Activities of Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)

H a. Whereas due to the lack of a common approach access to information held by the EU institutions is still difficult for citizens

2023/02/14
Committee: LIBE

2022/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)

6 a. Believes it is necessary to further develop a more proactive approach to transparency by making as many of documents as possible available to the public in the simplest and easiest way

2023/02/14
Committee: LIBE

2022/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)

10 a. Calls on the EU institutions to facilitate access to documents and based on full transparency, communication and direct democracy principle

2023/02/14
Committee: LIBE

2022/2015(INI)

Patryk JAKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Beata KEMPA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)

15 a. Believes that the EU's institutions should make full use of the potential of new technologies to ensure full and easy access to information

2023/02/14
Committee: LIBE

2022/0131(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6

(6) This Directive should cover employment relationships between third- country workers and employers. Where a Member State’s national law allows admission of third-country nationals through temporary work agencies established on its territory and which have an employment relationship with the worker, such agencies should not be excluded from the scope of this Directive. This Directive should not cover third- country workers who have been admitted to the territory of a Member State to work on a seasonal basis.

2022/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2022/0131(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24

(24) The right to equal treatment in specified fields should be strictly linked to the third-country national’s legal residence and the access given to the labour market in a Member State, which are enshrined in the single permit encompassing the authorisation to reside and work and in residence permits issued for other purposes containing information on the permission to work. This Directive should not grant rights in relation to situations which lie outside the scope of Union law, such as in relation to family members residing in a third country. This Directive should grant rights only in relation to family members who join third-country workers to reside in a Member State on the basis of family reunification or family members who already reside legally in that Member State.

2022/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2022/0131(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a directive
Recital 32

(32) To ensure the proper enforcement of this Directive, Member States should ensure that appropriate mechanisms are in place for the monitoring of employers and that, where appropriate, effective and adequate inspections are carried out on their respective territories. The selection of employers to be inspected should be based primarily on a risk assessment to be carried out by the competent authorities in the Member States taking into account factors such as the sector in which a company operates and any past record of infringement.

2022/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2022/0131(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Beata KEMPA

(33) Member States should also put in place effective mechanisms through which third-country workers may seek legal redress and lodge complaints directly or through third parties having, in accordance with the criteria laid down by the national law, a legitimate interest in ensuring compliance with this Directive, such as trade unions or other associations, or competent authorities. That is considered necessary to address situations where third- country workers are unaware of the existence of enforcement mechanisms or hesitant to use them in their own name, for example out of fear of possible consequences. Such mechanisms should respect the principle of equality vis-à-vis the nationals of the respective Member State.

2022/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2022/0131(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)

(g a) who are beneficiaries of protection in accordance with national law, international obligations or the practice of a Member State or have applied for protection in accordance with national law, international obligations or the practice of a Member State and whose application has not been the subject of a final decision;

2022/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2022/0131(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1

1. An application to issue, amend or renew a single permit shall be submitted by way of a single application procedure. Member States shall determine whether applications for a single permit are to be ~~submitted~~made by the third-country national or by the third-country national’s employer. Member States may also decide to allow an application from either of the two. If the application is to be submitted by the third- country national, Member States shall allow the application to be introduced ~~both~~ from a third country ~~and~~or, if provided for by national law, in the territory of the Member State in which the third- country national is legally present.

2022/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2022/0131(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

The competent authority shall adopt a decision on the complete application as soon as possible and in any event within ~~four~~six months of the date on which the application was lodged.

2022/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2022/0131(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 4

4. Within the period of validity referred to in paragraph 1, the single permit shall not be withdrawn during a period of at least three months in the event of unemployment of its holder. Member States shall allow the third- country national to stay in their territory until the competent authorities have taken a decision in accordance with paragraph 3, point (b), as relevant, even if that period of at least three months expired.deleted

2022/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2021/2180(INI)

Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1

1. Recalls that Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (the Conditionality Regulation) integrated the conditionality mechanism into a wider framework, requiring the Commission to use its own annual rule of law reports as a source for its assessments under the Regulation; calls on the Commission to implement the Conditionality Regulation without any further delay; recalls that for budget- related measures in the event of violations of the rule of law in a Member State, the competences of parliamentary committees should be determined on the basis of Annex VI of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure if the infringements under the Conditionality Regulation procedure are dealt with in Parliament;deleted

2022/02/16
Committee: CONT

2021/2180(INI)

Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2

2. Recalls its resolution of 8 July 2021 on the creation of guidelines for the application of the Conditionality Regulation; insists that the Commission include in its annual rule of law reports a section dedicated to cases where rule of law breaches in a Member State could affect or seriously risk affecting the sound financial management of the Union budget or the protection of the Union’s financial interests in a sufficiently direct way;deleted

2022/02/16
Committee: CONT

2021/2180(INI)

Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)

3 a. Calls on the Commission to present in its next reports a chapter on the compliance of the institutions of the European Union with the rule of law, in particular on the situation within the Commission itself. The EU institutions should resolve numerous internal problems, such as: lack of transparency, obstruction of access to documents, the 'revolving door' problem, and corruption;

2022/02/16
Committee: CONT

2021/2180(INI)

Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)

5 a. Notes with concern that the contracts signed by the Commission with pharmaceutical companies developing COVID-19 vaccines have clauses that have not been published in their entirety for over a year;

2022/02/16
Committee: CONT

2021/2180(INI)

Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)

5 b. Stresses that NGOs should be obliged to disclose their sources of funding; stresses that all European bodies must disclose and publish a list of all NGOs they fund and the amount of this funding in order to be in compliance with the principle of transparency and the right of EU citizens to information;

2022/02/16
Committee: CONT

2021/2180(INI)

Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6

6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to use the Commission’s annual rule of law reports to resolutely fight against systemic corruption and devise effective instruments for preventing, combating and sanctioning corruption and fighting fraud, as well as for regularly monitoring the use of public funds, including recovery and resilience facility funds. The Commission should focus in the coming years on the fight against corruption and organised crime, which have been fuelled by the COVID-19 pandemic. Organised crime groups are currently earning huge amounts of money from the trade in counterfeit medicines, vaccines, other medical equipment and false certificates.

