BETA

3137 Amendments of Marian HARKIN

Amendment 7 #

2019/0019(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) Good cooperation is necessary to ensure that the rights and entitlements of all persons concerned are protected and upheld.
2019/02/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2019/0019(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) In order to ensure that appropriate and timely information and advice concerning their rights are available to the persons concerned, the necessary means should be made available to relevant bodies at both Union and national level.
2019/02/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2019/0019(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 b (new)
(5b) The application of this Regulation is without prejudice to any further provisions in the field of social security coordination.
2019/02/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2018/2183(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fact that the Agency will introduce e-tendering; notes that according to the Court of Auditors e- invoicing and e-tendering are not introducedlaunched its first e-tender successfully in November 2018;
2018/12/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2018/2183(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Welcomes the Agency's European Ombudsman Award for Good Administration in the category of “Excellence in citizen/customer focused services delivery.” as a result of its innovative project to facilitate the translation management of multilingual websites, in collaboration with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT);
2018/12/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2018/2183(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Regrets that the carry overs for Title II (administrative expenditure) and Title III (operational expenditure) were high with 40 % for each title, which is in contradiction with the budgetary principle of annuality; recalls that such high carry overs also occurred in previous years and calls on the Agency to introduce without further delay differentiated budget appropriations to better reflect the multi- annual nature of operations; however acknowledges that the Agency is envisaging the possibility to adopt the model of differentiated appropriations for its operating expenditure in the near future;
2018/12/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2018/2183(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the Agency’s strong commitment to the prevention of harassment by adopting the policy on protecting the dignity of the person and preventing psychological harassment and sexual harassment; notes that the agency is to adopted the model decision guidelines on Whistleblowing in November 2018;
2018/12/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2018/2183(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that the Agency had not yet carried out anprovided the European Parliament with the results of a preliminary analysis on the impact of Brexit, at the time that the audit of the Court of Auditor took place, but that according to the Agency such an analysis has been conducted in the meantime; asks the Agency to make the result of this analysis available to the European Parliaments requested by the European Commission and has furthermore set up an internal Brexit Task Force to identify issues and monitor progress of Brexit negotiations;
2018/12/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2018/2183(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the Court of Auditors advises to strengthen the accounting officer’s independence by making him/her directly responsible to the Agency’s Director (administrative) and Management Board (functional), though according to the Agency the accounting officer is in practice reporting directly to the director; recognises that in response to this recommendation by the Court of Auditors, EU-OSHA is currently preparing a decision for the Governing Board to outsource the position of Accounting Officer to DG BUDG;
2018/12/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) In order to retain the essential Union-wide elements to ensure comparability between Member State decisions, without however limiting Member States in reaching Union objectives, a framework definition for ‘agricultural area’ should be set out. The related framework definitions for ‘arable land’, ‘permanent crops’ and ‘permanent grassland’ should be set out in a broad way to allow Member States to further specify definitions according to their local conditions and traditional practices. The framework definition for ‘arable land’ should be laid down in a way that allows Member States to cover different production forms, including system such as agroforestry and arable areas with shrubs and trees and that requires the inclusion of fallow land areas in order to ensure the decoupled nature of the interventions. The framework definition of ‘permanent crops’ should include both areas actually used for production and not, as well as nurseries and short rotation coppice to be defined by Member States. The framework definition of ‘permanent grassland’ should be set in a way that allows Member States to specify further criteria and allows them to include species other than grasses or other herbaceous forage that can be grazed, provide forage area for pollinators, or that may produce animal feed, whether used for actual production or not.
2018/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 161 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The CAP should ensure that Member States increase the environmental delivery by respecting local needs and farmers' actual circumstances. Member States should under direct payments in the CAP Strategic Plan set up Eco-schemes voluntathat are mandatory for farmers, which should be fully coordinated with the other relevant interventions. They should be defined by the Member States as a payment granted either for incentivising and remunerating the provision of public goods by agricultural practices beneficial to the environment and climate or as a compensation for the introduction of these practices. In both cases they should aim at enhancing the environmental and climate performance of the CAP and should consequently be conceived to go beyond aligned withe mandatory requirementenvironment objectives already prescribed by the system of conditionality. Member States may decide to set up eco- schemes for agricultural practices such as the enhanced management of permanent pastures and landscape features, and organic farming. These schemes may also includeshould be regarded as ‘entry-level schemes’ which mayshould be a condition for taking up more ambitious rural development commitments.
2018/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 268 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part
(b) 'agricultural area' shall be defined in a way that it is composed of arable land, permanent crops and, permanent grassland and agroforestry systems. The terms 'arable land', 'permanent crops' and 'permanent grassland' and ‘agroforestry systems’ shall be further specified by Member States within the following framework:
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 273 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) 'permanent crops' shall be non- rotational crops other than permanent grassland and permanent pasture that occupy the land for five years or more, which yield repeated harvests, including agroforestry systems, nurseries and short rotation coppice;
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 277 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) 'permanent grassland and permanent pasture' (together referred to as 'permanent grassland') shall be land not included in the crop rotation of the holding for five years or more, used to grow grasses or other herbaceous forage naturally (self-seeded) or through cultivation (sown). It may include other species such as shrubs and/or trees whichThe framework definition of ‘permanent grassland’ should be set in away that allows Member States to specify further criteria and allows them to include species other than grasses or other herbaceous forage that can be grazed or that may produce animal feed;, forage area for pollinators whether used for actual production or not.
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 288 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii a (new)
(iiia) ‘agroforestry systems’ shall be land use systems in which trees are grown in combination with agriculture on the same land;
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 412 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) promote employment, growth, social inclusion and local development in rural areas, including bio-agro forestry, bio- economy, the circular economy and sustainable forestry;
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 555 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)
(g) the use of best agroforestry practices on both agricultural and forest lands;
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 700 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – title
28 Schemes for the climate and the environmentmitigation and environmental sustainability actions;
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 705 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall provide under direct payments support for voluntaa mandatory schemes for the climate and the environmental sustainability actions ('eco- schemes') under the conditions set out in this Article and as further specified in their CAP Strategic Plans., these schemes shall be entry level schemes which shall be conditional for taking up more ambitious Rural Development commitments which shall be voluntary;
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 715 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall support under this type of intervention genuine farmers who make commitments to observe, on eligible hectares, agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and the environment. Areas designated pursuant to Directives 92/43/EEC and 2009/147/EC shall automatically be regarded as eligible for the scheme;
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 731 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall establish thea list of agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and the environment. that will enhance its climate mitigation and adaption potential and increase its environmental sustainability. Member States shall ensure that these practices are in compliance with WTO agreements on agriculture, Annex 2 (5) (6);
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 745 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4
4. Those practices shall be designed to meet one or more of the specific environmental- and climate-related objectives laid down in points (d), (e) and (f) of Article 6(1)., in order to ensure qualitative and quantitative outcomes to meet these objectives these practices shall be linked to specific actions designed to achieve, the already established prescribed standards set out in GAEC 1 to GAEC 10 of Annex III
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 774 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) go beyondare consistent with and aligned to the commitments prescribed in point 4 of this Article go beyond the other the relevant statutory management requirements and standards of good agricultural and environmental condition established under Section 2 of Chapter I of this Title;
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 780 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) go beyond the minimum requirements for the use of fertilisers and plant protection products, animal welfare, as well as other mandatory requirements established by national and Union law;
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 790 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Support for the "eco-schemes" shall take the form of an annual25% of direct payments paid as an annual uniform flat rate payment per eligible hectare and it shall be granted as either:
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 797 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) payments compensating beneficiaries for all or part of the additional costs incurred and income foregone as a result of the commitments as set pursuant to Article 65.deleted
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 857 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) Agroforestry and integrated production systems;
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 894 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
(i ) actions to enhance forage areas for pollinators;
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 915 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) a definition of a beehive and methods for calculating the number of beehives considered to be the equivalent of a livestock unit;
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 981 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) research and development of sustainable production methods, including pest resilienceIntegrated pest Management (IPM), agroforestry, innovative practices and production techniques boosting economic competitiveness and bolstering market developments; those objectives relate to the specific objectives set out in points (a), (c) and (i) of Article 6(1);
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1112 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 9
9. Where support under this type of interventions is granted to agri- environment-climate commitments, commitments to convert to or maintain organic farming practices and methods as defined in Regulation (EC) No 834/2007, the creation and regeneration of agroforestry systems, and forest environmental and climate services, Member States shall establish a payment per hectare.
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1182 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) establishment of agroforestry systems, afforestation and non-productive investments linked to the specific environmental- and climate-related objectives set out in points (d), (e) and (f) of Article 6(1);
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1223 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new)
(c ) financial contributions to measures which increase farm resilience, including but not limited to, crop diversification strategies and agroforestry systems;
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1239 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 1
1. Member States may grant support for agricultural, agroforestry, forestry and rural business knowledge exchange and information under the conditions set out in this Article and as further specified in their CAP Strategic Plans.
2018/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 21 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Citation 1 a (new)
having regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to which the EU and all its Member States are parties,
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The ESF+ should aim to promote employment through active interventions enabling (re)integration into the labour market, notably for youth, the long-term unemployed, family carers and the inactive, supported employment and reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities as well as through promoting self–employment, entrepreneurship and the social economy. The ESF+ should aim to improve the functioning of labour markets by supporting the modernisation of labour market institutions such as the Public Employment Services in order to improve their capacity to provide intensified targeted counselling and guidance during the job search and the transition to employment and to enhance workers’ mobility. The ESF+ should promote women’s participation in the labour market through measures aiming to ensure, amongst others, improved work/life balance and access to childcare and other care services or support. The ESF + should also aim to provide a healthy and well-adapted working environment in order to respond to health risks related to changing forms of work and the needs of the ageing workforce.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The ESF+ should provide support to improving the quality, effectiveness and labour market relevance of education and training systems in order to facilitate the acquisition of key competences notably as regards digital skills which all individuals need for personal fulfilment and development, employment, social inclusion and active citizenship. The ESF+ should help progression within education and training and transition to work and reintegration to work, support lifelong learning and employability, and contribute to competitiveness and societal and economic innovation by supporting scalable and sustainable initiatives in these fields. This could be achieved for example through work-based learning and apprenticeships, lifelong guidance, skills anticipation in cooperation with industry, up-to-date training materials, forecasting and graduate tracking, training of educators, validation of learning outcomes and recognition of qualifications.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The ESF+ should promote flexible upskilling and reskilling opportunities for all, notably digital skills and key enabling technologies, with a view to providing people with skills adjusted to digitalisation, technological change, innovation and social and economic change, facilitating career transitions, mobility and supporting in particular low-skilled, persons with disabilities and/or poorly qualified adults, in line with the Skills Agenda for Europe.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The ESF+ should support Member States’ efforts at all levels to tackle poverty with a view to breaking the cycle of disadvantage across generations and promote social inclusion by ensuring equal opportunities for all, tackling discrimination and addressing health inequalities and homelessness. This implies mobilising a range of policies targeting the most disadvantaged people regardless of their age, including children, persons with disabilities, marginalised communities such as the Roma, and the working poor. The ESF+ should promote the active inclusion of people far from the labour market with a view to ensuring their socio-economic integration. Projects that promote active inclusion and integration based on the three pillars of access to services, income support and inclusive labour markets, should be encouraged. Synergies between ESF+ funded measures and income support, in the form of minimum income and social benefits, which are of national competence and therefore not eligible expenditure under the ESF+, should be fostered to amplify their impact on the final beneficiaries. The ESF+ should be also used to enhance timely and equal access to affordable, sustainable and high quality services such as healthcare and long-term care, in particular family and community-based care services. The ESF+ should contribute to the modernisation of social protection systems with a view in particular to promoting their accessibility.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 189 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26 a (new)
(26a) Good governance and partnership between managing authorities and the partners require the effective and efficient use of capacity building for stakeholders, to whom Member Stes should allocate an appropriate amount of ESF+ resources. As investment in institutional capacity and in the efficiency of public administration and public services at the national, regional and local levels with a view to reforms, better regulation and good governance, is no longer included an operational objective of the ESF+ under shared management, but has been included in the Structural Support Reform Programme, it is necessary that the Commission and the Member States ensure effective coordination between the two instruments.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 200 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) The Member States and the Commission should ensure that ESF+ contributes to the promotion of equality between women and men in accordance with Article 8 TFEU to foster equality of treatment and opportunities between women and men in all areas, including regarding participation in the labour market, terms and conditions of employment and career progression. They should also ensure that the ESF+ promotes equal opportunities for all, without discrimination in accordance with Article 10 TFEU and promotes the inclusion in society of persons with disabilities on equal basis with others and contributes to the implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities with regard inter alia to education, work, employment and universal accessibility. These principles should be taken into account in all dimensions and in all stages of the preparation, monitoring, implementation and evaluation of programmes, in a timely and consistent manner while ensuring that specific actions are taken to promote gender equality and equal opportunities. The ESF+ should also promote the transition from residential/institutional care to family and community-based care, in particular for those who face multiple discrimination. The ESF+ should not support any action that contributes to segregation or to social exclusion. Regulation (EU) No [future CPR] provides that rules on eligibility of expenditure are to be established at national level, with certain exceptions for which it is necessary to lay down specific provisions with regard to the ESF+ strand under shared management.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 222 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34 a (new)
(34a) Transnational cooperation has significant added value. It should therefore be supported by all Member States with the exception of duly justified cases taking into account the principle of proportionality. It is also necessary to reinforce the Commission’s role in facilitating exchanges of experience and coordinating implementation of relevant initiatives.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 306 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) improving access to decent jobs for quality employment of all jobseekers, in particular youth and long-term unemployedfor disadvantaged groups such as youth, long-term unemployed, migrants and persons with disabilities, and of inactive people,rsons promoting self- employment, entrepreneurship and self employment initiatives, and the social economy;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 319 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point ii
(ii) modernising labour market institutions and services to assess and anticipate skills needs and ensure timely and tailor-made assistance and support to labour market matching, transitions across the life-cycle and mobility;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 331 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point iii
(iii) promoting women’s labour market participation, a better work/life balance including access to childcare and life-cycle care, a healthy and well–adapted working environment addressing health risks, adaptation of workers, enterprises and entrepreneurs to change, and active and healthy ageing;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 336 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point iv
(iv) improving the quality, effectiveness and labour market relevance of education and training systems, to support acquisition of key competences including digital skills, promote e-inclusion and facilitate the transition from education to work;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 341 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point v
(v) promoting equal access to and completion of, quality and inclusive education and training, in particular for disadvantaged groups and family carers, from early childhood education and care through general and vocational education and training, and to tertiary level, as well as adult education and learning, including facilitating learning mobility for all and accessibility for persons with disabilities;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 370 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point ix
(ix) enhancing the equal and timely access to quality, sustainable and affordable services; modernising social protection systems, including promoting access to social protection; improving accessibility, effectiveness and resilience of healthcare systems and long-term care services and family care services;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 372 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point x
(x) promoting social integration of people at risk of poverty and/or social exclusion, including the most deprived, persons with disabilities and children;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 418 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The Member States and the Commission shall also support specific targeted actions to promote the principles referred to in paragraph 1 within any of the objectives of the ESF+, including improving universal accessibility for persons with disabilities and the transition from residential/institutional care to family and community-based care.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 436 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall concentrate the ESF+ resources under shared management on interventions that address the challenges identified in their national reform programmes, in the Social Scoreboard under the European Semester as well as in the relevant country-specific recommendations adopted in accordance with Article 121(2) TFEU and Article 148(4) TFEU, and take into account principles and rights set out in the European Pillar of Social Rights.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 501 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall ensure adequate participation of social partners and civil society organisations in the delivery of employment, education and social inclusion policies supported by the ESF+ strand under shared management. The participation shall be inclusive and accessible to persons with disabilities.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 567 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the purchase of furniture, equipment and vehicles except where the purchase is necessary for achieving the objective of the operation, or these items are fully depreciated, or the purchase of these items is the most economic option, or if needed to ensure reasonable accommodation to ensure universal accessibility for persons with disabilities.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 647 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) to provide guidance for the development of social infrastructure (including housing, child care and education and training, health care and long term care) including accessibility requirements for persons with disabilities needed for the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) In February 2018, the Commission adopted its Communication on ‘A new, modern Multiannual Financial Framework for a European Union that delivers efficiently on its priorities post-2020’18 . The Communication stresses that the Union budget shall support Europe’s unique social market economy. Therefore, it will be of utmost importance to improve employment opportunities and to address the skills challenges, especially also those linked to digitisation. Budgetary flexibility shall be a key principle in the next Multiannual Financial Framework. Flexibility mechanisms shall remain in place to allow the Union to react rapidly to unforeseen events, and to ensure that budgetary resources are used where most urgently needed. __________________ 18 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta- political/files/communication-new- modern-multiannual-financial- framework_en.pdf
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) In its ‘Reflection Paper on Harnessing Globalisation’20 the Commission identifies the combination of trade related globalisation and technological change as the major drivers of an increased demand for skilled labour and a reduced number of jobs that require lower qualifications. Despite the overall tremendous advantages of more open trade and further integration of world economies, these negative side effects need to be tackled. As the current benefits of globalisation are already unequally distributed among people and regions, causing a significant impact on those adversely affected, there is a danger that the ever faster evolving technological advances will further fuel these effects. Therefore, in line with the principles of solidarity and sustainability, it will be necessary to ensure that the benefits of globalisation will be shared more fairly by reconciling economic openinggrowth and technological advance with social protection. active support to accessing employment and self- employment opportunities. __________________ 20 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publicatio ns/reflection-paper-harnessing- globalisation_en.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Globalisation and technological change is likely to further increase the interconnectedness and interdependence of world economies. Labour reallocation is an integral and inevitable part of such economic change. If the benefits of change are to be distributed fairly, offering assistance to displaced workers and those threatened by displacement is of utmost importance. The main Union instruments to assist workers affected are the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+), which is designed to offer assistance in an anticipatory way, and the EGF, which is designed to offer assistance in the case of major restructuring events in a reactive manner. The ‘EU Quality Framework for anticipation of change and restructuring’22 , is the Union policy instrument that sets the framework of best practice for anticipating and dealing with corporate restructuring. It offers a comprehensive framework on how the challenges of economic adjustment and restructuring and their employment and social impact should be addressed by adequate policy means. It also calls upon Member States to use EU and national funding in a way to ensure that the social impact of restructuring, especially the adverse effects on employment, can be cushioned more effectively. The main Union instruments to assist workers affected are the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+), which is designed to offer assistance in an anticipatory way, and the EGF, which is designed to offer assistance in the case of unexpected major restructuring events in a reactive manner. __________________ 22 COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS EU Quality Framework for anticipation of change and restructuring, (COM(2013)882 final, 13.12.2013).
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) As stated, in order to maintain the European nature of the EGF, an application for support should be triggered when a major restructuring event causes a significant impact on the local or regional economy. Such an impact should be defined by a minimum number of job displacements within a specific reference period. Taking into account the findings of the mid-term evaluation, the threshold shall be set at 250 jobs displacement within a reference period of four months (or 6 months in sectoral cases). Taking into account that waves of dismissals in different sectors but the same region have an equally significant impact on the local labour market, regional applications shall be possible as well. In small labour markets, such as small Member States or remote regions, including the outermost regions as referred in Article 349 of the TFEU, or in exceptional circumstances, applications couldmay be submitted in case of a lower number of job displacements.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) While respecting the principle of subsidiarity, and taking into account the need for a significant impact of the restructuring event as a threshold for an EGF application, the EGF should strive to show solidarity with dismissed workers from all types of enterprises, regardless of their size.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 b (new)
(14b) The EGF should remain a special EU instrument reacting to situations that cause major restructuring events in the European labour market. However, the Union should continue efforts to find more sustainable ways of tackling the structural change and challenges that affect labour markets and lead to such events in the Member States.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) Financial contributions from the EGF should be primarily directed at active labour market measures aimed at reintegrating beneficiaries rapidly into sustainable employment, wheither within or outside their initial sector of activity or self-employment. Measures should reflect the prospectived needs of the local or regional labour market. However, whenever relevant, the mobility of displaced workers should also be supported in order to help find new employment elsewhere. A particular focus shall be laid on the dissemination of skills required in the digital age. The inclusion of pecuniary allowances in a coordinated package of personalised services should be restricted to 25%. Companies cshould be encouraged to participate in the national co-funding for the EGF-supported measures.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) When drawing up the coordinated package of active labour market policy measures, Member States should favour measures that will significantly contribute to the employability of the beneficiaries. Member States should strive towards the reintegration into sustainable employment of the largest possible number of beneficiaries participating in these measures as soon as possible within the sixeven-month period before the final report on the implementation of the financial contribution is due.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) In compliance with the principle of sound financial management, financial contributions from the EGF should cannot replace but rather should, where possible, complement support measures which are available for beneficiaries within the Union funds or other Union policies or programmes. Nor can the EGF’s financial contribution replace national measures or replace measures that are the responsibility of dismissing companies under national law or collective agreements and should instead create real European added value.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) In the event of an enterprise closing down, displaced workers may be helped to take over some or all of the activities of their former employer and the Member State in which the enterprise is located may advance the funds that are required urgently to make this possible.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 147 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this Programme will contribute to mainstream climate action in the Union's policies and to the achievement of an overall target of 2530 % of the EU budget expenditures supporting climate objectives. Relevant actions will be identified during the fund's preparation and implementation, and reassessed in the context of its evaluation.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
The EGF shall contribute to a bettermore equitable distribution of the benefits of globalisation and technological advance and the promotion of alternative sustainable employment by helping displaced workers adapt to structural change. As such, the EGF shall contribute to the implementation of the principles defined under the European Pillar of Social Rights and enhance social and economic cohesion among regions and Member States.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of the programme is to demonstrate solidarity with and offer support tofinancial support for re- employment measures of displaced workers and self-employed persons whose activity has ceased in the course of unexpected major restructuring events, referred to in Article 5.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The specific objective of the EGF is to offer assistance in case of unexpectedto workers for reintegration to the labour market in case of major restructuring events, particularly those caused by globalisation-related challenges, such as changes in world trade patterns, trade disputes between the EU and third countries, financial or economic crises, the transition to low- carbon economy or as a consequence of digitisation or automation. Particular emphasis shall liebe placed on measures that help the most disadvantaged groups.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 167 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) 'displaced worker' means a worker, independent of their type of employment contract or employment relationship, whose employment is ended prematurely by redundancy, or whose contract is not renewed, due to economic reasons;
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 181 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the cessation of activity of more thanat least 250 displaced workers or self- employed persons, over a reference period of four months, in an enterprise in a Member State, including where that cessation applies in its suppliers or downstream producers;
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the cessation of activity of more thanat least 250 displaced workers or self- employed persons, over a reference period of six months, particularly in SMEs, where all operate in the same economic sector defined at NACE Revision 2 division level and located in one region or two contiguous regions defined at NUTS 2 level or in more than two contiguous regions defined at NUTS 2 level provided that there are more thanat least 250 workers or self- employed persons affected in two of the regions combined;
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 189 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the cessation of activity of more thanat least 250 displaced workers or self- employed persons, over a reference period of foursix months, particularly in SMEs, operating in the same or different economic sectors defined at NACE Revision 2 division level and located in the same region defined at NUTS 2 level.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 192 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. In small labour markets or in exceptional circumstances, in particular with regard to applications involving SMEs, where duly substantiated by the applicant Member State, an application for a financial contribution under this Article may be considered admissible even if the criteria laid down in points (a), (b) or (c) of paragraph 1 are not entirely met, when the redundancies have a serious impact on employment levels and the local or regional or national economy. The applicant Member State shall specify which of the intervention criteria set out in points (a), (b) or (c) of paragraph 1 are not entirely met. The aggregated amount of contributions in exceptional circumstances may not exceed 15 % of the annual ceiling of the EGF.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 195 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. The EGF may not be mobilised when workers are dismissed as a result of budget cuts taken by a Member State, which affect sectors that depend primarily on public financing.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 197 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. The applicant Member State shall specify the method used for calculating the number of displaced workers and self- employed persons defined in Article 4 for the purpose of Article 5.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 203 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The dissemination of skills required in the digital industrial age is a mandatory horizontal element of any package of personalised training or services offered. The level of training shall be adapted to the qualifications and thespecific needs of the respective beneficiary.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 208 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point a
(a) tailor-made training and retraining, including in information and communication technology and other skills that are required in the digital age, certification of acquired experience, job- search assistance, occupational guidance, advisory services, mentoring, outplacement assistance, entrepreneurship promotion, aid for self- employment, business start-ups and employee take-overs, and cooperation activities;
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 210 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point b
(b) special time-limited measures, such as job-search allowances, employers’ recruitment incentives, mobility allowances, training or subsistence allowances, including allowances for carers accessing the relevant measures.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 214 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
The costs of the measures referred to in point (b) may not exceed 325 % of the total costs for the coordinated package of personalised services listed in this paragraph.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 5
The investments for self-employment, starting an own business or for employee take-overs may not exceed EUR 205 000 per displaced worker.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 225 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The measures supported by the EGF shall not under any circumstances substitute passive social protection measures.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 226 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The coordinated package of services shall be drawn up in consultation with the targeted beneficiaries or their representatives, or and the social partners.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 229 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Within ten working days of the date of submission of the application, or, where applicable, of the date on which the Commission is in possession of the translation of the application, whichever is the later, the Commission shall acknowledge receipt of the application and inform the Member State of any additional information it requires in order to assess the application.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 234 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. On the basis of the information provided by the Member State, the Commission shall complete its assessment of the application’s compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution, within 60 working days of the receipt of the complete application or, where applicable, of the translation of the application. Where the Commission is unable, exceptionally, to comply with that deadline, it shall provide to the Member State a written explanation in advance setting out the reasons for the delay.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 236 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) the confirmation that, where the dismissing enterprise has continued its activities after the lay-offs, it has complied with all its legal obligations governing the redundancies and has provided for its workers accordingly;
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 267 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Member State may decide to postpone the starting date for the eligible actions by up to three months after the date of submission of the application. In the event of such postponement, the eligible actions shall be carried out within the 24-month period following the starting date communicated by the Member State in the application.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 270 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the type of measures and main results, explaining the challenges, lessons learned, synergies and complementarities with other EU funds, particularly ESF+ and indicating, whenever possible, the complementarity of measures with those funded by other Union or national programmes in line with the EU Quality Framework for anticipation of change and restructuring;
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 273 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the results of a beneficiary survey conducted six months after the end of the implementation period, which shall cover the perceived change in the employability of beneficiaries, or for those who already found employment, more information on the quality and type of employment found, such as the change in working hours, level of responsibility or change of salary level in comparison to previous employment, and the sector in which the person found employment and break down this information by gender, age group and education level;
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 276 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3
3. The evaluations referred to in paragraph 1 shall include relevant statistics on the financial contributions, broken down by sector and Member State.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) A European Labour Authority (the ‘Authority’) should be established in order to help strengthen fairness labour mobility and trust in the Single Market. To that effect, the Authority should support the Member States and the Commission in strengthening access to information for individuals and employers about their rights and obligations in cross- border labour mobility situations as well as access to relevant services, support compliance and cooperation between the Member States to ensure the effective application of the Union law in these areas, and mediate and facilitate a solution in case of cross- border disputes or labour market disruptions.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The establishment of the Authority should not create new rights and obligations for individuals or employers, including economic operators or non-profit organisations, as the activities of the Authority should cover them to the extent to which they are covered by the Union law within the scope of this Regulation. Furthermore, the Authority should not create additional administrative burden for companies, in particular SME's.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 268 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The Authority shall assist Member States and the Commission in matters relating to enhanced cooperation in cross- border labour mobility and the coordination of social security systems within the Union.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 272 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Authority shall not in any way interfere with the exercise of fundamental rights as recognised in the Member States and/or at Union level including the rights covered by specific industrial relations systems in Member States, in accordance with national law/or practice. Nor shall it affect the right to negotiate, to conclude and enforce collective agreement, or to take collective action in accordance with national law and/or practice.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 295 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) improve transparency and facilitate access for individuals and employers to information on their rights and obligations, as well as to relevant services;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 312 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) support cooperation between Member States in the cross-border enforcement of and contribute to the consistent, efficient and effective application of relevant Union law, including facilitating joint inspections;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 321 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) mediate and facilitate a solution in cases of cross-border disputes between national authorities or labour market disruptions.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 373 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) facilitate cooperation between relevant stakeholders in the event of cross-border labour market disruptions, in accordance with Article 14.deleted
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 419 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) provide relevant information to employers on labour rules, and the living and working conditions applicable to workers in cross-border labour mobility situations, including all relevant requirements for posted workers;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 432 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) support Member States in streamlining the provision of information and services to individuals and employers pertaining to cross-border mobility on a voluntary basis, while fully respecting Member States' competences.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 524 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The Authority shall encourage the use of innovative approaches to effective and efficient cross-border cooperation, and explore the potentialpromote the use of electronic exchange mechanisms between the Member States to facilitate the detection of fraud, providing reports to the Commission with a view to their further development.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 547 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. At the request of one or several Member States, the Authority shall coordinate concerted or joint inspections in the areas under the scope of the Authority’s competences. The definition of concerted or joint inspection shall be in line with ILO convention number 81. The request may be submitted by one or several Member States. The Authority may also suggest to the authorities of the Member States concerned that they perform a concerted or joint inspection.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 560 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Where the authority of a Member State decides not to participate in or carry out the concerted or joint inspection referred to paragraph 1, it shall inform the Authority in writing of the reasons for its decision duly in advance. In such cases, the Authority shall inform the other national authorities concerned. Furthermore, the Authority shall assess the information received and produce a reasoned opinion. This opinion shall be communicated to the European Commission and published.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 591 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. An agreement for setting up a joint inspection ('the joint inspection agreement') between the participating Member States and the Authority shall set out the conditions for carrying out such an exercise. The joint inspection agreement may include provisions which enable joint inspections, once agreed and planned, to take place at short notice. The Authority shall establish a model agreement while respecting national legislation and competencies.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 598 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Concerted and joint inspections and their follow-up shall be carried out in accordance with the national law of the Member States concerned. National authorities shall also be fully associated in the process and have full and autonomous authority. Where social partners are themselves in charge of inspections at national level, joint and concerted inspections should only take place if the social partners concerned so agree.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 664 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Authority shall assess risks and carry out analyses regarding cross-border labour flows, such as labour market imbalances, sector-specific threats and recurring problems encountered by individuals and employers in relation to cross-border mobility. For that purpose, the Authority shall ensure complementarity with, and draw on the expertise of, other Union agencies or services, including in the areas of skills forecasting and health and safety at work. Upon a request by the Commission or on its own initiative, the Authority may carry out focused in-depth analyses and studies to investigate specific labour mobility issues.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 677 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. The Authority shall regularly report its findings to the Commission, as well as directly to the Member States concerned, outlining possible measures to address identified weaknesses.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 690 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) develop EU-wide further-training programmes for inspectorates that address challenges such as bogus self- employment and abuses of posting;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 720 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Upon request of one of the Member States concerned by a dispute, the Authority shall launch a mediation procedure before its Mediation Board set up for this purpose in accordance with Article 17(2). If a Member State refuses to participate in a mediation procedure, it shall inform the Member State requesting the mediation procedure and the Authority of the reasons of its decision. The Authority may also launch a mediation procedure on its own initiative before the Mediation Board, including on the basis of a referral from SOLVIT, subject to the agreement of all Member States concerned by that dispute.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 759 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14
Cooperation in case of cross-border labour market disruptions At the request of the national authorities, the Authority may facilitate cooperation between relevant stakeholders in order to address labour market disruptions affecting more than one Member State, such as large-scale restructuring events or major projects impacting employment in border regions.Article 14 deleted
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 841 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point m
(m) appoint the Executive Director, and where necessaryappropriate extend his or her term of office or remove him or her from office in accordance with Article 32;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 842 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point p a (new)
(pa) respond to the assessment by the Executive Director on the opinions and the advice of the Stakeholder Group;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 869 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 4 – point k a (new)
(ka) assess the submissions from the Stakeholder Group and submit that assessment to the Management Board in particular stating if this has influenced the draft single programme document.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 878 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. The Stakeholder Group may, in particular,shall on its own initiative submit opinions and advice to the Authority on issues related to the application and enforcement of Union law in the areas covered by this Regulation.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 885 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3
3. The Stakeholder Group shall be chaired by the Executive Director and shall meet at least twice a year on the initiative of the Executive Director orhree times a year at regular intervals and where necessary at the request of the Commission.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 892 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
4. The Stakeholder Group shall be composed of sixeight representatives of Union- level social partners equally representing trade unions and employer’s organisations, and two representatives of the Commission.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 914 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 5
5. The Management Board, acting on its own initiative or on a proposal from the Commission that takes into account the assessment referred to in paragraph 4, may extend the term of office of the Executive Director once, for no more than five years or may request the Commission to initiate the process of selecting a new Executive Director.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 917 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 7
7. The Executive Director may be removed from office only upon a decision of the Management Board acting on its own initiative or on a proposal from the Commission.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2017/2260(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the need for structural reforms aimed at improving labour market and social policies, in order to help the workforce to acquire the skills they need and to promote equal opportunities in the labour market, fair working conditions, increasing labour productivity to support wage growth, and sustainable and adequate social protection systems; emphasises the need of reinforcing a favourable environment for business with a view to creating more employment while balancing the social and economic dimensions; calls on the Member States to gradually shifting taxes from labour to other sources;
2018/01/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2017/2260(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the percentage of people at risk of poverty and social exclusion remains high; points out that high levels of inequality reduce the output of the economy and the potential for sustainable growth;
2018/01/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2017/2260(INI)

6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to maximise their efforts in investing in high-quality education and training in order to guarantee that the skills acquired will match labour market demand; underlines, in this respect, the growing demand for digital and other transferable skills and insists that the development of these skills is urgent and particularly necessary; takes the view that mutual recognition of qualifications will be beneficial for overcoming the gap between skills shortages on the European labour market and jobseekers, especially young people;
2018/01/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 179 #

2017/2260(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Underlines that the integration of long-term unemployed individuals through individually tailored measures is a key factor for fighting poverty and social exclusion and contributing to the sustainability of national social security systems; highlights, in this context, the importance of skills and competences acquired in non-formal and informal learning environments;
2018/01/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 192 #

2017/2260(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Member States to provide labour inspectorates or other relevant public bodies with adequate resources to address the issue of undeclared work, as well as to reinforce labour inspection mechanisms and design measures to enable workers to move from the grey to the formal economy in order to have access to employment and social protection systems;
2018/01/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 197 #

2017/2260(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines the potential of SMEs, as well as health and social services and social enterprises, in job creation and the economy as a whole; considers it vital to support entrepreneurship and to improve the business environment by removing administrative burdens, improving access to finance and supporting the development of tax models and simplified tax compliance procedures favouring SMEs, entrepreneurs, micro-entities and start-ups;
2018/01/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 237 #

2017/2260(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Encourages the Member States to implement the necessary measures for the social inclusion of refugees as well as people of ethnic minority or immigrant origin;
2018/01/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 253 #

2017/2260(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines the role of the social partners and civil society as essential stakeholders in the reform process and the added value of their involvement in the drafting, sequencing and implementation of reforms; supports the opinion that new forms of employment in the globalised market call for new forms of social dialogue; affirms that the Member States need to help people build the skills required in the labour market;
2018/01/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2017/2152(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Appreciates the Agency’s activities and analysis on occupational safety and health which contribute to the EU policy making aiming to promote healthy and safe workplaces across the Union; notes its on- going work packages on supporting medium, small and micro enterprises (MSEs), with MSE-specific tools and guidelines to address knowledge gaps and facilitate better OSH compliance;
2017/12/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2017/2152(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the level of committed appropriations carried over to 2016 was high for Title II (30,2 %) and increased compared to the previous year (26 %); notes that these carry overs mainly concern IT services which had not yet been fully delivered or been invoiced by the end of the year; notes that the level of committed appropriations carried over to 2016 was also high for Title III (41,3 %) and represents an increase compared to 2015 (41 %); notes that these carry-overs mainly concern research projects and studies with a duration of more than one year; notes the Court’s comment that the Agency could consider using differentiated budget appropriations in order to address high carry-over rates and reflect the multi- annual nature of operations;
2017/12/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2017/2152(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the Agency’s follow-up measures in relation to the comments of the discharge authority made regarding the implementation of the budget of previous years; further welcomes the Agency’s rapid application of the Court’s advice regarding ICT and consultancy framework contracts as an area to improve in the discharge for 2016;
2017/12/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2017/2152(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes the revision of the Agency’s founding Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 2062/941a), and welcomes the inclusion by Parliament and the Commission of an explicit reference to the use of external audit reports and evaluations; __________________ 1a Council Regulation (EC) No 2062/94 of 18 July 1994 establishing a European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (OJ L 216, 20.8.1994, p. 1).
2017/12/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2017/2148(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Acknowledges the work of the Foundation during the four-year work programme 2013-2016 “From crisis to recovery: Better informed policies for a competitive and fair Europe”; welcomes the Foundations analysis and policy input as regards living and working conditions, industrial relations and employment and labour market developments, in particular the Overview report of the sixth European Working Conditions Survey and notes its impressive programme delivery rate of 97 % which was well above the target for 2016 and a significant improvement on the two previous years;
2017/12/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2017/2148(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Notes the revision of the Foundation’s founding Regulation No 1365/75/EEC1a and welcomes the inclusion by Parliament and the Commission of an explicit reference to the use of external audit reports and evaluations; ______________ 1aRegulation (EEC) No 1365/75 of the Council of 26 May 1975 on the creation of a European Foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions (OJ L 139, 30.5.1975, p. 1–4)
2017/12/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2017/2148(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Notes the Commission’s Internal Audit Service (IAS) 2016 audit report which highlighted the need to improve the Foundation´s management of projects, mainly in relation to governance arrangements, monitoring and reporting, and welcomes the Foundation’s willingness to implement the agreed action plan in cooperation with the IAS;
2017/12/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2017/2148(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Commends the high budget implementation rate (100 %); notes, however, that the level of appropriations carried over to 2017 increased for Title III (43 %) compared to the previous year (31 %), mainly in relation to projects going beyond the end of the year; notes the Foundation’s reply distinguishing that these were planned carry-overs and in fact below the initial figure of EUR 3 million;
2017/12/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2017/2148(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Regrets that in relation to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the Union laid down in Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/681a as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/20041b introduced in 2005, underpayments and overpayments to staff remains an issue for the Foundation despite recommendations from the Court concerning similar issues in 2014 and 2015; notes the Foundation’s reply that a comprehensive internal audit of the payroll function took place earlier in 2017 and urges the Foundation to take the necessary steps to address the issue; _______________ 1a OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1. 1b OJ L 124, 27.4.2004, p. 1.
2017/12/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the employment rate grew by 1.2% in 2016 in the EU28, 234.2 million people were in employment in the first quarter of 2017, the highest number ever recorded1a;however, the considerable number of jobs created in relation to economic growth hides challenges, such as the incomplete recovery in hours worked and modest productivity growth. If lasting, these factors may put additional pressure on long-run economic growth aspects and social cohesion in the EU1b; _________________ 1aEmployment and Social Developments in Europe, Annual Review 2017(ESDE),P11 1bEmployment and Social Developments in Europe, Annual Review 2017(ESDE),P46
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas long-term unemployment in the EU 28 has decreased from 5% in 2014 to 4% in 2016, it remains a concern accounting for almost half of total unemployment; notes with concern that the very long term unemployment rate of 2.5% in 2016 is still 1% above the 2008 figure; whereas wide disparities remain among Member States1a;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2017/2114(INI)

C. whereas poverty is decreasing but remains, with 4.8 million fewer people at risk of poverty and social exclusion in 2015 than in 2012; the rate of the-at-risk-of poverty or exclusion is still unacceptably high at 23.7%; however notes that figures remain very high in some Member States;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the fact that insufficient and inadequately focused investment in skills development and lifelong learning, particularly digital skills and programming may undermine the Union’s competitive position; notes that inequality has intensified in around ten Member States and is one of the main socio- economic challenges in the EU1c; _________________ 1cEmployment and Social Developments in Europe, Annual Review 2017(ESDE),P47
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the view that better skills matching and improved mutual recognition of qualifications is necessary to address skills shortages and mismatches; highlights the role that VET and apprenticeships can play in this regard; calls on the Commission to develop a pan- European skills needs forecasting tool;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on Member States to ensure adequate and sustainable pensions in light of continued demographic change; in this regard, highlights the importance of older workers continued participation and women’s integration into the labour market to combat old age poverty;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas the social provisions of the Charter are atare a crucial part of the Chearter and of the Union’s legal structure and therefore they contribute to reinforceing respect for fundamental rights across the Union;
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas since the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the Charter of Fundamental Rights is a source of primary law, applying in the first place to the institutions and bodies in the Union;
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas this means EU institutions should not only seek to avoid violations of Charter rights but also enhance the potential of the Charter by actively and systematically incorporating those rights when legislating or developing policies ;
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas Council and Parliament must ensure that systematically any choices to be made between different policy options under consideration should be assessed by the contribution that such options make to the fulfilment of the Charter;
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas the proclamation of the European Pillar of Social Rights further enhances equal opportunities and access to the labour market, fairdecent working conditions and social protection and inclusion;
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Reaffirms that all legal acts adopted by the EU must fully include and comply with the Charter’s social provisions, particularly in economic governance, and must be systematically assessed on compliincluding its social provisions. This shall include the area of economic governance;.
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Understands that EU legislation and policies shall be systematically assessed on compliance with the Charter;
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Understands that jurisprudence will impact on the scope of the Charter and this must be taken into consideration;
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that all EU actors should devote equal consideration to social and economic rights and principles as to the other fundamental rights and other principles enshrined in the Charter;
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls for the institutions and agencies to better align their practices with regard to Charter implementation;
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that EU Institutions and Member States should respect their obligations relating to the social and economic requirements of the Charter when seeking to fulfilensure compliance with EU instruments, such as the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union (TSCG).
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2017/2089(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recognises the vital role of the Fundamental Rights Agency in assessing compliance with the Charter;
2018/10/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2017/2044(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that growth is the key to more jobs and increased prosperity and that it is necessary to direct the structural funds more effectively towards promoting smart, sustainable and inclusive growth;
2017/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2017/2044(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that youth unemployment rates remain verunacceptably high in the Union and that the situation of unemployed young people, especially the persons who are not in education, employment, or training (NEETS), is particularly worrying; emphasises that, in order to address this issue, it is of high importance to ensure the proper and timely funding of the Youth Guarantee schemes through the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) and the European Social Fund; in this regard, stresses the importance of the agreed fresh funding of EUR 500 million for the YEI for 2017;
2017/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2017/2044(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the importance of sufficient funding and good budgetary management of the programmes within the 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework that aim to address unemployment, poverty and social exclusion, such as the YEI, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF), the different axes of the Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI) and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD); welcomes the increases proposed for EGF (+2 % in commitment appropriations) and FEAD (+1,9 % in commitment appropriations); however, regrets the significant proposed reduction of EUR 40 million in payment appropriations for the FEAD in addition to a reduction to its support expenditure;
2017/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2017/2044(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the EUR 72,8 million funding proposed by the Commission for the European Solidarity Corpse (appropriations are to be entered into the reserve until such time as the basic act is adopted by the legislator), EUR 2,5 million being provided in 2018 by the Progress axis of the EaSi; notes with concern the proposed EUR 11,1 million redeployment from the ESF to contribute to the Corps´ funding for 2018 and believes that such funding should instead be covered by the Global Margin for Commitments;
2017/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2017/2043(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that growth is the key to more jobssustainable growth and investment are the key to job creation and increased prosperity and that it is necessary to direct the structural funds more effectively towards promoting growth;
2017/05/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2017/2043(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that the 2018 budget must play a key role in enhancing the Union's contribution to growth and jobssustainable growth, jobs and social inclusion, especially in combatingthe areas of youth unemployment and inequality;
2017/05/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2017/2043(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that youth unemployment rates remain verunacceptably high in the Union1a and that the situation of unemployed young people, especially NEETS (not in education, employment, or training), is particularly worrying; emphasises that, in order to address this issue, it is of the utmost importance to ensure the properadequate and timely funding of the Youth Guarantee schemes through the European Youth Initiative and the European Social Fund;Youth Employment Initiative and the European Social Fund; in this regard, highlights the importance of continuing the YEI up to the end of the current MFF; also notes the Court of Auditors statement that it is not possible to address the whole NEET population with the resources available from the EU budget alone1b; _________________ 1aIn March 2017, the youth unemployment rate was 17.2% in the EU28 and 19.4% in the euro area, compared with 19.1% and 21.3% respectively in March 2016 - Eurostat, 2nd May 2017: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/29 95521/8002525/3-02052017-AP- EN.pdf/94b69232-83a9-4011-8c85- 1d4311215619 1bSpecial report No 5/2017: Youth unemployment – have EU policies made a difference?, p. 8
2017/05/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2017/2043(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Believes it is essential that the Youth Employment Initiative continues to be adequately funded and stresses in the context of the Multiannual Financial Framework mid-term review that the Council must adopt the agreed increase of EUR 500 million;
2017/05/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2017/2043(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the importance of sufficient funding and good budgetary management of the programmes within the 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework that aim to address unemployment, poverty and social exclusion, such as the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI), the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF), the different axes of the Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI) and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD); insists, therefore, that for 2018 these programmes' resources should at least be maintained at the levels of the previous EU budget; notes that payment amounts for this year's budget were limited as the structural funds have not been absorbed as quickly as expected and stresses that adequate payment appropriations be provided for in budget 2018;
2017/05/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2017/2043(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the view that the EU budget should also support vocational training and professional qualification measures; highlights, in this respect, that proper funding for the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) is paramountensure the adequate financial and human resourcing of EUROFOUND, CEDEFOP, ETF and EU-OSHA in order to allow them to fulfil their respective remits and ensure the best possible results in support of EU legislative and policy objectives;
2017/05/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2017/2043(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Emphasises the need for additional funding for the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND) in order to balance the substantial increase of the Irish country coefficient over recent years which makes it increasingly difficult to maintain the level of research done by the Agency; stresses the need for additional funding, particularly, to secure the work on the pan-European surveys and to allow for additional work in relation to 'Undeclared Work' and 'Integration of Refugees and Migrants into the Labour Market';
2017/05/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2017/2043(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises are a major source of employment in the Union andthe backbone of Europe's economy, representing 99% of all businesses in the EU; notes that one of the main problems in setting up and maintaining such enterprises and keeping them going is that of obtaining finance; underlines that the 2018 budget should support measures promoting entrepreneurship in those enterprises, including social entrepreneurship and, innovative social enterprises and self-employment; stresses, in this respect, that the budget 2018 should in particular facilitate access to micro- credits available through the microfinance and social entrepreneurship axis of the Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI) programme;
2017/05/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2017/2043(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Urges that financial support be provided for programmes creating jobs for those with multiple disadvantages onfrom EU funds reaches as many targeted beneficiaries as possible in particular for those furthest from the labour market, such as the long-term unemployed, people with disabilities and people from minority backgrounds;
2017/05/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2017/2043(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Reiterates that pilot projects and preparatory actions are very valuable tools to initiate new activities and policies in the fields of employment and social inclusion; stresses that several ideas of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs have been implemented successfully in the past as pilot projects/preparatory actions; is of the opinion, therefore, that that committee will make further use of those instruments in 2018; encourages the full use of the margins available under each heading; calls for Parliament to be given regular, detailed updates on the various stages in the implementation of pilot projects and preparatory actions by the Commission.
2017/05/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 143 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Is concerned about initial observations which show that improvements need to be made in the registration of and outreach to all NEETs, in particular those who are proving difficult to re-integrate, and especially inactive NEETs; urges the Member States to pay special attention to the needs of vulnerable NEETs;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2017/2039(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that establishing whether the YEI budget is well spent, and whether the ultimate YEI goal of helping young unemployed people into sustainable employment is attained, can only be achieved if operations are closely monitored on the basis of reliable and comparable data; calls on the Member States to urgently step up their monitoring of the YEI and YG and to guarantee that reliable and comparable data are gathered and made available in a timely manner; calls on the Commission to revise its guidelines on data collection in line with the recommendations of the COA in order to minimise the risk of overstatement of results;
2017/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2017/2024(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for the simplification of online signature collection (“OCS”) and verification and for a progressive approach to countering the technological barriers to OCS; invites the Commission to address data requirement divergences in national systems, especially regarding nationality and place of residence; and invites the Commission to explore the inclusion of a European citizen’s ID number (to be used on a secure website in the Member States) and qualified electronic signatures (QES); welcomes the AFCO proposal that the Commission run a free, centralised OCS system; suggests that this system make use of existing, proven online platform technologies and enable synergies with social media tools to galvanize more widespread signature collection; welcomes the Commission’s public survey on creating a “Collaborative ECI Platform”; invites the Commission to prolong the collection period such that the clock for collection starts running from the date of ECI registration; calls for greater transparency measures for ascertaining ECI financing;
2017/07/27
Committee: PETI
Amendment 48 #

2017/2024(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls upon the Commission to create a one-stop shop for ECI information disseminationphysical and online one-stop shop making use of the existing staff, resources of the point of contact based in the Europe Direct Contact Centre and EU facilities in each Member State for ECI information dissemination, help to manage technical and bureaucratic support related with the ECI, provide guidance during the whole process, translation services and citizen advisory services, in particular the provision of support in defining a compliant legal basis for an initiative; welcomes the AFCO proposal for a provision in the new Regulation on ECI communication activities at EU level; urges the Commission to link such efforts to the principles set out in the EU eGovernment Action Plan 2016-2020; and encourages the Commission and the Member States to achieve more user- friendly and more harmonised data collection requirements;
2017/07/27
Committee: PETI
Amendment 71 #

2017/2024(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Invites the Commission to consider the possibility of registering only part of an initiative in the event that the entire ECI does not fall within the Commission’s powers; invites the Commission to give the organisers, at the time of registration, an indication as to which part they could register, recognising that dialogue and engagement with ECI organisers is essential throughout the process, and to inform Parliament of its decision concerning the registration of the ECI;
2017/07/27
Committee: PETI
Amendment 74 #

2017/2024(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Invites the Commission to address the real need to solve the economic burdens for the organisation of ECIs in order to guarantee equal opportunities among citizens; and invites the Commission to reduce costs, red tape and to provide financial support where appropriate;
2017/07/27
Committee: PETI
Amendment 77 #

2017/2024(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Notes the important role of the European Ombudsman in investigating the handling of ECI requests by the Commission, and especially cases of refusal to register an ECI;
2017/07/27
Committee: PETI
Amendment 6 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
A a. Whereas the EU 2020 strategy establishes the EU's target of 75 % of men and women in employment by 2020 and, in particular, to close the gender gap in employment; whereas coordinated efforts will be required to facilitate women's labour-market participation.
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
A b. Whereas greater economic empowerment of women and greater gender equality is an economic opportunity which would significantly boost Europe´s economic growth, competitiveness, and opportunities in employment. Emphasises that GDP would grow between 15% and 45% in the EU Member States if gender gaps in employment were eliminated.
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A c (new)
A c. Whereas although women account for almost 60% of graduates in the EU they remain under-represented in science, mathematics, IT, engineering and related careers; highlights, as a result, inequality in occupations is taking new forms and, despite the investment in education, young women are still twice as likely as young men to be economically inactive;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Member States to promote the well-beingequality of women, by tackling the pay and pension gaps and combating atypical and insecure forms of work and employment, such as temporary co, which currently stand at 16 % and 40 % respectively; highlights the importance of the attractiveness of new forms of work by providing adequate flexibility that can promote higher employment racts or involuntary part-time worktes among women;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Highlights that the causes and consequences of the gender pension gap need to be addressed, as this is an obstacle to the economic independence of women in old age, when they face a higher risk of poverty than men.
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Calls on the Commission, together with the Member States, to promote and support female entrepreneurship initiatives as it can provide women the knowledge they need to found or co-found their own businesses based on their innovative ideas. In this regard, it is crucial to provide information on access to training, to support women entrepreneurs in accessing alternative sources of funding, business networking opportunities as well as advising on the start-up, management and growth of their businesses in the early phases.
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Underlines that due to the rapid spread of digital technology, this will result in a growing demand for digital and other complementary skills to address the existing digital gap between men and women;believes further measures aimed at enhancing digital skills among women and girls should not only cover the upskilling of the workforce but the process should already begin in the early schools years with the implementation of technical, entrepreneurial and relevant soft skills in the education programmes;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for measures to guaranteensure the economic and social dignity of feminised work, such as domestic work;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Stresses also the importance to pay attention to the specific needs of groups facing particular barriers to entry to the labour market such as women in rural areas as well as women with disabilities and migrant women.
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to enforcestrengthen the implementation of existing laws and workplace policies thato prohibit discriminationtect women from discrimination, particularly, in the recruitment, retention and promotion of women in employment in both the public and private sectors;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 123 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Member States to strengthen and enforce the full exercise of the right of collective bargaining in the private and public sectors; in this regard, social partners have high potential to support gender equality on the labour market by actively raising the issue of equal pay during collective bargaining;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the flexibility and ease of entry inherent in platform economy models can provide employment opportunities for groups traditionally excluded from the labour market in particular women, young people and migrants and in areas predominantly impacted by high unemployment such as disadvantaged or rural areas;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas access to high speed broadband is essential to participate in the platform economy and a lack of broadband provision potentially excludes groups such as older persons or those living in rural areas and outermost regions from benefiting from new opportunities;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the need for a clear distinction between 'professional' and 'non- professional' platforms and to recognise activities in the platform economy that are properly categorised as 'work'; In this regard encourages Member States to establish minimum thresholds to differentiate between occasional peer-to- peer activity and professional service provision;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for a framework directive on working conditions in the platform economy in order to encourage innovation and sustainable growth while guaranteeing the legal situation of platform workers and to ensure that all platform workers have the same social and employment rights and health and safety protection as workers in the traditional economy;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for more reliable data on jobs and working conditions in the platform economy and for the adjustment of related policies to create a level playing field between the platform and traditional economies; in this regard believes this data should include the employment status and history of platform workers, interviews with platform workers as well as platform collected data and that metrics should be developed which take into account job quality, income stability and work-life balance;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for EU standards on transparency and disclosure obligations for platform operators in order to monitor tax payments, social security contributions and practices regarding the rating of work on platforms; believes that Member States should facilitate platform workers in their self-reporting obligations with simplified tax declarations for platform work and should work with online platforms to communicate annual worker income via recorded electronic transactions to help combat tax evasion and undeclared work;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes the potential for unfair practices regarding work rating mechanisms, such as account deactivation or search result relegation by platforms based on an arbitrary number of negative client reviews, which may not necessarily reflect work quality and which cannot be challenged which impact on workers' ability to obtain jobs; believes platforms should notify and provide an arbitration process for platform workers before taking such action as a result of ratings scores;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines that constant accessibility represents a serious health and safety risk in the platform economy; advocates the establishment of a ‘right to log off’ without impacting on platform workers' ratings.
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Young people should be provided with easily accessible opportunities to engage in solidarity activities, which cwould enable them in the first place to express their commitment to the benefit of communities while acquiring useful experience, skills and competences for their personal, educational, social, civic and professional development, therebywhich would improvinge their employability. Those activities would also support the mobility of young volunteers, trainees and workers.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) The solidarity activities offered to all young people should be of high quality, in the sense that they should respond to unmet societal needs, contribute to strengthening communities, offer young people the opportunity to acquire valuable knowledge and competences, be financially accessible to young people, in particular efforts must be made to ensure participation of young persons with disabilities and disadvantages and be implemented in safe and healthy conditions.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The European Solidarity Corps would provide a single entry point for solidarity activities throughout the Union. Consistency and complementarity of that framework should be ensured with other relevant Union policies and programmes. The European Solidarity Corps should build on the strengths and synergies of existing programmes, notably the European Voluntary Service. It should also complement the efforts made by Member States to support young people and ease their school-to-work transition under the Youth Guarantee19 by providing them with additional opportunities to make a start on the labour market in the form of traineeships or jobs in solidarity-related areas within their respective Member State or across borders. Complementarity with existing Union level networks pertinent to the activities under the European Solidarity Corps, such as the European Network of Public Employment Services, EURES and the Eurodesk network, the European Youth Forum (YEJ), the European Volunteer Centre (CEV) and other relevant civil society organisations including the social partners should also be ensured. Furthermore, complementarity between existing related schemes, in particular national solidarity schemes and mobility schemes for young people, and the European Solidarity Corps should be ensured, building on good practices where appropriate. __________________ 19 Council Recommendation of 22 April 2013 on establishing a Youth Guarantee (2013/C 120/01).
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The European Solidarity Corps should open up new opportunities for young people to carry out volunteering, traineeship or job placements in solidarity- related areas as well as to devise and develop solidarity projects based on their own initiative. Those opportunities should help respond to unmet societal needs and contribute to strengthening communities while also contribute to enhancing their personal, educational, social, civic and professional development. The European Solidarity Corps should also support networking activities for European Solidarity Corps participants and organisations as well as measures to ensure the quality of the supported activities and to enhance the validation of their learning outcomes.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Voluntary activities constitute a rich experience in a non-formal and informal learning context which enhances young people's personal, socio-educational and professional development, active citizenship and employability. Voluntary activities should not have an adverse effect on potential or existing paid employment, nor should they be seen as a substitute for it. Solidarity placements in the form of volunteering under this Regulation should be offered by public authorities or by participating organisations in the not for profit sector or those involved in collaboration with a not for profit entity. In order to ensure continuity with respect to the volunteering activities that are supported at Union level, the volunteering activities under the European Voluntary Service that fall within the geographical scope of the European Solidarity Corps should be supported by the latter in the form of cross-border volunteering placements. The other volunteering activities under the European Voluntary Service that do not fall under the geographical scope of the European Solidarity Corps should continue to be supported under the Programme established by Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing 'Erasmus+': the Union programme for education, training, youth and sport20 . With respect to the interpretation of related legislation at Union level, both the cross-border volunteering placements under the European Solidarity Corps and the volunteering activities that continue to be supported under Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 should be considered equivalent to those carried out under the European Voluntary Service. __________________ 20 Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing 'Erasmus+': the Union programme for education, training, youth and sport and repealing Decisions No 1719/2006/EC, No 1720/2006/EC and No 1298/2008/EC, OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 50.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Traineeships and jobs in solidarity- related areas can offer additionalhelp to build social , economic and civic cohesion while offering opportunities for young people to make a start on the labour market while contributing to addressing key societal challenges. This can help foster the employability and productivity of young people while easing their transition from education to employment, which is key to enhancing their chances on the labour market. The traineeship placements offered under the European Solidarity Corps should be remunerated by the participating organisation and follow the quality principles outlined in the Council Recommendation on establishing a Quality Framework for Traineeships of 10 March 201421 . The traineeships and jobs offered should constitute a stepping stone for young people to enter the labour market and should therefore be accompanied by adequate post-placement support. The traineeship and job placements should be facilitated by relevant labour market actors, in particular public and private employment services, social partners and Chambers of Commerce. As participating organisations, they should be able to apply for funding via the competent implementing structure of the European Solidarity Corps in view of intermediating between the young participants and employers offering traineeship and job placements in solidarity sectors. Traineeships and jobs in solidarity related areas must be entirely separate from any volunteering activities. __________________ 21 Council Recommendation of 10 March 2014 on a Quality Framework for Traineeships, OJ C 88, 27.3.2014, p. 1.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Young people’s spirit of initiative is an important asset for society and for the labour market. The European Solidarity Corps should contribute to fostering this aspect by offering young people the opportunity to devise and implement their own projects aimed at addressing specific challenges to the benefit of their local communities. Those projects should be an opportunity to try out ideas in a sustainable way and support young people to be themselves drivers of solidarity actions. They could also serve as a springboard for further engagement in solidarity activities and could be a first step towards encouraging European Solidarity Corps participants to engage in self- employment or setting up associations, NGOs or other bodies active in the solidarity, non-profit and youth sectors.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Young people and organisations participating in the European Solidarity Corps should feel that they belong to a community of individuals and entities committed to enhancing solidarity across Europe. At the same time, participating organisations need support to strengthen their capacities to offer good quality placements to an increasing number of participants. The European Solidarity Corps should support networking activities aimed at strengthening the capacity of young people and participating organisations’ engagement in this community, at fostering a European Solidarity Corps spirit, as well as at encouraging the exchange of useful practices and experience. Those activities should also contribute to raising awareness about the European Solidarity Corps among public and private actors as well as to collect feedback from participants and participating organisations on the implementation of the European Solidarity Corps.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) A quality label should be put in place to ensure compliance of the participating organisations with the principles and requirements of the European Solidarity Corps Charter, as regards their rights and responsibilities during all stages of the solidarity experience. Obtaining a quality label should be a precondition for participation but should not automatically lead to funding under the European Solidarity Corps. The process that leads to attribution of a quality label should not create additional bureaucracy that would dissuade organisations, in particular private businesses in the occupational component, from contributing to the European Solidarity Corps.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) A European Solidarity Corps Portal should continuously be developed in order to ensure easy access to the European Solidarity Corps and to provide a one-stop shop for both interested individuals and organisations as regards, inter alia, registration, identification and matching of profiles and opportunities, networking and virtual exchanges, online training, language and pre and post-placement support as well as other useful functionalities, which may arise in the future.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Any entity willing to participate in the European Solidarity Corps, whether funded by the European Solidarity Corps budget, by another Union programme or by a different funding source, should receive a quality label provided that the appropriate conditions are fulfilled. The process that leads to the attribution of a quality label should be carried out on a continuous basis by the implementing structures of the European Solidarity Corps. Unnecessary administrative burdens must be avoided in this process. The attributed quality label should be reassessed periodically and could be revoked if, in the context of the checks to be performed, the conditions that led to its attribution were found to be no longer fulfilled.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 138 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
(41) This Regulation should apply from 1 JanuaryMarch 2018. In order to allow for the prompt application of the measures provided for in this Regulation, this Regulation should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 145 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) “solidarity activity” means an activity aimed at addressing unmet societal needs to the benefit of a community while also fostering the individual’s personal, educational, social, civic and professional development, which may take the form of placements, projects or networking activities which have local or European added value, developed in relation to different areas, such as education and training, employment, gender equality, entrepreneurship, in particular social entrepreneurship, citizenship and democratic participation, environment and nature protection, climate action, disaster prevention, preparedness and recovery, agriculture and rural development, provision of food and non-food items, health and wellbeing, creativity and culture, physical education and sport, social assistance and welfare, reception and integration of third-country nationals, territorial cooperation and cohesion;
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) “volunteering” means a full-time32 unpaid voluntary service for a period of up to twelve monthsn unpaid placement undertaken for a period of up to 12 months either on a full-time or on a part time basis of at least ten hours per week, which provides young people with the opportunity to contribute to the daily work of organisations active in solidarity- related fields, to the ultimate benefit of the communities within which the activities are carried out, including a solid learning and training dimension in order to enable the young volunteer(s) to gain skills and competences, which will be useful for their personal, educational, social and professional development, and which will also contribute to improving their employability; __________________ 32 As a general principle, an activity carried out continuously, 5 days a week for 7 hours a day.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
(8) “traineeship” means a period of work practice from twohree to twelve months, remunerated by the organisation hosting the European Solidarity Corps participant, based on a written traineeship agreement, which includes a learning and training component, and undertaken in order to gain practical and professional experience with a view to improving employability and facilitating transition to regular employment;
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 183 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
(9) "job" means a period of work from twohree to twelve months, remunerated by the participating organisation employing the European Solidarity Corps participant, carried out in a participating country and based on an employment contract in accordance with the national regulatory framework of that participating country;
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
(13) “European Solidarity Corps Resource Center” means the additional functions performed by a designated national agencyn entity selected for this purpose following a tender allocation process to support the development and implementation of activities under the European Solidarity Corps as well as the identification of the competences acquired by the participants through their placements and projects;
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the development and maintenance of a quality labels for entities willing to provide respectively volunteering placements or traineeships and job placements for the European Solidarity Corps in order to ensure compliance with the principles and requirements of the European Solidarity Corps Charter;
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 231 #

2017/0102(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. An application from an eligible entity to become a European Solidarity Corps participating organisation shall be assessed by the competent implementing body of the European Solidarity Corps in order to ascertain that its activities adhere to the requirements of the European Solidarity Corps. The application and registration process should be user- friendly. Administrative burdens should be avoided. The process that leads to the volunteering component should be differentiated to the process leading to the attribution of a quality label for the volunteering component, taking into consideration the specific characteristics of each component.
2017/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) The Union is party to the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities. The provisions of that Convention are thus, from the time of its entry into force, an integral part of the European Union legal order and Union legislation must as far as possible be interpreted in a manner that is consistent with the Convention. The Convention provides, among other things, in its Article 7 that Parties shall take all necessary measures to ensure the full enjoyment by children with disabilities of all human rights and fundamental freedoms on an equal basis with other children. Moreover, the Convention, in its Article 23, provides that States Parties shall take effective and appropriate measures to eliminate discrimination against persons with disabilities.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) Informal carers or family carers currently provide 80% of all care across the EU, free of charge. The prevalence of informal care in Europe coupled with the pressure on public expenditure in some countries renders this form of support even more important in the future. It is therefore clear that informal care needs to be supported and measures that enable carers to combine care with work are indispensable in this respect.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) The 2013 European Parliament Own Initiative Report entitled ‘Impact of the crisis on access to care for vulnerable groups’ (2013/2044) specifically calls for a Directive on Carers’ Leave
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) Work-life balance remains however a considerable challenge for many parents and workers with caring responsibilities, with a negative impact on female employment. A major factor contributing to the underrepresentation of women in the labour market is the difficulty of balancing work and family obligationresponsibilities. When they have children, women tend to work less hours in paid employment and spend more time fulfilling unpaid care responsibilities. Having an ill or dependent relative has also been shown to have a negative impact on female employment, leading some women to drop out of the labour market entirely.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) Work-life balance remains however a considerable challenge for many parents and workers with caring responsibilities, with a negative impact on female employment. A major factor contributing to the underrepresentation of women in the labour market is the difficulty of balancing work and family obligations. When they have children, women tend to work less hours in paid employment and spend more time fulfilling unpaid care responsibilities. Having an ill or dependent relative has also been shown to have a negative impact on female employment, leading some women to drop out of the labour market entirely. This in turn has negative financial consequences, as the social security and pension rights of these carers may be affected as a result. There is a strong business case to address the needs of working carers, as this can lead to better outcomes such as reduced absenteeism, attracted and retained staff, and better motivation of staff.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) The availability of quality, accessible, and affordable care infrastructures – supporting childcare as well as care for other dependants – has proven to be a crucial aspect to work-life balance policies. However, the majority of EU Member States have still not yet achieved the so-called Barcelona objectives for childcare, set in 2002. The achievement of these objectives is crucial to allow women to fully participate in employment. Moreover, funding for community-based services for persons with disabilities or other support needs is key for ensuring that women are not forced out of the labour market or unable to remain or re-enter paid employment, in line with the Council Conclusions of 7 December 2017 on Enhancing Community-Based Support and Care for Independent Living.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) Member States and, where appropriate, the European Union, should take measures under the European Pact for Gender Equality (2011-2020) and its provisions on the promotion of a better work-life balance to improve the supply of adequate, affordable, high-quality childcare services for children under the mandatory school age in line with the objectives set at the European Council in Barcelona in March 2002. Commission Recommendation 2013/112/EU[21] “Investing in children: breaking the cycle of disadvantage” also stresses the need to improve access to sufficient resources and to achieve the Barcelona objectives on childcare facilities for young children. At the same time, work-life balance and gender equality need to be complemented by investment in quality long-term care and diversification of services in this area.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 b (new)
(8b) In order to improve work-life balance, discriminatory practices such as the persistent gender pay gap should be tackled as to eventually ensure greater equity in the labour market. Member States together with the social partners and relevant stakeholders should include gender equality education in their curricula in compulsory and pre-school education and to continue with public authorities’ efforts to provide information and raise awareness. Policies on equal treatment should aim at addressing the issue of stereotypes in both male and female occupations and roles and social partners should act upon their key role in informing both workers and employers and in raising their awareness about tackling discrimination.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 c (new)
(8c) To better assess the impact of the underlying and other related legislation, relevant data such as the number of working hours, pay, position, including a breakdown by gender and age should be collected and published at local, regional and national level in order to document intersectional discrimination and shape policies in a targeted and resource- efficient way. The European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE), the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND) and the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) together with national and regional equality bodies should continuously update work-life balance indicators to ensure data is relevant and timely.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) Social partners should be constantly encouraged by Member States to continue their active work on ways to facilitate reconciliation of work, private and family life and improve gender equality and equal treatment in the labour market through education, adult learning, raising awareness and information campaigns.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) This Directive lays down minimum requirements related to paternity, parental and carers' leave and to flexible working arrangements for parents and workers with caring responsibilities. By facilitating the reconciliation of work and family life for parents and carers, this Directive should contribute to the Treaty-based goals of equality between men and women with regard to labour market opportunities, equal treatment at work and the promotion of a high level of employment in the Union. Current demographic developments, lead to increasing care needs due to the ageing of society on the one hand and the diminishing informal care potential on the other (due to smaller and more dispersed families and increasing female labour market participation). This requires a combination of investments in appropriate long-term care services and practical measures such as care leave and respite care that allows carers to maintain an active professional life.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 b (new)
(12b) Union legislation ensures the principle of equal treatment between various types of employment relationships, prohibits any direct or indirect discrimination based on sex in matters of employment, occupation, social protection and access to goods and services, ensures portability and preservation of rights in case of mobility between Member States and guarantees minimum requirements for the acquisition and preservation of supplementary pension rights across borders, as well as minimum requirements in terms of transparency of occupational schemes.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 c (new)
(12c) As labour markets evolve, social protection systems need to evolve too, to ensure that the European social model is future-proof and that it enables Union societies and economies to make the most of the future world of work. However, in most Member States, the rules governing contributions and entitlements of social protection schemes are still largely based on full-time open-ended contracts between a worker and a single employer while other groups of workers and the self-employed have been more marginally covered. Evidence shows that some non- standard workers and some self-employed have insufficient access to the branches of social protection which are more closely related to the labour market status or type of employment relationship. Social protection rights are not always preserved and transferred when individuals are transiting between different labour market statuses, for instance going from employment to self-employment or unemployment, combining salaried employment and self-employment, starting or closing down a business.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 143 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) In order to provide greater possibility for parents to use parental leave as their children grow up, the right to parental leave should be granted until the child is at least twelve years old. Member States should be able to specify the period of notice to be given by the worker to the employer when applying for parental leave and to decide whether the right to parental leave may be subject to a certain period of service. In view of the growing diversity of contractual arrangements, the sum of successive fixed-term contracts with the same employer should be taken into account for the purpose of calculating the period of service. To balance the needs of workers with those of employers, Member States should also be able to decide whether they define if the employer may be allowed to postpone the granting of parental leave under certain circumstances. In such cases, the employer should provide justification for the postponement. Given that flexibility makes it more likely that second parents, in particular fathers, will take up their entitlement to such leave, workers should be able to request to take parental leave on a full-time or part-time basis or in other flexible forms. It should be up to the employer whether or not to accept such a request for parental leave in other flexible forms than full-time. Member States should also assess if the conditions and detailed arrangements of parental leave should be adapted to the specific needs of parents in particularly disadvantaged situationsspecific situations, in particular with regard to children with disabilities, children with special needs or with serious medical conditions or illness, in accordance with their national law and practice.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) In order to facilitate the return to work following parental leave, workers and employers should be encouraged to maintain a reasonable level of contact during the period of leave and may make arrangements for any appropriate reintegration measures, to be decided between the parties concerned, taking into account national law, collective agreements and practice.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) In order to provide greater opportunities to remain in the work force for men and women carrying ofwho care for elderly family members and/or other relatives in need of care, all workers with a seriously ill or dependaent relative should have the right to take time off from work in the form of carers' leave to take care of that relative. This not only reflects the current care provision reality, with increasing care needs on the one hand and a deficit in the supply of formal long-term care options, it will also help carers to maintain their attachment to the labour market and prevent them from dropping out altogether when faced with a particularly intensive period of care. Finally, it will also help employers to mitigate the cost of absenteeism, presenteeism and the erosion of motivation and performance among working carers. Informal care is the bedrock of care provision and carers need to be enabled to care. To prevent abuse of that right, proof of the serious illness or dependency may be required prior to granting of the leave.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 197 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) Member States should give special attention to single parents who face particular challenges in terms of work-life balance and need specific support. This Directive should allow for separate provisions regarding leave and flexible working arrangements for single parents.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 207 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) In order to encourage working parents and carers to remain in the work force, those workers should be able to adapt their working schedules to their personal needs and preferences. Working parents and carers should therefore be able to request flexible working arrangements, meaning the possibility for workers to adjust their working patterns, including through the use of remote working arrangements, flexible working schedules, or a reduction in working hours, for caring purposes. In order to address the needs of workers and employers, it should be possible for Member States to limit the duration of flexible working arrangements, including a reduction in working hours. While working part-time has been shown to be useful in allowing some women to remain in the labour market after having children, or taking care of other dependants with a chronic care need, long periods of reduced working hours may lead to lower social security contributions translating into reduced or non-existing pension entitlements. In the case of many carers, this can lead to financial hardship, due to loss of direct as well as of future income and pension entitlements. It must be borne in mind that the provision of informal care is ultimately a sizeable contribution to society as well as to tight health and social budgets. The ultimate decision as to whether or not to accept a worker’s request for flexible working arrangements should lie with the employer, Specific circumstances underlying the need for flexible working arrangements can change. Workers should therefore not only have the right to return to their original working patterns at the end of a given agreed period, but should also be able to request to do so at any time where a change in the underlying circumstances so requires.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22 a (new)
(22a) Council Directive 2010/18/EC of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC provides the baseline reference for any actions by the Member States or the worker in the case of parental leave.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 241 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27 a (new)
(27a) Civil society, including equality bodies should have a role in the effective application of gender equality laws and provisions in employment relations with a view to ensuring equal treatment; Member States should improve social dialogue and the exchange of experience and best practice among all relevant stakeholders.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 280 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1
This Directive applies to all workers, men and women, who have an employment contract or employment relationship as defined by law, collective agreement and/or practices in force in each Member State.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 288 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) "paternity leave" means paid leave from work for fathers or the persons legally recognised as such to be taken on the occasion of the birth of a child;
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 302 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) “parental leave” means paid leave from work on the grounds of the birth or adoption of a child to take care of that child;
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 313 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) "carer" means a worker providing personal care or support in case of a serious illness or dependency of a relativeor chronic illness, disability or dependency of a relative, or, in accordance with national law, a worker not directly belonging to the family who provides such care on a non-profit basis, upon written request of the person being cared for;
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 334 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) "relative" means a worker's son, daughter, mother, father,step-child, foster child, mother, father, including adoptive ones, as well as step-father, -mother, siblings, grandparents and grandchildren, as well as spouse or partner in civil partnership, where such partnerships are envisaged by national law;
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 349 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) "dependency" means a situation in which a person is, temporarily or permanently, in need of care and / or assistance due to disability or, a serious medical condition other than serious illness or age;
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 359 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) “flexible working arrangements” means the possibility for workers after discussions with their employer to adjust their working patterns, including through the use of remote working arrangements, flexible working schedules, or a reduction in working hours.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 361 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) "single parent" means a person who is neither married nor in a partnership as recognised by national law and who has sole parental responsibility for a child.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 363 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 - point h a (new)
(ha) “carer’s leave” means leave from work for carers in order to provide personal assistance or support to a relative with support needs due to a disability, a mental health problem or a health condition;
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 364 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 - point i a (new)
(ia) “support needs” mean personalised assistance or support which allows an individual with a disability, a mental health problem or a health condition to fully participate in society;
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 378 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that fathers or the persons legally recognised as such have the right to take paternity leave of at least ten working days on the occasion of the birth of a child.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 379 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that fathers have the right to take paternity leave of at least ten working days on the occasion of the birth, stillbirth or adoption of a child.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 424 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Single parents shall have access to at least the same level of rights and protection ensured to parents under this Directive and may benefit from specific provisions, in accordance with national law, considering their specific situation.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 480 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that workers have the right to carers' leave of at least five working days per year, per worker. Such right may be subject to appropriate substantiation of the medical condition of the worker's relativ, dependency or the loss of autonomy of the worker's relative. The information on the medical condition, dependency or situation of loss of autonomy should be kept confidential and be shared only with a restricted number of involved services to safeguard the right to data protection of both the worker and the person in need of care.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 486 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that workers have the right to carers' leave of at least five working days per year, per worker. Such right may be subject to appropriate substantiation of the medical condition and support needs of the worker's relative.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 495 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Member States shall assess the need to adapt or extend the definition of "carer" to the purpose of applying for the relevant leave, with the aim of taking into account situations of particular difficulty.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 545 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Member States shall assess the need for arrangements necessary to make sure the application of flexible working arrangements is adapted to the needs of adoptive parents, disabled parents, parents with mental health problems, parents of children with disabilities, long- terms illnesses or mental health problems.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 559 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Employers shall consider and respond to requests for flexible working arrangements referred to in paragraph 1, taking into account the needs of both employers and workers. Employers shall justify any refusal of such a request in writing.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 573 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Rights acquired or in the process of being acquired by workers on the date on which leave referred to in Article 4, 5, 6, 7 or 69 starts shall be maintained until the end of such leave or of the respective period of time for the flexible working arrangements. At the end of such leave, those rights, including any changes arising from national law, collective agreements or practice, shall apply.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 584 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. .Member States shall define the status of the employment contract or employment relationship for the period of leave or of the respective period of time for the flexible working arrangements referred to in Article 4, 5, 6, 7 or 6,9 including as regards entitlements to social security, while ensuring that the employment relationship is maintained during that period.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 594 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Member States together with the social partners shall take the necessary measures to prohibit less favourable treatment of workers on the ground that they have applied for, or have taken, leave referred to in Article 4, 5, 6 or 6,7 or on the ground that they have exercised their right to flexible working arrangements referred to in Article 9.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 601 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States together with the social partners shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that reasonable, available and accessible legal advice and assistance can be obtained and is provided to those in need of it, including confidential and in-person counselling, by equality bodies or appropriate intermediaries.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 643 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
This Directive shall not constitute valid grounds for reducing the general level of protection already afforded to workers within Member States.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 644 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 b (new)
This Directive shall not affect Member States' prerogative to apply or to introduce laws, regulations or administrative provisions which are more favourable to workers or to encourage or permit the application of collective agreements more favourable to workers.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 645 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 c (new)
This Directive is without prejudice to any other rights conferred on workers by other legal acts of the Union.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 666 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. On the basis of the information provided by Member States pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report in which it reviews the application of this Directive, including data disaggregated by gender and age on the take-up of different types of leave contained in this Directive and its impact on micro, small and medium-sized undertakings, accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Emphasises the need of structural reforms creating a more flexible and secure labour market and responsible fiscal consolidation, thus reinforcing a favourable environment for business with a view to creating more employment while balancing the social and economic dimensions; stresses that those priorities will only be achieved if investment in human capital is prioritised as a common strategy;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 285 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Encourages the Member States to implement the necessary measures for the social inclusion of refugees as well as people of ethnic minority or immigrant origin;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 296 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes that in the AGS 2017 emphasis is placed on the need to promote tax and benefit reforms aimed at improving work incentives and making work pay, as tax systems can also contribute to combating income inequalities and poverty; calls on the Member States to gradually shift taxes from labour to other sources;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 301 #

2016/2307(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to work together on removing the obstacles to labour mobility, ensuring that EU mobile workers are treated equally with non-mobile workers;
2016/12/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2016/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. NHighlights that Cohesion policy proved to be one the most important public tools in promoting growth and jobs and reducing regional disparities; notes with concern that in 2015 only 34 % of Europeans said that they had heard about projects co-financed by the EU to improve the area in which they live and that this proportion has remained unchanged since June 20101 ; therefore, there is an urgent need to improve communication strategies to citizens, considering the low awareness of the positive effects cohesion policies have in quality of life and economic growth, which is even more important in times of challenge by populism and spread negativity about the European project; __________________ 1 Flash Eurobarometer 423: Citizens’ awareness and perceptions of EU regional policy.
2017/03/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2016/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission, in close cooperation with the managing authorities, to monitor regularly that all legal provisions as regards information and communication are being implemented thoroughly in order to ensure transparency and the widespread dissemination of information about the achievements of the Funds, and paying special attention to groups of beneficiaries in vulnerable positions;
2017/03/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2016/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve the visibility of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) by communicating the European added value of the projects, particularly in terms of job creation and social integration; in this context, draws attention to the growing importance of social media as the main source of information among many citizens, and also the dissemination of anti-European propaganda on the internet; recommends the more intense use of social media to communicate the successes of cohesion policies and the opportunities related to their use;
2017/03/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2016/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to reduce the administrative burden on authorities and beneficiaries, without affecting necessary controls and audits, with a view to ensuring a better absorption rate, in particular for SMEs, which have created around 85 % of new jobs within the Union in the past five years, and micro- businesses and companies in remote rural areas in order to foster their capacity to create employment and add economic value;
2017/03/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2016/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the importance of the integration of refugees as an urgent policy matter in the aftermath of the refugee crisis. In this regard, insists on appropriate allocation of the funds, flexible use of funds, and more appropriate targeting of the risk groups, in order to mitigate the risk of exclusion and social tensions;
2017/03/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2016/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Calls on the Commission to analyse the real impact of investing EU funds during the previous programming period and to draw specific conclusions regarding the positive and negative experiences as a starting-point for adding value to the investment process;
2017/03/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2016/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Stresses that there is a particular need at EU and at Members States level to improve simplification for beneficiaries with more precise targeting to meet their needs. In this regard, the social partners and stakeholders could contribute to the identification of both good and bad practices and help in introducing simplification option in their Member States;
2017/03/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2016/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Underlines concerns regarding the exclusion of some regions or municipalities from financing due to the increase in public debt since this increase usually stems from the activities of the central authorities;
2017/03/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas digitalisation penetrates deeply into all parts of the industrial se-ctor's activities increasing its competitiveness with innovative and sustainable production of goods and services which drives economic growth creating jobs as well as playing a significant role in the European countries' prosperity;
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the digitisation of industry represents a major challenge in terms of the organisation of work as well as resulting in an emerging opportunity of creating a significant number of new jobs and therefore requires targeted responses regarding employment, social and education policies, as well as the provision of up-to-date infrastructure;
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, in cooperation with social partners, to regularly assess the impact of digitisation on the quality, number and types of jobs and to consider not only the adjust related policies accordingly in case of having a clear negative impact but also a continued strengthening of the policies already considered as having positive effects on the labour market;
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to ensure universal access to training in digital skills, in order to allow equal participation of all citizens in the digital single market, be it as employees, entrepreneurs or customers; in this regards, highlights the importance of improving the matching between the industrial sector ´s labour requirements and the educational system at all educational levels in order to provide students with knowledge and skills required in knowledge society and for transition to a digitalised economy;
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the need to identify potential occupational health and safety risksreach a balanced approach to define not only the potential occupational health and safety risks but also advantages such as flexibility and teleworking stemming from the digitisation of industry and to take appropriate measures.
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2016/2270(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas Europe is one of the wealthiest regions in the world, although recent data on income poverty highlights the rising of poverty and severe poverty in Europe;
2017/05/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 7 #

2016/2270(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
A b. whereas income poverty is only a part of the overall concept of poverty, therefore poverty does not only refer to material resources, but also to social resources, notably education, health and access to services;
2017/05/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 9 #

2016/2270(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas a number of Member States have been coerced into reducing budget deficits and cutting their social spending, which has undermined public health, education, social security and housing systems;deleted
2017/05/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 46 #

2016/2270(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas the concept of minimum income must not be confused with the concept of a minimum wage, which is fixed by collective agreement or by legislation;
2017/05/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 67 #

2016/2270(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that urgent practical steps need to be taken to eradicate poverty and social exclusion and promote the fair distribution of income and wealthreduce inequalities that will help to ensure economic and territorial cohesion and an equilibrium between economic and social objectives;
2017/05/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 75 #

2016/2270(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Reinforces that the best way to reduce poverty and avoid social exclusion is to boost sustainable growth and to create favourable framework conditions for European companies - notably avoiding excessive administrative burdens as well as ensuring access to finance - in order to allow them to create jobs;
2017/05/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 86 #

2016/2270(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for priority to be given now, when shaping macroeconomic policies, to reducing social inequalities and guaranteeing universal free access to public social services, thus tackling poverty;
2017/05/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 116 #

2016/2270(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Argues that minimum income schemes are essentialcould act as transitional instruments in reducing and fighting poverty, social exclusion and inequalities, and they should be seen not only as a social investmentbut also as an economic investment; Notes the counter-cyclical effects of minimum incomes schemes;
2017/05/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 126 #

2016/2270(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to exchange best practices from minimum income schemes;
2017/05/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 137 #

2016/2270(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to propose a framework directive establishing minimum income schemes set at above 60% of national median equivalised disposable incomeand the Member States to evaluate the manner and the means of providing an adequate minimum income in all Member States and to consider further steps in support of social convergence across the EU, taking due account of each country’s specific characteristics., as well as national practices and traditions;
2017/05/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 3 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 14 June 2017 on the need for an EU strategy to end and prevent the gender pension gap;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital –A (new)
-A. Whereas equality and fairness are part of the European values and a cornerstone for the European Social model, the EU and its Member States.Whereas Member States and EU objectives are the promotion of employment, with a view to lasting high employment and the combating of exclusion.
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
A a. Whereas inequalities are understood both as the income gap among individuals and also as individuals' loss of opportunities, impeding the potential progress of the individual's abilities and skills, curbing their development and, consequently, their potential contribution to society;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas inequality undermines growth and quality job creation16 , according to international institutions such as the IMF17 or the OECD18 ; _________________ 16 IMF (2017) Working Paper 17/76 Inequality Overhang. Grigoli, Francesco; Robles, Adrian. 17 IMF (2015), Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality: A Global Perspective. Staff Discussion Note SDN/15/13 Washington: International Monetary Fund http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/20 15/sdn1513.pdf 18 OECD (2015) In It Together. Why Less Inequality Benefits All. OECD Publishing, Paris.
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
C a. Whereas the OECD and the IMF have stated that too high and rising inequalities have direct social costs, hamper social mobility and can also hamper economic growth today and in the future;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
C b. Whereas OECD highlights that "lowering inequality by 1-Gini point would translate into an increase in cumulative growth of 0.8% in the following five years" [1]. [1] OECD's report 'In it Together:Why Less Inequality Benefits All', p.67
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas increases in inequality are linked with declining labour shares of national wealth and shrinking trade union density;deleted
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
F a. whereas inequalities throughout the life-cycle are reflected in inequalities in old-age such as lower healthy life expectancy, old-age poverty, and a gender pension gap of almost 40 %;whereas this prevents older people to contribute fully to society and to support growth and quality of life as volunteers, carers, consumers or mentors;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas inequalities increased inwithin several Member States between 2008 and 2014 in terms of household disposable income, mainly in Mediterranean countries such as Spain, Greece, Portugal, or Cyprus19 ; _________________ 19 Eurofound (2017) Income inequalities and employment patterns in Europe before and after the Great Recession.
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
H a. Whereas disparities in and within the Member States' economic growth are leading to economic imbalances within the Union, these excessive unequal economic trends have generated excessive unemployment and poverty pockets.
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Firmly believes that the reduction of inequalities must be an institutionalone of the main priorityies at the European level in this very moment, not only in order to tackle poverty or to promote convergence, but also as the precondition for economic recovery, quality job creation and shared prosperity;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights that reducing inequalities is essential to promote fairer andcan help promoting more stable democracies, marginaliseing populism and extremism and ensureing that Europe is a project embraced by all its citizens;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Commission and the Member States to evaluate the performance and outcomes of economic policy coordination, taking into account the evolution of social progress and social justice in the EU; warns that the European Semester has not been successful in the achievement of these aims and in reducing inequalities;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop a concrete framework of measures ranging from social measures to economic ones that could address inequalities;Believes that specific polices aimed to fight economic inequalities should be introduced in the European Semester and in Country- specific recommendations;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. UrgesCalls on the Commission to extendinclude in the scope of the European Semester and in the in-depth analysis in the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure (MIP) by adding new binding indicators to estimate individual imbalances in inequalities as a way to link economic coordination with employment and social performancean estimate of imbalances in inequalities;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 145 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates its call for the establishment of an authentic European Pillar of Social Rights and the building of a deeper and fairer social dimension of the EMU, with the necessary legislative, institutional and financial means being devoted to guaranteeing true social progress for its citizens to ensure a level playing field in our market union;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Calls on the Member States to continue their efforts and to encourage an adequate framework of measures which ensures public education, health, adequate public infrastructure and social services, among others that encourages equality of opportunities.Such framework should enable a well-functioning "social lift";
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 167 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Calls for more equal economic trends without hampering incentives to free competition, entrepreneurship and innovation;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Calls on the European Commission and Member States to complement the Gini Index as a measure of inequalities with the Palma ratio as the evolution of the relationship between the 10% richest an the 40% poorest;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 169 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Boosting qualitydecent job creation
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Expresses its concern regarding the evolution of inequality in the EU after the crisis, which was largely driven by growing unemployment21 ;Understands unemployment as the main source of economic inequality.Despite the fact that it falls under Member States' competences, job-creation policies are the best option to increase productivity and raise competitiveness.Hence, believes that job-creation policies targeted towards the main unemployment pockets will not only homogenise unemployment rates across the Union but they will also help reduce differences in the incomes distribution; _________________ 21 Eurofound (2017) Income inequalities and employment patterns in Europe before and after the Great Recession.
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 199 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls on the European Commission and Members States to complement Economic and Monetary Union with a fully-fledged European labour market;Believes that well- functioning labour markets and welfare systems are vital to the success of the European monetary union and are part of a broader convergence process towards more resilient economic structures within the euro area;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 203 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12 b. Calls on Members States to ensure better alignment of education and training with labour market needs across the EU, improving opportunities for mobility, improving recruitment and training strategies - particularly 'on the job' training and through targeted investment that will boost job creation and increase employment demand;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 c (new)
12 c. Recalls that reskilling is one important element which enables to re- integrate people back into the labour market, helps to tackle long-term unemployment and to better match skills with jobs available;In addition, strongly supports anticipation of future skills' needs as well as fostering entrepreneurship and individual responsibility to meet demands of the labour market;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 210 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Expresses its concern about the increasing number of atypical work contracts and forms of non-stande in undeclared employmentwork linked with precarious working conditions, lower wages, exploitation and poorerlacking social security contributions, and rising inequality;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 229 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to present a proposal for a Framework Directive on decent working conditions for all forms of employment, ensuring for every worker a core set of enforceable rights, eliminating discrimination based on contractual status, ensuring a minimum number of working hours and facilitating decent working times and the right to negotiate schedulessocial partners to analyse if there is a need for common approach on decent working conditions for all forms of employment;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 240 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Expresses its concern regarding the negative effects of increasing automation due to the delay in adapting legislation, which threatens to exert downward pressure onAcknowledges the effects of increasing automation and the need to ensure the adequacy of the social protection systems and wages, especially affecting low and medium-skilled workers;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 253 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for a common apexchange of best proach acrosstices between Member States regarding the introduction of aan adequate Minimum Income Scheme, in order to support people with insufficient income, ease access to fundamental services, combat poverty and foster social integration;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 255 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Believes that the major step to avoid economic unequal trends is the creation of a Europe-wide income-policies framework that favour individuals with lower incomes, and a minimum income policy as a last resort for individuals before reaching poverty and social exclusion in line with the principle of subsidiarity;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 262 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to establishreflect on the feasibility of a European Unemployment Insurance sScheme, which avoids moral hazard and free-riding, complementing current national benefit systems; considers that such an automatic stabiliser can play an important role in reducing inequality between countries and in neutraliscushioning the consequences arising from the absorption of asymmetric shocks;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 286 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission and the Members States to strengthenNotes the importance of adequate workers' rights and fostering the bargaining power of employees through structural reforms of labour markets, widening collective bargaining coverage, and promoting unionisationhere appropriate; Recognizes that national authorities' role will be to ensure and reinforce the right to syndicate as well as the strength and autonomy of both workers and employers unions when engaging in negotiations at any level;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 292 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. Stresses the role of dialogue between social partners to address inequalities in the labour market;highlights that social dialogue should be complemented by civil dialogue with representatives of different groups of society, such as people living in poverty, different age groups, persons with different sexual orientations, persons with disabilities when discussing matters relating to inequalities and the fight against poverty and social exclusion;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 301 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Highlights that, in many countries, welfare and social protection systems have been severely undermined by austerity measures with huge consequences in terms of income inequalitiesimpacted by financial consolidation;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 305 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Believes that welfare systems should act as a safety net, but also ensure there are incentives to work;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 328 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Affirms that universal access to public, solidarity-based and adequate retirement and old-age pensions must be granted to all; calls on the Commission to support Member States in strengthening public and occupational pension systems to provide an adequate retirement income well above the poverty threshold and to allow pensioners to maintain their standard of living and to live in dignity and independence; reiterates its call for care credits in pension systems to compensate for lost contributions of women and men due to child and long-term care responsibilities as a tool to reduce the gender pension gap; highlights that while personal pension schemes can be important tools to improve pension adequacy, statutory solidarity-based pension systems remain the most efficient tool to combat old-age poverty and social exclusion and therefore should be provided with adequate resources;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 333 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Affirms that universal access to public, solidarity-based and adequate retirement and old-age pensions must be granted to all; calls on the Commission to support Member States in strengthening public and occupational pension systems to provide an adequate retirement income well above the poverty threshold and to allow pensioners to maintain their standard of livingHighlights also the important role of work-related pension systems and individual pension savings as a way to ensure an adequate mix, in line with Members States' practices;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 344 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Considers that international trade has been an engine for growth in many countries, but also can be perceived as a source of inequalitiesbut that the benefits are not always well distributed; calls on the Commission and the Member State to promote fairercontinue promoting international trade agreements that respect European labour market regulations, while proteccontributing to quality employment and workers' rights and ensuring intra- European and national mechanisms for the compensation of workers and sectors negatively affected;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 352 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28 a. Considers that each and every EU citizen is subject to the right for equal opportunities and free to choose its own path to emancipation;Believes in the capacity of individuals to shape their own destiny and create their own opportunities;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 363 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to facilitate a common approach towards a National Child Basic Income to ensure that every child receives a minimum income, thereby helping to achieve the goals of the Europe 2020 Strategy on reducing poverty and the risk of social exclusion;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 376 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Calls on the Commission to complete its work-life balance legislative package with two essential initiatives: a proposal for a new Maternity Leave Directive renewing these rights and a new proposal for a directive on long-term care and carers;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 381 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Considers that, despite existing legislation enshrining the principle of equal pay for work of equal value by male and female workers, there is still a gender pay gap and an even greater gender pension gap; calls on the Commission and, the Member States and social partners to address the gender gap challenge in pay and pensions;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 392 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Calls on the Commission to introduce legislation requiring Member States to publish tax rulings signed with large companies within a limited time- frameAsks the Member States to swiftly implement the Directive on Administrative Cooperation;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 394 #

