8 Amendments of Cristian TERHEŞ related to 2023/2120(INI)
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
I a. whereas in 2022, the Ombudsman has asked the Council to grant faster access to legislative documents so that the public can effectively participate in discussions on draft EU laws;1b _________________ 1b https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/ne ws-document/en/157774;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I b (new)
Recital I b (new)
I b. whereas in 2022, the Ombudsman has criticised how the Commission handled a request for public access to text messages between its President and the Pfizer CEO and has found that the refusal of the Commission to grant access to these text messages was maladministration;4c _________________ 4c https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/de cision/en/158295; https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/ne ws-document/en/151742;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I c (new)
Recital I c (new)
I c. whereas in 2022, the Ombudsman has opened an inquiry into how the European Central Bank (ECB) handles ‘revolving doors’;7h _________________ 7h https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/ne ws-document/en/153137
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
K a. whereas in 2022, the Ombudsman has urged the Commission to treat access to document requests concerning EU recovery funds with greater consistency and to better explain its reasoning if it decides not release the asked-for information; 1a _________________ 1a https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/ne ws-document/en/163567
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K b (new)
Recital K b (new)
K b. whereas in 2022, the Ombudsman opened an inquiry in the European Commission’s refusal to give public access to documents related to its proposal for a Regulation on the European Health Data Space; 9k _________________ 9k https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/cas e/en/62762
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K c (new)
Recital K c (new)
K c. whereas in 2022, the Ombudsman opened an inquiry on how the European Commission dealt with a request for public access to declarations of interests of the members of its Regulatory Scrutiny Board;10n _________________ 10n https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/op ening-summary/en/163838
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Congratulates the Ombudsman on the opening of an inquiry into time taken by Commission to deal with access to documents requests; 3c _________________ 3c https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/ne ws-document/en/154486
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Highlights the fact that the Ombudsman’s inquiry into the refusal of the Commission to grant access to text messages between the Commission President and Pfizer CEO related to the procurement of COVID-19 vaccines showed that the "Commission had asked its President’s private office (cabinet) to search only for documents that fulfil the Commission’s recording criteria. As the Commission does not to register text messages, the search did not yield any results. Thus, the Commission had not attempted to identify any text messages beyond what had been registered in its record management system, and it had therefore not even assessed whether any such text messages should be disclosed"; Highlights that the Ombudsman found that this was maladministration; 5d _________________ 5d https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/de cision/en/158295