9 Amendments of Nora MEBAREK related to 2022/2032(INI)
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas cohesion policy should provide efficient responses for tackling poverty and social exclusion, creating employment and growth, promoting investment in education, health, research and innovation, fighting climate change and tackling demographic challenges; whereas cohesion policy can only fulfil all these tasks if it is embedded in solid funding and is freed from macro- economic conditionality;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Is convinced that cohesion policy can only continue to play its present role as a vector for investment and job creation and a solidarity mechanism for all EU regions if it has solid funding and is no longer subject to any macro-economic conditionality; stresses that this implies providing for at least the same level of funding as in the 2021-2027 financial period, topped up with the Just Transition Fund (JTF) II budgetary resources;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Reaffirms its strong commitment to cohesion policy, which is an acquis communautaire inseparable from the European project, based on the principle of solidarity between Member States and regions;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the Commission’s introduction of the JTF to support regions facing challenges in their transition towards carbon neutrality; calls on the Commission to draw lessons from the implementation of the JTF; asks for a JTF II, which should be fully integrated into the CPR and significantly better funded than the current JTF, to be established in the post-2027 programming period, while applying shared management and partnership principles; believes that regions with high CO² per capita, as well as industries in transition, should have access to this fund; calls for this new JTF to differentiate between climate mitigation and adaptation; stresses that a certain proportion of funding should be allocated to the transition, in a socially just way, and to the reduction of the EU’s carbon footprint;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Considers that national recovery plans, financed by the Recovery and Resilience Facility, should not affect the ability to mobilise the ESI Funds, which meet other objectives set out in the Treaties, and calls on the Commission to swiftly implement the principle of ‘do not harm cohesion’ in order to ensure that it is cross-cutting across EU policies;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Takes note of the communication COM (2022)198 from the European Commission with a view to renewing the partnership with the Outermost Regions; recalls the vital role played by cohesion policy in the ORs and stresses the need to maintain all the measures specifically dedicated to them in the next programming period, in accordance with Article 349 TFEU; recalls, furthermore, the importance of a dynamic regional cooperation in order to unleash the potential of the ORs, and calls on the Commission to study all possible measures for future cohesion policy to stimulate the implementation of joint projects, in particular on sustainable tourism, preparedness for natural disasters, the development of the blue economy and renewable energies;
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls for the strengthening of European territorial cooperation and invites the Commission to take all necessary initiatives, including relaunching the cross-border cooperation mechanism, to make this cooperation more dynamic and effective for the benefit of the people;
Amendment 282 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Considers that the reflection on the future of cohesion policy post-2027 requires continuing to take into account the lasting economic and social consequences that Brexit has in EU regions;