2016/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33 a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to correct excessive interpersonal inequalities by supporting and encouraging most productive investments;recalls that for that objective taxation policies are crucial and that many Members States need a deep taxation reform.Calls on the Commission to monitor, advice, promote and prepare benchmarks in the light of the European Semester;
2017/07/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas, according to the European Court of Auditors Special report No 5/2017: 'Youth unemployment – have EU policies made a difference?'1a, while the seven Member States examined had made some progress in implementing the Youth Guarantee none had ensured that all NEETs had the opportunity to take up an offer within four months; notes the Court's comment that it is not possible to reach all NEETs with resources only from the EU budget; _________________ 1a http://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocu ments/SR17_5/SR_YOUTH_GUARANTE E_EN.pdf
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Ab. notes that there is no universally accepted definition of what constitutes a 'good quality offer' under the Youth Guarantee; believes that a good basis for such a definition is the Court's suggestion that Member States should ensure that offers are only considered to be of good quality if they match the participant's profile and labour market demand and lead to sustainable integration in the labour market;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2016/2242(INI)

1. Stresses that effective mechanisms to discuss and resolve difficulties experienced when implementing YG schemes are needed, together with a strong commitment by the Member States to implement the scope of the YG in full, including partnership-building, ensuring an effective outreach, enabling skills enhancement and putting in place proper evaluation structures as well as strengthening the administrative capacity;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that effective mechanisms to discuss and resolve difficulties experienced when implementing YG schemes are needed, together with a strong commitment by the Member States to implement the scope of the YG in full, including partnership-building, ensuring an effective outreach, enabling skills enhancement and putting in place proper monitoring, reporting and evaluation structures;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that preventive interventionoactive, holistic strategies and structural reform efforts by the Member States are needed in order to reap the benefits of the YG and ensure the success of school-to-work transitions of young people; stresses in this regard the importance of strong partnerships between key stakeholders, training for PES personnel, capacity building for public authorities, education & training institutions, career guidance providers and youth support services and cooperation with NGOs, where relevant;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that preventive interventions and structural reform efforts by the Member States are needed in order to reap the benefits of the YG and ensure the success of school-to-work transitions of young people; stresses in this regard the importance of training PES personnel, capacity building and cooperation with employers and NGOs, where relevant;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recalls the importance of cooperation between all levels of governance (EU, Member States and local entities) and the European Commission´s technical assistance in implementing effectively the YG;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the full potential of exchanging best practices among Member States has not yet been realised; notes in this respect the importance of mencourages the Commission and Member States to fully utilise the sharing of best practices through EMCO and the European Employment Strategy Mutual lLearning aimed at the activation of the most vulnerable groupProgramme and believes that a dedicated annual exchange of national YG contact persons should be established to facilitate this;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that a more diversified approach in the provision of services to different groups within the youth population is needed in order to avoid ‘cherry-picking’; calls for a stronger and dedicated outreach to young people facing multiple barriers and those furthest from the labour market (e.g. young people with disabilities);
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to provide consistent, quality data to facilitate the development of more evidence-based youth policies and to ensure the provision of follow-up data to assess the long-term sustainability of outcomes;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Member States to establish concrete and measurable objectives in implementing YG schemes and to identify its main challenges and appropriate action plans to overcome them; furthermore insists on the Member States to establish an overview of the cost of implementing the Youth Guarantee and to prioritize related measures according to available financing;
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2016/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Cautions against the repeated take- up of the YG which goes against the spirit of labour market activation and the aim of transition into permanent employment; to that end believes Member States should perform gap assessments and market analyses prior to setting up schemes and must ensure that offers of employment, education or training match participants' profiles and labour market demand to create sustainable employment.
2017/05/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas digitalisation, ambitious climate change goals, migration issues and the fight against poverty and social exclusion offer great potential for social entrepreneurship;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas across all Member States, social enterprises should have a common identity while drawing attention to the importance of recognising their diversity;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the vital importance of the hundreds of thousands ofapproximately 2 million social enterprises in Europe1a, which employ around 1more than 14.5 million people1b, and their invaluable contribution to continued economic growth in the EU internal market; and social cohesion in the EU; __________________ 1a https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/social- economy_en 1b http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId= 738&langId=en&pubId=7523, p. 47
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that, given the constantly rising demand for social services, social enterprises in the EU often bear enormous social responsibility and are becoming increasingly important;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises the importance of networking among social enterprises, and calls on the Member States to optimise knowledge transfer within Member States and throughout the EU;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for an online European platform for social enterprises, through which they could exchange ideas on setting-up and funding procedures and the legal situationestablishment and information, EU funding opportunities and requirements and possible legal structures;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to take quantifiable steps to unblock and attract public and private investment needed by social enterprises; notes in this regard that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises still face difficulties in accessing public procurement, such as barriers related to size and financial capability; reiterates the importance of effective implementation of the public procurement reform package by Member States in order to achieve greater participation by these enterprises in tendering procedures for public contracts, by improving the earmarking of contracts for such enterprises, including social clauses and criteria, simplifying procedures and drawing up tenders in a way that makes them accessible to smaller operators;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises the need to introduce at EU level a ‘European social label’ for social enterprises, based on clear criteria in order to increase their visibility, encourage investment and optimise their impact; believes the awarding of such an label should be done following a request by the enterprise and based on the subsequent satisfaction of clear common criteria such as a social objective, an entrepreneurial dimension, participatory decision-making, and the reinvestment of profits;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for theEU funds to be used effectively, and stresses that access to EUthese funds needs to be made easier for beneficiaries, not least in order to rule out the emergence of consultancy services provided solely for profitsupport and bolster social enterprises in their primary objective of making a social impact rather than profit maximisation, which ultimately offers a return on investment for society in the long-term.
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Emphasises the importance of social enterprises providing social services to support people at risk or experiencing poverty and social exclusion;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Highlights the necessity of offering employment to those most commonly excluded from the labour market, by reintegrating long-term unemployed people and combating unemployment in general.
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Highlights the importance of only awarding the European Social Label to enterprises that comply with the qualifying criteria; stresses the importance that a substantial percentage of the profits made by the undertaking must be reinvested or otherwise used to achieve the enterprises social purpose;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas the role of whistle-blowers is to help in deterring and preventinghelp to disclose or report acts or omissions which could harm the public interest as well as to deter future wrongdoing and corruption, thus contributing to the promotion of the rule of law, freedom of expression, transparency and democratic accountability;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas the importance of protection of whistleblowers has been recognised by all major international instruments concerning corruption and whistle-blowing standards have been set out by the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), Council of Europe Recommendation CM/Rec(2014)7 and the 2009 OECD Anti- Bribery Recommendation;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas recent mass leaks revealing corruption, such as the Panama Papers affair or the avoidance of rules on labour law leading in certain cases to precariousillegal employment, confirm the importance of the role played by whistle- blowers in defending the public interest;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital D
D. whereas serious concerns have often been raised that whistle-blowers can face hostility and exclusion at their place of work, rather than being viewed positively; whereas fears of retaliation can result in a chilling effect on whistle-blowers thereby endangering the public interest;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital E
E. whereas the objective of whistle- blowing should be the reporting of acts or omissions that represent a threat to the public interest or a breach of law;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital F
F. whereas some Member States already haignificant legal gaps and weaknesses in whistle-blower protection within a number of Member States results in an uneven laws thatevel of protection of whistle- blowers, but others do not, which limits the protection of whistle-blow across the EU; whereas this is particularly significant where therse are cross the EU; -border or EU-wide implications;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital G
G. whereas corruption is one of the mosta serious problems facing the worldEuropean Union today, as it can hamper a sMember States' ability to deliver inclusive economic growth in various fields;and competitiveness; whereas corruption is estimated to cost the EU economy €120 billion annually or 1% of EU GDP1a; __________________ 1ahttps://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what- we-do/policies/organized-crime-and- human-trafficking/corruption_en
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for effective measures to protect workhistle-blowers who detect and report wrongdoings in the field of unemploymentworkplace specifically protection from dismissal or other work-related unfair treatment, retaliation and criminal and civil liability;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Points to the dangers to the public interest of excluding whistle-blowing workers from career progression and of retaliation by colleagues at their workplace, and the dampening effect this has on those who may come across wrongdoing;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls the importance of devising instruments to ban any form of retaliation, whether this be active dismissal or passive measures such as the blocking of promotionin the form of harassment, dismissal or other punitive or discriminatory treatment;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Urges employers and the authorities to put in place effective channels for reporting and disclosing wrongdoing and to act on the information reported to them after this has been thoroughly verified, and to address the shortcomings identified;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2016/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls that proper legislation is needed; encourages Member States to develop legislative instruments that protect those who report justverified and proven breaches of conduct towrongdoing within organisations or public authorities;
2017/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas increases in employment rates mask the insufficient and socially inadequate response to the economic crisis, promotingcan sometimes mask ongoing impacts of the economic crisis, and the development of precarious forms of employment such as zero-hour contracts, bogus self-employment and involuntary part-time jobs, which do not provide workers with either a decent livingwage or full labour rights;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas part-time employment had never declined since the crisis, and full- time employment is still below its 2008 pre-crisis level; whereas the number of people working full-time in the second quarter of 2016 remained 2.5 % below the figure for 2008, while part-time employment increased by 11.1 % in the same period10 ; __________________ 10 ESDE Quarterly Review autumn 2016.the most common type of contract in Europe is still permanent full- time employment, accounting for more than half of total employment, although this is decreasing in most countries; whereas the number of employees with a permanent contract grew by 2.7 million in the year to the second quarter of 2016 and full-time workers saw their numbers increase by about 3.1 million; whereas part-time employment had never declined since the crisis, and full-time employment is still below its 2008 pre-crisis level;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Understands standard employment to mean full or part-time, regular employment on the basis of open-ended contracts or fixed-term contract work, and non- standard or atypical forms of employment to include, i.a., marginal part- time work, temporary agency work, fixed-term contract work, zero- hour contracts, internships that are not part of an education programme, and informal or undeclared work;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – indent 1
- little or no job security owing to the non-permanent nature of the work, as in some fixed-term contracts, involuntary and often marginal part-time contracts, contracts containing poor conditions, unwritten contracts, unclear working hours, and duties that change owing to work on demand;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – indent 2
- low remuneration below a minimum living wage, which may even be unofficial or unclear;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – indent 4
- no protection against discrimination;deleted
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – indent 5
- limited or no prospects for advancement in the labour market;deleted
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 174 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that decent work should specifically guarantee coverage by applicable collective agreements, security of collective bargaining, equal pay for equal work in the same place, and protection of the workers’ families, while supporting the work-life balance for all workers;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that numerous factors, such as digitalisation and automation, are contributing to a radical transformation of work, with an increase in non-standard forms of employment trends that willcould intensify unless newresponsive and proportionate regulation is put into place; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that work being transformed through digitalisation, and new employment being created as a result of it, is decent;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that precarious employment conditions have a long-term effect on social security protection and pensions, and can place workers at greater risk of poverty, social exclusion and deterioration of their fundamental rights;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 217 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that social protection, and protection by collective agreements and collective bargaining, should be available to all workers; calls on the Commission and the Member States to guarantee effective protection for workers who perform work in the context of an employment relationship, and a comprehensive policy response that includes policies towards reducing and ultimately eradicating precarious work; calls for policies that empower workers by strengthening social dialogue and promoting the extension of collective bargaining, ensuring that all workers can access and exercise their right to associate, and to bargain collectively, freely and without fear;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 231 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the importance of labour inspectorates and the social partners in safeguarding workers’ rights, defin and agreeing decent wages and incomes in accordance with Member States’ laws and practices, and in providing consultation and guidance to employers; strongly underlines that labour inspectorates should focus on the goal of monitoring and improving working conditions, and should not be used as migration control mechanisms; strongly condemns the practice of companies twho employ migrants without securing their full rights and benefits;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 250 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to combat non-standard, atypical and precarious forms of employment, in line with the ILO Decent Work Agenda and the European Social Charter;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 297 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that the policies of the Member States should be formulated and implemented in accordance with national law and practice, in consultation with, and without prejudice, the most representative organisations of employers and work the social partners;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 310 #

2016/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure effective protection to workers especially affected by uncertainty and precariousness, giving special priority to women workers, young workers, older workers, workers in the informal economy, migrant workers and workers with disabilities;
2017/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that Sweden submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF on 31 March 2016, and that the assessment of that applicationfollowing additional information provided by Sweden, its assessment was finalised by the Commission on 5 September 2016, and notified to Parliament that same daye same day, thereby respecting the deadline of 12 weeks from receipt of the completed application;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Points out thatEmphasises that the regions affected are faced with a relatively large group of older workers with similar backgrounds who have been made redundant at the same time, with and that most of these workersm, particularly those located in Kista, the town with the highest number of redundancies, do not possessing the skills sought after onby the local labour market;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that the Swedish authorities decided to focus possibleSweden’s decision to concentrate potential EGF assistance especially on the Kista, Katrineholm and Kumla sites, as thesewhich face the bigggreatest challenges; recalls that, while also offering individualised help must be offered to workers made redundant at the other sites as well;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Acknowledges Arbetsförmedlingen’s (the Swedish Public Employment Service) assessment that blue-collar workers have potential opportunities in public or private sector service industries, provided major retraining is offered to them;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Recognises that most of the affected white-collar workers are engineers, some of whom are specialised in niches that are unique to Ericsson, but welcomes the confidence of the Swedish PES that a personalised package of training programmes and coaching will enable most of those redundant employees to find new jobs of high quality.
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that Sweden is planning four types of measurthe EGF co-funded personalised services for the redundant workers covered by this application: (i) counselling and career guidance divided in: in-depth assessment and individual planning, guidance counselling and motivation coaching and career planning, (ii)include: counselling and career guidance; sheltered and supported employment and rehabilitation measures, (iii); education and training, (iv); and job search allowances; welcomes the special emphasis that will be placed on participants aged 50 and above when providing motivational coaching and career planning;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Notes that the income support measures amount to 33,92 % of the overall package of personalised measures, close to the maximum 35 % set out in the EGF Regulation; and that these actions are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities; considers this relatively high percentage to be justified in view of the significant proportion of older workers concerned and the provision of individual support to participants with learning disabilities;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Welcomes the Swedish authorities’ assurance that special efforts will be undertaken to break traditional gender barriers, including encouraging male beneficiaries to find jobs in the health care sector, as well as the contribution the measures will make to the 16 Swedish Environmental Quality Objectives;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 16 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that Swedenthe Swedish authorities have confirmsed that the eligibleproposed actions dowill not receive assistancefinancial support from other Union funds or financial instruments, that any double financing will be prevented and that those actions are complementary to actions funded by the Structural Funds; reiterates its call to the Commission to present a comparative evaluation of those data in its annual reports in order to ensure full respect for existing regulations and that no duplication of Union-funded services can occur;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 17 #

2016/2214(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates that assistanceWelcomes Sweden’s assurance that a financial contribution from the EGF mustwill not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements nor measures for restructuring companies or sectors; notes that Finland has confirmed that the EGF contribution will indeed not replace themthe enterprise concerned is required to take by virtue of national law or pursuant to collective agreements;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that Finland submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF on 11 March 2016, and that following additional information provided by Finland, its assessment was finalised by the Commission on 29 July 2016, thereby respecting the deadline of 12 weeks from receipt of the completed application;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Recognises that this application continues a series of cases revolving around the decline of Nokia in Finland and that two further related applications for workers being made redundant in the ICT sector are expected to follow;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Emphasises the importance of the ICT sector to employment in the regions of Helsinki-Uusimaa, Etelä-Suomi and Länsi-Suomi and the potential for the redundant workers to contribute to the industry if they receive sufficient support through further education, training and plans to take up entrepreneurship;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Welcomes the high percentage (close to 80 %) of the overall package being used for personalised services;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Notes that the pay subsidy mentioned in paragraph 7 is between 30 and 50 % of the worker’s payroll costs and will be given for a period of 6 to 24 months; calls on Member States to pay strict attention when using pay subsidies to ensure that redundant workers hired with a subsidy are not replacing, in whole or in part, a position held previously by another employee at the company concerned; is pleased the Finnish authorities have given assurances that this is the case;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2016/2211(BUD)

7 b. Notes that the income support measures amount to 16,64 % of the overall package of personalised measures, well below the 35 % limit set by the EGF Regulation and that these actions are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7 c. Invites the Commission to evaluate and provide information about the impact of these income support measures over a period of several years, to ensure that they are supporting high-quality employment and not being used to subsidise short- term, low-cost contracts;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 18 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9 c. Recalls that, in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy.
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 19 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. StressNotes that the Finnish authorities have confirmed that the eligibleproposed actions dowill not receive assistancefinancial support from other Union funds or financial instruments, that any double financing will be prevented and that such actions are complementary to actions funded by the Structural Funds; reiterates its call to the Commission to present an annual comparative evaluation of those data to ensure full respect of the existing regulations and that no duplication of Union-funded services can occur;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 20 #

2016/2211(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Reiterates that assistanceWelcomes Finland’s assurance that a financial contribution from the EGF mustwill not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements nor measures for restructuring companies or sectors; notes that Finland has confirmed that the EGF contribution will indeed not replace themthe enterprise concerned is required to take by virtue of national law or pursuant to collective agreements;
2016/09/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2016/2161(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that the Centre introduced a new internal structure in the beginning of 2015 and that 2015 was the Centre's first full year under the remit of the European Commission's Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs, and Inclusion;
2016/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Takes note of the results envisaged in PAs and OPs, and expects Member States and regions to take the right path in order to achieve cohesion policy objectives; recalls that more effective and efficient policies are needed, in order to avoid overlap, redundancies, destructive administrative burden and incoherencies;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Ask the Commission to be more assertive in monitoring the implementation of recommendations and investments under the ESIF;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the priority nature of the challenges that the ESF is charged with tackling, this being reflected in the sum of EUR 86.4 billion dedicated to ESF measures under the relevant thematic objectives in line with the Europe 2020 Strategy;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to improve simplification for beneficiaries, and for more precise targeting to meet their objectives bearing in mind the specific needs and particularities of Member States; Moreover, calls on the Member States to also make an effort in this area;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that 6 million unemployed young people are to benefit from the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) – which will help them find jobs or improve their skills and qualifications – now that YEI has been integrated into 34 ESF programmes in the 20 eligible Member States; is concerned, however, about the delayed start to thand effective implementation of the YEI; urges Member States to intensify their efforts to ensure that the results envisaged are achieved successfully;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to analyse carefully the real impact of investing EU funds during the previous programming period and to draw conclusions regarding the positive and negative outcomes of the PAs and OPs. The same should be done for future programming period; A portal summarising statistics on projects already approved is necessary to avoid fragmented information;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Underlines that the EU funds should not be only used to achieve the targets of Europe 2020 but also for more structural improvements and investments in the real economy; A quantified evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of funds already invested must be implemented, especially assessing the effects in job creation;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Recommends that the Commission develop and establish a user-friendly portal that provides a brief description of all funding options at EU level and links to the webpage of each individual programme.
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that only rarely do ESF- supported measures generate revenue directly, and that grants are therefore the appropriate tool for their implementation, while financial instruments could be a useful complementary tool for certain ESF interventions with a possible leverage effect; Underlines that scarce investment resources can be better targeted by forging links and synergies with other EU funding instruments, notably Erasmus+, Life+, the EU Programme for Employment and Social Innovation and Horizon 2020 with a holistic coordination;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Underlines the need to guarantee sufficient administrative capacity before investments are made, taking the fact that more EU funds do not mean more growth; A point is reached where returns begin to decline and additional funds do not lead to higher growth;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas petitioners tend to be citizens engaged in the improvement and future well-being of our societies; whereas the experience of these citizens in regard to the processing of their petitions, when based on the Committee's competences, may determine their perception of the EU institutions and respect for the right to petition contained in EU law;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 27 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas confidence in the system and in the European project as a whole has been dented by recent events in the United Kingdom, the humanitarian refugee crisis, the social and economic impact of the financial crisis, and the rise in xenophobia and racism throughout Europe; whereas the Committee on Petitions has the responsibility and the huge challenge of maintaining and strengthening constructive dialogue with EU citizens on European issues;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 32 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas the Committee on Petitions is best able to show citizens what the European Union does for them, according to its competences, and what solutions it can provide at European, national or local level; whereas the Committee on Petitions can do excellent work explaining the successes and benefits of the European project;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 40 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas the right to petition should enhance the European Parliament’s capacity to react, helping to resolve problems relating mainly to how EU legislation is applied, as petitions, which are based on EU competences and fulfil the admissibility criteria, constitute a valuable source of information in detecting deficiencies in how EU legislation is applied; whereas such petitions are a basic tool in the early detection of those Member States lagging behind in transposition of EU law;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 43 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas, therefore, petitions, which are based on EU competences and fulfil the admissibility criteria, are very important for the legislative process as they provide other Parliament committees with useful and direct input for their legislative work in their respective fields; whereas such petitions are not solely the responsibility of the Committee on Petitions, but should rather be a shared endeavour of all Parliament committees;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 45 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas, through petitions which are based on EU competences and fulfil the admissibility criteria, EU citizens can complain about poor implementation of EU law; whereas in so doing citizens act as a useful source of information when it comes to detecting breaches of EU law;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 53 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas during 2015 petitions lodged by citizens were processed faster and with greater efficiency, the timespan involved in correspondence with petitioners having been reduced; whereas the Secretariat has performed a noteworthy effort to achieve it;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 58 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas petitioners actively contribute to the work of the Committee, providing additional information to its members, the Commission and representatives of the Member States who may be present; whereas petitioners, by taking part in these discussions and presenting their petitions along with more detailed information, contribute to establishing a fluid and constructive dialogue with Members of the European Parliament and with the European Commission; whereas in 2015, 191 petitioners attended and were involved in the Committee’s deliberations; whereas although this number seems relatively low, the meetings of the Committee on Petitions are broadcast, enabling petitioners to follow live discussions in real time by means of internet streaming;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 84 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AC
AC. whereas the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) has to be an important tool for enabling citizens to participate in the EU political decision-making process, and its potential must be exploited fully while ensuring that citizens are fully informed as to matters of EU competence and national competence; whereas, as emerged from statements in the public hearing of 22 February 2015, there is a widespread feeling on the part of organisations processing an ECI that the administrative barriers need to be removed in order to obtain the best possible results in regard to participation by citizens; notes however the need for transparency and accountability by such organizations;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 95 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the right to petition should enhance the European Parliament’s capacity to react, helping to resolve problems relating mainly to implementation of EU legislation, as petitions, which are based on EU competences and fulfil the admissibility criteria, constitute a useful source of information in detecting breaches in the implementation of EU legislation;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 100 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the work that the Committee on Petitions carries out in listening to and helping to solve problems affecting its citizens at the European level and which fall within the Union's competences; believes that petitions can help in assessing the impact that EU legislation has on their daily lives;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 105 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the fact that the Committee on Petitions has an opportunity and the huge challenge of maintaining a dialogue with citizens as it has the possibility to bring the EU’s institutions and citizens together once again; notes also that it helps to promote participative democracy;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 138 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Considers it essential to improvinge cooperation with national parliaments and their relevant committees and with Member State governments, particularly to help ensure that the petition is dealt with by the relevant and competent authorities; encourages the representatives of Member States and of local and/or regional authorities concerned to attend meetings; highlights the need for Council and Commission representatives to be present at meetings and hearings of the Committee on Petitions;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 154 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. DeploresIs aware of the strict way in which the Commission has interpreted Article 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights with its stipulation that ‘the provisions of the [...] Charter are addressed to the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union with due regard for the principle of subsidiarity and to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law; recalls that, owing to the existence of Article 51 of the Charter, the expectations of citizens often go beyond what the Charter’s legal provisions strictly allow for; calls on the European Commission to adopt a new approach that is more consistent with those expectations;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 164 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the wide range of subjects raised in the petitions filed by citizens, such as fundamental rights, child welfare, the rights of persons with disabilities, the internal market, environmental law, labour relations, migration policies, trade agreements, public health issues, child welfare, transport, animal rights and discrimination;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 175 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that the organisation of public hearings is an important way of examining problems raised by petitioners which fall within the EU competences; draws attention to the public hearings organised on 26 February 2015 with the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety in response to the ECI on ‘Water is a Human Right’, and with the Committee on Legal Affairs for the ECI entitled ‘One of Us’;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 203 #

2016/2146(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Emphasises the important role of SOLVIT, a problem-solving network between the Member States which should be thoroughly developed to its full potential in collaboration with the States and their national SOLVIT centres under their national administrations, and requests that it be given moradequate resources and that a more systematic analysis of the problems identified by SOLVIT be conducted as this network helps to give a realistic picture of the dysfunctions of the single market;
2016/10/24
Committee: PETI
Amendment 27 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that voluntary initiatives are not adequatelone cannot fully addressing issues such as health and safety, wages, social security and working time;
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. BWelieves the current flagship initiative does not go fcomes the Commission's proposed objectives of better collaboration between stakeholders, awareness raising among European consumers, supporting developing countries to endorse and implement international labour and environmental standards, and fostering companies' responsible management and transpar enough incy of supply chains; believes the current flagship initiative can go further to improvinge the garment sector; calls on the Commission to release as a matter of urgency the report it commissioned identifying gaps in current policy;
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that trade unions must be able to operate independently and freely to promote and protect workers' rights, particularly health and safety, with access to factories to educate workers on their rights and their safety and that they are a necessary partner in social dialogue and collective bargaining;
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Emphasises the importance of independent labour inspections in early warning and prevention, yet notes that factors such as audit fatigue can undermine their effectiveness; recommends further research on ways of improving audits and inspections, such as sending different labour inspectors each time, which can lead to more stringent standards, especially in countries with corruption issues; notes the importance of the adequate recruitment of labour inspectors and ongoing training for new and existing inspectors alike;
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Believes that responsibility should extend throughout the entire supply chain, and commends existing efforts to this effect; believes, howevconsider,s that thenew EU is best placed to develop a common framework through legislation on mandatory due diligence and supply chain transparencylegislation is necessary to create a legal obligation of corporate Human Rights due diligence for EU garment companies outsourcing production to third countries, including binding measures to secure traceability and transparency, which would oblige companies wishing to operate on the European market to provide information about the entire supply chain of their products; recommends that regulation should come in addition to and in support of voluntary initiatives, and that information gathered as a result of EU action should be publicly available.
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the country-specific recommendations (CSRs) demonstrate the differences that exist between Member States; argues that the Member States should continue to give priority to reforms that will strengthen their economic recovery and job creation, making a commitment to investment, implementing structural reforms and taking an approach based on fiscal and budgetary responsibility; Request that major structural reforms advocated by CSRs should be accompanied by a social impact assessment regarding their medium-long term effects with the propose to better understand the impact on job creation and economic growth;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the country-specific recommendations (CSRs) demonstrate the differences that exist between Member States under the European Semester framework; argues that the Member States should continue to give priority to reforms that will strengthen their economic recovery, making a commitment to growth-friendly investment, implementing necessary structural reforms and taking an approach based on fiscal and budgetary responsibility;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Commission and the Council to provide stronger guidance on the implementation of the CSRs. Notes that the dialogue with Member States and other European institutions and social partners must continue to be intensified to enhance the ownership of CSRs in order to improve the unsatisfactory rate of reform implementation;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls for a stronger effort from the Commission and Members States to reduce poverty, social exclusion and growing inequalities, for instance through Member States´ exchange of best practices on the implementation of national minimum income schemes; Reiterates that tackling economic inequalities is fundamental to achieve long lasting economic growth and a socially sustainable rhythm of implementation;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Recalls that the longer-term vision outlined in the Europe 2020 Strategy is a good first step, but these targets should be adapted to the reality and needs in different Member States, leaving sufficient political space for Member States to find their own contextually adapted path to reform in close consultation with stakeholders while ensuring that the 2020 Strategy remains central to their objectives;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that economic growth should guarantee a positive social impact; welcomes the introduction of the three new headline socialemployment indicators in the macroeconomic imbalances procedure; reiterates the call for these to be pa balanced on an equal footingequilibrium with existing economic indicators, thereby guaranteeing that internal imbalances are better assessed and making structural reforms more effective; calls, in this connection, for a social imbalances procedure to be introduced; The social imbalance procedure must prevent a race to the bottom in terms of taxation and social standards, building on an effective use of the social and employment indicators in macroeconomic surveillance;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses that economic policies should adapt to social needs and should guarantee minimum social policies and basic services for its citizens; Highlights that a renewed process of upward economic and social convergence is needed, notably through investments in human capital and other social infrastructures, in order to tackle the economic and social disparities between Member States and within societies;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. The introduction of the 3 employment indicators shows that the European Employment Strategy, including Employment Guidelines, plays an important role in the EU economic governance process, but more efforts need to be made, notably through the introduction of social indicators, like the gini coefficient, palma index and persistent-at-risk-of-poverty rate;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Calls on the Commission to deliver the results of the consultation and to move forward with new effective steps on the establishment of a European Pillar of Social Rights, which is fundamental to broader efforts to deliver a fairer Union;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for a strong commitment to promoting the Juncker Plan (EFSI) in Member States with a low level of participationthat are especially affected by severe unemployment;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the European Commission to closely monitor and control the investments under the Juncker Plan; A report should audit and measure the economic and employment impact of the investments in real terms;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Recognises the significant progress made by the Member States in implementing structural reforms, while nevertheless taking the view that further progress is necessary: to enhance productivity, foster job creation, raise competitiveness and improve the business environment, while nevertheless taking the view that further progress is necessary, especially from Member States with large current account surpluses, notably through the implementation of measures to channel excess savings towards the domestic economy and thereby boost domestic investment;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Highlighted the importance of private investment, but believes that public expenditure should be also promoted in an efficient and effective way; Member States should focus on sources of expenditure that will raise productivity capacity in the future and that will have strong positive spill-overs on the economy as a whole - especially through education and training (academic, professional and vocational), R&D and infrastructures (transport, energy and communication);
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on Member States to reduce the tax wedge on labour, particularly for low earners, in a budgetary neutral way to foster job creation and to implement tax rules that foster incentives on entrepreneurship and employment creation;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 105 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Recalls once again that free movement of people is fundamental to enhance convergence and integration between European countries;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Regrets the fact that the Commission has disregarded Parliament's request to strengthen the application of Article 349 TFEU with a view to enhancing the outermost regions' integration into the EU; notes that these regions have unemployment rates over 30%; Priority should be also given to economies and regions that still face high long-term and youth unemployment and that productivity growth remains slow affecting living standards and competitiveness;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for account to be taken of the challenges that have been emerging in the EU since 2015the beginning of the crisis, which have required serious adaptation efforts; calls on the Commission not to apply any sanctions to the Member States in 2016to apply the rules of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) exactly the same way in every Member State, so as to prevent any sort of discrimination; Notes the flexibility already contained within the SGP;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that more EU transfers might be expected to generate greater additional growth, but in reality, it appears there may be decreasing returns from investment and investment- stimulating transfers; More funds do not necessarily mean more growth and better results; A point may be reached where returns begin to decline and additional funds do not lead to higher growth; Transfers to regions should therefore not exceed maximum desirable levels if inefficiency and misuse are to be avoided;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Calls on the Commission to help and to exchange best practices with Member States to improve administrative capacity at national, regional and local level which is a key challenge for re- launching long-term investments and ensuring job creation and sustainable growth;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Stresses that Member States deficit levels may be increased due to the Member States need to co-finance projects financed by ESI funds; Having regard to budgetary restrictions, many deprived regions have less possibilities to benefit from ESIF. Asks the Commission to revise the requests of co-financing in areas with dramatic indebtment or deficit;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
– having regard to the Report of the Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons,
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
– having regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, ratified by the EU in 2010,
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 10 September 2015 on creating a competitive EU labour market for the 21st century,
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the European Union needs a paradigm shift towards a strongmust continue to strengthen and build upon the European social model based on solidarity, social justice, a fair distribution of wealth, gender equality, a high- quality public education system, quality employment and sustainable growth - a model that ensures goodadequate social protection for all, combats economic inequality, empowers vulnerable groups, enhances participation in civil and political life, and improves the living standards for all citizens, delivering on the objectives and rights set out in the EU Treaties, the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Social Charter;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. The social dimension of the EU is much broader than EU Social Rights, the EPRS or Social Pillar also includes an extensive body of EU and national legislation protecting workers, as well as well-developed national social systems;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the Commission is expected to come forward in the spring of 2017 with a proposal for a binding European Pillar of Social Rights;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that the European Pillar of Social Rights (EPSR) cannot be limited to a declaration of principles or good intentions but must consist of real matter (legislation, policy-making mechanisms and financial instruments),should include specific policy-making mechanisms delivering a positive impact on citizens’ lives in the short term and enabling support for European construction in the 21st century by effectively upholding social rights and Treaty objectives, strengthening cohesion and upward convergence, and helping to complete EMU in the long term;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 190 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that the EPSR should equihelp European citizens with stronger means to keep control over their lives and make markets work for wellbeingto maintain ownership over their lives and make economic policy also work for social cohesion and sustainable developmentgrowth;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Acknowledges that the Social Pillar should not undermine the prerogative of social partner to agree beyond minimum standards agreed at EU level, and should never impair the freedom of social partners to negotiate in areas where flexicurity-approaches have proven to be effective. Neither create any difficulty or setback to Member States, sectors or citizens that have reached levels of social rights beyond the basic frame of the Social Pillar;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 206 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recognises that the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is ratified by the European Union and therefore believes that the EPSR should reference and mainstream the principles of the CRPD throughout each policy domain;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. In addition, EPSR should provide an instrument to foster upward convergence for national reforms of the economic, social and labour market systems of the member states to facilitate the free movement of labour in a deeper and fairer market;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 262 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Emphasises that the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States and social partners, should also reinforce the European social dialogue with a view to better reconciling labour markets and social protection demands in order to address social inequalities and competitiveness challenges;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 308 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point a
a. decent working conditions for internships, traineeships and apprenticeships, prohibiting those that are unpaid or paid so little that they do not enable workers to make ends meet;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 321 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point b
b. for work intermediated by digital platforms, a definition of employment that is less dependent on full cumulation of the relevant criteria;deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 339 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point c
c. limits regarding on-demand work: zero-hour contracts should be banned and certain core working hours should be guaranteed to all workers;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 349 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point c a (new)
ca. reduce social inequalities and promote employment, especially for young people and the long-term unemployed in order to boost economic growth;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 351 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Takes note that traditional work patterns are being challenged by an increase in the diversity of non-standard forms of employment, and new forms of work are emerging that are blurring the boundary between dependent employment and self-employment. Calls on Member States and the Commission improve the legal certainty and legal clarity on worker´s employment status and employers responsibility;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 367 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises the need for renewed upward convergence in wages throughout the EU; calls on the Commission to actively support a wider coverage for collective bargaining in line with Member States’ national traditions and practices; considers that to ensure decent living wages, minimum wages set at a decent level are necessary; recommends the establishment of national wage floors through legislation or collective bargaining, with the objective of attaining at least 60 % of the respective national average wage;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 383 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to carry out a substantive analysis of the best practice to assist Member States in the calculation of minimum pensions;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 409 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. StresRecognises the importance of collective rights; expect in many Member States; encourages the Commission to step up concrete support for strengthening social dialogue in Member States and sectors where it is weak owing to the prolonged crisis or the prevalence of non-standard forms of employmentat European level and in sectors where it is weak;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 458 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Supports more integrated provision of social protection benefits and social services as a way to make the welfare state more understandable and accessible while not weakening social protection; points to the importance of informing citizens about social rights and to the potential of e- government solutions, possibly including a European social security card, which could improve EU Social Security Coordination, individual awareness and also help mobile workers clarify their contributions and entitlements;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 486 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Is aware that rising life expectancy and workforcea shrinking workforce pose a challenge to the sustainability and adequacy of pensions systems and to intergenerational fairness; reaffirms that the best response is to increase the overall employment ratenotes that tackling the gender pension gap must also be a priority in this regard; reaffirms that the best response is to increase the overall employment rate for both younger and older workers with particular attention given to disadvantaged groups most excluded from the labour market; considers that pensionable ages should reflect, besides life expectancy, other factors including labour market trends, the economic dependency ratio, the birth rate and differences in job arduousness;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 512 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Insists that all workers should be covered by insurance against involuntary unemployment or part-time employment, unemployment, coupled with job-search assistance and investment in (re)-training;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 540 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for a European framework forEncourages Member States to introduce minimum income schemes; highlights the importance of such schemes for maintaining human dignity as well as their role as a form of social investments enabling people to undertake training and/or look for work;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 562 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Agrees that all persons with disabilities must be ensured enabling individualised services and basic income security allowing them a decent standard of living and social inclusion; recognises that disability benefits must be developed in a way which both encourages access to the labour market and ensures a decent standard of living in the community;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 576 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Considers access to quality and affordable long-term care services, including home-based care, to be a right that should be upheld with the help of suitabsupport of adequately qualified professionals employed under decent conditions; believes that low- income households should therefore be targeted by adequate public services and tax deductions to avoid institutionalisation and the risk of poverty; repeats its call for legislation ona carers’ leave directive accompanied by adequate remuneration and social protection;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 615 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for legislationon Member States to ensure that access to social housing or adequate housing benefits are provided for those in need, obviously including homeless people, and that vulnerable people and poor households are protected against eviction; calls for tax incentives to help young people on low incomes set up their own households; calls for greater use of the EFSI to support urban renewal and affordable housing provision;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 633 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for legislationmeasures ensuring fair access for all to good-quality and affordable social services of general interest and other essential services, such as e-communications, energy, transport and financial services; highlights the role of social enterprises;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 664 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Supports a Skills Guarantee as a new right for everyone to acquire fundamental skills for the 21st century, including digital literacy; stresses that universal access to broadband is a crucial component for the implementation of this right; highlights this as an important social investment, requiring adequate financing;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 683 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 – introductory part
19. Is alarmed at the spreconcerned about the lack of stability and security of new forms of contractual arrangement and the abusive use of 'atypical' contracts that have led to a certain fade of precariousness arising from the excessive use of ‘atypical’ contractthe employment relationship, making it difficult for workers to exercise their rights at work, or gain access to social security benefits; points out that a variety of employment contracts should be available for employers and workers; stresses the importance of ensuring sufficient institutional and budgetary capacities to provide adequate protection for people in non-standard forms of employment; considers in particular that:
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 719 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Points out that secure professional transitions require adequate investment, both in the institutional capacity of public employment services and to assist individual job-search and upskilling;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 733 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for full implementation of the Youth Guarantee for all people under 30 and of the recommendation on the long- term unemployed, including through the development of additional measures necessary to ensure the Youth Guarantee is accessible for persons with support needs; highlights these as important structural reforms and social investments that are in need of adequate financing;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 768 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – point b
b. there is a need for new legislative proposals at both a national and European level on family leave schemes, including maternity leave, paternity leave, parental leave and carers’ leave, encouraging equal take-up of leave arrangements by men and women across all categories of workers in order to improve women’s access to and position within the labour market and facilitate work-life balance;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 797 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
Fair mMobility
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 802 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Emphasises that labour mobility within the EU is a right whose exercise must be supported but which should not be forced on workers by poor conditions in their home regions, and should not undermine host countries’ social standard, non-discrimination and freedom of movement is a cornerstone for a well-functioning internal market, mobility should be encourage and support by the European Commission and Member States;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 821 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Calls for a structured, long-term EU strategy to address the challenges posed by demographic change, as all the Member States are now faced with an increasingly ageing population; calls on the Commission, in this context, to look extensively into future shortages and mismatches in the EU labour market, and to examine in depth how such problems can be addressed across the EU, inter alia through targeted anticipation of future skills needs, and by better matching skills with the jobs available in the labour market and further strengthening labour mobility; Calls on the EU and its Member States to continue its efforts to financial aid and services to families to improve labour market conditions favourable for work-life balance;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 826 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 b (new)
24b. Urges the Commission to put in place all suitable mechanisms for greater mobility among young people, with a special accent in apprenticeships, as a way to address skill mismatches in the labour market and improve access to employment opportunities; Calls for the establishment and regular use of coordination mechanisms between business organisations and training institutions to ensure that they provide training programmes adapted to market needs;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 838 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission to propose a clear roadmap for legislative updates and other measures that are necessary for full practical application of the EPSR; highlights that in cases of conflict of law,Welcomes that the EPRS delivers on the horizontal social clause (Article 9 TFEU) should be properly applied;, calls on the Commission and Member States to inspired the action in the goals and objectives an continue to promote and attaint high level of employment, to guarantee adequate social protection, to fight against social exclusion, and to provide for a high level of education, training and protection of human health.
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 861 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – introductory part
26. Considers that the objective of upward social convergence should be underpinned by a set of targets, building on the Europe 2020 strategy and the Sustainable Development Goals and serving to guide the coordination of economic, employment and social policies in the EU; Regrets that coordination mechanisms used in the employment and social fields have failed to achieve upward convergence in the past; believes that these targets could also form part of the Convergence Code currently being discussed for the euro area, and could be based on the following indicators which are directly affected by public policies:
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 867 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point a
a. Education, including the early school-leaving rate and the proportion of young people not in employment, education or training (NEETs);
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 869 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point a a (new)
aa. Productivity and labour costs
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 870 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point a b (new)
ab. Labour mobility and protection of workers
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 871 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point a c (new)
ac. Investment in infrastructure
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 878 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point c
c. the proportion of young people not in employment, education or training (NEETs);deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 885 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point d
d. the at-risk-of-poverty rateor social exclusion rate (AROPE) ;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 886 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point d a (new)
da. gini and palma index
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 887 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point d b (new)
db. income quintile share ratio
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 891 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point e a (new)
ea. access to adequate, safe and affordable housing;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 894 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point e b (new)
eb. EIGE gender equality index;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 925 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point j a (new)
ja. Pensions
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 991 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 – introductory part
30. Reiterates wits chout a comprehensive mid-term revision of the MFF the Union budget will be able neither to further address additional financial needs and new political priorities of the EPSR; Call for the raising of the MFF 2014-20 ceilings in order to cope with increased needs; calls, in particular, for:
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1009 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 – point c
c. the establishment of a new instrument, to be financed, for example, from EU revenue arising from competition law enforcement, to support the implementation of the Child Guarantee;deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1029 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Calls on the Commission and the EIB to refocus the EFSI on job creation and social investment and adapt its risk/return requirements accordingly; welcomes Commissioner Thyssen's statement that the social dimension of the investment plan for Europe will be reinforced by increasing support for social enterprises, social services and microfinance with €1 billion;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1059 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point a
a. a fund for renewed structural convergence, supporting the implementation of socially just reforms and investments that are necessary for increasing the growth potential of crisis- affected areas and restoring upward social convergence, including implementation of the Youth Guarantee, Skills Guarantee and Child Guaranteeinvestment that reduce inequalities and poverty;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1087 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Calls on the Commission to integrate the above-mentioned financial instruments in its proposals for the post- 2020 multiannual financial framework and its white paper on EMU;deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1110 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Considers that the EPSR should be adopted in 2017 as a bindingn agreement between the European Parliament and the European Council, involving social partners at the highest level, and should contain a clear roadmap for implementation, with concrete commitments and target dates;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas the Code of Conduct for Commissioners adopted in 2011 fails to sufficiently address several of Parliament’s recommendations for improvements, in particular as regards the declarations of financial interests of Members of the Commission, the post-office employment restrictions and the strengthening of the ad-hoc Ethical Committee responsible for the assessment of conflicts of interests;
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 14 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. RegretsDenounces the fact that the 2011 code of conduct has failed to address all the recommendations issued by Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control on 2 March 20111 and points out, in particular, that Commissioners are notshould be required to declare all their financial interests or assets buand not only those interests or assets ‘which might create a conflict of interest in the performance of their duties’, that there is no requirement to declare debts and liabilities and that dependent children are not required to produce the same information as spouses; __________________ 1 Letter from Mr De Magistris, chair of the Committee on Budgetary Control, to Mr Lehne, Chair of the Conference of Committee Chairs.
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 17 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. SConsiders that conflict of interests can only be assessed by an independent third party and stresses in particular that the Commissioners are expected tocannot make their own judgement on what might create a conflict of interest in the absence of a clear definition to guide them;
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 21 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 – point c
(c) with regard to the declaration of possession of company shares, stock and other property or rights representing assets and other intangible assets;
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 22 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Regrets the code of conduct fails to adequately codify the requirement under the Article 245 TFEU that "both during and after their term of office, Commissioners will respect the obligations... in particular their duty to behave with integrity and discretion as regards the acceptance, after they have ceased to hold office, of certain appointments or benefits."
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 32 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Regrets that the Commission does not report regularly on the implementation of the Code of Conduct for Commissioners, in particular as regards their declarations of interests and that the code of conduct does not provide for complaints or sanctions with regard to infringements with the exception of serious misconduct as referred to in Articles 245 and 247 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 33 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Regrets, in particular, the negative response by the President of the Commission to the request of the European Ombudsman to proactively publish its decisions on the authorisation of post term-of-office activities of former Commissioners, as well as the opinions of the Ad Hoc Ethical Committee; emphasises in this respect that the mere publishing of the minutes of Commission meetings is insufficient to offer the Parliament and civil society an insight in the interpretation in practice of 'potential conflicts of interest' and the integrity policies developed in this respect by the Ad Hoc Ethical Committee;
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 37 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Regrets that the code of conduct does not require former commissioners to make publicly available information on their meetings and telephone calls with officials of the European Institutions or officials of the governments of the Member States up to 10 years after they have ceased to hold office;
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 46 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 – point d
(d) that Commissioners disclosein office suspend and former Commissioners disclose for 10 years their membership of any non-governmental organisations or trade unions, and any donations to NGOs of more than EUR 500;
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 48 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 – point d a (new)
(da) that the Code of Conduct be amended, in line with Article 245 TFEU to extend Commissioners' post-office employment restriction to three years;
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 50 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 – point e
(e) that Commissioners designate submit their declarations within a specific time frame before theirso that the Ad Hoc Ethical Committee can submit to Parliament its views on potential conflicts of interests well in time for the hearings in Parliament;
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 56 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 – point e a (new)
(ea) that Commissioners designate include in their declarations all professional EU interest representation activities and all their financial interests in such activities in the past three years;
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 57 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 – point g
(g) that the Commission guides the Commissioners on how to implementrevises section 1.3 of the code of conduct, which stipulates that the Commissioners must declare any financial interest or asset which might create a conflict of interests in the performance of their duties, and in particular on the definition of conflicts of interests in order to make sure that all financial interests and related rules are clearly defined and guides both Commissioners designate and Commissioners in office how to implement section 1.3 of the code of conduct fully and comprehensively;
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 63 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 – point i a (new)
(ia) that the decisions on the authorisation of post term-of-office activities of former Commissioners, as well as the opinions of the Ad Hoc Ethical Committee are proactively published;
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 65 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 – point i b (new)
(ib) that the Ad Hoc Ethical Committee is composed of independent experts who have not themselves fulfilled positions as Commissioner or as Member of the European Parliament;
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 66 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 – point i c (new)
(ic) that the Ad Hoc Ethical Committee shall draw up and publish an annual report on its activities and may include any recommendations on the improvement of the Code of Conduct or of its implementation, as it may see fit;
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 67 #

2016/2080(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 – point i d (new)
(id) that, as a matter of priority, the duty to behave with integrity and discretion pursuant to Article 245 of the Treaty (TFEU) even beyond a period of 18 months after ceasing to hold office is elaborated and that the Ad Hoc Ethical Committee develops a manual providing guidelines on the basis of practical examples indicating which type of positions could be at odds with this duty both during and beyond the period of 18 months after ceasing to hold office; that the 'cooling off' period of 18 months is considerably extended, as long as such a manual has not yet been developed;
2016/09/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 9 #

2016/2079(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that small-scale fishing in the Mediterranean accounts for 80% of the fleet and 60% of jobs; points to the importance of small-scale non-industrial fishing for the sustainability of stocks, environmental conservation, and the socio- economic development of fishing communities, particularly rural communities;
2016/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2016/2079(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Maintains that where fisheries are concerned, policy-making should be such as to enable fishermen and their organisations, trade unions, and coastal communities to be involved in – and made an integral part of – decision-taking processes in line with the CFP's regionalisation principle;
2016/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2016/2079(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make information and technical support more readily available to fishermen’s organisations applying for EU funding, which should meet the sector’s needs by:
2016/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2016/2079(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 – indent 1
– promoting fleet renewal and modernisation, while seeking to reduce the fishing effortmaximising catches in a sustainable way and improve active and passive safety devices, for example personal locator systems in life jackets;
2016/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2016/2079(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 – indent 2
– promoting the recruitment of young people, thereby enhancing the status of work and vocational training; suring the continuity and vitality of the sector and a decrease in rural to urban migration or migration abroad; stresses the need for adequate provision of, and information on, training for fishermen by the competent authorities in this regard;
2016/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2016/2079(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 – indent 3
– encouraging those working in the sector to join forces and organise themselves for example through trade unions, community organisations, cooperatives and/or fishers' and fishing vessel owners' representative organisations;
2016/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2016/2079(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Suggests that a minimum wage could be established for fishermen in line with the national traditions and practices of the individual Member States; recommends that a wage compensation fund be set up to cover non-fishing periods and that such periods be treated as actual working time for the purposes of the retirement encourages the Member States to examine the feasibility of a fisheries wage compensation afund other social security entitlementto cover non-fishing periods;
2016/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2016/2079(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on those Member States who have not already done so to ratify the ILO's Work in Fishing Convention 188 which ensures that fishers have decent conditions of work on board fishing vessels;
2016/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Agrees with the Commission that the conditionsintervention criteria set out in Article 4(2) of the EGF Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 are met and that, therefore, Belgium is entitled to a financial contribution of EUR 1 824 041 under thatis Regulation, which represents 60 % of the total cost of EUR 3 040 069;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the Belgian authorities submitted the application for a financial contribution from the EGF on 17 DecemberCommission respected the deadline of 12 weeks from the reception of the completed application from the Belgian authorities, on 11 February 20156, and that its assessment was finalised by the Commissionuntil finalising its assessment on the compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution, on 4 May 2016 and notifiedying it to Parliament thaton the same day;.
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that following the announcement byof Caterpillar Belgium SA on 23 February 2013 of a collective redundancy procedure in its Gosselies plant, the majority of its 1399 workers were subject of EGF/2014/011 BE/Caterpillar application; and points out that the current application is a follow-up to that application since, as it is part of the same collective redundancy procedure; further points outunderlines that Hainaut is facing a difficult labour market situation with an unemployment rate of 14,5 % (5,9% higher than the national average), 1 236 job losses in 2013 and 1 878 in 2014 in the manufacturing sector, drop in job offers of 13 % since 2012 and high proportion of underqualified labour, as (over half of the job seekers lack upper secondary qualifications); , as well as high levels of long-term unemployment, which stands at 39,0% of overall unemployment in Hainaut Region;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that the Belgian authorities started providing the personalised services to the affected workertargeted beneficiaries on 1 January 2015, well ahead of the application for the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that Belgium is planning sixthe following types of measures for redundant workers covered by this application: (i) support/guidance/integration, (ii); facilitating job-search, (iii); integrated training, (iv); support for enterprise creation, (v); support for collective projects, and (vi) job- search and training allowances, taking into consideration the potential of the area and the business environment;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Welcomes the fact that the allowances and incentives, for which Belgium confirmed that they are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities, (Actions under Article 7(1)(b) of the EGF Regulation) are limited to less than 5 % of the total costs, which is far below the threshold of 35% of the total cost for the package of personalised measures allowed by the Regulation;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the personalised services provided to NEETsWelcomes that additionally to the 488 workers dismissed, 300 young people not in employment, education or training (NEETs) under the age of 25 from the same region are expected to participate in the measures and receive personalised services co-financed by EGF, which shall include: (i) mobilisation and guidance, either forto further education/training or to follow induction sessions, (ii) training, (iii) to explore interests; specific training courses; personalised upskilling, and (iv); job- search, training and mobility allowances;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Welcomes the fact that the Belgian authorities are proposing special measures designed for NEETs, targeting in this way more specifically their needs;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Notes the importance of launching an information campaign in order to reach the NEETs who could be eligible under these measures; recalls its position on the need to help the NEETs in a permanent and sustainable way;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 16 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. NotesWelcomes the fact that the coordinated package of personalised services hwas been drawn up inestablished following further consultations with all stakeholders including social partners, enterprises and the public employment services, who will also follow the implementation of the proposed measures through a monitoring committee;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 17 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Welcomes especially the approach of Belgian authorities and the cooperation with social partners for granting support to collective projects for workers who consider setting up a "social enterprise" together as a group, as a measure with a highly value added potential;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 18 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls that, in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services supported by the EGF shouldNotes that the proposed actions, constitute active labour market measures within the eligible actions set out in Article 7 of the EGF Regulation and recalls that, in line with this article, the personalised services provided are expected to anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy; notes, at the same time, that these actions do not substitute passive social protection measures;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 21 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls the importanceHighlights the need of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and the recognition of skills and competences gained throughout a worker's professional career; expects that the training on offered in the coordinated package to be adapted not only to will meet bothe needs of the dismissed workers but also to the actual workers and the business environment;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 24 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. AsksReiterates the call on the Commission to furtherprovide more detail,s in future proposals, on the sectors in which the workers are likely to find employment and whether the training on offer is aligned to the future economic prospects and labour market needs in the regions concerned by the dismissalshaving prospects to grow, and therefore to hire people, as well as to gather substantiated data on the impact of the EGF funding, including on the quality of jobs and the reintegration rate achieved through EGF;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 26 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Notes that, to date, the Manufacture of machinery and equipment n.e.c. sector has been the subject of 14 EGF applications, including this one, 8 of which were based on trade- related globalisation and 6 on the global financial and economic crisis;
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 27 #

2016/2074(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. AsksReiterates its call to the Commission again to assure public access to all the documents related to EGF cases;.
2016/06/02
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 1 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. BelieveRecalls that the main aim of projects financed underpurpose of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) should be to create growth and a dynamic labour market in Europe, and hence to enhance the well-being of EU citizenis to make sure that scarce public resources are used to mobilise private investment to target market failures by crowding-in private capital and ensuring investment reach real economy; believes that projects financed under the EFSI should create growth, stimulate the creation of jobs in Europeans areas where unemployment is huge and alarming and invest in sectors critical to Europe's future notably through social and human capital, European infrastructures and industry; stresses that it should be clear that all EFSI-supported projects could not have been carried out, without EFSI support; emphasises that the EFSI must be considered as an emergency plan; regrets that the EIB evaluation finds that the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) or H2020 may potentially compete with EFSI, and that the EIB sometimes privileges EFSI over those programmes;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls that according to recital 13 of the EFSI regulation, EFSI should seek to contribute to strengthening the Union's economic, social and territorial cohesion; in that sense, calls on the Commission to provide guidance to avoid EFSI' aggregated portfolio concentration in the EU15 (92%) as mentioned in the operations evaluation of the European Investment Bank; recalls that the introduction of quotas - regional and sectorial - is not an objective, but the fact that the EFSI is being concentrated in countries where the market gap on investment is less evident, leads to the conclusion that not enough attention is paid to really addressing market failures and labour market constraints; highlights also that 46% of the EFSI financing is allocated to the energy sector and 19% to the transport sector; stresses that there is a need to assess if these concentrations are really enhancing or hampering the fight against the big pockets of unemployment; stresses the need to develop more information campaigns about the EFSI, which would allow to increase private investment and thus avoid this regional and sectorial concentration;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Recognises the importance of the extension of the lifetime of the EFSI beyond 2020 and of the necessary increase in the EU budget guarantee but regrets that any comprehensive impact assessment has been made, so the Commission has little evidence that the proposed increase is justified;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Reinforces the additionality of the projects supported under EFSI to enhance the geographical coverage and reinforces the take-up especially in areas with high level of unemployment in order to have a strong impact in the employment figures; highlights the need to develop further the investment in cross-border projects;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Highlights that investment situation in Europe is slowly improving but the pace is still timid and can be reversible; investment levels are still below the pre-crisis level and the investment gap remains wide; in that sense EFSI must be oriented to any kind of projects that lead to job creation and sustainable growth and development;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. Highlights that initial results reveal that Member States with greater technical and administrative capacity, as well as financial institutions, are taking greater advantage of the EFSI; underlines that a greater role must be played by the EIB and the Commission in supporting those lagging behind through greater technical assistance and enhancing the capacity of some countries in taking advantage of the EFSI; notes that approximately 63% of total EFSI financing within the Innovation and Infrastructure Window was granted to three Member States, while the EFSI strategy foresees a maximum geographical concentration of 45%; notes that the situation is less problematic when it comes to the SME Window, but even here, only three Member States account for 54% of total EFSI financing;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission and the EIB to continue their local/national campaigns to help explain and promote the benefits of Investment Plan across the Union; welcomes the opening of new offices by the EIB in the Member States to provide more support and also enhance cooperation with National Promotional Banks contributing to generate more projects in areas of high level of unemployment that have been less covered so far;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the EFSI to operate in closer conjunction with the Structural FundsEuropean Structural Investment Funds (ESIF) and other Structural Funds; this articulation must be further simplified and administrative obstacles must be removed;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recalls that the EFSI remains without an assessment and analysis of the causes of the investment gap and the market needs and how to best address them; in that sense, calls on the Commission to provide this assessment;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Considers itmore than disappointing that the Commission’s assessment of the EFSI has failed to record the number of jobs created to date under the Fund; calls on the Commission to studied and assess the impact of these projects on the number of jobs created and the real impact of these investment in direct and indirect jobs;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Recalls the importance that new figures and updates are released regularly, including independent assessments, drawing on the experience collected so far; regrets that in terms of the objectives relating to growth and jobs, no targets have been set for EFSI; Calls on the monitoring of indicators relating to growth and jobs, as these are the ultimate objectives of the investments;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to lay down more clear-cut investment priorities and to draw up projects in collaboration with the European Investment Advisory Hub; the EIB should ensure a proper feedback loop of information with the European Commission regarding eventual regulatory barriers which may be preventing good projects of taking place at the different levels; calls on the Commission to work in closer cooperation with Member States in the European Semester process in order to help them begin as soon as possible to implement the recommendations, in particular by carrying out economic and social reforms, thus removing national barriers to investment; these reforms identified in the country- specific recommendations are an important condition to sustain and increase investment levels in Member States, taking into account national specificities.
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes that the Commission will, in close cooperation with the EIB, further strengthen the communication on the EFSI and the Hub in order to raise awareness of the availability of funding and technical assistance across the Union; suggests that information on funding solutions, technical assistance and procedures, including through good practices examples and case studies, can stimulate new ideas and boost investment initiatives;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. As recalled by the European Parliament resolution of 28 April 2016 on the EIB - annual report 2014 there is a need for the EFSI to function in an effective, fully transparent and fair way, in that sense insists in the need to achieve the highest levels of transparency and institutional accountability by ensuring the disclosure of exhaustive and sound budgetary information and access to financial data related to projects funded by the EIB;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission’s communication on ‘An Aviation Strategy for Europe’; stresses that action is needed to reinforce the social agenda and create and maintain high-quality jobs in aviation; believes that ensuring a level playing field in the sector is crucial;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to come forward with legislative initiatives to prevent flags of convenience, rule shopping and unfair competition in aviation, including a ban on zero-hours contracts and pay-to-fly schemes;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to invest in education and training in all parts of the aviation value chain recognising the need to address any skills gaps which emerge;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Believes that a network of aviation training institutes under the auspices of the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Virtual Academy would help to establish common training and safety standards;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2016/2062(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Recommends that common standards regarding competences of aviation safety inspectors should be established;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges that the implementation of the principle of equal pay for the same work and for work of equal value is crucial to reducing pay and pension gaps and to eliminating the risk of poverty; recognises also in this regard that key to preventing and mitigating the gender pension gap is women's access to the labour market, improved work/life balance for both men and women and addressing gender segregation in education and employment;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that pension policies shall be combined with adequate labour and active ageing policies to reduce gender pay and pension gaps; highlights in this regard vulnerable position of women and men of racial, ethnic, religious and linguistic minority origin; stresses the importance of fight against gender stereotypes in employment;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for an adequate public minimum pension not related to previous working life to eliminate coverage gaps; stresses the importance of shifting towards individual, rather than familyspousal-related, pension entitlements; highlights however the important role that survivor's pensions can play in protecting many older women from the higher risk of poverty and social exclusion they face compared to older men;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission to carry out a substantive analysis of the best practice to assist Member States in the calculation of such minimum pensions;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Member States to increase minimum wages asRecognises that minimum wages or sectoral collective agreements in the Member States can play an important tool forrole in narrowing pension gaps;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 155 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to introduce or reinforce pension credits for career interruptions resulting from caring, whatever the family and/or marital status; 'care credits' through labour and social security legislation for both women and men as equivalent periods for building up pension rights in order to protect those taking a break from employment to provide informal, unpaid care to a dependant or a family member; Calls on the Commission to come forward with a proposal for a Carers' leave directive which offers the carer adequate remuneration and social protection;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Believes that policies which reconcile work and family life such as paid maternity, paternity and shared parental leave as well as access to affordable childcare and long term care could counteract gender inequalities in economically active years which may impact on the gender pension gap in later life and encourages Member States to make provision for such policies; Calls on the Member States to effectively implement the Barcelona targets by 2020 and to endorse the 2014 quality framework on early childhood education and care;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that the sustainability of pension schemes can be reinforced by complementing social security with tax contributionsensuring equality of access to all pension pillars for women; in this regard encourages the Member States to devise awareness raising information campaigns to encourage and facilitate women's access to second and third pillar pensions, particularly in feminised sectors where take up may be low;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 210 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission to support the development of gender disaggregated statistics and research to enhance the monitoring and evaluation of the effects of pension reforms on women's prosperity and well-being;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 218 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Urges the Member States to reverse any reforms of pension systems that aggravate imbalances in pensions (especwhen examining the adequacy and sustainability of their current pension systems to carry out an ex-ante gender impact assessment to address potentially gender imbalances)bias that could aggravate imbalances in pensions.
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas guaranteeing universal access to medicines presents a myriad ofany challenges but nonetheless must be our common goal;
2016/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas people living with disabilities are the most vulnerable and need medicines the most;deleted
2016/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to the Report of the United Nations Secretary-General's High- Level Panel on Access to Medicines
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 15 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas the EU will need to oversee improvements in a range of fields that have an impact on how medicines are produced and distributed as well as ensuring the right of patients to all relevant information;
2016/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recommends that each Member State should be free to set its own innovation policy in the field of cutting- edge technologies, possibly with the aid of EU fundingBelieves that co-operation between Member States along with the sharing of expertise, leads to greater synergy in the field of innovation policy and recognises the importance of EU funding in supporting such initiatives;
2016/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the high prices of innovative medicines conflicts with the patients' and national health systems' ability to pay for pharmaceutical expenditure and hinders the fundamental right of citizens to health and medical treatment;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 51 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recommends that EU health research programmes should ensure greater knowledge sharing and that the rules for participating in EU research programmes could include possible mandatory conditions for licencing that preserve public policy objectives;
2016/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates that part of the reason why businesses are becoming less competitive and why welfare spending is so high is that EU rules – including rules on drug pricing – are too burdensome.deleted
2016/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Commission to find solutions to bring unprofitable but medically necessary drugs in to production;
2016/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the growing expenditure in the pharmaceutical sector prompts European cooperation and new policy measures at both EU and national level to enable selective investment in efficient and effective healthcare;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 85 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Calls on the Commission to increase research for neglected diseases;
2016/09/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the aim of intellectual property is to benefit society, guaranteeing investment returns to promote innovation, and whereas there is concern about the abuse/misuse thereofto diffuse knowledge;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 92 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the aim of intellectual property is to benefit society, guaranteeing incentivise investment returns to promote innovation, and whereas there is concern about the abuse/misuse thereof;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 111 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the Commission has had to introduce incentives to promote research in areas such as rare diseases, and whereas 25 000 people die each year in the EU owing to lack of access to adequate antimicrobial drugs;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 122 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the prices of medicines are usually negotiated by means of bilateral and confidential negotiations between the pharmaceutical industry and Member States, following rules set out in national reimbursement and pricing legislation;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 124 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the EU will need to oversee improvements in a range of fields that have an impact on how medicines are produced and distributed as well as ensuring the right of patients to all relevant information; particularly in the case of public health vaccination programmes;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 130 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas the entry of generics and biosimilars onto the market is an important mechanism to reduce prices, and whereas there are clear concerns about the strategies to delay this entrycontributes to ensuring the sustainability of healthcare systems, and whereas market entry of generics and biosimilars should not be delayed;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 159 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the EU pharmaceutical industry is one of the most competitive and strategic industries in Europe and that quality innovation is key to improving its competitiveness;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 177 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that over 7000 innovate medicines are in the development pipeline with much expected therapeutic benefit for patients; considers that some current pricing strategies for innovative medicines and their combined budgetary impact pose a threat to the sustainability of health care systems and therefore might not be accessible for those who need it;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 185 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Notes with concern the recent scientific trends that lead to investments being steered to low volume, high priced medicines, leaving other important areas neglected;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 186 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Notes that in a context of highly priced medicines in the innovative pharmaceutical sector, market research data show that R&D investment is often substantially lower than sales and marketing expenditure; Highlights the fact that this puts at risk the sustainability of European healthcare systems and indicates the persistence of inappropriate market rewards which should be corrected;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 187 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 d (new)
2d. Calls on Member States to build on the example of existing initiatives in Europe to place negative incentives on the marketing expenditure by the pharmaceutical industry such as a contribution system towards an innovation fund aimed at promoting independent research in areas of interest for the National Health Services that are insufficiently addressed by commercial research, (e. g. antimicrobial resistance), and for patient populations normally excluded by clinical studies such as children, pregnant women and the elderly;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 188 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that more transparency ofin the cost of development and clinical trials is crucial in order to set a fair price; proportion of publicly funded research is needed, and that when assessing the total cost of a drug, it is necessary to take into account the costs for research and development, including research failures and clinical trials, and the whole pharmaceutical value chain;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 198 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls that robust clinical trials are necessary to assess the efficacy and safety of medicines;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 204 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that it is in the interests of the pharmaceutical industry favour short trials andand patients to ensure fast access to the market for innovative medicines both in-patent and off-patent;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 212 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Welcomes the adaptive pathways pilot project and the PRIME scheme by the European Medicines Agency as a way to ensure timely access to medicines for patients with unmet medical needs, without compromising on patient safety;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 215 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on Member States to develop closer collaboration to fight such market fragmentation, namely to develop shared Health Technology Assessment processes and results, and to work on shared criteria to instruct price and reimbursement decisions at national level;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 221 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Considers innovation in the pharmaceutical sector to be crucial in order to address unmet medical needs;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 225 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that IP rights allow a legal monopoly, which needs to be carefully regulated to avoid conflict with the right to health protection and to promote quality of innovation and competitiveness; calls on the competent authorities to carefully apply the principle of the originality of patents, and to therefore avoid pandering to the market strategy (by always giving patents the green light) of pharmaceutical companies to keep a patent for a medicine for as long as possible by making non-essential changes, for example by adding bulking agents, to be able to continue holding the monopoly over that medicine;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 230 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Recognises that a balanced and strong, functioning and effective intellectual property environment, that is line with international commitments of the European Union, is important for supporting and promoting access to innovative, safe, effective and quality medicinal products in the European Union;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 234 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises that most medicines are not examples of genuine innovation, but often ‘me-too’ or ‘evergRecalls that incremental innovation for patented molecules such as repurposing, reformulation and the development of new medicines for the same indication ("me-too" substances) may offer incremening’ products, whictal value to patients, to patients sub-groups and to health care permitted notably by complementary patent extensionsystems; believes that the added value of such medicines should be carefully assessed and measurable benefits should be demonstrated prior to price and reimbursement decisions; warns against the potential misuse of IP protection rules allowing for the "evergreening" of patent rights;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 240 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recognises that medical innovation is also coming from known off-patent molecules through finding new indications, drug reformulations or new innovative combinations and stresses the importance to deliver to patients more customized treatments delivering better efficacy, less side effects, better adherence and better quality of life, to avoid disease exacerbations and costly therapeutic escalations;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 263 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that better regulation will promote competitiveness; also recognises the importance and effectiveness of antitrust tools against anti-competitive behaviours such as the abuse or misuse of patent systems and of the system for authorisation of medicines, in violation of Articles 101 and/or 102 of the TFEU; calls on the Commission to carry out an in- depth analysis of the existing Intellectual Property legislation in the pharmaceutical sector with a focus on divergent interpretation and litigation cases and, where necessary, to bring forward a legislative review to ascertain legal clarity and the correct implementation and use of legal provisions in order to safeguard legitimate intellectual property and patent rights, as well as public interest;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 264 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission to revise the Transparency Directive with a focus on guaranteeing timely entry into the market for generic and biosimilar medicines, ending patent linkage according to Commission's guidelines, accelerating pricing and reimbursement decisions for generics and precluding the multiple reassessment of the elements supporting marketing authorisation; Believes that this will maximise savings for national health budgets, improve affordability, accelerate patient access and prevent administrative burdens for generic and biosimilar companies;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 269 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Calls on the Commission to monitor regularly patent settlement agreements that may restrict generic market entry into the market in exchange for benefits transferred from the originator to the generic company;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 270 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Calls on the Commission to introduce a Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) manufacturing waiver to Regulation 469/2009 allowing the production of generic and biosimilar medicines in Europe, with the purpose of exporting them to countries without SPCs or where these have expired earlier, without undermining the exclusivity granted under the SPC regime in protected markets; believes that such provisions could have a positive impact on access to high quality medicines in developing and least developed countries and on increasing manufacturing and R&D in Europe, creating new jobs and stimulating economic growth;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 272 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 d (new)
9d. Highlights that some Member States have achieved particularly low prices by the use of large-scale tendering in generic medicines; Notes with concern that excessive focus on short-term cost- savings may lead to medium- and long- term unintended consequences such as market concentration in the generic industry, and increased risk of shortages due to lack of redundancy in the system and lack of financial motivation to produce low-profit margin medicines, as well as low-volume drugs;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 274 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 f (new)
9f. Considers that pricing and reimbursement decisions need to consider the added value of innovative medicines while avoiding unilateral appropriation of such value; stresses that new and fairer pricing models should aim at shared and balanced stakeholder benefit, by ensuring payers' sustainability, patients' health gains and proportionate industry profits;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 280 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Notes with concern that data supporting the assessment of the added value of innovative medicines is often scarce and not sufficiently convincing to support solid decision making on pricing;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 283 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Considers that independent and good quality evidence is crucial to determine the cost-effectiveness of new medicines;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 288 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Highlights the technical nature of Relative Efficacy and Effectiveness Assessment (REA) and of Therapeutic Added Value (ATV) procedures; Notes that differences in methodological approaches and quality of evidence required at Member State level contribute to unnecessary fragmentation and increased burden for industry;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 291 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Calls on Member States and the Commission to pursue efforts to develop shared capacities, data and methodologies; Calls on the Commission to put forward a proposal for a common framework for REA and ATV to be carried out at European level, with the participation of expert representatives from Member States; Believes this should be done within the existing institutional context and in respect of national competences concerning social and economic considerations within pricing and reimbursement decisions;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 310 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Believes that a fair price should coverfor a medicine delivering additional benefit to patients should take into account the cost of the drug development and production, plus a margin of profit;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 321 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses the importance of transparency, including as regards clinical data, R&D costs and public funding, marketing strategies, actual prices and reimbursement levels, to improve access to medicines with relevant additional benefits for patient and health systems;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 324 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Encourages Members States to engage in early dialogue and horizon scanning with industry, patients and payers and to anticipatorily incorporate in their determination of the cost- effectiveness of new medicines the forecasted evolution in the pharmaceutical innovation pipeline while giving due regard to budgetary impact considerations;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 350 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Highlights the European procedure for joint procurement of medicines used for the acquisition of vaccineal countermeasures for serious cross border health threats in accordance with Decision No 1082/2013/EU;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 389 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for EU-wide measures on the pharmaceutical market to reinforce the negotiation capacities of Member States in order to achieve fair prices for medicines, such as the initiative of the Benelux countries and Austria on rare diseases;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 420 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Acknowledges that the incentives put forward by the Paediatric Regulation have not proved effective to drive innovation in medicines for children, namely in the fields of oncology and neonatology; calls on the Commission to examine existing obstacles and propose measures to promote advancement in this area;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 426 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 e (new)
20e. Acknowledges the significant development of medicinal products with the orphan designation following the incentives put in place by the current legislative framework on orphan medicinal products; notes that such medicines are also used off-label, or repurposed and authorised for additional indications allowing increased sales and returns; calls on the Commission to examine these occurrences and to monitor the volume of sales of such medicines to ensure balanced incentives without discouraging innovation in this area;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 446 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Commission to review aluate the regulatory framework for orphan medicines, to define clearly the concept of unmet medical needs, to assess the impact of incentives to develop effective, safe and affordable drugs compared to the best available alternative and to promote the European register of rare diseases and reference centres;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 460 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Commission to guarantee safety and efficacy in any fast- track approval process and to introduce the concept of conditional authorisation based on effectivenessensure that such approvals are admissible in exceptional circumstances where a high unmet medical need has been identified;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 480 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Commission to set up a framework to promote, guarantee and reinforce the competitiveness of generic and biosimilar medicines, guaranteeing their faster entry onto the market and monitoring unfair practices in accordance with Articles 101 and 102 of the TFEU, and to present a biannual report in this regard;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 521 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Council to increase cooperation between the Member States as regards price-setting procedures, in order to share information about prices, reimbursement, negotiation agreements and good practices and to avoid unnecessary administrative requirements and delays, ensuring faster patient access to innovative medicines;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 534 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Council to promote rational use of medicines across the EU, such as avoiding overconsumption of medicines, in particular antibiotics;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 538 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Call on the Member States to ensure accessibility of pharmacies, including their density in both urban and rural areas, professional staff number, appropriate opening hours, qualitative advice and counselling service;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 540 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Calls on the Commission and on Member States to ensure full implementation of the pharmacovigilance legislation;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 541 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 b (new)
28b. Call on the Member States to ensure that for the protection of health and life and in the interests of consumer protection information notes accompanying medicines are provided by retailers in widely used languages of a particular Member State in addition to official language or languages;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 551 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Calls on the Member States to enter into dialogue with all the relevant stakeholders, such as patient organisations, paying agencies, healthcare professionals and industry, with the aim of establishing short-, medium- and long term holistic strategies for access to medicines, ensuring the sustainability of healthcare systems and a competitive pharmaceutical industry, leading to faster access for patients and affordable prices;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 578 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Calls on the Commission to examine and compare the actual prices of medicines in the EU and to present an annual report to the Council and to the European Parliament in this regard;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 592 #

2016/2057(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Calls on the Commission to analyse the causes of shortages, to establish a list of essential medicines and monitor compliance with Article 81 of Directive 2001/83/EU on shortages of supply, to explore mechanisms to address the withdrawal of effective medicines from the market purely for commercial reasons, such as remarketing for new indications, and to promote the supply of generics;
2016/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 125 #

2016/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital S
S. whereas several studies from the Commission have clearly shown that the link between the patent box and R&D is in most casescan be arbitrary and/or artificial; whereas this inconsistency may lead to the assumption that these schemes are in most cases set up for tax avoidance reasons; whereas tax incentives for incomes generated by R&D, chiefly patent boxes, often result in large decreases in tax revenue for all governments, including those engaging in such a policy;
2016/06/02
Committee: TAX2
Amendment 183 #

2016/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Urges the Commission to come forward with a proposal for a common corporate consolidated tax base (CCCTB) which would provide a comprehensive solution to harmful tax practices within the Union; believes that the consolidation of the CCCTB is essential and is becoming increasingly urgent; calls on the Member States to promptly reach an agreement on this and to swiftly implement it;deleted
2016/06/02
Committee: TAX2
Amendment 228 #

2016/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the fact that the Commissioner for Competition, Margrethe Vestager, has categorised transfer pricing as a particular focus area for state aid cases, as it is reported to be a common tool used byis using state aid to investigate whether MNEs foruse tax evasion schemes such as inter-group loans;
2016/06/02
Committee: TAX2
Amendment 272 #

2016/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to come up as soon as possible with a common Union list of uncooperative jurisdictions (i.e. a ‘blacklist of tax havens’), based on sound and objective criteria, including full implementation of OECD recommendations, BEPS actions and Automatic Exchange of Information standards, and welcomes the Commission’s intention to reach an agreement on such a list within the next six months; calls on the Member States to endorse that agreement by the end of 2016;
2016/06/02
Committee: TAX2
Amendment 293 #

2016/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Member States to renegotiate their bilateral tax treaties with third countries in order to introduce anti- abuse clauses and thus prevent ‘treaty shopping’; stresses furthermore that this process would be expedited considerably if the Commission were mandated by Member States to negotiate such tax treaties on behalf of the Union;
2016/06/02
Committee: TAX2
Amendment 299 #

2016/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Recommends introducing an EU- wide withholding tax, in order to ensure that profits generated within the Union are taxed at least once before leaving it; notes that such a proposal should include a refund system to prevent double taxation;deleted
2016/06/02
Committee: TAX2
Amendment 316 #

2016/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Notes that until now, patent, knowledge and R&D boxes have not proven sufficiently effective in fostering innovation in the Union, but are, rather, used by MNEs for profit-shifting through aggressive tax planning schemes, such as the well- known ‘double Irish with a Dutch sandwich’; considers that patent boxes are an ill-suitedconsiders that patent boxes in line with the OECD Modified Nexus Approach can be suitable tool for achieving economic objectives; insistbelieves that R&D can be promoted through subsidies which shcould be given preference over patent boxes, as subsidies are less at risk of being abused by tax avoidance schemes; observes that the link between patent boxes and R&D activities is often arbitrary and that some current models lead to a race to the bottom with regard to the effective tax contribution of MNEs; therefore calls on all Member States to ensure that their patent boxes are in line with the OECD Modified Nexus Approach;
2016/06/02
Committee: TAX2
Amendment 331 #

2016/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Member States to integrate a Minimum Effective Taxation (MET) clause in the Interests and Royalties Directive and to ensure that no exemptions are grandeleted;
2016/06/02
Committee: TAX2
Amendment 403 #

2016/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Notes the continuing lack ofCalls for improved transparency of the working methods of the Code of Conduct Group, which is preventing any concrete potential improvement in terms of tackling harmful tax practices;
2016/06/02
Committee: TAX2
Amendment 431 #

2016/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Calls on the Commission, in case of an unsatisfactory response on the part of the Member States, to present a legislative proposal to incorporate the Code of Conduct Group into the Community method;deleted
2016/06/02
Committee: TAX2
Amendment 486 #

2016/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
42. Calls on the OECD to start work on an ambitious BEPS II, to be based primarily on minimum standards and concrete objfocus on the full and effectives for implementation of BEPS I;
2016/06/02
Committee: TAX2
Amendment 509 #

2016/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
46. Stresses the need for a comprehensive EU/USinternational approach on the implementation of OECD standards and on beneficial ownership; stresses furthermore that good governance clauses and the full BEPS action plan should be included in the Transatlantic Trade Investment Partnership (TTIP) in order to ensure a level playing field, create more value for society as a whole and combat tax fraud and avoidance;
2016/06/02
Committee: TAX2
Amendment 2 #

2016/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that the 2017 budget has to be keyshould play a key role in enhancing the Union’s contribution to growth, the creation of jobs and combatting poverty, particularly child poverty;
2016/05/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2016/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets that the unemployment rate among young people still remains too high and calls on the Commission to provide enoughis unacceptably high in many Member States and calls on the Commission to work with Member States in utilising the financial support tos for those programmes targeting youth unemployment;
2016/05/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2016/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the budget should support programmes creating jobs, in particular, for those with multiple disadvantages in the labour market, such as women, long-term unemployed, elderly unemployed, people with disabilities and people from minority backgrounds;
2016/05/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2016/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the EU budget should invest in education and vocational training to provide opportunities, especially in the areas most affected areas by youth unemployment and in order to integrate migrants inand refugees into the labour market;
2016/05/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2016/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Points out the potential of digitalisation generating new business models and new jobs and calls for coherent budgetary efforts to provide appropriate recognition, training and re-skilling in the ICT sector;
2016/05/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2016/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Highlights the importance of the budget in promoting entrepreneurship initiatives including social entrepreneurship, innovative social enterprises, employee financial participation and self-employment;
2016/05/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2016/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that the budget should promotereinforce a high level of workers’ protection and prevention culture across the EU and help to address new challenges to health and safety at work;
2016/05/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2016/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Considers that the EU budget should support efforts to upskill and retrain workers in areas where there are skills shortages as well as in the healthcare and care sectors and the ICT and digital sectors;
2016/05/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2016/2024(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Considers that the EU budget should support the inclusion of people with disabilities in all employment programmes;
2016/05/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 41 a (new)
- having regard to the Eurocarers Carers Strategy, 'Enabling Carers to Care' 20141a, __________________ 1a http://www.eurocarers.org/userfiles/files/p olicy/Carers%20strategy%20- %20Enabling%20carers%20to%20care.p df
2016/06/14
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 32 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas achieving a genuine work- life balance requires not only comprehensive policies including measures for reconciling work, caring for and spending time with family, and time for leisure and personal development, but above all a cultural shift in society, changing its gender attitudes so that work and care are more evenly shared between men and women; Whereas in 2014, the EU 28 employment rate for men (aged 20-64) was 75% while it reached only 63,5% for women, despite the fact that women are better educated; Whereas promoting women's participation in the labour market and their economic independence is crucial for meeting the Europe 2020 headline target (75% of the population aged 20-64 employed by 2020), counteracting the shrinking of the working age population in most European Member States, and boosting growth; whereas GDP per capita losses attributable to gender gaps in the labour market have been estimated at up to 10 percent in Europe; whereas the number of women in the workforce is even lower when considering employment rates in full-time equivalents since the share of part-time employment among women is very high in some Member States, due to constraints such as the shortage of care services and unequal division of unpaid work, or low financial incentives to take up full-time work;
2016/06/14
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 109 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas access to childcare services for young children is the mainan important factor influencing the participation of women in the labour market; whereas only 11 Member States have met the first Barcelona target (childcare available for at least 90 % of children between the ages of 3 and the mandatory school age) and only 10 Member States have achieved the second target (at least 33 % of children under three years)19 ; __________________ 19 Progress report on the Barcelona objectives of 29 May 2013 entitled ‘The development of childcare facilities for young children in Europe with a view to sustainable and inclusive growth’ (COM(2013)0322).
2016/06/14
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 127 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. Whereas Member States and social partners together have the responsibility to find solutions and possibilities to improve the work/life balance;
2016/06/14
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 154 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that the EU is facing unprecedented demographic challenges – an ageing populationrising life expectancy, lower birth rates, changing family structuresnew forms of relation-building and (co)habitation and migration; is concerned that austerity measures have had a negative impact on the sustainability of public finances needed for work-life balance policies and services that foster demographic renewal;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 172 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the Commission’s approach to work-life balance policies as key in addressing socio-economic challenges; calls on the European Social Partners to come forward with an agreement on a comprehensive package of legislative and non-legislative measures regarding the reconciliation of professional, private and family life; calls on the Commission to put forward a proposal for such a package in the context of the announced European pillar of social rights should it not be possible for an agreement between the social partners to be reached;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 198 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to step up protection against discrimination and unlawful dismissal related to work-life balance and to ensure access to justice and legal action; Calls in this sense on the European Commission to propose policies to improve enforcement of antidiscrimination measures in the workplace, including increasing the awareness of legal rights to equal treatment by conducting information campaigns, reversal of the burden of proof (Zaborska report) and empowering national equality bodies to conduct formal investigations on their own initiative of equality issues and help potential victims of discrimination;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 208 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the importance of incorporating a lifecycle approach in work- life balance policies in order to ensure that everyone is supported at different times throughout their life and can actively participate in the labour market and in society as a whole; Calls on the Member States to improve the collection and availability of updated data on indicators on gender equality with a view of analysing and monitoring these for the Country Specific Reports;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 211 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Highlights that lack of comparable, comprehensive, reliable and regularly updated equality data makes it more difficult to prove the existence of discrimination, particularly indirect discrimination; Calls on the Member States to collect equality data in a systematic way and with the involvement of national equality bodies and national courts; calls on the Commission to take initiatives to further promote such data collection by means of a Recommendation to Member States, and by tasking Eurostat with the development of consultations aiming at mainstreaming data disaggregation on all discrimination grounds in European Social Surveys' indicators; Calls on the Commission to continue to cooperate with the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) to improve the quantity and quality of sex- disaggregated data in a systematic way;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 222 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Notes the important role of the national equality bodies in the implementation of the Employment Equality Directive, contributing to awareness raising and data collection, staying in touch with social partners and other stakeholders, addressing underreporting and making complaint processes more accessible; calls for the role of the national equality bodies to be strengthened, and their capacities enhanced, including through the provision of adequate funding;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 227 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Highlights that the Employment Equality Directive mentions the disproportionate impact of multiple discrimination in the fields of employment & occupation on women; recommends that national, regional and local authorities, law enforcement bodies, including labour inspectors, national equality bodies and civil society organisations, increase their monitoring of the intersectionality between gender and other grounds in cases of discrimination and in practices;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 228 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6d. Considers it necessary that adequate training on non-discrimination legislation in employment and case-law is provided for employees of national, regional and local authorities and law enforcement bodies and labour inspectors; believes that such training is also of critical importance for judges, prosecutors, lawyers and police force;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 229 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 e (new)
6e. Calls on the Commission to continue to work with EIGE to support further research on gender-relevant issues, including on women and men's perceptions of their role in the labour market and of the sharing of activities within the household, as well as their perceptions of working conditions and factors that limit opportunities in the labour market in EU-28 Member States;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 230 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 f (new)
6f. Calls on the Commission to regularly review the progress achieved on critical areas of concern as identified in the Beijing Platform for Action for which indicators have already been developed by EIGE, taking the outcomes of these reviews into account in the Commission's assessment of gender equality in the EU;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 238 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the need to address gender inequalities in paid and unpaid work and to promote an equal sharing of responsibilities and costs for children and care for dependants between women, men and society as a whole;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 249 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the Commission to adopt a post-2015 Gender Equality Strategy and to implement it through the European Semester, including the Annual Growth Survey and the country-specific recommendations;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 259 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Member States to put in place proactive policies designed to support women entering, returning to and staying in the labour market with stustainable and quality employment;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 268 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to involve the social partners and civil society in gender equality policies; stresses the importance of collective agreements in combating discrimination and promoting gender equality between women and men at work, and of research and exchanges of good practices;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 274 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Strongly regrets that the Commission withdrew the revision of the Maternity Leave Directive and calls as a matter of urgency for it to return with an ambitious proposalWelcomes in the Commission's work programme 2016 particularly the fact that "special attention will be paid to work-life balance of working families, with a view to increasing women's participation in the labour market"; expects by the end of the year an initiative of legislative and non legislative proposals in this respect, guided by the principle of better regulation as part of the Commission Working Programme 2017; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that women are paid for the duration of maternity leave; stresses that maternity leave must be accompanied by effective measures protecting the rights of pregnant and new mothers, reflecting the recommendations of the World Health Organisation21 ; __________________ 21 http://www.who.int/topics/breastfeeding/en /
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 323 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – point 1
(1) a paternity leave directive with a minimum of a two-week compulsory fully paid leave;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 345 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Member States to effectively implement the Barcelona targets by 2020 and to endorse the 2014 quality framework on early childhood education and care; Recalls that investing in social infrastructure ,such as child care, does not only generate considerable employment effects, but also significant additional income for the public sector in employment taxes and savings in respect of unemployment insurance; believes that adequate child care should be available and affordable also to allow parents to achieve educational goals;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 360 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls for the introduction of targets on care for elderly and other dependants, with monitoring tools within the European Semester; calls on Eurostat and Eurofound to collect relevant data and to carry out studion Eurostat and Eurofound to collect relevant data and to carry out studies on the basis of which the Commission and the Member States are to establish qualitative standards for all care services;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 373 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to establish qualitative standards for all care services;deleted
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 388 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Points out the high levels of working poor throughout Europe, with some people having to work more and longer, even combining several jobs, in order to earn a decent income; calls on the Member States and social partners to develop measures ensuring adequate wages for all workers, and to close the gender pay gap;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 428 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Welcomes the Commission's launch of a public consultation on the European Pillar of Social Rights to gather views and feedback on a number of essential principles to support well- functioning and fair labour markets and welfare systems within the euro area;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 438 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Underlines that leisure inequality and unequal sharing of responsibilities between women and men hascan have an impact on women’s personal development, learning of new skills and languages, and participation in social, political, cultural and community life;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 445 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Stresses that gender segregation, pay and pension gaps, gender stereotypes and high levels of stress in managing professional and private life are reflected in women`s high physical inactivity rate and have a huge impact on their physical and mental health23 ; __________________ 23European Parliament Directorate- General for Internal Policies of the Union study of March 2016 entitled ‘Differences in Men’s and Women’s Work, Care and Leisure Time’.deleted
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 463 #

2016/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on the Member States to put in place adequate income schemes in line with national practices and traditions to enable people to live a life in dignity, to support full participation in society and to ensure independence throughout the life cycle;
2016/06/02
Committee: EMPLFEMM
Amendment 1 #

2016/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that Saint-Gobain Group was in 2013 forced to close another production plant in Wallonia which was subject of the EGF/2013/011 BE/Saint-Gobain Sekurit application relating to 257 redundancies in the same sector; notes that several measures in the two applications are similar ;
2016/02/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2016/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that the derogation from Article 4(1)(a) of the EGF Regulation in this case relates to the number of redundancies which is not significantly lower than the threshold of 500 redundancies; welcomes that the application aims to support a further 100 NEETs;
2016/02/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2016/2013(BUD)

