wzmożonej pracy nad jego ulepszeniem. Nie możemy sobie pozwolić obecnie na to, by młodzi ludzie w trudnej sytuacji zostali pozostawieni sami sobie i pozbawieni wsparcia. Długofalowe skutki, także społeczne, takiej sytuacji byłyby wielokrotnie bardziej kosztowne dla państw członkowskich.Wiele mówimy o tym, że sposobem na wyjście z kryzysu i przywrócenie wzrostu gospodarczego mają być większe inwestycje. Ważne jest, abyśmy jako taką inwestycję traktowali także naszą młodzież.
2020/10/08
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the VPC/HR on relations with Belarus (A9-0167/2020 - Petras Auštrevičius)

Głosowałem za sprawozdaniem w sprawie zalecenia Parlamentu Europejskiego dla Rady, Komisji oraz Wiceprzewodniczącego Komisji / Wysokiego Przedstawiciela Unii do Spraw Zagranicznych i Polityki Bezpieczeństwa w sprawie stosunków z Białorusią. Po sfałszowanych wyborach prezydenckich i tłumieniu pokojowych protestów kurs unijnych stosunków z Białorusią musi ulec zmianie. Zgadzam się, że należy dokonać przeglądu dotychczasowej unijnej polityki wobec Białorusi.Należy wstrzymać wypłaty unijnej pomocy finansowej dla nieprawowitych władz Białorusi. Nie oznacza to, że UE ma zapomnieć o białoruskim społeczeństwie. Powinniśmy w dalszym ciągu wspierać organizacje społeczeństwa obywatelskiego i obywateli Białorusi.Trzeba poszerzyć grono osób objętych sankcjami, włączając w nie samego Alaksandra Łukaszenkę oraz wielu urzędników wysokiego i średniego szczebla. Są to osoby odpowiedzialne za sfałszowanie wyborów i stosowanie przemocy wobec pokojowo protestujących obywateli. Apelujemy o przeprowadzenie dochodzenia na poziomie unijnym lub międzynarodowym w sprawie przestępstw przeciwko ludności Białorusi popełnianych przez organy ścigania reżimu Łukaszenki.Wznowienie otwartych stosunków na linii UE-Białoruś jest możliwe tylko pod pewnymi warunkami. Są to: organizacja powtórnych, wolnych i demokratycznych wyborów, zaprzestanie stosowania przemocy i represji wobec protestujących, oczyszczenie więźniów politycznych z zarzutów, umożliwienie funkcjonowania niezależnych mediów i przywrócenie wolności słowa, likwidacja kary śmierci, a także reforma przepisów krajowych Białorusi w celu zapewnienia podstawowych praw i wolności obywatelskich. Są to zmiany, które zdecydowanie mogą przyczynić się do demokratyzacji ustroju Białorusi.
2020/10/21
The future of European education in the context of Covid-19 (B9-0338/2020)

Głosowałem za rezolucją dotyczącą przyszłości europejskiej edukacji w kontekście COVID-19. Pandemia obnażyła braki i problemy europejskich systemów edukacji. Obecnie powtórnie stajemy przez trudnymi wyzwaniami w tym zakresie. Przyjęta rezolucja zwraca uwagę na pewne ważne kwestie.W podjęciu wyzwania może pomóc współpraca na poziomie europejskim. Chodzi m.in. o wymianę dobrych praktyk, ale też wspieranie edukacji przez programy UE, np. Erasmus+. Państwa członkowskie muszą odnieść się do kwestii umiejętności cyfrowych nauczycieli. To również od nich zależy sukces e-edukacji. Niezbędne są programy szkoleniowe dla nauczycieli. Dlatego wzywamy również Komisję, aby przyjęła bardziej ambitne podejście do Planu działania w dziedzinie edukacji cyfrowej, tworząc skoordynowaną strategię na rzecz cyfrowej edukacji i umiejętności. Ważne jest też, aby w przyszłych ramach europejskiej polityki edukacyjnej Komisja wzięła pod uwagę obecne trudności europejskich systemów edukacji.Poważnym problemem jest także wykluczenie cyfrowe ze względu na brak dostępu do technologii i infrastruktury. W UE ciągle są miejsca, gdzie brak infrastruktury internetowej. Najczęściej należą do nich obszary wiejskie. UE dysponuje narzędziami, za pomocą których może z tym problemem walczyć. Jest to m.in. Instrument „Łącząc Europę”, Europejski Fundusz Rozwoju Regionalnego, ale też nowo zaproponowany Instrument na rzecz Odbudowy i Zwiększania Odporności. Polityka edukacyjna, a także inwestycje w infrastrukturę cyfrową i urządzenia cyfrowe dla placówek edukacyjnych powinny być wspierane przez te instrumenty i fundusze unijne.
2020/10/21
Enhanced cooperation between Public Employment Services (PES) (A9-0128/2020 - Manuel Pizarro)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem w pierwszym czytaniu sprawozdania na temat europejskiej sieci publicznych służb zatrudnienia, ponieważ uważam, że w wyniku negocjacji z Radą Parlamentowi Europejskiemu udało się osiągnąć dobre porozumienie w tej kwestii.Publiczne służby zatrudnienia wspierają osoby bezrobotne w poszukiwaniu pracy i pełnią istotną rolę społeczną. Ważne, aby szły z duchem czasu i w swych działaniach były sprawne i elastyczne, by móc dostosowywać wsparcie zarówno do długofalowych trendów na rynku pracy, jak i niespodziewanych sytuacji, takich jak pandemia COVID-19. Dlatego popieram postulat wzmocnionej współpracy tych służb na poziomie europejskim.Sieć powinna wspierać wymianę najlepszych praktyk, modernizację państwowych służb zatrudnienia i współpracę z partnerami społecznymi. Szczególny nacisk należy położyć na kształcenie umiejętności, w tym przede wszystkim cyfrowych i związanych z nowymi technologiami, gdyż wiemy, że ich poziom jest niestety wciąż niewystarczający.Cieszę się też, że do zadań, jakie stoją przed siecią, dołączono także kwestie zapobiegania bezrobociu i swobodnego przepływu pracowników na wspólnym rynku.
2020/11/11
Programme for the Union's action in the field of health for the period 2021-2027 (“EU4Health Programme”) (A9-0196/2020 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)

Głosowałem za rozporządzeniem w sprawie ustanowienia Programu działań Unii w dziedzinie zdrowia na lata 2021–2027, tzw. Programu UE dla zdrowia.Pandemia COVID-19 nauczyła nas, że z takimi ogromnymi wyzwaniami lepiej radzimy sobie wspólnie i solidarnie. Propozycja ustanowienia europejskiego programu na rzecz zdrowia ze strony Komisji Europejskiej wynikała właśnie z naszych trudnych doświadczeń z pandemią i głębokiego przekonania, że konieczne jest zwiększenie zdolności UE jako całości w zakresie skutecznego reagowania na poważne zagrożenia zdrowia teraz i w przyszłości.Główne założenia programu to wzmocnienie europejskich systemów zdrowia, np. poprzez poprawę dostępu do opieki zdrowotnej i zwiększenie skuteczności w walce z chorobami niezaraźliwymi takimi jak nowotwory, ale także zwiększenie dostępu do leków, również pod względem ich dostępności cenowej, i lepsze radzenie sobie z transgranicznymi zagrożeniami dla zdrowia, np. dzięki większej gotowości, sprawniejszemu reagowaniu kryzysowemu, monitorowaniu i współpracy.Co prawda działania UE w zakresie zdrowia są ograniczone, jednak jak pokazała nam pandemia, choroby nie zważają na granice. Przygotowując wspólną, unijną strategię w zakresie zdrowia, zwiększając skuteczność wymiany informacji czy dzielenia się najlepszymi praktykami i wzmacniając systemy ochrony zdrowia, stajemy się wspólnie silniejsi i przygotowujemy się na przyszłe wyzwania. UE powinna więc wspierać państwa członkowskie, koordynować i wzmacniać współpracę, a także działać na rzecz profilaktyki i lepszego radzenia sobie w sytuacjach kryzysowych.
2020/11/13
A New Industrial Strategy for Europe (A9-0197/2020 - Carlo Calenda)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem sprawozdania na temat nowej europejskiej strategii przemysłowej, ponieważ to ważny dla naszej gospodarki sektor, który jednak wymaga dostosowania do zmieniających się warunków. Nowe wyzwania, z jakimi musi się zmierzyć, to nie tylko konkurencyjność na globalnych rynkach. To także niezwykle ważna kwestia dostosowania się do celów Zielonego Ładu i gospodarki neutralnej klimatycznie, a także kwestie wykorzystania pełnego potencjału, jaki niesie ze sobą cyfryzacja.Wszystkie te zmiany wymagają stworzenia przyjaznego i wspierającego klimatu dla przemysłu. Dlatego uważam, że należy wspierać finansowanie badań i rozwoju oraz współpracę dużych przedsiębiorstw z MŚP, aby ułatwić przepływ wiedzy. Należy także pracować nad zmniejszeniem niepotrzebnych obciążeń administracyjnych, zwłaszcza tych związanych z wdrażaniem wsparcia unijnego.Przejście na gospodarkę neutralną klimatycznie stanowi ogromne wyzwanie dla wielu sektorów przemysłu. Dlatego też cieszę się, że w sprawozdaniu udało się zachować zapisy mówiące o tak ważnej kwestii jak zachowanie możliwości stosowania gazu ziemnego jako paliwa przejściowego na drodze do bardziej zaawansowanych technologii. To rozsądne podejście, które ułatwi transformację firmom, a jednocześnie będzie chroniło interesy konsumentów.
2020/11/25
European Citizens' Initiative - Minority Safepack (B9-0403/2020, B9-0405/2020)

Głosowałem za rezolucją w sprawie europejskiej inicjatywy obywatelskiej „Pakiet bezpieczeństwa mniejszości”.Wielokrotnie w Parlamencie Europejskim powtarzamy, że różnorodność jest naszą wielką wartością. Jesteśmy różni, pochodzimy z różnych krajów, mówimy różnymi językami, a jednak podejmujemy dialog ponad granicami i tym, co nas dzieli, potrafimy współpracować i dojść do porozumienia. Jesteśmy dumni z naszej różnorodności i widzimy, jak wzbogaca ona naszą wspólnotę i nasze społeczeństwa.Nie wyobrażam sobie więc, żebyśmy nie poparli inicjatywy obywatelskiej, w której aż 1 123 422 Europejczyków opowiedziało się za większym wsparciem dla mniejszości narodowych i językowych w Unii. Prawdą jest, że za ochronę mniejszości narodowych i językowych odpowiadają przede wszystkim władze państw członkowskich. UE może jednak wspierać je w tych wysiłkach. Poparcie rezolucji to wyraźny sygnał, że ochrona mniejszości, a także zachowanie przez nie ich tożsamości są dla nas tematem ważnym.W Parlamencie Europejskim wielokrotnie opowiadamy się również przeciwko jakiejkolwiek dyskryminacji. Rasizm, ksenofobia i mowa nienawiści rzucają cień na nasze społeczeństwa. Zdecydowanie należy przeciwdziałać takim zjawiskom. Zgadzam się więc, że Komisja Europejska może również odegrać rolę na tym polu, np. poprzez kampanie na rzecz tolerancji lub przeciwko mowie nienawiści.
2020/12/17
Strengthening the single market: the future of free movement of services (A9-0250/2020 - Morten Løkkegaard)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem sprawozdania w sprawie wzmocnienia jednolitego rynku i przyszłości swobodnego przepływu usług. Usługi, przyczyniając się aż do trzech czwartych PKB i zatrudnienia w Unii Europejskiej, stanowią bez wątpienia jeden z filarów europejskiej gospodarki. Niestety, pandemia COVID-19 w sposób niezwykle bolesny uderzyła w unijnych przedsiębiorców, przyczyniając się do wzrostu bezrobocia oraz skurczenia się europejskiej gospodarki o blisko 8%. Dlatego teraz, bardziej niż kiedykolwiek przedtem, tak ważne jest wzmocnienie europejskiego rynku usług, aby w pełni wykorzystać jego potencjał. Aby to uczynić, kluczowe jest usunięcie nieuzasadnionych barier istniejących w państwach członkowskich i odpowiednie wdrażanie istniejących reguł. Ważne jest również dalsze uproszczenie procedur administracyjnych, między innymi poprzez ich ucyfrowienie czy też utworzenie tzw. jednego okienka, aby faktycznie ułatwić pracę przedsiębiorcom. Szczególną uwagę należy też zwrócić na usługi transgraniczne, które wyjątkowo ucierpiały w wyniku pandemii koronawirusa. Nie ulega wątpliwości, że odblokowanie potencjału rynku usług znacząco przyczyni się do zwiększenia unijnej konkurencyjności oraz do redukcji bezrobocia, dlatego też wzywam do dalszych, intensywnych prac w tym obszarze.
2021/01/20
Revision of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) guidelines (A9-0251/2020 - Jens Gieseke)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem sprawozdania w sprawie rewizji wytycznych transeuropejskiej sieci transportowej (TEN-T). Założenia sieci bazowej uzgodnione zostały w 2013 r. i miały zostać zrealizowane do 2030 r., wydaje się jednak, że nie uda się dotrzymać tego terminu. W związku z tym przyjmuję z zadowoleniem zapowiedź rewizji wytycznych przez Komisję Europejską, co może stanowić nowy impuls dla przyspieszenia prac. Poprawa europejskiej sieci transportowej pozwoli usprawnić efektywność i wydajność transportu, a co za tym idzie handlu i wpłynie dodatnio na funkcjonowanie całego wspólnego rynku. Może to być impuls do rozwoju gospodarczego, zwłaszcza w regionach słabiej rozwiniętych i znajdujących się na peryferiach Unii, które wciąż borykają się z problemami infrastrukturalnymi.Ponadto, stworzenie zintegrowanej sieci transportu multimodalnego wpłynie dodatnio na codzienne życie obywateli, przede wszystkim tych żyjących i pracujących w regionach przygranicznych. Jestem zdania, że właśnie korytarze transportowe i „brakujące ogniwa” sieci w takich regionach jak moje województwo lubelskie, które jest regionem znajdującym się na granicy Unii Europejskiej, powinny być jednym z priorytetów przyszłych działań, gdyż wydatnie przyczynią się do zwiększenia spójności UE. Aby jednak tak się stało, potrzebujemy zwiększonego wysiłku ze strony państw członkowskich, aby te kluczowe projekty zostały jak najszybciej ukończone.
2021/01/20
Establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility (A9-0214/2020 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Siegfried Mureşan, Dragoș Pîslaru)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem rozporządzenia ustanawiającego Instrument na rzecz Odbudowy i Zwiększania Odporności. Myślę, że wszyscy na tej sali mamy pełną świadomość tego, jak niewyobrażalne szkody w europejskiej gospodarce wyrządziła pandemia COVID-19. Każdego dnia słyszę od polskich i europejskich przedsiębiorców, jak bardzo potrzebują wsparcia, by przetrwać ten dramatyczny okres. Nie ulega wątpliwości, że musimy błyskawicznie odpowiedzieć na te wołanie o pomoc i sprawić, by uzgodnione środki, które pozwolą odbudować europejską gospodarkę i udzielić realnego wsparcia przedsiębiorcom, były dostępne jak najszybciej.Dlatego apeluję do państw członkowskich o jak najszybsze opracowanie krajowych planów odbudowy w oparciu o rzetelne konsultacje społeczne, zaś do parlamentów narodowych o pilną ratyfikację decyzji w sprawie zasobów własnych, która umożliwi uruchomienie środków Instrumentu na rzecz Odbudowy i Zwiększania Odporności. Nie pozwólmy też na to, aby decyzje te stały się zakładnikiem innych negocjacji. Pamiętajmy bowiem, że od szybkiego uruchomienia tych środków zależy przetrwanie setek tysięcy europejskich firm.
2021/02/09
EU Association Agreement with Ukraine (A9-0219/2020 - Michael Gahler)

Głosowałem za sprawozdaniem w sprawie wdrożenia układu o stowarzyszeniu UE z Ukrainą. Podpisując porozumienie stowarzyszeniowe i zobowiązując się do podjęcia daleko idących reform, Ukraina opowiedziała się za wejściem na drogę europejskiej integracji. Widzimy poczynione już postępy, jednak rozpoczęty proces reform należy doprowadzić do końca. Sprawozdanie stawia w tym zakresie ambitne i konkretne cele. Priorytetowe obszary reform to praworządność, reforma wymiaru sprawiedliwości, a także walka z korupcją, która uniemożliwia demokratyczną transformację i deoligarchizację.W sprawozdaniu zdecydowanie potępiamy działania destabilizujące i zaangażowanie militarne Rosji na Ukrainie. Rosja prowadzi z Ukrainą wojnę hybrydową obejmującą m.in. dezinformację i cyberataki. UE powinna jasno przeciwstawiać się takim działaniom, wykorzystując sankcje, w tym sankcje personalne. Jest to szczególnie ważne również w kontekście obecnej sytuacji w samej Rosji.Jestem przekonany, że UE powinna mówić w tej sprawie jednym głosem. Nie możemy wspierać reżimu naruszającego suwerenność i integralność terytorialną innego państwa, a także wykazującego całkowity brak poszanowania dla praw i wolności własnych obywateli. Dlatego należy zrezygnować z budowy gazociągu Nord Stream 2, który stanowiłby gospodarcze wsparcie reżimu Putina, ale też zwiększyłby naszą zależność energetyczną od Rosji. Rezygnacja z Nord Stream 2 byłaby nie tylko jasnym sygnałem sprzeciwu wobec polityki władz rosyjskich, ale także wyrazem solidarności z Ukrainą i naszej własnej jedności.
2021/02/10
European Skills Agenda for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience (B9-0108/2021)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem rezolucji w sprawie Europejskiego programu na rzecz umiejętności, ponieważ popieram utworzenie nowego programu w tym zakresie. Proces transformacji naszej gospodarki i rynku pracy, a co za tym idzie całego społeczeństwa, przebiega obecnie tak szybko jak chyba nigdy wcześniej. Pandemia COVID-19 jeszcze przyspieszyła te zmiany i, niestety, ukazała, jak wielkie są nierówności, m.in. w zakresie umiejętności cyfrowych.Nowy program ma więc przed sobą trzy główne zadania: nie tylko stworzenie podwalin pod konkurencyjność naszej gospodarki, ale także zapewnienie spójności społecznej i wytworzenie odpowiedniej odporności na przyszłe kryzysy.Musimy nie tylko patrzeć na potrzeby, jakie ma rynek pracy dzisiaj, ale myśleć też o tym, w jaki sposób wyposażyć pracowników we wszechstronne umiejętności, które pozwolą elastycznie reagować na wyzwania, jakie pojawią się w przyszłości. Będzie to wymagało przede wszystkim stworzenia możliwości uczenia się przez całe życie i zachęcenia pracowników, także tych słabiej wykształconych, do doszkalania się i przekwalifikowywania się.Ponadto nowa agenda musi być inkluzywna i uwzględniać szczególne potrzeby osób niepełnosprawnych, starszych oraz z terenów wiejskich i oddalonych.
2021/02/10
Implementation of the Construction Products Regulation (A9-0012/2021 - Christian Doleschal)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem sprawozdania w sprawie wdrożenia rozporządzenia w sprawie wyrobów budowlanych. Sektor budowlany odgrywa szczególnie istotną rolę w europejskiej gospodarce, ponieważ zatrudnia 18 milionów osób oraz przyczynia się do 9% unijnego PKB. Systematycznie rośnie również eksport wyrobów budowlanych na terenie Unii Europejskiej. Niestety firmy działające w tym sektorze cały czas borykają się z barierami w handlu w ramach jednolitego rynku.Wynika to między innymi z niesprawnie działającego systemu norm, które nie są publikowane i wprowadzane, co w konsekwencji powoduje brak pewności prawnej dla firm działających w sektorze wyrobów budowlanych oraz nakłada nieuzasadnione bariery. Nie ulega wątpliwości, jak istotne jest zapewnienie sprawnego przepływu materiałów budowlanych przy jednoczesnym dopilnowaniu, by były one bezpieczne zarówno dla zdrowia i mienia, jak i dla środowiska. Ważne jest również większe ucyfrowienie sektora budownictwa, aby zapewnić większą przejrzystość oraz umożliwić porównywanie wymogów państw członkowskich z informacjami zawartymi w deklaracji właściwości użytkowych.Zgadzam się też z koniecznością zapewnienia większego nadzoru nad sprzedażą przez internet, w szczególności w odniesieniu do materiałów z państw trzecich, aby zapewnić zarówno bezpieczeństwo, jak i uczciwą konkurencję na rynku europejskim.
2021/03/10
Specific Programme implementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (A9-0118/2021 - Christian Ehle)

Głosowałem za ustanowieniem programu „Horyzont Europa”. Pandemia COVID-19 pokazała nam, jak ważne w naszym życiu są zdobycze nauki i szukanie nowych sposobów na pojawiające się wyzwania. To właśnie dzięki pracy naukowców korzystamy dzisiaj ze szczepionek, które dają nam nadzieję na powrót do normalności. Cieszę się, że dajemy temu wyraz w tym nowym programie inwestycyjnym UE w zakresie badań i innowacji. To jak dotąd największa i najbardziej ambitna inicjatywa tego typu na świecie. Wiele udało się osiągnąć, ale jednocześnie pamiętamy też o naszym celu finansowania badań i rozwoju w wysokości 3 % PKB. Tego celu dalej nie udało nam się osiągnąć i w przyszłości powinniśmy zwiększać finansowania na badania i rozwój.„Horyzont Europa” czerpie z sukcesów i dorobku swojego poprzednika. Uczestnicy naborów nie będą więc musieli uczyć się tego programu całkowicie na nowo i będą mogli wykorzystać swoje wcześniejsze doświadczenia. W programie pojawiają się jednak nowe instrumenty i grupy docelowe. Dobrym przykładem są misje, które w bardziej efektywny sposób mają rozwiązywać najważniejsze aktualne wyzwania. Cieszę się, że jednym z tych wyzwań stała się walka z nowotworami. Jest to odzwierciedlenie naszego silnego zobowiązania w tym zakresie. Cieszy również zwiększenie znaczenia innowacji w programie. Odgrywają one ogromną rolę w budowaniu przewagi i konkurencyjności UE.
2021/04/27
European Child Guarantee (B9-0220/2021)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem rezolucji w sprawie gwarancji dla dzieci, gdyż całym sercem popieram tę inicjatywę. Uważam, że nie może być naszej zgody na fakt, że w Unii Europejskiej w XXI wieku wciąż są dzieci, które wychowują się w biedzie czy niedostatku i dotykają je nierówności w dostępie do opieki zdrowotnej czy edukacji. A nie mówimy tutaj o problemie, który jest marginalny. W 2019 roku aż 18 milionów dzieci w UE żyło w warunkach marginalnych i było narażone na ubóstwo.Przedstawiona przez Komisję Europejską rekomendacja to dobry plan, jego wprowadzenie w życie wymaga jednak znacznych inwestycji, zarówno finansowych, jak i organizacyjnych. Dlatego też poparłem wezwanie państw członkowskich do ulokowania odpowiednich środków finansowych na działania prowadzące bezpośrednio do eliminacji ubóstwa wśród dzieci. Europejski Fundusz Społeczny, nasz największy unijny fundusz wspierający rozwój społeczno-gospodarczy Europy, powinien być tu jednym z głównych instrumentów wspierających te działania. Postulat przeznaczenia przynajmniej 5 % środków z tego funduszu na wdrożenie „gwarancji dla dzieci” w państwach członkowskich, w których sytuacja jest gorsza niż unijna średnia, uważam wobec tego za słuszny.Cieszę się także, że Parlament Europejski zwrócił uwagę na tak ważne kwestie, których zabrakło w propozycji Komisji, jak dostęp do podstawowych potrzeb takich jak woda i kanalizacja, co też niestety w niektórych regionach wciąż może stanowić problem.
2021/04/29
Review of the European Union Solidarity Fund (A9-0052/2021 - Younous Omarjee)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem sprawozdania na temat przeglądu funkcjonowania Funduszu Solidarności Unii Europejskiej, gdyż uważam, że jest to ważny i potrzebny instrument, który wielokrotnie udowodnił swoją skuteczność. Należy podkreślić, że w obliczu pandemii COVID-19 w szybkim trybie rozszerzono zakres interwencji na zagrożenia zdrowotne, co było słusznym i niezwykle pomocnym rozstrzygnięciem.Nie zmienia to jednak faktu, że fundusz, który powstał w 2002 roku, czyli niemal 20 lat temu, wymaga bardziej całościowej odnowy. Przede wszystkim należy zastanowić się nad takim uproszczeniem zasad wdrażania funduszu, by pomoc mogła być udzielana jak najszybciej, gdyż to właśnie czynnik czasu ma w przypadku katastrof najważniejsze znaczenie. Obecny średni termin 5 miesięcy od momentu złożenia wniosku do wypłaty środków jest zdecydowanie za długi.Ponadto, jako że mówimy o funduszu europejskim, ważne jest także wprowadzenie jasnych zasad i uproszczeń w sięganiu po środki z funduszu przez regiony transgraniczne, by mogły one współpracować w przypadku kryzysów dotykających społeczności po dwóch stronach granicy.
2021/05/18
Digital future of Europe: digital single market and use of AI for European consumers (A9-0149/2021 - Deirdre Clune)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem sprawozdania „Cyfrowa przyszłość Europy: jednolity rynek cyfrowy i wykorzystywanie AI z korzyścią dla europejskich konsumentów”. Nie ulega wątpliwości, że zarówno rynek cyfrowy, jak i wykorzystanie sztucznej inteligencji niosą ze sobą szereg korzyści, zarówno dla konsumentów, jak i przedsiębiorców. Pandemia koronawirusa w sposób dobitny pokazała, jak bardzo potrzebne są nam obecnie nowoczesne technologie, nie sposób też nie docenić ich w kontekście sprostania ambitnym unijnym celom klimatycznym.Aby jednak móc w pełni korzystać z korzyści, jakie niesie za sobą jednolity rynek cyfrowy, musimy unikać jego fragmentacji, jak również zapewnić efektywne wdrożenie istniejącej legislacji oraz znieść nieuzasadnione bariery. Ponadto musimy zapewnić, aby przedsiębiorcy, w szczególności małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa, oraz konsumenci mieli zaufanie do sztucznej inteligencji. Aby to osiągnąć, należy zapewnić jasne informacje oraz przejrzyste ramy prawne, dlatego zgadzam się ze sprawozdawczynią, że istnieje potrzeba szczegółowego rozporządzenia UE w sprawie sztucznej inteligencji.
2021/05/20
EU Digital COVID Certificate - Union citizens (C9-0104/2021 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem unijnego cyfrowego zaświadczenia COVID-19 – obywatele Unii. Pandemia COVID-19 w sposób szczególny uderzyła w mobilność i poczucie wolności Europejczyków. Przez ostatni rok wszyscy musieliśmy konfrontować się z dotkliwymi restrykcjami w podróżach, które znacząco utrudniały lub nieraz wręcz uniemożliwiały swobodne podróżowanie, czy to w celach zawodowych, czy turystycznych. Unijne cyfrowe zaświadczenie COVID-19 pozwoli nam odzyskać tę utraconą wolność i bezpieczeństwo w podróżowaniu. Jednak aby te działania były skuteczne i sprawiedliwe, muszą być one również równo dostępne dla wszystkich, dlatego zdecydowanie opowiadam się za wprowadzeniem darmowych testów w celu uzyskania zaświadczenia, tak samo jak w sposób darmowy oferowane są szczepienia. Musimy bowiem pamiętać, że proces szczepień jeszcze trwa i są osoby, które w dalszym ciągu czekają na swoją kolej. Ze szczepień wyłączone są również dzieci, a także nie wszyscy z przyczyn medycznych mogą być zaszczepieni. Tymczasem odpłatne testy stanowią nierzadko barierę finansową, która może zadecydować o rezygnacji w wyjazdu. Uderza to więc nie tylko w rodziny, które nie mogą w pełni korzystać z przysługującego im prawa do swobodnego przepływu osób, ale również w turystykę, która dziś bardziej niż kiedykolwiek przedtem potrzebuje wsparcia.
2021/06/08
Systematic repression in Belarus and its consequences for European security following abductions from an EU civilian plane intercepted by Belarusian authorities (B9-0328/2021, B9-0330/2021, B9-0332/2021, B9-0339/2021, B9-0340/2021, B9-0344/2021)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem rezolucji w sprawie Białorusi. Na przestrzeni ostatniego roku Aleksandr Łukaszenka przekraczał kolejne granice, fałszując wybory, stosując represje wobec własnych obywateli, wtrącając ich do więzienia i torturując. Wydarzenia z 23 maja to przekroczenie kolejnej czerwonej linii. Uprowadzony został cywilny samolot, a do jego eskorty wykorzystano myśliwiec MIG-29. To bezprecedensowy i bezczelny przykład państwowego terroryzmu, który pokazuje, że Łukaszenka nie obawia się konsekwencji swoich czynów. Na niebezpieczeństwo narażono cywilów, naszych obywateli, złamano międzynarodowe przepisy dotyczące transportu lotniczego, a także porwano białoruskiego opozycjonistę i dziennikarza Romana Pratasiewicza i jego partnerkę. Celem było nie tylko ukrócenie opozycyjnej działalności Pratasiewicza i wyeliminowanie go z życia publicznego, ale także upokorzenie go w białoruskiej telewizji i wykorzystanie do celów propagandowych reżimu.Białoruskie społeczeństwo patrzy z desperacją w stronę Unii Europejskiej. Dlatego też musimy zareagować w zdecydowany sposób. Do sankcji personalnych powinny dołączyć ukierunkowane sankcje gospodarcze. Jednocześnie potrzebujemy planu wsparcia dla białoruskich organizacji społeczeństwa obywatelskiego i wolnych mediów. Domagamy się także uwolnienia wszystkich więźniów politycznych. Patrząc na nasze stosunki z Białorusią, musimy umiejscowić je też w szerszym kontekście naszej zagranicznej polityki, np. także w kontekście stosunków z Rosją, która nieprzerwanie wspiera reżim Łukaszenki.
2021/06/10
Connecting Europe Facility (A9-0219/2021 - Henna Virkkunen, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Dominique Riquet)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem Instrumentu „Łącząc Europę” na lata 2021–2027. Cieszę się, że udało się zapewnić kontynuację tego programu, który sądzę, że dowiódł swojej skuteczności w zakresie zapewnienia lepszych połączeń transportowych, rozwoju sieci energetycznych czy też poprawy łączności w Europie. Dzięki budżetowi w wysokości blisko 34 miliardów euro nadal będzie można finansować kluczowe projekty w dziedzinie transportu, energii i cyfryzacji. Szczególne znacznie ma dla mnie fakt, że w ramach programu priorytetowo potraktowany zostanie dalszy rozwój transeuropejskich sieci transportowych, zwłaszcza połączeń brakujących. W tym kontekście chciałbym podkreślić konieczność intensyfikacji prac nad budową międzynarodowej trasy Via Carpatia, która ma szczególne znaczenie dla mieszkańców wschodniej Polski, w tym mojego regionu, czyli województwa lubelskiego. Ważne jest też zapewnienie finansowania dalszej integracji europejskiego rynku energii, działań mających na celu obniżanie emisyjności oraz zapewnienie bezpieczeństwa dostaw. Cieszę się też, że udało się zapewnić możliwość finansowania infrastruktury gazowej.
2021/07/06
Old continent growing older - possibilities and challenges related to ageing policy post 2020 (A9-0194/2021 - Beata Szydło)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem sprawozdania w sprawie starzenia się Starego Kontynentu, gdyż uważam, że porusza ono ważne kwestie związane z starzeniem się naszego społeczeństwa.Wyzwania, jakie pociąga za sobą wydłużenie życia i zwiększający się odsetek osób starszych, są wielorakie i wymagać będą całościowego podejścia. W perspektywie najbliższych lat należy wziąć pod uwagę takie kwestie jak dostosowania do specyficznych potrzeb osób starszych infrastruktury i usług, zwiększone inwestycje w służbę zdrowia czy sektor opieki. Osoby starsze wymagają bowiem naszego wsparcia i szczególnej troski i te potrzeby będą rosły.To jednak tylko jeden z aspektów. Uważam, że długofalowe podejście do kwestii starzenia się społeczeństwa musi kłaść nacisk także na aktywizację osób starszych, solidarność międzypokoleniową i pełne wykorzystanie potencjału, jakim osoby starsze dysponują, dla całego społeczeństwa. Nie zapominajmy, że w przeważającej większości sami seniorzy chcą pozostać aktywni i dzielić się swoją wiedzą i doświadczeniem z młodszym pokoleniem. Naszym zadaniem jest stworzyć i wspierać takie możliwości, chociażby poprzez centra wolontariatu czy świetlice wielopokoleniowe.Ponadto podczas tworzenia jakichkolwiek polityk czy strategii musimy pamiętać o podejściu „nic o nas bez nas” i zapewnić, by same osoby starsze były w pełni włączone w proces reform i by ich potrzeby były wysłuchane.
2021/07/07
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A9-0262/2021 - Lucia Ďuriš Nicholsonová)

Głosowałem za projektem rezolucji ustawodawczej w sprawie wytycznych dotyczących polityki zatrudnienia państw członkowskich. Postępująca transformacja cyfrowa wymaga uregulowań w kodeksach pracy. Pracownicy zrzeszeni w ramach platform cyfrowych muszą mieć takie same prawa jak pracownicy klasycznych branż. Problem braku tych podstawowych praw dotyczył wielu Polaków pracujących dla platform. Państwa członkowskie powinny zadbać o to, aby nowe stosunki pracy wynikające z nowych modeli zatrudnienia gwarantowały prawa pracownicze, godziwe warunki pracy, w tym bezpieczeństwo i higienę pracy, godziwe wynagrodzenie i właściwą równowagę między życiem prywatnym a zawodowym.Europejskie ustawodawstwo musi się adaptować do zmian zachodzących na świecie. Unia Europejska musi dbać o zwalczanie wykluczenia społecznego i dyskryminacji. W wyniku pandemii COVID-19 te gwarancje są dziś bardzo istotne. Popieram również nowe cele unijne na rok 2030 w zakresie zatrudnienia (78% ludności w wieku 20–64 lat powinno mieć zatrudnienie), umiejętności (60% wszystkich dorosłych powinno co roku uczestniczyć w szkoleniach) i ograniczania ubóstwa (o co najmniej 15 mln osób, w tym 5 mln dzieci).
2021/09/15
The future of EU-US relations (A9-0250/2021 - Tonino Picula)

Głosowałem za sprawozdaniem na temat przyszłości stosunków między UE a Stanami Zjednoczonymi. Od 2017 r. stosunki na linii UE–USA były trudne. Tegoroczna zmiana administracji i zaprzysiężenie nowego prezydenta dają szansę na ich odbudowę. Jedne z pierwszych decyzji prezydenta Bidena, takie jak powrót USA do Światowej Organizacji Zdrowia i porozumienia paryskiego, stanowią deklarację, że i Stany Zjednoczone są na to gotowe. USA to jeden z najważniejszych globalnych partnerów UE. Wyznajemy te same wartości i powinniśmy współpracować w zakresie wspólnych interesów i wyzwań. Do najważniejszych kwestii w naszej współpracy powinny należeć działania na rzecz bezpieczeństwa, w tym cyberbezpieczeństwa, a także pokoju i zwalczania terroryzmu.Unia samodzielnie nie pokona też zmiany klimatu. Aby realnie móc ją zwalczyć, potrzebujemy silnego zaangażowania naszych partnerów, w tym Stanów Zjednoczonych. Odbudowa relacji daje też szansę na skoordynowanie naszych stanowisk i polityk, np. w relacjach z Chinami czy Rosją. Pozwoli to na prowadzenie skuteczniejszej polityki zagranicznej i zapobieganie kryzysom.Ostatnie oziębienie stosunków ze Stanami Zjednoczonymi było też dla nas pewną lekcją. W tak ważnych obszarach jak bezpieczeństwo Unia nie może bezgranicznie polegać na swoich sojusznikach. Powinniśmy więc, budując dobre relacje z sojusznikami, jednocześnie zwiększać nasze zdolności w kluczowych dziedzinach.
2021/10/06
The protection of persons with disabilities through petitions: lessons learnt (A9-0261/2021 - Alex Agius Saliba)

Głosowałem za sprawozdaniem w sprawie ochrony osób z niepełnosprawnościami za pośrednictwem petycji. Petycje obywatelskie to bardzo ważne narzędzie, którym dysponuje Parlament. To ważne narzędzie dla nas, bo dzięki niemu jesteśmy bardziej świadomi, jakie kwestie są ważne dla naszych obywateli i z jakimi problemami się oni borykają, ale także dla nich, bo pozwala im aktywnie uczestniczyć w życiu publicznym, podejmować inicjatywę i daje im większą sprawczość.Pochylamy się w tym sprawozdaniu nad petycjami dotyczącymi problemów osób z niepełnosprawnościami. Wiemy, że osoby z niepełnosprawnościami wciąż borykają się z wieloma barierami. Jednak nawet Parlament Europejski, instytucja, w której tak dużo mówi się o równości i wsparciu osób z niepełnosprawnościami, która powinna być wzorem dla innych, nie jest dostatecznie dostosowana do potrzeb tych osób. Potrzebujemy np. dostosowania naszej strony internetowej, dostosowanie przestrzeni w Parlamencie, dostosowania form naszej komunikacji tak, aby 87 mln obywateli w UE z niepełnosprawnością mogło w taki sam sposób dotrzeć do informacji i uczestniczyć w życiu Parlamentu, jak pozostali obywatele Unii.Jednocześnie cieszę się, że Komisja Europejska w marcu tego roku przyjęła strategię na rzecz osób z niepełnosprawnościami do roku 2030. To ważny krok na drodze do równych szans, równego dostępu do uczestnictwa w życiu publicznym i zwalczania dyskryminacji.
2021/10/06
Humanitarian situation in Tigray (RC-B9-0484/2021, B9-0484/2021, B9-0486/2021, B9-0487/2021, B9-0489/2021, B9-0492/2021, B9-0493/2021, B9-0495/2021)

Ponownie głosowałem za przyjęciem rezolucji w sprawie sytuacji humanitarnej w Tigraj (Etiopia). W wyniku konfliktu niszczone i plądrowane są miasta, a ich mieszkańcy giną lub są torturowani. ONZ donosi o masakrach ludności cywilnej i przemocy seksualnej na dużą skalę, szczególnie w stosunku do kobiet i młodych dziewczyn.Utrudniony dostęp do pomocy humanitarnej sprawia że setki tysięcy ludzi cierpią z powodu głodu i braku dostępu do wody. Na wyjątkową uwagę zasługuje sytuacja dzieci w tym regionie. Zdaniem UNICEF w ciągu najbliższych 12 miesięcy, aż 100 tys. dzieci znajdzie się w stanie zagrożenia życia. Ta sytuacja wymaga działania UE, która musi wesprzeć wysiłki mediacyjne prowadzone przez Afrykę na rzecz zawieszenia broni i stworzenia przestrzeni dialogu.
2021/10/07
Protecting workers from asbestos (A9-0275/2021 - Nikolaj Villumsen)

Głosowałem za sprawozdaniem zawierającym zalecenia dla Komisji w sprawie ochrony pracowników przed zagrożeniami związanymi z azbestem.Aż 90 000 osób rocznie umiera na świecie na choroby wywołane kontaktem z azbestem. Zmagamy się z tym problemem od lat. Myślę, że nikt nie ma wątpliwości, że potrzebujemy strategii rejestrowania, usuwania, a także właściwego przetwarzania i unieszkodliwiania azbestu. Konieczne jest przede wszystkim zmobilizowanie funduszy na ten cel na poziomie Unii i państw członkowskich. Jest to bardzo ważne w kontekście wielu naszych polityk i celów, takich jak Europejski Plan Walki z Rakiem czy Europejski Zielony Ład.Azbest należy jednak usuwać bezpiecznie. Jedną z najbardziej narażonych grup są ekipy usuwające azbest, pracownicy sektora konserwacji i dekontaminacji. Należy więc zrobić wszystko, aby chronić tę grupę, szczególnie w kontekście Zielonego Ładu i nadchodzącej fali prac w zakresie izolacji i efektywności energetycznej budynków. Potrzebne są jasne standardy bezpieczeństwa, które należy spełnić w trakcie prowadzenia takich prac, i wytyczne odnośnie odzieży ochronnej, a także szkolenia dla pracowników.Myślę, że duże pole do działania ma tu też Europejska Agencja Bezpieczeństwa i Zdrowia w Pracy. Ważnym krokiem może być przygotowanie rekomendacji dla przedsiębiorców i państw członkowskich, a także działania uświadamiające i profilaktyczne wśród najbardziej narażonych grup.
2021/10/19
Joint Undertakings under Horizon Europe (A9-0246/2021 - Maria da Graça Carvalho)

Szanowni Państwo! Głosowałem za sprawozdaniem w sprawie wniosku dotyczącego rozporządzenia Rady ustanawiającego wspólne przedsięwzięcia w ramach programu „Horyzont Europa”. Wspólne przedsięwzięcia w programie Horyzont nie są niczym nowym. Możemy jednak na podstawie naszych doświadczeń i analizy ich dotychczasowego funkcjonowania wyciągnąć pewne wnioski i wprowadzić ulepszenia. Myślę, że zaproponowany tekst idzie w dobrym kierunku. Przede wszystkim kładziemy większy nacisk na otwartość na nowe podmioty, takie jak MŚP, start-upy czy organizacje społeczeństwa obywatelskiego. Zgadzam się, że potrzebujemy działań mających przyciągnąć takie podmioty i ułatwić ich uczestnictwo. W tym kontekście bardzo ważne jest też wspomniane wprowadzanie uproszczeń i ograniczenie obciążenia administracyjnego dla wszystkich stron, np. poprzez sprawowanie przez wspólne przedsięwzięcia wspólnych funkcji administracyjnych.Kolejną bardzo ważną rzeczą jest też działanie na rzecz szerszego udziału i odzwierciedlenia w projektach większej różnorodności geograficznej państw Unii tak, aby sprzyjać uczestnictwu także podmiotów z państw o skromniejszych dotychczas wynikach. Wspólne przedsięwzięcia obejmą kluczowe dla nas cele i wyzwania. Myślę, że dobrym posunięciem jest też dopuszczenie dodatkowego wsparcia dla obszarów, które szczególnie ucierpiały w trakcie pandemii, jak np. ochrona zdrowia.Bardzo istotny jest też zapis o propagowaniu i zwiększaniu zaangażowania młodych naukowców i doktorantów w działania wspólnych przedsięwzięć, m.in. poprzez działania „Maria Skłodowska-Curie”. Uważam, że tworzenie im możliwości w zakresie tak prestiżowych unijnych inicjatyw jest bardzo ważne i sprzyja ich rozwojowi, a potrzebujemy przecież doświadczonych i świetnie przygotowanych naukowców.I wreszcie, zwracamy uwagę na potrzebę większych synergii między wspólnymi przedsięwzięciami a europejskimi funduszami strukturalnymi i inwestycyjnymi, innymi inicjatywami w ramach programu „Horyzont Europa”, a także wszystkimi programami Unii w zakresie badań naukowych, innowacji i konkurencyjności. Myślę, że te propozycje wyznaczają pozytywny kierunek zmian i pozwolą na jeszcze lepsze funkcjonowanie wspólnych przedsięwzięć.
2021/10/21
EU sports policy: assessment and possible ways forward (A9-0318/2021 - Tomasz Frankowski)

Głosowałem za sprawozdaniem w sprawie polityki UE w dziedzinie sportu. Sport odgrywa w naszym życiu bardzo ważną rolę. Przyczynia się do kształtowania zdrowszego społeczeństwa, pozwala zachować aktywność fizyczną na dłużej i zapobiega rozwojowi chorób cywilizacyjnych, co z kolei pozwala ograniczyć wydatki publiczne na służbę zdrowia. Sport pełni też ważną funkcję społeczną, pozwalając na większą integrację, poczucie jedności i włączenie. Wiedząc o tych wszystkich pozytywnych cechach, często zapominamy, że sport to też po prostu gałąź gospodarki, która generuje około 2 % PKB Unii i odpowiada za 6 mln miejsc pracy.Sport to jednocześnie jeden z sektorów, które najbardziej ucierpiały w trakcie pandemii COVID-19. Ogromne problemy były odczuwane zwłaszcza na poziomie amatorskim. Potrzebujemy więc specjalnego podejścia do sportu, większej widoczności i wsparcia. Musimy zadbać przede wszystkim o to, aby sport był dostępny i bezpieczny. Ważne jest, aby zagwarantować większe finansowanie dla sportu, ale też kłaść nacisk na sprawiedliwszą dystrybucję środków tak, aby na poziomie lokalnym i w regionach wiejskich sport także był dostępny dla każdego.Szczególnie poważny może być problem dostępu do infrastruktury sportowej na obszarach wiejskich. Uważam, że powinniśmy tworzyć możliwości sportowe także tam, aby nie wykluczać tych społeczności. Ważne są też działania na rzecz większej widoczności sportu kobiet, a także zwalczanie dyskryminacji i rasizmu w sporcie.Uważam ponadto, że potrzebujemy większej przejrzystości, szczególnie jeżeli chodzi o przyznawanie praw do organizacji wielkich imprez sportowych. Nie powinny one być organizowane w państwach łamiących prawa człowieka. Dyktatorom i reżimom naruszającym prawa człowieka powinniśmy pokazać czerwoną kartkę.
2021/11/23
Introduction of a European Social Security pass for improving the digital enforcement of social security rights and fair mobility (B9-0551/2021)

Głosowałem za rezolucją w sprawie wprowadzenia europejskiego dowodu zabezpieczenia społecznego w celu poprawy cyfrowego egzekwowania praw w zakresie zabezpieczenia społecznego i sprawiedliwej mobilności. Wraz ze wzrostem liczby pracowników transgranicznych i mobilności zawodowej, a także pojawieniem się nowych, niestandardowych form zatrudnienia, musi zmienić się też nasze podejście. Europejscy pracownicy potrzebują pewności i stabilności. Dlatego powinniśmy wzmocnić współpracę pomiędzy służbami zatrudnienia w państwach członkowskich, aby umożliwić łatwiejszy dostęp do informacji, skuteczniejszą inspekcję pracy i łatwiejsze śledzenie składek i uprawnień pracowników, takich jak prawa emerytalne.Europejski dowód zabezpieczenia społecznego może zdecydowanie się do tego przyczynić. Prace nad tym rozwiązaniem Komisja zapowiadała już dawno. Rozumiem, że to, że nie przedstawiono jeszcze konkretnej propozycji, wynika z chęci skoordynowania nowych rozwiązań z już istniejącymi lub właśnie rozwijanymi systemami, a także przetestowania rozwiązań w programach pilotażowych. Jednak przy tak dynamicznie zmieniającej się sytuacji na rynku pracy, a także w kontekście pandemii COVID-19, która wymusiła cyfryzację wszystkich sektorów, w tym sektora publicznego, musimy działać szybciej. Powinniśmy w miarę możliwości usprawnić pracę nad E-ID i Single Digital Gateway, zwiększając zasoby, jeżeli to niezbędne.Należy także zintensyfikować wymianę dobrych praktyk i doświadczeń już nabytych przez państwa członkowskie w zakresie współpracy i wymiany informacji przez służby zatrudnienia. Może to usprawnić pracę nad Europejskim dowodem zabezpieczenia społecznego i pomóc nam, już na wczesnym etapie prac, wyeliminować pewne błędy. Myślę też, że już po wstępnych wynikach programów pilotażowych powinno być możliwe rozpoczęcie prac nad propozycją legislacyjną. I wreszcie, jak już wspomniałem Komisja, mimo wcześniejszych zapowiedzi, nie przedstawiła jeszcze propozycji legislacyjnej. Myślę, że aby zachować jak największą przejrzystość Parlament Europejski powinien mieć dostęp do informacji i wszelkich przeprowadzonych już analiz, które Komisja wzięła pod uwagę przy podjęciu tej decyzji. Myślę, że dogłębna analiza danych pozwoli na ulepszenie propozycji i zwiększenie jej efektywności kosztowej.
2021/11/25
The safety of truck parking lots in the EU (B9-0552/2021)

Głosowałem za rezolucją w sprawie bezpieczeństwa parkingów dla samochodów ciężarowych w UE. Tylko w latach 2017-2019 kradzieże ładunków w trakcie transportu kosztowały unijną gospodarkę aż 52 mln EUR. Chociaż to zaskakująco wysoka kwota, powinniśmy wiedzieć, że najprawdopodobniej jest jeszcze niedoszacowana. Coraz częściej kradzieże przeprowadzają zorganizowane grupy przestępcze i zjawisko to jest coraz powszechniejsze. Powoduje to oczywiście utratę towaru, przerywanie łańcuchów dostaw i opóźnienia, ale przede wszystkim ta sytuacja stanowi poważne narażenie życia i zdrowia europejskich kierowców. Trzeba przy tym pamiętać, że kierowcy samochodów ciężarowych są zobowiązani, ze względu na konieczność zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa na drodze, do obowiązkowego odpoczynku. Musimy zrobić wszystko, aby ten odpoczynek, również dla nich był jak najbezpieczniejszy.Uważam, że przedstawione w rezolucji sugestie działań mogą się do tego przyczynić. Przede wszystkim, ponieważ kradzieże ładunków mają coraz częściej charakter transgraniczny, należy wzmocnić współpracę transgraniczną, koordynację operacyjną, a także wymianę informacji pomiędzy organami ścigania państw członkowskich. Konieczna jest także ścisła współpraca z Europolem i jego silne wsparcie. Potrzebujemy jego wsparcia operacyjnego i analitycznego. Państwa członkowskie powinny systematycznie zgłaszać Europolowi wszelkie przestępstwa, natomiast Komisja powinna wzmocnić jego zdolność operacyjną. Powinniśmy też dążyć do podnoszenia bezpieczeństwa parkingów, zwiększając ilość regularnych patroli policji, a także, z wykorzystaniem m.in. funduszy strukturalnych i inwestycyjnych i inicjatyw takich jak program Łącząc Europę, usprawniać współpracę między służbami. Zgadzam się też, że w zwiększeniu bezpieczeństwa może pomóc nam wykorzystanie narzędzi cyfrowych, jak np. systemy informacji i rezerwacji bezpiecznych miejsc parkingowych czy narzędzia ostrzegawcze.
2021/11/25
Digital Markets Act (A9-0332/2021 - Andreas Schwab)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem aktu o rynkach cyfrowych (DMA). Rozporządzenie to daje nam możliwość zapewnienia uczciwej konkurencji na europejskich rynkach cyfrowych oraz respektowania praw europejskich firm i konsumentów. W obecnej sytuacji giganci internetowi, tacy jak Google czy Amazon, poprzez między innymi wyszukiwarki czy sklepy internetowe pełnią funkcję strażników pomiędzy użytkownikami a firmami, mając dzięki temu możliwość znacznego wpływu na relację między tymi podmiotami.Dzięki DMA otrzymujemy narzędzie dostosowane do specyfiki europejskiego rynku cyfrowego, które pozwoli nam zapewnić, by konkurencja na rynku cyfrowym została zachowana. Szczególnie cieszę się, że udało się osiągnąć to, że DMA określa strażników w ujęciu globalnym, dzięki czemu zapewnimy, by dana firma nie uchylała się od obowiązków określonych przez akt poprzez ograniczenie liczby firm z Unii Europejskiej.Wierzę, że dzięki temu podejściu unikniemy dyskryminowania europejskich firm, w szczególności zaś małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw, oraz zamkniemy potencjalną furtkę do obchodzenia europejskich przepisów.
2021/12/15
European framework for employees' participation rights and the revision of the European Works Council Directive (A9-0331/2021 - Gabriele Bischoff)

Szanowni Państwo, głosowałem za sprawozdaniem w sprawie europejskich ram praw pracowników do partycypacji i przeglądu dyrektywy w sprawie europejskiej rady zakładowej. Na europejskim rynku pracy zachodzą teraz dynamiczne przemiany. Nowe formy zatrudnienia, postępująca szybko cyfryzacja i transformacja ekologiczna wymuszają zmiany w miejscach pracy. Pracownicy nie powinni być tylko ich przedmiotem, ale powinni być włączeni w kształtowanie tych zmian. Rola dialogu społecznego jest więc ogromna. Może on wpływać m.in. na kształtowanie miejsc pracy wyższej jakości, polepszenie warunków pracy, jego bezpieczeństwa, większego włączenia, zwalczania nierówności, a także np. zwiększania efektywności pracy.Wszyscy mogą na tym skorzystać i warto wspierać budowanie odpowiedniego, sprzyjającego dialogowi społecznemu środowiska. Powinniśmy więc promować i dawać zachęty do większego włączenia pracowników w procesy decyzyjne. Trzeba też zapewnić lepsze wdrażanie już istniejących narzędzi i dopilnować, aby istniejące przepisy były przestrzegane. Myślę, że ważne jest podnoszenie świadomości wśród partnerów społecznych. Pracownicy powinni być świadomi swoich praw, a ich prawo m.in. do organizowania się nie może być ograniczane. Dbanie o to jest zadaniem nie tylko Komisji, ale nas wszystkich z państwami członkowskimi na czele.
2021/12/16
Situation at the Ukrainian border and in Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine (B9-0593/2021, B9-0594/2021, B9-0595/2021, B9-0596/2021, B9-0597/2021, B9-0598/2021)

Szanowni Państwo, głosowałem za rezolucją w sprawie sytuacji na granicy ukraińskiej i na terytoriach Ukrainy okupowanych przez Rosję. To, co dzieje się dzisiaj wzdłuż ukraińskiej granicy, bardzo nas niepokoi. Od listopada Rosja gromadzi tam swoje wojska i broń. Oczywiście teraz głównym celem powinny być wszelkie działania mające na celu zapobieganie eskalacji wydarzeń, tak aby sytuacja ta nie przerodziła się w zbrojny, otwarty konflikt. Powinniśmy więc wykorzystać wszelkie narzędzia i kanały dyplomatyczne na linii UE-Rosja. Nie możemy się jednak tylko do tego ograniczyć. Ukraina co prawda od czasu aneksji Krymu nie próżnowała, podjęto tam konkretne działania mające na celu wzmocnienie zdolności obronnych, jednak w dalszym ciągu Ukraina liczy na nasze wsparcie. Bardzo ważna jest więc wyraźna deklaracja takiego wsparcia dla Ukrainy. Może ono przyjąć różne formy: od przekazywania sprzętu wojskowego i medycznego po wsparcie logistyczne w zakresie obronności, cyberobrony czy walkę z dezinformacją.Bardzo ważne jest jednak wysłanie jasnego sygnału, że Ukraina nie jest i nie będzie sama w obliczu niebezpieczeństwa. Powinniśmy też dalej wspierać przeprowadzane na Ukrainie reformy. Demokratyczne przemiany i stabilizacja wewnętrznej sytuacji też umacniają Ukrainę i pozwalają na lepsze radzenie sobie z zewnętrznymi zagrożeniami. Wszystkie te działania są bardzo ważne, ale musimy też wziąć pod uwagę różne scenariusze rozwoju wypadków. Musimy już teraz wypracować spójną i jasną strategię tego, jak Unia zachowa się w przypadku agresji na Ukrainę. Powinniśmy skoordynować nasze stanowisko z naszymi sojusznikami i partnerami. Musimy nie tylko już teraz wiedzieć, jakie działania podejmiemy, gdyby doszło do zbrojnej napaści, ale powinniśmy też to w jasny sposób komunikować. Ukraina to nasz sojusznik, to nasz bliski partner. Nie zaakceptujemy naruszenia jej suwerenności terytorialnej. Obecna sytuacja zagraża jednak nie tylko Ukrainie, ale także samej Unii. Nie możemy być bierni wobec tego zagrożenia.
2021/12/16
European Medicines Agency (A9-0216/2021 - Nicolás González Casares)

Głosowałem za sprawozdaniem w sprawie wniosku dotyczącego rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w sprawie wzmocnienia roli Europejskiej Agencji Leków w zakresie gotowości na wypadek sytuacji kryzysowej i zarządzania kryzysowego w odniesieniu do produktów leczniczych i wyrobów medycznych.Pandemia Covid-19 uświadomiła nam dwie rzeczy. Po pierwsze, że działając wspólnie, prowadząc wspólne zamówienia na szczepionki i koordynując odpowiedź na pandemię w całej Unii, byliśmy w stanie lepiej radzić sobie z narastającymi wyzwaniami, niedoborami, nie zostawiając nikogo w tyle. Po drugie, niestety ta bezprecedensowa sytuacja unaoczniła nam także, że zdolności Unii w zakresie koordynacji wielu działań czy dostępu do produktów leczniczych i wyrobów medycznych były ograniczone. Działaliśmy tak szybko, jak to było możliwe, ale trzeba pamiętać, że UE stała przed koniecznością opracowywania doraźnych, awaryjnych rozwiązań, co wiązało się z pewnymi ograniczeniami. Aby reagować skuteczniej, szybciej i bardziej przewidywalnie, powinniśmy ustanowić jasne ramy działania Europejskiej Agencji Leków.Potrzebujemy szczególnie większych zdolności w zakresie monitorowania i ograniczania potencjalnych i faktycznych niedoborów leków i wyrobów medycznych, a także zapewniania terminowego ich opracowywania. Jest to szczególnie ważne w kontekście budowania odporności i przygotowania na wpływ jakichkolwiek poważnych wydarzeń na dostęp do produktów leczniczych. Uważam więc, że dobrym posunięciem jest ustanowienie w ramach Agencji Wykonawczej Grupy Sterującej ds. Niedoborów i Bezpieczeństwa Produktów Leczniczych. Jej działanie we współpracy z państwami członkowskimi umożliwi szybsze działanie w przypadku wystąpienia sytuacji kryzysowych mogących zakłócić dostęp do środków medycznych i szybsze reagowanie na stany zagrożenia zdrowia publicznego. Ważne jest przygotowywanie wykazu leków o krytycznym znaczeniu w kontekście zagrożenia zdrowia publicznego i szczególnie bliskie monitorowanie ich zasobów i dostępności. Uważam, że wszystkie te działania muszą opierać się na skutecznej wymianie danych, aby w lepszy sposób koordynować podejmowane na poziomie Unii i państw członkowskich kroki.
2022/01/19
Digital Services Act (A9-0356/2021 - Christel Schaldemose)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem Aktu o Usługach Cyfrowych. Nie ma wątpliwości, że Europa potrzebuje jednolitego rynku cyfrowego z jasnymi zasadami, silną ochroną konsumentów i środowiskiem przyjaznym dla biznesu. Nie możemy dłużej pozwolić na to, by to giganci internetowi ustalali zasady, zaś konsumenci nie byli wystarczająco chronieni.Cieszę się, że dzięki DSA zwiększy się bezpieczeństwo w sieci, zyskamy narzędzie, które pozwoli skutecznie usuwać nielegalne treści, zapewni walkę z piractwem czy też ochronę zwykłych użytkowników przed dezinformacją i nielegalną mową nienawiści, przy jednoczesnym zachowaniu wolności słowa i pluralizmu mediów. Zwiększy się też bezpieczeństwo zakupów internetowych, a zmniejszy anonimowość użytkowników biznesowych, aby pomóc w identyfikacji sprzedawców nielegalnych towarów.Korzystanie z internetu stanie się bardziej przejrzyste i przyjazne użytkownikowi, między innymi nie będziemy bombardowani wyskakującymi okienkami proszącymi o zgodę, gdy ta została już wycofana lub użytkownik jej odmówił.Co ważne, małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa będą mogły nadal skutecznie docierać do swoich klientów z interesującą dla nich ofertą, a jednocześnie dzieci będą chronione przed reklamą targetowaną. Zadbaliśmy również o to, by małe firmy były chronione przed nieproporcjonalnymi obowiązkami, które utrudniałyby im funkcjonowanie i generowały niepotrzebne koszty.
2022/01/20
Challenges for urban areas in the post-COVID-19 era (A9-0352/2021 - Katalin Cseh)

Głosowałem za sprawozdaniem w sprawie wyzwań stojących przed obszarami miejskimi w okresie po pandemii COVID-19. Pandemia stała się bezprecedensowym wyzwaniem dla miast, często uwypuklając już istniejące w nich problemy, takie jak nierówności, ubóstwo, bezrobocie, wykluczenie społeczne czy brak dostępu do mieszkań. Ze względu na większą gęstość zaludnienia walka z pandemią była w miastach szczególnie trudna. Również utrata miejsc pracy była znacznie większa w miastach niż na innych obszarach, co w wyjątkowo wysokim stopniu dotknęło osoby szczególnie narażone, takie jak osoby o niskich kwalifikacjach, ludzi młodych, kobiety, osoby pracujące w niepełnych formach zatrudnienia i otrzymujące wynagrodzenie minimalne. Pandemia była więc doświadczeniem bardzo trudnym, ale jej bliski – miejmy nadzieję – koniec wcale nie oznacza jednak końca wyzwań.Europejskie miasta były na pierwszej linii frontu w walce z pandemią COVID-19, a teraz są na pierwszej linii frontu w walce z kryzysem po niej. Jednym z najważniejszych elementów tej walki będzie zaangażowanie miast w transformację cyfrową. COVID-19 już przyspieszył ten proces i wymógł niejako na nas wszystkich szybsze działanie. Obecnie aż 45% polskich miast deklaruje zwiększenie zakresu cyfryzacji usług społecznych. Niezbędne będą oczywiście w tym celu inwestycje i wsparcie ze środków unijnych, np. z programu Cyfrowa Europa czy EFRR, w ramach którego 8% środków zarezerwowanych jest właśnie dla miast.Kolejnym ważnym wyzwaniem będzie oczywiści transformacja energetyczna, wzmocnienie edukacji i opieki zdrowotnej. Stojąc przed tak wielkimi wyzwaniami, miasta potrzebują jednak też bardziej odpowiedniego i bezpośrednio dostępnego finansowania. Zgadzam się, że aby zwiększyć wydajność i zmniejszać obciążenia administracyjne w przyszłości, a także nie dopuszczać do wykluczania z finansowania niektórych miast czy gmin ze względu na sytuację polityczną czy politycznie umotywowane decyzje, władzom lokalnym i regionalnym należy stworzyć możliwości bardziej bezpośredniego finansowania ze środków UE. Nie możemy zapomnieć, jak ważną rolę w odbudowie gospodarczej Unii odgrywają miasta. Nie ma wątpliwości, że by temu podołać, będą potrzebowały odpowiedniego wsparcia.
2022/02/15
Implementation of the Toy Safety Directive (A9-0349/2021 - Brando Benifei)

Głosowałem za sprawozdaniem w sprawie wdrożenia dyrektywy Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady 2009/48/WE w sprawie bezpieczeństwa zabawek. Nie ulega wątpliwości, że zapewnienie wysokiego poziomu ochrony dzieci w całej UE jest kwestią nadrzędną. Rodzice, dając dziecku zabawkę, muszą mieć pewność, że spełnia ona wszelkie wymogi bezpieczeństwa i wolna jest od substancji szkodliwych.W tym kontekście szczególnie ważny jest odpowiedni nadzór nad zabawkami pochodzącymi z krajów trzecich, które powinny spełniać te same wymogi bezpieczeństwa co zabawki produkowane w Unii Europejskiej. Z uwagi na fakt, że duża ilość podrabianych i niebezpiecznych zabawek trafia do europejskich konsumentów przez rynki internetowe, szczególnie ważna jest ścisła współpraca między tymi podmiotami a organami nadzoru, aby zabawki niespełniające europejskich norm były szybko usuwane ze sprzedaży.
2022/02/16
Tackling non-tariff and non-tax barriers in the single market (A9-0336/2021 - Kosma Złotowski)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem sprawozdania w sprawie zwalczania barier pozataryfowych i pozapodatkowych na jednolitym rynku. Niewątpliwie jednolity rynek jest jednym z największych i najbardziej namacalnych osiągnięć Unii Europejskiej. Swobodny przepływ towarów i usług w sposób niezwykle istotny przyczynia się do europejskiego wzrostu gospodarczego oraz zwiększa konkurencyjność europejskich firm.Niestety jednak w dalszym ciągu istnieją bariery, które zakłócają prawidłowe funkcjonowanie wspólnego rynku i hamują jego potencjał. Europejskie firmy cały czas muszą borykać się z takimi przeszkodami, jak rozproszona regulacja, nieadekwatna lub nieprawidłowa implementacja unijnych przepisów czy też nadmierne, a niekiedy wręcz protekcjonistyczne wymogi administracyjne dla prowadzenia działalności w innym kraju.Na te przeszkody szczególnie narażone są małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa, które nie mają możliwości finansowych czy też osobowych, by im przeciwdziałać. Dlatego też niezbędna jest prawidłowa identyfikacja i skuteczne usuwanie barier. Jest to tym bardziej aktualne teraz, gdy europejska gospodarka musi poradzić sobie z negatywnymi skutkami pandemii COVID-19 i wszelkie nieuzasadnione bariery dla funkcjonowania europejskich firm powinny być likwidowane.
2022/02/16
Cohesion policy: reducing healthcare disparities and enhancing cross-border health cooperation (A9-0026/202 - Tomislav Sokol)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem sprawozdania pt. Polityka spójności: zmniejszanie różnic w opiece zdrowotnej i zacieśnianie transgranicznej współpracy w dziedzinie zdrowia. Niestety cały czas w Unii Europejskiej napotykamy znaczne różnice w dostępie do opieki zdrowotnej, zarówno na poziomie poszczególnych państw członkowskich, jak i pomiędzy obszarami wiejskimi i miejskimi. Dostępność do leków i terapii jest niestety cały czas znacznie wyższa w Europie Zachodniej, w efekcie czego np. skuteczność leczenia raka jest w tych krajach o około 20% wyższa. Tymczasem to kod genetyczny, a nie pocztowy powinien mieć wpływ na nasze zdrowie.Dlatego też jestem przekonany, że niezbędne są znaczne inwestycje, zarówno w infrastrukturę, jak i dostępność specjalistów, szczególnie w regionach mniej rozwiniętych, i nie ulega wątpliwości, że polityka spójności jest w tym aspekcie doskonałym narzędziem do wykorzystania.
2022/03/08
Refugees in Europe: CARE (C9-0057/2022)

Głosowałem za rozporządzeniem w odniesieniu do działania w ramach polityki spójności na rzecz uchodźców w Europie tzw. CARE.Od początku agresji Putina na Ukrainę samą tylko granicę polsko-ukraińską przekroczyło 2,2 mln osób uciekających przed brutalnością rosyjskich wojsk. Z tego względu mierzymy się z ogromnym kryzysem humanitarnym w Europie. Postawa Europejczyków jest wspaniała. Okazali oni dużo serca i współczucia uchodźcom z Ukrainy. Ale w konfrontacji z ogromem tego wyzwania, potrzebujemy konkretnych form wsparcia i szybkiego, zdecydowanego działania.Inicjatywa CARE pozwala nam na większą elastyczność w wykorzystaniu środków i zastosowanie dofinansowania w wysokości 100% w roku obrachunkowym 2021–2022. Pozwoli to na skoncentrowanie większych środków, bo aż 10 mld EUR, na działania już teraz, gdy najbardziej ich potrzebujemy.CARE to dobry krok, jednak trzeba sobie wyraźnie powiedzieć, że wyzwania, z którymi się teraz mierzymy, mogą mieć, i zapewne będą miały, charakter długoterminowy. Potrzebujemy więc też takich długofalowych rozwiązań, obejmujących dostęp do edukacji dla ukraińskich dzieci, szkolenia językowe, a także działania na rzecz integracji w kontekście społecznym i zawodowym.Szczególnego wsparcia i funduszy będą potrzebowały regiony na zewnętrznych granicach UE bezpośrednio graniczące z Ukrainą, które są na pierwszej linii walki z tym kryzysem i jako pierwsze niosą niezbędną pomoc wszystkim przekraczającym granicę uchodźcom.
2022/03/24
Roaming Regulation (recast) (A9-0286/2021 - Angelika Winzig)

Zniesienie opłat roamingowych w 2017 r. w sposób istotny ułatwiło konsumentom komunikację podczas podróży po Europie i stanowiło tym samym niezwykle wyraźny efekt rzeczywistego wpływu Unii Europejskiej na życie obywateli. Jestem tym samym przekonany, że konieczne jest przedłużenie tych przepisów na kolejne 10 lat. Cieszę się też, że nowe przepisy zapewnią jeszcze lepszą jakość usług, na przykład poprzez zakazanie celowego spowalniania prędkości przesyłu danych za granicą.W debacie na temat roamingu nie możemy dziś jednak pominąć jeszcze jednego niezwykle istotnego aspektu. Obecnie już 3,5 mln Ukraińców przyjechało do Unii Europejskiej, ratując swoje życie przed przerażającą wojną. Te osoby zostały bardzo często rozdzielone od swoich rodzin – mężów, braci czy synów, którzy zostali w Ukrainie, walcząc o wolność swojego kraju. Nie mam wątpliwości, że naszym obowiązkiem jest uczynienie wszystkiego co możliwe, aby ułatwić im komunikację bez narażania na znaczące koszty, których często w obecnej sytuacji będą przekraczały ich możliwości finansowe.Apeluję zatem do Komisji Europejskiej o podjęcie natychmiastowych działań mających na celu przynajmniej tymczasowe zniesienie opłat roamingowych dla ukraińskich uchodźców.
2022/03/24
Impact of Russian illegal war of aggression against Ukraine on the EU transport and tourism sectors (B9-0223/2022)

Głosowałem za rezolucją w sprawie wpływu wojny w Ukrainie na sektory transportu i turystyki. Zarówno kryzys spowodowany pandemią, jak i obecny spowodowany wojną, silnie odbiły się na europejskiej turystyce i transporcie. Transport jest zresztą jednym z sektorów, który w obu przypadkach odgrywa ogromną rolę. Wcześniej potrzebowaliśmy dostaw szczepionek, środków higienicznych i leków, teraz dostaw żywności i pomocy humanitarnej. Jest więc to jeden z kluczowych sektorów UE, który boryka się teraz ze wzrostem cen paliw i koniecznością przekierowania swojej działalności na nowe trasy. Dlatego potrzebujemy dogłębnej analizy wpływu gospodarczego wojny na sektor transportu i konkretnych propozycji jego wzmocnienia. Należy umożliwić maksymalną elastyczność i przynajmniej tymczasowo złagodzić przepisy.To też dobry moment na przegląd sieci TEN-T. Rosja nie jest już w żadnym zakresie naszym partnerem. Konieczne jest uniezależnienie się od niej w każdym aspekcie. Dlatego powinniśmy rozwijać sieć TEN-T i alternatywne połączenia z Europą Wschodnią.Należy też zminimalizować wpływ na sektor turystyki. Obecna sytuacja odbija się szczególnie na turystyce w państwach sąsiadujących z Ukrainą. W bardzo złym położeniu są regiony przygraniczne, gdzie z jednej strony jest konieczność intensywnych działań i nakładów na pomoc przybywającym uchodźcom, a z drugiej niektóre sektory, w tym turystyka, całkowicie zamierają. Należy szczególnie tam silnie wspierać ten sektor.
2022/05/05
Mental health in the digital world of work (A9-0184/2022 - Maria Walsh)

Pandemia COVID-19 zmieniła w naszym życiu wiele. Także to, jak pracujemy. Telepraca stała się rzeczywistością wielu firm. Ma to oczywiście wiele swoich dobrych stron. Pozwala na większą elastyczność, oszczędność czasu, który wielu z nas spędza w korkach w drodze do pracy, ogranicza emisje i powoduje oszczędności dla przedsiębiorstw. Ale telepraca wiąże się też z ryzykiem. Zacierają się granice między życiem prywatnym i zawodowym, pracujemy nierzadko dłużej, a wielu pracowników jest dostępnych on-line niemal cały czas. W Parlamencie Europejskim dostrzegamy te problemy. Dlatego głosowałem za sprawozdaniem w sprawie zdrowia psychicznego w cyfrowym świecie pracy.W sprawozdaniu zawartych zostało kilka ważnych punktów. Po pierwsze, zdrowie psychiczne powinno być traktowane równie priorytetowo jak zdrowie fizyczne. Potrzebujemy działań profilaktycznych, a także kanałów wsparcia w zakresie zdrowia psychicznego dla obywateli, którzy tego potrzebują. Po drugie, bardzo ważne jest tworzenie możliwości podnoszenia umiejętności cyfrowych dla pracowników i najbardziej narażonych na wykluczenie grup, aby dopasować kompetencje do dynamicznie zmieniającego się rynku pracy, a także zwalczać przepaść cyfrową. I wreszcie, należy ustanowić minimalne wymogi dotyczące pracy zdalnej, aby pracownicy, którzy korzystają z tej możliwości, mieli zagwarantowane takie same prawa i standardy, jak pracownicy w zakładzie pracy.
2022/07/05
Energy efficiency (recast) (A9-0221/2022 - Niels Fuglsang)

Zdecydowałem wstrzymać się w głosowaniu nad sprawozdaniem w sprawie efektywności energetycznej.Zwiększanie efektywności energetycznej jest bardzo ważne i to nie tylko ze względu na konieczność ograniczania emisji gazów cieplarnianych, ale także w obecnej sytuacji ze względu na konieczność oszczędności energii i zwiększania wydajności w obliczu kryzysu energetycznego i destabilizującej nasz rynek energetyczny polityki Rosji. Zgadzam się więc, że musimy podejmować działania na rzecz transformacji energetycznej, biorąc pod uwagę zarówno obecny kryzys, jak i zmiany klimatyczne.Jednocześnie uważam, że aby transformacja energetyczna mogła się udać, cele, które sobie stawiamy, muszą być realistyczne i muszą uwzględniać zarówno nasze możliwości, jak i odpowiedni czas realizacji. W państwach członkowskich panują bardzo różne uwarunkowania i powinny być one brane pod uwagę. Niestety nie zostało to w pełni odzwierciedlone w tym dokumencie. W mojej ocenie, w przypadku polskiego sektora ciepłowniczego, wyznaczone cele są niewykonalne we wskazanym czasie. Dlatego też, mimo że zgadzam się z założeniami tego sprawozdania, nie mogłem poprzeć go w głosowaniu.
2022/09/14
Renewable Energy Directive (A9-0208/2022 - Markus Pieper)

Głosowałem za zmianą dyrektywy w sprawie energii odnawialnej. Europa mierzy się teraz z ogromnym kryzysem energetycznym. Na każdym kroku podkreślamy, jak ważna jest dywersyfikacja źródeł energii, aby zapewnić sobie bezpieczeństwo energetyczne w przyszłości. Dlatego uważam, że potrzebujemy działań w zakresie rozbudowy alternatywnych źródeł energii i ambitnych celów w tym zakresie. Dywersyfikacja źródeł pozwoli nam na obniżenie cen energii w długoterminowej perspektywie. Bardzo ważne są też badania i rozwój najnowszych technologii, takich jak technologie wodorowe. W tej kwestii jednak, szczególnie wobec obecnego kryzysu energetycznego, potrzebne są szybkie działania, dlatego musimy zrobić wszystko co możliwe, by maksymalnie uprościć i usprawnić rozwój i włączenie technologii wodorowych.
2022/09/14
Flexible Assistance to Territories (FAST-CARE) (A9-0232/2022 - Niklas Nienaß)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem sprawozdania FAST CARE. Unia Europejska musi obecnie stawić czoła najpoważniejszemu kryzysowi od czasów II Wojny Światowej. Pandemia COVID-19, konsekwencje brutalnej napaści Rosji na Ukrainę czy też niespotykany dotąd wzrost cen energii oraz inflacja w sposób istotny zachwiały europejską gospodarką i zagroziły stabilności naszych przedsiębiorców oraz spowodowały dodatkowe obciążenia dla budżetów publicznych i opóźnienia w inwestycjach.Nie ulega więc wątpliwości, że ta dramatyczna sytuacja wymaga od nas podjęcia wszelkich możliwych środków, aby mitygować te negatywne konsekwencje. Dlatego z zadowoleniem przyjąłem propozycję pakietu FAST-CARE, poszerzającego wsparcie udzielane już w ramach CARE. Zwiększenie możliwości dofinansowania do 100%, czy dodatkowych przesunięć między EFRR, EFS i Funduszem Spójności, zwiększa tak potrzebną dzisiaj elastyczność, co bez wątpienia jest oczekiwanym działaniem.Dodatkowo pozytywnie oceniam przeznaczenie co najmniej 30 % wsparcia dla władz lokalnych i organizacji społeczeństwa obywatelskiego, gdyż to właśnie oni są na pierwszej linii frontu w zakresie przyjmowania i integracji uchodźców i to na nich spoczywa największe obciążenie związane z tym kryzysem.Uważam wręcz, że w przypadku krajów, które przyjmują największą liczbę uchodźców, należałoby rozważyć dodatkowe zwiększenie tego minimalnego progu. Chciałbym też podkreślić, że wsparcie potrzebne jest natychmiast, dlatego za słuszne uważam przyjęcie tego pakietu w procedurze uproszczonej, aby umożliwić jak najszybsze uruchomienie tych bardzo wyczekiwanych środków.
2022/10/04
Borrowing strategy to finance NextGenerationEU (A9-0250/2022 - José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem raportu w sprawie strategii zaciągania pożyczek w celu finansowania „Next Generation EU”, gdyż uważam go za ważny element budowania zrównoważonej, długoterminowej strategii finansowania tego instrumentu.„Next Generation EU” jest instrumentem tymczasowym, który ma za zadanie pobudzić gospodarkę po spowolnieniu spowodowanym pandemią COVID-19. Z tego powodu nie bez znaczenia jest czas wdrażania i na szczególne zadowolenie zasługuje fakt, że według sprawozdań Komisji zaciąganie pożyczek, rozpoczęte w czerwcu 2021r, jest już obecnie zaawansowane. To oznacza, że pozyskane w ten sposób środki mogą trafić do beneficjentów.Z drugiej jednak strony, musimy mieć na uwadze, że zaciągnięte zobowiązania należy spłacić. Aby ten mechanizm wspólnych pożyczek przynosił wartość dodaną bez uszczerbku dla wierzytelności i interesów finansowych Unii, należy rozważyć lepsze włączenie operacji zaciągania i udzielania pożyczek do rocznej procedury budżetowej. Wspólne pożyczki mogłyby zostać na stałe włączone do systemu pozyskiwania zasobów przez UE, także wychodząc poza horyzont czasowy instrumentu „Next Generation EU”. Aby jednak rozważyć takie rozwiązanie, musimy także wypracować dobry, stabilny system zasobów własnych UE, z których zaciągnięte zobowiązania mogłyby być spłacane.
2022/11/22
2023 budgetary procedure: joint text (A9-0278/2022 - Nicolae Ştefănuță, Niclas Herbst)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem budżetu Unii Europejskiej na rok 2023. Uważam, że priorytety zawarte w tym budżecie, takie jak bezpieczeństwo energetyczne, wzmocnienie działań związanych z bezpieczeństwem granic, czy też bezpieczeństwem żywnościowym stanowią obecnie jedne z najpoważniejszych wyznań, przed którymi stoi obecnie Unia Europejska, i nie ulega wątpliwości, iż muszą one uzyskać odpowiedni poziom finasowania. Cieszę się też, że przyszłoroczny budżet zakłada utrzymanie wsparcia na priorytety związane ze zdrowiem oraz pobudzeniem inwestycji po pandemii. Musimy bowiem pamiętać, że gospodarka nie odbudowała się jeszcze po pandemii i europejscy przedsiębiorcy cały czas niezwykle potrzebują unijnego wsparcia. Jest to ważne szczególnie teraz, aby pomóc zniwelować konsekwencje kryzysu cen energii i wysokiej inflacji, które mocno uderzają w przedsiębiorców, zwłaszcza zaś w małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa. W tym kontekście jestem szczególnie dumny z działań zespołu negocjacyjnego Parlamentu Europejskiego, dla którego utrzymanie tego wsparcia było jednym z najważniejszych priorytetów. Zgadzam się też z koniecznością pilnej rewizji wieloletnich ram finansowych, aby dostosować unijny budżet do kryzysowej sytuacji, w jakiej znalazła się obecnie Europa.
2022/11/23
Energy performance of buildings (recast) (A9-0033/2023 - Ciarán Cuffe)

W głosowaniu końcowym nad sprawozdaniem w sprawie charakterystyki energetycznej budynków postanowiłem się wstrzymać od głosu. Chcę z całą mocą podkreślić, iż uważam cel, który przyświeca temu sprawozdaniu, za słuszny. Natomiast jestem zdania, że narzędzia do realizacji podanych tam założeń są jeszcze zbyt słabo przygotowane i pozostawiono zbyt mało czasu rządzącym, administracji i obywatelom na przygotowanie się i wdrożenie proponowanych norm i zasad.
2023/03/14
Data Act (A9-0031/2023 - Pilar del Castillo Vera)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem rozporządzenia w sprawie zharmonizowanych przepisów dotyczących sprawiedliwego dostępu do danych i ich wykorzystywania. Nie ulega wątpliwości, że harmonizacja przepisów dotyczących dostępu do danych gromadzonych przed podłączone do sieci maszyny i urządzenia oraz wykorzystywania takich danych jest niezbędna i istniała pilna konieczność zlikwidowania tej luki prawnej. Cieszę się, że użytkownicy zyskają dostęp do danych wytwarzanych przez połączone produkty. Wierzę też, że dzięki przyjętemu dzisiaj rozporządzeniu uda się usunąć nieuzasadnione bariery na wewnętrznym rynku danych. Jednocześnie niezwykle istotne jest, aby ochronie danych towarzyszyła ochrona innowacyjności przemysłu, a co za tym idzie również ochrona własności intelektualnej i tajemnic handlowych. Ważne jest też, że jasno zostały określone definicje danych, co zapewni przejrzystość prawną i zgodność interpretacji. Jestem przekonany, że nowe przepisy wzmocnią konkurencyjność i innowacyjność europejskich przedsiębiorstw.
2023/03/14
Role of cohesion policy in addressing multidimensional environmental challenges in the Mediterranean Basin (A9-0094/2023 - François Alfonsi)

Głosowałem za sprawozdaniem w sprawie roli polityki spójności w rozwiązywaniu problemów środowiskowych w basenie Morza Śródziemnego.Rejon Morza Śródziemnego jest szczególnie wrażliwy na skutki zmian klimatu i degradacji środowiska. Wpływa to kilka czynników: wzrost poziomu morza i degradacja wybrzeża, zanieczyszczenie i podnoszenie się temperatury wód, wymieranie fauny i flory morskiej, a także nadmierne połowy i intensywna turystyka. Mając to uwadze, potrzebujemy interwencji, która umożliwi osiągnięcie równowagi pomiędzy celami środowiskowymi a konkurencyjnością. Oczywiście mamy wiele przykładów wartościowych inicjatyw w tym rejonie, ale poszczególne regiony lub państwa, działając w pojedynkę, mogą zapewnić jedynie częściowe rozwiązania. Potrzebujemy bardziej zintegrowanego podejścia. Dlatego zgadzam się, że potrzebna jest strategia makroregionalna na obszarze Morza Śródziemnego, która umożliwiałaby współpracę władz regionalnych i lokalnych, a także społeczeństwa obywatelskiego.Kompleksowe działanie jest równie ważne w odniesieniu do finansowania. Aby sprostać wyzwaniom należy lepiej skoordynować środki z polityki spójności ze środkami w ramach Europejskiego Funduszu Morskiego, Rybackiego i Akwakultury, krajowymi planami odbudowy i zwiększania odporności, a także innymi politykami.Właściwe wykorzystanie tych środków, tak aby mogły się wzajemnie uzupełniać, wesprze regiony w działaniu na rzecz odbudowy i ochrony siedlisk i gatunków morskich, zwiększenia, bioróżnorodności, bardziej zrównoważonej turystyki, a także pozwoli na dywersyfikację działalności i rozwój umiejętności w rejonie Morza Śródziemnego.
2023/05/09
Roadmap on a Social Europe: two years after Porto (B9-0235/2023, B9-0236/2023)

Głosowałem za przyjęciem sprawozdania w sprawie planu działania na rzecz Europy socjalnej, gdyż uważam, że współczesne wyzwania w obszarach gospodarczych i środowiskowych wymagają równoległych wzmożonych wysiłków także w dziedzinie społecznej i zatrudnienia.Jesteśmy obecnie świadkami podwójnej tranformacji, środowiskowej i cyfrowej, i bez wątpienia zachodzące zmiany mają ogromny wpływ na rynki pracy i nasze codzienne życie oraz dobrobyt naszych rodzin. Dlatego tak ważne jest, aby zapewnić, by w obliczu tych zmian nikt nie został w tyle. Musimy wspierać rozwój nowych kompetencji wśród pracowników, zapewnić im dostęp do szkoleń i kształcenia ustawicznego, a osobom poza rynkiem pracy zapewnić wsparcie w rozpoczęciu ścieżki zawodowej lub powrocie na nią. Aby tworzyć wysokiej jakości miejsca pracy, musimy też wspierać naszych przedsiębiorców, szczególnie tych prowadzących mikro, małe i średnie firmy.Jednocześnie szczególną opieką otoczone muszą być osoby najsłabsze. Stąd też poparłem zapis wzywający do zwiększenia środków przeznaczonych na gwarancje dla dzieci do 20 mld EUR. Uważam, że zapewnienie równego startu i godnych warunków rozwoju najmłodszych to priorytet, na którym nie można oszczędzać. Musimy położyć silne fundamenty pod społeczeństwo jutra.
2023/05/11
Nature restoration (A9-0220/2023 - César Luena)

Głosowałem za odrzuceniem wniosku rozporządzenia w sprawie odbudowy zasobów przyrodniczych. Niestety propozycja pozostawia dużo do życzenia, a wiele naszych pytań pozostaje bez odpowiedzi.W ocenie wpływu nie ma np. słowa na temat cen mieszkań i tego, jak pogodzić wymagania stawiane w stosunku do miast z prognozowanym wzrostem populacji miejskiej. Dość jasno za to widać, że obniżenie terenu upraw o 10% spowoduje spadek produkcji żywności i wzrost cen produktów rolnych.Osobiście uważam, że spadek produkcji i prognozowany wzrost cen żywności mogą być jeszcze wyższe, niż zakładamy. Pamiętajmy bowiem, że rozporządzenie w sprawie odbudowy zasobów przyrodniczych nie znajduje się w próżni. Na stole mamy już kolejne rozporządzenie w sprawie zrównoważonego stosowania środków ochrony roślin, które zakłada obniżenie stosowania pestycydów o 50% do 2030 roku bez zapewnienia wcześniej rolnikom przystępnych cenowo i skutecznych alternatyw.Jak wiemy, rolnictwo organiczne jest o 25% mniej wydajne od tradycyjnego i zwykle wymaga wręcz zwiększenia obszaru upraw. Jak więc ta propozycja idzie w parze z 10% celem obniżenia terenu upraw w Unii? Jak to wpłynie na bezpieczeństwo żywnościowe, biorąc również pod uwagę stały wzrost populacji na świecie? Nie można poprzeć wniosku, który budzi tyle poważnych pytań i którego pokłosiem może być likwidacja setek gospodarstw rolnych w Unii.
2023/07/12

Written questions (51)

Clean Air Programme
2019/07/08
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Preparation of operational programmes
2020/02/05
Documents: PDF(38 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Just Transition Fund
2020/02/05
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme post-2020
2020/03/09
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)
COVID-19
2020/03/09
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Directive (EU) 2018/957 concerning the posting of workers
2020/06/02
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Disability focal points
2020/07/01
Documents: PDF(53 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Disability focal points
2020/07/01
Documents: PDF(53 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Restrictions on the free movement of services in France
2020/07/08
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Definition of ‘habitual, permanent and continuous’ activity
2020/07/08
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Obligation to indicate the origin of non-food consumer products
2020/07/16
Documents: PDF(38 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Proposal to amend the provisions on the establishment and revocation of African Swine Fever (ASF) risk areas
2020/10/08
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Purchase of Covid-19 vaccine
2021/01/13
Documents: PDF(38 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Agreements with pharmaceutical companies on COVID-19 vaccines
2021/01/13
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Operational programmes under the ​2021‑2027​ Cohesion Policy
2021/01/21
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Support for self-employed people
2021/02/02
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Support for students from Belarus to study at universities in the EU
2021/02/16
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Temporary Framework for State Aid
2021/03/01
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)
End-of-life vehicles
2021/03/03
Documents: PDF(38 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Spare parts for cars
2021/03/03
Documents: PDF(37 KB) DOC(9 KB)
National recovery plans
2021/03/11
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Contractual penalties for vaccine supply contracts
2021/03/11
Documents: PDF(38 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Resumption of logging activities on the Puszcza Białowiska site
2021/03/25
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Just Transition Fund
2021/03/29
Documents: PDF(38 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Volatility of EU ETS prices – access to EU ETS market by entities not obliged to participate in the system
2021/04/07
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(9 KB)
The temporary Support to mitigate Unemployment Risks in an Emergency (SURE) instrument and the European unemployment benefit reinsurance scheme
2021/04/26
Documents: PDF(46 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Evaluation of Poland's draft National Recovery Plan
2021/05/11
Documents: PDF(47 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Ensuring fair and transparent allocation of NextGenerationEU funding
2021/06/01
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Funding allocation for rural development under the ERDF
2021/07/14
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Rising gas prices
2021/09/22
Documents: PDF(38 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Ensuring continuity of vaccine supply
2021/09/23
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Support from European Union agencies for the management of refugees fleeing as a consequence of the Russian war in Ukraine
2022/03/28
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Using sanctions and seized property to motivate the Russian Federation to act in accordance with international law and pay for the damage it has caused
2022/04/06
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2246
2022/04/20
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
EU pharmaceutical policy – supporting and rebuilding the production of active substances in the EU
2022/04/26
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Forced deportations of Ukrainian citizens
2022/04/28
Documents: PDF(59 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Supply chain disruption due to war in Ukraine
2022/05/03
Documents: PDF(38 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Gazprom cuts off the gas supply to Poland and Bulgaria
2022/05/16
Documents: PDF(52 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Recognition of the professional qualifications of Ukrainian refugees
2022/05/16
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
The role of Russian-funded environmental organisations in shaping the EU’s climate policy – follow-up question
2022/09/12
Documents: PDF(47 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Unequal treatment of products manufactured by EU producers
2022/10/05
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Large-scale pro-Russian disinformation operations online on Twitter and Facebook
2022/10/19
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Reducing forced labour and child labour in EU supply chains by 2025
2022/12/09
Documents: PDF(52 KB) DOC(11 KB)
Motor Vehicle Bloc Exemption Regulation (MVBER)
2022/12/16
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Leaky Solidarity Lanes are damaging the viability of agriculture in the EU
2023/01/10
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Energy renovation of public buildings
2023/01/25
Documents: PDF(40 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Regulation on plant protection products and food security in the context of Russian aggression in Ukraine
2023/03/02
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Situation on the poultry meat market following the suspension of customs duties and quotas on products from Ukraine
2023/03/08
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Abuses of position by dominant market undertakings
2023/03/22
Documents: PDF(39 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Meeting the basic conditions for the implementation of cohesion policy
2023/04/21
Documents: PDF(37 KB) DOC(9 KB)
Removal of rehabilitation and therapy voucher from the European Funds for Social Development national programme
2023/07/20
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(10 KB)

Amendments (1954)

Amendment 11 #

2023/2586(RSP)


Recital A
A. whereas sustainable development is a fundamental objective of the EU; whereas the three pillars of sustainable development are the economic, the social and the environmental; whereas sustainable development is based, among other things, on full employment, social progress and fairness; whereas this is a fundamental objective of the EU, as laid down in Article 3(3) of the Treaty on European Union; whereas the emphasis currently lies on economic and environmental sustainability;
2023/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2023/2586(RSP)


Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that in-work poverty needs to be tackled through decent wages in order to ensure that work pays and that all social support measures needs to always be intertwined with active labour market policies of high quality, so that people’s inclusion and return to the labour market is encouraged and supported;
2023/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2023/2586(RSP)


Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Reiterates the importance of providing more systemic support for the people with disabilities at all stages of life to allow them for the life in dignity and independence, as well as their inclusion in the labour market; call on the Commission and Member States to work towards swift implementation of the EU Care Strategy and support for carers;
2023/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2023/2586(RSP)


Paragraph 9
9. Highlights that, according to principle 19, access to social housing or housing assistance of good quality should be provided for those in need; urges the Commission to develop an ambitious action plan to achieve accessible and green social housing to meet the housing needs of all EU citizens and to progressively eradicate homelessness by 2030; calls on the Member States to work on instruments that would create affordable, accessible and attractive offer for young persons and families to finance their first house;
2023/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
– having regard to the Council Recommendation of 22 May 2019 on High-Quality Early Childhood Education and Care Systems,
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 b (new)
– having regard to the Proposal for a Council Recommendation 2022/0263 of 14 September 2022 on the Revision of the Barcelona targets on early childhood education and care,
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan, adopted in 2021, aims to reduce the number of children at risk of poverty and social exclusion by at least 5 million by 2030; whereas even if this target were achieved around 15t least 20 million children in the EU would still be at risk of poverty and social exclusion;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas early disparities in skills, in children’s sense of curiosity, security and confidence become difficult to compensate for and have grave developmental implications over time and throughout the lifespan;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas institutions with semi- inpatient and inpatient facilities, especially in times of crisis, need good, qualified staff with child-friendly staffing levels to ensure that children and their families are cared for as needed and to provide children with qualified educational opportunities in order to promote their social integration;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas, particularly in times of crisis, the creation of high-quality jobs, through the expansion and promotion of companies, flexible, dynamic labor markets, the elimination of unemployment, particularly youth unemployment, combating the shortage of skilled workers through a corresponding qualification offensive and a right to training, is an important preventive measure to reduce inequalities and promote the social inclusion of children and their families;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas playing gives children the opportunity to express themselves in a symbolic way and forms an essential basis of the way they think, strengthening children’s participation in society ;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 177 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas children belong in school and not in factories or fields;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G b (new)
Gb. whereas the main cause for children having to work is poverty;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 182 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G c (new)
Gc. whereas child labour might be growing in the wake of the economic crisis and countries that were badly affected by austerity measures are countries at risk;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 184 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G d (new)
Gd. whereas many of the children working across Europe have extremely hazardous occupations in agriculture, construction, small factories or on the street or in the tobacco industry, with some children working up to 10 hours a day;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 186 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G f (new)
Gf. whereas the best interests of the child should be the guiding principle, as stated in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the standards of the European Social Charter;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Member States to establish policies (and practices) that empower parents to support their children outside the childcare setting throughout their childhood, and particularly during early childhood, when children are aged 0–3;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 214 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. DeplorNotes the fact that the governments of the Member States are moving away from universal policies and increasingly promoting policies based on the liberalisation of services and instruments whose availability depends on the resources of the beneficiaries; stresses for this reason, that universal and long-term policies offergive better protection against the multiple causes of poverty and social exclusion, by providing structural responses that can, if necessary, also be supplemented by immediate, one-offreinforcing necessary support measures;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 223 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to refrain from recommending reforms that lead to cuts in and the weakcommend a strengthening of public administrations and services in the Member States, aimed at in order to reduce inequalities and promotinge the relaxation of employment relationships and the privatisation of public services, which have led to the weakening and, in some cases, the undermining of the social and labour rights of children and their families; deploressocial inclusion of children and their families in times of crisis and to counteract privatisation; expresses its incomprehension with regard to the recent statements by the President of the ECB, who criticised the investments by national governments in social responses aimed at addressing the increased cost of living;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 243 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on the Commission to constantly and directly review, compare and flexibly change the framework conditions in a development process, including with AI, in order to be able to offer all member states better opportunities for use;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 247 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Emphasizes that children in special life situations due to illness, care, disability and / or cognitive disorders need specific and targeted measures as well as special educational and care offers in order to preventively counteract inequalities in social security protection and a lack of social integration of their person and their families in times of crisis;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 255 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 g (new)
4g. Moreover calls on Member States to pay specific attention to the problems of child labour in Europe, and to carefully evaluate the potential impact on child labour caused by budgetary cuts in the field of education and training as well in social policies and support to families;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 256 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 h (new)
4h. Calls on Member States to more intensively fight and condemn child labour, to investigate and guarantee labour inspection agencies to be in a position to do their work adequately, to collect data and monitor child labor and to use the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the European Social Charter as guidance for preventive and remedial action;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 285 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Recommends that the Member States ensure that all children halife-long learning involves access to formal and non-formal, public, free, inclusive and quality education at all ages, while children in particular require a needs-based design ;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 339 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Highlights the right to affordable comfortable housing that meets the needs of children and their families and ensures their well- being, privacy and quality of life; calls on the Member States to promote a public housing policy that tackles property speculation and guarantees this right;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 361 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Condemns all forms of violence, abuse, exploitation and neglect with regard to children; calls on the Member States to develop and implement integrated prevention and protection systems for children with a view to eradicating violencein order to eliminate all shortcomings and to strengthen, increase and promote the best interests of children;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 371 #

2023/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the need to invest in support and, follow-up, care and education for children and young asylum seekers, as well as their families, and host institutionin the accommodation/reception centres, in order to reduce inequalities and promote the social inclusion of children and their families in times of crisis;
2023/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas climate-related EU policies must be accompanied by well-founded and comprehensive impact assessments and carefully crafted to take account of the significant economic, social and political impact these measures may have on regions and various sectors so as to promote resilience and reduce disparities by means of targeted support and tailored strategies;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 12 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas there are profound differences between the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of the various regions and regions face different challenges, which consequently means that there is no one- size-fits-all solution for all territorial and socioeconomic needs; whereas the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) are the best suited EU investment tool to alleviate the burden of the twin green and digital transitions and the automotive transition on the worst-affected regions, as well as to unleash their full potential;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 18 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas despite the fact that the combined use of EU budget resources from the multiannual financial framework and from the Recovery and Resilience Facility hasallows the implementation of ambitious reforms and substantial investment, it has also created major difficulties for regions and local authorities in terms of policy fragmentation, administrative capacity and the complexity of planning and executing the funds programmed for the 2021-2027 period; whereas it is necessary to accelerate the Cohesion Policy absorption rate and delivery of the projects on the ground;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 22 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas as the twin green and digital transitions progress, they are likely to pose challenges to various sectors; whereas the automotive industry is undergoing a major transformation due to the adoption of zero and low-emission technologies, which will reshape business models and value chains within the sector and will entail significant employment and social changes, with patterns varying by region; whereas substantial investments are needed in all areas of the value chain, including production, to adapt the sector to the new CO2 emission performance standards and a gradual phasing out of CO2-emitting vehicles in the EU;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 28 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the EU is among the world's biggest producers of motor vehicles and automotive industry is one of the key European industries generating the turnover of over 7 % of EU GDP; whereas the sector provides direct and indirect jobs to 13.8 million Europeans representing 6.1% of total EU employment; whereas the sector is the largest private investor in research and development (R&D) in the EU;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 37 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the swift implementation of the proposed regulation on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure15 should ensure the viability of the transition towards decarbonised transport systems; _________________ 15 Proposal for a Regulation on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure, and repealing Directive 2014/94/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (COM(2021)559).
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 39 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas as green and digital transitions progress they may affect various sectors; whereas in order to uphold the competitiveness of the EU economy and preserve European production and jobs we need to monitor the impact of EU policies on key sectors and have tools at our disposal to timely react to new challenges posed by the green and digital transitions;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 41 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G b (new)
Gb. whereas the EU target of investing 3% of EU GDP in R&D has not yet been reached;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 43 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Reaffirms that cohesion policy should neither compensate for budgetary inflexibility nor suffer cuts due to crises, and that, as a long-term investment strategy, it should equip regions to address industrial, ecological, digital and demographic transitions; underlines that cohesion policy can only fulfil all these tasks if it is embedded in solid funding, therefore maintains that a strong cohesion policy with increased funding should be ensured in the post-2027 MFF;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 61 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that the EU cohesion policy beyond 2027 should follow a more differentiated and targeted approach, moving from the use of income-related criteria to determine the level of support to otherpproach, and considers, alongside the income-related criteria, also the application of additional criteria that also take into account regions’ characteristics, specific challenges they face and future growth potential, such as the youth unemployment rate, job dependency on transition sectors and research and development investment or, as well as depopulation, brain drain and the existing skills gap;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 66 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recommends the creation of a new ‘Just Transition Fund 2.0’ in the upcoming programming period after 2027, which should be endowed with more financial means, have a wider scope, focus on the appropriate NUTS level and be fully integrated in the Common Provisions Regulation16 ; stresses that the future JTF support should take into account regional specificities; underlines that various new sectors may be affected as the green and digital transitions progress, and therefore support for the just transition should be designed in such a way as to allow for prompt reaction to newly arising challenges across various sector and industries; _________________ 16 Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy (OJ L 231, 30.6.2021, p. 159).
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 78 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to expand the ‘financing not linked to costs’ approach in order to reduce reporting exercises, strengthsimplify reporting exercises, finding a balance between the focus on outcomes and impacts ratherand the focus on expenditure, and to achieve a more efficient implementation and use of the funds, for instance through a simplified cost procedure where possible;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 85 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Recognises that, despite the fact that digitalisation brings more economic benefits to developed regions, while less developed ones struggle owing to the needall regions, less developed regions struggle while undergoing the digital transition owing to the need to rapidly generate substantial investments and build capacity through developing necessary digital skills among the general population and workforce in order to shift from labour-intensive to capital-intensive technologies and avoid skills shortages and mismatches on the labour market; stresses in this respect the key role played by local educational and research institutions in leading digital innovation hubs, noting the waste of expertise due to uncoordinated regional policies;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 95 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses that significant support is needed in order to assist regions on their way to digitalisation and delivery of digital targets set in the 2030 Policy Programme “Path to the Digital Decade”;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 99 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that the decarbonisation of road transport must follow a well-planned strategy that ensures a smooth and socially acceptable transition for the workers and companies affected, especially those in less developed regions and regions facing demographic or territorial challenges; considers that this strategy must include a detailed plan for re-skilling workersadapting the automotive sector to the new CO2 emission performance standards and a gradual phasing out of CO2-emitting vehicles in the EU by implementing necessary changes across the value chain, including into production processes, in order to avoid relocating production outside of the EU and a massive loss of jobs; stresses that this strategy should also foresee are skilling workers, and, in case there is a decrease in employment, providinge alternative employment options for people currently employed in the automotive sector and providing incentives and support to ensure that new industrial plants resulting from the transition remain within the region, thereby maintaining the spillover effects in those areas;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 113 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that the just transition plans for automotive-dependent regions should follow a place-based approach and should be managed by the competent authorities on the basis of the principles of partnership and multilevel governance; emphasises, further, the need to prioritise investments in the necessary transformation of the sector allowing it to adapt to the new CO2 emission performance standards, re-skilling programmes and sustainable economic diversification strategies across the whole value chain to ensure a smooth and inclusive transition for workers and local economies;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 131 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses the need to close the R&D investment gap in the EU and reach the Union target of investing 3% of EU GDP in R&D;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 133 #

2023/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Member States to ensure an adequate and equitable ecosystem for the penetration of electric mobility and, in this regard, toin accordance with the Regulation for the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure (AFIR); stresses the importance of provideing public alternative fuel infrastructure in rural regions and regions with a low population density that are not adequately covered by private providers so as to meet the needs of the resident population; considers, in this regard, that the price of this publicly provided service should mirror the average price of the service offered by private providers in that same region or Member State;
2023/07/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 44 #

2023/2051(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 46 a (new)
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Europe’s Media in the Digital Decade: an action plan to support recovery and transformation (COM(2020)0784),
2023/07/05
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 47 #

2023/2051(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 46 b (new)
– having regard to the European Commission's European Media Industry Outlook SWD (2023) 150,
2023/07/05
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 48 #

2023/2051(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 46 c (new)
– having regard to its resolution on Europe’s Media in the Digital Decade: an action plan to support recovery and transformation (2021/2017(INI)),
2023/07/05
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 50 #

2023/2051(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 46 d (new)
– having regard to its resolution on an intellectual property action plan to support the EU’s recovery and resilience (2021/2007(INI)),
2023/07/05
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 67 #

2023/2051(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas, regardless of their role or their status as a worker or self-employed person, the living and working conditions of CCS professionals can be characterised by precariousness and instability, with unpredictable incomes, a weaker bargaining power in relations with counterparties, short-term contracts, weak or no social security, and a lack of access to unemployment support; whereas the extent of social security coverage of CCS professionals varies between countries, sectors and types of work within the sectors and may lead to differences in living and working conditions;
2023/07/05
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 132 #

2023/2051(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas practices involving copyright buyouts and work with transfer of copyright imposed on authors by video- on-demand (VOD) platforms based outside the EU are increasingly becoming standard practice;
2023/07/05
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 135 #

2023/2051(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J b (new)
Jb. whereas the European Parliament has in the past called on the Commission to take concrete steps to prevent potentially coercive practices such as copyright buyouts that may hinder creators' ability to benefit from adequate and proportionate remuneration, in three resolutions: on the situation of artists and the cultural recovery in the EU (2020/2261(INI)), on Europe’s Media in the Digital Decade: an action plan to support recovery and transformation (2021/2017(INI)), and on an intellectual property action plan to support the EU’s recovery and resilience (2021/2007(INI));
2023/07/05
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 158 #

2023/2051(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the arts, the broader cultural and creative sectors, entertainment and sports play a fundamental role in human flourishing and in Europe’s social cohesion and economy; underlines that CCS professionals are key to the process of European integration;
2023/07/05
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 248 #

2023/2051(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls the importance of copyright and related rights in the cultural and creative sectors and of properly implementing them, ensuring that every type of rightholder is fairly remunerated, in particular for authors and composers, who are in a weaker bargaining position compared to the large and dominant media companies; stresses that authors and composers need the protection provided by EU law to ensure that they are fairly remunerated and benefit fully from harmonised EU rules, while at the same time ensuring fair and proportionate remuneration for any use of their work;
2023/07/05
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 253 #

2023/2051(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Considers that fair copyright- based remuneration is the main source of income for authors and composers and underpins their working conditions; considers that failure to address the practice of coercive copyright buyouts and work with transfer of copyright imposed by video-on-demand (VOD) platforms based outside the EU would leave European authors and composers without a guarantee of adequate and proportionate remuneration for the use of their works;
2023/07/05
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 266 #

2023/2051(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Is concerned by abusive and coercive practices that may result in unfair contractual relationships for CCS professionals; draws attention to issues relating more specifically to ‘buy-out’ contracts; requests the Commission to assess and closely monitor the situation in that regard and work with transfer of copyright imposed by video-on-demand platforms based outside the EU and the application of third-country legislation to circumvent EU rules protecting authors and their fair remuneration; requests the Commission to assess and closely monitor the situation in that regard in order to prevent the circumvention of EU rules and regulations and to ensure adequate remuneration and fair working conditions for authors and composers;
2023/07/05
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 277 #

2023/2051(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Notes with concern that, in the case of worldwide exploitation of authors' and composers' works, particularly in the field of audiovisual works, European law as it stands is not capable of preventing the circumvention of EU safeguards through the choice of foreign rules and jurisdictions; awaits with interest the results of the Commission's study on authors' contractual relations, applicable law and the issue of coercive copyright buy-outs;
2023/07/05
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 280 #

2023/2051(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Stresses that collective management organisations enable authors to obtain remuneration for the use of their works which they would not be able to control or impose themselves, including on foreign markets; recognises that collective management organisations play an important role in securing remuneration for authors and composers through collective bargaining and are an important source of income for professional authors and composers;
2023/07/05
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 327 #

2023/2051(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Recognises the role that collective management organisations play in ensuring access to collective bargaining for rights holders, equal market access for all rights holders, the widest possible public access to a culturally diverse repertoires and the sustainability of the cultural sector in Europe; promotes collective management as a fair and sustainable model for future EU policy considerations;
2023/07/05
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 429 #

2023/2051(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Believes that the entertainment sector, including the sports sector, brings the peoples of Europe closer together through the lived experiences of Union competitions and by the cohesive function of grassroots sports;deleted
2023/07/05
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 16 #

2023/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas, according to Eurostat data, 46 EU regions, representing 16% of the EU populations, are currently in a talent development trap; whereas another 36 EU regions are at risk of falling into a talent development trap; whereas regions in a talent development trap face an accelerating decline of their working-age population, and a low and stagnant number of people with a tertiary education; whereas most of these regions are less developed;
2023/09/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 27 #

2023/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas in spite of its temporary impact on the labour market, the COVID- 19 pandemic has resulted in a boost to teleworking, offering great potential to connect jobs from urban centres to smaller cities, suburbs and towns15 ; whereas, in order to boost this trend, it is necessary to improve connectivity in areas with low coverage, including rural areas, and provide necessary infrastructure for internet access in so called “white areas”; __________________ 15 See the Draft Council conclusions on telework in the context of remote work, paragraph 17.
2023/09/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 34 #

2023/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the talent drain is closely related to the need to improve the working and living conditions of people living in regions with low incomes, social gaps and other socio-economic disparities; whereas it is necessary to improve access to basic services in the regions lagging behind such as transportation, connectivity, healthcare, education, including early education and care; whereas reducing such disparities is a commitment which has been reiterated through the European Pillar of Social Rights;
2023/09/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 41 #

2023/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas, as EU regions and their specific sectors face very different, complex challenges and as there is no one-size-fits-all solution, a place-based approach is the best way to tackle these obstacles; whereas regional and local authorities are best placed to create the socio-economic conditions for attracting talent; whereas these administrations need economic reinforcement;
2023/09/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 50 #

2023/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas talent retention does not refer exclusively to stopping the emigration of highly qualified persons from one country to another, or from one region to another, but also to attracting populations whose professional background is related to jobs that are still in high demand in rural and sparsely populated areas; whereas creating upskilling and reskilling opportunities plays an essential role in stopping the emigration flows and limiting the skills mismatch on the labour market;
2023/09/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 72 #

2023/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that policy objective four (PO 4) of ERDF-CF18 already envisages the achievement of a more social and inclusive Europe through the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights; is of the belief that improving equal access to inclusive and quality services in education, including early education and care, training and lifelong learning through the development of accessible infrastructure is crucial to achieving these objectives; __________________ 18 Article 3(1)(d)
2023/09/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 94 #

2023/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Bears in mind that less developed regions have the same particularities as those considered as being ‘in a talent development trap’most of the regions considered as being ‘in a talent development trap’ are less developed and share the same particularities, such as low population density, low economic resources, low employability, ageing of the population and a reduction in the population of working age; points out the need to include in the categorisation of such regions those deemed ‘less developed’, as defined in Article 108(2) of Regulation (EU) 2021/1060;
2023/09/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 101 #

2023/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Encourages the financing of specific measures through the multiannual financial framework to address the demographic challenges, with a specific budget for regions with severe and permanent demographic difficulties; in this context, considers it necessary to reformulate the specific instruments of the cohesion policy by assigning greater weight to depopulation for the allocation of funds; underlines the need to create synergies, where possible, between Cohesion Policy and CAP to tackle depopulation of rural areas;
2023/09/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 112 #

2023/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Considers it essential to improve the executive and managerial capacity of local administrations and to reduce bureaucracy, as well as to promote closer cooperation between the different institutions; underlines the importance of the involvement of social partners while drafting new policies and strategies;
2023/09/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 134 #

2023/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to finance and promote specific projects for the development of initiatives to ensure young people’s access to training, with a particular focus on deficit or high-demand occupations, to stimulate the creation of quality jobs and to guarantee paid traineeships; highlights the importance of labour surpluses and shortages data collection and analysis to observe current trends and anticipate future needs on the labour market and be able to develop targeted policies and high- quality training and upskilling strategies to reduce skills mismatches;
2023/09/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 152 #

2023/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Acknowledges also that as a twin green and digital transitions progress, many regions and sectors are required to undergo a profound transformation, which requires substantial investments; acknowledges, therefore, that such regions and sectors would require tailored support in order to avoid massive job loss; considers that, in case there is a decrease in employment as a result of challenges posed by transformation, it is necessary to provide workers with re-skilling and upskilling opportunities and alternative employment options;
2023/09/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 159 #

2023/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Emphasises the importance to support economic diversification of local and regional economies, as well as to support rejuvenating of certain ageing sectors, to promote local resilience;
2023/09/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 167 #

2023/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Advocates ensuring regions’ access to quality public services such as health, education, including early education and care, and social protection, as well as to essential transport infrastructure and digital connectivity;
2023/09/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 14 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 40 a (new)
– having regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities,
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 40 b (new)
– having regard to European Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas among the biggest challenges CVET is currently facing is its low attractiveness comparing to academic education and lack of interest among students and lack of skilled workers;
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas implementing high quality CVET might impose a significant financial burden, especially on micro and SMEs;
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which encompasses the full digitalisation of production processes, together with the rapid development of big data, artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things and increasing computing power, is shaping today’s labour and education markets and provides both challenges and opportunities for the companies and the workers;
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Q a (new)
Qa. whereas it is crucial that optimal conditions and incentives are established to enable employers to have access to high-quality CVETS that will provide them with a useful learning experience and the development of a relevant set of skills;
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital S
S. whereas demographic changes are ongoing; whereas companies may experience problems related to the loss of knowledge of older workers once they retire, whereas it is important to foster intergenerational transfer of skills;
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Emphasises that high-quality CVET promote the idea of lifelong learning and contribute to adaptation in the face of dynamic change on the labour market, and consequently extend working lives;
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that CVET policy remains fragmented in many EU Member States; points out that the development of well- functioning CVET systems requires the development of systematic strategies and adequate resources to empower people and ensure sustainable economic competitiveness, underlines that European Union should ensure its supportive role in this process;
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Points out the importance of vocational education for individuals and groups with special needs, including persons with different types of disabilities; stresses the need to develop a strategy and to provide vocational education and training opportunities for people in remote and rural areas in order to ensure the effectiveness of matching mechanisms in the EU labour market;
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that workplaces, and SMEs in particular, must be extensively involved, encouraged and supported by Member States and European Commission, to provide learning and training opportunities not only for those in employment, but also for the unemployed and those outside the labour market; notes the key role of the social partners in this area;
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 172 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on Member States to develop and implement strategies which will incentivise companies to pay more attention to the role of education in the workplace; stresses that companies need to dedicate a substantial part of their resources to ensuring that their employees are able to work with the latest technologies and in new organisational environments, as well as to prevent digital exclusion; calls on Member States to pay special attention to the SMEs, for which it is particularly challenging to meet those needs;
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Stresses that in order to adequately respond to the needs of the transforming industries and challenges posed by the twin transition, as well as to retain European industry competitive in the global markets, continuous investment in CVET infrastructure, teacher training, and quality assurance systems will be necessary;
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 203 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses that new technologies, including artificial intelligence and virtual reality, have the potential to provide new opportunities in the area of CVET, also in terms of making the training opportunities more accessible and affordable for broader amount of companies and workers;
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 209 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the need to promote vocational education, highlighting the attractiveness of and opportunities for development within the sector; calls on the Commission and the Member States to carry out educational campaigns and activities to promote vocational education, including through events such as EuroSkills and to promote the exchange of best practices in this area;
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 220 #

2022/2207(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Highlights the benefits that international mobility provides both for learners and educators in CVET, stresses the potential of Erasmus+ programme in this regard;
2023/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that the digital product passport goes hand in hand with the simplification of existing labels to ensure that consumers receive coherent and reliable information on the environmental and social footprint of products; that is one of the key element in the transition to a circular and more sustainable textile economy, notes that false and misleading environmental, circular and social claims on products should be prevented , and to ensure that underlying analysis is based on standard methodologies.
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 69 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that "fast fashion" phenomena puts enormous stress on suppliers and their workforce through unfair trading practices;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 81 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for mandatory criteria on responsible consumption to apply to public procurementonsiders that public authorities should drive the development of more sustainable textiles and circular business models and aim to reduce environmental impact of textiles when making public purchases; encourage the public authorities to use EU green public procurement criteria for textile products and service; Calls on the Commission for an impact assessment as regards the need for the mandatory green public procurement criteria for the textile products;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 88 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls the paramount importance of ensuring that market surveillance authorities have sufficient human and financial resources at their disposal; calls the Member States for a stronger market enforcement including extra human resources, more frequent controls, dissuasive penalties for the infringements, to ensure that products placed on the EU market, including via imports and e- commerce, meet minimum environmental and social standards and fits our objectives.
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 92 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Underlines that increasing the durability of textiles has a significant impact on the environment while at the same time creates the money-saving opportunities for customers, calls in this respect for measures to support research in sustainable textiles;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 96 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Stresses the necessity of securing policy coherence and ensuring harmonisation at the EU level, including on data requirements and methodologies of all the EU policy initiatives announced in the Strategy;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 98 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Underlines the potential of e- labelling, which would provide the consumers with detailed knowledge on the textile, including care advice and the information on repair and recycle options; underlines however that e-labels cannot replace the physical labels, which should continue to provide the basic information on care and composition;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 100 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 d (new)
9d. Stresses that the SMEs are often the frontrunners in the use of innovative and durable technologies and the ones promoting sustainable consumer behaviours, stresses the need to create a further enabling environment for such actions instead of imposing excessive obligatory measures which could curb this trend;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 102 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 f (new)
9f. Underlines the importance of informing the customers about the positive impact they might have on the environment by changing their habits, for example by recycling, reusing or curbing their consumption, underlines in this respect the importance of information campaigns or tutorials on how to reuse or recycle;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 103 #

2022/2171(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 g (new)
9g. Stresses the need to support the circular business models through a combination of policy measures with a particular emphasis on second-hand resale;
2022/12/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 4 #

2022/2170(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that the EU’s cohesion policy funds aimed at territorial, economic and social cohesion remain the main EU investment instruments and are crucial for supporting the transition towards climate neutrality while providing investments in green technologies, guaranteeing high- quality employmentducation and employment, as well as reskilling and upskilling opportunities in the regions;
2023/06/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 14 #

2022/2170(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the concept of a ‘just transition’, considering it a unique principle that must permeate all aspects of the transition to climate neutrality; emphasizes that there is no one-size-fits- all solution and that the support for a just transition shall be adapted to the local and regional circumstances, natural conditions and specific characteristics and needs of given regions; notes that an ambitious, and comprehensive just transition is needed to address the unintended distributional effects of the green transition, such as greater regional inequalities; highlight, as well as other challenges that regions may face as a result, such as unemployment, depopulation and brain drain; underlines that the Just Transition Fund (JTF) is a key cohesion policy instrument supporting regions impacted by the transition towards a net- zero economy, including notably former coal-mining and steel-producing regions, and suggests expanding and broadening the JTF’s scope to include also other industrial sectors and regions; that are equally affected by the green transition;
2023/06/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 23 #

2022/2170(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that social impact investment (SII) is no substitute for public social spending; notes, however, that SII can complement cohesion funds in tackling the challenges encountered on the path towards climate neutrality, provided it has a measurable social effect on greater inclusion, equalitycoping with demographic changes, equality, skills and employment; underlines that any adjustment of the legal, regulatory and economic framework for SII must meet these requirements;
2023/06/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 27 #

2022/2170(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the green transition has a strong gender dimension, with women tending to be under-represented in green jobs and men tending to be more affected by the disappearance of carbon-intensive jobs; underlines, therefore, the need for a gender perspective, as well as on older generations and other people in vulnerable situation, such as Roma; underlines, therefore, the need for a gender equality, respect for fundamental rights and equal opportunities to ensure greater inclusion of these groups, when designing and implementing all transition policies to avoid deepening the divides within local labour markets;
2023/06/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 30 #

2022/2170(INI)

4a. Highlights that one of the main focus of just transition should be to foster entrepreneurship and create employment opportunities for young people in carbon- intensive regions, so as to support their sustainable development and prevent depopulation and brain drain;
2023/06/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 31 #

2022/2170(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Remains convinced that a just transition has the potential to not only convert the EU into a successful net-zero economy, but also make it a global model for this existentially necessary transformation; highlights that cohesion policy is an essential tool on the path towards a net-zero economy and believes that the debate on the future of EU cohesion policy, including funding for 2028-2035, must be guided by i.a. the need to assist the Member States on this path; underlines in this respect that in the face of green transition and challenges arising thereof the future cohesion policy needs solid and appropriate funding.
2023/06/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1 #

2022/2051(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. In order to make social Europe a reality, and given the lessons from the pandemic and the war in Ukraine on the close interlinkages between our economic and welfare/social systems, it should beit is necessary to ensured that social rights are fully protected and safeguarded in case of conflict with economic freedoms, including by revising the current governance framework. As set out in previous European Parliament resolutions, possible tools to this effect include: - integrating the European Social Pillar in the Treawork on an update of the European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan to ensure that the objectives1 - introducing a Social Progress Protocol to the Treaties2 - adopting a Sustainable Development and Social Progress Pact making social and sustainable targets mandatory as part of a governance framework for a social and sustainable Europe3. that were set are met by potentially adopting additional proposals, where needed, and/or financial means1; - considering the effectiveness and examining the possibility of introducing a Social Progress Protocol to the Treaties. ___________________________ 1 European Parliament resolution of 17 December9 May 20202 on a strong social Europe for Just Transitionsthe social and economic consequences for the EU of the Russian was in Ukraine – reinforcing the EU’s capacity to act (20202/2084(INI653(RSP)), paragraph 6 25 Ibid, paragraph 6 3
2022/10/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2022/2051(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -2 (new)
-2. Furthermore, it is crucial to support strengthening the competitiveness and resilience of the EU economy, with special attention paid to small and medium-sized enterprises and competitiveness checks and to promote future-oriented investments focused on the just, green and digital transitions1a. _______________________ 1a European Parliament resolution of 9 June 2022 on the call for a Convention for the revision of the Treaties (2022/2705(RSP), paragraph 5
2022/10/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2022/2051(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Further, the EU should move away from unanimity and special legislativeUnion’s capacity to act could be enhanced by reforming voting procedures, in order to enable EU actcluding allowing decisions in areas where currently, due to the relevant decision-making provisions/scope of the Treaties, it has proved difficult/impossible, notably in areas falling under the EMPL Committee remit, and in order to further increase democratic decision-making. As already set out in previous European Parliament resolutions, possible tools to this effect include: - fall under the qualified majority decision process, in particular non-discrimination, social protection of workers (apart from cross-border situations), protection of workers whose employment contract has been terminated, the representation and collective defence of the interests of wthe Council by qualified majority voting instead of unanimity in relevant areas, such as the adoption of sanctions and so-called passerelle clauses, and in the event of an emergency3. Making more social policy areas fall under the qualified majority decision process shall be considered. making more social policy areas involving the European applying the Community method In orkders and employers, as well as conditions of employment for third- country nationals legally residing in the EU4; this can also be achieved by using the passerelle clauses5; - Parliament in defining the Integrated Guidelines for Growth and Jobs on an equal footing with the Council in the guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States to achieve equal footing with the Council6, - to the Semester process, and making it subject to an agreement between the Council and the European Parliament7 to strengthen democratic decision-making, the European Parliament shall be involved in defining the Integrated Guidelines for Growth and Jobs on an equal footing with the Council4. __________________________ 4 Ibid, paragraph 6 53 European Parliament resolution of 13 February9 June 201922 on the state of the debate on the future of Europe (2018/2094(INI)), paragraph 7 6call for a Convention for the revision of the Treaties (2022/2705(RSP), paragraph 5 4 European Parliament legislative resolution of 10 July 2020 on the proposal for a Council decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (COM(2020)0070 – C9-0079/2020 – 2020/0030(NLE)), Amendment 11 7 See above n. 1, paragraph 6European Parliament legislative
2022/10/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2022/2051(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. In order to ensure that upward social convergence is accelerated, proper use should be made of the EU funds as well as of the tools developed during recent crises, notably the pandemic. As set out in previous European Parliament resolutions, possible tools to this effect include: - including democratic oversight by Parliament8 - - EU investment to foster upward convergence in the area of social policies10 - resilience package11. ________________________________ 8 17 December 2020 on the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027, the Interinstitutional Agreement, the EU Recovery Instrument and the Rule of Law Regulation (2020/2923(RSP), paragraph 8 9 19 May 2022 on the social and economic consequences for the EU of the Russian war in Ukraine – reinforcing the EU’s capacity to act (2022/2653(RSP)) , paragraphs 34, 35 10 11. monitoring of the use of funds, emergency clauses and flexibility9 stabilising an increased level of a temporary European social European Parliament resolution of European Parliament resolution of Ibid, paragraph 12 Ibid, paragraph 24
2022/10/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2022/2051(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. However, the cohesion policy, that played massive role in recent crises, should not become a source of financing to make up for shortcomings in budgetary flexibility, nor face budgetary cuts in response to the crisis, and that as a long- term investment policy, cohesion policy should help to prepare regions for future challenges1a. Having this in mind, a dedicated crisis response mechanism should therefore be created within the next MFF1b. _____________________________ 1a European Parliament resolution of 15 September 2022 on economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU: the 8th Cohesion Report (2022/2032(INI)), paragraph 3 1b European Parliament resolution of 15 September 2022 on economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU: the 8th Cohesion Report (2022/2032(INI)), paragraph 37
2022/10/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2022/2032(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that delays in the multiannual financial framework (MFF) negotiations lead to considerable delays in the programming period; urges the Commission and the Member States to speed up the adoption of partnership agreements and operational programmes as the prolonged under-implementation of cohesion funds could lead to an abnormal backlog in payments in the second part of the current multiannual financial framework (MFF), putting additional pressure on payments during the negotiations on the post-2027 MFF; calls on the Commission, therefore, to consider creating two distinct parts within the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR), namely the content-related part (political) and the MFF-related part (financial resources), for the programming period post-2027; believes that the content-related part should be negotiated and concluded before the MFF-related part, to allow for the management authorities to start preparing the partnership agreements and programmes in a timely manner;
2022/05/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 88 #

2022/2032(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Welcomes the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) as an important tool to mitigate the economic and social impact of the coronavirus pandemic and make European economies and societies more sustainable, resilient and better prepared for the challenges and opportunities of the green and digital transitions; underlines the importance of ensuring it’s complementarities and synergies with the cohesion policy; urges the Member States that have not fulfil all the requirements needed to the approval of their national plans under the Recovery and Resilience Facility to urgently take all the actions needed for the approval, so that their citizens could benefit from this extraordinary instrument;
2022/05/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 93 #

2022/2032(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the European Court of Auditors has criticised the lack of differentiation between climate mitigation and climate adaptation; stresses that future cohesion policy should include such a differentiation in the monitoring of spending and in thematic concentration, provided that this will not put additional administrative burden on Member States and managing authorities;
2022/05/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 97 #

2022/2032(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the Commission’s introduction of the JTF to support regions facing challenges in their transition towards carbon neutrality; calls on the Commission to draw lessons from the implementation of the JTF; asks for a JTF II, which should be fully integrated into the CPR, to be established in the post-2027 programming period, while applying shared management and partnership principles; believes that regions with high CO² per capita, as well as industries in transition, should have access to this fund; calls for this new JTF to differentiate between climate mitigation and adaptation provided that this will not put additional administrative burden on Member States and managing authorities; stresses that a certain proportion of funding should be allocated to the transition, in a socially just way, and to the reduction of the EU’s carbon footprint;
2022/05/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 123 #

2022/2032(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Proposes thatBelieves that changes to the allocation within the European Regional Development Fund and ESF+ resources for the ‘Investment for jobs and growth’ goal shcould be allocated amongconsidered in the future taking into account specific circumstances existing at the time in a given Member State and proposes the following two categories of NUTS-2 regions as one of the possible options:
2022/05/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 132 #

2022/2032(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that there should only be two types of region; notes that most of the current transitional regions will be covered by the newly established JTF II;deleted
2022/05/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 161 #

2022/2032(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that ‘rust belts’ still exist in most Member States; believes that, to address the potentially negative impact of the transition of old industries such as steel and aluminium and to support the development of the regions affected, JTF II resources should be directed towards modernising these industries, creating smart specialisation strategies tailored to each of the regions in industrial transition, fostering innovation-led growth and ensuring the spread of growth benefits;
2022/05/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 170 #

2022/2032(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses the importance of supporting rural areas by valuing their diversity and potential, improving transport connectivity and high-speed broadband, and helping them meet challenges such as rural desertification, the decline of city- centre communities and insufficient healthcare; highlights as well the importance of urban-rural links within the context of functional urban areas;
2022/05/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 172 #

2022/2032(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses the importance of supporting rural areas by valuing their diversity and potential, improving transport connectivity and high-speed broadband, and helping them meet challenges such as rural desertification, the decline of city- centre communities and, insufficient healthcare and education opportunities;
2022/05/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 207 #

2022/2032(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Notes with concern the demographic challenges faced by the EU, such as an ageing population, the depopulation of rural and remote areas, and migratory flows and the arrival of refugees; stresses that local and regional authorities, professional associations and NGOs are essential to identifying and assessing specific investment needs in rural and urban areas for mobility, territorial accessibility and basic services, and, therefore, to unlocking the potential of the areas concerned, including economic, social and demographic trends; believes, therefore, that they should play a decisive role as active participants in developing territorial strategies stemming from local communities; highlights the importance of including, when possible, a specific budgetary response for reversing demographic trends in relevant EU programmes and of conducting impact assessments of public policies on demography; believes that rural areas, particularly these mostly prone to demographic challenges, should benefit from a defined level of minimum funds allocation; notes furthermore that demographic challenges in rural areas should be addressed concurrently by both tackling their depopulation, as well as retaining population and attracting young people;
2022/05/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 228 #

2022/2032(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Emphasises that thes regions in or endangered by falling into the ‘middle- income trap’ regions need more investments in education as well as mitigation strategies; urges the Commission to define these regions and to allocate higher amounts to them under the ESF+ in the next programming period;
2022/05/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 249 #

2022/2032(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Notes that cohesion policy reform for the financial period 2021-2027 has contributed to simplified and flexible use of funding for beneficiaries and management authorities; welcomes the flexibility proposed by the Cohesion’s Action for Refugees in Europe and the Coronavirus Response Investment Initiatives proposals, which have proven that cohesion policy is an excellent tool in the crisis situations; recalls however that the cohesion policy is a long-term investment policy and therefore a dedicated crisis response mechanism should be created within the next MFF; calls on the Commission to promote further simplification, flexibility and citizen participation;
2022/05/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 255 #

2022/2032(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Reiterates its position on the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation, underlines however, that these measures cannot be punitive against the citizens; calls on the Commission to use all the tools at its disposal to establish ways to ensure that citizens of Member States towards which Article 7(1) TEU was triggered are not deprived of the benefits of EU funds due to the actions of their governments, and to establish avenues for these funds to be administered directly by the Commission to their final beneficiaries;
2022/05/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 192 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Notes with concern the risks associated with the use of hate speech and cyberbullying on the online video game platforms, which is additionally reinforced by the players' sense of anonymity and is particularly dangerous when directed at the minors.
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 214 #

2022/2014(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Points out that online video game platforms can be used by fraudsters for phishing; calls to conduct information campaigns in order to raise awareness, especially among minors, of the risks involved.
2022/06/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 114 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The European Parliament’s Resolution of 10 February 2021 on the New Circular Economy Action Plan39 reiterated the objective of making all packaging reusable or recyclable in an economically viable way by 2030 and called on the Commission to present a legislative proposal including waste reduction measures and targets and ambitious essential requirements in the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive to reduce excessive packaging, including in e-commerce, improve recyclability and minimise the complexity of packaging, increase recycled content, phase out hazardous and harmful substances, and promote re-use. It also stressed that food safety and hygiene standards must not be compromised. __________________ 39 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc ument/TA-9-2021-0040_EN.html
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 122 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Packaging plays an important role in reducing food waste. According to the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA), food packaging protects food from microorganisms and makes it easier to store and to prolong the shelf life of food. Packaging helps preserving food, ensures its composition and organoleptic properties are not compromised, protects it from mechanical damage and physical shocks, and represents an effective barrier against microbiological degradation, oxygen or loss of aromas, therefore increasing the shelf life of food products. Packaging for fresh fruit and vegetables can ensure that consumers have access to fresh, healthy products that last longer therefore encouraging their consumption and healthy eating habits. Any initiative aiming to reduce the amount of packaging placed on the market should not impair packaging functionalities and jeopardise the EU food waste reduction ambitions.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 140 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) To ensure packaging circularity, packaging should be designed and manufactured in such a way as to allow for the increased substitution of virgin materials with recycled materials. The increased use of recycled materials supports the development of the circular economy with well-functioning markets for recycled materials, reduces costs, dependencies and negative environmental impacts related to the use of primary raw materials, and allows for a more resource- efficient use of materials. In relation to the different packaging materials, the lowest input of recycled materials is in plastic packaging. In order to address these concerns in the most appropriate manner, it is necessary to increase the uptake of recycled plastics, by establishing mandatory targets for recycled content in plastic packaging at different levels depending on the contact-sensitivity54 of different plastic packaging applications, the availability, prices and market volumes of recycled plastic and ensuring that the targets become binding byfrom 2030. In order to incrementally ensure packaging circularity, increased targets should apply as of 2040. __________________ 54 Contact sensitive packaging refers to plastic packaging of products covered by Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition (OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 29), Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (OJ L 338 13.11.2004, p. 4), Regulation (EC) No 767/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the placing on the market and use of feed, amending European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 and repealing Council Directive 79/373/EEC, Commission Directive 80/511/EEC, Council Directives 82/471/EEC, 83/228/EEC, 93/74/EEC, 93/113/EC and 96/25/EC and Commission Decision 2004/217/EC (OJ L 229, 1.9.2009, p. 1), Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products (recast) (OJ L 342, 22.12.2009, p. 59), Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC (OJ L 117, 5.5.2017, p. 1), Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and repealing Directive 98/79/EC and Commission Decision 2010/227/EU (OJ L 117, 5.5.2017, p. 176), Regulation (EU) 2019/4 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the manufacture, placing on the market and use of medicated feed, amending Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/167/EEC (OJ L 4, 7.1.2019, p. 1), Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on veterinary medicinal products and repealing Directive 2001/82/EC (OJ L 4, 7.1.2019, p. 43), Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 67) and Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on the inland transport of dangerous goods (OJ L 260, 30.9.2008, p. 13–59).
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 142 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) In order to prevent barriers to the internal market and ensure the efficient implementation of the obligations, economic operators should ensure that the plastic part of each unit of packaging contains a certain minimum percentage of recycled content recovered from post- consumer plastic waste calculated as an average of the plastic packaging placed by a producer on the Union market.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 148 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) Regarding plastic packaging, except where made from polyethylene terephthalate (PET), it will be warranted, sufficiently ahead of the date of application of the related recycled content requirements, to re-assess the availability and prices of recycled plastics, and the availability of suitable recycling technologies for such plastic packaging, also with respect to the state of authorisation under relevant Union rules, and the installation in practice of such technology. Based on this assessment, there might be need to provide for derogations from the recycled content requirements for specific contact sensitive plastic packaging concerned, or to revise the derogations. To that end, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 172 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44 a (new)
(44a) Sorting is an essential step to ensure greater packaging circularity. The improvement of sorting capacities, notably through technological innovations, should be encouraged in order to allow a better quality of sorting, and thus a better quality of feedstock for recycling.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 202 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 67
(67) In order to reduce the increasing proportion of packaging that is single use and the growing amounts of packaging waste generated, it is necessary to establish quantitative re-use and refill targets on packaging in sectors, which have been assessed as having the greatest potential for packaging waste reduction, namely food and beveraThe introduction of quantitative re-use and refill targets for take-away, large- white goods and transport packaging. This was appraised based onshould be done when they represent the best environmental option considering the whole life cycle of packaging, and should be based on proper impact assessments considering factors such as existing systems for re-use, necessity of using packaging and the possibility of fulfilling the functional requirements in terms of containment, tidiness, health, hygiene and safety. Differences of the products and their production and distribution systems, were also taken into account. The setting of the targets is expected to support the innovation and increase the proportion of re-use and refill solutions. The use of single use packaging for food and beverages filled and consumed within the premises in the HORECA sector should not be allowed.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 206 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 69
(69) Certain uses of single use transport packaging formats are not necessary, as there is a wide range ofcan be replaced by well-functioning reusable alternatives. In order to ensure that such alternatives are effectively used, it is appropriate to require economic operators, when transporting products between different sites of the same economic operator or between the economic operator and the linked or partner enterprises, to use only within the Union, to predominantly use reusable transport packaging with respect to packaging formats such as pallets, foldable plastic boxes, plastic crates, intermediate bulk containers, both rigid and flexible, or drums. The same obligation should, for the same reasons, apply to economic operators transporting products within one Member State.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 262 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) it can be recycled so that the resulting secondary raw materials are of sufficientcomparable quality to substitute the primary raw materials, in accordance with the definition of recycling set out in Article 3(17) of the Waste Framework Directive (2008/98/EC) and Article 47(3) of this Regulation;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 265 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Points (a)–(d) shall apply from5 years after the entry into force of the delegated act referred to in paragraph 4 and no earlier than 1 January 2030 and p. Point (e) shall apply from 1 January 20355 years after the date of entry into force of the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6, and no earlier than 5 years after the application of point (a).
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 267 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Recyclable packaging shall, from5 years after the entry into force of the delegated act referred to in paragraph 4 and no earlier than 1 January 2030, comply with the design for recycling criteria as laid down in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to paragraph 4 and, from 1 January 2035, also5 years after the date of entry into force of the delegated act referred to in paragraph 6, and no earlier than 5 years after the application of paragraph 2, point (a), with the recyclability at scale requirements laid down in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to paragraph 6. Where such packaging complies with those delegated acts, it shall be considered to comply with paragraph 2, points (a) and (e).
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 271 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The Commission is empowered to adoptshall, within 12 months of the entry into force of this Regulation, adopt in consultation with the Packaging Forum established by Article 12(a), delegated acts in accordance with Article 58 to supplement this Regulation in order to establish design for recycling criteria and recycling performance grades based on the criteria and parameters listed in Table 2 of Annex II for packaging categories listed in Table 1 of that Annex, as well as rules concerning the modulation of financial contributions to be paid by producers to comply with their extended producer responsibility obligations set out in Article 40(1), based on the packaging recycling performance grade, and for plastic packaging, the percentage of recycled content. Design-for-recycling criteria shall be based on existing guidelines and design for recycling standards, shall consider state of the art collection, sorting and recycling processes and shall cover all packaging components. If the adoption of the above criteria is delayed, the presumption of compliance with the requirements set out in paragraph 1 of this Article in accordance with industry guidelines and design for recycling standards shall apply to all packaging placed on the market in the Union from 1 January 2030 until such criteria are adopted by the Commission.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 281 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
From 1 January 20305 years from the date of adoption of a delegated act laying down design for recycling criteria pursuant to paragraph 4, packaging shall not be considered recyclable if it corresponds to performance grade E under the design for recycling criteria established in the delegated act adopted pursuant to paragraph 4 for the packaging category, to which the packaging belongs.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 295 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 10 – point c a (new)
(ca) packaging for infant formula and follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food for children and baby food, and food for special medical purposes as defined in Article 1, point (a), (b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) No 609/2013;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 297 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 11
11. The financial contributions to be paid by producers to comply with their extended producer responsibility obligations as referred to in Article 40 shall be modulated on the basis of the recyclability performance grade, as determined in accordance with the delegated acts referred to in paragraphs 4 and 6 of this Article and, as regards plastic packaging, also in accordance with the Article 7(6). The financial contributions are intended to finance the net costs of the collection, sorting and recycling infrastructure for the types of packaging for which they are paid, according to the categories set out in Table 1 of Annex II.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 301 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. From 1 January 2030, plastic part in packaging shall contain the following minimum percentage of recycled content recovered from post-consumer plastic waste, per unit of packaging5 years after the adoption of the implementing acts laying down the methodology for the calculation and verification of the percentage of recycled content recovered from post- consumer plastic waste, as referred to in Article 7, economic operators shall ensure the following minimum percentage of recycled content recovered from post-consumer plastic waste as an average of the economic operator’s overall portfolio of plastic packaging placed on the Union market that falls under the scope of these requirements:
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 304 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) 35 % for plastic packaging other than those referred to in points (a), (b) and (c).
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 306 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. From 1 January 2040, the plastic part in packaging shall containeconomic operators shall ensure the following minimum percentage of recycled content recovered from post-consumer plastic waste, per unit of packagingas an average of the economic operator’s overall portfolio of plastic packaging placed on the Union market that falls under the scope of these requirements:
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 310 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
(da) packaging for infant formula and follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food for children and baby food, and food for special medical purposes as defined in Article 1, point (a), (b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) No 609/2013;
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 311 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point d b (new)
(db) reusable and refillable packaging placed on the EU market before the adoption of the Regulation.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 316 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 7
7. By 31 December 2026Within 12 months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission is empowered toshall adopt implementing acts establishing the methodology for the calculation and verification of the percentage of recycled content recovered from post-consumer plastic waste, per unit of plastic packaging, and the format for the technical documentation referred to in Annex VII. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 59(3).
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 320 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1
By 31 JanuaryDecember 20285, the Commission shall assess the need for derogations from the minimum percentage laid down in paragraph 1, points a, b and d, and in paragraph 2, points a, b and c, for specific plastic packaging, or for the revision of the derogation established under paragraph 3 for specific plastic packaging. The assessment shall be based on the availability on the market and the prices of recycled plastics on an annual basis from the year of entry into force of this Regulation, taking into account Eurostat data on the recycling rates for plastic packaging achieved in the 27 EU Member States. This assessment shall also be based on the new recycling technologies applied and their impact on the quantities available on the market. Based on this assessment, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt, by 31 December 2026 at the latest, delegated acts in accordance with Article 58 to amend the Regulation in order to:
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 323 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) provide for derogations from the scope, timing or level of minimum percentage laid down in paragraph 1, points a, b and d, and in paragraph 2, points a, b and c, for specific plastic packaging, and, as appropriate,
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 326 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 10
10. Where justified by the lack of availability or excessive prices of specific recycled plastics that may have adverse effects on human or animal health, security of food supply or the environment, making compliance with the minimum percentages of recycled content set out in paragraphs 1 and 2 excessively difficult, the Commission shall be empowered to adoptor by the lack of legally validated recycling methods or the availability of infrastructure for separate collection and sorting, making compliance with the minimum percentages of recycled content set out in paragraphs 1 and 2 excessively difficult, the targets set out in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article shall be suspended until the Commission adopts, as a matter of urgency, a delegated act in accordance with Article 58 to amend paragraphs 1 and 2 by adjusting the minimum percentages accordingly. In evaluating the justification of such adjustment, the Commission shall assess requests from natural or legal persons to be accompanied by relevant information and data on the market situation for this post-consumer plastic waste and best available evidence regarding the related risks to human or animal health, to the security of food supply or to the environment.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 337 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Packaging manufactured or imported before the deadlines referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, may be marketed until 36 months after entry into force of this Regulation.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 434 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 a (new)
Article 12a Packaging Forum The Commission shall ensure, when adopting secondary legislation, the balanced participation of Member States’ representatives and all interested parties involved with the packaging industry, including waste treatment industry representatives, manufacturers and packaging suppliers, distributers, final distributers, fulfilment service providers, SMEs, environmental protection groups and consumer organisations. Those parties shall contribute in particular to preparing the delegated and implementing acts provided for in this Regulation to develop and further detail the sustainable development requirements, and to examine the effectiveness of the established market surveillance mechanisms. To this end, the Commission shall establish an expert group to bring these stakeholders together, called the ‘Packaging Forum’.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 532 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) from 1 January 2040, 80 % of those beverages are made available in reusable packaging within a system for re-use or by enabling refill.deleted
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 533 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) from 1 January 2040, 40 % of those products are made available in reusable packaging within a system for re-use or by enabling refill.deleted
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 535 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) from 1 January 2040, 25 % of those products are made available in reusable packaging within a system for re-use or by enabling refill.deleted
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 537 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) from 1 January 2040, 15 % of those products are made available in reusable packaging within a system for re-use or by enabling refill.deleted
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 539 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) from 1 January 2040, 25 % of those products are made available in reusable packaging within a system for re-use or by enabling refill.deleted
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 540 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
7. EBy 1 January 2030, economic operators using transport packaging in the territory of the European Union in the form of pallets, plastic crates, foldable plastic boxes, pails and drums for the conveyance or packaging of products in conditions other than provided for under paragraphs 12 and 13, and which are not in direct contact with food, shall ensure that:
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 541 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 7 – point b
(b) from 1 January 2040, 90 % of such packaging used is reusable packaging within a system for re-use.deleted
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 544 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 8 – point b
(b) from 1 January 2040, 50 % of such packaging used is reusable packaging within a system for re-use;deleted
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 548 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 9 – point b
(b) from 1 January 2040, 30 % of such packaging used for transport is reusable packaging within a system for re-use;deleted
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 551 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 10 – point b
(b) from 1 January 2040, 25 % of such packaging they used is reusable packaging within a system for re-use.deleted
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 552 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. The targets laid down in paragraphs 1-10 shall be met by economic operators without prejudice to requirements on health and safety, including product safety, and provided that this delivers a better overall environmental outcome and is justified by a life-cycle approach, in line with the hierarchy of waste as defined in Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 553 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. By 1 January 2030 or at the latest when carrying out an evaluation of this Regulation as prescribed in Article 63, the Commission shall evaluate the feasibility and need of proposing new reuse targets.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 554 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 12 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
TBy 2030, transport packaging used by an economic operator shall be reusable where it is used for transporting products:
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 556 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 12 – subparagraph 2
This obligation applies to pallets, boxes, excluding cardboard, trays, plastic crates, intermediate bulk containers, drums and canisters, of all sizes and materials, excluding cardboard, which are not in direct contact with food, including flexible formats.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 559 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 13 – subparagraph 1
EBy 1 January 2030, economic operators delivering products to another economic operator within the same Member State shall use only reusable transport packaging for the purpose of the transportation of such products.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 560 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 13 – subparagraph 2
This obligation applies to pallets, boxes, excluding cardboardtrays, plastic crates, intermediate bulk containers, and drums and canisters, of all sizes and materials, excluding cardboard, which are not in direct contact with food, including flexible formats.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 569 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Economic operators shall be exempted from the obligation to meet the targets in this article for specific packaging formats if the Member State in which they operate has attained the recycling target of the respective packaging material, as required under article 46 points (b) and (d)
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 570 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. When justified by cases of hygiene, food safety or environmental issues, economic operators shall be allowed to derogate from the targets laid down in paragraphs 2 to 6 of this Article.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 571 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 17
17. By [OP: Please insert the date = 8 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation]1 January 2030, the Commission shall review the situation regarding reuse of packaging and, on this basis, assess the appropriateness of establishing measures, reviewing the targets laid down in this Article, and setting new targets for the reuse and refill of packaging, and where necessary present a legislative proposal.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 574 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
By 31 December 20285, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing detailed calculation rules and methodology regarding the targets set out in Article 26. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 59(3). If, by 31 December 2025, no implementing acts establishing detailed calculation rules and methodology regarding the targets set out in Article 26 have been adopted, those targets shall be suspended until the Commission adopts the implementing acts provided for in this paragraph. The targets set out in Article 26 shall apply 5 years after the adoption of the implementing acts under this paragraph.
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 627 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex V
Single use packaging for condiments, preserves, sauces, coffee creamer, sugar, and seasoning in HORECA sector Single use packaging in the HORECA sector, containing individual portions or servings, used for condiments, preserves, sauces, coffee creamer, sugar and seasoning, except such packaging provided together with take-away ready- prepared food intended for immediate consumption without the need of any further preparation Sachets, tubs, trays, boxesdeleted deleted deleted
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 628 #

2022/0396(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex V
Single use plastic packaging, single use composite packaging or other single use packaging for fresh fruit and vegetables Single use packaging for less than 1.5 kg fresh fruit and vegetables, unless there is a demonstrated need to avoid water loss or turgidity loss, microbiological hazards or physical shocks Nets, bags, trays, containersdeleted deleted deleted
2023/06/05
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 45 #

2022/0326(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
(2) Across the Union, companies report difficulties to find workers with the necessary skills. In 2021, 28 occupations were classified as having shortages, including the healthcare, hospitality, construction and service sectors, in addition to shortages of IT and security specialists, in particular cybersecurity experts, and workers with science, technology, engineering and mathematics background.22 Increasingly, the biggest constraint to a successful digital and green transition is the lack of workers with the right skills. In many Member States, demographic ageing is expected to accelerate over the coming decade as “baby boom” cohorts retire, reinforcing the need to make use of the full potential of all working-age adults through continuous investments in their skills as well as activitating more people, in particular women and young people especially those not in education, employment or training (NEETs) and people with disabilities. _________________ 22 European Labour Authority, Report on labour shortages and surpluses 2021 and ENISA, Cybersecurity skills development in the EU, March 2020. The ENISA studies identify that there is a gap of 291,000 professionals in cybersecurity.
2022/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 177 #

2022/0326(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
1. Promoting increased, more effective and inclusive investment into training, reskilling and upskilling to harness the full potential of the European current and future workforce and to support people in entering the labour market, managing job-to-job transitions, active ageing, and benefiting from the new opportunities brought by the ongoing economic transformation.
2022/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 242 #

2022/0326(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1
The organisation of participation in the European Year at national and regional level shall be a responsibility of the Member States. To that end, each Member State shall appoint a national coordinator that can represent the different branches of government in a holistic manner. The national coordinators shall ensure the coordination of relevant activities at national and regional level, regional and local level. The national coordinators shall ensure the access to the initiatives of European Year is inclusive and covers also rural and remote areas and all groups of beneficiaries.
2022/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 251 #

2022/0326(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall convene meetings of the national coordinators in the course of preparation and during the European Year, in order to coordinate the activities referred to in Article 3. These meetings shall also serve as opportunities to exchange information regarding the implementation of the European Year at national and Union level. Representatives of the European Parliament and relevant Union Agencies may participate in those meetings as observers.
2022/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) In the interests of legal certainty, it should be clarified that personal injury includes medically recognised damage to psychological health, that is to say an adverse effect on the victim’s psychological integrity of such gravity or intensity that it affects the victim’s general state of health and that it cannot be resolved without medical treatment.
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 110 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) In order to protect consumers, damage to any property owned by a natural person should be compensated. Since property is increasingly used for both private and professional purposes, it is appropriate to provide for the compensation of damage to such mixed- use property. In light of this Directive’s aim to protect consumers, property used exclusively for professional purposes should be excluded from its scopeProperty used exclusively for professional purposes by small and micro enterprises should be covered by this Directive unless bilateral arrangements are specified in a separated contract between stakeholders.
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 124 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
(27) In order to ensure that injured persons have an enforceable claim for compensation where a manufacturer is established outside the Union, it should be possible to hold the importer of the product and the authorised representative of the manufacturer liable. The authorized representative should be verifiable and have access to personnel with sufficient and relevant knowledge and experience to have a meaningful impact. Practical experience of market surveillance has shown that supply chains sometimes involve economic operators whose novel form means that they do not fit easily into the traditional supply chains under the existing legal framework. Such is the case, in particular, with fulfilment service providers, which perform many of the same functions as importers but which might not always correspond to the traditional definition of importer in Union law. In light of the role of fulfilment service providers as economic operators in the product safety and market surveillance framework, in particular in Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 of the European Parliament and of the Council46, it should be possible to hold them liable, but given the subsidiary nature of that role, they should be liable only where no importer or authorised representative is based in the Union. In the interests of channelling liability in an effective manner towards manufacturers, importers, authorised representatives and fulfilment service providers, it should be possible to hold distributors liable only where they fail to promptly identify a relevant economic operator based in the Union. _________________ 46 Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on market surveillance and compliance of products and amending Directive 2004/42/EC and Regulations (EC) No 765/2008 and (EU) No 305/2011 (OJ L 169, 25.6.2019, p. 1).
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 132 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) In the transition from a linear to a circular economy, products are designed to be more durable, reusable, reparable and upgradable. The Union is also promoting innovative and sustainable ways of production and consumption that prolong the functionality of products and components, such as remanufacturing, refurbishment and repair.47. In addition, products allow for modifications through changes to software, including upgrades. When a product is modified substantially outside the control of the original manufacturer, it is considered to be a new product and it should be possible to hold the person that made the substantial modification liable as a manufacturer of the modified product, since under relevant Union legislation they are responsible for the product’s compliance with safety requirements. Whether a modification is substantial is determined according to criteria set out in relevant Union and national safety legislation, such as modifications that change the original intended functions or affect the product’s compliance with applicable safety requirements. In the interests of a fair apportionment of risks in the circular economy, an economic operator that makes a substantial modification should be exempted from liability if it can prove that the damage is related to a part of the product not affected by the modification. Economic operators that carry out repairs or other operations that do not involve substantial modifications should not be subject to liability under this Directive. _________________ 47 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, A new Circular Economy Action Plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe, COM/2020/98 final.
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 178 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Directive lays down common rules on the liability of economic operators for damage suffered by natural persons caused by defective products. This Directive shall also cover the liability of economic operators that are small and micro enterprises for damage suffered by legal persons if this liability was not specified in a separated contract between the parties.
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 199 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘product’ means all movables, even if integrated into another movable or into an immovable. ‘Product’ includes electricity, digital manufacturing files and software; For the purpose of this directive, “software” excludes free and open-source software developed or supplied outside the course of a commercial activity;
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 224 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
(a) death or personal injury, including medically recognised harm to psychological health;
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 229 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b – point iii
(iii) property used exclusively for professional purposes, unless among small and micro enterprises, when covered by business to business contractual agreements;
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 231 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
(c) loss or corruption of data that is not used exclusively for professional purposes; unless for small and micro enterprises that are not covered by business to business contractual agreements;
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 238 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
(7a) 'medically recognised harm to psychological health' means adverse psychological effects that are supported by expert evidence and amount to a diagnosed illness according to WHO criteria and that cannot be resolved without medical treatment, excluding stress and anxiety;
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 244 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 11
(11) ‘manufacturer’ means any natural or legal person who develops, deploys, manufactures or produces a product or has a product designed or manufactured, orand who markets that product under its name or trademark or who develops, manufactures or produces a product for its own use;
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 254 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new)
(17a) 'Authorised representative' means any natural or legal person established within the Union who has received and accepted a written mandate from a manufacturer, to act on the manufacturer’s behalf in relation to specified tasks with regard to the latter’s obligations under this directive;
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 258 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17 b (new)
(17b) ‘substantial modification’ means a modification of a product, by physical or digital means, shall be deemed to be substantial where it has an impact on the safety of the product and the following criteria are met: (a) the modification changes the product in a manner which was not foreseen in the initial risk assessment of the product; (b) the nature of the hazard has changed, a new hazard has been created or the level of risk has increased because of the modification; and (c) the modifications have not been made by the consumers themselves or on their behalf for their own use.
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 262 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17 c (new)
(17c) ‘obvious malfunction’ means the undisputable failure of a product to operate normally during its designated use.
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 263 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that any natural person or legal person as specified in Article 1, who suffers damage caused by a defective product (‘the injured person’) is entitled to compensation in accordance with the provisions set out in this Directive.
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 323 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. Any natural or legal person that modifies a product that has already been placed on the market or put into service shall be considered a manufacturer of the product for the purposes of paragraph 1, where the modification is considered substantial under relevant Union or national rules on product safety and is undertaken outside the original manufacturer’s control.
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 339 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that national courts are empowered, within the framework of the applicable procedural law of the Member States and the Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council, upon request of an injured person claiming compensation for damage caused by a defective product (‘the claimant’) who has presented facts and evidence sufficient to support the plausibility of the claim for compensation, to order the defendant to disclose relevant evidence that is at its disposal.
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 387 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) it isfactual evidence suggests that it is highly likely that the product was defective or that its defectiveness is an such a way that is a highly likely cause of the damage, or both.
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 421 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that the liability of an economic operator pursuant to this Directive is not, in relation to the injured person, limited or excluded by a contractual provision or by national law. This does not affect the ability of economic entities that are small and micro enterprises to commercially agree on distribution of liability as between themselves.
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 436 #

2022/0302(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. A software update or upgrade which does not amount to a substantial modification according to Article 7(4) shall not trigger or restart the limitation period referred to in paragraph 2.
2023/05/04
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 248 #

2022/0277(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
(39) It is also key that the Board is empowered to issue an opinion, on the Commission’s request, where national measures are likely to affect the functioning of the internal market for media services. This is, for example, the case when a national administrative measure is addressed to a media service provider providing its services towards more than one Member State, or when the concerned media service provider has a significant influence on the formation of public opinion in that Member State. Media service providers individually and directly affected by a measure should be able to request that the Board draw up opinions on such measures.
2023/04/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 272 #

2022/0277(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
(48) State funding, including state advertising is an important source of revenue for many media service providers, contributing to their economic sustainability. Access to it must be granted in a non-discriminatory way to any media service provider from any Member State which can adequately reach some or all of the relevant members of the public, in order to ensure equal opportunities in the internal market. Moreover, State funding, including advertising may make media service providers vulnerable to undue state influence to the detriment of the freedom to provide services and fundamental rights. Opaque and biased allocation of state funding, including advertising is therefore a powerful tool to exert influence or ‘capture’ media service providers. The distribution and transparency of state funding, including advertising are in some regards regulated through a fragmented framework of media-specific measures and general public procurement laws, which, however, may not cover all state advertising expenditure nor offer sufficient protection against preferential or biased distribution. In particular, Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council56 does not apply to public service contracts for the acquisition, development, production or co-production of programme material intended for audiovisual media services or radio media services. Media-specific rules on state funding, including advertising, where they exist, diverge significantly from one Member State to another. __________________ 56 Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 65-242).
2023/04/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 273 #

2022/0277(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
(49) In order to ensure undistorted competition between media service providers and to avoid the risk of covert subsidies and of undue political influence on the media, it is necessary to establish common requirements of transparency, objectivity, proportionality and non- discrimination in the allocation of state advertising and of state resources to media service providers for the purpose of purchasing goods or services from them other than state advertising, including the requirement to publish information on the beneficiaries of state advertising expenditure and the amounts spent. It is important that Member States make the necessary information related to state funding, including advertising publicly accessible in an electronic format that is easy to view, access and download, in compliance with Union and national rules on commercial confidentiality. This Regulation shall not affect the application of the State aid rules, which are applied on a case-by-case basis.
2023/04/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 346 #

2022/0277(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The head of management and the members of the governing board of public service media providers shall be appointed through a transparent, open and non-discriminatory procedure and on the basis of transparent, objective, non-discriminatory and, proportionate, pluralistic and balanced criteria laid down in advance by national law.
2023/04/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 592 #

2022/0277(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 4
4. The Board, upon request of the Commission or on its own initiative, shall draw up an opinion where a national legislative, regulatory or administrative measure is likely to affect the functioning of the internal market for media services. Following the opinion of the Board, and without prejudice to its powers under the Treaties, the Commission may issue its own opinion on the matter. Opinions by the Board and, where applicable, by the Commission shall be made publicly available. The Board, upon request by a media service provider individually and directly affected by a measure or by the Commission, shall draw up an opinion on the measure.
2023/04/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 646 #

2022/0277(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. In the absence of an assessment or a consultation pursuant to Article 21, the Board, upon request of the Commission or on its own initiative, shall draw up an opinion on the impact of a media market concentration on media pluralism and editorial independence, where a media market concentration is likely to affect the functioning of the internal market for media services. The Board shall base its opinion on the elements set out in Article 21(2). The Board may bring media market concentrations likely to affect the functioning of the internal market for media services to the attention of the Commission.
2023/04/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 671 #

2022/0277(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – title
Allocation of state advertisfunding
2023/04/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 673 #

2022/0277(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. Public funds or any other consideration or advantage granted by public authorities to media service providers and providers of online platforms, including for the purposes of advertising shall be awarded according to transparent, objective, proportionate and non- discriminatory criteria and through open, proportionate and non-discriminatory procedures. This Article shall not affect public procurement rules.
2023/04/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 678 #

2022/0277(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Public authorities, including national, federal or regional governments, regulatory authorities or bodies, as well as state-owned enterprises or other state- controlled entities at the national or regional level, or local governments of territorial entities of more than 1 million inhabitants, shall make publicly available accurate, comprehensive, intelligible, detailed and yearly information about their advertising expenditures allocated to media service providers and providers of online platforms, which shall include at least the following details:
2023/04/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 682 #

2022/0277(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the legal names of media service providers from which advertising services were purchased and who received state funding;
2023/04/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 686 #

2022/0277(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the total annual amount spent as well as the amounts spent per media service provider or providers of online platforms.
2023/04/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 690 #

2022/0277(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3
3. National regulatory authorities or bodies shall monitor the allocation of state funding , including advertising in media markets and to providers of online platforms. In order to assess the accuracy of the information on state funding, including advertising, made available pursuant to paragraph 2, national regulatory authorities or bodies may request from the entities referred to in paragraph 2 further information, including information on the application of criteria referred to in paragraph 1.
2023/04/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 128 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) As a member of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the Union is committed to promoting a rules-based, open, multilateral trading system under the WTO. Any measures introduced by the Union that affect trade must be WTO compliant. Further, all measures introduced by the Union that affect trade must take into account the possible response of the Union’s trade partners and ensure that the enforcement of the measure is not perceived as a unilateral protectionist measure.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 134 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) Currently there is no Union legislation that empowers Member States’ authorities to directly detain, seize, or order the withdrawal of a product on the basis of a finding that it was made, whether in whole or in significant parts, with forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 141 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) In order to ensure the effectiveness of the prohibition, such prohibition should apply to products for which forced labour has been used at any stage of their production, manufacture, harvest and extraction, including working or processing related to the products. The prohibition should apply to all products, of any type, including their components, and should apply to products regardless of the sector, the origin, whether they are domestic or imported, or placed or made available on the Union market or exported.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 147 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (’SMEs’) can have limited resources and ability to ensure that the products they place or make available on the Union market are free from forced labour. The Commission should therefore issue guidelines on due diligence in relation to forced labour, which should take into account also the size and economic resources of economic operators. In addition, the Commission should issue specific guidelines on forced-labour risk indicators and on publicly available information in order to help SMEs, as well as other economic operators, to comply with the requirements of the prohibition who will become affected by this Regulation, as well as other economic operators.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 148 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) Taking into account that this Regulation breaches the European Parliament's and Commission's interinstitutional agreement on Better Law-Making by excluding an impact assessment, and thus lacks significant estimates needed to evaluate cost-benefit, the one-in, one-out principle, and WTO compatibility amongst other things, the Commission should create an impact assessment six months after the Regulation's entry into force. The Commission should also submit a comprehensive report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the impact of the Regulation, three years after its applicability. The report shall evaluate the effectiveness of this Regulation in reaching its objectives, in particular, its impact on the eradication of forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 151 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 b (new)
(18b) Given that this Regulation will impose additional compliance costs on economic operators, action needs to be taken to prevent the total level of regulatory and financial burden from increasing. Therefore, in line with the Commission's Better Regulation agenda, and the 'one in, one out' principle, the Commission should present, before the application of this Regulation, proposals offsetting the regulatory and financial burdens introduced by this Regulation, through the revision or abolishment of provisions in other Union legislative acts that generate compliance costs for economic operators.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 170 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) Before initiating an investigation, competent authorities should request from the economic operators under assessment information on actions taken to mitigate, prevent or bring to an end risks of forced labour in their operations and valuesupply chains with respect to the products under assessment. Carrying out such due diligence in relation to forced labour should help the economic operator to be at a lower risk of having forced labour in its operations and valuesupply chains. Appropriate due diligence means that forced labour issues in the valuesupply chain have been identified and addressed in accordance with relevant Union legislation and international standards. That implies that where the competent authority considers that there is no substantiated concern of a violation of the prohibition, for instance due to, but not limited to the applicable legislation, guidelines, recommendations or any other due diligence in relation to forced labour being applied in a way that mitigates, prevents and brings to an end the risk of forced labour, no investigation should be initiated.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 173 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) In order to ensure cooperation among competent authorities designated under this and other relevant legislation and in order to ensure consistency in their actions and decisions, competent authorities designated under this Regulation should request information from other relevant authorities, where necessary, on whether economic operators under assessment are subject to and carry out due diligence in relation to forced labour in accordance with applicable Union legislation or Member States legislation setting out due diligence and transparency requirements with respect to forced labour. When requesting information from economic operators, competent authorities should follow the Commission’s Once-Only principle, through increased cooperation and dialogue between authorities who are engaged in overseeing product regulation. An economic operator should not have to submit the same information more than once.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 185 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) During the preliminary phase of investigation, competent authorities should focus on the economic operators involved in the steps of the valuesupply chain where there is a higher risk of forced labour with respect to the products under investigation, also taking into account their size and economic resources, the quantity of products concerned and the scale of the suspected forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 188 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Competent authorities, when requesting information during the investigation, should prioritise to the extent possible and consistent with the effective conduct of the investigation the economic operators under investigation that are involved in the steps of the valuesupply chain as close as possible to where the likely risk of forced labour occurs and take into account the size and economic resources of the economic operators, the quantity of products concerned, as well as the scale of suspected forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 203 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) Competent authorities should bear the burden of establishing that forced labour has been used at any stage of production, manufacture, harvest or extraction of a product, including working or processing related to the product on the basis of all information and evidence gathered during the investigation, including its preliminary phase. To ensure their right to due process, economic operators should have the opportunity to provide information in their defence to the competent authorities throughout the investigation.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 204 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Competent authorities that establish that economic operators violated the prohibition, should without delay prohibit the placing and making available of such products on the Union market and their export from the Union, and require the economic operators that have been investigated to withdraw the relevant products already made available from the Union market and have them recycled, or should this not be possible destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including Union legislation on waste management. Agricultural products that cannot be recycled, should be donated, or, should this not be possible, destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including Union legislation on waste management.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 219 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) If the economic operators fail to comply with the decision of the competent authorities by the end of the established timeframe, the competent authorities should ensure that the relevant products are prohibited from being placed or made available on the Union market, exported or withdrawn from the Union market and that any such products remaining with the relevant economic operators are recycled, or should this not be possible destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including Union legislation on waste management at the expense of the economic operators. Agricultural products that cannot be recycled, should be donated, or, should this not be possible, destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including Union legislation on waste management.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 238 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) The Commission should issue guidelines in order to facilitate the implementation of the prohibition by economic operators and competent authorities. Such guidelines should include guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour and complementary information for the competent authorities to implement the prohibition. The guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour should build on the Guidance on due diligence for Union businesses to address the risk of forced labour in their operations and supply chains published by the Commission and the European External Action Service in July 2021. The guidelines should be consistent with other Commission guidelines in this regard and relevant international organisations’ guidelines. The guidelines should include sectoral guidance such as the garment and textile sector, agri-sector and automotive sector, as well as type of supplier such as wholesale, manufacture or smallholder farm. The reports from international organisations, in particular the ILO, as well as other independent and verifiable sources of information should be considered for the identification of risk indicators.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 256 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) Where the competent authorities conclude that a product corresponds to a decision establishing a violation of the prohibition, they should immediately inform customs authorities which should refuse its release for free circulation or export. The product should be recycled, or should this not be possible destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including legislation on waste management, which excludes re-export in case of non-Union goods. . Agricultural products that cannot be recycled, should be donated, or, should this not be possible, destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including legislation on waste management.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 263 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37 a (new)
(37a) The Commission should take into due consideration the risk of disengagement by economic operators who are either related to products, regions or production sites in the data base, or who have had their product removed from the Union market, as well as the consequences on affected workers. The Commission should therefore, where appropriate, support economic operators in adopting and carrying out measures suitable and effective for bringing forced labour to an end.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 272 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42 a (new)
(42a) With acknowledgment of current developments in traceability technology and the use of blockhain to facilitate monitoring of supply chains, the Commission should support economic operators in the uptake of such technology, including through financial and technical assistance.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 282 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
(45) Since forced labour is a global problem and given the interlinkages of the global value chains, it is necessary to promote international cooperation against forced labour, which would also improve the efficiency of applying and enforcing the prohibition. The Commission should as appropriately cooperate with and exchange information with authorities of third countries and international organisations to create enabling environments to promote and protect human rights, including capacity building to support workers and local communities in their efforts to root out forced labour from global supply chains and enhance the effective implementation of the prohibition. International cooperation with authorities of non-EU countries should take place in a structured way as part of the existing dialogue structures, for example Human Rights Dialogues with third countries, or, if necessary, specific ones that will be created on an ad hoc basis. The Commission should further integrate this Regulation with existing trade measures such as free trade agreements and the Generalised Scheme of Preferences, to enhance the cumulative effect of EU trade measures in eradicating forced labour. This means that in the case where a product has been found to have forced labour, it cannot qualify for GSP tariff reduction. Furthermore, if third country authorities are found to be non-cooperative, or not taking measures to end forced labour within their national borders, the Commission should evaluate whether they should benefit from existing GSP trade facilitation. The Commission should ensure coherence and synergies between relevant external policies, in particular development cooperation and projects focusing on the eradication of forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 291 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules prohibiting economic operators from placing and making available on the Union market or exporting from the Union market products made with forced labour. This Regulation contributes to the fight against forced labour and promotes corporate sustainability due diligence standards.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 296 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. This Regulation shall only apply to economic operators and product areas referred to in Article 3 of the Directive (XXX) on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence. This Regulation shall not apply to economic operators or product areas where Member States lay down, in their national laws, provisions diverging from Article 3 of the Directive (XXX) on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 298 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation shall not cover the withdrawal of products which have reached the end-users in the Union market, or been transformed or integrated into another product and constitute minor component of the final product.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 304 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 a (new)
Article1a Scope This Regulation shall apply to the economic operators and product areas covered in Article 3 of the Directive (XXX) on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 318 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) ‘making available on the market’ means any supply of a product for distribution, consumption or use on the Union market in the course of a commercial activity, whether in return for payment or free of charge and in the case where the product is offered for sale online or through other means of distance sales, the making available on the market is deemed to take place when the offer for sale is targeted at end-users in the Union;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 319 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ‘product’ means any product that can be valued in money and is capable, as such, of forming the subject of commercial transactions, whether it is extracted, harvested, produced or manufactured, including working or processing related to a product at any stage of its supply chain;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 328 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ‘product made with forced labour’ means a product for which forced labour has been used in whole or into a significant part at any stage of its extraction, harvest, production or manufacture, including working or processing related to a product at any stage of its supply chain;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 338 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point k
(k) ‘product supplier’ means any natural or legal person or association of persons in the supply chain who extracts, harvests, produces or manufactures a product in whole or in part, or intervenes in the working or processing related to a product at any stage of its supply chain, whether as manufacturer or in any other circumstancessignificant parts thereof;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 352 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point n
(n) ‘substantiated concern’ means a well-founded reason, based on objective, factual and verifiable information, for the competent authorities to suspect that products were likely made with forced labour;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 355 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r – point 1 (new)
1) 'supply chain' means the network of organizations that cooperate to transform raw materials into finished goods (including the extraction, harvest, production or manufacturing)
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 356 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s a (new)
(sa) 'mass balance model' means a chain of custody model in which materials or products with a set of specified characteristics are mixed according to defined criteria with materials or products without that set of characteristics;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 359 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point u a (new)
(ua) “end-user” means any natural or legal person, to whom the product in question has been made available either as a consumer outside of any commercial activity or as a professional in the course of its industrial or professional activities;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 361 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point u b (new)
(ub) “SME” means any micro, small or medium-sized enterprises as defined in the Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2023 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 373 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Competent authorities shall follow a risk-based approach in assessing the likelihood that economic operators violated Article 3. That assessment shall be based on all relevant, factual and verifiable information available to them, including the following information:
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 385 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. In their assessment of the likelihood that economic operators violated Article 3, competent authorities shall focus on the economic operators involved in the steps of the valuesupply chain as close as possible to where the risk of forced labour is likely to occur and take into account the size and economic resources of the economic operators, the quantity of products concerned, the complexity of the supply chain as well as the scale of suspected forced labour.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 393 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Before initiating an investigation in accordance with Article 5(1), the competent authority shall request from the economic operators under assessment information on actions taken to identify, prevent, mitigate or bring to an end risks of forced labour in their operations and valuesupply chains with respect to the products under assessment, including on the basis of any of the following:
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 394 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
(aa) any industry scheme, third-party audit or certification from the economic operators' suppliers that guarantees the absence of forced labour;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 399 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Economic operators shall respond to the request of the competent authority referred to in paragraph 3 within 1530 working days from the day they received such request or make a justified request for an extension of that time limit. Economic operators may provide to competent authorities any other information they may deem useful for the purposes of this Article.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 422 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6
6. The competent authority shall duly take into account where the economic operator demonstrates that it carries out due diligence on the basis of identified forced labour impact in its supply chain, adopts and carries out measures suitable and effective for bringing to an end forced labour in a shortreasonable period of time.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 424 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6
6. The competent authority shall duly take into account where the economic operator demonstrates that it carries out due diligence on the basis of identified forced labour impact in its supply chain, adopts and carries out measures suitable and effective for bringing to an end forced labour in a short period of timetheir supply chain.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 458 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) prioritise the economic operators under investigation involved in the steps of the valuesupply chain as close as possible to where the likely risk of forced labour occurs and
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 461 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) take into account the size and economic resources of the economic operators, in particular, whether the operator is an SME, the quantity of products concerned, as well as the scale of suspected forced labour.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 462 #

2022/0269(COD)