2022/02/16
Committee: CONT

2021/2146(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)

31a. Recalls that the crisis at the EU- Belarus border caused by the Lukashenka regime's hybrid warfare is being kept under control thanks to FRONTEX;

2022/03/04
Committee: CONT

2021/2143(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Calls for buildings to be modernised in order to meet zero-emission standards, in particular by installing solar panels on all buildings belonging to the Agency;

2022/03/04
Committee: CONT

2021/2138(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14

14. Notes the gender distribution within the Authority’s senior management members, with 3 out of 5 being women (60 %); notes the gender distribution within the Authority’s management board, with 3 out of 6 being of the same gender (50 %); further notes the gender distribution within the Authority’s overall staff, with 134 out of 250 being men (53,60 %); points out, however, that, in the recruitment of new staff and in connection with promotions, the Authority should bear in mind that candidates’ skills, knowledge and experience are the most important factors; points out that the need for a geographical balance among staff members should also be borne in mind;

2022/03/03
Committee: CONT

2021/2138(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)

29a. Calls for buildings to be modernised in order to meet zero-emission standards, in particular by installing solar panels on all buildings belonging to the Authority;

2022/03/03
Committee: CONT

2021/2122(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. ~~Grants the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Asylum discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Asylum Support Office for the financial year 2020 /~~ Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Asylum discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Asylum Support Office for the financial year 2020;

2022/03/03
Committee: CONT

2021/2115(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34

34. Is aware of the EEAS efforts to achieve a meaningful geographical representation while respecting the competences and merits of candidates and reiterates, in this regard, the necessary provision of additional SNEs to face the EEAS’ increasing workload; urges the EEAS to continue its efforts to improve the geographical representation, as this is a recurring problem, especially in the positions of Heads of Delegation and middle and senior management; observes that at the end of 2020 EEAS staff included nationals from all Member States and welcomes the efforts made by the EEAS to keep the Human Resources Network of Member States informed about the composition of staff, to publish vacancies and to promote national efforts to increase the number of candidates;

2022/02/03
Committee: CONT

2021/2115(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35

35. Considers it important to ensure a balanced representation of countries that joined the Union after 2004 or later (EU13) ~~and thus, welcom~~; notes that the number of staff from these Member States at the end of 2020 had increased by 6 % compared to the previous year; points out that the share of EU13 in the EEAS staff is 23 % at the end of 2020~~, which is more than the share within the Union population, which corresponds to 20 %~~;

2022/02/03
Committee: CONT

2021/2108(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. ~~Grants the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2020 /~~ Postpones its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2020;

2022/02/03
Committee: CONT

2021/2108(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)

18 a. Recalls that key performance indicators are a widely recognized tool for measuring achievement against targets; calls on the Council to provide summaries of its key performance indicators and the related results in its management reports;

2022/02/03
Committee: CONT

2021/2108(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20

20. Regrets the lack of information on the ~~implementation of the Council’s gender action plan and the~~ measures taken to ensure equal opportunities for persons with disabilities at the Council as a workplace; calls on the Council to provide information on ~~gender balance,~~ geographical distribution and disabilities of its members of staff and on the related internal policies in force;

2022/02/03
Committee: CONT

2021/2108(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21

21. Recalls its resolution of 17 December 2020 on the need for a dedicated Council configuration on gender equality2as a dedicated institutional forum to ensure stronger integration of gender equality in Union strategies, coordination of all related policies and progress in the main files related to gender equality, as well as harmonisation of the protection of women’s rights and gender equality; _________________ 2 OJ C 445, 29.10.2021, p. 150.deleted

2022/02/03
Committee: CONT

2021/2108(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)

34 a. Encourages the Council to maintain control over its own technical systems, provide stronger safeguards for privacy and increase security and transparency for the public;

2022/02/03
Committee: CONT

2021/2108(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44

44. Emphasises Parliament's prerogative to grant discharge pursuant to Article 319 ~~TFEU~~of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as well as the applicable provisions of the Financial Regulation and Parliament’s Rules of Procedure~~; reiterates that this prerogative allows the Union to maintain transparency, democratic scrutiny and~~ in line with current interpretation and practice, namely, the power to grant discharge in order to maintain transparency and to ensure democratic accountability towards Union taxpayers;

2022/02/03
Committee: CONT

2021/2108(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45

45. Stresses the well-established and respected practice followed by Parliament over the course of almost twenty years of granting discharge to all Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies; recalls that the Commission has declared its inability to oversee the implementation of the budgets of the other institutions; stresses the reiterated view of the Commission that the practice of giving discharge to each institution for their administrative expenditure should continue to be pursued;(Does not affect the English version.)

2022/02/03
Committee: CONT

2021/2108(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46

46. Stresses that the current situation, where Parliament can only check the reports of the Court and of the European Ombudsman as well as the information on the Council’s website but does not receive written or oral answers from the Council during the annual discharge procedure, i.e., the Council refuses to collaborate with Parliament in the context of the annual ~~budgetary~~ discharge procedure, makes it impossible for Parliament to make an informed decision on granting discharge, and that this has a lasting negative effect on both institutions and discredits the management and democratic scrutiny of the Union budget; regrets the Council’s continuing refusal to engage in loyal cooperation in the framework of the discharge procedure that has lasted for more than a decade;

2022/02/03
Committee: CONT

2021/2108(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48

48. ~~Believes that a revision of the Treaties is necessary to streamline~~In respect of the Council's specific role as an institution giving recommendations on the discharge procedure, ~~making it clearer and more transparent, especially by giving Parliament the explicit competence to grant discharge to all institutions, bodies, offices and agencies individually~~reiterates its requests to the Council to give discharge recommendations with respect to the other Union institutions;

2022/02/03
Committee: CONT

2021/2107(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)

38 a. Reminds that the fight against Legionella bacteria is one of the most important tasks in the field of water treatment and disinfection;

2022/02/04
Committee: CONT

2021/2107(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46

46. Recalls the support by the vast majority of Parliament for a single seat to ensure efficient spending of Union taxpayers’ money and to assume its institutional responsibility to reduce its carbon footprint; recalls that Parliament’s plenary has previously requested a debate on its right to determine its own working arrangements and committed itself to initiating an ordinary treaty revision procedure under Article 48 of the Treaty on the European Union with a view to proposing changes necessary to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Protocol 6 to allow it to decide on the location of its seat and its internal organisation4 ; calls on the Council to take into account Parliament's position; _________________ 4Report A7-0350/2013 available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc ument/A-7-2013-0350_EN.pdf