7a. Welcomes the support for collective projects; calls on the Commission to assess the results of this type of measure in other applications in order to determine its benefits to the participants;
2016/02/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2016/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. NWelcomes that the application contains measures specifically aimed to provide assistance to NEETs; notes that the personalised services provided to NEETs shall include: (i) mobilisation and guidance either for further education/training or to follow induction sessions, (ii) training, (iii) personalised upskilling, and (iv) job-search and training allowances;
2016/02/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2016/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Appreciates that the allowances and incentives to be provided as part of the proposed measures are limited to 5,52 % of the total estimated costs;
2016/02/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2016/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls that, in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services supported by the EGF should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy;
2016/02/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2016/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Underlines that in case of successive applications from the same geographical region the Commission should collect and analyse the experiences from previous applications and ensure that in case of new applications any conclusion of that analysis is taken into due account;
2016/02/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that in recent years technological advances and digitalisation have transformed the postal services sector and that the modernisation and diversification of postal services has had a major impact on employment in the sector, with an average decrease in postal employment of 4,4 % between 2012 and 2013 in the EU28;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the number of part-time workers, agency workers and bogus self- employed persons in the sector has increased and that the general trend is towards more flexible employment contracts;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that there are substantial differences in working conditions and wages between universal service providers and competing companies providing specific postal services;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the role played by the social partners, particularly trade unions, who in many Member States have worked together with universal service providers in an effort to make the transformation of the postal services sector socially sustainable;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Highlights the opportunities to be found for consumers, SMEs and e- retailers as well as the postal sector itself in the growing parcel market, both within and across Member States´ borders; stresses, however, that in order to benefit from growth in this area, services such as cross-border parcel delivery must be affordable, accessible and available with price transparency and sufficient delivery features such as track and trace facilities and interoperability of delivery services;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Recalls the provision of postal services are essential to the social, economic and territorial cohesion of the EU and play a particularly important role in rural and remote areas, as outlined in Article 3(2) and Recitals 19, 20 ad 22 of the Postal Services Directive; Notes the important of rural broadband in this regard to ensure the continuation and future growth of services and the need for government commitment to ensure continued levels of service;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2016/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Supports the idea of one stop shops or multiservice centres for the continued provision of rural public services in which post offices can play a central role;
2016/05/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Directive 2006/123/EC requires Member States to put in place and keep constantly updated Points of Single Contacts where a service provider wishing to establish or to provide services can find all relevant information about requirements to be complied with and e-procedures in respect of all formalities, authorisations and notifications to go through. The Points of Single Contacts need to be upgraded in line with the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a single digital gateway to provide information, procedures, assistance and problem solving services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/20121a.However, costly information challenges and difficulties complying with national procedures at a distance remain to date for service providers, namely for sector-related requirements. Cooperation between the administrations of different Member States should in principle take place via the Internal Market Information System (IMI), an IT-platform offered for cross-border exchange of information and mutual assistance between authorities in different Member States under that Directive. Despite the fact that authorities sometimes have doubts with regard to the legal establishment of a provider in another Member State, the possibilities for cooperation currently provided in IMI are not exploited to their full potential. In order to create the correct conditions for the introduction of the introduction of the European services e-card, the Internal Market Information System (IMI) needs to be thoroughly recast to make it more user friendly and accessible. This should go hand in hand with training the coordinating authorities in the use of this new computer and tool, and with the roll- out of digital technology, throughout Europe
2018/02/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Requirements remain in place which can make expansion of service providers' operations across the internal market burdensome and unappealing, such as multiple and disparate authorisation schemes before different authorities and, which, regarding establishment, fail to achieve mutual recognition of conditions previously complied with in other Member States or, regarding temporary cross-border provision of services sometimes apply disproportionate or unjustified restrictions. As a consequence, in some cases service providers may face multiple and disproportionate compliance costs when going cross-border.
2018/02/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Cross-border trade and cross-border investment in certain business and construction services are particularly low showing a potential for better integration of services markets with significant negative repercussions for the remaining part of the economy. This underperformance leads to situations where the potential for more growth and jobs in the Single Market has not been fully exploited.
2018/02/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Directive 2006/123/EC requires Member States to put in place and keep constantly updated Points of Single Contacts where a service provider wishing to establish or to provide services can find all relevant information about requirements to be complied with and e-procedures in respect of all formalities, authorisations and notifications to go through. The Points of Single Contacts need to be upgraded in line with the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a single digital gateway to provide information, procedures, assistance and problem solving services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/20121a.However, costly information challenges and difficulties complying with national procedures at a distance remain to date for service providers, namely for sector-related requirements. Cooperation between the administrations of different Member States should in principle take place via the Internal Market Information System (IMI), an IT-platform offered for cross-border exchange of information and mutual assistance between authorities in different Member States under that Directive. Despite the fact that authorities sometimes have doubts with regard to the legal establishment of a provider in another Member State, the possibilities for cooperation currently provided in IMI are not exploited to their full potential.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 4 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) This Regulation aims to facilitate the freedom of establishment and the free movement of services within the single market in certain areas already covered by Directive 2006/123/EC through the adoption of further measures on approximation of provisions which have as their object the establishment and functioning of the internal market. It should be based on Article 114 of the TFUEU. During the e-card procedure for secondary establishment, a separate mechanism for suspending/withdrawing the e-card and the possibility of case-by- case derogations must be ensured.
2018/02/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) In so doing, this Regulation specifically targets business and construction service sectors included in scope of Directive …[ESC Directive]… which face some of the most stringent regulatory and administrative barriers to cross-border expansion and consequently have an unexploited potential for internal market integration..
2018/02/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Requirements remain in place which can make expansion of service providers’ operations across the internal market burdensome and unappealing, such as multiple and disparate authorisation schemes before different authorities and, which, regarding establishment, fail to achieve mutual recognition of conditions previously complied with in other Member States or, regarding temporary cross-border provision of services sometimes apply disproportionate or unjustified restrictions. As a consequence, service providers can face multiple and disproportionate compliance costs when going cross-border.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 6 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The European services e-card should be fully electronic, rely almost exclusively on datavalid and authentic data verified by the home and host Member States and provided by reliable sources, limit the use of documents to the minimum necessary and allow for multilingual processing to avoid translation costs. In order to make the procedure fully electronic and allow for administrative cooperation between home and host Member States. The Internal Market Information system set up by Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council22 should be used under this Regulation. A specific electronic platform should be developed for the purpose of issuing, updating, suspending, revoking or cancelling European services e-cards, as well as to make valid European services e- cards electronically available to their holders and to competent authorities. __________________ 22 Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System and repealing Commission Decision 2008/49/EC ( ‘the IMI Regulation’ ) (OJ L 316, 14.11.2012, p. 1)
2018/02/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Description of the terms of coverage of a mandatory or voluntary insurance included in written contracts might be difficult to find. Insurance distributers, as well as bodies appointed by a Member State to provide compulsory insurance, should therefore provide a description of the core elements of coverage to their client in the format of an insurance certificate. This certificate should be annexed to the application form. In order to ensure uniform implementation of this part of the Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to adopt a harmonised format for the certificates. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
2018/02/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Cross-border trade and cross-border investment in certain business and construction services are particularly low showing a potential for better integration of services markets with significant negative repercussions for the remaining part of the economy. This underperformance leads to situations where the potential for more growth and jobs in the Single Market has not been fully exploited.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 8 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) As regards the prior declaration that may be required under Article 9 of Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council25 , the electronic platform connected to IMI should direct holders of a European services e-card to electronic national procedures put in place in the host Member State where the workers will be posted, wherever such national procedures allow for the electronic submission of the above- mentioned prior declaration. __________________ 25 Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’) (OJ L 159, 28.5.2014, p. 11)
2018/02/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Procedures for issuing, updating, suspending or revoking a European services e-card should make use of documents only in exceptional circumstances, when more detailed information is absolutely essential. In any case, all of suchonly certified documents should be used and accepted in simple formaccepted.
2018/02/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) This Regulation aims to facilitate the freedom of establishment and the free movement of services within the single market in certain areas already covered by Directive 2006/123/EC through the adoption of further measures on approximation of provisions which have as their object the establishment and functioning of the internal market. It should be based on Article 114 of the TFUE.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 10 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) Service providers obliged to acquire professional liability insurance in Member States where they have not been active often have difficulty demonstrating their claims history regarding cover obtained elsewhere. Claims histories are an essential element to insurance distributers in ascertaining and assessing the risk profile of a potential client. Demonstration is difficult due to poor communication between insurance distributers across internal market borders but also to disparities in describing the track-record of an insured party, even within the same Member State. Insurance distributers and bodies appointed by a Member State to provide compulsory insurance cover should therefore be obliged to issue a statement relating to the third party liability claims which can then be used across borders and even domestically, should a service provider change insurance distributer.
2018/02/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) In so doing, this Regulation specifically targets business and construction service sectors included in scope of Directive …[ESC Directive]… which face some of the most stringent regulatory and administrative barriers to cross-border expansion and consequently have an unexploited potential for internal market integration.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 11 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. In the context of procedures to issue, update, suspend or revoke a European services e-card competent authorities of Member States shall only accept documents in a simple copy form and shall not request that documents submitted to them are subject to legalisation, apostille formalities, certification or authenticationcertified, reliable supporting documents.
2018/02/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Coordinating authorities and competent authorities in different Member States shall exchange information and give each other mutual assistance in the context of a procedure to issue suspend, revoke or cancel a European services e-card as well as in the update of the information contained therein. ThisClear lines of responsibility shall be established in respect of updating the information contained in the European services e-card in a timely manner. These obligations shall also apply in the context of formalities in accordance with Articles 6 (1) and 7 for secondment of staff and movement of self- employed, in relation to competent authorities as defined in point (ii) of Article 3(19).
2018/02/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The European services e-card should be fully electronic, rely almost exclusively on datavalid and authentic data verified by the home Member State and provided by reliable sources, limit the use of documents to the minimumwhat is necessary and allow for multilingual processing to avoid translation costs. In order to make the procedure fully electronic and allow for administrative cooperation between home and host Member States. The Internal Market Information system set up by Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council22 should be used under this Regulation. A specific electronic platform should be developed for the purpose of issuing, updating, suspending, revoking or cancelling European services e-cards, as well as to make valid European services e- cards electronically available to their holders and to competent authorities. __________________ 22 Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System and repealing Commission Decision 2008/49/EC (‘the IMI Regulation’) (OJ L 316, 14.11.2012, p. 1)
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 16 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) In order to submit an application for a European services e-card, a harmonised multilingual form should be made available ensuring that the elements necessary for identification of the provider and of the services for which the e-card is requested, as well as for the assessment of specific requirements applicable to the services at stake, such as those regarding proof of its establishment in the home Member State, good repute or insurance coverage, are included, and thus made available to coordinating authorities in both home and host Member States.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 18 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Description of the terms of coverage of a mandatory or voluntary insurance included in written contracts might be difficult to find. Insurance distributers, as well as bodies appointed by a Member State to provide compulsory insurance, should therefore provide a description of the core elements of coverage to their client in the format of an insurance certificate. This certificate should be annexed to the application form. In order to ensure uniform implementation of this part of the Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to adopt a harmonised format for the certificates. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 21 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) Service providers obliged to acquire professional liability insurance in Member States where they have not been active often have difficulty demonstrating their claims history regarding cover obtained elsewhere. Claims histories are an essential element to insurance distributers in ascertaining and assessing the risk profile of a potential client. Demonstration is difficult due to poor communication between insurance distributers across internal market borders but also to disparities in describing the track-record of an insured party, even within the same Member State. Insurance distributers and bodies appointed by a Member State to provide compulsory insurance cover should therefore be obliged to issue a statement relating to the third party liability claims which can then be used across borders and even domestically, should a service provider change insurance distributer.deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 24 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) In order to ensure uniform implementation of this Regulation in relation to the presentation of the description of liabilities, implementing powers to adopt rules on the standardised presentation format of that statement should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) A statement relating to claims history should be instrumental in allowing insurance distributers and bodies appointed by a Member State to provide compulsory indemnity insurance to ban discriminatory practices towards cross- border providers of which information is more scarce and difficult to obtain. The same non-discrimination principle should apply to professional organisations who offer group cover to their members or other service providers.deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 28 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 9
9. “professional liability insurance” means professional liability insurance as defined in the last indent of Article 23(5) of Directive 2006/123/EC.deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 31 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19
19. “insurance distributor” means insurance distributor as defined in point (8) of Article 2(1) of Directive (EU) 2016/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council30 , __________________ 30Directive (EU) 2016/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 January 2016 on insurance distribution (recast) (OJ L 26, 2.2.2016, p. 19)deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 35 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point g
(g) information on any existing professional indemnity insurance of the provider in relation to professional liability in the territory of the home Member State, including information on the cover for activities carried out in the territory of other Member States, as appropriate;deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 37 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5
1. Where information on insurance cover is entered into the standard form, in accordance with point (g) of the third subparagraph of Article 4(1), a corresponding insurance certificate shall be attached to the application form. The insurance distributor or the body appointed by a Member State to provide compulsory insurance shall provide the certificate to the applicant upon request. The insurance certificate shall contain information about the existence of professional liability insurance for the services concerned, including the territorial scope of such cover in other Member States, the insured risks, the duration, the insured sums per claim and for all claims in a year, and possible exclusions. 2. The Commission may adopt a harmonised format for the insurance certificate as referred to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 1 by means of an implementing act. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 16(2).Article 5 deleted Insurance certificate
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 45 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11
Statement relating to third party liability 1. issue, within 15 days of receiving a request to this effect from the policyholder, a statement concerning the third party liability claims related to his activities covered by the contract of professional liabilityArticle 11 deleted claims An insurance, during the preceding years of the contractual relationship up to a maximum of 5 years, or to the absence of such claims, describing the liabilities arising from provision of the services in question which were the object of a claim. 2. The Commission may adopt rules on the standardised presentation format of the statement referred to in paragraph 1 by means of implementing acts. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 16(2).istributor shall
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 46 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. An insurance distributor shall issue, within 15 days of receiving a request to this effect from the policyholder, a statement concerning the third party liability claims related to his activities covered by the contract of professional liability insurance, during the preceding years of the contractual relationship up to a maximum of 5 years, or to the absence of such claims, describing the liabilities arising from provision of the services in question which were the object of a claim.deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 48 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission may adopt rules on the standardised presentation format of the statement referred to in paragraph 1 by means of implementing acts. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 16(2).deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 50 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12
Obligations for insurance distributors Insurance distributors and bodies appointed by a Member State to provide compulsory insurance shall duly take into account in the acceptance policy and in the calculation of premiums, in a non- discriminatory manner, the experience of the provider as reflected in the claims statement issued in accordance with Article 11, as presented by the provider.Article 12 deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 56 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13
Obligations for professional organisations Professional organisations, including competent authorities as defined in points (i) and (ii) of Article 3(18), which offer group cover related to professional liability insurance to their members or to providers of services under specific conditions, shall ensure access to such cover, under the same conditions in a non-discriminatory manner, to providers of services from other Member States which express an interest in benefiting from such group cover.Article 13 deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 5 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Directive 2006/123/EC requires Member States to put in place and keep constantly updated Points of Single Contacts where a service provider wishing to establish or to provide services can find all relevant information about requirements to be complied with and e-procedures in respect of all formalities, authorisation and notifications to go through. The Points of Single Contacts need to be upgraded in line with the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a single digital gateway to provide information, procedures, assistance and problem solving services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/20121a. However, costly information challenges and difficulties complying with national procedures at a distance remain to date for service providers, namely for sector-related requirements. Cooperation between authorities in different Member States should in principle take place via the Internal Market Information System (IMI), an IT-platform offered for cross-border exchange of information and mutual assistance under that Directive. Despite the fact that authorities sometimes have doubts with regard to the legal establishment of a provider in another Member State, the possibilities for cooperation currently provided in IMI are not exploited to their full potential. Formalities associated with authorisations and notifications often require paper documents to be submitted and to be translated at a significant cost. Information regarding these obstacles is either not available online or is scarce, incomplete, dispersed and difficult to interpret in relation to the particular circumstances of a provider expanding across borders, as national rules often target purely domestic situations. Service providers often risk resubmitting information and documents.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 7 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Requirements remain in place which can make expansion of service providers' operations across the internal market burdensome and unappealing, such as multiple and disparate authorisation schemes before different authorities, which, regarding establishment, fail to achieve mutual recognition of conditions previously complied with in other Member States or, regarding temporary cross-border provision of services sometimes apply disproportionate or unjustified restrictions. As a consequence, service providers can sometimes face multiple and disproportionate compliance costs when going cross-border.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 9 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Cross-border trade and cross-border investment in certain business and construction services are particularly low showing a potential for better integration of services markets with significant negative repercussions for the remaining part of the economy. This underperformance leads to situations where the potential for more growth and jobs in the Single Market has not been fully exploited.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 11 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) In order to make it easier to take up and pursue service activities, this Directive builds upon Directive 2006/123/EC but does in no way amend its rules. The scope of this Directive is even more limited compared to the scope laid down in the Services Directive. It specifically targets business and construction service sectors, where many obstacles to cross-border activities still remain. In addition, cross- border trade and investment in construction and several business services are low and both sectors have seen weak productivity growth over the last decade.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 12 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) A European services e-card provides several advantages. It offers a proof of legal establishment in the home Member State. As long as a European services e-card remains valid, it should constitute a valid means of proof throughout the EU of legal establishment in the home Member State for the services covered by that e-card. Such proof should even be accepted in a domestic context, across all levels and administrative divisions of public administration. A valid European services e-card includes information which is often required in different contexts, such as controls applicable during or after the performance of services, the award of a public contract, a design contest or a concession, formation of subsidiaries or registration of branches under company law and registration of the service provider with mandatory social insurance schemes. Since that information is already available in a valid European services e-card, Member State authorities should not request this information from e- card holders for these other purposes.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 14 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) In addition, Member States should not be allowed to impose on holders of a European services e-card any service provision related authorisation or notification schemes prior to a service provision. Member States should not repeat, wholly or partially, controls previously performed in the context of issuing the European services e-card once provision of services has started in the host Member State. Authorisation or notification schemes such as those deriving from taxation, social security and labour law shall remain applicable as such matters are excluded from the scope of this Directive. Ex-post checks, inspections and investigations initiated by competent authorities should however remain admissible to control service performance, as under current EU Law. If such controls reveal serious breaches of requirements applicable in a host Member State, this cshould lead to the suspension or revocation of the European services e-card.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 16 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) There are two types of European services e-cards offered to service providers: a simpler procedure for temporary cross-border provision of services into other Member States, essentially controlling their previous establishment in the home Member State and allowing a host Member State to object to temporary provision of cross-border services only due to overriding reasons of public interests, and a more complex one, framing the control by host Member States of an economic activity in their territory for an indefinite periodfour years through secondary establishment in the form of branches, agencies or offices, in order to ensure, in a simplified workflow, mutual recognition is performed properly and expeditiously.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 19 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) The coordinating authority of the home Member State should, upon receiving an application for a European services e-card, complete it and validate its contents in order to accurately demonstrate legal establishment of the provider in its home Member State and describe its circumstances in a manner conducive for host Member State's authorities to pursue their own controls. While inaction on the part of the applicant should lead to a halt in the procedure, inaction on the part of the home Member State's authorities should give way to judicial redress.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 20 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) For provision of temporary cross- border services, given that Article 16 of Directive 2006/123/EC admits requirements for the generality of services covered by this Directive, host Member States should be allowed to object to the issue of a European services e-card by the home Member State in those cases where the circumstances of the applicant give rise to genuine and sufficiently serious threats to public interests related to public policy, public security, public health or the protection of the environment, in a manner which cannot be suitably and sufficiently addressed by requirements and controls applicable once service provision starts. This should be the case when a prior authorisation scheme or prior notification for temporary provision of the services in question is in place, justified in proportionate terms under one of those four overriding reasons of public interest safeguarded under Article 16 of Directive 2006/123/EC and when the conditions met by the applicant in its home Member State cannot be considered equivalent to the ones required in the host Member State for the granting of that prior authorisation. The possibilities and prerogatives of host Member States under Article 16 of Directive 2006/123/EC apply in the context of issuing a European services e-card.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 20 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Directive 2006/123/EC requires Member States to put in place and keep constantly updated Points of Single Contacts where a service provider wishing to establish or to provide services can find all relevant information about requirements to be complied with and e-procedures in respect of all formalities, authorisation and notifications to go through. The Points of Single Contacts need to be upgraded in line with the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a single digital gateway to provide information, procedures, assistance and problem solving services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/20121a . However, costly information challenges and difficulties complying with national procedures at a distance remain to date for service providers, namely for sector-related requirements. Cooperation between authorities in different Member States should in principle take place via the Internal Market Information System (IMI), an IT-platform offered for cross-border exchange of information and mutual assistance under that Directive. Despite the fact that authorities sometimes have doubts with regard to the legal establishment of a provider in another Member State, the possibilities for cooperation currently provided in IMI are not exploited to their full potential. Formalities associated with authorisations and notifications often require paper documents to be submitted and to be translated at a significant cost. Information regarding these obstacles is either not available online or is scarce, incomplete, dispersed and difficult to interpret in relation to the particular circumstances of a provider expanding across borders, as national rules often target purely domestic situations. Service providers often risk resubmitting information and documents.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) Host Member States should be allowed to request clarifications or additional information from the home Member State before the issue of a European services e-card, essentially relevant for the assessment of whether there is a justified and proportionate need to object to temporary provision of services by the applicant in its territory or, for establishment, to assess just how many of its regulatory concerns are already suitably addressed by compliance of the applicant with home Member State's requirements. Over time, it is expected that Member States will gain a better knowledge of their respective regulatory frameworks in the sectors covered by the e-card that should lead to enhanced mutual trust and thus allow for a more expedient assessment to the benefit of applicants.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 22 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
(35) The host Member State should no longer control whether the applicant for a European services e-card is legally established in another Member State. Nor should it put into question the veracity and validity of the data and documents included in an application, once validated by the coordinating authority of the home Member State. Conversely, the coordinating authority of the home Member State should not assess whether it issues a European services e-card for temporary cross-border provisions of services based on compliance by the provider of host Member State requirements, rather it should only assess of whether the applicant is legally established in its territory for the provision of the service in question at the time the decision to issue is made.deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 22 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Requirements remain in place which can make expansion of service providers' operations across the internal market burdensome and unappealing, such as multiple and disparate authorisation schemes before different authorities, which, regarding establishment, fail to achieve mutual recognition of conditions previously complied with in other Member States or, regarding temporary cross-border provision of services sometimes apply disproportionate or unjustified restrictions. As a consequence, service providers can sometimes face multiple and disproportionate compliance costs when going cross-border.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
(36) Relevant actions and decisions of the coordinating authorities involved in the procedure for issuing the European services e-card, in the host as well as in the home Member State should be subject to judicial remedies in accordance with national law. This should include appropriate remedies in the event of failure to act of the coordinating authority in the home Member State in accordance with the procedure to issue the e-card.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 23 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Cross-border trade and cross-border investment in certain business and construction services are particularly low showing a potential for better integration of services markets with significant negative repercussions for the remaining part of the economy. This underperformance leads to situations where the potential for more growth and jobs in the Single Market has not been fully exploited.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) In order to make it easier to take up and pursue service activities, this Directive builds upon Directive 2006/123/EC but does in no way amend its rules. The scope of this Directive is even more limited compared to the scope laid down in the Services Directive. It specifically targets business and construction service sectors, where many obstacles to cross-border activities still remain. In addition, cross- border trade and investment in construction and several business services are low and both sectors have seen weak productivity growth over the last decade.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
(37) Prior to the issuance of the European services e-card, a host Member State should be allowed to invoke legitimate policy concerns. Nevertheless, in the interest of allowing for a simplified and swift procedure, the principle of tacit approval should be observed in issuing a European services e-card. That is the general principle introduced under Directive 2006/123/EC. An alert of impending tacit approval and the extension of the applicable deadlines by twofour additional weeks should ensure that the host Member State has the appropriate time and means to consider applications for a European services e-card. A lack of information from the host Member State on applicable requirements should also not impede automatic issue of a European services e-card.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 28 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
(38) Service providers should not be required to provide information and documents which are already in the possession of other authorities in the home Member State, irrespective of administrative levels or divisions. It should also be the case when interconnection of national registers (e.g. central, commercial and companies' registers as required by Directive 2009/101/EC or insolvency registers under Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council28 ) allows for information and documents to be retrieved by the administration of the home Member State from other Member States. In all instances when personal data are processed under this Directive, rules on protection of personal data of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council29 [, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council30 ] and national legislation should be observed. __________________ 28Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings (OJ L 141, 5.6.2016, p.19). 29Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 281 , 23.11.1995, p. 31). 30Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 29 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 41
(41) This Directive should not interfere with the division of regional or local competences within the Member States, including regional and local self- government. This notwithstanding, administrative cooperation between different national authorities within strict time-limits may be necessary in order to meet the obligations laid down in the Directive. In order to help Member States meet their obligations and considering the decentralised structure of many of them, IMI could also be used as a tool for the effective exchange of information and mutual assistance between competent authorities within a certain Member State, without prejudice to other solutions put in place by Member States.deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 29 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) A European services e-card provides several advantages. It offers a proof of legal establishment in the home Member State. As long as a European services e-card remains valid, it should constitute a valid means of proof throughout the EU of legal establishment in the home Member State for the services covered by that e-card. Such proof should even be accepted in a domestic context, across all levels and administrative divisions of public administration. A valid European services e-card includes information which is often required in different contexts, such as controls applicable during or after the performance of services, the award of a public contract, a design contest or a concession, formation of subsidiaries or registration of branches under company law and registration of the service provider with mandatory social insurance schemes. Since that information is already available in a valid European services e-card, Member State authorities should not request this information from e- card holders for these other purposes.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) In addition, Member States should not be allowed to impose on holders of a European services e-card any service provision related authorisation or notification schemes prior to a service provision. Member States should not repeat, wholly or partially, controls previously performed in the context of issuing the European services e-card once provision of services has started in the host Member State. Authorisation or notification schemes such as those deriving from taxation, social security and labour law shall remain applicable as such matters are excluded from the scope of this Directive. Ex-post checks, inspections and investigations initiated by competent authorities should however remain admissible to control service performance, as under current EU Law. If such controls reveal serious breaches of requirements applicable in a host Member State, this cshould lead to the suspension or revocation of the European services e-card.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 42
(42) A European services e-card should be valid for an indefinite period in time, two year period, without prejudice to, in relation to temporary cross- border services, the effects of case-by-case derogations in accordance with Directive 2006/123/EC.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 34 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 43
(43) A European services e-card should however be suspended by the issuing coordinating authority if, temporarily, the service provider is banned from providing the services in question. The suspension should last as long as the ban is in place. A European services e-card should be revoked by the issuing coordinating authority if the conditions for issuing it or for it to remain valid, as a testament of legality of service provision in the host Member State, are no longer met. A final decision establishing that an e-card holder misrepresented him or herself as a service provider and that, under national law of either home or host Member State he or she is considered to be a worker, should lead to the revocation of the European services e-cards in question. Similarly, cases of fraudulent, inaccurate or falsified information or documents used in the context of issuing a European services e- card should impact the validityresult in the suspension or revocation of the e- card.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 34 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) There are two types of European services e-cards offered to service providers: a simpler procedure for temporary cross-border provision of services into other Member States, essentially controlling their previous establishment in the home Member State and allowing a host Member State to object to temporary provision of cross-border services only due to overriding reasons of public interests, and a more complex one, framing the control by host Member States of an economic activity in their territory for an indefinite period through secondary establishment in the form of branches, agencies or offices, in order to ensure, in a simplified workflow, mutual recognition is performed properly and expeditiously.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) The coordinating authority of the home Member State should, upon receiving an application for a European services e-card, complete it and validate its contents in order to accurately demonstrate legal establishment of the provider in its home Member State and describe its circumstances in a manner conducive for host Member State's authorities to pursue their own controls. While inaction on the part of the applicant should lead to a halt in the procedure, inaction on the part of the home Member State's authorities should give way to judicial redress.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) For provision of temporary cross- border services, given that Article 16 of Directive 2006/123/EC admits requirements for the generality of services covered by this Directive, host Member States should be allowed to object to the issue of a European services e-card by the home Member State in those cases where the circumstances of the applicant give rise to genuine and sufficiently serious threats to public interests related to public policy, public security, public health or the protection of the environment, in a manner which cannot be suitably and sufficiently addressed by requirements and controls applicable once service provision starts. This should be the case when a prior authorisation scheme or prior notification for temporary provision of the services in question is in place, justified in proportionate terms under one of those four overriding reasons of public interest safeguarded under Article 16 of Directive 2006/123/EC and when the conditions met by the applicant in its home Member State cannot be considered equivalent to the ones required in the host Member State for the granting of that prior authorisation. The possibilities and prerrogatives of host Member States under Article 16 of Directive 2006/123/EC apply in the context of issuing a European services e-card.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5
Effects of a European services e-card in 1. impose any prior authorisation scheme, prior notification scheme or an establishment requirement on the holder of a previously issued European services e-card for temporary cross-border provision of services as a condition for such provision of services in its territory. 2. impose any prior authorisation scheme or prior notification scheme on the holder of a previously issued European services e- card for establishment as a condition for establishment in its territory through a branch, agency or office located in its territory. 3. from imposing on holders of a previously issued European services e-card requirements other than those referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 the compliance of which has been or is deemed to have been verified under Articles 11 to 13. 4. Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 are without prejudice to: (i) in the context of selection procedures of candidates for authorisation schemes limited in number in accordance with EU law; (ii) obligations, prohibitions, conditions or limits imposed on providers in the context of selection procedures of candidates for the provision of services under a public contract, a design contest or a concession; (iii) authorisation schemes, notification schemes or requirements concerning conditions specifically related to the site where the service is provided or to the site where the provider is established; (iv) requirements regarding recognition of professional qualifications as provided for by Articles 4 and 4f of Directive 2005/36/EC; (v) for by Article 2 of Directive 2009/101/EC and Article 2 of Directive 89/666/EEC or obligations, prohibitions, conditions or limits imposed by national rules on registration of branches of companies registered in another Member State under company law. 5. Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 are without prejudice to reporting obligations imposed on the holder of a European services e- card or the performance of checks, inspections or investigations from competent authorities during the provision of the service, in compliance with EU law.Article 5 deleted the host Member State A host Member State shall not A host Member State shall not A host Member State shall refrain requirements imposed on providers requirements and other disclosure obligations as provided
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 44 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) Host Member States should be allowed to request clarifications or additional information from the home Member State before the issue of a European services e-card, essentially relevant for the assessment of whether there is a justified and proportionate need to object to temporary provision of services by the applicant in its territory or, for establishment, to assess just how many of its regulatory concerns are already suitably addressed by compliance of the applicant with home Member State's requirements. Over time, it is expected that Member States will gain a better knowledge of their respective regulatory frameworks in the sectors covered by the e-card that should lead to enhanced mutual trust and thus allow for a more expedient assessment to the benefit of applicants.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
(35) The host Member State should no longer control whether the applicant for a European services e-card is legally established in another Member State. Nor should it put into question the veracity and validity of the data and documents included in an application, once validated by the coordinating authority of the home Member State. Conversely, the coordinating authority of the home Member State should not assess whether it issues a European services e-card for temporary cross-border provisions of services based on compliance by the provider of host Member State requirements, rather it should only assess of whether the applicant is legally established in its territory for the provision of the service in question at the time the decision to issue is made.deleted
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
(36) Relevant actions and decisions of the coordinating authorities involved in the procedure for issuing the European services e-card, in the host as well as in the home Member State should be subject to judicial remedies in accordance with national law. This should include appropriate remedies in the event of failure to act of the coordinating authority in the home Member State in accordance with the procedure to issue the e-card.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
A European services e-card shall be valid for an indefinite duration period of 4 years and can be renewed using the procedure as in the directive, unless suspended, revoked or cancelled, in accordance with Articles 15 to 17.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 50 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
(37) Prior to the issuance of the European services e-card, a host Member State should be allowed to invoke legitimate policy concerns. Nevertheless, in the interest of allowing for a simplified and swift procedure, the principle of tacit approval should be observed in issuing a European services e-card. That is the general principle introduced under Directive 2006/123/EC. An alert of impending tacit approval and the extension of the applicable deadlines by twofour additional weeks should ensure that the host Member State has the appropriate time and means to consider applications for a European services e-card. A lack of information from the host Member State on applicable requirements should also not impede automatic issue of a European services e-card.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
(38) Service providers should not be required to provide information and documents which are already in the possession of other authorities in the home Member State, irrespective of administrative levels or divisions. It should also be the case when interconnection of national registers (e.g. central, commercial and companies' registers as required by Directive 2009/101/EC or insolvency registers under Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council28) allows for information and documents to be retrieved by the administration of the home Member State from other Member States. In all instances when personal data are processed under this Directive, rules on protection of personal data of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council29 [, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council30] and national legislation should be observed. __________________ 28Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings (OJ L 141, 5.6.2016, p.19). 29Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 281 , 23.11.1995, p. 31). 30Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).deleted
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The coordinating authority of the home Member State shall within onefour weeks of having received an application for a European services e-card:
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 56 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 41
(41) This Directive should not interfere with the division of regional or local competences within the Member States, including regional and local self- government. This notwithstanding, administrative cooperation between different national authorities within strict time-limits may be necessary in order to meet the obligations laid down in the Directive. In order to help Member States meet their obligations and considering the decentralised structure of many of them, IMI could also be used as a tool for the effective exchange of information and mutual assistance between competent authorities within a certain Member State, without prejudice to other solutions put in place by Member States.deleted
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) verify the completeness and, accuracy and validity of the information provided;
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 61 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) verify that the applicant is legally established in its territory and verify the content, and validity of accompanying documents, if any, that prove compliance with requirements applicable to the service provision to which the applicant is subject in the home Member State;
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 62 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 42
(42) A European services e-card should be valid for an indefinite period in time two year period, without prejudice to, in relation to temporary cross- border services, the effects of case-by-case derogations in accordance with Directive 2006/123/EC.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Where the coordinating authority of the home Member State requests supplementing of the application fromary information from the applicant, or, where, in the event of duly justified doubts, the host Member State requests re-verification of the validity of information submitted by the applicant, the time-limit is suspended until that information is provided.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 68 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Within twoIn the course of a procedure for issuing a European services e-card for the provision of temporary cross-border services, the coordinating authority of the host Member States hall, within four weeks from receiving the application the coordinating authority of the host Member State shall, examine it and inform the applicant and the home Member State of any requirements applicable to temporary cross-border provisions under the legislation of the host Member State with the exception of those referred to in Article 5(4). In line with the rights of Member States as referred to in Article 10, the coordinating authority of the host Member State may within the same time- limit, decide to object to the issue of the European services e-card by the coordinating authorityof the envisaged service activities, during the provision of the service, under the legislation of the homest Member State where it demonstrates that the application of a prior authorisation scheme, prior notification scheme or requirements to the applicant is justified for ith the exceptione of those overriding reasons of public interest set out in Article 16 of Directive 2006/123/EC or is admissible in accordance with other acts of EU lawreferred to in Article 5(4).
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 69 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 43
(43) A European services e-card should however be suspended by the issuing coordinating authority if, temporarily, the service provider is banned from providing the services in question. The suspension should last as long as the ban is in place. A European services e-card should be revoked by the issuing coordinating authority if the conditions for issuing it or for it to remain valid, as a testament of legality of service provision in the host Member State, are no longer met. A final decision establishing that an e-card holder misrepresented him or herself as a service provider and that, under national law of either home or host Member State he or she is considered to be a worker, should lead to the revocation of the European services e-cards in question. Similarly, cases of fraudulent, inaccurate or falsified information or documents used in the context of issuing a European services e- card should impact the validityresult in the suspension or revocation of the e- card.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Taking into account the rights of Member States as referred to in Article 10, if the coordinating authority of the host Member State does not react within the time-limit referred to in paragraph 1, that time limit shall automatically be extended by two additional weeks and the electronic platform where the application for a European services e-card has been submitted shall issue an alert to the coordinating authority of the host Member State to the effect that failure to react shall imply that there is no objection to the issue of the European services e-card to the applicant.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 74 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
If the host Member State does not object in accordance with paragraph 1, the coordinating authority of the home Member State shall issue the European services e-card without delay upon expiration of the extended time-limit resulting from the application of paragraph 2. In the absence of any objection under the second subparagraph of paragraph 1 and failing a decision by the coordinating authority of the home Member State upon expiration of the extended time-limit resulting from the application of paragraph 2, the European services e- card shall be deemed to have been issued by the home Member State in the terms communicated to the host Member State in accordance with Article 11(2).
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 77 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5
Effects of a European services e-card in 1. impose any prior authorisation scheme, prior notification scheme or an establishment requirement on the holder of a previously issued European services e-card for temporary cross-border provision of services as a condition for such provision of services in its territory. 2. impose any prior authorisation scheme or prior notification scheme on the holder of a previously issued European services e- card for establishment as a condition for establishment in its territory through a branch, agency or office located in its territory. 3. from imposing on holders of a previously issued European services e-card requirements other than those referred to Article 5 deleted the host Member State A host Member State shall not A host Member State shall not A host Member State shall refrain pParagraphs 1 and 2 the compliance of which has been or is deemed to have been verified under Articles 11 to 13. 4. prejudice to: (i) in the context of selection procedures of candidates for authorisation schemes limited in number in accordance with EU law; (ii) obligations, prohibitions, conditions or limits imposed on providers in the context of selection procedures of candidates for the provision of services under a public contract, a design contest or a concession; (iii) authorisation schemes, notification schemes or requirements concerning conditions specifically related to the site where the service is provided or to the site where the provider is established; (iv) recognition of professional qualifications as provided for by Articles 4 and 4f of Directive 2005/36/EC; (v) for by Article 2 of Directive 2009/101/EC and Article 2 of Directive 89/666/EEC or obligations, prohibitions, conditions or limits imposed by national rules on registration of branches of companies registered in another Member State under company law. 5. Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 are without prejudice to reporting obligations imposed on the holder of a European services e- card or the performance of checks, inspections or investigations from competent authorities during the provision of the service, in compliance with EU law., 2 and 3 are without requirements imposed on providers requirements and other requirements regarding disclosure obligations as provided
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
In the context of a procedure for issuing a European services e-card for establishment in the form of a branch, agency or office, the coordinating authority of the host Member State shall, within foursix weeks from receiving the application, identify which, if any, prior authorisation scheme or prior notification scheme as referred to in Article 5(2) is applicable, in compliance with EU law, to such establishment. If such a prior authorisation scheme or prior notification scheme has been identified, the host Member State shall also identify the conditions which the applicant is required to comply with, with the exception of those referred to in Article 5(5). The host Member State shall indicate why the application of such a prior authorisation scheme or prior notification scheme is necessary and proportionate for the pursuance of overriding reasons of public interest.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 87 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
Alternatively, the coordinating authority of the host Member State may inform the applicant and the coordinating authority of the home Member State of its intention to reject the application, in which case the applicant shall have afour weeks to present its observations.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 92 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
Upon receipt of the observations of the applicant or, where no observations have been made, upon expiration of the time- limit to present those observations, the coordinating authority of the host Member State shall decide, within onefour weeks, whether to issue the European services e- card or reject the application for the European services e-card.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 96 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 6
6. In case the host Member State, upon expiration of the periods for its reaction mentioned in paragraphs, 2 and 4, does not request compliance with any condition under paragraph 1 or does not take the decision to issue the European services e-card under paragraph 4, the European services e-card shall be deemed to have been issued by the host Member State in the terms communicated to the host Member State in accordance with Article 11(2).deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 99 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 7
7. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 18 in order to specify the procedure for the coordinating authority of the host Member State to request clarifications or additional information from the home Member State as referred to in paragraph 5, and to modifyextend if necessary the time-limits mentioned in paragraphs 1 and 4.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 100 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall adopt technical rules for the handling and processing of the application under paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 by means of implementing acts. These rules shall include time-limits on the expiration of the application due to inaction of the applicant.deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 101 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 2
Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19(2).deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 101 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
A European services e-card shall be valid for an indefinite duration period of 4 years and can be renewed using the procedure as in the directive, unless suspended, revoked or cancelled, in accordance with Articles 15 to 17.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Coordinating authorities in the home Member State shall not require providers to provide information and documents which are available to those authorities in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article or Article 14(3) of Regulation ….[ESC Regulation]….. when applying for a European services e-card or to prove compliance, in the context of a European services e-card for establishment, with conditions identified by the coordinating authority of the host Member State in accordance with Article 13(1).deleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 105 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) permanent or temporary cessation of activities covered by the European services e-card in the territory of the home Member State;
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 106 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) any significant change as regards the requirements that the holder of the e- card is subject to in its home Member State to the extent that information on compliance with these requirements had been communicated to the host Member State together with the e-card application;
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 111 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The coordinating authority of the home Member State shall within onefour weeks of having received an application for a European services e-card:
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 12(4) and Article 13(7) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of fivthree years from […]. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the five-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 114 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) verify the completeness and accuracy and validity of the information provided;
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) verify that the applicant is legally established in its territory and verify the content, and validity of accompanying documents, if any, that prove compliance with requirements applicable to the service provision to which the applicant is subject in the home Member State;
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – part 1
- Division 41 Construction of buildings Group 41.1 Development of building projects Group 41.2 Construction of residential and non-residential buildings Division 42 Civil engineering Group 42.1 Construction of roads and railways Group 42.2 Construction of utility projects Group 42.9 Construction of other civil engineering projects Division 43 Specialised construction activities Group 43.1 Demolition and site preparation Group 43.2 Electrical, plumbing and other construction installation activities, with the exclusion of installation, servicing, maintenance, repair or decommissioning by natural persons of equipment that contains fluorinated greenhouse gases listed in points (a) to (d) of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EU) 517/2014 Group 43.3 Building completion and finishing Group 43.9 Other specialised construction activitiesdeleted
2017/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 119 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Where the coordinating authority of the home Member State requests supplementing of the application fromary information from the applicant, or, where, in the event of duly justified doubts, the host Member State requests re-verification of the validity of information submitted by the applicant, the time-limit is suspended until that information is provided.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Within twoIn the course of a procedure for issuing a European services e-card for the provision of temporary cross-border services, the coordinating authority of the host Member State shall, within four weeks from receiving the application the coordinating authority of the host Member State shall, examine it and inform the applicant and the home Member State of any requirements applicable to temporary cross-border provisions under the legislation of the host Member State with the exception of those referred to in Article 5(4). In line with the rights of Member States as referred to in Article 10, the coordinating authority of the host Member State may within the same time- limit, decide to object to the issue of the European services e-card by the coordinating authorityof the envisaged service activities, during the provision of the service, under the legislation of the homest Member State where it demonstrates that the application of a prior authorisation scheme, prior notification scheme or requirements to the applicant is justified for ith the exceptione of those overriding reasons of public interest set out in Article 16 of Directive 2006/123/EC or is admissible in accordance with other acts of EU lawreferred to in Article 5(4).
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Taking into account the rights of Member States as referred to in Article 10, if the coordinating authority of the host Member State does not react within the time-limit referred to in paragraph 1, that time limit shall automatically be extended by two additional weeks and the electronic platform where the application for a European services e-card has been submitted shall issue an alert to the coordinating authority of the host Member State to the effect that failure to react shall imply that there is no objection to the issue of the European services e-card to the applicant.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
If the host Member State does not object in accordance with paragraph 1, the coordinating authority of the home Member State shall issue the European services e-card without delay upon expiration of the extended time-limit resulting from the application of paragraph 2. In the absence of any objection under the second subparagraph of paragraph 1 and failing a decision by the coordinating authority of the home Member State upon expiration of the extended time-limit resulting from the application of paragraph 2, the European services e- card shall be deemed to have been issued by the home Member State in the terms communicated to the host Member State in accordance with Article 11(2).
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
In the context of a procedure for issuing a European services e-card for establishment in the form of a branch, agency or office, the coordinating authority of the host Member State shall, within foursix weeks from receiving the application, identify which, if any, prior authorisation scheme or prior notification scheme as referred to in Article 5(2) is applicable, in compliance with EU law, to such establishment. If such a prior authorisation scheme or prior notification scheme has been identified, the host Member State shall also identify the conditions which the applicant is required to comply with, with the exception of those referred to in Article 5(5). The host Member State shall indicate why the application of such a prior authorisation scheme or prior notification scheme is necessary and proportionate for the pursuance of overriding reasons of public interest.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
Alternatively, the coordinating authority of the host Member State may inform the applicant and the coordinating authority of the home Member State of its intention to reject the application, in which case the applicant shall have a four weeks to present its observations.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 163 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
Upon receipt of the observations of the applicant or, where no observations have been made, upon expiration of the time- limit to present those observations, the coordinating authority of the host Member State shall decide, within onefour weeks, whether to issue the European services e- card or reject the application for the European services e-card.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 169 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 6
6. In case the host Member State, upon expiration of the periods for its reaction mentioned in paragraphs, 2 and 4, does not request compliance with any condition under paragraph 1 or does not take the decision to issue the European services e-card under paragraph 4, the European services e-card shall be deemed to have been issued by the host Member State in the terms communicated to the host Member State in accordance with Article 11(2).deleted
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 7
7. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 18 in order to specify the procedure for the coordinating authority of the host Member State to request clarifications or additional information from the home Member State as referred to in paragraph 5, and to modifyextend if necessary the time-limits mentioned in paragraphs 1 and 4.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 179 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall adopt technical rules for the handling and processing of the application under paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 by means of implementing acts. These rules shall include time-limits on the expiration of the application due to inaction of the applicant.deleted
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 2
Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19(2).deleted
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 181 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Coordinating authorities in the home Member State shall not require providers to provide information and documents which are available to those authorities in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article or Article 14(3) of Regulation ….[ESC Regulation]….. when applying for a European services e-card or to prove compliance, in the context of a European services e-card for establishment, with conditions identified by the coordinating authority of the host Member State in accordance with Article 13(1).deleted
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 187 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) permanent or temporary cessation of activities covered by the European services e-card in the territory of the home Member State;
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 188 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) any significant change as regards the requirements that the holder of the e- card is subject to in its home Member State to the extent that information on compliance with these requirements had been communicated to the host Member State together with the e-card application;
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 197 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 12(4) and Article 13(7) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of fivthree years from […]. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the five-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 201 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – part 1
- Division 41 Construction of buildings Group 41.1 Development of building projects Group 41.2 Construction of residential and non-residential buildings Division 42 Civil engineering Group 42.1 Construction of roads and railways Group 42.2 Construction of utility projects Group 42.9 Construction of other civil engineering projects Division 43 Specialised construction activities Group 43.1 Demolition and site preparation Group 43.2 Electrical, plumbing and other construction installation activities, with the exclusion of installation, servicing, maintenance, repair or decommissioning by natural persons of equipment that contains fluorinated greenhouse gases listed in points (a) to (d) of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EU) 517/2014 Group 43.3 Building completion and finishing Group 43.9 Other specialised construction activitiesdeleted
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 202 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – part 1 – paragraph 1
Division 41 Construction of buildings Group 41.1 Development of building projects Group 41.2 Construction of residential and non-residential buildingsdeleted
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 203 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – part 1 – paragraph 2
Division 42 Civil engineering Group 42.1 Construction of roads and railways Group 42.2 Construction of utility projects Group 42.9 Construction of other civil engineering projectsdeleted
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2016/0402(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – part 1 – paragraph 3
Division 43 Specialised construction activities Group 43.1 Demolition and site preparation Group 43.2 Electrical, plumbing and other construction installation activities, with the exclusion of installation, servicing, maintenance, repair or decommissioning by natural persons of equipment that contains fluorinated greenhouse gases listed in points (a) to (d) of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EU) 517/2014 Group 43.3 Building completion and finishing Group 43.9 Other specialised construction activitiesdeleted
2017/10/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure clarity regarding the terminology in EU law, the term “posting” should only be used for the posting of workers within the meaning of Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services.34 In addition, to achieve consistency in treatment between employed and self-employed persons it is necessary that the special rules for the determination of applicable legislation in the cases of workers who are temporarily posted or sent to another Member State should apply consistently to both employed and self-employed persons. __________________ 34deleted OJ L 018, 21.01.1997 p. 1.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The new provisions on unemployment benefit for cross-border workers could in some cases worsen the conditions for their return to the labour market. It is essential, therefore, to enhance administrative cooperation between the competent authorities responsible for supporting cross-border workers and for the regulatory framework to facilitate, for example, the steps to be completed in the Member State of residence, by clarifying the competence of the public employment service responsible for providing support to them, and for exchanges between the competent institution of the Member State of last activity and the job seeker to be conducted in an understandable language. The public employment service of the Member State of last activity must take into account the specific situation of job seekers whose place of residence is not in the Member State of last activity, and therefore establish specific accompanying measures facilitating their return to employment. Cross-border job seekers shall have the possibility to make themselves available to a cross-border employment service, providing that such a service exists in the geographic area corresponding to the area of their job research.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) Significant economic differences still exist between Member States. For members of the family residing in another Member State other than the competent Member State, different standards and costs of living are a necessary consideration for the calculation of family benefits.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) In order to enable a timely update of this Regulation to the developments at the national level, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the European Commission in respect of amending the Annexes to this Regulation and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009, and to establish a fair and optional adjustment mechanism for the calculation of family benefits in relation to children residing in another Member State other than the competent Member State. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016.36 In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. __________________ 36 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1–14.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 20
4a. Recital 20 is replaced by the following: “(20) In the field of sickness, long-term care, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits, insured persons, as well as the members of their families, living or staying in a Member State other than the competent Member State, should be afforded protection. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2004R0883:20130108:EN:HTML)” Or. en (http://eur-
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 179 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 24
(24) Long-term care benefits for insured persons and members of their families needshould, in principle, continue to be coordinated according to specific rules which, in principle, follow the rules applicable to sickness benefits,the rules applicable to sickness benefits, taking the specific nature of long-term care benefits into account and in line with the case law of the Court of Justice. It is also necessary to provide for specific provisions in case of overlapping of long-term care benefits in kind and in cash.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 187 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EC) 883/2004
Recital 35 b(new)
(35b) For members of the family residing in another Member State other than the competent Member State, different standards and costs of living are a necessary consideration for the calculation of family benefits. The Commission should, by means of delegated acts, establish an optional adjustment mechanism for the calculation of family benefits in relation to children residing in another Member State other than the competent Member State.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 46
(46) In order to enable a timely update of this Regulation to the developments at the national level, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the European Commission in respect of amending the Annexes to this Regulation and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009, and establish a fair and optional adjustment mechanism for the calculation of exporting family benefits by Member States for children residing in another Member State other than the competent Member State. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016.43 In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. __________________ 43 COM(2015) 216 final.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 205 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point c
(a) In Point (c) the term “Title III, Chapters 1 and 3” is replaced by the term “Title III, Chapters 1, 1a and 3”.deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 209 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point i – point 1 – point ii
(b) In Point (i)(1)(ii) after the term “Title III, Chapter 1 on sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits” the term “and Chapter 1a on long-term care benefits” is inserted.deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 213 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point i – point 1 – point ii
(b) In Point (i)(1)(ii) after the term “, point (ii) is replaced by the following: (ii) with regard to benefits in kind pursuant to Title III, Chapter 1 on sickness, long-term care, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits” the term “and Chapter 1a on long-term care benefits” is inserted., any person defined or recognised as a member of the family or designated as a member of the household by the legislation of the Member State in which he/she resides;
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 214 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point va – point i
(c) In Point (va)(i) after the term “Title III, Chapter 1 (sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits),” the term “and Chapter 1a (long-term care benefits)” is inserted and the last sentence is deleted.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 218 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point c a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point va
(ca) Point (va) is replaced by the following: (va) “Benefits in kind” means: (i) for the purposes of Title III, Chapter 1 (regarding sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits), benefits in kind provided for under the legislation of a Member State which are intended to supply, make available, pay directly or reimburse the cost of medical care and products and services ancillary to that care. This includes long-term care benefits in kind; (ii) for the purposes of Title III, Chapter 1 regarding long-term care benefits, benefits in kind provided for under the legislation of a Member State which are intended to supply, make available, pay directly or reimburse the cost of long-term care as defined in point (vb); (iii) for the purposes of Title III, Chapter 2 (accidents at work and occupational diseases), all benefits in kind relating to accidents at work and occupational diseases as defined in point (i) above and provided for under the Member States’ accidents at work and occupational diseases schemes;
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 221 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point d
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point vb
(vb) “long-term care benefit” means any benefit in kind, cash or a combination of both for persons who, over an extended period of time, on account of old-age, disability, illness or impairment, require considerable assistance from another person or persons to carry out essential daily activities, including to support their personal autonomy; this includes benefits granted to or for the person providing such assistance;
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 236 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. A Member State may require that the access of an economically inactive person residing in that Member State to its social security benefits be subject to the conditions of having a right to legal residence as set out in Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.44. __________________ 44deleted OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 77.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 259 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. A person who pursues an activity as an employed person in a Member State on behalf of an employer which normally carries out its activities there and who is posted within the meaning of Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services46 or sent by that employer to another Member State to perform work on that employer’s behalf shall continue to be subject to the legislation of the first Member State, provided that the anticipated duration of such work does not exceed 24 months and that the person is not posted or sent to replace another employed or self-employed person previously posted or sent within the meaning of this Article. __________________ 46OJ L 018, 21.01.1997 p. 1.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 301 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Title III – Chapter 1 – title
Sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2004R0883:20130108:EN:HTML)14a. In Title III, the title of Chapter 1 is replaced by the following: “Sickness, long-term care, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits” Or. en (http://eur-
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 304 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 19
14b. Article 19 is replaced by the following; “Article 19 Stay outside the competent Member State 1. Unless otherwise provided for by paragraph 2, an insured person and the members of his/her family staying in a Member State other than the competent Member State shall be entitled to the benefits in kind which become necessary on either medical grounds or due to the need for long-term care during their stay, taking into account the nature of the benefits and the expected length of the stay. These benefits shall be provided on behalf of the competent institution by the institution of the place of stay, in accordance with the provisions of the legislation it applies, as though the persons concerned were insured under the said legislation. 2. The Administrative Commission shall establish a list of benefits in kind which, in order to be provided during a stay in another Member State, require for practical reasons a prior agreement between the person concerned and the institution providing the care. (http://www.at4am.ep.parl.union.eu/at4am/ameditor.html?documentID=20512&locale=en#)benefit.” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 317 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 c (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
14c. In Article 28(1), the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: “1. A frontier worker who has retired because of old-age or invalidity is entitled in the event of sickness or the need for long-term care to continue to receive benefits in kind in the Member State where he/she last pursued his/her activity as an employed or self-employed person, in so far as this is a continuation of treatment for sickness or of provision of long-term care which began in that Member State. ‘Continuation of treatment’ in the case of sickness means the continued investigation, diagnosis and treatment of an illness for its entire duration. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2004R0883:20130108:EN:HTML)‘Continuation of provision of long-term care’ means the continued granting of long-term care benefits in kind where entitlement to such benefits was established prior to retirement.” Or. en (http://eur-
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 322 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 d (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 30
14d. Article 30 is replaced by the following: “Article 30 Contributions by pensioners 1. The institution of a Member State which is responsible under the legislation it applies for making deductions in respect of contributions for sickness, long-term care, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits, may request and recover such deductions, calculated in accordance with the legislation it applies, only to the extent that the cost of the benefits pursuant to Articles 23 to 26 is to be borne by an institution of the said Member State. 2. Where, in the cases referred to in Article 25, the acquisition of sickness, long-term care, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits is subject to the payment of contributions or similar payments under the legislation of a Member State in which the pensioner concerned resides, these contributions shall not be payable by virtue of such residence. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2004R0883:20130108:EN:HTML)” Or. en (http://eur-
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 330 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 33 a (new)
15a. the following Article is inserted: “Article 33a Long-term care benefits 1. The Administrative Commission shall draw up a detailed list of long-term care benefits which meet the criteria contained in point (vb) of Article 1, specifying which are benefits in kind and which are benefits in cash. 2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may coordinate long-term care benefits in accordance with another Chapter in Title III, provided that the outcome of such coordination is at least as favourable to the beneficiaries as it would be if the benefit were coordinated as a long-term care benefit under this Chapter and the benefit and the specific conditions to which the benefit is subject are listed in Annex XII. 3. Article 34 (1) and (3) shall also apply to benefits listed in Annex XII.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 333 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16
16. Article 34 is deleted.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 336 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 34 – paragraph 1
1. If a recipient of long-term care benefits in cash, which have to be treated as sickness benefits and are therefore6a. In Article 34, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: “1. If a recipient of long-term care benefits in cash, provided by the Member State competent for cash benefits under Articles 21 or 29, is, at the same time and under this Chapter, entitled to claim benefits in kind intended for the same purpose from the institution of the place of residence or stay in another Member State, and an institution in the first Member State is also required to reimburse the cost of these benefits in kind under Article 35, the general provision on prevention of overlapping of benefits laid down in Article 10 shall be applicable, with the following restriction only: if the person concerned claims and receives the benefit in kind, the amount of the benefit in cash shall be reduced by the amount of the benefit in kind which is or could be claimed from the institution of the first Member State required to reimburse the cost. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2004R0883:20130108:EN:HTML)” Or. en (http://eur-
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 340 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 34 – paragraph 2
lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2004R0883:20130108:EN:HTML)16b. In Article 34, paragraph 2 is deleted. Or. en (http://eur-
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 345 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Chapter 1 a
17. After Article 35, the following Chapter is inserted: ‘CHAPTER 1a Long-term care benefits Article 35a General provisions 1. Without prejudice to the specific provisions of this Chapter, Articles 17 to 32 shall apply mutatis mutandis to long- term care benefits. 2. shall draw up a detailed list of long-term care benefits which meet the criteria contained in Article 1 (vb) of this Regulation, specifying which are benefits in kind and which are benefits in cash. 3. paragraph 1, Member States may grant long-term care benefits in cash in accordance with the other Chapters of Title III, if the benefit and the specific conditions to which the benefit is subject are listed in Annex XII and provided that the outcome of such coordination is at least as favourable for the beneficiaries as if the benefit was coordinated under this Chapter. Article 35b Overlapping of long-term care benefits 1. benefits in cash granted under the legislation of the competent Member State receives, at the same time and under this Chapter, long-term care benefits in kind from the institution of the place of residence or stay in another Member State, and an institution in the first Member State is also required to reimburse the cost of these benefits in kind under Article 35c, the general provision on prevention of overlapping of benefits laid down in Article 10deleted The Administrative Commission By way of derogation from If a recipient of long-term care Two or more Member States, or Article 35 shall be applicable, with the following restriction only: the amount of the benefit in cash shall be reduced by the reimbursable amount for the benefit in kind which is claimable under Article 35c from the institution of the first Member State. 2. their competent authorities, may agree on other or supplementary measures which shall not be less favourable for the persons concerned than the principles laid down in paragraph 1. Article 35c Reimbursement between institutions 1. mutandis to long-term care benefits. 2. State where the competent institution under this Chapter is situated does not provide for long-term care benefits in kind, the institution which is or would be competent in that Member State under Chapter 1 for the reimbursement of sickness benefits in kind granted in another Member State shall be deemed to be the competent one also under Chapter 1a.. ’y mutatis If the legislation of a Member
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 414 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 65 – paragraph 1
1. An unemployed person who, during his or her last activity as an employed or self-employed person resided in a Member State other than the competent Member State shall make himself or herself available to the former employer or to the employment services in the competent Member State. Such a person shall receive benefits in accordance with the legislation of the competent Member State as if he or she were residing in that Member State. These benefits shall be provided by the institution of the competent Member State. He or she shall have the possibility to make himself or herself available to the employment services of the Member State of residence as well.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 417 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 65 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. An unemployed person register as job seeker with the employment services of the Member State of last activity shall benefit from a follow-up in an understandable language, in connection with EURES-t counsellors responsible for all the issues related to cross-border mobility in regions facing an important stream of cross-border workers.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 428 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 65 – paragraph 4
4. A wholly unemployed person referred to in this Article may in addition to making themselves available to the employment services of the competent Member State also make themselves available to the employment services of the other Member State. He or she shall as well be able to make himself or herself available to a cross-border employment service, providing that such a service exists in the geographic area of his or her job research.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 438 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 67 a (new)
lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2004R0883:20130108:EN:HTML)22a. The following article is inserted: “Article 67a Derogation rules for members of the family residing in another Member State 1. By derogation from Article 67, family benefits from competent Member States for the family members residing in another Member State will be adjusted according to the mechanism set out in Article 67b. Member States applying this derogation will be listed in Annex XIV by reference to the adaption of rules 67b. 2. The Commission shall adopt upgrading and downgrading factors for the optional adjustment mechanism set out in Article 67b for each Member State in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 88b.” Or. en (http://eur-
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 441 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 b (new)
lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2004R0883:20130108:EN:HTML)22b. The following article is inserted “Article 67b Delegated acts for an optional adjustment mechanism for exported family benefits The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 88a, supplementing this Regulation by establishing a fair and optional adjustment mechanism for the calculation of exporting family benefits by Member States for children residing in another Member State other than the competent Member State.” Or. en (http://eur-
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 465 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 76 a – paragraph 1 – indent 1
– the issuance, the format and the contents of a portable electronic document certifying the social security legislation which applies to the holder,
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 468 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 76 a – paragraph 1 – indent 2
– the determination of situations in which the document shall be issued, rectified or withdrawn,
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 474 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 76 a – paragraph 1 – indent 4
– the withdrawal of the document when its accuracy and validity is contested for justified reasons by the competent institution of the Member State of employment.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 492 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 88 a – paragraph 2
2. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 67b and 88 shall be conferred on the European Commission for an indeterminate period of time from the [the date of entry into force of the Regulation (EU) xxxx].
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 496 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 88 a – paragraph 3
3. The delegation of the power referred to in Articles 67b and 88 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 503 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 88 a – paragraph 6
6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 67b and 88 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiring of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the European Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 505 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27 a (new)Regulation (EC) No 883/2004

Article 88 b (new)
27a. The following article is inserted: “Article 88b Committee procedure 1. The Commission shall be assisted by the Administrative Commission, which shall be a Committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2001. 2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 508 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Recital 13
-1. Recital 13 is amended as follows: "(13) This Regulation provides for measures and procedures to promote the mobility of employees and unemployed persons. Frontier workers who have become wholly unemployed may make themselves available to the employment services in both their country of residence and the Member State where they were last employed. However, they should be entitled to benefits only from their Member State of residence. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2009R0987:20130108:EN:HTML)" Or. en (http://eur-
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 536 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5 – paragraph 2– point c
(c) Where the requesting institution having received the supporting evidence continues to have doubts about the validity of a document or the accuracy of the facts on which the particulars contained therein are based that the information upon which the document was issued is not correct, it mayshall submit evidence to that effect and make a further request for clarification and where appropriate the withdrawal of that document by the issuing institution in accordance within the procedure and timeframes set out above..
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 551 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. For the purposes of the application of Article 12(1) of the basic Regulation, a ‘person who pursues an activity as an employed person in a Member State on behalf of an employer which normally carries out its activities there and who is posted within the meaning of the Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services52 or sent by that employer to another Member State’ shall include a person who is recruited with a view to being posted or sent to another Member State, provided that immediately before the start of his employment, the person concerned is already subject to the legislation of the sending Member State in accordance with Title II of the basic Regulation.. __________________ 52OJ L 18, 21.01.1997 p. 1.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 583 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. If that institution determines that the legislation of another Member State applies, it shall do so provisionally and shall without delay inform the institution of the Member State which it considers to be competent of this provisional decision. The decision shall become definitive within two months after the institution designated by the competent authorities of the Member State concerned has been informed of it, unless the latter institution informs the first institution and, the persons and the employer concerned that it cannot yet accept the provisional determination or that it takes a different view on this.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 585 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 16 – paragraph 5
5. The competent institution of the Member State whose legislation is determined to be applicable either provisionally or definitively shall without delay inform the person concerned and/or his or her employer.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 598 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 20 a – paragraph 1 – indent 1
– the issuance, the format and the contents of a portable electronic document certifying the social security legislation which applies to the holder,
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 604 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Title III – Chapter 1– title
Sickness, long-term care, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits, and long-term care benefits.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 606 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 23 – second sentence
14. At the end of Article 23, the following sentence is added: ‘This provision applies mutatis mutandis to long-term care benefits. ’deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 609 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 23
14a. Article 23 is replaced by the following; "Article 23 Regime applicable in the event of the existence of more than one regime in the Member State of residence or stay If the legislation of the Member State of residence or stay comprises more than one scheme of sickness, long-term care, maternity and paternity insurance for more than one category of insured persons, the provisions applicable under Articles 17, 19(1), 20, 22, 24 and 26 of the basic Regulation shall be those of the legislation on the general scheme for employed persons. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2009R0987:20130108:EN:HTML)" Or. en (http://eur-
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 613 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15Regulation (EC) No 987/2009

Article 24 – paragraph 3
15. In Article 24(3), the term "and 26" is replaced by ", 26 and 35a".deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 614 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 25 – paragraph 1
15a. In Article 25, paragraph 1is replaced by the following: 1. For the purposes of the application of Article 19 of the basic Regulation, the insured person shall present to the health care or long-term care provider in the Member State of stay a document issued by the competent institution indicating his entitlement to benefits in kind. If the insured person does not have such a document, the institution of the place of stay, upon request or if otherwise necessary, shall contact the competent institution in order to obtain one. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2009R0987:20130108:EN:HTML)Or. en (http://eur-
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 617 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 25 – paragraph 3
15b. In Article 25, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: “3. The benefits in kind referred to in Article 19(1) of the basic Regulation shall refer to the benefits in kind which are provided in the Member State of stay, in accordance with its legislation, and which become necessary on medical grounds or due to the need for long-term care with a view to preventing an insured person from being forced to return, before the end of the planned duration of stay, to the competent Member State to obtain the necessary treatment. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2009R0987:20130108:EN:HTML) or long-term care.” Or. en (http://eur-
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 624 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16
16. In Article 28(1), after the term "pursuant to Article 21(1) of the basic Regulation", the following term is added "in accordance with Article 35a thereof".deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 628 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 31 – title
(c) The title is replaced by the following title: ‘Application of Article 35b of the basic Regulation; ’deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 629 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point d
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 31 – paragraph 1
(d) In paragraph 1, the term "Article 34" is replaced by "Article 35b";deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 630 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point e
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 31 – paragraph 2
(e) In paragraph (2), the term "Article 34(2)" is replaced by "Article 353a (21)".
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 631 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 32 – paragraph 1
17a. In Article 32, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. When a person or a group of persons are exempted upon request from compulsory sickness or long-term care insurance and such persons are thus not covered by a sickness or long-term care insurance scheme to which the basic Regulation applies, the institution of another Member State shall not, solely because of this exemption, become responsible for bearing the costs of benefits in kind or in cash provided to such persons or to a member of their family under Title III, Chapter I, of the basic Regulation. lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2009R0987:20130108:EN:HTML)" Or. en (http://eur-
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 633 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 32 – paragraph 4
18. In Article 32, the following paragraph 4 is added after paragraph 3: ‘4. mutandis to long-term care benefits. ’deleted This Article applies mutatis
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 647 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 24
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Title VI – Chapter I – title
24. Chapter 1 of Title IV is renamed as follows: ‘CHAPTER I Reimbursement of the cost of benefits in application of Article 35, 35c and Article 41 of the basic Regulation’deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 691 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Annex XII – title
LONG-TERM CARE BENEFITS IN CASH PROVIDED IN DEROGATION FROM ARTICLE 353A(1) OF CHAPTER 1A
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 692 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Annex XII – subheading
(Article 35a(3))deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 698 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 7 a (new)Regulation (EC) No 883/2004

Annex XIII a (new)
7a. The following annex is added: Annex XIIIa (Article 67 (2)) Member States adapting family benefits in accordance with the mechanism set out in Article 67b.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 62
(62) The European Strategy for a low- carbon mobility of July 2016 pointed out that food-based biofuels have a limited role in decarbonising the transport sector and should be gradually phased out and replaced bylong-term decarbonisation of transport in line with the 60 % reduction target by 2050 expressed in the 2011 Commission white paper on transport and also in line with the requirements of the Paris Agreement requires a wide use of all renewable fuels that deliver on the EU decarbonisation targets, taking into account the expected need for liquid and gaseous fuels in particular with regard to shipping, aviation and HDVs. Complementary to the promotion of greater market penetration of advanced biofuels. To prepa, it is there for the transition towards advanced biofuels and minimise the overalle necessary to distinguish between on the one hand first generation biofuels with high GHG efficiency and a low risk of indirect land- use change impacts, it is appropriate to reduce the amount of biofuels and bioliquids produced from food and feed crops that can be counted towards the Union target set out in this Directivethat shall play a role in the decarbonisation of transport and on the other hand the ones which don´t meet these criteria. Further, measures should be taken to phase down the use of feedstocks that drive deforestation or peatland drainage as a component of biofuels as soon as possible. The life-cycle assessment of biofuels also should take into consideration their role to play in the circular economy, which includes inter alia the supply of high-protein animal feed that is chronically short in the EU and otherwise would have to be imported.
2017/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 445 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
For the calculation of a Member State’s gross final consumption of energy from renewable energy sources, the contribution from biofuels and bioliquids, as well as from biomass fuels consumed in transport, if produced from food or feed crops, shall be no more than 7% of final consumption of energy in road and rail transport in that Member State. This limit shall be reduced to 3,8% in 2030not include bio-fuels that either foallowing the trajectory set out in part A of Annex X. Member States may set a lower limit and may distinguish between different types of biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels produced from food and feed crops, for instance by setting a lower limit for the contribution from food or feed crop based biofuels produced from oil crops, taking into account indirect land use change. under the definition set out in Article 2(u) or have GHG emissions savings calculated according to Article 28(1) of at least 70% in 2021 or 80% in 2030 and are produced from feedstocks obtained according to Article 93 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/20131a ____________________ 1a OJ L347, 20.12.2013, p549-607
2017/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 482 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
The contribution of transport fuels from feedstocks that drive deforestation or peatland conversation and their derivatives to the share of renewables in transport should be limited to a maximum of 1 % of the final consumption of energy in transport until global deforestation and peatland conversation is halted. Such limit may be amended on the basis of a report by the European Commission once correspondent effective prevention policies are put in place.
2017/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 548 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph -1 (new)
–1. Each Member State shall ensure that the share of energy from renewable sources in all forms of transport gradually increases from at least 10 % in 2020 to at least 15 % in 2030, expressed in terms of national share of final energy consumption and calculated according to the methodology set out in Article 7.
2017/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 650 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 – point a – subparagraph 2
However, electricity obtained from direct connection to an installation generating renewable electricity (i) that comes into operation after or at the same time ascan be fully counted as renewable electricity for the production of that renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuel of non-biological origin, if the installation producing the renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuel of non- biological origin andis (ii) is not connected to the grid, can be fully counted asdirectly to an installation generating renewable electricity for the production of that renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuel of non-biological origin(ii) connected to an electricity grid point while using only renewable energy surplus in a way to prevent renewable energy curtailment due to inefficiencies in the power grid on one or more voltage levels. In order to provide adequate proof for point (ii) the Commission shall provide guidance and establish a procedure on how to provide this proof by 2019.
2017/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1078 #

2016/0382(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex X – Part A
Part A: Maximum contribution from liquid biofuels produced from food or feed crops to the EU renewable energy target as referred to in Article 7 paragraph 1 Calendar year Minimum share 2021 7.0% 2022 6.7% 2023 6.4% 2024 6.1% 2025 5.8% 2026 5.4% 2027 5.0% 2028 4.6% 2029 4.2% 2030 3.8% Deleted
2017/07/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 24 #

2016/0374(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2006/112/EC
Annex III – point 6
(6) the supply, including on loan by libraries, of books, newspapers and periodicals, other than publications wholly or predominantly devoted to advertising and other than publications wholly or predominantly consisting of music or video content; including brochures, leaflets and similar printed matter, children's picture, drawing or colouring books, music printed or in manuscript form, maps and hydrographic or similar charts.
2017/04/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 60 #

2016/0364(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a – point -1 (new)
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
(-1) Article 2, paragraph 5, introductory part, is amended as follows: This Directive shall not apply only to the following:
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 67 #

2016/0364(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 5a
5a. This Directive shall not apply to an institution where the Commission establishes in a delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 148, on the basis of information available to it that the institution fulfils all of the following conditions, without prejudice to the application of state aid rules: (a) public law by a Member State's central government, regional government or local authority; (b) institution confirm that its activity is limited to advancing specified objectives of financial, social or economic public policy in accordance with the laws and provisions governing that institution, on a non-competitive, not for profit basis. For these purposes, public policy objectives may include the provision of financing for promotional or development purposes to specific economic activities, or geographical areas of the relevant Member State; (c) effective prudential requireit has been established under laws and provisions governing the it is subject to adequate and the central governments, including minimum own funds requirements, and to an adequate supervisory framework which has similar effect as the framework established under Union law; (d) government or local authority, as applicable, has an obligation to protect the institution's viability or directly or indirectly guarantees at least 90% of the institution's own funds requirements, funding requirements or exposures; (e) covered deposits as defined in point (5) of Article 2(1) of Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council12 ; (f) Member State where its head office is situated; (g) assets is below EUR 30 billion; (h) assets over the GDP of the Member State concerned is less than 20%; (i) the institution is not of significant relevance with regard to the domestic economy of the Member State concerned. The Commission shall regularly review whether an institution subject to a delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 148 continues to fulfil the conditions set out in the first subparagraph. __________________ 12 Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on deposit guarantee schemes (recast) (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 149)regional it is precluded from accepting its activities are confined to the the total value of the institution's the ratio of the institution's total
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 98 #

2016/0364(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point d
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 7
(d) the following paragraph 7 is added: ‘ By [5 years after entry into force], the Commission shall review the list set out in Article 2(5) by considering whether the reasons that led to the inclusion of entities in the list are still valid, the national legal framework and supervision applicable to the entities in the list, the type and quality of deposit coverage of the entities in the list and, for entities of the type specified in paragraphs 2(5a) and 2(5b) taking into account also the criteria described therein.. ’deleted
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 110 #

2016/0364(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 21b – paragraph 1
1. Subject to paragraph 1a, Member States shall require that two or more institutions in the Union, which are part of the same third country group, have an intermediate EU parent undertaking that is established in the Union.
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 116 #

2016/0364(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 21b – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Competent authorities may allow the institutions referred to in paragraph 1 to have two intermediate EU parent undertakings where the competent authorities is certain that a single intermediate EU parent undertaking would be incompatible with a mandatory requirement for separation of activities in accordance with the rules of the third country where the ultimate parent undertaking of the third country group has its head office or where it will facilitate the effective resolution of the institution.
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 122 #

2016/0364(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 21b – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall require an intermediate EU parent undertaking in the Union to obtain authorisation as an institution in accordance with Article 8, or as a financial holdingAn intermediate parent undertaking shall be a credit institution authorized in accordance with Article 8, or a financial holding company or mixed financial holding company in accordance with Article 21a. By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, where none of the institutions referred to in paragraph 1 is a credit institution or the second intermediate EU parent undertaking must be set up in connection with investment activities to comply with a mandatory requirement as referred to in paragraph 1a, the intermediate EU parent company or mixethe second financial holding company in accordance with Article 21atermediate EU parent company, respectively, may be an investment firm authorised in accordance with Article 5(1) of Directive 2014/65/EU.
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 129 #

2016/0364(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 21b – paragraph 3
3. Paragraphs 1, 1a and 2 shall not apply where the total value of assets in the Union of the third country group is lower than EUR 350 billion, unless the third country group is a non-EU G-SII.
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 135 #

2016/0364(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 21b – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. For the purposes of this Article, the total value of assets in the Union of the third country group shall includebe the sum of the following:
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 136 #

2016/0364(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 21b – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) the amount of total assets of each institution in the Union of the third country group, as resulting from their consolidated balance sheet or as resulting from their individual balance sheet, where an institution's balance sheet is not consolidated; and
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 139 #

2016/0364(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 21b – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) the amount of total assets of each branch of the third country group authorised to operate in the Union in accordance with Article 47.
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 151 #

2016/0364(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 21b – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Competent authorities shall ensure that there is a single intermediate EU parent undertaking for all institutions that areeach institution under their jurisdiction that is part of a third country group meets one of the following conditions: (a) it has an intermediate EU parent undertaking; (b) it is an intermediate EU parent undertaking; (c) it is the only institution in the Union of the third country group; or (d) it is part of the samea third country group. whose total value of assets in the Union is below EUR 30 billion.
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 183 #

2016/0364(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 84 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
EBA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify, for the purposes of this Article, the details of aprinciples for a proportioned and simple standardiszed methodology that institutions may use for the purpose of evaluating the risks referred to in paragraph 1 or be required to use according to paragraph 3.
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 251 #

2016/0364(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point b
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 98 – paragraph 5
5. The review and evaluation performed by competent authorities shall include the exposure of institutions to the interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities. Supervisory measures shall be required at least in the case of institutions whosIn the case of a decline of the economic value of equity referred to in Article 84(1) declines by more than 15 % of their Tier 1 capital as a result of a sudden and unexpected change in interest rates as set out in any of six supervisory shock scenarios applied to interest rates., the supervisory authority shall assess the risks arising from that decline.
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 333 #

2016/0364(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2013/36/EU
Article 109 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. The remuneration requirements laid down in Articles 92, 94 and 95 shall not apply on a consolidated basis to either of the following: (a) subsidiary undertakings established in the Union where those are subject to specific remuneration requirements in accordance with other instruments of Union law; (b) subsidiary undertakings established in a third country where those would be subject to specific remuneration requirements in accordance with other instruments of Union law if they were established in the Union.
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 427 #

2016/0364(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Pending the review of the prudential framework for investment firms, as per the Commission’s proposal for a Regulation COM (2017)790 final and for a Directive COM(2017) 791 final, member states may continue to apply the provisions of this Directive as they stood on [day before the date of entry into force of the amending directive] to investment firms that are not systemic investment firms as defined in point (139) of Article 4(1) of the Regulation (final number to be added – currently standing in COM(2016) 850 final Proposal amending the Regulation (EU) No 575/2013).
2018/02/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 50 #

2016/0304(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
(2) Differences in language, definitions, document formats, as well as assessment and qualification validation methods, all pose considerable challenges for individuals, employers and competent authorities. These challenges arise especially where individuals move between countries, including third countries, but also when looking for a new job or engaging in learning. Clear information and shared understanding isare necessary to address these challenges and facilitate mobility while ensuring sufficient flexibility with regard to Member States' established practices.
2017/04/26
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 61 #

2016/0304(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
(4) To achieve its main objective, the Europass framework focused on tools for the documentation of skills and qualifications. These tools have achieved wide use. Activities by National Europass Centres offer integral support and promote the documentation of skills and qualifications25 . _________________ 25 Second evaluation of the Decision of the European Parliament and the Council on a single Community framework for the transparency of qualifications and competences (Europass), COM(2013) 899 final.
2017/04/26
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 79 #

2016/0304(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 11
(11) Regulation (EU) 2016/589 of the European Parliament and of the Council31 establishes European Employment Services (EURES), a network of employment services and a mechanism for an automated matching of people to jobs through the EURES common IT platform. To enable the exchange and the matching of job vacancies with candidates, this mechanism needs a common and multilingual list of skills, competences and occupations. By developing ESCO the Commission is providing a multilingual classification system of occupations, skills and competences and qualifications that is suited towhich could assist this purpose. _________________ 31 OJ L 107, 22.4.2016, p. 1. OJ L 107, 22.4.2016, p. 1.
2017/04/26
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 102 #

2016/0304(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 17
(17) The current focus of the Europass framework on documentation is too limited to respond to current and future needs. To communicate skills and qualifications and make decisions on employment and learning opportunities users need access to relevant, up to date information and tools for understanding skills and qualifications as well as tools for documenting their own skills and qualifications.
2017/04/26
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 107 #

2016/0304(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 18
(18) Union tools and services for skills and qualifications should adapt to changing practices and advances in technology to ensure they remain relevant and of value to users. This should be achieved by, among other things, creating more synergyies between related EU and national tools and services, including those developed by third parties, to offer a more comprehensive and effective service.
2017/04/26
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 162 #

2016/0304(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) 'certificate supplement' means a document attached to a vocational certificate, in order to make it easier for third parties to understand the learning outcomes acquired by the holder of the qualification as well as the nature, level, context, content and status of the studiesVET completed;
2017/04/26
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 169 #

2016/0304(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) 'organisations' means employers, recruiters, education and training institutions, and other stakeholders such as the social partners with an interest in education, training and employment issues;
2017/04/26
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 221 #

2016/0304(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Europass shall seek to enhance transparency and understanding of learning acquired in formal, non-formal and informal settings and through practical experiences, including mobility and volunteering.
2017/04/26
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 238 #

2016/0304(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. Europass shallmay use the European Classification of Skills/Competences, Qualifications and Occupations (ESCO) established in Article 6 to ensure semantic interoperability between the tools for documentation and information. ESCO shall also provide a platform for interoperability with other relevant services such as those developed by the labour market.
2017/04/26
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 274 #

2016/0304(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The ESCO classification shall directlmay support the functioning of Europass by providing a common reference language for exchanging information and documents on skills and qualifications and for the purpose of job searching, job matching, searching for education and training opportunities and providing learning and career guidance.
2017/04/26
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 340 #

2016/0304(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) coordinate, in cooperation with the relevant national bodies, particularly the National Europass Centres, the activities related to the implementation of Europass tools and services at national level;
2017/04/26
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 69 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 271 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. By way of derogation from Article 2, applicant Member States may provide personalised services co-financed by the EGF to up to a number of NEETs under the age of 25, or where Member States so decide under the age of 30, on the date of submission of the application, equal to the number of targeted beneficiaries, as a priority to persons made redundant or whose activity has ceased, provided that at least some of the redundancies within the meaning of Article 3 occur in NUTS 2 level regions that had youth unemployment rates for young persons aged 15 to 24 of more than 25 % in 2012 and/or 2015 and, for Member States where the youth unemployment rate had increased by more than 30 % in 2012 and/or 2015, NUTS level 2 regions that had youth unemployment rates of more than 20 % in 2012 and/or 2015. The support may be rendered to NEETs under the age of 25, or where Member States so decide under the age of 30, in those NUTS 2 level regions that had youth unemployment rates for young persons aged 15 to 24 of more than 25 % in 2012 and/or 2015 and, for Member States where the youth unemployment rate had increased by more than 30 % in 2012 and/or 2015, NUTS level 2 regions that had youth unemployment rates of more than 20 % in 2012 and/or 2015.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2016/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4 a) This Regulation should ensure that, in accordance with Article 9 of the Marrakesh Treaty, the contracting parties provide financial and personal resources to facilitate international cooperation between authorized entities, the adequate availability of accessible format copies and the cross-border exchange of these works.
2016/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2016/0279(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) a publicly accessible national database which lists all produced accessible format copies, as well as all imported accessible works and their sources of supply, in order to allow all concerned stakeholders to gain access to relevant information and prevent legal uncertainties;
2016/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) Since the Investment Plan for Europe was presented in November 20143 , the conditions for an uptake in investment have improved and confidence in Europe’s economy and growth are returning. The Union is now in its fourth year of moderate recovery, with Gross Domestic Product growing at 2% in 2015. The comprehensive efforts initiated with the Investment Plan are already delivering concrete results, despite the fact that macroeconomic effects of larger investment projects cannot be immediate. Investment is expected to pick up gradually throughout 2016 and 2017 although ithe pace is still timid and can be reversible, and remains below historicalpre-crisis levels. __________________ 3 COM(2014) 903 final. COM(2014) 903 final.
2017/02/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) That positive momentum should be maintained and efforts need to be continued to bring investment back to its long-term sustainable trend reaching the real economy. The mechanisms of the Investment Plan work and should be reinforced to continue the mobilisation of private investments in sectors important to Europe's future and where market failures or sub-optimal investment situations remain.
2017/02/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The extended EFSI should address remaining market failures and sub-optimal investment situations and continue to mobilise private sector financing in investments crucial for Europe’s future job creation – including for the youth –, growthsustainable growth and development and competitiveness with strengthened additionality. They include investments in the areas of energy, environment and climate action, social and human capital and related cross-cutting infrastructure, healthcare, research and innovation, cross- border and sustainable transport, as well as the digital transformation, areas which have the highest GDP economic multipliers in order to strengthen economic, social and territorial cohesion. In particular, the contribution of operations supported by the EFSI to achievinge the Union's ambitious targets set at the Paris Climate Conference (COP21) and by Europe 2020 Strategy, especially those that tackle unemployment and inequalities, should be reinforced. Energy interconnection priority projects and energy efficiency projects should also be increasingly targeted. In addition, EFSI support to motorways should be avoided, unless it is needed to support private investment in transport in cohesion countries or in cross-border transport projects involving at least one cohesion country. For reasons of clarity, although they are already eligible, it should be explicitly laid down that projects in the fields of agriculture, fishery and aquaculture, aquaculture and technologies related to security and defence industries, come within the general objectives eligible for EFSI support.
2017/02/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) In addition, it is appropriate to reinforce the social dimension of the EFSI implementation such as education, training and vocational training for skills and lifelong learning, innovation in healthcare and medicines, social services, social housing and childcare.
2017/02/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) In order to reinforce the take-up of the EFSI, particularly in European areas with high levels of unemployment and in less-developed and transition aregionas, the scope of the general objectives eligible for EFSI support should be enlarged.
2017/02/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) The initial results reveal that Member States with greater technical and administrative capacity as well as financial institutions are taking greater advantage of the EFSI. In order to enhance the capacity of some countries in taking advantage of the EFSI, the EIB and the Commission should work further to support those lagging behind.
2017/02/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) Major information campaigns in Member States must be put in place to strengthen dialogue with national and local authorities which would allow to increase private investment and avoid regional and sectorial concentration.
2017/02/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) With a view to enhancing the transparency of EFSI operations, the Investment Committee should explain in its decisions, which are made public and accessible, the reasons why it deems that an operation should be granted the EU guarantee, with particular focus on compliance with the additionality criterion. The scoreboard of indicators should be made public once an operation under the EU guarantee is signed. Particular attention should be given to job creation and social investment in people's current and future capacities to engage in the labour market, using clear socio- economic indicators.
2017/02/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) New figures and updates should be released regularly, including independent assessments drawing on the experience collected so far. Targets should be set in terms of objectives relating to growth and jobs.
2017/02/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The European Investment Advisory Hub (EIAH) should be enhanced and its activities should focus on needs not covered adequately under current arrangements. It should pay particular attention to supporting the preparation of projects involving two or more Member States and projects that contribute to achieving the objectives of COP21 and of Europe 2020 strategy. Notwithstanding its objective to build upon existing advisory services of the EIB and the Commission, so to act as a single technical advisory hub for project financing within the Union, the EIAH should also contribute actively to the objective of sectorial and geographical diversification of the EFSI and support the EIB where needed in originating projects. It should also actively contribute to the establishment of investment platforms and provide advice on the combination of other sources of Union funding with the EFSI.
2017/02/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point i a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – point f
(f) education and traiia) point (f) is replaced by the following: (f) labour market, education and training, vocational training for skills and lifelong learning;
2017/02/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point - a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point g – point i
(i) education and training-a) in paragraph 2, point (g) point (i) is replaced by the following: (i) labour market, education and training, vocational training for skills and lifelong learning ;
2017/02/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The EIB shall target that at least 40 % of EFSI financing under the infrastructure and innovation window supports projects with components that contribute to climate action and job creation, in line with the COP21 commitments and the Europe 2020 strategy. The Steering Board shall provide detailed guidance to that end.;
2017/02/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2016/0265(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Regulation (EU) No 99/2013
Annex I – point I – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 1
(-1) In Point 1.1, the first paragraph is replaced by the following: “The endorsement of the Europe 2020 strategy by the European Council of June 2010 has shaped to a large extent the strategic agenda for the European Union and national policies in the years ahead. That agenda establishes a number of headline targets and flagship initiatives for which statistical indicators have to be delivered by the ESS in a number of areas (i.e. improving the conditions for innovation, research and development, promoting employment, meeting Union climate change and energy objectives, resource efficiency, improving education levels, including learning mobility, active and healthy ageing, and promoting social inclusion through the reduction of poverty).” with a focus on vulnerable groups).” Or. en (http://eur- lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:039:0012:0029:EN:PDF)
2017/02/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2016/0265(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 99/2013
Annex I – point I – point 1 – point 1.1 – point 1.1.1 – paragraph 1
Provide high-quality reliable statistical information, which shouldmust be available in a timely manner for the European Semester, to monitor the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy. New indicators shall, to the extent possible, be based on available statistical data.
2017/02/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2016/0265(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b b (new)
Regulation (EU) 0099/2013
Annex I – point I – point 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.1 – paragraph 2 – new indent
(bb) In Objective 1.2.1., after the second paragraph, the following indent is inserted: - “ providing statistical input for efficiently monitoring the economic inequalities that hamper the economic growth”;
2017/02/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2016/0265(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point d a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 99/2013
Annex I – point I – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1
(da) in point 2.1., the first paragraph is replaced by the following: “The economic crisis has reinforced the need to have a set of high-quality macroeconomic indicators to better understand and analyse economic fluctuations, the evolution of the economic inequalities and their effects on society, and thereby facilitate the decision-making process. Increasingly globalised production makes it necessary to develop a consistent framework that facilitates the interpretation and integration of statistics from different domains.” Or. en (http://eur- lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:039:0012:0029:EN:PDF)
2017/02/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2016/0264(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) In the context of the Europe 2020 Strategy21 and the strengthening of economic governance, social indicators play an essential role in informing and supporting the Union’s key priorities for growth and job creation, gender equality, the reduction of poverty and social exclusion, skills, mobility and the digital economy. In particular, social indicators must provide a sound statistical basis for developing and monitoring the policies introduced by the Union to address those priorities. __________________ 21 Communication from the Commission - EUROPE 2020 A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth COM (2010) 2020 of 3 March 2010.
2017/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2016/0264(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) In shaping European Social Statistics due attention should be given to Article 10 TFEU. Therefore it is essential to ensure gender-segregated data collection to prevail, allowing for a solid factual basis to assess in how far equality has been achieved and discrimination has been tackled.
2017/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2016/0264(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) In line with the "Beyond GDP" initiative1a , it is important to complement GDP with high level indicators reflecting other dimensions such as quality of life including work-life balance, inclusion, well-being and social cohesion, highlighting the importance of ensuring that the relevant data can be segregated in order to identify, for example, gender- specific issues; __________________ 1a http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco /pdf/SWD_2013_303.pdf and http://ec.europa.eu/environment/beyond_ gdp/index_en.html
2017/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 136 #

2016/0264(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) The developments described above need to be gradually streamlined, and statistical legislation in the area of social statistics needs to be modernised, in order to ensure that the high quality social indicators are produced in a more integrated, flexible and efficient manner. At the same time, due consideration must be given to the needs of users, to the burden placed on respondents, to Member States resources, the reliability and accuracy of the methods used, technical feasibility of producing the statistics, the time within which they can be available and the reliability of the results. To achieve data of high quality, due consideration should be given to the reference manual "Developing Gender Statistics: a practical tool”, prepared by the UNECE Task Force on Gender Statistics Training for Statisticians with contributions from various experts1a. __________________ 1a http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/st ats/publications/Developing_Gender_Stati stics.pdf
2017/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2016/0264(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Data collections in the domains of time use and consumption are currently carried out voluntarily by many Member States, on the basis of agreed general guidelines. Research based on the Time Use Survey has shown its utmost importance in assessing among others gender equality in sharing work and care responsibilities. The gender dimension is also of high importance in the field of household consumption. Therefore, among others, gender equality as fundamental principle of the Union, provides for another reason to integrate those two surveys fully into the set of European Social Statistics. These two domains should be modernised, so as to take full advantage of new technological advances. Data collections in these two domains should be organized in accordance with this Regulation so as to open possibilities and create opportunities for further developments in the future, ensuring data that are more timely and relevant, and produced more efficiently. In the meantime, the Member States’ current approaches should not be changed.
2017/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2016/0264(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Due to their specificities, demographic statistics23 , population and housing censuses24 , business surveys and statistics based on mainly administrative sources are not covered by this Regulation and should be governed separately by specific frameworks adapted to their characteristics. Statistical data is essential to describe, assess and support the improvement of life and well-being of citizens, the economy and the environment. It is of utmost importance for Union policies to be embraced by citizens. Statistical data should in this sense further advance the fundamental principle of European citizenship including non-discrimination and gender equality. __________________ 23 Regulation (EU) No 1260/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on European demographic statistics (OJ L 330, 10.12.2013, p.39). 24 Regulation (EC) No 763/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 on population and housing censuses (OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 14).
2017/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) As the three so-called tripartite Agencies - Cedefop, the European Foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions (Eurofound) and the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) - address issues related to the labour market, working environment and vocational education and training and skills, close coordination among the three Agencies is required and the ways to enhance efficiency and synergies should be exploitso that the work of the Agencies does not overlap where they have similar fields of interest, ways to enhance efficiency and synergies should be exploited and any duplication among the Agencies or between them and the Commission concerning their mandates, objectives and activities should be avoided. In addition, where relevant, the Agency should seek to engage in efficient cooperation with the European Commission's in-house research capacities.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The provisions concerning Cedefop's staff set out in Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 should be aligned with the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘Staff Regulations’) and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (‘CEOS’), laid down by Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/687 . Given the updated remit of the Agency, it is necessary that adequate staff numbers are in place in order that the Agency may discharge its remit. __________________ 7 Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1).
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. In carrying out its tasks, the Agency shall maintain a close dialogue particularly with specialised bodies, whether public or private, national or international, public authorities and educational institutions and with workers' and employers’ organisations. The Agency, without prejudice to its own aims, shall ensure cooperation with other European Union Agencies aimed at avoiding overlaps and promoting synergy and complementarity in their activities, including the possibility of working jointly, in particular with the European Training Foundation, Eurofound and EU-OSHA.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) threewo members representing the Commission;
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) two independent experts representing the European Parliament;
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
All members referred to in points (a)-(da) shall have voting rights.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
The members referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) shall be appointed by the Council on the basis of lists of candidates submitted by the Member States, the European employers' and employees' organisations respectively. The European Parliament and the Commission shall appoint the members who are to represent ithem.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The members of the Management Board shall be appointed only after they have signed a declaration that they have no conflicts of interests.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. The term of office for members and their alternates shall be four years. That term shall be extendrenewable. Upon the expiry of their term of office or in the event of their resignation, members shall remain in office until their appointments are renewed or until they are replaced.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. A representative of Eurofound and a representative of EU-OSHA shall have observer status at the meetings of the Management Board in order to enhance the efficiency of the three tripartite agencies and synergies between them, and to avoid overlaps in their activities.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point n
(n) take all decisionsconfirm after their evaluation, the decisions of the Executive Director on the establishment of the Agency's internal structures and, where necessary, their modification, taking into consideration the Agency's activity needs as well as having regard to sound budgetary management;
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The Management Board may invite any person whose opinion may be of interest to attend its meetings as an observer, in particular Eurofound, EU- OSHA and the European Training Foundation, in order to avoid duplication and to promote synergies and complementarity.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. The Executive Board shall be composed of the Chairperson of the Management Board, the three Deputy Chairpersons, the coordinators of the three groups as referred to in Article 4(5) and, one representative of the European Parliament and one of the Commission. Each group referred to in Article 4 (5) may designate up to two alternates to attend the meetings of the Executive Board, in the absence of the full members. The Chairperson of the Management Board shall also be the Chairperson of the Executive Board. The Executive Director shall take part in the meetings of the Executive Board, but shall not have the right to vote.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. The term of office of members of the Executive Board shall be two years. That term shall be extendrenewable. The term of office of members of the Executive Board shall end when their membership of the Management Board ends.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6
6. The Executive Board shall meet at most three times a year. In addition, it shall meet on the initiative of its Chairperson or at the request of its members.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – point j a (new)
(ja) taking the decisions regarding the human resources policy of the Agency.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Given the updated remit of the Agency, it is necessary that adequate staff numbers are in place in order that the Agency may discharge its remit.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The Executive Director shall be appointed by the Management Board, from a list of candidates proposed by the Commission, following an open and transparent selection procedure which guarantees rigorous assessment of the candidates and a high degree of independence. Before his/her appointment, the candidate selected must attend a hearing of the competent European Parliament committee.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 145 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3
3. The translation services required for the functioning of the Agency shallmay be provided by the Translation Centre of the bodies of the European Union or other providers.
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 190 #

2016/0256(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3
3. The translation services required for the functioning of the Agency shallmay be provided by the Translation Centre of the bodies of the European Union or other providers.
2017/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 143 #

2016/0254(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3
3. The translation services required for the functioning of the Agency shallmay be provided by the Translation Centre of the bodies of the European Union or other providers.
2017/04/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2016/0222(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
(34) In order to promote the self- sufficiency of applicants and to limit wide discrepancies between Member States, it is essential to provide clear rules on the applicants’ access to the labour market and to ensure that such access is effective, by not imposing conditions that effectively hinder an applicant from seeking employment. Labour market tests used to give priority to nationals or to other Union citizens or to third-country nationals legally resident in the Member State concerned should not hinder effective access for applicants to the labour market and should be implemented without prejudice to the principle of preference for Union citizens as expressed in the relevant provisions of the applicable Acts of Accession , sector restrictions, working time restrictions and unduly strict administrative formalities should not hinder effective access for applicants to the labour market. In order to increase integration prospects and self- sufficiency of applicants, early access to the labour market before 6 months from the date when the application for international protection was lodged and to language courses should be encouraged.
2017/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2016/0222(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
(35) The maximum time frame for access to the labour market should be aligned with the duration of the examination procedure on the merits. In order to increase integration prospects and self-sufficiency of applicants, earlier access to the labour market is encouraged where the application is likely to be well- founded, including when its examination has been prioritised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No XXX/XXX [Procedures Regulation]. Member States should therefore consider reducing that time period as much as possible with a view to ensuring that applicants have access to the labour market no later than 3 months from the date when the application was lodged in cases where the application is likely to be well-founded. Member States should however not grant access to the labour market to applicants whose application for international protection is likely to be unfounded and for which an accelerated examination procedure is applied.deleted
2017/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2016/0222(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
(39) Due to the possibly temporary nature of the stay of applicants and without prejudice to Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Member States should be able to exclude family benefits and unemployment benefits from equal treatment between applicants and their own nationals and should be able to limit the application of equal treatment in relation to education and vocational training. The right to freedom of association and affiliation may also be limited by excluding applicants from taking part in the management of certain bodies and from holding a public office.deleted
2017/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2016/0222(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States are encouraged to provide language courses to applicants from the moment of application, in order to integrate them and enable them to capitalise fully on their formal qualification and thus contribute to society.
2017/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2016/0222(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Member States are encouraged to provide adequate training on employment legislation and non-discrimination to applicants and to authorities, in order to avoid exploitation in the workplace by means of undeclared work practices and other forms of severe labour exploitation, and to avoid discrimination from the date when the application for international protection was lodged.
2017/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2016/0222(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) education and vocational training, except study and maintenance grants and loans or other grants and loans related to education and vocational training;
2017/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2016/0222(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in the context of existing procedures for recognition of foreign qualifications, with a view to ensure consistency with other Union policy on migration management, in accordance with Article 32 of Regulation (EU) xx/xx (qualification Regulation)1a , while facilitating, to the extent possible, full access for those applicants who cannot provide documentary evidence of their qualifications to appropriate schemes for the assessment, validation and accreditation of their prior learning. __________________ 1aProposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection and for the content of the protection granted and amending Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents
2017/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 149 #