(b) take into account the size and economic resources of the economic operators, the quantity of products concerned, the complexity of the supply chain as well as the scale of suspected forced labour.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 475 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. When deciding on the time limits referred to in this Article, competent authorities shall consider the size and economic resources of the economic operators concerned, in particular, whether the operator is an SME.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 476 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. When deciding on the time limits referred to in this Article, competent authorities shall consider the size and economic resources of the economic operators concerned as well as the complexity of the supply chain.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 488 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Competent authorities shall assess all information and evidence gathered pursuant to Articles 4 and 5 and, on that basis, establish and duly motivate whether Article 3 has been violated, within a reasonable period of time from the date they initiated the investigation pursuant to Article 5(1).
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 491 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, competent authorities may establish that Article 3 has been violated on the basis of any other facts available where it was not possible to gather information and evidence pursuant to Article 5(3) or (6).deleted
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 492 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, competent authorities may establish that Article 3 has been violated on the basis of any other facts available where it was not possible to gather information and evidence pursuant to Article 5(3) or (6).deleted
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 505 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) a prohibition to place or make the products or product component concerned available on the Union market and to export them;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 507 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) an order for the economic operators that have been subject to the investigation to employ reasonable and proportionate efforts to withdraw from the Union market the relevant products that have already been placed or made available on the market, taking into account the size and economic resources concerned, in particular, whether the operator is an SME;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 508 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) an order for the economic operators that have been subject to the investigation to withdraw from the Union market the relevant products or product component that have already been placed or made available on the market;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 511 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) an order for the economic operators that have been subject to the investigation to either donate the respective products to charitable causes or dispose of the respective products in line with the waste hierarchy in accordance with national law consistent with Union law.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 512 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) an order for the economic operators that have been subject to the investigation to dispose of the respective products in accordance with national law consistent with Union law or to remove or replace the component of the product that was made with forced labour.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 534 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – point c
(c) that any product remaining with the economic operator concerned is disposed ofeither be donated to charitable causes or be disposed of in line with the waste hierarchy in accordance with national law consistent with Union law at the expense of the economic operator.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 542 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6
6. Where competent authorities establish that economic operators have provided evidence to the competent authorities that they have complied with the decision referred to in paragraph 4, and that they have eliminatedadopted appropriate measures to address the risk of forced labour fromin their operations or supply chain or remediated forced labour cases in compliance with the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 with respect to the products concerned, the competent authorities shall withdraw their decision for the futurelift the market prohibition immediately and inform the economic operators of this decision.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 553 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the findings of the investigation and the information underpinning the findings;evidence that justifies the decision.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 579 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. Economic operators that have been affected by a decision of a competent authority pursuant to this Regulation shall have access to a court to review the procedural and substantive legality of the decision. Economic operators shall be entitled to compensation or damages for the prohibition, withdrawal or destruction of products arising from a wrongful decision by a competent authority.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 581 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. Economic operators that have been affected by a decision of a competent authority pursuant to this Regulation shall have access to an interim legal protection and to regular judicial proceedings before a court to review the procedural and substantive legality of the decision. The right to be heard of the economic operator shall be respected at any point of the process.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 585 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Economic operators shall have a right to compensation for damages in line with Union and applicable national law that were caused by a wrongful decision of public authorities.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 594 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) any court decision to annul competent authority decision referred to in Article 8(5);
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 598 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall make available the decisions, and the withdrawals referred to in the paragraph 1, points (c), (d), (e), (g) and (ga) on a dedicated website.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 613 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The competent authority shall, as soon as possible, diligently and impartially assess the information, including whether the claims are well-founded and, inform the person or association referred to in paragraph 1 of the outcome of the assessment of their submission.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 625 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall call upon external expertise to provideset up an indicative, non-exhaustivan accurate, verifiable and regularly updated database of forced labour risks in specific geographic areas or with respect to specific products including with regard to forced labour imposed by state authorities. The database shall be based on the guidelines referred to in Article 23, points (a), (b) and (c), and relevant external sources of information from, amongst others, international organisations and third country authorities. The Commission may also consult external experts for contributions.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 627 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall call upon external expertise to provide an indicative, non-exhaustive, verifiable and regularly updated database of forced labour risks in specific geographic areas or production sites with respect to specific products including with regard to forced labour imposed by state authorities. The database shall be based on the guidelines referred to in Article 23, points (a), (b) and (c), and relevant external sources of information from, amongst others, international organisations and third country authorities.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 635 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall ensure thatmake the database is made publicly available byat the external expertise at the latest 24 months after the entry into force of this Regulationlatest 12 months before the application of this regulation. The Commission shall be responsible for the databases's maintenance, content updates and regular review.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 642 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall ensure that the database is made publicly available by the external expertise at the latest 124 months after the entry into forcebefore the application of this Regulation.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 645 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. Economic operators placing or making available on the Union market or exporting products which are not mentioned in the database referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, or which come from areas that are not mentioned in that database, shall also be required to comply with Article 3in line with Article 4, risk-based approach shall not be considered to have a high risk of violating Article 3, unless serious proof of the contrary is available.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 661 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Member States shall confer on their competent authorities the necessary powers to issue an order requiring the providers of online marketplaces to remove products made with forced labour from their online interface, to disable access to it or to display an explicit warning. Such orders shall be issued in accordance with the minimum conditions set out in Article 9(2) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 692 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) within 4 working days of the suspension, if the competent authorities have not requested the customs authorities to maintain the suspension. In case of perishable products, animals and plants that time limit shall be 2 working days;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 706 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Where the release for free circulation or export of a product has been refused in accordance with Article 19, customs authorities shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the product concerned is disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union lawrecycled, or should this not be possible destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including Union legislation on waste management. Agricultural products that cannot be recycled, should be donated, or, should this not be possible destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law accordance. Articles 197 and 198 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 shall apply accordingly.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 732 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission shall issue guidelines no later than 182 months after the entry into force of this Regulation, which shall include the following:
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 734 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) guidance to the economic operator on due diligence in relation to forced labour, which shall take into account applicable Union legislation setting out due diligence requirements with respect to forced labour, guidelines and recommendations from international organisations, as well as the size and economic resources of economic operators; , different types of suppliers along the supply chain, different sectors and the particular risks associated with forced labour imposed by state authorities. The guidance shall also include advice on how to identify indicators of forced labour in different areas of the supply chain;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 737 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour, which shall take into account applicable Union legislation setting out due diligence requirements with respect to forced labour, guidelines and recommendations from international organisations, as well as the size and economic resources of economic operators, in particular where the operator is an SME;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 740 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) guidance to the economic operators on measures which are suitable and effective for bringing to an end different types of forced labour;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 741 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) information on risk indicators of forced labour, including a clear distinction for evaluation between forced labour risks in the private sector and risk of state-imposed forced labour, which shall be based on independent and verifiable information, including reports from international organisations, in particular the International Labour Organization, civil society, business organisations, and experience from implementing Union legislation setting out due diligence requirements with respect to forced labour;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 747 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) further information to facilitate the competent authorities’ implementation of this Regulation; which includes guidelines regarding the assessment of a notification and identification of indicators of forced labour in the pre-investigation phase and investigation phase. This includes benchmarks for the quantification of 'size of economic operator', 'resources of economic operators', 'quantity of products' and 'scale of forced labour' that will be assessed in order to establish substantiated concern for initiating an investigation. These guidelines should be clearly interpretable to ensure that implementation and enforcement of the measure is horizontal across Member States. Where relevant, the Commission should offer capacity building and training for staff of Member States' competent authorities;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 748 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) further information to facilitate the competent authorities’ implementation of this Regulation, in particular for public authorities carrying out procedures under Article 4, 5 or 6 on what constitutes a significant threshold for forced labour contents used at the different stages of a product's extraction, harvest, production or manufacture that would constitute a violation of Article 3;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 750 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) the guidelines should be consistent with guidance provided in accordance with relevant Union legislation;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 751 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) guidance for the practical implementation of Article 16 and, where appropriate, any other provision laid down in Chapter III of this Regulation, including with regard to the identification and evaluation of risks of forced labour linked to commodities sourced by economic operators through a mass balance approach.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 755 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The guidelines shall be consistent with guidelines provided in accordance with relevant Union Law, in particular with Directive (XXX) on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive and Regulation (XXX) [ Regulation on deforestation-free products ]
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 757 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 a (new)
Article23a Specific provisions for SMEs 1. SMEs shall be given special support and guidance in adapting to this Regulation. 2. This support and guidance shall include: a) SME-specific guidelines with due diligence checklist and toolkit on preventing forced labour b) capacity-building, training programme and administrative and technical support on the assessment and the prevention of forced labour; c) support in their outreach to relevant suppliers and other actors;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 759 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. A Union Network Against Forced Labour Products (‘the Network’) is established. The Network shall serve as a platform for structured coordination and cooperation between the competent authorities of the Member States and the Commission, and to streamline the practices of enforcement of this Regulation as well as other relevant due diligence legislation within the Union, thereby making enforcement more effective and coherent.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 774 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point f
(f) to promote the cooperation and exchange of expertise and best practices between competent authorities and customs authorities; as well as international organisations such as the World Customs Organisation and National Contact Points for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. The Network shall also maintain regular contact with the Commission's relevant services to receive relevant information from other EU initiatives that support the eradication of forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 779 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)
(fa) identify discrepancies between enforcement at the level of different EU Member States;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 781 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point f b (new)
(fb) provide recommendations to the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) to address identified systemic cases of forced labour in third countries and/or the Member States of the European Union;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 784 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall organise and chair regular meetings of the Network and shall support and encourage cooperation between enforcement authorities through the Network and participate in the meetings of the Network.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 789 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 a (new)
Article24a Support The Network shall support economic operators under investigation to undertake corrective action in line with Article 4(6) and Article 6(6) where the risk of forced labour has been identified to: a) correct the potential risk of forced labour before launching an investigation and b) avoid the last resort of disengagement if the economic operator is deemed violating Article 3. This shall include having dialogue with authorities operating in the region where forced labour has been identified as well as on national level. In the case where disengagement must take effect and economic operators become victim to a third country punitive measure, the Commission shall provide political, administrative or financial support.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 796 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. In order to facilitate effective implementation and enforcement of this Regulation, the Commission mayshall, as appropriate cooperate, engage and exchange information with, amongst others, authorities of third countries, international organisations, civil society representatives and business organisations. The Commission shall have regular contact and cooperation with countries that have similar legislation in place, to share information of risk products or regions as well as best practices for bringing to an end forced labour. International cooperation with authorities of third countries shall take place in a structured way as part of the existing dialogue structures with third countries or, if necessary, specific ones that will be created on an ad hoc basis.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 806 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Cooperation with third countries shall be integrated with other EU policies and instruments that include measures to eradicate forced labour, including free trade agreements, the Generalised Scheme of Preferences, and development cooperation projects led by the Commission.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 821 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3
3. The Member States shall, by [OP enter DATE = 2430 months from its entry into force of this Regulation], notify those provisions to the Commission, where they have not previously been notified, and shall notify it, without delay, of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 831 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 a (new)
Article31a Review and reporting No later than three years after the application of this Regulation, and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall review the application, enforcement and impact of this Regulation and present a report to the European Parliament and the Council. The report shall in particular assess the following issues: a) the effectiveness of this Regulation in achieving its objectives of prohibiting products made with forced labour in the Union market; b) the cost-benefit and effectiveness of this Regulation; c) the overall impact on eradicating forced labour; d) the impact of this regulation on SMEs and micro enterprises; e) the alignment with other legislations, particularly on CSDDD, deforestation and batteries regulation; f) the impact on trade and the competitiveness of the Union’s industry; g) the impact in terms of administrative burdens for the economic operators and Member States' authorities. Where the Commission considers it appropriate, the report shall be accompanied by relevant legislative proposals or repeal of the existing regulation.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 299 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) The European Parliament resolution of 12 February 2019 on the implementation of Directive 2009/128/EC on the sustainable use of pesticides41 noted that the Union must act without delay to transition to a more sustainable use of pesticides and called on the Commission to propose an ambitious Union-wide binding target for the reduction of pesticide use. The European Parliament re-affirmed its call for binding reduction targets, in its resolution of 20 October 2021 on a Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system42 , its call for reduction targets binding at EU level. __________________ 41 P8_TA(2019)0082, 12 February 2019. 42 P9_TA(2021)0425, 20 October 2021.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 321 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) The Commission Communication entitled ‘the European Green Deal’47 set out a roadmap of key measures, including legislative, to significantly reduce the use and risk of chemical pesticides. In the Farm to Fork Strategy48 , EU Biodiversity Strategy for 203049 and the Zero Pollution Action Plan50 , the Commission committed to take action to reduce by 50% the overall use and risk from chemical pesticides by 2030 and reduce by 50% the use of more hazardous pesticides (plant protection products containing one or more active substances approved as candidates for substitution in accordance with Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council51 and listed in Part E of the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/201152 , or containing one or more active substances listed in the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/40853 ) by 2030. The sustainable use of plant protection products is also complementary to the promotion of organic farming and achieving the Farm to Fork Strategy target of at least 25% of the Union’s agricultural land under organic farming by 2030. It supports the objectives of the EU strategic framework on health and safety at work54 and thereby contributes to the implementation of principle 10 of the European Pillar of Social Rights on a healthy, safe and well- adapted work environment. __________________ 47 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions The European Green Deal COM/2019/640 final. 48 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system, COM/2020/381 final. 49 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 Bringing nature back into our lives, COM/2020/380 final. 50 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Pathway to a Healthy Planet for All EU Action Plan: 'Towards Zero Pollution for Air, Water and Soil', COM(2021) 400 final. 51 Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 1). 52 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 of 25 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of approved active substances (OJ L 153, 11.6.2011, p. 1). 53 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 of 11 March 2015 on implementing Article 80(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and establishing a list of candidates for substitution (OJ L 67, 12.3.2015, p. 18). 54 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, EU strategic framework on health and safety at work 2021-2027 Occupational safety and health in a changing world of work, COM/2021/323 final.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 333 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Two European citizens’ initiatives address the use of pesticides and call for ambitious reduction targets. The initiative ‘Ban glyphosate and protect people and the environment from toxic pesticides’ submitted to the Commission on 6 October 2017 called on the Commission, under its third aim, ‘to set EU-wide mandatory reduction targets for pesticide use, with a view to achieving a pesticide- free future’. In its reply adopted on 12 December 2017, the Commission stated that it would re-evaluate the need for EU- wide mandatory targets for pesticides. More recently, the initiative ‘Save bees and farmers! Towards a bee-friendly agriculture for a healthy environment’ calls on the Commission ‘to propose legal acts to phase out synthetic pesticides in EU agriculture by 80% by 2030, starting with the most hazardous, and to become free of synthetic by 2035.’ The initiative has collected over 1 million statements of support by 30 September 2021 which are currently being verified by Member States authorities.deleted
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 359 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Biological control agents are a sustainable control alternative to the use of chemical products for the control of harmful organisms. As noted in Council Decision (EU) 2021/110257 , biological control agents have a growing importance in sustainable agriculture and forestry and have an instrumental role to play in the success of integrated pest management and organic farming. Access to biological controls facilitates moving away from chemical plant protection products. It is appropriate to encourage farmers to switch to low input agricultural methods including organic farming. It is therefore appropriate to define the concept of biological control as a basis for Member States to set indicative targets to increase the percentage of crops on which biological control agents are used. __________________ 57 Council Decision (EU) 2021/1102 of 28 June 2021 requesting the Commission to submit a study on the Union’s situation and options regarding the introduction, evaluation, production, marketing and use of invertebrate biological control agents within the territory of the Union and a proposal, if appropriate in view of the outcomes of the study (OJ L 238, 6.7.2021, p. 81).
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 369 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) The objective of the Farm to Fork Strategy is to make substantial progress in the reduction of the use of chemical plant protection products in an economically viable way. In order to achieve that aim, it is necessary to set quantified targets at Union and Member State levels for the reduction in the use and risk of chemical plant protection products and the use of more hazardous plant protection products to monitor progress. National targets should be established by national law in order to ensure adequate progress and accountability in relation to them. These binding national targets should also be achieved by Member States by 2030. The reduction in the use of chemical plant protection products is expected to significantly reduce occupational safety and health risks for professional userslevel.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 382 #
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 407 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) Member States should draft and publish national action plans. In order for the Member State national action plans to be effective, they should contain quantitative objectives, references to binding national 2030 reduction targets as set out in national law, together with related indicative targets set out in the national action plans, measures, timetables and indicators to reduce risks and impacts of pesticide use on human health and the environment. This will allow for a structured approach to the setting of quantitative objectives and targets, with a clear link to the national 2030 reduction targets. In order to monitor compliance with the provisions of this Regulation, Member States should also be required to report annually on targets and precise quantitative data relating to compliance with provisions on use, training, application equipment and integrated pest management.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 427 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) In order to achieve the Union-wide reduction targets (‘Union 2030 reduction targets’) as well as national 2030 reduction targets, it is necessary to increase the availability and use of biological control and other non-chemical alternatives. Availability of these alternatives will incentivise the adoption of low pesticide- input pest management practices such as organic farming.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 446 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) In order to ensure consistency and complementarity with related legislation, Member State national action plans should take into account Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council59 , Council Directive 92/43/EEC60 , Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council61 , Council Directive 91/676/EEC62 , Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council63 , Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council64 and Regulation xxx/xxx on nature restoration [reference to adopted act to be inserted] and should be consistent with the Common Agricultural Policy (“CAP”) Strategic Plans drawn-up in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council65 . __________________ 59 Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7). 60 Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7). 61 Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1). 62 Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (OJ L 375, 31.12.1991, p. 1). 63 Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (OJ L 152, 11.6.2008, p. 1). 64 Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants, amending Directive 2003/35/EC and repealing Directive 2001/81/EC (OJ L 344, 17.12.2016, p. 1). 65 Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1305/2013 and (EU) No 1307/2013 (OJ L 435, 6.12.2021, p. 1).
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 451 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Economic instruments, including those under the CAP that provide support to farmers, can play a crucialsignificant role in the achievement of objectives relating to the sustainable use of plant protection products and, in particular, reducing the use of chemical plant protection products. Member States have to show in their national CAP Strategic Plans that their implementation of the CAP contributes to and supports other relevant Union legislation and their objectives, including objectives under this Regulation.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 456 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) For the sake of transparency and in order to encourage greater progress, it is necessary to measure the progress made by Member States in relation to the achievement of the national 2030 reduction targets and other national indicative reduction targets. This should be done on an annual basis by means of annual progress and implementation reports. In order to monitor the level of compliance with this Regulation in a streamlined, easily comparable manner, Member States should also include quantitative data in relation to the implementation of this Regulation as regards use, training, application equipment and integrated pest management. In order for the Commission to encourage progress towards achieving national 2030 reduction targets and other national indicative reduction targets, including any measures in support of such achievement, the Commission should analyse such progress and measures every 2 years.deleted
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 464 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) An approach to pest control that follows integrated pest management in ensuring careful consideration of all available means that discourage the development of populations of harmful organisms, while keeping the use of chemical plant protection products to levels that are economically and ecologically justified and minimising risks to human health and the environment is necessary for the protection of human health and the environment. ‘Integrated pest management’ emphasises the growth of a healthy crop with the least possible disruption to agro-ecosystems, encourages natural pest control mechanisms and uses chemical control only when all other control means are exhausthad been considered. To ensure that integrated pest management is implemented consistently on the ground, it is necessary to lay down clear rules in this Regulation. In order to comply with the obligation to follow integrated pest management, a professional user should consider and implement all methods and practices that avoid the use of plant protection products. Chemical plant protection products should only be used when all other control means have been exhausted. In order to ensure and monitor compliance with this requirement, it is important that professional users keep a record of the reasons why they apply plant protection products or the reasons for any other action taken in line with integrated pest management and of advice received in support of their implementation of integrated pest management from independent advisors. These records are also required for aerial applications.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 485 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) In order to facilitate compliance with integrated pest management, it is necessary to lay down crop-specific rulguidelines that a professional user must followtake into consideration in relation to the specific crop and region in which the professional user operates. Such rulguidelines should convert the requirements of integrated pest management into verifiable criteria that apply to the specific crop. To ensure that the crop-specific rules are in accordance with the requirements of integrated pest management, detailed rules should be laid down as to what they should contain and the Commission should verify their development, implementation and enforcement on the groundindicate the principles of integrated pest management that apply to the specific crop.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 493 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) In order to verify compliance by professional users with integrated pest management, an electronic integrated pest management and plant protection product use register should be maintained with the aim of verifying compliance with the ruprinciples on integrated pest management set out in this Regulation and supporting the development of Union policy. Access to the register should also be granted to national statistical authorities for the development, production and dissemination of official statistics in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council66 . This register should record any preventative measure or interventionuse of plant protection product and the reasons for that preventative measure or intervention. This will provide the competent authorities with the information necessary to verify whether a professional user has carried out a decision-making process, in accordance with integrated pest management, before determining the specific preventative measure or intervention. The register should also contain details in relation to advice required annually in support of integrated pest management in order to verify that such strategic longer term planning in relation to integrated pest management is taking place. __________________ 66 Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on European statistics and repealing Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1101/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transmission of data subject to statistical confidentiality to the Statistical Office of the European Communities, Council Regulation (EC) No 322/97 on Community Statistics, and Council Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom establishing a Committee on the Statistical Programmes of the European Communities (OJ L 87, 31.3.2009, p. 164).
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 502 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Use of plant protection products may have particularly negative impacts in certain areas that are frequently used by the general public or by vulnerable groups, communities in which people live and work and ecologically sensitive areas, such as Natura 2000 sites protected in accordance with Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council67 and Council Directive 92/43/EEC68 . If plant protection products are used in areas used by the general public, the possibility of exposure of humans to such plant protection products is high. In order to protect human health and the environment, the use of plant protection products in sensitive areas and within 3 metres of such areas, should therefore be prohibited. Derogations from the prohibition should only be allowed under certain conditions and on a case- by-case basis. __________________ 67 Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7). 68 Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7).deleted
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 531 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Precision farming refers to agricultural management systems carefully tailoring crop management to fit localised conditions such as those found within land parcels. The application of existing technology, including the use of Union space data and services (Galileo and Copernicus), has the potential to significantly reduce pesticide usage. It is therefore necessary to provide for a legislative framework that incentivises the development of precision farming. Application of plant protection products from an aircraft, including application by planes, helicopters and drones, is usually less precise than other means of application and may therefore potentially cause adverse impacts on human health and the environment. Aerial application should therefore be prohibited, with limited derogations on a case-by-case basis where it has a less negative impact on human health and the environment than any alternative application method or there is no viable alternative application method. However, the possibility of protecting forest stands with the use of aerial treatments should be ensured. It is also necessary to record the numbers of aerial applications carried out on the basis of permits granted for aerial application in order to have clear data on how many aerial applications for which permits were granted actually took place.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 534 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) It is however likely that certain unmanned aircraft (including drones) will allow for the targeted aerial application of plant protection products. Such unmanned aircraft are likely to help reduce the use of plant protection products due to targeted application and consequently help reduce the risks to human health and the environment compared to use of land-based application equipment. It is therefore appropriate to set criteria in this Regulation for an exemption of certain unmanned aircraft from the prohibition of aerial application. It is also appropriate to defer the application of this exemption for 3 years given the current state of scientific uncertainty.deleted
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 558 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) In order to ensure a planned approach to harmful organism control techniques across a number of growing seasons with a view to minimising the use of chemical plant protection products as much as possible and to ensure a proper implementation of integrated pest management, professional users should be required to regularly consulthave possibility to consult, if needed, trained, independent advisors on pest management, so that plant protection products are only used as a last resort.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 561 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) Considering the possible risks to human health and the environment from the use of plant protection products, the public should have access to better information on the overall impacts of the use of such products through awareness- raising programmes, information passed on through distributors and other appropriate measureThe public should have access to full, balanced, objective and scientific- based information on plant protection products.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 568 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) In order to better understand the trends regarding acute poisoning incidents and chronic poisoning arising from exposure of persons to plant protection products, information on such trends should be compiled by each Member State. The Commission should also monitor the overall trends at Union level.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 603 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
(39) For the moment, the only robust statistical data available at Union level relating to the marketing and use of plant protection products are the statistics on the quantities of active substances in plant protection products placed on the market, and the data on the number of authorisations for emergency situations in plant protection granted under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009. Those statistics are used in the calculation of harmonised risk indicators 1 and 2 under Directive 2009/128/EC and in calculating progress towards the binding Union 2030 reduction targets and national 2030 reduction targets based on the Farm to Fork Strategy. The new harmonised risk indicator 2a will be calculated using statistics on the number of authorisations for emergency situations in plant protection, the properties of the active substances in plant protection products subject to these authorisations, and the areas treated under these authorisations to better quantify the risks arising from authorisations for emergency situations in plant protection.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 610 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
(40) For reasons of transparency, and to ensure uniform implementation by all Member States, the methodology for calculating progress towards achieving the two Union and two national 2030 reduction targets and the methodology for the calculation of harmonised risk indicators at Union and national level should be set out in an Annex to this Regulation.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 616 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
(41) The EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 recognises the need for urgent action to protect biodiversity. There is evidence of a widespread reduction of species, in particular insects and pollinators, in the Union. Biodiversity loss is, amongst other factors, driven by the use of plant protection products, while Member States actions under current Union policy instruments have not yet been able to stop this trend of biodiversity loss. It is therefore essential to ensure that plant protection products are used in such a way as to mitigate the risk of harmful effects of such products on wildlife, through a number of measures including training, inspection of application equipment in professional use and protection of the aquatic environment and sensitive areas.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 634 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
(44) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to protect human health and the environment from risks and impacts associated with the use of plant protection products and to achieve the targets set out in the Farm to Fork Strategy and the EU Biodiversity Strategy, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can rather, by reason of the scale of their use and the complexity and effects of the risk profiles associated with them, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.deleted
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 640 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
(46) In order to take into account technical progress and scientific developments, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission to amend technical aspects of the provisions on obligations of professional users and advisors related to integrated pest management, inspection of application equipment in professional use, calculation of harmonised risk indicators, the data to be provided in annual progress and implementation reports and the notification form in relation to application equipment as well as Annexes II III, IV, V and VI. Likewise, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by specifying precise criteria in relation to certain factors regarding unmanned aircraft, once technical progress and scientific developments allow for the development of such precise criteria. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Inter- institutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making76 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. __________________ 76 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
2023/04/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2200 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 a (new)
Article 18a Use of plant protection products in sensitive areas 1. Where Member State concludes, based on sound scientific risk analysis, that safety precautions adopted based on the Regulation 1107/2009 and included in labels of plant protection products do not eliminate the risk posed by the use of plant protection products in specific areas or objects, it shall define such areas or objects in national legislation and shall lay down: (a) appropriate measures to eliminate identified risk, (b) the rules of implementation of measures referred to in letter (a), (c) users of plant protection products obliged to implement measures referred to in letter (a), if applicable, (d) derogations from measures referred to in letter (a) and procedures of granting such derogations, if applicable. 2. Measures referred to in paragraph 1 letter (a) may include one or more of the following elements: (a) the ban of the use of all of plant protection products or specified groups of plant protection products in defined areas or objects, (b) restriction concerning the use of plant protection products in defined areas or objects, (c) obligation for professional users to apply appropriate buffer zone when using plant protection products in proximity of defined areas or objects, (d) obligation for professional users to apply anti-drift techniques, when using plant protection products in the close vicinity of defined areas or objects, (e) obligations for professional users to apply appropriate warning measures, (f) closing of defined areas or objects for the period of application of plant protection products, (g) other measures necessary to eliminate identified risk. 3. The measures referred to in paragraph 1 letter (a) are without prejudice to the Union and national law and powers of the competent authorities in scope of eradication and containment of quarantine pests, pests referred to in art 29 and 30 of the Regulation 2016/2031, vectors of above mentioned pests and Invasive Alien Species.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2237 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b – introductory part
(b) the aerial application has a less negative impact on human health and the environment than any alternative application method either because the aerial application equipment can be deployed on the relevant terrain in a faster timescale than land-based equipment and avoids a situation where the number of plant pests increases due to the longer time period required for land-based deployment or because it minimizes soil erosion when adverse weather conditions make the land unsuitable for land vehicles, and all of the following conditions are met: or
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2238 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i
(i) the application equipment installed on the aircraft is registered in the electronic register of application equipment in professional use referred to in Article 33(1);deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2239 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii
(ii) the aircraft is equipped with accessories that constitute the best availabdele technology to accurately apply the plant protection products and to reduce spray drift;d
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2241 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii
(iii) the plant protection product is authorised for use via aerial application under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2243 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) the aerial application is to be carried out for the purpose of forest stands protection.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2244 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new)
(bb) The competent authority may grant above mentioned permit if the following conditions are met: (i) the application equipment installed on the aircraft is registered in the electronic register of application equipment in professional use referred to in Article 33(1); (ii) the aircraft is equipped with accessories that constitute the best available technology to accurately apply the plant protection products and to reduce spray drift; (iii) the plant protection product is authorised for use via aerial application under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009. Member States may adopt national law specifying the best available technology referred to in second sentence point (ii). Member States may adopt national law specifying additional specific conditions under which aerial spraying may be carried out.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2252 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) the relevant weather conditions allowing a safe application;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2254 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) the application equipment to be used and the risk mitigation measures to be taken.deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2267 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. WBy way of derogation from Article 20(1) where certain categories of unmanned aircraft fulfil the criteria set out in paragraph 2, a Member Statethe Commission may exempt aerial application by such unmanned aircraft from the prohibition laid down in Article 20(1) prior to any aerial application of plant protection products. Provisions of Article 20 paragraph 2 to 5 do not apply to such unmanned aircraft.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2275 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. An aerial application by an unmanned aircraft may be exempted by the Member State from the prohibition laid down in Article 20(1) where factors related to the use of the unmanned aircraft demonstrate that the risks from its use are lower than the risks arising from other aerial equipment andare sufficient to keep risks from its use at the level equal or lower than posed by land- based application equipment. These factors shall include criteria relating to:
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2280 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the availability of plant protection products authorized for use as ultra-low volume formulations in the relevant Member State;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2284 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) the level of training required for pilots operating an unmanned aircraft;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2285 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) potential concurrent use of multiple unmanned aircraft in the same area.deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2294 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. By … [OP: please insert the date of application of this Regulation], Member States shall have in place effective measures and establish the necessary structure= the first day of the month following 2 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], Member States shall have in place national law-regulations to facilitate in a manner that does not endanger human health or the environment, the safe disposal of any unused plant protection products, any dilute solutions containing plant protection products and any packaging.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2314 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Representatives of the plant protection products producers or distributors, providing information for professional users on the use of plant protection products shall poses valid certificate or a proof of entry in a central electronic register confirming accomplishment of the training course for advisors.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2323 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. A distributor shall only sell a plant protection product authorised for professional use to a purchaser or his or her representative when that distributor has checked, at the time of purchase, that the purchaser or representative is a professional user and holds a training certificate for following courses for professional users issued in accordance with Article 25 or has a proof of entry in a central electronic register for following such courses in accordance with Article 25(5). In case when purchaser does not meet requirements referred to in first sentence, a distributor shall refuse to sell plant protection product. The distributor has the right to check the purchaser's identity document.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2337 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3
3. A distributor shall directinform a purchaser of a plant protection product tobeing a non-professional user that he or she should read its label prior to use and to use the product in accordance with the instructions on the label and shall inform the purchaser of the website referred to in Article 27.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2341 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
4. A distributor shall provide general information to non-professional users on the risks to human health and the environment of the use of plant protection products, including the information on hazards, exposure, proper storage, handling, application and safe disposal in accordance with Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council86 , and shall recommend alternative low-risk plant protection products and ways in which risks can be mitigated when using plant protection products. __________________ 86 Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312 22.11.2008, p. 3).
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2345 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 5
5. Each distributor shall ensure that it has sufficient staff that hold a training certificate for following courses for distributors issued in accordance with Article 25 or has a proof of entry in a central electronic register for following such courses in accordance with Article 25(5) available at the time of sale to provide adequate responses to requests of purchasers of plant protection products at the moment of sale on their use, related health and environmental risks and the appropriate safety instructions to manage those risks.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2350 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 6
6. The distributor referred to in paragraph 5 shall inform the purchaser of a plant protection product about less hazardous control techniques before the purchaser buys a plant protection product with a higher risk for human health and the environment.deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2357 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. A competent authority designated in accordance with paragraph 2 shall appoint one or more bodies to provide the following training: initial and follow up training to professional users, distributors and advisors, taking into account the subjects listed in Annex III and relevance of this subjects for particular groups of participants. Certificates issued before the entry into force of this Regulation shall remain valid for the time they have been issued. Member states may adopt national regulations concerning: (a) requirements for bodies conducting trainings, concerning qualifications of lecturers and necessary equipment that should be used during trainings, (b) detailed programs of particular types of training, including different programs for different types of users of plant protection products (c) examination procedure for training participants.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2359 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) initial and follow up training to professional users and distributors on the subjects listed in Annex III;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2364 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) practical training for professional users on the use of application equipment in professional use;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2368 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) extensive training for advisors on the subjects listed in Annex III with particular emphasis on the application of integrated pest management.deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2387 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) the employer of the professional user, distributor or advisor to whom the training was provided, where that employer is a legal person or a natural person in its professional capacity;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2390 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) the date on which sufficient knowledge of the relevant subjects listed in Annex III was demonstraf issuance of the training certificate or entry in the central electronic registedr;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2392 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 4 – point f
(f) the number of hours of training;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2399 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 5
5. 5. A competent authority designated in accordance with paragraph 2 or body referred to in paragraph 1 shall provide electronic proof of entry in a central electronic register to a professional user, distributor or advisor at the time the entry is made. Such electronic proof shall include a record of the period of validity of the entry in the central electronic register.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2407 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 6
6. A training certificate or an entry in a central electronic register shall be valid for 105 years in the case of a distributor or, professional user and for 5 years in the case of an advisor.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2409 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 7
7. Subject to paragraph 6, a training certificate or an entry in a central electronic register shall only be made or renewed if the holder of the certificate or the person whose name has been entered in the central electronic registeprofessional user, distributor or advisor demonstrates satisfactory completion of an initial andor follow up training or extensive training referred to in paragraph 1, point (a) or (c)and passes an exam on the knowledge covered by the training.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2413 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 8
8. Notwithstanding paragraph 6, a training certificate may be issued to a person who can demonstrate prior training through formal qualifications that demonstrate a more extensive knowledge of the subjects listed in Annex III than would be received in the training referred to in paragraph 1knowledge equal to knowledge covered by the training. If such knowledge has been obtain during education process, it should be proved by a secondary school or a university.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2416 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1a (new)
A competent authority designated in accordance with paragraph 2 shall withdraw a training certificate in case of serious violation of the law concerning providing an advice, sales, storage or use of plant protection product by a certificate holder. .
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2431 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3
3. Each professional user shall consult an independent advisor at least once a year for the purposes of receiving the strategic advice referred to in paragraph 4.deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2439 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4
4. An advisor referred to in paragraph 3 shall provide strategic advice on the following subjects: (a) techniques to prevent harmful organisms; (b) management; (c) including use of space data and services; (d) (e) products are necessary, measures to effectively minimise risks to human health and the environment, in particular to biodiversity, including pollinators, from such use, including risk mitigation measures and techniques.deleted application of relevant control implementation of integrated pest precision farming techniques, use of non-chemical methods; where chemical plant protection
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2460 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall designate a competent authority to provide information to the public, in particular through awareness-raising programmes, in relation to the risks associated withrelation to the use of plant protection products.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2466 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. The competent authority referred to in paragraph 1 shall establish a website or websites dedicated to providing information on risks associated with the use of plant protection products. That information may be provided directly or by providing links to relevant websites of other national or international bodies.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2476 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
(aa) the reason why plant protection products are used and their role in agriculture;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2478 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – point a b (new)
(ab) risk posed by pests, in particular quarantine pests and invasive alien species;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2499 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – title
Information on acute and chronic poisoning
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2504 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Each Member State shall designate a competent authority to maintain or put in place systems for gathering and keeping the following information on acute and chronic poisoning incidents arising from exposure of persons to plant protection products:
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2506 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the name and authorisation number of the plant protection product and the active substances involved in the acute or chronic poisoning incident;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2529 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1
1. By … [OP please insert the date = first day of the month following 9 month5 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], an owner of application equipment in professional use shall enter the fact that he or she is the owner of the application equipment in the electronic register of application equipment in professional use referred to in Article 33, using the form set out in Annex V, unless the Member State in which the owner uses the equipment has exempted that equipment from inspection in accordance with Article 32(3).
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2535 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2
2. If application equipment in professional use is sold, the seller and the buyer shall enter the fact of the sale, within 30 days after the sale, in the electronic register of application equipment in professional use referred to in Article 33, using the form set out in Annex V, unless the application equipment in professional use has been exempted from inspection in the relevant Member State(s) in accordance with Article 32(3). A similar obligation to enter a transfer of ownership in the electronic register applies in the case of any other changes of ownership of application equipment in professional use that has not been exempted from inspection in the relevant Member State(s) in accordance with Article 32(3).
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2576 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1
1. The competent authority referred to in Article 30 or a body designated by it shall inspect application equipment in professional use every three years, starting from the date of first purchase. The competent authority shall ensure that there is sufficient staff, equipment and other resources necessary for the inspection of all application equipment due for inspection, within the three year cycleInspections of application equipment in professional use carried out prior to the entry into force of this regulation remain valid.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2579 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 3
3. The inspection shall be carried out at a location where the risk of pollution and water contamination can be avoided or with the use of efficient measures eliminating risk of such pollution or contamination. The influence of external conditions on the reproducibility of the results of the inspection, such as effects of wind and rain, shall be minimised by the authority or body carrying out the inspection.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2580 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 4
4. All equipment necessary for an inspection and used by the inspector for testing the application equipment shall be accurate, in good condition and checked and, where necessary, calibrated at regular intervals. The person carrying out the inspection should be properly trained. Member States may adopt national law specifying the more detailed requirements for equipment to be used during inspections of the application equipment in professional use. Member States may adopt national law specifying detailed requirements for the training of persons conducting inspections of the application equipment in professional use.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2581 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 5
5. The owner of the application equipment in professional use shall ensure that the application equipment is clean and safe before the inspection starts. In case the application equipment in professional use is not clean or safe the competent authority or body delegated by it refuse to conduct the inspection.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2584 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 6
6. The results of each inspection for which application equipment in professional use passes the test shall be recorded by the competent authority referred to in Article 30 in the central electronic register of application equipment in professional use referred to in Article 33.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2586 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 7 – point a
(a) issued by the competent authority referred to in Article 30 or body delegated by it to the owner of application equipment in professional use where that equipment complies with the requirements listed in Annex IV; and
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2588 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 7 – point b
(b) recorded by that competent authority or body delegated by it in the central electronic register of application equipment in professional use referred to in Article 33.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2596 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 10
10. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 40 amending this Article and Annex IV in order to take into account technical progress and scientific developments.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2600 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
A Member State may, after carrying out the risk assessment referred to in paragraph 2, lay down less stringent inspection requirements and provide for different inspection intervals than those set out in Article 31 to application equipment in professional use which represents a very low scale of use estimated by way of the risk assessment referred to in paragraph 2 and which is listed in the national action plan referred to in Article 8.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2602 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c – point i (new)
(i) the risk assessment conducted before entry into force of this regulation can be used for the purpose of this paragraph.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2607 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3
3. A Member State may exempt from inspection referred to in Article 31 handheld application equipment or knapsack sprayers, in professional use, based on a risk assessment on their potential impact on human health and the environment, which shall include an estimation of the scale of use. The competent authority referred to in Article 30 shall maintain a copy of the risk assessment for control by the Commission. The risk assessment conducted before entry into force of this regulation can be used for the purpose of this paragraph.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2623 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) where there has been a transfer of ownership, the date of each transfer and the name and address of previous owners within the last five years;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2627 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) the nozzle type(s) present on the application equipment at the time of inspection;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2630 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) for equipment older than three years, the date of each inspection carried out in accordance with Article 31;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2645 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1
1. The methodology for calculating progress towards achieving the two Union 2030 reduction targets and the two national 2030 reduction targets until and including 2030 is laid down in Annex I. This methodology shall be based on statistical data collected in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2654 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2
2. Using the methodology set out in Annex I, the Commission shall calculate the results of progress towards achieving the two Union and two national 2030 reduction targets annually until and including 2030 and publish those results on the website referred to in Article 7.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2663 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 40 amending this Article and Annex VI in order to take into account technical progress, including progress in the availability of statistical data, and scientific and agronomic developments. Such delegated acts may modify the existing harmonised risk indicators or provide for new harmonised risk indicators, which may take into account Member States’ progress towards achieving the target of having 25% of their utilised agricultural area devoted to organic farming by 2030 as referred to in Article 8(1), point (d).
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2674 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36
Member State evaluation of progress calculations and harmonised risk 1. the results of each calculation of (a) progress towards achieving each of the two national 2030 reduction targets as referred to in Article 34 and (b) harmonised risk indicators at Member State level, as referred to in Article 35, each time the calculations are performed. 2. riskArticle 36 deleted indicators atEach Member State level referred to in Article 35 shall: (a) identify five active substances influencing the result most significantly; (b) the target pests on which the active substances referred to in point (a) are used; (c) specify available non-chemical methods to combat those pests; (d) summarise the actions taken to reduce the use and risk of the active substances referred to in point (a) and any barriers to the adoption of alternative pest controls. 3. the results of the calculations of harmonised risk indicators at Member State level, as specified in Annex VI, and the associated evaluations carried out pursuant to this Article to the Commission and to the other Member States and shall publish this information and other national indicators or quantifiable objectives referred to in paragraph 4 on the websites referred to in Article 27(2). 4. indicators specified in Annex VI and the data specified in Annex II, Member States may additionally continue to use existing, or to develop additional, national indicators or quantifiable objectives, and other data collected at a national or regional level, including future data on the use of plant protection products, that relates to the indicators and targets referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.shall evaluate Evaluations of the harmonised specify the crops or situations and Member States shall communicate Further to harmonised risk
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2692 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
By … [OP: please insert the date = the first day of the month following six monthtwo years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], each Member State shall inform the Commission of the competent authorities designated in accordance with this Regulation.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2737 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from … [OP: please insert the date = the first day of the month following 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation].
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2745 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – subheading 1
METHODOLOGY FOR CALCULATING PROGRESS TOWARDS ACHIEVING THE TWO UNION AND TWO NATIONAL 2030 REDUCTION TARGETS
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2748 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – introductory part
This Regulation is the instrument used to achieve the pesticide reduction targets contained in the Farm to Fork Strategy by requiring each Member State to contribute to achieving by 2030 a 50 % Union-wide reduction of both the use and risk of chemical plant protection products (‘Union 2030 reduction target 1’) and the use of more hazardous plant protection products (‘Union 2030 reduction target 2’). This Regulation also regulates the contribution of each Member State to these Union targets. Each Member State contribution, set in the form of a national target, to Union 2030 reduction target 1 is referred to as a ‘national 2030 reduction target 1’, while a Member State contribution to Union 2030 reduction target 2 is referred to as a ‘national 2030 reduction target 2’. The methodology for calculating progress towards achieving these targets is set out below:
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2760 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – subheading 1
National 2030 reduction target 1: mMethodology for estimating progress towards the reduction in use and risk of chemical plant protection products
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2762 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 1
1. The methodology shall be based on statistics on the quantities of chemical active substances placed on the market in plant protection products under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, provided to the Commission (Eurostat) under Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council91 and the Utilized Agricultural Area (UAA) under Regulation (EC) 2018/1091 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on integrated farm statistics and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1166/2008 and (EU) No 1337/2011, Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 concerning statistics on pesticides (OJ L 324, 10.12.2009, p. 1). __________________ 91 Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 concerning statistics on pesticides (OJ L 324, 10.12.2009, p. 1).
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2778 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 3 – paragraph 1
Progress towards achieving reduction target 1 shall be calculated by multiplying the annual quantities of active substances in plant protection products placed on the market for each group in the Table in this Annex by the relevant hazard weighting set out in row (iii), followed by the aggregation of the results of these calculations and divided by the utilized agricultural area (UAA) (iv.).
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2803 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
SECTION 2 National reduction reduction target 2: methodology for estimating progress towards reduction in the use the more hazardous plant protection products 1. statistics on the quantities of active substances placed on the market in plant protection products under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, provided to the Commission under Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009. 2. 2 shall be calculated by adding together the annual quantities of chemical active substances contained in more hazardous plant protection products placed on the mdeleted The methodology shall be based on Progress towards achieving tarkget each year. 3. shall be set at 100, and is equal to the average result of the above calculation for the period 2015-2017. 4. reduction target 2 shall be expressed by reference to the baseline. 5. progress towards achieving reduction target 2 in accordance with Article 34(2) of this Regulation for each calendar year and at the latest 20 months after the end of the year for which progress towards reduction target 2 is beingThe baseline for reduction target 2 Progress towards achieving The Commission shall calculated.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2818 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1
1 1. the trends in a Member State’s progress towards achieving the two national 2030 reduction targets referred to in Article 10(2), point (a); 2. indicated in Article 9(2), point (a), Article 9(3), point (a) and Article 9(4).deleted all other national indicative targets
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2825 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
1. the percentagenumber of professional users controlled for integrated pest management implementation;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2826 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
2. the percentagenumber of professional users failing to comply with the obligation to keep electronic records on integrated pest management implementation;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2829 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
3. the percentagenumber of professional users that failed to comply with the obligation to keep pesticide use data electronically;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2834 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
8. the estimated quantities of illegal plant protection products used and the quantities of illegal plant protection products detected;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2837 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 2 – point 10
10. the percentagenumber of professional users, advisors and distributors trained in the subjects listed in Annex III and holding a training certificate in accordance with Article 25 or who has a proof of entry in a central electronic register in accordance with Article 25(5), broken down by professional users, advisors and distributors;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2840 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – paragraph 2 – point 11
11. the percentage of professional users that failed to comply with the obligation to use independent advisory services at least once a year.deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2854 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 3
Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council95 __________________ 95 Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (OJ L 167, 27.6.2012, p. 1).deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2855 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 4
Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council96 __________________ 96 Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 concerning statistics on pesticides (OJ L 324, 10.12.2009, p. 1).deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2856 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 5
Regulation EC No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council97 __________________ 97 Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 353, 31.12.2008, p. 1).deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2857 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 7
Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council99 __________________ 99 Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021 establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1305/2013 and (EU) No 1307/2013 OJ L 435, 6.12.2021, p. 1).deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2858 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 8
Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council100 __________________ 100 Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC (OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 24).deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2859 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 9
Directive 2009/127/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council101 __________________ 101 Directive 2009/127/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 amending Directive 2006/42/EC with regard to machinery for pesticide application (OJ L 310, 25.11.2009, p. 29).deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2860 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 10
Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council102 __________________ 102 Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1).deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2861 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 11
Council Directive 89/391/EEC103 __________________ 103 Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (OJ L 183, 29.6.1989, p. 1).deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2862 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 12
Council Directive 89/656/EEC104 __________________ 104 Council Directive 89/656/EEC of 30 November 1989 on the minimum health and safety requirements for the use by workers of personal protective equipment at the workplace (third individual directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (OJ L 393, 30.12.1989, p. 18).deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2863 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 14
Directive 2004/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council106 __________________ 106 Directive 2004/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the protection of workers from the risks related to their exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work (OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 50).deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2864 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 15
Directive 2009/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council107 __________________ 107 Directive 2009/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for the use of work equipment by workers at work (second individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (OJ L 260, 3.10.2009, p. 5).deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2865 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 16
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council108 __________________ 108 Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1).deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2866 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – paragraph 17
Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council109 __________________ 109 Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on the inland transport of dangerous goods (OJ L 260, 30.9.2008, p. 13).deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2867 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 3 – introductory part
3. The hazards of and risks associated with improper use of plant protection products, and how to identify and control them, including the following subjects:
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2869 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 3 – point a
(a) potential risks to human health;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2870 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 3 – point b
(b) symptoms of plant protection product poisoning and appropriate first aid measures in case of such poisoning;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2871 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 3 – point c
(c) potential risks to non-target plants and insects, wildlife, biodiversity and the environment in general.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2872 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 4
4. IWhen relevant: integrated pest management strategies and techniques, integrated crop management strategies and techniques, organic farming principles, biological pest control methods, harmful organism control methods, the obligation to apply integrated pest management as set out in Articles 12 and 13 of this Regulation, and the obligation to enter records in the electronic integrated pest management and plant protection product use register, as set out in Article 14 of this Regulation.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2875 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 5
5. When plant protection products are needed, how to choose the plant protection products with the least sidtaking into consideration possible effects on human health, non- target organisms and the environment among all authorised products for a given pest problem, in a given situation.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2877 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 6 – introductory part
6. Measures to minimise potential risks to humans, non-target organisms and the environment, including:
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2879 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 7
7. Procedures for preparing application equipment for operation, including its calibration, with minimum potential risks to the user, other persons, non-target animal and plant species, biodiversity and the environment, including water resources.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2880 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 8
8. Practical training on the use of application equipment and its maintenance, and on risk mitigation measures including specific spraying techniques, use of new technology including precision farming techniques, as well as the technical check of sprayers in use and ways to improve spray quality. In this subject special attention shall be paid to the drift-reduction nozzles and the recommendations made by the manufacturers concerning optimal conditions of their use. Specific potential risks linked to use of handheld application equipment or knapsack sprayers and the relevant risk management measures. Practical training shall also cover the specific risks linked to the sowing of seeds treated with plant protection products.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2881 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 11
11. Facilities providing health monitoring and access to health care to which information on acute and chronic poisoning incidents can be reported..deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2882 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 13
13. How to minimise or eliminate applications of certain plant protection products classified as “harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects”, “very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects” or “toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects” pursuant to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 on or along roads, railway lines, very permeable surfaces or other infrastructure close to surface water or groundwater or on sealed surfaces with a high risk of run-off into surface water or sewage systems.deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2883 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 14 – point a – paragraph 1
the use of plant protection products in accordance with the restrictions indicated on the label in accordance with Article 31, point (4)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, while giving preference to plant protection products that are not classified as “(very) persistent”, “(very) bioaccumulative”,deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2884 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 14 – point a – paragraph 2
“very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects”, “toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects” or “harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects” pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008110 or containing priority substances included in the list adopted by the Commission in accordance with Article 16 of Directive 2000/60/EC implemented via Directives 2008/105/EC and 2013/39/EU, or pesticides having been identified as river basin specific pollutants under Annex V, point 1.2.6 of Directive 2000/60/EC, in particular those affecting water used for the abstraction of drinking water in accordance with Article 7 of Directive 2000/60/EC and Directive (EU) 2020/2184; __________________ 110 Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 353, 31.12.2008, p. 1).deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2885 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 14 – point d
(d) use of other mitigation measures which minimise the potential risk of off- site pollution caused by spray drift, drain- flow and run-off, including in particular mandatory buffer zones adjacent to surface waters courses and groundwater and aquifers;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2886 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 14 – point e
(e) how to comply with restrictions set out in Regulation (EC) 1107/2009 for minimising or substituting uses of the plant protection products classified as “harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects”, “very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects” or “toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects” pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, on or along roads, railway lines, very permeable surfaces or other infrastructure close to surface water or groundwater or on sealed surfaces with a high risk of run-off into surface water or sewage systems.deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2889 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – paragraph 2
The application equipment in professional use shall function reliably and be used only in accordance with its manual of operation for its intended purpose ensuring that plant protection products can be accurately applied in line with good agricultural practice (GAP) as defined in Article 3(2), point (a), of Regulation (EC) 396/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council111 . __________________ 111 Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC (OJ L 70, 16.3.2005, p. 1).
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2890 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – paragraph 3
The equipment shall be in such a condition to allow it to be filled and emptied safely, easily and completely and to prevent any leakage of either spray solution or concentrated product. It shall permit easy and thorough cleaning. It shall also allow for safe operation, and be capable of being immediately stopped from the position of the operator. It shall be simple to perform any necessary adjustments. Such adjustments shall be accurate and capable of being reproduced.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2891 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – paragraph 4 – Part 4 – paragraph 1
Agitation or mixing devices shall ensure a proper recirculation in order to achieve an even concentration of the whole volume of the liquid spray mixture in the tank.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2893 #

2022/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – paragraph 4 – Part 6 – paragraph 1
All devices for measuring, switching on and off and adjusting pressure or flow rate shall be properly calibrated and work correctly. The controls to be operated during the application operation shall be operable from the operator’s position, the necessary instruments to control the operation shall be present and accurate and the instrument displays shall be readable from the operator’s position. For equipment to apply liquid products, pressure adjustment devices shall maintain a constant working pressure at constant revolutions of the pump, in order to ensure that a stable volume application rate is applied. Additional equipment to dose or inject plant protection products shall function accurately and correctly.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 240 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) In order to ensure that Directive 2010/75/EU continues meeting its objectives to prevent or reduce emissions of pollutants and achieve a high level of protection of human health and the environment, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to supplement that Directive in order to establish operating rules containing requirements for activities relating to rearing of poultry, pigs and cattle, and to amend Annexes I and Ia to that Directive by adding an agro-industriicultural activity to ensure that it meets its objectives to prevent or reduce pollutants emissions and achieve a high level of protection of human health and the environment. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 201677 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. __________________ 77 Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making; OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1–14.
2022/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 412 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
‘By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, Member States mayust set a procedure for the registration of installations covered only by Chapter V or Chapter VIa., which shall consist of a notification. The registration procedure shall apply notably to installations using free-range, pasture-based or grazing techniques or in stables with natural ventilation.
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 646 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a – point i
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall ensure that the permit includes all measures necessary to comply with the requirements of Articles 11 and 18. To that effect, Member States shall ensure that permits are granted further to consultnotification tof all relevant authorities who ensure compliance with Union environmental legislation, including with environmental quality standards.;
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 766 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2010/75/EU
After article 14a – paragraph 3
3. The EMS of an installation shall be made available on the Internet, and free of charge and without restricting access tofor registered users.
2022/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 942 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Where an environmental quality standard requires stricter conditions than those achievable by the use of the best available techniques, additional and proportionate measures shall be included in the permit with a view to reducing the specific contribution of the installation to the pollution occurring in the relevant area.
2022/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1239 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 70a – paragraph 1
This Chapter shall apply to the activities set out in Annex Ia which reach the capacity thresholds set out in that Annex, paragraph 2, points 6.4 and 6.5 and to the intensive rearing of poultry and pigs: (a) with more than 40 000 places for poultry, (b) with more than 2 000 places for production pigs (over 30 kg), or (c) with more than 750 places for sows.
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1253 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 70b – title
Aggregation ruledeleted
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1258 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 70b – paragraph 1
If two or more installations are located close to each other and if their operator is the same or if the installations are under the control of operators who are engaged in an economic or legal relationship, the installations concerned shall be considered as a single unit for the purpose of calculating the capacity threshold referred to in Article 70a.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1306 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 70c – paragraph 3
3. Applications shall also include a non-technical summary of the information referred to in paragraph 2.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1311 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 70c – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall take necessary measures to ensure that the operator informs the competent authority, without delay, of any planned substantial change to the installations falling within the scope of this Chapter which may have consequences for the environment. Where appropriate, the competent authority shall reconsider and update the permit. Competent authorities shall establish a simplified procedure applicable to applications under Article 4(2) of this directive.
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1336 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 70e – paragraph 3
3. The operator shall, without delay, make available the data and information listed in paragraph 2 of this Article to the competent authority upon request. The competent authority may make such a request in order to verify compliance with the operating rules referred to in Article 70i. The competent authority shall make such a request if a member of the public requests access to the data or information listed in paragraph 2 of this Article.
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1346 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 70f – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Where non-compliance causes a significant degradation of local air, water or soil conditions, or where it poses, or risks to pose, a significant danger to human health, the operation of the installation shall be suspended by the competent authoritycompetent authority may undertake relevant measures to prompt early compliance, including, when possible, suspending the operation of the installation until compliance is restored.
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1354 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 70g – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that the public concerndirectly affected are given early and effective opportunities to participate in the following procedures:
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1358 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 70g – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) preparation of general binding rules as referred to in Article 6 on permits for installations falling within the scope of this Chapter;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1366 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 70g – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The competent authority shall make available to the public, including systematically directly affected, including via the Internet, and free of charge and without restricting access to registered users, the following documents and information:
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1373 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 70h – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Member States shall ensure that, in accordance with the relevant national legal system, members of the public concerned directly affected by the matter at stake have access to a review procedure before a court of law, or another independent and impartial body established by law to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of decisions, acts or omissions subject to this Chapter when one of the following conditions is met:
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1378 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 70h – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) they have a sufficiendirect interest;
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1417 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 70i – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2a (new)
The operating rules take into account the existence of emerging techniques in the livestock sector. They specify the conditions under which the competent authority may grant a permit to an installation using these emerging techniques.
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1463 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 74 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
2. In order to allow the provisions of this Directive to meet its objectives to prevent or reduce pollutants emissions and achieve a high level of protection of human health and the environment, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt a delegated act, in accordance with Article 76, to amend Annex I or Annex Ia by including in those Annexes an agro- industriicultural activity that meets the following criteria:
2022/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1635 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point g
Directive 2010/75/EU
Annex I – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 5 – point 5.3 – point a – indent i
(i) biological treatment (such as anaerobic digestion, except for manure);
2022/12/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1654 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II
Directive 2010/75/EU
ANNEX Ia – number
ANNEX Iadeleted
2022/12/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1655 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II
Directive 2010/75/EU
ANNEX Ia – title
Activities referred to in Article 70adeleted
2022/12/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1660 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II
Directive 2010/75/EU
Annex Ia – paragraph 1
1. Rearing of cattle, pigs or poultry in installations of 150 livestock units (LSU) or more.deleted
2022/12/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1681 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II
Directive 2010/75/EU
Annex Ia – paragraph 2
Rearing of any mix of the following animals: cattle, pigs, poultry, in installations of 150 LSU or more.deleted
2022/12/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1700 #

2022/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II
Directive 2010/75/EU
Annex Ia – paragraph 3
The approximate equivalent in LSU is based on the conversion rates established in Annex II to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2014*.deleted
2022/12/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 195 #

2022/0095(COD)

(59 a) "professional repairer" means an operator or undertaking which provides services of repair and professional maintenance
2022/12/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 201 #

2022/0095(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall not prohibit, restrict or impede the placing on the market or putting into service of products that comply with the performance requirements set out in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 4 for reasons of non- compliance with national performance requirements relating to product parameters referred to in Annex I covered by performance requirements included in such delegated acts.
2022/12/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 226 #

2022/0095(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission shall, as appropriate to the relevant product groups and with due consideration for all stages of their life cycle, establish ecodesign requirements to improve the following product aspects assessed in combination considering possible interdependencies:
2022/12/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 240 #

2022/0095(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. When preparing ecodesign requirements, the Commission shall ensure harmonisation and avoid conflicting or duplicating equirements, and shall:
2022/12/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 247 #

2022/0095(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point a a (new)
(a a) consider the interdependencies between different parameters of a product.
2022/12/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 248 #

2022/0095(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point a b (new)
(a b) run a clear lifecycle and circularity analysis to assess the appropriateness of performance requirements
2022/12/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 249 #

2022/0095(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point a c (new)
(a c) assess the different parameters based on a weighted aggregated evaluation system to set a single minimum environmental requirement.
2022/12/06
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 348 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) 3D-datasets placed on the market to permit the 3D-printing of construction products covered by this Regulation and 3D-printed construction products and moulds;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 362 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point g
(g) prefabricated one-family-houses of less than 180 m2 surface floor space with one floor or of less than 100 m2 surface floor space on two floors.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 387 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) sanitary appliances;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 894 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part C – point 1 – point 1.1 – point n
(n) risk of misunderstanding instructions for use in a field affecting health and safety;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 896 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part C – point 1 – point 1.1 – point o
(o) risk of unintended inappropriate installation or use;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 898 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part C – point 1 – point 1.1 – point p
(p) risk of intended inappropriate use.deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 928 #

2022/0094(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 4 – point h
(h) social media contact details;deleted
2022/12/20
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 184 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new)
Directive 2005/29/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c
(aa) in paragraph 2, point (c) is replaced by the following: ‘(c) any marketing of a good, in one Member State, as bewith seemingly identical to a goodpresentation to another good, which is marketed, in other Member States, while that good has significantlyunder the same brand, trademark or designation, while that good presents differentces in composition or characteristics, unless justified by legitimate and objective factors.including its sensory profile;’
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 313 #

2022/0092(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Directive 2005/29/EC
Annex I – point 13 a (new)
(3a) the following point 13a is inserted: 13a. Any marketing of a good as being identical or seemingly identical to the other good marketed in one or various Member State, while those goods have different composition or characteristics which have not been clearly marked on the packaging, so as to be visible to the consumer.
2022/11/24
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 101 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) This Regulation complements and is without prejudice to the Union and national laws providing for the access to and enabling to use data for statistical purposes, in particular regulation 223/2009 on European Statistics and its related legal acts as well as national legal acts related to official statistics.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 109 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) Physical products that obtain, generate or collect, by means of their components or embedded software, data concerning their performance, use or environment and that are able to communicate that data via a publicly available electronic communications service (often referred to as the Internet of Things) should be covered by this Regulation. Electronic communications services include land- based telephone networks, television cable networks, satellite-based networks and near-field communication networks. Such products may include vehicles, home equipment and consumer goods, medical and health devices or agricultural and industrial machinery. The data represent the digitalisation of user actions and events and should accordingly be accessible to the user, while information derived or inferred from this data, where lawfully held, should not be considered within scope of this Regulation. Such data are potentially valuable to the user and support innovation and the development of digital and other services protecting the environment, health and the circular economy, in particular though facilitating the maintenance and repair of the products in question.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 113 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Data generated by the use of a product or related service include data recorded intentionally by the user. Such data include also data generated as a by- product of the user’s action, such as diagnostics data, andsensor-generated data or data captured by embedded applications, and data recorded by a device without any action by the user, such as when the product is in ‘standby mode’, and data recorded during periods when the product is switched off. Such data should include data in the form and format in which they are generated by the product, but not pertain to data resulting from any software process that calculates derivative data from such data as such software process may be subject to intellectual property rights.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 113 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7 a) This Regulation complements and is without prejudice to the Union and national laws providing for the access to and enabling to use data for statistical purposes, in particular regulation 223/2009 on European Statistics and its related legal acts as well as national legal acts related to official statistics.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 118 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7 a) This Regulation complements and is without prejudice to the Union and national laws providing for the access to and enabling to use data for statistical purposes, in particular Regulation 223/2009 on European Statistics and its related legal acts as well as national legal acts related to official statistics.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 120 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) Virtual assistants play an increasing role in digitising consumer environments and serve as an easy-to-use interface to play content, obtain information, or activate products including physical objects connected to the Internet of Things. Virtual assistants can act as a single gateway in, for example, a smart home environment and record significant amounts of relevant data on how users interact with products connected to the Internet of Things, including those manufactured by other parties and can replace the use of manufacturer-provided interfaces such as touchscreens or smart phone apps. The user may wish to make available such data with third party manufacturers and enable novel smart home services. Such virtual assistants should be covered by the data access right provided for in this Regulation also regarding data recorded before the virtual assistant’s activation by the wake word and data generated when a user interacts with a product via a virtual assistant provided by an entity other than the manufacturer of the product if such data are collected. However, only the data stemming from the interaction between the user and product through the virtual assistant falls within the scope of this Regulation. Data produced by the virtual assistant unrelated to the use of a product is not the object of this Regulation.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 126 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) Physical products that obtain, generate or collect, by means of their components or embedded software, data concerning their performance, use or environment and that are able to communicate that data via a publicly available electronic communications service (often referred to as the Internet of Things) should be covered by this Regulation. Electronic communications services include land- based telephone networks, television cable networks, satellite-based networks and near-field communication networks. Such products may include vehicles, home equipment and consumer goods, medical and health devices or agricultural and industrial machinery. The data represent the digitalisation of user actions and events and should accordingly be accessible to the user, while information derived or inferred from this data, where lawfully held, should not be considered within scope of this Regulation. Such data are potentially valuable to the user and support innovation and the development of digital and other services protecting the environment, health and the circular economy, in particular though facilitating the maintenance and repair of the products in question.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 128 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Data generated by the use of a product or related service include data recorded intentionally by the user. Such data include also data generated as a by- product of the user’s action, such as diagnostics data, andsensor-generated data or data captured by embedded applications, and data recorded by a device without any action by the user, such as when the product is in ‘standby mode’, and data recorded during periods when the product is switched off. Such data should include data in the form and format in which they are generated by the product, but not pertain to data resulting from any software process that calculates derivative data from such data as such software process may be subject to intellectual property rights.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 132 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) Physical products that obtain, generate or collect, by means of their components or embedded software, data concerning their performance, use or environment and that are able to communicate that data via a publicly available electronic communications service (often referred to as the Internet of Things) should be covered by this Regulation. Electronic communications services include land- based telephone networks, television cable networks, satellite-based networks and near-field communication networks. Such products may include vehicles, home equipment and consumer goods, medical and health devices or agricultural and industrial machinery. The data represent the digitalisation of user actions and events and should accordingly be accessible to the user, while information derived or inferred from this data, where lawfully held, should not be considered within scope of this Regulation. Such data are potentially valuable to the user and support innovation and the development of digital and other services protecting the environment, health and the circular economy, in particular though facilitating the maintenance and repair of the products in question.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 134 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) Virtual assistants play an increasing role in digitising consumer environments and serve as an easy-to-use interface to play content, obtain information, or activate products including physical objects connected to the Internet of Things. Virtual assistants can act as a single gateway in, for example, a smart home environment and record significant amounts of relevant data on how users interact with products connected to the Internet of Things, including those manufactured by other parties and can replace the use of manufacturer-provided interfaces such as touchscreens or smart phone apps. The user may wish to make available such data with third party manufacturers and enable novel smart home services. Such virtual assistants should be covered by the data access right provided for in this Regulation also regarding data recorded before the virtual assistant’s activation by the wake word and data generated when a user interacts with a product via a virtual assistant provided by an entity other than the manufacturer of the product if such data are collected. However, only the data stemming from the interaction between the user and product through the virtual assistant falls within the scope of this Regulation. Data produced by the virtual assistant unrelated to the use of a product is not the object of this Regulation.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 151 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Data generated by the use of a product or related service include data recorded intentionally by the user. Such data include also data generated as a by- product of the user’s action, such as diagnostics data, andsensor-generated data or data captured by embedded applications, and data recorded by a device without any action by the user, such as when the product is in ‘standby mode’, and data recorded during periods when the product is switched off. Such data should include data in the form and format in which they are generated by the product, but not pertain to data resulting from any software process that calculates derivative data from such data as such software process may be subject to intellectual property rights.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 177 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) Virtual assistants play an increasing role in digitising consumer environments and serve as an easy-to-use interface to play content, obtain information, or activate products including physical objects connected to the Internet of Things. Virtual assistants can act as a single gateway in, for example, a smart home environment and record significant amounts of relevant data on how users interact with products connected to the Internet of Things, including those manufactured by other parties and can replace the use of manufacturer-provided interfaces such as touchscreens or smart phone apps. The user may wish to make available such data with third party manufacturers and enable novel smart home services. Such virtual assistants should be covered by the data access right provided for in this Regulation also regarding data recorded before the virtual assistant’s activation by the wake word and data generated when a user interacts with a product via a virtual assistant provided by an entity other than the manufacturer of the product if such data are collected. However, only the data stemming from the interaction between the user and product through the virtual assistant falls within the scope of this Regulation. Data produced by the virtual assistant unrelated to the use of a product is not the object of this Regulation.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 180 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
(71) Data processing services should cover services that allow on-demand and broad remote access to a scalable and elastic pool of shareable and distributed computing resources. Those computing resources include resources such as networks, servers or other virtual or physical infrastructure, operating systems, software, including software development tools, storage, applications and services. The capability of the customer of the data processing service to unilaterally self- provision computing capabilities, such as server time or network storage, without any human interaction by the service provider could be described as on-demand administration. The term ‘broad remote access’ is used to describe that the computing capabilities are provided over the network and accessed through mechanisms promoting the use of heterogeneous thin or thick client platforms (from web browsers to mobile devices and workstations). The term ‘scalable’ refers to computing resources that are flexibly allocated by the data processing service provider, irrespective of the geographical location of the resources, in order to handle fluctuations in demand. The term ‘elastic pool’ is used to describe those computing resources that are provisioned and released according to demand in order to rapidly increase or decrease resources available depending on workload. The term ‘shareable’ is used to describe those computing resources that are provided to multiple users who share a common access to the service, but where the processing is carried out separately for each user, although the service is provided from the same electronic equipment. The term ‘distributed’ is used to describe those computing resources that are located on different networked computers or devices and which communicate and coordinate among themselves by message passing. The term ‘highly distributed’ is used to describe data processing services that involve data processing closer to where data are being generated or collected, for instance in a connected data processing device. Edge computing, which is a form of such highly distributed data processing, is expected to generate new business models and cloud service delivery models, which should be open and interoperable from the outset. However, in order to avoid imposing overly broad obligations, a service should not be considered data processing service where enabling on- demand administration and broad remote access to a scalable and elastic pool of shareable computing resources of a centralised, distributed or highly distributed nature is merely a minor and purely ancillary feature of another service. For example, this should not apply to online platforms within the meaning of the Digital Services Act where data storing is merely a minor and purely ancillary feature of another service such as social networks or online marketplaces
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 193 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
(71) Data processing services should cover services that allow on-demand and broad remote access to a scalable and elastic pool of shareable and distributed computing resources. Those computing resources include resources such as networks, servers or other virtual or physical infrastructure, operating systems, software, including software development tools, storage, applications and services. The capability of the customer of the data processing service to unilaterally self- provision computing capabilities, such as server time or network storage, without any human interaction by the service provider could be described as on-demand administration. The term ‘broad remote access’ is used to describe that the computing capabilities are provided over the network and accessed through mechanisms promoting the use of heterogeneous thin or thick client platforms (from web browsers to mobile devices and workstations). The term ‘scalable’ refers to computing resources that are flexibly allocated by the data processing service provider, irrespective of the geographical location of the resources, in order to handle fluctuations in demand. The term ‘elastic pool’ is used to describe those computing resources that are provisioned and released according to demand in order to rapidly increase or decrease resources available depending on workload. The term ‘shareable’ is used to describe those computing resources that are provided to multiple users who share a common access to the service, but where the processing is carried out separately for each user, although the service is provided from the same electronic equipment. The term ‘distributed’ is used to describe those computing resources that are located on different networked computers or devices and which communicate and coordinate among themselves by message passing. The term ‘highly distributed’ is used to describe data processing services that involve data processing closer to where data are being generated or collected, for instance in a connected data processing device. Edge computing, which is a form of such highly distributed data processing, is expected to generate new business models and cloud service delivery models, which should be open and interoperable from the outset. However, in order to avoid imposing overly broad obligations, a service should not be considered data processing service where enabling on- demand administration and broad remote access to a scalable and elastic pool of shareable computing resources of a centralised, distributed or highly distributed nature is merely a minor and purely ancillary feature of another service. For example, this should not apply to online platforms within the meaning of the Digital Services Act where data storing is merely a minor and purely ancillary feature of another service such as social networks or online marketplaces.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 213 #

2022/0047(COD)

3. Union law on the protection of personal data, privacy and confidentiality of communications and integrity of terminal equipment shall apply to personal data processed in connection with the rights and obligations laid down in this Regulation. This Regulation shall not affect the applicability of Union law on the protection of personal data, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC, including the powers and competences of supervisory authorities. Insofar as the rights laid down in Chapter II of this Regulation are concerned, and where users are the data subjects of personal data subject to the rights and obligations under that Chapter, the provisions of this Regulation shall complement the right of data portability under Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. In the event of a conflict between this Regulation and Union law on the protection of personal data or national law adopted in accordance with such Union law, the relevant Union or national law on the protection of personal data shall prevail.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 218 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
(1a) ‘data generated by the use of a product or a related service’ means any data recorded intentionally by the user or as a by-product of the user’s action, as well as data generated or recorded without any action by the user among others in stand by mode or while the product is switched off. This includes sensor-generated data, data captured by embedded applications and diagnostics data.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 222 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
(1 a) ‘data generated by the use of a product or a related service’ means any data recorded intentionally by the user or as a by-product of the user’s action, as well as data generated or recorded without any action by the user among others in standby mode or while the product is switched off. This includes sensor-generated data, data captured by embedded applications and diagnostics data;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 223 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 b (new)
(1b) Diagnostic data is data that is the product of diagnostics functions or algorithms which provide information on the correct functioning and performance of the product and potential malfunctions
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 226 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 b (new)
(1 b) 'diagnostic data' is data that is the product of diagnostics functions or algorithms which provide information on the correct functioning and performance of the product and potential malfunctions;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 241 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘data holder’ means a legal or natural person who: i) has the right or obligation, in accordance with this Regulation, applicable Union law or national legislation implementing Union law, orto make available data generated by products or related services, or ii) in the case of non-personal data and through control of the technical design of the product and related services, has the ability, to make available certain data;
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 242 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘data holder’ means a legal or natural person who: (i) has the right or obligation, in accordance with this Regulation, applicable Union law or national legislation implementing Union law, orto make available data generated by products or related services, or (ii) in the case of non-personal data and through control of the technical design of the product and related services, has the ability, to make available certain data;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 255 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
(12) ‘data processing service’ means a digital service other than an online content service as defined in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1128, provided to a customer, which as its main feature enables on-demand administration and broad remote access to a scalable and elastic pool of shareable computing resources of a centralised, distributed or highly distributed nature;
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 255 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
(12) ‘data processing service’ means a digital service other than an online content service as defined in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1128, provided to a customer, which as its main feature enables on-demand administration and broad remote access to a scalable and elastic pool of shareable computing resources of a centralised, distributed or highly distributed nature;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 259 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20 a (new)
(20 a) 'official statistics' means European statistics according to Regulation 223/2009 and statistics considered official according to national legislation;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 264 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Products shall be designed and manufactured, and related services shall be provided, in such a manner that data generated by their use are, by default, easily, securely and, where relevant and appropriate, directly accessible to the user, including the user with special needs.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 266 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The data holder may reject the request for data if access to the data is restricted by Union law or national law.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 267 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. The user may grant or withdraw at any time consent for the data holder to the use of their data or to the third party nominated by the data holder.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 273 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20 a (new)
(20a) 'official statistics' means European statistics according to Regulation 223/2009 and statistics considered official according to national legislation.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 274 #

2022/0047(COD)

i) The data holder shall provide information on the data structures, data formats, vocabularies, classification schemes, taxonomies and code lists, where available, which shall be described in a publicly available and consistent manner.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 275 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (new)
ii) The technical means to access the data, such as Software Development Kits or application programming interfaces, and their terms of use and quality of service shall be sufficiently described to enable the development of such means of access.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 280 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Where on-device access is technically supported, the manufacturer shall make this means of access also available to third-party service providers in a non-discriminatory manner.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 281 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Where data cannot be directly accessed by the user from the product, the data holder shall make available to the user the data generated by its use of a product or related service without undue delay, free of charge and, where applicable, continuously and in real-time. This shall be done on the basis of a simple request through electronic means where technically feasible. In case when filing a request via electronic channels is not possible or limited by a disability, the data holder shall enable other forms of request that are appropriate for persons with communication problems.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 282 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Products shall be designed and manufactured, and related services shall be provided, in such a manner that data generated by their use are, by default, easily, securely and, where relevant and appropriate, directly accessible to the user, including the user with special needs.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 285 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The data holder may reject the request for data if access to the data is restricted by Union law or national law.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 286 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The data holder may reject the request for data if access to the data is restricted by Union law or national law.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 286 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Trade secrets shall only be disclosed provided that all specific necessary measures are taken to preserve the confidentiality of trade secrets in particular with respect to third parties. The data holder and the user can agree measures to preserve the confidentiality of the shared data, in particular in relation to third parties. The right to request the data referred to in paragraph 1 shall not adversely affect the rights and freedoms of others, including the rights protected under Directive (EU)2016/943.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 290 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. The user may grant or withdraw at any time consent for the data holder to the use of their data or to the third party nominated by the data holder
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 299 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The data holder may reject the request for data if access to the data is restricted by Union law or national law.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 301 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) The data holder shall provide information on the data structures, data formats, vocabularies, classification schemes, taxonomies and code lists, where available, which shall be described in a publicly available and consistent manner.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 302 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)
(cb) The technical means to access the data, such as Software Development Kits or application programming interfaces, and their terms of use and quality of service shall be sufficiently described to enable the development of such means of access.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 310 #

2022/0047(COD)

8. Trade secrets shall only be disclosed to third parties to the extent that they are strictly necessary to fulfil the purpose agreed between the user and the third party and all specific necessary measures agreed between the data holder and the third party are taken by the third party to preserve the confidentiality of the trade secret. In such a case, the nature of the data as trade secrets and the measures for preserving the confidentiality shall be specified in the agreement between the data holder and the third party. The right to request the data referred to in paragraph 1 shall not adversely affect the rights and freedoms of others, including the rights protected under Directive (EU)2016/943.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 313 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Where on-device access is technically supported, the manufacturer shall make this means of access also available to third-party service providers in a non-discriminatory manner.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 317 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Where data cannot be directly accessed by the user from the product, the data holder shall make available to the user the data generated by its use of a product or related service without undue delay, free of charge and, where applicable, continuously and in real-time. This shall be done on the basis of a simple request through electronic means where technically feasible. In case when filing a request via electronic channels is not possible or limited by a disability, the data holder shall enable other forms of request that are appropriate for persons with communication problems.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 320 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The data holder may reject the request for data if access to the data is restricted by Union law or national law.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 327 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The data holder may reject the request for data if access to the data is restricted by Union law or national law.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 331 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 71
(71) Data processing services should cover services that allow on-demand and broad remote access to a scalable and elastic pool of shareable and distributed computing resources. Those computing resources include resources such as networks, servers or other virtual or physical infrastructure, operating systems, software, including software development tools, storage, applications and services. The capability of the customer of the data processing service to unilaterally self- provision computing capabilities, such as server time or network storage, without any human interaction by the service provider could be described as on-demand administration. The term ‘broad remote access’ is used to describe that the computing capabilities are provided over the network and accessed through mechanisms promoting the use of heterogeneous thin or thick client platforms (from web browsers to mobile devices and workstations). The term ‘scalable’ refers to computing resources that are flexibly allocated by the data processing service provider, irrespective of the geographical location of the resources, in order to handle fluctuations in demand. The term ‘elastic pool’ is used to describe those computing resources that are provisioned and released according to demand in order to rapidly increase or decrease resources available depending on workload. The term ‘shareable’ is used to describe those computing resources that are provided to multiple users who share a common access to the service, but where the processing is carried out separately for each user, although the service is provided from the same electronic equipment. The term ‘distributed’ is used to describe those computing resources that are located on different networked computers or devices and which communicate and coordinate among themselves by message passing. The term ‘highly distributed’ is used to describe data processing services that involve data processing closer to where data are being generated or collected, for instance in a connected data processing device. Edge computing, which is a form of such highly distributed data processing, is expected to generate new business models and cloud service delivery models, which should be open and interoperable from the outset. However, in order to avoid imposing overly broad obligations, a service should not be considered data processing service where enabling on- demand administration and broad remote access to a scalable and elastic pool of shareable computing resources of a centralised, distributed or highly distributed nature is merely a minor and purely ancillary feature of another service. For example, this should not apply to online platforms within the meaning of the Digital Services Act where data storing is merely a minor and purely ancillary feature of another service such as social networks or online marketplaces
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 338 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 6
6. Unless otherwise provided by Union law, including Article 6 of this Regulation, or by national legislation implementing Union law, an obligation to make data available to a data recipient shall not oblige the disclosureWhile the obligation to make data available as provided by Union law, including Articles 4(3), 5(8), Article 6 and Article 19(2) of this Regulation, or by national legislation implementing Union law, shall be effective, this Regulationshall not question the protection of trade secrets as such and that the access is only granted under measures that warrant for the protection of trade secrets within the meaning of Directive (EU) 2016/943.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 343 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Where the data recipient is a micro, small or medium enterprise, as defined in Article 2 of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC, anyAny reasonable compensation agreed shall not exceed the costs directly related to making the data available to the data recipient and which are attributable to the request. These costs include the costs necessary for data reproduction, dissemination via electronic means and storage, but not of data collection or production. Article 8(3) shall apply accordingly.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 350 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The data holder may apply appropriate technical protection measures, including smart contracts, to prevent unauthorised access to the data and to ensure compliance with Articles 5, 6, 9 and 10, as well as with the agreed contractual terms for making data available. Such technical protection measures shall not be used as a means to discriminate or hinder the user’s right to effectively provide data to third parties pursuant to Article 5 or any right of a third party under Union law or national legislation implementing Union law as referred to in Article 8(1).
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 360 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. A contractual term, concerning the access to and use of data or the liability and remedies for the breach or the termination of data related obligations which has been unilaterally imposed by an enterprise on a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise as defined in Article 2 of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC or which has been unilaterally imposed by an enterprise which is the source of the data they hold shall not be binding on the latter enterprise, the data recipient or user, respectively, if it is unfair.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 372 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Where the data recipient is a micro, small or medium enterprise, as defined in Article 2 of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC, anyAny reasonable compensation agreed shall not exceed the costs directly related to making the data available to the data recipient and which are attributable to the request. These costs include the costs necessary for data reproduction, dissemination via electronic means and storage, but not of data collection or production. Article 8(3) shall apply accordingly.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 380 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. Union law on the protection of personal data, privacy and confidentiality of communications and integrity of terminal equipment shall apply to personal data processed in connection with the rights and obligations laid down in this Regulation. This Regulation shall not affect the applicability of Union law on the protection of personal data, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC, including the powers and competences of supervisory authorities. Insofar as the rights laid down in Chapter II of this Regulation are concerned, and where users are the data subjects of personal data subject to the rights and obligations under that Chapter, the provisions of this Regulation shall complement the right of data portability under Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. In the event of a conflict between this Regulation and Union law on the protection of personal data or national law adopted in accordance with such Union law, the relevant Union or national law on the protection of personal data shall prevail.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 381 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c – point 2
(2) obtaining the data in line with the procedure laid down in this Chapter would substantively reduce the administrative burden for data holders or other enterprises.; or
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 382 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c – point 2 a (new)
(2 a) obtaining data is necessary for official statistics purposes;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 386 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The data holder may apply appropriate technical protection measures, including smart contracts, to prevent unauthorised access to the data and to ensure compliance with Articles 5, 6, 9 and 10, as well as with the agreed contractual terms for making data available. Such technical protection measures shall not be used as a means to discriminate or hinder the user’s right to effectively provide data to third parties pursuant to Article 5 or any right of a third party under Union law or national legislation implementing Union law as referred to in Article 8(1).
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 386 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. This Chapter shall not affect obligations laid down in Union or national law for the purposes of reporting, complying with information requests or demonstrating or verifying compliance with legal obligations including official statistics purposes.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 393 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. A contractual term, concerning the access to and use of data or the liability and remedies for the breach or the termination of data related obligations which has been unilaterally imposed by an enterprise on a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise as defined in Article 2 of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC or which has been unilaterally imposed by an enterprise which is the source of the data they hold shall not be binding on the latter enterprise, the data recipient or user, respectively, if it is unfair.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 404 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
(1 a) ‘data generated by the use of a product or a related service’ means any data recorded intentionally by the user or as a by-product of the user’s action, as well as data generated or recorded without any action by the user among others in standby mode or while the product is switched off. This includes sensor-generated data, data captured by embedded applications and diagnostics data.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 407 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 b (new)
(1 b) ‘diagnostic data’ means data that is the product of diagnostics functions or algorithms which provide information on the correct functioning and performance of the product and potential malfunctions;
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 409 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 5
5. Where compliance with the request to make data available to a public sector body or a Union institution, agency or body requires the disclosure of personal data, the data holder shall take reasonable efforts to pseudonymise the data, insofar as the request can be fulfilled with pseudonymised data.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 419 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) destroy the data as soon as they are no longer necessary for the stated purpose and inform the data holder that the data have been destroyed. Official statistics authorities are exempted from the latter obligation.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 425 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c – point 2
(2) obtaining the data in line with the procedure laid down in this Chapter would substantively reduce the administrative burden for data holders or other enterprises.; or
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 426 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c – point 2 a (new)
(2a) obtaining data is necessary for official statistics purposes;
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 428 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. This Chapter shall not affect obligations laid down in Union or national law for the purposes of reporting, complying with information requests or demonstrating or verifying compliance with legal obligations including official statistics purposes..
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 431 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 4
4. Where a public sector body or a Union institution, agency or body transmits or makes data available under paragraph 1, it shall notify the data holder from whom the data was received. The notification should include the identity and the contact details of individuals or organisations receiving the data pursuant to paragraph 1, the purposes of data processing and the period for which the data will be stored.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 432 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. After receiving a notification based on art. 21 par. 4, the data holder has the right to object to transmitting or making available data that was received from him or her within 10 days.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 435 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Providers of a data processing service shall take the measures provided for in Articles 24, 25 and 26 to ensure, in terms of factors on their service side, that customers of their service can switch to another data processing service, covering the same service type, which is provided by a different service provider. In particular, providers of data processing service shall remove commercial, technical, contractual and organisational obstacles, which inhibit customers from:
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 436 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) terminating, after a maximum notice period of 30 calendar days, the contractual agreement of the service, without prejudice to any financial commitments made by the customer regarding the service;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 438 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The rights of the customer and the obligations of the provider of a data processing service in relation to switching between providers of such services shall be clearly set out in a written contractand made available to the customer in advance of that customer accepting terms and conditions of the service priori to signing up to the service of the provider. Without prejudice to Directive (EU) 2019/770, that contracte information to be provided to the customer and the terms and conditions of the service shall include at least the following:
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 440 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
(a) clauses allowing the customer, upon request, to switch to a data processing service offered by another provider of data processing service or to port all data, applications and digital assets generated directly or indirectly byby the customer or which is uniquely relate to theat customers own usage of the service, to an on-premise system, in particular the establishment of a mandatory maximum transition period of 360 calendar days, during which the data processing service provider shall execute and provide clear information concerning:
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 441 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘data holder’ means a legal or natural person who: (i) has the right or obligation, in accordance with this Regulation, applicable Union law or national legislation implementing Union law, orto make available data generated by products or related services, or (ii) in the case of non-personal data and through control of the technical design of the product and related services, has the ability, to make available certain data;
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 442 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a – point -1 (new)
(-1) the estimated, fastest possible in terms of factors on the side of the provider of the data processing service from which the switching is to take place, duration of the process for the customer to transition from the data processing service,including any operational, technical or organisational steps necessary for both the service provider and the customer to undertake, in order to complete the switching process;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 443 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 1
(1) assist andance with the switching process that the provider can supply including, where technically feasible, completeion of the switching process from the provider’s side;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 444 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 2
(2) any risks to continuity in the provision of the respective functions or services from the provider’s side during the switching process and commitment to make every effort on provider’s side to ensure full continuity in the provision of the respective functions or services.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 445 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) an exhaustive detailed specification of all data and application categories exportable during the switching process, including, at minimum, all data imported by the customer at the inception of the service agreement and all data and metadata created by the customer and by the use of the service during the period the service was provided, including, but not limited to, configuration parameters, security settings, access rights and access logs to the service;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 447 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. Where the mandatoryprovider of the data processing service becomes aware that the estimated transition period as defined in paragraph 1, points (a) and (c) of this Article is technically unfeasible for the provider, the provider of data processing services shall notify the customer within 714 working days after the switching request has been made, duly motivating the technical unfeasibility with a detailed report justifying and indicating an alternative shortest possible transition period, which may not exceed 6 months. In accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, full service continuity shall be ensured, where technically feasible, continue throughout the alternative transition period against reduced charges, referred to in Article 25(2) if the delay is due to factors on the side of the provider of a data processing service from which the switching is to take place.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 448 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. From [date X+3yrs] onwards, providers of data processing services shall not impose any charges on the customer for the switching process., unless the process is prolonged due to factors outside of the control of the provider of data processing service. If the switching process prolongs due to factors outside of the control of the provider of data processing service, the provider of data processing service may charge the party responsible;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 449 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. From [date X]onwards, providers of data processing services shall, before the customer signs up to the service, provide clear information in the terms and conditions of the service, about the costing parameters for mandatory operations that the provider of data processing services must perform in relation to porting and switching.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 450 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 3
3. The charges referred to in paragraph 2 shall not exceed the costs incurred by the provider of data processing services that are directly linked to the switching process concerned., unless the process is prolonged due to factors outside of the control of the provider of data processing service. If the switching process prolongs due to factors outside of the control of the provider of data processing service, the provider of data processing service may charge the party responsible;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 452 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) destroy the data as soon as they are no longer necessary for the stated purpose and inform the data holder that the data have been destroyed. Official statistics authorities are exempted from the latter obligation.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 452 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. Providers of data processing services that concern scalable and elastic computing resources limited to infrastructural elements such as servers, networks and the virtual resources necessary for operating the infrastructure, but that do not provide access to the operating services, software and applications that are stored, otherwise processed, or deployed on those infrastructural elements, shall ensure that the customer, after switching to aprovide capabilities, adequate information, documentation, technical support and, where appropriate, tools, to perform porting and switching, allowing for functional equivalence in the use of the new service coveringof the same service type offered by a different provider of data processing services, enjoys functional equivalence in the use of the new service.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 453 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4
4. Where the open interoperability specifications or European standards referred to in paragraph 3 do not exist for the service type concerned, the provider of data processing services shall, at the request of the customer, export all data generated or co-generated and where technically feasible, export all data generated directly by the customer or which is uniquely related to that customers own usage of the service, including the relevant data formats and data structures, in a structured, commonly used and machine- readable format for the relevant service type.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 459 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. All switching, porting and interoperability standards or specifications, as well as implementation of all measures of this regulation, shall ensure compliance with applicable law, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Directive 2002/58/EC,legislation on cyber security, consumer protection, product safety, trade secrets or intellectual property rights, as well as with the accessibility requirements.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 463 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
(12) ‘data processing service’ means a digital service other than an online content service as defined in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1128, provided to a customer, which as its main feature enables on-demand administration and broad remote access to a scalable and elastic pool of shareable computing resources of a centralised, distributed or highly distributed nature;
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 464 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 4
4. Where a public sector body or a Union institution, agency or body transmits or makes data available under paragraph 1, it shall notify the data holder from whom the data was received. The notification should include the identity and the contact details of individuals or organisations receiving the data pursuant to paragraph 1, the purposes of data processing and the period for which the data will be stored.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 466 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. After receiving a notification based on art. 21 par. 4, the data holder has the right to object to transmitting or making available data that was received from him or her within 10 days.
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 469 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Providers of a data processing service shall take the measures provided for in Articles 24, 25 and 26 to ensure, in terms of factors on their service side, that customers of their service can switch to another data processing service, covering the same service type, which is provided by a different service provider. In particular, providers of data processing service shall remove commercial, technical, contractual and organisational obstacles, which inhibit customers from:
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 472 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) for specific sectoral data exchange issues related to the implementation of this Regulation, the competence of sectoral authorities shall be respected; it refers particularly to the official statistics authorities and the activity and decisions of the competent authorities designated according to paragraph 1 shall not affect their professional independence.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 475 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) terminating, after a maximum notice period of 30 calendar days, the contractual agreement of the service, without prejudice to any financial commitments made by the customer regarding the service;
2022/11/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 479 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20 a (new)
(20 a) official statistics means European statistics according to Regulation 223/2009 and statistics considered official according to national legislation.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 490 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) the exclusion of trade secrets in Article 4 (3) and Article 5 (8);
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 495 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The rights of the customer and the obligations of the provider of a data processing service in relation to switching between providers of such services shall be clearly set out in a written contract. Without prejudice to Directive (EU) 2019/770, that contractand made available to the customer in advance of that customer accepting terms and conditions of the service priori to signing up to the service of the provider. Without prejudice to Directive (EU) 2019/770, the information to be provided to the customer and the terms and conditions of the service shall include at least the following:
2022/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 498 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Products shall be designed and manufactured, and related services shall be provided, in such a manner that data generated by their use are, by default, easily, securely and, where relevant and appropriate, directly accessible to the user, including the user with special needs.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 500 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
(a) clauses allowing the customer, upon request, to switch to a data processing service offered by another provider of data processing service or to port all data, applications and digital assets generated directly or indirectly byby the customer or which is uniquely relate to theat customers own usage of the service, to an on-premise system, in particular the establishment of a mandatory maximum transition period of 360 calendar days, during which the data processing service provider shall execute and provide clear information concerning:
2022/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 505 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The data holder may reject the request for data if access to the data is restricted by Union law or national law.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 507 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. The user may grant or withdraw at any time consent for the data holder to the use of their data or to the third party nominated by the data holder
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 507 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a – point -1 (new)
(-1) the estimated, fastest possible in terms of factors on the side of the provider of the data processing service from which the switching is to take place, duration of the process for the customer to transition from the data processing service,including any operational, technical or organisational steps necessary for both the service provider and the customer to undertake, in order to complete the switching process;
2022/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 510 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 1
(1) assist andance with the switching process that the provider can supply including, where technically feasible, complete the switching process from the provider’s side;
2022/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 515 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 2
(2) any risks to continuity in the provision of the respective functions or services from the provider’s side during the switching process and commitment to make every effort on provider’s side to ensure full continuity in the provision of the respective functions or services.
2022/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 526 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (new)
i) The data holder shall provide information on the data structures, data formats, vocabularies, classification schemes, taxonomies and code lists, where available, which shall be described in a publicly available and consistent manner.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 527 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (new)
ii) The technical means to access the data, such as Software Development Kits or application programming interfaces, and their terms of use and quality of service shall be sufficiently described to enable the development of such means of access.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 531 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) an exhaustive detailed specification of all data and application categories exportable during the switching process, including, at minimum, all data imported by the customer at the inception of the service agreement and all data and metadata created by the customer and by the use of the service during the period the service was provided, including, but not limited to, configuration parameters, security settings, access rights and access logs to the service;
2022/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 542 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. Where the mandatoryprovider of the data processing service becomes aware that the estimated transition period as defined in paragraph 1, points (a) and (c) of this Article is technically unfeasible for the provider, the provider of data processing services shall notify the customer within 714 working days after the switching request has been made, duly motivating the technical unfeasibility with a detailed report justifying and indicating an alternative shortest possible transition period, which may not exceed 6 months. In accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, full service continuity shall be ensured, where technically feasible, continue throughout the alternative transition period against reduced charges, referred to in Article 25(2). if the delay is due to factors on the side of the provider of a data processing service from which the switching is to take place.
2022/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 549 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. From [date X+3yrs] onwards, providers of data processing services shall not impose any additional charges on the customer for the switching process. unless the process prolongs due to factors outside of the control of the provider of data processing service. If the switching process prolongs due to factors outside of the control of the provider of data processing service, the provider of data processing service may charge the party responsible;
2022/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 555 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Where on-device access is technically supported, the manufacturer shall make this means of access also available to third-party service providers in a non-discriminatory manner.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 556 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. From [date X]onwards, providers of data processing services shall, before the customer signs up to the service, provide clear information in the terms and conditions of the service, about the costing parameters for mandatory operations that the provider of data processing services must perform in relation to porting and switching.
2022/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 564 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Where data cannot be directly accessed by the user from the product, the data holder shall make available to the user the data generated by its use of a product or related service without undue delay, free of charge and, where applicable, continuously and in real-time. This shall be done on the basis of a simple request through electronic means where technically feasible. In case when filing a request via electronic channels is not possible or limited by a disability, the data holder shall enable other forms of request that are appropriate for persons with communication problems.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 566 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The data holder may reject the request for data if access to the data is restricted by Union law or national law.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 568 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 3
3. The charges referred to in paragraph 2 shall not exceed the costs incurred by the provider of data processing services that are directly linked to the switching process concerned. unless the process prolongs due to factors outside of the control of the provider of data processing service. If the switching process prolongs due to factors outside of the control of the provider of data processing service, the provider of data processing service may charge the party responsible;
2022/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 575 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Trade secrets shall only be disclosed provided that all specific necessary measures are taken in advance to preserve the confidentiality of trade secrets in particular with respect to third parties. The data holder and the user can agree measures to preserve the confidentiality of the shared data, in particular in relation to third parties. The right to request the data referred to in paragraph 1 shall not adversely affect the rights and freedoms of others, including the rights protected under Directive (EU) 2016/943.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 578 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. Providers of data processing services that concern scalable and elastic computing resources limited to infrastructural elements such as servers, networks and the virtual resources necessary for operating the infrastructure, but that do not provide access to the operating services, software and applications that are stored, otherwise processed, or deployed on those infrastructural elements, shall ensure that the customer, after switching to aprovide capabilities, adequate information, documentation, technical support and, where appropriate, tools, to perform porting and switching allowing for functional equivalence in the use of the new service coveringof the same service type offered by a different provider of data processing services, enjoys functional equivalence in the use of the new service.
2022/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 590 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4
4. Where the open interoperability specifications or European standards referred to in paragraph 3 do not exist for the service type concerned, the provider of data processing services shall, at the request of the customer, export all data generated or co-generatedand where technically feasible, export all data generated directly by the customer or which is uniquely relate to that customers own usage of the service, including the relevant data formats and data structures, in a structured, commonly used and machine- readable format. for the relevant service type.
2022/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 615 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The data holder may reject the request for data if access to the data is restricted by Union law or national law.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 643 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 8
8. Trade secrets shall only be disclosed to third parties to the extent that they are strictly necessary to fulfil the purpose agreed between the user and the third party and all specific necessary measures agreed between the data holder and the third party are taken by the third party to preserve the confidentiality of the trade secret. In such a case, the nature of the data as trade secrets and the measures for preserving the confidentiality shall be specified in the agreement between the data holder and the third party. The right to request the data referred to in paragraph 1 shall not adversely affect the rights and freedoms of others, including the rights protected under Directive (EU) 2016/943.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 648 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. All switching, porting and interoperability standards or specifications, as well as implementation of all measures of this regulation, shall ensure compliance with applicable law, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Directive 2002/58/EC,legislation on cyber security, consumer protection, product safety, trade secrets or intellectual property rights, as well as with the accessibility requirements.
2022/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 651 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) for specific sectoral data exchange issues related to the implementation of this Regulation, the competence of sectoral authorities shall be respected;. It refers particularly to the official statistics authorities and the activity and decisions of the competent authorities designated according to paragraph 1shall not affect their professional independence.
2022/11/11
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 692 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 6
6. Unless otherwise provided by Union law, including Article 6 of this Regulation, or by national legislation implementing Union law, an obligation to make data available to a data recipient shall not oblige the disclosureWhile the obligation to make data available as provided by Union law, including Articles 4(3), 5(8), Article 6 and Article 19(2) of this Regulation, or by national legislation implementing Union law, shall be effective, this Regulation shall not question the protection of trade secrets as such and that the access is only granted under measures that warrant for the protection of trade secrets within the meaning of Directive (EU) 2016/943.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 706 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Where the data recipient is a micro, small or medium enterprise, as defined in Article 2 of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC, anyAny reasonable compensation agreed shall not exceed the costs directly related to making the data available to the data recipient and which are attributable to the request. These costs include the costs necessary for data reproduction, dissemination via electronic means and storage, but not of data collection or production. Article 8(3) shall apply accordingly.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 725 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The data holder may apply appropriate technical protection measures, including smart contracts, to prevent unauthorised access to the data and to ensure compliance with Articles 5, 6, 9 and 10, as well as with the agreed contractual terms for making data available. Such technical protection measures shall not be used as a means to discriminate or hinder the user’s right to effectively provide data to third parties pursuant to Article 5 or any right of a third party under Union law or national legislation implementing Union law as referred to in Article 8(1).
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 739 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. A contractual term, concerning the access to and use of data or the liability and remedies for the breach or the termination of data related obligations which has been unilaterally imposed by an enterprise on a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise as defined in Article 2 of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC or which has been unilaterally imposed by an enterprise which is the source of the data they hold shall not be binding on the latter enterprise, the data recipient or user, respectively, if it is unfair.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 794 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c – point 2
(2) obtaining the data in line with the procedure laid down in this Chapter would substantively reduce the administrative burden for data holders or other enterprises.; or
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 795 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c – point 2 a (new)
(2 a) obtaining data is necessary for official statistics purposes;
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 801 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. This Chapter shall not affect obligations laid down in Union or national law for the purposes of reporting, complying with information requests or demonstrating or verifying compliance with legal obligations including official statistics purposes.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 884 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 5
5. Where compliance with the request to make data available to a public sector body or a Union institution, agency or body requires the disclosure of personal data, the data holder shall take reasonable efforts to pseudonymise the data, insofar as the request can be fulfilled with pseudonymised data.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 905 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) destroy the data as soon as they are no longer necessary for the stated purpose and inform the data holder that the data have been destroyed. Official statistics authorities are exempted from the latter obligation.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 945 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 4
4. Where a public sector body or a Union institution, agency or body transmits or makes data available under paragraph 1, it shall notify the data holder from whom the data was received. The notification should include the identity and the contact details of individuals or organisations receiving the data pursuant to paragraph 1, the purposes of data processing and the period for which the data will be stored.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 946 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. After receiving a notification based on Article 21(4), the data holder has the right to object to transmitting or making available data that was received from him or her within 10 days.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 953 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Providers of a data processing service shall take the measures provided for in Articles 24, 25 and 26 to ensure, in terms of factors on their service side, that customers of their service can switch to another data processing service, covering the same service type, which is provided by a different service provider. In particular, providers of data processing service shall remove commercial, technical, contractual and organisational obstacles, which inhibit customers from:
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 958 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) terminating, after a maximum notice period of 30 calendar days, the contractual agreement of the service, without prejudice to any financial commitments made by the customer regarding the service;
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 962 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The rights of the customer and the obligations of the provider of a data processing service in relation to switching between providers of such services shall be clearly set out in a written contractand made available to the customer in advance of that customer accepting terms and conditions of the service priori to signing up to the service of the provider. Without prejudice to Directive (EU) 2019/770, that contracte information to be provided to the customer and the terms and conditions of the service shall include at least the following:
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 963 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
(a) clauses allowing the customer, upon request, to switch to a data processing service offered by another provider of data processing service or to port all data, applications and digital assets generated directly or indirectly byby the customer or which is uniquely relate to theat customers own usage of the service, to an on-premise system, in particular the establishment of a mandatory maximum transition period of 360 calendar days, during which the data processing service provider shall execute and provide clear information concerning:
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 966 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a – point -1 (new)
(-1) the estimated, fastest possible in terms of factors on the side of the provider of the data processing service from which the switching is to take place, duration of the process for the customer to transition from the data processing service, including any operational, technical or organisational steps necessary for both the service provider and the customer to undertake, in order to complete the switching process;
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 968 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 1
(1) assist andance with the switching process that the provider can supply including, where technically feasible, completeion of the switching process from the provider’s side;
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 970 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a – point 2
(2) any risks to continuity in the provision of the respective functions or services from the provider’s side during the switching process and commitment to make every effort on provider’s side to ensure full continuity in the provision of the respective functions or services.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 975 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) an exhaustive detailed specification of all data and application categories exportable during the switching process, including, at minimum, all data imported by the customer at the inception of the service agreement and all data and metadata created by the customer and by the use of the service during the period the service was provided, including, but not limited to, configuration parameters, security settings, access rights and access logs to the service;
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 981 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. Where the mandatoryprovider of the data processing service becomes aware that the estimated transition period as defined in paragraph 1, points (a) and (c) of this Article is technically unfeasible for the provider, the provider of data processing services shall notify the customer within 714 working days after the switching request has been made, duly motivating the technical unfeasibility with a detailed report justifying and indicating an alternative shortest possible transition period, which may not exceed 6 months. In accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, full service continuity shall be ensured, where technically feasible, continue throughout the alternative transition period against reduced charges, referred to in Article 25(2) if the delay is due to factors on the side of the provider of a data processing service from which the switching is to take place.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 982 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. From [date X+3yrs] onwards, providers of data processing services shall not impose any additional charges on the customer for the switching process., unless the process prolongs due to factors outside of the control of the provider of data processing service. If the switching process prolongs due to factors outside of the control of the provider of data processing service, the provider of data processing service may charge the party responsible;
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 984 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. From [date X] onwards, providers of data processing services shall, before the customer signs up to the service, provide clear information in the terms and conditions of the service, about the costing parameters for mandatory operations that the provider of data processing services must perform in relation to porting and switching.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 988 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 3
3. The charges referred to in paragraph 2 shall not exceed the costs incurred by the provider of data processing services that are directly linked to the switching process concerned. unless the process prolongs due to factors outside of the control of the provider of data processing service. If the switching process prolongs due to factors outside of the control of the provider of data processing service, the provider of data processing service may charge the party responsible;
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 992 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. Providers of data processing services that concern scalable and elastic computing resources limited to infrastructural elements such as servers, networks and the virtual resources necessary for operating the infrastructure, but that do not provide access to the operating services, software and applications that are stored, otherwise processed, or deployed on those infrastructural elements, shall ensure that the customer, after switching to aprovide capabilities, adequate information, documentation, technical support and, where appropriate, tools, to perform porting and switching, allowing for functional equivalence in the use of the new service coveringof the same service type offered by a different provider of data processing services, enjoys functional equivalence in the use of the new service.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 998 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4
4. Where the open interoperability specifications or European standards referred to in paragraph 3 do not exist for the service type concerned, the provider of data processing services shall, at the request of the customer, export all data generated or co-generated and where technically feasible, export all data generated directly by the customer or which is uniquely relate to that customers own usage of the service, including the relevant data formats and data structures, in a structured, commonly used and machine- readable format for the relevant service type.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1066 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. All switching, porting and interoperability standards or specifications, as well as implementation of all measures of this regulation, shall ensure compliance with applicable law, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Directive 2002/58/EC, legislation on cyber security, consumer protection, product safety, trade secrets or intellectual property rights, as well as with the accessibility requirements.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1099 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) for specific sectoral data exchange issues related to the implementation of this Regulation, the competence of sectoral authorities shall be respected; It refers particularly to the official statistics authorities and the activity and decisions of the competent authorities designated according to paragraph 1 shall not affect their professional independence.
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1151 #