2022/02/04
Committee: CONT

2021/2106(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. GPostpones its decision on grantsing the Commission discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2020;

2022/03/04
Committee: CONT

2021/2106(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Proposal for a decision 2
Paragraph 1

1. GPostpones its decision on grantsing the Director of the European Education and Culture Executive Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2020;

2022/03/04
Committee: CONT

2021/2106(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Proposal for a decision 3
Paragraph 1

1. GPostpones its decision on grantsing the Director of the European Innovation Council and SMEs Executive Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2020;

2022/03/04
Committee: CONT

2021/2106(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Proposal for a decision 4
Paragraph 1

1. GPostpones its decision on grantsing the Director of the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2020;

2022/03/04
Committee: CONT

2021/2106(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Proposal for a decision 5
Paragraph 1

1. GPostpones its decision on grantsing the Director of the European Research Council Executive Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2020;

2022/03/04
Committee: CONT

2021/2106(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Proposal for a decision 6
Paragraph 1

1. GPostpones its decision on grantsing the Director of the European Research Executive Agency discharge in relation to the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2020;

2022/03/04
Committee: CONT

2021/2106(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Proposal for a decision 7
Paragraph 1

1. GPostpones its decision on grantsing the Director of the European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2020;

2022/03/04
Committee: CONT

2021/2106(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2

2. Reiterates its deep concerns regarding the situation concerning the rule of law in a number of Member States, which is deeply worrying in its own right and may ultimately lead to serious losses for the Union budget and underlines its requests to the Commission to use all available tools to limit the risk of such losses. This should include the immediate and full application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget;deleted

2022/03/04
Committee: CONT

2021/2106(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2

2022/03/04
Committee: CONT

2021/2106(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 a (new)

40a. Calls on the Commission to stop unjustifiably withholding approval of National Recovery Plans and disbursement of the related funds;

2022/03/04
Committee: CONT

2022/02/02
Committee: LIBE

2021/0140(CNS)

Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2

~~The Council may set time limits for the implementation of specific recommendations.~~deleted

2022/02/02
Committee: LIBE

2020/2196(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1

1. Considers that the very concept of Schengen cooperation, that of ensuring the absence of controls at internal borders, has been further challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic~~, which has been added to the grounds invoked since 2015 for the persistent retention of internal border controls by some Member States; reiterates its condemnation of~~; notes the maintenance of internal border checks and ~~its~~takes the view that many of the prolongations are not in line with the rules pertaining to their extension, necessity or proportionality, and are therefore unlawful;

2021/01/20
Committee: LIBE

2020/2196(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2

2. ~~Deplores the fact~~Notes that internal border controls are continuing to be introduced by some Member States as a ~~unilateral~~ response to ~~new challenges, before they have given proper consideration to the common European interest in~~extraordinary challenges; stresses that maintaining Schengen as an area without internal border controls is in the common interest of all Member States; reiterates its call on the Commission to exercise appropriate scrutiny over the application of the Schengen acquis, ~~including through the use of infringement procedures,~~ and underlines the urgent need to enhance mutual trust and cooperation among the Schengen states and appropriate governance for the Schengen area;

2021/01/20
Committee: LIBE

2020/2196(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7

7. Deeply regrets the fact that there have been persistent and serious reports about violence and pushbacks at the external border, as well as the lack of adequate monitoring mechanisms to ensure respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law at the external borders; considers that the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) must be given an enhanced operational role with regard to the monitoring of respect for fundamental rights at the external borders;

2021/01/20
Committee: LIBE

2020/2194(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)

4 a. Reminds that the Union agencies are playing an increasingly important part in the Union, but their role in serving Union citizens effectively needs to be evaluated more carefully;

2021/01/19
Committee: LIBE

2020/2181(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)

5 a. Reminds that all Union agencies must rigorously comply with the Financial Regulation and the high standards of management.

2021/01/20
Committee: LIBE

2020/2172(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)

4 a. Reminds that according to the Financial Regulation all Union bodies must make payments within prescribed terms; however notes that the Agency frequently failed to do so exposing therefore the Agency to reputational risk;

2021/01/19
Committee: LIBE

2020/2158(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)

4 a. Reminds that the functioning of the agencies implies high costs and heavy administrative burden; stresses therefore that their activity and effectiveness in the service of citizens should be each time carefully analysed and assessed;

2021/01/15
Committee: LIBE

2020/2153(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)

3 a. EU institutions must rigorously comply with financial regulation and high management standards;

2021/01/19
Committee: LIBE

2020/2152(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)

4 a. Stresses that the role of the Agency in serving Union citizens effectively and the real added value of the Agency need to be evaluated more carefully as its functioning implies high costs and heavy administrative burden;

2021/01/19
Committee: LIBE

2020/2144(DEC)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)

32 a. Welcomes the fact that the Court sees a strong increase in media interest with particularly high coverage of its special reports;

2021/02/10
Committee: CONT

2020/2142(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. ~~Grants the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2019 /~~ Postpones its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and of the Council for the financial year 2019;

2021/02/10
Committee: CONT

2020/2142(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35

35. Emphasises Parliament's prerogative to grant discharge pursuant to Article 319 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union, and the applicable provisions of the Financial Regulation and Parliament’s Rules of Procedure in line with current interpretation and practice, namely to grant discharge in order to maintain transparency and ensure democratic accountability towards Union taxpayers;

2021/02/10
Committee: CONT

2020/2142(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)

35 a. Notes that over the course of almost twenty years Parliament has developed the practice of granting discharge to all Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies;

2021/02/10
Committee: CONT

2020/2142(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41

41. ENotes that the different roles of the respective institutions in the discharge procedures should be distinguished; emphasises that Parliament does not accept that the two institutions have an equivalent and reciprocal role in the discharge procedure;

2021/02/10
Committee: CONT

2020/2141(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20

20. Reiterates its call on the Secretary- General to insist on the need for real geographical balance in terms of proportional representation of all Member States at all levels of staff, including top management; notes the difficulties Parliament encountered in recruiting some nationalities; stresses the importance of increasing the attractiveness of Parliament as an employer throughout all Member States;

2021/02/09
Committee: CONT

2020/2141(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 86 a (new)

86 a. Geographic dispersion of Parliament - Single Seat

2021/02/09
Committee: CONT

2020/2141(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 86 b (new)

86 b. Recalls that a vast majority of Parliament expressed in various resolutions support for a single seat to ensure efficient spending of Union taxpayers money;

2021/02/09
Committee: CONT

2020/2141(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 86 c (new)

86 c. Notes that the Court has estimated that moving from Strasbourg to Brussels could generate annual savings of 114 million;

2021/02/09
Committee: CONT

2020/2141(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 86 d (new)

86 d. Recalls that additional expenditure caused by the travels to Strasbourg goes against the principle of sound financial management;

2021/02/09
Committee: CONT

2020/2141(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Elżbieta RAFALSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 90

90. Recalls that, at its meeting of 10 December 2018, the Bureau decided to modify the rules applicable to the pension scheme by increasing the retirement age from 63 to 65 years and introducing a levy of 5% to pension payments for future pensioners with a view to improve its sustainability; welcomes that the immediate effects of the rules change were savings in the 2019 pensions payments amounting to approximately EUR 325 000, that of these, EUR 306 000 stem from the increase in pension age and EUR 19 000 stem from the introduction of a 5% levy to all pensions established after 1 January 2019; asks that the Bureau evaluate all possible options as soon as the Court of Justice has made its decisions regarding the current measures in order to find a fair solution to the voluntary pension scheme and fund while keeping Parliament's liability to a minimum as Union taxpayers’ money is involved;

2021/02/09
Committee: CONT

2020/2140(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)

5 a. Reminds that the functioning of the agencies implies high costs and heavy administrative burden; stresses therefore that their activities and effectiveness in the service of citizens should always be carefully analysed and assessed;

2021/01/19
Committee: LIBE

2020/2140(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)

5 b. Stresses the need to ensure clear and simple rules for all forms of Union financing, while maintaining effective controls in order to verify how funds are spent and whether the expected results have been achieved;

2021/01/19
Committee: LIBE

2020/2132(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3

3. Stresses that the European Council has a ~~de facto~~ right of initiative when defining the strategic guidelines for legislative planning within the area of freedom, security and justice, which does not constitute a level playing field between Parliament and the Council; underlines moreover the early in~~fluence by~~volvement of the Member States via their participation in numerous Commission advisory bodies;

2021/03/16
Committee: LIBE

2020/2132(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5

5. Condemns the consistent lack of proper response to Parliament’s initiative on the establishment of an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights; reiterates its call on the Commission and the Council to enter without delay into negotiations with Parliament on the interinstitutional agreement;deleted

2021/03/16
Committee: LIBE

2020/2132(INI)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6

6. Reiterates its reasoned proposal on the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded; reiterates its deep concern that the standard modalities for hearings do not ensure equal treatment for Parliament, on the one hand, and the Commission and one third of the Member States, on the other, for presenting the reasoned proposal and access to information; expresses its regret that the hearings have not yet resulted in any significant progress on addressing clear risks of a serious breach of the values; points out that the Council’s failure to make effective use of Article 7 of the TEU continues to undermine the integrity of common European values, mutual trust, and the credibility of the Union as a whole.deleted

2021/03/16
Committee: LIBE

2020/2081(INI)

(76) In the absence of a general requirement for providers of intermediary services to ensure a physical presence within the territory of one of the Member States, there is a need to ensure clarity under which Member State's jurisdiction those providers fall for the purposes of enforcing the rules laid down in Chapters III and IV by the national competent authorities. A provider should be under the jurisdiction of the Member State where its main establishment is located, that is, where the provider has its head office or registered office within which the principal financial functions and operational control are exercised. In respect of providers that do not have an establishment in the Union but that offer services in the Union and therefore fall within the scope of this Regulation, the Member State where those providers appointed their legal representative should have jurisdiction, considering the function of legal representatives under this Regulation. In the interest of the effective application of this Regulation, all Member States should, however, have jurisdiction in respect of providers that failed to designate a legal representative, provided that the principle of ne bis in idem is respected. To that aim, each Member State that exercises jurisdiction in respect of such providers should, without undue delay, inform all other Member States of the measures they have taken in the exercise of that jurisdiction. In addition in order to ensure effective protection of fundamental rights of EU citizens that take into account diverse national law sand difference in socio-cultural context between countries, a Member State shall exercise jurisdiction where it concerns very large online platforms which offer services to a significant number of recipients in a given Member State. Member States jurisdiction is particularly important in case of very large online platforms which are social media because they play a central role in facilitating the public debate

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 91

(91) The Board should bring together the representatives of the Digital Services Coordinators and possible other competent authorities under the chairmanship of the Commission, with a view to ensuring an assessment of matters submitted to it in a fully European dimension. In view of possible cross-cutting elements that may be of relevance for other regulatory frameworks at Union level, the Board should be allowed to cooperate with other Union bodies, offices, agencies and advisory groups with responsibilities in fields such as equality, including equality between women and men, and non- discrimination, data protection, competition, electronic communications, audiovisual services, detection and investigation of frauds against the EU budget as regards custom duties, or consumer protection, as necessary for the performance of its tasks.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1

1. Providers of intermediary services shall, upon the receipt of an order to act against a specific item or multiple items of illegal content, issued by the relevant national judicial or administrative authorities, on the basis of the applicable Union or national law, in conformity with Union law, inform the authority issuing the order of the effect given to the orders, without undue delay, specifying the action taken and the moment when the action was taken.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new)

3 a. The Digital Services Coordinator of each Member State, on its own initiative, within 72 hours of receiving the copy of the order to act, has the right to scrutinise the order to determine whether it seriously or manifestly infringes the respective Member State’s law and revoke the order on its own territory.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2

2. Providers of intermediary services shall make public the information necessary to easily identify and communicate with their single points of contact, including postal address, and ensure that that information is up to date. Providers of intermediary services shall notify that information, including the name, postal address, the electronic mail address and telephone number, of their single point of contact, to the Digital Service Coordinator in the Member State where they are established.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4

4. Providers of intermediary services shall notify valid identification data, including the name, postal address, the electronic mail address and telephone number of their legal representative to the Digital Service Coordinator in the Member State where that legal representative resides or is established. They shall ensure that that information is up to date.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5 a (new)

5 a. Very large online platform defined in art. 25, at the request of the Digital Services Coordinator of the Member States where this provider offers its services, shall designate a legal representative to be bound to obligations laid down in this article

