4 Amendments of Daniel BUDA related to 2020/2221(INI)
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that the concentration of agricultural income support is mainly driven by area-based direct payments; underlines the need for more targeted support and a better balance between large and small beneficiaries at Member State level; stresses the need for the fastest possible external convergence between the EU Member States;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights that the Member States are responsible for the EU agricultural funds under shared management with the Commission; stresses the need for a reasonable period of learning and implementation for the introduction of the new eco-schemes; considers the new delivery model and the new National Strategic Plans to be a great opportunity to reinforce Member States’ and the Commission’s controls pertaining to the distribution and management of funds;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the need for a specifically tailored fraud prevention system to prevent any misuse of EU agricultural funds; takes the view that anti-fraud measures should retain their high priority for the EU and the Member States; notes that transparency and the control of agricultural funding are essential for the construction of a functional agricultural system; underlines that EU funds must be recovered in a timely manner and that proportionate sanctions be put in place as effective deterrents;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the importance of transparency for the early detection of fraud, conflicts of interest or other irregularities; stresses the importance of EU-wide database interoperability, common rules and data exchange between government stakeholders, cross- border cooperation and better use of IT tools and technology; stresses the need for information and prevention activities among recipients of CAP funding;