2022/0047(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) the exclusion of trade secrets in Article 4(3) and Article 5(8);
2022/11/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 16 #

2021/2251(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas the RRF created an unprecedented structure adapted to addressing the complex effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on economy, society and institutions and is positively contributing to the EU’s recovery and resilience, including economic growth, cohesion, jobs, productivity, competitiveness, research, development and innovation, and a well-functioning internal market with robust small and medium enterprises SMEs;
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2021/2251(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas a large number of reforms and investments aim to improve territorial infrastructure and services provided at local level; whereas these measures can also boost the local economy, national competitiveness and institutional resilience;
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2021/2251(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C b (new)
C b. whereas the importance of local and regional involvement in implementing the national recovery and resilience plans (NRRPs); whereas local and regional authorities are responsible for one third of all public expenditure and more than half of public investment in the EU1a, a large portion of which is in policy areas that are key for the RRF; _________________ 1a OECD, Key data on Local and Regional Governments in the European Union (brochure), 2018. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/regional/EU-Local- government-key-data.pdf
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2021/2251(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights that the COVID-19 crisis has already left many people jobless or in precarious employmentunemployed and young people are particularly affected by the COVID-19 crisis in terms of employment, education, training and mental well-being; calls on the Commission and Member States to fight against youth unemployment and to ensure that young people, especially those not in employment, education or training (NEETs), receive adequate, pairemunerated and quality first working experience;
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2021/2251(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Welcomes the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) as an ambitious and timely tool to enable the EU to emerge stronger from the COVID-19 crisis. Supports the European Commission's view that most Member States have satisfactory drawing up the (NRRPs) in a short space of time;
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2021/2251(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Emphasizes that in several Member States the NRRPs are only part of broader national recovery plans, and points to the need for more exchange of best practices between Member States and a comprehensive approach at European level, in order to overcome the crisis and make the EU economy more robust, resilient and competitive for the future;
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2021/2251(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Stresses Member States should focus on reforms and investments to support job creation, and the transition to new sectors and occupations, to boost competitiveness and improve the performance, functioning and resilience of the labour markets. Special attention should be given to horizontal upskilling programmes in digital skills, green skills and especially financial literacy;
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2021/2251(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Highlights that access to quality and inclusive education, training and life- long learning for all, is essential for ensuring that the workforce has the skills required to deliver on the green transition. Fair transition aspects should thus be integrated in the development and implementation of national skills strategies, in line with the European Skills Agenda and the EU’s new updated Industrial Strategy1b. Skills partnerships under the Pact for Skills will also be an important lever. Up-to-date labour market and skills intelligence and foresight, including at regional and local, sectoral and occupational levels allows for the identification and forecasting of relevant occupation-specific and transversal skills needs, also as a basis for adapting curricula to meet the skills needs for the green transition; VET should equip young people and adults, with the skills needed to master the green transition1c. _________________ 1b Communication from the Commission ‘Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a stronger Single Market for Europe’s recovery’, COM(2021) 350 final. 1c Council Recommendation of 24 November 2020 on vocational education and training (VET) for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience (OJ C 417, 2.12.2020, p. 1).
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2021/2251(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2 c. Welcomes that over a third of measures and around two thirds of the expenditure linked to the effectiveness of public administration and to business and public service continuity relate to the digital transformation1d; Highlights that the measures to enhance civil service diminish regulatory and administrative burdens, improve public procurement procedures and contribute to the effectiveness of the public administration; _________________ 1d Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the Recovery and Resilience Facility.
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2021/2251(INI)

2 d. Emphasizes that 10 NRRPs contain measures to improve the training development and work conditions of civil servants by facilitating flexible working arrangements, implementing a better pay system in the public service and the modernisation of recruitment processes and notably the effectiveness of the judicial systems are found in 13 NRRPs;
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2021/2251(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 e (new)
2 e. Calls for clear coordination between the NRRPs and the ESIF programmes, as this is mandatory in accordance with Article 17 of the RRF Regulation; therefore calls on the Commission to draw attention to this in the agreements concluded with the Member States on the NRRPs. The synergies between the NRRPs and the ESIF programmes should also be part of the Commission's annual reports on the implementation of the RRF and of the scrutiny by the European Parliament;
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2021/2251(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 f (new)
2 f. Calls for coordination with the other programmes funded by NextGenEU (e.g. REACT-EU) and for the alignment between the seven existing and new programmes funded by NextGenEU concerning ambitions for a green and digital transition and effective implementation by local and regional authorities of the recovery programmes;
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2021/2251(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 g (new)
2 g. Invites the European Commission to actively support local and regional authorities that have experienced problems while absorbing EU funds in the past, in addressing these problems, so that the NRRP scan be successfully implemented across the European Union;
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2021/2251(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 h (new)
2 h. Calls on the Member States to focus on a more decentralized approach in order to tackle possible territorial differences, both in terms of challenges and opportunities. Believes that, in this way, NRRPs could be more efficient; Points out that regions that were already lagging behind in their development before the outbreak of the pandemic are at risk of an even greater development gap, in employment, educational attainment, business support, digitalisation, mobility or other key policy areas;
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2021/2251(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 i (new)
2 i. Emphasizes that apprenticeships and remunerated traineeships, including strong training components, in particular for young people, contribute to labour market transitions, notably towards activities contributing to climate and environmental objectives, and sectors facing particular skills shortages. Increasing adult participation in lifelong learning should be promoted to meet upskilling and reskilling needs, inter alia by empowering individuals to seek training that is tailored to their needs and via short, quality-assured courses on skills for the green transition;
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2021/2251(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the creation and publication of the Recovery and Resilience Scoreboard., and should be further developed; asks the European Commission to ensure the "territorial dimension" and to ensure the role of local and regional authorities is properly reflected in the biannual scoreboard, without leading to excessive administrative burden for the relevant authorities;
2022/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2021/2106(DEC)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Asks the Commission to modify the spending rule N+3 years to the previous rule N+2 years in order to increase the budget execution and reduce the outstanding commitmentsNotes that the new Common Provisions Regulation allows for a more gradual transition of the decommitment rules for the current programming period 2021-2027 with regards to shared management funds; notes that the N+3 (2021-2026) and the N+2 (2027) combination would contribute to increase the budget execution and reduce the outstanding commitments; reminds that the Parliament has shown great support for this approach in plenary when voting on the agreement on the Common Provisions Regulation;
2022/03/04
Committee: CONT
Amendment 65 #

2021/2106(DEC)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Notes that the annual absorption rate for EFSI fFunds in 2020 was 15 %, which is the same as the final year of the previous 2007-2013 MFF but that the cumulative absorption rate is still only 55 %, which is 7 % lower than at the end of 2013. Notes that this implies that 45 % of the total commitments under the EFSI fFunds for the period 2014-2020 equal to EUR 209 billion has still not been paid out and constitutes the main part of the total outstanding commitments (RAL) of EUR 303 billion;
2022/03/04
Committee: CONT
Amendment 100 #

2021/2106(DEC)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
37. Regretminds that for the cCommon pProvisions rRegulation for the EFSI fFunds, was not subject to an impact assessment was not carried out and, but each of the shared management funds covered by the Regulation is accompanied by its own impact assessment; notes that important evaluations of the CAP were not available before the impact assessment was made concerning the CAP reform;
2022/03/04
Committee: CONT
Amendment 147 #

2021/2106(DEC)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 69
69. Underlines that specific instruments gave the Member States financial incentives to achieve results ande performance reserve that the new performance framework has foreseen which entails 6% of the resources to be frozen and consequently allocated on the basis of a performance review after the annual implementation report in 2019, to the programmes which have achieved their set milestones, so that Member States are incentivised to optimise their use of funding; regrets that according to recent data the Commission and the Member States were found to be only partially successful in using these instruments to makemaking the financing of Cohesion policy more performance-based; is worried that the Member States were found to show very limited interest in using some of the new performance-based funding models, i.e. 'joint action plans' and 'financing not linked to costs'; encourages wider use of the simplified cost options which the ECA considers have the potential to reduce beneficiaries’ administrative burden and are considered less prone to error;
2022/03/04
Committee: CONT
Amendment 148 #

2021/2106(DEC)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 69 a (new)
69 a. Welcomes the contribution of cohesion policy to provide emergency support to Member States throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing for a rapid redirection of the available 2014-2020 funding towards the most severely affected sectors while proposing considerable simplifications such as: extension of deadlines, accelerated payments and retroactive reimbursement of COVID-19 related expenditure and the use of the temporary increase of the EU co-financing rate to 100%; notes, in this regard, that flexibility and speed did not lead to increased risks for the EU budget and contributed to performance;
2022/03/04
Committee: CONT
Amendment 166 #

2021/2106(DEC)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 77 a (new)
77 a. Is concerned that the price hike in construction and raw materials change the total budget for many projects and could lead to under budgeting, missed milestones, impossible implementations and therefore undermines the TEN-T core network completion;
2022/03/04
Committee: CONT
Amendment 172 #

2021/2106(DEC)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 78 – point e
e. ensure that the Member States take into account and promote the implementation of the partnership principle and of gender equality throughout the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of all programmes as laid down in Regulation (EU) 1303/2013 and Regulation (EU) 2021/1060;
2022/03/04
Committee: CONT
Amendment 173 #

2021/2106(DEC)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 78 – point h
h. propose a legislative revision to ensure that the payment retention is adequately protected before it is released, to improve its audit work, audit documentation and review process, to strengthen the main elements of the regularity of information provided in the AARs, and to ensure that the College of Commissioners provide relevant and reliable information in the AMPR; notes that the Common Provisions Regulation for the 2021 - 2027 programming period contains an overhauled enabling conditions and performance framework, paired with a new approach in programming, monitoring and control; welcomes the performance-enhancing provisions such as the single audit principle that represents a risk-proportioned audit conditioned by collaboration with the EPPO, enhanced obligations on conflict of interest, the use of simplified cost options of financing not linked to costs; acknowledges that the newly-reformed system will reveal its advantages in the years to come; discourages therefore opening the texts of the agreement with regards to a legislative revision, unless that would be a necessary alignment with the upcoming revision of the Financial Regulation; notes that before the mid- term review such initiative would only negatively affect the performance of the funds;
2022/03/04
Committee: CONT
Amendment 179 #

2021/2106(DEC)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 78 – point l
l. ensure that sufficient resources are available for Horizon Europe in order to launch new Union partnerships in areas such as clean hydrogen, batteries, clean aviation, rail, connected and automated mobility, zero-emission road and waterborne transport, in particular for the Work Programme 2021-2022 and welcomes the progress of Horizon Europe in this sense; stresses the need to support projects that contribute, in particular, to a future-proof, sustainable, smart and climate-friendly European transport network;
2022/03/04
Committee: CONT
Amendment 180 #

2021/2106(DEC)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 78 – point l a (new)
l a. calls for further actions to create incentives and intensify investments in railway and inland waterway transport and its harmonisation and standardisation to achieve more competitive, climate-resilient and affordable transport system of the future; notes that such initiative will improve the monitoring of the spending in transport investments, enhance the implementation of funds and reduce potential error rates;
2022/03/04
Committee: CONT
Amendment 184 #

2021/2106(DEC)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 78 – point n a (new)
n a. calls on the Commission to ensure the long-term and coherent planning of commitments and calls, as well as to enhance the link between funding and the achievement of projects' milestones in order to ensure the effective, efficient and timely completion of the core TEN-T networks;
2022/03/04
Committee: CONT
Amendment 185 #

2021/2106(DEC)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 78 – point n b (new)
n b. calls on the co-legislators to adopt the European Cross-Border Mechanism (ECBM) in order to tackle red tape in the next implementation period; recalls that the ECBM proposal would facilitate the implementation significantly and will reduce the risks of errors; calls, in this regard, on the Council to unblock the file as soon as possible; underlines that analyses and studies clearly show the negative consequences of not adopting the ECBM regulation; notes that the ECBM has the potential of increasing efficiency in transport services planning as diverging priorities and procedures of Member States impact the pace of implementation of cross-border transport projects;
2022/03/04
Committee: CONT
Amendment 29 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes, however, that inconsistencies that call for a revision of the TSD remain and therefore asks the Commission to foresee an exhaustive impact assessment in order to check if and how these inconsistencies could be addressed;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 42 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that spreading out requirements across several pieces of legislation, and providing for different limit values, can be is burdensome and can in some caseseven necessitate duplicate the measuring of substances, as in the case of migration and content limit values; calls on the Commission, therefore, to consider consolidating all applicable limits for toys in one piece of legislation in order to streamline conformity assessment and make it more easy and less burdensome to comply with the requirements;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 47 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that the derogation from the prohibition of chemicals that are carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction (CMRs) set out in the TSD allows for the presence of those chemicals in concentrations that arppear to be too high to ensure the protection of children; calls on the Commission to urgently to substantially reduce the generic limits for derogated CMRs in the TSD; insists that, in line with the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability, the possibility toconduct an impact assessment in order to analyse if the derogateion from the rules on the presence of CMRs in parts of the toy that are inaccessibleinaccessibility of CMRs to the child should be deleted;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 52 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines that lower limit values for chemicals such as nitrosamines and nitrosatable substances set out at national level compared to those established in the TSD create inconsistencies, even when justified by the Commission; notes, however, that all EU children should enjoy the same high level of protection; acknowledges that this limit value cannot be amended by an implementing act but would require a legislative procedure; calls on the Commission, therefore, to adapt the limit valueconduct an exhaustive impact assessment before its revision of the TSD analysing, if the limit value needs to be adapted to the strictest value in force at national level in a revision of the TSD;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 67 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Is concerned that the stricter provisions for chemicals in toys intended for children aged under 36 months do not take into account the fact that older children remain vulnerable to dangerous substances; notes that this distinction can result in manufacturers circumventing the provisions by indicating that the toy is intended for children above 36 months even when it is clearly not the case; stresses that several stakeholders and Member States have indicated thatcalls on the Commission, therefore, to analyse this distinction is clearly inadequate and asked for it to be eliminated; calls on the Commission, therefore, to do so in itssue within the impact assessment to the revision of the TSD;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 98 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Member States to step up coordination of their market surveillance activities; Underlines that an efficient market surveillance is essential in order to detect unsafe toys and calls therefore on the Member States to increase the resources, provide modern equipment to and properly staff their market surveillance authorities and custom authorities and to step up coordination and cooperation among them, including at cross-border level, so that a swift transfer of information on unsafe toys can be enabled;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 107 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16 b. Urges the Commission to cooperate with the regulatory authorities of third countries in order to allow an exchange of market-surveillance-relevant information on unsafe toys;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 130 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses that online marketplaces should take additional steps tocan play a tremendous role in limiting the circulation of unsafe toys and therefore they should be obliged to take more responsibility in ensureing the safety and compliance of toys sold on their platforms by consulting the Safety Gate (RAPEX) system before placing a toy on their platform, removing toys identified as unsafe by the Safety Gate (RAPEX) immediately, taking measures to stop them from reappearing and cooperating effectively with the market surveillance authorities; insists in the strongest terms, in this sense, that it is fundamental to ensure consistency between different instruments such as the Digital Services Act and the future legislative act revising the GPSD when it comes to the responsibility of online marketplaces, under the principle ‘what is illegal offline is illegal online’;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 137 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Urges the Commission to require online marketplaces to introduce a link to the Safety Gate (RAPEX) on their websites so as to raise awareness about this platform and to modernise the Safety Gate (RAPEX) system in order to also allow better and quicker identification of unsafe toys by the online marketplaces;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 146 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Considers it essential to provide for a broader scope for amendments in the future revision, includinghat the Commission effects a solid impact assessment to analyse if and how mechanical and physical requirements in particular for children under 36 months, limit values for nitrosamines, labelling provisions for allergenic fragrances and CMRs could be inserted in the future revision of the TSD;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 159 #

2021/2040(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Commission to introduce mandatory labelling for toys, providing the consumer at the time of purchase with clear, easily understandable and comparable information on a toy’s estimated lifetime, the extent to which it is reparable and the availability of spare parts, including, where relevant, the availability of the necessary software, and setting out options for repairanalyse whether the durability and reparability of toys can influence their safety;
2021/07/13
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 69 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) As part of the Package “Clean Energy for all Europeans” proposed by the Commission on 30 November 2016, Regulation (EU) 2019/9436 and Directive (EU) 2019/9447 brought about a further step in the development of the internal market for electricity with citizens at its core and contributing to the Union’s objectives of transition to a clean energy system and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The internal market in natural gas and renewable gases should be built on those same principles and, in particular, ensure an equal level of consumer protection. _________________ 6 Regulation (EU) 2019/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the internal market for electricity (OJ L 158, 14.6.2019, p. 54). 7 Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on common rules for the internal market for electricity and amending Directive 2012/27/EU (OJ L 158, 14.6.2019, p. 125).
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 72 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) This Directive aims to facilitate the penetration of renewable and low-carbon gases into the energy system enabling a shift from fossil gas and to allow these new gases to play an important role towards achieving the EU’s 2030 climate objectives and climate neutrality in 2050. The Directive aims also to set up a regulatory framework which enables and incentivises all market participants to take the transitional role of fossil gas into account while planning their activities to avoid lock-in effects and ensure gradual and timely phase-out of fossil gas notably in all relevant industrial sectors and for individual heating purposes while mitigating deepening energy poverty.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 75 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) In line with the EU Hydrogen Strategy, renewable hydrogen is expected to be deployed on a large-scale from 2030 onwards for the purpose of decarbonising certain sectors, ranging from aviation and shipping to hard-to-decarbonise industrial sectors. All final customers connected to hydrogen systems will benefit from consumer protection rules and basic consumer rights applicable to final customers connected to the natural gas system such as the right to switch supplier and accurate billing information. In those instances where customers are connected to the hydrogen network, e.g. industrial customers, they will benefit from the same consumer protection rights applicable to natural gas customers. However, consumer provisions designed to encourage household participation on the market such as price comparison tools, active customers and citizen energy communities do not apply to the hydrogen system.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 76 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) The freedoms which the Treaty guarantees the citizens of the Union — inter alia, the free movement of goods, the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services — are achievable only in a fully open market, which enables all consumers freely to choose their suppliers and all suppliers freely to deliver to their customers.. A fully integrated EU energy market must prioritise fair and open competition alongside a better connection of energy infrastructure between Member States.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 78 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Consumer interests should be at the heart of this Directive and quality of service should be a central responsibility of natural gas undertakings. Existing rights of consumers and rights for access to essential services, including energy, and safeguarding against energy poverty, as stated in the European Pillar of Social Rights communication and the REPowerEU Plan need to be strengthened and guaranteed, and should include greater transparency. Consumer protection should ensure that all consumers in the wider remit of the Union benefit from a competitive gas and hydrogen market. Consumer rights should be enforced by Member States or, where a Member State has so provided, the regulatory authorities.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 79 #

2021/0425(COD)

(12 a) The REPower EU Plan underlines that during the EU’s clean energy transition, the decoupling from Russian energy imports can lead to higher and more volatile energy prices and therefore emphasises the need, at Member State level, for targeted measures to minimise volatility, keep prices in check and protect the individuals in or at risk of energy poverty in order to ensure a fair transition for all.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 80 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) Member States should have a wide discretion to impose public service obligations on gas undertakings in pursuing objectives of general economic interest. However, public service obligations in the form of price setting for the supply of natural gas constitute a fundamentally distortive measure that often leads to the accumulation of tariff deficits, the limitation of consumer choice, poorer incentives for energy saving and energy efficiency investments, lower standards of service, lower levels of consumer engagement and satisfaction, and the restriction of competition, as well as to there being fewer innovative products and services on the market. Consequently, Member States should apply other policy tools, in particular targeted social policy measures and other targeted measures to minimise volatility, keep prices in check, protect the individuals in or at risk of energy poverty and, to safeguard the affordability of natural gas supply to their citizens and to ensure a fair transition for all and that no one is left behind. Public interventions in price setting for the supply of natural gas should be carried out only as public service obligations and should be subject to specific conditions. A fully liberalised, well-functioning retail natural gas market would stimulate price and non- price competition among existing suppliers and provide incentives to new market entrants, thereby improving consumer choice and satisfaction.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 81 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) Clear and comprehensible information should be made available to consumers concerning their rights in relation to the energy sector. The Commission has established , after consulting relevant stakeholders including Member States, regulatory authorities, consumer organisations and natural gas undertakings, an accessible, user-friendly energy consumer checklist providing consumers with practical information about their rights. That energy consumer checklist should be maintained to date,regularly maintained, updated and should reflect current market developments, where possible. It should be provided to all consumers and should be made publicly available.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 86 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) The switch from fossil gas to renewable alternatives, including biomethane, will concretise if energy from renewable sources becomes an available, attractive, non-discriminatory choice for consumers based on truly transparent information where the transition costs are fairly distributed among different groups of consumers and market players.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 87 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
(27) To be coherent and effective, this mirroring approach should be encompass all consumer protection and empowerment provisions, whenever feasible and adaptable to the gas market. This should go from basic contractual rights and comprehensive pre-contractual information to rules for billing information, switching energy provider, having at disposal reliable comparison tools, protecting vulnerable and energy poor consumers, ensuring adequate data protection for smart meters and data management, and efficient alternative dispute resolution rules.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 90 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) The modernisation of the gas sector is expected to lead to substantial economic benefits in terms of botthrough improved retail competition while also delivering incentives and supports for new market entrants, and its social and distributional benefits and customer empowerment, including strengthened contractual rights and better available information on consumption and energy sources leading to greener and more price-competitive choices. Energy communities-of-interest should contribute to the uptake of renewable gas.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 92 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) Switching is an important indicator of consumer engagement as well as in important tool to boost competition on the natural gas market. Switching rates remain inconsistent among Member States and consumers are discouraged from switching by exit and termination fees. Although removing such fees might limit consumer choice by eliminating products based on rewarding consumer loyalty, restricting their use further should improve consumer welfare, consumer engagement and competition in the market, including promoting the use of hydrogen, biomethane and other low carbon gases.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 93 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
(31) Shorter switching times are likely to encourage customers to search for better energy deals and switch supplier. With the increased deployment of information technology, by the year 2026, the technical switching process of registering a new supplier in a metering point at the market operator should typically be possible to complete within 248 hours on any working day. Ensuring that it is possible by that date for the technical process of switching to take place within 248 hours would minimise switching times, helping to increase consumer engagement and retail competition.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 95 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
(32) Several factors impede consumers from accessing, understanding and acting upon the various sources of market information available to them. It follows that the comparability of offers should be improved and unjustified barriers to switching should be minimised to the greatest practicable extentremoved without unduly limiting consumer choice.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 96 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) Independent comparison tools, including websites, are an effective means for smaller customers to assess the merits of the different energy offers that are available on the market. They should aim to include the broadest possible range of available offers, and to cover the market as completely as is feasible so as to give the customer a representative overview in a clear and easy to understand manner. It is crucial that smaller customers have access to at least one comparison tool and that the information given on such tools be trustworthy, impartial and transparent and easy to understand. To that end, Member States could provide for a comparison tool that is operated by a national authority or a private company. It is also vital to provide customers with a clear and understandable pre-contractual information, so that they are fully aware about the details and consequences of the contract.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 102 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
(37) Bills and billing information are an important means to inform and empower final customers. Energy bills remain the most common consumer concern and source of consumer complaints, a factor that contributes to the persistently low levels of consumer satisfaction and engagement in the gas sector. Provisions for billing information in the gas sector also lag behind rights granted to consumers in the electricity sector, therefore holding back the full potential of consumer engagement in the gas sector, particularly when it comes to renewable and low carbon gases. It is therefore necessary to align them and to set minimum requirements for bills and billing information in the gas sector, so that consumers have access to transparent, easy to understand information. Bills should convey information to the final consumers on their consumption and costs, thus facilitating comparison between offers and switching supplier, as well as information on their consumer rights (such as on alternative dispute resolution). In addition, bills should be a tool to actively engage consumers in the market, so that consumers can manage their consumption patterns and make greener choices. Consumers should be able to access accurate billing information in both online and offline formats.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 105 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
(39) A key aspect in supplying customers is access to objective and transparent consumption data. Thus, consumers should have access to their consumption data and associated prices and services costs so that they can invite competitors to make an offer based on that information . Consumers should also have the right to be properly informed about their energy consumption and should be able to readily access that information. Prepayments should not place a disproportionate disadvantage on their users, while different payment systems should be non- discriminatory. Information on energy costs provided to consumers frequently enough should create incentives for energy savings because it will give customers direct feedback on the effects of investment in energy efficiency and change of behaviour.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 106 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 44
(44) Greater consumer protection is guaranteed by the availability of effective means of dispute settlement for all consumers. Member States should provide for speedy and effective complaint handling procedures. Information about where and how to complain must be made available in consumer contracts and billing information.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 107 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 45
(45) Member States should take appropriate measures, such as providing benefits by means of their social security systems, to ensure the necessary supply to vulnerable customers, or providing for support for energy efficiency improvements, to address energy poverty where identified pursuant to Article 3(3), point (d) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council9 , including in the broader context of poverty. Such measures could differ according to the particular circumstances in the Member States in question and could include social or energy policy measures relating to the payment of gas bills, to investment in the energy efficiency of residential buildings, or to consumer protection such as disconnection safeguards. It has to be underlined that for the transitional period, fast decoupling from Russian energy imports can lead to higher and more volatile energy prices and therefore targeted measures are needed to minimize volatility, keep prices in check and protect the individuals in or at risk of energy poverty in order to ensure a fair transition for all. _________________ 9 Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 1).
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 118 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2, Member States may apply public interventions in the price setting for the supply of natural gas to energy poor or, vulnerable household customers or protected customers as defined in Regulation (EU) 2017/1938. Such public interventions shall be subject to the conditions set out in paragraphs 4 and 5. In the event of an unprecedented price increase, interventions that comply with the criteria set out in paragraphs 4 and 5 could be expanded to other limited number of customer groups in order to avoid significant socio-economic impacts.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 129 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point h
(h) information relating to consumer rights, including clear and understandable information on complaint handling including how and where a complaint should be submitted and all the information referred to in this paragraph, clearly communicated on the bill or the hydrogen or natural gas undertaking's web site.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 131 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Conditions shall be fair and well known in advance. In any case, the clear and understandable information shall be provided prior to the conclusion or confirmation of the contract. Where contracts are concluded through intermediaries, the information referred to points (a) to (f) shall also be provided prior to the conclusion of the contract.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 142 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Customers shall have the right to switch gases suppliers or market participants. Switching supplier or market participant shall be carried out within the shortest possible time. Member States shall ensure that a customer wishing to switch suppliers or market participants, while respecting contractual conditions, is entitled to such a switch within a maximum of three weeks from the date of the request. By 2026 at the latest, the technical process of switching supplier or market participant shall take no longer than 248 hours and shall be possible on any working day.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 147 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Member States should ensure that user-friendly information is offered to citizens in relation to the rules and process for switching suppliers in their respective Member State along with any relevant switching information as appropriate.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 154 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall appoint a competent authority to be responsible for issuing trust marks for comparison tools that meet the requirements set out in paragraph 1, and for ensuring that comparison tools bearing a trust mark continue to meetthose requirements. In particular, competent authorities shall carry out regular reviews of price comparison tools bearing a trust mark to ensure that the requirements of paragraph 1 are continually being met. That authority shall be independent of any market participants and comparison tool operators.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 162 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) subject to fair compensation as assessed by the regulatory authority, relevant distribution system operators cooperate with citizen energy communities to facilitate transfers of renewable natural gases such as biomethane within citizen energy communities;
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 168 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. All information provided to consumers, including contractual information, offers and billing information, shall be up-to-date, correct, complete and presented in a manner that facilitates comparison by final customers.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 172 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Each Member States shall ensure that one single points of contact areis established to provide customers with all necessary information concerning their rights, the applicable law and dispute settlement mechanisms available to them in the event of a dispute. Such single points of contact may be part of general consumer information points and may be the same entities as the single contact points for electricity referred to in Article 26 of Directive 2019/944/EU [on common rules for the internal market in electricity.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 175 #

2021/0425(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 1
Member States shall take appropriate measures to protect final customers, and shall, in particular, ensure that there are adequate safeguards to protect vulnerable customers. In this context, each Member State shall define the concept of vulnerable customers which may refer to energy poverty. Measures to protect vulnerable consumers may include, inter alia, to the prohibition of disconnection to such customers in critical times. Member States shall ensure that where gas is used for heating, vulnerable customers shall not be disconnected during winter times.
2022/06/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 173 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) This Directive respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’). In particular, Article 315 of the Charter provides forto the right to work and to pursue a freely chosen or accepted occupation as well as to provide services. Article 31 of the Charter supplements the right to work with the right of every worker to working conditions which respect his or her health, safety and dignity. Article 27 of the Charter protects the workers’ right to information and consultation within the undertaking. Article 8 of the Charter provides that everyone has the right to the protection of personal data concerning him or her. Article 16 of the Charter recognises the freedom to conduct a business.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Principle No 5 of the European Pillar of Social Rights, proclaimed at Gothenburg on 17 November 201753 , provides that, regardless of the type and duration of the employment relationship, workers have the right to fair and equal treatment regarding working conditions, access to social protection and training; that, in accordance with legislation and collective agreements, the necessary flexibility for employers to adapt swiftly to changes in the economic context is to be ensured; and that innovative forms of work that ensure quality working conditions are to be fostered, that entrepreneurship and self-employment are to be encouraged and that occupational mobility is to be facilitated, thus strongly reaffirming the right under Article 15 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the basic freedom of choice every person enjoys when engaging in work and the fundamental principle of free market initiative, including on the labour market. The Porto Social Summit of May 2021 welcomed the Action Plan accompanying the Social Pillar54 as guidance for its implementation. __________________ 53 Interinstitutional Proclamation on the European Pillar of Social Rights (OJ C 428, 13.12.2017, p. 10). 54 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, ‘The European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan’, COM(2021) 102 final, 4.3.2021.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 218 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) Platform work may facilitate flexibility and optimisation of resources, and provide opportunities for both people working in or through digital labour platforms and clients, and the matching of demand for and supply of services.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 220 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 b (new)
(6b) Innovation in digital tools is a precondition for platform work and can contribute to growth in times of crisis and recovery.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 221 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 c (new)
(6c) Platform work can offer advantages for students and those who wish to combine study and work at the same time, as well as creating access to employment for young people not in education, employment or training (NEETs), and people with lower skill levels;
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 222 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 d (new)
(6d) The trend towards remote working in many sectors, and especially online- based trade and services is unavoidable and favourable for many companies and workers and the booming development of digital technologies predetermines many new and unpredictable opportunities for so-called non-standard forms of work and employment.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 223 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 e (new)
(6e) The labour and social security legislation of most Member States are generally unprepared to the challenges of the digital world and digitalized labour market in particular, which is causing grave risks to both people, engaged in digitally based work, and to existing solidarity-based healthcare and social security models. If not tackled accordingly, the above-mentioned risks might jeopardise the entire European model of the social market economy and the goals of the European Pillar of Social Rights, whereas adapting to technological progress might provide the solutions for adaptation of the European social model to the realities of the 21st century;
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 227 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) Court cases in several Member States have shown the persistence of misclassification of the employment status in certain types of platform work, in particular in sectors where digital labour platforms exert a certain degree of control over the remuneration and performance of work. While digital labour platforms frequently classify persons working through them as self-employed or ‘independent contractors’, many courts have found that the platforms exercise de facto direction and control over those persons, often integrating them in their main business activities and unilaterally determining the level of remuneration. Those courts have therefore reclassifiedvarious aspects of the performance of the work. Those courts have therefore reclassified, based on different criteria and national legislative solutions, purportedly self-employed persons as workers employed by the platforms. However, various national legislations, social dialogue practices and case law has resulted in diverse outcomes and digital labour platforms have adapted their business model in various ways, thus increasing the lack of legal certainty over the employment status.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 244 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) When platforms operate in several Member States or across borders, it is often unclear where the platform work, especially online based, is performed and by whom. Also, national authorities do not have easy access to data on digital labour platforms, including the number of persons performing platform work, their employment status, and their working conditions. This complicates the enforcement of applicable national and European rules, including in respect of labour law, health and social protection. security, social protection and taxation.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 272 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) In addition, the Commission held extensive exchanges with relevant stakeholders, including digital labour platforms, associations of persons performing platform work, experts from academia, Member States and international organisations and representatives of civil society. It is of utmost importance for these consultations to continue after the adoption of this Directive, including social partners at all levels, in order to guarantee the smooth transposition and implementation of the Directive and provide for a timely revision, based on lessons learned.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 297 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) Social dialogue and collective bargaining are of utmost importance for achieving the goals of the present Directive. However, digitally based labour market practices require the use of new digital technologies in organizing social dialogue, too. Therefore, traditional trade union organizations might prove unsuitable for organizing platform workers or collective agreements among self-employed persons, engaged in platform work, especially when established trade unions are not ready to adapt to new digital realities, so new forms of organization of workers should be made available by the Member States.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 310 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) In its case law, the Court of Justice has established criteria for determining the status of a worker62 . The interpretation by the Court of Justice of those criteria should be taken into account in the implementation of this Directive. The abuse of the status of self-employed persons, as defined in national law, either at national level or in cross-border situations, is a form of falsely declared work that is frequently associated with undeclared work. False self-employment occurs when a person is declared to be self- employed while fulfilling the conditions characteristic of an employment relationship, in order to avoid certain legal or fiscal obligations. __________________ 62 Judgments of the Court of Justice of 3 July 1986, Deborah Lawrie-Blum v Land Baden-Württemberg, C-66/85, ECLI:EU:C:1986:284; 14 October 2010, Union Syndicale Solidaires Isère v Premier ministre and Others, C-428/09, ECLI:EU:C:2010:612; 4 December 2014, FNV Kunsten Informatie en Media v Staat der Nederlanden, C-413/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2411; 9 July 2015, Ender Balkaya v Kiesel Abbruch- und Recycling Technik GmbH, C-229/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:455; 17 November 2016, Betriebsrat der Ruhrlandklinik gGmbH v Ruhrlandklinik gGmbH, C-216/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:883; 16 July 2020, UX v Governo della Repubblica italiana, C- 658/18, ECLI:EU:C:2020:572; and order of the Court of Justice of 22 April 2020, B v Yodel Delivery Network Ltd, C-692/19, ECLI:EU:C:2020:288.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 393 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) Digital labour platforms should not be required to disclose the detailed functioning of their automated monitoring and decision-making systems, including algorithms, or other detailed data that contains commercial secrets, price sensitive information or is protected by intellectual property rights. Digital labour platforms should also not be required to disclose information that, with reasonable certainty, would result in the enabling of deception of consumers or consumer harm through the manipulation of the system. However, the result of those considerations should not be a refusal to provide all the information required by this Directive.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 439 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 45
(45) Platform work is characterised by the lack of a common workplace where workers can get to know each other and communicate with each other and with their representatives, also in view of defending their interests towards the employer. It is therefore necessary to create digital communication channels, in line with the digital labour platforms’ work organisation, where persons performing platform work can exchange with each other and be contacted by their representatives. Digital labour platforms should create such communication channels within their digital infrastructure or through similarly effective means, while respecting the protection of personal data and refraining from accessing or monitoring those communicationsfacilitate the establishment of such communication channels while respecting the protection of personal data.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 443 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 46
(46) In administrative or judicial proceedings regarding the correct determination of the employment status of persons performing platform work, the elements regarding the organisation of work allowing to establish the employment status and in particular whether the digital labour platform controls certainlimits the engagement in work for other clients or through other platforms or digital and offline means, as well as whether it controls certain key and determining elements of the performance of work may be in the possession of the digital labour platform and not easily accessible to persons performing platform work and competent authorities. National courts or competent authorities should therefore be able to order the digital labour platform to disclose any relevant evidence which lies in their control, including confidential information, subject to effective measures to protect such information.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 504 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) ‘person performingengaged in platform work' means any individual performing platform work, irrespective of the contractual designation of the relationship between that individual and the digital labour platform by the parties involved;
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 517 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
(5) 'representatives’ means the platform workers’ organisations or representatives provided for by national law or practices, or both;
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 544 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall have appropriate procedures in place to verify and ensure the correct determination of the employment status of persons performing platform work, with a view to ascertaining the existence of an employment relationship as defined by the law, collective agreements or. Where such procedures already exist, they shall be harmonized with this Directive through new legislation and collective agreements taking into account the practice in force in the Member States with consideration to the case-law of the Court of Justice, and ensuring that they enjoy the rights deriving from Union law applicable to workers.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 565 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3a This Directive shall apply without prejudice to the Directive 2008/104/EC.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 616 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) effectivelyDe facto determining, or setting upper limits for thethe total level of remuneration, beyond what is required by law;
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 627 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) requiring the person performing platform work to respect specificextensive binding rules with regard to appearance, conduct towards the recipient of the service or performance of the work;, beyond what is required by law or reasonably necessary to safeguard health and safety or to ensure the essential functioning of the service.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 640 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) supervising the performance of work or verifying the quality of the results of the work including by eleincluding by electronic means beyond what is required by law or reasonably necessary to safeguard health and safety or to ensure the essential functrionic means;ng of the service.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 662 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e b (new)
(eb) effectively restricting the possibility to build a client base;
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 714 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
(da) develop precise recommendations providing guidance for digital labour platforms, persons performing platform work and social partners to understand and implement the legal presumption including on the procedures for rebutting it in accordance with Article 5;
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 725 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Ensuring correct determination of the employment status should not prevent the improvement of working conditions of genuine self-employed persons performing platform work. Where a digital labour platform decides – on a purely voluntary basis or in agreement with the persons concerned – to pay for social protection, accident insurance or other forms of insurance, training measures or similar benefits to self- employed persons working through that platform, those benefits as such should not be regarded as determining elements indicating the existence of an employment relationship.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 761 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Member States shall develop a process according to which digital labour platforms and platform workers are granted consultation rights under which national and local authorities pre- emptively assess, approve and justify the employment status of platform workers on the basis of the control of the performance of work within the meaning of Article 4 paragraph 2 of the present Directive.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 770 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5a Improvement of working conditions for genuine self-employed persons performing platform work Ensuring correct determination of the employment status shall not prevent the improvement of working conditions of genuine self-employed persons performing platform work. Where a digital labour platform decides, in agreement with the persons concerned, to pay for social protection, accident insurance or other forms of insurance, training measures or similar benefits to self-employed persons working through that platform, those benefits as such shall not be regarded as determining elements indicating the existence of an employment relationship.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 812 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Digital labour platforms shall not process any personal data concerning platform workers that are not intrinsically connected to and strictly necessary for the performance of the contract between the platform worker and theWithout prejudice to articles 6 and 9 of the GDPR digital labour platform. In particular theys shall not:
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 819 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) process any personal data relating to the health of the platform worker, except in cases referred to in Article 9(2), points (ba) to (j) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 842 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 a (new)
Article 6a Unless otherwise provided in this Directive or in the national law to which the platform operator is subject, in particular legislation concerning access to information, the platform operator shall not be obliged to disclose information which they have designated as confidential.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 875 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that platform workers have the right to obtain an explanation from the digital labour platform for any decision taken or supported by an automated decision- making system that significantly affects the platform worker’s working conditions, as referred to in Article 6(1), point (b). In particularto the extent that this is provided for in Union or Member State law , Member States shall ensure that digital labour platforms provide platform workers with access to a contact person designated by the digital labour platform to discuss and to clarify the facts, circumstances and reasons having led to the decision. Digital labour platforms shall ensure that such contact persons have the necessary competence, training and authority to exercise that function.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 882 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Where platform workers are not satisfied with the explanation or the written statement of reasons obtained or consider that the decision referred to in paragraph 1 infringes their rights, they shall have the right to request the digital labour platform to review that decision. The digital labour platform shall respond to such request by providing the platform worker with a substantiated reply without undue delay and in any event within one week of receiptin line with deadlines outlined in GDPR. That period may be extended by two further months where necessary, taking into account the complexity and number of the requests.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 930 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Without prejudice to Regulations (EC) No 883/200469 and 987/200970 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Member States shall require digital labour platforms which are employers to declare work performed by platform workers to the competent labour and social protection authorities of the Member State in which the work is performed and to share relevant data , including all health and social security contributions, with those authorities, in accordance with the rules and procedures laid down in the law of the Member States concerned. __________________ 69 Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p. 1). 70 Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ L 284, 30.10.2009, p. 1).
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 934 #

2021/0414(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 c (new)
Member States shall ensure full portability of all health and social security contributions, made through platforms, irrespective of the employment classification, and non-discriminatory treatment of persons, engaged in platform work vis-a-vis any other self-employed person or worker.
2022/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1
(1) In its Communication “2030 Digital Compass: the European way for the Digital Decade” of 9 March 202131 (“Digital Compass Communication”) the Commission laid out its vision for 2030 to empower citizens and businesses through the digital transition. The Union way for the digital transformation of economy and society should encompass digital sovereignty, skills development, job creation, competitiveness, inclusion, equality, sustainability, resilience, security, improving quality of life, respect of citizens’ rights and aspirations and should contribute to a dynamic, resource efficient, and fair economy and society in the Union, contributing to making Europe the entrepreneurial hotspot of the world. _________________ 31 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions “2030 Digital Compass: the European way for the Digital Decade” COM/2021/118 final/2.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
(4) The Commission’s Communication on the European Green Deal35 emphasised that Europe should leverage the potential of the digital transformation, which is a key enabler for reaching the Green Deal objectives. The Union should promote and invest in the necessary digital transformation as digital technologies are a critical enabler for attaining the sustainability goals of the Green Deal in many different sectors. Digital technologies such as artificial intelligence, 5G, cloud and edge computing and the internet of things can accelerate and maximise the impact of policies to deal with climate change and protect the environment. Digitalisation also presents new opportunities for distance monitoring of air and water pollution, or for monitoring and optimising how energy and natural resources are used. Europe needs a digital sector that puts sustainability and competitiveness at its heart, ensuring that digital infrastructures and technologies become verifiably more sustainable and energy- and resource efficient, and contribute to a sustainable circular and climate-neutral economy and society in line with the European Green Deal. _________________ 35 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions “The European Green deal”, 11.12.2019, COM/2019/640 final.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
(5) The measures envisaged in the Digital Compass Communication should be implemented, to intensify actions defined in the strategy for Shaping Europe’s digital future, and building on existing Union instruments (such as Cohesion programmes, the Technical Support Instrument, Regulation (EU) 2021/694 of the European Parliament and of the Council36 , Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council37 and Regulation (EU) 2021/523 of the European Parliament and of the Council38 ) and on the funds allocated for digital transition of Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 making use, where appropriate, of synergies between the union and national funds. By this Decision, a Policy Programme “Path to the Digital Decade” should therefore be established in order to achieve, accelerate and shape a successful digital transformation of the Union’s economy and society, leaving no one behind. _________________ 36 Regulation (EU) 2021/694 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2021 establishing the Digital Europe Programme and repealing Decision (EU) 2015/2240 (OJ L 166, 11.5.2021, p. 1). 37 Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1290/2013 and (EU) No 1291/2013 (OJ L 170, 12.5.2021, p. 1). 38 Regulation (EU) 2021/523 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 March 2021 establishing the InvestEU Programme and amending Regulation (EU) 2015/1017 ( OJ L 107, 26.3.2021, p. 30). 39 Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 February 2021 establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility (OJ L 57, 18.2.2021, p. 17).
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 6
(6) In order to follow the trajectory of the Union regarding the pace of digital transformation, digital targets should be established, taking into account specific situations and differences in individual Member States’ capacities. These targets should be linked to concrete areas, where progress should collectively be made within the Union. The targets follow the four cardinal points identified in the Digital Compass Communication, identified as the essential areas for the digital transformation of the Union: digital skills, digital infrastructures, digitalisation of businesses and of public services.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 7
(7) Digital skills, basic and advanced, are essential to reinforce the collective resilience of the Union’s society and to strengthen the competitiveness of our economies. Digitally empowered and capable citizens at any age will be able to take advantage of the opportunities of the Digital Decade. Moreover, high quality and inclusive digital training and education should support a workforce in which people can acquire specialised digital skills, keeping up with the demands of modern labour markets, to get quality jobs and rewarding careers in much greater numbers than today, with convergence between women and men. In addition, an essential enabler for taking advantage of the benefits of digitisation, for further technological developments and for Europe’s digital leadership is a sustainable digital infrastructure for connectivity, microelectronics and the ability to process vast data. Excellent and secure connectivity for everybody and everywhere in Europe including in rural and remote areas40 is needed. Societal needs for upload and download bandwidth are constantly growing. By 2030, networks with gigabit speeds should become available at accessible conditions for all those who need or wish such capacity. Moreover, microprocessors which are already today at the start of most of the key, strategic value chains are expected to be in even higher demand in the future, in particular the most innovative ones. Climate neutral highly secure edge node guaranteeing access to data services with low latency wherever businesses are located and quantum capacity are also expected to be critical enablers. _________________ 40 Long-term Vision for the EU’s Rural Areas. COM(2021) 345 final.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
(9) Democratic life and public services will also crucially depend on digital technologies and therefore they should be fully accessible for everyone, including persons with disabilities and senior citizens, as a best–in- class digital environment providing for easy-to-use, efficient and personalised services and tools with high security and privacy standards.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 11
(11) A harmonious, inclusive and steady progress towards the digital transformation and towards the achievement of the digital targets in the Union, requires a comprehensive, robust, reliable, inclusive, flexible and transparent form of governance, based on close cooperation and coordination between the Union institutions, bodies and agencies, and the Member States and a wide range of stakeholders and social partners. An appropriate mechanism should ensure coordination of convergence and the consistency and effectiveness of policies and measures at Union and national level. Therefore, it is necessary to lay down provisions on a monitoring and cooperation mechanism implementing the Digital Compass Communication.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 19
(19) The Commission should, together with Member States, develop projected trajectories for the Union to reach the digital targets as laid down in this Decision. The trajectories should be developed using clearly established criteria. These projected trajectories should then be translated by Member States into national trajectories, where possible. The different potential of Member States to contribute to the digital targets, their specific situation and different starting points, as well as regional differences should be taken into account and reflected in national trajectories. These trajectories should help assess progress over time at Union and national level respectively.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 29
(29) In order to ensure transparency and public participation, the Commission should engage with all interested stakeholders. To that end, the Commission should closely cooperate with stakeholders including private and public actors, such as bodies governed by public laws of the educational or health sector, as well as social partners, and consult them on measures to accelerate the digital transformation at Union level. The involvement of stakeholders would be important at the level of Member States as well, in particular when adopting their national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps and their adjustments.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 29 a (new)
(29 a) Investments in digital infrastructure, early digital education, updated digital education curricula and lifelong learning are paramount for the development of the qualifications necessary in the digital age to tackle digital exclusion and overcome the digital divide in society, starting with children, younger and older people in the Union as well as people in rural and remote areas.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 29 b (new)
(29 b) The Union must become an entrepreneurial hotspot and a global leader in promoting the socially responsible, ethical, transparent and accountable use of artificial intelligence. The Union’s employment and social acquis fully apply to artificial intelligence and it is of utmost importance that proper enforcement of employment law relating to digital services is ensured in order to prevent, inter alia, the exploitation of workers and the abuse of undeclared work.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 127 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) promote a human-centered, ethical, growth-stimulating, innovative, inclusive, secure and open digital environment where digital technologies and services respect and enhance Union principles and values;
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) ensure that democratic life, public services and health and care services are accessible online for everyone, in particular disadvantaged groups including persons with disabilities and senior citizens, offering inclusive, efficient and personalised services and tools with high security and privacy standards, as well as training programs for digital skills development;
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ensure that digital infrastructures and technologies become more sustainable, competitive, resilient and energy- and resource efficient, and contribute to a sustainable circular and climate-neutral economy and society in line with the European Green Deal;
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 205 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – introductory part
(a) at least 75% of Union enterprises have taken up accordingly to their individual needs and preferences:
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 222 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
(c) at least 80% of Union citizens use a digital identification (ID) solutionhave access to and possess necessary skills to be able to use a digital identification (ID) solution according to their individual needs and preferences.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 227 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 1
(1) The Commission shall monitor the progress of the Union against the objectives and digital targets set out in Articles 2 and 4. To this end, the Commission shall rely upon Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), and for the purpose of this decision, in accordance with Article 25 (2), shall set out in an implementing act the key performance indicators (‘KPIs’) for each digital target. . , taking into account the specific situation and differences in individual Member States’ capacities.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 231 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 3
(3) The Commission, in close cooperation with Member States, shall, using clearly established criteria, define Union-level projected trajectories for the attainment of each of the digital targets, which would serve as basis for the monitoring and the national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps. Where necessary, in light of technical, economic or societal developments, the Commission shall update one or more of these projected trajectories.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 245 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 1
(1) By [sixtwelwe months after the entry into force of this Decision- specific date to be inserted by OP], Member States shall submit to the Commission their national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps which shall be consistent with, and contribute to achieving at Union level, the objectives and digital targets set out in this Decision. Member States and the Commission shall take into account relevant sectoral initiatives and ensure consistency with them.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 255 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 2
(2) Within two months from the publication of the report on the “State of the Digital Decade”, the Commission and the Member States shall endeavor to discuss the Member State’s preliminary observations, notably as regards policies, measures and actions recommended by the Commission in the report on the “State of the Digital Decade” and possible areas of cooperation, assistance and support that could be provided by the Commission to Member States in the face of identified shortages and gaps.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 261 #

2021/0293(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 11 – paragraph 1
(1) The Commission shall closely cooperate with the Member States, relevant private and public stakeholders, including social partners, to collect information and develop recommended policies, measures and actions for the purposes of the implementation of this Decision.
2022/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2021/0223(COD)

(2) Various instruments of Union law already set targets for renewable fuels. Directive 2018/2001/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council45 for instance set a market share target of 14 % of renewables in transport fuels, including a target of 3,5% for advanced biofuels. _________________ 45 Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 82).
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 108 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) The initiatives on ReFuelEU aviation48 and FuelEU maritime49 should boost the production and uptake of sustainable alternative fuels in aviation and maritime transport. While the fuel use requirements for the sustainable aviation fuels can largely rely on the existing refuelling infrastructure, investments are needed for the electricity supply of stationary aircraft. The FuelEU maritime initiative sets requirements in particular for the use of on shore power that can only be fulfilled if an adequate level of on shore power supply is deployed in TEN-T ports. However those initiatives do not contain any provisions on the required fuel infrastructure which are a prerequisite that the targets can be met. Moreover the infrastructure for renewable fuels bunkering of ships should gain special attention throughout the ports of Europe to fast track the decarbonisation of ships. The heavy-duty vehicle renewable fuels infrastructure should focus on available renewable fuel technology and increase the level of ambition in the (bio-) LNG infrastructure throughout Europe to allow fast decarbonisation of heavy-duty vehicles, whilst new technology for these vehicles can be further developed. _________________ 48 COM(2021) 561. 49 COM(2021) 562.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 110 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) Therefore all modes of transport should be addressed in one instrument which should take into account a variety of alternative fuels, the development of their market share and particularly their affordability. The use of zero-emission powertrain technologies and alternative fuels is at different stages of maturity in the different modes of transport and in different Member States and regions. In particular, in the road sector, a rapid uptake of battery-electric and plug-in hybrid passenger cars and light commercial vehicles is taking place. Hydrogen fuel-cell road vehicles are available to markets, as well. In addition, smaller hydrogen and battery electric vessels and hydrogen fuel- cell trains are currently being deployed in different projects and in first commercial operations, with full commercial roll out expected in the next years. In contrast, the aviation and waterborne sectors , as well as heavy-duty road transport continue to be dependent on liquid and gaseous fuels, as zero- and low-emission powertrain solutions are expected to enter the market only around 2030 and in particular for the aviation sector even later, with full commercialisation taking its time. The use of fossil gaseous or liquid fuels is only possible if it is clearly embedded into a clear decarbonisation pathway that is in line with the long-term objective of climate neutrality in the Union, requiring increasing blending with or replacement by renewable fuels such as bio-methane, advanced biofuelsgaseous or liquid bio-methane, biomass fuels, biofuels, advanced biofuels, recycled carbonfuels, renewable fuels of non-biological origin or renewable and low- carbon synthetic gaseous and liquid fuels.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 113 #

2021/0223(COD)

(5 a) Therefore, the general principle of technological neutrality should be maintained and market competition between the different alternative technologies should be promoted and protected on Union and national levels, thus providing for the best technological solutions and affordable prices. Targets and milestones should be set on Union and national levels, depending on the market development of different technologies, while taking into account the different starting points of Member States and EU regions.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 114 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Such biofuels, advanced biofuels and synthetic fuels, substituting diesel, petrol and jet fuel, can be produced from different feedstock and can be blended into fossil fuels at very high blending ratios. They can be technically used with the current vehicle technology with minor or no adaptations. Renewable and bio-LNG can be used for heavy-duty transport, both road and maritime, as demonstrated by the fact that already 20% of gas used in road transport is bio-methane. Renewable methanol can also be used for inland navigation and short-sea shipping. Synthetic and paraffinic fuels have a potential to reduce the use of fossil fuel sources in the energy supply to transport. All of these fuels can be distributed, stored and used with the existing infrastructure or where necessary with infrastructure of the same kind. The potential of biogas as a renewable source should be taken into account and included in the definition of gas in the regulation.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 120 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) LNG is likely to play a continued role in maritime transport, where there is currently no economically viable zero- emission powertrain technology available. The Communication on the Smart and Sustainable Mobility Strategy points to zero-emission seagoing ships becoming market ready by 2030. Fleet conversion based on relevant, affordable and viable new technologies should take place gradually due to the long lifetime of the ships. Contrary to maritime transport, fFor inland waterways, with normally smaller vessels and shorter distances, low- and zero-emission powertrain technologies, such as hydrogen and, electricity, sh and other alternative fuels, could enter the markets more quickly. LNG is, CNG, LPG and their renewable derivatives are, however expected to no longer play a significant role in that sectorand the competitive development of the market in this sector is still ongoing. Transport fuels such as LNG need increasingly to be decarbonised by blending/substituting with liquefied biomethane (bio-LNG) or renewable and low-carbon synthetic gaseous e-fuels (e- gas) for instance. Those decarbonised fuels can be used in the same infrastructure as gaseous fossil fuels thereby allowing for a gradual shift towards decarbonised fuels.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 121 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) In the heavy-duty road transport sector, LNG trucks are fully mature and can run on a high blend of bio-LNG . On the one hand, the common scenarios underpinning the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy and the Climate Target Plan as well as the revised “Fit for 55” modelling scenarios suggest some limited role of gaseous fuels that will increasingly be decarbonised in heavy-duty road transport especially in the long haul segment. Furthermore,On the other hand, LNG and bio-LNG are readily available and competitive solutions to cut GHG emissions of the heavy-duty sector, and LNG stations network in Europe remains insufficient in relation to the minimum requirements to match the demand and decarbonization needs of the sector towards 2030 and beyond. LPG and CNG vehicles for which already a sufficientsome infrastructure network exists across the Union are expected to gradually be replaced by zero emission drivetrains and therefore only a limitclimate-neutral alternative fuels, despite this not being an existing market tendency yet. Therefore an extended targeted policy for LNG infrastructure deployment that can equally supply decarbonised fuels is considered necessary to close remaining gaps in the main networks. As the market for decarbonised heavy-duty vehicles is still developing, a variety of alternative technologies should be incentivised, including via infrastructure planning and adaptation, while taking into account market shares and traffic data.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 126 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The deployment of publicly accessible recharging infrastructure for light-duty electric vehicles has been uneven across the Union. Continued uneven distribution would jeopardize the uptake of such vehicles, limiting connectivity across the Union. Continuing divergence in policy ambitions and approaches at national level will not create the long-term certainty needed for substantive market investment. Mandatory minimum targets for Member States at national level should therefore provide policy orientations and complement National Policy Frameworks. That approach should combine national fleet based targets with distance-based targets for the trans-European network for transport (TEN-T)., taking into account the need for flexibility in sparsely populated areas National fleet based targets should ensure that vehicle uptake in each Member State is matched with the deployment of sufficient publicly accessible recharging infrastructure. Distance-based targets for the TEN-T network should ensure full coverage of electric recharging points along the Union’s main road networks and thereby ensure easy and seamless travel throughout the Union.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 130 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) National fleet based targets should be established on the basis of the total number of registered electric vehicles in that Member State following a common methodology that accounts for technological developments such as the increased driving range of electric vehicles or the increasing market penetration of fast-charging points which can recharge a greater number of vehicles per recharging point than at a normal recharging point. The methodology also has to take into account the different recharging patterns of battery electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles as well as population density. A methodology that norms national fleet based targets on the total maximum power output of the publicly accessible recharging infrastructure should allow flexibility for the implementation of different recharging technologies in Member States.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 135 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22 a (new)
(22 a) Newly proposed obligations regarding a minimum coverage of publicly accessible recharging points dedicated to light and heavy-duty vehicles on the road network result in increased expectations on distribution system operators to connect recharging points, which will consequently affect distribution system in terms of additional investment cost and its functioning on the daily basis. Therefore, implementation of the tasks resulting from this regulation should take into account the technical and financial capabilities of distribution system operators.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 137 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) At the early stage of market deployment there is still a degree of uncertainty with regard to the kind of vehicles that will come into the market and to the kind of technologies that are going to be widely used. As outlined in the Commission’s communication ‘A hydrogen strategy for a climate-neutral Europe’56 the heavy-duty segment was identified as the most likely segment for the early mass deployment of hydrogen vehicles. Therefore, hydrogen refuelling infrastructure should preliminarily focus on that segment while also allowing light-duty vehicles to fuel at publicly accessible hydrogen refuelling stations. To ensure interoperability, all publicly accessible hydrogen stations should at least serve gaseous hydrogen at 700 bar. The infrastructure roll out should also take into account the emergence of new technologies, such as liquid hydrogen, that allow a larger range for heavy-duty vehicles and are the preferred technology choice of some vehicle manufacturers. To that end, a minimum number of hydrogen refuelling stations should serve also liquid hydrogen in addition to gaseous hydrogen at 700 bar. _________________ 56 COM(2020) 301 final
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 140 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) A number of LNG refuelling points are established in the Union, already providing a backbone for the circulation of LNG driven heavy-duty vehicles. The TEN-T core network should remain the basis for the deployment of LNG infrastructure, and progressively for bio- LNG, as it covers the main traffic flows and allows cross border connectivity throughout the Union. It had been recommended in Directive 2014/94/EU that such refuelling points be installed every 400 km on the TEN-T core network, but certain limitedsome important gaps in the network remain to reach that objective. Member States should by 2025 reach that objective and fill the remaining gaps, after which the target should cease to applacross the EU and its regions to reach that objective. LNG stations are insufficient especially in Eastern Europe and in third countries, situated on international transport corridors, including corridors, linking different Member States. Member States should by 2025 reach that objective and fill the remaining gaps, after which they should be able to further support the extension of their network in line with their decarbonisation pathway.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 154 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) The revised national policy frameworks should include detailed market and traffic shares, especially for transit traffic, data monitoring and evaluation on a frequent basis, providing for market projections and supporting actions for the development of the market as regards alternative fuels, including the deployment of the necessary infrastructure to be put into place, in close cooperation with regional and local authorities and with the industry concerned, while taking into account the needs of small and medium- sized enterprises. Additionally, the revised frameworks should describe the overall national framework for planning, permitting and procuring of such infrastructure, including the identified obstacles and actions to remove them so shat a faster rollout of infrastructure can be achieved.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 155 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
(40) In order to promote alternative fuels and develop the relevant infrastructure, the national policy frameworks should consist of detailed strategies to promote alternative fuels in sectors that are difficult to decarbonise such as aviation, maritime transport, inland waterway transport as well as rail transport on network segments that cannot be electrified. In particular, Member States should develop clear strategies for the decarbonisation of inland waterway transport along the TEN-T network in close cooperation with those Member States concerned. Long term decarbonisation strategies should also be developed for TEN-T ports and TEN-T airports, in particular with a focus on the deployment of infrastructure for low and zero emission vessels and aircraft as well as for railway lines that are not going to be electrified. On the basis of those strategies taking into consideration the national market and traffic share data and market projections, the Commission should review this Regulation with a view to setting more mandatory targets for those sectors.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 159 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
(46) Data should play a fundamental role in the adequate functioning of recharging and refuelling infrastructure. The format, the frequency and the quality in which these data should be made available and accessible should determine the overall quality of an alternative fuels infrastructure ecosystem that meets user needs. Moreover, those data should be accessible in a coherent manner in all Member States. Therefore, data should be provided in accordance with the requirements set in Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and the Council59 for national access points (NAPs). _________________ 59 Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the framework for the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in the field of road transport and for interfaces with other modes of transport (OJ L 207, 6.8.2010, p. 1)through a single European access point, to ensure a uniform format and enable operators to supply data once.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 162 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
(54) The market for alternative fuels and in particular for zero emission fuels is still in the early stages of development and technology is evolving fast. This should likely affect the demand for alternative fuels and consequently for alternative fuels infrastructure across the modes. The Commission should therefore review this Regulation by the end of 2026 in particular as regards the targets setting for electric recharging points for HDV as well as t, taking into account national margkets for infrastructure for alternative fuels for zero-emission vessels and aircraft in waterborne transport and avia and traffic shares data and market projections.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 163 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54 a (new)
(54 a) Given that this Regulation will generate additional compliance costs for affected sectors, compensatory actions need to be taken in order to prevent the total level of regulatory burdens from increasing. The Commission should therefore be obliged to present, before the entry into force of this Regulation, proposals offsetting the regulatory burdens introduced by this Regulation, through the revision or removal of provisions in other EU Regulations that generate compliance costs in the affected sectors.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 166 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part
(3) ‘alternative fuels’ means fuels or power sources which serve, at least partly, as a substitute for fossil oil sources in the energy supply to transport and which have the potential to contribute on a permanent basis or for a transitional phase to its decarbonisation and enhance the environmental performance of the transport sector, including:
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 167 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – introductory part
(a) ‘alternative fuels for low- and zero- emission vehicles’:
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 168 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – indent 2
– hydrogen and hydrogen derived fuels,
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 169 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – indent 1
– biomass fuels and biofuels as defined in Article 2, points (27) and (33) of Directive (EU) 2018/2001such as bio-hydrogen, bio-ammonia, bio-methane, bio-LNG, bio-CNG, bio-LPG, RCF,
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 170 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b – indent 2
– synthetic and paraffinic fuels, including ammoniae-hydrogen, e-ammonia, e- methanol, e-methane, e-LNG, rDME, RFNBO, produced from renewable energy,
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 173 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c – introductory part
(c) ‘alternative fossil fuels’ for a transitional phaseprogressively blended with renewable fuels:
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 174 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c a (new)
(c a) all fuels, produced by blending by fuels, enumerated under the present point 3, are considered alternative fuels, for the purpose of this Regulation,
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 177 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 39
(39) ‘Quick Response code’ (QR code) means an ISO 18004-compliant encoding and visualization of data;deleted
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 184 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 a (new)
- the grid connection and the grid capacity are provided,
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 202 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i
(i) by 31 December 20257, each recharging pool shall offer a power output of at least 300 kW and include at least one recharging station with an individual power output of at least 150 kW;
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 210 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. Neighbouring Member States shall ensure that the maximum distances referred to in points (a) and (b) are not exceeded for cross-border sections of the TEN-T core and, unless economically unfeasible, of the TEN-T comprehensive network.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 212 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Paragraph 1 and 2 shall not apply to the outermost regions and islands, if the costs are disproportionate to the benefits, including environmental ones. In such a case, Member States shall reasonably explain their decision and shall make available that information on their national policy frameworks.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 215 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. The Commission should take the necessary measures to ensure the cooperation with third-countries, especially candidates for membership in the EU and those third countries, in which transit corridors, connecting Member Stats, are situated.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 216 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 c (new)
3 c. Where a recharging pool is serving both light and heavy-duty vehicles, the recharging pool and the recharging stations within shall be regarded as publicly accessible recharging infrastructure for both light duty and heavy duty road vehicles, provided that the total installed capacity and type of chargers are as required for both light and heavy-duty vehicles.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 217 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 d (new)
3 d. The provisions of this article shall not apply to existing sections of the TEN- T core network which at the date specified in art. 3 are under upgrade/construction process, and in accordance with Regulation 1315/2013 has a status of section “to be upgraded”. Member states shall ensure a minimum coverage of publicly accessible recharging points, for all newly constructed, upgraded and retrofitted sections of the TEN-T core network in accordance with the provisions of art. 3 or within 24 months after the completion of works [if date of completion is beyond date given by art. 3].
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 223 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) by 31 December 202530, each recharging pool shall offer a power output of at least 1400 kW and include at least one recharging station with an individual power output of at least 350 kW;
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 225 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) by 31 December 2030, each recharging pool shall offer a power output of at least 3500 kW and include at least two recharging stations with an individual power output of at least 350 kW;deleted
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 231 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) by 31 December 20305, each recharging pool shall offer a power output of at least 1400 kW and include at least one recharging station with an individual power output of at least 350 kW;
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 234 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) by 1 December 2035, each recharging pool shall offer a power output of at least 3500 kW and include at least two recharging stations with an individual power output of at least 350 kW;deleted
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 247 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(e a) Member States shall ensure that the grid connection and the grid capacity necessary is provided;
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 250 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to the outermost regions and islands, if the costs are disproportionate to the benefits, including environmental benefits. In such a case, Member States shall reasonably explain their decision and shall make available that information on their national policy frameworks.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 252 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. The Commission should take the necessary measures to ensure the cooperation with third countries, especially candidates for membership in the EU and those third countries in which transit corridors connecting Member States are situated.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 256 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
(a) operators of recharging points shall, at publicly accessible recharging stations with a power output below 50 kW, deployed from the date referred to in Article 24, accept electronic payments through terminals and devices used for payment services, including at least one of the following:
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 260 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii
(iii) devices using an internet connection with which for instance a Quick Response code can be specifically generated and used for the payment transaction;deleted
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 262 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) operators of recharging points shall, at publicly accessible recharging stations with a power output equal to or more than 50 kW, deployed from the date referred to in Article 24, accept electronic payments through terminals and devices used for payment services, including at least one of the following: (i) payment card readers; (ii) devices with a contactless functionality that is at least able to read payment cards.deleted
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 267 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
From 1 January 2027 onwards, operators of recharging points shall ensure that all publicly accessible recharging stations with a power output equal to or more than 50 kW operated by them comply with the requirement in point (b)of this paragraph.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 270 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The requirements laid down in points (a) and (b)this paragraph shall not apply to publicly accessible recharging points that do not require payment for the recharging service.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 272 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Prices charged by operators of publicly accessible recharging points shall be reasonable, easily and clearly comparable, transparent and non- discriminatory. Operators of publicly accessible recharging points shall not discriminate between the prices charged to end users and prices charged to mobility service providers nor between prices charged to different mobility service providers. Where relevant, the level of prices may only be differentiated in a proportionate manner, according to an objective justification.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 278 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Operators of publicly accessible recharging points shall ensure that all publicly accessible recharging points operated by them comply with provisions of directive (EU) 2016/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 279 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that, in their territory, a minimum number of publicly accessible hydrogen refuelling stations are put in place in accordance with reasonable national and EU-wide market share and transit traffic share indicators by 31 December 2030.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 281 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
To that end as a jump-start investment Member States shall ensureplan that by 31 December 2030 publicly accessible hydrogen refuelling stations with a minimum capacity of 2 t/day and equipped with at least a 700 bars dispenser are deployed with a maximum distance of 150 km in-between them along the TEN-T core and the TEN-T comprehensive network. Liquid hydrogen shall be made available at publicly accessible refuelling stations with a maximum distance of 450 km in-between them.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 284 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
They shall ensure that by 31 December 2030, at least one publicly accessible hydrogen refuelling station is deployed in each urban node. An analysis on the best location shall be carried out for such refuelling stations that shall in particular consider the deployment of such stations in multimodal hubs where also other transport modes could be supplied.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 286 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to outermost regions and islands, if the costs are disproportionate to the benefits, including environmental benefits. In such a case, Member States shall reasonably explain their decision and shall make available that information on their national policy frameworks.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 287 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. The Commission shall take the necessary measures to ensure cooperation with third countries, especially candidates for membership in the EU and those third countries in which transit corridors connecting Member States are situated.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 292 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Prices charged by the operators of publicly accessible hydrogen refuelling points shall be reasonable, easily and clearly comparable, transparent and non- discriminatory. Operators of publicly accessible hydrogen refuelling points shall not discriminate between the prices charged to end users and those charged to mobility service providers as well as between the prices charged to different mobility service providers. Where relevant, the level of prices may only be differentiated according to an objective justification.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 295 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – title
LTargets for LNG, LPG and CNG infrastructure for road transport vehicles
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 297 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure at least until 1 January 202530 that an appropriate number of publicly accessible refuelling points for LNG bio-LNG, LPG, and CNG and bio- CNG are put in place, at least along the TEN-T core network, in order to allow LNG, bio-LNG, LPG, and CNG and bio- CNG heavy-duty motor vehicles to circulate throughout the Union, where there is demand, unless the costs are disproportionate to the benefits, including environmental benefits. . 2.As an indication, the necessary average distance between refuelling points should be no longer than 400 km 3.To this end, Member States take the necessary measures to ensure that, by 31 December 2030: a) In urban areas, CNG stations are installed according to a spatial density criterion ensuring that one station covers a catchment area of 20 km²,in order to promote the use of natural gas and biomethane in cities, including for public transport. b) LNG, LPG and CNG refuelling infrastructures are built in correspondence of road infrastructures such as motorways, facilitating their access to the public. 4.Without prejudice to the previous points, Member States support the installation of LNG LPG and CNG refuelling stations also at LNG logistics centres, depots or multipurpose refuelling stations in ports, as well as at airports for the refuelling of ground-moving vehicles, such as vehicles for the transport of passengers. 5.Further targets, including for the TEN- T comprehensive network, shall be set by Member States, in accordance with reasonable national and EU-wide market share and transit traffic share indicators, allowing for unhindered use of the LNG, CNG and LPG fleets. 6.All newly-build infrastructure for LNG, CNG and LPG should be compatible with renewable fuels and allowing for progressive blending with and gradual replacement of alternative fossil fuels. 7.The Commission shall assess the application of the requirement in paragraph 1 and, as appropriate, submit a proposal to amend this Directive by 31 December 2026, taking into account the LNG heavy-duty motor vehicles market, in order to ensure that an appropriate number of refuelling points for LNG accessible to the public are put in place in each Member State. 8. The provisions of this Article shall not apply to the outermost regions and islands, if the costs are disproportionate to the benefits, including environmental benefits. In such a case, Member States shall reasonably explain their decision and shall make available that information on their national policy frameworks. 9. The Commission should take the necessary measures to ensure the cooperation with third-countries, especially candidates for membership in the EU and those third countries, in which transit corridors, connecting Member Stats, are situated.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 300 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Where the maritime port of the TEN-T core network and the TEN-T comprehensive network is located on an island which is not connected directly to the electricity grid, or in an outermost region, paragraph 1 shall not apply, until such a connection has been completed or there is a sufficient locally generated capacity from clean energy sources.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 302 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – title
Targets for supply of LNG and other alternative fuels in maritime ports
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 303 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that an appropriate number of refuelling points for LNG are put in place at TEN-T core maritime ports referred to in paragraph 2, to enable seagoing ships to circulate throughout the TEN-T core network by 1 January 2030, and ensuring that all TEN- T core ports have LNG refuelling points by 2025. Member States shall cooperate with neighbouring Member States where necessary to ensure adequate coverage of the TEN-T core network.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 305 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. In the pursuit of efficient planning, Member States shall designate in their national policy frameworks TEN-T core and comprehensive maritime ports that shall provide access to the refuelling points for LNG referred to in paragraph 1, also taking into consideration existing LNG supply points as well as actual market needs and developments.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 306 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Member States shall support the development or retrofitting of needed infrastructure to facilitate the penetration of renewable and low-carbon gases.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 307 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 a (new)
Article 11 a Targets for supply of LNG and other alternative fuels in rail sector In the pursuit of efficient planning, Member States shall identify, within their national policy frameworks, in which parts of their non-electrified railroads, still relying on more polluting fossil fuels such as diesel or fuel oil, it is economically advisable, compared to electrification, to ensure an appropriate level of LNG infrastructure or other alternative fuel infrastructure. By 1 January 2030, Member States will ensure in those already identified parts of their rail networks, an appropriate number of LNG refuelling points or alternative fuel infrastructure. Member States shall cooperate with neighbouring Member States where necessary to ensure adequate coverage. Member States shall support the development or retrofitting of needed LNG infrastructure to facilitate the penetration of renewable and low-carbon gases.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 308 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Where the airport of the TEN-T core network or the TEN-T comprehensive network is located on an island which is not connected directly to the electricity grid or in an outermost region, paragraph1 shall not apply until such a connection has been completed or there is sufficient locally generated capacity from clean energy sources or if the costs are disproportionate to the benefits, including environmental benefits.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 309 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. By 1 January 2024, each Member State jointly with regional, national and local authorities shall prepare and send to the Commission a draft national policy framework for the development of the market as regards alternative fuels in the transport sector and the deployment of the relevant infrastructure. The national policy framework shall be based on detailed market and traffic shares, especially for transit traffic, data monitoring and include detailed market projections.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 310 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) an assessment of the current state and future development of the market as regards alternative fuels in the transport sector, and of the development of alternative fuels infrastructure, considering intermodal access of alternative fuels infrastructure and, where relevant, cross- border continuity and mobility and accessibility between outermost regions and between them and the mainland;
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 312 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) national targets and objectives pursuant to Articles 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 for which mandatory national targets are set out in this Regulation;
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 313 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point k a (new)
(k a) measures to ensure that the density of publicly accessible alternative fuels infrastructure available at national level takes into account the population density and the number of registrations of vehicles, powered by alternative fuels in the local area based on NUTS 3 level in accordance with the latest NUTS classification;
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 314 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point n
(n) a deployment plan for alternative fuels infrastructure in maritime ports other than for LNG and shore-side electricity supply for use by sea going vessels, in particular for hydrogen, ammoniahydrogen derived fuels and electricity;
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 315 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point o
(o) a deployment plan for alternative fuels in inland waterway transport, in particular for both hydrogen and, electricity, LNG and other relevant alternative fuels;
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 318 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that the national policy frameworks take into account regional disparities and the needs of the different regions and transport modes existing on their territory, including those for which limited alternatives to fossil fuels are available.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 319 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Member States shall cooperate with the relevant distribution system operators in preparing their national policy frameworks in relation to deployment of recharging points.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 323 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Members States, in their policy frameworks, shall take into account regional disparities and pay special attention to less developed regions (at NUTS-2 level), especially those with Regional GDP (PPS per inhabitant in % of the EU 27) under 50.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 324 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. The Commission should take the necessary measures to ensure the cooperation with third-countries, especially candidates for membership in the EU and those third countries, in which transit corridors, connecting Member States, are situated.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 328 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 7 – point b
(b) policies and measures relating to Member States’ objectives and targets, targets and their geographic distribution across the regions within the Member .
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 331 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. The regulatory authority of a Member States shall assess, in cooperation with distribution system operators concerned at the latest by 30 June 2024 and periodically every three years thereafter, how the deployment and operation of recharging points could enable electric vehicles to further contribute to the flexibility of the energy system, including their participation in the balancing market, and to the further absorption of renewable electricity. That assessment shall take into account all types of recharging points, whether public or private, and provide recommendations in terms of type, supporting technology and geographical distribution in order to facilitate the ability of users to integrate their electric vehicles in the system. It shall be made publicly available. On the basis of the results of the assessment, Member States shall, if necessary, take the appropriate measures for the deployment of additional recharging points and include them in their progress report referred to in paragraph 1. The assessment and measures shall be taken into account by the system operators in the network development plans referred to in Article 32(3) and Article 51 of Directive (EU) 2019/944.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 332 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) the number of publicly accessible hydrogen and other renewable refuelling points;
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 334 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – point j a (new)
(j a) the alternative fuel infrastructure in outermost regions and islands;
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 338 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii
(ii) number of and availability connectors,
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 340 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 a (new)
Article 21 a Compensatory regulatory reduction The Commission shall present, one year after the entry into force of this Regulation at the latest, and in line with its communication on the application of the “one in, one out” principle, proposals offsetting the regulatory burdens introduced by this Regulation, through the revision or removal of provisions in other EU Regulations that generate compliance costs in the affected sectors.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 341 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – title
Report and review
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 342 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point 1 (new)
(1) The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council, by 1 January 2030, and every third year until 2050, the results of an evaluation on the functioning of this Regulation, with emphasis on this Regulation’s effects on the funtioning of the single market, the competitiveness of affected sectors and the magnitude of carbon leakage.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 343 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new)
(2) The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council, by 1 January 2030, and every fifth year until 2050, the results of a comprehensive evaluation of the aggregated macroeconomic impact of the Regulations that make up the Fit for 55 package,[1]with emphasis on the effects on the Union’s competitiveness, job creation, transport freight rates, household purchasing power and the magnitude of carbon leakage. [1] Communication from the Commission (COM/2021/550), 14 July 2021.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 344 #