2016/0222(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3 –subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Member States may restrict equal treatment of applicants: in certain specific situations. However, restrictions should be consistent with the provisions of international law and other Union policy on better migration management as set out by the Commission in the European Agenda on Migration.
2017/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2016/0222(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point ii
(ii) pursuant to point (c) of this paragraph, to education and vocational training which is directly linked to a specific employment activity;deleted
2017/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 437 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a a (new)
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 3 - point c a (new)
(aa) The following point is inserted: ‘(ca) 'if a media service provider has its head office in a Member State but provides a media service where the majority of audiovisual commercial communications on said service are directed towards the territory of another Member State then the media service in question shall be deemed to be established in the targeted Member State. The target territory of audiovisual commercial communications may be determined by language, any specificities of any licence held by the media service or media service provider, the source of revenue from such communications or any other appropriate means. Disputes between Member States under this provision shall be dealt with under paragraphs 5b & 5c of this Article.’
2016/10/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 441 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 5 a
5a. Member States shall communicate to the Commission a list of the audiovisual media service providers under their jurisdiction and the criteria set out in paragraphs 2 to 5 on which their jurisdiction is based. This list shall include information regarding the Member State or non-Union territory targeted by individual audiovisual media service providers or audiovisual media services and the languages in which these services are provided. They shall subsequently inform the Commission without undue delay of any changes to that list. The Commission shall ensure that the competent independent regulatory authorities have access to this information.
2016/10/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 450 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 5 b
5b. Where, in applying Articles 3 and 4 of this Directive, the Member States concerned do not agree on which Member State has jurisdiction, they shall bring the matter to the Commission's attention without undue delay. The Commission may request the European Regulators Group for Audiovisual Media Services (ERGA) to provide an opinion on the matter within 15 working days from submission of the Commission's request. If the Commission requests an opinion from ERGA, the time-limits set out in Articles 3(5) and 4(5) shall be suspended until ERGA has adopted an opinion.
2016/10/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 457 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b a (new)
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 5 b a (new)
(ba) The following paragraph is inserted: ‘5ba. The Commission shall decide, within one month following the notification referred to in paragraph 5b or the opinion provided by ERGA, on said notification.’
2016/10/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 566 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2010/13/EU
Chapter III
PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TONLY TO ON-DEMAND AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA SERVICES AND PROVISIONS RELATING TO LEVIES ON AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA SERVICE PROVIDERS;
2016/10/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 740 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may require providers of on-demand audiovisual media services under their jurisdiction to contribute financially to the production of European works, including via direct investment in content and contributions to national funds. Member States may require providers of on-demand audiovisual media services, targeting audiences in their territories, but established in other Member States to make such financial contributions. In this case, the financial contribution shall be based only on the revenues earned in the targeted Member States. If the Member State where the provider is established imposes a financial contribution, it shall take into account any financial contributions imposed by targeted Member States. Furthermore, Member States may not impose a levy on an ancillary on- demand audiovisual media service if it has already imposed a levy on the corresponding broadcasting service. Any financial contribution shall comply with Union law, in particular with State aid rules.
2016/10/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 755 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 13 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall waive the requirements laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2 for providers with a low turnover or low audience or if they are small and micro enterprises. Member States may also waive such requirements in cases where they would be impracticable or unjustified by reason of the nature or theme of the on- demand audiovisual media services.
2016/10/27
Committee: CULT
Amendment 49 #

2016/0107(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) The European Parliament in its resolution of 16 December 2015 on bringing transparency, coordination and convergence to corporate tax policies in the Union18 acknowledged that increased transparency in the area of corporate taxation can improve tax collection, make the work of tax authorities more efficient and, ensure increased public trust and confidence in tax systems and governments and improve investment decision-making based on more accurate risk profiles of companies. __________________ 18 2015/2010(INL)
2017/03/21
Committee: ECONJURI
Amendment 73 #

2016/0107(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Enhanced transparency and public scrutiny of corporate income taxes borne by multinational undertakings carrying out activities in the Union is an essential element to further foster corporate responsibility, to contribute to the welfare through taxes, to promote fairer tax competition within the Union through a better informed public debate and to restore public trust in the fairness of the national tax systems. Such public scrutiny can be achieved by means of a report on income tax information, irrespective of where the ultimate parent undertaking of the multinational group is established.
2017/03/21
Committee: ECONJURI
Amendment 99 #

2016/0107(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) To ensure that cases of non- compliance are disclosed to the public, statutory auditor(s) or audit firm(s) should check whether the report on income tax information has been submitted and presented in accordance with the requirements of this Directive and made accessible on the relevant undertaking’s website or on the website of an affiliated undertaking. Cases of infringements by undertakings and branches to the reporting on income tax information, giving rise to penalties by Member States, in conformity with Article 51 of Directive 2013/34/EU, should be reported in a public registry managed by the European Commission.
2017/03/21
Committee: ECONJURI
Amendment 125 #

2016/0107(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2013/34/EU
Chapter 10 a – Article 48 b – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The report on income tax information shall be published in a common template available in an open data format and made accessible to the public on the website of the undertaking on the date of its publication in at least one of the official languages of the Union. On the same date, the undertaking shall also file the report in a public registry managed by the European Commission.
2017/03/21
Committee: ECONJURI
Amendment 143 #

2016/0107(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2013/34/EU
Chapter 10 a – Article 48 b – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The report on income tax information shall be published in a common template available in an open data format and made accessible to the public on the date of its publication on the website of the subsidiary undertaking or on the website of an affiliated undertaking in at least one of the official languages of the Union. On the same date, the undertaking shall also file the report in a public registry managed by the European Commission.
2017/03/21
Committee: ECONJURI
Amendment 150 #

2016/0107(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2013/34/EU
Chapter 10 a – Article 48 b – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
The report on income tax information shall be published in a common template available in an open data format and made accessible to the public on the date of its publication on the website of the branch or on the website of an affiliated undertaking in at least one of the official languages of the Union. On the same date, the undertaking shall also file the report in a public registry managed by the European Commission.
2017/03/21
Committee: ECONJURI
Amendment 171 #

2016/0107(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2013/34/EU
Chapter 10 a – Article 48 c – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) names of undertakings, a brief description of the nature of the activities and geographical location;
2017/03/21
Committee: ECONJURI
Amendment 175 #

2016/0107(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2013/34/EU
Chapter 10 a – Article 48 c – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the number of employeeworked man-hours;
2017/03/21
Committee: ECONJURI
Amendment 184 #

2016/0107(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2013/34/EU
Chapter 10 a – Article 48 c – paragraph 2 – point b c (new)
(bc) value of tangible assets other than cash or cash equivalents, and annual cost of maintaining those assets;
2017/03/21
Committee: ECONJURI
Amendment 194 #

2016/0107(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2013/34/EU
Chapter 10 a – Article 48 c – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) the amount of income tax paid which is the amount of income tax paid during the relevant financial year by undertakings and branches resident for tax purposes in the relevant tax jurisdiction; and
2017/03/21
Committee: ECONJURI
Amendment 195 #

2016/0107(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2013/34/EU
Chapter 10 a – Article 48 c – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(fa) stated capital;
2017/03/21
Committee: ECONJURI
Amendment 234 #

2016/0107(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2013/34/EU
Chapter 10 a – Article 48 c – paragraph 5
5. The report on income tax information shall be published in a common template available in an open data format and made accessible on the website in at least one of the official languages of the Union. On the same date, the undertaking shall also file the report in a public registry managed by the European Commission.
2017/03/21
Committee: ECONJURI
Amendment 260 #

2016/0107(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2013/34/EU
Chapter 10 a – Article 48 i – paragraph 1
The Commission shall report on the compliance with and the impact of the reporting obligations set out in Articles 48a to 48f. The report shall include an evaluation of whether the report on income tax information delivers appropriate and proportionate results, and assess cost- benefits of lowering the consolidated net turnover threshold beyond which undertakings and branches are required to report on income tax information as well as evaluating the possible necessity to take further complementary measures, taking into account the need to ensure a sufficient level of transparency and, the need for preserving and ensuring a competitive environment for undertakings and private investment.
2017/03/21
Committee: ECONJURI
Amendment 265 #

2016/0107(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2013/34/EU
Chapter 10 a – Article 48 i a (new)
Article 48ia Common template for the report The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, lay down the common template to which Article 48b(1), (3), (4) and (6) and Article 48c(5) refer. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 50(2).
2017/03/21
Committee: ECONJURI
Amendment 268 #

2016/0107(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Directive 2013/34/EU
Article 51 – paragraph 1
Member States shall provide for penalties app(3a) in Article 51, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: Member States shall ensure that undertakings are held licable tofor the infringements of the national provisions adopted in accordance with this Directive and shall take all the measures necessary to ensure that thosepursuant to this Directive. Without prejudice to the right of the Member States to impose criminal penalties, Member States shall designate or establish competent authorities to adopt appropriate administrative measures and impose administrative penalties for the infringement by undertakings of national provisions adopted for the purpose of transposing this Directive. Member States shall ensure that those administrative measures and penalties are applied and enforced. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.’ administrative measures and penalties shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Member States shall provide the Commission with the names and other details of the competent authorities responsible for adopting and imposing administrative measures and penalties pursuant to the second paragraph. The competent authorities shall submit an annual report to the Commission on their activity in monitoring the application of this Directive.’ Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?qid=1489418875325&uri=CELEX:32013L0034)
2017/03/21
Committee: ECONJURI
Amendment 46 #

2016/0050(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) With a view to contributing to the mobility of persons involved in the operation of vessels across the Union and considering that all certificates of qualification, service record books and logbooks issued in accordance with this Directive should comply with minimumthe required standards, Member States should recognise the professional qualifications certified in accordance with this Directive. Consequently the holders of such qualifications should be able to exercise their profession on all Union inland waterways.
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2016/0050(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) Member States should issue certificates of qualification only to persons that have the minimumrequired levels of competence, the minimum age, the minimum medical fitness and the navigation time required for obtaining a specific qualification.
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2016/0050(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) To safeguard the mutual recognition of qualifications, the certificates of qualification should be based on the competences necessary for the operation of vessels. Member States should ensure that persons receiving certificates of qualification have the corresponding minimumrequired levels of competence, verified following an appropriate assessment. Such assessments may take the form of an administrative examination or may form part of approved training programmes carried out in accordance with common standards in order to ensure a comparable minimum level of competence in all Member States for various qualifications.
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2016/0050(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) Approval of training programmes is necessary to verify that the programmes comply with common minimum requirements regarding content and organisation. Such compliance allows for eliminating unnecessary barriers to entering the profession by preventing those who have already acquired the necessary skills during their vocational training from passing unnecessary additional examination. The existence of approved training programmes may also facilitate the entry of workers with prior experience from other sectors into the profession of inland navigation as they may benefit from dedicated training programmes that take account of their already acquired competences.
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2016/0050(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) In order to provide minimumthe required harmonised standards for the certification of qualifications and to facilitate the exchange of information between Member States and the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of this Directive by the Commission, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission as regards the setting of standards of competence, standards for medical fitness, standards for practical examinations, standards for the approval of simulators and standards defining the characteristics and conditions of use for a database kept by the Commission to host a copy of key data related to Union certificates of qualifications, service record books, logbooks and recognised documents. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2016/0050(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. When necessary for ensuring safety of navigation, Member States mayshall identify stretches of inland waterways with specific risks, except for inland waterways of a maritime character referred to in Article 7, where such risks are due to:
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2016/0050(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) that they meet the minimum requirements laid down in Annex I on age, required competence, administrative compliance and navigation time corresponding to the qualification applied for;
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2016/0050(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) that they meet the minimum requirements laid down in Annex I on age, required competence, administrative compliance and navigation time corresponding to the specific authorisation applied for.
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2016/0050(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) an examination verifying compliance with the standards of competence referred to in Article 15(1) is carried out by qualified independent examiners.
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2016/0050(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Member States thatving identifyied inland waterways stretches with specific risks in the meaning of Article 8(1), shall define the additional competence required from boatmasters navigating on these stretches and the means to prove that such requirements are met.
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2016/0050(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 3
3. On reaching the age of 605, the holder of a Union certificate of qualification shall successfully complete a medical fitness examination in the three months thereafter and shall subsequently successfully complete this examination every five years thereafter. On reaching the age of 70, the holder shall successfully complete this examination every two years thereafter.
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2016/0043(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
(2) The "Europe 2020 Strategy" proposed by the Commission enables the Union to turn its economy towards smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, accompanied by a high level of employment, productivity and social cohesion. Five headline targets, listed under the relevant guidelines, constitute shared objectives which guide the action of the Member States, and take into account their relative starting positions and national circumstances as well as the positions and circumstances of the Union. The European Employment Strategy has the leading role in the implementation of the employment and labour market objectives of the new strategy. The European Parliament stresses however that Member States have made little progress towards achieving the EU 2020 targets, especially those targets relating to employment, social exclusion and poverty. It underlines that very significant efforts must be made by Member States in this regard and that the achievement of the EU 2020 strategy in the employment and social area must remain a key objective of Member States' employment policy.
2016/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2016/0043(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) The European Parliament regrets that the Council did not take its position into account on Council decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States for 2015; it stresses that Parliament´s position should be taken into consideration;
2016/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2016/0043(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
(4) The examination of the Member States' National Reform Programmes contained in the Joint Employment Report shows that Member States should continue to make every effort to address the priority areas of increasing labour market participation and reducing structural unemployment, developing a skilled workforce responding to labour market needs and promoting job qualitydecent jobs and lifelong learning, improve the performance of education and training systems at all levels and increasing participation in tertiary education, promoting social inclusion and combating poverty, particularly child poverty.
2016/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that barriers to doing business across borders are barriers to growth and job creation; believes that particular attention must be devoted to reduce administrative burdens through for example simplified VAT-requirements, one-stop-shops for digital public services for businesses with a particular focus for SME's and simplified rules for setting up businesses;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the deepening of the single market and the digital single market will bring new opportunities and challenges, such as skills, new forms of employment and financial structures, which will have to be addressed; notes with concern that 47 % of the EU-population is insufficiently digitally skilled and that the demand for digitally skilled employees are growing by 4 % per year, underlines in this regard the importance of Member States investing in digital education;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the potential of the collaborative economy for job creation and a more inclusive labour market across Member States; believes that a country-by-country taxation principle needs to be establishednotes the need to adapt and modernise legislation to reach the potential of the shared economy;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the Commission’s support for dual education systems; stresses the importance of ensuring that the SMS does not in any way undermine dual education systems; believes that dual education systems within the EU could be strengthened by a European benchmark on dual education which could highlight the correlation between dual education and youth employment;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Regrets that the services market remains fragmented; calls on the Commission to deliver the necessary reforms that will remove barriers in the service secton implementation of the Services Directive; underlines that assessments show that when administrative barriers are lower, more by adopting a targeted sector-specific approach for servicesusinesses are created and thereby is the potential for job-creation strengthened;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2015/2354(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to work with the Member States to simplify and speed up procedures for the recognition of professional qualifications, including by facilitating and encouraging the introduction of Common Training Frameworks and a Services Passport to facilitate cross-border recognition of qualifications;
2016/02/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that the employment rate in the EU currently stands at 69.2 %, which is well below the Europe 2020 target, and calls for increased public and private investment in job creation and skills;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. INotes that the entire envelope earmarked for the Youth Employment Initiative was frontloaded in 2014-2015 and that the figures available indicate full absorption to date; insists on the continuation of the Youth Employment Initiative and calls for the resources for this initiative to be provided until 2020;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the Court of Auditors’ report on ‘EU Youth Guarantee - Implementation in Member States’, due to be completed at the beginning of 2017, will provide a clearer assessment of the programme’s results; considers that, inter alia, analysis of the efficiency and the long-term results should be outlined in the report;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Notes the persistently high levels of youth unemployment in many Member States; calls on Member States to make use of the possibility to include NEETs in EGF applications where relevant and to promote entrepreneurship among young people as a mechanism to encourage job creation;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises that the policies for poverty reduction and social inclusion among vulnerable groups have failed to produce the expected results and calls for increased financial aid to social services and the social economympact assessments and value for money analysis to find the reasons for this failure; calls on the Commission and Member States to promote and support the social economy and calls on Member States to ensure the provision of adequate social services;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Draws attention to the huge problem of child poverty in Europe, which is afflicting over 20 million children, and reiterates its call for the establishment of a Child Guarantee with dedicated special resources, together with; notes that between 2008 and 2014 24 EU countries saw an increase in child poverty; emphasises the need for a strong focus on alleviating child poverty in all relevant ESF programmes and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived along with targeted interventions and programmes to assist parents in getting out of social exclusion and unemployment;
2016/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes the impact of the second cycle of the Youth Strategy (2013-2015) in providing a flexible framework for cross- sectoral involvement; values the structured dialogue with youth organisations in this regard; reminds of the eight fields of action promoted by the Youth Strategy;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the importance of the Youth Strategy, given the EU’s alarmingly's high youth unemployment and NEET rates; stresses that the next cycle (2016-2018) should contribute to the two objectives of the Youth Strategy by focusing on tackling youth unemployment, fostering entrepreneurship among young people, investing in education, and training andfor the skills employers look for, and facilitating the transition to the labour market;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that there has been a decrease in youth unemployment in most Member States since 2013, despite this fact, notes with real concern that youth unemployment continues to be almost double the overall unemployment rate with around 8 million young Europeans still being unemployed;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to combat early school-leaving by adequately informing students about future labour market opportunities and qualitative apprenticeshipcareer paths, including apprenticeships, technical and artisanal job profiles;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Believes that Member States youth policies should be closely coordinated with other policies and that more synergies should be found; further recommends to enhance the cooperation between schools, businesses, public authorities and other labour market stakeholders to estimate the future skills needs to pre-empt skills ' mismatch and to facilitate the process whereby young people choose jobs profiles that actually match the needs of the labour market;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underscores the importance of recognising competencies acquired in non- formal environments; calls on the Member States to ensure the coherent validation of formal, non-formal and informal learning with a view to bridging the gap between the skills shortages and skills´ mismatch observed in the European labour market and the many young job seekers;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that employment and entrepreneurship constitute one of the eight priorities identified in the EU Youth Report (2010-2018); stresses that youth work and non-formal learning play a vital role in developing young people’s's creative and innovative potential, including entrepreneurial skills;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Member States to implement fully the Erasmus+ programme, thereby fostering further cross-border career and labour mobility; expresses concern that the mobility of apprentices has not yet achieved the desired levels and calls on the Commission, the Member States, companies and schools to find solutions to overcome the remaining obstacles to the mobility of apprentices;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Member States to implement fully the Youth Guarantee, by integrating young people into the labour market with a job, apprenticeship or traineeship within 4 months of leaving school or losing a job and for example by putting in place career guidance systems and compulsory registration forimproving the data available about the unemployed in order to gain a picture of the real situation as regards youth unemployment. as well as improving the services of job centres for young jobseekers;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Member States to implement fully the Youth Guarantee, including for young persons with disabilities, for example by putting in place career guidance systems and compulsory registration for the unemployed in order to gain a picture of the real situation as regards youth unemployment.
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the fact that more than EUR 12.4 billion from the European Social Fund (ESF) and the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) have been earmarked for the fight against youth unemployment during the new programming period; calls for the assessment of the results and objectives achieved via such funding;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Notes that the Court of Auditors' report on 'EU Youth Guarantee - Implementation in Member States', due to be completed at the beginning of 2017, will provide a clearer assessment of the programme's results; considers that, inter alia, analysis of the efficiency and the long-term results should be outlined in the report;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2015/2349(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the flexibility and ease of entry inherent in the collaborative economy can provide employment opportunities for groups traditionally excluded from the labour market in particular women, young people and migrants;
2016/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2015/2349(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the need for a proportionate regulatory environment that encourages investment and access to financing, and fosters sustainable growth and qualitydecent jobs within small transport businesses;
2016/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2015/2349(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. In this regard encourages Member States to establish minimum thresholds to differentiate between economic activity which can be considered non-professional peer-to-peer activity and professional service provision;
2016/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2015/2349(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recommends that collaborative economy businesses consider the possibility of creating representative bodies across all sectors at national level to represent their shared interests and those of their consumers for example in the area of insurance;
2016/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2015/2349(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Is concerned about the rise of precarious employment, bogus self- employment, undeclared work and social dumping; calls on the Member States to guarantee fair competition and ensure decent working conditions and the highest possiblan adequate level of social protection for all workers; believes that the collaborative economy via recorded electronic transactions etc. can help Member States to combat such practices;
2016/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2015/2349(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Is concerned about the misuse of subcontracting in the transport sector to circumvent working and employment standards; calls on the Commission and the Member States to introduce and strengthen laws on joint and several liability;
2016/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2015/2345(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Acknowledges the vital role performed by many NGOs in society through advocating and promoting their policy objectives and contributing to the public debate on important social issues including by carrying out public awareness campaigns, research and data collection, mobilising their memberships to deliver better services and providing resources and expertise for policy makers at the European and Member State level;
2016/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2015/2345(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that EU programmes such as the EaSI, ESF and FEAD cannot be fully implemented without NGO involvement and therefore it is important to develop genuine partnerships between the Commission, Member States and NGOs to help deliver EU policies particularly in the area of social inclusion;
2016/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2015/2345(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out that social NGOs contribute to the social policy priorities set by the EU and that for some of these priorities the Commission can help to ensure progress by adequately funding those NGOs working in this area at a European level;
2016/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2015/2345(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that manysome NGOs have difficulties in accessing ESF funding and are disproportionately burdened by the complexity of programmes and reporting requirements; calls on the Commission and Member States to step up support in this area and make every effort to reduce the bureaucratic burden, particularly for smaller NGOs;
2016/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2015/2345(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that most EU funds available for social NGOs require co-financing, and too high a share can be detrimental to the applicant NGO which may not be able to raise this amount; notes some NGOs report that there are inconsistencies in the way co-financing levels are applied to various social NGOs;
2016/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2015/2345(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Points out that in the social field full policy impact is difficult to identify and measure within one year; calls on the Commission to better balance the measuring and reporting of output and impact and ensure that assessments are designed to evaluate and reflect the real added value of NGOs;
2016/04/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2015/2344(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that the success of the eEurozone is dependent on increasing the welfare of all its citizens, and on well- functioning labour markets and welfare systems, based on decent work with rights, a strong role for the social partners, social dialogue, collective bargaining and collective agreements, and preventing individual Member States from tryingboosting economic growth and job creation, on aiming to full employment with permanent increase of high added value jobs; recalls the creation as quick as possible of an European Labour market, as a frame, with full and fair mobility which should complement the EMU, increasing its shock absorbing capacity and give citizens the opportunity to seek employment or employees in other Member States allowing more individuals to gafind an unfair competitive advantage by infr decent job; takes note that a strong role of social partners, fair bargainging workers’ rights or promoting social dumping, negotiations and agreements should also be allowed by the budgetary capacity;
2016/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2015/2344(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Regrets the low proportion of the budget in relation to the EU GDP which prevents too much a more efficient policy towards employment and labour markets;
2016/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2015/2344(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that economic convergence within the Eurozone is essential to reach more efficient labour markets in the Union, therefore the Eurozone Member States' specific economic and labour market features should be taken into account when setting down the budgetary capacity; points out that large concentrations of unemployment in certain regions in the Eurozone harm the European economy and distort labour markets; underlines that convergence should also be achieved through reduction of disequilibria induced by high public surpluses;
2016/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2015/2344(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Asks the Member States to respect and promote the autonomy of collective bargaining on wages and working conditions, and to restore balance with the economic governance pillar by urgently moving ahead on the social dimensionin line with Member States' practices and laws and to always take into account the social dimension when improving economic governance;
2016/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2015/2344(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the importance of not linking any unemployment benefit system with economic conditionality for the Member Sfinancing policies to achieve better social cohesion and full employment, to reduce structural unemployment, to erase poverty, to fight economic inequalities that hamper economic growth, to strengthen the welfare states, and of promoting social policies which fight poverty, social exclusion and social dumpingto help attain all the social objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy;
2016/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2015/2344(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the importance of reducing unemployment and generating high-skilled employment supporting industries that require high levels of human capital, stimulating high technological sectors and fostering research, development and innovation and, simultaneously, to alleviate in the short term the situation of the excluded nonqualified young unemployed;
2016/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
C a. Whereas there are approximately 2 million unfilled vacancies in the EU, of which almost 900.000 are in the digital sector, which hampers economic growth and job-creation; whereas in 2012 one in three Europeans were either over- or under-qualified for their job; whereas this mis-match negatively affects growth;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to foster, at Member State level, forms of cooperation involving governments, enterprises, educational institutions and social partners in accordance with national customs and traditions, with a view to adapting Member States' education and training systems to combat skills mis-matches and meeting the needs of the labour market;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2015/2327(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that Erasmus+ is one of the key drivers ofmakes an important contribution to growth, employment, competitiveness and social cohesion in that it contributes to improving European education and training systems and employability, and provides many Europeans with an opportunity to acquire transversal and transferable sets of skills and competences via studies, training and work experience abroad;
2016/10/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2015/2327(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Highlights that one of the main end results of Erasmus+ should be closing the skills gap and increasing employability; in this context, outlines that, when measuring the programme's efficiency and success, these indicators should be taken into account;
2016/10/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2015/2327(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the fact that vocational education and training (VET) and VET mobility play a vital economic and social role in Europe as a mechanism leading to equal opportunities for all citizens, including those from socially disadvantaged groups, unemployed young people, migrants and women, who are all under-represented in VET; calls on the Commission and the Member States to position VET as a choice which leads to a promising career, make it accessible to all, including for persons with a disability, to ensure gender balance and non- discrimination, encourage take up among these groups, and guarantee that it is adequately funded;
2016/10/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2015/2327(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Encourages the National Agencies, besides managing the top-down implementation of the Erasmus+ programme, also to focus on setting up a forum for constructive dialogue between the authorities in charge with education and labour policies in each Member State, in order to enhance the cooperation aiming to close the skills gap; considers that this undertaking and the data it would gather may be essential during the mid-term evaluation of Erasmus+;
2016/10/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2015/2327(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that, despite clear improvements in recognition and validation systems in education and VET, problems still persist; calls for specific targets such as the implementation of a fully operational credit transfer system and recognition, and for validation of competences acquired through non-formal and informal learning.; outlines that the European Voluntary Service (EVS) aims to increase skills and encourage learning, therefore considers that this experience should be recognised for its value with the aim of raising the employability of the EVS participants;
2016/10/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2015/2327(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Taking into account the importance of multilingualism in raising the employability of young people1a , considers that more efforts should be made to promote and support multilingualism in the Erasmus+ programme; __________________ 1aJRC Science and Policy Report on Languages and Employability, 2015
2016/10/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. calls on the Commission to dedicate, for each directorate-general, a webpage listing the Member States not having transposed directives or not complying with decisions and regulations; considers it should be updated on a monthly basis and should detail which directives have not been transposed and/or which decisions and regulations have not been complied with;
2016/03/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 13 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. considers that the Commission should more actively tackle cases of improperly transposed directives, as it may cover cases of both involuntary and of voluntary action by Member States;
2016/03/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 14 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. considers it the duty of the Commission to oppose the two legislative branches of decision making at the European level leaving substantive elements to be decided through delegated acts/implementing acts during the co- decision process, due to the legal uncertainties and potential risks, dangers and complications which could result;
2016/03/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 15 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. expresses concern that the settlement concluded with the UK on February 19 2016 has been concluded outside of the EU treaty framework which could create legal uncertainties; underlines the importance of the Court of Justice in its enforcement control as well as its sovereign power;
2016/03/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 5 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 10 September 2015 on creating a competitive EU labour market for the 21st century: matching skills and qualifications with demand and job opportunities, as a way to recover from the crisis;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that in order to ensure better conditions for job creation for the SME sector Member States must address the following problems, which are unequally present in different Members States and different regions: skills scarcity and brain drain; skills mismatch, insufficient dialogue between labour market stakeholders and estimation of future skills´ needs, regulatory burdens and regulatory uncertainty; the shadow economy; and the de facto privileged position of multinational corporations (MNCs)s well as high taxation on labour;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Recalls that almost 99 % of the European companies are SMEs being therefore the backbone of the EU economy;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that high labour costs have an negative impact on SMEs' job creation potential and competitiveness; to this end, stresses that the tax burden should be shifted away from labour to other sources of taxation that are less detrimental to employment and growth, while protecting adequate social protection;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Believes that promoting digitalisation in public sector (e- government) and increasing broadband availability in remote areas would reduce establishing and operating costs to SMEs, therefore enabling them to further increase job creating potential;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Highlights the growing significance of self-employment, both as a form of economic activity and as a stepping stone to business creation;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses, however that lowering labour costs by reducing workers' protection ishould not abe correctnsidered as means of achieving lower unemployment, and that, in addition, reducing workers' pay and rights could induces higher skills outflows, and exposinge SMEs to shortages of skilled workers;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Underlines the need for targeted incentives for start-ups, SMEs, micro- enterprises in order to facilitate their establishment and operation, as well as the necessity to facilitate the hiring of qualified labour force and training of employees;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that traineeship and apprenticeship schemes within SMEs should be promoted by Member States, including through financial incentives; recalls that SMEs have very specific skills 'needs;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 169 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Encourages the Member States, regional governments and educational institutions to create opportunities for young people to acquire entrepreneurship skills; also stresses the importance of mentoring for young entrepreneurs;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the 'Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs' programme, which helps provide aspiring European entrepreneurs with the skills necessary to start and/or successfully run a small business; and believes that such programmes should be further promoted in order to help more young people become established and succeed;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 182 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on Member States to adopt favourable legislative frameworks for young graduatespeople who are employed by an SME or are starting up an enterprise; believes that such frameworks should also include promotion of work placements programmes for students so they could get their first practical experience in an SME;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 198 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Stable and favourable regulatory environment
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 219 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Member States to review the rules affecting SMEs and to introduce measures based on the ‘Think Small First’ principle, in order to remove the bureaucratic obstacles with which SMEs are confronted and achieve a high level of regulatory certainty, transparency and proportionality as a precondition for job stability and full job creation potential;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 229 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Takes the view that a stable and favourable regulatory environment is an essential prerequisite for job perennity and job creation in SMEs; considers that this regulatory certainty must encompass, among other elements, contract law and fiscal and social regulation, as well as tax rulings and also legal certainty and procedural effectiveness;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 242 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider that SMEs face specific obstacles and should therefore be exempted from excessively burdensome administrative procedurethe impact of administrative requirements is felt disproportionately by SMEs and that measures such as exemptions should therefore be systematically considered to minimize such requirements, while always ensuring that they provide their employees with the necessaryir employees receive adequate health and safety standardsprotection;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 268 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Member StatHighlights the fact that three out of four SMEs do not trade beyond their national borders and the need to facilitate access to remove thethe EU Single Market by removing remaining administrative barriers; with a view to facilitating market access for micro-enterprises and SMEs from other Member Stateelcomes the strong focus on SMEs in the 2015 Single Market Strategy and urges the Commission and Member States to follow up on the positive initiatives with specific measures that are tangible to small traders;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 280 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Member States to adopt favourable legislative frameworks for newly- created SMEs, focusing in particular on incentive measures aimed at tackling the shadow economybelieves that among other initiatives, the Start-up Initiative announced in the Commission's Single Market Strategy will provide a constructive framework for such improvements;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 299 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Notes that in some cases EU competition policy could results in privileging that mostly benefits big market operators that are characterised by greater economic efficiencyes of scale than SMEs; stresses in this regard the need for specific measures for SMEs in order to curb their market diseconomies, thus enabling their internationalisation and boosting their job creation potential;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 323 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Notes that in regions where economic development is focused on attracting foreign direct investment (FDI), MNCs arecould be in some cases treated preferentially in both legislative and tax matters; believes that these practices should be examined with a view to ensuring a level playing field for SMEs and restorenhancing their employment creation capacitiesy;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 329 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Notes that a reduced regulatory burden, better regulation and improvement of law enforcement can contribute to tackling the issues of the shadow economy and tax avoidance, as the attractiveness of such ‘exits’ from'bypassing' of the regulatory systems would be substantially reduced;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 347 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28 a. Underlines the importance of a robust SME Chapter in the future TTIP agreement in order to ensure that structures, processes and rules are established that facilitate SMEs' capacity for transatlantic trade and enhances their capacity to create jobs;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 351 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Notes the opportunities offered by the Digital Single Market to generate growth and jobs, notably in the field of e- commerce; stresses, however, the need for an SME-focused evaluation of the potential risks and benefitbenefits and risks in different Member States;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 355 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Welcomes the presence of information portals aimed specifically at SMEs, such as the 'Access to Finance Portal' on Your Europe, and calls on the Commission to continue with them and improve their functionality; highlights in particular the importance of delivering effectively the new Single Digital Gateway announced in the Single Market Strategy as an online access point to all Single- Market related information and services;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the ex-post evaluation of the EGF and the first biennial report; notes that the Commission complies with its reporting obligation; considers that these and other reports contribute to the transparency and efficiency of the EGF; believes in this regard that the Commission could make public their internal mission reports following monitoring visits to ongoing applications in Member States;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Further notes that currently there is no obligation on Member States to make public their applications and final reports under the current Regulation although this can be done voluntarily; strongly encourages all Member States to make these documents publicly available in a timely manner in the interest of greater transparency;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes the conclusion of the Court of Auditors with regard to the lengthy EGF approval procedure; expects that the more timely procedure introduced in the current regulation has improved the situation; strongly recommends that all Member States start implementing the measures as soon as their applications are sent to the Commission, and is pleased that many Member States already do so; emphasises the vital importance of timely intervention by Member States in order to ensure a maximum beneficiary reach rate;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to promote awareness of the EGF to workers and their representatives and to do so in a timely manner in order to ensure that the maximum number of potential beneficiaries can be reached and gain from EGF measures;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that the average share of beneficiaries aged 55 or over was 15 % and of beneficiaries aged 15-24 was 5 %; welcomes therefore the emphasis in the new regulation on older and younger workers and the inclusion of NEETs in certain applications; strongly believes that the derogation for the inclusion of NEETs should be continued to the end of the programming period in December 2020;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Considers that the inclusion of NEETs in EGF applications often requires different types of interventions and believes that all actors, including the social partners and local community groups, should be called upon to promote the measures necessary to ensure the inclusion of NEETs; further calls for dedicated and sustained support to ensure NEETs´ completion of the EGF programme;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Regrets the fact that one third of EGF funding compensates national workers’ income support schemes with no EU added value; notes the restriction in the current regulation where such costs are capped at 35 % and believes that this cap should be lowered;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls on Member States, in line with Article 7 of the current Regulation, to anticipate future labour market needs and required skills and thereby gear the design of the co-ordinated package of personalised services towards a resource- efficient and sustainable economy;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 150 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Welcomes the efforts of several Member States to increase the use of measures supporting entrepreneurship and the social economy, in the form of start-up grants and measures aimed towards promoting entrepreneurship and social cooperatives and services for new entrepreneurs;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2015/2284(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Emphasises the need to streamline audit procedures at national level so as to ensure coherence and efficiency and to avoid unnecessary repetition between bodies operating different levels of control;
2016/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2015/2279(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital D
D. whereas mountain areas make a positive contribution to sustainable development, tourism and the preservation of regional ecosystems;
2016/01/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 49 #

2015/2279(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Regrets that despite the sector-specific measures that have been taken, there does not yet exist a fully-fledged EU approach to mountain regions; proposes in this regard that efforts be made to adopt a common definition of mountain regions in line with the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) so as to cover areas where agricultural production is inhibited due to very difficult climatic conditions;
2016/01/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 126 #

2015/2279(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the importance of establishing co-operative producer groups or appropriate organisations to strengthen the bargaining power of farmers in the food chain;
2016/01/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 8 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the CRPD is the first international human rights treaty ratified by the EU, which has also been signed by all 28 EU Member States and ratified by 25 Member States excluding Finland, Ireland and the Netherlands;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the case law of the Court of Justice reinforces that the CRPD is binding on the EU and in its Member States when implementing EU law, as the CRPD is an ‘integral part of the European Union legal order’ that has ‘primacy over instruments of secondary law’;1a __________________ 1aCJEU, Joined Cases C-335/11 and C- 337/11 HK Danmark, 11 April 2013, paras. 29-30; CJEU, Case C-363/12 Z, 18 March 2014, para. 73; CJEU, Case C- 356/12 Glatzel, 22 May 2014, para. 68.
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas children with disabilities have the rights to live in (their) families or family environment in line with their best interest;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas children with disabilities are 17 times more likely to live in an institution than their peers without disabilities, where their risk of violence, neglect and abuse is much higher than when living at home;1a __________________ 1aFRA Report: Violence against children with disabilities: legislation, policies and programmes in the EU, http://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_ uploads/fra-2015-violence-against- children-with-disabilities_en.pdf
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F c (new)
Fc. whereas women with disabilities are more likely to suffer domestic violence and sexual assault which lasts reportedly longer and is more intense than for women without disabilities;1a __________________ 1aFRA Report, Violence against women: an EU-wide survey. Main results report: http://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra- 2014-vaw-survey-main-results- apr14_en.pdf
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F d (new)
Fd. whereas disability is a cause and consequence of poverty and approximately 30% of the homeless population have a disability and are at risk to be overlooked;1a __________________ 1aVan Straaten et al (2015). Self-reported care needs of Dutch homeless people with and without a suspected intellectual disability: a 1.5-year follow-up study, In: Health Soc Care Community 2015 Oct 1. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F e (new)
Fe. whereas an estimated 80% of persons with disabilities live in developing countries;1a __________________ 1a World Report on Disability, 2011.
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F f (new)
Ff. whereas the EU supports the promotion of the rights of persons with disabilities at the international level, and is the world’s biggest donor of Official Development Assistance (ODA);
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas disability can be caused by a gradual and sometimes invisible degradation of the state of health of an individual, as is the case for people with neurodegenerative or rare diseases; 2Or. en
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H b (new)
Hb. whereas the EU, as a party to the CRPD, has the duty to ensure the close involvement and active participation of persons with disabilities and their representative organisations in the development and implementation of legislation and policies to implement the Convention and in all decision making processes concerning issues that relate to persons with disabilities;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Urges a comprehensive and cross- cutting review of EU legislation and funding programmes, including future programming periods, with a view to complying fully with the CRPD by constructively involving disability organisations and the members of the EU Framework for the CRPD (hereinafter the ‘EU Framework’);
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Asks the Commission to proposevide a list of legislation with a view to proposing an update of the declaration of competence in light of the Concluding Observations, to be repeated periodically with the formal involvement of disability organisations and the European Parliament;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to set up a structured dialogue with disabilityconsolidate and make a proposal for a structured dialogue between the EU and disability organisations including appropriate funding to ensure full and equal participation by persons with disabilities and their representative organisations;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to use the review of the European Disability Strategy and to develop a comprehensive EU CRPD strategy with a clear implementation timeframe, benchmarks and indicators;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to take steps to combat all forms of discrimination, including multiple and intersectional discrimination based on disability, with special regard to women and children with disabilities, older persons and individuals who have complex support needs, including those with intellectual and psychosocial disabilities and to those whose disabilities change over time;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the European institutions and Member States to ensure that boys and girls with disabilities and their representative organisations be consulted in all matters affecting them – with appropriate assistance provided, according to their disability and age;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Regrets the fact that the Council has still not adopted the 2008 proposal for a directive on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation; reiterates its call on the Council to do so as soon as possible;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to work with Parliament to deliver a strongclear and effective directive on the accessibility of public sector bodies’ websites, with a broad scope and a robust enforcement mechanism in line with the proposed European Accessibility Act;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Is concerned about the lack of accessibility of the EU-wide 112 emergency number, which is at national level and when roaming, causing unnecessary deaths and injuries; highlights the need for implementing measures at national level ensuring inter alia compatibility across Member States, including accessible national emergency points;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Is concerned that the Employment Eq2uality Directive does not explicitly make the denial of reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities a form of discrimination; asks the Commission to provide a state of play on the kinds of complaints received;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Urges the Member States to adopt quality frameworks for traineeships with a view to ensuring reasonable accommodation and accessibility for persons with disabilities and to ensure that all EU programmes such as the Youth Guarantee are fully accessible to persons with disabilities;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 127 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Is concerned that the European Structural and Investment Funds are being misused to foster institutionalisation, and calls on the Member States and the Commission to strengthen their monitoring in line with the CRPD and in consultation with disability organisations and recommends to suspend, withdraw and recover payments from Member States if the obligation to respect fundamental rights is breached;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 136 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Welcomes the ex-ante conditionalities on social inclusion and its investment priority on the ‘transition from institutional to community based services’ in Regulation 1303/2013 on the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF); calls on the Member States to use the funds for deinstitutionalisation and as a tool to implement the CRPD;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 151 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for the development of human rights-based indicators and calls on the Member States to provide comparable disaggregated disability data;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 154 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for the development of human rights-based indicators and comparable disaggregated disability data; underlines the need to disaggregate data on the basis of various factors including by gender, age and disability;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the Commission to fund research and data collection on violence, abuse and exploitation of all persons with all types of disabilities in the community and in institutions;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commissionbudget authorities to allocate adequate resources to enable the EU Framework to perform its functions independently;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Highlights that the CRPD network needs to be strengthened to appropriately coordinate CRPD implementation internally but also interinstitutionally, while actively involving and closely consulting with persons with disabilities and their representative organisations in its activities and meetings;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 166 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Urges the institutions to review allensure existing staff regulations, internal rules and implementing provisions for CRPD compatibility are fully implemented in line with the CRPD and internal rules and implementing provisions are developed fully applying CRPD provisions, as part of an open and disability-inclusive process, in order to address the Concluding Observations;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls for the provision of adequate needs-based and CRPD-compatible reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities – or with dependent family members with disabilities – who are in the service of the European institutions, paying particular attention to the needs of disabled parents;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Urges the EU institutions to make their internet-based content and apps, including their intranets and all documents and audiovisual content, accessible while equally ensuring physical accessibility of their buildings;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 183 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Calls for the EU to revise the rules of the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme, the pension system and disability-related social security and social protection measures in order to ensure non- discrimination and equality of opportunities for persons with disabilities, inter alia by recognising disability-related health needs as being distinct from an illness;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission, the Member States and the agencies to revise the requirements of the VET mobility programmes to make them relevant as regards duration and content, combining periods of training and work; this revision should address the demands of and react to developing labour market needs in sectors such as the digital and green economies to prevent future skills gaps;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes pilot projects such as that recently approved by Parliament, entitled ‘European framework for the mobility of apprentices’, as the basis for a specific mobility programme in the context of VET; Notes that such a framework could act as a specific 'highway' to alleviate youth unemployment by facilitating a smooth transition from education and training to the labour market;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to the fundamental freedom to provide services laid down in Article 56 TFEU,
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 b (new)
- having regard to the fundamental freedom of movement of workers laid down in Article 45 TFEU,
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to the on-going implementation of Directive 2014/67/EU,
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
- having regard to the adoption of the European Platform to enhance cooperation in the prevention and deterrence of undeclared work,
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
- having regard to the Eurofound report entitled “Posted workers in the European Union” (2010) and the national reports,
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 150 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for a directive based on ILO Convention No. 81 on labour inspectionWelcomes the ratification by the Member States of the ILO Convention No. 81 on labour inspections and the progress made by adopting the new European Platform to enhance cooperation in the prevention and deterrence of undeclared work; in this regard, recognizes the Commission's work in financing the mutual learning programmes for labour inspectors in the Member States and the progress made via SLIC system;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Welcomes the Commission´s intention to evaluate EU OSH legislation as part of the Smart Regulation programme;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 181 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on Member States to increase the staffing levels and resources of their control bodies, including labour inspectorates and their liaison offices and other control bodies such as customs, revenue, social protection bodies and immigration, in particular for interpretation and translation;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 238 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for a directive based on ILO Convention No. 189 concerning decent work for domestic workersNotes the Council of Ministers Decision authorising the EU Member States to ratify ILO Domestic Workers Convention No. 189 and calls on the Member States follow the decision;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 273 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Requests that information on postings should not be retroa case of posting, data and information should be made available before the posting starts effectively and should be entered in a European electronic register; stresses that the competent authorities of the host Member State should be able to revise form A1 in the event of serious doubts about whether a posting is genuine;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 282 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Recalls its appeal for the creationWelcomes looking into the efficiency of 'a forgery-proof European social security card (...) on which could be stored all the data needed to verify the bearer's employment relationship'11 ; wishes all as well as storing the information associated with the worker's postings to feature on this card; __________________ 11 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDo c.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA- 2014-0012+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 335 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to combat the phenomenon of letterbox companies by applying more generally the principle that each company should have a single corporate headquarter, in cases of free provision of services with temporary posted workers, each company involved should perform a genuine 'activity' and therefore be genuine undertakings; recalls the rejection by the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs of the proposal for a directive on single-person limited liability companies;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 382 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Commission to monitor the progress on the on-going implementation of the Enforcement Directive and to facilitate and assist Member States´ authorities with its implementation;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 458 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls for the creation of aBelieves that creating one European transport agency bringing together existing agencies; takes the view that at the very least a specific road transport agency is needed could be looked into;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 571 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Commission rapidly to draw up proposals toto continue combatting unfair competition in the; agrees that appropriate regulatory environment is needed for digital and sharinged economy;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2015/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 b (new)
- having regard to the EU Guidelines on the promotion and protection of freedom of religion or belief,
2015/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 78 #

2015/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas Article 18 of UDHR recognises the freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief must be unconditionally enhanced through inter- relig; whereas this right remains widely under threat, and the number of violatiouns and inter-cultural dialogueshas sharply risen;
2015/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 292 #

2015/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60
60. Recalls that freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief is a fundamental human right, as recognised in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, interrelated with other human rights and fundamental freedoms encompassing the rights to believe or not to believe, the freedom to practice theistic, non-theistic or atheistic belief alike, and the right to adopt, change and abandon or return to a belief of one's choice;
2015/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 297 #

2015/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60 c (new)
60c. Welcomes the EU's commitment to promoting the right to freedom of religion or belief at international platforms including the UN, OSCE and the Council of Europe; commends the HR/VP for her determination to protect freedom of religion or belief, and for stating that it is one of three special human rights priorities; encourages the HR/VP in her chairmanship of the Foreign Affairs Council, to raise freedom of religion or belief as a special issue for the Council twice a year;
2015/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 298 #

2015/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60 d (new)
60d. Is concerned about the increase in violence against religious or belief minorities around the world; calls for the special protection of refugees who have been forced to flee their place of origin as a result of discrimination on the basis of their religion or belief; asserts that all states have a duty to protect minorities against discrimination and violence;
2015/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 325 #

2015/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 66
66. Condemns in the strongest terms all forms of discrimination, including those based on race, colour, gender, sexual orientation, language, culture, religion or belief, social origin, caste, birth, age, disability or any other status; urges the EU to intensify its efforts to eradicate all types of discrimination, racism and xenophobia through human rights and political dialogues, the work of the EU Delegations and public diplomacy; urges the EU also to continue promoting the ratification and full implementation of all UN Conventions that support this cause, such as the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination or the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities;
2015/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 401 #

2015/2229(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 80
80. Calls on the EU and its Member States to constantly monitor and raise cases of violations of freedom of assembly and association, including through various forms of bans and limitations on civil society organisations and their activities and of unlawful damages to assembly sites such as properties used for religion or civil assembly;
2015/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 12 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that closing the gender pay gap requires increased transparency in pay systems, gender-neutral classification, a reversal of the onuenforcement of relevant EU legislation and a strong emphasis ofn proof when it comes to challenging gender discrimination in the workplace, and desegregation of the workforcolicies that promote the reconciliation of professional and family life;
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that efforts to close the gender pay gap will benefit from measures that improve conditions for all low- and medium-waged workers, including reversing the trend of declining labour income share and linking wage growth to productivity1 , increasing the minimum wage, reducing unemployment and, boosting collective bargaining rightsand facilitating care leave and ensuring that credits are part of any package on such leave; __________________ 1 International Labour Organisation, Global Wage Report 2012/13: Wages and equitable growth, 2013.
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Emphasises that employment is a key strategy for reduction of poverty among women; notes that proactive measures are needed to improve women's situation in the labour market, including elimination of gender stereotyping in employment through awareness-raising campaigns, proper counselling of women and girls on their professional choices, and policies to increase the number of women in responsible positions in companies and public institutions;
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Considers that the gender pay gap in pensions, which stands at 39%1a and is a determining factor of women's poverty risk in the EU, needs to be tackled by a wide range of comprehensive instruments for enabling gender equality within different sector policies, such as the adjustment of pension systems, education, career planning, parental leave system and other parenthood supporting services; __________________ 1aEuropean Parliament resolution of 9 September 2015 on the Report on the implementation, results and overall assessment of the 2012 European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations (2014/2255(INI)); http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getD oc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA- 2015-0309+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that women are disproportionately and often involuntarily concentrated in precarious work; urges the Member States to consider implementing the International Labour Organisation (ILO) recommendations intended to reduce the scale of precarious work2 , such as restricting the circumstances in which precarious contracts can be used and limiting the length of time workers can be employed on such a contract, after which they must be given the option of a permanent contract; __________________ 2 International Labour Organisation, Policies and regulations to combat precarious employment, 2011.
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the lack of affordable childccessible, affordable and quality childcare, disability and elderly support and care contributes to the gender employment gap, the pay gap and related pension gap, and the disproportionate number of women who are in precarious work and in or at risk of poverty; urges the Member States to ensure access to childcarethese services by, for example, increasingensuring adequate expenditure on the provision of childcareare and support services and/or subsidies to households, incentivising employer contributions to childcare costs, and making better use of EU funds;
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that women's economic independence plays a crucial role in their ability to escape situations of domestic violence, and that women who have exhausted their paid leave are at risk of losing their jobs and economic independence; calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider introducing a statutory right toto examine the feasibility and the positive outcomes of introducing a system of paid domestic violence leave.;
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2015/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Believes that supporting women entrepreneurs through various EU programmes can play a role in generating employment and alleviating poverty.
2016/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the centrality of agriculture to social cohesion owing to its role in economic growth and diversification, and in fixmaintaining populations in rural areas; stresses the need to strengthemaintain the CAP budget and to ensure social fairness in its implementation;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Supports an integrated approach between the CAP's second pillar and other EU funds such as the European Social Fund; underlines the importance of involving the voluntary community sector and local and regional administrations in the management and design of rural policies; highlights the importance of ITI and CLLD in this regard;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Having regard to the acknowledged success of the LEADER Programme in creating employment in rural areas, calls on Member States to adequately resource LEADER;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets the strong market orientation of the EU’s agricultural policies and its negative effect on rural incomes and employment, as evidenced by the liberalisation of the dairy sector; condemns the negative impact on agricultural labour of free trade agreements such as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership;deleted
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the introduction of social conditionality in the CAP’s first pillar;deleted
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the importance of training and skill formation for farmers and agricultural workers, particularly for young people entering the workforce and in order to be able to adapt to changes in agriculture and food production; in this regard reiterates that a developed broadband and ICT infrastructure in rural areas is crucial for the success of both farmers and rural businesses and for rural job creation;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that improving access to land through instruments such as public land banks is key to agricultural employmentis key to agricultural employment as is access to credit and notes the role which the European Investment Bank can play in this regard;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Believes that farming and especially family farming is the single most important influence in preserving the economic and social fabric of rural areas; in this regard believes that family farming would be made increasingly sustainable by incentivising consolidation of existing holdings and thereby maximising consequent employment in local areas;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for the defence of the right to public services in rural areas against current neo-liberal policies; supports the development of minimum income schemSupports the protection of public services in rural areas such as post offices and some form of one stop shop or multiservice centres; supports the development of minimum income schemes in line with the principle of subsidiarity and Member States´ national practices to ensure social cohesion, given the highunacceptable rate of poverty and social exclusion in rural areas.
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2015/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Believes that ITI and CLLD have the potential to respond directly to local needs and challenges in a more focused and appropriate way and therefore they contribute to the sustainability of employment initiatives;
2015/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2015/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to create channels of communication with Member States and local agents in order to ensure real and meaningful participation by local actors in the process and points out that CLLD and ITI will only achieve success with the commitment and ownership of all the stakeholders involved;
2015/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2015/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Is concerned that in some Member States CLLD is sometimes a ‘box ticking’ exercise rather than a genuine bottom-up approach and in this context insists that local actors have real decision making powers;
2015/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2015/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Notes the potential of the bottom-up approach of CLLD in creating job opportunities and encouraging sustainable rural development, and would welcomcalls on the Commission to actively pursue the inclusion of urban areas in this mechanism;
2015/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
- having regard to the OECD report 'In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All' of 21 May 20151 a, __________________ 1ahttp://www.oecd.org/social/in-it- together-why-less-inequality-benefits-all- 9789264235120-en.htm
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Aa (new)
Aa. whereas the prices of essential goods and services, at certain times and in certain countries, have increased relatively rapidly, and, accordingly, family expenditure;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
A b. Whereas the increase in family expenditure, associated with the cost of accommodation, food, utilities (electricity, gas, water), transport, medical costs or costs associated with education, makes it difficult to achieve the objective of reducing poverty laid down in the Europe 2020 Strategy;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas not having adequate heatingliving conditions can hasve a negative impact on a person’s health, in particular for children and older persons;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. Whereas Directive 2012/27/EU calls on the Member States to develop programmes to raise awareness, and inform and advise individthe reduction of poverty and social exclusion is one of the specific objectives of the Union and of the Member States, and progress is made towards equality where all citizens have equals and households on energy efficiency; ccess to opportunities and basic resources;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to adopt integrated frameworks to combat energythe various forms of poverty by linking energy andconomic, education, employment, energy and transport policy, among others, and social policy, particularly poverty/social inclusion policies with short-term effects more closely;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to adopt integrated frameworks to combat energy poverty by linking energy and poverty/social inclusion policies more closely;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. In many cases, the most important costs in this area are those of renting or buying housing. The social pillar should put forward decisive measures in relation to social housing and the treatment of homeless families.
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Member States to sign up to a European winter heating disconnection moratorium so as to ensure that during a defined winter period no household can be cut off from energy or that those who are must be reconnected to energy needed for heating that meets World Health Organisation (WHO) standards for adequate housing temperature;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Member States to sign up to a European winter heating disconnection moratorium so as to ensure that during a defined winter period no household can be cut off from energy or that those who are must be reconnected to energy needed for heating that meets World Health Organisation (WHO) standards for adequate housing temperatureevaluate the measures adopted to comply with the World Health Organisation (WHO) standards for adequate housing temperature, and in particular to move towards signing up to a European winter heating disconnection moratorium so as to take account of the minimum conditions to be met by the client to opt into such a benefit and the scheduling of outstanding payments between client and supplier and the public contribution. Energy companies will not be responsible for social policies, which will always be set by governments;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Invites the Commission to present, in the context of the announced social pillar, an EU framework directivEncourages Member States to introduce oan adequate minimum income in 2016line with national practices and traditions;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Member States to ensure a more efficient and targeted use of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) by national, regional and local authorities in order to tackle enpovergty povertyand social exclusion within the Union;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Member States to ensure a more efficient and targeted use of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) by national, regional and local authorities in order to tackle energy poverty, especially amongst poor households living in poor quality and inefficient housing stock;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Finds regrettable that the EU2020 target to reduce poverty in Europe by lifting 20 million people out of poverty appears even further out of reach than when it was set; reiterates that one of the target groups is people that face severe material deprivation; calls on the Commission and the Member States to renew their commitment to the poverty reduction target by:
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 3
- ensuring that the Member States provide everyone with accessible adequate income support, including minimum income above the poverty threshold throughout the life cyclefor as long as the duly documented situation of poverty persists;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 166 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 5 a (new)
- taking measures to address extreme forms of poverty that currently fall beyond the scope of the target, namely homelessness;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for a Council recommendation similar to the Youth Guarantee on tackling poverty in order to reviveach the poverty target;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 179 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to present a new social pillar; recalls that to deliver on Article 9 TFEU, such a pillar should be aimed at setting a European framework for a minimum income above the poverty level, continuing with a rights- based approach to social policy and improving implementation of existing social, labour and anti-discrimination legislation; Recalls the need to deliver on Article 9 TFEU;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to aim for a social triple A score for the Union; finds regrettable that this is currently out of reach owing to increasing inequality, high poverty and social exclusion and less and less availability of quality and affordable social, health and care services; recalls that a social triple A mustshould be based on Article 9 TFEU aimed at a ‘high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion and a high level of education, training and protection of human health’; recalls that achieving a social triple A as a benchmark requires assessing both policies that hinder and work towards achieving the benchmark; finds regrettable that so far the latter has not been addressed at Union level;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 217 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that a decent income is a fundamental element for being able to live your life in dignity and that a job is still the best way out of poverty; recalls that 16.7 % of the population in the EU 28 in 2013 were at- risk- of- poverty after social transfers; invites the Commission to present in 2016 in the context of the announced social pillar an EU framework directive on adequate minimum income and that in-work poverty remains unacceptably high;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 233 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Recommends that an EU framework directive on minimum income should specify which criteria Member States’ minimum income schemes would need to meet so as to lift people out of poverty; considers that such a framework would need to be rights-based, address the level of income, the non-discriminatory, efficient and easy access and the take-up, targeting especially those groups, who currently are excluded from or at risk of exclusion from minimum income schemes minimum income scheme at Member State level, in line with national practices and traditions, would help to specify which criteria minimum income schemes would need to meet so as to lift people out of poverty;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 241 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that minimum income schemes shouldat Member State level can prevent and lift households out of severe material deprivation and allow for an income above the poverty threshold; recalls that a minimum income is a key instrument forschemes which respect national practices and traditions are compatible with and will help to delivering on Article 9 TFEU guaranteeingtaking into account adequate social protection as well as on the fundamental right to decent living conditions, participating in societythe fight against social exclusion and protection of human health;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 353 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Member States to sign up to a European winter heating disconnection moratorium so as to ensure that during a defined winter period no household can be cut off from energy or that those who are must be reconnected to energy needed for heating that meets World Health Organisation (WHO) standards for adequate housing temperature; points out that such a moratorium aims to decrease excess winter mortality,meet World Health Organisation (WHO) standards for adequate housing temperature; supporting the most vulnerable groups, especially young children, the elderly and permanently sick and disabled people so as to protect their health and well-being;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Title
on workers representation on boardat corporate level in Europe
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the development of the European Union and the European social model require a strengthening of democracy, including economic democracyrespect for democratic values in all fields;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the scope and intensity of worker participation vary greatly, but it has proved effective, and whereas the countries concerned are essentially economically successful ones16; __________________ 16http://www.worker- participation.eu/About-WP/European- Participation-Index-EPI owing to differences in business and trade union structure and how workers are represented, all of which may have a positive effect on company management;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the economic model based on the short-term ‘shareholder value’ principle has failed in the financial crisis;deleted
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas future corporate management will only be successful with a long-term, sustainable approach which includes all stakeholders18; __________________ 18http://de.worker-participation.eu/Ueber- WP.eu/Publications/The-Sustainable- Company-a-new-approach-to-corporate- governance;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas the existing form of the European Company (SE) is also used to avoid nationalenables different forms of worker participation in companies, in line with the management system in force and the company’s freedom to establish its own statutes;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M
M. whereas company law legislative acts at European level and / or such acts applied cross-border are often drawn up without taking into accounthave to comply with labour law;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas giving priority to the fundamental economic freedoms in the European Union often leads to the erosion of the national worker representation, not only at supervisory board levelthe freedom of businesses to act and the right to worker representation must be respected and brought up to date, so they co-exist in the framework of good corporate governance;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas there do not yet exist at EU level any general standards for employee representation on supervisory boardsat corporate level;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital P
P. whereas the adoption of any further legislative acts in European company law without tshall whe regulation of pertinent take worker participation will lead to a further erosion of national rulesinto account;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1
Worker representation on supervisory boards – general requirementat corporate level – general observations
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission and its agencies on a regular basis and systematically to gather, evaluate and publish data and good examples relating to worker representation at supervisory boardcorporate level;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to establish permanent joint expert groups of the social partners tasked with gathering over a lengthy period of time information on the development and good examples concerning employee representation on supervisory boardsat corporate level; points out that they should examine in particular corporate level employee representation at enterprise, local, regional and national levels, as well as at transnational and European supervisory board levelslevel, assessing in turn to what extent the working, business and trade union culture of each Member State may affect the efficiency thereof;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to introduce in the Directive on mergers of limited liability companies minimum European rules for employee representation on supervisory boards, rather than referring to national legislation;deleted
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 197 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
RequirementSuggestions in respect of a directive on worker representation on supervisory boards applicable to all directives regarding European exchange of best practices and reflections on a possible European framework on worker representation in corporate lawbodies
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 210 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Asks the Commission to examine and clarify the existing legal basis for a possible European framework in this area, given the impact it could have on areas of national competence;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 274 #

2015/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Recommends that efforts should be made to obtain an effective ratio of communication and action between workers' representatives sitting on supervisory boardcorporate bodies, European Works Councils or other I & C representatives and worker representations at national, regional and local levels;
2016/04/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2015/2212(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that less than 15% of the total eligible beneficiaries are targeted by the measures included in the application;
2015/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2015/2212(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Appreciates that all 184 targeted beneficiaries are expected to benefit from the personalised services;
2015/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2015/2212(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Notes that allowances and incentives are limited to mobility costs and hiring benefits and will stay below the allowed maximum amount of 35% of the total costs for the coordinated package of personalised services, as set out in the EGF Regulation;
2015/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2015/2212(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Welcomes the hiring benefits for workers over 50 years of age; considers that the way the payment benefits are differentiated will incentivise hiring the concerned workers with better conditions;
2015/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2015/2212(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes that the accredited agencies providing active job-search support to the workers are paid on the basis of the results achieved;
2015/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2015/2212(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recallminds that, in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services supported by the EGF should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy.;
2015/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2015/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission Communication "White paper - An Agenda for Adequate, Safe and Sustainable Pensions" (COM(2012) 055 FINAL);
2015/09/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 12 #

2015/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas in the 1st quarter of 2015, real GDP was higher than in the 1st quarter of 2014 in all Member States.
2015/09/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 80 #

2015/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes with concern the varying degrees of commitment demonstrated by Member States to implementing last year's CSRs; stresses the importance of the implementation of the CSRs in order to ensure consistent and fair implementation of the economic governance framework across Member States; deplorNotes in this context the non-binding nature of the recommendations;
2015/09/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 97 #

2015/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that many Member States, in particular in the eurozone, are faced with similar macroeconomic challenges, including most importantly high debts, both public and private, and low investment;
2015/09/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 138 #

2015/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that further fiscal consolidation is still needed in many Member States in order to comply with the conditions of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP); notwelcomes the Commission's interpretative communication on flexibility in the SGP, aimed at clarifying the scope of the investment clause and allowing for a certain degree of temporary flexibility in the preventive arm of the SGP;
2015/09/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 231 #

2015/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses the role of flexible labour markets in combatting unemployment, in particular the negative impact on job creation rates of rigid rules on dismissal, excessive minimum wage levels and lengthy labour disputesined with strong social security systems in combatting unemployment; calls for a shift away from labour taxes to other sources of taxation;
2015/09/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 252 #

2015/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Deplores the fact that the CSRs suffer from lack of ownership at national level and from a democratic accountability mechanism; calls, in this context, for an increased role for national parliaments, social partners and national civil society in the preparation of the National Reform Programmes (NRPs); stresses that increased ownership is a crucial factor for the successful implementation of the CSRs and, in the longer term, for the success of the Europe 2020 strategy;
2015/09/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1 #

2015/2205(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Reaffirms that the discussion of the draft annual work programmes and the multiannual strategies of the agencies in the committees responsible helps to ensure that the programmes and strategies reflect the actual political priorities but stresses the need to align the EU budgetary cycle with the EU 2020 Strategy in order to be able to fully monitor and comprehensively report on the performance of each of the agencies in the context of their contribution to achieving EU 2020 objectives;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2015/2173(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Expresses its satisfaction that the Court of Auditors has declared the transactions underlying the Foundation’s annual accounts for the financial year 2014 to be legal and regular in all material respects and that its financial position as of 31 December 2014 is fairly represented;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2015/2173(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. NotesWelcomes the fact that in response to comments from the discharge authority, the Foundation participated in 2014 in a joint procurement procedure for banking services launched by the Commission in order to ensure the security of its assets which were beforepreviously kept in a single bank with a low credit rating;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2015/2173(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Notes the increasing number of requests for ETF support to EU external relations assistance from 78 in 2013 to 82 in 2014 and believes this underlines its relevance in supporting the role of the EU as a global actor in this field;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2015/2169(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Expresses its satisfaction that the Court of Auditors has declared the transactions underlying the Agency’s annual account for the financial year 2014 to be legal and regular in all material respects and that its financial position as of 31 December 2013 is fairly represented;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2015/2169(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Commends the work of the agency in developing an online interactive risk assessment tool and its efforts through the Healthy Workplaces Campaign to strengthen risk prevention and promote sustainable and healthy workplaces;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2015/2165(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Expresses its satisfaction that the Court of Auditors has declared the transactions underlying Eurofound´s annual accounts for the financial year 2014 to be legal and regular in all material respects and that its financial position as of 31 December 2014 is fairly represented;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2015/2165(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the successful implementation of Eurofound’s programme; praises the important work performed on the three European surveys: the European Quality of Life Survey, the European Working Conditions Survey and the European Company Survey; notes that Eurofound continued to focus its research on youth unemployment and appreciates its contribution to assessing the impact of the crisis on working and living conditions;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2015/2164(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Expresses its satisfaction that the Court of Auditors has declared the transactions underlying the Centre’s annual accounts for the financial year 2014 to be legal and regular in all material respects and that its financial position as of 31 December 2014 is fairly represented;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2015/2164(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Appreciates that the Centre focused its activity on contributing to and supporting policies addressing youth unemployment; commends particularly the Centre's skills forecasts and analyses as well as the work focusing on developing apprenticeships; furthermore notes that the detailed country fiches on vocational education and training policies in all Member States informed the Country Specific Recommendations of the European Semester;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2015/2164(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Welcomes the fact that visits to the Europass website managed by Centre and available in 27 languages reached 21.7 million users in 2014 an increase of 8% on the 2013 figures;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2015/2154(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Expresses its concerns about the fact that out of 170 transactions examined by the Court in the employment and social affairs policy area 60 (35 %) were affected by error; urges the Commission to implement corrective measures and apply strict procedures to reduce the risk of irregularities in this policy area as well as to follow up the cases of ineligible expenditure identified by the Court; notes in particular that if Member States or independent auditors had made use of all the information available to them, a significant proportion of the errors could have been prevented, detected or corrected;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that whilst it is impossible to hold back the digital revolution, it is possible to shape its course; digital technologies bring tremendous opportunities for productivity gains, growth and job-creating leading to quality employment; acknowledges the importance of the digital revolution as fuel for enterpreneurship, digital transformation of industry, the development of new business models, ideas and innovative start-ups; stresses that according to the European Commission, The Digital Single Market has the potential to generate Euro 250 billion in additional growth in Europe thereby creating hundreds of thousands of new jobs; stresses that productivity gains historically have resulted in overall employment growth and increased wealth and that the ultimate beneficiary of digital transformation of industry will be the consumer;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recognises that the Digital Single Market can only become a reality when there is access to high performance broadband infrastructure throughout the regions of the EU in both urban and rural areas;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Notes that only 1.7% of EU enterprises make full use of advanced digital technologies while 41% do not use them at all; stresses that if the EU is to maintain and improve its competitiveness digitalisation of all sectors is crucial;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that 35% of the EU population is at risk of exclusion from the Digital Single market in particular those over 50 and people with disabilities and in this context stresses that accessible technologies can help deliver digital inclusion and improve access to the labour market;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Is convinced that accessibility is best achieved and most cost effective when incorporated from the outset using a universal design approach and that it also represents a potential business opportunity;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that as job and skills profiles become more complex, new demands are being placed on training, vocational training and further education; emphasises the importance of social dialogue in efforts to bring course content up to date andensure a better match between skills and jobs; is concerned that according to the Commission 47 % of the EU- workforce lack sufficient digital skills and that this skills-shortage might cause up to 900.000 unfilled vacancies until 2020; calls on the Commission, as a matter of urgency, to develop a skills strategies-strategy which can meet this skills-shortage through education for the younger part of the population, vocational training, exchange of best practices and through training in partnership with the social partners for the older part of the population;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. PNotes that the demand for digitally skilled employees is growing by around 4% per year and that shortages of ICT professionals in the EU could exceed 800,000 by 2020 if no decisive action is taken; points out that as job and skills profiles become more complex, new demands are being placed on training and further education; emphasises the importance of social dialogue in efforts to bring course content up to date and develop skills strategies;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the establishment of the Europe-wide grand coalition for digital jobs, and encourages businesses to jointhe social partners' active participation with the aim of realizing the potential of the digital economy to create growth and new jobs leading to quality employment; encourages the Europe-wide grand coalition for digital jobs to develop recommendations for new forms of learning, i.e. online learning, employer- designed short-courses etc., to keep pace with the evolving digital technology and changes; encourages additionally educational institutions to respond to the opportunities in the digital economy by developing flexible learning profiles including enhanced opportunities for vocational training which match the demands of the labour market;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that the digitalisation-driven trend towards more flexible working practices may also give rise to precarious forms of employment to which current standards as regards social security, working time, working location, worker participation and employment protection no longer apply; calls for self-employed persons with quasi-employee status to be placed on an equal footing with employed persons under employment law;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 149 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Emphasises the need to protect the continuity of cultural and creative jobs in the digital era by ensuring that artists and creators receive fair value for cultural and creative works disseminated on Internet platforms;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that freedom of association must apply in the context of new forms of employmentis a fundamental freedom that must apply in all sectors in all parts of the EU;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the need to develop employee data protection measures whichat the Digital Single Market and EU privacy and data regulations should provide a covher new forms of data collection (relations between humans and robots)ent and stable framework to facilitate innovation, trade and entrepreneurship while ensuring adequate protection of data;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2015/2125(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Considers that the enterprise surveys and visits are actions which may benefit not only dismissed workers covered by this application, but may also contribute to building knowledge about employment issues within this sector for future redundancies; notes that these specific actions are already a continuation of a similar measure carried out during an earlier EGF case in Finland (EGF/2013/001 FI/Nokia);
2015/06/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2015/2125(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that the authorities plan to use 17,46% of all costs on allowances and incentives in the form of pay subsidies (as part of the salary for each employment relationship established for a targeted worker) and allowances for travel, overnight and removal costs, which amounts to half of the maximum allowed 35 % of all costs for such measures;
2015/06/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2015/2125(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Notes that the estimated cost of the pay subsidy amounts up to EUR 6000 per beneficiary, applying to a relatively small group of all targeted workers (62 beneficiaries);
2015/06/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2015/2125(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the coordinated package of personalised services hasWelcomes the procedures that the Finnish authorities have followed to consult the targeted been drawn up in consultation witheficiaries or their representatives ofr the targeted beneficiaries and the ssocial partners as well as locial and regional partnerauthorities;
2015/06/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2015/2125(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Recalls that, in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy;
2015/06/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2015/2125(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Welcomes the complementarity of the proposed EGF interventions with other actions funded by national or Union funds;
2015/06/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
– having regard to the interim report of the UN's Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion and belief, Hans Bielefeldt, submitted in accordance with general Assembly resolution 68/170 on Freedom of religion and belief,
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 22 a (new)
– having regard to the Gender Equality Directive (Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast)),
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas evidence collected by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) shows that racism, xenophobia, as well as homophobia and transphobia and related forms of intolerance are widespread, despite measures taken by governments and civil society across the EU, and whereas the social and political climate is growing ever more tolerant of extremist, racist and xenophobic agendas that exploit fears about youth unemployment and security in the face of terrorism and other geopolitical challenges;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the FRA LGBT survey (http://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2014/ eu-lgbt-survey-european-union-lesbian- gay-bisexual-and-transgender-survey- main) as well as the FRA "Being Trans in Europe" (http://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2014/ being-trans-eu-comparative-analysis-eu- lgbt-survey-data) report highlight the persisting discrimination of LGBT people in access to and within the labour market;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Highlights that religion is sometimes used as proxy for race when it comes to discrimination in employment, based on the real or perceived belonging of a person to a religion;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the role played by the European Court of Human Rights, through its decisions in the interpretation and implementation of the Directive, and looks forward with interest to the future first decisions on this matter of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU);
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Is of the opinion that it should be considered that, in accordance with the case law of the ECtHR the Directive provides protection against discrimination on the ground of the employer's religion or belief;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that restrictions imposed by employers to the wearing of religious symbols are not always in line with international human rights standards, as they are not limited to well-defined and narrow circumstances or do not pursue a legitimate goal, and Member States do not always check the validity of these restrictions; is concerned that some Member States have introduced general bans on religious symbols in public bodies, in the name of neutrality and secularism, which have led to attempts to extend such restrictions to the private sector;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the fact that all Member States offer grants or subsidies to employers providing reasonable accommodation, thereby incentiviszing employers to adapt the workplace in order to hire people with disabilities; Recommends that national, regional and local authorities propose guidance for reasonable accommodation and prevention of exclusion of specific vulnerable groups; calls for dialogue with social partners, such as trade unions and employers with an aim at defining guidance for reasonable accommodation practices to be put in place;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Urges the European Commission and the Member States to adopt quality frameworks for traineeships with a view to ensuring reasonable accommodation and accessibility for persons with disabilities;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 212 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Recalls that the scope of protection from discrimination available to trans people remains uncertain in many Member States; calls for measures to implement effectively national legislation transposing the Gender Equality Directive (recast); points out that such measures could include improved legal definitions and the extension ofto ensure that protections for trans people to include others thans all trans people not only those undergoing or have undergone gender reassignment21 ; __________________ 21 Ibid.
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Is concerned that rights awareness in the area of discrimination, and awareness of the existence of bodies and organisations offering support to victims of discrimination, are low, with higher rates of awareness among LGBTI people; takes the view that national, regional and local authorities, along with workers organisations, should substantially intensify awareness raising activities for both victims and employers; points out that national LGBTI organizations are key partners in these efforts;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 235 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Highlights that lack of comparable equality data makes it more difficult to prove the existence of discrimination, particularly indirect discrimination; calls on the Member States to collect equality data in a systematic way and with the involvement of national equality bodies and national courts; calls on the Commission to take initiatives to promote such data collection by means of a Recommendation to Member States, and by tasking Eurostat with the development of consultations aiming at mainstreaming data disaggregation on all discrimination grounds in European Social Surveys' indicators;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 247 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Notes the important role of the national equality bodies in the implementation of the Employment Equality Directive, contributing to awareness raising and data collection, staying in touch with the social partners and other stakeholders, addressing underreporting and making complaint processes more accessible; calls for the role of the national equality bodies to be strengthened, and their capacities enhanced, including through the provision of adequate funding;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 249 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Highlights that the Directive mentions the disproportionate impact of multiple discrimination on women; recommends that national, regional and local authorities, law enforcement bodies, including labour inspectors, national equality bodies and civil society organisations, increase their monitoring of the intersectionality between gender and other grounds in cases of discrimination and in practices;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 253 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 b (new)
26b. Considers that further focus is needed on balancing competing rights such as freedom of religion and belief and freedom of speech in cases of harassment on this ground;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 284 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Considers it necessary that adequate training is provided for employees of national, regional and local authorities and law enforcement bodies and labour inspectors; believes that training for judges, prosecutors, lawyers and police force on non-discrimination legislation in employment and case-law is of critical importance, along with training on cultural understanding and unconscious bias provided by organisations representing the most discriminated groups;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 286 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Considers it necessary that the European Commission provides private companies, including SMEs and micro companies with models for equality and diversity frameworks which can be later replicated and adapted according to their needs; Calls on the business stakeholders to go further than making pledges with regard to respecting equality and diversity, by, among others, reporting annually their initiatives in this respect with the help of the equality bodies if they want to;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 298 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33a. Considers it necessary that the Commission adopts a European framework for national strategies to combat anti-Semitism, Islamophobia and other forms of racism;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2015/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recommends that the EU become a member of GRECO and request participation in the Open Government Partnership;
2016/07/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 32 #

2015/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Regrets that the European Commission has not yet published its 2nd Anti-Corruption Report, which is due to be issued in 2016;
2016/07/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 39 #

2015/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that, in order to fight corruption effectively and ensure lasting outcomes, the EU and Member States need to adopt a political strategy and a list of priorities, which may comprise not only legislative action but also a set of concrete benchmarks that Member States commit to attain in order to tackle corruption in the public and private sector and organised crime; takes the view that these targets and benchmarks should be holistic, comprising at least measures to improve transparency of public acts, access to information, public officials' asset disclosure, judicial capacity and technical assistance, whistleblower protection and mechanisms for citizen engagement in decision-making;
2016/07/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 57 #

2015/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for the establishment of a specialist Europol unit to combat organised criminal groups which operate in several sectors at the same time; takes the view that the Member States should set up a body with responsibility forsecure and effective mechanisms in the current institutional framework to ensuringe that investigations into organised crime are properly coordinated and that mutual trust among law enforcement authorities in Member States is fostered;
2016/07/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 118 #

2015/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Deplores the fact that cross-border police and judicial cooperation involves excessively lengthy, bureaucratic procedures that hamper its efficiency and jeopardise the effectiveness of the fight against organised crime, corruption and money laundering at EU level; calls on the Member States to increase the resources they devote to cross-border police and judicial cooperation, to ensure proper training and technical support, to guarantee the mutual admissibility of evidence between Member States, and to ensure that greater use is made of joint investigation teams and to employ a common system for communication and for exchanging information relevant to the fight against organised crime and corruption;
2016/07/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 121 #

2015/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Stresses the urgency of creating a more efficient system for communication and exchanging information among judicial authorities within the EU, replacing the traditional instruments of mutual legal assistance for criminal matters, if necessary; asks the Commission to assess the need for legislative action in this field, to create a proper EU system of exchange of information among EU judicial authorities;
2016/07/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 133 #

2015/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 7
Preventing organised crime and corruption from infiltrating the legal economy
2016/07/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 139 #

2015/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Requests the European Commission to monitor and report to the Parliament on the percentage of use of direct awarding of public contracts in Member States, as well as the legal circumstances where national administrations most make use of them;
2016/07/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 151 #

2015/2110(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Takes the view that the Commission should impose the highest levels of integrity in the procurement processes for implementation of EU- funded projects; recalls that monitoring results of projects in cooperation with civil society organisations and holding local authorities accountable is essential to determine whether EU funds are used appropriately and that corruption is tackled;
2016/07/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 51 #

2015/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recognises the 10 % target – to be achieved by 2020 – as a valuable target and a step in the right direction; considers, however, that it does not always reflect the market situation and has not been established on the basis of scientific evidence; recalls that the 10 % target was first set in 2002 on the basis of the installed electricity generation capacity that existed at that time; acknowledges that, although the 10 % target is important, it describes neither the quantity of electricity flowing between countries nor the quality, such as the availability of the existing interconnection infrastructure or of the existing national infrastructure between the interconnectors; notes also that this figure takes no account of demand and that in certain member States it can have the effect of encouraging infrastructure build to meet a generating capacity target rather than a demand target; believes, therefore, that a one-size-fits-all interconnection target based on installed electricity generation capacity is not on its own appropriate for all Member States;
2015/08/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 85 #

2015/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Regrets the lack of a transparent decision-making process leading to the establishment of the projects of common interest (PCI) list; regrets further the predominant role of ENTSO-E, transmission system operators (TSOs) and project promoters in the development of a harmonised cost-benefit analysis methodology, in preparing the ten-year network development plans and the network codes, and in evaluating the costs and benefits of each project; recalls the need to provide complete assessments including social and environmental impacts; and in this context asks that DG Energy or DG Environment conduct the required assessments on a cost neutral basis at arm’s length from promoters in order to ensure full transparency and accountability in the process; calls on the Commission, the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) and national regulators to play a more proactive role in order to develop a more neutral, transparent and democratic consultative process, including the effective participation of Parliament and giving voting status to civil society representatives; furthermore, requests while the actual ranking of a project may remain secret due to commercial sensitivities that those involved in the consultation process in selection and ranking of PCI projects should be fully informed of the rationale behind the selection and ranking of these projects; calls on the Commission to assess the situations in which the use of best available technology (BAT) could be established as a precondition for granting EU funds to projects;
2015/08/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 148 #

2015/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Urges the Commission, furthermore, to: 1) encourage investments in the best available technology, which, while costlier, offers considerable financial advantages as well as time savings in the long run, this could include undergrounding or partial undergrounding of cables; 2) conduct a review of the financing rules with the aim of streamlining the existing mechanisms and highlighting the principle that wealthier Member States are responsible for projects involving their countries, while EU financial support should be used in countries facing greater challenges; and 3) strengthen incentives for further investments in the grid by, inter alia, introducing a requirement for profits made from transmission congestion rent to be reinvested in additional interconnectors;
2015/08/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 4 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 15
– having regard to the ‘EUROPE 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth' (COM(2010)2020), and to its main objective which is to increase employment levels to 75% by the end of the decade in the European Union, including the greater involvement of women, older workers and better integration of migrants in the work force,
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 a (new)
- having regard to the Communication of the European Commission 'Taking stock of the Europe 2020 Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth' (COM(2014) 130 final/2),
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 b (new)
- having regard to the 2015 Annual Growth Survey (COM(2014) 902 final) and Joint Employment Report (COM(2014) 906 final),
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 c (new)
- having regard to the European Commission's White paper 'An Agenda for Adequate, Safe and Sustainable Pensions' (COM(2012) 55 final),
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 25 a (new)
- having regard to the EU Joint Action on Mental Health and Well-being,
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 25 b (new)
- having regard to the EU-OSHA Agency 's current campaign entitled "Healthy Workplaces Manage Stress",
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the proportion of workers, who report their health and safety to be at risk because of their work, varies significantly across Member States, which underlines the need for a much stronger European focus on implementation and enforecement of the excisting OHS legislation14 ; __________________ 14 5th Working Conditions Survey, Overview Report, Eurofound (2012) http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/defa ult/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ ef1182en.pdf
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas clear, efficient, well implemented and enforceable legislation is a precondition for compliance with OHS requirements, which is today heavily regulated with 24 directives, and thereby a precondition for a high level of protection for all workers regardless of contract and place of work;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas reforms to secure the sustainability of the pension systems throughout Europe require, among other factors, older workers to stay longer in the labour market;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas a strong and enforced framework on health and safety at work is an important element of safeguarding workers' health and productivity benefiting employees, employers and society as a whole;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D c (new)
Dc. whereas very little progress has been made towards the Europe 2020 target of 75% employment for 20-64 year olds, including vulnerable groups; whereas an additional 1.8 million workers have lost their jobs since 2010;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D d (new)
Dd. whereas the indicator on healthy life years has been regressing by 1.1 years for women and by 0.4 years for men between 2010 and 2013;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that all employees have a right to the highest level of protection regarding health and safety in the workplace regardless of the size of the employer, the underlying contract or the Member State of employment; points out that complex, unclear and overlapping OSH rules can have unintended consequences and undermine employers' protection, stresses therefore the need for better, more clear and efficient rules in the field of OSH;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes that many important fields of action are identified in the EU OSH strategic framework; stresses, in this context, that more concrete legislative measures shoulda stronger focus on implementation and enforcement of the existing rules as well as the development of non-legislative tools must be included in the framework, following the 2016- review;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 150 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that national OSHS strategies are essential and contributes to improvements in OSHS in the Member States and stresses that regular reporting on progress made should be encouraged; considers it necessary to continue to initiate and coordinate policiesapply a much stronger focus on implementation and enforcement of the existing OHS legislation at EU level with a view to ensuring a high level of occupational health and safety for all workers;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 154 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the importance of occupational health and safety measures to target the specific challenges of women in the workplace; calls upon the Commission and Member States to collect data and provide research on how to best address the specific health and safety situation of women;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to support Member States to define rehabilitation and reintegration measures which would ensure a timely return ,i.e. when it is appropriate, rather than early to return to work after an accident or disease and addressing pain and stress issues, to ensure a healthy and productive working life;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to ensure that national OSH strategies are fully transparent and open to input from social partners and civil society;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 202 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls onEncourages the Member States and social partners to take initiatives to upgrade the skills of health and safety representatives and managers in accordance with national customs and traditions; calls on the Commission to draw up guidelines for the involvement of employeethe social partners in implementing preventive OSH measures;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 213 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Points out that a precondition for good OSHS management and performance is clear, efficient, well implemented and enforceable legislation and documented risk assessment, which allows for appropriate preventive measures to be put in place;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 270 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. highlights the importance of national enforcement authorities to communicate and work with companies, particularly SMEs and micro-enterprises, to convey the benefits and implementation of occupational health and safety policies;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 293 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Draws the attention of the Commission to the increased number of those affected by chronic conditions/diseases in the workforce and the need to encourage and support employers to make reasonable accommodations to their working environments to prevent the exacerbation of these conditions and to provide opportunities for supported self- management;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 302 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Welcomes the focus of the Strategic Framework on health and safety at work on psycho-social risks at work, such as depression, stress, workplace bullying and discrimination; Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop guidelines on the prevention of psycho-social risks;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 305 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on Eurofound to further examine and analyse the employment opportunities and the degree of employability for people with chronic diseases in the Member States and report back on best practices;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 346 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Points out the importance of psychosocial risk factors, which are a growing problem for employers and employees across Europe and are perceived to be highly challenging; emphasizes the need to put in place initiatives, including better monitoring, to improve the psychosocial working environment for workers; thereby reducing absenteeism and presenteeism;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 352 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Urges employers to facilitate a sound work-life balance, taking into account the growing number of employees that need to combine work and care, in this context believes that special measures e.g. care leave etc. are required to ensure the physical and mental health of these carers;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 369 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Stresses the importance of providing common definitions of work-related diseases, common health indicators, such as pain, the level of stress and weariness and EU wide statistical data, with a view to setting targets to reduce the incidence of occupational diseases;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 371 #

2015/2107(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. In the context of the Second European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks ( ESENER-2) by the EU-OSHA, calls on the Commission to come forward with proposals on musculoskeletal disorders;
2015/07/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recognises that 90 per cent of global growth is occurring outside of the European Union and therefore underlines the crucial importance of securing opportunities for new market access for EU businesses as well as ensuring fair, non-discriminatory and equal treatment for EU service providers; expects that particular obstacles faced by SMEs are taken into account when negotiating new agreements;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Negotiations on further market liberalisation should bear in mind the need for the EU-wide cooperation in order to maintain working conditions in accordance with the respective laws on labour and social affairs and collective agreements in the EU;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Calls for transparent negotiation; European and national parliaments, European social partners and civil society should have the possibility to contribute to the negotiating process in a meaningful way, in order to promote a more inclusive and relevant agreement;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Encourages trade agreements to be negotiated on a multilateral level rather than a bilateral level;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Insists that social and sustainability impact assessments are conducted, allowing not only for an ex-ante but also for an ex-post evalu that focus on impacts on the social and employment situation in the European Union and calls for publication of statistical projections to ensure that each agreement will contribute fairly and significantly to job creation;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that, as a minimum, the legislation on the posting of workers and other national and EU labour legislation, as well as collective agreements, should be applicable to contractual service supplier provisions of social and employment legislation at both the European Union and national levels, as well as collective agreements and social standards must be guaranteed; insists, however, that European Union wide posting of workers should not be regulated in trade agreements;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Rejects any further liberalisation of the GATS Mode 4 commitmentUnderlines the importance to monitor GATS mode 4 category of service providers in order to avoid abuse and exploitation of third-country workers;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that labour standards, including the eight fundamental International Labour Organisation conventions, must be equally implemented in all chapters of trade agreements, and that these agreements must include a revision clause allowing aCalls for the ILO labour standards to be respected; expects that the European Union plays a leading role in reaching the objective to encourage all partyies to leave the agreement or to suspend commitments inratify, implement and enforce the eight fundamental ILO conventions and the evDecent of infringements of labour and social standardsWork Agenda;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises the need to increase the staffing levels of, and the resources available to, Member States’ labour inspectorates to allow for effective monitoringCalls on Member States to ensure effective and timely monitoring and enforcement of labour standards;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. points out that while automation has in general positive effects, nevertheless, over the next decade some jobs will be completely eliminated and many others affected. Highlights that for the time being, considering the currently available technologies, activities which involve human interaction like caring, guiding and leading people or which require expertise for decision making, planning or creative work are the hardest ones to automate;
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. stresses that robotisation requires an interplay among several factors such as: technical feasibility, the cost of developing and deploying both the hardware and the software for automation, the cost of labour and related supply-and-demand and the benefits apart from labour substitution i.e. the quality of output. Therefore, understanding the activities that are most susceptible to automation from a technical perspective could provide an unique opportunity to rethink how workers engage with their jobs and how digital labour platforms can better connect individuals, teams and projects;
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. calls for efforts to create the kind of educational system that will preserve the value of human labour in the future to prevent situations where groups which might be considered "obsolete" could be deemed "inferior". Highlights also the importance of peopling adapting their skills to the tasks in which they continue to have a comparative advantage over machines;
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. points out however, that there are risks from using robots which should be carefully weighed against the benefits they might bring. Work injuries caused by robots and related claims should be kept in mind. While wearable robot technology like exoskeletons aimed at protecting against workplace injuries might increase productivity, they could give rise to higher employer expectations of human workers and, in turn, to greater injury risks. This must be taken into consideration by legislators, employers, unions and employees via internal rules, collective agreements etc. Other risks associated with robots might relate to anti-discrimination which could occur following a job interview in the event of data that was acquired leading to unintended analysis. Trade and privacy issues could also appear following the use of robots;
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. points out that, whilst robotics and artificial intelligence promise real advantages in the short and medium term in terms of effectiveness and economy not only for production and trade but also in areas where human intelligence hitherto meant there were only humans (whose work will be increasingly unnecessary), there is a danger of the number of jobs in the field of robotics not increasing to match the number of jobs which are expected to be lost; believes in this regard that employee ownership and financial participation schemes for employees to co- own and invest in robots could play a role in ensuring employees have a financial interest in robots which may compete with them on the labour market in the future thus ensuring a second stream of income independent from their job;
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. stresses that the majority of benefits coming from automatisation and robotisation in employment should come not only from reducing labour costs but from raising productivity through fewer errors, higher output and improved quality, safety and speed;
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. considers that bans and restrictions on automatisation and robotisation are not feasible and should not be envisaged as they might have opposite, undesirable and unpredictable effects. believes on the other hand that given the pace of technological advance we should aim to legislate for robotics for the foreseeable future (short and medium term).; believes also, that legislation should be rather general and flexible, and open so as to accommodate changes in science and technology in order to be quickly updated and to mirror the reality on the ground.
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2015/2103(INL)

5 b. points to scientific studies which have identified four major problems that arise when trying to legislate for the use of robots: - discretion, with regard to the platforms and manufacturers involved in the development and research of artificial intelligence, which might not always be visible to regulators; - diffuseness which arises when artificial intelligence systems are developed using teams of researchers that are organisationally, geographically and jurisdictionally separate; - discretion refers to the fact that artificial intelligence systems could entail many separate, distinct pre-existing hardware and software components. The effects of bringing all those components together may not be fully appreciated until after the fact. - opacity means that the way in which artificial intelligence systems work may be more opaque than previous technologies. This might constitute a problem for regulators as there is a lack of clarity concerning the problems that may be posed by such systems and how those problems can be addressed.
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
- having regard to the Eurofound report 'Maternity leave provisions in the EU Member States: Duration and allowances' (July 2015);
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the connection between reconciliation of professional and family life and the principle of gender equality in employment is now established in EU legislation;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas Directive 92/85/EEC grants rights to women workers during pregnancy, immediately after giving birth and while breastfeeding, Directive 96/34/EC recognises the reconciliation between professional and family life as a separate topic while Directive 2010/18/EU stipulates that all employees have a right to four months unpaid parental leave while one of those months must be granted on a non-transferable basis thus ensuring that reconciliation of professional and family life involves both men and women;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas Eurofound studies have illustrated aspects that influence fathers' take-up rate of parental leave which include the level of compensation, the flexibility of the leave system, the availability of information, availability and flexibility of childcare facilities and the extent to which workers fear isolation from the labour market when taking leave. Therefore these issues need to be addressed;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. Notes that where there are no provisions for leave, or where existing ones are considered insufficient, social partners, through collective agreements, may have an important role to play in establishing new provisions or updating current ones for maternity, paternity and parental leave;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas most EU Member States already comply with the minimum requirements of the Parental Leave Directive 2010/18/EU and in many Member States national provisions go beyond these requirements;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the provisions necessary for the transposition of Directive 2013/62/EU take different forms in the various Member States; believes that the transposition should therefore comply fully with legislation and usages in force in the area of collective bargaining between social partners;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Believes that since not all Member States have followed the EU separate or sequential approach to maternity and parental leaves classifying the different types of leave at an EU level is problematic;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 142 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Member States to introduce financial compensation for parental leave with a view to reaching a level that would act as an incentive for income replacement, over the minimum time period guaranteed by the directive, based on the average EU maternity leave income replacement rate, in order to safeguard families’ social and economic wellbeingin order to facilitate reconciliation between work and family life;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Believes that the promotion of individualisation of the right to leave and of positive action aiming at the promotion of the role of fathers is essential in helping to achieve gender balanced reconciliation of work and family life;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 189 #