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1

1. Providers of intermediary services shall include information on any restrictions that they impose in relation to the use of their service in respect of information provided by the recipients of the service, in their terms and conditions. That information shall include information on any policies, procedures, measures and tools used for the purpose of content moderation, including algorithmic decision-making and human review. It shall be set out in clear plain, intelligible and unambiguous language and shall be publicly available in an easily accessible format.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)

2 a. Very large online platforms as defined in article 25, should publish their terms and conditions in all official languages of the Union.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 b (new)

2 b. The Digital Services Coordinator of each Member State has the right to request very large online platforms, to apply measures and tools of content moderation, including algorithmic decision-making and human review reflecting Member State’s socio-cultural context. Framework for this cooperation as well as specific measures thereof may be laid down in national legislation and be notified to the European Commission.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 c (new)

2 c. Notwithstanding the right in article 12(3), the Digital Services Coordinator of each Member State, by means of national legislation, may seek to request from a very large online platform to cooperate with the Digital Services Coordinator of the Member State in question in handling specific legal content removal cases in which there is reason to believe that Member State’s socio-cultural context may have played a vital role.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b

(b) the number of notices submitted in accordance with Article 14, categorised by the type of alleged illegal content concerned, any action taken pursuant to the notices by differentiating whether the action was taken on the basis of the law or the terms and conditions of the provider, and the average and median time needed for taking the action;

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point d

(d) the number of complaints received through the internal complaint-handling system referred to in Article 17, the basis for those complaints, decisions taken in respect of those complaints, the average and median time needed for taking those decisions and the number of instances where those decisions were reversed.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)

2 a. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 69, after consulting the Board, to lay down specific templates of reports specified in paragraph 1.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point b

(b) a clear indication of the electronic location of that information~~, in particular the exact URL or URLs,~~ and, where necessary, and applicable additional information enabling the identification of the illegal content which shall be appropriate to the type of content and to the specific type of intermediary;

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1

This Section shall not apply to online platforms that qualify as micro or small enterprises within the meaning of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC and which do not engage in illegal activity.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)

(c a) any other decisions that affect the availability, visibility or accessibility of that content and the recipient’s account or the recipient’s access to significant features of the platform’s regular services

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4

4. Online platforms shall inform complainants without undue delay of the decision they have taken in respect of the information to which the complaint relates and shall inform complainants of the possibility of out-of-court dispute settlement provided for in Article 18 and other available redress possibilities. This feedback shall also include: - information on whether the decision referred to in paragraph 1 was taken as a result of human review or through automated means - in case the decision referred to in paragraph 1 is tobe sustained, detailed explanation on how the information to which the complaint relates is in breach of the platform’s terms and conditions or why the online platform finds the information unlawful.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 5

5. Online platforms shall ensure that the decisions, referred to in paragraph 4, are not solely taken on the basis of automated means. Complainants shall have the right to request human review and consultation with relevant online platforms’ staff with respect to content to which the complaint relates to.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 5 a (new)

5 a. Recipients of the service negatively affected by the decision of an online platform shall have the possibility to seek swift judicial redress in accordance with the laws of the Member States concerned. The procedure shall ensure that an independent judicial body decides on the matter without undue delay, resolving the case no later than within 14 days while granting then negatively affected party the right to seek interim measures to be imposed within 48 hours since the recourse is brought before this body. The right to seek a judicial redress and interim measures will not be limited or conditioned on exhausting the internal complaint-handling system.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1

1. Very large online platforms that use recommender systems ~~shall set out in~~ or any otheir systerms ~~and conditions, in a clear, accessible and easily comprehensible manner, the main parameters used~~ used to determine the order of presentation of content, including th~~eir recommender systems, as well as any options for the recipients of the service to modify or influence those main parame~~at which decrease the visibility of content, shall set out in their terms ~~that they may have made available, including at least one option which is not based on profiling, within the meaning of Article 4 (4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679.~~and conditions, in a clear, accessible and easily comprehensible manner, the main parameters used in these systems

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 a (new)

1 a. 2.The main parameters referred to in paragraph1 shall include, at minimum: (a) the main criteria used by the relevant recommender system, (b) how these criteria are weighted against each other, (c)the optimisation goal of the relevant recommender system, (d) explanation of the role that the behaviour of the recipients of the service plays in how the relevant recommender system functions.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 b (new)

1 b. 3. Very large online platforms shall provide options for the recipients of the service to modify or influence parameters referred to in paragraph 2, including at least one option which is not based on profiling, within the meaning of Article 4 (4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2

2. ~~Where several options are available pursuant to paragraph 1, v~~Very large online platforms shall provide an easily accessible functionality on their online interface allowing the recipient of the service: a) to select and to modify at any time their preferred option for each of the recommender systems that determines the relative order of information presented to them, b) to select third party recommender systems.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1

1. The Commission and the Board shall ~~encourage~~have the right to request and facilitate the drawing up of codes of conduct at Union level to contribute to the proper application of this Regulation, taking into account in particular the specific challenges of tackling different types of illegal content and systemic risks, in accordance with Union law, in particular on competition and the protection of personal data.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2

2. Where significant systemic risk within the meaning of Article 26(1) emerge and concern several very large online platforms, the Commission ~~may invite~~shall request the very large online platforms concerned, other very large online platforms, other online platforms and other providers of intermediary services, as appropriate, as well as civil society organisations and other interested parties, to participate in the drawing up of codes of conduct, including by setting out commitments to take specific risk mitigation measures, as well as a regular reporting framework on any measures taken and their outcomes.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 3 a (new)

3 a. 4: Member States shall exercise jurisdiction for the purposes of Chapters III and IV of this Regulation where it concerns very large online platforms, as defined in art. 25, which offer services to a significant number of active recipients of the service in a given Member State, which can be calculated on the basis of art. 23(2).

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1

Recipients of the service shall have the right to lodge a complaint against providers of intermediary services alleging an infringement of this Regulation with the Digital Services Coordinator of the Member State where the recipient resides or is established. The Digital Services Coordinator shall assess the complaint and, where appropriate, transmit it to the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment. Assessment of the complaint can be supplemented by the opinion of Digital Services Coordinator of the Member State, where the recipient resides or is established, on how the matter should be resolved taking into account national law and socio-cultural context of a given Member State. Where the complaint falls under the responsibility of another competent authority in its Member State, the Digital Service Coordinator receiving the complaint shall transmit it to that authority.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Pursuant to paragraph 1 the Digital Services Coordinator of establishment in cases concerning complaint transmitted by the Digital Services Coordinator of the Member State where the recipient resides or is established, should assess the matter in a timely manner and should inform the Digital Services Coordinator of the Member State where the recipient resides or is established, on how the complaint has been handled.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 a (new)

1 a. A request or recommendation pursuant to paragraph 1 should not preclude the possibility of the Digital Services Coordinator of the Member State where the recipient of the service resides or is established, to be able to carry out its own investigation concerning suspected infringement of this regulation by a provider of an intermediary service.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 a (new)

2 a. A recommendation pursuant to paragraph 1 and 2 may additionally indicate: a) an opinion on matters that involve taking into account national law and socio-cultural context; b) a draft decision based on investigation pursuant to paragraph1a

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 7

7. Where, pursuant to paragraph 6, the Commission concludes that the assessment or the investigatory or enforcement measures taken or envisaged pursuant to paragraph 4 are incompatible with this Regulation, it shall request the Digital Service Coordinator of establishment to further assess the matter and take the necessary investigatory or enforcement measures to ensure compliance with this Regulation, and to inform it about those measures taken within two months from that request. This information should be also transmitted to the Digital Services Coordinator or the Board that initiated the proceedings pursuant to paragraph 1.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 6

6. The Board shall adopt its rules of procedure~~, following the consent of~~ and inform the Commission thereof.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point d

(d) advise the Commission to take the measures referred to in Article 51 and, ~~where requested by the Commission, adopt opinions on draft Commission measur~~adopt opinions on issues concerning very large online platforms in accordance with this Regulation;

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)

(e a) (f) issue opinions, recommendations or advice on matters related to Article 34.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 1

1. In order to carry out the tasks assigned to it under this Section, the Commission may by simple request or by decision require the very large online platforms concerned, their legal representatives, as well as any other persons acting for purposes related to their trade, business, craft or profession that may be reasonably be aware of information relating to the suspected infringement or the infringement, as applicable, including organisations performing the audits referred to in Articles 28 and 50(3), to provide such information within a reasonable time period.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 1

1. By ~~fiv~~three years after the entry into force of this Regulation at the latest, and every ~~fiv~~three years thereafter, the Commission shall evaluate this Regulation and report to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee. On the basis of the findings and taking into utmost account the opinion of the Board, that report shall, where appropriate, be accompanied by a proposal for amendment of this Regulation.

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0361(COD)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 4

4. By three years from the date of application of this Regulation at the latest, the Commission, after consulting the Board, shall carry out an assessment of the functioning of the Board and shall report it to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee, taking into account the first years of application of the Regulation. On the basis of the findings and taking into utmost account the opinion of the Board, that report shall, where appropriate, be accompanied by a proposal for amendment of this Regulation with regard to the structure of the Board.deleted

2021/06/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0319(NLE)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1

1. ~~Refuses to g~~Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;

2021/07/15
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g – point v

~~(v) the sibling or siblings of the applicant;~~deleted

2021/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1

1. Where the applicant is in possession of a valid residence document, the Member State which issued the document shall be responsible for examining the application for international protection. That responsibility shall cease after the applicant leaves the Member State which issued the residence document.

2021/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1

1. Where it is established, on the basis of proof or circumstantial evidence as described in the two lists referred to in Article 30(4) of this Regulation, including the data referred to in Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Eurodac Regulation], that an applicant has irregularly crossed the border into a Member State by land, sea or air having come from a third country, the first Member State thus entered shall be responsible for examining the application for international protection. That responsibility shall cease if the application is registered more than 3one years after the date on which that border crossing took place.

2021/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point d

(d) take back, under the conditions laid down in Articles 31 and 35 of this Regulation, a resettled or admitted person who has made an application for international protection or who is irregularly staying in a Member State other than the Member State which accepted to admit him or her in accordance with Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Union Resettlement Framework Regulation] ~~or which granted international protection or humanitarian status under a national resettlement scheme~~.

2021/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

The request shall state the reasons warranting an urgent reply and the period within which a reply is requested. That period shall be at least ~~one~~two weeks.

2021/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1

1. The requested Member State shall make the necessary checks, and shall give a decision on the request to take charge of an applicant within ~~one~~two months of receipt of the request.

2021/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2

2. Notwithstanding the first paragraph, in the case of a Eurodac hit with data recorded pursuant to Article 13 and 14a of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Eurodac Regulation] or of a VIS hit with data recorded pursuant to Article 21(2) of Regulation (EC) No 767/2008, the requested Member State shall give a decision on the request within ~~two weeks~~one month of receipt of the request.

2021/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 7

7. Where the requesting Member State has asked for an urgent reply pursuant to Article 29(2), the requested Member State shall reply within the period requested or, failing that, within at least two weeks of receipt of the request.

2021/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1

1. In a situation referred to in Article 26(1), point (b), (c) or (d) the Member State where the person is present shall make a take back notification without delay and in any event within ~~two weeks~~one month after receiving the Eurodac hit.

2021/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1

1. The determining Member State whose take charge request as regards the applicant referred to in Article 26(1), point (a) was accepted or who made a take back notification as regards persons referred to in Article 26(1), point (b), (c) and (d) shall take a transfer decision at the latest within ~~one~~two weeks of the acceptance or notification.

2021/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Where the measures proposed are not in proportion to the contributions that the contributing Member State would have made by means of the measures referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) or (c), the Commission shall set out in the implementing act the measures proposed while adjusting their level.deleted

2021/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3

Where the measures proposed would lead to a shortfall greater than 30% of the total number of solidarity measures identified in the report on migratory pressure under Article 51(3)(b)(ii), the contributions set out in the implementing act shall be adjusted so that those Member States indicating such measures would be required to cover 50% of their share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54 through measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii). The Commission shall adjust measures referred to in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) indicated by those Member States accordingly.deleted

2021/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

The share of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c) to be provided by each Member State in accordance with Articles 48 and 53 sh~~all be calculated in accordance with the formula set out in Annex III and shall be based on the following criteria for each Member State, according to the latest available Eurostat data:~~ould take into account the actual efforts of the Member States in the field of asylum, migration and border management, their effectiveness in terms of returns, their external dimension actions, the overall capacity of their own systems and potential migratory pressure on their territory. The Member States whose burden of responsibility is greater should have the option of reducing their solidarity contribution.