2021/0223(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (new)
(3) The Commission shall consider possible amendments to this Regulation with regards to regulatory simplification. The Commission and the competent authorities shall continuously adapt to best practice administrative procedures and take all measures to simplify the enforcement of this Regulation, keeping administrative burdens to a minimum.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 207 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a – point i
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 26 – paragraph 1
For the calculation of a Member State's gross final consumption of energy from renewable sources referred to in Article 7 and of the greenhouse gas intensity reduction target referred to in Article 25(1), first subparagraph, point (a), the share of biofuels and bioliquids, as well as of biomass fuels consumed in transport, where produced from food and feed crops, shall be no more than one percentage point higher than the share of such fuels in the final consumption of energy in the transport sector in 2020 in that Member State, with a maximum of other than high indirect land use change risk feedstock for which a significant expansion of the production area into land with high carbon stock is observed, shall be no more than 7 % of the final consumption of energy in the transport sector in that Member Stateat EU level.;
2022/02/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 210 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a – point i a (new)
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 26 – paragraph 1
(ia) the second subparagraph is deleted
2022/02/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 214 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a – point ii – introductory part
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 26 – paragraph 1
(ii) the fourth subparagraph is replaced by the following:deleted.;
2022/02/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 303 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 31
(21) in Article 31, paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 are deleted:
2022/02/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 309 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 31a – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall ensure that a Union database is set up to enable the tracing of liquid and gaseous renewable fuels, including the tracing of the feedstocks listed in Annex IX used in their production, and recycled carbon fuels.
2022/02/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 313 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2
Regulation 2018/1999/EC
Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – point 2 –subparagraph 3 (new)
Member States shall collectively ensure that the sum of their contribution of biofuels produced from food and feed crops other than high ILUC-risk feedstocks to the greenhouse gas intensity reduction in the transport sector does not exceed the level set in Article 26.1of Directive 2018/2001/EC. The European Commission shall, on the basis of the cumulated national integrated national and climate progress reports and their Annex IX, issue recommendation to adjust Member States’ forecasts to ensure compliance with the 7% limit at EU level.;
2022/02/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 314 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Directive 98/70/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 3
(2 a) Article 3 is amended as follows: Paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: Member States shall require suppliers to ensure the placing on the market of petrol with a minimum oxygen content of 2.7 % m/m or a minimum ethanol content of 5 % v/v. They shall ensure the provision of appropriate information to consumers concerning the biofuel content of petrol and, in particular, on the appropriate use of different blends of petrol.
2022/02/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 321 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Directive 2018/2001/EC
Annex V – part C – point 5
5. Emissions from the extraction or cultivation of raw materials, eec, shall, include emissions from the extraction or cultivation process itself; from the collection, drying and storage of raw materials; from waste and leakages; and from the production of chemicals or products used in extraction or cultivation. Capture of CO2 in the cultivation of raw materials shall be excluded. If available, the disaggregated default values for soil N2O emissions set out in Part D shall be applied in the calculation. It is allowed to calculate averages based on local farming practices based on data of a group of farms, as an alternative to using actual values.’;deleted
2022/02/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 335 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Annex V – part C – point 15
b) point 15 is deleted:
2022/02/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 336 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Annex V – part C – point 18
18. For the purposes of the calculations referred to in point 17, the emissions to be divided shall be eec + el + esca + those fractions of ep, etd, eccs and eccr that take place up to and including the process step at which a co-product is produced. In the case of eccr CO2 from fermentation that is captured and re-used for replacing fossil- based CO2 shall be considered an emission saving that is entirely allocated to the biofuel or bioliquid resulting from fermentation. If any allocation to co- products has taken place at an earlier process step in the life-cycle, the fraction of those emissions assigned in the last such process step to the intermediate fuel product shall be used for those purposes instead of the total of those emissions.
2022/02/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 350 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
(1 a) Annex I is amended as follows (new): In the line ‘Oxygen content’ the entry in the last column‘Limits’ ‘Maximum’, ‘3,7’ is replaced by ’8,0’ In the line ‘Ethanol (stabilising agents may be necessary)’, the entry in the last column ‘Limits’ ‘Maximum’, ’10,0’ is replaced by ’22,0’. The Commission shall adopt a delegated act in accordance with article 10a to supplement this Annex by setting the corresponding parameters for the maximum limits of different oxygenates, vapour pressure and distillation. Footnote 3 is deleted.;
2022/02/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 352 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Directive 98/70/EC
Article 10 a.2
(3 a) 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 10(1) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from [date of entry into force of the Directive]
2022/02/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 866 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 31 – paragraph 2, 3 and 4
(21) in Article 31, paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 are deleted:
2022/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 870 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 31a – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall ensure that a Union database is set up to enable the tracing of liquid and gaseous renewable fuels, including the tracing of the feedstocks listed in Annex IX used in their production, and recycled carbon fuels.
2022/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 885 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 2
Regulation (EU) 2018/1999
Article 4 – point a – point 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Member States shall collectively ensure that the sum of their contribution of biofuels produced from food and feed crops other than high ILUC-risk feedstocks to the greenhouse gas intensity reduction in the transport sector does not exceed the level set in Article 26.1 of Directive 2018/2001/EC. The European Commission shall, on the basis of the cumulated national integrated national and climate progress reports and their Annex IX, issue recommendation to adjust Member States’ forecasts to ensure compliancewith the 7% limit at EU level;
2022/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 891 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Directive 98/70/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. (2a) in Article 3: paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: “Member States shall require suppliers to ensure the placing on the market of petrol with a maxinimum oxygen content of 2,.7 % andm/m or a maxinimum ethanol content of 5 % until 2013 and may require the placing on the market of such petrol for a longer period if they consider it necessaryv/v. They shall ensure the provision of appropriate information to consumers concerning the biofuel content of petrol and, in particular, on the appropriate use of different blends of petrol.”
2022/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 906 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Directive (Eu) 2018/2001/EC
Annex V – part C – point 5
(a) point 5 and 6 are6 is replaced by the following: “5. cultivation of raw materials, eec, shall, include emissions from the extraction or cultivation process itself; from the collection, drying and storage of raw materials; from waste and leakages; and from the production of chemicals or products used in extraction or cultivation. Capture of CO2 in the cultivation of raw materials shall be excluded. If available, the disaggregated default values for soil N2O emissions set out in Part D shall be applied in the calculation. It is allowed to calculate averages based on local farming practices based on data of a group of farms, as an alternative to using actual values.’;Emissions from the extraction or 6. For the purposes of the calculation referred to in point 1(a), greenhouse gas emissions savings from improved agriculture management, esca, such as shifting to reduced or zero-tillage, improved crop/rotation, the use of cover crops, including crop residue management, and the use of organic soil improver (e.g. compost, manure fermentation digestate), shall be taken into account only if they do not risk to negatively affect biodiversity. Further, solid and verifiable evidence shall be provided that the soil carbon has increased or that it is reasonable to expect to have increased over the period in which the raw materials concerned were cultivated while taking into account the emissions where such practices lead to increased fertiliser and herbicide use1.’; https://euc-word- edit.officeapps.live.com/we/wordeditorfra me.aspx?ui=en%2DUS&rs=en%2DUS&w opisrc=https%3A%2F%2Feuroparl.sharepo int.com%2Fsites%2FFitfor55ENVISecreta riatteam%2F_vti_bin%2Fwopi.ashx%2Ffil es%2Fcb87432fed6645c9978bb69221eaa4 a4&wdenableroaming=1&mscc=1&hid=22 A920A0-506B-3000-AFA7- 7CCE3275F341&wdorigin=ItemsView&w dhostclicktime=1644844895823&jsapi=1& jsapiver=v1&newsession=1&corrid=d135b 8b1-7b8b-4a9a-af19- 0cb35ebfa68c&usid=d135b8b1-7b8b- 4a9a-af19- 0cb35ebfa68c&sftc=1&mtf=1&sfp=1&inst antedit=1&wopicomplete=1&wdredirectio nreason=Unified_SingleFlush&rct=Mediu m&ctp=LeastProtected - _ftnref1 __________ 1Measurements of soil carbon can constitute such evidence, e.g. by a first measurement in advance of the cultivation and subsequent ones at regular intervals several years apArticleIn such a case, before the second measurement is available, increase in soil carbon would be estimated on the basis of representative experiments or soil models. From the second measurement onwards, the measurements would constitute the basis for determining the existence of an increase in soil carbon and its magnitude.
2022/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 922 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001/EC
Annex VI – part B – point 15
b) point 15 is deleted:
2022/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 924 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
Directive (EU) 2018/2001/EC
Annex VI – part B – point18
18. For the purposes of the calculations referred to in point 17, the emissions to be divided shall be eec + el + esca + those fractions of ep, etd, eccs and eccr that take place up to and including the process step at which a co-product is produced. In the case of eccr CO2 from fermentation that is captured andre-used for replacing fossil- based CO2 shall be considered an emission saving that is entirely allocated to the biofuel or bioliquid resulting from fermentation. If any allocation to co- products has taken place at an earlier process step in the life-cycle, the fraction of those emissions assigned in the last such process step to the intermediate fuel product shall be used for those purposes instead of the total of those emissions.
2022/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 949 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Directive 98/70/EC
Annex I – Table
(1a) Annex I is amended as follows: (a) In the line ‘Oxygen content’ the entry in the last column ‘Limits’ ‘Maximum’, ‘3,7’ is replaced by’8,0’; (b) In the line ‘Ethanol (stabilising agents may benecessary)’, the entry in the last column ‘Limits’‘Maximum’, ’10,0’ is replaced by ’22,0’.; (c) The Commission shall adopt a delegated act inaccordance with article 10a to supplement thisAnnex by setting the corresponding parametersfor the maximum limits of different oxygenates,vapour pressure and distillation.Footnote 3 is deleted.; (d) Footnote 3 is deleted.;
2022/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 951 #

2021/0218(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Directive 98/70/EC
Article 10 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
(3a) In paragraph 1, the following subpragraph 1 a is inserted: “The power to adopt delegated actsreferred to in Article 10(1) shall be conferred onthe Commission for a period of five years from[date of entry into force of the Directive]”
2022/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 151 #

2021/0210(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Indirect land-use change occurs when the cultivation of crops for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels displaces traditional production of crops for food and feed purposes. Such additional demand increases the pressure on land and can lead to the extension of agricultural land into areas with high-carbon stock, such as forests, wetlands and peatland, causing additional greenhouse gas emissions and loss of biodiversity. Research has shown that the scale of the effect depends on a variety of factors, including the type of feedstock used for fuel production, the level of additional demand for feedstock triggered by the use of biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels, and the extent to which land with high-carbon stock is protected worldwide. The level of greenhouse gas emissions caused by indirect land-use change cannot be unequivocally determined with the level of precision required for the establishment of emission factors required by the application of this regulation. However, there is evidence that all fuels produced from feedstock cause indirect land-use change to various degrees. In addition to the greenhouse gas emissions linked to indirect land-use change – which is capable of negating some or all greenhouse gas emissions savings of individual biofuels, bioliquids or biomass fuels – indirect land-use change poses risks to biodiversity. This risk is particularly serious in connection with a potentially large expansion of production determined by a significant increase in demand. Accordingly, no feed and food crop-based fuels should be promoted. Directive (EU) 2018/2001 already limits and sets a cap on the contribution of such biofuels, bioliquids and biomass to the GHG emissions savings targets in the road and rail transport sector considering their lower environmental benefits, lower performance in terms of greenhouse reduction potential and broader sustainability concerns.
2022/03/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 157 #

2021/0210(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) However, this approach must be stricter in the maritime sector. The maritime sector has currently insignificant levels of demand for food and feed crops- based biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels, since over 99% of currently used marine fuels are of fossil origin. Therefore, the non-eligiuse of biofuels, biolity of food and feed crop- basedquids and biomass fuels under this Regulation alsomust minimises any risk to slow down the decarbonisation of the transport sector, which could otherwise result from a shift of crop-based biofuels from the road to the maritime sector. It is essential to minimise such a shift, as road transport currently remains by far the most polluting transport sector and the maritime transport currently uses predominanatly fuels of fossil origin. It is therefore appropriate to avoid the creation of a potentially large demand of food and feed crops-basedunsustainable biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels by promoting their use under this Regulation. Accordingly, the additional greenhouse gas emissions and loss of biodiversity caused by all types of feed and food crop-based fuels require that these fuels be considered to have the same emission f, and ensure that the maritime industry only uses biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels that comply with the sustainability criteria and greenhouse gas saving criteria set out in Article 29 of Directive (EU) 2018/2001. Accordingly, the additional greenhouse gas emissions and loss of biodiversity caused by all types of biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels require that the greenhouse gas emission factors of these fuels shall be determined actcors as the least favourable pathwayding to the methodologies set out in Directive (EU) 2018/2001.
2022/03/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 164 #

2021/0210(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) This Regulation should establish the methodology and the formula that should apply to calculate the yearly average greenhouse gas intensity of the energy used on-board by a ship. This formula should be based on the fuel consumption reported by ships and consider the relevant emission factors of these fuels. The use of substitute sources of energy, such as wind or electricity, and any associated emissions, should also be reflected in the methodology.
2022/03/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 167 #

2021/0210(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The well-to-wake performance of all renewable and low-carbon maritime fuels should be established using default or actual and certified emission factors covering the well-to-tank and tank-to-wake emissions. The performance of fossil fuels should however only be assessed through the use of default emission factors as provided for by this Regulation.
2022/03/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 174 #

2021/0210(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The use of on-shore power supply (OPS) abates air pollution produced by ships as well asnd can reduces the amount of GHG emissions generated by maritime transport. OPS represents an increasingly clean power supply available to ships at berth, in view of the growing renewables share in the EU electricity mix. While only the provision on OPS connection points is covered by Directive 2014/94/EU (Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Directive – AFID), the demand for and, as a result, the deployment of this technology has remained limited. Therefore specific rules should be established to mandate the use of OPS by the most polluting ships, where, after accounting for the GHG emissions associated with electricity production, the use of OPS leads to a lowering of overall emissions.
2022/03/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 179 #

2021/0210(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) Exceptions to the use of OPS should also be provided for a number of objective reasons, certified by the managing body of the port of call and limited to unscheduled port calls for reasons of safety or saving life at sea, for short stays of ships at berth of less than two hours as this is the minimum time required for connection, for longer stays of ships at berth in a port where use of OPS will lead to an overall increase in emissions of greenhouse gases and pollutants, and for the use of on-board energy generation under emergency situations.
2022/03/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 192 #

2021/0210(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) The Commission should establish and ensure the functioning of an electronic database that registers the performance of each ship and, ensures its compliance with this Regulation, and records journey lengths and times for the purposes of monitoring for the risk and occurrence of carbon leakage. In order to facilitate reporting and limit administrative burden to companies, verifiers and other users, this electronic database should build upon the existing THETIS-MRV module and take into account the possibility to reuse information and data collected for the purpose of Regulation (EU) 2015/757.
2022/03/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 352 #

2021/0210(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) biofuels and biogas that do not comply with point (a) or that are produced from food and feed crops shall be considered to have the same emission factors as the least favourable fossil fuel pathway for this type of fuel;
2022/03/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 439 #

2021/0210(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission shall present a preliminary report assessing the effectiveness and shortcomings of the Regulation to the European Parliament and the Council no more than five years after the coming into force of the Regulation. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council, by 1 January 2030, the results of an detailed and comprehensive evaluation on the functioning of this Regulation and the evolution of the technologies and market for renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport and its impact on the maritime sector in the Union, including the risk and occurrence of carbon leakage arising from the implementation of the Regulation. The Commission shall consider possible amendments to:
2022/03/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 460 #

2021/0210(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
For the purpose of this regulation the termin the numerator of Equation (1) shall be set to zero.deleted
2022/03/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 465 #

2021/0210(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 2
The emissions factors of all biofuels, biogas, renewable fuels of non-biological origin and recycled carbon fuels shall be determined according to the methodologies set out in Annex 5 part C of Directive (EU) 2018/2001.
2022/03/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 470 #

2021/0210(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 11
Column 7 contains the emission factor Cf for methane in [gCH4/gfuel]. Default values as contained in the table shall be used. Values certified by mean of testing can be used in place of the default values. For LNG fuels Cf for methane armay be set to zero if the value for amount of fuel lost as fugitive emissions (Cslip) accurately accounts for all methane emissions.
2022/03/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 484 #

2021/0210(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Table 1 – Default factors
Table 1 – Default factors 1 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WtT TtW 𝑪𝒔𝒍𝒊𝒑 𝑳𝑪𝑽 𝑪𝑶𝟐𝒆𝒒 𝑾𝒕𝑻 Energy 𝑪𝒇 𝑪𝑶𝟐 𝑪𝒇 𝑪𝑯𝟒 𝑪𝒇 𝑵𝟐𝑶 As % of the Class / Pathway 𝑔𝐶𝐻4 𝑔𝑁2𝑂 Feedstock name [ ] 𝑀𝐽 𝑀𝐽 𝑔 𝑔 [𝑔𝐶𝑂2𝑒𝑞 𝑀𝐽 ] Converter Class [ 𝑔𝐶𝑂2 𝑔𝐹𝑢𝑒𝑙 ] [ ] [ ] 𝑔𝐹𝑢𝑒𝑙 𝑔𝐹𝑢𝑒𝑙 mass of the fuel used by the engine 1 2 3 4 5 ALL ICEs HFO 3,114 ISO 8217 6 7 8 9 WtT TtW ALL ICEs HFO 3,114 ISO 8217 Gas MEPC245 (66) Grades 0,0405 0,00005 0,00018 - - 13,5 Turbine Regulation (EU) RME to Steam 2015/757 RMK Turbines and Boilers Aux Aux Engines Fossil ALL ICEs 13,2, crude Gas LSFO 0,0405 3,114 0,00005 0,00018 - - 13,7 blend Turbine Steam Steam Turbines and Boilers Aux Aux Engines ULSFO 0,0405 13,2 ALL ICEs 3,114 0,00005 0,00018 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WtT TtW 3,206 VLSFO 0,041 13,2 ALL ICEs MEPC245 (66) 0,00005 0,00018 - Fossil MRV Regulation LFO 3,151 ISO 8217 MEPC245 (66) Grades 0,041 13,2 ALL ICEs 0,00005 0,00018 - Regulation (EU) RMA to 2015/757 RMD MDO MGO 3,206 ISO 8217 MEPC245 (66) Grades 0,0427 14,4 ALL ICEs 0,00005 0,00018 - Regulation (EU) DMX to 2015/757 DMB LNG Otto (dual fuel 3,1 medium speed) 2,755 LNG Otto MEPC245 (66) LNG 0,0491 18,5 (dual fuel 0 0,00011 1,7 Regulation (EU) slow speed) 2015/757 LNG Diesel (dual fuel 0.2 slow speed) LBSI N/A 3,03 Buthane 3,00 Propane LPG 0,046 7,8 All ICEs MEPC245 (66) TBM TBM Regulation (EU) 2015/757 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WtT TtW H2 Fuel Cells 0 0 - (natural 0,12 132 - gas) ICE 0 0 TBM NH3 NH3 (natural 0,0186 121 No engine 0 0 TBM - gas) 1,375 Methanol MEPC245 (66) (natural 0,0199 31,3 All ICEs TBM TBM - - Regulation (EU) gas) 2015/757 Ref. to 1,913 Ethanol Directive MEPC245 (66) 0,0268 All ICEs TBM TBM - E100 (EU) Regulation (EU) 2018/2001 2015/757 Bio-diesel Main Ref. to products / Directive 0,00005 0,00018 Bio-diesel 0,0372 ALL ICEs 2,834 - - wastes / (EU) TBM TBM Liquid Feedstock 2018/2001 biofuels mix HVO Main Ref. to products / Directive 0,044 ALL ICEs 3,115 0,00005 0,00018 - wastes / (EU) Feedstock 2018/2001 mix Bio-LNG 0,05 Ref. to LNG Otto 2,755 0,00005 0,00018 3,1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WtT TtW Main Directive (dual fuel MEPC245 (66), products / (EU) medium Regulation (EU) wastes / 2018/2001 speed) 2015/757 Feedstock LNG Otto mix (dual fuel 1,7 slow speed) LNG Diesel 0.2 (dual fuels) LBSI N/A Bio-H2 Main Fuel Cells 0 0 0 Gas products / 0,12 N/A - biofuels wastes / Feedstock ICE 0 0 TBM mix Ref. to 3,206 Directive MEPC245 (66) e-diesel 0,0427 ALL ICEs 0,00005 0,00018 - (EU) Regulation (EU) 2018/2001) 2015/757 Ref. to 1,375 e- Directive MEPC245 (66) 0,0199 All ICEs 0,00005 0,00018 - methanol (EU) Regulation (EU) 2018/2001 2015/757 Renewable LNG Otto Fuels of (dual fuel non- 3.1 medium Biological Ref. to speed) 2,755 Origin Directive LNG Otto MEPC245 (66) (RFNBO) e-LNG 0,0491 0 0,00011 (EU) (dual fuel Regulation (EU) 1,7 - 2018/2001 slow speed) 2015/757 (e- fuels) LNG Diesel 0.2 (dual fuels) LBSI N/A Fuel Cells 0 0 0 e-H2 0,12 3,6 - ICE 0 0 TBM e-NH3 0,0186 0 No engine 0 N/A TBM N/A 106,3 EU MIX 2020 Others Electricity - OPS - - - - 72 EU MIX 2030 2018/2001 Ref. to Directive HVO 0,044 ALL ICEs 3,115 0,00005 0,00018 - (EU) Liquid 2018/2001 biofuels LNG Otto (dual fuel 3,1 medium speed) Ref. to 2,755 Directive LNG Otto MEPC245 (66), Bio-LNG 0,05 (dual fuel 0,00005 0,00018 1,7 (EU) Regulation (EU) 2018/2001 slow speed) 2015/757 LNG Diesel 0.2 (dual fuels) LBSI N/A Fuel Cells 0 0 0 Gas Bio-H2 0,12 N/A - biofuels ICE 0 0 TBM Ref. to 3,206 Directive MEPC245 (66) e-diesel 0,0427 ALL ICEs 0,00005 0,00018 - (EU) Regulation (EU) 2018/2001) 2015/757 Ref. to 1,375 Renewable e- Directive MEPC245 (66) 0,0199 All ICEs 0,00005 0,00018 - Fuels of methanol (EU) Regulation (EU) non- 2018/2001 2015/757 Biological LNG Otto Origin (dual fuel 3.1 (RFNBO) medium - Ref. to speed) 2,755 (e- fuels) Directive LNG Otto MEPC245 (66) e-LNG 0,0491 0 0,00011 (EU) (dual fuel Regulation (EU) 1,7 2018/2001 slow speed) 2015/757 LNG Diesel 0.2 (dual fuels) LBSI N/A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WtT TtW Fuel Cells 0 0 0 e-H2 0,12 3,6 - ICE 0 0 TBM e-NH3 0,0186 0 No engine 0 N/A TBM N/A 106,3 EU MIX 2020 Others Electricity - OPS - - - - 72 EU MIX 2030
2022/03/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 63 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) However, resources are needed to finance those investments. In addition, before they have taken place, the cost supported by households and transport users for heating, cooling and cooking, as well as for road transport, is likely to increase as fuel suppliers subject to the obligations under the emission trading for buildings and road transport pass on costs on carbon to the consumers. There is a need to avoid reactive-only measures, therefore the Fund should start its operation before inclusion of at least private households and transport into the scope of directive 2003/87/EC (ETS) so that there is a time to prepare the mostvulnerable transport users and households and to minimise the need of direct income payments. To that end it is desirable that the measures supporting energy efficiency and aimed at improvement of air quality undertaken by Member States are aligned with the purpose of minimising the impact of broadening of the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 119 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) However, resources are needed to finance those investments. In addition, before they have taken place, the cost supported by households and transport users for heating, cooling and cooking, as well as for road transport, is likely to increase as fuel suppliers subject to the obligations under the emission trading for buildings and road transport pass on costs on carbon to the consumers. There is a need to avoid reactive-only measures, therefore the Fund should start its operation before inclusion of at least private households and transport into the scope of directive 2003/87/EC (ETS) so that there is a time to prepare the most vulnerable transport users and households and to minimise the need of direct income payments. To that end it is desirable that the measures supporting energy efficiency and aimed at improvement of air quality undertaken by Member States are aligned with the purpose of minimising the impact of broadening of the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC.
2022/02/23
Committee: EMPLENVI
Amendment 199 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘building renovation’ means all kinds of energy-related and accompanying it safety-related building renovation, including the insulation of the building envelope, that is to say walls, roof, floor, the replacement of windows, the replacement of heating, cooling and cooking appliances, the upgrade of electrical installations and the installation of on-site production and storage of energy from renewable sources;
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 227 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
(13) ‘vulnerable transport users’ means transport users, including from lower middle-income households, that are significantly affected by the price impacts of the inclusion of road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC and lack the means to purchase zero- and low- emission vehicles or to switch to alternative sustainable modes of transport, including public transport, particularly in rural and remote areas or for whom the switch to alternative modes of transport would mean significant decrease of well- being.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 255 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) finance measures and investments to increase energy efficiency of buildings, to implement energy efficiency improvement measures, to carry out building renovation, and to decarbonise heating and cooling of buildings, including the integration of energy production and storage of energy from renewable energy sources;
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 318 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(e a) improvements in safety, particularly: reduction in the number of buildings with unsafe electrical installations,increased deployment of smoke detection, smoke management and automatic fire suppression.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 325 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States may include the costs of measures providing temporary direct income support to vulnerable households and vulnerable households that are transport users to absorb the increase in road transport and heating fuel prices. Such supportdirect income support shall not exceed 20% of the costs of Member States national plans and shall decrease over time and be limited to the direct impact of the emission trading for buildings and road transport. Eligibility for such direct income support shall cease within the time limits identified under Article 4(1) point (d).
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 337 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) contribute to the decarbonisation, including the electrification, of heating and cooling of, and cooking in, buildings and the integration and storage of energy from renewable sources that contribute to the achievements of energy savings as well as connection to district heating networks;
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 350 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) provide support of development and grant free access to public transport or adapted tariffs for access to public transport, as well as fostering sustainable mobility on demand and shared mobility services;
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 366 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The financial envelope for the implementation of the Fund for the period 20253-2027 shall be at least EUR 23 700 000 000 in current prices, with increase of the envelope subject to paragraph 2a of this article.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 370 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The financial envelope for the implementation of the Fund for the period 2028-2032 shall be at least EUR 48 500 000 000 in current prices, subject to the availability of the amounts under the annual ceilings of the applicable multiannual financial framework referred to in Article 312 TFEU and with increase of the envelope subject to paragraph 2a of this article.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 375 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Additional allocationsshall be made available to the budget of the Fund subject to technicaladjustment under article 4 paragraph 1 point b of the Council Regulation (EU,Euratom) 2020/2093 based on higher than expected revenues from auctioning of allowances under Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 433 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘building renovation’ means all kinds of energy-related and accompanying it safety-related building renovation, including the insulation of the building envelope, that is to say walls, roof, floor, the replacement of windows, the replacement of heating, cooling and cooking appliances, the upgrade of electrical installations and the installation of on-site production and storage of energy from renewable sources;,
2022/02/23
Committee: EMPLENVI
Amendment 454 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. After the Commission has adopted a decision as referred to in Article 16, it shall in due time conclude an agreement with the Member State concerned constituting an individual legal commitment within the meaning of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 covering the period 20253-2027. That agreement may be concluded at the earliest one year before the year of the start of the auctions under Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC.
2022/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 499 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
(13) ‘vulnerable transport users’ means transport users, including from lower middle-income households, that are significantly affected by the price impacts of the inclusion of road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC and lack the means to purchase zero- and low- emission vehicles or to switch to alternative sustainable modes of transport, including public transport, particularly in rural and remote areas or for whom the switch to alternative modes of transport would mean significant decrease of well- being.
2022/02/23
Committee: EMPLENVI
Amendment 547 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) finance measures and investments to increase energy efficiency of buildings, to implement energy efficiency improvement measures, to carry out building renovation, and to decarbonise heating and cooling of buildings, including the integration of energy production and storage of energy from renewable energy sources;
2022/02/23
Committee: EMPLENVI
Amendment 678 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) improvements in safety, in particular: reduction in the number of buildings with unsafe electrical installations, increased deployment of smoke detection, smoke management and automatic fire suppression.
2022/02/23
Committee: EMPLENVI
Amendment 712 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States may include the costs of measures providing temporary direct income support to vulnerable households and vulnerable households that are transport users to absorb the increase in road transport and heating fuel prices. Such supportdirect income support shall not exceed 20% of the costs of Member States national plans and shall decrease over time and be limited to the direct impact of the emission trading for buildings and road transport. Eligibility for such direct income support shall cease within the time limits identified under Article 4(1) point (d).
2022/02/23
Committee: EMPLENVI
Amendment 741 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) contribute to the decarbonisation, including the electrification, of heating and cooling of, and cooking in, buildings and the integration and storage of energy from renewable sources that contribute to the achievements of energy savings as well as connection to district heating networks;
2022/02/23
Committee: EMPLENVI
Amendment 776 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) provide support of development and grant free access to public transport or adapted tariffs for access to public transport, as well as fostering sustainable mobility on demand and shared mobility services;
2022/02/23
Committee: EMPLENVI
Amendment 831 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The financial envelope for the implementation of the Fund for the period 20253-2027 shall be at least EUR 23 700 000 000 in current prices, with increase of the envelope subject to paragraph 2a of this article.
2022/02/23
Committee: EMPLENVI
Amendment 848 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The financial envelope for the implementation of the Fund for the period 2028-2032 shall be at least EUR 48 500 000 000 in current prices, subject to the availability of the amounts under the annual ceilings of the applicable multiannual financial framework referred to in Article 312 TFEU and with increase of the envelope subject to paragraph 2a of this article.
2022/02/23
Committee: EMPLENVI
Amendment 853 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Additional allocations shall be made available to the budget of the Fund subject to technical adjustment under article 4 paragraph 1 point b of the Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093 based on higher than expected revenues from auctioning of allowances under Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC
2022/02/23
Committee: EMPLENVI
Amendment 1006 #

2021/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. After the Commission has adopted a decision as referred to in Article 16, it shall in due time conclude an agreement with the Member State concerned constituting an individual legal commitment within the meaning of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 covering the period 20253-2027. That agreement may be concluded at the earliest one year before the year of the start of the auctions under Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
2022/02/23
Committee: EMPLENVI
Amendment 126 #

2021/0205(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) Development and deployment of sustainable aviation fuels with a high potential for sustainability, commercial maturity and a high potential for innovation and growth to meet future needs should be promoted. This should support creating innovative and competitive fuels markets and ensure sufficient supply of sustainable aviation fuels for aviation in short and long term to contribute to Union transport decarbonisation ambitions, while strengthening Union’s efforts towards a high level of environmental protection. For this purpose, sustainable aviation fuels produced from feedstock listed in Parts A and B of Annex IX of Directive (EU) 2018/2001, as well as synthetic aviation fuels should be eligible. In particular, sustainable aviation fuels produced from feedstock listed in Part B of Annex IX of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 are essential, as currently the most commercially mature technology to decarbonise air transport already in the short term.
2022/02/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 132 #

2021/0205(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) For sustainability reasons, only sustainable feed and food crop-based fuels should not be eligible. In particular,Concerns with indirect land-use change, which can occurs when the cultivation of crops for biofuels displaces traditional production of crops for food and feed purposes. Such additional demand increases the pressure on land and can lead to the extension of agricultural land into areas with high-carbon stock, such as forests, wetlands and peatland, causing additional greenhouse gas emissions and loss of biodiversity concerns. Research has shown that the scale of the effect depends on a variety of factors, including the type of feedstock used for fuel production, the level of additional demand for feedstock triggered by the use of biofuels and the extent to which land with high-carbon stock is protected worldwide. The highest risks of indirect land-use change have been identified for biofuels, fuels produced from feedstock for which a significant expansion of the production area into land with high-carbon stock is observed. Accordingly, feed and food crop-based fuels should not be promoted. This approach is in line Union policy and in particular with Directive (EU) 2018/2001 which limits and sets a cap on the use of such biofuels in road and rail transport, considering their lower environmental benefits, lower performance in terms of greenhouse reduction potential and broader sustainability concerns. In addition to the greenhouse gas emissions linked to indirect land-use change – which is capable of negating some or all greenhouse gas emissions savings of individual biofuels – indirect land-use change poses risks also to biodiversity. This risk is particularly serious in connection with a potentially large expansion of production determined by a significant increase in demand. The aviation sector has currently insignificant levels of demand for food and feed crops- based biofuels, since over 99% of currently used aviation fuels are of fossil origin. It is therefore appropriate to avoid the creation of a potentially large demand of food and feed crops-based biofuels by promoting their use under this Regulation. The non-eligibility of crop- based biofuels under this Regulation also minimises any risk to slow down the decarbonisation of road transport, which could otherwise result from a shift of crop-based biofuels from the road to the aviation sector. It is essential to minimise such a shift, as road transport currently remains by far the most polluting transport sector, are already addressed in Directive (EU) 2018/2001 by means of a cap on the contribution of crop-based biofuels for the Union targets including aviation, as well as a delegated act on high-ILUC risk biofuels, which are to be phased out to 0% by 2030.
2022/02/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 203 #

2021/0205(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 5
— ‘sustainable aviation fuels’ (‘SAF’) means drop-in aviation fuels that are either synthetic aviation fuels, advanced biofuels as defined in Article 2, second paragraph, point 34 of Directive (EU) 2018/2001, or biofuels produced from the feedstock listed in Part B of Annex IX to that Directive or biofuels in aviation produced respecting the sustainability criteria set in Directive (EU) 2018/2001, which comply with the sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions criteria laid down in Article 29(2) to (7) of that Directive and are certified in accordance with Article 30 of this Directive;
2022/02/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 47 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) In order to achieve the target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 55%, Member States for the sectors covered by Regulation (EU) 2018/842 will need to reduce their emissions progressively until they reach- collectively the EU-wide reduction target -40% in 2030, compared to 2005 levels.
2022/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 51 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the Union’s economy and its level of emissions to a degree that cannot yet be fully quantified. On the other hand, the Union is deploying its largest stimulus package ever, also having a potential impact on the level of emissions. Due to those uncertainties, it is appropriate to review the emissions data in 2025 and, if necessary, readjust the annual emission allocations.deleted
2022/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 57 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) It is therefore appropriate to update in 2025 the annual emission allocations for the years 2026 to 2030. This should be based on a comprehensive review of the national inventory data carried out by the Commission in order to determine the average of the greenhouse gas emissions of each Member State during the years 2021, 2022 and 2023.deleted
2022/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 65 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) In order to achieve the target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 55%, by the sectors covered by Regulation (EU) 2018/842, Member States will need to reduce their emissions progressively until they reach- 40% collectively the Union-wide target of 40 % reductions in 2030, compared to 2005 levels.
2022/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 78 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
(19 a) As Covid-19 changed the economic environment in the EU, including high level of debts, changes in supply chains and soaring energy prices, those changes will have a long-term effect and the legacy of the crisis will weigh on the Member States; the transition towards climate-neutral Europe might provide significant challenges for Member States. All Member States shall contribute to the transition and shall seek to meet their respective targets inline with this Regulation, however not meeting those targets shall imply only a corrective procedure stated in Article 8 which shall not include financial sanctions.
2022/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 86 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the Union’s economy and its level of emissions to a degree that cannot yet be fully quantified. On the other hand, the Union is deploying its largest stimulus package ever, also having a potential impact on the level of emissions. Due to those uncertainties, it is appropriate to review the emissions data in 2025 and, if necessary, readjust the annual emission allocations.deleted
2022/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 91 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) do not exceed, in the years 2023, 2024 and 2025 to 2030, the limit defined by a linear trajectory starting in 2022 at the annual emission allocation for that Member State, as set out pursuant to paragraph 3 of this Article for that year, and ending in 2030 at the limit set for that Member State in column 2 of Annex I to this Regulation;
2022/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 93 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) do not exceed, in the years 2026 to 2030, the limit defined by a linear trajectory starting in 2024, at the average of its greenhouse gas emissions during the years 2021, 2022 and 2023, as submitted by the Member State pursuant to Article 26 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, and ending in 2030 at the limit set for that Member State in column 2 of Annex I to this Regulation.deleted
2022/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 93 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) It is therefore appropriate to update in 2025 the annual emission allocations for the years 2026 to 2030. This should be based on a comprehensive review of the national inventory data carried out by the Commission in order to determine the average of the greenhouse gas emissions of each Member State during the years 2021, 2022 and 2023.deleted
2022/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 98 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
For the years 2023, 2024 and 2025 to 2030, it shall determine the annual emission allocations based on the value for the 2005 greenhouse gas emissions of each Member State indicatlinear trajectory starting in2022 at the annual emission allocation of that Member State forthat year, as determined pursuant to the second subparagraph, and the reviewed values of the national inventory data for the years 2016, 2017 and 2018 referred to in the second subparagraphending in 2030 at the limit for that Member State set out in column 2 of Annex I to this Regulation .
2022/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 100 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
For the years 2026 to 2030, it shall determine the annual emission allocations based on the value for the 2005 greenhouse gas emissions of each Member State indicated pursuant to the second subparagraph and on a comprehensive review of the most recent national inventory data for the years 2021, 2022 and 2023 submitted by the Member States pursuant to Article 26 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999.deleted
2022/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 129 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 c (new)
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 8 – paragraph 3
(5 c) In Article 8, paragraph 3 is amended as follows: “3. The Commission mayshall issue an opinion regarding the robustness of the corrective action plans submitted in accordance with paragraph 1 and shall in that case do so within four months of receipt of those plans. The Member State concerned shall take utmostfull account of the Commission’s opinion and mayshall revise its corrective action plan accordingly. If the Member State concerned does not address a recommendation or a substantial part thereof, it shall provide its reasoning. Or. en (Regulation (EU) 2018/842)
2022/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 130 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 d (new)
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(5 d) In Article 8, the following paragraph is added: “3a. The corrective actions shall not imply any form of financial sanctions.”
2022/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 131 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) As COVID-19 changed the economic environment in the Union, including a high level of debts, changes in supply chains and soaring energy prices, those changes will have a long-term effect and the legacy of the crisis will weigh on the Member States. The transition towards climate-neutral Europe might provide significant challenges for Member States. All Member States should contribute to that transition and should seek to meet their respective targets in line with this Regulation. Failing to meet those targets should result in the application of a corrective procedure that excludes financial penalties.
2022/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 185 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point (b)
(b) do not exceed, in the years 2023, 2024 and 2025 to 2030, the limit defined by a linear trajectory starting in 2022 at the annual emission allocation for that Member State, as set out pursuant to paragraph 3 of this Article for that year, and ending in 2030 at the limit set for that Member State in column 2 of Annex I to this Regulation;
2022/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 192 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point (c)
(c) do not exceed, in the years 2026 to 2030, the limit defined by a linear trajectory starting in 2024, at the average of its greenhouse gas emissions during the years 2021, 2022 and 2023, as submitted by the Member State pursuant to Article 26 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, and ending in 2030 at the limit set for that Member State in column 2 of Annex I to this Regulation.deleted
2022/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 212 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
For the years 2023, 2024 and 2025 to 2030, it shall determine the annual emission allocations based on the value for the 2005 greenhouse gas emissions of each Member State indicatlinear trajectory starting in 2022 at the annual emission allocation of that Member State for that year, as determined pursuant to the second subparagraph, and the reviewed values of the national inventory data for the years 2016, 2017 and 2018 referred to in the second subparagraphending in 2030 at the limit for that Member State set out in column 2 of Annex I to this Regulation.
2022/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 219 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
For the years 2026 to 2030, it shall determine the annual emission allocations based on the value for the 2005 greenhouse gas emissions of each Member State indicated pursuant to the second subparagraph and on a comprehensive review of the most recent national inventory data for the years 2021, 2022 and 2023 submitted by the Member States pursuant to Article 26 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999.deleted
2022/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 284 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 7
(b) paragraph 1 is amended as follows: (i) the introductory sentence is replaced by the following: ‘ To the extent that a Member State’s greenhouse gas emissions exceed its annual emission allocations for a given year, including any annual emission allocations banked pursuant to Article 5(3) of this Regulation, a quantity up to the sum of total net removals and total net emissions from the combined land accounting categories included in the scope of Regulation (EU) 2018/841, may be taken into account for its compliance under Article 9 of this Regulation for that year, provided that:. ’ (ii) point (a) is replaced by the following: ‘ (a) the cumulative quantity taken into account for that Member State for the years 2021 to 2025 does not exceed half of the maximum amount of total net removals set out in Annex III to this Regulation for that Member State; (aa) the cumulative quantity taken into account for that Member State for the years 2026 to 2030 does not exceed half of the maximum amount of total net removals set out in Annex III to this Regulation for that Member State;. ’ (iii)deleted paragraph 2 is deleted.
2022/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 305 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 c (new)
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 8 – paragraph 3
(5c) In Article 8, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: "3. The Commission mayshall issue an opinion regarding the robustness of the corrective action plans submitted in accordance with paragraph 1 and shall in that case do so within four months of receipt of those plans. The Member State concerned shall take utmostfull account of the Commission’s opinion and mayshall revise its corrective action plan accordingly. If the Member State concerned does not address a recommendation or a substantial part thereof, it shall provide its reasoning. "
2022/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 326 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. If the greenhouse gas emissions of a Member State in either the period from 2021 to 2025 or the period from 2026 to 2030 referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2018/841 exceeded its removals, as determined in accordance with Article 12 of that Regulation, the Central Administrator shall deduct from that Member State’s annual emission allocations an amount equal to those excess greenhouse gas emissions in tonnes of CO2 equivalent for the relevant years. If a Member State exceeds its emission allocations for two consecutive years, it shall provide reasoning in a report to the Commission and policy adjustments for its long-term national strategy.
2022/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 327 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)
(6a) In Article 9 the following paragraph is added: “2a. The corrective actions shall not imply any form of financial penalties.”
2022/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 351 #

2021/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 11a – paragraph 3 – introductory sentence
3. The additional reserve shall consist of the net removals that participating Member States have generated in the period 20261 to 2030 in excess of their respective targets pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/841, after deduction of both of the following:
2022/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 299 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 25 a (new)
(25 a) ‘benchmark’ means any index by reference as defined in Article 3, section 1, point (3), of Regulation (EU) 2016/1011.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 359 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall require that the creditor and, where applicable, the credit intermediary or the provider of crowdfunding credit services provide the consumer with the pre-contractual information needed to compare different offers in order to take an informed decision on whether to conclude a credit agreement or crowdfunding credit services on the basis of the credit terms and conditions offered by the creditor or by the provider of crowdfunding credit services and, where applicable, the preferences expressed and information supplied by the consumer. Such pre-contractual information shall be provided to the consumer at least one day within a reasonable time before he or she is bound by any credit agreement or offer, or by any agreement or offer for the provision of crowdfunding credit services.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 364 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
In case the pre-contractual information referred to in the first subparagraph is provided less than one day before the consumer is bound by the credit agreement or offer, or by any agreement or offer for the provision of crowdfunding credit services, Member States shall require that the creditor and, where applicable, the credit intermediary or the provider of crowdfunding credit services send a reminder, on paper or on another durable medium, to the consumer of the possibility to withdraw from the credit agreement or crowdfunding credit services and of the procedure to follow for withdrawing, in accordance with Article 26. That reminder shall be provided to the consumer, at the latest, one day after the conclusion of the credit agreement, of the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services, or the acceptance of the credit offer.deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 422 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. At the same time as the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form is provided to the consumer, the creditor and, where applicable, the credit intermediary or the provider of crowdfunding credit services, shall provide the consumer with the Standard European Consumer Credit Overview form set out in Annex II, containing the following pre-contractual informationThe following pre-contractual information should be placed prominently at the beginning of the Standard European Consumer Credit Information form:
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 559 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The assessment of creditworthiness shall be carried out on the basis of credit scoring models and analysis of the customer's credit history based on information from own and external databases including debts registers. When the total amount of credit exceeds EUR 5 000 the assessment shall be carried out also on the basis of relevant and accurate information on the consumer’s income and expenses and other financial and economic circumstances which is necessary and proportionate such as evidence of income or other sources of repayment, information on financial assets and liabilities, or information on other financial commitments. The information shall be obtained from relevant internal or external sources, including the consumer and, where necessary, on the basis of a consultation of a database referred to in Article 19.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 569 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The information obtained in accordance with this paragraph, where possible and necessary, shall be appropriately verified, where necessary through reference to independently verifiable documentation.
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 715 #

2021/0171(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the annual percentage rate of charge;deleted
2022/03/16
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 138 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) The development of AI applications might bring down the costs and increase the volume of services available, e.g. health services, public transport, Farming 4.0, making them more affordable to a wider spectrum of society; that AI applications may also result in the rise of unemployment, pressure on social care systems, and an increase of poverty; in accordance with the values enshrined in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union, there might be a need to adapt Union AI transformation to socioeconomic capacities, to create adequate social shielding, support education and incentives to create alternative jobs; the establishment of a Union AI Adjustment Fund building upon the experience of The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) or the currently developed Just Transition Fund should be considered.
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 169 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The placing on the market, putting into service or use of certain AI systems intended to distort human behaviour, whereby with due diligence it could be predicted that physical or psychological harms are likely to occur, should be forbidden. Such AI systems deploy subliminal components individuals cannot perceive or exploit vulnerabilities of children and people due to their age, physical or mental incapacities. They do so with the intention to materially distort the behaviour of a person and in a manner that causes or is likely to cause harm to that or another person. The intention may not be presumed if the distortion of human behaviour results from factors external to the AI system which are outside of the control of the provider or the user. Research for legitimate purposes in relation to such AI systems should not be stifled by the prohibition, if such research does not amount to use of the AI system in human- machine relations that exposes natural persons to harm and such research is carried out in accordance with recognised ethical standards for scientific research.
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 250 #

2021/0106(COD)

(76a) An AI advisory council (‘the Advisory Council’) should be established as a sub-group of the Board consisting of relevant representatives from industry, research, academia, civil society, standardisation organisations, relevant common European data spaces, and other relevant stakeholders, including social partners, where appropriate depending on the subject matter discussed, representing all Member States to maintain geographical balance. The Advisory Council should support the work of the Board by providing advice relating to the tasks of the Board. The Advisory Council should nominate a representative to attend meetings of the Board and to participate in its work.
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 253 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 86 a (new)
(86a) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, it shall be accompanied by the publication of guidelines to help all stakeholders to interpret key concepts covered by the Regulation, such as prohibited or high-risk AI cases and the precise means and implementation rules of the Regulation by national competent authorities;
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 260 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) users of AI systems located withusing the AI system in the Union ;
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 275 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘artificial intelligence system’ (AI system) means software that is developed with one or more of the techniques and approaches listed in Annex I and can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, indispensably with some degree of autonomy, generate outputs such as content, predictions, recommendations, or decisions influencing the environments they interact with;
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 322 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the placing on the market, putting into service or use of an AI system that deploys subliminal techniques beyond a person’s consciousness in order to materially distort a person’s behaviour in a manner that causes or is likely to cause that person or another person physical or psychological harm that could be predicted with due diligence;
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 324 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the placing on the market, putting into service or use of an AI system that exploits any of the vulnerabilities of a specific group of persons due to their age, physical or mental disability, in order to materially distort the behaviour of a person pertaining to that group in a manner that causes or is likely to cause that person or another person physical or psychological harm that could be predicted with due diligence;
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 328 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d – introductory part
(d) the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement, unless and in as far as such use by law enforcement is strictly necessary for one of the following objectives:
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 328 #

2021/0106(COD)

(3 a) The development of AI applications might bring down the costs and increase the volume of services available, e.g. health services, public transport, Farming 4.0, making them more affordable to a wider spectrum of society; that AI applications may also result in the rise of unemployment, pressure on social care systems, and an increase of poverty; in accordance with the values enshrined in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union, there might be a need to adapt the Union AI transformation to socioeconomic capacities, to create adequate social shielding, support education and incentives to create alternative jobs; the establishment of a Union AI Adjustment Fund building upon the experience of The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) or the currently developed Just Transition Fund should be considered;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 351 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. The AI system shall be considered high-risk where it meets the following two cumulative criteria:  (a) the AI system is used or applied in a sector where, given the characteristics of the activities typically undertaken, significant risks of harm to the health and safety or a risk of adverse impact on fundamental rights of users, as outlined in Article 7(2) can be expected to occur. (b) the AI system application in the sector in question is used in such a manner that significant risks of harm to the health and safety or a risk of adverse impact on fundamental rights of users, as outlined in Article 7(2) are likely to arise.
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 357 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. In addition to the high-risk AI systems referred to in paragraph 1, and in accordance with paragraph -1 of this Article, AI systems referred to in Annex III shall also be considered high-risk.
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 376 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The notion of biometric identification system, including remote biometric identification system as used in this Regulation, should be defined functionally, as an AI system intended for the identification of natural persons including at a distance through the comparison of a person’s biometric data with the biometric data contained in a reference database repository, excluding verification/ authentication systems whose sole purpose is to confirm that a specific natural person is the person he or she claims to be, and systems that are used to confirm the identity of a natural person for the sole purpose of having access to a service, a device or premises, and without prior knowledge whether the targeted person will be present and can be identified, irrespectively of the particular technology, processes or types of biometric data used. Considering their different characteristics and manners in which they are used, as well as the different risks involved, a distinction should be made between ‘real-time’ and ‘post’ remote biometric identification systems. In the case of ‘real- time’ systems, the capturing of the biometric data, the comparison and the identification occur all instantaneously, near-instantaneously or in any event without a significant delay. In this regard, there should be no scope for circumventing the rules of this Regulation on the ‘real- time’ use of the AI systems in question by providing for minor delays. ‘Real-time’ systems involve the use of ‘live’ or ‘near- ‘live’ material, such as video footage, generated by a camera or other device with similar functionality. In the case of ‘post’ systems, in contrast, the biometric data have already been captured and the comparison and identification occur only after a significant delay. This involves material, such as pictures or video footage generated by closed circuit television cameras or private devices, which has been generated before the use of the system in respect of the natural persons concerned.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 410 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) examination in view of possible biases, defined as a statistical error or a top-down introduction of assumptions harmful to an individual, that are likely to affect health and safety of persons or lead to discrimination prohibited by Union law;
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 431 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The placing on the market, putting into service or use of certain AI systems intended to distort human behaviour, whereby with due diligence it could be predicted that physical or psychological harms are likely to occur, should be forbidden. Such AI systems deploy subliminal components individuals cannot perceive or exploit vulnerabilities of children and people due to their age, physical or mental incapacities. They do so with the intention to materially distort the behaviour of a person and in a manner that causes or is likely to cause harm to that or another person. The intention may not be presumed if the distortion of human behaviour results from factors external to the AI system which are outside of the control of the provider or the user. Research for legitimate purposes in relation to such AI systems should not be stifled by the prohibition, if such research does not amount to use of the AI system in human- machine relations that exposes natural persons to harm and such research is carried out in accordance with recognised ethical standards for scientific research.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 520 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) High-risk AI systems should only be placed on the Union market or put into service if they comply with certain mandatory requirements. Those requirements should ensure that high-risk AI systems available in the Union or whose output is otherwise used in the Union do not pose unacceptable risks to important Union public interests as recognised and protected by Union law. AI systems identified as high-risk should be limited to those that have a significant harmful impact on the health, safety and fundamental rights of persons in the Union and such limitation minimises any potential restriction to international trade, if any. In particular, the classification as high-risk according to Article 6 should not apply to AI systems whose intended purpose demonstrates that the generated output is a recommendation, provided it is delivered with the information on its accuracy or other relevant methodical aspects necessary for the decision making. A human intervention is required to convert this recommendation into an action.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 523 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 1
1. Before placing on the market or putting into service a high-risk AI system referred to in Article 6(2), the provider or, where applicable, the authorised representative shall register that system in the EU database referred to in Article 60.
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 527 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 1 a (new)
2. A high-risk AI system designed, developed, trained, validate, tested or approved to be placed on the market or put into service, outside the EU, can be registered in the EU database referred to in Article 60 and placed on the market or put into service in EU only if it is proven that at all the stages of its design, development, training, validation, testing or approval, all the obligations required from such AI systems in EU have been met.
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 549 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) Technical inaccuracies of AI systems intended for the remote biometric identification of natural persons, including remote biometric identification, can lead to biased results and entail discriminatory effects. This is particularly relevant when it comes to age, ethnicity, sex or disabilities. Therefore, ‘real-time’ and ‘post’ remote biometric identification systems , including remote biometric identification, should be classified as high-risk. In view of the risks that they pose, both types of remote biometric identification systems should be subject to specific requirements on logging capabilities and human oversight.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 572 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) Another area in which the use of AI systems deserves special consideration is the access to and enjoyment of certain essential private and public services and benefits necessary for people to fully participate in society or to improve one’s standard of living. In particular, AI systems used to evaluate the credit score or creditworthiness of natural persons should be classified as high-risk AI systems, since they determine those persons’ access to financial resources or essential services such as housing, electricity, and telecommunication services. AI systems used for this purpose may lead to discrimination of persons or groups and perpetuate historical patterns of discrimination, for example based on racial or ethnic origins, disabilities, age, sexual orientation, or create new forms of discriminatory impacts. Considering the very limited scale of the impact and the available alternatives on the market, it is appropriate to exempt AI systems for the purpose of creditworthiness assessment and credit scoring when put into service by small-scale providers for their own use. Due to the fact that AI systems related to low-value credits for the purchase of movables do not cause high risk, it is proposed to exclude this category from the scope of high-risk AI category as well. . Natural persons applying for or receiving public assistance benefits and services from public authorities are typically dependent on those benefits and services and in a vulnerable position in relation to the responsible authorities. If AI systems are used for determining whether such benefits and services should be denied, reduced, revoked or reclaimed by authorities, they may have a significant impact on persons’ livelihood and may infringe their fundamental rights, such as the right to social protection, non- discrimination, human dignity or an effective remedy. Those systems should therefore be classified as high-risk. Nonetheless, this Regulation should not hamper the development and use of innovative approaches in the public administration, which would stand to benefit from a wider use of compliant and safe AI systems, provided that those systems do not entail a high risk to legal and natural persons. Finally, AI systems used to dispatch or establish priority in the dispatching of emergency first response services should also be classified as high- risk since they make decisions in very critical situations for the life and health of persons and their property.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 597 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Board shall establish a AI Advisory Council (Advisory Council). The Advisory Council shall be composed of relevant representatives from industry, research, academia, civil society, standardisation organisations, relevant common European data spaces and other relevant stakeholders or third parties appointed by the Board, representing all Member States to maintain geographical balance. The Advisory Council shall support the work of the Board by providing advice relating to the tasks of the Board. The Advisory Council shall nominate a relevant representative, depending on the configuration in which the Board meets, to attend meetings of the Board and to participate in its work. The composition of the Advisory Council and its recommendations to the Board shall be made public.
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 622 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43 a (new)
(43 a) Fundamental rights impact assessments for high-risk AI systems may include a clear outline of the intended purpose for which the system will be used, a clear outline of the intended geographic and temporal scope of the system’s use, categories of natural persons and groups likely to be affected by the use of the system or any specific risk of harm likely to impact marginalised persons or groups at risk of discrimination, or increase societal inequalities;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 623 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 1
1. In compliance with the terms and conditions laid down in this Regulation, the Commission in consultation with Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties, including administrative fines, applicable to infringements of this Regulation and in cooperation with Member States shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are properly and effectively implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate, and dissuasive. They shall take into particular account the interests of small-scale providers andsize and the interests of SME providers, including start-ups and their economic viability.
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 625 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 2
2. The Member States shall notify the Commission of those rules and of those measures and shall notify it, without delay, of any subsequent amendment affecting them.deleted
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 638 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
(a) AI systems intended to be used for recruitment or selection of natural persons, notably for advertising vacancies, screening or filtering applications, evaluating candidates in the course of interviews or tests;
2022/03/31
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 742 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 76 a (new)
(76 a) An AI advisory council(‘the Advisory Council’) should be established as a sub-group of the Board consisting of relevant representatives from industry, research, academia, civil society, standardisation organisations, relevant common European data spaces, and other relevant stakeholders, including social partners, where appropriate depending on the subject matter discussed, representing all Member States to maintain geographical balance. The Advisory Council should support the work of the Board by providing advice relating to the tasks of the Board. The Advisory Council should nominate a representative to attend meetings of the Board and to participate in its work.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 775 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 86 a (new)
(86 a) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, it should be accompanied by the publication of guidelines to help all stakeholders to interpret key concepts covered by the Regulation, such as prohibited or high-risk AI cases and the precise means and implementation rules of the Regulation by national competent authorities;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 822 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) users of AI systems located withusing the AI system in the Union;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 914 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘artificial intelligence system’ (AI system) means software that is developed with one or more of the techniques and approaches listed in Annex I and can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, indispensably with some degree of autonomy, generate outputs such as content, predictions, recommendations, or decisions influencing the environments they interact with;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1049 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 36
(36) ‘remote biometric identification system’ means an AI system, including remote biometric identification, for the purpose of identifying natural persons including at a distance through the comparison of a person’s biometric data with the biometric data contained in a reference database repository, excluding verification/authentication systems whose sole purpose is to confirm that a specific natural person is the person he or she claims to be, and systems that are used to confirm the identity of a natural person for the sole purpose of having access to a service, a device or premises; , and without prior knowledge of the user of the AI system whether the person will be present and can be identified ;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1137 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 73 to amend the list of techniques and approaches listed in Annex I, within the scope of the definition of an AI system as provided for in Article 3(1), in order to update that list to market and technological developments on the basis of characteristics and hazards that are similar to the techniques and approaches listed therein.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1165 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the placing on the market, putting into service or use of an AI system that deploys subliminal techniques beyond a person’s consciousness in order to materially distort a person’s behaviour in a manner that causes or is likely to cause that person or another person physical or psychological harm that could be predicted with due diligence;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1183 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the placing on the market, putting into service or use of an AI system that exploits any of the vulnerabilities of a specific group of persons due to their age, physical or mental disability, in order to materially distort the behaviour of a person pertaining to that group in a manner that causes or is likely to cause that person or another person physical or psychological harm that could be predicted with due diligence;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1243 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d – introductory part
(d) the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purpose of law enforcement, unless and in as far as such use by law enforcement is strictly necessary for one of the following objectives:
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1412 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. The AI system shall be considered high-risk where it meets the following two cumulative criteria:  (a) the AI system is used or applied in a sector where, given the characteristics of the activities typically undertaken, significant risks of harm to the health and safety or a risk of adverse impact on fundamental rights of users, as outlined in Article 7(2) can be expected to occur. (b) the AI system application in the sector in question is used in such a manner that significant risks of harm to the health and safety or a risk of adverse impact on fundamental rights of users, as outlined in Article 7(2) are likely to arise.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1443 #

2021/0106(COD)

2. In addition to the high-risk AI systems referred to in paragraph 1 and in accordance with Article 6– paragraph -1a, AI systems referred to in Annex III shall also be considered high-risk.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1698 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) examination in view of possible biases defined as a statistical error or a top-down introduction of assumptions harmful to an individual, that are likely to affect health and safety of persons or lead to discrimination prohibited by Union law;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1716 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. Training, validation and testing datasets sets shall be relevant, representative, up-to-date, and to the extent that it could be reasonably expected, taking into account the state of the art, free of errors and as complete as could be reasonably expected . They shall have the appropriate statistical properties, including, where applicable, as regards the persons or groups of persons on which the high-risk AI system is intended to be used. These characteristics of the data sets may be met at the level of individual data sets or a combination thereof.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 1813 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way, including with appropriate human-machine interface tools, that they can be effectively overseen by natural persons during the period in which the AI system is in use, where required by the risk analysis as foreseen in the product legislations listed in Annex II.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2061 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Users of high-risk AI systems which affect natural persons, in particular, by evaluating or assessing them, making predictions about them, recommending information, goods or services to them or determining or influencing their access to goods and services, shall inform the natural persons that they are subject to the use of such an high-risk AI system. This information shall include a clear and concise indication of the user and the purpose of the high-risk AI system, information about the rights of the natural person conferred under this Regulation, and a reference to publicly available resource where more information about the high-risk AI system can be found, in particular the relevant entry in the EU database referred to in Article 60, if applicable.This information shall be presented in a concise, intelligible and easily accessible form, including for persons with disabilities. This obligation shall be without prejudice to other Union or Member State laws, in particular Regulation 2016/679 [GDPR], Directive 2016/680 [LED], Regulation 2022/XXX [DSA].
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2080 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 a (new)
Article 29 a Fundamental rights impact assessments for high-risk AI systems 1. The user of a high-risk AI system as defined in Article 6 paragraph 2 shall conduct an assessment of the system’s impact on fundamental rights and public interest in the context of use before putting the system into use and at least every two years afterwards. The information on clear steps as to how the potential harms identified will be mitigated and how effective this mitigation is likely to be should be included. 2. If adequate steps to mitigate the risks outlined in the course of the assessment in paragraph 1 cannot be identified, the system shall not be put into use. Market surveillance authorities, pursuant to their capacity under Articles 65 and 67, shall take this information into account when investigating systems which present a risk at national level. 3. In the course of the impact assessment, the user shall notify relevant national authorities and all relevant stakeholders. 4. Where, following the impact assessment process, the user decides to put the high- risk AI system into use, the user shall be required to publish the results of the impact assessment as part of the registration of use pursuant to their obligation under Article 51 paragraph 2. 5. Users of high-risk AI systems shall use the information provided to them by providers of high-risk AI systems under Article 13 to comply with their obligation under paragraph 1. 6. The obligations on users in paragraph 1 is without prejudice to the obligations on users of all high-risk AI systems as outlined in Article 29.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2245 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 1
1. Before placing on the market or putting into service a high-risk AI system referred to in Article 6(2), the provider or, where applicable, the authorised representative shall register that system in the EU database referred to in Article 60.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2250 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 1 a (new)
2. A high-risk AI system designed, developed, trained, validate, tested or approved to be placed on the market or put into service, outside the EU, can be registered in the EU database referred to in Article 60 and placed on the market or put into service in the EU only if it is proven that at all stages of its design, development, training, validation, testing or approval, all the obligations required from such AI systems in EU have been met;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2457 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. The Board shall establish a AI Advisory Council (Advisory Council). The Advisory Council shall be composed of relevant representatives from industry, research, academia, civil society, standardisation organisations, relevant common European data spaces and other relevant stakeholders or third parties appointed by the Board, representing all Member States to maintain geographical balance. The Advisory Council shall support the work of the Board by providing advice relating to the tasks of the Board. The Advisory Council shall nominate a relevant representative, depending on the configuration in which the Board meets, to attend meetings of the Board and to participate in its work. The composition of the Advisory Council and its recommendations to the Board shall be made public.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2774 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 a (new)
Article 68 a Representation of affected persons and the right of public interest organisation to lodge complaints 1. Without prejudice to Directive 2020/1828/EC, natural per-sons or groups of natural persons affected by an AI system shall have the right to mandate a body, organisation or association to lodge a complaint referred to in Article 68 on their behalf, to exercise the right to remedy referred to in Article 68 on their behalf, and to exercise on their behalf other rights under this Regulation, in particular the right to receive an explanation referred to in Article 4a 2. Without prejudice to Directive 2020/1828/EC, the bodies, organisations or associations referred to in paragraph 1 shall have the right to lodge a complaint with national supervisory authorities, independently of the mandate of the natural per-son, if they consider that an AI system has been placed on the market, put into service, or used in a way that infringes this Regulation, or is otherwise in violation of fundamental rights or other aspects of public interest protection, pursuant to article 67. 3. National supervisory authorities have the duty to investigate, in conjunction with relevant market surveillance authority if applicable, and respond within a reasonable period to all com- plaints referred to in paragraph 2.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2817 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 1
1. In compliance with the terms and conditions laid down in this Regulation, the Commission in consultation with Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties, including administrative fines, applicable to infringements of this Regulation and in cooperation with Member States shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are properly and effectively implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate, and dissuasive. They shall take into particular account the size and the interests of small-scaleSME providers andincluding start- ups and their economic viability.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 2823 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 2
2. The Member States shall notify the Commission of those rules and of those measures and shall notify it, without delay, of any subsequent amendment affecting them.deleted
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3054 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part
1. Biometric identification and categorisation of natural persons:
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3062 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
(a) AI systems intended to be used for the ‘real-time’ and ‘post’ remote biometric identification of natural persons without their agreement, including remote biometric identification;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3111 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
(a) AI systems intended to be used for recruitment or selection of natural persons, notably for advertising vacancies, screening or filtering applications, evaluating candidates in the course of interviews or tests;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3131 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
(b) AI systems intended to be used to evaluate the creditworthiness of natural persons or establish their credit score, with the exception of AI systems put into service by small scale providers for their own use; or AI systems related to low- value credits for the purchase of movables;
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 3145 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c a (new)
(c a) AI systems intended to be used for insurance premium setting, underwritings and claims assessments, with the exception of AI systems related to low- value property insurance.
2022/06/13
Committee: IMCOLIBE
Amendment 21 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) The manufacturer or the manufacturer’s authorised representative should also ensure that a risk assessment is carried out for the machinery product, which the manufacturer wishes to place on the market. For this purpose, the manufacturer should determine which of the essential health and safety requirements that are applicable to the machinery product and in respect of which measures must be taken to address the risks that the machinery product may present. Where the machinery product integrates an artificial intelligence system, the risks identified during the risk assessment should include those only foreseeable risks that may appear during the machinery product’s lifecycle due to an intended evolution of its behaviour to operate with varying levels of autonomy. In this respect, where the machinery product integrates an artificial intelligence system, the risk assessment for the machinery product should consider the risk assessment for that artificial intelligence system that has been carried out pursuant to Regulation (EU) .../... of the European Parliament and of the Council23 . _________________ 23 +OJ: Please insert in the text the number of the Regulation contained in document ….
2022/01/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) agricultural and forestry vehicles, as well as systems, components, separate technical units, parts and equipment designed and constructed for such vehicles, that fall within the scope of application of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013; , with the exclusion of machinery mounted on those vehicles”;
2022/01/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 1 – point 1.1 – point 1.1.9 – paragraph 2
A hardware component relevant for connection or access to software that is critical for the compliance of the machinery product with the relevant health and safety requirements shall be designed so that it is adequately protected against accidental or intentional corruption. The machinery product shall collect evidence of a legitimate or illegitimate intervention in the aforementioned hardware component (relevant for connection or access to software that is critical for the compliance of the machinery product).
2022/01/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.1 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) they can reasonably withstand, where appropriate to the circumstances and the risks, the intended operating stresses and intended and unintended external influences, including malicious attempts from third parties to create a hazardous situation;
2022/01/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 3 – point 3.3 – point 3.3.3 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
Autonomous mobile machinery products shall comply with anyt least one of the two following conditions:
2022/01/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 3 – point 3.3 – point 3.3.3 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) it shall be equipped with devices intended to detect any human, domestic animal or any other obstacle in its vicinity, where those obstacles could give rise to a risk to health and safety of persons or where appropriate of domestic animals or to safe operation of the machinery product.
2022/01/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 149 #

2021/0105(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) agricultural and forestry vehicletractors, as well as systems, components, separate technical units, parts and equipment designed and constructed for such vehicles, that fall within the scope of application of Regulation (EU) No 167/2013, with the exclusion of machinery mounted on those vehicles;
2021/11/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 61 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) The reporting by undertaking, should, however, following the principle of proportionality, not cause an excessive burden on companies or require efforts non-proportionate to the size of the company, its staff and/or scope of business activities, thus putting into danger the employment and/or incomes of management and personnel, engaged in the usual business activities, by imposing new structures, job titles and management positions to the company staff.
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 b (new)
(8b) There should, furthermore, be no double reporting required and this Directive shall not be interpreted as requiring any reporting, already mandatory under another European or national legislative act, whereas certain adaptation of national legislation might be necessary in order to avoid double reporting
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) Reporting could, however, not disclose any and all information on sustainability issues, either required by investors or expected by the public. Therefore, this Directive should by no means be interpreted as relieving public authorities of their duties or market players and social partners of their professional responsibilities.
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) The report on the review clause of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (Directive 2014/95/EU), and its accompanying fitness check on corporate reporting, identified problems as to the effectiveness of that Directive48 . There is significant evidence that many undertakings do not disclose material information on all major sustainability- related topics. The report also identified as significant problems the limited comparability and reliability of sustainability information. Additionally, many undertakings from which users need suTherefore, this Directive aims mainly at proper reinforcement of the existainability information g rules for large not obliged to report suchand listed companies and the harmonization of the sustainability information required. _________________ 48 Publication office: please insert reference to Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on the review clauses in Directives 2013/34/EU, 2014/95/EU, and 2013/50/EU, and accompanying SWD- Fitness Check.
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) The requirement that also large non-listed undertaking, but potentially harmful undertakings from high-impact sectors should disclose information on sustainability matters is mainly driven by concerns about the impacts and accountability of such undertakings, including through their value chain. In this respect, all large undertaking. In this respect, all large and potentially harmful undertakings from high-impact sectors should be subject to the same requirements to report sustainability information publicly. In addition, financial market participants also need information from those large non-listed undertakings.
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Considering the growing relevance of sustainability-related risks and taking into account that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) listed on regulated markets comprise a significant proportion of all listed undertakings in the Union, in order to ensure investor protection it is appropriate to require that also those SMEs disclose limited information on sustainability matters. The introduction of this requirement will help to ensure that financial market participants can include smaller listed undertakings in investment portfolios on the basis that they report the sustainability information that financial market participants need. It will therefore help to protect and enhance the access of smaller listed undertakings to financial capital, and avoid discrimination against such undertakings on the part of financial market participants. The introduction of this requirement is also necessary to ensure that financial market participants have the information they need from investee undertakings to be able to comply with their own sustainability disclosure requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) 2019/2088. SMEs listed on regulated markets should, however, be provided with sufficient time to prepare for the application of the requirement to report limited sustainability information, due to their smaller size, limited scope of activities and more limited resources, and taking account of the difficult economic circumstances created by the COVID-19 pandemic. They should also be given the possibility to report according to standards that are proportionate to the capacities and resources of SMEs. Non- listed SMEs can also choose to use these proportionate standards on a strictly voluntary basis. The SME standards will set a reference for undertakings that are within the scope of the Directive regarding the level of sustainability information that they could reasonably request from SME suppliers and clients in their value chainss. No public authority or publicly regulated entity whatsoever shall require or consider beneficial voluntary sustainability reporting from a non-listed SME, including, but not limited to, as precondition for participation in public procurements, tenders etc.
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Considering the growing relevance of sustainability-related risks and taking into account that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) listed on regulated markets comprise a significant proportion of all listed undertakings in the Union, in order to ensure investor protection it is appropriate to require that also those SMEs disclose information on sustainability matters. The introduction of this requirement will help to ensure that financial market participants can include smaller listed undertakings in investment portfolios on the basis that they report the sustainability information that financial market participants need. It will therefore help to protect and enhance the access of smaller listed undertakings to financial capital, and avoid discrimination against such undertakings on the part of financial market participants. The introduction of this requirement is also necessary to ensure that financial market participants have the information they need from investee undertakings to be able to comply with their own sustainability disclosure requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) 2019/2088. SMEs listed on regulated markets should, however, be provided with sufficient time to prepare for the application of the requirement to report sustainability information, due to their smaller size and more limited resources, and taking account of the difficult economic circumstances created by the COVID-19 pandemic. They should also be given the possibility to report according to standards that are proportionate to the capacities and resources of SMEs. Non- listed SMEs can also choose to use these proportionate standards on a voluntary basis. The SME standards will set a reference for undertakings that are within the scope of the Directive regarding the level of sustainability information that they could reasonably request from SME suppliers and clients in their value chains.
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 105 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 42 a (new)
(42a) Achieving a climate neutral economy is also posing significant risk to employment levels and quality, especially in transition sectors and regions. Therefore, undertakings in those sectors and regions should also report on possible risks and negative trends regarding employment and incomes, due to flaws in the transition process.
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 43
(43) Sustainability reporting standards should specify the information that undertakings should disclose on social factors, including employee factors and human rights. Such information should cover the impacts of undertakings on people, including on human health. The information that undertakings disclose about human rights should include information about forced labour in their value chains where relevant, , but in no way should such reports replace the public authorities’ responsibility to address import of goods, produced as result of human rights abuses, including forced labour, by trade policy and diplomacy means. Reporting standards that address social factors should specify the information that undertakings should disclose with regard to the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights that are relevant to businesses, including equal opportunities for all and working conditions. The European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan adopted in March 2021 calls for stronger requirements on undertakings to report on social issues. The reporting standards should also specify the information that undertakings should disclose with regard to the human rights, fundamental freedoms, democratic principles and standards established in the International Bill of Human Rights and other core UN human rights conventions, the International Labour Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, the fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organisation, and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The reporting on social factors should be proportionate to the scope and goals of this Directive, thus limited to essential rights and freedoms along the value chain.
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2013/34/EU
Article 19a – paragraph 1
1. Large undertakings and, as of 1 January 2026,, including small and medium-sized listed undertakings as of 1 January 2026, when subject to this Directive, which are undertakings referred to in Article 2, point (1), point (a), as well as high-impact undertakings, shall include in the management report information necessary to understand the undertaking’s impacts on sustainability matters, and information necessary to understand how sustainability matters affect the undertaking’s development, performance and position.
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2013/34/EU
Article 19a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e – point i
(i) the due diligence process implemented with regard to sustainability matters;deleted
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2013/34/EU
Article 19a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e – point ii
(ii) the principal actual or potential adverse impacts connected with the undertaking’s value chain, including its own operations, its products and services, its business relationships and itsthe supply chain in high- impact sectors;
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2013/34/EU
Article 19b – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. The sustainability reporting standards referred to in paragraph 1 shall require that the information to be reported is understandable, accessible in particular for persons with disabilities relevant, representative, verifiable, comparable, and is represented in a faithful manner.
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 199 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2013/34/EU
Article 19b – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b – point i
(i) equal treatment and opportunities for all, including gender equality and equal pay for equal workwork, measures for just transition in the vulnerable regions and sectors, including, but not limited to measures under the Just Transition Mechanism, training and skills development, and employment and inclusion of people with disabilities;
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2013/34/EU
Article 19b – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b – point i a (new)
(ia) the recognition of trade unions, existence of collective agreements and the coverage of workers therein;
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 206 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2013/34/EU
Article 19b – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b – point ii
(ii) working conditions, including secure and adaptable employment, wages, social dialogueincluding adaptation to social and climate factors and to market disturbances, caused by green transition policies, availability of just transition policies in the vulnerable regions and sectors, adequacy of wages, social dialogue, freedom of association, collective bargaining and the involvement of workers, work-life balance, and a healthy, and safety, and well-just transition measures adaopted work environmentthrough social dialogue;
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 217 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2013/34/EU
Article 19b – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b – point iii a (new)
(iiia) human rights impact assessments carried out by the relevant public authorities and adopted by the undertaking with respect violation of essential human rights and in particular against forced labour and child labour and the implementation of the undertaking's policy on free, prior and informed consent.
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 220 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2013/34/EU
Article 19b – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c – point i
(i) the role of the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies, including with regard to sustainability matters, and their composition;
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 228 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2013/34/EU
Article 19c – paragraph 1
The Commission shall, by 31 October 2024 at the latest, adopt a delegated acts in accordance with Article 49 to provide for sustainability reporting standards proportionate to the capacities and characteristics oflisting for which sectors small and medium- sized- undertakings. Those sustainability reporting standards shall specify which information referred to in Articles 19a and 29a are to report according to Articles 19a and 29a. The list of sectors shall list sectors according to the third level of NACE Rev, 2 as defined by Article 2(c) of Regulation (EC) No1893/2006. The delegated act smhall and medium-sized undertakings referred to in Article 2, point (1)(a) shall report. They shall take into account the criteria set out in Article 19b, paragraphs 2 and 3. They shall also, where relevant, specify the structure in which that information shall be reportedlist sectors that according to their nature or their overall impact on environmental, social or governance factors pose a particular impact unsustainability matters. When adopting that delegated act, the Commission shall take into consideration if mandatory reporting would particularly benefit the access to financial capital for the concerned small and medium sized- undertakings or if the disclosure of information would have a particular benefit for other stakeholders.
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2013/34/EU
Article 19c – paragraph 2
The Commission shall adopt those delegated acts at the latest by 31 October 20234.
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 243 #

2021/0104(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2013/34/EU
Article 29 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e – point i
(i) the due diligence process implemented with regard to sustainability matters;deleted
2021/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2020/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas we face a critical time in our history, with the idea that economic growth automatically trickles down to all sectors of society being widely discredited; whereas we are witnessing a thinning of the middle class, increasingly precarious job conditions for blue collar and platform workers and growing polarisation in terms of income and wealth;deleted
2021/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2020/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas, contrary to the crowding- out hypothesis that has prevailed in economic thinking for the last three decades, public investment and its crowding-in effects should play a central role in this new economic paradigm; whereas investments and reforms should also focus on digital skills and educational and vocational training for all in order to have a positive impact on social cohesion, which is a pre-condition for economic growth, job creation and employment;
2021/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2020/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O a (new)
O a. whereas cohesion policy, as the EU’s main investment policy for social, economic and territorial development, has demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing inequalities and regional differences, in particular regarding the poorest regions;
2021/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2020/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O b (new)
O b. whereas social protection systems and labour market policies are deeply rooted in national traditions and there is great variation between the Member States, which should be maintained when working towards common social goals through the European Semester; whereas issues lacking a transnational dimension are dealt with at national level in line with TFEU146(2), 147(1), 151 and the principle of subsidiarity;
2021/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 105 #

2020/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O c (new)
O c. whereas the green transition and the digitalisation of the economy will involve substantial economic diversification and transformation of business models and policymaking; whereas that will create new opportunities as well as significant socio-economic challenges in many regions and industrial sectors; whereas the EU needs a common strategy to accompany workers and businesses concerned in order to ensure that no one is left behind;
2021/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2020/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to reform the financial legal framework and the European Semester process in order to strengthen democratic accountability and the involvement of the European Parliament; stresses that the social progress objectives regarding social welfare systems and quality employment must be shielded from the application of macroeconomic conditionality;
2021/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 166 #

2020/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that fiscal flexibility to support investment in social rights is vitalimportant, as is the mainstreaming, effectively and at all stages, of all principles enshrined in the EPSR; demands that any proposed fiscal measures be ex-ante assessed and monitored against the provisions of Article 9 of the TFEU to evaluate their social impact, and that they only be considered when they will be beneficial for upward social convergence and increasing wellbeing standards in Member States;
2021/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2020/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Regrets that the way data is presented in the joint employment report is not clear and that the data is often inconclusive or difficult to compare, regarding the evolution of wages, productivity, capital gains and profits, subsidies and tax breaks for corporations, or the tax wedge for labour and capital; warns that multifactor productivity is not being measured; calls on the Member States to include the Gender Equality Index as one of the European Semester’s tools and to analyse the structural reforms from a gender perspective;
2021/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 186 #

2020/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop a quality employment package, including legislative initiativesinitiatives contributing and supporting Member States actions in the field taking into account diverse forms of national practices and the role of social partners and collective bargaining aimed at improving wages and protecting decent working conditions for all, with a particular focus on telework, the right to disconnect, mental well-being at work, occupational health and safety, the rights of platform workers, ensuring quality jobs for essential workers, and strengthening democracy at work and the role of the social partners and collective bargaining;
2021/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 190 #

2020/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Stresses that Members States should also focus on innovation and investments for improved connectivity and artificial intelligence methods and systematic deployment of 5G and Gigabit infrastructure along urban and rural households and large-scale transport corridors in line with EU’s 2025 5G and Gigabit connectivity objectives;
2021/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 201 #

2020/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for a quality employment package and notes that macroeconomic policies that guarantee high levels of employment, as well as fair taxation, are essential for the sustainability of our national pension systems in a demographic context of ageing European populations;
2021/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 218 #

2020/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that implementing the EU skills agenda equitably is critical for promoting health systems and tackling skills shortages for people in new fields of work; warns, however, that a skills agenda is not enough to tackle the increasing precariousness and in-work poverty in the EU labour market; calls on the Commission and the Member States to maximise their efforts to invest in affordable, accessible, inclusive and high- quality vocational education and training, to reinforce upskilling and reskilling measures, including digital and transferable skills, and to promote lifelong learning to prepare workers for the needs of the labour market affected by the green and digital transformations; takes the view that the mutual recognition of qualifications will be beneficial for overcoming skills shortages and skills mismatches;
2021/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 240 #

2020/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to analyse brain drains in certain regions and sectors, and to support mobile workers by ensuring fair mobility and strengthening the portability of rights and entitlements; underlines that the digitalisation of public services can help to facilitate fair labour mobility, particularly with regard to the coordination of social security systems;
2021/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 245 #

2020/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure a growth- friendly investment climate and to support SMEs and their employees in the transition to a more digital and greener economy, and to give adequate consideration to the interests of SMEs in the policy making process by analysing the possible effects of policies on SMEs; highlights the importance of improving access for SMEs to public and private funding, including microcredits and crowdfunding, and reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens;
2021/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 246 #

2020/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Points out that fairness conditions must be establishshould be considered for companies that wish to access public funds and support in order to avoid such support going to companies based in tax havens, to those without significanta jurisdiction referred to in Annex I to Council conclusions on the revised EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes1a, should not subvert collective bargaining, workers’ participation in company matters or codetermination, or those without a ban on bonuses to limit CEO and top executive remuneration;or codetermination in company decision-making processes in accordance with national law and practice, and should be conditional on maintaining the same level of working and employment conditions and rights, including protection against dismissals and reductions in wages, no bonuses to managers or dividends to shareholders; _________________ 1a OJ C 64, 27.2.1010, p. 8
2021/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas the Fourth Industrial Revolution, digitalisation and artificial intelligence (AI) are leading to fundamental and structural changes to the labour market, the workplace, the work patterns and the work profile of every worker;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas new opportunities brought by digital transformation and digital single market should empower and allow to prosper all EU citizens;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas digitalisation and artificial intelligence has the potential to substantially change the way people receive information, the way they communicate and the way they think;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas greater challenges are posed on the synergies between labour market and education system as the education system should better foresee the future needs of the labour market and be able to adapt accordingly;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A d (new)
Ad. whereas the use of AI holds potential for safer and more inclusive workplaces and labour markets;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas these developments plausibly facilitate human-machine synergies, thereby producing a combined effect greater than the sum of their separate outcomes, but also pose serious challenges in terms of workforce reorganisation and the potential elimination of more sectors and employment than the new forms they createsome employment sectors while at the same time creation of new employment opportunities;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the fast technological change is often accompanied by the spread of false information, hoax and misinterpretation that can undermine the positive aspects and opportunities brought by the development;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas artificial intelligence (including high risk AI) is increasingly used not only in the work place but also in the recruitment and other administrative processes;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the future regulatory framework for AI in the European Union shouldmust ensure that workers’ human dignity and rights are fully respected and adapted to the new forms of work relations and work organisation, in a way that secures jobs and improves upon wages and working conditions, while safeguarding the quality of employment as well as workers´ work-life balance; stresses, in addition, that the European AI framework should respect European values, Union rules and the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights and set clear and predictable rules for civil liability connected to AI;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses the urgent need to recognize the ethics-by-default principle as a leading principle for the design and use of artificial intelligence;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that AI must always be human-centric and thus serve exclusively as an aid to human performance and comply with all rules ensuring respect for fundamental rights with human dignity at the forefront, including the protection of personal data and privacy, and the prohibition of arbitrary profiling;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines that new technologies including AI should be used to improve labour market functioning and produce sustainable and inclusive labour market matches between workers and businesses;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to adopt communication strategies in order to enable smooth transposition of the changes brought by the development of AI. Calls on the special attention to be paid to providing detailed information on the changes to the workers, trade unions and social partners and thus prevent the spread of misinformation and hoaxes;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that the use of AI applications, algorithms and process development affecting all aspects of work and workers’ rights, such as recruitment processes, must not discriminate against workers and vulnerable groups or reinforce inequalities inter alia on the pretext of gender, age, disability or nationalityand health state or nationality; underlines the need to provide information in a simple and understandable manner regarding the use of the AI in recruitment processes or work-related administrative processes as explainability of the basic features of algorithms is a pre-condition for an ethical usage;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Highlights the potential of artificial intelligence to mitigate the inequalities in society and stresses the need to focus on the solutions provided by the artificial intelligence that can help the most vulnerable groups like persons with disabilities or persons living in remote or rural areas to improve their opportunities on the labour market;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Recalls that the process of machine learning needs to be based on a sufficient amount of quality and diverse data that prevent the incidence of biased algorithms; calls therefore on the Commission and the Member States to cooperate in the collection of quality and diverse data ensuring the unbiased AI to avoid possible collateral deepening of inequalities in the society;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to update the European Skills Agenda and the Digital Education Action Plan, so that workers can reskill or upskill and become qualified for the challenges of the future world of work; calls on the Member States to update their national vocational and professional training and upskill, reskilling, upskilling and lifelong learning programmes so as to ensure digital literacy and promote digital inclusion (οn average, 16 % of EU workers fear that digitalisation will render their skills outdated2 ); __________________ 2 Cedefop, ‘Artificial or human intelligence? Digitalisation and the future of jobs and skills: opportunities and risks’, p. 3.
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the European Labour Authority to take leadership in facilitation of the transformation process towards a social-digital economy;
2021/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the decisive contribution of SMEs to innovation, job creation and an inclusive labour market; is extremely concerned about the rising unemployment rates in the EU and the risk of millions of people losing their jobs as a result of the COVID-19 crisis; recognises that at present SMEs are faced with severe liquidity problems and, in this context, highlights the need for sustainable finance to bridge the current investment gap and to reinforce SMEs’ resilience and ability to innovate and move towards more sustainable, resource- efficient, circular and climate-neutral solutions, ensuring the successful implementation of the European Green Deal and the related just transition;
2020/09/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the reduction of the regulatory burden and the simplification of rules on access to finance for SMEs and self-employed persons should constitute a cornerstone of the future strategy for European SMEs, and would make a crucial contribution to a speedy economic recovery; calls in this regard for the reduction of ‘gold plating’ of EU rules in Member States;
2020/09/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the EU to support the digital and green transitions by investing in artificial intelligence and in reskilling and upskilling initiatives to foster digital literacy, the uptake of advanced digital skills and the new skills for new occupations and sectors that will emerge from the transition to a sustainable, carbon- neutral economy; highlights the need to adopt a forward-looking approach to vocational education and training and skills, in particular digital skills; stresses, as a matter of priority, the need to address the mismatch between skills/qualifications and the needs of the labour market.; calls for the best use of the European Social Fund+ to address these challenges;
2020/09/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2020/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 a (new)
- having regard to the European Commission Report on the Impact of Demographic Change from 17th June 20201a _________________ 1a https://ec.europa.eu/info/files/report- impact-demographic-change-reader- friendly-version-0_en
2021/02/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 16 #

2020/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 19 a (new)
- having regard the opinion of the European Committee of the Regions– Demographic change: proposals on measuring and tackling its negative effects in the EU regions from 12-14 October 2020
2021/02/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 33 #

2020/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas, although the EU population has seen substantial growth in previous decades, the growth rate is now falling and the population is expected to decrease in the longer term; whereas in 2015 the EU has experienced the first natural population decline with more deaths than births; whereas Europe will account for less than 4 % of the world’s population by 2070, and long- term demographic trends in European regions indicate lower birth rates and ageing societies;
2021/02/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 48 #

2020/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas COVID-19 crisis has a significant impact on changes in births, deaths and migration in Europe;
2021/02/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 163 #

2020/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses that the COVID-19 health crisis has affected all Member States and regions to different extents, and is likely to lead to new trends as regards demographic flows; recalls in this context that the additional resources provided through REACT-EU in order to ensure a sound and robust recovery of the EU’s economy from the crisis could significantly help to keep people in employment, including through support for small and medium-size enterprises and for short-time work schemes and the self-employed; underlines that such support must be granted in a non-discriminatory basis;
2021/02/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 176 #

2020/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Invites the Commission and Member States to reflect on how the COVID-19 crisis and the rise of telework could affect the future intra-EU mobility and the perception of attractiveness of different regions and to take account of this in their policies;
2021/02/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 184 #

2020/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Member States to conduct the programming and implementation process of the 2021-2027 cohesion policy with full respect for the partnership principle and to take account of particular needs of the regions with demographic handicaps in their partnership agreements; stresses the importance of prioritising regional needs, including as regards demographic and migration aspects and urban challenges;
2021/02/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 216 #

2020/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the regions at risk of depopulation to focus investments on universal accessibility to quality services and infrastructure and job creation; insists on investment in education, upskilling and reskilling of workers, creating entrepreneurial conditions and supporting SMEs;
2021/02/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 25 #

2020/2028(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that unlike other NLF legislation, the use of harmonised standards under the CPR is mandatory, which requires an effective system of adoption to address the needs of industry, open the ways for innovation, keep up with technological developments and ensure legal clarity;
2020/10/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 56 #

2020/2028(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to consider, taking into account a very specific situation of the manufacturing and placing on the market of construction products, the possibility of including in the CPR minimum product requirements aimed at ensuring health and safety and protecting the environment and other public interests, thereby following the approach of NLF legislation, which has proven to be effective; stresses in this respect that such a possibility should be thoroughly assessed in relation to the possible overlapping with requirement set in other EU sectoral legislation;
2020/10/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 298 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
Tackling Illegal and Harmful Content Online
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 304 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses that the existence and spread of illegal and harmful content online is a severe threat that undermines citizens' trust and confidence in the digital environment, and which also harms the economic development of healthy platform ecosystems in the Digital Single Market and severely hampers the development of legitimate markets for digital services;
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 321 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Notes that there is no ‘one size fits all’ solution to all types of illegal and harmful content and, including cases of mdisinformation online; believes, however, that a more aligned approach at Union level, taking into account the different types of content, will make the fight against illegal and harmful content more effective;
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 361 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Commission to address the increasing differences and fragmentations of national rules in the Member States and to propose concrete legislative measures including a notice- and-action mechanism, that can empower users to notify online intermediaries of the existence of potentially illegal or harmful online content or behaviour; is of the opinion that such measures would guarantee a high level of users' and consumers' protection while promoting consumer trust in the online economy;
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 534 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part I – paragraph 6 – indent 1 – subi. 2
- clear and detailed procedures and measures related to the removal of illegal and harmful content online, including a harmonised legally-binding European notice-and action mechanism;
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 688 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part V – title
V. MEASURES RELATED TO TACKLING ILLEGAL AND HARMFUL CONTENT ONLINE
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 690 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part V – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Digital Services Act should provide clarity and guidance regarding how online intermediaries should tackle illegal and harmful content online. The revised rules of the E- Commerce Directive should:
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 694 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part V – paragraph 1 – indent 1
- clarify that any removal or disabling access to illegal or harmful content should not affect the fundamental rights and the legitimate interests of users and consumers;
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 711 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part V – paragraph 1 – indent 4
- introduce new transparency and independent oversight of the content moderation procedures and tools related to the removal of illegal and harmful content online; such systems and procedures should be available for auditing and testing by independent authorities.
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 723 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part V – paragraph 2 – indent 1
- apply to illegal online content or behaviour as well as to harmful content including disinformation;
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 727 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part V – paragraph 2 – indent 2
- rank different types of providers, sectors and/or illegal and harmful content;
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 732 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part V – paragraph 2 – indent 4
- allow users to easily notify by electronic means potentially illegal or harmful online content or behaviour to online intermediaries;
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 738 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part V – paragraph 2 – indent 7
- specify the requirements necessary to ensure that notices are of a good quality, thereby enabling a swift removal of illegal content; such requirement should include the name and contact details of the notice provider, the link (URL) to the allegedly illegal or harmful content in question, the stated reason for the claim including an explanation of the reasons why the notice provider considers the content to be illegal, and if necessary, depending on the type of content, additional evidence for the claim;
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 762 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part V – subheading 2 – indent 1
- The decision taken by the online intermediary on whether or not to act upon content flagged as illegal or harmful should contain a clear justification on the actions undertaken regarding that specific content. The notice provider, where identifiable, should receive a confirmation of receipt and a communication indicating the follow-up given to the notification.
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 765 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part V – subheading 2 – indent 2
- The providers of the content that is being flagged as illegal or harmful should be immediately informed of the notice and, that being the case, of the reasons and decisions taken to remove or disable access to the content; all parties should be duly informed of all existing available legal options and mechanisms to challenge this decision;
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 770 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part V – subheading 2 – indent 4
- If the redress and counter-notice have established that the notified activity or information is not illegal nor harmful, the online intermediary should restore the content that was removed without undue delay or allow for the re-upload by the user, without prejudice to the platform's terms of service.
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 908 #

