BETA

Activities of Tomasz FRANKOWSKI related to 2020/2022(INI)

Plenary speeches (1)

Digital Services Act: Improving the functioning of the Single Market - Digital Services Act: adapting commercial and civil law rules for commercial entities operating online - Digital Services Act and fundamental rights issues posed - Framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies - Civil liability regime for artificial intelligence - Intellectual property rights for the development of artificial intelligence technologies (continuation of debate)
2020/10/19
Dossiers: 2020/2022(INI)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on the Digital Services Act and fundamental rights issues posed
2020/07/20
Committee: CULT
Dossiers: 2020/2022(INI)
Documents: PDF(131 KB) DOC(46 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Petra KAMMEREVERT', 'mepid': 96837}]

Amendments (5)

Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that fundamental rights constitute an objective system of values which ensures that fundamental communication freedoms are not alterable, rights to property, as well as its protection, are not alterable and must be balanced with one another, including by private-law agreements or business terms and conditions;
2020/04/28
Committee: CULT
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that the Digital Services Act should be fully compliant with the objective of ensuring the protection of fundamental rights, including the right to freedom of expression and information, privacy, as well as the right to property, including intellectual property;
2020/04/28
Committee: CULT
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for all protective measures which might at the same time be detrimental to fundamental rights to remain tasks for the State that are subject to thorough judicial review and for no public-authority tasks to bto fully respect fundamental rights and recalls that such mandatory protective measures operate within a legislative tfransferred to private-sector firmsmework and are subject to judicial oversight;
2020/04/28
Committee: CULT
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for recognition of the factStrongly believes that services developed in the EU which guarantee effective and comprehensive privacy protection and maximum digital freedom, intellectual property protection, the promotion of cultural diversity and freedom of information and communication represent an advantage in global competition that should not be underestimated, and calls on the Commission to systematically promote their development in a more targeted manner;
2020/04/28
Committee: CULT
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for sector-specific rules that serve to realise society-wide objectives and give tangible expression to them for certain sectors, such as the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD), to take precedence over general rules. to ensure legal security, before, if necessary, any reassessment takes place, that may follow the introduction of any new general rule;
2020/04/28
Committee: CULT