2021/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 1 – point a

~~(a) the size of the population (50% weighting);~~deleted

2021/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 1 – point b

~~(b) the total GDP (50% weighting).~~deleted

2021/12/09
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 – paragraph 4

4. When the period referred to in Article 55(2) expires, the benefitting Member State shall immediately inform the sponsoring Member State that the procedure set out in paragraphs 5 to 10 shall be applied in respect of the illegally staying third-country nationals concerned.deleted

2021/12/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1

Where the checks confirm that there are reasonable grounds to consider the person concerned a danger to its national security or public order, the Member State of relocation shall inform within one ~~week~~month the benefitting Member State of the nature of and underlying elements for an alert from any relevant database. In such cases, relocation of the person concerned shall not take place.

2021/12/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 4

4. Where the Member State of relocation has relocated a beneficiary for international protection, the Member State of relocation shall automatically grant international protection status respecting the respective status granted by the benefitting Member State.deleted

2021/12/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0279(COD)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 5

~~5. Where the Member State of relocation has relocated a third-country national who is illegally staying on its territory, of Directive 2008/115/EC shall apply.~~deleted

2021/12/10
Committee: LIBE

2020/0277(COD)

Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11

(11) The procedural rules set out in Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Management] for carrying out relocation and return sponsorship should be applied for the purpose of ensuring the proper implementation of the solidarity measures in a situation of crisis, although they should be adjusted in order to take into account the gravity and urgency of that situation. The concept of return sponsorship should include a precise definition of the roles of the country of entry, the sponsoring country and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. If this instrument is chosen, Member States must be allowed to indicate the nationality of third-country nationals required to return, taking into account their bilateral cooperation with the countries of origin on returns and readmission.

2022/01/28
Committee: LIBE

2020/0277(COD)

Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b

~~(b) an imminent risk of such a situation.~~deleted

2022/01/28
Committee: LIBE

2020/0277(COD)

Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 5

5. By way of derogation from Article 51(3)(b)(ii), Article 52(1) and 52(3) first sub-paragraph and Article 53(3)(a) of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Management], relocation shall include not only persons referred to in points (a) and (c) of Article 45(1) of that Regulation, but also persons referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 45(2).deleted

2022/01/28
Committee: LIBE

2020/0277(COD)

Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 6

6. By way of derogation from Article 54 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Management], the share calculated in accordance with the formula set out in that Article shall also apply to measures set out in Article 45(2), points (a) and (b) of that Regulation.deleted

2022/01/28
Committee: LIBE

2020/0277(COD)

Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 7

~~7. By way of derogation from Article 55(2) of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Management], the deadline set therein shall be set at four months.~~deleted

2022/01/28
Committee: LIBE

2020/0277(COD)

Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1

1. In a crisis situation as referred to in Article 1(2)(a), and on the basis of an implementing act adopted by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Article, Member States may suspend the examination of applications for international protection in accordance with Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedures Regulation] and Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Qualification Regulation] in respect of displaced persons from third countries who are facing a high degree of risk of being subject to indiscriminate violence, in exceptional situations of armed conflict, and who are unable to return to their country of origin. In such a case, Member States shall grant immediate protection status to the persons concerned, unless they represent a danger to the national security or public order of the Member State, which may also revoke immediate protection in other justified cases, where return is considered viable. Such status shall be without prejudice to their ongoing application for international protection in the relevant Member State.

2022/01/28
Committee: LIBE

2020/0277(COD)

Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Patryk JAKI, Beata KEMPA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2

2. Member States shall ensure that beneficiaries of immediate protection have effective access to all the rights laid down in Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Qualification Regulation] applicable to beneficiaries of subsidiary protection.deleted

2022/01/28
Committee: LIBE

2019/2208(INI)

Beata KEMPA, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)

Aa. whereas the effectiveness of return policy at EU level is not high, and a fall in the effectiveness of returns has even been noted;

2020/07/10
Committee: LIBE

2019/2208(INI)

Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Beata KEMPA, Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)

4a. Draws attention to the need to increase the transparency and speed of procedures for issuing return decisions, as this will make it more common for such decisions to be issued at the same time as or immediately after decisions to end legal residence, e.g. in the event of a negative asylum decision or the expiry of a visa or residence permit;

2020/07/10
Committee: LIBE

2019/2208(INI)

Beata KEMPA, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)

4b. Recalls that return procedures are hampered by the failure of third-country nationals to cooperate, and that Member States themselves do not have sufficient tools to enable the competent authorities to swiftly exchange the necessary information in relation with return operations;

2020/07/10
Committee: LIBE

2019/2208(INI)

Beata KEMPA, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)

7a. Stresses that the lack of consistent definitions and interpretations concerning the risk of absconding and the use of detention means, inter alia, that irregular migrants abscond or engage in secondary movements;

2020/07/10
Committee: LIBE

2019/2208(INI)

Beata KEMPA, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)

13a. Stresses the importance of an accelerated border procedure that would apply to persons whose asylum applications have been rejected in the course of asylum procedures at the border and would help to speed up the adoption and enforcement of return decisions at external borders;

2020/07/10
Committee: LIBE

2019/2206(INI)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)

Aa. whereas the increase in the number of Dublin procedures in 2016- 2017 compared to 2014 is clearly linked to migrants who arrived in Europe during the crisis moving to their destination countries, which places a significant administrative burden on some Member States; points out that this results not only from the architecture of the Dublin system, but above all from differences in integration and social policy between Member States;

2020/07/08
Committee: LIBE

2019/2206(INI)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1

~~Incorporating the principle of solidarity into the m~~Management of asylum seekers

2020/07/08
Committee: LIBE

2019/2206(INI)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1

1. Considers that the Dublin system places a significant burden on a minority of Member States, in particular when influxes of migrants occur; takes the view that the EU therefore needs a solidarity mechanism which makes for fair sharing of burdens and responsibility among Member States, including through relocation on the basis of objective criteria of asylum seekers who are manifestly eligible for asylum;Notes that in connection with the mass influx of migrants, some Member States are facing a major administrative burden; recognises the difficult, global migration situation and considers that measures to address it should immediately be taken together with the entire international community; recalls, at the same time, that EU agencies such as Frontex and the EASO were set up precisely to balance the excessive burden on some Member States and support them in the implementation of the asylum and border acquis.