2020/2018(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part VIII – paragraph 4
The central regulator should coordinate the work of the different authorities dealing with illegal and harmful content online, enforce compliance, fines, and be able to carry out auditing of intermediaries and platforms.
2020/05/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 15 #

2020/2012(INL)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. Wwhereas AI offers economic and societal benefits, while at the same time raising a number of challenges; Whereas AI offers economic and societal benefits, while at same time raising a number of challenges and that new AI applications should not have a negative impact on the current labour conditions;
2020/06/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2020/2012(INL)

Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the introduction of AI has made the tasks of workers less executive and more complex, research1a has shown that AI leads to more ‘technostress’, with, in particular, less educated and elderly workers being more vulnerable to ‘technostress’. __________________ 1aMeylemans, Lise; Vanderstukken, Arne; Vereycken, Yennef; Ramioul, Monique; 2019. Aanwezigheid en impact van nieuwe technologieën in sectoren van ACV-CSC METEA.
2020/06/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2020/2012(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the need to thoroughly assess the effects or implications of AI applications in companies and in public administration in relation to workers, jobs and workflows; considers it indispensable as part of this assessment that workers and their representative social partners are consulted and receive sufficient information before AI applications are put to use; considers it necessary that training be provided to all concerned employees when new AI technologies are introduced at the workplace;
2020/06/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2020/2012(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that AI solutions have the potential to improve working conditions and the quality of life, yet they can also lead to disproportionate and illegal surveillance of workers, discriminatory treatment due to biased algorithms, including gender biased algorithms3 - and they can undermine the dignity and autonomy of people; AI algorithms at the workplace should be fair, transparent and respecting social implications for the workers concerned. __________________ 3 European Parliament “Education and employment of women in science, technology and the digital economy, including AI and its influence on gender equality”, April 2020
2020/06/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #

2020/2012(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for a legislative framework on the ethical aspects of AI applications in the workplace, especially with regard to workers’ rights and working conditions; points out the necessity for this legislative framework to be in line with the rules of protection of personal data and respect privacy of the workers;
2020/06/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the Professional Qualifications Directive facilitates the intra-EU labour mobility and the Services Directive realises the free movement of services, but the full potential of the single market for services and professionals can still be further improved and developed and the barriers for the free movement of services and professionals removed;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 8 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the COVID-19 crisis has caused an unprecedented economic crisis, and unlocking the full potential of the single market as well as enhancing the free movement of workers and services by making full use of the mutual recognition of professional qualifications and freedom to provide services under the Services Directive can facilitate the recovery process and put the economy back on track after the crisis;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 11 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas different regulatory choices at both the European and national level, imperfect and inadequate transposition of relevant directives, excessive requirements, lack of clear rules and fragmentation create the obstacles to fully benefit from the free movement of workers and services;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 13 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A d (new)
Ad. whereas in March 2020 the Commission has issued the Guidelines concerning the exercise of the free movement of workers during COVID-19 outbreak, which sets out the principles for an integrated approach to effective internal borders management to protect public health while preserving the integrity of the internal market;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 15 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A e (new)
Ae. whereas the Council has adopted a recommendation on a coordinated approach to the restrictions of free movement in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which aims at increasing the transparency and predictability of free movement across the EU for both citizens and enterprises;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 18 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights that, in the present health crisis, free movement of workers in the field of health services clearly demonstrates the benefits of the PQD; recalls that the aim of PQD is to facilitate the professionals to provide their services across Europe whilst guaranteeing an improved level of protection for consumers and citizens, which is particularly important during the pandemic crisis,
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 21 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. underlines the great importance of free movement of workers and services in overcoming the recession and increased unemployment rates caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, reiterates that further removal of the existing barriers within the single market is essential in order to fully benefit from its potential; regrets that the Recovery Plan proposed by the Commission lacks ambition when it comes to the movement of workers and services and fails to fully recognise its importance as a tool for economic recovery;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 32 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets that insufficient national implementation of existing legislation continues to seriously hamper the free mobility of workers within the EU to the detriment of workers and the European economy as a whole and calls on the European Commission to open infringement procedures whenever necessary;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 41 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that while it is a competence of Member States to regulate a certain profession, they must respect the limits of the principles of non- discrimination and proportionality, as explicitly stipulated in the Proportionality Test Directive; calls on the Commission to provide structured assistance and issue guidance to Member States on how to conduct ex-ante proportionality assessments of new national regulation of services according to the Proportionality Test Directive;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 45 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Member States to reduce bureaucratic obstacles, and, as quickly as possible, make it possible to obtain electronically the documents needed for the cross-border provision of services as well as facilitate the cross- border activities of workers in regulated professions;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 48 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Takes into consideration that the harmonisation inspired by the Professional Qualifications Directive gained success within several professions; further proclaims that Member States should reconsider and coordinate rules governing entry and exercise requirements in relation to specific activities or professions;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 51 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Stresses, that, according to the Single Market Scoreboard 2020, further improvements are needed to ensure the free movement of professionals, especially in the field of recognising professional qualifications;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 66 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Encourages the Commission to fully and effectively enforce existing rules; calls for alternative resolution mechanisms to be assessed and for infringement procedures to be applied swiftly and rigorously whenever breaches of relevant legislation are identified or disproportionate burdens introduced;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 68 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Encourages Member States to work together in order to guarantee the continuity of work of cross-border workers during the pandemic crisis, taking into account their specific situation and in order to preserve the free movement of services and workers in regulated professions within the internal market;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Reiterates that Member States should follow the Council Recommendation on a coordinated approach to the restriction of free movement in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, adopted on 13th October 2020 in order to avoid any disruption in the internal market and free movement of workers and services;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 73 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to improve tools such as the Points of Single Contact and the Single Digital Gateway where appropriate, to provide guidelines to help Member States streamline procedures, in particular for SMEs; calls and on the Member States to use such tools to provide workers, consumers and businesses with prompt, accurate and easily accessible information regarding their rights and obligations related to free movement within the single market.
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 78 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recalls that cross-border health care services fall within the ambit of freedom to provide services as stated by the Court of Justice of the EU; notes that Cross-border Health Care Directive was adopted also on basis of Article 114 TFEU; regrets that Cross-border Health Care Directive creates additional obstacles to provision of cross-border health care services when compared to the case-law of the Court of Justice applying the Treaty provisions on free movement of services; underlines the necessity that these additional obstacles are removed, underlines that a better coordination and promotion of best practices between Member States and cross-border mobility of health professionals are beneficial and particularly important during the COVID- 19 pandemic;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 81 #

2020/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that all relevant procedures to access the services market in another Member State are efficiently coordinated and that service providers are properly informed, in order to ensure compliance with applicable national rules, including proportionate employment terms and conditions that Member States apply in accordance with Union law;
2020/10/30
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 3 #

2020/1998(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recognises the need for the EU budget to continue to support recovery, convergence, reforms, fair and inclusive sustainable long-term growth and competitiveness of the European economy to address structural weaknesses of the economies and strengthen their resilience and other EU priorities such as social, economic and territorial cohesion and regional development, climate action, green transition, digitalisation and innovation, security and the management of migration, to avoid widening of the divergence in the Union, while acknowledging that the COVID-19 pandemic has provided a new and unexpected challenge on economic and health sector that the EU and its Member States need to respond determinedly and provide efficient solutions at the EU level;
2020/09/02
Committee: REGI
Amendment 12 #

2020/1998(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Reminds that cohesion is a shared competence between the EU and Member States and that as a main public investment policy it will play a major role in mitigating the economic and social impact and it will also play a crucial role in the recovery path from the COVID-19 pandemic consequences; emphasises that cohesion policy isis fundamental and most recognised policy that has shaped the Union we know today, based on a solidarity and its goal is to reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between Member States and within the EU and regionslong with strengthening economic, territorial and social resilience within the EU and regions for a more harmonious development that will help the Union to remain globally competitive; emphasizses in that context that programmes managed under European Structural and Investments (ESI) Funds support and contribute significantly to sustainable solutions for fair and long-term inclusive economic growth, investments and competitiveness, as well as high quality, safe and secure working and living conditions of the citizens, including equal opportunities, social justice and non- discrimination; in order to maximise the impact of ESI Funds, it is essential that Member State authorities at all levels work closely with each other and in partnership with employers, trade unions, academics, non-governmental organisations and other stakeholders;
2020/09/02
Committee: REGI
Amendment 22 #

2020/1998(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the budget for the year 2021 starts the new programming period 2021-2027 and that it should reflect the principles and priorities of an updated and reoriented Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and contribute effectively to the mitigation of the social and, economic and health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, while carefully considering available resources, including new own resources, as well as budgetary rules and principles that will ensure realistic, immediate and satisfactory implementation;
2020/09/02
Committee: REGI
Amendment 34 #

2020/1998(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the enhanced flexibility in cohesion policy – increased co- financing, anti-crisis use of EU funds - introduced in March and April 2020 and believes that it - should be maintained also in MFF 2021-2027 as a mechanism that will act as a safeguard of the Union economy during turbulent and unpredictable times;
2020/09/02
Committee: REGI
Amendment 52 #

2020/1998(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Member States to share clearly and determinedly their post-crisis plans, strategies, ambitions and expectations as well as acknowledge their shared role in preparation for a coordinated EU approach., which will enable high- quality and measurable results that will lead to long-term sustainable growth;
2020/09/02
Committee: REGI
Amendment 87 #

2020/0380(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) For the purposes of contributing to economic, social and territorial cohesion, it is appropriate that Member States, when designing support measures, focus in particular on the regions, areas and local communities, including those dependent on fishing activities in the United Kingdom waters, that are likely to be most negatively impacted by the withdrawal of the United Kingdom. Member States may have to take specific measures notably to support businesses and economic sectors adversely affected by the withdrawal and regions under impact of changes of migration flows as the result of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom. It is therefore appropriate to provide a non-exhaustive list of the type of measures that are most likely to achieve this objective.
2021/03/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 219 #

2020/0380(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) measures aimed at re-integration of EU-nationals that left the United Kingdom, as a result of the withdrawal;
2021/03/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 291 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23 a (new)
(23a) Consumers should be able to safely purchase products and services online, irrespective of whether a product or service has been produced in the Union. For that reason, traders from third countries should establish a legal representative in the Union to whom claims regarding product safety could be addressed. Providers of intermediary services from inside the Union as well as from third countries should ensure compliance with product requirements set out in Union law.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 331 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The territorial scope of such orders to act against illegal content should be clearly set out on the basis of the applicable Union or national law enabling the issuance of the order and should not exceed what is strictly necessary to achieve its objectives. In that regard, the national judicial or administrative authority issuing the order should balance the objective that the order seeks to achieve, in accordance with the legal basis enabling its issuance, with the rights and legitimate interests of all third parties that may be affected by the order, in particular their fundamental rights under the Charter. In addition, where the order referring to the specific information may have effects beyond the territory of the Member State of the authority concerned, the authority should assess whether the information at issue is likely to constitute illegal content in other Member States concerned and, where relevant, take account of the relevant rules of Union law or international law and the interests of international comity. Since intermediaries should not be required to remove information which is legal in their country of establishment, national and Union authorities should be able to order the blocking of content legally published outside the Union only for the territory of the Union where Union law is infringed and for the territory of the issuing Member State where national law is infringed.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 358 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36 a (new)
(36a) Providers of intermediary services should also establish a single point of contact for recipients of services, allowing rapid, direct and efficient communication.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 376 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
(40) Providers of hosting services play a particularly important role in tackling illegal content online, as they store information provided by and at the request of the recipients of the service and typically give other recipients access thereto, sometimes on a large scale. It is important that all providers of hosting services, regardless of their size, put in place easily accessible, comprehensive and user-friendly notice and action mechanisms that facilitate the notification of specific items of information that the notifying party considers to be illegal content to the provider of hosting services concerned ('notice'), pursuant to which that provider can decide whether or not it agrees with that assessment and wishes to remove or disable access to that content ('action')following the applicable law ('action'). Such mechanisms should be clearly visible on the interface of the hosting service and easy to use. Provided the requirements on notices are met, it should be possible for individuals or entities to notify multiple specific items of allegedly illegal content through a single notice. The obligation to put in place notice and action mechanisms should apply, for instance, to file storage and sharing services, web hosting services, advertising servers and paste bins, in as far as they qualify as providers of hosting services covered by this Regulation. Providers of hosting services could, as a voluntary measure, conduct own-investigation measures to prevent content which has previously been identified as illegal from being disseminated again once removed. The obligations related to notice and action should by no means impose general monitoring obligations.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 385 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
(41) The rules on such notice and action mechanisms should be harmonised at Union level, so as to provide for the timely, diligent and objective processing of notices on the basis of rules that are uniform, transparent and clear and that provide for robust safeguards to protect the right and legitimate interests of all affected parties, in particular their fundamental rights guaranteed by the Charter, irrespective of the Member State in which those parties are established or reside and of the field of law at issue. The fundamental rights include, as the case may be, the right to freedom of expression and information, the right to respect for private and family life, the right to protection of personal data, the right to non-discrimination and the right to an effective remedy of the recipients of the service; the freedom to conduct a business, including the freedom of contract, of service providers; as well as the right to human dignity, the rights of the child, the right to protection of property, including intellectual property, and the right to non- discrimination of parties affected by illegal content. Providers of hosting services should act upon notices without undue delay, taking into account the type of illegal content that is being notified and the urgency of taking action. The provider of hosting services should inform the individual or entity notifying the specific content of its decision without undue delay after taking a decision whether to act upon the notice or not.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 614 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (new)
i) facilitate innovations, support digital transition, encourage economic growth and create a level playing field for digital services within the internal market while strengthening consumer protection and contributing to increased consumer choice.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1125 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 a (new)
Article 15a Online interface design and oversight 1. Providers of hosting services shall not subvert or impair the autonomy, decision-making, or choice of the recipients of the service through the structure, function or manner of operation of their online interface or a part thereof. In particular, providers of hosting services shall refrain from: a) giving more visual prominence to any of the options when asking the recipient of the service for a decision that might have detrimental effects for the recipient; b) repeatedly requesting that a recipient of the service consents to data processing, regardless of the scope or purpose of such processing, especially by presenting a pop-up that interferes with user experience; c) urging a recipient of the service to change any setting or configuration of the service after the person in question has already made her choice, including by the use of a standard protocol in accordance with paragraph 4; d) making the procedure of cancelling a service more cumbersome then signing up to it; e) requiring a recipient of the service to consent to the collection or processing of personal data concerning the recipient that is not strictly technically necessary for the functioning of the service. 2. A choice or decision made by the recipient of the service using an online interface that does not comply with the requirements of paragraph 1 shall not constitute consent in the sense of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. 3. Providers of hosting services shall design and organise their online interfaces in a way that enables them and traders to comply with their obligations under applicable Union and Member State law on data protection and consumer protection, including on product safety. 4. Providers of hosting services shall respect the communication of choices made by the recipients of the service, including consent or withdrawal of consent to the processing of personal data, through automated means, in particular through the settings of software placed on the market permitting electronic communications, including the retrieval and presentation of information on the internet. The Commission shall, after consulting the Board, adopt delegated acts laying down the technical conditions for automated means referred to above. 5. The Commission shall adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 69, after consulting the Board to indicate specific design patterns that qualify as subverting or impairing the autonomy, decision making, or choice of the recipients of the service. The Commission shall keep this list updated in the light of technological developments and, in the case of very large online platforms, assessments related to systemic risks identified in accordance with Article 27(2). 6. The Commission may adopt implementing acts to prescribe the design and functions of online interfaces that facilitate expression of consent in accordance to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 or other choices that may be expressed by the recipients of the service. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 70. Before the adoption of any measures pursuant to this paragraph, the Commission shall publish a draft thereof and invite all interested parties to submit their comments within the time period set out therein, which shall not be less than one month.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1236 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) the dispute settlement takes place in accordance with clear and fair rules of procedure that are clearly visible and easily accessible to all parties concerned and in full compliance with all applicable law.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1391 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) a self-certification by the trader committing to only offer products or services that comply with the applicable rules of Union law and where applicable confirming that all products have been checked against the Union Rapid Alert System for dangerous non-food products (Rapex).
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1459 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 a (new)
Article 22a Obligation to inform consumers and authorities about illegal products and services 1. Where an online platform allows consumers to conclude distance contracts with traders, it shall be subject to additional information obligations for consumers. Where the online platform becomes aware of the illegal nature of a product or services offered by a trader on its interface it shall: (a) immediately remove the illegal product from its interface and inform relevant authorities about it; (b) maintain an internal database of content removed and/or recipients suspended pursuant to Article 20 to be used by internal content moderation systems tackling the identified risks; (c) where the online platform has the contact details of the recipients of its services, inform such recipients of the service that have purchased said product or service during the past twelve months about the illegality, the identity of the trader and options for seeking redress; (d) compile and make publicly available through application programming interfaces a repository containing information about illegal products and services removed from its platform in the past six months along with information about the concerned trader and options for seeking redress.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1476 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States shall refrain from imposing additional transparency reporting obligations on the online platforms, other than specific requests in the context of exercising their supervisory powers.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1512 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 b (new)
3. Providers of intermediary services shall obtain consent from the recipients of their service, in order to provide them with micro targeted and behavioural advertisement. Providers of intermediary services shall ensure that recipients of services can easily make an informed choice when expressing their consent by providing them with meaningful information.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1580 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) any potentially negative societal effect, in particular related to the increased polarisation of opinions and insufficient exposure to objective sources of information.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1698 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The parameters used in recommender systems shall always be fair and non-discriminatory.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1808 #

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 a (new)
Article 33a Algorithm transparency 1. When using automated decision making, the very large online platform shall upon request provide the Commission with the necessary information to assess the algorithms used. 2. When carrying out the assessments referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission shall consider the following elements: (a) the compliance with corresponding Union requirements; (b) potential negative effects on fundamental rights, including on consumer rights, through dissemination of illegal content; 3. Following an assessment the Commission shall communicate its findings to the very large online platform and allow it to provide additional explanation. 4. Where the Commission finds that the algorithm used by the very large online platform does not comply with point (a) or (b) of paragraph 2 of this Article, the Commission shall inform the Digital Service Coordinator of establishment of the very large online platform.
2021/07/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 131 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
(9) ‘smart gas grid’ means a gas network that makes use of innovative digital solutions to, technology and engineering solutions in the view of integrateing in a cost efficient manner a plurality of low- carbon and renewable gas sources in accordance with consumers’ needs and, gas quality requirements in order to reduce theand system’s safety requirements, enabling the reduction of carbon footprint of the related gas consumption, enable and increased share of renewable and low- carbon gases, ands well as createing links with other energy carriers and sectors;
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 141 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new)
(16 a) “Natural gas PCI at an advanced implementation stage or at a mature level” means an existing natural gas 'Project of Common Interest' which by the end of 2023 is in permitting stage or under construction or for which a CEF grant agreement for works or studies has been concluded by this date;
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 143 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 b (new)
(16 b) “Repurposed / Retrofitted infrastructure” means the technical upgrade or modification of existing natural gas infrastructure for use of pure hydrogen or of admixture/blending of methane with hydrogen at a pre-defined level;
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 145 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 c (new)
(16 c) “Blending” means the admixture of methane with hydrogen at a pre- defined level;
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 162 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) is located on the territory of one Member State and has a significant cross- border impact or potential to create such, as set out in point (1) of Annex IV.
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 184 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a – introductory part
(a) for electricity transmission and storage projects falling under the energy infrastructure categories set out in points (1)(a), (b), (c) and (e) of Annex II, the project is to contribute significantly to sustainability through the integration of renewable energy into the grid and the transmission of renewable generation to major consumption centres and storage sites, and at least one of the following specific criteria:
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 193 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point d – introductory part
(d) for hydrogen projects falling under the energy infrastructure categories set out in point (3) of Annex II the project is to contribute significantly to sustainability, including by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, by enhancing the deployment of renewable hydrogen and supporting variable renewable power generation by offering flexibility and/or storage solutions. Furthermore, the project is to contribute significantly to at least one of the following specific criteria:
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 197 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point e – point i
(i) sustainability, including by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing the deployment of renewable hydrogen.
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 203 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f – introductory part
(f) for smart gas grid projects falling under the energy infrastructure category set out in point (2) of Annex II, the project is to contribute significantly to sustainability byin the view of enabling and facilitating the integration of renewable and low-carbon gases, such as biomethane, or renewable hydrogenhydrogen, or synthetic gas, into the gas distribution and transmission networks as well as storage systems enabling the reduction of in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, the project is to contribute significantly to at least one of the following specific criteria:
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 208 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f – point i
(i) network security and quality of supply by retrofitting, repurposing, increasing the capacity or improving the efficiency and interoperability of gas transmission and distribution or storage system in day-to-day network operation by, among others, addressing challenges resulting from the injection of gases of different qualities through the deployment of innovative technologiesolutions in at least one of the following areas: innovative technologies, mechanical or engineering improvements and cybersecurity;
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 210 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f – point iii
(iii) facilitating smart energy sector integration through the creation of reverse flows or links to other energy carriers and sectors and enabling demand response.
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 213 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f – point iii a (new)
(iii a) (iv) enabling transport of renewable and decarbonised gases from production units to the transmission or distribution network;
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 218 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)
(f a) (f a) (new) for natural gas PCIs at advanced implementation stage projects falling under the energy infrastructure category set out in point (new) of Annex II, the project by the end of 2023 is under construction or a Connecting Europe Facility grant agreement for works or studies has been concluded by this date and is to contribute significantly to at least one of the following specific criteria: (i) market integration, inter alia through lifting the isolation of at least one Member State and reducing energy infrastructure bottlenecks;interoperability and system flexibility; (ii) security of supply, inter alia through appropriate connections and diversification of supply sources, supplying counterparts and routes; (iii) competition, inter alia through diversification of supply sources, supplying counterparts and routes; (iv) sustainability, inter alia through reducing emissions, supporting intermittent renewable generation and enhancing deployment of renewable or low carbon gas;
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 226 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) feasibility and design studies including, as regards, climate adaptation and compliance with environmental legislation and with the principle of “do no significant harm” to environmental objectives within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 2020/852;
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 231 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. By 31 December28 February of each year following the year of inclusion of a project of common interest on the Union list pursuant to Article 3, project promoters shall submit an annual report, for each project falling under the categories set out in points (1) to (4) of Annex II, to the competent authority referred to in Article 8.
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 236 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. By 31 JanuaryMarch, each year, the competent authorities referred to in Article 8 shall submit to the Agency and to the respective Group the report referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article supplemented with information on the progress and, where relevant, on delays in the implementation of projects of common interest located on their respective territory with regard to the permit granting processes, and on the reasons for such delays. The contribution of the competent authorities to the report shall be clearly marked as such and drafted without modifying the text introduced by the project promoters.
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 245 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Where the national legislation provides more favorable treatment, particularly in terms of the time limits for a given type of investment than those set out in this Article, competent authorities shall ensure that the mostfavorable treatment applies to the projects of common interest.
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 353 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d – introductory part
(d) any equipment or installation essential for the hydrogen system to operate safely, securely and efficiently or to enable bi-directional capacity, including compressor stations. Hydrogen infrastructure as listed in points (a), (b), (c), and (d) may be used in the transitional period for the purpose of blending of hydrogen with methane until the emergence of sufficient market demand which will make pure hydrogen economically feasible.
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 357 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d a (new)
(d a) (e) transmission pipelines or reception, storage and regasification or decompression facilities for liquefied naturalgas (LNG) or any equipment or installation essential for the system to operate safely, securely and efficiently for the purpose of methane and hydrogen to enable fuel switch from more carbon intensive fuels (notably coal, lignite, oil) during a transitional period, giving access to multiple network users on a transparent and non-discriminatory basis, provided that, upon construction, these investments are ready for the future use of hydrogen.
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 365 #

2020/0360(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
(5 a) (5 a) concerning natural gas: all infrastructure, equipment, installation or services which were part of natural gas projects that were included in the fourth or fifth Union list established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No347/2013 and not yet finished.
2021/04/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 135 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) Better working and living conditions, including through adequate minimum wages, benefit both workers and businesses in the Union and are a prerequisite for achieving inclusive and sustainable growth. Addressing large differences in the coverage and adequacy of minimum wage protection, while preserving competences of the Member States and respecting the principle of subsidiarity, contributes to improving the fairness of the EU labour market and promote economic, social progress and upward convergence. Competition in the Single Market should be based on high social standards, innovation and productivity improvements ensuring a level playing field.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 154 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) Women, young and low-skilled workers and persons with disabilities have a higher probability of being minimum wage or low wage earners than other groups. During economic downturns, such as the Covid-19 crisis, the role of minimum wages in protecting low-wage workers becomes increasingly important and is essential to support a sustainable and inclusive economic recovery. Addressing minimum wage reduces discrimination against people with disabilities and contributes to respecting the needs of all generations, contributes to gender equality, closing the gender pay and pension gap as well as elevating women out of poverty.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 205 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) While strong collective bargaining at sector or cross-industry level contributes to ensuring adequate minimum wage protection, traditional collective bargaining structures have been eroding during the last decades, in part due to structural shifts in the economy towards less unionised sectors and to the decline in trade union membership related to the increase of atypical and new forms of work.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 211 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) The Commission has consulted management and labour in a two-stage process with regard to possible action to address the challenges related to adequate minimum wages protection in the Union, in accordance with Article 154 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. There was no agreement among the social partners to enter into negotiations with regard to those matters. It is, however, important to take action at Union level, while preserving the competences of the Member States and respecting the principle of subsidiarity, to ensure that workers in the Union are protected by adequate minimum wages, taking into account the outcomes of the social partners’ consultation.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 217 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) This Directive establishes minimum requirements at Union level, while preserving the competences of the Member States and respecting the principle of subsidiarity, to ensure both that minimum wages are set at adequate level and that workers have access to minimum wage protection, in the form of a statutory minimum wage or in the form of wages set under collective agreements as defined for the purpose of this Directive.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 299 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) Minimum wages are considered adequate if they are fair in relation to the wage distribution in the country and if they provide a decent standard of living. The adequacy of statutory minimum wages is determined in view of the national socio- economic conditions, including employment growth, competitiveness as well as regional and sectoral developments. Their adequacy should be assessed at least in relation to their purchasing power, to the productivity developments and to their relation to the gross wage levels, distribution and growth. The use of indicators commonly used at international level, such as 60% of the gross median wage and 50% of the gross average wage, can help guide the assessment of minimum wage adequacy in relation to the gross level of wages.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 334 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) An effective enforcement system, including controls and field inspections, is necessary to ensure the functioning of national statutory minimum wage frameworks. To strengthen the effectiveness of enforcement authorities, a close cooperation with the social partners is also needed, including to address critical challenges such as those related to sub- contracting, bogus self-employment or non-recorded overtime. Moreover, workers should have easily access to appropriate information on applicable statutory minimum wages, also in formats accessible to people with different types of disabilities, to ensure an adequate degree of transparency and predictability as regards their working conditions.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 343 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) The effective implementation of minimum wage protection set out by legal provisions or provided by collective agreements is essential in the performance of public procurement and concession contracts. Non-respect of collective agreements providing for minimum wage protection in a given sector may indeed occur in the execution of such contracts or in the sub- contracting chain thereafter, resulting in workers being paid less than the wage level agreed in the sectoral collective agreements. To prevent such situations, economic operators have to apply to their workers the wages set by collective agreements for the relevant sector and geographical area in order to abide by applicable obligations in the field of labour law, in accordance with Articles 18(2) and 71(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and the Council on public procurement40 , Articles 36(2) and 88(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and the Council41 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and Articles 30(3) and 42(1) of Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and the Council42 on the award of concession contracts. __________________ 40Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 65). 41 Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243). 42Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contract (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 1).
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 380 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) In implementing this Directive Member States should avoid imposing administrative, financial and legal constraints in a way which would hold back the creation and development of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Member States are therefore invitobliged to assess the impact of their transposition act on small and medium-sized enterprises in order to ensure that they are not disproportionately affected, giving specific attention to micro-enterprises and to the administrative burden, and to publish the results of such assessments. If found that micro, small and medium-sized enterprises are disproportionately affected, Member States should consider introducing measures to support these enterprises to adjust their remuneration structures to the new requirements.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 384 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
(31) The Technical Support Instrument43 and the European Social Fund plus44 are available to Member States and enterprises, especially to SMEs, to develop or improve the technical aspects of minimum wage frameworks, including on assessment of adequacy, monitoring and data collection, broadening access, as well as on enforcement and on general capacity building related to the implementation of said frameworks. __________________ 43Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 May 2020 on the establishment of the Technical Support Instrument, COM(2020) 409 final 44Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Social Fund Plus, COM/2018/382 final.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 387 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 31 a (new)
(31 a) The European Commission and the Member States should make every effort to ensure that the implementation of this Directive does not have negative consequences in terms of increased bogus self-employment, atypical contracts or undeclared work. Information on the impact of this Directive on these aspects should be included in the review report on its implementation.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 410 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) prohibiting any activity that violates the right of employees to join workers' organizations and ensuring that all employees have adequate access to information about their rights, including in formats accessible to people with various types of disabilities.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 531 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Member States where collective bargaining coverage is less than 70% of the workers defined within the meaning of Article 2 shall in addition provide for a framework of enabling conditions for collective bargaining, either by law after consultation of the social partners or by agreement with them and respecting existing legislation and traditions and practices in this field , and shall establish an action plan to promote collective bargaining. The action plan shall be made public and shall be notified to the European Commission.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 556 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States with statutory minimum wages shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the setting and updating of statutory minimum wages are guided by criteria set to promote adequacy, taking into account local specificities and in such a way that they do not disturb the economic balance and competitiveness, with the aim to achieve decent working and living conditions, social cohesion and upward convergence. Member States shall define those criteria in accordance with their national practices, either in relevant national legislation, in decisions of the competent bodies or in tripartite agreements. The criteria shall be defined in a stable and clear way.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 617 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall use indicative reference values to guide their assessment of adequacy of statutory minimum wages in relation to the general level of gross wages, such as those commonly used at international level.deleted
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 673 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States may allow different rates of statutory minimum wage for specific groups of workers only in exceptional cases. Such a differentiation must be objectively and reasonably justified by a legitimate aim. Member States shall keep these variations to a minimum, and ensure that any variation is non- discriminatory, proportionate, limited in time if relevant, and objectively and reasonably justified by a legitimate aim.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 750 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) ensure that information on statutory minimum wages is made publicly available in a clear, comprehensive and easily accessible way also in formats accessible to people with different types of disabilities.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 764 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
In accordance with Directive 2014/24/EU, Directive 2014/25/EU and Directive 2014/23/EU, Member States shall take appropriate measures to ensure that in the performance of public procurement or concession contracts economic operators comply with the wages set out by relevant collective agreements for the relevant sector and geographical area and with the statutory minimum wages where they exist.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 771 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall task their competent authorities with developing effective data collection tools to monitor the coverage and adequacy of minimum wages. These tools should be designed in a way that will not impose excessive administrative burden on employers, especially in the SME sector and on micro-entrepreneurs.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 831 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that information regarding minimum wage protection, including collective agreements and wage provisions therein, is transparent and publicly accessible, also in formats accessible to people with different types of disabilities.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Past experiences have shown that investment is often drastically cut during crises. However, it is essential to support investment in this particular situation to speed up the recovery and strengthen long- term growth potential. Investing in green and digital technologies, capacities and processes aimed at assisting clean energy transition, boosting energy efficiency in housing and other key sectors of the economic are important to achieve sustainable growth and overall help create jobs, as well as foster mid-term competitiveness. It will also help make the Union more resilient and less dependent by diversifying key supply chains. and boosting a knowledge based economy
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 22 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Against this background, it is necessary to strengthen the current framework for the provision of support to Member States and provide direct financial support to Member States through an innovative tool. To that end, a Recovery and Resilience Facility (the ‘Facility’) should be established under this Regulation to provide effective financial and significant support to step up the implementation of reforms and related public investments in thethat will entail an improvement of the sustainability and competitiveness of Member States economics. The Facility should be comprehensive and should also benefit from the experience gained by the Commission and the Member States from the use of the other instruments and programmes.
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 29 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Reflecting the European Green Deal as Europe’s sustainable growth strategy, together with other economic development objectives, and the translation of the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, the Facility established by this Regulation will contribute to mainstreaming climate actions and environmental sustainability and to the achievement of an overall target of 25 % of the EU budget expenditures supporting climate objectives.s long as they may not hinder European Union’s industry growth capacity, affected as it has been by COVID-19 crisis
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 35 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) In order to implement these overall objectives, relevant actions will be identified during the Facility’s preparation and implementation, and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review processes. Also, due attention should be paid to the impact of the national plans submitted under this Regulation on fostering not only the green transition, but also the digital transformation and the development of a knowledge based economy. They will both play a priority role in relaunching and modernising our economy.
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 105 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of the Recovery and Resilience Facility shall be to promote the Union’s economic, social and territorial cohesion by improving the resilience and adjustment capacity of the Member States, mitigating the social and economic impact of the crisis, and supporting the green a competitive knowledge based economy and digital transitions, thereby contributing to restoring the growth potential of the economies of the Union, fostering employment creation in the aftermath of the COVID-19 crisis, and promoting sustainable and competitive growth.
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 147 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. The recovery and resilience plans shall be consistent with the relevant country-specific challenges and priorities identified in the context of the European Semester, in particular those relevant for or resulting from the greenknowledge based economy and digital transition. The recovery and resilience plans shall also be consistent with the information included by the Member States in the national reform programmes under the European Semester, in their national energy and climate plans and updates thereof under the Regulation (EU)2018/199921 , in the territorial just transition plans under the Just Transition Fund22 , and in the partnership agreements and operational programmes under the Union funds. _________________ 21Regulation (EU)2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action. 22 […]
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 162 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) an explanation of how the plan strengthens the growth potential, job creation and economic and social resilience of the Member State concerned, mitigates the economic and social impact of the crisis the improvement of the business fabric,, and its contribution to enhance economic, social and territorial cohesion and convergence;
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 163 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) an explanation of how the plan strengthens the growth potential, job creation and economic and social resilience of the Member State concerned, mitigates the economic and social impact of the crisis, the improvement of the business fabric, and its contribution to enhance economic, social and territorial cohesion and convergence;
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 168 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) an explanation of how the measures in the plan are expected to contribute to the greenknowledge based economy and the digital transitions or to the challenges resulting from them;
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 175 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point h
(h) the accompanying measures that may be needed; amongst other issues the reduction of national bureaucracies and increase of public private partnerships
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 177 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4
4. In the preparation of proposals for their recovery and resilience plan, Member States may request the Commission to organise an exchange of good practices in order to allow the requesting Member States to benefit from the experience of other Member States. Member States, and that shall he made public to the rest of the European institutions and bodies once it may have become consolidated. may also request technical support under the Technical Support Instrument in accordance with the regulation thereof.
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 183 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The Commission shall assess the importance and coherence of the recovery and resilience plan and its contribution to the greenknowledge based and digital transitions, as well as competitive economy and for that purpose, shall take into account the following criteria:
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 190 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) whether the plan contains measures that effectively contribute to the greenknowledge based economy and the digital transitions as to develop a competitive economy or to addressing the challenges resulting from them;
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 194 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) whether the recovery and resilience plan is expected to effectively contribute to strengthen the competitive growth potential, job creation, and economic and social resilience of the Member State, mitigate the economic and social impact of the crisis, and contribute to enhance economic, social and territorial cohesion;
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 196 #

2020/0104(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point f
(f) whether the recovery and resilience plan contains measures for the implementation of reforms and public investments projects that represent coherent actions, and they might as well help job growth and the development of a knowledge based society;
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 207 #

2020/0104(COD)

(f) the arrangements for providing access by the Commission to the underlying relevant data, from the regional, local and national administrations.
2020/09/11
Committee: REGI
Amendment 48 #

2020/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In order to redress huge shocks to the economy stemming from the exceptional restrictions put in place by Member States to contain the COVID-19 spreadingspread of COVID-19 and the risks of an asymmetric recovery stemmarising from the different national means available in different Member States, which resultinged in serious impacts on the functioning of the Internal Market, the European Council endorsed on 23 April 2020 the “Roadmap for recovery” with a strong investment component, called for the establishment of the European Recovery Fund and mandated the Commission to analyse the needs so that the resources would be targeted towards the sectors and geographical parts of the Union most affected, while clarifying also the link with the Multiannual Financial Framework for 2021-2027.
2020/07/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 75 #

2020/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) In order to complement the actions already available under the scope of support of the ERDF, as extended by Regulations (EU) 2020/460 and (EU) 2020/558 of the European Parliament and of the Council5 , Member States should continue to be allowed to use the additional resources primarily for investments in products and services for health services, for providingincluding cross-border health services. Resources should be used to provide equal services for all citizens, as well as support in the form of working capital or investment support to SMEs, in operations contributing to the transition towards a digital and green economy, infrastructure providing basic services to citizens living in rural, insular, mountainous and outermost regions, or economic support measures for those regions most dependent on sectors most affected by the crisis, such as tourism which generates about 10% of the EU's GDP, employs about 13 million workers and is the fourth largest export industry. The data shows that it is necessary to revitalize this economic sector as soon as possible, and it is especially important for all Member States in which tourism is of strategic importance. Technical assistance should also be supported. It is appropriate that the additional resources are focused exclusively under the new thematic objective "Fostering crisis repair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and preparing a green, digital and resilient recovery of the economy", which should also constitute a single investment priority, to allow for simplified programming and implementation of the additional resources. _________________ 5 Regulation (EU) 2020/460 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 March 2020 amending Regulations (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013 and (EU) No 508/2014 as regards specific measures to mobilise investments in the healthcare systems of Member States and in other sectors of their economies in response to the COVID-19 outbreak (Coronavirus Response Investment Initiative) (OJ L99, 31.3.2020, p. 5); Regulation (EU) 2020/558 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2020 amending Regulations (EU) No 1301/2013 and (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards specific measures to provide exceptional flexibility for the use of the European Structural and Investments Funds in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, (OJ L 130, 23.4.2020, p. 1).
2020/07/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 88 #

2020/0101(COD)

(9a) In order to enable equal access to health care, reduce unmet medical needs and increase resilience to future health crises, additional resources for the ERDF should also be used to develop centres of excellences for specific disease and health crises around the EU by providing financial support for the procurement of medicinal products and medical devices, as well as supporting the additional specialization of already established centres for complex diseases and virus research. Stronger health cooperation, coordination and resilience can be fostered by developing a network of centres of excellence around the EU, evenly deployed between Member States and its regions, each specialised in providing specific treatment for all European citizens that are in need of a such health service and treatment.
2020/07/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 89 #

2020/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) For the ESF, Member States should primarily use the additional resources to support the modernisation of the labour market, health and social systems, as well as comprehensive lifelong learning strategies in order to negate long-term unemployment and support job maintenance, including through short-time work schemes and significant support to self-employed, job creation, in particular for people in vulnerable situations and those who are living in rural, insular, mountainous and outermost regions, support to youth employment measures, education and training, skills development and to enhance access to social services of general interest, including for children for all citizens, including children. Special attention should be given to measures supporting training and mobilisation of health and social care workers, particularly in the context of increasing resilience for potential future crises. It should be clarified that in the present exceptional circumstances support to short-time work schemes for employees and the self- employed in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic can be provided even when that support is not combined with active labour market measures, unless the latter are imposed by the national law. Union support to those short-time work schemes should be limited in time.
2020/07/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 104 #

2020/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) In order to ensure that Member States have sufficient financial means to swiftly implement crisis repair actions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and preparing a green, digital and resilient recovery of health systems and the economy, it is necessary to provide a higher level of initial pre- financing payment or, where applicable, annual pre- financing, for the quick implementation of actions supported by the additional resources. This pre-financing rate will serve as a defence mechanism against the economic and social consequences, as the beneficiaries of the Funds need a strong momentum in ensuring the financial liquidity. The initial pre- financing to be paid should ensure that Member States have the means to arrange for advance payments to beneficiaries where necessary and to reimburse beneficiaries quickly following the submission of payment claims, as more current available resources mean more opportunities to react.
2020/07/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 111 #

2020/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) With a view to alleviating the burden on public budgets regarding crisis repair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and preparing a green, digital and resilient recovery of health systems and the economy, Member States should be given the exceptional possibility to request a co- financing rate of up to 100 % to be applied to the separate priority axes of operational programmes providing support from the additional resources.
2020/07/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 113 #

2020/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) In order to enable Member States to deploy the additional resources for crisis repair quickly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and preparing a green, digital and resilient recovery of the health systems and economy within the current programming period, it is justified to exempt, on an exceptional basis, Member States from the need to comply with ex ante conditionalities and requirements on the performance reserve and application of the performance framework, on thematic concentration, also in relation to the thresholds established for sustainable urban development for the ERDF, and requirements on preparation of a communication strategy for the additional resources. It is nevertheless necessary that Member States carry out at least one evaluation by 31 December 2024, or by 31 December 2026 where additional resources are made available for budgetary commitment in 2023 and 2024, to assess the effectiveness, efficiency and impact of the additional resources as well as how they contributed to achieving the goals of the new dedicated thematic objective. To facilitate the availability of comparable information at Union level, Member States are encouraged to make use of the programme-specific indicators made available by the Commission. In addition, while carrying out their responsibilities linked to information, communication and visibility, Member States and managing authorities should enhance the visibility of the exceptional measures and resources introduced by the Union, in particular by ensuring that potential beneficiaries, beneficiaries, participants, final recipients of financial instruments and the general public are aware of the existence, volume and additional support stemming from the additional resources.
2020/07/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 135 #

2020/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) In order to facilitate the transfers authorised by the changes introduced under this Regulation, the condition laid down in Article 30(1)(f) of the Financial Regulation regarding the use of appropriations for the same objective should not apply in respect ofto those transfers.
2020/07/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 162 #

2020/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 92 b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 6
Each Member State shall allocate the additional resources available for programming under the ERDF and the ESF to operational programmes involving public authorities as well as relevant bodies representing civil society, in accordance with the partnership principle, bearing in mind that this approach adds value to the implementation of European public policies. Up to 5 % of the additional resources shall be used for cross-border projects.
2020/07/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 174 #

2020/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 92 b – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
8. The additional resources not allocated to technical assistance shall be used under the thematic objective set out in paragraph 10 to support operations fostering crisis repair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic or, focusing for example on the revitalization of tourism, health and other hardest-hit sectors, as well as preparing a green, digital and resilient recovery of the economy.
2020/07/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 182 #

2020/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 92 b – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3
For the ERDF, the additional resources shall primarily be used to support investment in products and services for health infrastructure, systems and services, including cross-border health services, to provide support in the form of working capital or investment and advisory support to SMEs, investments contributing to the transition towards a digital and green economy, investments in infrastructure providing basic services to citizens living in rural, insular, mountainous and outermost regions, and economic measures in the regions which are most dependent on sectors most affected by the crisis such as tourism. Additional resources may also be used to develop centres of excellence for specific diseases and health crises around the EU by providing financial support for the procurement of medicinal products and medical devices, as well as supporting the additional specialization of already established centres for complex diseases and virus research, which will enable equal access to health care, reduce unmet medical needs and increase resilience to future health crises.
2020/07/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 194 #

2020/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 92 b – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 4
For the ESF, the additional resources shall primarily be used to support the modernisation of the labour market, health and social systems, as well as comprehensive lifelong learning strategies in order to negate long-term unemployment and support job maintenance, including through short-time work schemes and significant support to self- employed, even when that support is not combined with active labour market measures, unless the latter are imposed by national law. The additional resources shall also support job creation, in particular for people in vulnerable situations and for those living in rural, insular, mountainous and outermost regions, youth employment measures, education and training, skills development, in particular to support the twin green and digital transitions, and to enhance access to social services of general interest, including for children. Special attention shall be given to measures supporting training and the mobilisation of health and social care workers, particularly in the context of increasing resilience for potential future crises.
2020/07/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 217 #

2020/0101(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 92 b – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 6
By way of derogation from Article 30(1), requests for the amendment of a programme submitted by a Member State shall be duly justified and shall in particular set out expected impact of the changes to the programme on fostering crisis repair in the context of the COVID- 19 pandemic and preparing a green, digital and resilient recovery of health systems and the economy. They shall be accompanied by the revised programme.
2020/07/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1 #

2020/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The Commission adopted a Communication on the European Green Deal on 11 December 20199 , drawing its roadmap towards a new growth policy for Europe and setting ambitious objectives to counter climate change and for environmental protection. In line with the objective to achieve climate neutrality in the Union by 2050 in an effective and fair manner, the European Green Deal announced a Just Transition Mechanism to provide means for facing the climate challenge while leaving no one behind. The most vulnerable regions and people are the most exposed to the harmful effects of climate change and environmental degradation. At the same time, managing the transition requires significant structural changes and while Member States have different starting position, the least developed regions, outermost regions, mountainous, islands, sparsely populated, rural, remote and geographically disadvantaged areas with small population are those where the transition in energy towards climate neutrality is more difficult to implement. _________________ 9 COM(2019) 640 final.
2020/09/01
Committee: REGI
Amendment 22 #

2020/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) In order to enhance the economic diversification of territories impacted by the transition, the Facility should cover a wide range of investments, on condition that they contribute to meet the development needs in the transition towards a climate neutral economy, as described in the territorial just transition plans. The investments supported may cover energy and transport infrastructure, including infrastructure for the bridging technology replacing coal, lignite, peat or oil shale, district heating networks, green mobility, smart waste management, clean energy and energy efficiency measures including renovations and conversions of buildings, support to transition to a circular economy, land restoration and decontamination, as well as up- and re- skilling, training and social infrastructure, including social housing. Infrastructure developments may also include solutions leading to their enhanced resilience to withstand disasters. Comprehensive investment approach should be favoured in particular for territories with important transition needs. Investments in other sectors could also be supported if they are consistent with the adopted territorial just transition plans. By supporting investments that do not generate sufficient revenues, the Facility aims at providing public sector entities with additional resources necessary to address the social, economic and environmental challenges resulting from the adjustment to climate transition. In order to help identify investments with a high positive environmental impact eligible under the Facility, the EU taxonomy on environmentally sustainable economic activities may be used.
2020/09/01
Committee: REGI
Amendment 51 #

2020/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
2. 'beneficiary' means a public sector legal entity established in a Member State as a public law body, or as a body governed by private law entrusted with a public service mission, or private entity cooperating with public sector entity under public-private partnership agreement, with whom a grant agreement has been signed under the Facility;
2020/09/01
Committee: REGI
Amendment 56 #

2020/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of the Facility is to address serious socio- economic and environmental challenges deriving from the transition process towards a climate-neutral economy for the benefit of the Union territories identified in the territorial just transition plans prepared by the Member States in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation [JTF Regulation].
2020/09/01
Committee: REGI
Amendment 60 #

2020/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The Facility shall have the specific objective of increasing public sector investments, which address the development needs of regions identified in the territorial just transition plans, by facilitating the financing of projects that do not generate a sufficient stream of own revenues and would not be financed without the element of grant support from the Union budgeto cover investment cost.
2020/09/01
Committee: REGI
Amendment 83 #

2020/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the projects do not receive support under any other Union programmes;deleted
2020/09/01
Committee: REGI
Amendment 98 #

2020/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The amount of the grant shall not exceed 15% of the amount of the loan provided by the finance partner under this Facility. For projects located in territories in NUTS level 2 regions with a GDP per capita not exceeding 75% of the average GDP of the EU-27 as referred to in Article [102(2)] of Regulation [new CPR], the amount of the grant shall not exceed 205% of the amount of the loan provided by the finance partner.
2020/09/01
Committee: REGI
Amendment 99 #

2020/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. In addition to the grounds specified in Article 131(4) of the Financial Regulation and after consulting the finance partner, the amount of the grant may be reduced or the grant agreement may be terminated, if within twohree years from the date of signature of the grant agreement, the economically most significant supply, works or services contract has not been signed, in cases where the conclusion of such contract is envisaged pursuant to the grant agreement.
2020/09/01
Committee: REGI
Amendment 110 #

2020/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. The beneficiaries and the finance partners, with the support of national and regional authorities, shall ensure the visibility of the Union support provided under the Facility, in particular when promoting the projects and their results, by providing targeted information to multiple audiences, including the media and the public.
2020/09/01
Committee: REGI
Amendment 112 #

2020/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The information about the Union support shall be provided in clear, approachable and attractive manner, using variety of communication channels.
2020/09/01
Committee: REGI
Amendment 39 #

2020/0030(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1
(1) Member States and the Union are to work towards developing a coordinated strategy for employment and particularly for promoting a skilled, trained and adaptable workforce, as well as labour markets that are responsive to economic change, with a view to achieving the objectives of full employment and social progress, balanced growth and a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment set out in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union. Member States shall regard promoting employment as a matter of common concern and shall coordinate their action in this respect within the Council, taking into account national practices related to the responsibilities of management and labour. In this context, the current COVID-19 crisis, which will have a serious and long- lasting impact on EU labour markets, requires coordinated action to support employment and to stimulate the economy and labour demand.
2020/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2020/0030(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
(2) The Union is to combat social exclusion and discrimination and promote social justice and protection, as well as equality between women and men, solidarity between generations, inclusion of persons with disabilities and the protection of the rights of the child. In defining and implementing its policies and activities, the Union is to take into account requirements linked to the promotion of a high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against poverty and social exclusion and a high level of education and training as set out in Article 9 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
2020/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2020/0030(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 3
(3) In accordance with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Union has developed and implemented policy coordination instruments for economic and employment policies. As part of these instruments, the present Guidelines for the Employment Policies of the Member States, together with the Broad Guidelines for the Economic Policies of the Member States and of the Union set out in Council Recommendation (EU) 2015/1184 (5), form the Integrated Guidelines. They are to guide policy implementation in the Member States and in the Union, reflecting the interdependence between the Member States. The resulting set of coordinated European and national policies and reforms are to constitute an appropriate overall sustainable economic and employment policy mix, which should achieve positive spill-over effects, as well as an effective response to the impact of COVID-19 on the labour markets and economies of Member States. __________________ 5Council Recommendation (EU) 2015/1184 of 14 July 2015 on broad guidelines for the economic policies of the Member States and of the European Union (OJ L 192, 18.7.2015, p. 27).
2020/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2020/0030(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
(5) The European Semester combines the different instruments in an overarching framework for integrated multilateral coordination and surveillance of economic and employment policies. While pursuing environmental sustainability, productivity, fairness and stability, the European Semester integrates the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights, including strong engagement with social partners, civil society and other stakeholders. It supports the delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals (13). The Union and Member States’ employment and economic policies should go hand in hand with Europe’s transition to a climate neutral, environmentally sustainable and digital economy, while improving competitiveness, fostering innovation, promoting social justice, social inclusion and equal opportunities as well as tackling inequalities and regional disparities. __________________ 13 UN Resolution A/RES/70/1.
2020/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2020/0030(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 7
(7) The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission signed an inter-institutional proclamation for a European Pillar of Social Rights (14). The Pillar sets out twenty principles and rights to support well-functioning and fair labour markets and welfare systems, structured around three categories: equal opportunities and access to the labour market, fair working conditions and social protection and inclusion. The principles and rights give direction to our strategy making sure that the transitions to climate- neutrality and environmental sustainability, digitalisation and demographic change are socially fair and just. The Pillar constitutes a reference framework (with particular reference to the impact of the crisis caused by COVID-19) to monitor the employment and social performance of Member States, to drive reforms at national, regional and local level and to reconcile the “social” and the “market” in today’s modern economy, including by promoting the social economy. __________________ 14 OJ C 428, 13.12.2017, p. 10.
2020/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2020/0030(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
(9) Member States and the Union should ensure that the transformations are fair and socially just, strengthening the drive towards an inclusive and resilient society in which people are protected and empowered to anticipate and manage change, and in which they can actively participate in society and the economy. Discrimination in all its forms should be tackled. Access and opportunities for all should be ensured and poverty and social exclusion (including that of children, persons with disabilities and disadvantaged groups) should be reduced, in particular by ensuring an effective functioning of labour markets and of social protection systems and by removing barriers to education, training and labour- market participation, including through investments in early childhood education and care. Timely and equal access to affordable healthcare services, including prevention and health promotion are particularly relevant in a context of ageing societies. The potential of people with disabilities to contribute to economic growth and social development should be further realised. As new economic and business models take hold in Union workplaces, employment relationships are also changing. Member States should ensure that employment relationships stemming from new forms of work maintain and strengthen Europe’s social model.
2020/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2020/0030(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – Guideline 5 – paragraph 1
In the context of the COVID-19 crisis, Member States should actively promote a sustainable social market economy and facilitate and support investment in the creation of quality jobs. To this end, they should reduce the barriers that businesses face in hiring people, foster responsible entrepreneurship and genuine self- employment and, in particular, support the creation and growth of micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises, including through access to finance. Member States should actively promote the development of the social economy, foster social innovation, social enterprises, and encourage those innovative forms of work, creating quality job opportunities and generating social benefits at local level.
2020/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2020/0030(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – Guideline 6 – paragraph 1
ITaking into account the impact of the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, in the context of technological and environmental transitions, as well as demographic change, Member States should promote sustainability, productivity, employability and human capital, fostering relevant knowledge, skills and competences throughout people's lives, responding to current and future labour market needs. Member States should also adapt and invest in their education and training systems to provide high quality and inclusive education, including vocational education and training. Member States should work together with the social partners, education and training providers, enterprises and other stakeholders to address structural weaknesses in education and training systems and improve their quality and labour market relevance, also with a view to enabling the environmental transition. Particular attention should be paid to challenges of the teaching profession. Education and training systems should equip all learners with key competences, including basic and digital skills as well as transversal competences to lay the foundations for adaptability later in life. Member States should seek to ensure the transfer of training entitlements during professional career changes, including, where appropriate, through individual learning accounts. They should enable everyone to anticipate and better adapt to labour market needs notably through continuous reskilling and upskilling, with a view to supporting fair and just transitions for all, strengthening social outcomes, addressing labour market shortages and improving the overall resilience of the economy to shocks.
2020/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 172 #

2020/0030(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – Guideline 6 – paragraph 2
Member States should foster equal opportunities for all by addressing inequalities in education and training systems, including by providing access to good quality education, including early childhood education. They should raise overall education levels, reduce the number of young people leaving school early, increase access to and completion of tertiary education and increase adult participation in continuing learning, particularly among learners from disadvantaged backgrounds, the least qualified. Taking into account new requirements in digital, green and ageing societies, Member States should strengthen work-based learning in their vocational education and training systems (VET) (including through quality and effective apprenticeships) and increase the number of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) graduates both in medium-level VET and in tertiary education. Furthermore, Member States should enhance the labour-market relevance of tertiary education and research, improve skills monitoring and forecasting, make skills more visible and qualifications comparable, including those acquired abroad, and increase opportunities for recognising and validating skills and competences acquired outside formal education and training. They should upgrade and increase the supply and take- up of flexible continuing vocational education and training. Member States should also support low skilled adults to maintain or develop their long-term employability by boosting access to and take up of quality learning opportunities, through the implementation of Upskilling Pathways, including a skills assessment, an offer of education and training matching labour market opportunities, and the validation and recognition of the skills acquired.
2020/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 212 #

2020/0030(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – Guideline 7 – paragraph 6
Where relevant and building on existing national practices, Member States should take into account the experience on employment and social issues of relevant civil society organisations, including those representing groups facing barriers to quality work.
2020/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 219 #

2020/0030(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – Guideline 8 – paragraph 1
Member States should promote inclusive labour markets, open to all, by putting in place effective measuresConsidering the current additional long-term social and economic challenges posed by the COVID-19 epidemic, Member States should promote inclusive labour markets, open to all. In order to achieve this, effective measures should be put in place to fight all forms of discrimination and promote equal opportunities for under-represented groups in the labour market, with due attention to the regional and territorial dimension. They should ensure equal treatment regarding employment, social protection, health and long-term care, education and access to goods and services, regardless of gender, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation.
2020/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 226 #

2020/0030(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – Guideline 8 – paragraph 2
Member States should modernise social protection systems to provide adequate, effective, efficient, and sustainable social protection throughout all stages of an individual's life, fostering social inclusion and upward social mobility, incentivissupporting labour market participation and addressing inequalities, including through the design of their tax and benefit systems. Complementing universal approaches with selective ones will improve effectiveness of social protection systems. The modernisation of social protection systems should lead to better access, quality, adequacy and sustainability.
2020/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 228 #

2020/0030(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – Guideline 8 – paragraph 3
Member States should develop and integrate the three strands of active inclusion: adequate income support, inclusive labour markets and access to quality enabling services, meeting individual needs. Social protection systems should ensure adequate minimum income benefits for everyone lacking sufficient resources and promote social inclusion by encouragsupporting people to’s actively participateion in the labour market and society, including through targeted social services.
2020/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 233 #

2020/0030(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – Guideline 8 – paragraph 4
The availability of affordable, accessible and quality services such as inclusive early childhood education and care, out-of- school care, education, training, housing, health and long-term care is a necessary condition for ensuring equal opportunities. Particular attention should be given to fighting poverty and social exclusion, includ affecting, inter alia, persons with disabilities and persons experiencing in- work and child poverty. Member States should ensure that everyone, including children, has access to essential services. For those in need or in a vulnerable situation, Member States should ensure access to adequate social housing or housing assistance. The specific needs of people with disabilities including accessibility should be taken into account in relation to these services. Homelessness should be tackled specifically.
2020/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The transition to a climate-neutral and circular economy constitutes one of the most important policy objectives for the Union. On 12 December 2019, the European Council endorsed the objective of achieving a climate-neutral Union by 2050, in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement. While fighting climate change and environmental degradation will benefit all in the long term and provides opportunities and challenges for all in the medium term, not all regions and Member States start their transition from the same point or have the same capacity to respond. Some are more advanced than others, whereas the transition entails a wider social and economic impact for those regions that rely heavily on solid fossil fuels - especially coal, lignite, peat and oil shale - or greenhouse gas intensive industries. Such a situation not only creates the risk of a variable speed transition in the Union as regards climate action, but also of growing disparities between regions, detrimental to the objectives of social, economic and territorial cohesion.
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In order to be successful, the transition has to be fair and socially acceptable for all. Therefore, both the Union and the Member States must take into account its economic and social implications from the outset, and deploy all possible instruments to mitigate adverse consequences. The Union budget has an important role in that regard to ensure that nobody is left behind.
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) As set out in the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan, a Just Transition Mechanism should complement the other actions under the next multi-annual financial framework for the period from 2021 to 2027. It should contribute to addressing the social and economic consequences of transitioning towards Union climate neutrality by bringing together the Union budget’s spending on climate and social objectives at regional and subregional level.
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) In view of the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement, the commitment regarding the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the increased ambition of the Union as proposed in the European Green Deal, the JTF should provide a key contribution to mainstream climate actions. RThe new resources from the JTF own envelope are additional to the existing policies and come on top of the investments needed to achieve the overall target of 25% of the Union budget expenditure contributing to climate objectives. Resources transferred from the ERDF and ESF+ will contribute fully to the achievement of this targetcould be used, on voluntary basis, to complement the JTF interventions.
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 147 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) The new resources from the JTF should complement the resources available under cohesion policy.
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 155 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Transitioning to a climate-neutral economy is a challenge for all Member States. It will be particularly demanding for those Member States that rely heavily on solid fossil fuels or greenhouse gas intensive industrial activities which need to be phased out or which need to adapt due to the transition towards climate neutrality and that lack the financial means to do so. The JTF should therefore cover all Member States, but the distribution of its financial means should reflect the capacity of Member States to finance the necessary investments to cope with the transition towards climate neutrality, as well as the extent to which its economy relies on solid fossil fuels.
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 186 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) To protect citizens who are most vulnerable to the climate transition, the JTF shouldmust also cover the up-skilling and reskilling of the affected workers, with the aim of helping them to adapt to new employment opportunities, as well as providing counselling, support services and job-search assistance to jobseekers and their active inclusion into the labour market.
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 211 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) In order to provide flexibility for the programming of the JTF resources under the Investment for jobs and growth goal, it should be possible to prepare a self- standing JTF programme or to programme JTF resources in one or more dedicated priorities within a programme supported by the European Regional Development Fund (‘ERDF’), the European Social Fund Plus (‘ESF+’) or the Cohesion Fund. In accordance with Article 21a of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], JTF resources shcould be reinforced with complementary funding from the ERDF and the ESF+. The respective amounts transferred from the ERDF and the ESF+Such voluntary interventions from the ERDF and the ESF+, notified to the Commission, should be consistent with the type of operations set out in the territorial just transition plans.
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 219 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The JTF support should be conditional on the effective preparation, launching and implementation of a transition process in a specific territory in order to achieve a climate-neutral economy. In that regard, Member States should prepare, in close cooperation with the relevant stakeholders, in particular local and regional authorities, in accordance with partnership principle and supported by the Commission, territorial just transition plans, detailing the transition process, consistently with their National Energy and Climate Plans. To this end, the Commission should set up a Just Transition Platform, which would build on the existing platform for coal regions in transition to enable bilateral and multilateral exchanges of experience on lessons learnt and best practices across all affected sectors.
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 228 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) The territorial just transition plans should identify the territories most negatively affected, where JTF support should be concentrated and describe specific actions to be undertaken to reach a climate-neutral economy, notably as regards the conversion or closure of facilities involving solid fossil fuel production or other greenhouse gas intensive activities while developing new job opportunities to avoid social exclusion in the affected territories. Those territories should be precisely defined and correspond to NUTS level 2 or 3 regions or should be parts thereof. The plans should detail the challenges and needs of those territories and identify the type of operations needed in a manner that ensures the coherent development of climate-resilient economic activities that are also consistent with the transition to climate-neutrality and the objectives of the Green Deal while at the same time safeguarding the employment levels. Only investments in accordance with the transition plans should receive financial support from the JTF. The territorial just transition plans shcould be part of the programmes (supported by the ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund or the JTF, as the case may be) which are approved by the Commission.
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 258 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The JTF shall support the Investment for jobs and growth goal in all Member States, with the particular attention to the Member States relying on fossil fuels.
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 262 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The resources for the JTF under the Investment for jobs and growth goal available for budgetary commitment for the period 2021-2027 shall be EUR 24.37.5 billion in 2018 prices, which may be increased, as the case may be, by additional resources allocated in the Union budget, and by other resources in accordance with the applicable basic act. These resources should not be cut nor transferred from the funds covered by Regulation (EU) .../... [new CPR].
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 286 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) productive investments in SMEs, including start-ups, leading to economic diversification and reconversion as well as contributing to new jobs creation;
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 293 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) investments in the creation of new firms and social enterprises, including through microfinance, business incubators and consulting services;
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 302 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) investments to reduce energy poverty and air pollution, notably through investments in district heating and eliminating individual heating solutions based on coal;
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 316 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) investments in social innovations;
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 326 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point i
(i) counselling, support services and job-search assistance to jobseekers;
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 331 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point k a (new)
(ka) any other specific activities, as agreed between the relevant local and regional authorities for the territory concerned, the Member State and the European Commission, that are in line with regional development strategies and contribute to the transition towards EU climate neutrality by 2050.
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 354 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) undertakings in difficulty, as defined in Article 2(18) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/201416 ; __________________ 16Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty (OJ L 187, 26.6.2014, p. 1).deleted
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 362 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) investment related to the production, processing, distribution, storage or combustion of solid fossil fuels;
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 377 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The JTF priority or priorities shall comprise the JTF resources consisting of all or part of the JTF allocation for the Member States and the resources transferred in accordance with Article [21a] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR]. The total of the ERDF and ESF+ resources transferred to the JTF priority shall be at least equal to one and a half times the amount of support from the JTF to that priority but shall not exceed three times that amount. Member States may choose to complement it with its ERDF and ESF+ resources. In such case, those resources should be included in the levels of thematic concentration of ERDF and ESF+.
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 381 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Eligible projects financed under the Just Transition Fund contributing to the specific objective as set out in Article 2 can benefit from up to 80% of relevant costs.
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 388 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall prepare, togetherin close cooperation with the relevant authorities of the territories concerned, one or more territorial just transition plans covering one or more affected territories corresponding to level 2 or 3 of the common classification of territorial units for statistics ("NUTS level 2 regions" or ‘NUTS level 3 regions’) as established by Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 868/201417 or parts thereof, in accordance with the template set out in Annex II. Those territories shall be those most negatively affected based on the economic and social impacts resulting from the transition, in particular with regard to expected job losses in fossil fuel production and use and the transformation needs of the production processes of industrial facilities with the highest greenhouse gas intensity. __________________ 17 Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) (OJ L 154 21.6.2003, p. 1).
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 418 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) a description of the type of operations envisaged and their expected contribution to alleviate the social, economic, energy security and environmental impacts of the transition;
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 434 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 a (new)
Article 7a Partnership 1. In accordance with [Article 6] of Regulation (EU) .../... [the new CPR] and with the Delegated Regulation (EU) No 240/2014, each Member State shall ensure a meaningful participation of social partners and civil society organisations, and other relevant or representative organisations in the programming and delivery of measures supported by the JTF. Such meaningful participation shall be inclusive and accessible to all.
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 469 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the allocations resulting from the application of point (a) are adjusted to ensure that no Member State receives an amount exceeding EUR 2 billion. The amounts exceeding EUR 2 billion per Member State are redistributed proportionally to the allocations of all other Member States. The Member States shares are recalculated accordingly;deleted
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 475 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point c – paragraph 1
This adjustment does not apply to Member States for which the allocation has been capped in accordance with point (b).deleted
2020/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Citation 5
— having regard to the Concluding Observations of the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD Committee) of 2 October 2015 on the initial report of the European Union, including those on the European Union institutions’ compliance with the Convention as public administrations,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Citation 28 a (new)
- having regard to the exploratory opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee requested by the European Parliament on the situation of women with disabilities,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Citation 28 b (new)
- having regard to the European Ombudsman’s strategic inquiries into how the European Commission ensures that persons with disabilities can access its websites (OI/6/2017/EA), how the European Commission treats persons with disabilities under the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme for EU staff (OI/4/2016/EA) and the Decision in the joint inquiry in cases 1337/2017/EA and 1338/2017/EA on the accessibility for visually impaired candidates of selection procedures to recruit EU civil servants, organised by the European Personnel Selection Office,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Recital A
A. whereas, as full citizens, all persons with disabilities have equal rights in all fields of life (including access to open labour market and education) and are entitled to inalienable dignity, equal treatment, independent living, autonomy and full participation in society, respecting and valuating their input to social and economic progress of Europe;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Recital G a (new)
G a. whereas only about 47% of persons with disabilities are employed, compared to 72% of persons without disabilities and the unemployment rate of persons aged 20-64 with disabilities is 17%, compared to 10% of people without disabilities;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Recital G a (new)
G a. whereas in 2018 among all people with disabilities (aged 16 and over) 28,7 % was at risk of poverty and social exclusion13g _________________ 13g https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/product s-eurostat-news/-/DDN-20191029-2
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges the advancement in the implementation of the UNCRPD brought about by the European Disability Strategy 2010-2020; calls on the Commission to continue the work by building upon and integrating what has been achieved and by upscaling the present Strategy, with a special focus on supporting Member States in implementation of the European Accessibility Act;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 1
1. Aacknowledges the advancement in the implementation of the UNCRPD brought about by the European Disability Strategy 2010-2020; and calls on the Commission to continue the work by building upon and integrating what has been achieved and by upscaling the presentits commitment to the rights of persons with disabilities through the Strategy;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 1
- with clearly designated priority areas covering all the provisions of the UNCRPD in all areas of EU policy and addressing the Concluding Observations of the UNCRPD Committee adopted in 2015,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 174 #
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 187 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 5
- mainstreaming the rights of the childrenpersons with disabilities into all policies and areas,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 5 a (new)
- giving special attention to wellbeing and equal opportunities for children with disabilities inter alia via ensuring unreserved access to childcare and education and supporting families with children with disabilities,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 210 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 8
- allocating an adequate budget for the implementation of the post-2020 Strategy; and ensuring continuity of financing in the New Multiannual Financial Framework,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 213 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 8 a (new)
- recognising and addressing the multiple and intersectional forms of discrimination they may face,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 217 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 8 b (new)
- accelerating work on mutual recognition of disability status between EU Member States in all areas,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 218 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 8 c (new)
- implementing the EU Disability Card to all EU Member States to ensure recognition of disability while moving across the EU and secure freedom of movement, access to culture, education and work for people with disabilities,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 219 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 8 d (new)
- ensuring that persons with disabilities have equal opportunities in the labour market, access to inclusive and mainstream education, health services as well as equal access to transport by eliminating the barriers to social participation and application of universal design principles into infrastructural and digital investments across the EU,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 220 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 8 e (new)
- acknowledging the evolution of new technologies and its potential for persons with disabilities including ICT applications,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 222 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 8 g (new)
- targeting adult people with disabilities with a special attention to the intellectually disabled and their future after the death of the attendant;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 238 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Calls the Commission to ensure the inclusion of a gender-based and intersectional approach to combat the multiple forms of discrimination faced by women and girls with disabilities, and urges the European Union and those Member States which have not done so already to accede to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention);
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 245 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Calls for the post 2020 Strategy to set out an interinstitutional structure to oversee its implementation; urges that Disability Focal Points be present in all Commission Directorates General and agencies and in all EU institutions, with the central Focal Point located within the Commission’s General Secretariat; stresses that an interinstitutional mechanism exist to ensure collaboration between the Commission, the Parliament and the Council, with their respective Presidents meeting at the start of each mandate;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 250 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to prepare the post-2020 Strategy with the close and systematic involvement of persons with disabilities, their families, and of their representative organisations, and to ensure their accessible and meaningful participation in the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the post-2020 Strategy also through funding their capacity-building;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 252 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to prepare the post-2020 Strategy with the close and systematic involvement of persons with disabilities and of their representative organisations, and to ensure their accessible and meaningful participation in the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the post-2020 Strategy also through funding their capacity-building;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 291 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to systematically mainstream the rights of persons with disabilities in all the relevant EU laws, policies and programmes; urges the full integration of the disability-rights perspective in the Gender Equality Strategy, the Youth Guarantee, the Green New Deal, the Child Guarantee and the forthcoming Green paper on Ageing, and stresses the need for a Disability Rights Guarantee to assist persons with disabilities into employment, traineeships, job placements and further education;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 309 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Stresses the fact that people with disabilites are more exposed to the risk of poverty and social exclusion than those without;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 337 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that all projects financed by the EU funds have positive impact on respect of rights of persons with disabilities in particular supporting accessibility, access to education, health and employment;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 362 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop a comprehensive campaign in accessible format with engagement of media to raise awareness of the UN CRPD, rights and needs of persons with disabilities as well as barriers they face among the persons with disabilities and the society in general;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 393 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Calls on the European Commission to ensure that the Strategy includes the end of violence against persons with disabilities as one of its main objectives, paying particular attention to gender-based violence, including forced sterilisation, forced institutionalisation, forced treatment and violence;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 402 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 10 b (new)
10 b. Urges the Commission and the Member States to make the EU a leader in promoting the rights of persons with disabilities, including marginalised groups with disabilities, such as women and girls with disabilities, through its external action;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 437 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls on the Commission to include a section on European Union institutions as public administrations to ensure that they comply with the UN CRPD in all respects, which includes making available the necessary resources, focal points, coordination mechanisms, internal policies, accessible infrastructure such as buildings, communications (including in sign language and Braille), websites and ICT applications, as well as permanent mechanisms to consult actively and effectively with representative organisations of persons with disabilities, positive actions and anti-discrimination safeguards that are necessary for the successful implementation of the Strategy and of the CRPD both in the EU at large as well as within the EU institutions and agencies;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2019/0246(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Given the fragile ecosystem in the Baltic Sea, support for the permanent cessation of fishing activities should not be granted for the retrofitting of fishing vessels for other activities than commercial fishing, such as recreational fishing, which could have a detrimental impact on the ecosystem. Therefore, such support should only be granted for the scrapping of fishing vessels. At the same time, support should only be granted for the scrapping of fishing vessels, including vessels used for recreational fishing. In view of the above, compensation scheme coverage and the possibility of scrapping recreational fishing units should take place on a similar basis as for industrial fishing.
2020/01/31
Committee: PECH
Amendment 51 #

2019/0246(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) Given the cultural and multi- generational characteristics of the coastal fishing profession, alternatives to the scrapping of vessels that would allow fishermen to remain in the profession should be provided.
2020/01/31
Committee: PECH
Amendment 53 #

2019/0246(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 a (new)
(20a) Compensation for the permanent cessation of vessels’ activities will not be attractive to operators if it is deducted from the temporary cessation compensation paid in the past pursuant to Article 25(5) of Regulation (EU) No 508/2014. Such a deduction would not make sense because services have been provided in the past for the temporary cessation of vessels’ activities, while compensation for permanent cessation of activities concerns future benefits.
2020/01/31
Committee: PECH
Amendment 58 #

2019/0246(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) No 508/2014
Article 34 – paragraph 4 c a (new)
4ca. Support granted to ship-owners under Article 33 shall not be deducted from support received by ship-owners under this Article in respect of the same vessel.
2020/01/31
Committee: PECH
Amendment 5 #

2018/2166(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. considers that, after a very slow start, the implementation of the 2014-2020 programmes has now reached cruising speed, with the payments executed in 2017 amounting to EUR 41 billion, 1.5 times the 2016 amount, notes, however, that the level of payment, amounts to 124.7 billion EUR, and is considerably lower than budgeted; ;
2018/12/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 7 #

2018/2166(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. is concerned by the fact that the overall average absorption rate for the current MFF was even lower than in the corresponding year of the previous MFF(16% to 22%), which was mainly due to the late closure of the previous MFF, delayed adoption of legal acts, difficulties in implementing the new requirements for the current MFF and the change of de- commitment rules from n+2to n+3, and the administrative burden linked to the overlaps between MFF periods;
2018/12/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 8 #

2018/2166(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. reiterates its call for the Commission and Member States to step up the efforts to allow the timely and swift adoption and implementation of the new operational programmes for the years 2021-2027, in order to avoid problems with absorption of the funds in the future;
2018/12/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 9 #

2018/2166(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7 c. welcomes an increased budget flexibility introduced by the MFF mid- term review, notes, however, that further flexibility and simplification measures may prove to be necessary to adequately accommodate future needs;
2018/12/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 45 #

2018/2119(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the proposals for the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and the strengthened links between cohesion policy and the European Semester process for delivering sustainable and inclusive growth; calls for the swift and timely adoption of MFF package and the cohesion policy regulations in order to avoid any possible delays in the implementation;
2019/01/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 29 #

2018/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that access to public services is crucial for the 150 million- strong cross-border population, and is hampered by numerous legal and administrative barriers; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to maximise their efforts to remove these barriers, especially when related to health services, transport, education, culture, sport, labour mobility, as well as regulation and business development;
2018/05/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 96 #

2018/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Underlines the importance of sport as a tool for facilitating the integration of communities living in border regions and calls on the Member States and the European Commission to allocate appropriate economic resources in territorial cooperation programmes to finance local sport infrastructure;
2018/05/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 74 #

2018/2034(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Takes note of the Commission’s 2018 country-specific recommendations (CSR) as an important part of the European Semester process and welcomes the special attention given in them to social challenges; notes with concern that only 50 % of the recommendations for 2017 were implemented fully or partially and therefore encourages the Member States to step up their efforts to implement the recommendations, in particular in the fields of educationfight against poverty and social exclusion, education and life-long learning, sustainability and adequacy of pension systems, and healthcare, including long- term care;
2018/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2018/2034(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Points out the need for well- designed policies for a better work-life balance, including flexible working arrangements, take-up of advantageous familymaternity, paternity, parental and carer’s leave and adequate investment in affordable, quality child - and long-term care; sees, in this regard, the swift adoption of the directive on work-life balance for parents and carers as a necessary step towards improved work-life balance;
2018/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2018/2034(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the importance of enhancing structured dialogue and the participation of employers’ organisations and trade unions in, trade unions and civil society organisations in designing and implementing employment and social policies and reforms;
2018/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2018/0332(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services. Evidence is not conclusive as to whether the benefits of summer-timTherefore any changes implemented at EU level and in the Member States in connection with the repeal of Directive 2000/84/EC will seek to preserve the harrangements outweigh the inconveniencmonisation of time zones linked to a biannual change of time the EU at least at the current level.
2019/01/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 27 #

2018/0332(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services. Evidence is not conclusiTherefore any changes implemented at EU level as to whether the benefits of summer-timnd in the Member States in connection with the repeal of Directive 2000/84/EC will seek to preserve the harrangements outweigh the inconveniencmonisation of time zones linked to a biannual change of time the EU at least at the current level.
2019/01/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 40 #

2018/0332(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) This Directive should not prejudice the existing right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time and subsequently apply the notified changes. The Commission should, on the basis of that notification, inform all other Member States so that they can take all necessary measures. It should also inform the general public and stakeholders by publishing this information.
2019/01/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 42 #

2018/0332(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) It is important to note that there are also ways to regulate the circadian rhythm in the Member States, in addition to defining time zones, such as: the working hours of public institutions, labour law, custom. Even today, in Member States located in the same time zone there are differences in working hours, including in public institutions and businesses. Such solutions can be an effective instrument for meeting social expectations while preserving the harmonisation of time zones in the EU at least at the current level in the implementation of this Directive.
2019/01/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 44 #

2018/0332(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) This Directive shouldall apply from 1 April 2019, so that the last summer-time period subject to the rules of Directive 2000/84/EC should start, in every Member State, at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 31 March 2019. Member States that, after that summer-time period, intend to adopt a standard time corresponding to the time applied during the winter season in accordance with Directive 2000/84/EC should change their standard time at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 27 October 2019, so that similar and lasting changes occurring in different Member States take place simultaneously. It is desirable that Member States should take the decisions on the standard time that each of them will apply as from 2019 in a concerted manner, so that any change implemented at EU level and in the Member States in connection with the implementation of this Directive maintains the harmonisation of time zones in the EU at least at the current level.
2019/01/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 45 #

2018/0332(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) This Directive should not prejudice the existing right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time and subsequently apply the notified changes. The Commission should, on the basis of that notification, inform all other Member States so that they can take all necessary measures. It should also inform the general public and stakeholders by publishing this information.
2019/01/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 47 #

2018/0332(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) Implementation of this Directive should be monitoredcoordinated and monitored, so that, among other things, any changes implemented at EU level and in the Member States in connection with the repeal of Directive 2000/84/EC maintain the harmonisation of time zones in the EU at least at the current level. The results of this monitoring should be presented by the Commission in a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. That report should be based on the information that is made available to the Commission by the Member States in a timely fashion to allow for the report to be presented at the specified time.
2019/01/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 49 #

2018/0332(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) It is important to note that there are also ways to regulate the circadian rhythm in the Member States, in addition to defining time zones, such as: the working hours of public institutions, labour law, custom. Even today, in Member States located in the same time zone there are differences in working hours, including in public institutions and businesses. Such solutions can be an effective instrument for meeting social expectations while preserving the harmonisation of time zones in the EU at least at the current level in the implementation of this Directive.
2019/01/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 52 #

2018/0332(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) This Directive shouldall apply from 1 April 2019, so that the last summer-time period subject to the rules of Directive 2000/84/EC should start, in every Member State, at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 31 March 2019. Member States that, after that summer-time period, intend to adopt a standard time corresponding to the time applied during the winter season in accordance with Directive 2000/84/EC should change their standard time at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 27 October 2019, so that similar and lasting changes occurring in different Member States take place simultaneously. It is desirable that Member States should take the decisions on the standard time that each of them will apply as from 2019 in a concerted manner, so that any change implemented at EU level and in the Member States in connection with the implementation of this Directive maintains the harmonisation of time zones in the EU at least at the current level.
2019/01/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 58 #

2018/0332(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) Implementation of this Directive should be monitoredcoordinated and monitored, so that, among other things, any changes implemented at EU level and in the Member States in connection with the repeal of Directive 2000/84/EC maintain the harmonisation of time zones in the EU at least at the current level. The results of this monitoring should be presented by the Commission in a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. That report should be based on the information that is made available to the Commission by the Member States in a timely fashion to allow for the report to be presented at the specified time.
2019/01/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 60 #

2018/0332(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still, for a final time, apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 2019, provided that they do so at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 27 October 2019. The Member States shall notify this decision in accordance with Article 2.
2019/01/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 62 #

2018/0332(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still, for a final time, apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 2019, provided that they do so at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 27 October 2019. The Member States shall notify this decision in accordance with Article 2.
2019/01/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 76 #

2018/0332(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall adopt and publish, without delay and by 1 April 2019 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
2019/01/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 79 #

2018/0332(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
They shall apply those provisions from 1 April 2019, i.e. when the final transition to summertime comes into effect in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2000/84/EC.
2019/01/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 89 #