2015/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Believes that an integrated approach to gender equality and the reconciliation of work and family life in future EU legislation would bring coherence and transparency to the process and would help ensure the promotion of gender- balanced reconciliation of work and family life;
2016/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Maintains that labour market data have to be taken into account in the permanent relocation mechanism for refugees in order to ensure that it will not worsen the social and economic situation for refugees’ home territories and their populations. A comprehensive approach on migration inclusive of the major demographic problem currently challenging Europe and its economy also needs to be taken into account;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that, in the Commission’s view, there is nothing to prevent European funds, including the European Social Fund, from being used to help integrate refugees; calls on fund managing authorities, however, to use the funds as effectively as possible without damaging other goals and recipients; outlines the allocation of a concrete and specific line of budget within the ESF to effectively undertake the integration of migrants and refugees without undermining its employment goals;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Points out to the Commission that illegal work by migrants constitutes a dangershould never be tolerated; notes that under the ‘Sanctions’ Directive1 and the ‘Seasonal Workers’ Directive2 , employers can be punished for exploiting migrant labour; calls on the Commission, however, to work towards a more integration-oriented system serving to encompass all aspects of this problem; __________________ 1 Directive 2009/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 providing for minimum standards on sanctions and measures against employers of illegally staying third-country nationals, OJ L 168, 30.6.2009, p. 24. 2 Directive 2014/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the conditions of entry and stay of third-country nationals for the purpose of employment as seasonal workers, OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 375.
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to adopt an ambitious approach when revising the ‘Blue Card’ Directive3 in order to make it clearer and more effective in attracting highly qualified labour, and stresses the necessity for a comprehensive assessment on migration comprising the evaluation of courses of action towards fighting the existing shortages in the European labour markets towards a win-win situation. __________________ 3 Council Directive 2009/50/EC of 25 May 2009 on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of highly qualified employment, OJ L 155, 18.6.2009, p. 17.
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas, according to the ILO there are approximately 2.5 million domestic workers in the EU, but given the high degree of informality that characterises domestic work, it is likely that this figure underestimates the reality and whereas 88% of them are women,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas women domestic workers and carers is a growing category of workers, representing on average around 1% of total employment,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas two major demographic trends influence the demand for domestic workers namely the ageing of the European population and the increased participation of women in labour markets,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A d (new)
Ad. Whereas real change in the lives of domestic workers requires facilitating social and attitudinal change, which are complex and long processes,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. having regard to the difficulties women domestic workers and carers often encounter in entering the regular labour market owing to legal or linguistic obstacles, difficulties combining work and personal life, or the fact of being under 18, among other barriers,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the provision of care is both formal and informal and policy must address this dual approach,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. having regard to the particular relationship of dependency between a male employers and a female employees as a result of the latter's workoften working as well as sometimes living in the former's private space,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Ca. Notes the economic significance of the sector which provides job opportunities for a high proportion of the work force particularly those that are low skilled,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Ca. having regard to the increase in recent years in the proportion of female domestic workers who are migrants,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Encourages the Member States to urgently ratify ILO Convention 189, and urges those who have already done so to apply it stringently;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes the prevalence of undeclared work in the sector which affects the quality of care and working conditions for many informal carers and stresses the role the European Platform on the prevention and deterrence of undeclared work can play in combatting this;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recommends the establishment of an office, a helpline and a website providing assistance and information on the rights of wdomenstic workers and carers in each Member State;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses how important it is to ensure the professionalisation of the sector so as to foster the creation of quality jobs and bring better working conditions and access to training, and ensure the validation of acquired experience;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 149 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses howthe important it is toce of ensureing the professionalisation of the sector so as to foster the creation of quality jobs and bringdecent jobs leading to quality employment with better working conditions and access to training;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 151 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the need to create specific learning paths for both male and female students and also to improve the relationship between this labour market and educational institutions;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 155 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. For those already working in this sector, emphasises the need to improve standards through practice oriented training and retraining schemes; Such training should encompass managing the risks around posture and movement related tasks and biological and chemical risks as well as the use of assistive technology;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 169 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Recommends affording women domestic workers and carers through labour legislation the same status as the rest of the labour force particularly in regard to the use of formal contracts and the provision of maternity leave;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Encourages the exchange of best practice between Member States to enhance actions and impacts;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 181 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for the establishment of a European legal framework, encompassing the rights set out in Convention 189, that covers female carers and those providing care services on a casual, occasional or ad hoc basis.deleted
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 188 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses the necessity of adapting European migration policies to the needs of the labour market in terms of domestic workers, in order to protect female migrants from ending up in illegal work situations.
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
– having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 165 and 166 thereof,
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas delays in access to the labour market and long periods of unemployment adversely affect career prospects, pay, health and social mobility;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas young people are an asset to the European economy and whereas they should commit themselves to acquiring the skills sought by the labour market, anticipating tomorrow’s needs;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas young people fall into three main groups – students, workers and the unemployed – and whereas distinct political approaches should be adopted for each of these groups in order to ensure that members of the group always have access to the labour market, which means that young students must have the skills needed by the labour market, young workers must update their skills and training throughout their careers and, in the case of young unemployed people, the distinction must take into account the fact that they are active job-seekers or NEETs;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A d (new)
Ad. whereas the financial crisis of 2008 created additional problems in the access of young people to the jobs market, as youth unemployment is more sensitive to the economic cycle than overall unemployment because young people are generally less experienced;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas disadvantaged people may beare often excluded from the possibility of developing their talents and skills;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that skills development is one of the key elements of integrated employment and social policies and that it can make it possible to generate long-term growth, promote European competitiveness, combat unemployment and build a more inclusive European society;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses that providers of education and training and businesses should work together to devise qualifications which faithfully reflect the actual skills that holders of those qualifications have acquired throughout their lives;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to build up partnerships between local authorities, education and employment services and the business community to support the creation, implementation and monitoring of employment strategies and action plans; calls for closer co-operation between schooling and vocational education, public administration, business and civil society, especially youth organisations;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of administrative capacity; calls therefore for the provision of appropriate training for local and regional authorities in order to use European funds more effectively and strategically; calls furthermore on governments to have the courage to be more politically ambitious, anticipating the needs of young people, businesses and civil society as well as of academic and vocational training establishments, implementing operational employment programmes more quickly;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that the promotion of entrepreneurship is an important factor in promoting an active approach towards one’s own carrier; believes that it is the responsibility of public bodies, businesses and the media to promote entrepreneurship; reiterates the need to develop mobility within businesses;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 155 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that training in the workplace and high-quality apprenticeships, backed by partnerships between schools, training establishments and businesses, are ways of improving youth access to the labour market and a better use of these opportunities could enlarge the pool of potential candidates for vacancies and also improve their preparedness for work;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that good quality educational and training guidance at all stages of education is necessary and can lower the risk of early school-leaving as well as help to overcome difficulties in accessing the labour market; stresses that language learning and digital literacy are fundamental;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 177 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for the exchange of good practices in vocational education and the development of skills and, if necessary, for the revision of training programmes to be undertaken, anticipating the needs of the market, thus enabling access to the labour market to be enhanced for young people;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 184 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Urges that a system of training and studies be established which adopts innovative but accessible approaches, and which focuses on developing basic skills as well as intellectual and technical capacities;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 199 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the Quality Framework for Traineeships and the European Alliance for Apprenticeships; calls for additional measures to be taken to provide compulsory social protection;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls that the dual model of education as well as the acquisition of practical, social and communication skills is of high importance; emphasises that these accomplishments will increase young people’s confidence in the system, make it easier for them to enter the labour market and improve their training and their predisposition to work;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Recalls that traineeships and apprenticeships should lead to employment and condemns the abuse of such arrangements; calls for Member States to withdraw the incentives which they give to businesses if the latter use traineeships and apprenticeship contracts merely to obtain cheap labour;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 250 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses that skills development should also be considered as a mechanism leading to equal opportunities for people from disadvantaged groups, in particular for children and young people from families affected by poverty, the long-term unemployed, including second-generation unemployed, immigrants and people with disabilities; stresses that prevention as well as support and counselling at an early stage are of the outmost importance, because although enabling people who are at a disadvantage to develop skills and to enter the labour market requires time and resources it is also socially and economically profitable; stresses that, in order for the most disadvantaged to be included, appropriate training must be provided for employers, human resources teams and teachers, in order to support this fringe group in society in the best possible way so as to render its integration as effective as possible;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Urges that financial support be provided for programmes creasupporting jobs creation for those with multiple disadvantages on the labour market, such as the long-term unemployed, people with disabilities and people from minority backgrounds;
2015/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises employ many workers in the EU and that one of the main problems in setting up such enterprises and keeping them going is that of obtaining finance; proposes, therefore, that the microfinance element be expanded;
2015/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Stresses that the promotion of an entrepreneurship culture and support for entrepreneurs should be a core component of EU budgetary policy;
2015/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2015/2065(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Doubts whether voluntary initiatives are adequate for addressing UTPs and the acknowledged ‘fear factor’ in the supply chain arising from the imbalance; notes that the 'fear factor' prevents reporting of unacceptable demands by major retailers on food processors, and consequently ofn power betwroducers, which emphasises the neend farmers and retailersor effective regulatory action to ensure fairness in the food supply chain;
2015/09/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 95 #

2015/2065(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Questions the Commission's unwavering support for the SCI, given the reluctance of farmers to participate; regrets the pre- emptive conclusion thato exclude regulatory action at EU level is not foreseenthus further enhancing the risk of a fragmented internal market;
2015/09/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 280 #

2015/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
- having regard to the European Parliament's Annual report on EU Competition Policy, namely on paragraph 104,
2016/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 284 #

2015/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 b (new)
- having regard to the extremely critical situation faced by farmers and agricultural cooperatives, especially, in the dairy, pig meat, beef, fruit & vegetables and cereals,
2016/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 286 #

2015/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 c (new)
- having regard to the UK Groceries Code Adjudicator Investigation into Tesco plc from 26th January 2016,
2016/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 287 #

2015/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 d (new)
- having regard to the Final report of the Study "Monitoring the implementation of principles of good practice in vertical relationships in the food supply chain" produced by Areté srl for the European Commission (January 2016),
2016/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 315 #

2015/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Believes that the Supply Chain Initiative, as recognised by the recent European Commission report, has inherent weaknesses such as: - Lack of effective deterrents against UTPs; - Not allowing for individual anonymous complaints by potential victims of UTPs or for own-initiative investigations by an independent body.
2016/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 320 #

2015/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Points out that the Supply Chain Initiative needs to be further strengthened through a number of actions which are identified by the European Commission on its recent report. These include: - Stepping up efforts to publicise the SCI, particularly among SMEs; - Ensuring the impartiality of the governance structure, e.g. by establishing an independent chair who is not affiliated to specific stakeholder groups; - Allowing alleged victims of UTPs to complain confidentially; - Setting up an independent body with the power to investigate complaints and impose sanctions where appropriate; - Enhancing internal procedures to check that individual operators comply with their processes commitments; - Monitoring the occurrence and outcome of bilateral disputes in a confidential manner;
2016/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 331 #

2015/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. WelcomNotes the setting up of Supply Chain Initiative national platforms of organisations and businesses in the food supply chain to promote fair trading practices and seek to put an end to UTPs; points out however that some national platforms have not delivered on these objectives and, as in the case of Finland, farmers have abandoned that platform;
2016/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 340 #

2015/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that whilst many Member States have adopted legislation to combat UTPs in the food supply chain, a coordinated and harmonised binding action at EU level to improve the functioning of the food supply chain is still necessary;
2016/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 389 #

2015/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls for due account to be taken, when drafting rules in this area, ofbinding action in the food supply chain against retailers harming farmers and consumers, of the following aspects: the specific features of each market and the legal requirements obpertaining ton it, the different situations and approaches in individual Member States, the degree of consolidation or fragmentation of individual markets, and other significant factors; takes the view that such regulatory efforts should ensure that there is relatively broad discretion to tailor the measures to be taken to the specific features of each market and should be based on the general principle of improving enforcement by involving the relevant public agencies;
2016/03/02
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 5 #

2015/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the EEA countries and Switzerland to continue their efforts to transpose, and fully implement and enforce internal market legislation; calls on Switzerland to ensure that Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications is fully implemented and to rapidly transpose Directive 2013/55/EU, which improves it;
2015/05/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2015/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on Switzerland to make every effort to achieve progress in the negotiations on its participation in the Erasmus+ programme, in order to guarantee exchange reciprocity and not penalise young people and also to promote the access of researchers to Horizon 2020 funding;
2015/05/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2015/2056(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the redundancies are spread across 84 sites in the whole of mainland France; notes that the number of redundancies in the different sites ranges from 2 (Carlos en Champagne and Saint Louis) to 257 (Gonesse); notes furthermore that since the redundancies occurred in many sites but in limited numbers, the impact on local employment and the local economy is also limited;
2015/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2015/2056(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that only one action from the coordinated package of personalised services is to be co-funded by the EGF: advice and guidance to the redundant workers provided by a team of expert consultants (Cellule d, among the personalised services to be provided, only one action is to be implemented by a one-stop-shop (Cellule de reclassement) which is run by three contracting agencies; notes that France requests only the funding of this one-stop-shop from the EGF; expects the Commission and the Freclassement) from three contractors whonch authorities to strictly follow the principle according to which payments to the agencies will be paidmade by instalments and on the basis of results achieved;
2015/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2015/2056(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the coordinated package of personalised services has been drawn up three contractors operating the Cellule de reclassement were selected by the judicial Administrator following consultations with the representatives of the targeted beneficiaries and the social partnredundant workers, the objective being to cover as much as possible of mainland France and to ensure the reintegration of the largest possible number of the targeted workers;
2015/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2015/2056(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Considers that the monitoring of the activity of the agencies by means of regular written reports ensures the appropriate use of the EGF funding to provide participants a personalised career path, sufficient number of job offers and mentoring for business creation within the framework of the one-stop-shop system;
2015/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2015/2056(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Reminds that the EGF funding is intended to help the workers to find new employment through training and not in any case to support the agencies and their administrative costs;
2015/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2015/2056(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Notes that the task of the contractors is to assist and guide the redundant workers and help them find solutions enabling them to remain in the labour market and embark on new jobs;
2015/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2015/2056(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. Considers that workers in the 55-64 age group are at a higher risk of prolonged unemployment and exclusion from the labour market; considers therefore that these workers have specific needs when it comes to providing them with personalised approach;
2015/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2015/2056(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 e (new)
7e. Reminds that in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy;
2015/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2015/2056(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 f (new)
7f. Welcomes the use of European Social Fund for further active measures (e.g. the longer training courses as such), which are not included in the application submitted byFfrance ;
2015/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2015/2056(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Expects that the French authorities will comply with the provisions of the EGF Regulation as regards providing information and publicising the funded actions, despite the fact that the they did not request funding for preparatory activities, management and information and publicity;
2015/03/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 1 #

2015/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
A. whereas the principle of EU solidarity which is partly expressed through the mechanism of the share out of EU funding should remain a central tenet of EU policy;
2015/06/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2015/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission's criteria, highlighting the fact that multiannual programmes and the long-term nature of the challenges facing Member States require certainty and permanence, and that frequent reprogramming should therefore be avoided and stability preferred in order to reinforce the predictability and credibility of ESI fund programmes; trust that the European Commission and the Council will be very cautious when applying the reprogramming or the suspension of funds for the programmes as foreseen by the regulation of the Common Provisions;
2015/06/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2015/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Highlights the fact that investment supported by ESI (European Structural and Investment Funds) should take place in a sound macroeconomic framework to maximised the impact on growth, development, cohesion and jobs creation in Europe, particularly in very depressed areas;
2015/06/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2015/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. HighlightsPoints out the fact that reprogramming or suspension as regulated in Article 23 of the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR) could undermine social and economic convergence between regions and jeopardise goals pursued by ESI fundshave serious consequences for the respective programmes and regions severely hit by the crisis, as well as for the achievements of cohesion goal as a whole, especially in countries with deep macroeconomic and social imbalances; asks the Commission to use the mechanism only when Member States have persistently failed to take effective action to address its requests to reprogramme funding and giving due consideration to the unemployment rate or the impact on the economies of the Member States concerned; when reprograming funds the Commission and Member States should take in to account the potential of job creation of the new programmes and its contribution to achieve Country Specific Recommendations.
2015/06/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2015/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Considers it counterproductive that EU funds supporting education, training and employment creation might be suspended if such funds are achieving their objectives;
2015/06/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2015/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Given the long term and result oriented nature of the ESI funds and the annual cycle of the European Semester, believes that the shorter term focus of the CSRs should not jeopardise the long term goals of ESI funds;
2015/06/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2015/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to avoidmitigate the effects of any suspension of commitments or payments provided for in the second strand of Article 23 of the CPR where Member States are involved in any of the situations described in sub-paragraphs (a) to (e) of paragraph 1 of Annex III to the CPR. The European Commission should assess the impact on unemployment and try to compensate undesirable effects on weaker population; if reprogramming were to be frequently needed, the European Commission could even design some systems of compensation for depressed an deprived areas;
2015/06/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2015/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Commission to avoid arbitrariness in applying Article 23 of the CPR, to devise a transparent and democratic decision- making process, in line with Article 23(15) of the CPR, and to allow Parliament, on the basis of a formalised process, to be informed at all stages of the adoption of reprogramming requests or of any proposals and decisions on suspension of commitments or payments.
2015/06/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas microfinance can contribute to meeting the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy; and whereas microfinance can lift people out of poverty andby creating jobs and providing access to employment; and can enhance cohesion in communities by improveing social inclusion and minimising social disproportions;
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the objective of the Facility is to increase access to finance for unemployed and other, those at risk of losing their jobs, the socially excluded and other vulnerable and disadvantaged people and for microenterprises, including those employing the above mentioned, which in turn generates employment and, growth and social inclusiveness in local communities;
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Capitalizing on the experience gathered so far, calls on the Commission and the Member States to raise awareness particularly in remote regions and within communities, especially in those with a minority background or within organizations for persons with disabilities about the existence of this facility, its benefits and the ways to access it.
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to assess the suitability of the current definition of microcredit with a view to ensuring that future financial instruments meet the needs of the market; encourages the Member States and the Commission to gather data on the characteristics of micro- enterprises, their specific needs and their survival rates and then assess these data against the design and rules of the EaSi programme as to be able to address and correct it, if necessary, with the occasion of the mid-term evaluation; welcomes the fact that the balance and the reflows of the Facility will be injected into the budget of the MF/SE axis of EaSI, thus increasing the number of guarantees and funded instruments that will be offered to microborrowers;
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Invites the Commission and the Member States to assess the potential connections and opportunities of combining the microcredit facility available under the new EaSI programme with different forms of Employees' Financial Participation (EFP), according to Member States' specificities.
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls, as well, on the European Commission to investigate possible avenues of interconnecting the microcredit facility and the EFP in a future legislative proposal envisaging a European EFP mechanism or any other similar proposal on this matter.
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Welcomes the fact that among the general objectives of the Programme the Commissions specifically included the promotion of workers' geographical mobility and of gender mainstreaming and where appropriate gender budgeting.
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the EIF to enforce provisions in agreements with MFIs requiring them to open themselves up to and cooperate more closely with vulnerable groups, including among others, organisations representing minority groups or for persons with disabilities in order to reach target groups more effectively;
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to improve methods of evaluating the viability and the impact within their community of businesses after repayment of the microcredit;
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission and the EIF to improve reporting about beneficiaries and MFIs, while recognising that a balance needs to be struck so as to not overburden MFIs; stresses that most of the information that would be required for an appropriate report is provided by both the MFIs and the microborrowers in order to obtain a loan;
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2015/2042(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Encourages the Commission to closely monitor this new feature and to encourage the Member States to exchange data, knowledge and best practices in this respect, ensuring appropriate reporting from MFIs;
2015/09/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for an overall improvement in the prevention of, and the fight against, corruption in the public sector through a holistic approach, commencing with better public access to documents and more stringent rules on conflicts of interest and transparency registers, with a view to developing a coherent global approach to these issu, support for investigative journalism and for anti-corruption watchdogs, the introduction or strengthening of transparency registers, the provision of sufficient resources for law enforcement measures and through improved co- operation among Member States as well as with relevant third countries;
2015/11/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 4 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission's announcement of its intention to present, in 2016, a proposal for an inter-institutional agreement revising the Transparency Register for representatives of interest groups; insists that the consultations preceding the proposal take account, in a balanced way, of the different points of view expressed; believes that the level of transparency must be raised through the creation of a legislative footprint for EU lobbying, and by establishing a mandatory EU register for all lobbying activities for all of the EU institutions; points in this regard to the need for introducing annexes to Commission proposals and reports of the EP, clearly indicating which lobbyists had a substantial effect on the text of these proposals and reports, and for creating the possibility for Members of Parliament, who wish to do so, of publishing on their official webpage of the Parliament, which lobbyists they have met;
2015/12/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 9 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Calls upon those European institutions who have introduced codes of conduct, including the Parliament, to step up their monitoring and implementation measures, such as the checks of declarations of financial interests; notes, in this regard, that monitoring and sanctioning bodies must be politically independent;
2015/12/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 12 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls upon those European institutions who have introduced codes of conduct, including the Parliament, to step up their implementation measures, such as the checks of declarations of financial interests;
2015/11/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 15 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Requests that all EU institutions implement article 16 of the EU Staff Regulations by annually publishing information about senior officials who left the EU administration, as well as a list of conflicts of interests; requests that the aforementioned structure assess the compatibility of post- EU employment or the situation whereby civil servants move from the public to the private sector (the ‘revolving door’ issue) and the possibility of a conflict of interest, and define clear cooling-off periods during which officials are required to behave with integrity and discretion or to comply with certain conditions when taking up new duties, which will cover at least the time of transitional allowances;
2015/11/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 22 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Encourages the dissemination of the conflict-of-interest policy among officials alongside ongoing awareness-raising activities; and the inclusion of integrity and transparency as an obligatory item to be discussed during recruitment procedures and performance chats;
2015/11/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 25 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Considers the Commission's first biennial anti-corruption report was a promising attempt to oversee corruption in Member States; calls on the Commission to include an analysis of corruption risks in the EU institutions in the forthcoming 2016 report, along with an overview of the greatest corruption problems in Member States, policy recommendations to tackle them and follow up measures to be taken by the Commission, taking specifically into account the detrimental impact of corrupt activities in the functioning of the Internal Market;
2015/12/22
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 27 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the Commission’s agreement to incNotes with concern the findings of the rease transparency by improving its system of expert groups, particularly as regards the procedure for selecting experts, through the development of a new conflict-of-intearchers in the study ‘Composition of the Commission’s expert groups and the status of the register of expert groups’1 a; urges the Commission to take the recommendations of this study into account, when drafting amendments to the curresnt policy for experts appointed in a personal capacity; takes note of the requirement for experts to be registered in the transparency register where relevant;horizontal rules governing expert groups; requests the Commission to engage in a dialogue with the Parliament, before these rules are being formally adopted, especially in relation to the up-coming CONT/JURI report on this matter; __________________ 1aDirectorate General for Internal Policies, 10/09/2015. PE 552.301
2015/11/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 33 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that the level of transparency couldmust be raised through the creation of a legislative footprint for EU lobbying, with the objective of switching from a voluntary toand by establishing a mandatory EU register for all lobbying activities for any of the EU institutions; points in this regard to the need for introducing annexes to Commission proposals and reports of the EP, clearly indicating which lobbyists had a substantial effect on the text of these proposals and reports, and for creating the possibility for Members of Parliament, who wish to do so, of publishing on their official webpage of the Parliament, which lobbyists they have met;
2015/11/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 39 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Considers, in this context, that a mandatory EU register should include clear provisions on the type of information to be recorded, i.e. accurate and regularly updated information on the nature of lobbying/legal activities, together with detailed records of contacts and input into EU law and policymaking; believes that a system of sanctions in the event of abuse should be envisaged under the supervision of Parliament; calls upon the Commission to submit its proposals for a mandatory register without further delay;
2015/11/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 41 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Demands that all those EU institutions that have not yet done so adopt internal rules on whistleblowing and assess the possibility of agreeing on a common approach to their obligations, focusing on the protection of whistleblowers; asks special attention for the protection of whistleblowers in the context of the Directive on the Protection of Trade Secrets;
2015/11/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 47 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. States that the annual reports of the European institutions could play an important role in the compliance regarding transparency, accountability and integrity; calls upon the European institutions to have a standard chapter in the annual reports on these components;
2015/11/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 48 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
14. Considers the Commission’s first biennial anti-corruption report to be a promising attempt to better understand corruption in all its dimensions, to develop effective responses with a view to tackling it, and to pave the way for enhanced accountability of the public sphere to EU citizens; reaffirms, in this context, the importance of the EU’ zero-tolerance policy on fraud, corruption and collusion; regrets, however, that this report did not include anti-corruption policies of the EU institutions themselves;
2015/11/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 49 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 16
16. Demands that at the latest in its second anti- corruption report the Commission carry out further analysis at the level of both the EU institutions and the Member States of the environment in which policies are implemented, in order to identify inherent critical factors, vulnerable areas and risk factors conducive to corruption;
2015/11/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 50 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Requests the Commission in this regard to pay particular attention to the prevention of conflicts of interest, as well as corruptive practises in the case of decentralised agencies who are particularly vulnerable, considering the fact that they are relatively unknown to the public and are also located throughout the EU;
2015/11/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 57 #

2015/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls upon the Commission to fulfil without delay its reporting obligations under the UN Convention against Corruption;
2015/11/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 6 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for the ILO’s eight core labour standards and the four ILO Priority Conventions for the industrialised countries to be systematically includrespected and implemented in all bilateral EU trade agreements;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for closer cooperation at multilateral level with a view to achieving genuine coordination betweenwith the international organisations WTO and ILO;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for a strengthening of the chapter on sustainable development in bilateral agreements through the provision of a complaints proceduremonitoring and reporting mechanism open to the social partners;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for sustainable impact assessments and human rights impact assessments to be carried out, at bilateral level, before, during and after the negotiations the negotiations, as well as for an ex-post systematic monitoring and evaluation to be applied; takes the view, also, that negotiators should take into account to a greater extent the priorities and concerns that emerge from these impact studies;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to include systematically in all free trade agreements negotiated with non-EU countries a series of social standards that include the full implementation ofare in keeping with the ILO’s Decent Work Agenda;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to proactively and constructively engage with the OECD and the ILO to develop a global approach to improving working conditions in the garment sector;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Commission to create incentives and promote the uptake of corporate social responsibility (CSR), which must complement and under no circumstances replace labour and environmental laws;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2015/2032(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that, to date, this is the second EGF application from the publishing sector;e publishing activities sector has been the subject of one other EGF application1a; _______________ 1aEGF/2009/024 NL Noord Holland and Zuid Holland (COM(2010) 532 final).
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2015/2032(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Considers that the coordinating role and the involvement of the representatives of the targeted beneficiaries was especially important in drawing up the personalised services, since the dismissals took place in 46 different companies in the publishing sector;
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2015/2032(BUD)

8b. Welcomes that all eligible redundant workers are expected to participate in the measures supported by EGF;
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2015/2032(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes that all eligible redundant workers have been offered occupational guidance consisting of different stages, which will provide them with individual, personalised advices and plans to reintegrate into employment;
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2015/2032(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Notes that most of the requested funds are to support business start-ups in the form of self-employment subsidies (EUR 1 200 000) and training measures, including vocational training (EUR 1 104 000) and training allowances (EUR 828 000);
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2015/2032(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Notes that the maximum eligible amount of EUR 15 000 will be granted to up to 80 selected workers as a contribution to setting up their own businesses; underlines that the aim of this measure is to promote entrepreneurship by providing funding to viable business initiatives, which should result in the creation of further workplaces in the medium term;
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2015/2032(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10c. Notes that an estimated 80 workers will receive a mobility allowance, with the aim of supporting their move after accepting a job offer involving a change of residence;
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2015/2032(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 d (new)
10d. Notes that the contribution for preparatory activities, management, information and publicity and control and reporting constitutes for 3,36 % of the total budget; notes furthermore that almost half of this budget is planned to be used for information and publicity;
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2015/2031(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Considers that the coordinating role and the involvement of the representatives of the targeted beneficiaries was especially important in drawing up the personalised services, since the dismissals took place in 16 different companies in the publishing sector;
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2015/2031(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Welcomes that all eligible redundant workers are expected to participate in the measures supported by EGF;
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2015/2031(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes that all workers have been offered occupational guidance consisting of different stages, which will provide them with individual, personalised advices and plans to reintegrate into employment;
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2015/2031(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Notes that most of the requested funds are to support business start-ups in the form of self-employment subsidies (EUR 1 800 000) and training measures, including vocational training (EUR 1 536 000) and training allowances (EUR 1 152 000);
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2015/2031(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Considers that the occupational guidance, training self-employment supporting measures should take into account the emerging opportunities that the new web media could provide for these workers;
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2015/2031(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 d (new)
9d. Notes that the maximum eligible amount of EUR 15 000 will be granted to up to 120 selected workers as a contribution to setting up their own businesses; underlines that the aim of this measure is to promote entrepreneurship by providing funding to viable business initiatives, which should result in the creation of further workplaces in the medium term;
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2015/2031(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 e (new)
9e. Notes that an estimated 120 workers are to receive a mobility allowance, with the aim of supporting their move after accepting a job offer involving a change of residence;
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2015/2031(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 f (new)
9f. Notes that the contribution for preparatory activities, management, information and publicity and control and reporting constitutes for 2,50 % of the total budget; notes furthermore that almost half of this budget is planned to be used for information and publicity;
2015/03/05
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2015/2018(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the redundancies at Aleo Solar are expected to have a negative impact on the Prenzlau/Brandenburg region, where per capita income is well below the national average and the unemployment rate the highest in Germany with 15,5 % and 16,4 % respectively; highlights that the inclusion of the redundancies from Aleo Solar would increase this rate by 0,9 %; notes that theregrets that there is no immediate prospect of the redundant workers finding any equivalent new jobs, due to a relatively low population density and lack of majorpotential employers in: the region are an obstacle in the job search of the workers made redundantarea has mostly small and medium-sized enterprises, and only 10 enterprises (0,3%) have more than 249 workers (Aleo Solar was one of these major employers);
2015/02/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2015/2018(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that the training allowance does not exceed the ceiling of 35 % of the total costs for the coordinated package of personalised services, as the new regulation requiresauthorities plan to utilise the maximum allowed 35 % of all costs on allowances and incentives in the form of training allowances (Transferkurzarbeitergeld) constituting 60 % or 67 % of a worker's previous net income – depending on the household situation of the beneficiary – which is in line with the practice where workers become unemployed in Germany; notes that the training allowance is not a substitute for passive social protection measures and is tied to strict conditions to undertake the training and other activities that have been organised;
2015/02/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2015/2018(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes therefore that no extra incentives for training are provided for the participants by the EGF, moreover, more personalised and in-depth measures should be encouraged;
2015/02/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2015/2018(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Notes that 164 of the Aleo Solar workers made redundant in Prenzlau were rehired by an Asian consortium, which bought the plant from the liquidator; notes that the reasoning of the German authorities for enabling these workers to benefit from the measures to be funded by the EGF is that the security of their new employment was not certain at that time;
2015/02/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2015/2018(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Notes that the 104 workers made redundant in the administrative centre in Oldenburg are not included in the measures to be funded by the EGF; notes that the employment situation in this region is much more promising;
2015/02/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2015/2018(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 c (new)
11c. Regrets that the risk of long-term unemployment for the redundant workers is high and stresses therefore the importance of measures encouraging workers to look beyond the immediate area and take up job offers which can be found in other regions;
2015/02/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2015/2018(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 d (new)
11d. Considers that workers in the 55-64 and 15-29 age groups are at a higher risk of prolonged unemployment and exclusion from the labour market; considers therefore that these workers have specific needs when it comes to providing them with personalised approach;
2015/02/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2015/2018(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 e (new)
11e. Recalls that in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy;
2015/02/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2015/2017(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Notes that the redundancies at SGS mainly concern production-line workers (83 % of staff concerned have ‘ouvrier’ status); considers that in the context of the labour market situation in the affected region, the dismissed workers will have to be retrained to find jobs in other occupations and/or other sectors;
2015/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2015/2017(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Notes that the personalised services listed in the application consist of several measures aimed at promoting the workers’ return to the labour market and helping them with administrative procedures, most of which are expected to support all the dismissed workers;
2015/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2015/2017(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Notes that measures which are mandatory under collective redundancy procedures under Belgian federal legislation and which are carried out as part of the standard activities of the Redeployment Units (e.g. outplacement support, training, job-search assistance and careers advice, etc.) are not included in this EGF application;
2015/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2015/2017(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Welcomes that the social partners were involved in the preparation of the social plan as well as in the implementation of the measures ;
2015/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 1 #

2015/2016(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that the requested amount is the lowest in EGF history;
2015/02/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2015/2016(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the coordinated package of personalised services to be co-funded is aimed atmeasures supported by the EGF are targeted at the 50 workers in the 50 most disadvantaged perssituations and includes the following 2 measures: hiring incentives and intervention works; notes that the majority of the workers made redundant by Zachem and its suppliers benefit from complementary measures funded by other European Social Fund projects; points out the importance of ensuring that double financing in cases of such complementary actions is prevented;
2015/02/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2015/2016(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Notes that the largest proportion of the costs for personalised services will be spent on hiring incentives targeted at 45 workers, which aim to provide an incentive to employers who decided to hire these workers for at least 24 months;
2015/02/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2015/2016(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Notes that a smaller-scale support is provided to 5 redundant workers over 50 years of age to cover their social security contributions; notes that this age group is at a higher risk of prolonged unemployment and exclusion from the labour market;
2015/02/17
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 63 #

2015/2010(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas according to the Union treaties the power to legislate on corporate taxation is currently vested in the Member States;
2015/10/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 56 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to identify new forms of employment especially for women and to safeguard fundamental workers’ rights and the social protection of employees in order to combat precarious working conditions;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to identifyanalyse the new forms of employment especially for women andin the digital age and ways to safeguard fundamentalexisting workers’ rights and the social protection of employees in order to combat precarious working conditions;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Points Is concerned about that the gender pay gap continues for self-employed women and women working in the ICT sectorin some sectors in some countries; stresses that the principle of equal pay for equal work in the same workplace to ensure just and fair wages is being challenged;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that there is a pressing need to tackle the demand for new skills, particularly in the ICT field, needs to be tackled through training as well as through further education and lifelong learning, in the interests of promoting digital literacy and tackling the existing gender gap in order to enlarge the pool of highly qualified candidates; stresses that there is a pressing need to ensure that educational institutions ensure a better match between the skills of their candidates and the demands on the labour market.
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas young people benefit immensely from practical entrepreneurial experience, which contributes to their development of skills and talent as well as to new business creation and employability and, boosts innovation in the wider organisations in which they are employed and reduces youth unemployment;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas social and creative businesses contribute to innovative sustainable growth and cohesion within society and local communities, and create employment opportunities for young people, including disadvantaged young people and those furthest from the labour market;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Member States to use existing EU-level funding resources, such as Progress Microfinance, to support initiatives pursuing links with businesses and offering entrepreneurship education to low income young people, school dropouts, young people in danger of long-term unemployment and young people with disabilities;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Member States to use existing EU-level funding resources to support initiatives pursuing links with businesses and offering entrepreneurship education to low income young people, school dropouts, young people in danger of long-term unemployment and young people with disabilities; calls on the EU to make these funds easily accessible and easy to use;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Member States to offer increased access to and availability of micro-scholarships and micro-loans schemes, such as those supported under the Microfinance and Social Entrepreneurship axis of EaSI, to innovative students in secondary and tertiary education respectively in order to start their own ventures or projects;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Member States to improve the entrepreneurial culture within tertiary education by establishing the conditions to support the creation of new companies by young people based on academic research (spin-offs), reducing the bureaucratic burden involved in establishing such companies and promoting the benefits of commercialising research as well as by strengthening the cooperation between educational institutions and companies, welcomes the initiatives which reward young people for successful business ventures (e.g. The Best Student Company of the Year), further emphasises the importance for companies to provide the possibility for young people to get their first direct in-house work experience and re-iterates the necessity to promote traineeships schemes with such objective;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Member States to improve the entrepreneurial culture within tertiary education by establishing the conditions to support the creation of new companies based on academic research (spin-offs), reducing the bureaucratic burden involved in establishing such companies and promoting the benefits of commercialising research; recalls the importance of Erasmus+ as a vehicle to promote entrepreneurship through education and training providing young people with the opportunity to study and train abroad as well as supporting institutions and organisations to exchange and innovate good practices and form cross-sector strategic partnerships;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 236 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) The demand for accessible products and services is high and the number of citizens with disabilities and/or functional limitations will increase significantly with the ageing of the European Union's population. An environment where products and services are more accessible allows for a more inclusive society and facilitatesare essential for independent living.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 247 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) The approximation of national measures at Union level is therefore necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market in order to put an end to fragmentation in the market of accessible products and services, to create economies of scale, to facilitate cross-border trade and mobility,, free movement of goods and services and the free movement and mobility of persons, including persons with disabilities as well as to help economic operators to concentrate resources on innovation instead of using those resources for complying with fragmented legal requirements across the Union.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 253 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) The entry into force of the Convention in the Member States’ legal orders entails the need to adopt additional national provisions on accessibility of products and, services and the built environment related to the provision of services which without Union action would further increase disparities between national provisions.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 265 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) It is necessary to introduce the accessibility requirements, while enabling all people to fully use the products and services covered by the Directive, in the least burdensome manner for the economic operators and the Member States, notably by only including in the scope the products and services which have been thoroughly selected.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 267 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) It is therefore necessary to specify accessibility requirements for the placing on the market of products and services as well as the built environment related to the provision of services which fall within the scope of this Directive in order to ensure their free circulation in the internal market.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 273 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) In some situations, cCommon accessibility requirements of the built environment wshould facilitate the free movement of the related services and of persons with disabilities. Therefore, this Directive enables Member States to include the built environment used in the provision of the services under the scope of this Directive, ensuring compliance with the accessibility requirements set in Annex X.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 276 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25 a (new)
(25a) When identifying and classifying the needs of persons with disabilities the product or service is intended to meet, the principle of the universal design should be viewed in accordance with the General Comment No. 2 (2014) on Article 9 of the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities1a. __________________ 1ahttps://documents-dds- ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G14/033/13/ PDF/G1403313.pdf?OpenElement
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 287 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
(37) This Directive should follow the principle of 'think small first' and should take account of the administrative burdens that SMEs are faced with. It should set lightprecise and effective rules in terms of conformity assessment and should establish safeguard clauses for economic operators, rather than providing for general exceptions and derogations for those enterprises. Consequently, when setting up the rules for the selection and implementation of the most appropriate conformity assessment procedures, the situation of SMEs should be taken into account and the obligations to assess conformity of accessibility requirements should be limited to the extent that they do not pose a disproportionate burden on SMEs. In addition, market surveillance authorities should operate in a proportionate manner in relation to the size of undertakings and to the small serial or non-serial nature of the production concerned, without creating unnecessary obstacles for SMEs and without compromising the protection of public interests.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 290 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
(40) In the absence of harmonised standards and where needed for market harmonisation purposes, the Commission should be able to adopt implementing acts establishing common technical specifications for the accessibility requirements set in this Directive.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 314 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1a Measures which go beyond the minimum requirements Member States may maintain or introduce measures in conformity with Union law which go beyond the minimum requirements for accessibility established by this Directive.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 324 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21
(21) "e-commerce" means the online sale of products and services, including any third party elements needed for the provision of the online sale.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 366 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 10
10. Member States may decidshall ensure, in the light of national conditions, that the built environment used by clients of passenger transport services including the environment that is managed by service providers and by infrastructure operators as well as the built environment used by clients of banking services, and customer services centres and shops under the scope of telephony operators shall, comply with the accessibility requirements of Annex I, section X, in order to maximise their use by persons with functional limitations, including persons with disabilities.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 384 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the estimated costs and benefits for the economic operators in relation to the estimated benefit for persons with functional limitations, including persons with disabilities, taking into account the frequency and duration of use of the specific product or service.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 396 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 6
6. Where the economic operators have used the exception provided for in paragraphs 1 to 5 for a specific product or service they shall notify the relevant market surveillance authority of the Member State in the market of which the product or service is placed or made available. Notification shall include the assessment referred to in paragraph 3. In order for an exemption to be granted pursuant to such exception, the market surveillance authority shall regularly verify such assessments, unless the economic operator has provided an independent third party assessment. Microenterprises are exempted from this notification requirement but must be able to supply the relevant documentation upon request from a relevant market surveillance authority.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 401 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. A structured dialogue shall be established between relevant stakeholders, including persons with disabilities and their representative organisations and the market surveillance authorities, to ensure that adequate principles for the assessment of these exceptions are established.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 408 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. To facilitate the exchange of information and best practices amongst the market surveillance authorities and to ensure coherence in the application of the requirements set out in the Directive, the Commission shall establish a working group formed by representatives of the national authorities and the representative organisations of the relevant stakeholders, including persons with disabilities and their representative organisations.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 413 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) where applicable, to the provisions in Union legislation referring to accessibility for persons with disabilities.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 416 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the estimated costs and benefits for the competent authorities concerned in relation to the estimated benefit for persons with functional limitations, including persons with disabilities, taking into account the frequency and duration of use of the specific product or service;
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 432 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – row 2 – Section I – column 1 – title
General purpose computer hardware and operating systems and household appliances operated by user interface
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 438 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – row 2 – Section I – column 2 – point 2 – title
User interface and functionality designFunctionality requirements for user interface and design of the product
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 453 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – row 3 – Section II – column 2 – point 1 – point d
(d) the interfacing of the product with assistive devices and technologies, including hearing technologies, such as hearing aids, telecoils, cochlear implants and assistive listening devices. The product shall also allow for the use of personal headsets.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 455 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – row 3 – Section II – column 2 – point 2 – title
User interface and functionality designFunctionality requirements for user interface and design of the product
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 466 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – row 4 – Section III – column 2 – point A – point 1 – point c
(c) making websites and mobile based services, including mobile applications needed for the provision of the service accessible in a consistent and adequate way for users’ perception, operation and understanding, including the adaptability of content presentation and interaction, when necessary providing an accessible electronic alternative; and in a way which facilitates interoperability with a variety of user agents and assistive technologies available at Union and international level;
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 496 #

2015/0278(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – row 6 – Section V – column 2 – point A – point 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) the built environment needed for the provision of the service shall comply with Section X of this Annex.
2017/01/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) As a response to recent terrorist acts which demonstrated gaps in the implementation of Directive 91/477/EEC especially with The safe and secure movement of lawfully owned firegard to deactivation of weapons, convertibility and marking rules, the "European Agenda on Security" adopted in April 2015 and the Declaration of the Home Affairs Ministers Council of 29 August 2015 called for the revision of that Directive and for a common approach on the deactivation of firearms to prevent reactivation and use by criminalms should benefit from clear harmonised rules at Union level on the marking, traceability and deactivation of firearms.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 107 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) Member States should ensure that an effective system is implemented for monitoring possession of firearm. That system, which could be periodic or continuous, should either be based on medical review, if deemed appropriate, upon the issuance or renewal of an authorisation, or provide for an effective alternative system of continuous monitoring taking into account the risks concerned, and any relevant indications, for example from medical personnel, indicating that the conditions for allowing possession may no longer be met. Where a system of continuous monitoring is used, it may inter alia include for the owner to submit at any time to a check of continued eligibility for possession, and on-site checks of compliance with safe storage requirements.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 123 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 b (new)
(3b) The definition of the term "firearm" under Directive 91/477/EEC should continue to exclude objects which expel a shot, bullet or projectile by the action of a non-combustible propellant, for example through the operation of compressed air or another gas, including so-called airsoft devices and airgun devices, as well as objects which merely have the appearance of a firearm (replicas, imitations), provided in both cases that such objects cannot be converted to a firearm or do not contain an essential component which is capable of being used in a firearm. Member States should be able to regulate such objects under their national law.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 127 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 b (new)
(3b) Certain persons have a legitimate interest in accessing firearms classified in category A, provided that exemptions are granted on a strictly limited basis. These could include, inter alia, national defence, armourers, proof houses, manufacturers, forensic scientists and, in certain cases, those involved in film production, as well as individuals needing firearms for self- defence purposes.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 136 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 c (new)
(3c) Essential components should be defined as those components which are necessary for the operation of a firearm and are constructed to withstand high pressure of firing. Accessories, such as devices designed or adapted to diminish the sound caused by firing a firearm, should not fall within the definition of an essential component, as the firearm can still be operated without them.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 138 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 d (new)
(3d) It should be specified that the activities of a dealer include not only the manufacturing but also the modification or conversion a firearm, such as the shortening of a complete firearm, and in addition the modification or conversion of parts of firearms and of ammunition, provided that it affects the category of such a firearm or ammunition, and that, therefore, only authorised dealers should be permitted to engage in those activities. This will not prevent, where allowed by national law, private persons from preparing ammunition or from modifying non-essential components of firearms for personal use.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 142 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 e (new)
(3e) Member States should lay down particularly high requirements for secure storage with respect to firearms or ammunition classified in category A. Such requirements could include, where appropriate, measures ensuring real-time monitoring, as well as requirements to maintain essential components and ammunition in safe storage separate from the firearms in which they can be used.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 151 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Bodies concerned with the cultural and historical aspects of weapons and recognised as such by the Member State in whose territory they are established and holding in theirIn special cases for educational, cultural, research and historical purposes, it should be possible for Member States to choose to authorise persons to acquire and possession firearms and ammunition classified in category A acquired before the date of entry into force of this Directive should be able to keep those firearms in their possession subject to authorisation by the Member S, provided that those persons demonstrate, prior to being granted authorisation, that they have taken the necessary measures to address any risks to public security or safety, including by way of secure storage. Any such authorisation should tatke concerned and provided that those firearms have been deactivatedinto account and reflect the specific situation, including the nature of the collection and its purposes.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 161 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) National defence purposes shall constitute a legitimate purpose for certain persons to acquire and possess firearms classified in category A, provided that those persons demonstrate, prior to being granted authorisation, that they have taken the necessary measures to address any risks to public security or safety, including by way of secure storage.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 173 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Since collectors have been identified as a possible source of traffic of firearms, they should be covered by this Directive.deleted
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 186 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) Taking into consideration the high risk of reactivating badly deactivated weapons and in order to enhance security across the Union, dDeactivated firearms should not be covered by this Directive. Additionally, for the most dangerous firearms stricter rules should be introduced in order to ensure that those firearms are not allowed to be owned or traded. Those rules should also apply to fire if they have been deactivated in accordance with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2403 or in accordance with prior national standarmds of that category even after they have been deactivated. Where those rules are not respected, Member States should take appropriate measures including the destruction of thoseand procedures recognised as resulting in the firearms being rendered permanently unfit for use, inoperable and incapable of being converted into functioning firearms.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 190 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The acquisition and possession of firearms should only be permitted if, inter alia, this is done for a legitimate purpose. It should be possible for Member States, whilst not being under any obligation in that regard, to find that the acquisition and possession of firearms for the purpose of, for example, hunting, target shooting, national defence training, various scientific, technical or testing activities and re-enactment of historical events, filmmaking or historical study and collection can constitute a legitimate purpose.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 217 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) Some semi-automatic firearms can be easily converted to automatic firearms, thus posing a threat to security. Even in the absence of conversion to category "A", certain semi-automatic firearms may be very dangerous when their capacity regarding the number of rounds is high. Such semi-automatic weapons should therefore be banned for civilian use.deleted
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 252 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) Selling arrangements of firearms and their components by means of distance communication may pose a serious threat to security as they are more difficult to control than the conventional selling methods, especially as regards the on line verification of the legality of authorisations. It is therefore appropriate to limit the selling of arms and components by means of distance communication, notably internet, to dealers and brokers.deleted
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 253 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) Selling arrangements of firearms and their components by means of distance communication may pose a serious threat to security asMarketing of firearms, parts and ammunition by means of the internet or other means of distance communication, for example by way of online auction catalogues or classified advertisements, and they arranging of a sale more difficult to control than the conventional selling methods, especially as regards the on line verification of the legality other transaction by means of, for example, telephone or email should, where allowed under national law, be possible provided that the actual handing over takes place either between the parties directly on a face-to-face basis, or by way of collecting the firearm, essential component ofr authorisations. It is therefore appropriate to limit the selling of arms and components by means of distance communication, notably internet, to dealers and brokersmmunition at the premises of a dealer, local police station or another reliable body, based on nationally established practices of Member States, which have been proven to be safe and secure. The verification of identity and appropriate licenses of the right to engage in such a transaction shall be done either on a face- to-face basis or through a secure and reliable system, such as electronic verification.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 287 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) Objects, that have the physical appearance of a firearm ("replica"), but are manufactured in such a way that they cannot be converted to firing a shot or expelling a bullet or projectile by the action of a combusted propellant, should not be covered by this Directive.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 313 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point a
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 1 – point 1b
1b. For the purposes of this Directive, "essential component" shall mean the barrel, frame, receiver, slide or cylinder, bolt or breaech block and any device designed or adapted to diminish the sound caused by firing a firearm which, being separate objects, are included in the category of the firearms on which they are or are intended to be mounted.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 331 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 1 – paragraph 1e
1e. For the purposes of this Directive, "broker" shall mean any natural or legal person, other than a dealer, his agents and representatives, whose trade or business consists wholly or partly in buying, selling or arranging the transfer within a Member State, from one Member State to another Member State or exporting to a third country fully assembled firearms, their parts and ammunition.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 360 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point c
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 1– paragraph 1h
1h. For the purposes of this Directive, "replica firearms" shall mean objects that have the physical appearance of a firearm, but are manufactured in such a way that they cannot be converted to firing a shot or expelling a bullet or projectile by the action of a combustible propellant.deleted
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 388 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point d
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point ii
(ii) the manufacture, including modification or conversion, trade, exchange, hiring out, or repair or conversion of parts of firearmf essential components;
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 415 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. This Directive shall not apply to the acquisition or possession of weapons and ammunition, in accordance with national law, by the armed forces, the police, the and public authorities. Nor shall it apply to commercial transfers of weapons and ammunition of war.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 423 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that any assembled firearm or part placed on the market has been markedessential component, when manufactured or imported, has been marked without delay with an irremovable mark and registered in compliance with this Directive, or that it has been deactivated in accordance with the provisions implementing Article 10b and registered in compliance with this Directive.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 468 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The marking shall be affixed to the frame or receiver of the firearm.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 470 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
For the purposes referred to in the first subparagraph, Member States may choose to apply the provisions of the United Nations Convention for the Reciprocal Recognition of Proof Marks on Small Arms of 1 July 1969.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 510 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Without prejudice to Article 3, Member States shall authorise the acquisition and possession of firearms only by persons who have good cause and who:deleted
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 511 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Without prejudice to Article 3, Member States shall authorise the acquisition and possession of firearms only by persons who have good cause and who:deleted
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 520 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) are at least 18 years of age, except in relation to the possession of firearms for hunting and target shooting, provided that in that case persons of less than 18 years of age have parental permission, or are under parental guidance or the guidance of an adult with a valid firearms or hunting licence, or are within a licenced or otherwise approved training centre;deleted
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 540 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 5 – paragraph 1a (new)
1a. Member States shall establish rules on appropriate storage of firearms, their essential components and ammunition, including when under transport, ensuring a level of security proportionate to the risk of unauthorised access and to the nature and category of the firearms concerned.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 548 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall provide for standard medical tests for issuing or renewing authorisations as referred to in paragraph 1 and shall withdraw authorisations if any of the conditions on the basis of which it wasthey were granted is no longer met.
2016/04/28
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 594 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Member States shall take all appropriate steps to prohibit the acquisition and the possession of the firearms and ammunition classified in category A and to destroy those firearms and ammunition held in violation of this provison and seized.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 612 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 6 – subparagraph 2
Member States may authorise bodies concerned with the cultural and historical aspects of weapons and recognised as such by the Member State in whose territory they are established to keep in their possession firearms classified in category A acquired before [the date of entry into force of this Directive] provided they have been deactivated in accordance with the provisions that implement Article 10(b).
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 625 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 6 – paragraph 3
The acquisition of firearms and their parts and ammunition concerning categories A, B and C by means of distance communication, as defined in Article 2 of Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(*), shall be authorised only with respect to dealers and brokers and shall be subject to the strict control of the Member States. (*) Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).deleted
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 650 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6 a (new)Directive 91/477/EEC

Article 6 a (new)
(6a) The following Article is inserted: "Article 6a Except with respect to transfers between dealers and brokers, the selling and acquisition of firearms and their essential components and ammunition following a transaction by means of distance communication, as defined in Article 2 of Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, shall be subject to strict control by the Member States and allowed only if it takes place under conditions whereby the identities and appropriate licences of the parties can be reliably and securely verified."
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 706 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 9
Directive 91/477/EEC
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. TFor the purposes of the efficient application of this Directive, the competent authorities of the Member States shall exchange information on theby electronic means via a data-exchange platform or interoperable data-exchange platforms to be operational by ... [insert date], including information on authorisations granted for the transfers of firearms to another Member State as well as information with regard to refusals to grant authorisations as defined in Article 7. The Member States shall, upon request by another Member State, exchange information relevant to an assessment of the criminal history, if any, of persons who apply for or who have been granted exceptions pursuant to Article 6 or authorisations pursuant to Article 7. That information shall include the entire text of the corresponding judicial decision or decision of a relevant public authority.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 747 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point i
6. Automatic firearms which have been converted into semi-automatic firearms;deleted
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 763 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point i
Directive 91/477/EEC
Annex I – part II – point A – category A – point 7
7. Semi-automatic firearms for civilian use which resemble weapons with automatic mechanisms;deleted
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 774 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point i
Directive 91/477/EEC
Annex I – part II – point A – category A – point 7
7. Semi-automatic firearms for civilian use which resemble weapons withwhich have been converted into automatic mechanisfirearms;
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 781 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point i
Directive 91/477/EEC
Annex I – part II – point A – category A – point 8
8. Firearms under points 1 to 7 after having been deactivadeleted.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 798 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point ii
Directive 91/477/EEC
Annex I – part II – point A – category B – point 7
(ii) in category B, point 7 is deleted.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 844 #

2015/0269(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive [312 months after publication toin the OJ]. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
2016/04/29
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 266 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) an offer of securities addressed to fewer than 15300 natural or legal persons per Member State, other than qualified investors;
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 279 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) an offer of securities with a total consideration in the Union of less than EUR 510 000 000, which shall be calculated over a period of 12 months;
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 290 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) shares resulting from the conversion or exchange of other securities or from the exercise of the rights conferred by other securities, where the resulting shares are of the same class as the shares already admitted to trading on the same regulated market, provided that the resulting shares represent, over a period of 12 months, less than 20 per cent of the number of shares of the same class already admitted to trading on the same regulated market. Where a prospectus was drawn up in accordance with either this Regulation or Directive 2003/71/EC upon the offer to the public or admission to trading of the securities giving access to the shares, or where the securities giving access to the shares were issued before the entry into force of this Regulation, this Regulation shall not apply to the admission to trading on a regulated market of the resulting shares irrespective of their proportion in relation to the number of shares of the same class already admitted to trading on the same regulated market.;
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 331 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. A Member State may exempt offers of securities to the public from the prospectus requirement of paragraph 1 provided that: (a) the offer is made only in that Member State, and (b) the total consideration of the offer is less than a monetary amount calculated over a period of 12 months, which shall not exceed EUR 10 000 000. Member States shall notify the Commission and ESMA of the exercise of the option under this paragraph, including the consideration of the offer chosen below which the exemption for domestic offers applies.deleted
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 365 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Where the prospectus relates to the admission to trading on a regulated market of non-equity securities that are solely offered to qualified investors, there shall be no requirement to provide a summary.
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 372 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(ba) The competent authority may grant a derogation to allow the issuer to provide a summary longer than six sides of A4-sized paper required in this paragraph in cases where the complexity of the issuer's activities or the nature of the issue or the nature of the securities offered requires a longer summary.
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 399 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point c
(c) under a sub-section titled 'What are the key risks that are specific to the issuer?' a brief description of no more than five of the most material risk factors specific to the issuer contained in the category of highest materiality according to Article 16.
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 422 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) under a sub-section titled 'What are the key risks that are specific to the securities?' a brief description of no more than five of the most material risk factors specific to the securities, contained in the category of highest materiality according to Article 16.
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 428 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The summary shall contain under the sub-sections titled 'What are the key risks that are specific to the issuer?' and 'What are the key risks that are specific to the securities?' a brief description of no more than 10 of the most material risk factors that are specific to the issuer or the securities.
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 432 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 10
10. The summary shall notmay contain cross- references to other parts of the prospectus or incorporate information by reference.
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 443 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7
7. A summary shall only be drawn up when the final terms are approved or filed and such a summary shall be specific to the individual issue.
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 457 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) the various types and characteristics of offers and admissions to trading on a regulated market of non-equity securities. In particular, the information required in a prospectus relating to non-equity securities on, or being admitted to, a regulated market shall be adapted appropriately when the offer of securities is addressed to qualified investors;
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 496 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. TIn the context of securities transactions, the risk factors featured in a prospectus shall be limited to risks which are both material and specific to the issuer and/or the securities and are material for taking an informed investment decision, as corroborated by the content of the registration document and the securities note. They shallose risks may be allocated across a maximum of three distinct categories which shall differentiate them by their relative materiality based on the issuer's assessment of the probability of their occurrence and the expected magnitude of their negative impactcording to the type of risk.
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 516 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
A frequent issuer shall submit an application to the competent authority containing the necessary amendments to the universal registration document, where applicable, the securities note and the summary submitted for approval. A frequent issuer shall not be required to obtain approval for non-material amendments to the universal registration document. Where a prospectus has already been approved by the competent authority and a supplement is subsequently required to the universal registration document, a frequent issuer shall not be required to obtain approval from the competent authority for that supplement prior to the publication.
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 523 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 11
11. ESMA shall use its powers under Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 to promote supervisory convergence with regard to the scrutiny and approval processes of competent authorities when assessing the completeness, consistency and comprehensibility of the information contained in a prospectus. To that effect, ESMA shall deliver guidance on vetting principles for competent authorities across the Union. In particular, ESMA shall foster convergence regarding the efficiency, methods and timing of the scrutiny by the competent authorities of the information given in a prospectus.
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 533 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 10
10. A papern electronic copy of the prospectus shall be deliverprovided to any natural or legal person, upon request and free of charge, by the issuer, the offeror, the person asking for admission to trading or the financial intermediaries placing or selling the securities. DeliveryProvision shall be limited to jurisdictions in which the offer to the public is made or where the admission to trading is taking place under this Regulation.
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 554 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Where a prospectus is submitted for approval in one or more Member States and it contains a universal registration document which has already been approved in another Member State, the competent authority considering the application for approval of the prospectus shall not re-review the universal registration document and shall accept its prior approval.
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 576 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
2. The third country issuer shall designate a representative established in its home Member State, among the entities which are subject to and supervised under EU financial services regulation, on the basis of an authorisation. The third country issuer shall notify the competent authority of the identity and contact details of its representative.deleted
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 581 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3
3. The representative shall be the contact point of the third country issuer in the Union for the purposes of this Regulation, through which any official correspondence with the competent authority shall take place. The representative shall, together with the third country issuer, be responsible for ensuring compliance of the prospectus with the requirements of this Regulation, in accordance with Chapters VII and VIII of this Regulation, towards the competent authority of the home Member State.deleted
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 603 #

2015/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) to suspend an offer to the public or admission to trading for a maximum of 10 consecutive working days on any single occasion where there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the provisions of this Regulation have been infringed;
2016/04/21
Committee: ECON
Amendment 78 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Reforms are by their very nature complex processes that require political will, the ability to engage in dialogue and multi-level cooperation, budgetary and administrative resources, and a complete chain of highly-specialised knowledge and skills. Addressing structural reforms in a variety of public policy areas is challenging since their benefits often take time to materialise. Therefore, early and efficient design and implementation is crucial, be it for crisis-struck or structurally-weak economies. In this context, the provision of support by the Union in the form of technical assistance has been crucial inmust take into account the lessons learned from the programmes that aimed to supporting the economic adjustment of Greece and Cyprus in the last years.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The Union has a long-lasting experience on providing specific support toexperience gained by the Union in assisting national and/or subnational authorities carrying out reforms related to capacity building in national administrations and other, local and regional authorities ofand other Member States as regards capacity buildinguthorities, and similar actions in certain sectors (e.g. taxation, customs, support to small- and medium-sized enterprises) and in relation to the implementation of cohesion policy. The experience gained by the Union in assisting national authorities carrying out reforms should be used in order to enhance the capacity of the Union to provide support to Member States. Comprehensive, should be used. Action to support those Member States that are undertaking reforms to enhance sustainable growth, social well-being, and the accessibility of healthcare and education, and that request assistance from the Union in this respect, might be necessary if these reforms are not already eligible for other technical assistance programmes. These support measures will be based on and integrated action is indeed necessary in order to provide support to those Member States that are undertaking growth-enhancing reforms and request assistance from the Union in this respectpproach, taking into account the links between the different areas of structural reforms, and the ability of all levels of government to work together as partners – while respecting each Member State's institutional framework and also involving all stakeholders.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Against this background, it is necessary to establish a Structural Reform Support Programme ('the Programme') with the objective of strengthening the capacity of Member States to prepare and implement growth-enhancing administrative and structural reforms, including through assistance for the efficient and effective use of the Union funds. The Programme is intended to contribute to the achievement of common goals towards obtaining economic recovery, sustainable job creation, boosting Europe's competitiveness and stimulating investment in the real economy.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Support under the Programme should be provided by the Commission upon request by a Member State, in areas such as budget and taxation, public function, institutional and administrative reforms, the justice system, anti-fraud, anti-corruption and anti-money laundering, business environment, private sector development, investment, competition, public procurement, privatization processes, access to finance, investment, trade, sustainable development, innovation, education and training, labour policies, the promotion of social inclusion, public health, asylum, migration policies, agriculture and rural development and financial sector policies. Member States wishing to benefit the Programme should bring local and regional authorities, as well as the social partners, civil society and other stakeholders, into the process of drawing up the application, based on the code of conduct on partnership in force with regard to Cohesion policy.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Member States should be able to request support from the Commission under the Programme in relation to the implementation of reforms in the context of economic governance processes, in particular of Country Specific Recommendations in the context of the European Semester, to actions related to the implementation of Union law, as well as in relation to the implementation of economic adjustment programmes. They should also be able to request support in relation to reforms undertaken at their own initiative, in order to achieve sustainable investment, growth and job creation and inclusive growth.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Further to a dialogue with the requesting Member State, including in the context of the European Semester, the Commission should analyse the request, taking into account the principles of subsidiarity, transparency, equal treatment, partnership and sound financial management and determine the support to be provided based on urgency, breadth and depth of the problems as identified, support needs in respect of the policy areas envisaged, analysis of socioeconomic indicators, and the general administrative capacity of the Member State. The Commission should also, With a view to the entry into force of the Programme, the Union should draw up a single strategic document to improve the institutional and administrative capacity of public authorities at all levels of government, transparently and fairly setting close cooperation with the Member State concerned, identify the priority areas, the scope of the support measures to be provided and the global financial contribution for such support, taking into account the existing actions and measures financed by Union funds or other Union programmes. riteria to be adopted so as to determine which measures under the Programme are to be prioritised and how available resources are to be allocated, as well as criteria and mechanisms to coordinate measures at Union, national, regional and local level. The Commission should also, in agreement with the Member State concerned, identify the priority areas, the scope of the support measures to be provided and the global financial contribution for such support, taking into account the existing actions and measures financed by Union funds or other Union programmes; in so doing, the Commission and the Member State concerned should take into account the current division of powers between the different levels of government – which often provides for an important role for local and regional authorities – as well as the fact that some Country Specific Recommendations are addressed to local and regional authorities.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 139 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The Commission Communications ‘The EU Budget Review’13 and ‘A budget for Europe 2020’14 underline the importance of focusing funding on activities with clear European added value, i.e. where the Union intervention can bring additional value compared to action of Member States alone. Against this background, the support actions carried out under the Programme should ensure complementarity and synergy with other programmes and policies at national, regional, local, Union and international level. The actions under the Programme should allow elaborating and implementing solutions that address national challenges which have impact on cross-border or Union-wide challenges and achieve a consistent and coherent implementation of Union law. In addition, they should contribute to further develop trust and promote cooperation with the Commission and among Member States. Moreover, the Union is in a better position than Member States to provide a platform for the provision and sharing of good practices from peers as well as to mobilise expertise so as to develop solutions tailored to the specific situation in the requesting Member States. __________________ 13 COM(2010)700 of 19 October 2010. 14 COM(2011)500 final of 29 June 2011.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 150 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) Member States that request support should be ablehave the option to contribute to the financial envelope of the Programme with additional funds. Currently, Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 limits the possibility of a transfer of resources dedicated to technical assistance at the initiative of a Member State to those Member States which face temporary budgetary difficulties. Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 should therefore be amended in order to allow all Member States to participate financially to the Programme. The resources transferred to the Union budget should be used for supporting actions contributing to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth or Fund- specific purposes in the Member States concerned.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 208 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
The general objective of the Programme shall be to contribute to institutional, administrative and structural reforms in the Member States by providing support to national authorities forthat bring European Added Value in policy areas relating to competences shared between the Union and the Member States and that are not already targeted by a technical assistance programme, by providing support to Member States' public authorities to attain the administrative capacity necessary to design and implement measures aimed at reforming institutions, governance, administration, economic and social sectors in response to economic and social challenges with a view to enhancing competitiveness, growth,inclusive growth, sustainable jobs, and investment, in particular in the context of economic governance processesand economic, social and territorial cohesion, including through assistance for the efficient and effective use of the Union funds.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 221 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
These objectives shall be pursued in closefull cooperation with Beneficiary Member States
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 224 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The specific objectives set out in paragraph 1 shall refer to policy areas related to competitiveness, growth,inclusive growth, sustainable jobs and investment, in particular to the following:
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 232 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) education and training, labour market policies, social inclusion and the fight against poverty, social security and social welfare systems, public health and healthcare systems, asylum, migration and borders policies;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 242 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) collection of data and statistics; development of common methodologies and, where appropriate, indicators and/or benchmarks;
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 250 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Taking into account the principles of transparency, equal treatment and sound financial management, further to a dialogue with the Member State, including in the context of the European Semester, the Commission shall analyse the request for support referred to in paragraph 1 based on the urgency, breadth and depth of the problems identified, support needs in respect of the policy areas concerned, analysis of socioeconomic indicators and general administrative capacity of the Member State. Taking into account the existing actions and measures financed by Union funds or other Union programmes, the Commission in close cooperationagreement with the Member State concerned shall identify the priority areas for support, the scope of the support measures to be provided and the global financial contribution for such support.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 257 #

2015/0263(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) the implementation of reforms by Member States, undertaken at their own initiative, notably to achieve inclusive growth and sustainable investment, growth and job creation.
2016/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Recital 8
(8) Action in line with the guidelines is an important contribution to reaching the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy. The outcome of the 2014 public consultation on the Europe 2020 Strategy clearly showed how the employment, poverty, social exclusion and education targets of the Strategy are still extremely important and highly relevant. The guidelines constitute an integrated set of European and national policies, which Member States and the Union should implement in order to achieve the positive spill-over effects of coordinated structural reforms, an appropriate overall economic policy mix and a more consistent contribution from European policies to the Europe 2020 strategy's objectives.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 1 – paragraph 1
Member States should facilitate sustainable job creation, reduce barriers for business to hire people, promote entrepreneurship and in particular support the creation and growth of small and medium enterprises in order to increase the employment rate of women and men. Member States should also actively promote white and green sector jobs, the social economy and foster social innovation.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 1 – paragraph 2
The tax burden should be shiftedMember States should consider shifting the tax burden away from labour to other sources of taxation that are less detrimental to employment and growth while protecting revenue for adequate social protection and growth enhancing expenditures. Reductions in labour taxation should be aimed at the relevant components of the tax burden and at removing barriers and disincentives to labour market participation, in particular for persons with disabilities and those furthest away from the labour market.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 1 – paragraph 3
Member States should, together with the social partners, encourage wage-setting mechanisms allowing for a responsiveness of wages to productivity developments. In this respect, differences in skills and local labour market conditions as well as divergences in economic performance across regions, sectors and companies should be taken into account. When setting minimum wages, Member States and social partners should ensure their adequacy and consider their impact on in- work poverty, job creation and competitiveness.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 2 – paragraph 1
Member States should promote productivity and employability throughby supporting an appropriate supply of relevant knowledge and skills. Member States should make the necessary investments in education and vocational training systems while improving their effectiveness and efficiency to raise the skill level of the workforce, allowing it to better anticipate and meet the rapidly changing needs of dynamic labour markets in an increasingly digital economy. Member States should devise strategies to address the concern that unless the low demand driving high unemployment is reversed it will foster and perpetuate skill mismatch and skill obsolescence through over qualification and unemployment which, eventually, will lead to a lack of skills. Member States should step up efforts to improve access to quality adult learning for all and implement active ageing strategies to enable longer working lives.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 145 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 2 – paragraph 2
High unemployment should be tackled and long-term unemployment prevented. The number of long-term unemployed should be significantly reduced by means of comprehensive and mutually reinforcing strategies, including the provision of specificrsonalised active support to long-term unemployed to return to the labour market. The yYouth unemployment needs to be comprehensively addressed, including by equipping the relevant institutions with the necessary means to fully and consistently implement their national Youth Guarantee Implementation Plans and by investing in sectors that have the potential for significant job creation.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 2 – paragraph 3
Structural weaknesses in education and training systems should be addressed to ensure quality learning outcomes and prevent and tackle early school leaving. Member States should increase educational attainment and consider, set up and improve dual learning systems where appropriate and upgradinge professional training while at the same time increase opportunities. Member States should either upgrade existing frameworks such as Europass or create a qualification framework for recognising and validating skills acquired outside the formal education system, especially those acquired through non-formal and informal learning.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 2 – paragraph 4
Barriers to labour market participation should be reduced, especially for women, older workers, young people, thepersons with a disabledility and legal migrants and other people that face discrimination or exclusion. Gender equality including equal pay must be ensured in the labour market as well asby means of access to affordable quality early childhood education and care as well as the flexibility necessary to prevent the exclusion of those with breaks in their careers due to family responsibilities such as family carers.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 183 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 3 – paragraph 1
Member States should reduce labour market segmentation. Employment protection rules and institutions should provide a suitable environment for recruitment while offering adequate levels of protection to those in employment and those seeking employment or employed on temporary, part-time or atypical contracts or independent work contracts. Quality employment should be ensured in terms of socio-economic security, education and training opportunities, working conditions (including health and safety), decent wages and work-life balance.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 192 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 3 – paragraph 2
Member States should closely involve National Parliaments and, social partners and civil society organisations when relevant, in the design and implementation of relevant reforms and policies, in line with national practices, while supporting the improvement of the functioning and effectiveness of social dialogue at national level.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 200 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 3 – paragraph 3
Member States should strengthen active labour market policies by increasing their targeting, outreach, coverage and interplay with passive measures. These policies should aim at improving labour market access and matching and support sustainable transitions on the labour market, with public employment services delivering individualised support and implementing performance measurement systems. Member States should also ensure that their social protection systems effectively activate and enable those who can participate in the labour market, protect those (temporarily) excluded from the labour markets and/or unable to participate in it, and prepare individuals for potential risks, by investing in human capital Member States should promote inclusive labour markets open to all and also put in place effective anti-discrimination measures.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 202 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 3 – paragraph 4
Mobility of workers should be ensurpromoted with an aim of exploiting the full potential of the European labour market, including by enhancing the portability of pensions and the recognition of qualifications. Member States should at the same time guard against abuses of the existing rules.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 219 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 4 – paragraph 1
Member States should modernise their social protection systems to provide effective, efficient, and adequate protection throughout all stages of an individual's life, ensuring fairnesssocial inclusion and addressing inequalities. There is a need for simplified and better targeted social policies complemented by affordable quality childcare and education, training and job assistance, housing support and accessible health care, access to basic services such as bank account and Internet and for action to prevent early school leaving and, fight poverty and social exclusion including extreme forms of poverty like homelessness.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 225 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 4 – paragraph 2
For that purpose a variety of instruments should be used in a complementary manner, including labour activation enabling services and income support, targeted at individual needs. Social protection systems should be designed in a way that facilitate take up of all persons entitled, support investment in human capital, and help prevent, reduce and protect against poverty and social exclusion.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 238 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 4 – paragraph 3
The pension systems should be reformed in order to secure their sustainability and adequacy for women and men in a context of increasing longevity and demographic change, including by linking statutory retirement ages to life expectancy, by increasing effective retirement ages, and by developing complementary retirement savings and by ensuring that workers who take time out of their employment to care for a family member have the opportunity to build up pension credits.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 242 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 4 – paragraph 4
Member States should improve the accessibility, affordability, efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare and long term care systems, while safeguarding fiscal sustainability.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2015/0026(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In order to address the budgetary constraints faced by Member States at the initial stage of the programming period and, taking into account the urgent need to address youth unemployment and the specific features of the YEI, it is appropriate to lay down provisions in order to complement Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, with a view to increase the level of the initial pre-financing paid to operational programmes supported by the YEI in 2015. To ensure that Member States have sufficient means to provide payments to beneficiaries responsible for the implementation of operations that target youth unemployment, an additional initial pre-financing amount from the specific allocation for the YEI should be paid in 2015 for operational programmes supported by the YEI, in order to complement the pre-financing amounts paid in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. In order to enable a prompt implementation of the operational programmes supported by the YEI, the Commission should commit itself to pay the pre-financing amount to the Member States immediately after the entry into force of this Regulation.
2015/03/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2015/0026(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) To ensure that the additional initial pre- financing amount is used for the immediate implementation of the YEI, it should be foreseen that this amount is reimbursed to the Commission, if the Union contribution from the YEI does not amount to an adequate level in interim payment applications submitted to the Commission 12 months after the entry into force of this Regulation. This measure is a safeguard to ensure that eligible Member States set up the required structures to promptly implement the YEI. Member State action is urgently needed to deliver on the YEI and combat alarming levels of youth unemployment.
2015/03/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The purpose of the EFSI should be to help resolve the difficulties in financing and implementing productive investments in the Union and to ensure increased access to financing, and to support job creation. It is intended that increased access to financing should be of particular benefit to small and medium enterprises. It is also appropriate to extend the benefit of such increased access to financing to mid- cap companies, which are companies having up to 3000 employees. Overcoming Europe's current investment difficulties should contribute to strengthening the Union's economic, social and territorial cohesion.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The EFSI should support strategic investments with high economic value added contributing to achieving Union policy objectives. Using the EFSI to boost investment in education and social infrastructure can help to improve cohesion in Europe, which has declined sharply.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The EFSI should target investments that are expected to be economically and technically viable, which may entail a degree of appropriate risk, whilst still meeting and offer significant potential for creating jobs. The level of risk entailed by those investments should be appropriate to the achievement of the fund’s objectives, in particular as regards job creation, provided that the particular requirements for EFSI financing are met.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 138 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) The Steering Board of the EFSI will determine the investment policy of projects that can be supported and the risk profile. Given that the selection of projects will depend on this policy, the European Parliament should be involved in drawing up the criteria.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Decisions on the use of the EFSI support for infrastructure and large mid- cap projects should be made by an Investment Committee. The Investment Committee should be composed of independent experts who can identify projects offering the greatest potential for resolving Europe’s major social and economic problems and are knowledgeable and experienced in the areas of investment projects. The Investment Committee should be accountable to a Steering Board of the EFSI, who should supervise the fulfilment of the EFSI's objectives. To effectively benefit from the experience of the EIF, the EFSI should support funding to the EIF to allow the EIF to undertake individual projects in the areas of small and medium enterprises and small mid-cap companies.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 154 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) In order to enable the EFSI to support investments, the Union should grant a guarantee of an amount equal to EUR 16 000 000 000. When provided on a portfolio basis, the guarantee coverage should be capped depending upon the type of instrument, such as debt, equity or guarantees, as a percentage of the volume of the portfolio of outstanding commitments. It is expected that when the guarantee is combined with EUR 5 000 000 000 to be provided by the EIB, that the EFSI support should generate EUR 60 800 000 000 additional investment by the EIB and EIF. This EUR 60 800 000 000 supported by the EFSI is expected to generate a total of EUR 315 000 000 000 in investment in the Union within the period 2015 to 2017, thus demonstrating the emergency nature of the fund and the need for it to have an immediate impact in the next three years. Guarantees that are attached to projects which are completed without a call on a guarantee are available for supporting new operations.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) The EIB should regularly evaluate activities supported by the EFSI with a view to assessing their relevance, performance and impact, notably as regards their social and economic impact, paying particular attention to job creation, and to identifying aspects that could improve future activities. Such evaluations should contribute to accountability and analysis of sustainability.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 198 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) To ensure accountability to European citizens, the EIB should regularly report to the European Parliament and the Council on the progress and impact of the EFSIreal social and economic impact of the EFSI, paying particular attention to job creation.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 236 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The EFSI Agreement shall provide that the EFSI shallis to be governed by a Steering Board, which shallis to determine the strategic orientation, the strategic asset allocation and operating policies and procedures, including the investment policy of projects that EFSI can support and the risk profile of the EFSI, in conformity with the objectives under Article 5(2), subject to the prior approval of the criteria by the European Parliament. In determining the investment policy of the EFSI, the Steering Board shall take into consideration the socioeconomic indicators of European areas affected by large pockets of unemployment. The Steering Board shall elect one of its members to be Chairperson.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 264 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The Investment Committee shall be composed of six independent experts and the Managing Director. Independent experts shall have a high level of relevant market experience in project finance and be able to identify those projects which are more likely to be able to solve major social and economic problems. The experts shall be appointed by the Steering Board for a renewable fixed term of threone years.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 335 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) an assessment of the impact of EIB financing and investment operations in terms of job creation;
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 354 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 5
5. At the latest [PO insert date three years after the entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council a comprehensive quality assessment to evaluate the true socio- economic effect of this special strategic plan on the application of this Regulation accompanied by any relevant proposal.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1334 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
In accordance with its own transparency policies on access to documents and information, tThe EIB shall make publicly available on its website information relating to all EIB financing and investment operations and how they contribute to the general objectives and specific projects referred to in Article 5(2) ); the EIB shall guarantee furthermore that any citizen of the European Union and any natural and legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member States shall have access to the documents related to the EFSI in accordance with the Regulation No. 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents.
2015/03/19
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 10 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that many Member States still have large deficits and that there is a need to develop fiscal responsibility programmes that are fully compatible with quality job creation, economic growth and welfare state sustainability; calls on the Commission, which has already received the national budget proposals for 2016, and within the framework of COM(2015)00121, to provide a flexible process of fiscal responsibility at national level, which better reflects the cyclical situations in individual Member States and that allows for the adoption of socially responsible and economically efficient policies aimed at creating decent job creation; s leading to quality employment; __________________ 1 COM(2015)0012, ‘Making the best use of the flexibility within the existing rules of the SGP’.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that while those Member States with high deficits or debt levels need to continue their efforts to achieve fiscal sustainability, equally those Member States with fiscal space should use that space to encourage domestic demand and growth friendly investment;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for the country-specific recommendations (CSR) to include the Commission’s recommendation2 on private debt aimed at creating second chances for enterprises; calls foron these programmes to be extended to families at risk of eviction from their first home and for these to be guaranteed, in particular, in banking entities within bank restructuring programmes supported by public money; Commission to investigate the possibility of extending such programmes to families at risk of eviction in order to ensure greater social cohesion by reducing the risk of homelessness; __________________ 2 Recommendation of 12 March 2014 on a new approach to business failure and insolvency.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fostering of a European investment policy aimed at boosting growth and job creation; considers it regrettable, however, that Parliament’s call3 to promote social investment not only in pursuit of financial profit but also with the aim of promoting a positive socialNotes that while deficits have been reduced in a number of countries, this process has been largely driven by falling demand and more particularly falling investment; welcomes therefore the fostering of a European investment policy aimed at boosting growth and job creation; considers also that further efforts need to be made to ensure that the Union´s regulatory framework is supportive of jobs, growth and investment and that the Commission needs to further strengthen its regulatory tools such as impact has been neglected; __________________ 3 Resosessment, evaluationof 11 March 2015 (Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0068), paragraphs 10 and 18. etc.;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the social economy provides employment for over 14 million people representing around 6.5% of workers in the Union; considers it regrettable, therefore, that Parliament’s call1 to promote social investment not only in pursuit of financial profit but also with the aim of promoting a positive social impact has been neglected; __________________ 1Resolution of 11 March 2015 (Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0068), paragraphs 10 and 18.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Takes note of the recommendations on the need to move forward within new labour reforms, and calls for such reforms, if carried out, to guarantee social dialogue and to ensure necessary political consensus in order to be sustainable and effective; considers it regrettable that many labour reforms have not ensured the required balance between flexibility and security, resulting in, for example, the exclusion of millions of workers from collective bargaining; calls for labour reforms capable of reducing fragmentation, putting an end to insecurity and increasing the productivity and competitiveness of our economy while ensuring decent jobs and living wages through investment in human capitalleading to quality employment;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that high rates in long-term unemployment in the EU, especially in some Member States, are resulting in an increasing number of workers losing their benefits before finding a new job; considers it regrettable that many Member States have limited access to such benefits or have reduced the amount available and/or the eligibility period for them; considers it important to maintain a balance between adequate social protection and adequate incentives for active job searching; recognises that improving employment policy and social protection to activate support and protect people to ensure stronger social cohesion are key components of sustainable economic growth; calls for a specific study on such incentives at EU level, and calls on the Member States to guaranteintroduce minimum income schemes according to national practices in order to avoid pockets of social exclusion and ensure a minimum income to families;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines the fact that, according to an IMF report3, the progressivity of tax systems has been weakened in recent years, resulting in increasing inequality; considers that the tax wedge has been much higher for low-wage workers and SMEs with higher effective tax rates; points outrecognises that while taxation is a Member State competence, progressive tax systems help to cushion the worst effects of austerity and recognises the importance of reducing taxes for labour and enterprises in pursuit of more redistributive forms and insists that tax fraud and tax evasion must be dealt with within and between Member States; __________________ 3 IMF report ‘Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality: A Global Perspective’, June 2015.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
14. Is deeply concerned by the limited role that national parliaments, social partners and civil society have played in the drafting of the national reform programme (NRP) and the convergence programme (CP); Notes however the changes to the running of the 2015 European Semester to increase ownership at national level; calls on the Commission to favour, within the revision of the economic governance mechanisms, a reform that grants adequatefurther democratic legitimacy to the European Semester.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2014/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Considers the European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) to be an innovative instrument for transnational participatory democracy and the first direct democratic instrument to enable citizens to become actively involved in the framing of European policies and legislation;
2015/05/18
Committee: PETI
Amendment 19 #

2014/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that, in previous resolutions and annual reports prepared by the Committee on Petitions, Parliament pointed out the weaknesses of the existing legal framework and the bureaucratic burdens in the practical running of the ECI owing to a lack of IT support and disparate use in the national administrations; calls for simplified and harmonised personal data requirements and procedures for all Member States when signing a statement of support;
2015/05/18
Committee: PETI
Amendment 50 #

2014/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for enhanced inter-institutional cooperation when dealing with ECIs in providing information and support to ECI organisers; calls for the future establishment of an independent physical and online 'one-stop shop' providing information, legal advice, translation services and funding, which could use the resources of the point of contact based in the Europe Direct Contact Centre and the Commission's representations and Parliament's information offices in the Member States; considers that such a set- up would bring the ECI project closer to citizens;
2015/05/18
Committee: PETI
Amendment 63 #

2014/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to ensure transparency in the decision-making process and clarify the procedure for legal admissibility; invites the Commission to respond to successful ECIs with more concrete actions and where declared inadmissible to ask the Commission to provide reasoning for rejection that is more robust, consistent and comprehensible to the citizen;
2015/05/18
Committee: PETI
Amendment 6 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
– having regard to the work currently undertaken by the UN Working Group on Ageing towards a Convention on the protection of the rights of older people,
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas there are some 125,000 occupational pension funds operating across the EU, holding assets worth €2.5 trillion on behalf of around 75 million Europeans, which represents 20% of the EU's working-age population;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas older women represent 20% of the EU's population and this percentage will continue to increase according to the current demographic trends; in most EU countries older women have higher risk poverty rate than older men, on average 21% for women and 16% for men; whereas the gender pension gap in the EU is 39 %;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that reliable statistics on the situation of older people and demographic changes are needed to develop better targeted and effective active ageing strategies; calls on the Commission to ensure comprehensive high-quality data collection on the societal status of older people, their health, rights and standard of living;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Member States to ensure affordable, accessible and non- discriminatory health care and to prioritize prevention in their health care policies; invites the European Commission to analyse the affordability of health care for older people, collect data on waiting times in health care systems across the EU and to propose guidelines for maximum waiting times;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Takes the view that a European strategy on dementia needs to be developed, which should include measures for assistance to the families of the patients, information campaigns, awareness raising and exchange of best practices between Member States;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Considers it regrettable that older workerpersons are still often exposed to age discrimination, stereotypes and barriers; calls on the Member States, therefore, to correctly implement Directive 2000/78/EC on equal treatment in employment and occupation; welcomes the European Commission push to adopt the long- awaited Equal Treatment Directive, blocked in Council since 2008 and calls on the Member States to proceed with its adoption by the end of the year;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Member States to use available ESF, ESIF, EaSI funding for financial assistance to self-help programmes of organisations of older people who are sharing their energy, knowledge, experiences and wisdom with each other and helping people in need, thereby contributing to active and healthy ageing, and living independently for a longer time;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls on the Commission, the Council and the Member States to adopt a positive position at the UN Open-Ended Working Group on ageing to ensure older citizens can fully enjoy their human rights; invites the Commission to closely cooperate with the UN Independent Expert on the Rights of Older Persons and with older people´s representative organizations in the EU;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls on the Member States to guarantee individual and adequate pension rights for all to ensure a dignified life in old age– including those with justified career breaks, mainly women;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 166 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Stresses the importance of adequate supervision and independent audits of the occupational pension funds for safe and sustainable pensions;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Believes that a UN Convention to protect the rights of older persons will improve the lives of older persons by guaranteeing them equal access to political, economic, health care and cultural rights and would represent an important platform to create an attitude shift towards ageing globally;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Regrets that the European Commission has not yet addressed age inequalities in the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) and the Disability Strategy; calls therefore on the European Commission to raise awareness and address age discrimination of the rights of older persons with disabilities and ensure that the UNCRPD application does not leave older people behind;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 181 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses the importance of volunteering, which promotes intercultural learning and intergenerational solidarity, fosters active ageing and lifelong civic participation, and enables older people to make a contribution to society and earn recognition, thereby improving their quality of life, well-being and general state of health. In this context regrets the discontinuation of the Grundtvig programme which supported older volunteers;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 751 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Deplores the way in which the financial and economic crisis and the measures taken to deal with it have had an impact – in some cases a drastic one – on economic, social and cultural rights, resulting in poverty, exclusion and isolation;isolation and exclusion especially in light of the fact that social exclusion determines marginalisation of individuals and makes them vulnerable to a parallel criminal or terrorist system which offers power, money and sense of belonging.
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 832 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses that corruption represents a serious fundamental rights violation; calls on the Member States and institutions to devise effective instruments for combating corruption and to monitor regularly the use of public funds, be they European or natganized criminal groups, included mafia-style ones, are systems of exploitation based on privileges and on the deprivation of basic rights; these groups are fuelled by unemployment, by under-development, by corruption and also and especially, by social exclusional;
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 846 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Ascertains that criminal organizations see their power increase through usury and money laundering which are two phenomena endorsed also by a liquidity and solvency crisis, ‘credit crunch’, social fragmentation and loss of trust in institutions which means that the more poverty increases, the more social inequity develops, the more criminal organizations, included mafia- style ones, are strengthened and the more corruption flourishes;
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 850 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 b (new)
21b. Calls on the Member States and institutions to devise effective instruments for combating corruption and to monitor regularly the use of public funds, be they European or national;
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 853 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 c (new)
21c. Recognises that adequate social welfare provisions (such as minimum income) are one of the most effective ways to reduce poverty, to guarantee a standard of life which respects human dignity and to promote social integration which, in turn, determine freedom of choice and make individuals less liable to be blackmailed thus making these economic measures a fundamental tool in the fight to overcome organized crime and corruption;
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 855 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 d (new)
21d. Realises that continued efforts need to be made in order to implement and maintain the above mentioned measures in all Member States;
2015/05/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 5 #

2014/2252(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the closer participation of national parliaments in the European legislative process, which has resulted in a positive increase in awareness of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality in the interinstitutional context; notes however, that further work still needs to be done in this context; Suggests therefore that the Commission engages in a yearly debate with each of the national parliaments in the national parliament in order to strengthen the dialogue between the Commission and the national parliaments;
2015/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2014/2252(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Reminds that according to Article 5 in the Maastricht Treaty the European Union shall only act if and in so far as the objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States;
2015/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2014/2252(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses that the principle of subsidiarity is an important tool to balance the exercise of power and to ensure genuine European added value and thereby promoting growth and job- creation; stresses that in respecting the principle of subsidiarity it is key to consider the role of the social partners and to ensure their autonomy according to Member States' customs and traditions, believes in this regard that breaches of the principle of subsidiarity can lead to unintended consequences such as undermined faith in the European Union for European citizens and that breaches of the principle of subsidiarity should therefore be avoided;
2015/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2014/2247(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
1. Welcomes the fact that, with effect from 2014, Regulation 1303/2013/EU1 contains new elements intended to help the disadvantaged: it makes it compulsory to dismantle institutions with large staff complements, and, in promoting social inclusion and combating poverty and all forms of discrimination, to switch from institutional services to community-based services, and incorporated marginalised communities, which may face growing challenges and increasingly lag behind other groups in a knowledge-based society; urges the Member States to take action against hate crime directed at people from marginalised communities and to promote anti-discrimination policies, if necessary by, inter alia, appropriate legislation, strengthening their national anti- discrimination bodies and promoting specific training for civil servants. __________________ 1 Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006.
2015/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2014/2247(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considering that the recent economic and financial crisis has hit in particular the marginalised groups, such as migrants and minorities, recalls that education and employment is the best way out of poverty and thereby integrating the marginalised communities into labour market should be a priority. Highlights the need for a dual approach when working towards helping and integrating the marginalised groups: directly with those affected by providing education, including education facilities, training, counselling and job opportunities; and with the local community and authorities in order to improve and / or change the public perception by raising awareness of the effects of prejudice, improving public services and adapt social systems.
2015/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2014/2247(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Draws the attention of Member States and the Commission to the fact that after 2020, even though there will be fewer and fewer people of working age, there will be ever greater competition for jobs, while the private sector will provide fewer and fewer jobs for those who are currently relatively low-skilled, which will require a new approach and not only long-term strategies but also short-term measures, to prevent permanent unemployment and a lasting increase in it; In this context recalls the need for vocational training and basic skills developing for people with low skills or no qualifications based not on a "one-size- fits-all" policy solutions, but on tailored policy recommendations, contingent on the region's existing knowledge assets. Emphasizes the public–private policy- learning agenda as a consequence of partnerships between civil society organizations and local authorities, capitalizing on the results/outcome indicators, ongoing monitoring and evaluation, combined with pilots, policy experiments and test cases. Points to the necessity of a policy-design framework which considers the potential innovation and entrepreneurial opportunities associated with the region's existing characteristics, its realistic diversification potential so as to design appropriate strategy interventions on the basis of these features and intended outcomes; and thus prevent the risk of over qualification or skills training which in certain regions can induce a non- desired aspect of outflow of population towards more developed regions where these skills are required.
2015/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2014/2247(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes the importance of micro and small business in helping to sustain jobs in rural and peripheral areas and calls therefore for increased emphasis on ensuring access to finance for these enterprises;
2015/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2014/2247(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recalls that the main objective of Cohesion policy is to promote territorial development and reduce regional disparities and therefore stresses that specific, cross-cutting measures should be taken in the implementation and management of relevant EU funds to achieve this objective;
2015/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Notes that CEDEFOP proposes that adapting curricula and including environmental awareness with an understanding of sustainable development and business efficiency is better than proposing new training programmes;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2014/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on Member States to integrate sustainable development, and environmental competences and skills, into training and education systems; recalls the importance of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) skills and the need to ensure that more women study STEM subjects;
2015/04/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
A a. Whereas one fifth of the EU´s total population is under 18. Despite commitments over one in four children now lives at risk of poverty or social exclusion across the EU;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. Whereas organisations point out that the main cause of increasing child poverty is the so-called austerity measures (a significant reduction of social support to children and families, rising unemployment, the spread of precarious employment and an increase in the tax burden), UNICEF states that budget cuts, particularly in the Mediterranean countries, havethe crisis and the regression to levels of lower prosperity have helped increased inequalities and helped worsenexacerbate the living conditions of children10 so that these policies violate the rights of children and constitute a violation of international obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; __________________ 10 UNICEF Office of Research (2014), ‘Children of the Recession: The impact of the economic crisis on child well-being in rich countries’, Innocenti Report Card 12, UNICEF Office of Research, Florence.
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
E a. Whereas local and regional authorities are at the forefront of work to tackle child poverty and exploitation and therefore have a crucial responsibility in preventing marginalisation and social exclusion;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
F a. Whereas children from vulnerable population groups such as street children, migrant, or ethnic minority families for example Roma are more at risk of marginalisation, poverty and social exclusion;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
J a. Whereas child poverty is a multi- dimensional phenomenon that requires a multi-dimensional response. Employment is one important factor, but does not always guarantee a route out of poverty for the family of the children concerned.
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
K a. Whereas, according to the 2012 Eurostat Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC), energy poverty is a problem that affects all Member States. Children are hit hardest as it undermines their well-being, diet and health;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Reiterates the importance of preventive public policies investing in sensible child welfare policies supporting the upbringing of empowered individuals, capable of integrating in society and into the labour market, rather than focusing on the consequences of their social exclusion and poverty;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 179 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Urges Member States to implement and rigorously monitor plans for alleviating child poverty to ensure follow up of policy guidance, putting the focus on the intrinsic rights of children, and setting targets for reducing poverty and child social exclusion;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 182 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls on Member States to recognise that child poverty and social exclusion are key barriers to overcome if they are to achieve their Europe 2020 targets in relation to employment rate, investment in research, development, energy and sustainable development;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 196 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls on the Commission to bear in mind the proposals contained in the Opinion published by the European Economic and Social Committee, ‘For coordinated European measures to prevent and combat energy poverty’, and to encourage the urgent adoption of a European energy security and solidarity commitment and, within this framework, the setting-up of a European poverty observatory and a European fund with the specific aim of eradicating energy poverty;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 229 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Reiterates the need to avoid ghettoization of children experiencing poverty and social exclusion and to promote a social mix in housing and suggests that the introduction of minimum standards for housing children, taking into account the primacy of children's rights, should be considered;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 304 #

2014/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Recommends that the Commission and Member States develop statistical methods that integrate multidimensional indicators in measuring poverty, disaggregated for particular disadvantaged groups, in measuring poverty to inform evidence-based policy development and to take into account the limitations of relative poverty measurements and the work of the UNDP, UNICEF and the OECD, going beyond the AROPE indicator;
2015/05/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas social support and health services providers, many of which are social enterprises, represents one of the key job growth areas in the EU, having created 1.3 million jobs between 2009 and 2013;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas procurement often takes the form of large one-off tenders for services or supplies which may exclude smaller actors;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
The Commission should recognise the diversity of social enterprises and ensure EU-level actions are taken to support social enterprises of all types;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that the social entrepreneurship model often appeals to young people and gives them an opportunity to provide innovative responses to the current economic, social and environmental challenges; In this context calls for the immediate implementation of the EaSI programme;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that social innovation makes a significant contribution towards laying the foundations for a type of growth which serves a more sustainable, inclusive society generating social cohesion; Notes that social innovation is sometimes used as an excuse to simply cut funding and that social innovation must be aimed at improving the quality of services in an efficient manner;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The Commission should recognise and support the role of not-for-profit social service providers, politically and financially;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Points out that demographic trends are bound up with new models of consumption. Population ageing in developed countries is making growing demands on social services, but will also provide opportunities to create socially responsible businesses;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Believes that social economy enterprises can develop processes that allow more efficient, responsible and transparent management of shrinking resources, and can increase implementation of socially responsible measures;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Supports the idea that social enterprises could form a specific company category with its own legal status and other objectives than simply profit for shareholders;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission and Member States to include social economy enterprises in action plans for employment and social integration in order to help unlock the job creation potential in the sector;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Points out that social economy enterprises face difficulties in accessing public procurement, such difficulties can include barriers which are related to their size and their financial capability; calls for action to facilitate their participation in public procurement by providing appropriate advice and, simplifying the procedures and drawing up tenders in such a way as to make them accessible for smaller operators; calls for bids to be rewarded that offer most economic and social value rather than the lowest price in public procurement, with social or environmental criteria being included in public procurement contracts;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 143 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the European Commission to continue to promote the social investment approach as presented in the Social Investment Package; Calls for investment in the social economy to be taken into account when assessing European Strategic Investment Fund projects;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 149 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on Member States to include the entrepreneurial spirit, entrepreneurial education and the principles of the social economy in education and training curricula;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 167 #