2020/07/08
Committee: LIBE

2019/2206(INI)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)

1a. Agrees that the migration crisis has highlighted the flaws in the Dublin system, which depends, among other things, on the correct registration of migrants who illegally cross the EU's external borders and apply for international protection; stresses, at the same time, that the current regulation requires above all the full implementation of rules that are clear and take into account the link between the Member State and the applicant and the role of the Member State in migrants crossing the border;

2020/07/08
Committee: LIBE

2019/2206(INI)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)

1b. Stresses that taking responsibility for the EU's external borders is key to ensuring the safety of EU citizens;

2020/07/08
Committee: LIBE

2019/2206(INI)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)

1c. Stresses that the principle of solidarity must be balanced with the principle of responsibility, and that reform of the Dublin system cannot be based on the automatic redistribution of applicants within the EU, as that would further increase pressure on national asylum systems and encourage illegal migration and human trafficking and smuggling; considers, too, that compulsory relocation is an ineffective instrument;

2020/07/08
Committee: LIBE

2019/2206(INI)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 d (new)

1d. Considers a balanced and harmonised migration policy, including asylum, at European level to be necessary, but that it should be based on consensus and a balance of responsibility and solidarity, in line with the June 2018 European Council conclusions;

2020/07/08
Committee: LIBE

2019/2206(INI)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2

2. Stresses th~~at ad hoc agreements are no substitute for a harmonised and sustainable policy at EU level; deplores the fact that efforts to overhaul the Dublin III Regulation have been blocked in the Council~~e importance of the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility, with the aim of establishing a framework for the external dimension of migration and asylum policy through enhanced cooperation between the EU and third countries on legal migration and mobility, combating trafficking in human beings, promoting international protection and extending the external dimension of EU asylum policy and the interaction between migration and development policies;

2020/07/08
Committee: LIBE

2019/2206(INI)

Patryk JAKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA

2a. Stresses that solutions under the European Asylum System must guarantee an adequate level of security and should be based primarily on the principle of Member States' responsibility for national asylum systems; stresses, at the same time, the need for a comprehensive approach to migration, taking into account, among other things, the issue of returns;

2020/02/03
Committee: CONT

2019/2090(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Banking Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority’s budget for the financial year ~~2018 / Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Banking Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Authority for the financial year~~ 2018;

2020/02/03
Committee: CONT

2019/2088(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) discharge in respect of the implementation of Europol’s budget for the financial year 2018/ Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2018;

2020/02/03
Committee: CONT

2019/2087(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Director-General of the Euratom Supply Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year ~~2018 / Postpones its decision on granting the Director-General of the Euratom Supply Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year~~ 2018;

2020/02/03
Committee: CONT

2019/2086(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Chemicals Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year ~~2018 / Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Chemicals Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year~~ 2018;

2020/02/03
Committee: CONT

2019/2084(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European GNSS Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year ~~2018/ Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European GNSS Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year~~ 2018;

2020/02/03
Committee: CONT

2019/2083(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2018 / Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Agency for the financial year 2018;

2020/02/03
Committee: CONT

2019/2081(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Railways discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year ~~2018/ Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Railways discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year~~ 2018;

2020/01/31
Committee: CONT

2019/2080(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year ~~2018/ Postpones its decision on granting the Director of the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year~~ 2018;

2020/02/03
Committee: CONT

2019/2079(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Raffaele FITTO, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Director of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control discharge in respect of the implementation of the Centre’s budget for the financial year 2018 / Postpones its decision on granting the Director of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Centre for the financial year 2018;

2020/01/31
Committee: CONT

2019/2077(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Raffaele FITTO, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2018/ Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2018;

2020/01/31
Committee: CONT

2019/2076(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Maritime Safety Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year ~~2018/ Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Maritime Safety Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year~~ 2018;

2020/01/31
Committee: CONT

2019/2074(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Administrative Director of the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) discharge in respect of the implementation of Eurojust’s budget for the financial year 2018/ Postpones its decision on granting the Administrative Director of the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) discharge in respect of the implementation of the Eurojust’s budget for the financial year 2018;

2020/02/04
Committee: CONT

2019/2073(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Medicines Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year ~~2018/ Postpones its decision on granting the Director of the European Medicines Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year~~ 2018;

2020/02/03
Committee: CONT

2019/2071(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2018 / Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2018;

2020/02/03
Committee: CONT

2019/2070(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Environment Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year ~~2018 / Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Environment Agency discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Agency for the financial year~~ 2018;

2020/02/03
Committee: CONT

2019/2069(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Director of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction discharge in respect of the implementation of the Centre’s budget for the financial year 2018 / Postpones its decision on granting the Director of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Centre for the financial year 2018;

2020/01/31
Committee: CONT

2019/2067(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Raffaele FITTO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) discharge in respect of the implementation of the Foundation’s budget for the financial year 2018 / Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) discharge in respect of the implementation of the Foundation’s budget for the financial year 2018;

2020/02/03
Committee: CONT

2019/2066(DEC)

Ryszard CZARNECKI, Raffaele FITTO, Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Patryk JAKI

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training discharge in respect of the implementation of the Centre’s budget for the financial year 2018 / Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training discharge in respect of the implementation of the Centre’s budget for the financial year 2018;

2020/01/31
Committee: CONT

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1

1. Notes the overall reduction of AMIF commitment appropriations by 15,4 % (-172 million euros) compared to 2019; ~~regret~~notes the decrease of commitment appropriations aimed at strengthening and developing the CEAS and enhancing responsibility-sharing between Member States (-29,5 %) compared to 2019; recalls the importance of providing adequate financial capacity to improve the integration of migrants as well as re- integration of migrants who forcibly or voluntarily returned to a third country, and to respond to emergency assistance needs of Member States under migratory pressure; expresses its disappointment at the fact that the AMIF budget does not include some financial reserves to finance the reformed Dublin legislation and the new Union Resettlement schemes in case of adoption during 2020; proposes to foresee an amount in the reserve for temporary arrangements for disembarkation in the Union and relocation of people rescued in the Mediterranean; requests, in order to free financial resources, that the EU Trust Fund for Africa and the Regional development protection programmes for North Africa that primarily support external policies of the Union are funded by Heading IV of the Union budget (Global Europe) instead of by AMIF under Heading III (Security and Citizenship)compared to 2019;

2066/01/18
Committee: LIBE

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)

3 a. Stresses the necessity to solve the migration crisis at its source and to protect the Union's external borders; in this context particularly welcomes the increases of Commitment appropriations of EBCG.

2066/01/18
Committee: LIBE

2019/2028(BUD)