6 Amendments of Iskra MIHAYLOVA related to 2015/2154(DEC)
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes the application of the initiative Integrity Pacts and urges the Commission to carry out an appropriate ex-ante evaluation as to their potential to really improve transparency and efficiency in public procurement as regards ESI Funds;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Acknowledges the ESIF 2014-2020 regulatory framework with ex-ante conditionality concerning public procurement and calls on those Member States which have not fulfilled the ex-ante conditionality, to implement effectively their agreed action plans as soon as possible and not later than by the end of 2016.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Urges the Member States to take all necessary measures for appropriate and quick transposition of the 2014 package of EU public procurement directives into their respective national legislation by 18th of April 2016; calls on the Commission to strictly supervise this process providing the respective guidance and technical assistance to the Member States in the context of the correct transposition of the directives into national law.
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Acknowledges the work of the Task Force for better implementation; However, calls on the Commission to support not only the increase of the absorption of funds but also to enhance the efficiency, effectiveness and added value of cohesion policy projects implemented;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to focus on implementing targeted and timely preventive measures, in particular regarding the compliance with public procurement and state aid rules, through provision of timely information and effective training and guidance, with view to avoid irregularities and therefore the increasing level of suspension and interruption of payments because the latter may disrupt the smooth projects implementation and achievement of the envisaged results and hence the cohesion policy goals;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Acknowledges the Commission´s replies to the ECA report that the average decrease in error rate compared with 2000-2006 period represents an improvement of the management and control systems; however calls on the Commission to assess through qualitative indicators the efficiency, effectiveness and impact of the cohesion policy projects implemented;