Activities of Anne-Sophie PELLETIER related to 2020/2217(INI)
Shadow opinions (2)
OPINION on a European strategy for data
OPINION on a European strategy for data
Amendments (7)
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that a large proportion of available data is the result of free collaboration between users to create content and share data, and takes the view that the data resulting from that free cooperation should be regarded as a common good accessible to all and non- tradable;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Urges the Commission to empower consumers to put them in control of their data and to ensure that the single market for data is grounded in European values and fairness in competition; believes that citizens’ data could help in developing innovative green solutions and services that would benefit European consumers and companies; asks the Commission to consider how to support data altruism in full compliance with European legislation; calls on the Commission to look into the introduction of a digital tax on businesses monetising the collection and exchange of personal data;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out that non-pre-filtered raw data input into artificial intelligences may reproduce our societies’ many societal or economic biases, discriminations and inequalities in digital-service provision;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the need to create a single European data space for data stored and processed on European territory, with the aim of ensuring the free flow of non- personal data across borders and sectors; underlines the principle of the free flow of non-personal data as imperative for a single market for data, providing a level playing field for data sharing between stakeholders; considers that business-to- business (B2B) and business-to- government (B2G) data sharing should be voluntary, while mandatory access to data should also be envisaged to remedy potential market failures;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Emphasises that personal-health data must not be processed or appropriated without the full and informed consent of the person concerned; emphasises that, accordingly, personal-health data protection must be an inalienable right;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Emphasises that data transfers to other jurisdictions must always abide by the provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the Law Enforcement Directive and other relevant Union legislation, as recently underlined by the CJEU judgment of 16 July 2020 in the Schrems II case, C-311/18, and the recommendations of the European Data Protection Board;
Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Requests the Commission and Member States to work to set up storage and processing architectures for genuinely European data, ensuring that European citizens’ data are processed on European territory in order to guarantee compliance with European provisions on fundamental rights such as fair terms of competition between economic actors; takes the view that a requirement to store and process data on European territory will ensure greater strategic autonomy while facilitating the emergence of both public and private digital-service offerings guaranteeing compliance with European rules;