2018/0332(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this DirectiveThey shall apply those provisions from 1 April 2019, i.e. when the final transition to summertime comes into effect in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2000/84/EC.
2019/01/29
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 19 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) At Union level, the European Semester of economic policy coordination is the framework to identify national reform priorities and monitor their implementation. Member States develop their own national multiannual investment strategies in support of those reform priorities. Those strategies should be developed in partnership between national, regional and local authorities and presented alongside the yearly National Reform Programmes as a way to outline and coordinate priority investment projects to be supported by national and/or Union funding. They should also serve to use Union funding in a coherent manner and to maximise the added value of the financial support to be received notably from the programmes supported by the Union under the European Regional Development Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, the European Investment Stabilisation Function and InvestEU, where relevant.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 36 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The ESF+ should aim to promote employment through active interventions enabling (re)integration into the labour market, notably for youth, the long-term unemployed and the inactive, as well as through promoting self–employment and the social economy. The ESF+ should aim to improve the functioning of labour markets by supporting the modernisation of labour market institutions such as the Public Employment Services in order to improve their capacity to provide intensified targeted counselling and guidance during the job search and the transition to employment and to enhancfacilitate workers’ mobility. The ESF+ should promote women's participation in the labour market through measures aiming to ensure, amongst others, improved work/life balance and access to childcare. The ESF + should also aim to provide a healthy and well-adapted working environment in order to respond to health risks related to changing forms of work and the needs of the ageing workforce.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 58 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The ESF+ should support Member States’ efforts to tackle poverty with a view to breaking the cycle of disadvantage across generations and promote social inclusion by ensuring equal opportunities for all, tackling discrimination and addressing health inequalities. This implies mobilising a range of policies and strategies targeting the most disadvantaged people regardless of their age, including children, marginalised communities such as the Roma, and the working poor. The ESF+ should promote the active inclusion of people far from the labour market with a view to ensuring their socio-economic integration. The ESF+ should be also used to enhance timely and equal access to affordable, sustainable and high quality services such as healthcare and long-term care, in particular family and community- based care services. The ESF+ should contribute to the modernisation of social protection systems with a view in particular to promoting their accessibility.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 74 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The ESF+ should aim to promote employment through active interventions enabling (re)integration into the labour market, notably for youth, the long-term unemployed and the inactive, as well as through promoting self–employment and the social economy. The ESF+ should aim to improve the functioning of labour markets by supporting the modernisation of labour market institutions such as the Public Employment Services in order to improve their capacity to provide intensified targeted counselling and guidance during the job search and the transition to employment and to enhancfacilitate workers’ mobility. The ESF+ should promote women’s participation in the labour market through measures aiming to ensure, amongst others, improved work/life balance and access to childcare. The ESF + should also aim to provide a healthy and well-adapted working environment in order to respond to health risks related to changing forms of work and the needs of the ageing workforce.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) Efficient and effective implementation of actions supported by the ESF+ depends on good governance and partnership between all actors at the relevant territorial levels and the socio- economic actors, in particular the regional and local authorities, social partners and civil society. It is therefore essential that Member States encourage the participation of regional and local authorities social partners and civil society in the implementation of the ESF+ under shared management.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 92 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The ESF+ should provide support to improving the quality, effectiveness and labour market relevance of education and training systems in order to facilitate the acquisition of key competences notably as regards entrepreneurial and digital skills which all individuals need for personal fulfilment and development, employment, social inclusion and active citizenship. The ESF+ should help progression within education and training and transition to work, support lifelong learning and employability, and contribute to competitiveness and societal and economic innovation by supporting scalable and sustainable initiatives in these fields. This could be achieved for example through work-based learning and apprenticeships, lifelong guidance, skills anticipation in cooperation with industry, up-to-date training materials, forecasting and graduate tracking, training of educators, validation of learning outcomes and recognition of qualifications.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The ESF+ should promote flexible upskilling and reskilling opportunities for all, notably entrepreneurial and digital skills and key enabling technologies, with a view to providing people with skills adjusted to digitalisation, technological change, innovation and social and economic change, facilitating career transitions, mobility and supporting in particular low-skilled and/or poorly qualified adults, in line with the Skills Agenda for Europe.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The ESF+ should support Member States’ efforts to tackle poverty with a view to breaking the cycle of disadvantage across generations and promote social inclusion by ensuring equal opportunities for all, tackling discrimination and addressing health inequalities. This implies mobilising a range of policies and strategies targeting the most disadvantaged people regardless of their age, including children, people with disabilities, marginalised communities such as the Roma, and the working poor. The ESF+ should promote the active inclusion of people far from the labour market with a view to ensuring their socio-economic integration. The ESF+ should be also used to enhance timely and equal access to affordable, sustainable and high quality services such as healthcare and long-term care, in particular family and community- based care services. The ESF+ should contribute to the modernisation of social security institutions and public employment services and social protection systems with a view in particular to promoting their accessibility and effectiveness in responding to the changing realities of world of work.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) improving access to employment of all jobseekers, including those in rural areas, in particular youth and long- term unemployed, and of inactive people, promoting entrepreneurship, self- employment and the social economy;
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 140 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point v
(v) promoting equal access to and completion of, quality and inclusive education and training, in particular for disadvantaged groups, as well as in rural and remote areas, from early childhood education and care through general and vocational education and training, and to tertiary level, as well as adult education and learning, including facilitating learning mobility for all;
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 149 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point xi a (new)
(xia) enhancing institutional capacity of public authorities and stakeholders and efficient public administration;
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 151 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point xi b (new)
(xib) increasing the socioeconomic integration of marginalised communities, migrants and disadvantaged groups, through integrated measures including housing and social services;
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 156 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point 2 a (new)
2 a. A Europe closer to citizens through poverty reduction and social inclusion measures taking into account the specificities of urban, rural and coastal areas in view of tackling the socio- economic inequalities in cities and regions.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 178 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall allocate an appropriate amount of their ESF+ resources under shared management to address challenges identified in relevant country-specific recommendations adopted in accordance with Article 121(2) TFEU and Article 148(4) TFEU and in the European Semester falling within the scope of the ESF+ as set out in Article 4. This will be complemented by sufficient flexibility at managing authority level to identify priorities and areas for ESF+ investments in line with the specific local or regional challenges.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 205 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall allocate an appropriate amount of ESF+ resources under shared management in each programme for the capacity building of local and regional authorities, social partners and civil society organisations.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 212 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
The actions addressing the challenges identified in relevant country-specific recommendations (CSRs) and in the European Semester as referred to in Article 7(2) shall be programmed under one or more dedicated priorities. Sufficient flexibility shall be ensured at managing authority level to identify priorities and areas for ESF+ investments in line with the specific local or regional challenges, due to annual character of CSRs and multiannual character of the ESF+ programming.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 213 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 a (new)
Article 11a Integrated territorial development The ESF+ may support integrated territorial development within programmes under both goals referred to in Article 4(2) of Regulation(EU) 2018/xxxx [new CPR] in accordance with Chapter II of Title III of that Regulation[new CPR]. 2. Member States shall implement integrated territorialdevelopment, supported by the ESF+, exclusively through the forms referred to in Article [22] of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxxx [new CPR].
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 214 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 b (new)
Article 11b Transnational cooperation Member States may support transnational cooperation actions under a specific priority.3. Transnational cooperation actions may be programmed under any of the specific objectives set out in points (i) to (x) of Article 4(1).4. The maximum co- financing rate for this priority may be increased to 95% for the allocation of maximum 5% of the national ESF+ allocation under shared management to such priorities.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 218 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall support actions of social innovation and social experimentations, or strengthen bottom-up approaches based on partnerships involving public authorities, in particular on local and regional level, the private sector, and civil society such as the Local Action Groups designing and implementing community-led local development strategies.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 224 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. Each Member State shall dedicate at least one priority to the implementation of paragraphs 1 or 2 or to both. The maximum co-financing rate for these priorities may be increased to 95% for the allocation of maximum 5% of the national ESF+ allocation under shared management to such priorities. The implementing and audit rules for such actions should be sufficiently flexible to allow risk-taking and creativity.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 241 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii
(iii) of participating countries administrations, in particular on regional and local level, social security institutions and employment services responsible for promoting labour mobility, of microfinance institutions and of institutions providing finance to social enterprises or other social investment actors, as well as networking;
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 309 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) improving access to employment of all jobseekers, in particular youth anddisadvantaged groups such as youth, older people, long- term unemployed, and ofpersons with disabilities, as well as inactive people, promoting self-employment and the social economy;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 339 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point iv
(iv) improving the quality, effectiveness and labour market relevance of education and training systems, to support acquisition of key competences including entrepreneurial and digital skills;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 353 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point vi
(vi) promoting lifelong learning, notably flexible upskilling and reskilling opportunities for all taking into account entrepreneurial and digital skills, better anticipating change and new skills requirements based on labour market needs, facilitating career transitions and promoting professional mobility;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 367 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point ix
(ix) enhancing the equal and timely access to quality, sustainable and affordable services; modernising social security institutions and public employment services and social protection systems, including promoting access to social protection; improving accessibility, effectiveness and resilience of healthcare systems and long-term care services;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 375 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point xi a (new)
(xia) (xii) enhancing institutional capacity of public authorities and stakeholders and efficient public administration;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 377 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point xi b (new)
(xib) (xiii) increasing the socioeconomic integration of marginalised communities, migrants and disadvantaged groups, through integrated measures including housing and social services;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 378 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point xi c (new)
(xic) (xiv) improving accessibility to goods, services and physical environment in order to enable persons with disabilities to live independently and participate fully in all aspects of life, on an equal basis with others.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 381 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point 2 a (new)
2a. 3. a Europe closer to citizens through poverty reduction and social inclusion measures taking into account the specificities of urban, rural and coastal areas in view of tackling the socio- economic inequalities in cities and regions.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 454 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall allocate an appropriate amount of their ESF+ resources under shared management to address challenges identified in relevant country-specific recommendations adopted in accordance with Article 121(2) TFEU and Article 148(4) TFEU and in the European Semester falling within the scope of the ESF+ as set out in Article 4. This will be complemented by sufficient flexibility at managing authority level to identify priorities and areas for ESF+ investments in line with the specific local or regional challenges.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 535 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
The actions addressing the challenges identified in relevant country-specific recommendations (CSRs) and in the European Semester as referred to in Article 7(2) shall be programmed under one or more dedicated priorities. Sufficient flexibility shall be ensured at managing authority level to identify priorities and areas for ESF+ investments in line with the specific local or regional challenges, due to annual character of CSRs and multiannual character of the ESF+ programming.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 541 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 a (new)
Article 11a Integrated territorial development 1. The ESF+ may support integrated territorial development within programmes under both goals referred to in Article 4(2) of Regulation(EU) 2018/xxxx [new CPR] in accordance with Chapter II of Title III of that Regulation[new CPR]. 2. Member States shall implement integrated territorial development, supported by the ESF+, exclusively through the forms referred to in Article [22] of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxxx [new CPR].
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 554 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may support the upscaling of innovative approaches tested on a small-scale (social innovation and social experimentations) developed under the Employment and Social Innovation strand and other Union programmes.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 555 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. Innovative actions and approaches may be programmed under any of the specific objectives set out in points (i) to (x) of Article 4(1).
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 558 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. Each Member State shall dedicate at least one priority to the implementation of paragraphs 1 or 2 or to both. The maximum co-financing rate for these priorities may be increased to 95% for the allocation of maximum 5% of the national ESF+ allocation under shared management to such priorities. The implementing and audit rules for such actions shall be sufficiently flexible to allow risk-taking and creativity.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 593 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4
4. The delivery of food and/or material assistance mayshall be complemented with re-orientation towards competent services and other accompanying measures aiming at the social inclusion of the most deprived persons.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 348 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Support from the ERDF shall be granted to individual external cross-border Interreg programmes provided that at least equivalent amounts are provided by IPA III CBC and NDICI CBC under the relevant strategic programming document. That equivalencecontribution shall be subject to a maximum amount set out in the IPA III or NDICI legislative act.
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 533 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 6 – point 1 (new)
(1) 7. The threshold of EUR 200 000 which is set out in art. 48(1) [new CPR] and point b of art. 48(2) [new CPR] should be applied for a small project.
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 651 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Where the managing authority does not carry out verification under point(a) of Article 68 (1) of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] throughout the whole programme area, each Member State shall designate the body or person responsible for carrying out such verification in relation to beneficiaries on its territory.
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 676 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) 2021: 13%;
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 683 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) 2022: 13%;
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 691 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) 2023: 13%;
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 697 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) 2024: 13%;
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 705 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) 2025: 13%;
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 712 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) 2026: 13%.
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 237 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv
(iv) developing skills and supporting activities for smart specialisation, industrial transition and entrepreneurship;
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 248 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part
(b) 'a greener, low-carbon Europe by promoting clean and fair energy transition and sustainable urban mobility, green and blue investment, the circular economy, climate adaptation and risk prevention and management ('PO 2') by:
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 306 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point vii a (new)
(vii a) promoting sustainable urban mobility;
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 336 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iv
(iv) promoting sustainable multimodal urban mobility;deleted
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 372 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – point iv
(iv) ensuring equal access to health care through developing infrastructurehealth care assets, including primary care;
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 376 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – point iv a (new)
(iv a) providing support for physical, economic and social regeneration of deprived communities in urban and rural areas.
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 397 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – point i
(i) fostering the integrated social, economic and environmental development, cultural heritage and security in urban areas, including functional urban areas;
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 482 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) Member States of group 1 shall allocate at least 850 % of their total ERDF resources under priorities other than for technical assistance to PO 1 and PO 2, and at least 6055 % to PO 1;
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 497 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) Member States of group 2 shall allocate at least 450 % of their total ERDF resources under priorities other than for technical assistance to PO 1, and at least 3025 % to PO 2;
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 511 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) Member States of group 3 shall allocate at least 350 % of their total ERDF resources under priorities other than for technical assistance to PO 1, and at least 3025 % to PO 2.
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 529 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) investments in infrastructure and facilities;
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 533 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) investments in R&D&I;
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 561 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
In addition, pProductive investments in enterprises other than SMEs can be supported when they involve cooperation with SMEs in research and innovation activities supported under point (a)(i) of Article 2 (1) or business infrastructure that benefits SMEs.
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 606 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) investment in airport infrastructure except for outermost regions;deleted
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 620 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) investment in disposal of waste in landfill;deleted
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 625 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) investment in facilities for the treatment of residual waste;deleted
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 638 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) investment related to production, processing, distribution, storage or combustion of fossil fuels, with the exception of investment related to clean vehicles as defined in Article 4 of Directive 2009/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council26 unless it supports deployment of renewable energy sources, otherwise provides substantial contribution to transition towards cleaner future, or is a precondition for supporting entrepreneurship in the region; _________________ 26 Directive 2009/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles (OJ L 120, 15.5.2009, p. 5).
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 646 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) investment in broadband infrastructure in areas in which there are at least two broadband networks of equivalent category;deleted
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 657 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) funding for the purchase of rolling stock for use in rail transport, except if it is linked to the: (i) discharge of a publicly tendered public service obligation under Regulation 1370/2007 as amended; (ii) provision of rail transport services on lines fully opened to competition, and the beneficiary is a new entrant eligible for funding under Regulation (EU) 2018/xxxx [Invest EU regulation].deleted
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 661 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j – point i
(i) discharge of a publicly tendered public service obligation under Regulation 1370/2007 as amended;deleted
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 666 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j – point ii
(ii) provision of rail transport services on lines fully opened to competition, and the beneficiary is a new entrant eligible for funding under Regulation (EU) 2018/xxxx [Invest EU regulation].deleted
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 694 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The ERDF shall support integrated territorial development based on territorial strategies in accordance with Article [23] of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxxx [new CPR] focused on functional urban areas taking into account the need to promote partnership within the metropolitan areas and to support urban-rural linkages ('sustainable urban development'), within programmes under both goals referred to in Article 4(2) of that Regulation.
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 365 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point c
(c) in the context of State aid schemes, the undertaking which receivesbody which receives the aid, except when the Member State decides that the beneficiary is the body granting the aid;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 405 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) a greener, low-carbon Europe by promoting clean and fair energy transition and sustainable urban mobility, green and blue investment, the circular economy, climate adaptation and risk prevention and management;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 416 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) a more connected Europe by enhancing mobility, energy and regional ICT connectivity;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 578 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the selected policy objectives indicating by which of the Funds and programmes they will be pursued and a justification thereto, and where relevant, a justification for using the delivery mode of the InvestEU, taking into account relevant country-specific recommendations and regional specificities;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 646 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall assess the Partnership Agreement and its compliance with this Regulation and with the Fund- specific rules. In its assessment, the Commission shall, in particular, take into account relevant country-specific recommendations and regional specificities.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 742 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Member State, in close cooperation with the relevant managing authority, shall establish a performance framework which shall allow monitoring, reporting on and evaluating programme performance during its implementation, and contribute to measuring the overall performance of the Funds.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 753 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. For programmes supported by the ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund, the Member State and relevant managing authority, shall review each programme, taking into account the following elements:
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 867 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. Member States or relevant managing authority, in cooperation with the partners referred to in Article 6, shall prepare programmes to implement the Funds for the period from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2027.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 917 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point i
(i) the related types of actions, including an indicative list of planned operations of strategic importance, and their expected contribution to those specific objectives and to macro-regional strategies and sea- basin strategies, where appropriate;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 929 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point iv
(iv) specific territories targeted on the basis of strategic documents prepared at national and regional level, including the planned use of integrated territorial investment, community-led local development or other territorial tools;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 948 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point i
(i) the envisaged approach to communication and visibility for the programme through defining its objectives, target audiences, communication channels, social media outreach, planned budget and relevant indicators for monitoring and evaluation;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 972 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 7
7. The Member Statemanaging authority shall communicate to the Commission any changes in the information referred to in paragraph (3)(j)dicative list of planned operations of strategic importance referred to in paragraph (3)(d)(i), and the information referred to under points (d)(iii), (d)(vii) and(d)(j) of paragraph (3), without requiring a programme amendment.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 986 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission may make observations within three months of the date of submission of the programme by the Member State. The Member State shall provide the Commission all the necessary additional information.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1009 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall assess the amendment and its compliance with this Regulation and with the Fund-specific Regulations, including requirements at national level, and may make observations within three months of the submission of the amended programme. The Member State shall provide the Commission with all necessary additional information.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1037 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
The Member State, while fully respecting the Code of Conduct for Partnership and Multi-level Governance, may transfer during the programming period an amount of up to 510 % of the initial allocation of a priority and no more than 35 % of the programme budget to another priority of the same Fund of the same programme. For the programmes supported by the ERDF and ESF+, the transfer shall only concern allocations for the same category of region.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1082 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. Member States may request the transfer of up to 510 % of programme financial allocations from any of the Funds to any other Fund under shared management or to any instrument under direct or indirect management.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1105 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) another territorial tool supporting initiatives designed by the Member Statemanaging authorities of programmes for investments programmed for the ERDF under the policy objective referred in Article 4(1)(e).
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1115 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The managing authority shall ensure that territorial strategies implemented pursuant to points (a) or (c) of Article 22 shall contain the following elements:
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1135 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. When preparing territorial strategies, entities referred to in Article 23(2) shall cooperate with relevant managing authorities, as far as the scope of operations to be supported under the relevant programme is concerned.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1225 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) for the ERDF support under the Investment for jobs and growth goal, and for the Cohesion Fund support: 2,5 %;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1240 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) for the ESF+ support: 4% and for programmes under Article 4(1)(c)(vii) of the ESF+ Regulation: 5 5%;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1259 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Member Statemanaging authority shall set up a committee to monitor the implementation of the programme ('monitoring committee') within three months of the date of notification to the Member State concerned of the decision approving the programme.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1266 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 4
4. The Member Statemanaging authority shall publish the rules of procedures of the monitoring committee and all the data and information shared withconcerning the work of the monitoring committee on the website referred to in Article 44(1).
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1287 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the methodology and criteria used for the selection of operations, including any changes thereto, after consultation with the Commission pursuant to Article 67(2), without prejudice to points (b), (c) and (d) of Article 27(3);
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1291 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) changes to the list of planned operations of strategic importance referred to in Article 17(3)(d)(i),and the information referred to under points (d)(iii), (d)(vii) and (d)(j) of Article 17(3);
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1292 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In the case of financial instruments, paragraph 2, point a, will be used only for the selection of operations by the managing authority or intermediate body.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1301 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The managing authority shall electronically transmit to the Commission cumulative data for each programme by 31 January, 31 March, 31 May, 31March, 30 Julyne, 30 September and 30 Nov1 December of each year in accordance with the template set out in Annex VII. The first transmission shall be due by 31 March 2022, and the last by 31 March 2030.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1405 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The managing authority shall select the body implementing a financial instrument in accordance with Article 67.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1412 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 6
6. National co-financing of a programme may be provided either by the managing authority or at the level of holding funds, or at the level of specific funds, or at the level of investments in final recipients, in accordance with the Fund- specific rules. When the national co- financing is provided at the level of investments in final recipients, the body implementing financial instruments shall keep documentary evidence demonstrating the eligibility of the underlying expenditure.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1418 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 2
2. Interest and other gains attributable to support from the Funds paid to financial instruments shall be used undertil the same objective or objectives as the initial support from the Funds, either withend of the eligibility period in the same or other financial instrument; s for, following the winding up of the financial instrumurther investments in final recipients, in other financial instruand for any management costs and fees associated with such further investments, or in other forms of support, untilder the end of the eligibility periodsame specific objective or objectives.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1425 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 1
1. Resources paid back, before the end of the eligibility period, to financial instruments from investments in final recipients or from the release of resources set aside as agreed in guarantee contracts, including capital repayments and any type of generated income that is attributable to the support from the Funds, shall be re- used in the same or other financial instruments for further investments in final recipients, under the same specific objective or objectives and for any management costs and fees associated to such further investments or in other forms of support.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1428 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall adopt the necessary measures to ensure that the resources referred to in paragraph 1 and paid back to financial instruments during a period of at least eightfive years after the end of the eligibility period, are re-used in accordance with the policy objectives of the programme or programmes under which they were set up, either within the same financial instrument or, following the exit of those resources from the financial instrument, in other financial instruments or in other forms of support.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1443 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) recoverable value added tax ('VAT'), except for operations the total cost of which is below EUR 5 000 000.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1452 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 3
3. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply to programme contributions to or from financial instruments and any operation which undergoes cessation of a productive activity due to a non- fraudulent bankruptcy.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1494 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 – paragraph 2
2. Commission audits shall be carried out up to threewo calendar years following the acceptance of the accounts in which the expenditure concernedafter the final payment to the beneficiary was included. This period shall not apply to operations where there is a suspicion of fraud.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1742 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Member State shall submit a maximum of fourmanaging authority shall submit payment applications per programme, per Fund and per accounting year. Every year the time limit for each payment application shall be 30 April, 31 July, 31 October and 26 December.
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1745 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The last payment application submitted by 31 July shall be deemed to be the final payment application for the accounting year that has ended 30 June.deleted
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1752 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Where financial instruments are implemented in accordance with Article 53(32), payment applications that include expenditure for the establishment of financial instruments shall be submitted in accordance with the following conditions:or contribution to them.
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1754 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the amount included in the first payment application shall have been paid to the financial instruments and may be up to 25 % of the total amount of programme contributions committed to the financial instruments under the relevant funding agreement, in accordance with the relevant priority and category of region, if applicable;deleted
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1756 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the amount included in subsequent payment applications submitted during the eligibility period shall include the eligible expenditure as referred to in Article 62(1).deleted
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1757 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The amount included in the first payment application, referred to in point (a) of paragraph 2, shall be cleared from Commission accounts no later than the final accounting year.deleted
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1758 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
It shall be disclosed separately in payment applications.deleted
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1784 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall decommit any amount in a programme which has not been used for pre-financing in accordance with Article 84 or for which a payment application has not been submitted in accordance with Articles 85 and 86 by 2631 December of the seconthird calendar year following the year of the budget commitments for the years 2021 to 2026. In the event of payment stops on a legal or precautionary basis, an extension shall also be applied.
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1811 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 102 – paragraph 1
1. The ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund shall support the Investment for jobs and growth goal in all regions corresponding to level 2 of the common classification of territorial units for statistics (‘NUTS level 2 regions’) established by Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 868/2014 and by Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/2066.
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1902 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission decision approving a programme shall fix the co- financing rate and the maximum amount of support from the Funds for each priority and the co- financing rate for the programme.
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 2000 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The co-financing rate for Interreg programmes shall be no higher than 7085 %.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 52 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a European Labour Authoritgency (text with relevance for the EEA and for Switzerland) (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) A European Labour Authoritgency (the ‘Authoritgency’) should be established in order to help strengthen fairness and trust in the Single Market. To that effect, the Authoritgency should support the Member States and the Commission in strengthening access to information for individuals and employers about their rights and obligations in cross- border labour mobility situations and cross-border provision of services as well as access to relevant services, support compliance and cooperation between the Member States to ensure the effective application of the Union law in these areas, and mediate and facilitate a solution in case of cross- border disputes or labour market disruptions.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The Authoritgency should perform its activities in the areas of cross-border labour mobility, cross-border provision of services and social security coordination, including free movement of workers, posting of workers and highly mobile services. It should also enhance cooperation between Member States in tackling undeclared work. In cases where the Authoritgency, in the course of the performance of its activities, becomes aware of suspected irregularities, including in areas of Union law beyond its scope, such as violations of working conditions, health and safety rules, or the employment of illegally staying third-country nationals, it should be able to report them and cooperate on these matters with the Commission, competent Union bodies, and national authorities where appropriate.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) The Authoritgency should contribute to facilitating the free movement of workers governed by Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , Directive 2014/54/EU of the European Parliament and the Council40 and Regulation (EU) 2016/589 of the European Parliament and the Council41 . It should facilitate the posting of workers governed by Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and the Council42 and Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and the Council43 , including by supporting the enforcement of those provisions implemented through universally applicable collective agreements in line with the practices of Member Statesnational law. It should also help the coordination of social security systems governed by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and the Council44 , Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council45 , Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 of the European Parliament and the Council46 ; as well as Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/7147 and Council Regulation (EC) No 574/7248 . __________________ 39 Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (OJ L 141, 27.5.2011, p. 1). 40 Directive 2014/54/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 April 2014 on measures facilitating the exercise of rights conferred on workers in the context of freedom of movement for workers (OJ L 128, 30.4.2014, p. 8). 41 Regulation (EU) 2016/589 of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 April 2016 on a European network of employment services (EURES), workers’ access to mobility services and the further integration of labour markets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 492/2011 and (EU) No 1296/2013 (OJ L 107, 22.04.2016, p. 1). 42 Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ L 18, 21.1.1997, p. 1). 43 Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’) (OJ L 159, 28.05.2014, p. 11). 44 Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, (OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p.1, corrigendum OJ L 200, 7.6.2004, p. 1). 45 Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems, (OJ L 284, 30.10.2009, p. 1). 46 Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 extending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by these Regulations solely on the ground of their nationality (OJ L 344, 29.12.2010, p. 1). 47 Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ L 149, 5.7.1971 p. 2). 48 Council Regulation (EC) No 574/72 of 21 March 1972 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons, and to their families moving within the Community (OJ L 74, 27.3.1972, p. 1).
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The individuals covered by the activities of the Authoritgency should be persons who are subject to the Union law within the scope of this Regulation, including workers, self-employed persons, jobseekers, and economically non-active persons and employers; this should cover both Union citizens and third-country nationals who are legally resident in the Union, such as posted workers, EU Blue Card holders, intra-corporate transferees or long-term residents, as well as their family members.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) For these purposes, the Authoritgency should cooperate withfacilitate coordination between other relevant Union initiatives and networks, in particular the European Network of Public Employment Services (PES)54 , the European Enterprise Network55 , the Border Focal Point56 and SOLVIT57 , as well as with relevant national services such as the bodies to promote equal treatment and to support Union workers and members of their family, designated by Member States under Directive 2014/54/EU, and national contact points designated under Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council58 to provide information on healthcare. The Authoritgency should also explore synergies with the proposed European services e-card59 , notably with regard to those cases in which Member States opt for the submission of declarations regarding posted workers through the e-card platform. The AuthoritThe Agency should replace the Commission in managing the European network of employment services (‘EURES’) European Coordination Office established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 2016/589, including the definition of user needs and business requirements for the effectiveness of the EURES portal and related IT services, but excluding the IT provision, and the operation and development of the IT infrastructure, which will continue to be ensured by the Commission. __________________ 54 Decision No 573/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on enhanced cooperation between Public Employment Services (PES) (OJ L 159, 28.5.2014, p. 32). 55 European Enterprise Network, https://een.ec.europa.eu/ 56 Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions, COM(2017) 534. 57 Commission Recommendation of 17 September 2013 on the principles governing SOLVIT (OJ L 249, 19.9.2011, p. 10). 58 Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare (OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 45). 59 COM(2016) 824 final and COM(2016) 823 final.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 169 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) To increase Member States' capacity to tackle irregularities with a cross-border dimension in relation to Union law within its scope, the Authoritgency should support the national authorities in carrying out concerted and joint inspections, including by facilitating the implementation of the inspections in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 2014/67/EU. These should take place at the request of a Member State, Member States orand upon their agreement to the Authority's suggestion. The Authorit. The Agency should provide strategic, logistical, and technical support if needed to Member States participating in the concerted or joint inspections in full respect of confidentiality requirements. Inspections should be carried out in agreement with the Member States concerned and take place fully within the legal framework of national law of the Member States concerned which territory the inspection is being carried out, which should follow up on the outcomes of the concerted and joint inspections according to that Member State's national law.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 215 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) The Authority should directly rely on the expertise of relevant stakeholders in the areas under its scope through a dedicated Stakeholder Group. The members should be representatives of Union-level and sectorial social partners. In carrying out its activities, the Stakeholder Group will take due account of the opinions and draw on the expertise of the Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Social Security Systems established by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and the Advisory Committee on the Free Movement of Workers established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 492/2011.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 265 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The Authoritgency shall assist Member States and the Commission in matters relating to cross-border labour mobility, cross-border provision of services and the coordination of social security systems within the Union.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 285 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The objective of the Authoritgency shall be to contribute to ensuring fair labour mobility and cross-border provision of services in the internal market. To this end, the Authority shall:
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 396 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Authoritgency shall improve the availability, quality, reliability and accessibility of information offered to individuals and employers to facilitate labour mobility across the Union, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 589/2016 on EURES and Regulation [Single Digital Gateway – COM(2017)256]. To that end, the Authoritgency shall:
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 403 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) provide relevant information on the rights and obligations of individuals in cross-border labour mobility situations and cross-border provision of services;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 427 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) support Member States in complying with the obligations on the dissemination of and access to information relating to the free movement of workers as laid down in Article 6 of Directive 2014/54/EU, and to the posting of workers as laid down in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU; especially support with the proper functioning of single official national websites;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 430 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) support Member States in improving the accuracy, completeness and user-friendliness of relevant national information services and sources, in accordance with the quality criteria laid down in Regulation [Single Digital Gateway – COM(2017)256];
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 453 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) cooperate with other Union initiatives and networks, such as the European Network of Public Employment Services, the European Enterprise Network and the Border Focal Point, in particular to identify and overcome cross-border obstacles to labour mobility; and cross- border provision of services;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 476 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) facilitate the follow-up to requests and information exchanges between national authorities by providing logistical and technical support, including translation and interpretation services, and through exchanges on the status of cases if requested by concerned Member States;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 497 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
(d) facilitate cross-border enforcement procedures of penalties and fines if requested by concerned Member States;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 548 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. At the request of one or several Member States, the Authoritgency shall coordinate concerted or joint inspections in the areas under the scope of the Authoritgency’s competences. The request may be submitted by one or several Member States. The Authority may also suggest to the authorities of the Member States concerned that they perform a concerted or joint inspection. Member States take part in the concerned or joint inspection only after their agreement.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 558 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. A Member State may decide not to take part in a concerned or joint inspection. Where the authority of a Member State decides not to participate in or carry out the concerted or joint inspection referred to paragraph 1, it shall inform the Authoritgency in writing of the reasons for its decision duly in advancebefore the beginning of the planned inspection. In such cases, the Authoritgency shall inform the other national authorities concerned.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 576 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. The organisation of a concerted or joint inspection shall be subject to the prior agreement of all participating Member States before the beginning of such an inspection via their National Liaison Officers. In the event that one or more Member States refuse to take part in the concerted or joint inspection, the other national authorities may, where appropriate, only carry out the envisaged concerted or joint inspection in the participating Member States. The Member States that declined to participate in the inspection shall keep information about the envisaged inspection confidential.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 589 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. An agreement for setting up a joint inspection ('the joint inspection agreement') between the participating Member States and the Authoritgency shall set out the conditions for carrying out such an exercise, especially the scope of the inspection and the applicable law. The joint inspection agreement may include provisions which enable joint inspections, once agreed and planned, to take place at short notice. The Authoritgency shall establish a model agreement after consulting all Member States.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 599 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Concerted and joint inspections and their follow-up shall be carried out in accordance with the national law of the Member States concerned where the inspection is taking place. Inspections are being carried out under the supervision of the national relevant authority of the Member State where the inspection is taking place.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 609 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. The Authoritgency shall provide logistical and technical support if requested by the Member States concerned, which may include translation and interpretation services, to Member States carrying out concerted or joint inspections.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 632 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Parties being subject of the inspection shall receive the post- inspection report and shall have the right to refer to it and challenge findings in accordance with national law of the Member State, on which territory the inspection has been carried out.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 640 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Joint inspections as well as their legal consequences, decisions on administrative fines and penalties as well as rights and obligations of the parties being subject of the inspection shall be with no prejudice to the law applicable on the territory of a Member State where the inspection is taking place.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 661 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Authority shallgency shall, in cooperation with Member States, assess risks and carry out analyses regarding cross-border labour flows, such as labour market imbalances, sector-specific threats and recurring problems encountered by individuals and employers in relation to cross-border mobility and cross-border provision of services. For that purpose, the Authoritgency shall ensure complementarity with, and draw on the expertise of, other Union agencies or services, including in the areas of skills forecasting and health and safety at work. Upon a request by the Commission or a Member State, the Authority may carry out focused in-depth analyses and studies to investigate specific labour mobility issues.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 672 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) identify, analyse and take appropriate measures towards any national provisions which are not proportionate, justified or non- discriminatory as well as any barriers towards cross-border labour mobility and cross-border provision of services;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 688 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) develop common guidelines for optional use by Member States, including guidance for inspections in cases with a cross-border dimension, as well as shared definitions and common concepts, building on relevant work at the Union level;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 723 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Upon request of one of the Member States concerned by a dispute, the Authoritgency shall launch a mediation procedure before its Mediation Board set up for this purpose in accordance with Article 17(2). The Authoritgency may also launch a mediation procedure on its own initiative before the Mediation Board, including on the basis of a referral from SOLVIT, subject to the agreement of all Member States concerned by that dispute. Member States concerned take actively part in the mentioned procedure and make at disposal any relevant and/or requested information. The parties being subject of the mediation such as employers, employees, self- employed persons shall also be consulted and involved.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 847 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Management Board shall elect a Chairperson and a Deputy Chairperson from among the members with voting rights, and shall strive for gender and geographical balance. The Chairperson and the Deputy Chairperson shall be elected by a majority of two-thirds of the members of the Management Board with voting rights.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2017/2260(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the number of children experiencing poverty remains alarmingly high in Europe, currently standing at more than 25 million;
2018/01/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2017/2260(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to adopt all the necessary measures to reduce poverty in Europe, and particularly child poverty, in line with the 2013 Commission's Recommendation Investing in children: breaking the cycle of disadvantage"; stresses the need for the Member States to adopt national plans to reduce child poverty;
2018/01/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 227 #

2017/2260(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Recognises the potential of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) in supporting growth and employment in high-risk investment projects; is concerned, however, about the enormous imbalance in use of the Fund between the EU15 and the EU13[1];[1] http://www.eib.org/attachments/ev/ev_eval uation_efsi_en.pdf
2018/01/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 254 #

2017/2260(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines the role of the social partners and civil society as essential stakeholders in the reform process and the added value of their involvement in the drafting, sequencing and implementation of reforms; supports the opinion that new forms of employment in the globalised market call for new forms of social dialogue; affirms that the Member States need to help people build the skills required in the labour market;
2018/01/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2017/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the streamlining and focus of the Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs); expresses its concern, however, regarding the uneven degree of implementation of the CSRs; calls on the Commission and Member States to closely collaborate and coordinate the process in order to support structural reforms and boost investment and to recognise the supportive role local and regional authorities can have in the process;
2018/02/01
Committee: REGI
Amendment 26 #

2017/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises the important role in the recovery process of cohesion policy as the main investment policy in Europe and is of the opinion that it should be maintained at least at similar budgetary level in the future Multiannual Financial Framework; considers, however, that its interaction with the European Semester should be improved to further increase the multiplier effect of cohesion spending and its contribution to sustainable and inclusive growth;
2018/02/01
Committee: REGI
Amendment 38 #

2017/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the extension of the European Fund for Strategic Investments until 2020 to help boost investment; underlines the need for complementarities and synergies between those toolsis however concerned about the enormous imbalance in use of the Fund between EU15 and EU13; calls therefore for a greater geographical balance and underlines the need for complementarities and synergies between EFSI and ESIF while maintaining the latter as the main investment policy of the EU;
2018/02/01
Committee: REGI
Amendment 5 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas women's economic empowerment and equal opportunities in the labour market are crucial for women individually but also instrumental for EU's economic growth with positive impact on GDP, inclusiveness and competitiveness of businesses as well as challenges related to the ageing population in the EU
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that equal opportunities for economic independence and the guaranteeimplementation of the principle of equal pay for male and female workers for equal work andor work of equal value applied by the Member States as defined in the article 157 of TFEU are necessary steps for women's economic empowerment;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Member States to promote the well-being of women, by tackling the pay and pension gaps and combating atypical and insecure forms of work and employment, such as temporary contracts or involuntary part-time workand equal opportunities for women, by tackling the pay gap, addressing and eliminating breaches of anti-discrimination legislation in employment, combating insecure forms of work and employment, such as involuntary part-time work or the use of contracts which do not correspond to the nature of the work performed in accordance with the national law;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. points out that digitalisation has a profound impact on the labour market by changing value chains, conditions and nature of work as well as creating new job opportunities and more flexible working patterns; notes that opportunities for flexible and teleworking arrangements brought about by digitalisation may serve as a an effective tool for further inclusion of women into the labour market as well as better reconciliation of professional and domestic duties for both women and men;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. highlights that improving digital skills and IT-literacy among women and boosting inclusion into the ICT, which is one of the highest paying sectors, could contribute to their economic empowerment and independence resulting in the reduction of the total gender wage gap;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3 c. Points out that the demand for digital technology professionals in the EU has grown by 4% annually in the last ten years and the number of unfilled vacancies for ICT professionals is expected to double by 2020; calls therefore on the Member States and the Commission to advance their efforts to promote digital skills and e-literacy among women and girls, who remain underrepresented in this sector, from the earliest stages at school and going through the whole educational cycle as well as in the framework of life-long learning;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to implement and enforce public social care policies as well as to provide quality childcare fafurther develop care facilities for the dependent, including children and elderly, with the view of enhancing reconciliaties and promote the equal sharing of unpaid domestic work and co- responsibility in care.on of private and professional life for the working families and increasing women's participation in the labour market as a precondition for women's economic empowerment;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital -A (new)
-A. whereas the collaborative economy offers many opportunities for growth and jobs, especially for people who are distant from the labour market, such as young people, students, women and seniors, and provides innovative new services for citizens and consumers;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas the Commission communication entitled ‘A European Agenda for the collaborative economy’ stresses the increasing significance of the platform economy, its important contribution to growth and jobs by providing new opportunities for citizens and innovative entrepreneurs, and its impact on economic and employment policies;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas with the Communication on a European agenda for the collaborative economy, the EU provides welcomed guidelines on applicable EU rules and recommendations to help citizens, businesses and EU countries to fully benefit from these new business models and promote a balanced and fair development of the collaborative economy;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the Commission communication on collaborative economy is a starting point of the EU contribution to a balanced and fair development of the collaborative economy, given the rapid evolution of this economy and its related regulatory loopholes and uncertainties that still must be clarified;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas the European Commission and the Member States need to address more deeply the social dimension of the collaborative economy by providing in depth analysis and data on new forms of employment, by monitoring the evolving regulatory environment and by encouraging the exchange of good practices among EU countries, in order to overcome the social challenges related to this new economy;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the need for a clear distinction between ‘professional’ and ‘non-professional’ platforms and to recognise activities in the platform economy that are properly categorised as ‘work’platforms with a lucrative business model and those based on the sharing of costs, resources or skills, in order to ensure a level playing field for EU businesses and citizens; in parallel, calls for a clear distinction between non-professional peer-to-peer activity and service providers acting in their professional capacity by further developing sector specific criteria and thresholds, in collaboration with relevant stakeholders; amongst service providers, underlines the need to distinguish employees and self-employed, in order to apply them rights and duties accordingly;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. States that all workers in the platform economy are either employed or self-employed based on the primacy of facts; recalls in this context that, for the purpose of applying EU law, the Court of Justice has defined the concept of ‘worker’ on the basis of an employment relationship characterised by certain criteria such as subordination, remuneration and the nature of workthe existence of a subordination link, the presence of a remuneration and the nature of work, even so EU Member States are responsible for deciding who is to be considered a worker in their national legal order; calls also to clarify self- employment in order to prevent bogus self-employment and to ensure the rights of self-employed workers;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for a framework directiveon the Commission and the Member States, in cooperation with social partners, to assess the impact of the collaborative economy on forms of employment and working conditions, to check if the current legislations are able to cover platform workers and, if necessary, to consider accordingly the need to update the current social acquis, to better enforce legal frameworks on working conditions into the platform economy, in order to guarantee the legal situation of platform workers and, to ensure that all platform workers have the same social and employment rights and health and safety protection as workers in the traditional economy and to ensure a level playing field for businesses; Underlines that digital technologies are evolving so fast that policy making should not be based on a catch-up approach but rather on a logic of anticipation;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Takes note of the multiplication of national and local regulatory initiatives affecting the collaborative economy; Stresses the importance of rapid clarification at European level of the applicable rules in order to limit the fragmentation of the internal market;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for more reliable data on joband evidence on jobs, skills and working conditions in the platform economy and, if necessary, for the adjustment of related policies to create a level playing field between the platforms and traditional economiebusinesses, especially SMEs, in particular in the field of consumer protection, taxation and working conditions;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Underlines that the collaborative economy fosters entrepreneurship; Stresses the need to adapt training mechanisms to this new kind of businesses;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Calls on the national public employment services and the EURES Network to communicate better on the opportunities offered by the collaborative economy;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the European Commission and the Member States to reflect on the appropriate means to ensure that digital platforms inform providers on the regulatory framework that has to be complied with, when offering services, as individuals using platforms are sometimes not even aware of the requirements they should fulfil; considers that digital platforms should play a more proactive role in checking whether the service provider fulfils its legal requirements; Calls on Member States to operate specific controls in order to check if operators stick to the rules, especially in terms of taxation, consumer protection, working conditions and skills requirements;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 150 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Highlights that the collaborative economy has flourished mainly so far in urban areas; Stresses therefore the importance of deploying broadband in rural areas in order to enable all EU territories to benefit from the potential of the collaborative economy, especially in terms of employment; Calls for Member States to strengthen financial and human resources to enable people from rural areas to acquire basic digital skills;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
K a. whereas the digital transformation is not yet completed and the societal and labour market needs are constantly evolving;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 210 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Underlines that any skills policies should take into consideration not only the currently on-going transformations on the labour market but also ensure that they are universal enough to develop workers learning agility and to facilitate their adaptation to the challenges in future;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 221 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Recognises the importance of fostering work-based learning apprenticeships and internships as one of the tools to further facilitate the integration of individuals into the labour market;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 347 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Urges active dialogue, data- sharing and cooperation between the university community and the world of work aimed at developing educational programmes which equip young people with the requisite skills and competences;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 479 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
37. Calls on the Commission and Member States to make funding available in order to bridge the existing technological gap between educational institutions which are well equipped and those which are not, as part of the national strategies for digital skills; underlines the need to promote the access to internet among all groups and European regions;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 496 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
40. Asks the Commission to leave more flexibility to Member States to broaden their skills offer and to not only focus on universal basic skills in the framework of the upskilling pathways, in the context ofbut also to identify and address concrete needs at local, regional and sectorial level (for example intercultural, health, family skills);
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 509 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. Calls on the Commission to establish a European Year of Adult LearningDigital and Entrepreneurial Skills, which will help to raise awareness of the value of adult educationimportance of those competences across Europe;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 57 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) In view of their potential to considerably affect the road haulage market, as well as the social protection of workers, serious infringements of Union rules on the posting of workers and the law applicable to contractual obligations should be added to the items relevant to the assessment of good repute.deleted
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The rules on national transport performed on a temporary basis by non- resident hauliers in a host Member State (‘cabotage’) should be clear, simple and easy to enforce, while broadly maicontainuing the level of liberalisation achieved so far.
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) To this end, and in order to facilitate checks and to eliminate uncertainty, the limitation on the number of cabotage operations subsequent to an international carriage should be abolished, while the number of days available for such operations should be reduced.
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 147 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point iii
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 6
(xi) the posting of workerssocial and labour law;
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 6 paragraph 1
(b) define the degree of seriousness of infringements according to their potential to create a risk of fatalities or serious injuries and to distort competition in the road transport market, including by undermining the working conditions of transport workershe threat to the health and safety of the worker posed by the non- compliance with labour law;
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a – point i
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 16 – paragraph 2
(h) the number of employees working in the company over the last calendar year;
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a – point i
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 16 – paragraph 2
(i) the total assets, liabilities, equity and turnover during the last two years;a copy of the annual financial report or other documents proving financial capacity, of the kind mentioned under Article 7(2).
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 228 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Once the goods carried in the course of an incoming international carriage from another Member State or from a third country to a host Member State have been delivered, hauliers referred to in paragraph 1 shall be allowed to carry out, with the same vehicle or, in the case of a coupled combination, the motor vehicle of that same vehicle, cabotage operations in the host Member State or in contiguous Member States. The last unloading in the course of a cabotage operation shall take place within 57 days from the last unloading in the host Member State in the course of the incoming international carriage’;
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Drivers engaged in long-distance international transport operations spend long periods away from their home. The current requirements on the regular weekly rest unnecessarily prolong those periods. It is thus desirable to adapt the provision on the regular weekly rest in such a way that it is easier for drivers to carry out transport operations in compliance with the rules and to reach their home for a regular weekly rest, and be fully compensated for all reduced weekly rest periods. It is also necessary to provide that operators organise the work of drivers in such a way that these periods away from homtheir place of residence are not excessively long. Drivers should also be able to choose how they take their rest.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) There are differences among Member States in the interpretation and implementation of the weekly rest requirements as regards the place where the weekly rest should be taken. It is therefore appropriate to clarify that requirement to ensure that drivers are provided with adequate accommodation for their regular weekly rest periods if they are taken away from home. If this condition is to be fulfilled, the Member States must put sufficient investment into the construction of safe parking areas that are adapted to the needs of drivers.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 6 – paragraph 3
(2a) in Article 6, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: 3. The total accumulated driving time during any twofour consecutive weeks shall not exceed 9180 hours.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) two regular weekly rest periods of at least 45 hours and two reduced weekly rest periods of at least 24 hours., or:
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) one regular weekly rest period of at least 45 hours and three reduced rest periods of at least 24 hours.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
For the purposes of point (b) and (ba), the reduced weekly rest periods shall be compensated by an equivalent period of rest taken en bloc before the end of the thirdfourth week following the week in question.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 a – introductory part
8a. The regular weekly rest periods and any weekly rest of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for previous reduced weekly rest shall notmay be taken in a vehicle. They shall be taken in a suitable accommodation, with adequate sleeping and sanitary facilities;vehicle if the vehicle is properly equipped for sleeping in, and is parked in a secure and suitably equipped parking area, if possible. Otherwise, these rest periods shall be taken in a suitable accommodation, with adequate sleeping and sanitary facilities; The Commission should encourage Member States to construct safe and suitably adapted parking areas. Two years after the regulation has entered into force, the Commission should draw up a report on the quality and number of parking areas in the Member States. If the Commission finds that the quality and quantity of parking spaces meet the requirements of European international transport, it should submit proposals for relevant legislative changes concerning the possibility to rest in the cabin.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 a – point b
(b) at home or at another privateanother location chosen by the driver.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 b
8b. A transport undertaking shall organise the work of drivers in such a way that the drivers are able to spend at least one regular weekly rest period or a weekly rest of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for reduced weekly rest at homthe driver’s place of residence within each period of three consecutive weeks. Confirmation that a regular weekly rest period or a weekly rest period of more than 45 hours to compensate for a previous reduced weekly rest period in another location chosen by the driver has been taken shall take the form of a declaration by the driver. The Commission shall draw up a paradigm for this declaration.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Directive 2006/22/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
These checks shall cover each year a large and representative cross-section of mobile workers, drivers, undertakings and vehicles falling within the scope of Regulations (EC) No 561/2006 and (EU) No 165/2014 and in case of checks at the premises of mobile workers and drivers falling withing the scope of Directive 2002/15/EC.;
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2006/22/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Checks at premises shall be planned in the light of past experience in relation to the various types of transport and undertakings. Checks of conformity with Directive 2002/15/EC shall be done solely at premises. They shall also be carried out if serious infringements of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 or (EU) No 165/2014 or Directive 2002/15/EC have been detected at the roadside.;
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
Directive 2006/22/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 1
Member State shall submit the information requested by other Member States pursuant to paragraph 1(b) of this Article within 25 working days from the receipt of the request in cases requiring in-depth examination or involving checks at premises of the undertakings concerned. A shorterdifferent time limit may be mutually agreed between the Member States if justified by the nature of the request. In urgent cases or cases requiring simple consultation of registers, such as of a risk rating system, the requested information shall be submitted within three working days.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Directive 2006/22/EC
Annex I – Part A – point 6
(6) weekly working times as set out in Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 2002/15/EC.deleted
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Transit operations are fully exempted from the scope of Directive 96/71/EC and this Directive.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. International transport operations as defined by regulations 1072/2009 and 1073/2009 are fully exempted from the scope of Directive 96/71/EC and this Directive.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 179 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall not apply points (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC to drivers in the road transport sector employed by undertakings referred to in Article 1(3)(a) of that Directive, when performing international carricabotage operations as defined by Regulations 1072/2009 and 1073/2009 where the period of posting to their territory to perform these operations is shorter than or equal to 3 days during a period of one calendar month.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 218 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. For the purposes of the calculation of the periods of posting referred to in paragraph 2, a day may not be less than 24 hours respectively spent in the territory of the host Member State. The weekly rest periods shall be excluded from the calculation of the periods of posting. :
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 240 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Cabotage operations falling under the scope of this Directive are excluded from rules on long-term posting referred in Article 1 of the legislative act amending Directive 96/71/EC.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 241 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Cabotage operations falling under the scope of this Directive shall be excluded from rules on collective agreements which are not universally applicable as defined in Article [...] of Directive 96/71/EC.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 246 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. For the purpose of transport operations covered by this Directive, Article 9 paragraph 1 and 2 of the Enforcement Directive 2014/67/EU is replaced by the following: Member States may only impose the following administrative requirements and control measures:
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 259 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) an obligation for the road transport operator established in another Member State to send a postingstandardized, electronic, simple declaration to the national competent authorities at the latest at the commencement of the posting, in electronic form, in an official language of the host Member State or in English, containing only the following information:
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 274 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a – point vi
(vi) the type of transport services, that is to say carriage of goods, carriage of passengers, international carriage, cabotage operation;deleted
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 281 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a – subparagraph 1 a (new)
For the purposes of this point, the road transport operator may provide a simple declaration covering a period of a maximum of six months. The information referred to in points from (ii) to (vi) shall be updated electronically by the road transport operator in line with current factual situation.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 288 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) an obligation for the driver to keep and make available, where requested at the roadside control, in paper or electronic form, a copy of the postinga simple declaration and evidence of transport operation taking place in the host Member State, such as: an electronic consignment note (e-CMR) or evidence referred to in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 304 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) an obligation for the driver to keep and make available, where requested at the roadside control, in paper or electronic form, a copy of the employment contract or an equivalent document within the meaning of Article 3 of Council Directive 91/533/EEC20 , translated into one of the official languages of the host Member State or into English; __________________ 20 Council Directive 91/533/EEC of 14 October 1991 on an employer's obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship (OJ L 288, 18.10.1991, p. 32)deleted
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 315 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) an obligation for the driver to make available, where requested at the roadside control, in paper or electronic form, a copy of payslips for last two months; during the roadside check, the driver shall be allowed to contact the head office, the transport manager or any other person or entity which may provide this copy;deleted
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 323 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point f
(f) an obligation for the road transport operator to deliver, after the period of posting, in paper or electronic form, copies of documents referred to in points (b), (c) and (ec), at the request of the authorities of the host Member State within a reasonable period of time;
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 329 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 –subparagraph 1 a (new)
During the roadside check, the driver shall be allowed to contact the head office, the transport manager or any other person or entity which may help in carrying out the check. Checks and controls of employment contract or an equivalent document within the meaning of Article 3 of Council Directive 91/533/EEC and/ or payslips shall be carried out solely at the premises.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 339 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 5
5. For the purposes of point (a) of paragraph 4 the road transport operator may provide a posting declaration covering a period of a maximum of six months.deleted
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 343 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 5
5. For the purposes of point (a) of paragraph 4 the road transport operator may provide a posting declaration covering a period of a maximum of six monthsBy ... [two years after the date of entry into force of this Directive], the Commission shall develop the standardised form of the simple declaration containing only the information as specified in paragraph 4(a) (i) to (vi).
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 364 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
They shall apply those provisions from […]... [the date when COD 2016/007 -revised Posting of Workers Directive is applicable.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
The objective of the European Solidarity Corps is to enhance the engagement of young people and organisations in accessible and high quality solidarity activities as a means to contribute to strengthening cohesion and solidarity in Europe, supporting communities and swiftly and effectively responding to societal challenges.
2017/09/18
Committee: REGI
Amendment 143 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) “solidarity activity” means an activity aimed at addressing unmet societal needs to the benefit of a community while also fostering the individual’s personal, educational, social, civic and professional development, which may take the form of placements, projects or networking activities, developed in relation to different areas, such as education and training, employment, gender equality, entrepreneurship, in particular social entrepreneurship, citizenship and democratic participation, environment and nature protection, climate action, disaster prevention, preparedness and recovery, agriculture and rural development, provision of food and non-food items, health and wellbeing, creativity and culture, physical education and sport, social assistance and welfare, disabilities, solidarity between generations, reception and integration of third-country nationals, territorial cooperation and cohesion;
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 149 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) “participant” means a young person, aged 18-30, who has registered in the European Solidarity Corps Portal and takes part in a solidarity activity under the European Solidarity Corps offered by a participating organisation;
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) “participating organisation” means any public or private non-profit entity that has been attributed the European Solidarity Corps quality label, which offers a placement to a participant in the European Solidarity Corps or implements other activities in the framework of the European Solidarity Corps;
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 187 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
(11) “quality label” means the certification attributed to a public or private non-profit entity or an international organisation willing to provide placements under the European Solidarity Corps following a procedure aimed at ensuring compliance with the principles and requirements of the European Solidarity Corps Charter;
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 187 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Any public or private entity established in a participating country as well as international organisations carrying out solidarity activities in the participating countries may apply for funding under the European Solidarity Corps. In the case of the activities referred to in point (a) of Article 7(1), a quality label shall be obtained by the participating organisation as a pre-condition for receiving funding under the European Solidarity Corps. In the case of the solidarity projects referred to in point (b) of Article 7(1), natural persons may also apply for funding on behalf of informal groups of European Solidarity Corps participants. The application and distribution of funding should be carried out in the way that will ensure an effective and swift response to the societal challenges.
2017/09/18
Committee: REGI
Amendment 195 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
The objective of the European Solidarity Corps is to enhance the engagement of young people and organisations in accessible and high quality solidarity activities as a means to contribute to strengthening cohesion and solidarity in Europe, supporting communities and swiftly and effectively responding to societal challenges.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 215 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) measures aimed at ensuring the quality of solidarity placements, including comprehensive training, language support, administrative support for participants and participating organisations, insurance, post- placement support as well as the development of a certificate that identifies and documents the knowledge, skills and competences acquired during the placement;
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. The European Solidarity Corps shall be open to the participation of public or private non profit entities, or international organisations, provided that they have received a European Solidarity Corps quality label.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 235 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Any public or private non-profit entity established in a participating country as well as international organisations carrying out solidarity activities in the participating countries may apply for funding under the European Solidarity Corps. In the case of the activities referred to in point (a) of Article 7(1), a quality label shall be obtained by the participating organisation as a pre-condition for receiving funding under the European Solidarity Corps. In the case of the solidarity projects referred to in point (b) of Article 7(1), natural persons may also apply for funding on behalf of informal groups of European Solidarity Corps participants. The application and distribution of funding should be carried out in the way that will ensure an effective and swift response to the societal challenges.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas cohesion policy has played a vital role and has shown significant responsiveness to macroeconomic and fiscal constraints, supporting the most pressing needs and strengthening certain interventions;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 45 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that growth and regional, economic and social convergence cannot be achieved without good governance, cooperation, mutual trust and the effective involvement of all partners at national, regional and local level, as is enshrined in the partnership principle (Article 5 of the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR)); reiterates that the EU cohesion policy's shared management arrangement provides the EU with a unique tool to directly address the concerns of citizens in relation to internal and external challenges;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 57 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the first signs of the accelerated implementation of the operational programmes observed during the year 2016; urges the Commission to identify the causes of the delays in implementation to avoid similar problems at the beginning of the next programming period and strongly encourages all actors involved to continue to speed up their activities;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 82 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that territorial cooperation in all its forms, including macro-regional strategies, transposes the concept of political cooperation and coordination of regions and citizens across borders in the EU; underlines the merit of cohesion policy in addressing the challenges of outermost and northernmost, peripheral and sparsely populated regions;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 98 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines that the current categorisation of regions, the thematic objectives and the performance framework have demonstrated the value of cohesion policy and should be consolidated; asks the Commission to present ideas for greater flexibility, such as an unallocated reserve or a simplification of re-programming, in order to adapt ESIF investments to unforeseen events and to the specific needs of each region as well as to create incentives for the best performing regions; calls on the Commission to use more precise indicators to measure performance;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 122 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Opposes macro-economic conditionalities and hHighlights that the link between cohesion policy and economic governance processes should be reciprocal and that a greater recognition of the territorial dimension would be beneficial for the European Semester;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 150 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on Member States to simplify and reduce the number of national rules and guidelines and to assure that the information on EU funding is clear, concise and do not constitute unnecessary burden for the beneficiaries; calls furthermore to avoid gold-plating in the future;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 155 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Asks the Commission to reflect on solutions based on proportionality and differentiation, especially with regard to the multiple layers of audit, which should be restricted to combating fraud and corruption, and the number of controls, to a greater harmonisation between cohesion policy and competition policy, in particular state aid rules, as well as with regard to the possibility of a single set of rules for all ESI Funds;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 169 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Believes that grants should remain the basis of the financing of cohesion policy; notes, however, the gradual shift from grants to financial instruments; points out that the replacement of grants by loans, equity or guarantees mustloans, equity or guarantees can play a complementary role, but their use shall be carried out with caution and where such financial instruments demonstrate an added value, taking into account regional disparities and the diversity of practices and experiences; stresses the importance of assistance of the Commission, European Investment Bank and Member States to local and regional authorities on the innovative financial instruments through platforms such as fi-compass; or by providing the incentives for the beneficiaries;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 189 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to ensure better synergies between the ESI Funds and other Union funds and programmes and to facilitate multi-fund options; warns that the EFSI should not undermine the strategic coherence and long-term perspective of cohesion policy programming should not replace or crowd out the grants and insists on the additionality of its resources;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 211 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Invites the Commission to reflect on the development of alternative set of indicators to the GDP indicator, which remains the legitimate method for allocating ESI Funds fairly; such set of alternative indicators may include a demographic indicator or dynamic indicators based on demographic, social and employment aspects, such as Social Progress Index; stresses, furthermore, the relevance of outcome indicators to strengthen the result and performance orientation of the policy;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 216 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Call on the Commission to maintain the European Territorial Cooperation as one of the three equally important goals of cohesion policy; underlines, that its budget should match the great challenges that ETC has to meet, and its potential of providing the high level of European added value; calls for greater respect for Article 174 TFEU on territorial cohesion;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 219 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Encourages the Commission to consider the possibility of using NUTS III level as classification of regions in cohesion policy for some selected priorities;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 231 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Suggests an increased use of ESI Funds in order to tackle demographic change and address its regional and local consequences, such as depopulation; notes the increasing importance of the Territorial Agenda and of successful rural-urban partnerships, as well as the exemplary role of smart cities as microcosms and catalysts for innovative solutions for regional and local challenges;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 237 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Emphasises the role of the new territorial development tools, such as Community Led Local Development and the Integrated Territorial Investments;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 240 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes the Pact of Amsterdam and the better recognition accorded to the role of cities and urban areas in European policy-making and demands an effective implementation of the partnerships and cooperative working methods that the Pact entails through the partnerships that the Pact entails; expects the results to be incorporated in future EU policies post- 2020;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 242 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Underlines the enhanced urban dimension of cohesion policy in the form of specific provisions for sustainable urban development and the urban innovative actions, and considers that it should be further developed in the future; encourages the Commission to strengthen the direct support to local governments under cohesion policy by enhancing financing and providing tailored instruments for territorial development;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 246 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Endorses the EU's commitments under the Paris climate change agreement and underlines that the ESI Funds should be used as effectively as possible for climate change mitigation and adaptation, as well as for green economies and renewable energies, highlights the potential of European Territorial Cooperation in this regard;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 254 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. HUnderlines that in the era of euroscepticism, the increased visibility of the Cohesion Policy is vital, highlights the fact that in order to improve the visibility of ESI Funds, greater focus must be placed on participation by stakeholders and recipients; urges, furthermore, the Commission, Member States, regions and cities to communicate in a more efficient way on both the achievements of cohesion policy, particularly how it delivers the measurable change to the everyday life of EU citizens, and the lessons to be learned;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 262 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Recognises that challenges such as migration and security or ongoing future political developments in the EU should not negatively affect the investments through cohesion policy or its goals and expected results, especially after the current programming period;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 266 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for the fostering of economic, social and territorial cohesion and solidarity across the EU to be put at the top of the EU agenda, and to maintain the fight against regional disparities, poverty and social exclusion, as well as against discrimination;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 269 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for the fostering of economic, social and territorial cohesion and solidarity across the EU to be put at the top of the EU agenda, and to maintain the fight against poverty and social exclusion, as well as against discrimination; considers that, apart from the goals enshrined in the Treaties, cohesion policy should continue serving as a tool to attain EU political objectives and remain the Union main investment policy available to all regions;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 279 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Reiterates that it is high time to prepare the post-2020 EU cohesion policy in order to launch it effectively at the very start of the new programming period; calls therefore for timely adoption of all rules on management and control before the start of the new programming period; underlines that delayed implementation of operational programmes may affect the efficiency of cohesion policy and raises the risk of backlogs;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 282 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Underlines that the rules on management and control should be maintained and in particular no retroactive effect of new rules, including the application of Commission guidelines should be applied;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 298 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Is convinced of the need for an adequate budget for cohesion policy after 2020 which takes into account the complex internal and external challenges that the policy will have to address; calls for the share of cohesion policy in the total EU budget to be maintained in the future;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 300 #

2016/2326(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Underlines the multi-annual nature of cohesion policy and calls to maintain its 7-year programming period or to introduce a 5+5 years programming period with an obligatory mid-term revision;
2017/04/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 35 #

2016/2306(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Shares the view of the CommissionUnderlines that, in the context of the European Semester and efforts to simplify the Cohesion Policy, such as the activities of the Taskforce for Better Implementation, Member States need to step up their effortactions to implement the necessary reforms aimed atnd all other measures which support this implementation, including institutional capacity building, with the aim of removing obstacles encountered by beneficiaries of the Cohesion Policy;
2016/12/16
Committee: REGI
Amendment 42 #

2016/2306(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines that in order to better respond to economic challenges and boost growth, a higher level of flexibility in implementation has to be further provided for the Member States to make use of the investment clauses; shares in this context the view of the European Court of Auditors that public procurement, while being a perennial problem, needs to be addressed also at the Commission level, which should act as an advocate for improvements in this field;
2016/12/16
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1 #

2016/2305(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1 Whereas the future of European society and economy will rely on 5G infrastructure, the impact of which will go far beyond existing wireless access networks, with the aim for communication services, reachable everywhere, all the time and faster;
2017/02/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 17 #

2016/2305(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Believes that 5G is more than an evolution of mobile broadband. It will be a key enabler of the future digital world, the next generation of ubiquitous ultra- high broadband infrastructure that will support the transformation of processes in all economic sectors (public sector, healthcare, energy, utilities, manufactory, transportation, automotive, VR, online gaming and so forth) and providing new services that improve every citizen's life;
2017/02/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 40 #

2016/2305(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Calls the Commission to ensure and maintain financing the 5G Action Plan at the proper level in the horizon of the next Multiannual financial framework 2020-2027;
2017/02/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 56 #

2016/2305(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Stresses that commercial investments should be supported by a policy and regulatory environment and not be delayed by overly ambitious public schemes that may impede 5G implementations;
2017/02/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 57 #

2016/2305(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Notes that in order to achieve coordinated 5G deployment across all EU Member States, there is a need for the consideration of specific economic and geographic national circumstances;
2017/02/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 58 #

2016/2305(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4 c. Calls on the Member State to develop, by mid-2018, national 5G deployment roadmaps as part of the National Broadband Plan;
2017/02/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 59 #

2016/2305(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4 d. Calls on the Commission to assess the National Broadband Plans to identify gaps and formulate country-specific recommendations for further action;
2017/02/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 10 #

2016/2304(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas there should be a clear link between the level of funding available for each Member State and the level of awareness of local EU-funded programmes awareness of local EU-funded programmes among end-users and society as a whole is pivotal;
2017/03/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 80 #

2016/2304(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes the important role of the media in informing citizens on EU affairs; regrets nevertheless the rather limited coverage of EU cohesion policy investments; stresses the need to develop communication strategies that aim at the media and are adapted to the current informational challenges, and deliver information in an accessible and attractive form and take account of digital advancements and the mix of different types of media channels;
2017/03/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 108 #

2016/2304(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Considers that there is a growing need for a strengthening of communication through new media channels which will require developing a communication strategy for digital and social media that focuses on reaching end- users through different set of tools such as interactive on-line surveys or mobile applications, developing more accessible mobile-based content and ensuring that information is available in different languages and adjusted to different age groups;
2017/03/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 152 #

2016/2304(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Further asks the Commission to set up ancreate an interactive EU e-communication platform on cohesion policy implementation that would collect all relevant data on ESI Funds projects, feedback from end-users and indications of whether or not the message communicated has been receiv and would allow theend-users to give the feedback on the implementation process and the results delivered;
2017/03/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas the information and communications technology (ICT) sector currently employs six million people in Europe and, whereas 40 % of European workers have insufficient digital skills and whereas there is an expected gap of 800 000 of unfilled vacancies in ICT sector by 2020; whereas this gap is a risk for European growth and competitiveness, but, with adequate measures undertaken, could be translated into the increased employment;
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the digitisation of industry represents a major challenge in terms of theboth the creation and loss of jobs, as well as new organisation of work and therefore requires targeted responses regarding employment, social and education policies, as well as the provision of up-to-date infrastructure;
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Underlines that due to the fact that progressive digitalisation will result in growing demand for digital and other complementary skills, the training in this direction should not only cover upskilling of the workforce but the process should start already in the early school years with implementation of technical, entrepreneurial and relevant soft skills in the education programmes;
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Stresses the potential of digital competence centres in supporting the digitalisation of industry and increasing competitiveness of existing companies and encouraging the creation of new ones;
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Points out that digital transformation is a complex phenomenon that needs to be dealt with also at European level in order to avoid the fragmentation of the single market and that the close cooperation with national and regional stakeholders is desired in this context;
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, in cooperation with social partners, to regularly assess the impact of digitisation on the quality, number and types of jobs and to adjust related policies, programmes and legislation accordingly;
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission and the Member StatesMember States, with the support of the Commission, to clarify the legal situation of platform workers and to guarantee all workers the same basic social rights, including the freedom of association, and the right to conclude collective agreements and the right to organise;
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to ensure universalinclusive access to training in digital skills, in order to allow equal participation of all citizens in the digital single market, be it as employees, entrepreneurs or customers;
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas introducing and strengthening minimum income schemes is, when rightly combined with other social and labour market activation measures and policies, might be an important and effective way to overcome poverty, support social integration and access to the labour market and meet the targets of the Europe 2020 strategy;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas the guarantee of an adequate minimum income and minimum wagefor those who lack sufficient resources for a decent standard of living and fair remuneration for employment is included in the first draft of the European Pillar of Social Rights9 ; whereas, at the high-level conference held in Brussels on 23 January 2017, following the public consultation on this issue, the President of the Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, reiterated that such measures should be adopted by all Member States; __________________ 9 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions launching a consultation on a European Pillar of Social Rights (COM(2016)0127) – Annex 1.
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas, according to Eurostat, in 2015 the employment rate of EU citizens of age 20-64 stood at 70.1% and was far from the EU 2020 strategy goal set for 75%;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital P a (new)
Pa. whereas the Council Conclusions on the 2017 Annual Growth Survey and the Joint Employment Report adopted by the EPSCO Council on the 3rd March 20171a call on Member States to ensure that social protection systems provide adequate income support and that reforms should continue to focus, amongst others, on providing adequate income support and high quality activation and enabling services; __________________ 1a6885/17 "The 2017 Annual Growth Survey and Joint Employment Report: Political guidance on employment and social policies - Council Conclusions (3 March 2017)" and 6887/17 "JOINT EMPLOYMENT REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION AND THE COUNCIL accompanying the Communication from the Commission on the Annual Growth Survey 2017 (3 March 2017)"
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 163 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Recalls that one of the main goals of the Europe 2020 strategy is reducing poverty and social exclusion by at least 20 million people and that still more efforts are needed to reach that goal; believes that minimum income schemes can be a helpful way to reach this objective;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Stresses that the best way to fight poverty and social exclusion are decent jobs; recalls in this context the importance to boost growth, investment and job creation;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 266 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Draws attention to the fact that despithe recent gradual economic slowdown, with risingrevival, some Member States still suffer from ever-lasting high unemployment and fewer job opportunities, what puts many people at risk of poverty and, social exclusion, and that this is particularly acute in some Member States that suffer from high rates of unemployment or long- term inactivity;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2016/2245(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
G a. whereas proper infrastructure and access to public services and high-quality jobs are important factors influencing the decision whether or not to stay in a particular area;
2017/07/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 211 #

2016/2245(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Invites the Commission to consider the establishment of new criteria, such as depopulation trends or the direction of internal migration, that could pinpoint the territories facing demographic challenges; considers that GDP and population density areis not a sufficient indicators in this regard;
2017/07/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 49 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the new forms of employment that are emerging are blurring the boundary between dependent employment and self-employment9 , leading to a decline in the quality of employment and the rise of bogus self- employmentwill require greater flexibility while at the same time ensuring employment security and job quality; __________________ 9 ILO report of 2016 on Building a social pillar for European convergence.
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas increases in employment rates mask the insufficient and socially inadequate response to the economic crisis, promoting precarious forms of employment such as zero-hour contracts, bogus self-employment and involuntaryafter the economic crisis marked rise in temporary and part-time jobcontracts, which do not provide workers with either a decent living or full labour rightscreate greater risk of precariousness than standard employment;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Understands standard employment to mean full-time, or part-time regular employment on the basis of open-ended contracts, and non- standard or atypical forms of employment to include, i.a., marginal and involuntary part-time work, temporary agency work, fixed-term contract work, zero-hour contracts, internships that are not part of an education programme, and informal or undeclared work;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that numerous factors, such as digitalisation, are contributing to a radical transformation of work, with an increase in non-standard forms of employment trends that will intensify unless new regulation is put into place; calls on the Commission and the Member States to closely monitor those changes and to ensure that work being transformed through digitalisation, and new employment being created as a result of it, is decent;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2016/2148(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Highlights the European added value of ETC, which should be reflected in an increased level of appropriations for this cohesion policy objective, to be introduced as soon as practicable; underlines the need to preserve this instrument as one of the core elements of the cohesion policy after 2020;
2016/09/19
Committee: REGI
Amendment 207 #

2016/2148(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Underlines that the concept of results orientation requires that Interreg programmes ensure high-quality project- level cooperation and the adaptation of evaluation methods and criteria to take into account the specific nature of each programme; calls on the Commission, the Member States and the managing authorities to work together and exchange information and good practices in order to ensure that results orientation is implemented and targeted as effectively as possible, considering ETC specificities;
2016/09/19
Committee: REGI
Amendment 208 #

2016/2148(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 b (new)
30b. Stresses the potential of using financial instruments in Interreg programmes that, through complementing grants, help to support SMEs and develop research and innovation, by increasing investment, creating new jobs, allowing better results to be achieved and boosting the effectiveness of projects;
2016/09/19
Committee: REGI
Amendment 209 #

2016/2148(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 c (new)
30c. Deplores the low public awareness and insufficient visibility of ETC programmes, and calls for more effective communication of the achievements of completed projects; calls on the Commission, the Member States and the managing authorities to establish mechanisms and broad institutionalised platforms for cooperation in order to ensure better visibility and awareness- raising; calls on the Commission to map the achievements of the ETC programmes and projects so far;
2016/09/19
Committee: REGI
Amendment 365 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises the need for renewed upward convergence in wages throughout the EU; cCalls on the Commission to actively support a wider coverage for collective bargaining; considers that to ensure decent living wages, minimum wages set at a decent level are necessary; recommends the establishment of national wage floors through legislation or collective bargaining, with the objective of attaining at least 60 % of the respective national average wage;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 541 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for a European framework forMember States to investigate the possibility of introducing minimum income schemes; highlights the importance of such schemes for maintaining human dignity as well as their role as a form of social investments enabling people to undertake training and/or look for work;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 594 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Considers child poverty to be a major issue on which Europe should 'act big'; calls for the swift implementation of a Child Guarantee in all Member States,the Recommendation on Investing in Children in all Member States and develop and introduce other necessary initiatives so that every child now living in poverty can have access to free healthcare, free education, free childcare, decent housing and proper nutrition;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 680 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 – introductory part
19. Is alarmed at the spread of precariousness arising from the excessive use of ‘atypical’ contractNotes that flexible forms of working arrangements allow workers to better balance their work and private life; underlines that any "atypical" form of contract shall not be abused and create precariousness; stresses the importance of ensuring sufficient institutional and budgetary capacities to provide adequate protection for people in non-standardall forms of employment; considers in particular that:
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 760 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – point b
b. there is a need for new legislative proposals on family leave schemes, including maternity leave, paternity leave, parental leave and carers’ leave,measures encouraging equal take-up of leave arrangements by men and women across all categories of workers in order to improve women's access to and position within the labour market and, strengthen the role of fathers in bringing up their children and to facilitate work-life balance;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1044 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Considers that the specific dynamics of economic adjustment within the euro area call for the development of two financial instruments, within the euro area’s fiscal capacity, that would be particularly relevant for the implementation of the EPSR: a. a fund for renewed structural convergence, supporting the implementation of socially just reforms and investments that are necessary for increasing the growth potential of crisis- affected areas and restoring upward social convergence, including implementation of the Youth Guarantee, Skills Guarantee and Child Guarantee; b. a European unemployment insurance scheme, complementing national schemes in cases of severe cyclical downturn and helping prevent the translation of an asymmetric shock into structural disadvantage;deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. CStresses that the EFSI should fulfil a supplementary and complementary function in relation to cohesion policy, which remains the EU’s main investment policy; calls for the EFSI to operate in closer conjunctionbetter synergy with the Structural Funds;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and the ECB to increase investment in projects in the most remote and outermost regions, which are particularly handicapped by underinvestment in job opportunities, resulting in unemployment, exclusion, and emigration;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Considers it disappointing that the Commission’s assessment of the EFSI has failed to record the number of jobs created to date under the Fund; calls on the Commission to present such an analysis, with particular emphasis on SMEs;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Requests that integrated ESIF- EFSI projects should be excluded from calculations of budgetary adjustments under the Stability and Growth Pact;deleted
2016/09/16
Committee: REGI
Amendment 50 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges that the implementation of the principle of equal pay for the same work andRecalls that in accordance with article 157 TFEU "Member States shall ensure that the principle of equal pay for male and female workers for equal work or for work of equal value is applied" and that this is crucial to reducinge pay and pension gaps and to eliminatinge the risk of poverty among women;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the fact that all people have the right to a decent public pension, and rRecalls that the Union recognises the entitlement to social security benefits and social services which provide protection in the event of old age or dependency;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Member States to increase minimum wages as an important tool forconcentrate their efforts on eliminating the pay gap between men and women, promoting equal opportunities, increasing women's participation in the labour market and improving reconciliation of work, family and private life in order to narrowing the pension gaps;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that the sustainability and security of pension schemes can be reinforced by diversifying saving sources and building a system that is based on public and private pillars and by complementing social security with tax contributions as well as introducing tax incentives;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 227 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on Member States to invest in affordable and accessible quality care for children and other dependents as a way to support women who often have a more disrupted career than men and more often take up care responsibilities in the family.
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 231 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Calls on the European Commission and on the Member states to run information campaigns and constantly improve pension literacy among women and men.
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 213 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Underlines the role of European research projects and SMEs in improving the access to medicines at the European level, highlights the role of Horizon 2020 programme in this respect.
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 433 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to promote open data in private research, especially where public funding is involved, and to establish conditions such as affordable pricing and non-exclusivity, or co- ownership of IP for projects funded by EU public grants such as Horizon 2020;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 501 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission to propose legislation on a European system for health technology assessment as soon as possible, and to assess added-value medicines compared with the best available alternative; also calls on the Commission to harmonise pricing procedure and reimbursement criteria to take into account the level of innovation and the social and economic cost-benefit analysis, and to put in place a European classification on the added value level of medicines;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 547 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on the Commission and the Council to explore in justified cases new measures to control prices, such as horizontal scanning and coordinating joint procurements;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 56 #

2016/2032(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that quick access to funding on favourable terms is crucial to SMEs’ development; points out, therefore, that the excessive length of time it currently takes for EU funding applications to be processed is forcing SMEs to seek other, more expensive, solutions or preventing their projects from coming to fruition, which is hampering their development; draws attention to the need for local or regional development agencies to give SMEs easier access to repayable instruments in the EU budget;
2016/04/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 32 #

2016/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Highlights the importance of the budget in promoting entrepreneurship initiatives including social entrepreneurship, innovative social enterprises and self-employment as well as the creation of start-ups for the development of SMEs;
2016/05/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2
— having regard to Articles 8, 10, 153(1)(i), 153(2) and 157 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
2016/06/14
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 9 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5
— having regard to the Commission proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Maternity Leave Directive (COM(2008)0637),deleted
2016/06/14
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 10 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6
— having regard to its position adopted at first reading on 20 October 2010 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2011/.../EU of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 92/85/EEC2 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding and on the introduction of measures to support workers in balancing work and family life3 , asking – among other things – for a two-week period of paternity leave, __________________ 2 3deleted OJ C 70 E, 8.3.2012, p. 163. OJ C 70E, 8.3.2012, p. 163.
2016/06/14
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 13 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8
— having regard to its resolution of 11 March22nd February 20156 on the European Semester for Economic Policy Coordination: Employment and Social Aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 20156,4 __________________ 4 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0068 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0059
2016/06/14
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 36 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas achieving a genuine work- life balance requires comprehensive and coherent policies including incentives and efficient measures for reconciling work, caring for and spending time with family, and time for leisure and personal development;
2016/06/14
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 55 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas reconciliation policies are to be considered as an improvement of the working environment, enabling good working conditions and, the wellbeing of workers and increasing the overall labour market participation;
2016/06/14
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 89 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas family-related types of leave are still oftenhappen to be grounds for discrimination and stigmatisation despite existing legislation;
2016/06/14
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 104 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas family-friendly policies are essential in order to better address the demographic challenges faced across the European Union and trigger positive demographic trends;
2016/06/14
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 110 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas access to childcare services for young children is one of the main factors influencing the participation of women in the labour market; whereas only 11 Member States have met the first Barcelona target (childcare available for at least 90 % of children between the ages of 3 and the mandatory school age) and only 10 Member States have achieved the second target (at least 33 % of children under three years)19 ; __________________ 19 Progress report on the Barcelona objectives of 29 May 2013 entitled ‘The development of childcare facilities for young children in Europe with a view to sustainable and inclusive growth’ (COM(2013)0322).
2016/06/14
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 139 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that reconciliation of professional, private and family life needs to be guaranteed as a fundamental right for all people in the spirit of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 143 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Highlights the importance of focusing on the lack of implementation of existing legislation in the Member States before considering the need to submit new legislative proposals in the field of gender equality, work-life balance and different types of leave, in accordance with the Commission's commitment for better regulation;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 151 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that the EU is facing unprecedented demographic challenges – an ageing population, low birth rates, changing family structures and migration; is concerned that austerity measures have had a negative impact on the sustainability of public finances needed forpositive measures and incentives should be aimed at addressing the need for sustainable family-friendly and work-life balance policies, and services thats well as fostering demographic renewal, well-being and sustainable development of EU citizens and society as a whole;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 174 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the Commission's approach to work-life balance policies as key in addressing socio-economic challenges; calls on the European Social Partners to come forward with an agreement on a comprehensive package of legislative and non-legislative measures regarding the reconciliation of professional, private and family life; calls on the Commission to putconsider putting forward a proposal for such a package in the context of the announced European pillar of social rights should it not be possible for an agreement between the social partners to be reached;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 185 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to put in place policies that acknowledgeacknowledge, in relevant policies, the increasing diversity of family relationships and parenting arrangements, in particular to guarantee that a child is not discriminated against because of its parents' marital status or family constitution;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 246 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the Commission to adopt a post-2015 Gender Equality Strategy and to implement it through the European Semester, including the Annual Growth Survey and the country-specific recommendations;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 276 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Strongly regrets that the Commission withdrew the revision of the Maternity Leave Directive and calls as a matter of urgency for it to return with an ambitious proposal; calls on the Commission andcalls on the Member States to ensure that women are paid for the duration of maternity leave; stresses that maternity leave must be accompanied by effective measures protecting the rights of pregnant and new mothers, reflecting the recommendations of the World Health Organisation21; __________________ 21 http://www.who.int/topics/breastfeeding/en /
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 295 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to publish an implementation report on the Parental Leave Directive and urges it to use the review clause to extend the minimum duration of paid leave from four to at least six months;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 304 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Believes that promoting the individualisationrole of fathe right to leave as well as the role of fathersrs and their take up of parental leave is essential to achieving gender-balanced reconciliation of work and private life;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 315 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – introductory part
15. UrgesCalls on the Commission to bring forward proposals of initiatives on:
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 320 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – point 1
(1) a paternity leave directive with a minimum of a two-week fully paid leave;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 331 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – point 2
(2) a carers’ leave directive which supplements the provision of professional care, enables care for dependants and offers the carer adequate remuneration and social protection;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 340 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Member States to introduce ‘care credits’ for both women and men as equivalent periods forrecognise the value of the unpaid work of caretakers in building up pension rights in order to protect those taking a break from employment to provide informal care to a dependant;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 349 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. UrgesCalls on the Member States to invcreate possibilitiest in and ensureing the availability of and universal access to affordable and high- quality early childhood education and care, elderly and dependant care by, for example, increasing public expenditure on care services and incentivising employer contributions to care costs, including by making better use of EU funds, and calls for the MFF revision to be used to invest in social infrastructure and elderly and dependant care, including by making better use of EU funds;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 364 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls for the introduction of targets on care for elderly and other dependants, with monitoring tools within the European Semester; calls on Eurostat and Eurofound to collect relevant data and to carry out studies;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 374 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to establishMember States to work towards the raise of qualitative standards for all care services;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 392 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Underlines the potential of "smart working" for reconciling work and family life, especially for parents returning or entering the labour market after the maternity or parental leave;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 410 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Considers that excessive working hours have a great influence for the workers ability for self-development and lifelong learning and therefore encourages the Commission and the Member States to promote the advantages of increasing skills of the workers through the lifelong learning among the employers;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 414 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Points out that excessive working hours and insufficient rest periods, as well as the disproportionate output required, are major factors in increased levels of occupational accidents and diseases; calls on the Commission to initiate infringement proceedings against Member States who are failing to implement the Working Time Directive;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 415 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Points out that excessive working hours and insufficient rest periods, as well as the disproportionate output required, are major factors in increased levels of occupational accidents and diseases; calls on the Commission to initiate infringement proceedings against Member States who are failing to implement the Working Time Directive;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 441 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Points to the need for specific proposals making for better balance in terms of working, family, and personal life by encouraging men and women to share occupational, family, and social responsibilities more evenly, especially where assistance to dependants and childcare are concerned;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 451 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Underlines the importance of lifelong learning for adjusting workers to ever-changing working conditions, for self-development and to counteract professional burnout; encourages the Commission and Member States to promote lifelong learning;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 456 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Member States and social partners to develop and put in place policies for educational and training leave and to make learning outside work accessible to workers in disadvantaged situations, while respecting the principle of subsidiarity;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 73 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) It is necessary to guarantee legal certainty by clarifying that aAccess to social security benefits for economically inactive mobile citizens in the host Member State, may be made conditional upon that citizen holding a legal right of residence in that Member State in accordance with Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.33 For these purposes, an economically inactive citizen should be clearly distinguished from a jobseeker whose right of residence is conferred directly by Article 45 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. __________________ 33only to the extend settled by existing case law C-133/13 Dano, C-67/14 Alimanovic and C-299/14 Garcia-Nieto. OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 77.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure clarity regarding the terminology in EU law, the term “posting” should only be used for the posting of workers within the meaning of Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services.34 In addition, to achieve consistency in treatment between employed and self-employed persons it is necessary that the special rules for the determination of applicable legislation in the cases of workers who are temporarily posted or sent to another Member State should apply consistently to both employed and self-employed persons. __________________ 34 OJ L 018, 21.01.1997 p. 1.deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) In the area of unemployment benefits, the rules on the aggregation of periods of insurance should be applied uniformly by all Member States. With the exception of cross-border workers referred to in Article 65(2), the rules on the aggregation of periods for the purpose of conferring entitlement to unemployment benefits should be subject to the condition that an insured person has most recently completed at least three months of insurance in that Member State. The previously competent Member State should become competent for all insured persons who do not satisfy this condition. In this case, registration with the employment services of the Member State of most recent insurance should have the same effect as registration with the employment services of the Member State, where the unemployed person had been previously insuredone day of insurance in that Member State.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 127 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Family benefits intended to replace or grant additional income during child- raising periods are designed to meet the individual and personal needs of the parent subject to the legislation of the competent Member State and therefore are distinguishable from other family benefits as they are intended to compensate a parent for loss of income or salary during time spent raising a child rather than solely meeting general family expenses.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5 – addition
2. In Recital 5, after “the different national legislation for the persons concerned” the following wording is inserted: , subject to the conditions as regards the access to certain social security benefits by economically inactive mobile EU citizens in the host Member State set out in Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.40 __________________ 40 OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 77deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 161 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5
(2a) Recital 5 is replaced by the following: (5) It is necessary, within the framework of such coordination, to guarantee within the CommunityUnion equality of treatment under theacross different national legislationaw for the persons concerned.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5a
(5a) The Court of Justice has held that Member States are entitled to make the access of economically inactive citizens in the host Member State to social security benefits, which do not constitute social assistance within the meaning of Directive 2004/38/EC subject to a legal right of residence within the meaning of that Directive. The verification of the legal right of residence should be carried out in accordance with the requirement of Directive 2004/38/EC. For these purposes, an economically inactive citizen should be clearly distinguished from a jobseeker whose right of residence is conferred directly by Article 45 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. In order to improve legal clarity for citizens and institutions, a codification of this case law is necessary.deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5b
(5b) Member States should ensure that economically inactive EU mobile citizens are not prevented from satisfying the condition of having comprehensive sickness insurance cover in the host Member State, as laid down in Directive 2004/38/EC. This may entail allowing such citizens to contribute in a proportionate manner to a scheme for sickness coverage in the Member State in which they habitually reside.deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5c
(5c) Notwithstanding the limitations on the right to equal treatment for economically inactive persons, that arise from the Directive 2004/38/EC or otherwise by virtue of Union law, nothing within this Regulation should restrict the fundamental rights recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably the right to human dignity (Article 1), the right to life (Article 2) and the right to healthcare (Article 35).deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 24
(24) LIn line with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, long-term care benefits for insured persons and members of their families need to be coordinated according to specific rules which, in principle,should, in principle, continue to be coordinated following the rules applicable to sickness benefits, in line with the case law of the Co. However, those rules should take into account the specific naturte of Justicelong- term care benefits. It is also necessary to provide for specific provisions in case of overlapping of long-term care benefits in kind and in cash.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 184 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 35a
(35a) Family benefits in cash intended to replace income or grant additional during a periods of child- raising are individual rights which are personal to the parent subject to the legislation of the competent Member State. Given the specific nature of these family benefits, such benefits should be listed in Part I of Annex XIII to this Regulation and should be exclusively reserved to the parent concerned. The Member State with secondary competence may elect that the rules of priority in the case of overlapping of rights to family benefits under the legislation of the competent Member State and under the legislation of the Member State of residence of members of the family should not apply to such benefits. Where a Member State chooses to disapply the priority rules it must do so consistently in respect of all entitled persons in an analogous situation and be listed in Part II of Annex XIII. (Article 1- paragraph 6)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 207 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point c
(a) In Point (c) the term “Title III, Chapters 1 and 3” is replaced by the term “Title III, Chapters 1, 1a and 3”.is replaced by the following: “(c) ‘insured person’, in relation to the social security branches covered by Title III, Chapters 1 and 3, means any person satisfying the conditions required under the legislation of the Member State competent under Title II to have the right to benefits for at least one of the risks covered by the Chapter which has to be applied, in accordance with this Regulation.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 211 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point i – point 1 – point ii
(b) In Ppoint (i)(1)(ii) after the term “Title III, Chapter 1 on sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits” the term “and Chapter 1a on long-term care benefits” is inserted., point (ii) is replaced by the following: "(ii) with regard to benefits in kind pursuant to Title III, Chapter 1 any person defined or recognised as a member of the family or designated as a member of the household by the legislation of the Member State in which he/she resides;”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point va – point i
(c) In Point (va)(i) after the term “, point (i) is replaced by the following: “(i) for the purposes of Title III, Chapter 1, with regard to (sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits),” the term “and Chapter 1a (long-term care benefits)” is inserted and the last sentence is deleted., (sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits), benefits in kind provided for under the legislation of a Member State which are intended to supply, make available, pay directly or reimburse the cost of medical care and products and services ancillary to that care. This includes long-term care benefits in kind within the meaning of point (vb) of this point.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 220 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point d
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point vb
(vb) “long-term care benefit” means any benefit in kind, cash or a combination of both for persons who, over an extended period of time, on account of old-age, disability, illness or or in cash, the purpose of which is to address the care needs of a person who, on account of impairment, require considerables assistance from another person or persons to carry out essential daily activities, including of daily living for an extended period of time in order to support this/heir personal autonomy; this includes benefits granted to or forfor the same purpose to the person providing such assistance;
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 224 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) sickness benefits; (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)9a. In Article 3(1), point (a) is replaced by the following: “(a) sickness and long-term care benefits;” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 227 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point ba
10. In Article 3(1), the following point is inserted after point (b): ‘(ba) long-term care benefits;’deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 239 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. A Member State may require that the access of an economically inactive person residing in that Member State to its social security benefits be subject to the conditions of having a right to legal residence as set out in Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.44. __________________ 44deleted OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 77.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 243 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 11 – paragraph 2
(a) In pParagraph 2 the term “sickness benefits in cash covering treatment for an unis replaced by the following: “2. For the purposes of this Title, persons receiving cash benefits because or as a consequence of their activity as an employed or self-employed person shall be considered to be pursuing the said activity. This shall not apply to invalimdited period” is replaced by the term “y, old age or survivors’ pensions or to pensions in respect of accidents at work or occupational diseases or to long-term care benefits in cash”. paid to the person in need of care.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 258 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. A person who pursues an activity as an employed person in a Member State on behalf of an employer which normally carries out its activities there and who is posted within the meaning of Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services46 or sent by that employer to another Member State to perform work on that employer’s behalf, shall continue to be subject to the legislation of the first Member State, provided that the anticipated duration of such work does not exceed 24 months and that the person is not posted or sent to replace another employed or self-employed person previously posted or sent within the meaning of this Article. __________________ 46 OJ L 018, 21.01.1997 p. 1person sent previously by this employer within the meaning of this Article.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 278 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. A person who normally pursues an activity as a self-employed person in a Member State who goes to pursue a similar activity in another Member State shall continue to be subject to the legislation of the first Member State, provided that the anticipated duration of such activity does not exceed 24 months and that the person is not replacing another posted employed or self-employed person..
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 283 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Where an employed person covered by paragraph 1 does not complete the task or activity foreseen in the contract and is replaced by the same employer by another sent person to complete the work, the person replacing the previously sent person shall continue to be subject to the legislation of the Member State from which he/ she is sent provided that the total duration of work of that person does not exceed 24 months.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 286 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. After the end of a posting as referred to in paragraph 1, the employed person concerned shall not be posted by the same undertaking to the same Member State until two months after the end of the previous posting. In exceptional circumstances, an undertaking may apply to the competent authority for a derogation from the first subparagraph.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 302 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Title III – Chapter 1 – title
Sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits 14a. In Title III, the title of Chapter 1 is replaced by the following: “Sickness, long-term care, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits” Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883R(01)&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 306 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 c (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 19
14 c. Article 19 is replaced by the following: “Article 19 Stay outside the competent Member State 1. Unless otherwise provided for by paragraph 2, an insured person and the members of his or her family staying in a Member State other than the competent Member State shall be entitled to the benefits in kind which become necessary on medical grounds or due to the need for long-term care during their stay, taking into account the nature of the benefits and the expected length of the stay. These benefits shall be provided on behalf of the competent institution by the institution of the place of stay, in accordance with the provisions of the legislation it applies, as though the persons concerned were insured under the said legislation.< 2. The Administrative Commission shall establish a list of benefits in kind which, in order to be provided during a stay in another Member State, require for practical reasons a prior agreement between the person concerned and the institution providing the care. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)benefit.” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 308 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 d (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 20 – title
14d. In Article 20, the title is replaced by the following: “Travel with the purpose of receiving benefits in kind - Authorisation to receive appropriate treatment and long-term care outside the Member State of residence (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 310 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 e (new)
14e. In Article 20, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: “2. An insured person who is authorised by the competent institution to go to another Member State with the purpose of receiving the treatment or long- term care appropriate to his or her condition shall receive the benefits in kind provided, on behalf of the competent institution, by the institution of the place of stay, in accordance with the provisions of the legislation it applies, as though he or she were insured under the said legislation. The authorisation shall be accorded where the treatment or long-term care in question is among the benefits provided for by the legislation in the Member State where the person concerned resides and where he or she cannot be given such treatment within a time- limit which is medically justifiable, taking into account his or her current state of health and the probable course of his illness. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)or her illness or within a time limit which is justifiable, taking into account his or her current state of need of long-term care and the probable course of his or her need of long-term care.” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 311 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 g (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 25
14g. Article 25 is replaced by the following: “Article 25 Pensions under the legislation of one or more Member States other than the Member State of residence, where there is a right to benefits in kind in the latter Member State Where the person receiving a pension or pensions under the legislation of one or more Member States resides in a Member State under whose legislation the right to receive benefits in kind is not subject to conditions of insurance, or of activity as an employed or self-employed person, and no pension is received from that Member State, the cost of benefits in kind provided to him/her and to members of his/her family shall be borne by the Institution of one of the Member States competent in respect of his/her pensions determined in accordance with Article 24(2), to the extent that the pensioner and the members of his/her Family would be entitled to such benefits if they resided in that Member State. ” Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883R(01)&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 313 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 i (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 27 – title
14i. In Article 27, the title is replaced by the following: “Stay of the pensioner or the members of his family in a Member State other than the Member State in which they reside – Stay in the competent Member State – Authorisation for appropriate treatment or long-term care outside the Member State of residence (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 314 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 j (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 27 – paragraph 2
14j. In Article 27, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: “3. Article 20 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a pensioner and/or the members of his family who are staying in a Member State other than the one in which they reside with the purpose of receiving there the treatment or long-term care appropriate to their condition. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 316 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 l (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. A frontier worker who retires4l. In Article 28(1), the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: “1. A frontier worker who retires because of old-age or invalidity is entitled in casethe event of sickness or the need for long-term care to continue to receive benefits in kind in the Member State where he/she last pursued his or her activity as an employed or self-employed person, in so far as this is a continuation of treatment or long-term care which began in that Member State. The term" "continuation of treatment" means the continued investigation, diagnosis and treatment of an illness for its entire duration. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)The term "continuation of long-term care" means the continued granting of long-term care benefits in kind due to the need of care which was established before retirement and which continues beyond that date.” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 321 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 m (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 30
14m. Article 30 is replaced by the following: “Article 30 Contributions by pensioners 1. The institution of a Member State which is responsible under the legislation it applies for making deductions in respect of contributions for sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity and long-term care benefits, may request and recover such deductions, calculated in accordance with the legislation it applies, only to the extent that the cost of the benefits pursuant to Articles 23 to 26 is to be borne by an institution of the said Member State. 2. Where, in the cases referred to in Article 25, the acquisition of sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity and long-term care benefits is subject to the payment of contributions or similar payments under the legislation of a Member State in which the pensioner concerned resides, these contributions shall not be payable by virtue of such residence. ” Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883R(01)&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 327 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – point a – point i
(i) rights available on the basis of an activity as an employed or self-employed person of the insured person, including rights existing in the application of Article 11(2) or (3)(c);
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 329 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 33 a (new)
15a. The following article is inserted: “Article 33a Long-term care benefits 1. The Administrative Commission shall draw up a detailed list of long-term care benefits which meet the criteria laid down in point (vi) of Article 1, specifying which are benefits in kind and which are benefits in cash, and whether the benefit is provided to the person in need of care or to the person providing such care. 2. Where a long-term care benefit falling under this Chapter also has the characteristics of benefits coordinated under another Chapter in Title III, Member States may, by way of derogation from paragraph 1, coordinate such benefits in accordance with the rules laid down in that other Chapter, specifying which Chapter applies, provided that: (a) the outcome of such coordination is at least as favourable to the beneficiaries as it would have been had the benefit been coordinated as a long- term care benefit under this Chapter; and (b) the long-term care benefit is listed in Annex XY. 3. With regard to benefits listed in Annex XII, Article 34(1) and (3) shall apply mutatis mutandis.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 332 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 34
16. Article 34 is deleted.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 337 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 34 – paragraph 1
1. If a recipient of long-term care benefits in cash, which have to be treated as sickness benefits and are therefore provided by the Member State competent for cash benefits6a. In Article 34, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: “1. If a recipient of long-term care benefits in cash, which is provided under Articles 21 or 29, is, at the same time and under this Chapter, entitled to claim benefits in kind intended for the same purpose from the institution of the place of residence or stay in another Member State, and an institution in the first Member State is also required to reimburse the cost of theose benefits in kind under Article 35, the general provision on prevention of overlapping of benefits laid down in Article 10 shall be applicable, with the following restriction only: if the person concerned claims and receives the benefit in kind, the amount of the benefit in cash shall be reduced by the amount of the benefit in kind which is or could be claimed from the institution of the first Member State required to reimburse the cost. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 339 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 34 – paragraph 2
(http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)16b. In Article 34, paragraph 2 is deleted. Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 341 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 34 – paragraph 3 c (new)
(http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)16c. In Article 34, the following paragraph is added: “3a. The Member State in which the institution responsible for meeting the cost of benefits in kind is situated shall be responsible for providing long-term care benefits in cash.” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 342 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Chapter 1 a
17. After Article 35, the following Chapter is inserted: ‘CHAPTER 1a Long-term care benefits Article 35a General provisions 1. Without prejudice to the specific provisions of this Chapter, Articles 17 to 32 shall apply mutatis mutandis to long- term care benefits. 2. shall draw up a detailed list of long-term care benefits which meet the criteria contained in Article 1 (vb) of this Regulation, specifying which are benefits in kind and which are benefits in cash. 3. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may grant long-term care benefits in cash in accordance with the other Chapters of Title III, if the benefit and the specific conditions to which the benefit is subject are listed in Annex XII and provided that the outcome of such coordination is at least as favourable for the beneficiaries as if the benefit was coordinated under this Chapter. Article 35b Overlapping of long-term care benefits 1. benefits in cash granted under the legislation of the competent Member State receives, at the same time and under this Chapter, long-term care benefits in kind from the institution of the place of residence or stay in another Member State, and an institution in the first Member State is also required to reimburse the cost of these benefits in kind under Article 35c, the general provision on prevention of overlapping of benefits laid down in Article 10deleted The Administrative Commission If a recipient of long-term care Two or more Member States, or Article 35 shall be applicable, with the following restriction only: the amount of the benefit in cash shall be reduced by the reimbursable amount for the benefit in kind which is claimable under Article 35c from the institution of the first Member State. 2. their competent authorities, may agree on other or supplementary measures which shall not be less favourable for the persons concerned than the principles laid down in paragraph 1. Article 35c Reimbursement between institutions 1. mutandis to long-term care benefits. 2. State where the competent institution under this Chapter is situated does not provide for long-term care benefits in kind, the institution which is or would be competent in that Member State under Chapter 1 for the reimbursement of sickness benefits in kind granted in another Member State shall be deemed to be the competent one also under Chapter 1a.. ’y mutatis If the legislation of a Member
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 351 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 61
19. Article 61 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 61 Special rules on aggregation of periods of insurance, employment or self- employment 1. Article 65(2), the application of Article 6 shall be conditional on the person concerned having most recently completed a period of at least three months of insurance, employment, or self- employment in accordance with the legislation under which the benefits are claimed. 2. not satisfy the conditions for the aggregation of periods in accordance with paragraph 1 because the total duration of his or her most recently completed periods of insurance, employment or self- employment in that Member State is less than three months that person shall be entitled to unemployment benefits in accordance with the legislation of the Member State where he or she had previously completed such periods under the conditions and subject to the limitations laid down in Article 64a. ’deleted Except in the cases referred to in Where an unemployed person does
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 356 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 61 – paragraph 1
1. Except in the cases referred to in Article 65(2), the application of Article 6 shall beThe competent institution of a Member State whose legislation makes the acquisition, retention, recovery or duration of the right to benefits conditional upon the person concerned having most recently completed a period of at least three monthcompletion of either periods of insurance, employment or self- employment shall, to the extent necessary, take into account periods of insurance, employment, or self- employment in accordance with the legislation under which the benefits are claimed. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)completed under the legislation of any other Member State as though they were completed under the legislation it applies. However, where, under the applicable legislation, the right to benefits is conditional on the completion of periods of insurance, the periods completed under the legislation of another Member State shall be taken into account only if those periods would qualify for the purposes of establishing entitlement to unemployment benefits in the Member State under whose legislation they were completed. Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 360 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 61 – paragraph 1
1. Except in the cases referred to in Article 65(2), the application of Article 6 shall be conditional on the person concerned having most recently completed a period of at least three monthsone day of insurance, employment, or self- employment in accordance with the legislation under which the benefits are claimed.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 367 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 61 – paragraph 2
2. Where an unemployed person does not satisfy the conditions for the aggregation of periods in accordance with paragraph 1 because the total duration of his or her most recently completed periods of insurance, employment or self- employmentExcept in the cases referred to in Article 65(5)(a), the application of paragraph 1 of this Article shall be conditional on the person concerned having the most recently completed, in accordance with the legislation under which the benefits are claimed: – periods of insurance of at least one day, inf that Member State is less than three months that person shall be entitled to unemployment benefits in accordance with the legislation of the Member State where he or she had previously completed such periods under the conditions and subject to the limitations laid down in Article 64a. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)legislation requires periods of insurance, – periods of employment of at least one day, if that legislation requires periods of employment, or – periods of self-employment of at least one day, if that legislation requires periods of self-employment. Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 405 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 64a
21. After Article 64, the following Article 64a shall be inserted: ‘Article 64a Special rules for unemployed persons who moved to another Member State without fulfilling the conditions of Article 61(1) and Article 64 In the situations referred to in Article 61(2), the Member State to whose legislation the unemployed person was previously subject shall become competent to provide unemployment benefits. They shall be provided at the expense of the competent institution for the period laid down in Article 64(1)(c), if the unemployed person makes himself/herself available to the employment services in the Member State of most recent insurance and adheres to the conditions laid down under the legislation of that Member State. Article 64 (2) to (4) shall apply mutatis mutandis. ’deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 449 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 68b – paragraph 1
1. Family benefits in cash which are intended to replace or grand additional income during periods of child-raising and which are listed in Part 1 of Annex XIII shall be awarded solely to the person subject to the legislation of the competent Member State and there shall be no derived right for his or her family members to such benefits. Article 68a of this Regulation shall not apply to such benefits nor shall the competent institution be required to take into account a claim submitted by the other parent, a person treated as a parent or institution acting as guardian of the child or children pursuant to Article 60(1) of the Implementing Regulation. (Article 1- paragraph 23)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 512 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 1 – point 2 – point e a
(ea) ‘fraud’ means any intentional act or omission to act, in order to obtain or receive social security benefits or to avoid to pay social security contributions, contrary to the provisions of the basic Regulation and the implementing Regulation or the law of a Member State;.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 514 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point e b (new)
(eb) ‘error’ means unintentional wrong conduct or unintentional omission on the part of an institution or of a person falling within the scope of the basic Regulation and the implementing Regulation;
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 515 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 2 – paragraph 5
5. When a person's rights or obligations to which the basic and implementing Regulations apply have been established or determined, the competent institution may request the institution in the Member State of residence or stay to providetransmit personal data about that person. within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. The request and any response shall concern information which enables the competent Member State to identify any inaccuracyconsistencies in the facts on which a document or a decision determining the rights and obligations of a person under the basic or implementing Regulation is based. The request can also be madetransmitted where there is no existing doubt about the validity or accuracy of the information contained in the document or on which the decision is based in a particular case, but the information shall be required in accordance with the legislation applicable to the competent institution. The request for information and any response must be necessary and proportionate.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 522 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Documents issued by the institution of a Member State and showing the position of a person for the purposes of the application of the basic Regulation and of the implementing Regulation, and supporting evidence on the basis of which the documents have been issued, shall be accepted by the institutions of the other Member States for as long as they have not been withdrawn or declared to be invalid by the Member State in which they were issued. Such documents shall only be valid ifWhere not all sections indicated as compulsory are filled in, the receiving institution shall without delay notify the issuing institution, which should take the appropriate action.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 525 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Where there is doubt about the validity of a document or the accuracy of the facts on which they are based, the institution of the Member State that receives the document shall ask the issuing institution for the necessary clarification and, where appropriate, the withdrawal of that document, clearly stating the grounds and presenting all the supporting evidence of doubt.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 526 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) When receiving such a request, the issuing institution shall reconsider the grounds for issuing the document and, if necessary, withdraw it or rectify it, within 25 working day shall inform the competent institutions of the Member States concerned of the result within three months from the receipt of the request. Upon detection of an irrefutable case of fraud committed by the applicant of the document, the issuing institutionrmination that the applicable law was incorrectly certified, the certificate shall be withdrawn or rectify the document immediately and with retroactive effectied, whereby the legislation applicable in the issuing Member State shall be complied with. This shall also be applied to previous periods.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 527 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5– paragraph 2 – point a
(a) When receiving such aa reasoned request, the issuing institution shall reconsider the grounds for issuing the document and, if necessary, withdraw it or rectify it, within 25 working days from the receipt of the request. Upon detection of an irrefutable case of fraud committed by the applicant of the document, the issuing institution shall withdraw or rectify the document immediately and with retroactive effect.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 532 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5– paragraph 2 – point b
(b) If the issuing institution, having reconsidered the grounds for issuing the document is unable todoes not detect any error it shall forward to the requesting institution all supporting evidence within 25 working days from the receipt of the request. In urgent cases, where the reasons for urgency have been clearly indicatedproven in the request, thise validity of the document shall be dconefirmed within two working days from the receipt of the request, notwithstanding that the issuing institution may not have completed its deliberations pursuant to subparagraph (a) above.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 535 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) 987/2009
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) Where the requesting institution having received the supporting evidence continues to have doubts about the validity of a document or the accuracy of the facts on which the particulars contained therein are based that the information upon which the document was issued is not correct, it may submit evidence to that effect and make a further request for clarification and where appropriate the withdrawal of that document by the issuing institution in accordance within the procedure and timeframes set out above.and the requesting institution and the issuing institution are not able to come to an agreement, they shall make use of the dialogue and conciliation procedure set out in Decision No A11a. . __________________ 1a. Decision No A2 of 12 June 2009 concerning the interpretation of Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the legislation applicable to posted workers and self-employed workers temporarily working outside the competent State (OJ C 106, 24.4.2010, p. 5).
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 539 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5– paragraph 2 – point c a new
(ca) Forwarding the supporting evidence shall not lead to disclosure of company's secrets or violate the protection of personal data.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 553 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. For the purposes of the application of Article 12(1) of the basic Regulation, a ‘person who pursues an activity as an employed person in a Member State on behalf of an employer which normally carries out its activities there and who is posted within the meaning of the Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services52 or sent by that employer to another Member State’ shall include a person who is recruited with a view to being posted or sent to another Member State, provided that immediately before the start of his employment, the person concerned is already subject to the legislation of the sending Member State in accordance with Title II of the basic Regulation.. __________________ 52OJ L 018 , 21.01.1997 p. 1.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 561 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Once a person has been sent in accordance with Article 12(1) of the basic Regulation or pursues an activity as a self-employed person in another Member State in accordance with Article 12(2) of the basic Regulation for a total of 24 months, either continuously or with interruptions of not longer than two months, no new period under Article 12(1) or (2) for the same employed or self- employed person in the same Member State shall start until at least two months have elapsed from the end of the previous period. Undertakings may derogate from the first subparagraph in specific circumstances.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 570 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 14 – paragraph 5a
5a. For the purpose of the application of Title II of the basic Regulation, ‘registered office or place of business’ shall refer to the registered office or place of business where the essential decisions of the undertaking are adopted and where the functions of its central administration are carried out, provided the undertaking performs a substantial activity in that Member State. Otherwise, it shall be deemed to be situated in the Member State where the centre of interest of activities of the undertaking determined in accordance with the criteria laid down in paragraphs 9 and 10 is located.. In determining the location of the "registered office or place of business" the following factors shall be taken into account in an overall assessment: (a) the place of residence of the main directors; (b) the places where general meetings are held; (c) the place where administrative and accounting documents are kept; (d) the place where financial and particularly transactions mainly take place; (e) the habitual nature of the activity pursued. The determination shall be carried out in the framework of an overall assessment giving due eight to each of the criteria mentioned above.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 575 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 14 – paragraph 12
12. If a person who resides outside the territory of the Union pursues his activities as an employed or self-employed person in two or more Member States and if this person, by virtue of the national legislation of one of those Member States, is subject to the legislation of that State, the provisions of the basic Regulation and the implementing Regulation on the determination of the applicable legislation shall apply mutatis mutandis subject to the proviso that his or her residence shall be deemed to be in the Member State where the registered office or place of business of the undertaking or his or her employer or the centre of interest of his or her activities as self-employed person is located..
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 582 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. If that institution determines that the legislation of another Member State applies, it shall do so provisionally and shall without delay inform the institution of the Member State which it considers to be competent of this provisional decision. The decision shall become definitive within two months after the institution designated by the competent authorities of the Member State concerned has been informed of it, unless the latter institution informs the first institution and the persons and the employers concerned that it cannot yet accept the provisional determination or that it takes a different view on this.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 587 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 19 – paragraph 2
10a. In Article 19, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: "2. At the request of the person concerned or of the employer, the competent institution of the Member State whose legislation is applicable pursuant to Title II of the basic Regulation shall provide an attestation that such legislation is applicable and shall indicate, where appropriate, until what date and under what conditions. As of 1 July 2019, at the latest, such an attestation shall be made solely in the form of the Structured Electronic Document referred to in point (d) of Article 1(2) of the implementing Regulation and using the Electronic Exchange of Social Security Information — EESSI referred to in the third subparagraph of Article 95(1) of the implementing Regulation. Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?qid=1515592051048&uri=CELEX:02009R0987-20170411)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 594 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 20a – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt implementing acts specifying the procedure to be followed in order to ensure uniform conditions for the application of Articles 12 and 13 of the basic Regulation. Those acts shall establish a standard procedure includingfor the issuing institution with regard to time limits for:
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 611 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 24 – paragraph 3
15. In Article 24(3), the term "and 26" is replaced by ", 26 and 35a".deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 616 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 25 – paragraph 1
15a. In Article 25, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. For the purposes of the application of Article 19 of the basic Regulation, the insured person shall present to the health care or long-term care provider in the Member State of stay a document issued by the competent institution indicating his entitlement to benefits in kind. If the insured person does not have such a document, the institution of the place of stay, upon request or if otherwise necessary, shall contact the competent institution in order to obtain one. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 619 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 25 – paragraph 3
15b. In Article 25, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: "3. The benefits in kind referred to in Article 19(1) of the basic Regulation shall refer to the benefits in kind which are provided in the Member State of stay, in accordance with its legislation, and which become necessary on medical grounds or due to the need for long-term care with a view to preventing an insured person from being forced to return, before the end of the planned duration of stay, to the competent Member State to obtain the necessary treatment. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 621 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 c (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 26
15c. Article 26 is replaced by the following: "Article 26 Scheduled treatment A. Authorisation procedure 1. For the purposes of the application of Article 20(1) of the basic Regulation, the insured person shall present a document issued by the competent institution to the institution of the place of stay. For the purposes of this Article, the competent institution shall mean the institution which bears the cost of the scheduled treatment or long-term care; in the cases referred to in Article 20(4) and 27(5) of the basic Regulation, in which the benefits in kind provided in the Member State of residence are reimbursed on the basis of fixed amounts, the competent institution shall mean the institution of the place of residence. 2. If an insured person does not reside in the competent Member State, he shall request authorisation from the institution of the place of residence, which shall forward it to the competent institution without delay. In that event, the institution of the place of residence shall certify in a statement whether the conditions set out in the second sentence of Article 20(2) of the basic Regulation are met in the Member State of residence. The competent institution may refuse to grant the requested authorisation only if, in accordance with the assessment of the institution of the place of residence, the conditions set out in the second sentence of Article 20(2) of the basic Regulation are not met in the Member State of residence of the insured person, or if the same treatment or long-term care can be provided in the competent Member State itself, within a time-limit which is medically justifiable, taking into account the current state of healthneed of long-term care and the probable course of illnessneed of long- term care of the person concerned. The competent institution shall inform the institution of the place of residence of its decision. In the absence of a reply within the deadlines set by its national legislation, the authorisation shall be considered to have been granted by the competent institution. 3. If an insured person who does not reside in the competent Member State is in need of urgent vitally necessary treatment, and the authorisation cannot be refused in accordance with the second sentence of Article 20(2) of the basic Regulation, the authorisation shall be granted by the institution of the place of residence on behalf of the competent institution, which shall be immediately informed by the institution of the place of residence. The competent institution shall accept the findings and the treatment options of the doctors approved by the institution of the place of residence that issues the authorisation, concerning the need for urgent vitally necessary treatment. 4. At any time during the procedure granting the authorisation, the competent institution shall retain the right to have the insured person examined by a doctor of its own choice or, in the case of the need for long-term care, by a doctor or another expert of its own choice in the Member State of stay or residence. 5. The institution of the place of stay shall, without prejudice to any decision regarding authorisation, inform the competent institution if it appears medically appropriate to supplement the treatment covered by the existing authorisation. B. Meeting the cost of benefits in kind incurred by the insured persor appropriate taking into account the current state of need for long-term care to supplement the treatment or long-term care covered by the existing authorisation. B. Meeting the cost of benefits in kind incurred by the insured person 6. Without prejudice to paragraph 7, Article 25(4) and (5) of the implementing Regulation shall apply mutatis mutandis. 7. If the insured person has actually borne all or part of the costs for the authorised medical treatment or long-term care him or herself and the costs which the competent institution is obliged to reimburse to the institution of the place of stay or to the insured person according to paragraph 6 (actual cost) are lower than the costs which it would have had to assume for the same treatment or long-term care in the competent Member State (notional cost), the competent institution shall reimburse, upon request, the cost of treatment or long-term care incurred by the insured person up to the amount by which the notional cost exceeds the actual cost. The reimbursed sum may not, however, exceed the costs actually incurred by the insured person and may take account of the amount which the insured person would have had to pay if the treatment or long-term care had been delivered in the competent Member State. C. Meeting the costs of travel and stay as part of scheduled treatment or long-term care 8. Where the national legislation of the competent institution provides for the reimbursement of the costs of travel and stay which are inseparable from the treatment or long-term care of the insured person, such costs for the person concerned and, if necessary, for a person who must accompany him/her, shall be assumed by this institution when an authorisation is granted in the case of treatment or long- term care in another Member State. D. Family members 9. Paragraphs 1 to 8 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the members of the family of the insured persons. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 623 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 28 – paragraph 1
16. In Article 28(1), after the term "pursuant to Article 21(1) of the basic Regulation", the following term is added "in accordance with Article 35a thereof".deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 626 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 31 – title and paragraphs 1 and 2
17. Article 31 is amended as follows: (c) following title: ‘Application of Article 35b of the basic Regulation; ’ (d) 34" is replaced by "Article 35b"; (e)deleted The title is replaced by the In paragraph (2)1, the term "Article 34(2)" is replaced by "Article 35a (2)".
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 632 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 32 – paragraph 1
17a. In Article 32, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. When a person or a group of persons are exempted upon request from compulsory sickness or long-term care insurance and such persons are thus not covered by a sickness insurance scheme to which the basic Regulation applies, the institution of another Member State shall not, solely because of this exemption, become responsible for bearing the costs of benefits in kind or in cash provided to such persons or to a member of their family under Title III, Chapter I, of the basic Regulation. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 637 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 55 – paragraph 7
21. In paragraph 7 of Article 55, the term “Article 65a(3)” is replaced by “Article 64a and Article 65a(3)”deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 640 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 55a
22. The following Article 55a is inserted after Article 55: ‘Article 55a Obligation of employment service of the Member State of most recent insurance In the situation referred to in Article 61(2) of the basic Regulation, the institution of the Member State of most recent insurance shall immediately send a document to the competent institution of the Member State of previous insurance containing: the date on which the person concerned had become unemployed, the period of insurance, employment or self- employment completed under its legislation, the relevant circumstances of the unemployment likely to affect entitlement to benefits, the date of registration as unemployed person and their address.. ’deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 646 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 24
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Title VI – Chapter I – title
24. Chapter 1 of Title IV is renamed as follows: ‘CHAPTER I Reimbursement of the cost of benefits in application of Article 35, 35c and Article 41 of the basic Regulation’deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 648 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 65 – paragraph 1
1. The annual average cost per person in each age group for a specific year shall be notified to the Audit Board at the latest by the end of the second year following the year in question, with sickness and long- term care benefits in kind indicated separately.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 649 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 66 – paragraph 2
26a. In Article 66, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: "2. The reimbursements between the institutions of the Member States, provided for in Articles 35 and 41 of the basic Regulation, shall be made via the liaison body. There may be a separate liaison body for reimbursements under Articles 35 and Article 41 of the basic Regulation. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- Mutual claims shall be off-set between the liaison bodies. The Administrative Commission shall establish detailed arrangements for such off-setting. " Or. en 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 650 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26 b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 67 – paragraph 1
26b. In Article 67, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. Claims based on actual expenditure shall be introduced to the liaison body of the debtor Member State within 12 months of the end of the calendar half-year during which those claims were recorded in the accounts of the creditor institution. Claims shall be met, where possible, within one month, and in any event within six months, of the claim. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 651 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26 c (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 67 – paragraph 3
3. In the case referred to in Article 6(5) second subparagraph of the implementing Regulation, the deadline set out in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article shall not start before the competent institution has been identified. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987-26c. In Article 67, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: "3. The period referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not commence until the date on which the creditor institution becomes aware of the claim of the debtor institution. Claims may be introduced for benefit periods of no more than the previous five calendar years. The introduction of claims to the liaison body of the debtor Member State shall be decisive.” Or. en 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 652 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26 e (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 67 – paragraph 5
26e. In Article 67, paragraph 5 is replaced by the following: "5. The claims shall be paid to the liaison body of the creditor Member State referred to in Article 66 of the implementing Regulation by the debtor institution within 18 months of the end of the month during which they were introduced to the liaison body of the debtor Member State. This does not apply to the claims which the debtor institution has rejected for a relevant reason within that period. The liaison body of the creditor Member State shall reply to such a rejection within 12 months of the end of the month during which the rejection was received. In the absence of such a reply, the rejection shall be deemed to be accepted. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 654 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26 f (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 67 – paragraph 7
26f. In Article 67, paragraph 7 is replaced by the following: "7. The Audit Board shall facilitate the final closing of accounts in cases where a settlement cannot be reached within the period set out in paragraph 6, and, upon a reasoned request by one of the parties, shall give its opinion on a dispute within sixnine months following the month in which the matter was referred to it. The Audit Board shall receive the request no later than nine months after expiry of the period set out in paragraph 6. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 656 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26 g (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 68 – paragraph 2
26g. In Article 68, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: "2. The interest shall be calculated on the basis of the reference rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations plus eight percentage points. The reference rate applicable shall be that in force on the first day of the month on which the payment is due. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32009R0987)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 660 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 73 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
In case of a retroactive change of the applicable legislation including situations referred to in Article 6(4) and (5) of the implementing Regulation, at the latest threesix months after the applicable legislation has been determined or the institution responsible for paying the benefits has been identified, the institution which unduly paid cash benefits shall draw up a statement of the amount paid and shall send it to the institution identified as being competent for the purpose of their reimbursement.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 661 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 73 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
If the amount of unduly paid contributions exceeds the amount the legal and/or natural person owes to the institution identified as being competent, the institution which unduly received contributions shall reimburse the amount in excess to the legal and/or natural person concerned. in accordance with national law.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 662 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 73 – paragraph 4
4. The existence of time limits and application procedures under national legislation shall not be a valid ground for the refusal of the settlement of claims between institutions under this Article.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 682 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 85 a – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. By agreement between the applicant party and the requested party and in accordance with the arrangements laid down by the requested party resulting from existing national law or practice, officials authorised by the applicant party may, with a view to promoting mutual assistance provided for in this Section:
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 685 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 39 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 86
39a. Article 86 is replaced by the following: "Article 86 Review clause 1. No later than the fourth full calendarwo years after the entry into force of the implementing Regulationexpiry of the transitional period referred to in Article 95, the Administrative Commission shall present a comparative report on the time limits set out in Article 67(2), (5) and (6) of the implementing Regulation. On the basis of this report, the European Commission may, as appropriate, submit proposals to review these time limits with the aim of reducing them in a significant way. 2. No later than the date referred to in paragraph 1, the Administrative Commission shall also assess the rules for conversion of periods set out in Article 13 with a view to simplifying those rules, if possible. 3. Administrative Commission shall present a report specifically assessing the application of Chapters I and III of Title IV ofThe report shall include a review of when settlement on the basis of fixed amounts, as referred to in Section 2 of Chapter I of Title IV, can be deleted. On the basis of this report, the Commission may, as appropriate, submit proposals to shorten those timplementing Regulation, in particular with regard to the procedures and time limits referred to in Article 67(2), (5) and (6) of the implementing Regulation and to the recovery procedures referred to in Articles 75 to 85 of the implementing Regulation. In the light of this report, the European Commission may, if necessary, submit appropriate proposals to make these procedures more efficient and balanced. e limits as well as a proposal to delete Section 2 of Chapter I of Title IV. " No later than 1 May 2015, the Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 687 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 40 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 87 – paragraph 6
However, if the institution which was requested to carry out the check also uses the findings for the granting of benefits on its own account to the person concerned under the legislation it applies, it shall not claim the expenses referred to in the previous sentence..
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 696 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 7 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Annex XIII a (new)
7a. The following annex is added: “Annex XIIIa Long-term care benefits in cash provided in derogation from Article 33a(a) of Chapter I (Article 33a(2))”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Due to their potential to increase the efficiency of the EFSI intervention, blending operations combining non- reimbursable forms of support and/or financial instruments from the Union budget, such as those available under the Connecting Europe Facility, and financing from EIB Group, including EIB financing under the EFSI, as well as other investors should be encouraged. Blending aims to enhance the value added of Union spending by attracting additional resources from private investors and to ensure the actions supported become economically and financially viable. However it is crucial that EFSI will not replace or crowd out the grants and its additionality will be maintained.
2017/01/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 46 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The potential of EFSI in upturning the labour markets and creating sustainable jobs should be made more evident, as it is the case in the Cohesion Policy, and the relevant reliable data should be gathered and analysed.
2017/01/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 72 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The EIB and the EIF should ensure that the final beneficiaries, including SMEs, are informed of the existence of EFSI support, so as to enhance the visibility of the EU guarantee granted under Regulation (EU) 2015/1017 and to encourage preparation of investment projects in broad sectorial and geographical coverage.
2017/01/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 77 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The European Investment Advisory Hub (EIAH) should be enhanced and its activities should focus on needs not covered adequately under current arrangements. It should pay particular attention to supporting the preparation of projects involving two or more Member States and projects that contribute to achieving the objectives of COP21 and the Europe 2020 strategy, including tackling poverty and social exclusion. Notwithstanding its objective to build upon existing advisory services of the EIB and the Commission, so to act as a single technical advisory hub for project financing within the Union, the EIAH should also contribute actively to the objective of sectorial and geographical diversification of the EFSI and support the EIB where needed in originating projects. It should also actively contribute to the establishment of investment platforms and provide advice on the combination of other sources of Union funding with the EFSI.
2017/01/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 80 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point -a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i
(-a) Article 4(2) point (i) is replaced by the following: (i) the establishment of the EFSI as a distinct, clearly identifiable, with its own logo, and transparent facility and as a separate account managed by the EIB, the operations of which are clearly distinguished from other operations of the EIB;
2017/02/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point -a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
(-a) Article 7(3) is replaced by the following: 3. The Steering Board shall comprise four members: three appointed by the Commission, one from ECFIN and the other two, alternating, from relevant DGs, and one by the EIB. The Steering Board shall elect a Chairperson from among its members for a fixed term of three years, renewable once. The Steering Board shall take its decisions by consensus.
2017/02/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – introductory part
(a) Paragraph 8 is amended as follows: (-i) In third paragraph second sentence is replaced by the following: The Steering Board shall strive to select experts altogether having mix of experience in investment in all of the following fields:
2017/01/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 94 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 7 - paragraph 12
Decisions approving the use of the EU guarantee shall be public and accessible, and include the rationale for the decision, with particular focus on compliance with the Union policies, including the objective of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, quality job creation and economic, social and territorial cohesion and with the additionality criterion. The publication shall not contain commercially sensitive information. In reaching its decision, the Investment Committee shall be supported by the documentation provided by the EIB.;
2017/01/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 117 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b – point i
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 14 - paragraph 2 - point c
(c) leveraging local knowledge and supporting capacity building to facilitate EFSI support across the Union and contributing where possible to the objective of sectorial and geographical diversification of the EFSI referred to in Section 8 of Annex II by supporting the EIB to originate operations;;
2017/01/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 42 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Citation 4
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee5, and the counter- opinion; _________________ 5 OJ C,, p..
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Citation 4 a (new)
Having regard to the reasoned opinions issued by national parliaments from 11 Member States objecting the Commission proposal on the grounds of subsidiarity;
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) The free movement of workers, freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services are fundamental principles of the internal market in the Union enshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The implementation of those principles is further developed by the Union aimed at enhancing social cohesion among Member States and guaranteeing a level playing field for businesses and respect for the rights of workers.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) The freedom to provide services includes the right of undertakings to provide services in another Member State, to which they may post their own workers temporarily in order to provide those services there. The Treaty provides that restrictions on the freedom to provide services are prohibited.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Almost twenty years after its adoption, it is necessary to assess whetherenforce the rules and confirm that the Posting of Workers Directive still strikes the right balance between the need to promote the freedom to provide services and the need to protect the rights of posted workers.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) The Rome I Regulation clarifies also the situation of posted workers as it provides that the country where the work is habitually carried out shall not be deemed to have changed if he is temporarily employed in another country.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) In view of the long duration of certain posting assignments, it is necessary to provide that, in case of posting lasting for periods higher than 24 months, the host Member State is deemed to be the country in which the work is carried out. In accordance with the principle of Rome I Regulation, the law of the host Member Sates therefore applies to the employment contract of such posted workers if no other choice of law was made by the parties. In case a different choice was made, it cannot, however, have the result of depriving the employee of the protection afforded to him by provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement under the law of the host Member State. This should apply from the start of the posting assignment whenever it is envisaged for more than 24 months and from the first day subsequent to the 24 months when it effectively exceeds this duration, unless two Member States concerned agree on derogation. This rule does not affect the right of undertakings posting workers to the territory of another Member State to invoke the freedom to provide services in circumstances also where the posting exceeds 24 months. The purpose is merely to create legal certainty in the application of the Rome I Regulation to a specific situation, without amending that Regulation in any way. The employee will in particular enjoy the protection and benefits pursuant to the Rome I RegulationIn order to take into account characteristics of various sectors, the 24 months should be calculated within the reference period of 36 months. For the purpose of calculating the posting period the concept of "the same task at the same place" is also clearly defined and should be determined taking also into consideration the nature of the service provided and the work to be performed.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 139 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) It is settled case law that restrictions to the freedom to provide services are only admissible if justified by overriding reasons in theof public interest and must be proportionate and necessary. The overriding reasons relating to the public interest which have been acknowledged by the Court include the protection of workers and in particular the social protection of workers in the construction industry.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) Directive 2014/67/EU on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC provides a number of provisions to make sure that rules on posting of workers are enforced and are respected by all service providers. Article 4 of the enforcement directive provides a list of elements that should be assessed in order to identify the genuine posting and prevent abuse and circumvention.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Because of the highly mobile nature of work in international road transport, the implementation of the posting of workers directive raises particular legal questions and difficulties (especially where the link with the concerned Member State is insufficient). It would be most suitTherefore transport services such as transit, international transport and linked cabotage are excluded forom these challenges to scope of this Directive and should be addressed through sector-specific legislation together with other EU initiatives aimed at improving the functioning of the internal road transport market.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) The elements of remuneration under national law or universally applicable collective agreements should be clear and transparent to all service providers. It is therefore justified to impose on Member States the obligation to publish the constituent elements of remuneration on the single website provided for by Article 5 of the Enforcement Directive. The elements of remuneration under national law or universally applicable collective agreements should be clear, up to date and transparent to all service providers. It is therefore justified to impose on Member States the obligation to publish the constituent elements of remuneration on the single website provided for by Article 5 of the Enforcement Directive. In order to provide more transparency and clarity generally applicable collective agreements should be also accompanied by clear information on applicable elements of remuneration. Social partners are also obliged to make public all collective agreements, which are applicable according to this Directive. Similarly, foreign subcontractors should be informed in writing about terms and condition of employment including remuneration they should apply towards posted workers
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 219 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) The elements of remuneration under national law or universally applicable collective agreements should be clear and transparent to all service providers. It is therefore justified to impose on Member States the obligation to publish the constituent elements of remuneration on the single website provided for by Article 5 of the Enforcement Directive. It is important for each Member State to ensure that its website works properly and is updated on a regular basis. The Commission should ensure that the addresses of those websites and details of how frequently the sites are updated are available in one place.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) Laws, regulations, administrative provisions or collective agreements applicable in Member States may ensure that subcontracting does not confer on undertakings the possibility to avoid rules guaranteeing certain terms and conditions of employment covering remunerationMember States have the freedom to establish on their territory appropriate measures applicable to local and foreign service providers in order to ensure compliance with the applicable rules concerning posting in case of subcontracting chains. In the case of the construction sector Member States are obliged, by the Directive 2014/67/EU, to introduce appropriate liability measures in order to ensure fair competition and workers’ rights. WThere such rules on remuneration exist at national level, thefore laws, regulations, administrative provisions or universally applicable collective agreements applicable in Member States may apply them in a non- discriminatory mannensure that subcontracting does not confer ton undertakings posting workers to the possibilitsy territory provided that they do not disproportionately restrict the cross-border proviso avoid rules guaranteeing certain terms and conditions of servicesemployment.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 258 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 2
(–1) In Article 1, paragraph 2 is amended as follows: "2. This Directive shall not apply to merchant navy undertakings as regards seagoing personnel as well as transport services such as transit, international transport and linked cabotage."
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 301 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2a – paragraph 1
1. When the anticipated or the effective duration of posting of an individual worker exceeds twenty-four months, the Member State to whose territory a worker is posted shall be deemed to be the country in which his or her work is habitually carried out.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 307 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2a – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The duration of posting of an individual worker shall be calculated within a reference period of 36 months, with a possibility to refrain from the application of par.1 following an agreement between the two Member States concerned.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 322 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2a – paragraph 2
2. For the purpose of paragraph 1, in case of replacement of posted workerscalculating the effective duration of posting of an individual posted worker according to paragraph 1, in case of replacement of that individual posted worker by another worker performing the same task at the same place, the cumulative duration of the posting periods of the workers concerned shall be taken into account, with regard to workers that are posted for an effective duration of at least six months.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 323 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
2. For the purpose of paragraph 1, in case of replacement of posted workerscalculating the effective duration of posting of an individual posted worker according to paragraph 1, in case of replacement of that individual posted worker by another worker performing the same task at the same place, the cumulative duration of the posting periods of the workers concerned shall be taken into account, with regard to workers that are posted for an effective duration of at least six months.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 336 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
For the purpose of calculating the posting period the concept of "the same task at the same place" shall be understood as the very same working place (address) where the worker is posted to the same working position to perform the same task under agreement between the same service provider and the same service receiver.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 342 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2a – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. When a period of two months have elapsed from the date of expiry of the previous posting period, the calculation restarts.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 408 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of this Directive, remuneration means all minimum rates of pay and other elements of remuneration rendered mandatory by national law, regulation or administrative provision, collective agreements or arbitration awards which have been declared universally applicable and/or, in the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements or arbitration awards to be of universal application, other collective agreements or arbitration awards within the meaning of paragraph 8 second subparagraph, in the Member State to whose territory the worker is posted.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 416 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
For the purpose of calculating the remuneration double payment of other elements of equal or similar nature shall be avoided. In case of a conflict a suitable decision shall be taken jointly by competent authorities of the host and of the home member state.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 427 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Member States shall publish inensure that the single official national website referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU the constituent elements of remuneration in accordance with point (c). works properly and is updated on a regular basis and shall publish on that website the constituent elements of remuneration, and in the case of undertakings operating in the international transport sector, the elements of the minimum rate of pay, their territorial and personal scope and the method used to calculate them, in accordance with point (c). The Commission shall post on its website a list of the addresses of those official national websites, together with details of all updates made to them.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 430 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Member States shall specify in a transparent way different elements of remuneration applicable to their territory. They shall publish in the single official national website referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU the constituent elements of remuneration in accordance with point (c). In case of universally applicable collective agreements a separate clear information on the applicable remuneration shall be published.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 445 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 b (new)
Posted workers shall be entitled to the gross amount of remuneration which does not have to comply with all the mandatory elements but with the amount required.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 446 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 c (new)
Miscalculation of remuneration due to a posted worker resulting from wrong or insufficient information published in the single official national website or transmitted to subcontractors in written form shall not be sanctioned.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 453 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a
(b) The following paragraph is added: 1a. territory of a Member State are obliged by law, regulation, administrative provision or collective agreement, to sub-contract in the context of their contractual obligations only to undertakings that guarantee certain terms and conditions of employment covering remuneration,, the Member State may, on a non– discriminatory and proportionate basis, provide that such undertakings shall be under the same obligation regarding subcontracts with undertakings referred to in Article 1 (1) posting workers to its territory.deleted If undertakings established in the
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 463 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1a – subparagraph 1 a (new)
In case of subcontracting the national contractors shall be obliged to inform their subcontractors in writing about applicable terms and condition of employment including remuneration.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Regulation (EU) No 994/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 concerning measures to safeguard security of gas supplyExisting Union law, in particular the relevant elements of the Third Energy Package and Regulation (EU) No 994/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council has already had a significant positive impact on the Union situation as regards the security of the gas supply, both in terms of preparation and mitigation. Member States are better prepared to face a supply crisis now that they are required to draw up plans including preventive and emergency measures, and they are better protected now that they have to meet a number of obligations regarding infrastructure capacity and gas supply. However, the implementation report of Regulation (EU) No 994/2010 of October 2014 highlighted areas in which improvements to that Regulation could further bolster the Union supply security.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 65 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) An internal gas market that operates smoothly is the best guarantee of security of energy supply across the Union and to reduce the exposure of individual Member States to the harmful effects of supply disruptions. Where a Member State’s security of supply is threatened, there is a risk that measures developed unilaterally by that Member State may jeopardise the proper functioning of the internal gas market and damage the gas supply to customers in other Member States. To allow the internal gas market to function even in the face of a shortage of supply, provision must be made for solidarity and coordination in the response to supply crises, as regards both preventive action and the reaction to actual disruptions of supply, leading to integration of regions’ energy markets.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 66 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The Union should further diversify energy sources, suppliers and supply routes, as a precondition of energy security. However, the Union shall support, including through funding, only those diversification-oriented projects that are fully in line with Union law and principles as well as with the Union’s long-term policy objectives and priorities, as is the case with any other category of infrastructural projects.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 69 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) In a spirit of solidarity, regional cooperation, involving both public authorities and natural gas undertakings, should be the guiding principle of this Regulation, to identify the relevant risks in each region and optimise the benefits of coordinated measures to mitigate them and to implement the most cost-effective measures for Union consumers. Regional cooperation should gradually be complemented with a stronger Union perspective, allowing recourse to all available supplies and tools in the entire internal gas market. This could be facilitated by providing in-depth analysis at Union level on the relevant Emergency Supply Corridors, based on gas supply sources common for a group of Member States.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 115 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 1 – introductory part
(1) ‘protected customer’ means a household customer connected to a gas distribution network and, in addition, where the Member State concernedin the event that the competent authorities within each region so decides, may also mean one or more of the following:
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 120 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 2 a (new)
(2a) “Emergency Supply Corridors” is a concept which is complimentary to and reinforces the regional approach as referred to in Annex I, and which means EU gas supply routes identified to help Member States to better mitigate the effects of potential supply and/or infrastructure disruption.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 126 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 6
6. The measures to ensure the security of supply contained in the preventive action plans and in the emergency plans shall be clearly defined, transparent, proportionate, non-discriminatory and verifiable, shall not unduly distort competition and the effective functioning of the internal market in gas and shall not endanger the security of gas supply of other Member States or, regions ofr the Union as a whole.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 130 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
No later than 31 March 2017 Member Statesthe competent authorities within each region shall notify the Commission their definition of protected customers, the annualonsumers in that region, the annual and daily peak gas consumption volumes of the protected customers and the percentage they represent of the total annual final gas consumption in thatrespective Member States as well as how it could influence cross-border flows in the region. Where a Member State includes in its definition of protected customers the categories referred to in point (a) or (b) of Article 2 (1) it shall specify in the notification to the Commission the gas consumption volumes corresponding to consumers belonging to those categories and the percentage that each of those groups of consumers represents in terms of the annual final use of gas.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 138 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5
5. The risk assessment once agreed by all Member States in the region shall be notified to the Commission for the first time no later than on 1 September 2018. The risk assessment shall be updated every four years unless circumstances warrant more frequent updates. The risk assessment shall take account of progress made in investments needed to cope with the infrastructure standard defined in Article 4 and of country-specific difficulties encountered in the implementation of new alternative solutions. It shall also build on the experience acquired through the simulation of the emergency plans contained in Article 9 (2).If the competent authorities within a region do not agree on the risk assessment, the Commission shall present a risk assessment for that region in cooperation with the competent authorities.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 147 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
At the request of a competent authority, specific parts of the preventive action plan and the emergency plan may be excluded from publication. In that case, the competent authority concerned shall provide the Commission with a comprehensive summary of the plans to make them publicly available. The comprehensive summary shall contain at least all main elements of the plans in accordance with Annex V, in order to provide market players with sufficient information to comply with the requirements of this Regulation. The complete versions of the plans shall be available to competent authorities of other regions, the Commission and the Agency for Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER).
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 160 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Where there is concrete, serious and reliable information that an event may occur which is likely to result in a significant deterioration of the supply situation (early warning) in a third country, the Commission shall pursue external action in line with the set of priorities outlined by the Council Conclusions on Energy Diplomacy of 20 July 2015 in cooperation with the third countries by, inter alia, engaging in consultations, providing mediation services and deploying task forces, where necessary.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 161 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 a (new)
Article 10 a Emergency Supply Corridors By 1 November 2017, ENTSO for Gas shall perform the tasks set out in this paragraph. 1. It shall carry out a Union-wide simulation of supply and infrastructure disruption scenarios. The scenarios shall be defined by ENTSO for Gas in consultation with the Gas Coordination Group. The competent authorities shall provide ENTSO for Gas with the necessary data for the simulations such as daily peak demand values, domestic production capacity and demand side measures. It shall identify and asses Emergency Supply Corridors, complementary to the regional approach as referred to in Annex I, along which gas can flow between regions in order to prevent fragmentation of the internal gas market. The results of that assessment and the proposal of the Emergency Supply Corridors shall be discussed in the Gas Coordination Group. That Union-wide simulation and those Emergency Supply Corridors shall be updated every three years, unless circumstances warrant more frequent updates. 2. In the event of an emergency declared by one or more competent authorities, the Member States on the Emergency Supply Corridors shall ensure that all essential information is provided as regards the gas supply, in particular, available gas quantities, possible modalities and sources for gas channelling to the Member States having declared the emergency. Member States on the Emergency Supply Corridor shall ensure that no measures prevent the supply of gas to the Member States that have declared the emergency. 3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 18 to establish the Emergency Supply Corridors.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 165 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The first subparagraph shall apply to essential social services and district heating installations to the extent they are covered by the definition of protected customers in the respective Member Stateregion.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 166 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. If the Member States concerned are unable to agree on the circumstances warranting the resumption of supply to customers other than households, essential social services and district heating installations, the Commission shall, after consulting the Gas Coordination Group, and in accordance with Article 10(1), present the assessment of the supply standard in the Member States which declared the emergency crisis level.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 170 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) to the competent authority and to the Commission immediately after their conclusion or modification the gas supply contracts with the same supplier from a third country or from its affiliates, with a duration of more than 1 year concluded or modified after [OP: Please insert the date of entry in force of this Regulation] that individually or cumulatively with other contracts with the same supplier or its affiliates provide more than 40% of yearly natural gas consumption incontracts of other natural gas undertakings on the same market with the same supplier or its affiliates exceed the threshold of 8 billion cubic meters or provide more than 40% of total annual gas imports from third countries to the Member State concerned. The notification obligation shall not apply to the modifications related only to the gas price. The notification obligation shall also apply to all commercial agreements relevant for the execution of the gas supply contract. To that end, the national regulatory authorities shall monitor on a yearly basis the market supply structure and inform the relevant natural gas undertakings once the 40% threshold is exceeded. This information shall be communicated no later than the 1st June each year for the year proceeding the year for which the threshold was calculated.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 172 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. The Commission shall take into account the information received under this article in the preparation of a list of good practices as well as abusive clauses for reference of competent authorities and national undertakings.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 5 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that one of the main objectives of the European Union is to promote economic, social and territorial cohesion and solidarity among Member States; underlines that cohesion policy set out for the long term is the Union's main investment policy and a tool for reducing disparities between all EU regions, and that it plays an important role in the delivery of the Europe 2020 strategy;
2016/04/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 8 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the need for increasing the effectiveness and result-orientation of cohesion policy and welcomes the fact that some mechanisms have already been introduced; recalls that European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds are at an early stage of implementation in 2016 and that at the time of the MFF review/revision only limited evidence is available as to results; nevertheless underlines that the existing evidence should be used to the most possible extend during the debate;
2016/04/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 9 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that synergies and coordination between all five European Structural and Investment Funds, especially between ESF and ERDF, and other EU instruments have the potential to enhance their effectiveness, and shall be further developed;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the need to further improved synergies and coordination among the five European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) and other EU instruments, which is an important element in ensuring the effectiveness of the EU budget;
2016/04/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 35 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates its firm position on the importance of simplifying access to ESI Funds, and supports in this context the work of the Commission's High Level Group in monitoring simplification for beneficiaries and invites Member States and the Commission to introduce relevant simplification proposals of the High Level Group already in the current programming period;
2016/04/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 72 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes that the discussion on the next programming period has already started and underlines in this context the importance of maintaining the role of cohesion policy after year 2020 as the main EU investment policy with adequate level of funding;
2016/04/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 21 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 34 a (new)
- - Having regard to the Commission's Recommendation on the active inclusion of people excluded from the labour market (October 2008),
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 34 b (new)
- - Having regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 34 c (new)
- - Having regard to the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities' Concluding Observations on the initial report of the European Union (September 2015),
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas one of the five Europe 2020 targets aims at reducing by at least 20 million the number of people in or at risk of poverty and social exclusion; whereas almost 123 million people in the EU are in this situation; whereas in 2013 26.5 million children in the EU28 were at risk of falling into poverty or social exclusion; whereas in 2012 32.2 million persons with disabilities over 16 years are in this situation;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 279 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the need to promote sustainable growth leading to the creation of more and better jobs and tangible prospects for all, young people in particular, in order to respond to the internal and external challenges facing the EU;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 296 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Points out that enterprises in the social economy, including social services face as many difficulties as traditional enterprises in obtaining public or private financing; underlines the need to give them more support, especially as regards access to the different forms of financing, such as European funds; calls on the Commission to support investment into the social economy;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 312 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Points out that investment priorities must be oriented to infrastructurale and human capital development projects where these are clearly needed in order to ensure social fairness or enhance sustainable growth; calls on the Commission to require both a prior presentation of the expected social and economic outcomes of any EU-funded investment project and its subsequent monitoring and evaluation;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 377 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Points out to the Member States, in view of the ageing of Europe's citizens, the social risk implied in not being able to guarantee the sustainability and effectiveness of social security systems over the coming decades;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 418 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Welcomes the fact that the Commission has clearly distinguished a European and a national phase with regard to the European Semester; stresses the need for closer coordination between the European institutions in the design, implementation and evaluation of the European strategy for growth; calls on the Commission to establish a clear agenda in this respect, also involving the social partners and civil society and the national parliaments;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2015/2284(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that, while the thematic scope and fields of intervention of ESI funds (in particular ESF) and EGF are often similar, the latter has been created to react quickly to situations which may arise, while the structural and investment funds have a multiannual programming cycle; underlines the need to strengthen synergy between them, so that the ESI funds shall act as follow up measures in the EGF areas of support by stimulating investment, overall growth and job creation;
2016/01/21
Committee: REGI
Amendment 14 #

2015/2284(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Calls the Commission to consider raising level of maximum support from EGF from 60% to 85% in regions, where the overall level of unemployment is significantly higher than the country average;
2016/01/21
Committee: REGI
Amendment 33 #

2015/2284(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. NoteRegrets that the average rate of self- employment in all cases of support by the EGF is as low as 5 % of the overall re- employment rate; recalls in this regard the need to use support from the ESI Funds in such a way as to enhance the positive perception and the potential of self- employment, entrepreneurship and business creation.
2016/01/21
Committee: REGI
Amendment 71 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that while the thematic scope and fields of intervention of ESI funds (in particular ESF) and EGF are often similar, and that the latter has been created to react quickly to arisen situation, while the structural and investment funds have a multiannual cycle of planning, underlines in this context the need to strengthen synergy between them and that the ESI funds shall act as a follow up measures in the EGF areas of support;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Regrets that the level of self- employment among the re-employed workers is low; calls the Commission and Member States to make efforts to promote the potential of entrepreneurship and self- employment to the beneficiaries;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2015/2282(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Encourages the Member States and regional authorities to make full use of the financial instrument opportunities; emphasises the need to ensure the transparency, accountability and scrutiny of such financial instruments; calls for simplified access to credit, taking into account the particular characteristics of startups and micro-enterprises;
2016/03/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 77 #

2015/2282(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the fact that the Commission is paying increased attention to good governance and high-quality public services; recalls the importance for SMEs to have a transparent, consistent and innovative public procurement set-up; stresses the need to continue with the strict application of anti-error and anti-fraud measures without adding to the administrative burdenremove excessive administrative burdens and prevent the creation of additional requirements at national level, given that these are one of the main causes of error;
2016/03/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 125 #

2015/2282(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Asks the High Level Group on Simplification to draw attention to the need for SMEs to reduce the administrative burden and simplify procedures in the management of ESI Funds, with particular focus on auditing requirements;
2016/03/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 11 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas European Territorial Cooperation is an integral part of cohesion policy, as it strengthens the territorial cohesion of the European Union;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 19 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas there is a need for a joint reflection on the potential design principles for Interreg VI (structure of European Territorial Cooperation post-2020);
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 21 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for greater respect for Article 174 TFEU on territorial cohesion, in particular in rural areas, with attention duly paid to the important relationship between cohesion policy and rural development, in particular as regards areas affected by industrial transition, and regions that suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, northernmost regions with low population density, and island, cross-border and mountain regions; recommends that consideration be given as well to other demographic challenges that have a major impact on regions, such as depopulation, an ageing population and highly dispersed populations; asks the Commission to pay particular attention to the most geographically and demographically disadvantaged areas when implementing cohesion policy; Notes that ETC has become one of the two goals of cohesion policy 2014-2020, with its own regulation; underlines, however, that the ETC budget of EUR 10.1 billion, representing a mere 2.8 % of the cohesion policy budget, does not match the great challenges that ETC has to meet; is convinced that an increased budget for ETC in the next programming period will boost the added value of cohesion policy;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 22 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that ETC has become one of the two equally important goals of cohesion policy 2014-2020, with its own regulation; underlines, however, that the ETC budget of EUR 10.1 billion, representing a mere 2.8 % of the cohesion policy budget, does not match the great challenges that ETC has to meet;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 40 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Is convinced that ETC offers a significant European added value, supporting peace, stability and regional integration in the framework of enlargement and neighbourhood policy, as well as across the world by dissemination of best practices;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 47 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines that the concept of results orientation requires that ETCInterreg programmes ensure high-quality project- level cooperation and the adoapt a new typeation of evaluation; calls on the Commission, the Member States and the managing authorities to undertake assessments and issue guidelines as to how methods and criteria to take into account the specific nature of each programme; calls on the Commission, the Member States and the managing authorities to work together and exchange information and good practices in order to ensure that results orientation can be betteris implemented and targeted as effectively as possible, considering ETC specificities;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 49 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes with concern the late adoption of ETCInterreg programmes, and urges the Commission and the Member States to mobilise their efforts for their efficient and successful implementation;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 57 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Deplores the lack of reliable cross- border data and evidence on the effectiveness of cross-border integration with regard to reporting on performance framework; calls, accordingly, on the Commission, Eurostat and the managing authorities to jointly coordinate and set out methodologies for the provision and us, use and exchange of reliable data;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 67 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Regrets that Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI) and Community-Led Local Development (CLLD) are not widely implemented in the ETCInterreg programmes for 2014-2020, and encourages Member States to make greater use of them;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 88 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Notes the important role that ETCInterreg programmes play in enhancing the competitiveness and innovation potential of regions, by fostering synergies between smart specialisation strategies, collaboration between clusters and development of innovation networks;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 90 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Notes the important role that ETC programmes play in enhancing the competitiveness and innovation potential of regions, by fostering synergies between smart specialisation strategies, collaboration between clusters and development of innovation networks; asks the Commission to come forward with a comprehensive overview of the territorial cooperation in the ERDF and ESF on the basis of the Common Strategic Framework, an annex to the Common Provisions Regulation;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 102 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Stresses thate potential of using financial instruments need to be ain iIntegral part of ETCrreg programmes that, through complementing grants with a view, help to supporting SMEs, and develop research and innovation, by increasing investment, creating new jobs, allowing better results to be achieved and boosting the effectiveness of projects;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 106 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Notes the roleRecalls that the Sixth Cohesion Report has paid insufficient attention to European Territorial Cooperation, given that this is a fully-fledged cohesion policy objective since the 2007-2013 programming period; recalls the potential of the European Groupings for of Territorial Cooperation (EGTCs) not only as an instrument for managing cross-border governance, but also as a means of contributing to a comprehensively integrated territorial development; Notes the role of the European Groupings for Territorial Cooperation in supporting and promoting European territorial cooperation, and points out the flexibility that they offer as a platform for multilevel governance;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 111 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative of carrying out, by the end of 2016, an analysis of the barriers to cross-border cooperation that will look at solutions and examples of good practices; asks the Commission to include in this analysis a study on border regions' needs;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 118 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Considers that ETCInterreg programmes may, in complementarity with other appropriate funding, support responses to migration- related challenges within the framework of their existing intervention logic;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 126 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Underlines that during the programming period 2007-2013 the possible complementarities between the ETCInterreg programmes and other EU-funded programmes were not sufficiently assessed; calls for the setting-up of appropriate coordination mechanisms to ensure effective coordination, complementarity and synergy between the ESI Funds and other Community and national funding instruments, as well as with the EFSI and EIB;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 129 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Underlines that during the programming period 2007-2013 the possible complementarities between the ETC programmes and other EU-funded programmes were not sufficiently assessed; calls for the setting-up of appropriate coordination mechanisms to ensure effective coordination, complementarity and synergy between the ESI Funds and other Community and national funding instruments, such as Horizon 2020, as well as with the EFSI and EIB;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 133 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make full use of the opportunities provided by the ETCInterreg programmes to facilitate cross-border labour mobility, by adjusting, if necessary, the administrative and social regulatory framework;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 140 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Is convinced that the multi-level governance principle and code of conduct are particularly significant for the development of ETCInterreg programmes;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 141 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Stresses that, irrespective of the existence of a separate regulation for ETC, the implementation of territorial cooperation programmes remains too coshould be further simplicatfied, and calls on the High Level Group on Simplification1 to consider measures for simplification and reducing the administrative burden on beneficiaries; __________________ 1 High Level Group of Independent Experts on Monitoring Simplification for Beneficiaries of ESI Funds.
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 143 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Calls on the Commission to propose specific actions to simplify the rules on reporting, auditing and state aid and to harmonise procedures; urges drawing up standard requirements for all ETCInterreg programmes on a strand-by-strand basis;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 148 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 a (new)
36a. Stresses that all simplifications of growth and jobs programmes must also apply to Interreg programmes;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 158 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
38. Considers that the basic cooperation philosophy and current structure of ETC, including compliance with the lead beneficiary principle, should be maintained, as well as the emphasis on the cross-border component; stresses that there should be a fair distribution of funds under ETCInterreg programmes, on the basis notaking into account territorial specificities, and that conly of population size but also of a set of harmonised criteria, considering territorial specificitiessideration should be given to whether the cooperation philosophy on which the ETC is based could be applied to other multinational programmes supported at EU level ;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 159 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38a. Stresses the importance of cross- border cooperation at the external borders of the EU under the Instrument for Pre- Accession Assistance and the European Neighbourhood Instrument; calls on the Member States to ensure that good practices, that allow the administrative burden for beneficiaries of Interreg programmes to be reduced, can also be applied to programmes implemented at the external borders of the EU;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 171 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
40. Calls on the Commission to strengthen and further develop the role of financial instruments to complement grants,; considers it essential to working more closely with the EIB;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 172 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. Calls on the Commission, the Member States and the managing authorities to consider the proposal by the Luxembourg Presidency for the creation of a new legal instrument for cohesion policy post-2020, following the results of the ex post evaluations, the implementation of the 2014-2020 programmes and an appropriate impact assessmentthat could have a positive impact on cohesion policy post-2020;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 173 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
42. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to initiate in 2016 a structured multi-stakeholder debate at EU level on the future of ETC post-2020, with a view to preparing the post-2020 cohesion policy; stresses that the debate should, first and foremost, cover matters related to the structure of ETC, the procedure for the allocation of programme budgets and work on new mechanisms to ensure wider application of the concept of results orientation;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 178 #

2015/2280(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
43. Deplores the low public awareness and insufficient visibility of ETC programmes, and calls for more effective communication of the achievements of completed projects; calls on the Commission, the Member States and the managing authorities to establish mechanisms and broad institutionalised platforms for cooperation in order to ensure better visibility and awareness-raising; calls on the Commission to map the achievements of the ETC programmes and projects so far;
2016/04/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 100 #

2015/2278(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Stresses the importance of tailoring education and research to the real needs of the market in an effort to make sure that new innovations meet demand and lead to economic growth;
2016/02/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 79 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
C a. having regard to the fact that there is no legal definition of social dumping which may create confusion and stigmatise cases of legal competitiveness based on lower labour costs;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
C b. whereas undefined terms in the EU acts favour arbitrary interpretation which may lead to different national solutions, aimed at fighting the abuses but contrary to fundamental freedoms of the single market.
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C c (new)
Cc. having regard to the balance between social and economic rights stipulated in the Treaty and confirmed by the European Court of Justice in its several judgements (Laval und Partneri (C- 341/05), Rüffert (C-346/06), Luxembourg (C-319/06), proving that the exercise of certain rights constituting a restriction to the basic freedoms of movement cannot always be justified with regard to the objective of protecting workers.
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 254 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Takes the view that the competent authorities should be able to suspend the provision of services in cases of serious breaches of legislation on postings; considers that the amount of the fines should exceed employees' contribution that endangers the life or health of workers;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 455 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls for the creation of a European transport agency bringing together existing agencies; takes the view that at the very least a specific roadon a stronger cooperation of the national transport agency is neededies;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the centrality of agriculture to social cohesion owing to its role in sustainable economic growth and diversification, and in fixliving populationsconditions and social development in rural areas; stresses the need to strengthen the CAP budget and to ensure social fairness in its implementation;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recognises the role of family and independent crofts in employment creation and developing entrepreneurship in rural areas and stresses the fact that such farms shall have equal to large farms access to CAP support;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets the strongUnderlines that market orientation of the EU's agricultural policies and its negative effect on rural incomes and employment, as evidenced by the liberalisation of the dairy sector; condemns thshall in no case have negative impaeffect on agricultural labour of free trade agreements such as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnershiprural incomes and employment;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the introduction of social conditionality in the CAP’s first pillar;deleted
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for a stronger role for social partners in the development and implementation of common agricultural policy in order to create quality jobs, ensure adequate health and safety conditions and foster the social integration of rural workers, in particularcluding migrant workers;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that improving access to land through instruments such as public land banks is key to agricultural employment;deleted
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for the defence of the right to public services in rural areas against current neo-liberal policies; supports the development of minimum income schemesSupports the development of minimum income schemes at national level and all the measures targeted to ensure social cohesion, given the high rate of poverty and social exclusion in rural areas.
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2015/2224(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Considers youth unemployment to be one of the most pressing issues facing a large number of Member States; stresses that local and territorial development strategies have to recognise tackling youth unemployment as one of their top priorities; underlines a great potential of Small and Medium Size Enterprises in this respect and highlights the importance of undertaking measures to attract private investment;
2015/12/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 15 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that whilst it is impossible to hold back the digital revolution,the digital revolution will have an increasingly significant impact with regard to changing the labour market and that it is possible to shape its course to some extent;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that employment and social policy need to keep pace with the digitalisation of society in order to take the best possible advantage of the opportunities that digitalisation creates for employers and employees, and to minimise the dangers associated with it;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to undertake athe thorough and regular assessment of the impact which digitalisation will have on the number and types of jobs available and to gather information on new forms of employment, such as crowdsourcing and crowdworking;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that as job and skills profiles become more complex, new demands are being placed on training and further education, including lifelong learning; emphasises the importance of social dialogue and strengthened cooperation with employers in efforts to bring course content up to date and develop skills strategies;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take account, in their digital skills strategies, of the fact that new professions will arise over the next few years for which high-level ICT qualifications will be required, and that it will also be necessary for almost all groups of workers to possess basic digital skills;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Emphasises the potential of digitalisation for the implementation of flexible forms of employment, and particularly for facilitating the return to the labour market of women who have completed a period of maternity leave;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. an answer must be found to the question of which areas might see restrictions or a ban on total automation in order to safeguard employment levels, taking into account demographic changes and sustainability and any unintended social consequencesn how to safeguard employment levels challenged by growing automation.
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas numerous researchers suggest that fathers who take paternity leave build a better relationship with their children and are more likely to take active role in future child-care tasks; whereas parental leave have long-term benefits for child's development;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the EU as a whole is facing a serious demographic challenge as birth rates are constantly decreasing in most Member States, and family policies that are fair to men and women should both improve women's prospects on the job market, improve work-life balance and have a positive impact on demographic processes;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Condemns the decision taken byRegrets the fact that some Member States to only provide access to social welfare rights for a shorter duration than the maximum duration of parental leave, thus reducing the number of parents who actually use this maximum duration;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises that family rights assigned by public policies, including parental leave, should be individual rather than transferable,designed with a view to encouraging both parents to achieve a better work-life balance; while taking in consideration their individual situation and thus allowing certain flexibility; underlines in this respect that the main aim of measures undertaken in regard to the increased use of parental leave is the benefit of a child;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Strongly deplorNotes the fact that the proposed revision of the directive on maternity leave was withdrawn just beforeand that the publication of the roadmap 'New start to address the challenges of work-life balance faced by working families' was published; and the fact that, in the context of this roadmap, the Commission does not at this stage intend to publish a final report on the implementation of the directive on parental leave;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Believes, in view of the overlapping nature of the different types of family leave, that a coherent revisionew of the various texts at EU level is required;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Emphasises the need to activate the revisionew clause in EU legislation on parental leave for that purpose;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Member States to introducereconsider their systems of financial compensations for parental leave with a view to reaching a level that would act as an incentive for income replacement, over the minimum time period guaranteed by the directive, based on the average EU maternity leave income replacement ratetaking up the full parental leave available for both parents, in order to safeguard families' social and economic wellbeing;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission and the social partners to offer toinvestigate the possibility of extend thising minimum duration of parental leave from four to six months to improve work-life balance;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Notes that return to work after parental leave can be a difficult and stressful situation for both a parent and a child. Encourages in this respect the use of modern technologies such as teleworking in order to assure a smooth and gradual return to work;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Urges the Member States and the social partners to continue with their efforts at sharing best practices on positive action in the area of work-life balance, paying particular attention to policies that help mothers to enter the job market and fathers to participate in family life; encourages Commission to monitor and promote that actions;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Call on the Commission, in that regard, to incorporate workplace gender equality objectives into the European Semester for economic policy coordination to enable the targets of the Europe 2020 strategy to be met and to gauge the positive influence of legislative measures on improving work-life balance with a view to redistributing family and domestic responsibilities;deleted
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the fact that the Commission has adopCommission's efforts to created an ambitious European migration agenda; and urges the European Council to show the samea high level of ambition and to support the Commission by deedstay united in order to come up with timely and strong responses towards the migration crisis;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on Member States to exchange good practice on how to integrate refugees into European society and labour market; calls on the Commission to take advantage of Member States' experiences and come up with a set of recommendations on how to complete this process in an effective way;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Maintains that labour market data have to be taken into account in the permanent relocation mechanism for refugeeswhen designing integration policies in the EU in order to ensure that ithis process will not worsen the social and economic situation for refugees’ home territoriin host Member States and their populations;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on Member States to carefully screen their education systems in order to identify ways on how to integrate refugees’ children as soon as possible into the education process;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on Member States to duly take into account non- governmental organisations and other relevant stakeholders when designing integration strategies as well as information campaigns addressed to local communities;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Calls on Member States to prepare local societies to welcome refugees and their families via well prepared information campaigns;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. StressesPoints out that regardless of 2 million unfilled vacancies in the EU there are many over-qualified youth unemployed whose skills do not match demand of the labour market, stresses therefore, the need to build up partnerships between local authorities, education and employment services and the business community to support the creation, implementation and monitoring of employment strategies and action plans; calls for closer and structural co-operation between education, public administration, business and civil society, especially youth organisations;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to build up partnerships between local authorities, education and employment services and the business community to support the creation, implementation and monitoring of employment strategies and action plans; calls for closer and structural co-operation between education, public administration, business and civil society, especially youth organisations;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of administrative capacity; calls thereforefor the strengthening of the partnership principle as well as for the provision of appropriate training for local and regional authorities as well as other relevant stakeholders in order to use European funds more effectively and strategically;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Underlines that entrepreneurial skills can be acquired also through skills development programmes organised outside of the general education system and that these programmes may include coaching and mentoring activities supplied by experienced trainers, entrepreneurs and business experts that facilitate not only valuable business know-how, advice and feedback to potential entrepreneurs but also allow them to develop valuable network of contacts with existing enterprises and entrepreneurs that could otherwise take very long time to achieve;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Recalls that employers and entrepreneurs play a great role in training in the workplace as well as providing apprenticeships and that this should be further supported and developed;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 166 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that good quality educational guidancetailor- made guidance and support at all stages of education is necessary and can lower the risk of early school-leaving as well as help to overcome difficulties in accessing the labour market;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Stresses the importance of regular monitoring of the future skills needs' and encourages therefore Member States and all relevant stakeholders to share good practice in this regard and further develop monitoring and forecasting tools;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 205 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls for enhanced cooperation between education institutions (both on vocational and higher level) and entrepreneurs in developing curricula adjusted to the labour market needs;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 209 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Underlines the importance of developing digital skills and media literacy from the earliest stage at school and going through the whole education cycle;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes the recent decision by EU co-legislators on increasing pre-financing for the Youth Employment Initiative, which aims to smooth the implementation of this important initiative for regions and states facing financial difficulties; calls Member States and local and regional authorities to use the available funds for bringing forward the necessary structural reforms and creating sustainable instead of only ad hoc solutions;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 235 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Points out that, despite high youth unemployment rates in some Member States and unfilled job vacancies in others, intra-EU labour mobility remains low; recalls therefore the importance of the mobility of workers for a competitive labour market, and stresses the need to reduce the linguistic and cultural barriers that are liable to restrain it by providing sector-specific language courses and trainings on intercultural communication for the unemployed;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 243 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses that skills development should also be considered as a mechanism leading to equal opportunities for people from disadvantaged groups, in particular for children and young people from families affected by poverty, the long-term unemployed, including second-generation unemployed, immigrants and people with disabilities; stresses that prevention as well as life- long support and counselling at anfrom the earlyiest stage possible are of the outmost importance, because although enabling people who are at a disadvantage to develop skills and to enter the labour market requires time and resources it is also socially and economically profitable; also stresses the need to provide support and skills development via training for employers, recruiters and human resources managers to support the inclusion of disadvantaged groups into the labour markets;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Demands that the payment plan to be agreed between Parliament, the Council and the Commission, in line with the joint statement of December 2014 of the Parliament and of the Council in the framework of the agreement reached on 2014 and 2015 budgets, be implemented without any further delay; calls, to this end, for sufficient payment appropriations to be provided under heading 1b within the 2016 budget, with a view to decreasing the level of the backlog as much as possible by the end of the year, and at the same time avoiding or limiting to the minimum delays as regards interim payments; underlines the urgency of addressing this issue in a proper way, as the situation of outstanding payments undermines the credibility, effectiveness and sustainability of the policy.
2015/05/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 30 #

2015/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to avoid any suspension of commitments or payments provided for in the second strand of Article 23 oftake into account situations described in sub- paragraphs (a) to (e) of paragraph 1 of Annex III to the CPR wherin the Member States are involved concerned when considering any of the situations described in sub-paragraphs (a) to (e) of paragraph 1 of Annex III tosuspension of commitments or payments provided for in the second strand of Article 23 of the CPR;
2015/06/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2015/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Commission to avoid arbitrariness in applying Article 23 of the CPR, to devise a transparent and democratic decision-making process, in line with Article 23(15) of the CPR, and to allowwhich would include introducing an early warning approach to inform the country concerned about the possibility of launching the reprogramming procedure immediately after publication of country- specific recommendations; and to inform Parliament, on the basis of a formalised process, to be informed at all stages of the adoption of reprogramming requests or of any proposals and decisions on suspension of commitments or payments.
2015/06/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2015/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Deplores any disproportionate increase of the administrative burden for all levels of administration, given the tight deadlines and the complexity of the reprogramming procedure under Article 23 CPR; warns against any overlapping of reprogramming procedures under Article 23 CPR with subsequent European semester cycles; calls therefore the Commission to apply the early warning approach and inform the country concerned about the possibility of launching the reprogramming procedure under Article 23 of CPR immediately after publication of country-specific recommendations;
2015/05/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 296 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) investments with high socio- economic returns, supporting long- term growth and employment creation;
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that many Member States still have large deficits and that there is a need to develop fiscal responsibility programmes that are fully compatible with quality job creation, and economic growth and welfare state sustainability; calls on the Commission, which has already received the national budget proposals for 2016, and within the framework of COM(2015)00121, to provide a flexiblemaintain a process of fiscal responsibility at national level that allows for the adoption ofpreserves socially responsible and economically efficient policies aimed at decent job creation; __________________ 1 COM(2015)0012, ‘Making the best use of the flexibility within the existing rules of the SGP’.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fostering of a European investment policy aimed at boosting growth and job creation; considers it regrettable, however, that Parliament’s call3 to promote social investment not only in pursuit of financial profit but also with the aim of promoting a positive social impact has been neglected; __________________ 3 Resolutionof 11 March 2015 (Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0068), paragraphs 10 and 18.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Takes note of the recommendations on the need to move forward within new labour reforms, and calls for such reforms, if carried out, to guarantee social dialogue and to ensure necessary political consensus in order to be sustainable and effective; considers it regrettable that many labour reforms have not ensured the required balance between flexibility and security, resulting in, for example, the exclusion of millions of workers from collective bargaining; calls for labour reforms capable of reducing fragmentation, putting an end to insecurity and increasing the productivity and competitiveness of our economy while ensuring decent jobs and living wages through investment in human capital;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) have warned of the social (in-work poverty) and economic (depressed internal demand) problems caused by the wage devaluation that has occurred in recent years; noting that issues concerning wages belong strictly to national competence, considers it regrettable that there is no reference to the importance of increasing wages, especially in those countries where wages are below the poverty threshold; supports recommendations calling for better adaptation of wages to productivity and underlines that wages should not undermine the competitiveness of Member States; recalls that minimum wages differ substantially between Member States (Bulgaria EUR 184/month, Luxembourg EUR 1 923/month), and reiterates its request for a study4 on this issue; __________________ 4 Resolution of 11 March 2015 (Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0068), paragraph 47.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take note of the IMF2 report on the causes and consequences of inequality, which states that the increase in the income gap is negatively affecting economic growth and the potential for job creation; calls for enhanced efforts to shift taxation burden away from labour towards other sources, effective action on labour taxation, labour markets and redistributive policies to facilitate greater and upward economic and social convergence; __________________ 2 IMF report ‘Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality: A Global Perspective’, June 2015.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Notes thate high rates inof long-term unemployment in the EU, especially in some Member States, are resulting in an increasing number of workers losing their benefits before finding a new job; considers it regrettable that many Member States have limited access to suchunemployment benefits or have reduced the amount available and/or the eligibility period for them; considers it important to maintain a balance between adequate social protection and adequate incentives for active job searching; calls for a specific study on such incentives at EU level; and calls on theencourages Member States to guaranteenvisage minimum income schemes to avoid pockets of social exclusion and ensure a minimum income to familiein accordance with each Member State’s customs and traditions;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 139 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Considers it regrettable that the Commission has not included in the CSR the importance of maintaining strong automatic stabilisers in Member States, as called for by Parliament4, given its important role in maintaining social cohesion and stimulating internal demand and economic growth; __________________ 4 Resolutionof 11 March 2015 (Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0068).deleted
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas a significantly smaller budget was allocated to EY 2012 than to the majority of recent European Years;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas, as average life expectancy grows longer and longer, inter- generational relations are becoming increasingly important;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Considers it essential thatcrucially important for the initiatives launched as part of EY 2012 to be followed up and transformed into a strong political commitment followed by concrete action to ensure social inclusion and the well-being of all generations;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Draws attention to the contribution older people can make to society by imparting their knowledge and experience to others; stresses, in this connection, the need to create an environment conducive to inter-generational exchanges of experience;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2014/2247(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses that the partnership principle must lead to involvement at all levels and needs to be applied by Member States on an obligatory basis; stresses the importance of the implementation of the code of conduct on partnership to ensure equal participation and representation of marginalised communities; is concerned about the poor compliance with the obligatory involvement of partners in accordance with Article 5 of the CPR; calls on the Commission not to authorise payments for programmes that disregard theto implement the system of incentives and to support those managing authorities and beneficiaries who have particularly good results in involvement of partners, includi their programmes; and to exchange those most concernede best practices in this area;
2015/07/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 149 #

2014/2247(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Notes that cross-financing is currently used in a limited way, which could be caused by complex rules described in Article 98(2) of the CPR; is of the opinion that increasing the flexibility of rules for cross-financing, particularly in reference to marginalised communities, could increase the effectiveness of the projects and bring an important added value to their impact; calls therefore the Commission to conduct an analysis of the application and level of use of cross-financing;
2015/07/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 99 #

2014/2246(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the flagship initiatives are considered to have served their purpose, but also highlights the fact that their visibility is considered to be rather low; notes also the mitigated progress towards the strategy's headline targets; welcomes the conclusion drawn as to the need to enhance ownership and involvement on the ground, with a view to improving the delivery of the strategy; calls for shifting from process and outcome orientation to actual result orientation approach in order to assure the highest efficiency and effectiveness of the strategy;
2015/07/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 178 #

2014/2246(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Considers that the review of the Europe 2020 strategy, which will probably precede the launch of the proposal for the mid-term review/revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2014-2020, will already give an indication of trends for future cohesion policy post-2020, as well as for other MFF instruments; stresses, in this context, the importance of effectively addressing all the concerns raised above, while ensuring the continuity of the strategic approach; recalls, also, the added value of an EU-wide cohesion policy, both in terms of growth and jobs objectives and with a view to ensuring balanced, harmonious development across the EU; underlines in this regard the need to ensure that a proper level of ESI funding is maintained after 2020;
2015/07/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 24 #

2014/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Underlines the potential sustainable urban mobility has in increasing the attractiveness of the European cities and regions both for investors and inhabitants by improving accessibility, road safety and reducing traffic and pollution; believes in positive role it could have in ensuring better work-life balance due to reduced commuting time; calls therefore the regional and local authorities to foster innovative solutions in sustainable urban mobility;
2015/05/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 30 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas there is clear evidence that shifting from labour to environmental taxation, investing in energy and resource efficiency, and developing the supply chain through a clear industrial strategy hascould have a positive impact on job creation;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas the agriculture sector has potential to deliver good quality green jobs;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to adopt ambitious and integrated regulatory, fiscal and financial frameworks to guarantee sustainable investment and encourage innovation, thereby fully unlocking the employment potential of these changes; highlights that policies should be developed in a framework of long-term horizons that includes binding targets where necessary as well as indicators to measure progress towards their achievement;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 155 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission to use the EU Semester and the review of the Europe 2020 strategy to support green job creation; calls on the Commission to issue country- specific recommendations that contribute to higher employment and smaller ecological footprints, including a shift from labour to environmental taxation and the phasing out of counterproductive subsidies by 2020;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
E a. Whereas decent, well-paid work for at least one parent constitutes the main factor protecting families from the threat of poverty;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
G a. Whereas pre-school education may play a significant role in compensating for the low socio-economic status of children at threat of poverty and constitute a factor facilitating parents’ return to the labour market 1a; 1 a European Commission report entitled ‘Study regarding funds for implementing policy regarding child poverty’ 2008, p. 9
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. Whereas all children have the right to be protected from abuse, violence and neglect and that research has concluded that financial pressures within families and cuts in public services put children at greater risk; whereas so-called austerity measures are leading to greater violence against children ;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recommends that Member States increase the quantity, amounts, scope and effectiveness of the social support specifically directed to children, but also to parents (such as unemployment benefits) and to promote labour laws that guarantee social rights and security to families and fight precarious employment;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to refrain from recommending reformulations and cuts in the public services of Member States, from promoting flexible labour relations and the privatisation of public services, which have led unequivocally to the weakening of the social rights of children;deleted
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Urges the European Commission and the European Parliament to take the opportunity provided by the mid-term review of the multiannual financial framework to increase the appropriations frommake better use of the European Social Fund and the Food Aid Program forund for European Aid to the mMost dDeprived groups and to check if children are a priority in the programming and implementation of regional and cohesion policies;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 228 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Recommends that Member States move away from institutional care in favour of stable foster care systems which better prepare children and young people for an independent life, continued learning or work;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 232 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8 b. Urges Member States to conduct policies facilitating the creation and maintenance of decent workplaces as well as developing systems for training, increasing qualifications and amenities such as teleworking or flexitime facilitating parents’ entry or return to the labour market following a break in their professional career;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 240 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recommends that Member States guarantee all children access to free, quality public education at all ages, including early childhood, particularly taking into account education for developing key skills, including enterprise, and establish appropriate teacher-student ratios;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 245 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Urges Member States to increase the quality of educational services offered by applying an individual approach and promoting cooperation among teachers, social workers and parents in order to prevent children and young persons from ceasing their education;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 248 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Urges Member States to provide universal and equal access to crèches and pre-schools to children from all social groups;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 253 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recommends that Member States provide freeuniversal access to school materials and school transportation during school hours, as well as access to meals in educational establishments;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 262 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Urges Member States to guarantee universal, public, free and quality access to health care with regard to prevention and primary care, access to diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation, guaranteeing women the right to sexual and reproductive health by ensuring health care for babies, maternity care in the pre- and post-natal care period, particularly in the case of premature birth, access to family doctors, dentists and mental health specialists for all children, and integrate these aspects into national and the EU public health strategies;;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 283 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on Member States, particularly those where social inequalities are greater, to strengthen the effectiveness of the social rights that the state must guarantee, increasing the number of employees and technicians in social security services, and increasing the medical, psychological and social care of by directing them well at those most in need, in particular at children;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 198 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Considers that cohesion policy measures have an essential role to play in reducing internal competitive disparities and structural imbalances; calls on the Commission to find specific solutions for those Member States that, though facing very high unemployment, are obliged to return EU funds owing to co-financing problems; calls, therefore, on the Commission to apply the frontloading principle to all funds for these Member States in the 2014-2020 period;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 277 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Recalls that decent wages are important not only for social cohesion, but also for maintaining a strong economy and a productive labour force; calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for a European framework for minimum wages with a view to reducing wage inequalities and limiting nominal imbalances in competitiveness;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 325 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Stresses that, according to the Commission, despite high unemployment rates there are 2 million job vacancies in the EU, and that only 30.3 % of the active population works in another Member State; recalls that divergences in labour mobility rates range up to 10 percentage points, notably in those Member States hardest hit by the crisis, can be overcome also using the tool of the EURES platform;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2014/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Observes that towns and cities have an important role to play in attaining the Europe 2020 objectives and must therefore be involved goals of the Cohesion policies and must therefore be consulted and involved where appropriate during the whole process of formulating policies at EU level, which can be achieved, inter alia, by means of the systematic inclusion of representatives of towns and cities in groups of expertelcomes in this regard an EU urban agenda which would ensure a better coordination of policies and the involvement of the relevant actors from the European urban areas;
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2014/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Considers that in order to ensure that the views of all urban stakeholders are better taken into consideration, the already existing tools and the EU structures should be explored more efficiently through consultation, evaluation, impact assessment and exchange of best practices and experiences especially in drawing up the operational programs;
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2014/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Is concerned that many European cities are losing employment opportunities and are experiencing complex economic and demographic decline; warns that this shrinkage represents a serious societal damage; considers that the EU urban dimension should settle the European guidelines of an urban development and address issues such as unemployment, poverty, security, globalisation, depopulation, foreseen changes in the production patterns as well as migration within and outside the EU in order to maintain and systematically uplift quality of life of the European citizens;
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2014/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Underlines that towns and cities are a part of a broader functional area and cannot be treated in isolation; calls on the Commission to respect the principle of sustainable regional development in developing its urban agenda, especially in the sectors of infrastructure and public services;
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2014/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for public expenditure on combating unemployment and poverty and for the purpose of promoting social investment to be excluded from the calculation of the public deficit in order to facilitate greater productive investment by towns and cities;deleted
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2014/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Brings into attention the problem of the overpopulation of the biggest cities which, in absence of an appropriate infrastructure, can lead to insufficient or poor quality housing and mobility problems; is concerned about the problems with the traffic and smooth circulation in the cities, which significantly increase the commuting time and reduces the quality of life of many Europeans; stresses that the lack of appropriate infrastructure can cause psychological pressure and stress on workers hindering the reconciliation of professional and private life;
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2014/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Calls on the European Commission and the Member States to help urban areas to modernise their economic, social and environmental characteristics through smart investments and better coordination; reminds that urban areas should be logistically interconnected not only at regional or national, but also trans-border level; calls on all the relevant stakeholders to engage in a debate on increasing attractiveness of middle-size urban areas; points out that lack of an appropriate intra-cities infrastructure allowing easy access and movements of goods and services constitute a burden especially for the middle-size cities and diminish their attractiveness for the investors; encourages Member States, to help build infrastructures within EU and non-EU urban areas in order to raise potential for job creation for the middle-size cities bordering non EU countries;
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2014/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to actively promote gender budgeting in Europe’s towns and cities; calls on the Commission furthermore to promote exchanges of best practices in gender budgeting;
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2014/2213(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Observes that the consistent application of the subsidiarity and proportionality principles by the Commission is extremely important to towns and cities, to enable them to design their employment policies and social policies in a targeted manner, particularly in the fields of public services and services of general interest; calls on the Commission to systematically reduce the red tape and to ensure that the implementation of new urban policies will not cause additional administrative burden on towns and cities.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2014/2155(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines the importance of anti- fraud education and awareness building in anti-fraud prevention as well as further tackling the problem of fraud;
2014/11/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 55 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The transnational and cross-border co- operation, including cross-border partnerships and the support to all organisations operating for EURES in Member States would be facilitated by a structure at Union level ('the European Coordination Office') that should provide common information, training activities, tools and guidance. That structure should also be responsible for the development of the 'European Job Mobility portal' (EURES portal), the common IT platform. To guide its work, multiannual work programmes should be developed in consultation with Member States.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 61 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) In cross-border regions, permanent structures like working communities, euroregions and in particular the EGTC can be the basis for cross-border partnerships
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 63 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) A broader membership of the EURES network has social, economic and financial benefits. It improves efficiency in service delivery by facilitating partnerships, enhancing complementarity and quality improvements. It increases the market share of the EURES network insofar as new members make available job vacancies, job applications and curriculum vitae ('CV’s'). TInterregional, transnational and cross- border co-operation, which is a key feature of the operation of the EURES network, could generate innovative forms of learning and co-operation between employment services, including on quality standards for job vacancies and support services. The EURES network would therefore enhance its relevance as one of the key Union tools available to Member States and the European Commission for supporting concrete measures towards a high level of employment within the Union.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 67 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) A profound understanding of labour demand in terms of occupations, sectors and needs of employers would benefit the right of free movement of workers within the Union and therefore support services should include good quality assistance to employers, small and medium sized enterprises in particular. Close working relationships between employment services and employers will increase the pool of job vacancies and job matching of suitable candidates, ensure decreasing of labour shortages, secure pathways for job seekers in particular those in vulnerable groups and improve labour market intelligence.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 83 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) ‘employment services’ means any legal or natural person, lawfully operating in a Member State, whether of a public or private nature and, in the latter case, whether for profit or non-profit, which provides services for job seekers to get employed and for employers to recruit workers;
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 84 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) "cross-border partnership and cooperation for the placement of frontier workers" means any cooperation and collaboration activities between the competent authorities at national, regional and local level to provide services to mediate between supply and demand with the objective of filling a job vacancy for frontier workers.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 85 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) The EURES Partners which are the organisations authorised by Member States to provide at national, regional and/or local level support with clearance and/or support services to workers and employers and EURES cross-border partnerships.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 88 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. In accordance with their respective roles and responsibilities, all organisations participating in the EURES network promote actively, in close cooperation, the opportunities labour mobility in the Union offers and seek to enhance ways and means for workers and employers to seize these opportunities at local, regional, national and EuropeanEuropean, national and, in particular regional and/or local level.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 90 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the better functioning and integration of the labour markets in the Union;, including cross-border labour markets,
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 93 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) support smooth transition from education to work at the labour markets in the Union.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 99 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the analysis of geographic and occupational mobility, endeavouring to reflect regional and/or local characteristics;
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 102 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the monitoring and evaluation of EURES activity and its employment performance, in co-operation with EURES Members;, with particular attention to the regional and/or local dimension and, where appropriate, drawing up any proposals for improvement that it sees fit.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 105 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) organisation of the work for EURES in the Member State, including organisation of the delivery of support services, with particular attention to the regional and/or local dimension, in accordance with Chapter IV;
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 113 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. Each Member State ensures that its National Coordination Office gets the staff and other resources necessary to carry out its tasks as defined under this Regulation. and properly represents the regional and/or local interests that exist within its territory;
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 118 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 6
6. EURES Partners may involve other EURES Partners or other organisations in order to comply together with the criteria in the Annex. In such cases, the continued existence of an appropriate partnership, particularly designed to resolve the specific problems of EU regions and/or municipalities, is an additional condition for participation in the EURES network.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 119 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Applicant organisations can choose to participate in the EURES network according tothrough the following optiomeans:
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 120 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to contributeing to the pool of job vacancies in accordance with Article 14(1), paragraph (a);
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 121 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to contributeing to the pool of job applications and CV’s in accordance with Article 14(1), paragraph (b);
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 122 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) to provideing support services to workers and employers in accordance with Chapter IV or.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 123 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) a combination of points (a) to (c).deleted
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 140 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall support the development of a coordinated approach at national level to such services, designed to address the specific needs of regions and/or municipalities.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 144 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2
2. If employers are interested in further assistance and there is a reasonable likelihood of an intra-EU recruitment, the EURES Partners concerned provide further assistance, consisting of such services as the pre-selection of suitable candidates and assistance with providing translations and/or obtaining clarifications on specific job applications, in the fields in which there is a major labour shortage in the Member State concerned.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 146 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
The Commission and the Member States monitor labour mobility flows and patterns in the Union on the basis of Eurostat statistics and the available national and regional data.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 147 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3
3. Taking into account the exchange of information and the joint analysis, Member States shall endeavour to develop mobility policies as an integral part of their employment policies. These mobility policies provide the framework on the basis of which Member States carry out the programming referred to in Article 28.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 149 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Commission, through cooperation between the European Coordination office and DG REGIO, ensures synergy with funding available from INTERREG 2014-2020 and the EU programme for Employment and Social Innovation.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 152 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Article 14(1) to (7) shall apply two years following the date of entry into force referred to in paragraph 1.
2015/02/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 247 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) to support smooth transition from education to work in the Union labour market.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 335 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. The National Coordination Office promotes the collaboration with stakeholders such as career guidance services, universities, chambers of commerce, organisations representing vulnerable groups on the labour market such as woman, people with disabilities, elderly people, migrants and organisations involved in apprenticeships and traineeships schemes.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 336 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. The National Coordination Office promotes the collaboration with stakeholders such as career guidance services, universities, chambers of commerce, organisations representing vulnerable groups on the labour market such as women, people with disabilities, elderly people, migrants and organisations involved in apprenticeships and traineeships schemes.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 400 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Applicant organisations can choose to participate in the EURES network according toby means of the following options:
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 401 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to contributeing to the pool of job vacancies in accordance with Article 14(1), paragraph (a);
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 404 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to contributeing to the pool of job applications and CV’s in accordance with Article 14(1), paragraph (b);
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 407 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) to provideing support services to workers and employers in accordance with Chapter IV or.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 409 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) a combination of points (a) to (c).deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 699 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Article 14(1) to (7) shall apply from … [two years after the date of entry into force].
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL