BETA

Activities of Mathilde ANDROUËT related to 2020/2076(INI)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on a New Industrial Strategy for Europe
2020/09/09
Committee: REGI
Dossiers: 2020/2076(INI)
Documents: PDF(133 KB) DOC(73 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Tsvetelina PENKOVA', 'mepid': 197845}]

Amendments (16)

Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas a domestic industry is a motor of growth, innovation the coronavirus health crisis is having a lasting impact on European economies and cannot be ignored in future strategy formulation, making it extremely important for European countries to take full advantage of Europeand social well-being within the EUtructural funds to rebuild their economies;
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the coronavirus health crisis has revealed that deindustrialisation is a factor contributing to destabilisation and lasting fragility and has created a colossal dependence on China for manufactures;
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas the EU’s SMEs have traditionally generated a high share of the EU’s employment, and in so doing have ensured social and economic well-being and prosp, by creating a sound fabric of very small businesses and SMEs, it is possible to guarantee sustainable economic dynamism, diversification of production and a solid territyorial network;
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the paths towards development and economic independence are those of cutting-edge technology and the production of digital goods and services;
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Bb . whereas future industrial strategies can no longer exclude environmental considerations;
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the EU’s industrial future is linked to an alignment of the economy with the principles of the European Green Deal, a roadmap towards a new growth policy for the EU, bringing citizens, cities and regions together, and allowing for a just transitione need for relocation and public investment in industrial activities, particularly strategic industries, organised by Member States or at level 1 of the nomenclature of territorial units (NUTS1);
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point a (new)
(a) Takes the view that Member States should introduce a per-kilometre duty on imports in a bid to promote short and intra-Community circuits for pollution containment purposes and launch a concerted supply channel revolution;
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point c (new)
(c) Stresses the need to secure supply in the absence of local solutions, especially by ensuring a geographical spread of supply sources;
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. NotTakes that investment in innovative means of production should foster cohesion amongst all EU regions, allowing them to accomplish fair and inclusive economic growthe view that the use of national or European companies in strategic sectors must be obligatory;
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that in supporting SMEs through the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) the goal should be, inter alia, an innovative and smart economic transformation, a gree need for strategic national health, military, energy and low carbon EU, as well as an EU which is more connected and aims to ensure long- term and susfood stocks and for regular stocktakinable employmentg;
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Reiterates that the public sector has an important new role to play in facilitating a just transition by promoting a green and fair energy transition, green and blue investments, the circular economy, as well as climate adaptation and risk prevention in all EU regaffirms the importance of establishing a hierarchy of European standards, with strategic protection taking precedence over competition and, in certain cases, over environmental considerations, while keeping in mind the imperative need to switch to less pollutant options;
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the EU’s cohesion policy needs adequate financing from the ESIF to foster economic, social and territorial cohesion in all EU regions by helping to reduce economic and social disparities, achieve positive convergence and foster sustainable developmentBelieves it mandatory to support European innovation and research in the scientific, digital and energy fields, including nuclear research, especially into waste recycling options;
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 92 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 – point a (new)
(a) Calls for the fortification of research sectors with policies ensuring a high level of patent protection and effective defences against industrial espionage;
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 93 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 – point b (new)
(b) Stresses the need to support innovation and research regarding the circular economy;
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the EU should be attentive to preserving and developing an industrial strategy and production which ensure European strategic autonomy, as well as the availability and delivery of essential products and equipment for citizens if the need arises in the single marketNotes the need for training to be provided in companies engaged in strategic industries or in the circular economy;
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 109 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that ESIF financial support should prioritise investments in new or transformed industrial production in carbon-intensive regions in order to facilitate achieving the goals of a just transition.deleted
2020/06/15
Committee: REGI