BETA

13 Amendments of Emmanuel MAUREL related to 2016/2031(INI)

Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas in its resolution adopted on 24 November 2016, the European Parliament called for a temporary freeze on the accession negotiations as long as the situation of human rights and civil liberties does not improve in Turkey;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Addresses, in connection with the trade negotiations between the EU and Turkey, and provided that an improvement of the situation of human rights takes place in Turkey before the Council issues a negotiating mandate, the following recommendations to the Council and the Commission:
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) the strengthening of trade relations between the EU and Turkey should be set against the background of the common will of the parties to share the set of values and principles laid down in the EU's founding treaties, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and to work together to implement them fully and comprehensively; besides, in case of a repeated deterioration of the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Turkey during the negotiations process, the trade discussions should be temporarily frozen;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) the strengthening of trade relations between the EU and Turkey should be set against the background of the common will of the parties to share the set of values and principles laid down in the EU's founding treaties, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and to work together to implement them fully and comprehensively; in this respect, a suspension clause on human rights and fundamental freedoms should be included in the upgraded customs union between Turkey and the EU;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point iv
(iv) the current structure of the Ankara agreement should be considered inadequate in terms of the evolution of the EU’s trade policy, in that: (a) it does not consider specific issues such as sustainable development, protection of social rights and labour, child labour, gender equality, protection of food safety and health, SMEs or the protection of foreign investmentsand environmental standards, to which specific chapters and provisions should be dedicated; (b) it does not take account of the specific role of the European Parliament and of the national parliaments; (c) the provisions concerning the settlement of disputes reflect the political nature of the agreement and have made the mechanism de facto ineffective;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point vi
(vi) the entire negotiating process should be based on the principles of transparency and full access to the proceedings allowing adequate monitoring from the European Parliament; calls on the Council to publish the negotiating mandate as soon as possible;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) the fight against counterfeiting, piracy, the trade in wild animals and food fraud are importantfundamental aspects of the Customs Union to safeguard consumers and companies;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point v
(v) it is important to introduce an effective dispute settlement mechanism that is able to operate within a framework of impartiality and legal certainty in keeping with the rules and practice of the WTO;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) the liberalisation of the sectors that are not currently included in the Customs Union should take place in a progressive and binding manner, by measuring its impact on businesses, particularly SMEs, workers, consumers and the environment. To that end, parliamentary institutions, both at EU level and nationally, can play an active role in liaising and holding talks with stakeholders and civil society;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iii
(iii) negotiations shouldmust focus on the active promotion of decent work for all and the effective fight against national practices which seek to undermine the social and environmental substance of work for the purpose of promoting domestic production and attracting foreign investment by means of a specific chapter on sustainable development that includes binding provisions and a sanctions based mechanism;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point vi
(vi) owing to its importance and impact, the services sector should be liberalised on the basis of positive lists and stringent transparency criteria, full reciprocity, non- discrimination and legislative harmonisation, with the exclusion of audiovisual services and services of general economic interest;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point viii b (new)
(viii b) on rules, it will be important to negotiate specific provisions for SMEs, binding and enforceable provisions on sustainable development and a proper protection of European GIs;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point ix
(ix) the new EU-Turkey trade framework should lay down specific provisions for the protection of investments;deleted
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA