[ParlTrack]

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44

(44) Union institutions and bodies should ensure the confidentiality of electronic communications as provided for by Article 7 of the Charter. In particular, Union institutions and bodies should ensure the security of their electronic communication networks, protect the information related to end-users’ terminal equipment accessing their publicly available websites and mobile applications in accordance with Regulation (EU) XXXX/XX [new ePrivacy Regulation] and protect the personal data in directories of users, whilst maintaining full accessibility for citizens and interest groups to the institutions, its staff and in particular its political representatives.

2017/07/12
Committee: LIBE

John PROCTER

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 68

(68) In order to strengthen the supervisory role of the European Data Protection Supervisor and the effective enforcement of this Regulation, the European Data Protection Supervisor should, as a sanction of last resort, have the power to impose administrative fines. The fines should aim at sanctioning the institution or body – rather than individuals – for non-compliance with this Regulation, to deter future violations of this Regulation and to foster a culture of personal data protection within the Union institutions and bodies. This Regulation should indicate infringements and the upper limits and criteria for setting the related administrative fines. The European Data Protection Supervisor should determine the amount of fines in each individual case, by taking into account all relevant circumstances of the specific situation, with due regard to the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement and of its consequences and the measures taken to ensure compliance with the obligations under this Regulation and to prevent or mitigate the consequences of the infringement. When imposing an administrative fine on a Union body, the European Data Protection Supervisor should consider the proportionality of amount of the fine. The administrative procedure for the imposition of fines on Union institutions and bodies should respect the general principles of Union law as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union.deleted

2017/07/12
Committee: LIBE

John PROCTER

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1

1. Where point (d) of Article 5(1) applies, in relation to the offer of information society services directly to a child, the processing of the personal data of a child shall be lawful where the child is at least 136 years old. Where the child is below the age of 136 years, such processing shall be lawful only if and to the extent that consent is given or authorised by the holder of parental responsibility over the child.

2017/07/12
Committee: LIBE

John PROCTER

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2

2. Where a restriction is not provided for by a legal act adopted on the basis of the Treaties or by an internal rule in accordance with paragraph 1, the Union institutions and bodies may restrict the application of Articles 14 to 22, 34 and 38, as well as Article 4 in so far as its provisions correspond to the rights and obligations provided for in Articles 14 to 22, if such a restriction respects the essence of the fundamental rights and freedoms, in relation to a specific processing operation, and is a necessary and proportionate measure in a democratic society to safeguard one or more of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1. The restriction shall be notified to the competent data protection officer.deleted

2017/07/12
Committee: LIBE

John PROCTER

Proposal for a regulation
Article 66

~~[...]~~deleted

2017/07/12
Committee: LIBE

Activities of John PROCTER related to 2017/0002(COD)

Shadow reports (1)

Amendments (5)

ParlTrack - 2011-2024