Activities of Robert ROOS related to 2020/2014(INL)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION with recommendations to the Commission on civil liability regime for artificial intelligence
Amendments (7)
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. Whereas there are five levels of autonomy for automated driving systems, ranging from complete driver control to full autonomy;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
B b. Whereas surveys have found that up to ninety percent of traffic accidents are caused at least in part by human error;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Recital B c (new)
Recital B c (new)
B c. Whereas when vehicles are to be truly autonomous, they will need to replicate the human decision-making process; whereas some decisions are more than just a mechanical application and seem to require a sense of ethics;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Recital B d (new)
Recital B d (new)
B d. Whereas people are far less tolerant for errors caused by machines and algorithms than by people;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that AI can be appliin vehicles is used atin different levels in vehicles and has an important impact on their autonomy and consequentlyof autonomy for automated driving systems, ranging from complete driver control to full autonomy and that, there is a sliding transfer onf civil liability of the driver towards other parties, the greater the degree of autonomy of the automated driving systems;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the importance of defining a clear division of responsibilities between software developers, manufacturers of various components, service providers and operators and end users; stresses that ultimately a natural person must be responsible for the algorithm that guides ethical decisions of vehicles with high levels of automation;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the importance of ensuring that drivers are always fully aware of a vehicle’s level of automation and their level of liability: drivers should be informed about their vehicles’ AI systems and related limitations of such systems such as activation, deactivation, failure; moreover, in-vehicle features should periodically remind the driver that he or she is in charge of monitoring the vehicle status; stresses that drivers cannot be held liable when automatic driving assistance systems err if they are found to have lawfully used these systems.