BETA

32 Amendments of Daniel BUDA related to 2020/2012(INL)

Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies that have a lasting influence on all areas of activity throughout European society with the potential to directly impact all aspects of our societies, including basic social and economic principles and values, are being developed very quickly;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the Union and its Member States have a particular responsibility to make sure that these technologies contribute to the well-being and general interest of their citizens, while providing guarantees to enhance the added value of artificial intelligence in the EU;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas, therefore, this common framework must make it possible to strike a balance with regard to the protection of citizens, maintaining confidence in the safety, reliability and consistency of goods and services, including digital technologies, and investment in innovative AI systems;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas such questions should be addressed through an effective, comprehensive and future-proof legal framework reflecting the Union’s principles and values as enshrined in the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights that would bring protection, confidence and legal certainty to businesses and citizens alike;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas action at Union level is justified by the need to avoid regulatory fragmentation or a series of national regulatory provisions with no common denominator for a homogenous application of common ethical principles when developing, deploying and using artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas Parliament continues to call for the establishment of a European Agency tothe European Commission should ensure a harmonised approach across the Union and address the new opportunities and challenges, in particular those of a cross-border nature, arising from ongoing technological developments.
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that AI systems must be tailored to human needs in line with the commitment to put them to work in the service of humanity and the common good, seeking to enhance well-being and individual freedom, while at the same time maximising the benefits offered, while preventing and reducing the risks;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Is convinced that, in order to effectively exploit the advantages of AI, prevent possible misuse thereof and avoid regulatory fragmentation at EU level, it is essential to adopt legislation embodying principles adapted to future requirements throughout the EU and applicable to all AI systems; takes the view that, while sector-specific provisions are preferable for a wide range of possible applications, an effective and harmonised legal framework based on common principles and applicable across the board is necessary in order to establish equal standards throughout the Union and effectively protect our European values;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Takes the view that these common framework principles must be based on respect for all rights set out in international human rights law, the EU Treaties and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that explainability is essential to ensuring that citizens trust these technologies, even if the degree of explainability is relative to the complexity of the technologies, and that; points out that it is not always possible to explain why a model has led to a particular result or decision, black box algorithms being a case in point; in such cases it should be complemented by auditability and traceability and transparent information regarding system capacities;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that AI systems should be designed to respect, serve and protect moral values and physical and mental integrity, promote a sense of personal and cultural identity and help satisfy essential needs; underlines the need to avoid any use of AI systems that might lead to inadmissible direct or indirect coercion, threaten to undermine psychological autonomy and mental health or lead to unjustified surveillance, deception or inadmissible manipulation;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Underlines the need to ensure that data belonging to vulnerable groups, such as people with disabilities, patients, children, minorities and migrants, migrants and other groups at risk of exclusion, are protected adequately;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 11
A European Agency for Artificial Intelligencedeleted
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Recalls that Parliament’s resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics asked the Commission to consider the designation of a European Agency for Artificial Intelligence;deleted
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Commission to follow- up on that request, especially in view of the added-value of having a body at Union level coordinating the mandates and actions of each national supervisory authority as referred to in the previous sub-section;deleted
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Believes that such a body, as well as the certification referred to in the following paragraph, would not only benefit the development of Union industry and innovation in that context but also increase the awareness of our citizens regarding the opportunities and risks inherent to these technologies;deleted
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Suggests that the European Agency for Artificial Intelligenceaction be taken within the European Commission to develops common criteria and an application process relating to the granting of a European certificate of ethical compliance following a request by any developer, deployer or user seeking to certify at national level the positive assessment of compliance carried out by the respective national supervisory authority;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Stresses that the Union’s ethical principles for the development, deployment and use of these technologies shouldcould make Europe a world leader in the IA sector and should therefore be promoted worldwide by cooperating with international partners and liaising with third countries with different development and deployment models.
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Points out the added-value of a European Agency as referred to above in this context as well.deleted
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Concludes, following the above reflections on aspects related to the ethical dimension of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, that the ethical dimension should be framed as a series of principles resulting in a legal framework at Union level supervised by national competent authorities, coordinated and enhanced by a European Agency for Artificial Intelligence and duly respected and certified within the internal marketn effective, forward looking and comprehensive legal framework at Union level, reflecting the standards and values enshrined in the treaties and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights and affording protection, trust and legal safety to members of the public and economic operators;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 280 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – point I – indent 1 a (new)
- to ensure the balance between public protection on the one hand and business incentives to invest in innovation, especially AI systems, on the other;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 283 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – point I – indent 2
- to support the development of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies in the Union, including by helping businesses, small and medium- sized enterprises and start-ups to assess and address regulatory requirements and risks during the development process;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 297 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – point II – indent 2
- a European Agency for Artificial Intelligence and a European certification of ethical compliance;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – point II – indent 5
- the involvement and consultation of, as well as provision of support to, stakeholders, including start-ups, small and medium-sized enterprises, businesses, social partners, and other representatives of the civic society.
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 315 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – point IV – introductory part
IV. The key elements of the Commission’s task as regards compliance with ethical principles for the development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies are: - to issue guidance as regards the application of the proposed regulation; - to develop a European certificate of compliance with ethical principles; - to support regular exchanges with concerned stakeholders and the civil society.
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 325 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – point V
V. The European Agency for Artificial Intelligence should be established following a detailed proposal from the Commission, which should include the following main tasks: - to supervise the application of the proposed Regulation; - to issue guidance as regards the application of the proposed Regulation; - to liaise with the “Supervisory Authority” in each Member State and coordinate their mandate and tasks; - of compliance with ethical principles; - concerned stakeholders and the civil society.deleted to develop a European certificate to support regular exchanges with
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 364 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 1
(1) The development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, including the software, algorithms and data used or produced by such technologies, are based on a desire to serve society. They can entail opportunities and risks, which should be addressed and regulated by an efficient, forward- looking and comprehensive legal framework of ethical principles to be complied with from the moment of the development and deployment of such technologies to their use.
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 368 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 2
(2) The level of compliance with the ethical principles regarding the development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, including the software, algorithms and data used or produced by such technologies in the Union should be equivalent in all Member States, in order to efficiently seize the opportunities, avoid regulatory fragmentation and consistently address the risks of such technologies. It should be ensured that the application of the rules set out in this Regulation throughout the Union is homogenous.
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 478 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 46
(46) Action at Union level as set out in this Regulation would be best achieved through the establishment of a European Agency for Artificial Intelligence. Such a body would be essential in coordinating the mandates and actions of the national supervisory authorities in each Member State, outlining objective criteria for the risk assessment of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, developing and issuing a certification of compliance with the ethical principles laid down in this Regulation, supporting regular exchanges with concerned stakeholders and civil society, promoting the Union’s approach through international cooperation and ensuring a consistent reply worldwide to the opportunities and risks inherent in these technologies.deleted
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 485 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 1 – paragraph 1
The purpose of this Regulation is to establish a comprehensive and forward- looking regulatory framework of ethical principles for the development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies in the Union.
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 492 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘artificial intelligence systems’ means software systems that, inter alia, collect, process and interpret structured or unstructured data, identify patterns and establish models in order to reach conclusions or take display intelligent behaviour by analysing certain input and taking action, with some degree of autonomy, to achieve specific goals. AI- systems can be purely software-based, actionsng in the physicvirtual wor virtual dimension basld, or can be embedded oin such conclusionhardware devices;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 511 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) ‘deployer’ means any natural or legal person who is involved in the deployment of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, and has an operating or managing functhe person who decides on the use of the AI-system, exercises control over the associated risk and benefits from its operation;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI