8 Amendments of Jakop G. DALUNDE related to 2018/2156(INI)
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the joint communication by the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the Action Plan on Military Mobility, as it recognises the strategic role played by the trans- European transport network (TEN-T) in integrating the Union’s infrastructure in order to achieve rapid and seamless mobility across the continent, thus further developing the internal market;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Strongly supports the decisionUrges the Commission to find a more balanced approach and not to allocate the military mobility envelope under the centralised management of the CEF programme; takes note of the preliminary actions set by the Action Plandemands that more profound analyses prior to the implementation of the military mobility which willmust be a based onis for the identification of and agreement on the military requirements, to be followed by the identification of sections of the TEN-T network suitable also for military transport and a list of priority projects, together with the eventual upgrade of the technical requirements applicable to the TEN-T network;
Amendment 19 #
3. Stresses that infrastructure features (e.g. weight tolerance, maximum height clearance) have a significant impact on speed of movement; points out that seamless mobility and logistics are essential for military deployment, as they are for passenger and freight transport; sees the implementation of the Action PlanCEF as an opportunity to enable the civilian transport network to benefit from increased network capacity and to foster multimodal connections;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. PoUnderlintes out that the military mobility projects will have to follow the same criteria, conditions and procedures as set out aim of the CEF programme is to stimulate smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by facilitating the CEF regulation in order to be eligible; stresses that the process of identification of the sections of the TEN-T network suitable for military transport must unconditionally maximise civilian and military synergiesfree movement of persons, goods, capital and services; stresses, in this regard, that civilian needs should constitute the prominent focus of any project realised under the programme's military mobility envelope;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that any contribution from the CEF military mobility envelope should, wherever possible, give priority to multimodal projects, as they bring the most opportunities for dual use, according to the pilot analysis carried out in 2017,should give priority to projects that clearly address civilian needs, particularly multimodal and to cross-border projects, as they contribute to addressing existing missing links and bottlenecks, which are the major current physical barriers to a rapid and seamless mobility;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Recalls that technologies used in the military sector have been successfullymust be better translated into the civilian sector; highlights that the deployment of an intelligent transport system and the uptake of Galileo-related technologies represent one of the most challenging opportunities ahead for the civilian transport sector; considers, therefore, that future revisions of the Action Plan should ultimately explore the possibility for civil transport to exploit military responses to those challenges, for instance in the field of cybersecurity.