2014/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Is in favour of creating a multilingual digital platform for exchanging information aimed at social enterprises, business incubators, business clusters and investors in social enterprise, and of facilitating information-sharing and access to support from EU programmes; believes that the development of such a platform should be preceded by consultations with interested groups;
2015/05/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Notes however the risks highlighted by CEDEFOP regarding the perpetuation of skill mismatch and skill obsolescence due to the low demand driving high unemployment;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 189 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls that it is of utmost importance to give guidance and counselling to jobseekers in how to look for a job and to ensure that their skills are recognised through ‘competences passports' e.g. Europass, reflecting the skills acquired through both formal and informal learning;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 299 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Highlights the job creation potential offered by completing the digital single market, building the energy union, creating jobs through investing in research and development and innovation, promoting social entrepreneurship and the social economy and up-skilling of workers in the health and social care sector and fostering transport networks;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point x
(x) to ensure that statistical projections on job losses/gains, and on sectors, affected, are constantly updated so that timely intervention canshall be undertaken by the Commission to support affected sectors, regions or Member States; this could be achieved through allocations of Cohesion Policy funds and the European Globalization Adjustment fund adapted and with a reinforced budget.
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the EU needs to make a decisive change in an economic policy that has allowed the Union to drift away from the EU 2020 targets, and that has increased the risks of secular stagnation; whereas the EU is worryingly losing weight in the world economy, while mostsome other countries are showing solid signs of recovery; whereas in October 2014 the IMF estimated that the probability of a recession in the euro area had increased and would reach 35-40% at year’s end;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas various factors including failure to create a positive environment to boost investment and growth, high unemployment levels, excessive focuslowering onf wage depressions in some countries to regain competitiveness, and a decline in spending on social protection in almost all Member States, have led to significant reductions in household gross disposable incomes, leaving millions of European families at risk of exclusion, and have increased inequalities alarmingly; whereas one in four Europeans are at risk of poverty; whereas underemployment and precariousness has peaked and, for 50 % of all job seekers, securing employment is not enough to lift them out of poverty;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas investment in qualitybetter and sustainable jobs, human capital, research and innovation, resource efficient energy union, the digital single market and promoting entrepreneurship must be the top priority for both the Commission and the Member States, as investment in these areas are essential not only to ensuring a recovery but also to expanding the EU’s economic potential to grow and to create prosperity;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to introduce a much-needed,for an ambitious expansionary economic policy to boost smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and to create quality jobs; stresses that low inflation is already increasing real interest rates as well as real public and private debt, which, together with high unemployment, depresses growth and increases poverty;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 139 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the fact that the EFSI must be focused on creating new investments in areas where investor appetite is subdued rather than on substituting investments that would have been produced elsewhere (crowding out), or on focusing on highly profitable investments that would have occurred in any case (deadweight); calls on the Commission to also include and promote social investments that not only generate financial returns but promote positive social spillovers, such as investments in human capital or, investments with high impact in job creation or poverty reductionsocial inclusion and poverty reduction or investments in the social economy; reiterates its call for the implementation of the Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP);
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 145 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to prioritisensure investments in economically weaker regions suffering from high unemployment, and in SMEs in such regions, given their very limited access to financing, to ensure that these efforts have a meaningful impact where they are most needed;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the extension of the pace of fiscal consolidation, and the introduction of new headline targets – focusing more on structural than on cyclical deficits – that will have a positive effect on employment and growth; notes, however, that the size of fiscal multipliers in the current context is nevertheless still very high and that this will inevitably have a negative impact on economic growth and job creation; calls on the Commission to explore the possibility of introducing escape clauses, or of delayuse the maximum flexibility withing these targets, in order to avoid weakening demand further and destroying jobs Stability and Growth Pact;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 174 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the development of a European framework to assure that investments under the Juncker Plan, which are excluded from national deficit targets, have a significant impact in terms of stimulating economic growth and creating quality jobs; calls on the European Commission to monitor and control the investments under the Junker Plan. A report should audit and measure the economic and social impact of the investments in real terms;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 189 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Takes note of the ECB´s expanded asset purchase programme which goes, once again, to the banking system, therefore calls on the ECB to optimise all its potential to improve the real economy and provide with credit in order to boost growth and tackle unemployment in Europe;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 217 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that decisive investment plans for growth and job creation can only be fully realised if they are coupled with national reforms that enhance quality labour participation, boost productivity and develop human capital in all age groups; believes that structural labour market reforms should introduce internal flexibility measures aimed at maintaining employment in times of economic disruption, ensure job quality and security in employment transitions, and provide unemployment benefit schemes that are based on realistic activation requirements and linked to reintegration policies;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 231 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission to design tailor-made policies to support qualitybetter and sustainable job creation for the long-term unemployed, senior unemployed people, women and other priority groups hit especially hard by the crisis, such as immigrants or people with disabilities focussing not only on unemployed people themselves but also on measures in favour of work-life balance, life-long learning and training; tailor-made policies should focus on combatting the low level of education that affects some of these groups, many of whom are at risk of social exclusion;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 242 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Regrets that the European Semester has not been sufficiently aligned with the Europe 2020 strategy; calls for more determined efforts to guide and coordinate EU policies to boost smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and create qualitybetter and sustainable jobs;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 275 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Recalls that decent wages are important not only for social cohesion, but also for maintaining a strong economy and a productive labour force; calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for a European framework for minimum wages with a view to reducing wage inequalities and limiting nominal imbalances in competitivenesinvestigate the impact of Member States introducing minimum wages particularly in the context of reducing wage inequalities;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 288 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Is concerned that labour market reforms in many Member States have mainly promoted precarious jobs; observes that 50 % of jobs created in 2014 were temporary jobs; notes that, according to the Commission, in-work poverty persists, and that for 50 % of all job seekers, securing employment is not enough to lift them out of poverty, nor does it raise productivity; calls on the Commission and the Member States to make job quality a priorityMember States to ensure better and sustainable jobs and to address labour market segmentation;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 314 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission to propose a European framework introducing minimum standards for the implementation of Youth Guarantees covering young people aged 25-30; calls on the Member States to use the available budget efficiently and to implement the Youth Guarantees without delay; calls for the available budget to be increased during the promisedan adequate budget in the mid-term review of the MFF in accordance with ILO recommendations;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 319 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Calls on Member States to make labour markets more inclusive for those who have family duties such as raising children and caring for family members who need care; therefore calls for measures favouring the reconciliation of work and family life as part of the labour market reforms promoted by the European Semester;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 320 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 b (new)
25b. Reiterates the call on Member States to invest in opportunities for life-long learning, vocational training and on the job training; calls for national life-long learning systems to be assessed as part of the European Semester's strategies of labour market reform;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 384 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Welcomes the fact that the Joint Employment Report annexed to the AGS includes a scoreboard for employment and social policies; considers it regrettable, however, that these indicators are not sufficient and that they have not been made binding, which would allow them to be used more forcefully; asks the Commission to remedy this situation;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 390 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32a. Regrets that the Annual Growth Survey and the Joint Employment Report do not contain any measure or policy framework to meet the Europe 2020 Strategy objective on poverty reduction; calls on the European Commission and Member States to better reflect this objective in the European Semester;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 411 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Calls on the Commission and Member States to tackle immediately the alarming increase in child poverty throughout the EU e.g. through the introduction of a child guarantee against poverty;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 433 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Reminds the Commission that in order to ensure both the sustainability and the adequacy of pensions, pension reforms need to be accompanied by policies that: limit access to early retirement schemes and other early exit pathways; provide for the compensation of times spent caring for children or dependent family members; develop employment opportunities for older workers; guarantee access to life-long learning; introduce tax benefit policies offering incentives to stay in work longer; and support active healthy ageing; stresses that pension reforms require national political and social cohesion, and should be negotiated with the social partners in order to be successful;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 441 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
37. Takes note of the Commission’s recommendation to reform healthcare systems so that they meet their objectives of providing universal access to high- quality care – including affordable access to medicines, especially those that are life- saving – and to secure respect for the rights of health staff; observes that, as a consequence of the crisis, some Member States have failed to ensure full coverage of public health; calls for this situation to be corrected without delay; calls for further reform efforts to ensure that the quality and financial accessibility of health infrastructure is not put at risk;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 470 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. Calls on the Commission and the Council to enter into an interinstitutional agreement with Parliament in order to give Parliament a full role in the drafting and approval ofbetter involve the Parliament in the AGS and the Economic Policy and Employment Guidelines;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2014/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Points out that EU financial assistance to certain Member States, provided on terms combining solidarity with conditionality, has proved to be most successful when there was a strong ownership and commitment to reform; reminds the Commission and the Member States that they need to explore ways of bringing the financial assistance under the EU framework; calls therefore for the creation of a European Monetary Fund (EMF) on the basis of Union law, which would be subject to the Community method;
2015/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 164 #

2014/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Is concerned about protectionist tendencies in certain Member States; points out that the Treaty does not provide for the restriction of the free movement of people, services or capital, and recalls that the Commission must safeguard and enforce these freedoms;
2015/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 202 #

2014/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Agrees with the Commission that most Member States need to continue to pursue growth-friendly fiscal consolidation; invites Member States with sufficient fiscal space to consider reducing taxes and social security contributions with a view to stimulating private investment; stresses the fact that special emphasis should be placed on growth-enhancing reforms and policies;
2015/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 206 #

2014/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Notes the excessively high public debt levels, particularly in the euro area; urges Member States and the Commission to address the debt overhang by establishing a European debt redemption fund based on conditionality combining structural reforms with fiscal incentives; points out that such a debt redemption fund needs to go hand in hand with an insolvency procedure for sovereigns safeguarding market discipline;
2015/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 226 #

2014/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4
Strengthened coordination of national policiesand international policies, and improved democratic accountability
2015/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 241 #

2014/2221(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23b. Reiterates its view that the current economic governance framework is lacking sufficient democratic accountability in the application of its rules and of the institutions and bodies involved; calls on the Commission to make the necessary proposals to address the lack of proper democratic accountability in EU economic governance;
2015/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 5 #

2014/2208(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Strongly condemns the withdrawal of the circular economy legislative package, the provisions of which would have contributed to creating up to 180 000 jobs in the EU waste management sector alone, calls on the Commission to come forward with an ambitious proposal including a focus on the issue that waste would not be created in the first place;
2015/04/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2014/2208(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the cCircular eEconomy has the potential to generate millions of jobs across Europe but also notes that many jobs will be 'greened' and therefore require retraining and up-skilling;
2015/04/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2014/2208(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the Circular Economy will have a significant local/regional dimension, therefore calls on the Commission and Member States to support the regions in this transition;
2015/04/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2014/2208(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that, in a transition towards a circular economy, internal transformation and redefinition of jobs may affect sectors with a high share of emissions; calls, in consequence, on the Member States and the EU to work in conjunction with the social partners to put in place all the necessary measures to support affected workers;
2015/04/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2014/2160(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to take steps to combat all forms of discrimination in the labour market, including those against women, and to adopt social protection measures in order to ensure that women’s pay and welfare entitlements, including pensions, are not lower than those of men doing the same jobwork or work of equal value;
2015/04/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2014/2160(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Council to engage proactively with the Parliament and Commission in order to unblock the Maternity Leave Directive;
2015/04/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2014/2160(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that occupational and sectoral segregation of the labour market remains a factor in determining the gender pay gap; also stresses that women`s jobs, particularly domestic workers and careers, are consistently undervalued;
2015/04/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2014/2160(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to involve social partners (trade unions, gender equality bodies and NGOs) in the realisation of gender equality, with a view to fostering equal treatment; stresses that the areas covered by social dialogue should include the monitoring of gender equality practices at the workplace, and the promotion of flexible working arrangements, with the aim of facilitating the reconciliation of work and private life, and the monitoring of collective agreements, codes of conduct, research or exchanges of experience and good practice in the area of gender equality.
2015/04/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2014/2160(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Asks the Commission to ensure that Country Specific Recommendations in the European Semester on addressing the gender pay gap are implemented;
2015/04/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2014/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the decline in the EU unemployment rate, from 20.8 % in the first quarter of 2010 to 12.1 % in the third quarter of 2013 but also notes that according to the Commission Services´ spring 2014 forecast there was an increase in unemployment from 11.3% at the end of 2012 to 12.1% in the third quarter of 2013;
2014/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2014/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Regrets that between 2006 and 2011, inequality has increased in approximately two thirds of EU Member States;
2014/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2014/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Agrees withGiven the Commission Services´ spring 2014 forecast that GDP in the euro area fell by 0.4% in 2013 after a decline of 0.7% in 2012, questions the ECB’s recommendations that growth-friendly fiscal consolidation over the medium term should ensure compliance with the fiscal compact, while at the same time boosting potential growth and generating employment opportunities;
2014/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2014/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the ECB’s call on Member States to carry out the necessary labour market reforms, in particular through increasing flexibility and optimising the conditions for businesses to create jobs;
2014/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2014/2157(INI)

6a. Regrets that for young people the employment rate declined from 37% in 2008 to 32% in the first quarter of 2014 and more than 40% of young employees are on a temporary contract while nearly 25% work part time;
2014/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recognises that REFIT represents a first important step towards reducing the administrative burdens of regulation on businesses and eliminating barriers to growth, competitiveness and job creation;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Supports the Commission’s commitment on cutting red tape and for providing better regulation; welcomes the effort of the Juncker Commission to a strengthened Better Regulation Agenda and calls for the need for it to deliver an efficient system and actual progress; believes that cutting red tape should aim to deliver proportionate, evidence-based protection for workers, while ensuring that businesses can grow, create jobs and boost competitiveness; notes that debetter regulation and better regulationhigh protection of employees are not mutually exclusive;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes efforts to identify genuine opportunities for simplification of legislationand adaptability of legislation whilst maintaining high standards; stresses the need for simpler, clearly-worded rules that remove complexity and can be implemented in a simple manner in order to improve compliance, particularly in the area of health, safety and employment legislation; recalls the importance of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the Commission’s indication that the maternity leave directive should be considered for withdrawal;deleted
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Calls on the Commission to urgently consider measures to address the impact that recently implemented EU VAT rules for digital services are having on micro enterprises, particularly the significant administrative burden, in order to allow the digital economy to thrive;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 105 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for further measures such as carrying out independent impact assessments throughout the legislative process, further strengthening the independence, objectivity and neutrality of impact assessments and the SME-test, further facilitating citizens participation in the EUs legislative process, ensuring the adaptability of legislators and increasing transparency of inter- institutional negotiations as well as monitoring the transposition of the EU- legislation into national laws by including national gold-plating in the EU Regulatory Scoreboard to check that legislation is doing what it was intended to do and to identify areas where there are inconsistencies and ineffective measures;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Commission and co- legislators to continue to improve the legislative cycle and to introduce sunset clauses when justified and useful in concrete cases to ensure that employment legislation is periodically reviewed;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to prioritise action in the fields of what have been identified as the ‘Top Ten’ most burdensome laws for SMEs, including the working time and temporary agency directives;
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 149 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the committee responsible to systematically review Commission impact assessments and review IMPA’s analysis as early as possible in the legislative process, and to call for independent impact assessments on its own reports.
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 151 #

2014/2150(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 (new)
In the area of public procurement, strongly supports further measures such as the promotion of smaller procurement parcels to assist SMEs and micro enterprises to compete for public procurement tenders.
2015/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative to conduct an initial review of the framework’s effectiveness with a view to assessing the effective and uniform application of governance rules by the Member States and by the Commission; also suggests that the review presents an opportunity for an exchange of views on the ways in which the framework could be deepened; Suggests that the review in addition focuses on measures that will enhance private trust in the economy as trust is a precondition for private investments which is a precondition for job-creation;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the European Semester to be strengthened and deepened as an effective way of preventing a crisis, for post-crisis job-creation and for growth convergence within the EU; with this in mind, welcomes the Commission’s proposal to focus its action not only on budget responsibility but also on investment and structural reform in order to link the market economy and job-creation with social progress;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission, in tandem with the EIB, to make it easier for SMEs – the main sources of jobs and job-creation in Europe – to access financing from the European Fund for Strategic Investments, in connection with the European Investment Fund; Underlines the importance of new growth and job- creation for public acceptance of the European economic governance framework, calls therefore for the Commission to take measures to increase trust in the economy and to improve the business environment with particular attention to SMEs, removal of red tape and access to finance;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. With a view to improving the effectiveness and focus of budget policies, calls on the Member States to press ahead with their efforts to modernise their labour markets, educational systems and social security systems through structural reforms which ensure a better match between skills and jobs; with this in mind, encourages them to share best practices;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. So as to address the urgent situation with regard to youth unemployment, encourages Member States to use the available resources in an effective and focused way via the introduction of the youth employment initiative, enhanced use of vocational training as a tool for enhanced employability and a better match between skills and jobs and recommends that cross-border mobility be supported via the development of the EURES portal as a vector for youth employment;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. With a view to stepping up democratic scrutiny, recommends that the European Parliament, national parliaments and management and labourthe social partners be more closely involved in economic dialogue between the Member States and the Commission.
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2014/2139(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes all actions inthe progress made in the implementation of the Roadmap which aims to streamline the functioning of the agencies into a more coherent and efficient framework in order to improve their efficiency, cost-effectiveness and accountability.
2014/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2014/2137(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Agrees with the Commission that the intervention criteria set out in Article 4(1)(a) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, Finland is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation;
2014/11/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2014/2137(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that to date, the shipbuilding sector in broad terms has been the subject of 6 EGF applications, with one based on trade related globalisation and the other five on the global financial and economic crisis; considers that restructuring in the sector may alleviate the difficulties and that the shipbuilding industry in the different Member States could be supported by guidelines from a European perspective;
2014/11/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2014/2137(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Welcomes the establishment of Service Points amongst the proposed actions; appreciates that these points are expected to provide an even more personal and in-depth service than the public employment office;
2014/11/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2014/2137(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Notes that a high proportion (41,42%) of dismissed workers are between the age of 55 and 64 years; further notes that this age group is at a higher risk of prolonged unemployment and exclusion from the labour market; considers therefore that these workers may have specific needs when it comes to providing them with personalised services;
2014/11/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2014/2137(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Welcomes the idea that those planning to start a business can experience what it is like to be an entrepreneur by means of placement in an existing enterprise; remarks the potential added value of starting business after being redundant for the persons in question and for the society as a whole;
2014/11/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2014/2137(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Notes that the purpose of the pay subsidies is to ensure that targeted workers hired by new employers do not lose out in the first period of their new employment; considers that such measure could serve as an incentive towards searching and engaging in a broader spectrum of new and unfamiliar jobs for the workers;
2014/11/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2014/2137(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 c (new)
12c. Reminds that in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy;
2014/11/14
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2014/2104(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Appreciates the progress made in the development of evidence based VET reform through the Torino Process and other specific policy analysis which has achieved ownership in the Partner countries leading to national policy developments andwhich helps to guarantee future sustainability.
2014/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2014/2100(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the Agency’s completed corrective actions in relation to the Court’s comments made in the previous years, in particular significant improvements in the implementation of the annual work programme, the listing of activity based budgeting in 2013 and issues in regard to recruitment and salaries;
2014/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2014/2100(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes that the Agency finally moved to the new premises on 1 January 2014 and notes the significant decrease in rent costs, following the conclusion of the seat agreement with the Spanish authorities.
2014/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2014/2088(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Welcomes the increased contributions of Eurofound to policy development, the greater use of its expertise in key EU policy documents and the growing recognition of the scientific value of Eurofound´s research;
2014/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2014/2088(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes Eurofound’s replies regarding the concerns raised by the Court of Auditors on the physical inventory and fixed assets registration; considerexpects that with the new assets accounting system, such errors will be avoided in the future;
2014/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2014/2087(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines that the Centre’s work remains highly relevant to the European vocational education and training (VET) and skills policy agenda; and notes its concern that unless the low demand driving high unemployment is reversed it will foster and perpetuate skill mismatch and skill obsolescence through over qualification and unemployment; acknowledges the Centre’s key achievements in 2013 in its field of activity; furthermore notes that Cedefop will undertake its first pan-European skills survey (eu-SKILL) in 2014;
2014/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2014/2075(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes the Court's finding that projects using Simplified Cost Options are less likely to be prone to error than the ones using actual costs;
2014/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2014/2075(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the intention of Member States to absorb EU funds, particularly towards the end of the eligibility period, should not compromise the consistent application of effective controls, which can lead to the non-detection of infringement rules with subsequent funding of projects that are too costly, poorly implemented or unlikely to achieve the intended result;
2014/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2014/2075(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the new guidance developed by the Commission in order to further strengthen the reliability of management verifications in the 2014-2020 programming period. This guidance, which draws on the lessons learned from the previous programming period, has been presented to Member States and will be issued in the second half of 2014;
2014/12/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2014/2040(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Proposes to launch a pilot project on Social security card to investigate the benefits of introducing, and – if appropriate – to make available, a forgery-proof European electronic document containing professional and social security details of the worker; as a foundation for the pilot project and to establish the necessary knowledge for the pilot project the Commission should initiate a comparative analysis on the different social security systems within the EU-28;
2014/07/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2014/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that that the redundancies in the textile sector in Comunidad Valenciana will further aggravate Comunidad Valenciana has been severely affected by globalisation withe unemployment situation in the affected region which has already experienced a rapid increase in unemployment rate, rising from 9,61 % (Q1 2008) to 29,19 % (Q1 2013)reaching 29,19 % in the first quarter of 2013; welcomes the fact that the region avails itself yet again of EGF aid to alleviate high unemployment by addressing for the second time lay-offs in textile sector;
2014/02/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2014/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Congratulates Comunidad Valenciana on the capacity to apply for and use EGF to address problems of its labour market characterised by a high percentage of SMEs; in this context recalls that Valenciana region has already applied for the EGF support on five instances for textile, ceramic and natural stone as well as construction sector (applications: EGF/2009/0014, EGF/2010/005 and EGF/2010/009, EGF/2011/006 and EGF/2013/004);
2014/02/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2014/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Underlines the capacity of EGF to help address fragile employment situation in the regions dependant on traditional sectors such as textiles or construction sectors; stresses that this capacity depends on the readiness and effectiveness of national and local authorities to apply for EGF support;
2014/02/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2014/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes the fact that the coordinated package includes vocational training focusing on sectors where opportunities exist or are likely to arise as well as contains on-the-job training which will match the identified needs of local enterprises;
2014/02/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2014/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Regrets that the Commission proposal does not outline the educational structure of the dismissed labour force;
2014/02/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2014/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Notes that the coordinated package foresees financial incentives for job- search (lump sum of EUR 300), mobility allowance, outplacement incentive (up to EUR 350) as well as contribution for carers of dependent persons; welcomes the fact that the overall amount of financial incentives is relatively limited leaving the majority of the contribution to be spent on training, counselling, job search assistance and support of entrepreneurship;
2014/02/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2014/2013(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 d (new)
9d. Notes that the case at hand typically reflects the social and economic landscape of a region with local economy characterised by a high percentage of SMEs; stresses that the new EGF 2014- 2020 with its extended scope will be able to assist self-employed workers as well;
2014/02/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2014/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets that the 2011 figures proposed by the Commission as the basis for the negotiation did not reflect the reality of the needs of Member States;
2014/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2014/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Regrets that despite obvious time pressure stemming from the upcoming expiry of the MFF and the European elections, the negotiations on the EGF and the FEAD were delayed, resulting in unacceptably tight timetables for reaching agreements;
2014/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2014/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Points out the difficulty of individually negotiating horizontal elements which are similar to several multiannual programmes in different policy areas and believes that a more systemic approach would deliver better results;
2014/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 3
(3) Article 151 of the Treaty sets out as objectives in the field of social policy the promotion of employment and improved living and working conditions. With a view to achieving these objectives, the Union can support and complement the activities of Member States in the fields of health and safety at work, working conditions, the integration of persons excluded from the labour market and the combating of social exclusion. The Union may adopt measures to encourage cooperation between Member States, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) The national legislation as well as definitions as regards undeclared work may vary from one country to the other. Therefore, the development of measures to tackle undeclared work should be tailored accordingly.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) As well as measures to deter undeclared work Member States should examine incentives to support compliance with declared work and such incentives could include a phased reduction in unemployment payments, a retention of a reducing proportion of their welfare payments and/or secondary benefits.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 155 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 8 b (new)
(8b) While fully respecting national legislation there should be respect for an important principle that the burden of repayment for any unpaid social security and taxes rests with the employer. This acts as a deterrent because it disincentives employers to operate in the informal economy.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 10
(10) The strengthening of cooperation among Member States at EU level is necessary to help Member States to prevent and deter undeclared work more efficiently and effectively. The goal of the strengthened cooperation must be to encourage declared work by making declared work associated with less bureaucracy and administration thereby making sure that undeclared work is the less attractive option.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 11
(11) The Platform will aim to facilitate the exchange of best practices and information, provide a framework at EU level to develop expertise and analysis, and including on new and emerging employment relationships which may give rise to new threats of undeclared work, such as crowdsourcing or job slicing, and also to improve operational coordination of actions between the different national enforcement authorities of the Member States.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 186 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 11
(11) The Platform will aim to facilitate the exchange of best practices and information, provide a framework at EU level to develop expertise and analysis, and improve operational coordination of actions between the different national enforcement authorities of the Member States. Additionally, the Platform will aim at sharing best practices of clear and simple regulation between Member States which will reduce the risks of unintended errors especially among self-employed persons and SMEs.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 187 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 11
(11) The Platform will aim to facilitate the exchange of best practices and information, provide a framework at EU level to develop expertise and analysis, enhance knowledge, thus creating a knowledge bank available to all member States and improve operational coordination of actions between the different national enforcement authorities of the Member States.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 195 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 12
(12) The Platform should make use of all relevant sources of information, in particular studies, bilateral agreements concluded between Member States and multilateral cooperation projects and create synergies between existing EU level instruments and structures to maximise the deterrent or preventive effect of these measures. The operational coordination of actions of the Member States could take the form of joint trainings, peer reviews and solutions for data sharing. European campaigns or common strategies could increase the awareness of undeclared work. The Platform should facilitate cooperation between the Member States by promoting innovative approaches and exchanging the best practices.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 323 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) CoordinatEncourage cross-border operational actions and communication between local and regional officials of border regions about such actions.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 348 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) Develop the analysis of effectiveness of different policy measures in curbing the incidence of undeclared work, including preventive and punitive as well as deterrence measures in general; furthermore analyse why there are Member States and regions with less undeclared work than others,
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 407 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
In accordance with national legislation, regional authorities shall be involved in appointing representatives as members of the Platform.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 460 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The Platform shall, where possible, refrain from the duplication by works already undertaken be these other bodies and it shall instead coordinate with them towards the sharing of information.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 493 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
This Regulation shall apply to agricultural products listed in Annex I to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘the Treaty') and to somethe following products originating from agriculture, including aquaculture, where such products are, or are intended to be, produced, prepared, distributed, placed on the Union market, or imported into or exported from the Union as organic: (a) live or unprocessed agricultural products, including seed and other plant reproductive material; (b) processed agricultural products for food; (c) feed; (d) algae and aquaculture animals; (e) wine; (f) yeast; (g) mushrooms; (h) collected wild plants and parts thereof, and to other products listed in Annex I to this Regulation, insofar as those agricultural products and those other products closely linked to agriculture are intended to be produced, prepared, distributed, placed on the market, imported or exported as organic.
2015/06/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 507 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Mass catering operations shall not be subject to this Regulation. Member States may apply national rules or, in the absence thereof, private standards, on labelling and control of products originating from mass catering operations, in so far as the said rules comply with Community Law.
2015/06/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 520 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7
(7) 'group of operators' means a group in which each operator is a farmer who has a holding of up to 5 hectares of utilised agricultural area and who may, in addition to producing food or feed, be engaged in processing of food or feed; : (i) managed exclusively by farmers through an internal control system; (ii) in which each operator may, in addition to producing food or feed, be engaged in processing of food or feed; (iii) whose farms are geographically close; iv)in which the production involves only one type of production.
2015/06/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 533 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new)
(10a) 'organic plant breeding and variety development' means the enhancement of genetic diversity coupled with reliance on natural reproductive ability. Organic plant breeding aims for new varieties, particularly suited for organic production systems. It is a holistic approach that respects natural crossing barriers and is based on fertile plants that can establish a viable relationship with the living soil. Organic plant breeding is undertaken under organic conditions which comply with the requirements of this Regulation.
2015/06/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 561 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Organic production is a sustainable management system for agriculture that is based on the following general principles:
2015/06/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 565 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) contribution to protect landscapes, climate, habitats and humans;
2015/06/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 599 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) exclusion of genetic engineering, animal cloning, artificially induced polyploidy in animal production and ionising radiation from the whole organic food chain;
2015/06/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 629 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. By way of derogation from paragraph 1 (a), a holding may be split up into clearly separated units or aquaculture production sites which are not all managed under organic production. As regards animals, different species shall be involved. As regards aquaculture the same species may be involved, provided that there is adequate separation between the production sites. As regards plants, different varieties that can be easily differentiated/distinguished shall be involved. Where, in accordance with the second subparagraph, not all units of a holding are used for organic production, the operator shall keep the land, animals, and products used for, or produced by, the organic units separate from those used for, or produced by, the non-organic units and keep adequate records to show the separation.
2015/06/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 658 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. The competent authority may decide to recognise retroactively as being part of the conversion period any previous period during which: (a) the land parcels were subject to measures specified in a programme implemented pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1305/2013, or in any other official programme, provided that the measures concerned ensure that products not authorised for organic production have not been used on those parcels; or (b) evidence can be provided by the operator showing that, over a period of at least three years, the parcels were either natural or agricultural areas which were not treated with products or substances not authorised for organic production. Notwithstanding the provisions in paragraph 1, the conversion period may be reduced to one year for pasturages and open air areas used by non-herbivore species. This period may be reduced to six months where the land concerned has not during the last year, received treatments with products not authorised for organic production.
2015/06/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 683 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Each Member State shall ensure that a computerised database is established for listing the varieties andorganic seed, heterogeneous material and seed potatoes, according to Regulation (EU) No XX/XXX (PRM law) for which plant reproductive material obtained by the organic production method is available on its territorythe market on its territory. Each Member State shall create and manage a list of species or groups of varieties for which plant reproductive material is easily available at the national level. If farm-saved plant reproductive material is produced according to this Regulation it is also considered as obtained by the organic production method notwithstanding if the PRM is derived from registered varieties or not.
2015/06/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 707 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts amending or supplementing the specific poultry production rules. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 37(2);
2015/06/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 730 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
In order to allow organic production to continue or recommence in the event of catastrophic circumstances and subject to the principles laid down in Chapter II, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 36 providing for the criteria to qualify such situations as catastrophic and laying down specific rules on how to deal with them, on monitoring and on reporting requirements. 1. Exceptions from the production rules laid down in this Chapter shall be subject to the principles laid down in Chapter II. 2. Exceptions as referred to in paragraph 1 shall be kept to a minimum and, where appropriate, limited in time, and may only be provided for in the following cases: (a) where they are necessary in order to ensure that organic production can be initiated or maintained on holdings confronted with climatic, geographical or structural constraints; (b) where they are necessary in order to ensure access to feed, seed and vegetative propagating material, live animals and other farm inputs, where such inputs are not available on the market in organic form; (c) where they are necessary in order to ensure access to ingredients of agricultural origin, where such ingredients are not available on the market in organic form; (d) where they are necessary in order to solve specific problems related to the management of organic livestock; (e) where they are necessary with regard to the use of specific products and substances in the processing referred to in point (b) of Article 19(2) in order to ensure production of well-established food products in organic form; (f) where temporary measures are necessary in order to allow organic production to continue or recommence in the case of catastrophic circumstances. (g) where it is necessary to use food additives and other substances as set out in Article 19(2)(b) or feed additives and other substances as set out in Article 16(1)(d) and such substances are not available on the market other than produced by GMOs; (h) where the use of food additives and other substances as set out in Article 19(2)(b) or feed additives as set out in Article 16(1)(d) is required on the basis of Union law or national law. The Commission may in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 37(2) lay down specific conditions for the application of exceptions provided for under this article.
2015/06/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 744 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) as fertilisers, and soil conditioners and nutrients;
2015/06/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 768 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. A Member State can put forward a proposal for inclusion of a substance referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) to (f) by sending a dossier for notification in all Member States with a full description of the substance, reasoning of why it should be included and a demonstration how it fulfils the criteria for authorisation. In case there is no objection from any Member State within three months of the notification, the substance can be included without any further examination. In case there is one or more objection, the Member State can decide to propose to the Commission that the proposal follow the regular authorization procedure as set out in Article 19.
2015/06/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 771 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20
Presence of non-authorised products or 1. Products in which the presence of products or substances that have not been authorised in accordance with Article 19 is detected beyond the levels established taking account in particular of Directive 2006/125/EC, shall not be marketed as organic. 2. In order to ensure the effectiveness, efficiency and transparency of the organic production and labelling system, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 36 regarding the specific criteria and conditions for the application of the levels referred to in paragraph 1 and regarding the establishment of those levels and their adaptation in the light of technical developments. 3. By way of derogation from Article 211(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, and subject to an authorization by the Commission adopted without applying the procedure referred to in Article 37(2) or (3) of this Regulation, Member States may grant national payments to compensate farmers for the losses they have incurred due to the contamination of their agricultural products by non-authorised products or substances which prevents them from marketing those products as organic provided that the farmers have taken all appropriate measures to prevent the risk of such contamination. Member States may also use the instruments of the Common Agricultural Policy to cover totally or partially such losses.Article 20 deleted substances
2015/06/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 810 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 a (new)
Article 20 a Precautionary measures to be taken in the event of suspicions and irregularities 1. The following precautionary measures shall be taken by operators: (a) where an operator suspects that a process, product or input material which has been sourced, produced or prepared does not comply with this Regulation, that operator shall separate and identify the product; (b) in order to assess cases in which non- compliance is suspected, the operator concerned shall set up a system appropriate to the type and size of the operation for the purpose of verification and assessment following procedures based on a systematic identification of critical procedural steps in accordance with the requirements laid down in points 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 of Part IV of Annex II; (c) if, having carried out the assessment provided for in point (b), the operator concludes that the suspicion is substantiated, the operator shall withdraw the product from the market and discontinue its processing and shall immediately inform the competent authorities or control body. 2. The following measures shall be taken by competent authorities, control bodies and authorities: (a) where a control authority or control body is informed by an operator of a substantiated suspicion in accordance with point (c) of paragraph 1 or is informed that an operator intends to place on the market a product which is not in compliance with the organic production rules but which bears a reference to the organic production method, the control authority or control body may prohibit the placing of the product on the market with an indication referring to the organic production method, either for a specified period of time or until it is satisfied that the suspicion has been eliminated. The period of time between such prohibition and the confirmation of the suspicion shall be as short as possible, taking into account the durability of goods, and shall not exceed two months; (b) the control authority or control body shall confirm or eliminate the suspicion by no later than the period of time laid down under point (a). In such a case, the operator concerned shall cooperate fully with the control body or authority. Before confirming the suspicion, the control authority or control body shall allow the operator to comment; (c) where the non-compliance is confirmed, as well as in cases of repetitive, continued or fraudulent non- compliance, Article 26a shall apply; (d) where the non-compliance is not confirmed within the period of time laid down under point (a), the decision referred to therein shall be repealed not later than at the expiry of that period of time.
2015/06/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 817 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) in the list of ingredients and in the same visual field as the sales description, provided that: (i) the main ingredient is a product of hunting or fishing; (ii) it contains other ingredients of agricultural origin that are all organic; (iii) the food complies with the requirements in Annex II part VI.
2015/06/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 820 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The list of ingredients referred to in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph shall indicate which ingredients are organic. The references to organic production may only appear in relation to the organic ingredients. That list of ingredients shall include an indication of the total percentage of organic ingredients in proportion to the total quantity of agricultural ingredients.
2015/06/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 822 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
The terms referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall not be used for a product for which it has to be indicated in the labelling or advertising that it contains GMOs, consists of GMOs or is produced from GMOs according to Union provisions.
2015/06/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 832 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. The organic production logo of the European Union may be used in the labelling, presentation and advertising of products which comply with this Regulation. The organic logo shall not be used in the case of in-conversion products and food as referred to in Article 21 (3) b).
2015/06/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 846 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 a (new)
Article 23 a Control system 1. Member States shall set up a system of controls and shall designate one or more competent authorities to be responsible for monitoring compliance with the obligations laid down by this Regulation, in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No XX/XXXX (the Official controls Regulation OCR). 2. In addition to the conditions laid down in the Official controls Regulation, the control system set up under this Regulation shall comprise at least the application of the precautionary measures provided for by Article 20a and the control measures provided for by this Chapter. 3. The nature and frequency of the controls shall be determined on the basis of an assessment of the risk of occurrence and the seriousness of non-compliance with the requirements laid down in this Regulation. All operators and groups of operators shall be subject to a process of physical in site verification of their compliance with the applicable rules. Such verification shall be based on at least one annual audit and on additional inspections, screening and targeted screening, depending on the likelihood of non-compliance. The criteria for risk assessments used by control authorities and control bodies to identify the most risky parts of the food chain are laid down in Annex Vf. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 36 concerning the detailed elements of the risk assessment, the rates of control and the proportion of random controls. However, operators dealing only with pre-packaged products and operators selling to the final consumer or user as described in Article 24a(2) shall not be subject to the control system as provided for in this Regulation. 4. The competent authority may: (a) delegate its control competences to one or more other control authorities for organic products as defined in Art. 3 point 33 of this Regulation. Control authorities shall offer adequate guarantees of objectivity and impartiality, and shall have at their disposal the qualified staff and resources necessary to carry out their functions; (b) delegate control tasks to one or more control bodies for organic products as defined in Art. 3 point 34 of this Regulation. In such cases, the Member States shall designate authorities responsible for approving and supervising such bodies. 5. The competent authority may delegate control tasks to a particular control body or control authority only if the conditions laid down in Article 26 of the Official controls Regulation are satisfied, and in particular where: (a) there is an accurate description of the tasks that the control body or control authority is to carry out, and of the conditions under which it may carry them out; (b) the control body or control authority: (i) has the expertise, equipment and infrastructure required to carry out the tasks delegated to it; (ii) has a sufficient number of suitable qualified and experienced staff; and (iii) is impartial and free from any conflict of interest as regards the exercise of the tasks delegated to it; (c) the control body or control authority is accredited to the most recently notified version, by a publication in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union, of European Standard EN 17065 or ISO Guide 65 (General requirements for bodies operating product certification systems), and is approved by the competent authorities; (d) the control body or control authority communicates the results of the controls carried out to the competent authority on a regular basis and whenever the competent authority so requests. If the results of the controls show serious noncompliance, the control body shall immediately inform the competent authority; (e) there is effective and documented coordination between the delegating competent authority and the control body or control authority. 6. In addition to the provisions of paragraph 5, the competent authority shall take into account the following criteria when approving a control body or control authority: (a) the standard control procedure to be followed, containing a detailed description of the control measures and precautions that the control body or control authority undertakes to apply to operators subject to its control; (b) the measures that the control body intends to apply where non-compliance is found. 7. The competent authority may not delegate to the control bodies or control authorities the following tasks: (a) the supervision and audit of other control bodies or control authorities; (b) the competence to grant derogations, as referred to in Article 17, unless this is provided for in the exceptional production rules; (c) the monitoring of non-compliance affecting the organic status of a product in accordance with Article 26a and Articles 134, 135 and 136 of the Official controls Regulation. 8. In accordance with Article 29 of the Official controls Regulation, competent authorities delegating control tasks to control bodies or control authorities shall organise audits or inspections of control bodies or control authorities, as necessary, in close cooperation with accreditation bodies. If, as a result of an audit or an inspection, it appears that such bodies are failing to carry out properly the tasks delegated to them, the delegating competent authority may withdraw the delegation. It shall withdraw it without delay if the control body or control authority fails to take appropriate and timely remedial action. 9. In addition to complying with the provisions of paragraph 8, the competent authority shall in close cooperation with the accreditation body: (a) ensure that the controls carried out by the control body or control authority are objective and independent; (b) verify the effectiveness of controls carried out by the control body or control authority; (c) take cognisance of any non- compliances found and corrective measures applied;
2015/06/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 880 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. Operators and groups of operators that have notified their activity and submitted their undertaking to the control system in accordance with Article 24a(1) and comply with this Regulation shall be entitled to be provided with an organic certificate. The organic certificate, issued in electronic form wherever possible, shall at least allow the identification of the operator or group of operators, the type or range of products covered by the certificate and its period of validity.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 918 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. The respect of the conditions and measures for the import of organic products into the Union shall be ascertained by the control provisions laid down in chapter V and at border control posts, in accordance with Article 45(1) of Regulation (EU) No XXX/XXX (Official controls regulation). The physical checks referred to in Article 47(3) of that Regulation shall be performed at a frequency dependent on the risk of non- compliance with this Regulation.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 922 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
A recognised third country as referred to in the first indentpoint (b)(ii) of Article 28(1)(b)(ii) is a third country which the Union has recognised under a trade agreement as having a system of production meeting the same objectives and principles by applying rules which ensure the same level of assurance of conformity as those of the Union.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 925 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The Commission shall publish, and shall provide the European Parliament and the Council with, regular status reports on all ongoing negotiations on such trade agreements including a list of differences between the production rules and control measures applied in the third country concerned and those applied in the Union. The final results of the negotiations shall be presented to the European Parliament and the Council, and shall be published, listing in detail any differences between the production rules and control measures applied in the third country concerned and those applied in the Union. Detailed proposal for handling the referred differences in production rules and control measures shall be presented to the European Parliament and to the Council The European Parliament and the Council may exercise its right of veto at any time before signing a specific trade agreement with a certain third country. The Commission shall publish a list of the differences between the production and control provisions contained in all existing trade agreements covered by this Article.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 929 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
A recognised third country as referred to in the second indentpoint (b)(ii) of Article 28(1)(b)(ii) is a third country which has been recognised for the purposes of equivalence under Article 33(2) of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007, including those recognised under the transitional measure provided for in Article 40. The recognition of the third countries referred to in the first subparagraph shall expire when all recognized third countries have been transferred to the new rules.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 935 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. Competent authorities, control authorities and control bodies may not, on grounds relating to the production, to the labelling or to the presentation of the products, prohibit or restrict the marketing of organic products controlled by another competent authority, control authority or control body located in another Member State, if those products comply with this Regulation. In particular, no official controls and other official activities other than those underset out under this Regulation and the corresponding parts of Regulation (EU) No XXX/XXX (Official controls Regulation) may be performed and no fees for official controls and other official activities other than those under Article 76other than those of thatis Regulation may be collected.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 944 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1
By 31 December 20210, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the availability of organic plant reproductive material and animals for breeding purpos, feed, animals for breeding purposes, young poultry and parent animals for poultry production and aquaculture juveniles on the Union market, identifying potential gaps and the reasons for those gaps and outlining a plan and possible measures for closing those gaps, including support measures designed to stimulate the market. That report shall be based on a study including data collection and analysis in Member States.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 954 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 a (new)
Article 39 a Transitional measures 1. Where necessary, measures to facilitate the transition from the rules established by Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 to this Regulation shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 37(2). 2. Transitional measures that can be applied when new provisions are adopted in forthcoming regulation: (a) When it is justified according to certain conditions, Member States can apply a transitional period when new EU provisions are introduced; (b) The conditions are decided by delegated acts in the organic EU regulation; (c) The conditions should protect operators against risk of market distortion and avoid confusion about the identity or profile of organic products amongst consumers. 3. Those conditions should be: - The Member State has to demonstrate that the production is that small that export is not relevant. - The Member State has to demonstrate that he national production is that small that it does not make any competition against imported products of the same category. 4. To guarantee full transparency, a Member State that apply a transitional period according to this article has to notify and send the relevant justification to the Commission and to other Member States; 5. A Member State can only apply a transitional period for maximum 2 - 5 years.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 957 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40
Transitional measures relating to the origin of plant reproductive material, animals for breeding purposes and young In order to ensure a smooth transition between the rules on organic origin of plant reproductive material provided for in Article 12(1)(i) of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 and on animals for breeding purposes provided for in Article 14(1)(a)(ii) of that Regulation and on young stock of aquaculture animals provided for in Article 15(1)(a)(ii) of that Regulation and the exception to production rules that the Commission adopted pursuant to Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007, and the new production rules for plants and plant products and livestock and seaweed and aquaculture animals provided for in Articles 10(1) and 11(1), respectively, of this Regulation, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 36 providing for exceptions where granting exceptions is deemed necessary in order to ensure access to plant reproductive material and live animals for breeding purposes and young stock of aquaculture animals, that may be used in organic production. The delegated acts adopted under this Article shall cease to apply on 31 December 2021.Article 40 deleted stock of aquaculture animals
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 964 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1
1. The recognition of control authorities and control bodies granted under Article 33(3) of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 shall expire on [31 December 2018] at the latwhen all recognized third countries have been transferred to the new rulest.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 966 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1
Products produced in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 and placed on the market before 1 July 2017[date of entry into force] may continue to be marketed after that date until stocks are exhausted.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 973 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from 1 Julanuary 20172052. __________________ 52 At least 6 months after enter into force.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 990 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – indent 19 b (new)
- uncarded wool,
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 995 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – indent 19 c (new)
- raw hides,
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 998 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – indent 19 d (new)
- traditional herbal medicinal products,
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1016 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part I – .point 1.4.1 a (new)
1.4.1a. For the development of organic varieties, the varieties in question shall be bred and selected under organic conditions that comply with the requirements of this Regulation. Where available, the use of varieties bred according the breeding rules described in this Regulation shall be preferred. All breeding and multiplication practices except meristem culture shall be under certified organic management. Organic plant breeding shall develop organic varieties only on the basis of genetic material that has not been exposed to genetic engineering.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1021 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part I – point 1.4.2 – introductory part
1.4.2. Use of plant reproductiveseed or vegetative propagating material not obtained from organic production
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1023 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part I – point 1.4.2 – paragraph 1
Plant reproductive material not obtained from organic production may be used only when it comes from a production unit in conversion to organic production or where it is justified for use in research, test in small-scale field trials or for genetic resources conservation purposes agreed by the competent authority of the Member State.deleted
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1026 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part I – point 1.4.2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
In addition to 1.4.1, seed or vegetative propagating material not obtained from organic production may be used only in accordance with Article 10 and 35 where such material is justified for use in research and development, for tests in small-scale field trials or for genetic resources conservation purposes defined by the competent authority.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1027 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part I – point 1.4.2 – paragraph 1 b (new)
2) Where paragraph 1 a is not applicable, Member States may authorise the use of non-organic seed, or vegetative propagating material if not available from organic production. However, for the use of non-organic seed, heterogeneous material and seed potatoes the points (i) and (ii) apply (i) Non-organic seed, heterogeneous material and seed potatoes may be used, provided that the seed or seed potatoes are not treated with plant protection products, other than those authorised for treatment of seed in accordance with Article 19(1), unless chemical treatment is prescribed in accordance with Council Directive 2000/29/EC (1) for phytosanitary purposes by the competent authority of the Member State for all varieties of a given species in the area where the seed or seed potatoes are to be used. Availability of organic seed, heterogeneous material and seed potatoes is verified by the means of the database referred to in Article 10. (ii) Authorisation may only be granted during periods for which the database is updated in accordance with Article 49(3).
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1030 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part I – point 1.4.2 a (new)
1.4.2 a. Species or subspecies present in the list referred to in article 10 may not be subject of authorizations unless these are justified by one of the purposes referred to in art 1.4.2. from annex II. If the quantity of organic seed or vegetative propagation material available is insufficient, for instance due to harvest failure, the competent authority can decide to remove a species or subspecies from this list.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1040 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part I – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Although mushrooms are not plants, the general production rules for plant production apply, where applicable. Above that, the following rules apply: For the production of mushrooms, substrates may be used, if they are composed only of the following components:
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1042 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 1.2.2
1.2.2. Conversion periods specific to the type of animal production to be applied in case of non-simultaneous conversion are set out in point 2.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1044 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 1.2.4
1.2.4. Animals and animal products may be considered organic at the end of thefter a conversion period of 24 months if there is simultaneous conversion of the complete production unit, including livestock, pasturage or any land used for animal feed and if the animals are mainly fed with products from the production unit itself.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1050 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 1.3.2
1.3.2. Animals existing on the agricultural holding at the beginning of the conversion period and their products may be deemed organic after compliance with the applicable conversion period referred to in point 21.2.2 or 1.2.4 depending on the conversion type chosen.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1060 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 1.3.5
1.3.5. For breeding purposes, non- organically raised animals may be brought onto an agricultural holding when breeds are in danger of being lost to farming in accordance with Annex IV to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/200668 and in that case animals of those breeds must not necessarily be nulliparous holding, only when organic animals are not available in sufficient number and subject to the conditions provided for in the following points a to d of this Article. __________________ 68 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 of 15 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ L 368, 23.12.2006, p. 15).
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1086 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 1.4.3.2 a (new)
1.4.3.2a. Feed from own holding and other sources In the case of herbivores, except during the period each year when the animals are under transhumance subject to point 1.4.2.2, at least 60 % of the feed shall come from the farm unit itself or, where this is not feasible, shall be produced in cooperation with other organic farms in the same region. In the case of pigs and poultry, at least 20% of the feed shall come from the farm unit itself or, where this is not feasible, shall be produced in cooperation with other organic farms or feed business operators in the same region. In the case of bees, at the end of the production season hives shall be left with sufficient reserves of honey and pollen to survive the winter. The feeding of bee colonies shall only be permitted where the survival of the hives is endangered due to climatic conditions. Feeding shall be with organic honey, organic sugar syrups, or organic sugar.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1100 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 1.5.2.4
1.5.2.4. With the exception of vaccinations, treatments for parasites, phytotherapeutic and homeopathic products and compulsory eradication schemes where an animal or group of animals receive more than three courses of treatments with chemically- synthesised allopathic veterinary medicinal products including antibiotics within 12 months, or more than one course of treatment if their productive lifecycle is less than one year, the livestock concerned, or produce derived from them, shall not be sold as organic products, and the livestock shall undergo the conversion periods referred to in points 1.2 and 2.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1104 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 1.5.2.5
1.5.2.5. The withdrawal period between the last administration of an allopathic chemically synthesised veterinary medicinal product to an animal under normal conditions of use, and the production of organically produced foodstuffs from such animals, is toshall be twice the withdrawal period as referred to in Article 119 of Directive 2001/82/EC or, in a case in which this period is not specified, 48 hours, except for phytotherapeutic and homeopathic products without legal withdrawal period.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1132 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 1.7.9
1.7.9. MAll mutilation of animals shall be prohibited. Disbudding (removal of horn- producing cells in young animals), and tail docking of sheep to a maximum half of the tail, only for female breeding sheep, carried out in the lamb’s first week of life shall be allowed.
2015/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1151 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 2.1.2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) notwithstanding point (a), male bovine animabulls over one year old shall have access to pasturage or an open air area;
2015/06/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1160 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 2.1.2 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) rearing systems for bovine, ovine and caprine animals shall be based on maximum use of grazing pasturage according to the availability of pastures in the different periods of the year when conditions allow. At least 60 % of the dry matter in daily rations of bovine, ovine and caprine animals shall consist of roughage, fresh or dried fodder, or silage. A reduction to 50 % for animals in dairy production for a maximum period of three months in early lactation shall be allowed;
2015/06/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1185 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 2.3.2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) at least 60 20% of the feed shall come from the farm itself or in case this is not feasible, be produced in the same region in cooperation with other organic farms or feed operators;
2015/06/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1195 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 2.3.4. – paragraph 2 - table
The minimum surface areas indoors and outdoors and other characteristics for housing porcine animals shall be as follows Indoors area Outdoors area (net area available to animals) (exercise area, excluding pasturage) Live weight M2/head M2/head minimum (kg) Farrowing sows with piglets 7,5 sow 2,5 up to 40 days Fattening porcine animals up to 50 0,8 0,6 up to 85 1,1 0,8 up to 110 1,35 1,2 1 Piglets over 40 days and 0,6 0,4 up to 30 kg Brood porcine animals 2,5 female 1,9 6 male 8,0 If pens are used for natural service: 10 m2/boar
2015/06/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1212 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 2.4.2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
When a flock is constituted for the first time, renewed or reconstituted and organically reared parent production are not available in sufficient numbers, non- organically reared poultry may be brought into an organic poultry production unit, provided that the pullets for the production of eggs and poultry for meat production are less than three days old.
2015/06/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1219 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part II – point 2.4.3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) at least 620 % of the feed shall come from the farm itself or in case this is not feasible, be produced in the same region in cooperation with other organic farms or feed operators;
2015/06/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1279 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part III – point 4.1.2.1 a (new)
4.1.2.1a. For on-growing purposes, when organic aquaculture juvenile animals are not available, subject to the following restrictions: a) organic juveniles should be used when available b) at least the latter three quarters of the duration of the production cycle shall be managed under organic management. Each Member State shall ensure that a computerized database is established for listing the aquaculture species for which organic juveniles is available on its territory and the production capacity among certified aquaculture farms. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts laying down the technical details for establishing the database referred to in paragraph 2. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 37(2).
2015/06/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1281 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part III – point 4.1.3.3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Astaxanthin derived primarily from organic sources, such as organic crustacean shells may be used in the feed ration for salmon and trout within the limit of their physiological needs. If organic sources are not available natural sources of astaxanthin (such as Phaffia yeast) may be used.
2015/06/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1285 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part III – point 4.1.4.2 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the use of parasite treatments, not including compulsory control schemes operated by Member States, shall be limited to twice per year or once per year where the production cycle is less than 18 months;deleted
2015/06/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1304 #

2014/0100(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part IV – point 2.2.5 a (new)
2.2.5a. In addition to the requirements laid down in this Regulation, the following additional requirements for the processing of organic flavours shall be fulfilled: 1. Only flavouring extracts and natural flavourings as defined in Article 16(4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 shall be considered as organic flavourings. 2. For organic flavourings, 95% of flavour components shall be organic. 3. Only organic carriers shall be allowed and included in the calculation of the percentage of agricultural ingredients. 4. Additives, solvents and processing aids shall be used in organic form when available.
2015/06/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 89 #

2014/0091(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) In order to further facilitate the mobility of workers between Member States, this Directive aims to ensure good governance, information to scheme members, transparency and safety of the occupational retirement provision.
2015/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2014/0091(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Directive 2003/41/EC represented a first legislative step on the way to an internal market for occupational retirement provision organised on a European scale. A genuine internal market for occupational retirement provision remains crucial for economic growth and job creation in the European Union and for tackling the challenge of an ageing European society. Therefore, the role of social dialogue is important. The Directive, dating from 2003, has not been substantially amended to introduce a modern risk-based governance system also for institutions for occupational retirement provision.
2015/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2014/0091(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 41 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Member States shall ensure that all supplementary relevant information shall be easily available and accessible upon request by the members.
2015/03/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 275 #

2014/0091(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) In view of changing work patterns and increasing worker mobility, new individualised pensions solutions are being developed within collective systems. The rules should facilitate the development of new, innovative pension products, so as to guarantee adequate retirement provisions for all, regardless of career patterns or place of work.
2015/10/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 282 #

2014/0091(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) The activities of the institutions for occupational retirement provision should safeguard the intergenerational balance by ensuring equitable spread of risks and benefits between generations.
2015/10/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 290 #

2014/0091(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Action is needed to further develop complementary private retirement savings such as occupational pensions. This is important since social-security systems are coming under increasing pressure, which means that citizens will increasingly rely on occupational retirement pensions as a complement in the futureto complement future retirement savings. Institutions for occupational retirement provision play an important role in providing secure retirement benefits. Their activities should ensure the intergenerational balance in occupational pension provision and reflect changing labour markets' patterns. Occupational retirement pensions should be developed, without, however, calling into question the importance of social-security pension systems in terms of secure, durable and effective social protection, which should guarantee a decent standard of living in old age and should therefore be at the centre of the objective of strengthening the European social model.
2015/10/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 343 #

2014/0091(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Institutions for occupational retirement provision are financial service providers which bear a heavy responsibility for the provision of occupational retirement benefits and therefore should. They also serve a social function. Therefore, it is essential for them to meet certain minimum prudential standards with respect to their activities and conditions of operation.
2015/10/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 357 #

2014/0091(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
(25) A prudent calculation of technical provisions is an essential condition to ensure that obligations to pay retirement benefits can be met both in the short and in the long-term. Technical provisions should be calculated on the basis of recognised actuarial methods and certified by qualified persons. The maximum interest rates should be chosen prudently according to any relevant national rules. The minimum amount of technical provisions should both be sufficient for benefits already in payment to beneficiaries to continue to be paid and reflect the commitments that arise out of members' accrued pension rights.
2015/10/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 371 #

2014/0091(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) Institutions are very long-term investors. Redemption of the assets held by these institutions cannot, in general, be made for any purpose other than providing retirement benefits. Furthermore, in order to protect adequately the rights of members and beneficiaries and ensure the intergenerational balance in occupational pension provision, institutions should be able to opt for an asset allocation that suits the precise nature and duration of their liabilities. These aspects call for efficient supervision and an approach towards investment rules allowing institutions sufficient flexibility to decide on the most secure and efficient investment policy and obliging them to act prudently. Compliance with the ‘prudent person’ rule therefore requires an investment policy geared to the membership structure of the individual institution for occupational retirement provision.
2015/10/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 403 #

2014/0091(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 41
(41) In order to ensure intergenerational balance in occupational pension provision, it is essential that institutions improve their risk management so that potential vulnerabilities in relation to the sustainability of the pension scheme can be properly understood and discussed with the competent authorities. Institutions should, as part of their risk management system, produce a risk evaluation for their activities relating to pensions. That risk evaluation should also be made available to the competent authorities. In that evaluation institutions should provide among others a qualitative description of key elements determining their funding position in accordance with national law, the effectiveness of their risk-management system and the ability to comply with the requirements regarding technical provisions. This risk evaluation should include new or emerging risks, such as risks related to climate change, resource use or the environment.
2015/10/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 605 #

2014/0091(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 4
4. The risk evaluation for pensions shall take into account the need to ensure intergenerational balance and long-term sustainability of occupational pension provision. It shall be an integral part of the operational strategy and shall be taken into account in the strategic decisions of the institution.
2015/10/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 12 #

2013/2277(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas regressive budgetary measures are having a disproportionate impact on low-income groups leading to higher levels of poverty, deprivation and health inequalities due to the fact that low income groups are especially dependant on public health systems
2014/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2013/2277(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets the fact that those programmes were designed without any assessment of the consequences by means of impact studies or coordination with the Employment Committee, the Social Protection Committee, the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council (EPSCO) or the Commissioner for Employment and Social Affairs; regrets, too, that the ILO were not consulted and the fact that, despite the important social implications, the consultative bodies established by Treaty, in particular the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) and the Committee of the Regions (CoR), were not consulted;
2014/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2013/2277(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the adjustment policies and structural reforms in the four countries have led to dramatic unemployment rates, historically high rates of job losses, an unacceptable increase in the number of long term unemployed and worsening working conditions; points out that the consequences for activity rates, in particular as regards the sustainability of social protection and pension systems, are even more serious because the gap between the Europe 2020 targets and reality is rapidly growing ever wider;
2014/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2013/2277(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Notes with great concern that it is young people who are suffering the highest levels of unemployment, with the situation in countries such as Greece, where the rate is over 50%, or Portugal and, where it is in excess of 30% or Ireland, where it is in excess of 3025%, being quite devastating, furthermore notes that these figures persist five years into the crisis; regrets the fact that even those who do find a job often find themselves working under precarious conditions or on part-time contracts which make it hard to live independently;
2014/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2013/2277(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that the most vulnerable groups – the long-term unemployed, carers, women, migrant workers and the disabled – have been strongly hit and are suffering from higher unemployment rates than the national average;
2014/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2013/2277(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Warns that, if not remedied, these huge divergences, especially in the case of the younger generation, will in the long run, result in structural damage to the labour market of the four countries, limit their capacity for recovery, provoke massive forced migration with tremendous brain- drain effects and increase the persistent divergences between Member States supplying employment and those supplying a low-cost workforce;
2014/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 154 #

2013/2277(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Deplores the fact the cuts to education services for children with special needs is having a hugely detrimental effect on their life chances and that such negative impacts at an early age can never be reversed;
2014/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2013/2277(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Deplores that cuts to resources for independent living for persons with disabilities;
2014/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 169 #

2013/2277(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Regrets the negative impacts of mass emigration of young people in particular the social and economic consequences thereof;
2014/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 205 #

2013/2277(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Calls on the relevant EU institutions to insist that adequate financial resources are dedicated to educations services in particular those services targeting children with special needs and persons with disabilities and furthermore to insist that the resources necessary for independent living are restored;
2014/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2013/2277(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Calls on the EU institutions to prioritise employment creation and entrepreneurship support;
2014/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2013/2264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the Finnish authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 01 February 2013, and that its assessment was made available by the European Commission on 16 October 2013; regrets the lengthy evaluation periods and inquires why this particular application required 8 months of assessment whereas previous application related to Nokia Salo from 2012 had been evaluated within 3 months;
2013/11/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2013/2264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Regrets that the redundancies in Nokia stem from its corporate decision to move its production plants as well as the design and product development to Asia and are part of its plan to reduce global employment in Nokia Corporation by 17 000 workers by the end of 2013; notes that this decision led to three EGF mobilisations in favour of 6 138 Nokia workers;
2013/11/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2013/2264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. NoteRecalls that the mobile phone sector has been the subject of several EGF applications, all of which based on trade related globalisation, this being the fourth application on behalf of workers made redundant by Nokia; the three previous cases were for former Nokia workers in Germany, Romania and FinlandEGF already acted in favour of 1 337 workers dismissed in result of re-location of Nokia from Germany to Romania in 2008; notes that now five years later the EGF is mobilised for the fourth time in relation to dismissals in Nokia;
2013/11/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2013/2264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Finish authorities decided to initia the Finnish authorities started the implementation of the personalised services to the affected workerscoordinated package of personalised service already on 01 August 2012, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support hen the dismissals started in order to assist workers before the proposed coy stop wordkinated packageg at Nokia;
2013/11/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2013/2264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the fact that the package contains innovative measures like Protomo - a matching service for new business start-ups;
2013/11/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2013/2264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Notes that financial allowances to be covered by the EGF are limited and the majority of support will be devoted to training and entrepreneurship;
2013/11/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2013/2264(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes the fact that the redundancies and the preparation of the coordinated package of specialised services are addressed by a dedicated working group comprising the social partners (including Nokia representatives) and regional authorities;
2013/11/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 1 #

2013/2263(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the concerned redundancies are part of a broad restructuring plan which cut the global work force of First Solar Manufacturing GmbH by 30% to sharply reduce its global production capacity and resulted in closing both sites located in Germany; stresses the added value of EGF to react to redundancies caused by unexpected market changes linked to globalisation;
2013/11/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2013/2263(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the German authorities decided to initiate the implementation of the personalised services to the affected workers on 1 January 2013, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package; notes that redundant workers have also benefitted from the ESF support before participating in the EGF measures; welcomes the fact that the German authorities confirmed that necessary precautions have been taken to avoid double financing from Union funds;
2013/11/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2013/2263(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that more than half of the EGF support will be spent on allowances - 875 workers are said to receive during their active participation in the measures a subsistence allowance (estimated cost EUR 2 714 per worker over 9 months); further notes that the application includes a lump sum of EUR 1 869 activation premium for 200 workers who quickly find a job without further assistance after the conclusion of the measures;
2013/11/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2013/2263(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Recalls that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to job search and training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances; if included in the package they should be of complementary nature and never replace allowances under the responsibility of Member States or companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements; stresses in this context that the new EGF regulation for 2014-2020 will limit the inclusion of financial allowances in the package to a maximum of 35% of the cost of the measures and that accordingly the rate of allowances within the coordinated package for this demand will not repeat under this new regulation;
2013/11/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2013/2263(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the fact that the social partners, as well as workers’ representativdopted a social plan for the redundancies ofin First Solar Manufacturing GmbH wand that a transfere consulted on the social plan for redundant workers, andmpany will design and manage the coordinated package of personalised services; notes that its operation during the first six months is paid by First Solar Manufacturing GmbH and ESF via its Federal programme and that the services of the transfer company will be extended to new measures financed by EGF; notes that a policy of equality of women and men as well as the principle non- discrimination will be applied during the various stages of the implementation of and in access to the EGF;
2013/11/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 1 #

2013/2262(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the Danish authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 21 December 2012, and that its assessment was made available by the European Commission on 16 October 2013; notes that the evaluation of this application took much longer compared to the previous Vestas case submitted by Denmark in May 2012;
2013/11/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2013/2262(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Is of the opinion that the EU wind energy market is set to grow further generating demand for Europe's wind turbine manufacturers and associated industries through the on-going promotion of energy from renewable sources at Union level; points in this respect to the mandatory national targets for the use of renewable energy by 2020; therefore, expresses concern about this particular relocation and points out the risk of importation of wind turbines produced in Asia to the European market;
2013/11/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2013/2262(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Notes that the concerned dismissals are the direct result of the strategic decision taken by Vestas group in November 2011 to reorganise its structure and increase proximity to its customers in the regional markets, especially in China; notes that the affected region of Ringkøbing-Skjern invested considerably in infrastructre to attract an innovative enterprise such as Vestas group and the decision of Vestas puts the regions into difficulties;
2013/11/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2013/2262(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the fact that the workers will follow individualised targeted training packages meeting their needs as defined during the counselling and coaching phase;
2013/11/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2013/2262(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Welcomes the fact that the coordinated package provides for measures with special mentoring and outplacement for workers aged 55 years or older, who are likely to experience additional difficulties in finding new job due to their age;
2013/11/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2013/2262(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. Regrets however that more than half of the EGF support will be spent on financial allowances - all workers are said to receive subsistence allowance which is estimated at EUR 10 400 per worker;
2013/11/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2013/2262(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 e (new)
7e. Recalls that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to job search and training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances; notes that, if included in the package, they should be of complementary nature and never replace allowances under the responsibility of Member States or companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements; stresses in this context that the new EGF regulation for 2014-2020 period will introduce a cap on financial allowances, which shall not constitute more than 35% of the cost of the package and that accordingly the rate of allowances within the coordinated package for this demand will not repeat under the new regulation;
2013/11/18
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2013/2256(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the importance of close cooperation between agencies; points out existing good practices of synergy effects among agencies, such as memoranda of understandings and prior consultation on working programmes, in order to avoid overlapping and repetition of activities leading to more effective output;
2014/01/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2013/2217(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Expresses its satisfaction that the Court of Auditors has declared the transactions underlying the Foundation’s annual accounts for the financial year 2012 to be legal and regular and that its financial position as of 31 December 2012 is clearly represented;
2014/01/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2013/2217(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes that the overall level of committed appropriations continued to stay at a high level (99.9%) in 2012 and that they were completed in a timely manner, which indicates proper budgetary planning; welcomes that the level of completed outputs is in line with the Foundation’s budget;
2014/01/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2013/2210(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the contribution of the Foundation to the promotion of knowledge about living and working conditions in the EU at a time when these conditions are continuing to deteriorate in some Member States; recalls the launch of the overview report from the fifth European Working Conditions Survey containing important and relevant findings about trends in job quality, sustainable work and ageing workforce, health and well-being, and working time and work-life balance;
2014/01/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2013/2210(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Expresses its satisfaction that the Court of Auditors has declared the transactions underlying the Foundations’ annual account for the financial year 2012 to be legal and regular and that its financial position as of 31 December 2012 is clearly represented;
2014/01/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2013/2208(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges the essential role of the Centre in the promotion of vocational education and training (VET) in the European Union andt a time when new methods of training are needed, in the contribution to policies which aim to use VET’s potential to support economic development and facilitate transition from learning to employment, particularly in the context of the economic recession; welcomes that the different stakeholders show an increased demand for the Centre’s expertise and analytical capacity;
2014/01/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2013/2208(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Expresses its satisfaction that the Court of Auditors has declared the transactions underlying the Centre’s annual accounts for the financial year 2012 to be legal and regular and that its financial position as of 31 December 2012 is clearly represented;
2014/01/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2013/2192(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that employment in Comunidad Valenciana has been severeally affected by the crisis. The with unemployment rate in the region increased rapidly, rising from 9,61% (Q1 2008) to 29,19% (Q1 2013)reaching 29,19% in the first quarter of 2013; welcomes the fact that the region avails itself yet again of EGF aid to address high unemployment;
2013/10/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2013/2192(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Congratulates Communidad Valenciana on the capacity to apply for and use EGF to address problems of its labour market characterised by a high percentage of SMEs; in this context recalls that Valenciana region has already applied for the EGF support on four instances for the textile, ceramic and natural stone as well as construction sector (Applications EGF/2009/0014 ES/Comunidad Valenciana; EGF/2010/005 ES/Comunidad Valenciana and EGF/2010/009 ES/Comunidad Valenciana, EGF/2011/006 ES/Comunidad Valenciana Construction of buildings;
2013/10/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2013/2192(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that the Spanish authorities inform that in their assessment based on the experience with previous EGF applications, only 300 of the workers targeted for the EGF support will choose to participate in the measures; calls on the Spanish authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential, in particular for upskilling the workers with basic education, who make up 74,4% of targeted workers;
2013/10/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2013/2192(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that the coordinated package foresees financial incentives for job- search (lump sum of EUR 300), mobility allowance (up to EUR 400), outplacement incentive (up to EUR 700); welcomes the fact that the overall amount of financial incentives is limited leaving the majority of the contribution to be spent on training, counselling, job search assistance and support towards entrepreneurship;
2013/10/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2013/2192(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes the fact that the social partners were consulted on several occasions on the design and the implementation of the coordinated package of personalised services;
2013/10/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2013/2192(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes the fact that the coordinated package includes vocational training focusing on sectors where opportunities exist or are likely to arise as well as contains up-skilling designed to the future needs of manufacturers in the sector concerned by redundancies;
2013/10/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2013/2192(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Notes that the case at hand typically reflects the social and economic landscape of a region whose local economy is characterised by a high percentage of SMEs which should in the future be addressed by extending the scope of the EGF to self-employed workers (as proposed by the Commission in the proposal for the new Regulation on European Globalisation Adjustment Fund 2014-2020).
2013/10/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2013/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the recession in the eurozone came to an end, numerically speaking, in the second quarter of 2013, but whereas annual growth in the eurozone will remain negative this year and unemployment and inequality are at a record high; whereas growth needs to be furthersignificantly enhanced for this to be considered a long-lived recovery, and in order to generate the necessary momentum to relieve the EU of its socioeconomic challenges;
2014/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2013/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas unemployment in the EU has reached the alarming figure of 26.6 million whereas long-term unemployment has risen in most Member States and reached an all time high in the EU as a whole; whereas the decline in employment has been more pronounced in thossome countries which are undertaking more substantial fiscal consolidation;
2014/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2013/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas systematic errors in the Commission’s economic forecasts for growth and unemployment in recent years demonstrate the need for a change of diagnosis and strategy with a view to ending the crisisn improved model of forecasting; whereas the pace of fiscal consolidation has slowed, yet the deflationary impact of certain structural reforms, mostly focusing on external demand, are having the same severe effects on internal demand, with stagnant investment and growth and weak job creation;
2014/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2013/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas certain macroeconomic imbalances, for instance in the area of external competitiveness, have improved, although internal imbalances between Member States have been exacerbated; whereas a strengthened exchange rate of the Euro vis-a-vis the dollar and sterling since 2007 has created further difficulties for struggling Eurozone members in their efforts to increase exports; whereas evidence shows that a one-size- fits-all policy that relies on external demand and squeezes internal demand is not possible for all eurozone members at the same time; whereas this is heightening the (underestimated) negative impact of simultaneous austerity programmes, thereby depressing internal demand and resulting in over-reliance on demand from third economies, at a time when there are signs of a weakening outlook for emerging economies;
2014/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2013/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
M a. whereas support for entrepreneurs should be a priority for Member States;
2014/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2013/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas a coherent policy mix combining macroeconomic policies, structural policies, sound labour market institutions, unsegmented and flexible labour markets, coordination of collective bargaining and well-resourced welfare systems (which serve as automatic stabilisers) is essential in absorbing cyclical shocks;
2014/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2013/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the fact that in the AGS 2014 the Commission calls on the Member States to protect or promote longer-term investment in education, research and innovation, energy and climate action; considers this insufficient, however, to allow Member States with already- constrained budgets to accomplish that goal; calls on the Commission to explore and promote the necessary reforms to exclude productive investments, for instance in education, and research and development, from the deficit targets established under EU rules so as to ring- fence them, given their potential to generate growth and jobs;
2014/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2013/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Considers that cohesion policy is essential in helping to reduce internal competitive disparities and structural imbalances; calls on the Commission, as a matter of urgency, to reprogramme unspent structural funding in favour of youth employment programmes and SMEs; calls on the Commission to find special solutions for those countries with very high unemployment rates which will be forced to return EU funds on account of co-financing problems; asks the Commission, to this end, to explore the possibility of excluding Member States’ participation in the co-financing of EU funds or programmes (under heading 1 (‘Sustainable growth’) of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF)) from the calculation of their structural deficit as defined in the two-pack;
2014/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2013/2158(INI)

37. Welcomes the adoption of the Youth Guarantee by the Council and the earmarking of EUR 6 billion for the Youth Employment Initiative under the next MFF; calls on the Member States to implement youth guarantee schemes as a matter of urgency, and to use the available resources efficiently, concentrating on those in the most difficult situations; however is concerned that governments have not made available the financing necessary for this to happen;
2014/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 163 #

2013/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
38. Notes with satisfaction that these funds can be used during the first two years of the next financial framework; recalls, however, that this amount is wholly insufficient to combat youth unemployment in a lasting manner and should form an initial tranche with which to combat youth unemployment; emphasises that the International Labour Organisation (ILO) has calculated that EUR 21 billion is needed to implement an effective programme to combat youth unemployment in the eurozone alone; calls on the Commission to make the Youth Guarantee a priority and to increase the available budget in the promised mid-term review of the MFF;
2014/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 167 #

2013/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
39. Calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure that Member States subject to the excessive deficit procedure also have the fiscal space to make use of these measures, in particular by temporarily exempting Member States’ co-financing of measures to combat youth unemployment from the calculation of excessive deficits;
2014/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2013/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
47. Supports the Commission’s call to shift the tax burden away from labour and suggests shifting it towards other forms of sustainable tax such as a harmonised corporate tax, the financial transaction tax (FTT) and carbon taxes;
2014/01/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2013/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
- having regard to the European Union's Guidelines on the promotion and protection of freedom of religion or belief,
2013/10/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 33 #

2013/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the uprisings in the Arab world prompted the European Union to acknowledge the failure of past policies and to commit to a 'more for more' approach in the Review of the Neighbourhood Policy, based on a commitment to 'adapt levels of EU support to partners according to progress on political reforms and building deep democracy', including free and fair elections, freedom of association, expression and assembly, freedom of thought, conscience and religion or belief, a free press and media, and the rule of law administered by an independent judiciary;
2013/10/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 172 #

2013/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Notes with concern that respecting the rights of minorities is one of the key challenges identified in the Commission's Enlargement Strategy for 2012-2013; encourages the Member States to launch a general public debate on the acceptance of minorities through education, civil society engagement, and awareness-raising in general; regrets that the Roma community is particularly disadvantaged throughout the Western Balkans; condemns the generally negative societal attitudes towards vulnerable groups such as the LGBT community and people with disabilities, which is a recurring issue in many enlargement countries; expresses its concerns about Turkey's treatment of religious minorities;
2013/10/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 207 #

2013/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. Supports all steps leading to political dialogue, which is essential to move the transition in Egypt forward; expresses its deep concern about recent crises and, including the street battles between the army and Muslim Brotherhood supporters, terrorism and violent clashes in the Sinai and the extremist violence against Coptic Christian communities; calls on all political leaders in the country to find a way to break the dangerous stalemate and agree on implementing tangible confidence-building measures to avoid the risk of more bloodshed and polarisation in the country; urges the Egyptian authorities to advance the work on an inclusive constitution with equal rights for all;
2013/10/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 259 #

2013/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 52
52. Expresses grave concern regarding the steadily deteriorating human rights situation in Iran, the continued repression of reformists, the growing number of political prisoners and prisoners of conscience and faith, the discrimination and persecution of the Baha'i community, the consistently high number of executions, including of minors, the widespread torture, the unfair trials and exorbitant sums demanded for bail, and the heavy restrictions on the freedom of information, expression, assembly, religion, education and movement;
2013/10/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 314 #

2013/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 20 a (new)
Freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief (This subheading should be place between paragraph 72 and paragraph 73)
2013/10/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 315 #

2013/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 73
73. Stresses that the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief, as encapsulated in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights and other international human rights instruments, is a fundamental human right, encompassing the right to believe or not to believe, and the right to adopt, change and abandon a belief of one's choiceinterrelated with other human rights and fundamental freedoms, encompassing the right to believe or not to believe, and the freedom to practise theistic, non-theistic or atheistic belief alike, either in private or public, alone or in a community with others and the right to adopt, change and abandon a belief of one's choice; calls on the EU to promote the right of freedom of religion or belief within international and regional fora and in bilateral relations with third countries;
2013/10/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 321 #

2013/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 74
74. Condemns in the strongest terms discrimination, intolerance, violence and killings on grounds of religion or belief, wherever and to whomever they occur; is particularly concerned about the threat of increasing sectarianism along religious lines in countries such as Egypt and Syria as an impediment to long-lasting peace and reconciliation; furthermore, is concerned about increasing government and social hostility in many Islamic countries, Central Asia and the deplorable situation in North Korea, countries which continue to deny minority religious or belief groups the freedom to worship or publicly express their religion or belief; social hostility and attacks against religious or belief groups, which have resulted in many deaths and injuries, are on the increase; and impunity and the lack of protection for minority religious or belief communities remains a concern;
2013/10/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 324 #

2013/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 74 a (new)
74a. Opposes any legislation that penalises individuals for changing their religion or belief; expresses deep concern that as a result of such legislation individuals in certain countries face imprisonment or even the death penalty; is also concerned that those who have left or changed their religion are subjected to social hostility such as violence and intimidation; opposes laws that penalise expressions deemed blasphemous, defamatory, or insulting to religion or religious symbols, figures, or feelings; states that these laws do not comply with accepted international human rights standards; condemns Blasphemy law provisions in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Egypt, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia which allow imprisonment and the death penalty;
2013/10/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 327 #

2013/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 74 b (new)
74b. Welcomes the EU's commitment to promoting the right to freedom of religion or belief within international and regional fora including the UN, the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the Council of Europe (CoE) and other regional mechanisms; encourages the EU to continue tabling its yearly resolution on freedom of religion or belief at the UN General Assembly and supporting the mandate of the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief
2013/10/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 329 #

2013/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 74 c (new)
74c. Welcomes recent EIDHR calls for proposals prioritising and supporting civil society actions combating discrimination on the basis of religion or belief; encourages the EU to support inclusive efforts of intercultural and interfaith dialogue and cooperation at various levels, involving community leaders, women, youth and ethnic minority representatives, and with the aim to promote peace building and societal cohesion calls on the EU and EU member states to develop small grant schemes for the protection and promotion of freedom of religion or belief in countries where this right is most at risk;
2013/10/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 9 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Deplores the fact that the EU 27 is now in recession and that current fiscal policies are not reversing this process; calls therefore on the Commission to re- evaluate its approach in light of this fact and the unacceptable levels of youth and long-term unemployment in many Member States;
2013/07/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises that this year's Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs) are particularly important, because Member States define their investment priorities for cohesion policy in the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF); calls in this context for increased targeting of EU funding on growth and employment policies, especially on combating youth unemployment and long-term unemployment;
2013/07/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the debt to GDP ratio in some countries is still increasing and that employment and growth promoting measures must be stepped up in these Member States;
2013/07/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that all Member States have received recommendations with regard to levels of labour market participation; calls on those Member States with high levels of unemployment to step up, in consultation with the social partners, active labour market measures, such as training and employment services, and to introduce further reforms to facilitate access to employment, prevent early withdrawals from the labour market, reduce the cost of labourimprove competitiveness and combat labour market segmentation;
2013/07/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the need to ensure greater equity in tax systems, in particular more progressive tax systems and the shifting of the tax base from labour to other sources;
2013/07/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on Member States to put in place schemes to ensure greater access to finance for SMEs in order to boost employment growth;
2013/07/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Stresses the need for greater fiscal flexibility to meet the specific needs of different Member States;
2013/07/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that particular action is needed to increase the labour participation of women, older workers and workers with disabilities by ensuring that there are efficient incentives to return to, and stay in, work; recalls that the quality, affordability and accessibility of services related to early childhood education and child, childcare and eldercare play a crucial role;
2013/07/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls the skills mismatches and bottlenecks in many regions and sectors and the inadequacy of certain education and training systems to cope with market demands; welcomes the reforms of vocational education and training systems undertaken by several Member States in order to adapt skills and competences to labour market needs, especially those of young people; recalls that almost all Member States need to undertake further action and investment in the field of education and training, training, research, innovation and development;
2013/07/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2013/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to reassesscontinue the current restrictions on the use of some neonicotoinoids in light ofand to consistently examine any new scientific evidence in this field and urges the Commission to properly assess the economic and environmental impact of suchany restrictions before bringing them into force and to give due consideration to any economic impact;
2013/11/13
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 139 #

2013/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Highlights the specific labour needs of the horticulture sector, and specifically the need for seasonal workers, and calls on the Member States to ensure that there are effective schemes in place to ensure that horticulture producers can access the labour they need for key periods of the year while fully respecting the requirements of the Seasonal Workers Directive;
2013/11/13
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 157 #

2013/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Is deeply concerned that up to a third of edible produce is wasted because of its appearance and calls on the Commission to urgently create possibilities for marketing a wider range of quality specifications of produce;
2013/11/13
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 26 #

2013/2098(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas successful and comprehensive rural development programmes can have a concrete positive impact on employment rates and the competitiveness of businesses in rural areas, and thus reduce the risk of unemployment or that as a result of low rural incomes inhabitants live in abject poverty;
2013/10/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 33 #

2013/2098(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas regional quality branding can contribute to the development of territorial economies by broadening the concept of quality through the use of schemes for the delivery of sets of high-quality goods and services which are inextricably interlinked and which embody the specific characteristics of each territory, and in particular its heritage (historical, cultural, geographical, etc.); whereas, as a result, these sets of goods and services come to be seen as unique, generating revenue at territorial level and opening up new opportunities on local and international markets;
2013/10/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 42 #

2013/2098(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas official European quality labels already exist (Protected Designation of Origin, Protected Geographical Indictation, Traditional Specialty Guaranteed) and the number of both European and Third country products carrying them continues to increase;
2013/10/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 91 #

2013/2098(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to develop an approach tocontinue to develop its three official recoquality labels (Protected Designiation of regOrigin, Protected Geographical Indication, Traditional quSpeciality branding based on an objective assessment of the governanGuaranteed) which are already established and increasingly recognised by consumers, and to concentrate resources ofn the territorial development process, focusing in particular on the steps taken to incorporate the social, economic and environmental dimensions,se clearly defined labels rather than creating new ones, to enable them to contribute to both the dieversity of thelopment of rural areas economic andally, social actors involved in promoting regional quality branding and the quality of the set of specific goods and services which they can offerly and environmentally, and the development of quality EU products to the greatest extent possible;
2013/10/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 11 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas expiry of the milk quotas will affect the entire European milk market, in particular dairy farmers in mountain areas, northernmost areas and outermost regions where it will not be possible to take as much advantage of the growth opportunities generated by deregulation as in other areas;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 29 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas in many of these areas milk production is the most important and most widespread branch of agricultural activity;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 54 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Considers it essential for a grazing stock premium to be earmarked for these areas under the first pillar of the CAP;deleted
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 59 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses the important role of coupled payments under the first agricultural policy pillar; points out that the Member States in these areas should be given additional possibilities to couple payments, national or EU-funded, as it was agreed in the current CAP reform;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 63 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the need for CAP provisions to focus on small and medium size farms in these areas, given that they are structurally more labour intensive and make a valuable contribution to sustained employment levels and rural development;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 74 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States and regions to formulate a specificaddress in their rural development programmes the challenges for milk production in these areas and thus ensuring a better targeting of the support;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 88 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that second-pillar measures such as compensatory allowances, agro- environmental premiums or investment aids are of great importance for sustainable milk production in these areas; urges therefore that Member States and regions be given the necessary opportunities to ensure the payment of adequate and clearly differentiated compensatory allowances and promote environmentally friendly, sustainable and organic forms of agriculture; calls for adequate compensatory payments from the second CAP pillar to offset the higher investment costs for milk production in mountain and northernmost areas occasioned by the particular nature of the terrain;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 96 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Member States to promote in particular measures under the second pillar, such as cooperative ventures for the rational use ofmore efficient use of available resources such as agricultural machinery or, buildings and infrastructure;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 98 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Underlines the need to develop contractual arrangements in the milk sector to keep up a balanced milk production throughout the EU;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 100 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Points out that if the milk sector in the EU is hit by crisis, the mountain and disadvantaged areas should be the first that are supported by different measures because of the vulnerability of these regions; calls therefore the Commission to develop specific tools to counter price or production quantity fluctuations in these areas;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 107 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that, given the substantial logistical problems arising with regard to transport and the generally small quantities of milk produced on individual farms, collection costs in mountain areas and outermost regions are particularly high, placing them at a major geographical and competitive disadvantage; calls on the Member States and regions accordingly to earmark state subsidies for processing plant, so as to offset the higher costs of collection compared with those in more favourable locations; underlines the need of subsidies for the collection of milk from disadvantaged areas;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 130 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Points out that stockbreeding methods for efficient milk production are particularly cost-intensive on small farms; calls on the Commission to allow Member States and regions accordingly to provide state subsidies enabling dairy farms in these areas to breed their own high quality livestock in spite of this;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 140 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission and Member States to extend joint research programmes to encompass grassland areas and milk production in less favoured areas and devote particular attention to them under joint research projects; calls for a better coordination between CAP and research policy encouraging innovative solutions for these areas;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 143 #

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on the Commission to follow closely milk production development in these areas and to review the economic impact of the expiry of the milk quotas on dairy farms in these areas; asks the Commission to submit to Parliament and the Council a report dealing with this issue as of 1 January 2017 and, if appropriate, put forward a legislative proposal if milk production has decreased significantly in these regions;
2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1 #

2013/2087(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Deeply regrets that the Commission did not analyse the effectiveness of the use of the crisis derogation criterion until now, specially taking into account that these EGF cases were not evaluated in the EGF mid-term review; notes that the Commission is entering the final phase of the ex-post evaluation of the EGF (2007- 2013); regrets, however, that the results are likely toresults of the final ex-post evaluation of EGF will arrive too late to feed into the discussion on the new regulation for the EGF in 2014-2020, especially regarding the effectiveness of the use of the crisis derogation criterion, since the concerned EGF cases were not analysed in the EGF mid-term evaluation report.
2013/06/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2013/2087(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. WelcomNotes that the Commission will continue to workhas already started to work in 2011 on the electronic application form and on the standardised procedures for simplified applications, faster processing of the applications and better reporting; asks the Commission to present the progress made following the use of technical assistance in 2012; recalls the need to shorten the application procedures1 and in 2012.
2013/06/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2013/2087(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls the importance of networking and exchange of information on the EGF; supports, therefore, the funding of the Expert Group of Contact Persons of the EGF as well as other networking activities among the Member States including this years' seminar for practitioners on the implementation of the EGF; underlines the need to further enhance the liaisi; underlines further both the importance of information exchange between all those involved in EGF applications, including namely the social partners, to create as many synergies as possible and the importance of ensuring that Member States fully implement the new regulation for the period 2014-2020.
2013/06/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2013/2087(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to invite the Parliament to the seminars and meetings of the Expert Group of Contact Persons organised by means of technical assistance, by using the relevant provisions of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission1; __________________ 1. OJ L 304, 20.11.2010, p. 47.
2013/06/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2013/2087(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to invite the social partners to the seminars for practitioners organised by means of technical assistance;
2013/06/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2013/2087(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Is concerned about the possible adverse impact which reducing the staffing level may have on the swift, regular and effective evaluation of incoming applications and implementation of the EGF technical assistance; considers that any short-term or long-term revision in staff should be based on a prior impact assessment and should take full account, inter alia, of the Union's legal obligations and the institutions' new competences and increased tasks arising from the Treaties;
2013/06/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2013/2087(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Regrets that the Commission does not envisage any particular awareness-raising activities for 2013 given that some Member States, including users of the EGF, question the utility and advantages of the EGF;
2013/06/10
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 30 #

2013/2082(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) Violence against religious communities, with political, socio- economic or ideological roots, persists in many parts of the world; clear condemnation by the European Union of all forms of violence and discrimination should be a basic element of EU policy in the area of freedom of religion or belief. Particular attention should be given to the position of those who changed their religion or belief, as in practice they are often the subject of social pressures, intimidation or outright violence.
2013/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 41 #

2013/2082(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) As the draft Guidelines state, in accordance with the principles accepted by the international community, manifestation of freedom of religion or belief may be subject only to «such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others»7 ; this is an exhaustive list: limitations in order to protect, for example, national security are therefore not permitted; at the same time, the limitations must be proportionate with regard to the protected rights of others and the right balance must be achieved; the proportionality criterion should therefore be stressed in the Guidelines.
2013/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 43 #

2013/2082(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
(g) While freedom of religion or belief and freedom of expression are mutually reinforcing rights, in cases where these two rights are invoked against each other, the EU should also recall that modern media tools can afford a close interconnectedness between cultures and faiths. Therefore steps need to be taken to avoid inter- cultural violence as a reaction to acts of freedom of expression related to criticism and especially ridicule; the EU should help in reducing such tensions, for example by promoting mutual understanding and dialogue.
2013/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 47 #

2013/2082(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h
(h) It should be stressed in the Guidelines that an indispensable part of freedom of religion or belief is the right to manifest the freedom of religion or belief in community with others; this includes: - the freedom to worship or assembly in connection with a religion or belief, and to establish and maintain places of worship and religious sites, for these purposes; - the freedom to establish and maintain appropriate religious, social and charitable institutions with legal personality and organisational acharitable or humanitarian institutions; - the freedom to solicit and receive voluntary financial and other contributionomy, including the freedom to appoint personnel and leaders of these institutions without external interference from the state,s from individuals and institutions. - the freedom to train, appoint, elect or designate by succession appropriate leaders called for by the freedom to provide religious teaching and training, the freedom to exercise one's ministry, the freedom to observe days of rest and to celebrate holidays and ceremonies in accordance with the precepts of one'squirements and standards of any religion or belief; - the freedom to establish and maintain communications with individuals and communities in matters of religion orand belief andt the freedom to carry out charitable activitienational and international levels. Equally, it should be noted in the Guidelines that the right to exercise religion in community with others should not unnecessarily be limited to officially recognised places of worship, and that all undue limitations to the freedom of assembly should be condemned by the EU.
2013/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 53 #

2013/2082(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i
(i) The EU should take action when registration requirements for religious or belief-related organisations unduly limit the freedom of religion or belief. Registration should not be understood as a prerequisite for the enjoyment of one's human right to freedom of religion or belief, as that right cannot be conditional upon administrative or legal requirements. The EU should call for the abolishment of any legislation, such as the mandatory registration of one's religion in civil status documents, if this legislation leads to discrimination against persons holding non-religious beliefs or persons who have changed their religion or belief;
2013/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 73 #

2013/2082(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point q
(q) The EU should continue its initiatives in various multilateral fora in order to promote and protect the freedom of religion or belief. Whenever relevant, the EU will assist third countries in drawing up legislation promoting and protecting freedom of religion or belief.
2013/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 74 #

2013/2082(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point r
(r) In accordance with Article 36 of the Treaty on the European Union, the European Parliament should be involved in the evaluation of the implementation of the Guidelines which should take place no later than three years after the Guidelines have come into force. The evaluation should be based on an analysis of the EU response to concrete situations related to the violation of freedom of religion or belief in third countries. The European Parliament should be regularly informed of areas or developments of concern, as reported by the EU delegations. Its relevant committees will receive detailed information.
2013/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 75 #

2013/2082(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
(r a) The EU Special Representative on Human Rights should see the protection of freedom of religion or belief as an important aspect of his/her mandate and will have a visible role in promoting this freedom through the external relations of the EU. He/she should be formally charged to liaise with the European Parliament on this issue and engage in a structural dialogue with relevant non- governmental organisations such as EPRID.
2013/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 7 #

2013/2066(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that poor employability of Roma women caused by both discriminatory practices and their low level of education and training is a key issue, and that, therefore, addressing poor employability is the most important tool in achieving a higher employment rate, in decreasing dependency on social assistance and in reducing the risk of poverty;
2013/07/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2013/2066(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that increasing efforts in providmproving access to health services and increasing access to child- care facilities for reconciliation of family and working life in rural areas cwould have a positive impact.
2013/07/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2013/2065(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that, as the population ages, the proportion of elderly people with a disability is increasing, and that those concerned are more likely to be women owing to their longer life expectancy; stresses that women with disabilities as a group face greater exclusion and have less opportunities in the labour market than men with disabilitiesa lower rate of activity in the labour market and/or jobs carrying less responsibility and lower salaries, great social isolation, greater financial dependency on the family and/or care persons; calls on the European Union to implement positive action measures to include women with disabilities in the labour market;
2013/07/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2013/2065(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Notes that all discrimination based on disability and gender shall be prohibited; emphasises that the overlap of such discrimination has particularly negative effects on women and girls with disabilities;
2013/07/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 25 a (new)
- having regard to Article 6 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 11 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas of the 80 million people with disabilities living in the European Union there are 40 million women and girls and all are in significant need of an accessible and unprejudiced environment;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 12 #

2013/2065(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Notes that the increase in the number of people with disabilities will increase the burden on carers, in particular on family carers;
2013/07/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2013/2065(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Calls on Member States to use the European Social Fund as an effective tool to improve the levels of inclusion of women and girls with disabilities in all important areas of life, such as access to the labour market, training and education;
2013/07/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the increase in the number of people with disabilities will increase the burden on carers, in particular on family carers;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 21 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas disability prevalence is higher among women and women have a greater life expectancy than men, this means that the number of older women with disabilities will increase;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 58 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Ma. whereas women and girls with disabilities suffer multiple discriminations both from a gender based perspective and a disability based perspective;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 62 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas women with disabilities were at great risk of poverty already before the crisis, and whereas their inclusion in society, and especially in the labour market, should be given priority among public policies; whereas women and girls with disabilities suffer greater emotional dependency, greater risk of falling victim to all gender-based violence, lower levels of personal and social development and widespread ignorance regarding sexuality and the innumerable and damaging myths surrounding this issue;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 74 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Insists that disability policies should be gender mainstreamed;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 79 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that all discrimination based on disability and gender shall be prohibited emphasises that the overlap of such discrimination has particularly negative effects on women and girls with disabilities;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 110 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that women with disabilities have the right to decide, as far as possible, over their own lives, and highlights the fact that this right should also be promoted in specialised institutions; stresses that personal assistance can beis a means of autonomous living and should therefore be encouragbe facilitated and promoted;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 153 #

2013/2065(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the EU and Member States to take all appropriate legislative, administrative, social, educational and other measures to protect women and girls with disabilities, both within and outside the home, from all forms of exploitation, violence and abuse and access to all community services and justice should be guaranteed;
2013/07/18
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 1 #

2013/2049(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes with regret that the Italian authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 30 December 2011, supplemented by additional information up to 2 October and that its assessment was made available by the European Commission on 7 March 20123; notes that its assessment was made available by the Commisregrets the lengthy evaluation period of 15 months; calls on the Commission to conclude the evaluation phase and finally present proposals for decisions on 7 Marchthe remaining cases submitted in 20131;
2013/03/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2013/2049(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that the Commission has already stated the impact of the economic and financialrecognised that ICT sectors had been hit by the crisis oin the enterprises operatingpast as the EGF has supported workers dismissed in the ICT sector1; --------- (1) of ICT in Holland (case EGF/2010/012 Noord Holland ICT, COM(2010)0685 final)1; --------- (1) Decision 2011/99/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 41, 15.2.2011, p. 8).
2013/03/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2013/2049(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Italian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures, recalls that early EGF interventions in Italy suffered from relatively low rate of budget implementation mainly due to low participation rates;
2013/03/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2013/2049(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Welcomes, in the coordinated package of personalised services, the module "Mentoring after reintegration into work", which is aimed at assuring that the return of the workers on the labour market is sustainable;
2013/03/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2013/2049(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes the fact that the contribution to expenses of residence shall only be paid as a one-off contribution upon presentation of proof of the expenditure incurred;
2013/03/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2013/2049(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Welcomes the contributions towards special expenses for carers foreseen to enable reconciliation of trainings and job search with family obligations;
2013/03/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2013/2049(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Ask the Commission to further detail in future proposals the types of training to be provided, in which sectors the workers are likely to find employment and if the training on offer is aligned to the future economic prospects and labour market needs in the regions concerned by the dismissals but welcomes the strict link between the voucher and each worker's agreed pathway of reintegration;
2013/03/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2013/2049(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Underlines the importance of good and swift cooperation between the Commission and Member States when preparing applications under the forthcoming new EGF regulation in order to provide EGF support speedily;
2013/03/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2013/2048(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes with regret that the Austrian authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 20 December 2011, supplemented by additional information up to 9 October and that its assessment was made available by the European Commission on 7 March 20123; notes that its assessment was made available by the Commisregrets the lengthy evaluation period of 15 months; calls on the Commission to conclude the evaluation phase and finally present proposals for decisions on 7 Marchthe remaining cases submitted in 20131;
2013/03/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2013/2048(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that at NUTS II level, the Landthe EGF has already supported workers dismissed in the region of Niederösterreich was also ahich suffectred by other mass redundancies for which EGF applications were submitted to the Commission: 704 redundancies in the metal sector in 20091 and 1 274 redundancies related to the road transport sector in 20102; ------------ (1) from mass lay-offs in 2009 and 2010 in the metal and road transport sectors (EGF/2010/007 AT/Steiermark- Niederösterreich, OJ L 263, 7.10.2011. (2)1 and EGF/2011/001 /AT/Niederösterreich- Oberösterreich, 2); -------- (1) Decision 2011/652/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 263, 7.10.2011, p. 9). (2) Decision 2011/770/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 317, 30.11.2011, p. 28).
2013/03/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2013/2048(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes the fact that the EGF supported measures will be provided to workers by means of a labour foundation established as a part of the social plan which was agreed with the social partners; recalls that labour foundations are institutions set up by sectoral social partners in order to accompany workers in industrial change with training measures to enhance their employability; recalls, further, that this model of providing active labour market measures was very successful in the past regarding the reintegration of workers into the labour market and the use of the EGF funds for this purpose;
2013/03/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2013/2048(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Calls on the Austrian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures;
2013/03/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2013/2048(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Welcomes the proposed coordinated package of personalised services and the detailed descriptions of the measures presented in the Commission proposal; welcomes the fact that the training on offer is combined with the future economic prospects and the future skills and qualification needs in the region;
2013/03/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2013/2048(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Draws the attention to the subsistence allowance for workers on training and on job search which is said to amount EUR 1 000 per worker per month (calculated for 13 months, unemployment benefit will be interrupted during that period) which will be combined with training allowance of EUR 200 per worker per month; recalls that the EGF should in the future be primarily allocated to training and job search as well as occupational orientation programs, and its financial contribution to allowances should always be of additional nature and in parallel to what is available to dismissed workers by virtue of national law or collective agreements;
2013/03/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2013/2048(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Regrets that EUR 4 266 000 of the total cost of the package amounting to EUR 5 864 615 is devoted to various financial allowances, a similar proportion to previous cases; recommends that a proportionate amount should be dedicated to training-related measures in future mobilisations;
2013/03/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2013/2032(BUD)

Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 2
2. Notes with regret that the Italian authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 29 December 2011, supplemented by additional information up to 4 September and that its assessment was made available by the European Commission on 20 February 20123; notes that its assessment was made available by the Commregrets the lengthy evaluation period of 14 months; calls on the Commission to conclude evaluation phase and finally present proposals for decissions on 20 Februarythe four remaining cases submitted in 20131;
2013/03/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2013/2032(BUD)

Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that Antonio Merloni SpA was ruled insolvent already in October 2008 and the sale of its assets and the take over of 700 workers were concluded only in December 2011; notes that the Italian authorities launched their original request for EGF assistance previously in 2009; however, the application had to be re-launched in late 2011 given that the workers were formally dismissed only when the assets had been sold and administrative proceedings concluded;
2013/03/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2013/2032(BUD)

Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Recalls that already in 2008 the Parliament sent a written question to the Commission bringing its attention to the gravity of dismissals in Antonio Merloni SpA and calling for a quick reaction at Union level by means of EGF and of cohesion funds to alleviate the situation of the regions concerned;
2013/03/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2013/2032(BUD)

Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Recalls that the EGF has already supported workers dismissed in the sector of manufacturing of domestic appliances (case EGF/2009/010 LT/Snaige);
2013/03/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2013/2032(BUD)

Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that in order to provide workers with rapidspeedy assistance, the Italian authorities decided to startinitiate the implementation of the personalised measures on 29 March 2012, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package; however, deplores that the EGF could only intervene almost 3 years and a half after the company had been ruled insolvent;
2013/03/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2013/2032(BUD)

Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the fact that the design of the measures was consulted with the social partners and that it made part of social plan "Accordo di Programma" signed by the Ministry of Economic Development and the concerned regions and that the implementation of the EGF support will be monitored by a coordination group;
2013/03/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2013/2032(BUD)

Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Asks the Commission to further detail in future proposals the types of training to be provided through a voucher, in which sectors the workers are likely to find employment and whether the training on offer is aligned to the future economic prospects and labour market needs in the regions concerned by the dismissals;however, welcomes the strict link between the voucher and each worker's agreed pathway of reintegration;
2013/03/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2013/2032(BUD)

Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Calls on the Italian authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential and to encourage the maximum number of workers to participate in the measures; recalls that early EGF interventions in Italy suffered from relatively low rate of budget implementation mainly due to low participation rates;
2013/03/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2013/2032(BUD)

Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Welcomes in the coordinated package of personalised services the modul "Guidance for over-50s" intended for older employees, which make 12% of the targeted labour force;
2013/03/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2013/2032(BUD)

Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 8 d (new)
8d. Welcomes the fact that the contribution to expenses of residence shall only be paid as a one-off contribution upon presentation of proof of the expenditure incurred;
2013/03/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2013/2032(BUD)

Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 8 e (new)
8e. Takes note that 5 684 000 EUR of the total cost of the package of services amounting to 7 451 972 EUR is devoted to various financial incentives and allowances, including the facilitation of dismissed workers mobility; recommends that a proportionate amount should be dedicated to training-related measures in future mobilisations;
2013/03/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2013/2032(BUD)

Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 8f (new)
8f. Points out that the biggest part of the costs of personalised services is to be committed to "Job search allowance" (2 000 EUR per worker for the days of participations to EGF measures), which is an equivalent of the Italian subsistence allowance "CIGS" for the sake of simplification; reiterates therefore that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances which are the responsibility of Member States by virtue of national law; recommends that in future cases of a mobilisation of that Fund such measures should be discouraged;
2013/03/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2013/2032(BUD)

8g. Notes the relatively high "Hiring benefit" (5 000 EUR per worker); welcomes the fact that such measures will only be disbursed to employers guaranteeing permanent contracts for targeted workers and expects the Commission to deliver the relevant detailed information regarding the contract conditions for these workers;
2013/03/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 16 #

2013/2032(BUD)

Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Underlines the importance of good and swift cooperation between the Commission and Member States when preparing applications under the coming new EGF regulation;
2013/03/07
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 1 #

2013/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the seventh and eighth progress reports and calls on the Commission to examine, in the sixth Cohesion Report in 2014, the long-term impact of the steadily decreasing cohesion between Europe's countries and regions as a result of the economic crisis and the measures which must be taken to reduce the gap, in particular cohesion between programme and non-programme counties;
2013/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2013/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the high proportion of early school-leavers in some regions is significantly above the target of 10 % and that a solution must therefore be found to the problem of integrating poorly-trained young people into the labour market, taking into account the fact that the lack of qualifications leads to unemployment, which in turn results in poverty, calls on Member States to encourage appropriate vocational and on the job training for those who will benefit from it;
2013/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2013/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that employment in some regions remains below 60 % and that some regions are missing their national targets by a factor of 20-25 %, which is having a particularly adverse effect on young people, women, older people, carers and people with disabilities; keeping such people in employment requires special measures, particularly as unemployment has been a feature of some isolated settlements for generations, and this poses a particular threat to marginalised communities;
2013/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2013/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises with regard to the ‘urban paradox’ that the number of families on the brink of poverty, suffering material deprivation, having very low work intensity and threatened by exclusion – primarily single-parent families, carers of disabled family members or older people close to retirement for whom access to equal opportunities must be particularly taken into account, including physical accessibility and access to information and communication media, the achievement of which must be assessed using objective, comparable indicators, taking into account the demographic challenges – is in many cases higher in the regions around capital cities which, according to the indicators, are classified as developed.
2013/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The work programme drawn up by the Commission should be based on the objectives set out in this Regulation, which consist of increasing the market share of European products, increasing their competitiveness and opening up new markets, especially in those sectors most affected by trade agreements, as well as informing consumers about the high standards that EU legislation requires of EU products and increasing recognition and awareness of European quality schemes (PGI, PDO, TSG, organic).
2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 94 #

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) Financing rules should be set. As a general rule, so that interestinged proposing organisations assume their responsibilities, the Union should cover only part of the cost of programmes. Certain administrative and staff costs which are not linked to implementation of the CAP form an integral part of information provision and promotion measures and could be eligible for Union funding.
2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 108 #

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1a Objectives The work programme provided for in Article 8 shall cover the following objectives: (a) Increasing the market share of EU products and opening up new markets, with a specific focus on the markets with the highest growth potential; (b) Increasing the competitiveness of EU products and raising their profile both within and outside the European Union, and especially that of the products most vulnerable to globalisation in international trade; (c) Providing information to consumers on the high standards that EU products must meet arising from the application of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), with a particular focus on food safety, authenticity, nutritional and health aspects, animal welfare and respect for the environment; (d) Increasing awareness and recognition of European quality schemes (PGI, PGO, TSG, organic);
2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 113 #

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – title
Measures on the internal market and in third countries
2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 122 #

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 - point a
(a) information measures aimed at stressing the specific features of agricultural productions methods in the Union, particularly in terms of food safety, traceability, sustainability, authenticity, nutritional and health aspects, animal welfare or respect for the environment;
2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 125 #

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 - point b
(b) information measures aimed at stressing the characteristics of agricultural and food products and on the themes referred to in Article 5(4);
2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 130 #

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 - point b a (new)
(ba) promotion measures aimed at increasing sales of agricultural and food products produced in the EU.
2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 141 #

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3
The eligible measures in third-countries are as follows: (a) information measures aimed at stressing the characteristics of agricultural and food products and on the themes referred to in Article 5(4); (b) promotion measures aimed at increasing sales of agricultural and food products from the EU.Article 3 deleted Measures in third countries
2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 203 #

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new)
(ca) community or national quality schemes for agricultural products listed in Annex I to the Treaty.
2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 332 #

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph – -1 (new)
- 1. By not later than 31 December [2017], the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council an interim report on the application of this Regulation, including rate of uptake in different Member States, together with any appropriate proposals. At the European Parliament's request the Commission shall come and present the interim report to the responsible committee.
2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 333 #

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27
By not later than 31 December [2020], the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the application of this Regulation together with any appropriate proposals. At the European Parliament's request the Commission shall come and present the interim report to the responsible committee.
2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 40 #

2013/0390(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 1 a (new)Directive 2009/38/EC

Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new)
(1a) In Article 10, the following paragraph is added: ‘5. A member of a special negotiating body or European Works Council or his or her alternate, who is a member of the crew of a seagoing vessel shall be entitled to participate in a meeting of the special negotiating body or European Works Council or in any other meeting within any procedures established under Article 6(3) if he or she is not at sea or in a port in a State other than that in which the shipping company is domiciled when the meeting takes place. Meetings shall, wherever practicable, be scheduled to facilitate the participation of members who are members of the crews of seagoing vessels.’
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2013/0390(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – point 2
3. This Directive shall apply to the transfer of a seagoing vessel registered in and/or flythat is part of a transfer of an undertaking, business, or part of an undertaking or business withing the flag of a Member State and constituting anmeaning of paragraphs 1 and 2, provided that the transferee is situated, or the transferred undertaking, business, or part of an undertaking or business for the purposes of this Directive, even when it is not situated within the territorial scope of the Treatyremains, within the territorial scope of the Treaty. This Directive shall not apply if the object of the transfer exclusively consists of one or more seagoing vessels.
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2013/0361(APP)


Article 1
The task of the Tripartite Summit for Growth and Employment shall be to ensure, in compliance with the Treaty and with due regard for the powers of the institutions and bodies of the Union, that there is a continuous concertation between the Council, the Commission and the social partners. It will enable the social partners at European level to contribute, in the context of their social dialogue and their expertise, to the various components of the Union’s strategy for growth and jobs. For that purpose, it shall draw on the upstream work of and discussions between the Council, the Commission and the social partners in the different concertation forums on economic, social and employment matters.
2014/01/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2013/0361(APP)


Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Each delegation shall consist of representatives of European cross-industry organisations, either representing general interests or more specific interests of supervisory and managerial staff and micro, small and medium-sized businesses at European level.
2014/01/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 606 #

2013/0137(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) it is made available on the market in small quantities by persons other than professional operators, or by professional operators employing no more than ten persons and whose annual turnover or balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million;
2013/12/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 635 #

2013/0137(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegatedimplementing acts, in accordance with Article 140, setting out, with regard to the production and making available on the market of niche material belonging to particular genera or species, one or more of the following:
2013/12/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 637 #

2013/0137(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the maximum size of packages, containers or bundles;deleted
2013/12/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 643 #

2013/0137(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) modalities of making available on the market.deleted
2013/12/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 814 #

2013/0137(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) it is produced in the region(s) of origin;deleted
2013/12/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 826 #

2013/0137(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 – paragraph 3
3. After the registration of a variety in a national variety register pursuant to paragraph 2(a), competent authorities may approve additional region(s) of origin for that variety.deleted
2013/12/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 838 #

2013/0137(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. There shall be no fees for the registration of these varieties by SMEs.
2013/12/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 13 #

2013/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) The Commission should have the power to adopt delegated acts under Article 290 of the TFEU in order to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of particular legislative acts, notably to take account of economic, social and technical developments. The Commission should ensure that these delegated acts do not impose a significant additional administrative burden on the Member States or on the respondent units.
2013/08/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2013/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) In view of the importance of the Labour Force Survey ad hoc modules in support of Union policies, a contribution by the Union to the financing of their implementation is proposwill be awarded through grant procedures, without calls for proposals. The grants shall be awarded to the national statistical institutes and other national authorities referred to in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on European statistics. Grants that are provided for purposes of carrying out labour force surveys may take the form of lump sums. In this context, the use of lump sums should be a principal means of simplifying grant management.
2013/08/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2013/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) By derogation from Article 126(3)(e) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, in view of the increased administrative burden related to the additional information to be collected for the Labour Force Survey ad hoc modules which will contribute to providing the indicators for three of the Europe 2020 headline targete Union policies, it is necessary to cofinance the salary costs of the personnel of national administrations even if the relevant public authority would have carried out the supported action without an EU grant.
2013/08/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2013/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 577/98
Article 7 b (new)
The Union mayshall award financial support to the national statistical institutes and other national authorities referred to as designated beneficiaries in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009, for the implementation of the ad hoc modules as referred to in Article 7a in accordance with Article X of Regulation (EU) No XX/XX of the European Parliament and of the Council on a European Union Programme for Social Change and Innovation, [COM (2011) 609 final].
2013/08/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2013/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 577/98
Article 7 c – paragraph 2 (new)
2. When exercising the powers delegated in accordance with Article 4(2) and Article 7a, the Commission shall ensure that the delegated acts do not impose a significant additional administrative burden on the Member States and on the respondents. In addition, the Commission shall duly justify the actions in those intended delegated acts and shall provide information with input from Member States on the burden and the production costs as referred to in Article 14(3) of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009.
2013/08/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2013/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 577/98
Article 7 c – paragraph 3 (new)
3. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 4(2) and Article 7a shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of five years from …*. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the five-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of time from (Publications officean identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period. ______________ * OJ: please insert the exact date of the entry into force of the amendingis Regulation). .
2013/08/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2013/0062(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) In accordance with Article 154 of the Treaty, the Commission consulted the social partners on the possible direction of Union action in this field and the social partners indicated that explanatory guidance in particular for SMEs would be useful.
2013/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2012/2309(INI)

Proposal for a Decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament
Article 3
Pursuant to Article 1, the number of representatives in the European Parliament elected in each Member State is hereby set as follows, with effect from the beginning of the 2014-2019 parliamentary term: Belgium 21 Bulgaria 17 Czech Republic 21 Denmark 13 Germany 96 Estonia 6 Ireland 112 Greece 21 Spain 54 France 74 Croatia 112 Italy 732 Cyprus 6 Latvia 8 Lithuania 11 Luxembourg 6 Hungary 21 Malta 6 Netherlands 26 Austria 198 Poland 51 Portugal 21 Romania 32 Slovenia 8 Slovakia 13 Finland 13 Sweden 19 United Kingdom 73
2013/02/01
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 40 #

2012/2301(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Invites Member States to support women's participation in the labour market by measures such as guaranteeing free access to public childcare and care services for dependent persons, adequate support for family carers including the provision of respite care, increasing resources for education, and professional qualification programmes;
2013/01/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2012/2301(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Asks Member States to ensure that policies and programmes which enhance work life balance are implemented.
2013/01/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2012/2280(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the Spanish authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 28 December 2011, supplemented by additional information up to 5 September 2012, and that its assessment was made available by the Commission on 19 October 2012; regrets the lengthy evaluation period of 10 months;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2012/2280(BUD)

3. Welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with immediatespeedy assistance, the Spanish authorities decided to start the implementation of the measures on 19 March 2012 - well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2012/2280(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the Spanish authorities inform that, in their assessment based on the experience with previous EGF applications, only 500 of the dismissed workers will choose to participate in the EGF supported measures; calls on the Spanish authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2012/2280(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Welcomes the fact that the design of the measures was consulted with the social partners and that the regional authorities, business representatives and the trade unions formed a special committee responsible for the coordination, management and implementation of the EGF project;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2012/2280(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Regrets that the information on the training measures in the Commission proposal does not describe in which sectors the workers are likely to find employment and if the package is adapted to the future economic prospects in the region;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2012/2280(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Regrets that the measures supporting entrepreneurship do not contain any financial support to set up own business while several financial incentives are offered for workers following training measures;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2012/2280(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes the fact that a comprehensive package of information and publicity activities accompanies the EGF supported project;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2012/2279(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the Swedish application; deplores, however, the fact that, despite applying for EGF support, Sweden is among the countries undermining the future of the Fund after 2013 and blocking the extension of the crisis derogation;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2012/2279(BUD)

2. Notes that the Swedish authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 25 May 2012, supplemented by additional information up to 20 August 2012, and that its assessment was made available by the Commission on 19 October 2012; welcomes the relatively speedy evaluation period;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2012/2279(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Swedish authorities decided to start the implementation of the measures on 20 December 2011, the same date as the start of the redundancy reference period, and the Swedish authorities aimed to help to the dismissed workers immediately and that the implementation of the coordinated package of personalised services started already on 20 December 2011 - well ahead of the final decision ton granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2012/2279(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that this is yet another EGF application addressing dismissals in the automotive sector and that with 16 applications this sector has been the subject of the most numerous EGF applications submitted both in relation to crisis and to globalisation criteria;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2012/2279(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Regrets that Saab bankruptcy led to 20% increase in unemployment in the region of Trollhattan where the production plant was based; in this context, notes that the Swedish authorities targeted only 1 350 of 3 239 dismissed workers for EGF support; calls on the Swedish authorities to use the EGF potential to the full in favour of dismissed workers;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2012/2279(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes the fact that the training offered is matched with the future skills and qualifications needs in the region and that it will be focused on growth areas such as greens jobs;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2012/2279(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes the fact that the municipality developed positive relations with the social partners while assisting Saab workers; however, regrets that the Commission proposal does not include more detailed information concerning the consultation process of the social partners in the design and the implementation measures and in particular concerning the involvement, possibly financial, of Saab;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2012/2279(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Notes that the payment appropriations in the EGF budget line 04 05 01 have been exhausted; however, is strongly critical of the fact that the Commission has decided to use the European Progress Microfinance Facility budget line in order to make the transfer for this application;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2012/2278(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the Danish authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 21 December 2011, supplemented by additional information up to 23 August 2012, and that its assessment was made available by the Commission on 19 October 2012 and that its assessment was made available by the Commission only on 19 October 2012; regrets the lengthy evaluation periods and inquires why this particular Danish application required 10 months of assessment; urges the Commission to speed up the evaluation process;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2012/2278(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls for reciprocity in trade between the EU and third countries as an essential condition for EU companies to gain access to new non-European markets;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2012/2278(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that the Danish authorities inform that in their assessment only 153 of 303 workers dismissed would choose to participate in the measures; calls on the Danish authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2012/2278(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that the region of Midtjylland, where the municipality of Skive is located, has already benefited from the EGF support by means of two applications, viz.: EGF/2010/017 Midtjylland Machinery and EGF/2012/003 Vestas;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2012/2278(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes the fact that the vocational training courses target new areas of possible growth and that the design of the coordinated package is based on an in- depth research of the local labour market and of the features of the dismissed workers;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2012/2278(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a Welcomes the fact that the coordinated package of personalised services also offers courses to start a new business which are foreseen for 20 workers; notes that no financial incentive is proposed for business start-ups;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2012/2278(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Notes, however, the subsistence allowance of EUR 4 439 per worker for the participation in the measures and considers them as too high; recalls that the EGF should in future be primarily allocated to training and job search as well as occupational orientation programs and its financial contribution to allowances should always be of additional nature and in parallel to what is available to dismissed workers by virtue of national law or collective agreements;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2012/2277(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the Austrian authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 21 December 2011, supplemented by additional information up to 25 June 2012, and that its full assessment was made available by the Commission on 19 October 2012; regrets the lengthy evaluation period of 10 months;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2012/2277(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with immediate assistance, the Austrian authorities decided to start the implementation of the measur the Austrian authorities decided to address the dismissals immediately and launched the coordinated package of services on 1 October 2011 -, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2012/2277(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the region of Steiermark has already been affected by mass lay-offs and workers in this region have benefited from the EGF support by means of three applications, viz.: EGF/2009/009 AT/Steiermark, EGF/2010/007 AT/Steiermark-Niederosterreich and EGF/2010/008 AT/AT&S;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2012/2277(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that EGF project will be carried out in the framework of a labour foundation established at the regional level managed by a development association experienced with a past EGF application (EGF/2009/009 AT/Steiermark); recalls that labour foundations are institutions set up by sectoral social partners in order to accompany workers in industrial change with training measures to enhance their employability; recalls further that this model of providing active labour market measures was very successful in the past regarding the reintegration of workers into the labour market and the use of the EGF funds for this purpose;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2012/2277(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Regrets that this EGF application is a direct result of budget cuts in social policy which are being implemented despite a controversial debate between the social services providers and the regional government; further regrets that more social workers are expected to be dismissed in the region in the course of 2012;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2012/2277(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the proposed co-ordinated package of personalised services and the detailed descriptions of the measures presented in the Commission proposal; welcomes the fact that the training on offer is combined with the future economic prospects and the future skills and qualification needs in the region;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2012/2277(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Draws the attention to the subsistence allowance for workers on training and on job search which is said to amount EUR 1000 per workers per month (calculated for 11 months, unemployment benefit will be interrupted during that period) which will be combined with training allowance of EUR 200 per worker per month; recalls that the EGF should in future be primarily allocated to training and job search as well as occupational orientation programs and its financial contribution to allowances should always be of additional nature and in parallel to what is available to dismissed workers by virtue of national law or collective agreements;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2012/2277(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Considers the ratio of subsistence allowance and training allowance to the costs of training of EUR 14 400 to 7 000 as an unjustified quasi-financing of unemployment benefits;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2012/2277(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Notes that the proposed measures cost approximately EUR 22 000 per worker, of which roughly EUR 14 000 is to be covered by the EGF, making it a very high contribution per capita compared to other EGF applications;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2012/2276(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Agrees with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2 (a) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, Finland is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2012/2276(BUD)

2. UnderlinNotes that the Finnish authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 4 July 2012, supplemented by additional information up to 21 August 2012, and that its assessment was made available by the European Commission only on 19 October 2012; welcomes the improvement of the evaluation processfact that the application was submitted immediately after the reference period allowing for instant response to the dismissals; welcomes also the speedy evaluation period by the Commission;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2012/2276(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Regrets that the redundancies Salo in Finland and in Cluj in Romania (application EGF/2011/014/ RO/Nokia from Romania) stem from a corporate decision of Nokia to move its production plants to Asia and are part of its plan to reduce global employment in Nokia Corporation by 17 000 workers by the end of 2013;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2012/2276(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the Commission proposal indicates that another EGF application is expected to cover the second wave of dismissals in Nokia centre in Salo;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2012/2276(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for reciprocity in trade between the EU and third countries as an essential condition for EU companies to gain access to new non-European markets;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2012/2276(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that the Salo area was heavily dependant on Nokia as an employer and grew into a highly specialised region in the information and communication technologies; notes that the dismissals in Nokia will seriously affect the local employment market as it is expected that the unemployment rate may rise to 17% as a result of the current Nokia redundancies;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2012/2276(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the fact that a widely representative working group has been set up to deal with the reorganisation of Nokia and advise on a range of issues such as well-being, studies, new jobs outside Nokia and business opportunities;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2012/2276(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Considers the cost of the coordinated package of personalised services (approximately EUR 10 000 per worker) as high; notes, however, the fact that the package contains innovative measures like protomo - matching service for new business start-ups and that financial allowances to be covered by the EGF are limited; welcomes the fact that the measures are well described in the Commission proposal;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2012/2276(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Regrets that there are no details concerning the types of training measures to be provided within the coordinated package and how these are matched with the local skills and qualification needs and possible areas of future growth in the region, given the structural changes it is currently undergoing;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2012/2276(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Welcomes the fact that, in view of the structural changes in the region, the use of the EGF and the ESF and the division of responsibilities between the two Funds has been coordinated by a dedicated project group, involving regional authorities and the social partners, which established strategic guidelines and goals for the region;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 16 #

2012/2276(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Considers that the payment of subsistence allowances of EUR 7 500 per worker for 360 workers is excessive; recalls that the EGF should in the future be primarily allocated to training and job search as well as occupational orientation programs and its financial contribution to allowances should always be of additional nature and in parallel to what is available to dismissed workers by virtue of national law or collective agreements;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 17 #

2012/2276(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Regrets that the Commission proposal does not explain whether and how Nokia was involved in the creation of the package of services and possibly co- financing of the measures;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2012/2275(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the Romanian authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 22 December 2011, supplemented by additional information up to 22 August 2012, and that its assessment was made available by the Commission on 19 October 2012 and that its assessment was made available by the Commission only on 19 October 2012; regrets the lengthy evaluation periods and inquires why this particular application required 8 months of assessment; urges the Commission to speed up the evaluation process;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2012/2275(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Regrets that the redundancies in Cluj in Romania and Salo in Finland (application EGF/2012/006/ FI/Nokia from Finland) stem from a corporate decision of Nokia to move its production plants to Asia and are part of its plan to reduce global employment in Nokia Corporation by 17 000 workers by the end of 2013;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2012/2275(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for reciprocity in trade between the EU and third countries as an essential condition for EU companies to gain access to new non-European markets;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2012/2275(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that the EGF already acted in favour of 1 337 workers dismissed in result of re-location of Nokia from Germany to Romania in 2008; now three years after the EGF has to act again as the production plant opened in Cluj following the closure in Germany was closed down in 2011 as a consequence of re-location to Asia; inquires whether, at the time of relocation from Germany, Nokia had benefited from any financial incentives on regional, national or European level (in particular from the cohesion funds) to locate its plant in Romania;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2012/2275(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that the Commission proposal indicates that another EGF application is expected to cover the second wave of dismissals in Nokia centre in Salo and therefore calls on the Commission to clarify to what extent Nokia itself supports the redundancy financially;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2012/2275(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Expects the Commission to explain whether and how Nokia was involved in the creation of the coordinated package of personalised service and possibly in co- financing;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2012/2275(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Regrets that there are no details concerning the types of training measures and internships to be provided within the coordinated package and how these are matched with the local skills and qualification needs and possible areas of future growth in the region;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2012/2265(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1 Agrees with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2(b) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, Italy is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation; therefore notes that the number of dismissed employees lies just above the intervention criteria;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2012/2265(BUD)

2. Notes that the Italian authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 30 December 2011, supplemented by additional information up to 10 September 2012 and that its assessment was made available by the Commission on 19 October 2012; regrets the lengthy evaluation period of 10 months;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2012/2265(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Welcomes the fact that the design of the measures was consulted with the social partners during several meetings;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2012/2265(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Regrets that the information on the training measures in the Commission proposal does not describe in which sectors the workers are likely to find employment and if the training on offer is adapted to the future economic prospects and labour market needs in the region;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2012/2265(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Notes that the payment appropriations in the EGF budget line 04 05 01 have been exhausted for 2012; however, is highly critical of the fact that the Commission decided to use the European Progress Microfinance Facility budget line in order to make the transfer for this application;
2012/11/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2012/2259(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Points to the importance of gradually achieving a European energy market for renewables that would allow alternative energy sources to become competitive on a sustainable basis; points to the importance of self-sufficiency in energy and to the significant role of European renewable energy sources, including slowly renewable sources, for the rural areas;
2013/01/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 22 #

2012/2259(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that energy policy should not promote the production and use of renewable resources to the detriment of environmental sustainability; Stresses the importance of resource efficiency in energy consumption and production on a farm level; reminds the potential of livestock farm biogas system development based on biowaste;
2013/01/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 44 #

2012/2259(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. AcknowledgStresses the importance of promoting and encouraging the development of on- farm sources of alternative energy and decentralised production, especially on a small scale, and of disseminating the relevant methods to farmers, small rural enterprises and consumers alike;
2013/01/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 49 #

2012/2259(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Points out that the 2020 renewable energy targets set in the Renewable Energy Directive for the EU as a whole as well as for Member States have spurred renewable energy use in Europe and European countryside; considers that, to establish policy on a long-term footing and strengthen the security of investment, the EU must, as soon as possible, put forward new targets for the period beyond 2020;
2013/01/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 52 #

2012/2259(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Points out that bioenergy is the main renewable energy source in the EU; considers it important that the Commission's plans regarding sustainability criteria for solid biomass should not impede the use of sustainable bioenergy generated in the EU and Member States and that the possible criteria should be based primarily on existing legislation and inventory and monitoring tools; points out that when drawing up sustainability criteria for biomass, it is necessary to cover – in addition to ecological sustainability – other areas of sustainable development such as economic and social sustainability, and the corresponding effects of alternative energy sources also have to be considered;
2013/01/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2 #

2012/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Points out the very different rates of ageing in EU Member States and the significant national, political and cultural differences in perceptions of the demographic challenge and, especially, of ways of facing it and planning for it;
2012/11/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2012/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to create the appropriate conditions for people to work longer and to be more productive, both by improving labour-market flexibility through the introduction of time accounts and part-time possibilities and by making provision for moderndifferent forms of employment contract, including temporary ones, taking care to ensure that there is always adequate social protection in place;
2012/11/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2012/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that it is crucial to fight information isolation of the older generation; access to new technologies and their use is one of the essential tools for active and healthy ageing and for the social inclusion of seniors.
2012/11/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2012/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Recognises the importance of planning for adequate care provision, both formal and informal;
2012/11/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2012/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Stresses the need to put in place support systems for family carers;
2012/11/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2012/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Stresses the importance of supporting and facilitating older volunteers and intergenerational volunteering;
2012/11/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2012/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas in 2012 the employment situation has worsened and the prospects for 2013 are pessimistic; whereas labour market segmentation has continued to rise, long-term unemployment has reached alarming levels, in-work poverty is still a major problem, average household incomes are declining in many Member States and indicators point to a trend of higher levels and deeper forms of poverty and social exclusion, with in-work poverty and social polarisation on the rise in many Member States.
2012/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2012/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas social protection expenditure has decreased in nearly all Member States and whereas the Social Protection Committee (SPC) warns of increasing numbers of people at risk of income poverty, child poverty, severe material deprivation and social exclusion because of the impact of fiscal consolidation measures;
2012/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2012/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas fiscal consolidation must continue in view of the high debt levels and long-term challenges to public finances but the pace of consolidation must be managed so that it does not damage the growth potential of the economy or its social fabric; whereas fiscal consolidation can have negative growth and employment effects in the short term, especially in countries in recession or with marginal growth rates, compromising future growth and job-creation potential; whereas fiscal consolidation must therefore continuebe managed in a growth-friendly manner;
2012/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2012/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Acknowledges the need to continue fiscal consolidation programmes in order to guarantee the sustainability of public finances, but warns about the negative short-, medium and long term growth and employment effects thereof, especially in countries in recession or with marginal growth rates;
2012/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2012/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Considers that fiscal consolidation must continue in a proportionalte and growth-friendly manner and that the rhythm of consolidation must be differentiated across countries according to their fiscal space, and that of the broader European economy in order to achieve the proper balance between potential negative growth and employment effects and the risks to debt sustainability;
2012/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2012/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25 a. Calls on the European Commission to recalibrate its models on the impact of the multiplier effect of fiscal cuts on the budgets of Member States in line with recent revisions by the IMF;
2012/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2012/2230(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Welcomes the fact that social partners adopted a social plan for the redundancies in Manroland and that two transfer companies will design and manage the coordinated package of personalised services;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2012/2230(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that more than half of the EGF support will be spent on allowances - 2001 workers are said to receive during their active participation in the measures a short-time allowance (estimated cost EUR 2 727,67 per worker over 6-8 months) to complement a subsistence allowance paid by the public employment services on the basis of the net salary earned; further notes that the application includes a lump sum of EUR between 4 000 and EUR 1 000 as activation premium for 430 workers who accept a work contract with a lower salary than the one in their previous job;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2012/2230(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the German authorities decided to start the implementation of the measures ahead of the final decision on granat the implementation of the coordinated package of personalised services started on 1 August 2012 - well ahead of the decision to grant EGF support by the budgetary authority; notes that redundant workers have also benefitted to from the ESF support before participating in the EGF support for the proposed coordinated packagemeasures; notes that the German authorities confirmed that necessary precautions have been taken to avoid double financing from Union funds;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2012/2230(BUD)

5a. Recalls that that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to job search and training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances; believes that, if included in the package, EGF support should be of complementary nature and never replace allowances under the responsibility of Member States or companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2012/2230(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the fact that the coordinated package of personalised measures seeks to enhance transborder mobility by supporting international job- search;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2012/2230(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Notes that according to the German authorities the EGF coordinated package of personalised services constitutes a significant added value to the measures available under national and ESF funds;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2012/2230(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Deplores the fact that, despite several successful German mobilisations of the EGF under both the trade-related and the crisis related criteria, Germany is among the countries undermining the future of the EGF after 2013 and blocking the extension of the crisis derogation;
2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2012/2228(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes this call for the EGF financial contribution by the Danish Government even though this Member State has opposed the extension of the crisis derogation for the current EGF and jeopardises the future of the EGF after 2013;
2012/10/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2012/2228(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Danish authorities decided to start the implementation of the measures the implementation of the coordinated package of personalised services started on 12 August 2012 - well ahead of the final decision ton granting the EGF support forby the proposed coordinated packagebudgetary authority;
2012/10/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2012/2228(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Is of the opinion that the EU wind energy market is set to grow further generating demand for Europe's wind turbine manufacturers and associated industries through the on-going promotion of energy from renewable sources at EU level; points in this respect to the mandatory national targets for the use of renewable energy by 2020; therefore, expresses concern about this particular relocation and points out the risk of importation of wind turbines produced in Asia to the European market;
2012/10/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2012/2228(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that this is the third EGF application addressing the layoffs in the wind turbine industry, all of them from Denmark (EGF/2010/017 DK/Midtjylland Machinery and EGF/2010/022 DK/LM Glasfiber);
2012/10/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2012/2228(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the fact that the relevant social partners and municipalities have been involved have been consulted during the preparation of the EGF application and retraining measuresdesign phase of the package and that they will be briefed on the implementation of the project;
2012/10/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2012/2228(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that the dismissals in the municipality of Ringkøbing-Skjern are the direct result of the strategic decision taken by Vestas group in November 2011 to reorganise its structure and increase proximity to its customers in the regional markets, especially in China; notes that this reorganisation will result in 2 335 layoffs world-wide and is estimated to bring EUR 150 million reduction in fixed costs to the group;
2012/10/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2012/2228(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that the EGF has already supported 325 of 825 Vestas group workers made redundant in the first round of dismissals taking place in 2009; inquires about the results of the coordinated package in terms of the reintegration rate of the dismissed workers on the labour market and if any lessons were learnt for the new deployment of the EGF in the region;
2012/10/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2012/2228(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes the fact that the package contains considerable financial incentives for setting-up own businesses which will strictly be linked to participation in entrepreneurship courses and monitoring exercise at the end of the EGF project;
2012/10/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2012/2228(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Notes, however, that more than half of the EGF support will possibly be spent on financial allowances - 720 workers are said to receive subsistence allowance (including student grants) which is estimated at EUR 10 400 per worker;
2012/10/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 17 #

2012/2228(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Recalls that that the EGF support should primarily be allocated to job search and training programs instead of contributing directly to financial allowances; considers that, if included in the package, the EGF support should be of complementary nature and never replace allowances under the responsibility of Member States or companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements;
2012/10/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 18 #

2012/2228(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Deplores the fact that despite eight successful Danish mobilisations of the EGF under both the trade-related and the crisis related criteria, Denmark is among the Member States undermining the future of the EGF after 2013 and blocking the extension of the crisis derogation;
2012/10/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2012/2192(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes the commitment of the Foundation to put in place a treasury policy to minimise and spread financial risk;
2013/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2012/2188(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes the commitment of the Agency to carry out a comprehensive physical check of all its assets by the end of 2012.
2013/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2012/2184(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes the commitment of the Foundation to continue and even increase efforts to reduce the amount of planned carry forward through closer budget monitoring.
2013/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2012/2165(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Regrets the period of 27 months of assessment between the submission of the application on 5 May 2010 and the adoption of the proposal for a decision of the Budgetary Authority on 21 August 2012; notes that this is so far the longest period of assessment of an application for EGF mobilisation since its creation in 2007;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2012/2165(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the coordinated package of personalised services supported by the EGF is part of the voluntary redundancy plan launched to help 5 100 workers to leave PSA and which comprises also measures required by French national law in case of mass redundancies, like early retirement schemes;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2012/2165(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the EGF will only support measures additional to those required by virtue of national law falling within three strands of the redundancy plan: "professional or personal project", "redeployment leave" and "setting up or taking over a business"; requests more information on the features of the measures included in the coordinated package of personalised service making them additional compared to the measures obligatory under national legislation or collective agreements;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2012/2165(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a Notes that the coordinated package includes allowances provided under the category "redeployment leave" amounting to an average of 5 105,18 EUR per worker offered to 1 080 workers; recalls that the EGF support should be primarily allocated to training and job search as well as training programs instead of contributing directly to unemployment benefits which are the responsibility of national institutions;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2012/2165(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a Requests more information on the types of training provided, especially for employees older than 55 years, who represent more than 41,55% of targeted workers and highlights the importance of (re)training for active labour market measures in line with the future needs of the labour market so as to promote sustainable employment;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2012/2165(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a Notes that the measures will not replace measures within the responsibility of the company under national law or collective agreements and that the measures target individual workers and will not be used for restructuring of PSA;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2012/2165(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Recalls that the Commission in its Communication "Responding to the crisis in the European automotive industry" (COM(2009)0104) has presented an integrated approach to address structural problems by making the sector more competitive and more in tune with the needs of the future, to which EGF measures can positively contribute, albeit on a small scale;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2012/2164(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes this call for the EGF financial contribution by the Dutch Government even though this Member State has opposed the extension of the crisis derogation for the current EGF and jeopardises the future of the EGF after 2013;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2012/2164(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the Dutch authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 28 December 2011, supplemented by additional information up to 18 June 2012, and that its assessment was made available by the European Commission on 9 August 2012; welcomes the fact that regrets the lengthey evaluation process and submission of additional information by the Netherlands were speedy and accurateeriod;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2012/2164(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the application clearly states that 'cuts in public expenditure had a direct negative impact on investments in infrastructure and housing programmes', thus nurturing the vicious circle between austerity and the accelerated destruction of industrial jobs in the Union;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2012/2164(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Dutch authorities decided to start the implementation of the measures on 2 January 2013 well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2012/2164(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that the redundancies will have a noticeable impact on local communities and the number of open positions compared to the number of unemployed; regrets that the application does not provide any statistical data about the labour market concerned;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2012/2164(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the involvement of the social partners in the design of the coordinated package via the Mobility Center Zalco, a collective initiative of the parties involved in the Zeeland labour market;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2012/2164(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Regrets that the information on the training measures does not describe in which sectors the workers are likely to find employment and if the package has been adapted to the future economic prospects in the region;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2012/2164(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes the fact that the EGF contribution is planned to support solely active labour measures (training and counselling) and will not be used for allowances;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2012/2160(BUD)

2. Notes that the Spanish authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 28 December 2011, supplemented by additional information up to 28 May 2012, and that its assessment was made available by the European Commission on 9 August 2012; observes that regrets the lengthey evaluation process of the application could have been more expeditiouseriod;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2012/2160(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the employment situation in the region is difficult as the unemployment rates reached 18,% for women and 16,32% for men in the end of 2011; welcomes the fact that EGF is seen as an efficient tool to support local labour markets and that the region has already applied for the EGF support (EGF/2010/003 ES Galicia / Textile sector);
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2012/2160(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the Spanish authorities inform that in their assessment based on the experience with previous EGF applications, only 450 of the workers targeted for the EGF support will choose to participate in the measures; calls on the Spanish authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2012/2160(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, despite the long approval process, the Spanish authorities decided to start the implementation of the measures on 23 March 2012, well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2012/2160(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the fact that the regional authorities engaged in dialogue with the social partners in order to plan and implement the coordinated package of personalised services;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2012/2160(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that the coordinated package foresees several participation incentives to encourage participation in the measures: job search allowance (EUR 400) (lump sum) outplacement incentive (EUR 200), mobility allowance (EUR 180), on-the-job training allowance (EUR 300); recalls that the EGF support should be primarily allocated to training and job search as well as training programs instead of contributing directly to unemployment benefits which are the responsibility of national institutions;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2012/2160(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Regrets that the information on the training measures does not describe in which sectors the workers are likely to find employment and if the package has been adapted to the future economic prospects in the region;
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2012/2160(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Regrets that the measures supporting entrepreneurship do not contain any financial support to set up own business while several financial incentives are offered for workers following trainings.
2012/09/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2012/2157(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Regrets the decision of a Talk Talk to form alliances with three key non-EU providers where a significant bulk of work is being transferred, reflecting a strategy that is detrimental to EU industrial jobs and to the Europe 2020 strategy;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2012/2157(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls for reciprocity in trade between the EU and third countries as a an essential condition for EU companies to gain access to new non European markets;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2012/2157(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that the dismissals took place in the South East region which has seen it employment rates decreased from 62,7 to 58,1% over the period 2007-2011 and suffers from the unemployment rate higher then the state average;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2012/2157(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Regrets that TalkTalk decided to close the Waterford site was abruptly and left the workers only 30 day notice not allowing for proper discussion on the redundancy plan and nor the involvement of the social partners; regrets that no social partners were involved in the planning and design of the EGF application as no trade unions existed at Talk Talk level; notes however that the concerned workers were consulted directly;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2012/2157(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the fact that the Irish authorities decided to start the implementation of the coordinated package already on 7 September well in advance of the decision of the budgetary authority on granting the support;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2012/2157(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Notes that the coordinated package foresees several participation incentives to encourage participation in the measures: training, education and enterprise allowance of EUR 3 612,14 per worker which is available "in lieu of social welfare payments", EGF training grant of EUR 2 600,84 and EGF course expenses contribution of EUR 2 500; notes that despite evidently high cost and risk of launching own business, the support foreseen for business start-up and self- employment of EUR 2 600 is lower then the allowances available to participants on training;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2012/2157(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Regrets that the regulation allows EGF support to substitute social welfare payments required under the national legislation; emphasizes that the fund should be primarily allocated to training and job search as well as occupational orientation programs and promotion of entrepreneurship, acting complementarily to national institutions and not substituting employment benefit or any other social welfare payments which are the responsibility of national institutions under national laws;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2012/2157(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Notes that the Irish authorities complain about time constraints for EGF implementation which prevents from providing training courses exceeding the 24-month implementation period; welcomes the fact that an accelerated bachelor course has been designed for the targeted workers that addresses identified skills shortages and which can be concluded within the EGF implementation period;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2012/2155(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes this call for the EGF financial contribution by the Swedish Government even though this Member State is opposed to the EGF after 2013;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2012/2155(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the Swedish authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 23 December 2011, supplemented by additional information up to 16 April 2012, and that its assessment was made available by the European Commission on 16 July 2012; welcomes the fact that therelatively speedy evaluation process and submission of additional information by Sweden were speedy and accurate;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2012/2155(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Regrets the decision of AstraZeneca to increase R&D investments in countries like China or Russia, reflecting a strategy that is detrimental to highly skilled jobs in the Union and contrary to Europe 2020 strategy;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2012/2155(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Swedish authorities decided to start the implementation of the measures on 26 October 2011 well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2012/2155(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for trade reciprocity in trade between the Union and third countries as an essential condition for EU companies to gain access to new non-European markets;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2012/2155(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that the workers dismissed from Astra Zeneca are highly skilled and educated and therefore require specific approach; regrets that the Swedish authorities do not inform about the areas in which the training measures and occupational guidance have been planned and if and how these have been adapted to the local labour markets affected by the dismissal;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2012/2155(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that the R&D activities carried out in Lund site have been transferred by AstraZeneca to Mölndal site; inquires if any of the Lund workers were offered the possibility to be employed in the enlarged site of Mölndal instead of being dismissed;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2012/2155(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes that the coordinated package foresees several participation incentives to encourage participation in the measures: job search allowance of EUR 7 170 (calculated for an average of 6 months of participation) mobility allowance of EUR 500; recalls that the EGF support should be primarily allocated to training and job search as well as training programs instead of contributing directly to unemployment benefits which are the responsibility of national institutions;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2012/2155(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Welcomes the fact that Swedish authorities plan to organise an awareness raising campaign about activities supported by the EGF;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2012/2154(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes this call for the EGF financial contribution by the Dutch Government even though this Member State has opposed the extension of the crisis derogation for the current EGF and jeopardises the future oft the EGF after 2013;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2012/2154(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the Dutch authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 15 December 2011 and that its assessment was made available by the European Commission on 16 July 2012; regrets the lengthy evaluation process;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2012/2154(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Understands that the construction sector is an important employer in the Gelderland region and the redundancies will have an impact on local communities given that already 4100 jobs were lost in the sector in 2010 and that youth unemployment has risen by 10% in 2011;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2012/2154(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes however that according to Eurostat the national unemployment rate in the Netherlands in July stood at 5,3 % and is the second lowest in the EU;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2012/2154(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the involvement of the social partners in the design and in the implementation of the coordinated package which makes a part of a social plan agreed by the social partners;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2012/2154(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes more extensive explanations of the modules included in the coordinated package compared to the previous Dutch applications; notes however, the very high cost of training amounting to EUR 18 000 per worker (foreseen for 75 workers) and the outplacement assistance - EUR 8 500 per worker (foreseen for 150 workers) and requests more information concerning those two measures and operators carrying them out;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2012/2154(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes the fact that the EGF contribution is planned to support solely active labour measures (training and counselling) and will not be used for subsistence allowances;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2012/2154(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes the fact that in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Dutch authorities decided to start the implementation of the measures on 1 January 2012 well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package;
2012/09/24
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 31 #

2012/2144(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes the need to improve the rules on portability of pension schemes, in particular occupational pension schemes.
2012/12/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2012/2121(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Agrees with the Commission that the conditions set out in point b) of Article 2 of the Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 are met and that, therefore, Spain is entitled to a financial contribution under that regulation;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2012/2121(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that the Spanish authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 28 December 2011 and that its assessment was made available by the European Commission on 18 June 2012; welcomes the relatively speedy evaluation process;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 4 #

2012/2121(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the employment situation in the region is difficult as the unemployment rates doubled in the period 2008-2011 and that the region is suffering from depopulation; welcomes the fact that EGF is seen as an efficient tool to support local labour markets and that the region already applied for the EGF support (EGF/2008/004 ES Castilla y León & Aragón automotive and EGF/2010/016 ES Aragón retail);
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2012/2121(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the Spanish authorities inform that in their assessment based on the experience with previous EGF applications, only 320 of the workers targeted for the EGF support will choose to participate in the measures; calls on the Spanish authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2012/2121(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Welcomes the fact that in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Spanish authorities decided to start the implementation of the measures on 28 December 2011 well ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2012/2121(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the fact that the regional authorities engage in dialogue with the social partners in order to improve the match between the demand and supply in the labour market and that the coordinated package of personalised services has been discussed and developed with the social partners;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2012/2121(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes in particular the training course which was designed to match the identified needs of local enterprises, which will in turn undertake to employ some of the workers participating in this action;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2012/2121(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Regrets that the measures supporting entrepreneurship are foreseen only for 20 workers; hopes that the Spanish authorities will promote entrepreneurship and be able to adapt the coordinated package of services in case of increased interest in this kind of measures;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2012/2121(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes that the coordinated package foresees several participation incentives to encourage participation in the measures: job search allowance of EUR 300 (lump sum), outplacement allowance of EUR 200 and EUR 400 for self-employed per month for a maximum of three months; recalls that the EGF support should be primarily allocated to training and job search as well as training programs instead of contributing directly to unemployment benefits which are the responsibility of national institutions;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2012/2121(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Notes that the case at hand reflects the social and economic landscape of the specific region which could in the future be addressed by extending the scope of the EGF to self-employed workers (as proposed by the Commission in the proposal for the EGF 2014-2020);
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2012/2110(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Agrees with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2 (a) of the Regulation No. 1927/2006 are met and that, therefore, Denmark is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 3 #

2012/2110(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that the Danish authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 28 October 2011 and that its assessment was made available by the Commission on 6 June 2012; urges the Commission to speed up the evaluation process, in particular in case of applications targeting sectors where EGF was already deployed on several occasions;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2012/2110(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the Danish authorities have indicated that, in their assessment, only 550 of 981 workers dismissed would choose to participate in the measures while others would either decide to retire or would find new employment themselves; calls on the Danish authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2012/2110(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Welcomes the fact that the municipalities of Odense and Kerteminde, which are heavily affected by the dismissals in the Odense Steel Shipyard, were closely involved in the application, which is a part of a strategy for new growth opportunities in the region formulated by a consortium of local, regional and national stakeholders following the announcement of the closure of the shipyard in 2009;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2012/2110(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that the Danish authorities propose a relatively expensive coordinated package of personalised services (EUR 11 737 of EGF support per worker); welcomes, however, the fact that the package consists of measures that are additional and innovative compared to those offered regularly by the employment agencies and which are adapted to assist highly skilled workers in a difficult employment market;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2012/2110(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the fact that the vocational training courses target new areas of strong growth or where strong public commitments are to be implemented in coming years, namely Energy Technology, Construction and Landscaping, Robotics and Welfare Technology;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2012/2110(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the fact that the coordinated package of personalised services offers also incentives and courses to start a new business which are foreseen for ten workers (including one start up loan of EUR 26 000), especially in the region where entrepreneurship is weak;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2012/2110(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Notes, however, the proposed subsistence allowance of EUR 103 per worker per day of active involvement and that the amount foreseen for those allowances represent more than one-third of the total cost of the package; recalls that that EGF support should primarily be allocated to job search and training programmes rather than contributing directly to financial allowances which are the responsibility of Member States by virtue of the national law;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2012/2110(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes the fact that the EGF support in this case is coordinated by a newly set-up EGF Secretariat under the Odense Municipality and that a dedicated website was established and two conferences are planned to promote the outcome of the two EGF applications;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2012/2110(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Stresses that the Danish authorities recognise the advantages of the EGF and its unique capacity to assist dismissed workers immediately with specific tailored measures; notes that in the Danish authorities' view those measures could have been deployed either in the framework of the European Social Fund or of the European Regional Development Fund;
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 16 #

2012/2110(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Deplores the fact that, despite several successful Danish mobilisations of the EGF under both the trade-related and the crisis related criteria, Denmark is among the countries undermining the future of the EGF after 2013, blocking the extension of the crisis derogation and decreasing the financial allocation to the Commission for technical assistance for the EGF for 2012.
2012/06/29
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 209 #

2012/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Recognises that the Laeken Declaration in 2001 points out that the EU institutions need to be brought closer to the Unions citizens;
2012/11/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 210 #

2012/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 b (new)
26b. Supports the development of the 'Solidarité proposal' for an inter- institutional human resources programme in the EU Institutions to facilitate the involvement of the Institutions' staff and trainees in community engagement through benevolent humanitarian and positive social activities, both as part of staff training and volunteering in their own time.
2012/11/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2012/2089(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Agrees with the Commission that the conditions set out in Article 2 b) of the EGF Regulation are met and that, therefore, Spain is entitled to a financial contribution under that Regulation;
2012/05/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 5 #

2012/2089(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Notes that the Spanish authorities submitted the application for EGF financial contribution on 28 December 2011 and that its assessment was made available by the Commission on 4 May 2012; welcomes the fact that the evaluation process and submission of additional information by the Member State were speedy and accurate;
2012/05/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #

2012/2089(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Notes that the footwear sector represented 26% of the total employment in the region of Valenciana and therefore was an important contributor to local economy, which is dominated by small and medium-sized enterprises in traditional sectors like textile, shoes and ceramics;
2012/05/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #

2012/2089(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Notes that the region of Valenciana has been hit in the past by four mass dismissals and welcomes the fact that the region decided to use the EGF support to address those redundancies: EGF/2009/014 ES/Valencia - Ceramic industry, EGF/2010/005 ES/Valencia - Stone marble, EGF/2010/009 ES/Valencia - Textile sector, EGF/2011/006 ES/Valenciana - Construction sector; welcomes the fact that the region builds on the experience with the EGF and quickly assists workers in several sectors;
2012/05/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2012/2089(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. Notes the information given by the Spanish authorities that in their assessment based on the experience with previous applications, only 350 of the workers targeted for the EGF support will choose to participate in the measures; calls on the Spanish authorities to use the EGF support to its full potential;
2012/05/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2012/2089(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 f (new)
1f. Welcomes the fact that, in order to provide workers with speedy assistance, the Spanish authorities decided to start the implementation of the measures ahead of the final decision on granting the EGF support for the proposed coordinated package;
2012/05/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #

2012/2089(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 g (new)
1g. Notes that the educational background of the dismissed workers is rather poor and recalls the importance of improving the employability of such workers by means of adapted training and recognition of skills and competences gained through out the professional career; expects the training on offer in the coordinated package to be adapted to the level and needs of the dismissed workers;
2012/05/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #

2012/2089(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 h (new)
1h. Notes that the training measures target high-added value jobs in the footwear sector, which according to the Spanish authorities are unlikely to relocate, as well as jobs in sectors, which offer prospects for growth in the short or medium-term;
2012/05/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2012/2089(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 i (new)
1i. Welcomes the fact that the social partners were consulted on the contents of the coordinated package, allocation of roles and distribution and scheduling of tasks;
2012/05/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #

2012/2089(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 j (new)
1j. Highlights the fact that lessons should be learned from the preparation and implementation of this and other applications addressing mass dismissals in a high number of SMEs in one sector, in particular, in terms of the eligibility of self-employed and owners of the SMEs for EGF support in the future regulation and the arrangements used by the regions and the Member States to come up quickly with sectoral applications covering a large number of enterprises;
2012/05/23
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 2 #

2012/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Heading 1
with recommendations to the Commission on a Code of Practice on the Information and consultation of workers, anticipation and managem in the event of restructuring,
2012/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2012/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the crisis which began in 2008 has served to speed up the rate of change sharply; whereas ithat crisis has added to the structural pressures to adapt to change resulting from globalisation's more immediate constraints which subject undertakings, workers, territories and governments to critical tensionrequire companies and their employees to make such changes as are necessary to safeguard competitiveness and protect jobs;
2012/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2012/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M
M. whereas good information and consultation in relation to restructuring means a more intelligent, proactive, responsible and strategic manner, which willcan contribute to making undertakings and the Union more competitive, as well as sending out a message of certainty and transparency to European citizens at a time of crisis;
2012/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2012/2061(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Requests the Commission to submit to the Parliament within three months of the date of adoption of this resolution on the basis of Article 225 of the Treaty, a legislative proposal for a direCode of Good Practivce as recommended in the Annexon Restructuring;
2012/07/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 1, Recital 10
(10) Such an Union framework should apply to major companies and groups of companies, those which employ on the territory of the Union at least 500 workers, and to restructuring operations of a certain dimension, covering at least 100 workers in a single company or 500 employees in a company and its dependent comp. Restructuring is defined as any change in a company that falls within the scope of the Collective Redundancies or one or more Member States over a period of three monthTransfer of Undertakings Directives.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 166 #

2012/2061(INI)

2. Long-term strategic planning shall includGood practice require that companies should put in place human resources, employment and skills objectives that focus on developing, on a permanent basis, the skills and competences of the workforce in order to increase the competitiveness of the company and its capacity of adaptation, as well as to increase the employability of employees and to managenhance their internal and external mobility.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 4, paragraph 3
3. To that end, companies shall recognise the right of every employee to benefit from appropriate training. Eand employees shall recognise that education and lifelong learning are necessary to enhance their employability and shall accept relevant training offers.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, title
AnticipIdentification of employment and skills needs
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, paragraph 2, introductory part
2. To that end,Good practice provides for companies shallto establish, in co-operation with employees' representatives and other relevant stakeholders human resource development plans tailored to their own individual circumstances. Examples of such good practice include, but are not limited to:
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 188 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, paragraph 2, point a
(a) mechanisms for the long-term planning of quantitative and qualitative employment and skills needs that are linked to innovation and development strategies and that take into account the foreseeable evolution of employment and skills, both positive and negative;deleted
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, paragraph 2, point b
(b) multiannual plans of employment and skills development covering the following areas:deleted
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, paragraph 2 b, subpoint 6
– training packages, if needed, in co- operation with external stakeholdersrograms, both in-house and externally;
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 206 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, paragraph 2, point b subpoint 8
– specific training measures to tackle possible negative or problematic developmentdeal with identified problems.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 208 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, paragraph 3
3. Every employee shall be offered a given number of hours of training per year to be determined by law or collective agreement. Any refusal to accept that offer by employees shall only be permitted on justified grounds.deleted
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 213 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 5, paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The training needs of individual employees should be reviewed on a regular basis and appropriate training solutions identified, where necessary.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 237 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 6, paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. After having considered the information provided the employees' representatives may, within a reasonable time, offer an opinion on the measures envisaged which can be taken into account by the company when finalising its decisions.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 239 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 6, paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. The local economic actors, in particular companies and their employees in a situation of dependence in relation to the restructuring company should also be informed from the beginning about the proposed restructuring.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 263 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 7, paragraph 3
3. Companies shall from the beginning inform the public authorities at the relevant level, in particular at local level, and involve them in the preparation of the restructuring process.deleted
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 281 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 8, paragraph 2
2. In particular, good practice suggests that companies shallould consider the following options as alternatives for redundancies:
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 302 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 9
9. The provisions of Recommendations 6 and 7 shall not apply to companies and employees covered by an agreement concluded at the relevant level and with the relevant parties on the procedures and mechanism for preparing, managing in a socially responsible way and minimising internal social costs of restructuring operations.deleted
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 308 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 10, paragraph 1
1. When a restructuring operation has major local effects, companies shall seek to develop complementarities and synergies betweenis being contemplated the company should actively engage with its employees and their preparatory action and the actions of the all the otresentatives, and with the public authorities where actors, with a view toppropriate, to discuss ways of maximising the re- employment opportunities of employees at risk of being or to be made redundant, in order to encouraging economic and social re-conversion and to developing new economic activities generating jobsthose who may be made redundant.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 314 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 10, paragraph 2
2. The measures referred to in Recommendation 7 shall cover, as far as possible, the employees of companies that are dependent, in particular as a result of subcontracting or a supply contract. Dependent companies and their workers shall, in any event, be informed of those measuresDependent companies and their workers should, be kept fully informed about the restructuring insofar as such information is required or useful for their own adaptation and for the management of the restructuring process within those companies.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 338 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 11, paragraph 3
3. In regions affected by structural change, public authorities shallould consider, as appropriate:
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 341 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 11, paragraph 3, point a
a) createing permanent bodies, networks or observatories to monitor change processes;
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 343 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 11, paragraph 3, point b
b) promoteing territorial employment pacts aimed at favouring employment creation and adaptation;
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 348 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 11, paragraph 3, point c
c) promoteing or create mechanisms facilitating employment transitions;
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 351 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 11, paragraph 3, point d
d) implementing training actions benefiting small and medium-sized companies and their employees and support dialogue and co-operation between these and large companies;
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 353 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 11, paragraph 3, point e
e) favouring regional employment and economic and social re-conversion.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 361 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 12, paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to the obligations of companies resulting from national laws or practices, public authorities shall co- ould, where possible and subject to national budgetary constraints, co-finance employability measures that favour employees of companies undergoing restructuring, insofar as this type of support is necessary or appropriate for allowing them to quickly re-enter the labour market.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 368 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 13
Member States shall designate the public authorities, at national, regional or local level that are responsible for the purposes of the Direis Code of Practivce.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 369 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 14, Title
FOLLOW-UP, EVALUATION AND REPORTING OFLEARNING FROM RESTRUCTURING PROCESSES
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 394 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 16, Title
Compliance with the DirectivPublicising this Code
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 396 #

2012/2061(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Recommendation 16, paragraph 1
1. Member States shall provide fortake such measures as are appropriate measures to bring the event of failure to comply with the Directive; in particular, they shall ensure that adequate admiis Code to the attention of their national social partners' organistrative or judicial procedures are available to enable the obligations deriving from the Directive to be enforcedons who, in turn, should be encouraged to publicise it widely among their members.
2012/08/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2012/2058(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Agrees with the measures proposed by the Commission to be financed as technical assistance in accordance with Article 8(1) and (4) as well as with Article 9 (2) of the EGF Regulation;
2012/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 8 #

2012/2058(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that the Commission will start to prepare the final evaluation of the EGF; regrets, however, that the results will arrive too late to feed into the discussion on the new regulation for the EGF in 2014-2020, especially regarding the effectiveness of the use of the crisis derogation criterion, since the concerned EGF cases were not analysed in the EGF mid-term evaluation report;
2012/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #

2012/2058(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Regrets that the Commission does not envisage any particular awareness raising activities for 2012 in the situation where the utility of the EGF and its existence in the next financing period are questioned by Member States, including the frequent users of the Fund; recalls that the current proposal for the technical assistance will leave around EUR 630 000 unused for 2012;
2012/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 14 #

2012/2058(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Interrogates the Commission on the impact and efficiency of the information tools funded by technical assistance in previous years; asks for reliable data on the use of those tools;
2012/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #

2012/2058(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Notes that the Commission will continue to work on the standardised procedures for simplified applications, faster processing of the applications and better reporting; asks the Commission to present the progress made following the use of technical assistance in 2011; recalls the need to shorten the application procedures;
2012/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 16 #

2012/2058(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Recalls the importance of networking and exchange of information on the EGF; supports, therefore, the funding of the Expert Group of Contact Persons of the EGF; underlines further the importance to liaise all those involved in EGF applications, including the social partners, to create as much synergies as possible;
2012/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 17 #

2012/2058(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e. Encourages the Member States to profit from the exchange of best practices and to learn particularly from those Member States that have already put in place national information networks on the EGF involving the social partners and stakeholders at local level with a view to having a good structure for assistance in place once mass redundancies might occur;
2012/05/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 19 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recognises that administrative burdens and financial risks often result in stress and other negative health impacts for employees and owners of SMEs and micro enterprises; emphasises the need for employment and social regulation to contribute to the well-being of entrepreneurs and their employees without creating additional barriers to their success;
2012/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that developing e-government and one stop shops will reduce administrative procedures and create new business opportunities; notes that greater access to procurement markets can assist SMEs in unlocking their potential for job creation; notes that such e-government could be used to provide access to all relevant information on compliance with employment legislation and tax regimes, as well as information on accessing different levels of European, national and regional funding and support schemes for SMEs and micro-enterprises;
2012/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that lack of appropriate infrastructure in rural areas, e.g. broadband internet access, presents a serious barrier to employment and growth, particularly for SMEs, micro- enterprises, the self employed and "self- starters", which could otherwise benefit from location outside cities and high rent areas;
2012/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that costs associated with compliance have a disproportionate effect on SMEs, especially on micro-enterprises; and that these costs can present a major obstacle to expansion of these businesses and their capacity to employ and retain staff; encourages Member States to take this into account when reviewing their national tax and social security regimes;
2012/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Notes and strongly supports the focus on micro-enterprises in a strengthened SME test (see COM(2011)0803) through which all available possibilities such as exclusion from the scope, individual provisions, extended transition periods or lighter regimes are systematically assessed.; emphasises that new employment and social legislation which passes the enhanced SME test should be applied in the simplest form, creating the minimum necessary administrative burden required to achieve its functional objective, and respecting the subsidiarity principle; calls on Member States to carefully consider the intended objective of social legislation, and implement it without "gold-plating" or introducing additional requirements which are not explicitly required under EU law;
2012/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2012/2039(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Points out that certain Mutual Societies have a very strong voluntary component and that this volunteer ethos must be preserved and facilitated.
2012/10/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2012/2039(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
14. Regards as regrettable the gap in EU legislation, as mutual societies are not specifically mentioned in the treaties and respect for their business models is not covered by any secondary legislation, which refers only to public and private enterprises, which undermines the status of mutual societies, their development and the establishment of a cross-border group and therefore believes that Mutual Societies should be included in Article 54 TFEU in order to ensure that the diversity of enterprises is fully anchored in the Treaties;
2012/10/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2012/2039(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Commission to take into account the specific characteristics of mutual societies so as to ensure a level playing field, with a view to avoiding additional discrimination and ensuring that any new legislation is proportionate as well as guaranteeing a fair and competitive market.
2012/10/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2012/2039(INI)

Draft opinion
Annexe - Paragraph 17 a (new) - Recommendation 6 (new)
17a. Calls on the EU Commission to introduce into the proposed regulation the main characteristics of Mutual societies’ person-based societies, operating essentially according to the principle of self-governance, where the members or their representatives take part directly in defining the mutual society's policy or have the right to influence that policy. Mutual societies do not aim to make profit for distribution to external shareholders and are based on individual affiliation and open enrolment. They are non- discriminatory as far as risk selection is concerned, democratically oriented by their members and financed through solidarity, with a view to improving social conditions of local communities and of wider society in the spirit of mutuality.
2012/10/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2012/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the transport of meat and other animal products ismay be technically easier andunder certain circumstances and in some instances can be financially more rational than the transport of live animals;
2012/06/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 48 #

2012/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas animal slaughter and meat processing at the closest possible proximity to the breeding location is important for the stimulation of rural areas and their sustainable development; can help rural areas in their sustainable development; however, there are serious economic challenges in sustaining small local slaughterhouses and producers need access to the best market price for their output at all times;
2012/06/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 124 #

2012/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Further to the concerns described above, cCalls on the Commission to evaluate fully the influence of the coscosts and benefits of animal transport on the price of meat products in the European Union market;
2012/06/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 146 #

2012/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that given that the Regulation has not fulfilled its aim of limiting the transport of animals, EU policy on the matter should be reviewed and should also be directed at supporting local processing, small and local slaughterhouses and local meat processing plants where possible, based on the supply of animals for slaughter from the immediate vicinity;
2012/06/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 188 #

2012/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the improvement in the quality of animal transport, but believes that the Commission findings referred to above are based on the results of surveys carried out among slaughterhouses and business and transport enterprises engaged in the transportation of live animals. The results of the surveys carried out by the Commission may therefore not fully reflect the actual state of affairs recognised by EFSA and the Commission; welcomes the investments made by the sector to achieve improvements in the quality of production systems, transport and slaughter of animals across the Union; takes note that following the considerable investments needed, many producers and slaughterhouses, mostly small ones, have closed down, especially in isolated and peripheral areas of Europe;
2012/06/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 203 #

2012/2031(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the fact that in its report the Commission used the scientific research presented by the EFSA, which highlights the need to significantly reduce the length of transport time for horses, which correlates with the suggestions advanced in Parliament's Written Declaration of 25 February 2010shows that good animal welfare conditions during transport are mostly affected by the conditions of transport in relation to stocking density, straw, food, water and ventilation as well as the good handling of animals, rather than the duration of travel;
2012/06/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2 #

2012/2016(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the 2013 budget should support the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy and calls for adequate funding of the flagship initiatives ‘Youth on the Move’, ‘New Skills for New Jobs’, ‘European Platform Against Poverty’ and ‘An Innovation Union’; calls for particular emphasis to be put on job creation through the establishment and consolidation of new businesses and to highlight the significant role they play in achieving the employment target of 75% for 2020;
2012/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2012/2016(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for a sustained effort to be made through the budget to provide for appropriate training and reskilling, with the support of the social partners for sectors with labour shortages, and for improved utilisation of the ESF and enhancement of the EGF; calls on the Member States to make full use of the EGF and in particular increase their efforts to improve awareness of this instrument;
2012/04/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
- having regard to the Commision Communication of 18 April 2012 on Towards a job-rich recovery (COM(2012)173),
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission Regulation Proposal of 6 October 2011 on a European Union Programme for Social Change and Innovation COM(2011)609,
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission Communication of 20 December 2011 on the Youth Opportunities Initiative COM(2011)933,
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the current economic and, financial and competitiveness crisis will have long lasting effects not only on economic growth but also on employment rates, public savings and the quality of social investments in Europe;
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas education outcomes in the European Union are still inadequate to meet labour market needs and fall short of the growing skill-intensity of available jobs, as well as of skills needed for future job rich sectors;
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that social investments, being the provision and use of finance to generate social as well as economic returns, aim at addressing emerging social risks and needs, and focus on public policies and human capital investment strategies that prepare individuals, families and societies to adopt to various transformations and to manage their transition towards more flexible labour markets where new skills will be needed for future job rich sectors;
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Facilitating and focusing on social entrepreneurship and access to microfinance for vulnerable groups and those furthest away from the labour market are key in the context of social investment, in that they allow the creation of new sustainable jobs, often persisting changes in the economic cycles;
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the crisis requires a modernisation of the European Social Modelhas further increased the need for investing in social business and support for social entrepreneurship, a rethinking of national social policies and a transition from an ‘active welfare state’, that only responds to emerging damages caused by market failure, to an ‘activating welfare state’, that invests in people and gives citizens instruments and incentives;
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point b
b) createinvest in sustainable and quality jobs provided in particular by SMEs, improving work productivity as well as work distribution,
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point e
e) reformadapt pension systems to changing economic and demographic circumstances and create conditions for working longer,
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 110 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Encourages Member States to invest in supporting young persons, and in improving their access to the labour market, by providing training and youth internship programmes, by promoting entrepreneurship and a youth guarantee, by creating incentives for employers to engage graduates, by securing a better transition from education to work and by promoting European and regional mobility and by stressing the importance of vocational and educational training;
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to guarantee a comprehensive implementation of flexicurity principles, and to address labour market segmentation, by providing both adequate social protection coverage for people in periods of transition, or on temporary or part-time employment contracts, and access to training, career development and full-time work possibilities; encourages Member States to invest in services – such as childcare and all-day school places – that help promote gender quality, foster better work–life balance and encourage inactive and lone parents to work;
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Encourages Member States to invest in services – such as childcare, all-day school and elderly care places – that help promote gender equality, foster better work–life balance and facilitate for all parents to establish themselves on the formal labour market;
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. EncouragesCalls on Member States to introduce necessary reforms in order towhich have increased the statutory retirement age and limit early retirement possibilities,or will be doing so, to encourage work by older people through appropriate measures and to combine this with the constant improvement of working conditions, and the implementation of lifelong training schemes enabling longer professional careers;
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 330 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28
(28) ‘roll-your-own tobacco’ means tobacco which can be used for making cigarettes by consumers or retail outlets;; and further defined in Article 5(2) of Council Directive 2011/64/EU of 21 June 2011 on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco1; ____________ 1 OJ L 176, 5.7.2011, p. 24.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 453 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall prohibit the placing on the market of tobacco productscigarettes and 'roll-your- own' tobacco with a characterising flavour which are marketed as such.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 477 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall not prohibit the use of additives which are essential for the manufacture of tobacco products, as long as the additives do not result in a product with a characterising flavourcigarettes and 'roll-your- own' tobacco.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 676 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) in conjunction with the bar codes, tax stamps, track and trace and other essential markings, cover 75 % of the external area of both the front and back surface of the unit packet and any outside packaging;
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 707 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) for unit packets of cigarettes, respect the following dimensions: (i) height: not less than 64 mm; (ii) width: not less than 55 mm.deleted
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 724 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The combined health warnings shall be divided into three sets rotating on an annual basis. Member States shall ensure that each combined health warning is displayed as nearly as possible on equal numbers of each brand.deleted
2013/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 742 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) define the position, format, layout, design, rotation and proportions of the health warnings;deleted
2013/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 879 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. A unit packet of cigarettes shall have a cuboid shape. A unit packet of roll-your- own tobacco shall have the form of either a pouch, i.e. a rectangular pocket with a flap that covers the opening. The flap of the pouch shall cover at least 70% of the front of the packet, or a pack with a cuboid or cylindrical base. A unit packet of cigarettes shall include at least 20 cigarettes. A unit packet of roll-your-own tobacco shall contain tobacco weighing at least 420 g.
2013/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 88 #

2012/0340(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) The conformity with web-accessibility requirements should be continuously monitored from the initial construction of the public sector bodies' website to all subsequent updates of its content. A harmonised monitoring methodology would cover a way of verifying, on a uniform basis in all Members States, the degree of compliance of the website with the requirements for web-accessibility, the collection of representative samples and the periodicity of the monitoring. The methodology used to monitor the compliance of the websites concerned should be issued not later than one year after the adoption of this Directive. Member States should report annually on the outcome of the monitoring and more generally on the list of actions taken in application of this Directive.
2013/07/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 167 #

2012/0340(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 a (new)
Article 6a Enforcement body and its tasks 1. Each Member State shall establish or nominate one authority responsible for the enforcement of this Directive and competent to monitor the compliance of websites with the general accessibility requirements set in Article 3. These competent authorities shall involve organisations representing persons with disabilities. 2. Each Member State shall define the tasks, powers, organisation and cooperation arrangements of the competent authorities, in accordance with Article 7, including the possibility for persons to lodge a complaint in order to challenge any breach of obligation imposed to Member States by this Directive. 3. Member States shall keep the Commission informed about their implementing measures related to paragraph 2, and such information will be publicly available.
2013/07/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 171 #

2012/0340(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 b (new)
Article 6b Implementing and enforcement measures For the purposes of this Directive, the competent authorities of the Member States shall be entitled to take, inter alia, the measures listed below, where appropriate: (i) follow up on a complaint for inaccessibility of a website in a reasonable timeframe; (ii) act as a resource centre for public bodies and authorities; (iii) train civil servants and staff of public bodies and authorities in regard to accessibility of websites and of web-based services; (iv) give recommendations to implement this Directive.
2013/07/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 172 #

2012/0340(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall monitor the compliance of the websites concerned with the requirements for web-accessibility on a continuous basis, using the methodology provided for in paragraph 4. For that purpose each Member State should designate a competent authority. This competent authority shall also be responsible for the enforcement of this Directive and shall have the resources necessary to carry out its task. These competent authorities shall involve organisations representing persons with disabilities. Each Member State shall define the tasks, powers, organisation and cooperation arrangements of the competent authority. Member States should inform the Commission about the designated competent authorities by 30 June 2014. Member States shall keep the Commission informed as to the compliance of relevant websites and such information will be publicly available.
2013/07/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 176 #

2012/0340(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Commission may establish a working group consisting of representatives of the Commission and representatives appointed by the Member States to meet annually in order to discuss the results of the monitoring and exchange best practices regarding the implementation of this Directive. The working group shall involve relevant stakeholders, including persons with disabilities and/or their representative organisations.
2013/07/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 181 #

2012/0340(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission establishes, by way of implementing acts, the methodology for the monitoring of the conformity of the websites concerned with the requirements for web-accessibility as set out in Article 3. That methodology shall be transparent, transferable, comparable and it shall be established in close consultation with relevant organisations representing persons with disabilities. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 9(3). The methodology will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
2013/07/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 45 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) In order to achieve gender equality in the workplace there must be a gender balanced model of decision making at all levels within the company while also ensuring the elimination of the gender pay gap which contributes significantly to the feminisation of poverty.
2013/05/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) In their internal staffing policies all EU institutions and agencies should comply with the principle of gender equality, in particular by ensuring gender balanced decision making at all levels within the bodies concerned.
2013/05/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) The efficient use of human capital is the most important determinant of an economy's competitiveness and is key to addressing the EU's ever increasing demographic challenges, to competing successfully in a globalised economy and to ensuring a comparative advantage vis-à- vis third countries. The pool of highly trained and qualified women is constantly growing as evidenced by the fact that 60 per cent of university graduates are female. A continued failure to draw on this pool in appointments to economic decision-making positions would amount to a failure to fully exploit skilled human capital.
2013/05/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) In order to ensure the promotion of gender equality, Member States should put in place provisions whereby men and women can combine work and family life, in particular, flexible arrangements and supports for those with care responsibilities.
2013/05/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) At company level, it is widely acknowledged that the presence of women on boards improves corporate governance, because team performance is enhanced and the quality of decision- making are enhanced due to a more diverse and collective mind-set incorporating a wider range of perspectives and therefore reachingis improved due to the fact that it incorporates a more balanced decisionsperspective. Numerous studies have also shown that there is a positive relationship between gender diversity at top management level and a company's financial performance and profitability. Enhancing female representation on the boards of publicly listed companies in the Union canshould therefore have a positive impact on the performance of companies concerned.
2013/05/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) Existing evidence also shows that labour market equality can improve economic growth substantially. Enhancing female presence in the boardrooms of listed companies in the Union not only affects the women appointed to boards, but also contributes to attracting female talent to the company and ensuring a greater presence of women at all levels of management and in the workforce. Therefore, a higher share of women on company boards hasshould have a positive impact on closing both the gender employment gap and the gender pay gap. Making full use of the existing female talent pool would constitute a marked improvement in terms of return on education for both individuals and the public sector. Female under- representation in the board rooms of publicly listed companies in the EU is a missed opportunity in terms of achieving long- term sustainable growth for Member States' economies at large.
2013/05/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) While this Directive does not aim to harmonise national laws on the selection procedures and qualification criteria for board positions in detail, the introduction of certain minimum standards as regards the requirement for listed companies without balanced gender representation to take appointment decisions for non- executive directors on the basis of an objective comparative assessment of the qualifications of candidates in terms of suitability, competence and professional performance ishas been shown to be necessary in order to attain gender balance among non-executives directors. Only an EU-level measure can effectively help to ensure a competitive level-playing field throughout the Union and avoid practical complications in business life.
2013/05/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) The Europe 2020 Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth ascertained that increased female labour force participation is a precondition for boosting growth and for tackling demographic challenges in Europe. The Strategy set a headline target of reaching an employment rate of 75 per cent for women and men aged 20-64 by 2020, which can only be reached if there is a clear commitment to gender equality and a reinforced effort to tackle all barriers to women's participation in the labour market. The current economic crisis has magnified Europe's ever-growing need to rely on knowledge, competence and innovation and to make full use of the pool of available talent. Enhancing female participation in economic decision-making, on company boards in particularand at all management levels throughout the company, is expected to have a positive spill-over effect on female employment in the companies concerned and throughout the whole economy.
2013/05/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) This Directive should not apply to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), as defined by Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, even if they are listed companies, however Member states should put in place policies to support and incentivise SMEs to significantly improve the gender balance at all levels of management and on company boards.
2013/05/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) All board systems distinguish between executive directors, who are involved in the daily management of the company, and non-executive directors who are not involved in the daily management, but do perform a supervisory function. The quantitative objectives provided for in this Directive should apply only to the non- executive directors in order to strike the right balance between the need to increase the gender diversity of boards and the need to minimise interference with the day-to- day management of a company, however Member States should encourage and incentivise companies to extend the provisions of this Directive to executive directors and to all levels of management within the company. As the non-executive directors perform supervisory tasks, it is also easier to recruit qualified candidates from outside the company and to a large extent also from outside the specific sector in which a company operates – a consideration which is of importance for areas of the economy where members of a particular sex are especially under- represented in the workforce.
2013/05/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) Member States exercise a dominant influence over listed companies which are public undertakings within the meaning of Article 2(b) of Commission Directive 2006/111/EC of 16 November 2006 on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings, as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings. Due to that dominant influence, they have the instruments at their disposal to bring about the necessary change more rapidly. Therefore, in such companies the objective of least 40 per cent of non-executive directors of the under-represented sex should be set at an earlier date and Member States should encourage and incentivise these companies to extend the provisions of this Directive to executive directors and to all levels of management within the company.
2013/05/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 150 #

2012/0299(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Member States mayare encouraged to introduce or maintain provisions which are more favourable than those laid down in this Directive to ensure a more balanced representation of men and women in respect of companies incorporated in their national territory, in particular the attainment of the provisions of this Directive in the case of executive directors, provided those provisions do not create unjustified discrimination, nor hinder the proper functioning of the internal market.
2013/05/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2 a) Article 2 of the Treaty of the European Union underlines that the Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 21 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 b (new)
(2 b) Article 6 of the Treaty of the European Union underlines that the Union recognises the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 23 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) The Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (hereinafter the ‘Fund’) should strengthen social cohesion by contributing to the reduction of poverty in the Union by supporting, primarily through the provision of food supplies, national schemes that provide non-financial assistance to the most deprived persons to alleviate food deprivation, homelessness and material deprivation of children.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 26 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4 a) The Fund cannot replace public policies undertaken by Member State governments to limit the need for emergency food aid and to develop sustainable targets and policies for the full eradication of hunger, poverty and social exclusion.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 43 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
(16 a) All citizens in the European Union should be treated equally and yet levels of deprivation differ across Member States. The Commission should produce a report showing what percentage the European funds make up of national budgets for aid programmes for most deprived persons.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 44 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 b (new)
(16 b) Much of the work undertaken by associations working with the provision of food to Europe's most deprived is undertaken by volunteers. Therefore, the process for applying to be a beneficiary of the Fund must not be prohibitively complicated.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 47 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
(18 a) Member States and partner organisations should work actively with large and small scale companies throughout the food supply chain, in line with their corporate and social responsibility programmes, as well as economical incentives, to reduce food waste and to ensure this produce is made available to associations working with Europe's most deprived.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 75 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The Fund shall be used to complement national strategies, not to replace or reduce national, long-term, sustainable poverty eradication and social inclusion programmes, which remain the responsibility of Member States.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 83 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. The Fund may support accompanying measures, primarily complementing the provision of food and goods, contributing to the social inclusion of the most deprived persons. It should also encourage collaboration with organisations which focus on the eradication of poverty and long-term social reintegration.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 99 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 12 a (new)
(12 a) The Fund shall be used to complement national strategies, not to replace Member States' authorities' responsibilities, for eradicating poverty and social exclusion, notably through the provision of long-term, sustainable programmes aiming at social reintegration rather than alleviating immediate food deprivation and material needs.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 100 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 12 b (new)
(12 b) Member States, and the bodies designated by them, shall build partnerships with companies throughout the food chain to create programmes allowing food companies to reduce waste and fulfil corporate and social responsability programmes, and for associations working with Europe's most deprived to gain access to food resources.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 136 #

2012/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
This platform shall include encouraging an exchange between those working on immediate material deprivation alleviation and organisations working for longer- term, sustainable social reintegration, and looking at how links could be developed between these different objectives.
2013/03/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 18 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) This Regulation includes requirements regarding the design, safety and performance characteristics of medical devices intended to prevent occupational injuries as laid down in Council Directive 2010/32/EU of 10 May 2010 implementing the Framework Agreement on prevention from sharp injuries in the hospital and healthcare sector concluded by HOSPEEM and EPSU1. It must be recognised that these requirements would only apply in health settings specifically recognised in the Framework Agreement between HOSPEEM and EPSU and this Regulation should enable separate discussions to take place in other settings such as dental clinics which were not embraced by that Framework Agreement. ________________ 1 OJ L 134, 1.6.2010, p. 66.
2013/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
(53) Healthcare professionals and patients should be empowered to report suspected serious incidents, which affect the safety of patients, care givers, healthcare professionals or others, at national level using harmonised formats. The national competent authorities should inform manufacturers and share the information with their peers when they confirm that a serious incident has occurred in order to minimise recurrence of those incidents.
2013/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 45
(45) ‘corrective action’ means action taken to eliminate the cause of a potential or real non-conformity or other undesirable situationnon-conformities in order to prevent recurrence;
2013/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 46
(46) ‘field safety corrective action’ means corrective action taken by the manufacturer for technical or medical reasons to prevent orto reduce thea risk of adeath or serious incident in relation to a device made available on the marketdeterioration in the state of health associated with the use of a medical device;
2013/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 47
(47) ‘field safety notice’ means thea communication sent by theout by a manufacturer to users or customor its representative to the device users in relation to a fField sSafety cCorrective aAction;
2013/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 89 amending or supplementing, in the light of technical progress and considering the intended users or patients, the general safety and performance requirements set out in Annex I, including the information supplied by the manufacturer.
2013/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 89 amending or supplementing, in the light of technical progress, the elements in the technical documentation set out in Annex II.
2013/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Throughout this process, the views of all relevant stakeholders including patients, caregivers or healthcare professionals' organisations, shall be taken into account.
2013/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 94 – paragraph 4
4. By way of derogation from Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC, conformity assessment bodies which comply with this Regulation may be designated and notified before its date of application. Notified bodies which are designated and notified in accordance with this Regulation may apply the conformity assessment procedures laid down in this Regulation and issue certificates in accordance with this Regulation before its date of application provided that the relevant delegated and implementing acts have entered into force.
2013/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part II – point 11 – point 11.2 a (new)
11.2a. Devices which can transfer potentially fatal blood-borne infections to healthcare staff, patients or other persons, by unintended cuts and pricks such as needle stick injuries, shall incorporate appropriate safety-engineered protection mechanisms in accordance with Directive 2010/32/EU. However the specificities relating to the dental profession must be respected.
2013/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 248 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 5 – indent 2 – paragraph 2
Any device intended to be partially introduced into the human body by clinical intervention and intended to remain in place after the procedure for at least 30 days shall also be considered an implantable device; 'implantable device' means any device, including those that are partially or wholly absorbed, which is intended
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 407 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – title
Implant cardnformation about implantable devices
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 414 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The manufacturer of an implantable device shall provide together with the device an implant cardinformation which shall be made available to the particulsubmitted to the healthcare patient who has been implanted with the devicerofessional implanting the device who will be responsible for: - submitting this information to the patient; and - recording this information in the patient's medical records.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 419 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
This cardinformation shall contain the following:
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 443 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 7 – point a
(a) determining the devices, categories or groups of devices whose identification shall be based on the UDI system as set out in paragraphs 1 to 6, and the timelines for implementing this. Following a risk-based approach, implementation of the UDI system shall be gradual, starting withrestricted to devices falling in the highest risk class;
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 444 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 7 – point b
(b) specifying the data to be included in the production identifier which, following a risk based approach, may vary depending on the risk class of the device;
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 537 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 88(3). Before adopting implementing acts, the Commission shall consult with relevant stakeholders and take into account their suggestions.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 539 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) amending or supplementing the classification criteria set out in Annex VII. Before adopting delegated acts, the Commission shall consult with relevant stakeholders and take into account their suggestions.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 706 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 78 – paragraph 6
6. Where appropriate, organisations representing the interests of the medical device industry, healthcare professionals, laboratories, patients and consumers at Union level shall be invited to MDCG meetings in the capacity of observers. The MDCG may invite, on a case-by- case basis, other experts and other third parties to attend meetings or provide written contributions.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 782 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part II – point 11 – point 11.7
11.7. Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to facilitate the safe disposal of the device and the substances with which the device has been exposed to and/or of any waste substances by the user, patient or other person and, where possible and appropriate, replace with the use of devices and methods with improved safety features and characteristics to reduce as far as possible the exposure of patients, users and other persons to potentially harmful substances, such as chemical or nuclear material.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 852 #

2012/0266(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 7 – part III – point 6 – point 6.7 – paragraph 1
All devices incorporating or consisting of nanomaterial are in class III unless the nanomaterial is encapsulated or bound in such a manner that it cannot beintended to be intentionally released into the patient's or user's body when the device is used within its intended purposehuman body are classified as class III.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 99 #

2012/0184(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 5
– trailers and semi-trailers with a maximum permissible mass not exceeding 3 500 kg – vehicle categories O1 and O2,deleted
2013/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 110 #

2012/0184(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 7
– two- or three-wheel vehicles – vehicle categories L1e, L2e, L3e, L4e, L5e, L6e and L7e,deleted
2013/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 115 #

2012/0184(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 8
– wheeled tractors with a maximum design speed exceeding 40 km/h – vehicle category T5.deleted
2013/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 188 #

2012/0184(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 1
– Vehicles of categories L1e, L2e, L3e, L4e, L5e, L6e and L7e: four years after the date on which the vehicle was first registered, then two years and thereafter annually;deleted
2013/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 205 #

2012/0184(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
– Vehicles of category M1, N1 and O2N1: four years after the date on which the vehicle was first registered, then two years and thereafter annually;
2013/03/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 107 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Adequate and effective implementation and enforcement are key elements in protecting the rights of posted workers, whereas poor enforcement undermines the effectiveness of the Union rules applicable in this area. Close cooperation between the Commission and the Member States is, therefore essential, without neglecting the important role of Commission, labour inspectorates and the social partners in this respectsential.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 212 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
(32) Member States should take appropriate measures in the event of failure to comply with the obligations laid down in this Directive, including administrative and judicial procedures, and should provide for effective, dissuasive and proportionate penalties for any breaches of the obligations under this Directive. Failure of Member States to fully comply with this Directive should result in the launch of infringement proceedings by the Commission.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 710 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
1. With respect to the construction activities referMember States shall ensured to inhat the Annex to Directive 96/71/EC, for all posting situdirect employer shall be liable to pay any outstanding remuneration as covered by Article 1(3) of Directive 96/71/EC, the Member States shall ensure on a non–discriminatory basis with regard to the protection of the equivalent rights of employees of direct subcontractors established in its territory, that the contractor of which the employer (service provider or temporary employment undertaking or placement agency) is a direct sub1 paragraph 5 a, the refund of excessive costs according to Article 11 paragraph 5 b, any back-payments or refund of taxes or social security contributions. This shall also be ensured after the employee has returned to his/her home countracty or can, in addition to or in place of the employer, be held liable by the posted worker and/or common funds or institutions of social partners for non-payment of the following:other Member State. Member States may apply more stringent rules at national level or introduce such rules.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 832 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 1
No later than 53 years after the expiry of the deadline for transposition, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on the implementation of this Directive, making appropriate proposals where necessary.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 206 #

2012/0011(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) Children deserve specific protection of their personal data, as they may be less aware of risks, consequences, safeguards and their rights in relation to the processing of personal data. Such protection is particularly important in the context of social networks, where children should be aware of the identities of those with whom they are communicating. To determine when an individual is a child, this Regulation should take over the definition laid down by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
2012/12/20
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 405 #

2012/0011(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Where an information society service makes social networking facilities available to children it shall take explicit measures to protect their welfare, including by ensuring, in so far as possible, that they are aware of the identities of those with whom they are communicating.
2012/12/21
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 426 #

2012/0011(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) Children deserve specific protection of their personal data, as they may be less aware of risks, consequences, safeguards and their rights in relation to the processing of personal data. Such protection is particularly important in the context of social networks, where children should be aware of the identities of those with whom they are communicating. To determine when an individual is a child, this Regulation should take over the definition laid down by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
2013/03/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1016 #

2012/0011(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Where an information society service makes social networking facilities available to children it shall take explicit measures to protect their welfare, including by ensuring, in so far as possible, that they are aware of the identities of those with whom they are communicating.
2013/03/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 2986 #

2012/0011(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 81 – paragraph 2
2. Processing of personal data concerning health which is necessary for historical, statistical or scientific research purposes, such as patient registries set up for improving diagnoses and differentiating between similar types of diseases and preparing studies for therapies, ishall be permitted only with the consent of the data subject, and shall be subject to the conditions and safeguards referred to in Article 83.
2013/03/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 3060 #

