Activities of Joanna KOPCIŃSKA related to 2020/2012(INL)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION with recommendations to the Commission on a framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies
Amendments (11)
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. Wwhereas the artificial intelligence (AI) global leadership race, which will determine the source of ethical values and standards shaping the sector worldwide, is picking up the pace is picking up the pace but should not be separated from ethical values and standards;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas there are serious ethical concerns about the autonomy of machines and their influence on the doctor-patient relationship;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas AI will play an increasingly significant role, bearing in mind our ageing societies and possible shortages of healthcare professionals;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. Whereas solutions which stress the need to include scientific research as the basis for development strategies by creating repositories of medical data (e.g. neurological and cardiological data) and sharing data from this research can produce tangible social benefits in the context of public safety and health;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the Union must undertake all necessary steps to guarantee that its ethical values, as expressed in the acquis, apply effectively to all AI areas within its territory and to promote its standards worldwide; emphasises in this regard that technological developments in AI must always be to the benefit of humankind;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out that the safety standards laid down in the Medical Devices Regulation may not be sufficient for the challenges of the mass employment of artificial intelligence systems; calls on the Commission to monitor the challenges in this field and to put forward proposals where necessary;
Amendment 103 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Warns against attempts to give machines some kind of 'personality' which might result in the removal of human liability in the event of treatment errors;
Amendment 104 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on the Commission to initiate an open, transparent sectoral dialogue giving priority to health care in order to then present an action plan to facilitate the development, testing and introduction of AI in research and innovation and the wide application of these in public health services;
Amendment 111 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Strongly supports the Commission in establishing a minimal common Union AI ethical framework to counter the shortcomings caused by AI internal market fragmentation, including environmental, healthcare, and food safety applications, and to prevent AI double standards across Member States for AI developed in Union and beyond, inter alia in areas such as consumer data management, protection and privacy in smart grids, waste management, equal access to services, patient-doctor relationship standards, data protection and privacy, civil liability in AI-assisted public healthcare, civil liability regarding autonomous vehicles or machinery;
Amendment 133 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Member States to align medical education and training programmes to developments in AI, as well as an awareness of the ethical challenges associated with the application of AI;