6 Amendments of Milan UHRÍK related to 2022/2142(INI)
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the potential for fast, efficient and effective foreign policy, security and defence action, as set out in the Lisbon Treaty, has only been used in a very limited way over the past decade due to a lack of political will fromto an appropriate extent and with due regard to the Member States' positions;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the use of passerelle clauses would immediately boost the efficiencjeopardise the unanimity of decision-making in the field of the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) and would be highly appropriatedangerous given the dramatic change toin the European security environment as a result of the Russian war against UkraineU's foreign policy;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Recital C
Recital C
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. RegretNotes that passerelle clauses have never been used in the field of the CFSP, even though the Russian war against Ukraine has clearly called for more efficient and swift decision-making and continues to insist on unanimity in voting on CFSP issues;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Urges the Member States to switch to QMV for decisions in all areas of the CFSP, starting within a year with priority areas such as the EU global human rights sanctions regime, restrictive measures and other instruments linked to the Russian war against Ukraine and interim steps in the enlargement process; sStresses that unanimity decisions should remain required for the creation and deployment of military missions or operations under the common security and defence policy (CSDP);