6 Amendments of Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ related to 2010/2040(INI)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that both the fisheries sector and environmental organisations share the concern that fisheries should be taken into account in policies dealing with maritime affairs as a wholeDraws attention to the importance of including the fisheries policy in the IMP as a full policy, not subordinated to other policies, so as to provide the most appropriate response to the environmental and economic concerns of both society in general and the fisheries sector itself;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Insists, in particular, that the constraints and specificities of the fisheries and aquaculture sectors be taken into account in the IMP as regards use of the maritime domain, the preservation of stock recovery and development conditionin particular as regards the availability of areas in which to carry on such activities and the need to conserve marine habitats by establishing marine reserves and othe conduct of research programmes; r measures for that purpose, with special emphasis on research;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Particularly stresses the vital need to carry out multidisciplinary research programmes designed to properly integrate all the activities occurring in the marine environment, based on an ecosystem approach and taking account of the potential impact of such activities on fisheries and aquaculture, as these sectors are extremely dependent on natural resources;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls, also, for consultation mechanisms to be established for drawing up decisions relating to the IMP andstrengthening of the mechanisms for cooperation between the various policies that together form the IMP, including the CFP, based in particular on the joint consultation bodies set up in each Member State and bringing together actors from the fisheries and maritime affairs sectorsall the sectors involved, thus making possible a genuine upstream exchange between IMP and CFP actorthose policies;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that the wish to see the IMP contribute to the safeguarding of a viable European fisheries sector which respects the environment but is also a source of wealth for its actors has implications for the Union’s commercial policywill also help with the success of the Community employment and economic development policies, including the commercial policy, and with the supply of high-quality foods to the EU, which itself has serious shortages in this area;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that funding to implement the IMP must be guaranteed in the Community budget by means of a proportional contribution from all the sectors affected by this policy, taking account of the differences that the EU budget applies to each policy, the balance between the benefits and risks – both environmental and socio-economic – of such activities to society, and the degree of interdependence between coastal areas and the different activities, bearing in mind that the fisheries sector’s dependence on the marine area is unavoidable.