BETA

Activities of Cristian TERHEŞ related to 2022/2091(DEC)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2021, Section III – European Public Prosecutor’s Office
2023/02/01
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2022/2091(DEC)
Documents: PDF(131 KB) DOC(65 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Saskia BRICMONT', 'mepid': 197470}]

Amendments (8)

Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 1 (new)
(1) Stresses that financial regulations and high management standards have to be observed by all Union institutions;
2022/12/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Considering Article 14(2)(c) and Article 14(5) of Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 regarding the appointment and dismissal of the European Chief Prosecutor, points to the Decision of 11 November 2021 of Romania's High Court of Cassation and Justice according to which Laura Kövesi does not have the highest prosecutorial or judicial grade in Romania;
2022/12/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Notes EPPO's announcement from the 14 October 2022 with respect to the ongoing EPPO investigation into the acquisition of COVID-19 vaccines in the Union and to the fact that the exceptional confirmation comes after the extremely high public interest into the matter;
2022/12/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. RegretNotes that the EPPO’s full independence has been put into question by some Member States governments’ interferences withexistence has generated constitutional issues in some Member States regarding their European delegated prosecutors' appointment procedure;
2022/12/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Points to the fact that, as long as there are constitutional issues at the level of Member States regarding the European delegated prosecutors and that there are serious issues regarding the independence and the management of those delegated prosecutors1a, EPPO should not be given more powers; _________________ 1a https://www.g4media.ro/kovesi-cere- mai-multe-puteri-si-scoaterea- parchetului-european-de-sub-comisia- europeana-intr-un-discurs-tinut-in- parlamentul-germaniei-randamentul- investitiei-in-eppo-este-masiv-si-imediat- pui-un.html
2022/12/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Awaits with interest the findings and conclusions of EPPO's investigation into the acquisition of COVID-19 vaccines in the Union;
2022/12/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Warns that in the current crisis context, identifying new budgetary resources for the Union risks to become EPPO's sole reason of existence, with clear and serious impact on citizens rights and freedoms;
2022/12/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the EPPO’s caseload has been significantly underestimated; stresses the importance to adapt human and financial resources to the growing workload and to increase the EPPO's budget accordingly.deleted
2022/12/08
Committee: LIBE