2012/0011(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) Member States law may provide for exceptions to the requirement of consent for research, as referred to in paragraph 1a, with regard to research that serves an exceptionally high public interests, if that research cannot possibly be carried out otherwise. The data in question shall be anonymised, or if that is not possible for the research purposes, pseudonymised under the highest technical standards, and all necessary measures shall be taken to prevent re-identification of the data subjects. Such processing shall be subject to prior authorisation of the competent supervisory authority, in accordance with Article 34(1).
2013/03/08
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 26 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the European Council to ensure coherence between the different priorities in its policy guidance, so that guidance on fiscal consolidation does not hamper efforts to tackle unemployment and mitigate the social consequences of the crisis;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Is deeply concerned about the fact that the current national targets are not even in theory sufficient to achieve the EU2020 headline targets for employment, education and poverty reduction; urges the European Council to ensure that all Member States, and Member States which currently have a Memorandum of Understanding with the EU, IMF and ECB in particular, step up their national targets and that these are accompanied by concrete and realistic roadmaps for implementation and assessed using clear and consistent indicators drawing on the agreed Joint Assessment Framework, so that the EU is put on a clear and feasible track to reach all EU2020 objectives and that progress can be transparently measured;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the European Council to give the necessary budgetary leeway and encouragement for investments in sustainable job creation and that such flexibility is also available in Member States which currently have a Memorandum of Understanding with the EU, IMF and ECB; calls on Member States with a current account surplus to contribute to the reduction of macroeconomic imbalances by increasing internal demand in order to prevent a recessionary spiral detrimental to job growth across the EU;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the European Council to endorse the policy guidance to shift the tax burden away from labour, making hiring employees more attractive in order to improve the situation of vulnerable groups, young unemployed people, low-skilled workers, people with low incomes and second earners; calls on the European Council in line with the subsidiarity principle to endorse the guidance on increasing revenue through fair, effective and efficient taxation and better tax coordination to combat tax evasion;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Regrets that policy guidance aimed at making work more attractive does not address the quality of jobs and that too little attention is devoted to putting in place the necessary preconditions for increasing labour participation, notably of women; calls on the European Council to include guidance on decent work and efforts to support the reconciliation of work, family and private life, by means of affordable care and childcare provision, family- related leave and flexible working arrangements;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Emphasises that Article 9 TFEU needs to be reflectmainstreamed throughout the European Semesters, including in the country- specific recommendations, which should be accompanied by ex-ante and ex- post social impact assessments;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Calls on Member States to promote business start-ups and support existing SMEs in their job creation activities;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Considers that the EU2020 headline target for the employment rate can only be achieved if the labour market participation of women is increased significantly; believes that guidance to Member States should aim at putting in place the necessary conditions for higher employment rates among women, such as affordable care and child care, adequate maternity, paternity and parental leave schemes and flexibility in working hours and place of work;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Member States to invest in education, training, the promotion of entrepreneurial skills, lifelong learning and informal and non-formal learning, and warns of the long-term social and economic costs of cuts in education budgets;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2011/2312(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Points out that territorial cooperation and macro-regional strategies could be useful instruments for identifying and combating regional disparities, such as access to education and employment, and for promoting convergence between European regions;
2012/05/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2011/2312(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that there are considerable employment and social disparities both between and within regions; believes that programmes have to be tailored to regional and sub-regional needs and concentrate on a small number of priorities responding to the specific challenges they face and considers that the ESF has to continue supporting the development of local approaches in the field of employment and social inclusion;
2012/05/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2011/2312(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Stresses that responding effectively to many problems in the area of social exclusion and poverty requires an adjusted and differentiated approach that has to take into account the specific needs of a given territory, such as metropolitan areas or rural areas;
2012/05/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2011/2312(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Believes that mobility of workers and young graduates could be a possible solution for regional and local labour market shortages and encourages Member States and regions to use it more effectively in order to encourage territorial development and cohesion;
2012/05/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2011/2312(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4 c. Considers it essential to coordinate the actions supported by the ESF at different policy levels in order to enable an efficient territorial approach; in particular, considers it necessary to link the educational services and facilities at the local level to the labour market needs;
2012/05/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2011/2312(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Believes that operational programmes and projects must be designed and implemented at the appropriate level and attention must be paid to the role of cities, functional geographic territories, and areas facing specific geographical or demographic problems;
2012/05/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2011/2312(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Considers that institutional capacity at different levels of intervention is a significant element ensuring the success of applying the territorial approach;
2012/05/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2011/2312(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Supports the proposal of the creation of Intermediate regions which will help to ensure a proportionate and targeted response to the situation in regions where GNI is increasing and also regions where GNI is decreasing;
2012/05/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2011/2293(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that volunteering contributes to fighting poverty while helping to achieve economic and social cohesion and to promote solidarity between generations by encouraging the cooperation among young and senior citizens and having a positive impact on their active participation in the social activities;
2012/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2011/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the economic crisis and political and economic factors have an impact on sustainable funding and fundraising for voluntary activities;
2012/03/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 25 #

2011/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas many volunteer led projects and organisations do not have the resources to access and secure funding under existing EU programmes due to excessive red tape and bureaucracy;
2012/03/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 29 #

2011/2293(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that volunteering should not be an alternative nor a substitute for paid work and, should not, in any case, constitute a reason for superseding the obligations of the social state;
2012/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2011/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Encourages the Member States to recognise the benefits of participating in cross-border volunteer activities to provide citizens with new skills, contributing to their employability, mobility and strengthening the development of social inclusion and to support cooperation between organisers of voluntary activities in EU countries to promote the mobility of young volunteers across Europe, with the aim of fostering mutual intercultural enrichment;
2012/03/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 52 #

2011/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights the need to ensure that high- quality volunteering is developed, both nationally and at cross-border level, through a structured framework of comprehensive information and appropriate training for volunteers which includes current best practice;
2012/03/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 58 #

2011/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Asks the Commission and the national, regional and local authorities and the various civil society organisations to improve information networks in order to make everyone aware of volunteering opportunities, to tackle barriers to participation, to enhance access to volunteering best practice and the promotion of cooperation across borders;
2012/03/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 61 #

2011/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Therefore proposes that a centralised EU portal be created, to include a best practice volunteer resources bank, a section on cross-border volunteering, with information abouton the programmes available, their costs and the conditions for participation, allowing for an exchange of information on administrative burdens, the legal and fiscal aspects of volunteering, barriers encountered in accessing programmes and the best ways to tackle them;
2012/03/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 63 #

2011/2293(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on the Commission to propose a mechanism allowing Member States wishing to strengthen civil society to generally exempt from VAT all or most of the activities and transactions carried out by voluntary non-profit making organisations; stresses that at least the smaller non-profit-making organisations should be covered by such a mechanism;
2012/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2011/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to give a high profile to volunteering in sport, particularly at the grassroots level, to acknowledge the important role played by volunteer led sporting organisations in strengthening culture, promoting social inclusion and enhancing communities, and to reduce the barriers to sports volunteering across the EU;
2012/03/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 80 #

2011/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Commission to address in the ‘European Skills Passport’ the need for a cohesive and transferable approach to proper screening and vetting of volunteers who work with children and/or vulnerable members of society;
2012/03/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 84 #

2011/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Urges the Member States to develop mechanisms for validating non-formal and formal learning outcomes, which will improve the value and transferability of the skills acquired outside formal education; and lead to a formalised recognition of the cross-skilling and competences acquired through volunteering;
2012/03/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 86 #

2011/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Proposes that a training and qualifications framework for volunteer coaches and coach education be established and incorporated in the European Qualifications Framework in order to advance the mobility of volunteer coaches and to enhance the transferability of skills and competences developed through volunteering;
2012/03/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 101 #

2011/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission, in particular, to to secure the lasting legacy of the European Year of Volunteering (EYV) 2011 by ensureing that volunteering projects are included in all new funding programmes;
2012/03/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 103 #

2011/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that information on available funding and the relevant programmes is freely available to volunteer led projects and the application procedures are not made inaccessible due to excessive red tape;
2012/03/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 111 #

2011/2293(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Recommends that the Commission maintain the useful contact points set up both with ‘EYV 2011 Alliance’, which includes many civil society volunteering and networking organisations, and with the national coordinating bodies, strategic partners and spokesmen of the national governments in this sector, given the large variety of bodies responsible for volunteering in the EU and encourages these contact points to engage with the proposed centralised EU Portal, as a pan European platform, to facilitate further coordination and increased cross border activity;
2012/03/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 33 #

2011/2181(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Supports a differentiated and proportionate regime for small and medium sized listed companies;
2011/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2011/2181(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for greater diversity including gender diversity in company boards;
2011/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2011/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas 168 000 European citizens die every year from work-related accidents or diseases, and whereas it is not yet possible to put an accurate figure on the accidents linked to the use of new technologies and new forms of work,
2011/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2011/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Regrets the unequal application across the EU of the Framework Agreement on Work-related Stress and calls on the Commission to present a legislative proposal on work-related stress, bearing in mind that job insecurity has a real impact on the stress factor;
2011/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2011/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Regrets the lack of information on risks among employees, employers, social partners and even health services; points out the positive role in this regard of employees’ participation and representation; and the importance of training workers with a view to planning the necessary measures and improving safety levels at the workplace;
2011/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2011/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Commission to propose a directive protecting the jobs of people who legitimately draw attention to and investigate unacknowledged risks in an enterprise by notifying the appropriate labour inspectorate;
2011/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2011/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas cooperative enterprises promote the interests of their members and users as well as solutions to societal challenges, and do not seekseek both to maximise financial profit for shareholdersbenefits to members and ensure their livelihood by means of a long-term and sustainable business policy and to put the well-being of clients, employees and members in the entire region at the centre of business strategy;
2011/10/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2011/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas cooperatives are an important pillar of the European economy and a key driver for social innovation, and thus in particular preserve infrastructure and local services specifically in rural areas and conurbations, and whereas Europe has 160 000 cooperatives, owned by more than a quarter of all Europeans, which provide work for around 5.4 million employees;
2011/10/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2011/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Points out that, when revising the Directive, it should be taken into account that cooperatives, particularly in rural areas, can contribute to providing employment prospects in the shape of secure jobs and allow employees to plan their life flexibly at their place of origin;
2011/10/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2011/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that, owing to its complexity, the Statute does not meet the needs of cooperatives and that it should be simplified and made intelligible to all in order to make it more user- friendly without losing quality;
2011/10/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2011/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses that the option of merging national cooperatives from different Member States should be created;
2011/10/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2011/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Points out that the cooperative as a form of organisation can be seen as a successful and contemporary approach to the social economy;
2011/10/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2011/2114(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
B a. Whereas higher food prices do not automatically translate into higher farm incomes, mainly due to the speed at which farm input costs increase and the growing divergence between producer and consumer prices;
2011/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 71 #

2011/2114(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas crop rotation shcould be included in ‘greening’ measures as part of CAP reform where local conditions allow and with regard to its significant contribution to climate change mitigation and the potential for reducing the use of synthetic fertilisers and pesticides;
2011/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 85 #

2011/2114(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Q
Q. whereas farm saved seeds, when allowed by EU Regulation /EC) No 2100/94 on Community plant variety rights, can offer significant economic and environmental benefits, including cost reductions for farmers and less commodity dependence, thereby responding to specific agronomic conditions in farms; whereas improved infrastructure in this field can significantly reduce animal feed and seed production costs in the long term;
2011/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 92 #

2011/2114(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Asks for greater scrutiny and better analysis to be given at EU and global level to the economic fundamentals which explain rising food prices, predominantly interactions between supply and demand fluctuations, as well as increasing interactions between the price movements of energy, inputs, and food commodities;
2011/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 93 #

2011/2114(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Asks the Commission to refine its analysis on the reasons behind extreme market fluctuations and seek greater clarity on the interactions between speculation and agricultural markets, as well as energy markets and food commodities prices; stresses that this should be part of the efforts to better regulate, increase transparency and the quality of information on financial markets at global and EU level, including in the upcoming review of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) and the Market Abuse Directive (MAD);
2011/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 101 #

2011/2114(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses in particular the need for a European Food Prices Monitoring Tool which wWelcomes the European Food Prices Monitoring Tool set up by Eurostat and the setting up of the High Level Forum for a better functioning of the food supply chain, which must include the input sector operating upstream and should deliver better transparency on input price development and allowcontribute to improved farm-gate prices to be linked to production costs; Insists that regular reporting of progress made and concrete proposals should be transmitted to and discussed with the European Parliament;
2011/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 109 #

2011/2114(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Considers that primary producers cannot fully benefit from increased output prices as they are being 'squeezed' between, on the one side, low farm-gate prices due to the strong positions of processors and retailers, and high input prices due to increased concentration of input companies on the other side;
2011/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 112 #

2011/2114(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on national and European competition authorities to address robustly the abuses of dominant position of agribusiness traders and input companies, and to consider proposals for anti-trust legislationin particular in the fertilizers sector where farmers face tremendous difficulties to forward-buy essential fertilizers for their production; European competition authorities should therefore consider launching a full sector inquiry to challenge all potential anti-competitive practices applied by fertilizers and crop protection products companies so as to ensure a freely operating input market;
2011/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 122 #

2011/2114(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the new rural development policyCAP to include specific support measures for better and more efficient resource management and for sustainable practices which reduce input use and costs and vulnerability to price volatility, and which specificallyimprove farmers' ability to adapt to price volatility, including measures to support short input and food chains;
2011/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 154 #

2011/2114(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Considers that efficient measures for on-farm and local energy saving and management should be made available throughout the EU via rural development programmes and should becomeby creating new incentives and targeted support mechanisms at the heart of the CAP reform, including as part of farm extension services;
2011/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 171 #

2011/2114(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Repeats its call to include crop rotation and crop diversity in an EU-wide list of ‘greening’ measures to be rewarded within the CAP where local conditions allow, and without interfering with farmers' production choices or limiting their productive capacity, given the positive effect the former have on climate change mitigation, soil and water quality and farmers' finances (with significantly reduced use of fertilisers, soil improvers, plant protection products and pesticides which will reduce input costs for farmers);
2011/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 176 #

2011/2114(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Insists that, as part of the reform of the CAP, an EU-wide list of 'greening' measures should primarily reward increased resource efficiency, nutrient management including precision farming techniques for a competitive and less input intensive and fossil-fuel dependent EU agriculture;
2011/10/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 3 #

2011/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
- having regard to the "Federation Strategy" for the future of the beekeeping sector drawn up by Apimondia, the International Federation of Beekeepers’ Associations 1, __________________ 1 http://www.apimondia.com/en/the- federation/strategy
2011/08/31
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 105 #

2011/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. recommends that a greater linkage be made to the Apimondia Secretariat in Rome which can supply relevant stakeholders, particularly scientists, with expertise and experience in putting forward possible solutions to the decreasing numbers of honeybees throughout the EU.
2011/08/31
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 11 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas sport is a competence of the EU under the Treaty of Lisbon aiming to promote fairness and openness in sporting competitions, cooperation between the bodies responsible for sport, protecting the physical and moral integrity of sports people, enhancing the health, social, cultural and economic benefits of sport and requires appropriate financial and policy support,
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 13 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas EU Sports Policy must be developed to address and support the aims and objectives of both professional and amateur sports,
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 15 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas the support and promotion of sport for people with intellectual or physical disabilities should be a priority in the EU considering its important role in delivering social inclusion, public health and volunteerism across borders,
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 46 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas traditional and grassroots sporting organisations play a key role in strengthening culture, promoting social inclusion and enhancing communities,
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 47 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J b (new)
Jb. whereas a key motivating factor behind citizen involvement in sport and physical activity is to improve personal health and well-being,
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 71 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 a (new)
- 1a.Urges the European Commission to propose a dedicated and ambitious budget for sports policy under the future MFF given the public health, social, cultural and economic benefits of sport;
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 75 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the importance of encouraging participation in sports activities in schools and, universities and communities;
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 97 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on sports organisations to pay attention to the needs of disabled sportspeopleAcknowledges the work done by organisations delivering sporting activities for persons with intellectual or physical disabilities across the EU, calls on further sports organisations to pay attention to the needs of disabled sportspeople and calls for the European Commission to allocate organisational funding to support them;
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 101 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls for the underrepresentation of women within the decision-making and governance bodies of sports organisations to be addressed;
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 135 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Urges Member States to establish clear guidelines to integrate sport and physical activity into all levels of education across the Member States;
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 140 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Urges Member States to develop educational programmes structured to facilitate the combination of learning and training for professional athletes;
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 141 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Proposes that a training and qualifications framework for coaches and coach education be established and incorporated in the European Qualifications Framework and Life Long Learning Programmes in order to advance a knowledge based society and the development of excellence in coaching at both the amateur and professional level;
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 154 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Underlines the importance of sport and physical activity at all ages for public health and calls on Member States to facilitate and promote engagement in sport and physical activity and its health benefits;
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 166 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 f (new)
6f. Maintains that the potential of sport and sporting events for tourism development needs to be identified and capitalised upon for the benefit of the sporting organisations and local areas;
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 224 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Reaffirms its attachment to the European model of sport, within which federations play a central role and which has clubs and volunteers at its base, which have a fundamental role in supporting the entire sport structure;
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 248 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines that training for players at local level is needed for the sustainable development of European sport and grassroots sporting organisations are essential for the dissemination of the benefits of sport at local level;
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 313 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 – indent 1
– to organise a ‘European Day of Sports’ every year which promotes the social and cultural role of amateur and professional sports and the benefits of sport in terms of public health;
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 319 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 – indent 3
– to draw up a European map of local, traditional sports which play a significant cultural role within the EU and support its dissemination;
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 325 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 – indent 4
– to set up a mobility programme for young athletes and coaches, to enable them to learn new training methods, establish best practice and develop their European awareness and to encourage intercultural dialogue;
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 327 #

2011/2087(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 – indent 4 a (new)
- to work with Member States and sporting organisations to protect the fundamental integrity of grassroots sport;
2011/09/09
Committee: CULT
Amendment 40 #

2011/2082(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Underlines that non-profit-making organisations play a vital and very beneficial role for democracy, growth and prosperity in Europe; calls on the Commission to propose a mechanism allowing Member States wishing to strengthen civil society to generally exempt from VAT all or most of the activities and transactions carried out by these organisations; stresses that at least the smaller non-profit-making organisations should be covered by such a mechanism;
2011/07/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 56 #

2011/2082(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls on the Commission to look carefully into the issue of further reducing VAT red tape for non-profit- making organisations; underlines that there should be a higher degree of flexibility in the VAT system for Member States wishing to take ambitious measures in order to ease the VAT administration burden for these organisations;
2011/07/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 7 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph C
C. whereas there is a need to ensure a strengthened interaction between employment, social and economic policies in the context of the European Semester, and whereas this has to be done in a manner fostering democratic accountability, ownership and legitimacy and an essential part of this is the full involvement of the European Parliament,
2011/06/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission and Council to ensure that sustainable and inclusive growth linked to employment and job creation are at the heart of all policy proposals;
2011/06/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2011/2067(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas austerity measures being pursued in a number of Member States have coincided with, and are partly responsible for, very significant increases in unemployment,
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2011/2067(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that the combination of demographic change, decreasing workforce and changes in production chains calls for better employment, education and work organisation strategies in order to maximise the competitiveness of the European economy, minimise the loss of human capital, better utilise the asset that older workers present and create new job possibilities for workers of all ages;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2011/2067(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that national flexicurity arrangements must be strengthened and adapted to the new socio-economic contexts of each individual Member State, in accordance with its specific needs, in order to ensure a flexible and active labour market, social inclusion, efficient training and secure social security systems; warns against one-size- fits-all solutions;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2011/2067(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Regrets that for many workers the reconciliation of work and family life remains a difficult task; calls on the Member States to give all parents, especially single-parent families, opportunities for integration not only into working life but also into lifelong learning processes, furthermore calls on Member States to put in place policies and programmes to support family carers;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2011/2067(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Encourages Member States to implement a dual system of education/training in order to introduce young people to the labour market from the earliest stage and promote a quality framework for internships and apprenticeships leading as much as possible to stable employment; furthermore, calls on relevant stakeholders to ensure that traineeships and apprenticeships lead to the provision of new jobs;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 212 #

2011/2067(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Considers it necessary to improve mutual recognition of competences, diplomas and skills at EU level, also to improve the recognition of non-formal skills and learning methods e.g. those acquired at work and through volunteering activities with the same recognition being extended to workers from third countries;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2011/2067(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to stimulate creation of small and medium-sized enterprises, to provide them with a regulatory friendly environment and, to cut red tape, to improve their access to finance and to use all available mechanisms to ensure their sustainability e.g. loan guarantee schemes; recalls that 85% of jobs in the EU are provided by SMEs; urges all relevant stakeholders to remove barriers to business creation and its free movement;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 273 #

2011/2067(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission, Member States, social partners and other stakeholders to ensure efficient use of EU funds, such as ESF, ERDF and the Cohesion Fund, and facilities such as the Microfinance Facility, for job creation and for supporting the social economy;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 335 #

2011/2067(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Emphasises the importance of increasing the number of older workers in the workforce and of mainstreaming intergenerational solidarity and cooperation within the employment context and the implementation of initiatives promoting longer working lives such as job shares, skills and career re- appraisal, employee volunteering and phased retirement including among those who are freelancers;
2011/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
– having regard to the Directive 2000/78/EC, of 27 November 2000, establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation,
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment A #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Ccalls on the Commission to involve civil society at national and European level and to make discussions with people living in poverty a formal part of the annual convention on povertyboost the involvement in the development of a European strategy at all levels of governance (European, national, regional and local) of organised civil society and of all stakeholders, such as NGOs, social economy organisations, service providers, experts in social innovation and the social partners, as well as people living in poverty themselves, in partnership with the associations in which they freely express their opinions and which have acquired experience and knowledge, particularly through the development of national platforms against poverty and social exclusion in each Member State; calls on the Commission to enhance cooperation between local, regional and national authorities and European Institutions, particularly the European Parliament; believes that the synergies should concern all stakeholders, including SMEs and entrepreneurs; calls for discussions with people living in poverty and social exclusion to be institutionalised, and to be extended at national level, and for their participation and contribution to be made a formal and central part of the annual convention on poverty and social exclusion, and calls for appropriate and regular follow-up of the recommendations so developed;
2011/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment LL #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas women are in general more vulnerable to poverty than men owing to various factors such as gender discrimination at work, which results in the persistent gender pay gap, the resulting pension disparities, and labour market discriminationbut also career breaks in order to care for dependants and labour market discrimination; whereas only 63% of women work in Europe, compared to 76% of men, and having regard to the lack of support networks and concrete measures to help parents achieve a work/life balance, including affordable care services,
2011/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment MM #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M
M. whereas unemployment among young people, which is already higher than for other age groups, has exploded in the EU since the crisis and now runs at over 20% reaching a critical level in all Member States, which puts young people at risk of falling into poverty from a very early age; whereas this alarming situation calls for urgent political, economic and social responses and will, in combination with demographic changes, aggravate skills shortages; having regard to the vital role that vocational training can play in helping young people and low skilled workers to join the labour market; whereas, however, getting a job does not always mean escaping poverty, and whereas young people are especially susceptible to falling into the category of working poor,
2011/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment T #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. AdvocatesRecommends the Member States to adopt a proactive decent housing policy in order to ensure universal access to decent, affordable housingquality housing at affordable prices or on preferential terms of purchase, and to prevent the loss thereof, with guaranteed access to services essential to health and safety, the lack of such housing being a serious affront to dignity, along with a proactive energy policy that steps up the use of renewable energies and boosts energy efficiency in order to combat energy poverty; calls for more attention to be paid to housing for migrants, who are often exploited and forced to live in sub- standard housing; recalls Protocol 26 annexed to the Treaty of Lisbon on social housing and calls for the provisions contained therein to be respected, in particular on the Member States’ freedom to organise social housing, including the question of financing; encourages the Member States to implement special housing programmes and opportunities for homeless people, in view of guaranteeing the most basic standards of living for the most vulnerable in society;
2011/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment U #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for Roma people, and the organisations that represent and work with them, to be actively involved in the elaboration and implementation of the national Roma Integration Strategies up to 2020, so as to contribute to achieving the EU poverty target; calls on the European Union and the Member States to establish the European strategy to promote Roma inclusion as soon as possible, and calls on the Member States to propose, by the end of this year, measures to promote the inclusion of Roma in accordance with the European framework for coordinating national Roma inclusion strategies presented by the Commission in April 2011; stresses that, as with the fight against poverty and social exclusion, the inclusion and integration of the Roma will require greater effort to achieve, by 2020, their full inclusion and an end to the numerous forms of discrimination to which they are subject; 16a. calls for other marginalised communities such as immigrants to be involved in all EU or Member State policies relating to their social inclusion;
2011/09/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas women are more vulnerable to poverty owing to various factors such as the persistent gender pay gap, the time taken out of the workforce to care, the resulting pension disparities, and labour market discrimination,
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M
M. whereas unemployment among young people, which is already higher than for other age groups, and low skilled workers has exploded in the EU since the crisis,
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 136 #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital P a (new)
Pa. whereas family carers provide the greatest proportion of care in the EU,
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to involveboost civil society at national and European levelinvolvement, and enhance cooperation with local, regional, national authorities and European Institutions and to make discussions with people living in poverty a formal part of the annual convention on poverty;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 249 #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls for efforts to promote policies of transition between working life and retirement, for example by removing mandatory retirement age, but also between working life and family life, for example by examining the feasibility of a proposal on carers’ leave which will enable workers to take time off to deliver care.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 317 #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls for strong support to ensure the quality and accessibility of social services, especially in health, long-term care, education, transport, energy, water and communication.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 327 #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Advocates a proactive housing policy in order to ensure universal access to decent, affordable housing with guaranteed access to services essential to health and safety, along with a proactive energy policy that steps up the use of renewable energies and boosts energy efficiency;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 345 #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for Roma and immigrants to be involved in all EU or Member State policies relating to their social inclusion;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 364 #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that austerity policies agreed with Member States do not conflict with or put into question the attainment of the EU 2020 targets of lifting 20 million people out of poverty;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 380 #

2011/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls on Member States to provide adequate support, training and respite services to family carers so that elderly people and those who need care can remain in their own homes and communities for as long as they wish to;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2011/2020(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the increase in commitment appropriations for the ‘Youth on the Move’ and ‘European Platform against Poverty and Social Exclusion’ flagship initiatives; points out that the crisis is notfar from over yet, and opposes the real reduction of the ‘Employment and social affairs’ chapter and the ‘New Skills for New Jobs’ flagship initiative;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2011/2020(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for an increase in thStresses the need to ensure adequate payment appropriations for the European Social Fund and the creation of a new category of intermediate regions;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2011/2019(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for adequate funding for the flagship initiatives ‘New Skills for New Jobs’, ‘Youth on the Move’ and ‘European Platform against Poverty and Social Exclusion’;
2011/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2011/2019(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Is of the opinion that those objectives require national budgets and the Union budget to be comparablebetter aligned, compatible and complementary;
2011/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2011/2019(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on Member States to ensure greater synergies between the European Social Fund and the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund;
2011/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2011/2019(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses that targeted use of the microfinance facility can assist unemployed persons or those on low income to start up, stabilise or expand a small business and encourages Member States to offer complementary assistance to such ventures in order to help ensure their sustainability;
2011/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2011/2019(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Takes the view that the EU budget must provide support for partner countries in the Mediterranean region in reforming their labour markets and vocational training systems in order to make possible a real labour market integration and facilitate the recognition of professional qualifications.
2011/05/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) arbitration and conciliation services, including dispute adjudication services;
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) at least 90 % of the activitiesthe activities in their entirety of that legal person are carried out for the controlling contracting authority or for other legal persons controlled by that contracting authority;
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) there is no private participation in the controlled legal person.deleted
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 142 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
A contracting authority shall be deemed to exercise over a legal person a control similar to that which it exercises over its own departments within the meaning of point (a) of the first subparagraph where it exercises a decisive influence over both strategic objectives and significant decisions of the controlled legal person.deleted
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 143 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 also applies where a controlled entity which is a contracting authority awards a contract to its controlling entity, or to another legal person controlled by the same contracting authority, provided that there is no private participation in the legal person being awarded the public contract.deleted
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 147 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
A contracting authority, which does not exercise over a legal person control within the meaning of paragraph 1, may nevertheless award a public contract without applying this Directive to a legal person which it controls jointly with other contracting authorities, where the following conditions are fulfilled:deleted
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 151 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3 - subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the contracting authorities exercise jointly over the legal person a control which is similar to that which they exercise over their own departments; (a) the contracting authorities exercise jointly over the legal person a controldeleted
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) at least 90 % of the activities of that legal person are carried out for the controlling contracting authorities or other legal persons controlled by the same contracting authorities;deleted
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) there is no private participation in the controlled legal person.deleted
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 161 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
For the purposes of point (a), contracting authorities shall be deemed to jointly control a legal person where the following cumulative conditions are fulfilled:deleted
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) the decision-making bodies of the controlled legal person are composed of representatives of all participating contracting authorities;deleted
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) those contracting authorities are able to jointly exert decisive influence over the strategic objectives and significant decisions of the controlled legal person;deleted
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c
(c) the controlled legal person does not pursue any interests which are distinct from that of the public authorities affiliated to it;deleted
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point d
(d) the controlled legal person does not draw any gains other than the reimbursement of actual costs from the public contracts with the contracting authorities.deleted
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 206 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
However, in the case of public service and public works contracts as well as public supply contracts covering in addition services or siting and installation operations, legal persons may be required to indicate, in the tender or the request to participate, the names and relevant professional qualification levels of the staff to be responsible for the performance of the contract in question.
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 215 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Unless otherwise provided in this Directive or in the national law concerning access to information, and without prejudice to the obligations relating to the advertising of awarded contracts and to the information to candidates and tenderers set out in Articles 48 and 53 of this Directive, the contracting authority shall behave with utmost good faith and shall not disclose information forwarded to it by economic operators which they have designated as confidential, including, but not limited to, technical or trade secrets and the confidential aspects of tenders.
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 224 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The minimum time limit for the receipt of tenders shall be 4052 days from the date on which the contract notice was sent.
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 229 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The minimum time limit for receipt of requests to participate shall be 307 days from the date on which the contract notice or, where a prior information notice is used as a means of calling for competition, the invitation to confirm interest is sent.
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Only those economic operators inviselected by the contracting authority following their assessment of the requested information may submit a tender. Contracting authorities may limit the number of suitable candidates to be inviselected to participate in the procedure in accordance with Article 64.
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 232 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The minimum time limit for the receipt of tenders shall be 3540 days from the date on which the invitation to tender is sent.
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 233 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Where contracting authorities have published a prior information notice which is not used as a means of calling for competition, the minimum time limit for the receipt of tenders as laid down in the second subparagraph of paragraph 2 of this Article may be shortened to 15, as a general rule, be shortened to 36 days, but under no circumstances to less than 22 days, provided that all of the following conditions are fulfilled:
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 234 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) it was sent for publication between 452 days and 12 months before the date on which the contract notice was sent.
2012/06/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 423 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) arbitration and conciliation services, including dispute adjudication services;
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 470 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) at least 90 % of the activities in their entirety of that legal person are carried out for the controlling contracting authority or for other legal persons controlled by that contracting authority;
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 475 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) there is no private participation in the controlled legal person.deleted
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 488 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
A contracting authority shall be deemed to exercise over a legal person a control similar to that which it exercises over its own departments within the meaning of point (a) of the first subparagraph where it exercises a decisive influence over both strategic objectives and significant decisions of the controlled legal person.deleted
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 492 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 also applies where a controlled entity which is a contracting authority awards a contract to its controlling entity, or to another legal person controlled by the same contracting authority, provided that there is no private participation in the legal person being awarded the public contract.deleted
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 500 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. A contracting authority, which does not exercise over a legal person control within the meaning of paragraph 1, may nevertheless award a public contract without applying this Directive to a legal person which it controls jointly with other contracting authorities, where the following conditions are fulfilled: (a) the contracting authorities exercise jointly over the legal person a control which is similar to that which they exercise over their own departments; (b) at least 90 % of the activities of that legal person are carried out for the controlling contracting authorities or other legal persons controlled by the same contracting authorities; (c) there is no private participation in the controlled legal person. For the purposes of point (a), contracting authorities shall be deemed to jointly control a legal person where the following cumulative conditions are fulfilled: (a) the decision-making bodies of the controlled legal person are composed of representatives of all participating contracting authorities; (b) those contracting authorities are able to jointly exert decisive influence over the strategic objectives and significant decisions of the controlled legal person; (c) the controlled legal person does not pursue any interests which are distinct from that of the public authorities affiliated to it; (d) the controlled legal person does not draw any gains other than the reimbursement of actual costs from the public contracts with the contracting authorities.deleted
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 600 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
However, in the case of public service and public works contracts as well as public supply contracts covering in addition services or siting and installation operations, legal persons may be required to indicate, in the tender or the request to participate, the names and relevant professional qualification levels of the staff to be responsible for the performance of the contract in question.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 609 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Unless otherwise provided in this Directive or in the national law concerning access to information, and without prejudice to the obligations relating to the advertising of awarded contracts and to the information to candidates and tenderers set out in Articles 48 and 53 of this Directive, the contracting authority shall behave with utmost good faith and shall not disclose information forwarded to it by economic operators which they have designated as confidential, including, but not limited to, technical or trade secrets and the confidential aspects of tenders.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 666 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – point c
(c) with regard to knowledge-based services or supplies, where the technical specifications cannot be established with sufficient precision with reference to any of the standards, European technical approvals, Common technical specifications or technical references within the meaning of points 2 to 5 of Annex VIII;
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 689 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The minimum time limit for the receipt of tenders shall be 4052 days from the date on which the contract notice was sent.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 701 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The minimum time limit for receipt of requests to participate shall be 307 days from the date on which the contract notice or, where a prior information notice is used as a means of calling for competition, the invitation to confirm interest is sent.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 703 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. Only those economic operators inviselected by the contracting authority following their assessment of the requested information may submit a tender. Contracting authorities may limit the number of suitable candidates to be inviselected to participate in the procedure in accordance with Article 64.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 707 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The minimum time limit for the receipt of tenders shall be 3540 days from the date on which the invitation to tender is sent.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 709 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Where contracting authorities have published a prior information notice which is not used as a means of calling for competition, the minimum time limit for the receipt of tenders as laid down in the second subparagraph of paragraph 2 of this Article may be shortened to 15, as a general rule, be shortened to 36 days, but under no circumstances to less than 22 days, provided that all of the following conditions are fulfilled:
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 710 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) it was sent for publication between 452 days and 12 months before the date on which the contract notice was sent.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 721 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
In the contract notice or in the invitation to confirm interest contracting authorities shall describe the procurement and the minimum requirements to be met and specify the award criteria so as to enable economic operators to identify the nature and scope of the procurement and decide whether to request to participate in the negotiations. In the technical specifications, contracting authorities shall specify which parts thereof define the minimum requirements.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 730 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
3. Contracting authorities shall negotiate with tenderers the tenders submitted by them to improve the content of the offers in order to better correspond to the award criteria andhe tenderers the content of the tender, subject to the minimum requirements referred to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 1.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 765 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 28 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Contracting authorities shall behave with utmost good faith and shall not reveal to the other participants solutions proposed or other confidential information communicated by a candidate participating in the dialogue without its agreement. Such agreement shall not take the form of a general waiver but shall be given with reference to the intended communication of specific solutions or other specific confidential information.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 773 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 28 – paragraph 8
8. The contracting authorities mayshall specify prizes or payments to the participants in the dialogue.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 780 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 2
2. The partnership shall be structured in successive stages following the sequence of steps in the research and innovation process, possibly up to the manufacturing of the supply or the provision of the services. It shall provide for intermediate targets to be attained by the partner and provide for payment of the remuneration in appropriate instalments. Based on those targets, the contracting authority may decide after each stage to terminate the partnership and launch a new procurement procedure for the remaining phases, provided that it has acquired the relevant intellectual property rights.
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 782 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
1. The contract shall be awarded in accordance with the rules for a competitive procedure with negotiation set out in Article 27.deleted
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1580 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex 14 – part 2 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) a list of the principal deliveries effected or the main services provided over at the most the past three years, with the sums, dates and recipients, whether public or private, involved. Where necessary in order to ensure an adequate level of competition, contracting authorities may indicate that evidence of relevant supplies or services delivered or performed more than threfive years before will be taken into account;
2012/07/12
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 24 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Directive 2005/36/EC only applies to professionals who want to pursue the same profession in another Member State. There are cases where the activities concerned are part of a profession with a larger scope of activities in the host Member State. If the differences between the fields of activity are so large that in reality a full programme of education and training is required from the professional to compensate for shortcomings and if the professional so requests, a host Member State should under these particular circumstances grant partial access. However, in case of overriding reasons of general interest, such as in the case of a doctor of medicine or other health professionals, a Member State should be able to refuse partial accessa Member State should be able to refuse partial access. Partial access should not be granted for professions providing health services or otherwise related to public health.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) Whilst the Directive already provides for detailed obligations for Member States to exchange information, such obligations should be reinforced. Member States should not only react to request for information but also alert other Member States in a proactive manner. Such alert system should be similar to that of Directive 2006/123/EC. A specific alert mechanism is however necessary for health professionals benefiting from automatic recognitionregulated under Directive 2005/36/EC. This should also apply to veterinary surgeons unless the Member States have already triggered the alert mechanism provided for in Directive 2006/123/EC. All Member States should be alerted if a professional due to a disciplinary action or criminalis temporarily or permanently removed from the right to practice or if any restrictions to practice or convicdition is no longer entitled to move to anothers on the right to practice have been imposed in their home or host Member State. This alert should be activated through the IMI regardless of whether the professional has exercised any of the rights under Directive 2005/36/EC or of whether he has applied for recognition of his professional qualifications through the issuance of a European Professional Card or through any other method provided for by that Directive. The alert procedure should comply with Union law on the protection of personal data and other fundamental rights.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) In order to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of Directive 2005/36/EC, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of updating of Annex I, setting the criteria for the calculation of fees related to the European Professional Card, establishing the details of the documentation necessary for the European Professional Card, the adaptations of the list of activities set out in Annex IV, the adaptations of points 5.1.1 to 5.1.4, 5.2.2, 5.3.2, 5.3.3, 5.4.2, 5.5.2, 5.6.2 and 5.7.1 of Annex V, clarifying the knowledge and skills for medical doctors, nurses responsible for general care, dental practitioners, veterinary surgeons, midwives, pharmacists and architects, adapting the minimum periods of training for specialist medical trainings and specialist dental training, the inclusion in point 5.1.3 of Annex V of new medical specialities, the amendments to the list set out in points 5.2.1, 5.3.1, 5.4.1, 5.5.1 and 5.6.1 of Annex V, inclusion in point 5.3.3 of Annex V of new dental specialities, specifying the conditions of application of common training frameworks, and specifying the conditions of application of common training tests. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expertrepresentation and consultation including experts at both European and national level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing- up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely, transparent and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30 a (new)
(30 a) This Directive is without prejudice to measures necessary to ensure a high level of health and consumer protection.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – point ii
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point l
(l) “lifelong learning”: all general education, vocational education and training, non-formal education and informal learning undertaken throughout life, resulting in an improvement in competencies (knowledge, skills and competenc, attitudes and values).
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 4a – paragraph 7
7. Any fees which applicants may incur in relation to administrative procedures to issue a European Professional Card shall be reasonable, proportionate and commensurate with the costs incurred by the home and host Member States and shall not act as a disincentive to apply for a European Professional Card not representing any additional cost for the individual professional. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 58a concerning the setting of criteria for the calculation and distribution of fees.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
1. The competent authority of the home Member State shall verify the application, create and validate a European Professional Card within two weeks from the date it receives a complete application. It shall inform the applicant and the Member State in which the applicant envisages to provide services, of the validation of the European Professional Card. The transmission of the validation information to the host Member States concerned shall constitute the declaration provided for in Article 7. The host Member State may not require a further declaration under Article 7 for the following two years, unless overriding concerns are expressed.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 4d – paragraph 2
2. In the cases referred to in Article 16, 21 and 49a, a host Member State shall decide on validation of a European Professional Card under paragraph 1 within one month as from the date of receipt of the European Professional Card transmitted by the home Member State. In case of justified doubts, the host Member State may request additional information from the home Member State. That request shall not suspend the period of one month period.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 4f – paragraph 2
2. Partial access may be rejected if such rejection is justified by an overrshall not be granted for professions providing rheason of general interest, such as public health, it would secure the attainment of the objective pursued and it would not go beyond what is strictly necessarylth services or otherwise related to public health.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) In order to promote the free movement of professionals, while ensuring a more efficient and transparent recognition of qualifications it is necessary to provide for a European Professional Card. In particular that card is necessary to facilitate temporary mobility and recognition under the automatic recognition system, as well as to promote a simplified recognition process under the general system. The card should be issued upon request from a professional and after submission of necessary documents and completion of related review and verification procedures by the competent authorities. The functioning of the card should be supported by the Internal Market Information System (IMI) established by Regulation (EU) No […] on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System23 . This mechanism should help enhance synergies and trust among competent authorities, while at the same time eliminating duplication of administrative work for the authorities and creating more transparency and certainty for professionals. The process for the application and issuing of the card should be clearly structured and incorporate safeguards and the corresponding rights of appeal for the applicant. The card and the related workflow within IMI should ensure the integrity, authenticity and confidentiality of the data stored and avoid unlawful and unauthorised access to information contained therein. The recognition of professional qualifications under the professional card should respect the principle that the responsibility to recognise a professional qualification lies exclusively with the host Member State.
2012/10/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 132 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 22
For the purposes of point (b) of the first paragraph, as from [insert date - the day after the date set out in first subparagraph of paragraph 1 of Article 3] and every five years thereafter, the competent authorities in Member States shall submit publicly available reports to the Commission and to the other Member States on their continuing education and training procedures related to doctors of medicine, medical specialists, nurses responsible for general care, dental practitioners, specialised dental practitioners, veterinary surgeons, midwives and pharmacists. Member States must have a system in place to ensure health professionals regularly update their competencies through Continuing Professional Development.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 – point b
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 31 – paragraph 2
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 58a concerning amendments to the list set out in point 5.2.1 of Annex V with a view to adapting it to the educational, scientific and technical progress, and the development and evolution of the nursing profession".
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 138 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 – point c
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 31 – paragraph 3
The training of nurses responsible for general care shall comprise at least three years of study, which may also be expressed with the equivalent ECTS credits, consisting of at least 4 600 hours of theoretical and clinical training, the duration of the theoretical training representing at least one third and the duration of the clinical training at least one half of the minimum duration of the training. Member States may grant partial exemptions to persons who have received part of their training on courses which are of at least an equivalent level.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point a
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 34 – paragraph 2
Basic dental training shall comprise a total of at least five years of full-time theoretical and practical study, which may also be expressed with the equivalent of 300 ECTS credits, and shall consist of at least 5000 hours of full-time theoretical and practical study, comprising at least the programme described in Annex V, point 5.3.1 and given in a university, in a higher institute providing training recognised as being of an equivalent level or under the supervision of a university.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 35
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 49a – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the knowledge, skills and competences for such common training framework shall refer to the levels of the European Qualifications Framework, as defined in Annex II of the Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning(*);Article 11 of this Directive; Article 11 shall not be applicable to the professions regulated under Annex V point 1.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 149 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 35
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 49a – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the knowledge, skills and competences for such common training framework shall refer to the levels of the European Qualifications Framework, as defined in Annex II of the Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning(*);Article 11 of this Directive.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 150 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 35
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 49a – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) the profession concerned is neither covered by another common training framework nor regulated already under Chapter III of Title III;, or Article 10, point b.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 38
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
A Member State shall ensure that any controlverifications of the knowledge of a language are carried out by a competent authority after the decisions referred to in Articles 4d, 7(4) and 51(3) have been taken and if there is a serious and concrete doubt about the professional's sufficient language knowledge in respect of the professional activities this person intends to pursue.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) Whilst the Directive already provides for detailed obligations for Member States to exchange information, such obligations should be reinforced. Member States should not only react to request for information but also alert other Member States in a proactive manner. Such alert system should be similar to that of Directive 2006/123/EC. A specific alert mechanism is however necessary for health professionals benefiting from automatic recognitionregulated under Directive 2005/36/EC. This should also apply to veterinary surgeons unless the Member States have already triggered the alert mechanism provided for in Directive 2006/123/EC. All Member States should be alerted if a professional due to a disciplinary action or criminalis temporarily or permanently removed from the right to practice or if any restrictions to practice or convicdition is no longer entitled to move to anothers on the right to practice have been imposed in their home or host Member State. This alert should be activated through the IMI regardless of whether the professional has exercised any of the rights under Directive 2005/36/EC or of whether he has applied for recognition of his professional qualifications through the issuance of a European Professional Card or through any other method provided for by that Directive. The alert procedure should comply with Union law on the protection of personal data and other fundamental rights.
2012/10/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 163 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 38
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In case of professions with public health and patient safety implications, Member States may confer to the competent authorities the right to carry out language checking covering all professionals concerned if it is expressly requested by the national health care system, or in case of self-employed professionals not affiliated to the nationals health care system, by representative national patient organisationsverify the language knowledge necessary to carry out the specific role. Language verification undertaken by the competent authority shall not prevent an employer from carrying out additional checks, as appropriate.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 38
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Any language control shall be limited to the knowledge of one of the official languages of the Member State according to the choice of the person concerned, itknowledge verification shall be proportionate to the activity to be pursued and free of charge for the professional. The person concerned shall be allowed to appeal such controls before national courts.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 55a
With a view to grant access to a regulated profession, the home Member State shall recognisetake proportionate account of the remunerated traineeship pursued in another Member State and certified by a competent authority of that Member State.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 172 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 42
1. The competent authorities of a Member State shall inform the competent authorities of all other Member States and the Commission about the identity of a professional who has been prohibitedtemporarily or permanently removed from the right to practice or if any restrictions to practice or conditions on right to practice have been imposed in their home or host Member State by national authorities or courts from pursuing, even temporarily, on the territory of that Member State the following professional activities:
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 42
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 56a – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) nurses recognised under the scope of Article 10;
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 42
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 56a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The information referred to in the first subparagraph shall be sent at the latest within three days from the date of adoption ofwhen the decision prohibiting the professional concerned from permanently exercising a professional activity is legally binding.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 44
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 57a – paragraph 4
4. All procedures shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2006/123/EC relating to the points of single contact. Any time limits for Member States to be complied with procedures or formalities set out in this Directive shall commence at the point when an complete application has been submitted by a citizen tovia a point of single contact to the competent authority.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 179 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 44
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 57a–paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. The functioning of points of single contact shall be without prejudice to the allocation of functions and powers among the authorities within national systems.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 181 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 46
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 58 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee on the recognition of professional qualifications, ensuring appropriate representation and consultation at both European and national expert level. That Committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 501 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point a
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 34 – paragraph 2
Basic dental training shall comprise a total of at least five years of full-time theoretical and practical study, which may also be expressed with the equivalent of 300 ECTS credits, and shall consist of at least 5000 hours of full-time theoretical and practical study, comprising at least the programme described in Annex V, point 5.3.1 and given in a university, in a higher institute providing training recognised as being of an equivalent level or under the supervision of a university.
2012/10/17
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 574 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 35
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 49 a – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the knowledge, skills and competences for such common training framework shall refer to the levels of the European Qualifications Framework, as defined in Annex II of the Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning(*);Article 11 of this Directive. Article 11 shall not be applicable to the professions regulated under Annex V point 1.
2012/10/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 602 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 38
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 53 – paragraph 2
A Member State shall ensure that any controlverifications of the knowledge of a language are carried out by a competent authority after the decisions referred to in Articles 4d, 7(4) and 51(3) have been taken and if there is a serious and concrete doubt about the professional's sufficient language knowledge in respect of the professional activities this person intends to pursue.
2012/10/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 610 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 38
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In case of professions with patient safety implications, Member States may confer to the competent authorities the right to carry out language checking covering all professionals concerned if it is expressly requested by the national health care system, or in case of self-employed professionals not affiliated to the nationals health care system, by representative national patient organisator to request evidence attesting knowledge of the language of the host Member States from all professionals concerned following recognition of the professional qualification but before granting access to the professions.
2012/10/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 620 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 38
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Any language control shall be limited to the knowledge of one of the official languages of the Member State according to the choice of the person concerned, itknowledge verification shall be proportionate to the activity to be pursued and free of charge for the professional. The person concerned shall be allowed to appeal such controls before national courts.
2012/10/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 641 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 55 a
With a view to grant access to a regulated profession, the home Member State shall recognisetake proportionate account of the remunerated traineeship pursued in another Member State and certified by a competent authority of that Member State.
2012/10/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 683 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 44 a (new)
Directive 2005/36/EC
Recital 44
(44a) This Directive is without prejudice to measures necessary to ensure a high level of health and consumer protection.
2012/10/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 690 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 44
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 57 a – paragraph 4
4. All procedures shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2006/123/EC relating to the points of single contact. Any time limits for Member States to be complied with procedures or formalities set out in this Directive shall commence at the point when an complete application has been submitted by a citizen tovia a point of single contact to the competent authority.
2012/10/23
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 38 #

2011/0415(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The common set of rules and procedures should be consistent with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), which entered into forced for the Union on 22 January 2010 pursuant to Council decision 2010/48 of 26 November 2009 concerning the conclusion, by the Community, of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities1, and the European Disability Strategy2. ______________ 1 OJ L 23, 27.1.2010, p. 35. 2 COM(2010)0636.
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #

2011/0415(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Appropriate screening on the implementation of the UNCRPD, including accessibility, non discrimination and support of disabled people's organizations, shall be undertaken at project level. The involvement of interested stakeholders shall be ensured.
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 55 #

2011/0415(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Support measures shall ensure that accessibility criteria for disabled people are observed.
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 62 #

2011/0415(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) Global grants can ensure small size projects for vulnerable groups.
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 69 #

2011/0415(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point e a (new)
(ea) Ensure participation of civil society, including organizations of people with disabilities as stated in Article 4.3 of UNCRPD. Capacity building shall be promoted to ensure full participation.
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 82 #

2011/0415(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 8
8. Tenderers, applicants and candidates who have been awarded contracts shall respect applicable environmental legislation including multilateral environmental agreements as well as, internationally agreed core labour standards and the principles of non discrimination and accessibility for people with disabilities.
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 96 #

2011/0415(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Reporting on the Human rights actions and specifically in civil society and implementation of the UNCRPD.
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 92 #

2011/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) The actions should be consistent with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) that entered into forced for the EU on 22nd January 2010, the Council decision (2010/48), the EU ACP Joint Parliamentary Assembly Resolution on the Inclusion of People with Disabilities in Developing Countries, and with and the European Disability Strategy.
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 94 #

2011/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) enhancing the respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms, as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international and regional human rights instruments, including the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and strengthening their protection, promotion and monitoring, mainly through support to relevant civil society organisations, human rights defenders and victims of repression and abuse;
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 108 #

2011/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) promoting freedom of association and assembly, unhindered movement of persons, freedom of opinion and expression, including artistic and cultural expression, free press and independent pluralistic media, both traditional and ICT based, internet freedom and measures to combat administrative obstacles as well as physical barriers hindering accessibility to the exercise of these freedoms, including the fight against censorship;
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 120 #

2011/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a – point vi a (new)
(via) promoting the equal participation of people with disabilities in social, economic and political life, and supporting equality of opportunity non discrimination, and the participation and political representation;
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 125 #

2011/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) the abolition of the death penalty, prevention of torture, ill-treatment and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, including forced institutionalization of disabled people, and rehabilitation of victims of torture;
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 136 #

2011/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point viii
(viii) the rights of persons with disabilities, as proclaimed in the Convention on the Rights of the Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol;
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 144 #

2011/0412(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) fostering cooperation by civil society with international and regional intergovernmental organisations, and supporting civil society activities, including capacity building of NGOs representing vulnerable groups such as persons with disabilities and women, aimed at promoting and monitoring the implementation of international and regional instruments concerning human rights, justice, the rule of law and democracy;
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 72 #

2011/0405(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) The Union seeks to promote, develop and consolidate the values of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, principles of equality and non discrimination, participation of civil society and nongovernmental organizations and the rule of law on which it is founded through dialogue and cooperation with third countries.
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 133 #

2011/0405(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) Gender equality and, anti- discrimination and accessibility for disabled people should be a cross-cutting objective in all actions undertaken under this Regulation.
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 168 #

2011/0405(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) achieving progressive integration into the Union internal market and enhanced sector and cross-sectoral co-operation including through legislative approximation and regulatory convergence towards Union and other relevant international standards, related institution building and investments, notably in interconnectionconventions and standards, including the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, related institution building and investments, notably in interconnections and full accessibility for people with reduced mobility and disabilities;
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 218 #

2011/0405(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Union support provided under this Regulation to each partner country shall be differentiated in form and amounts according to the partner country's commitment to reforms and its progress in implementing these reforms. Such differentiation shall reflect the level of ambition of the country's partnership with the Union, its progress in building deep and sustainable democracy, its progress in implementing agreed reform objectives, the country's needs and capacities, its progress in participation of civil society and non governmental organisations and the potential impact of Union support.
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 226 #

2011/0405(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Union support under this Regulation shall, in principle, be established in partnership with the beneficiaries. The partnership shall involve as appropriate, national, regional and local authorities, other stakeholders, civil society, non governmental organizations (including vulnerable groups such as disabled people) social partners and other non-state actors in preparing, implementing and monitoring Union support.
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 257 #

2011/0405(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 7 – indent 3 a (new)
- not compliance with international legally binding instruments concluded by the Union such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
2012/06/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 112 #

2011/0404(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) The actions should be consistent with United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) that entered into forced for the Union on 22nd January 2011, Council Decision No 2010/48 and the European Disability Strategy. The IPA should reflect the Union's commitment and ambitions of the external relations chapter of the Union's Disability Strategy, where it promotes the rights of people with disabilities in the Union's enlargement programmes.
2012/06/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 118 #

2011/0404(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii). promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, enhanced respect for minority rights, promotion of gender equality, social inclusion and the rights of persons with disabilities, non- discrimination and freedom of the press, and promotion of good neighbourly relations;
2012/06/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 138 #

2011/0404(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point v
(v) development of physical capital, the improvement of connections with Union and regional networks, including accessible environment to increase physical mobility of people with reduced mobility.
2012/06/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 161 #

2011/0404(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with disabilities, including the principles of non discrimination, accessibility for persons with reduced mobility, de-institutionalization and participation of representative NGOs, shall be ensured under all policy areas. The building of the capacities of vulnerable groups enabling them to participate in and access the instrument shall also be ensured.
2012/06/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 10 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) securing sufficient supplies of safe and high quality food and other bio-based products, by developing productive and resource-efficient primary production systems (including nutrient, energy, carbon, water and soil use efficiency) and by making agricultural bio-waste an asset used at its full potential, reducing food waste along the whole food supply-chain from primary production to final consumption point, fostering related ecosystem services, along side competitive and low carbon supply chains;
2012/06/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 18 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – Part II – point 1 – point 1.4 – point 1.4.2 – title
1.4.2. Biotechnology-based industrialproducts and processes
2012/06/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 20 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – Part II – point 1 – point 1.4 – point 1.4.2
The objective is twofold: on the one hand, enabling the European industry (e.g. chemical, health, mining, energy, pulp and paper, textile, starch, crop production and food processing) to develop new products and processes meeting agricultural, industrial and societal demands; and competitive and enhanced biotechnology- based alternatives to replace established ones; on the other hand, harnessing the potential of biotechnology for detecting, monitoring, preventing and removing pollution. It includes R&I on enzymatic and metabolic pathways, bio- processes design, advanced fermentation, up- and down-stream processing, gaining insight on the dynamics of microbial communities. It will also encompass the development of prototypes for assessing the techno- economic feasibility of the developed products and processes.
2012/06/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 32 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – Part III – point 2 – point 2.1 – title
2.1. Sustainable and competitive agriculture and forestry
2012/06/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 33 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – Part III – point 2 – point 2.1
Appropriate knowledge, knowledge transfers, tools, services and innovations are necessary to support more productive, resource-efficient and resilient agriculture and forestry systems that supply sufficient food, feed, biomass and other raw- materials and deliver ecosystems services while at the same time supporting the development of thriving rural livelihoods and rural innovative SMEs. Research and innovation will provide options for integrating agronomic, climatic and environmental goals into more sustainable production, thus: increasing productivity and resource efficiency of agriculture; reducing soil erosion and agricultural greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions; reducing leaching of nutrients from cultivated lands into terrestrial and aquatic environments; decreasing dependence from international plant derived protein imports to Europe; increasing the level of biodiversity in primary production systems.
2012/06/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 35 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – Part III – point 2 – point 2.1 – point 2.1.1 – title
2.1.1. Increasing production efficiency and coping with and mitigating climate change, while ensuring sustainability and resilience
2012/06/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 37 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – Part III – point 2 – point 2.1 – point 2.1.1 – paragraph 1
Activities will enhance productivity as well as the adaptive capacity of plants, animals and production systems to cope with rapidly changing environmental/climatic conditions and increasingly scarce natural resources. The resulting innovations and their transfer to all economic actors involved will help to move towards a low energy, low emission and low waste economy, along the entire food and feed supply chain. In addition to contributing to food security, new opportunities will be created for the use of biomass, bio-waste and agricultural and forestry residues and by-products from agriculture and forestry for a wide range of non-food applications (in particular energy and chemistry).
2012/06/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 38 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I– Part III – point 2 – point 2.1 – point 2.1.1 – paragraph 2
Multi-disciplinary approaches and inter- sector synergies will be sought to improve the performance of plants, animals, micro- organisms, while ensuring efficient resource use (water, soil, nutrients, energy) and the ecological integrity of rural areas. Emphasis will be placed on integrated and diverse production systems and innovative agronomic practices, including the use of precision technologies and ecological intensification approaches to benefit both conventional and organicall types of agriculture. Genetic improvement of plants and animals for adaptation and productivity traits will call for all appropriated conventional and modern breeding approaches and for a better use of genetic resources. Due attention will be given to on-farm soil management for increasing soil fertility as a basis for crop and animal productivity and sustainable yields increase. Animal and plant health will be promoted and integrated disease/pest control measures will be further developed. Strategies for the eradication of animal diseases including zoonoses will be tackled along with research on antimicrobial resistance. Studying the effects of practices on animal welfare will help meet societal concerns. The above listed areas will be underpinned by more fundamental research to address relevant biological questions as well as to support the development and implementation of Union policies.
2012/06/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 42 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – Part III – point 2 – point 2.1 – point 2.1.2
Agriculture and forestry are unique systems delivering commercial products but also wider societal public goods (including cultural and recreational value) and important ecological services such as functional and in-situ biodiversity, pollination, water regulation, landscape, erosion reduction and carbon sequestration / GHG mitigation. Research activities will support the provisions of these public goods and services, through the delivery of management solutions, decision-support tools and the assessment of their non- market value. Specific i, the development of indicators to assist the appropriate measurement of the results achieved though climate change mitigation activities undertaken by farmers, and the assessment of their non- market value. A system for calculating the financial value of specific public goods and services provided by farmers must also be developed, since increasingly targeted 'greening' measures will play a more prominent role in agricultural policy in coming years. Issues to be dealt with include the identification of farming/forest systems and landscape patterns likely to achieve these goaloptimise the provision of public goods and services. Shifts in the active management of agricultural systems - including the use of technologies and change of practices, in particular soil nutrients management - will increase GHG mitigation and the adaptive capacity of the agriculture sector to the adverse effects of climate change.
2012/06/11
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 25 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part II – point 1 – point 1.4.2 – paragraph 1
Powered by the expansion of the knowledge of living systems, biotechnology is set to deliver a stream of new applications and to strengthen the Union's industrial base and its innovation capacity. Examples of the rising importance of biotechnology are in industrial applications including bio- chemicals, of which the market share is estimated to increase by up to 12 %-20 % of chemical production by 2015, as well as agricultural applications including crop production, which is the starting point of the food production value-chain and bio- economy as a whole. A number of the so- called twelve rules of Green Chemistry are also addressed by biotechnology, due to the selectivity and efficiency of bio-systems. The possible economic burdens for Union enterprises can be reduced by harnessing the potential of biotechnology processes and bio-based products to reduce CO2 emissions, estimated to range from between 1 to 2.5 billion tons CO2 equivalent per year by 2030.In Europe's biopharmaceutical sector, already some 20 % of the current medicines are derived from biotechnology, with up to 50 % of new medicines. Biotechnology also opens new avenues for exploiting the huge potential of marine resources for producing innovative industrial, health and environmental applications. The emerging sector of marine (blue) biotechnology has been predicted to grow by 10 % a year.
2012/06/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 27 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part II – point 1 – point 1.4.3 – point b – introductory part
(b) Biotechnology-based industrialproducts and processes
2012/06/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 31 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part II – point 1 – point 1.4.3 – point b
Developing industrial biotechnology for competitive industrial products and processes (e.g. chemical, health, mining, energy, pulp and paper, textile, starch, crop production and food processing) and its environmental dimension.
2012/06/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 38 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part III – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1
The specific objective is to secure sufficient supplies of safe and high quality food and other bio-based products, by developing productive and resource- efficient primary production systems, fostering related ecosystem services, along side competitive and low carbon supply chains. This will accelerate the transition to a sustainable competitive European bio- economy.
2012/06/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 40 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part III – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 2
Over the coming decades, Europe will be challenged by increased competition for limited and finite natural resources (in particular water, land, and fossil carbon sources), by the effects of climate change, in particular on primary production systems (agriculture, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture) and by the need to provide a sustainable, safe and secure food supply for the European and an increasing global population. A 70 % increase of the world food supply is estimated to be required to feed the 9 billion global population by 2050. Agriculture accounts for about 10 % of Union greenhouse gases emissions, and while declining in Europe, mainly due to improved production efficiency and reduced numbers in livestock in some areas, global emissions from agriculture are projected to increase up to 20 % by 2030. Furthermore, Europe will need to ensure sufficient supplies of raw materials, energy and industrial products, under conditions of decreasing fossil carbon resources (oil and liquid gas production expected to decrease by about 60 % by 2050), while maintaining its competitiveness. Bio-waste (estimated at up to 138 million tonnes per year in the Union, of which up to 40 % is land-filled) represents a huge problem and cost, despite its high potential added value. For example, an estimated 30 % of all food produced in developed countries is discarded. Major changes are needed to reduce this amount by 50 % in the Union by 2030from primary production to final consumption points along the whole food supply-chain are needed to reduce this amount by 50 % in the Union by 2030. and further initiatives are needed to turn agricultural bio-waste into an asset. In addition, national borders are irrelevant in the spread of animal and plant pests and diseases, including zoonotic diseases, and food borne pathogens. While effective national prevention measures are needed, action at Union level is essential for ultimate control and the effective running of the single market. The challenge is complex, affects a broad range of interconnected sectors and requires further inter-sector synergies and a plurality of approaches.
2012/06/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 46 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part III – point 2 – point 2.3 – point a – introductory part
(a) Sustainable and competitive agriculture and forestry
2012/06/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 48 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part III – point 2 – point 2.3 – point a
The aim is to supply sufficient food, feed, biomass and other raw-materials, while safeguarding natural resources and enhancing ecosystems services, including coping with and mitigating climate change. The activities shall focus on more sustainable and productive agriculture and forestry systems which are both resource- efficient (including nutrient and energy efficiency and low-carbon targets) and resilient, while at the same time developing of services, concepts and policies for thriving rural livelihoods and rural innovative SMEs. Knowledge development capacity and innovation transfers in agriculture shall aim at reversing the continuous decrease of the yield growth potential in Europe, and create a virtuous cycle towards achieving a sustainable intensification of Union agriculture production.
2012/06/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 54 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part III – point 2 – point 2.3 – point d
The aim is the promotion of low carbon, resource efficient, sustainable and competitive European bio-based industrie (including nutrient, energy, carbon, water and soil use efficiency), sustainable and competitive European bio-based industries, while making bio-waste an asset used at its full potential. It is vital to create a closed circuit between urban and rural areas. The activities shall focus on fostering the bio-economy by transforming conventional industrial processes and products into bio- based resource and energy efficient ones, the development of integrated second and third generation biorefineries, utilising biomass from primaand other residues from primary agricultural and forestry production, biowaste and bio- based industry by- products, and opening new marketthrough efficient transformation of bio-waste in urban areas into agricultural inputs. This will foster new markets and create potential new revenue streams for primary producers through supporting standardisation, certification schemes, regulatory and demonstration/field trial activities and others, while taking into account the implication of the bio-economy on land use and land use changes.
2012/06/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 21 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing for the period 2014 to 2020 the Equality, Rights and Citizenship Programme
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Citizens should be able to exercise fully the rights deriving from the citizenship of the Union and from international Conventions that the EU has acceded to. They should be able to exercise their right to move and reside freely in the Union, their right to vote for and stand as a candidate in European Parliament and municipal elections, their right to consular protection and their right to petition the European Parliament. They should feel at ease about living, travelling and working in another Member State, trusting that their rights are protected, no matter where in the Union they happen to be, and that access for persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others is ensured.
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) Non-Pursuant to the Articles 10 and 19 of the TFEU, the Union shall aim to combat discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation and equality between women and men are values common to the Member States. Combating all forms of discrimination is an onmainstream equality. Non-discrimination is also enshrined in Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Combating all forms of discrimination and the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities derived from the accession of the EU to the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities are on-going goals which requires coordinated action, including by the allocation of funding. Pursuant to Articles 2 and 3 (3) of the Article 8 of TFEU, equality between women and men is a fundamental value and objective of the EU and the EU should promote gender equality in all its activities. Equality between women and men is also enshrined in Article 23 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Promoting gender equality across the EU is done through a dual approach of specific actions and effective gender mainstreaming in both policies and budgetary allocations.
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The Communication from the Commission on Europe 20207 sets out a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Supporting and promoting the rights of persons within the Union, tackling discrimination and inequapromoting equality between women and men, tackling discrimination and inequalities, protecting the rights of persons with disabilities and promoting citizenship contribute to the promotion of the specific objectives and flagship initiatives of the Europe 2020 Strategy.
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
(13 a) Many non-governmental organisations (NGOs) active at various levels can make an important contribution at European level through European representative networks of rights-holders which assist in developing policy orientations relating to the general objectives of the Programme.
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) to promote equality between women and men, including through combating violence against women, children and other vulnerable persons, and ensuring that a gender equality perspective is taken into account in defining and implementing of all the policies and activities of the Union;
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) to enhance the respect of the rights of the child and in particular fight against domestic violence;
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. The indicators to measure the achievement of the objectives set out in paragraph 1 shall be, inter alia, the European perception ofqualitative and quantitative data collected, at European level, on the respect, exercise and implementation of these rights and the number of complaints.
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2011/0344(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) promoting transnational cooperation and building up of mutual knowledge and mutual trust among all involved stakeholders, networks and non- governmental organisations;
2012/07/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 174 #

2011/0308(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – paragraph 3
3. ‘Government’ means any national, regional or local authority of a Member State or of a third country. It includes a department, agency or undertaking controlled by that authority as laid down in Article 23 (1) to (6) of this Directive. This will guarantee EU citizens the same level of accountability that would be available to their counterparts globally.
2012/05/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 181 #

2011/0308(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – paragraph 4
4. ‘Project’ is equivalent to a specific operational reporting unit at should be considered equivalent to the contract, licence, lease, concession or other lowest level within the undertaking at which regular internal management reports are prepared to monitor itsegal agreement which gives rise to a company's tax and revenue liabilities in each country where it operates. Where any payment liabilities are incurred on a different buasiness, reporting shall be on that basis.
2012/05/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 252 #

2011/0308(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 38 – paragraph 5
5. The report shall exclude any type of payments made to a government in a country where the public disclosure of this type of payment is clearly prohibited by the criminal legislation of that country. In such cases the undertaking shall state that it has not reported payments in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 3, and shall disclose the name of the government concerned.deleted
2012/05/09
Committee: JURI
Amendment 107 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The Union budget should finance CAP expenditure, including that on rural development, through both Funds either directly or in the context of shared management with the Member States. The types of measures that can be financed using those Funds should be specified. Retrospective changes to the terms of any measure should be avoided.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 124 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Union aid should be paid to beneficiaries in good time so that they may use it efficiently. A failure by the Member States to comply with the payment deadlines laid down in Union legislation could create serious difficulties for the beneficiaries and could jeopardise the Union's yearly budgeting. Therefore, expenditure made without respecting deadlines for payments should be excluded from Union financing. In order to respect the principle of proportionality, the Commission should be able to provide for exceptions to this general rule. This principle, laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 should be maintained and apply to both the EAGF and the EAFRD. If Member States pay late, they should add interests on the principal amount at their own cost to compensate the beneficiaries. Such a provision could create an incentive to Member States to better respect payment deadlines, and could give more assurance to beneficiaries to be paid in time, or at least to be compensated in case of late payment. The implementation of the qualifying projects under the EAFRD and efficiency in funding would be facilitated by establishing maximum coherence in interpreting regulations governing qualification for funds.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 149 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
(54) As regards Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy28 the provisions will only be operational under cross compliance when all Member States will have fully implemented them in particular with clear obligations for farmers. According to the Directive the requirements at farm level will be applied at the latest by 1 January 2013.deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 154 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
(55) As regards Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides29 the provisions will only be operational under cross compliance when all Member States will have fully implemented them in particular with clear obligations for farmers. According to the Directive the requirements at farm level will be progressively applied following a time schedule and in particular the general principles of integrated pest management will be applied at the latest by 1 January 2014.deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 164 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57
(57) The cross compliance system implies certain administrative constraints for both beneficiaries and national administrations since record keeping must be ensured, checks must be carried out and penalties have to be applied where necessary. Those penalties should be proportionate, effective and dissuasive. Such penalties should be without prejudice to other penalties laid down under other provisions of Union or national law. For the sake of consistency, it is appropriate to merge the relevant Union provisions into one single legal instrument. For farmers participating in the small farmers scheme referred to in Title V of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx[DP], the efforts to be made under the cross compliance system may be considered as exceeding the benefit of keeping those farmers under that system. For reasons of simplification, those farmers should therefore be exempted from cross compliance and in particular from its control system and from the risk of cross compliance penalties. However, that exemption should be without prejudice to the obligation to respect the applicable provisions of the sectoral legislation and to the possibility to be checked and to be imposed penalties under that legislation. Minor unintentional infringements associated with cross compliance inspections should not incur a penalty and instead a warning should be issued and compliance monitored at a future inspection.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 247 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the sustainable development of the economical activity of holdings other than those referred to in paragraph (2)(d)the small farms as defined by the Member States, of the farms participating in the small farmers scheme referred to in Title V of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx[DP] and of other holdings;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 248 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the sustainable development of the economical activity of holdings other than those referred to in paragraph (2)(d)the small farms as defined by the Member States, of the farms participating in the small farmers scheme referred to in Title V of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx[DP] and of other holdings;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 261 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(ba) the minimum requirements or actions in the field of climate change mitigation and adaptation, biodiversity, protection of water, animal and plant disease notification, and innovation, as laid down in Annex I to this Regulation.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 263 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(ba) the minimum requirements or actions in the field of climate change mitigation and adaptation, biodiversity, protection of water, animal and plant disease notification, and innovation, as laid down in Annex I to this Regulation.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 382 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 1
1. For any undue payment following the occurrence of irregularity or negligence, Member States shall request recovery from the beneficiary within one year of the first indic24 months after a control report or similar document, stationg that such an irregularity has taken place and shall record the corresponding amounts, has been approved and, where applicable, received by the paying agency or body responsible for the recovery. The corresponding amounts shall, at the time of the recovery request, be recorded in the debtors' ledger of the paying agency.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 385 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 1
1. For any undue payment following the occurrence of irregularity or negligence, Member States shall request recovery from the beneficiary within one year of the first indic24 months after a control report or similar document, stationg that such an irregularity has taken place and shall record the corresponding amounts, has been approved and, where applicable, received by the paying agency or body responsible for the recovery. The corresponding amounts shall, at the time of the recovery request, be recorded in the debtors' ledger of the paying agency.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 394 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
If recovery has not taken place within four years of the date of the recovery request, or within eight years where recovery is taken in the national courts, 50% of the financial consequences of non-recovery shall be borne by the Member State concerned, and 50% by the Union budget, without prejudice to the requirement that the Member State concerned must pursue recovery procedures in compliance with Article 60.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 399 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
If recovery has not taken place within four years of the date of the recovery request, or within eight years where recovery is taken in the national courts, 50% of the financial consequences of non-recovery shall be borne by the Member State concerned and 50% by the Union budget, without prejudice to the requirement that the Member State concerned must pursue recovery procedures in compliance with Article 60.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 405 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
However, if for reasons not attributable to the Member State concerned, recovery could not take place within the time limits specified in the first subparagraph, and the amount to be recovered exceeds €1 million, the Commission may, at the request of the Member State, extend the time limits by a maximum of 50% of the initial time limits.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 406 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
However, if for reasons not attributable to the Member State concerned, recovery could not take place within the time limits specified in the first subparagraph, and the amount to be recovered exceeds €1 million, the Commission may, at the request of the Member State, extend the time limits by a maximum of 50% of the initial time limits.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 528 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 88
[...]deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 532 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 89
Article 89 Other checks related to market measures 1. Member States shall take measures to ensure that the products referred to in Annex I to Regulation (EU) xxx/xxx [sCMO] which are not labelled in conformity with the provisions of that Regulation are not placed on, or is withdrawn from, the market. 2. Without prejudice to any specific provisions which may be adopted by the Commission, imports into the Union of the products specified in paragraph 1(a) and (b) of Article 129 of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx [sCMO] shall be subject to checks to determine whether the conditions provided for in paragraph 1 of that Article are met. 3. Member States shall carry out checks, based on a risk analysis, in order to verify whether products referred to in Annex I to Regulation (EU) xxx/xxx [sCMO] conform to the rules laid down in Section I of Chapter I of Title II of Part II of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx[sCMO] and shall apply administrative penalties as appropriate. 4. In order to protect Union funds and the identity, provenance and quality of Union wine, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 111 pertaining to: (a) the establishment of an analytical databank of isotopic data that will help detect fraud to be constructed on the basis of samples collected by Member States; and for rules on the Member States' own databanks; (b) rules on control bodies and the mutual assistance between them; (c) rules on the common use of Member States' findings; (d) rules on the application of penalties in the case of exceptional circumstances.deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 610 #

2011/0288(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall carry out on-the- spogive adequate notice of inspection when they carry out checks to verify whether a beneficiary complies with the obligations laid down in this Title.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 78 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) To ensure the sustainable development of rural areas, it is necessary to focus on a limited number of core priorities relating to knowledge transfer and innovation in agriculture, forestry and rural areas, the competitiveness of all types of agriculture and farm viability, safety measures and increased awareness of farm safety; food chain organisation and risk management in agriculture, restoring, preserving and enhancing ecosystems dependant on agriculture and forestry, resource efficiency and the shift towards a low carbon economy in the agricultural, food and forestry sectors, and promoting social inclusion, poverty reduction and the economic development of rural areas. In doing so account must be taken of the diversity of situations that affect rural areas with different characteristics or different categories of potential beneficiaries and the cross-cutting objectives of innovation, environment and climate change mitigation and adaptation. Mitigation action should relate to both limiting emissions in agriculture and forestry from key activities such as livestock production, fertilizer use and to preserving the carbon sinks and enhancing carbon sequestration with regard to land use, land use change and the forestry sector. The Union priority for rural development relating to knowledge transfer and innovation in agriculture, forestry and rural areas should apply horizontally in relation to the other Union priorities for rural development.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 111 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) Farm advisory services help farmers, forest holders and SMEs in rural areas to improve the sustainable management and overall performance of their holding or business. Therefore both the setting up of such services and the use of advice by farmers, forest holders and SMEs should be encouraged. In order to enhance the quality and effectiveness of the advice offered, provision should be made for the minimum qualifications and regular training of advisors. Farm advisory services, as provided for in Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU) No HR/2012 of […]14 should help farmers assess the performance of their agricultural holding and identify the necessary improvements as regards the statutory management requirements, good agricultural and environmental conditions, agricultural practices beneficial to the climate and the environment set out in Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU) No DP/2012 of […]15 , requirements or actions related to climate change mitigation and adaptation, biodiversity, protection of water, animal disease notification and innovation at least as laid down in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No HR/2012. Where relevant, advice should also cover occupational safety standards. Advice may also cover issues linked to the economic, agricultural and environmental performance of the holding or enterprise. Farm management and farm relief services should help farmers improve and facilitate management of their holding. Furthermore, in the context of the growing number of farm fatalities and accidents, farm advisory services should offer advice and guidance on improving farm safety measures and the safety of those working and living on farms.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 184 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) The LEADER approach for local development has, over a number of years, proven its utility in promoting the development of rural areas by fully taking into account the multi-sectoral needs for endogenous rural development through its bottom-up approach. LEADER should therefore be continued in the future and its application should remain compulsory for all rural development programmes. The added value of the LEADER approach is not limited to the projects undertaken and physical outputs, but also the bottom-up approach of an independent local action group can produce significant added value such as 'capacity-building' and 'empowering the local community' which is not achieved where decision-making is dominated by local authorities. 1 __________________ 1 as identified by the Special Report No. 5 2010 of the European Court of Auditors on the implementation of the LEADER approach for Rural Development
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 185 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
(40) Support to LEADER local development from the EAFRD should cover all aspects of the preparation and implementation of local development strategies and operation of local action groups in which decision-making is community-led and in partnership with other relevant actors, as well as cooperation among territories and groups which carry out bottom-up and community-led local development. In order to enable partners in rural areas not yet applying LEADER to test and prepare for the design and operation of a local development strategy a ‘LEADER start-up kit’ should also be financed. In order to ensure the efficient and effective use of EAFRD budgetary resources and the implementation of the LEADER approach, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the detailed definition of eligible animation costs for local action groups and for the purpose of adopting rules to ensure that Member States fully implement the community-led approach.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 233 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point t
(t) ‘short supply chain’: a supply chain involving a limited number of economic operators in direct selling, local markets and community supported agriculture, committed to co-operation, local economic development, and close geographical and social relations between producers and consumers;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 317 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) strengthening farm safety awareness and training;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 350 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
(a) facilitating restructuring of farms facing major structural problems, notably farms with a low degree of market participation, market-oriented farms in particular sectors and, farms in need of agricultural diversification; and where appropriate, the facilitation of land exchange;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 437 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
(a) facilitating diversification, creation of new small enterprises and job creation, especially utilising local or indigenous product, and job creation, such as small-scale food processing and marketing start-ups;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 445 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a a (new)
(a a) enhancing availability and accessibility of training courses, workshops and coaching on the relevant vocational training and skills in rural communities;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 447 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
(b) fostering local development, and, in particular, community-led local development in rural areas;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 571 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c – paragraph 1 – point v
(v) appropriate action is envisaged to simplify the implementation and running of the programme;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 599 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
In addition to tThe ex ante conditionalities referred to in Annex IV should apply only in so far as they are relevant to the objectives of a rural development programme. In addition , the general ex ante conditionalities established in Annex IV of Regulation (EU) No [CSF/2012] shall apply for the EAFRD.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 634 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the submission and approval of proposals for amendments to rural development programmes, within a definite timescale, including their entry into force and frequency of submission at a maximum of two per year during the programming period.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 733 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) where relevant, advice and information on improving farm safety measures and the safety of those working and living on farms and occupational safety standards based on Union legislation. .
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 804 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Information on and application to the scheme will be easily accessible and the process conducted in a timely and transparent manner without unnecessary administrative criteria and restrictions;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 945 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) annualone-off payments for farmers participating in the small farmers scheme established by Title V of Regulation (EU) No DP/2012 (hereafter ‘the small farmers scheme’) who permanently transfer their holding to another farmer.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 956 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) retirement payments for farmers who permanently transfer their holding to another farmer.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1063 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) investments by public bodies or local development organisations in recreational infrastructure, tourist information and sign- posting of touristic sites;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1119 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. Support under Article 22(1)(a) shall be granted to private land-owners and tenants, municipalities and their associations and shall cover the costs of establishment and an annual premium per hectare to cover the costs of agriculture income foregone and maintenance, including early and late cleanings, for a maximum period of tenhirty years.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1163 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3
3. Support shall be limited to the 100% maximum support rate laid down in Annex I.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1315 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5
5. Commitments under this measure shall be undertaken for a period of five to seven years. However, where necessary in order to achieve orIn the context of achieving and maintain theing EU environmental benefits sought, Member States may determine a longer period in their rural development programmes for particular types of commitments, including by means of providing for their annual extension after the termination of the initial periodobjectives, commitments under this measure shall be undertaken for a period of fourteen years with opt out provided at seven years stage'.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1325 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 6
6. Payments shall be granted annually and shall compensate beneficiaries for all or part of the additional costs and income foregone resulting from the commitments made. Where necessary they may also cover transaction costs to a value of up to 230% of the premium paid for the agri- environment-climate commitments. Where commitments are undertaken by groups of farmers, the maximum level shall be 30%.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1359 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Member States shall endeavour to provide farmers undertaking commitments under this measure with the knowledge and information required to implement them.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1453 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Areas other than those referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be eligible for payments under Article 32 if they are affected by specific constraints indicating natural handicap and where land management should be continued in order to conserve or improve the environment, maintain the countryside and preserve the tourist potential of the area or in order to protect the coastline.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1673 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) capacity building, training and networking with a view to preparing and implementing a community-led local development strategy.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1948 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) 80% for the measures referred to in Articles 15, 28, 29 and 36, for the LEADER local development referred to in Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No [CSF/2012] and for operations under Article 20(1)(a)(i). It may be increased to 90% for the programmes of less developed regions, the outermost regions and the smaller Aegean islands within the meaning of Regulation (EEC) No 2019/93;
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2081 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
ANNEX I – Article 24(3)
24(3) Establishment of agro- 80% Of the amount of eligible forestry systems investment for the establishment of agro-forestry systems Text amended 24(3) Establishment of agro- 100% Of the amount of eligible forestry systems investment for the establishment of agro-forestry systems
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 451 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) This Regulation should provide for the possibility of disposal of products bought in public intervention. Such measures should be taken in a way that avoids market disturbances and that, ensures equal access to goods and equal treatment of purchasers and enables produce to be made available for the scheme for food distribution to the most deprived in the Union.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 456 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) In order to ensure that private storage has the desired effect on the market, the power to adopt certain acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of measures for reducing the amount of aid to be paid where the quantity stored is lower than the contracted quantity; and conditions for granting of an advance payment and conditions for re-marketing and disposal of products including making them available for the scheme for food distribution to the most deprived in the Union.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 733 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Products may be disposed of by making them available for the scheme for food distribution to the most deprived in the Union set out in Regulation (EU) No […] if that scheme so provides. In that case, the accounting value of such products shall be at the level of the relevant fixed public intervention price referred to in Article 14(2).
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 777 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) butter produced from cream obtained directly and exclusively from cow's milk;deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 818 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 160, where necessary in order to provide for market transparency to lay down the conditions under which it may decide to grant private storage aid for the products listed in Article 16, taking into account average recorded Union market prices and the reference prices for the products concerned or the need to respond in a timely way to a particularly difficult market situation or economic developments in the sector in one or more Member States.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 822 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, decide to grant private storage aid for butter, produced from cream, obtained directly and exclusively from cow's milk. The use of this tool is necessary throughout the entire private storage period.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 877 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) the conditions according to which it may be decided that products covered by private storage contracts may be re- marketed or disposed of, disposed of or made available for the scheme for food distribution to the most deprived in the Union set out in Regulation (EU) No [...];
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1787 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 110
[...]deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1822 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 111
Financial contributions of non-members Where rules of a recognised producer organisation, a recognised association of producer organisations or a recognised interbranch organisation are extended under Article 110 and the activities covered by those rules are in the general economic interest of persons whose activities relate to the products concerned, the Member State which has granted recognition may decide that individuals or groups which are not members of the organisation but which benefit from those activities shall pay the organisation all or part of the financial contributions paid by its members to the extent that such contributions are intended to cover costs directly incurred as a result of pursuing the activities in question.Article 111 deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 182 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) Due to the successive integration of various sectors into the single payment scheme and the ensuing period of adjustment granted to farmers, it has become increasingly difficult to justify the presence of significant individual differences in the level of support per hectare resulting from use of historical references. Therefore direct income support should be more equitably distributed between Member States, by reducing the link to historical references and having regard to the overall context of the Union budget. To ensure a more equal distribution of direct support, while taking account of the differences that still exist in wage levels and input costs, the levels of direct support per hectare should be progressively adjusted. Member States with direct payments below the level of 90 % of the average should close one third of the gap between their current level and this level. This convergence should be financed proportionally by all Member States with direct payments above the Union average. In addition, aAll payment entitlements activated in 2019 in a Member State or in a region should haveapproximate to or reach a uniform unit value following a convergence towards this value that should take place during the transition period in linear steps. However, in order to avoid disruptive financial consequences for farmers, Member States having used the single payment scheme, and in particular the historical model, should be allowed to partially take historical factorsand other factors as agreed with the Commission into account when calculating the value of payment entitlements in the first year of application of the new scheme. The debate on the next Multiannual Financial Framework for the period starting in 2021 should also focus on the objective of complete convergence through the equal distribution of direct support across the European Union during that period. Member States may also the limit the reduction in the basic payment to farms resulting from discontinued use of the historical model.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 316 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
(43) With a view to strengthening their rural development policy, Member States should be given the possibility to transfer funds from their direct payments ceiling to their support assigned for rural development. At the same time, Member States where the level of direct support remains lower than 90 % of the Union average level of support should be given the possibility to transfer funds from their support assigned for rll monies thus transferred should be subject to co-financing by the Member State at the rate applying to the Rural dDevelopment to their direct payments ceiling. Such choices should be made, within certain limits, once and for the whole period of application of this RegulationProgramme in that Member State.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 317 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
(43) With a view to strengthening their rural development policy, Member States should be given the possibility to transfer funds from their direct payments ceiling to their support assigned for rural development. At the same time, Member States where the level of direct support remains lower than 90 % of the Union average level of support should be given the possibility to transfer funds from their support assigned for rll monies thus transferred should be subject to co-financing by the Member State at the rate applying to the Rural dDevelopment to their direct payments ceiling. Such choices should be made, within certain limits, once and for the whole period of application of this RegulationProgramme in that Member State.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 427 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) ‘permanent grassland’ means land used to grow grasses or other herbaceous forage naturally (self-seeded) or through cultivation (sown) and that has not been included in the crop rotation of the holding for fivthree years or longer; it may include other species suitable for grazing provided that the grasses and other herbaceous forage remain predominant;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 615 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) they were not engaged in an agricultural production activity in any of the years 2009, 2010 or 2011.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 732 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – indent 1
– by 230 % for the tranche of more than EUR 150 000 and up to EUR 200 000;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 745 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
– by 460 % for the tranche of more than EUR 200 000 and up to EUR 250 000;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 750 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – indent 3
– by 70 % for the tranche of more than EUR 250 000 and up to EUR 300 000;deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 759 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – indent 4
– by 100 % for the tranche of more than EUR 30250 000.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 819 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Before 1 August 2013, Member States may decide to make available as additional support for measures under rural development programming financed under the EAFRD as specified under Regulation (EU) No […] [RDR], up to 10 % of their annual national ceilings for calendar years 2014 to 2019 subject to co-financing by the Member State at the rate applying to the rural development programme in that Member State, as set out in Annex II to this Regulation. As a result, the corresponding amount shall no longer be available for granting direct payments.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 823 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Before 1 August 2013, Member States may decide to make available as additional support for measures under rural development programming financed under the EAFRD as specified under Regulation (EU) No [...] [RDR], up to 10 % of their annual national ceilings for calendar years 2014 to 2019 subject to co-financing by the Member State at the rate applying to the rural development programme in that Member State, as set out in Annex II to this Regulation. As a result, the corresponding amount shall no longer be available for granting direct payments.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1296 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to have threewo different crops on their arable land where the arable land of the farmer covers more than 315 hectares and is not entirely used for grass production (sown or natural), entirely left fallow or entirely cultivated with crops under water for a significant part of the year;
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1298 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to have threewo different crops on their arable land where the arable land of the farmer covers more than 315 hectares and is not entirely used for grass production (sown or natural), entirely left fallow or entirely cultivated with crops under water for a significant part of the year;
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1338 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) to have ecological focus area on their agricultural area. rable land where the arable land of the farmer covers more than 15 hectares and is not entirely used for grass production (sown or natural), entirely left fallow or entirely cultivated with crops under water for a significant part of the year.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1341 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) to have ecological focus area on their agricultural arrable land where the arable land of the farmer covers more than 15 hectares and is not entirely used for grass production (sown or natural), entirely left fallow or entirely cultivated with crops under water for a significant part of the year.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1435 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Farmers with more than 70% of the eligible agricultural area covered by grassland or farmers whose holding is certified under national or regional environmental certification schemes shall be entitled ipso facto to the payment referred to in this chapter.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1475 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5
5. The payment referred to in paragraph 1 shall take the form of an annual payment per eligible hectare declared according to Article 26(1), the amount of which shall be calculated annually by dividing the amount resulting from the application of Article 33(1) by the total number of eligible hectares declared in the Member Spayable to individual farmers as a fixed percentatge concerned according to Article 26 top of their basic payment.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1477 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5
5. The payment referred to in paragraph 1 shall take the form of an annual payment per eligible hectare declared according to Article 26(1), the amount of which shall be calculated annually by dividing the amount resulting from the application of Article 33(1) by the total number of eligible hectares declared in the Member Spayable to individual farmers as a fixed percentatge concerned according to Article 26 top of their basic payment.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1531 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. Where the arable land of the farmer covers more than 315 hectares and is not entirely used for grass production (sown or natural), entirely left fallow or entirely cultivated with crops under water for a significant part of the year, cultivation on the arable land shall consist of at least threewo different crops. None of those three crops shall cover less than 5 % of the arable land and tThe main onecrop shall not exceed 70 % of the arable land.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1609 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Farmers shall maintain as permanent grassland the areas of their holdings declared as such in the application made pursuant to Article 74(1) of Regulation (EU) No XXX (HZ) for claim year 2014, hereinafter referred to as ‘reference areas under permanent grassland’Member States shall ensure that the ratio of the land under permanent grassland is maintained, within defined limits, in relation to the total agricultural area . That obligation shall apply at national or regional level.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1717 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. When the arable land of the farmer covers more than 15 hectares, Farmers shall ensure that at least 7 5% of their eligible hectares as defined in Article 25 (2), excluding areas under permanent grassland, is ecological focus area such as land left fallow, terraces, landscape features, buffer strips and afforested areas as referred to in article 25(2)(b)(ii), hedges, stone walls or internal farm roadways, land planted with nitrogen-fixing crops, short rotation coppice and afforested areas as referred to in article 25(2)(b)(ii). The inclusion of such features as ecological focus areas does not preclude these measures being aided under Regulation No [ ] [RDR].
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1839 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1
1. In order to finance the payment referred to in this Chapter, Member States shall use 3025 % of the annual national ceiling set out in Annex II.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1850 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall apply the payment referred to in this Chapter at national or, when applying Article 20, at regional level. In case of application at regional level, Member States shall use in each region a share of the ceiling set pursuant to paragraph 3. For each region, this share shall be calculated by dividing the respective regional ceiling as established in accordance with Article 20(2) by the ceiling determined according to Article 19(1).deleted
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1933 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall grant an annual payment to young farmers who are entitled to a payment under the basic payment scheme referred to in Chapter 1 and who meet objective criteria determined by the Member State.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1967 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall calculate each year tThe amount of the payment referred to in paragraph 1 by multiplying a figure corresponding to 25 % of the average value of the payment entitlements held by the farmer by the number of entitlements he has activated in accordance with Article 26(1)shall be the exact amount required to bring the payment up to the average per hectare under the basic payment of the Member State or region plus 25%. Where the basic per hectare payment already exceeds the average plus 25%, then no additional payment shall be made. Member States shall fix a limit which may be up to a maximum of 50 hectares.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1968 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall calculate each year tThe amount of the payment referred to in paragraph 1 by multiplying a figure corresponding to 25 % of the average value of the payment entitlements held by the farmer by the number of entitlements he has activated in accordance with Article 26(1)shall be the exact amount required to bring the payment up to the average per hectare under the basic payment of the Member State or region plus 25%. Where the basic per hectare payment already exceeds the average plus 25%, then no additional payment shall be made. Member States shall fix a limit which may be up to a maximum of 50 hectares.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2090 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 1
1. In order to finance the voluntary coupled support, Member States may decide, by 1 August of the year preceding the first year of implementation of such support, to use up to 15 % of their annual national ceiling set out in Annex II.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2106 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may decide to use up to 120 % of the annual national ceiling set out in Annex II provided that:
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 97 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11 a) The European Union and most Member States are party to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities while the remaining Member States are in the process of ratifying it. It is important in the implementation of the relevant projects that the obligations stemming from this Convention with regard inter alia to education, employment, and accessibility are considered by all projects supported by the CSF Funds.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 161 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 5 – paragraph 2
2. In accordance with the multi-level governance approach, the partners shall be involved by Member States in the preparation of Partnership Contracts and progress reports and in the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of programmes. The partners shall participate in the monitoring committees for programmes. The partners shall be ensured equal access to the funding provided for these purposes.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new)
(10a) investing in accessibility for persons with reduced mobility, including the elderly and persons with disabilities
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 198 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) The European Union and its Member States are party to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, while the remaining Member States are in the process of ratifying it. It is important in the implementation of the relevant projects that the obligations stemming from this Convention with regard inter alia to education, employment, and accessibility are considered by all projects supported by the CSF Funds.
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 217 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) an integrated approach to address the specific needs of geographical areas most affected by poverty or of target groups at highest risk of discrimination or exclusion, with special regard to marginalised communities, where appropriate and persons with disabilities, including the indicative financial allocation for the relevant CSF Funds;
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 327 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 48 – paragraph 3 – point l
(l) the adequacy of planned measures to promote equal opportunities between men and women and to prevent discrimination, including measures to remove barriers to accessibility for persons with disabilities;
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 427 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 5 – paragraph 2
2. In accordance with the multi-level governance approach, the partners shall be involved by Member States in the preparation of Partnership Contracts and progress reports and in the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of programmes. The partners shall participate in the monitoring committees for programmes.The partners shall be ensured equal access to the funding provided for these purposes.
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 449 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 101 – paragraph 3 – point i
(i) progress in the implementation of measures to address the specific needs of geographical areas most affected by poverty or of target groups at highest risk of discrimination or exclusion, with special regard to marginalised communities including, where appropriate, the financial resources used;
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 455 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 7 – paragraph 2
The Member States and the Commission shall take appropriate steps to prevent any discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation during the preparationogramming and implementation of programme, as well as monitoring and evaluation of the Funds.
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 458 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
In particular, accessibility for disabled persons shall be one of the criteria observed in defining operations co- financed by the Funds and taken into account during the programming and implementation, as well as monitoring and evaluation of the Funds.
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 459 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 7 – paragraph 2 b (new)
Provisions stemming from the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities shall be considered during the programming and implementation, as well as monitoring and evaluation of the Funds.
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 501 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 9
(9) promoting social inclusion and combating poverty and fighting against discrimination;
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 511 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 11
(11) enhancing institutional and partners' capacity and an efficient public administration.
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 526 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – General ex-ante conditionalities – point 1 – column 2
The existence of a mechanism which ensures effective implementation and application of Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation1 and Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin1, and other international anti- discrimination commitments such as the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (Article 5)
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 533 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – General ex-ante conditionalities – point 3 – column 3 – indent 1 – sub-indent 3 a (new)
- the involvement of disability representative organisations in the design and implementation of these arrangements;
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 617 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) an integrated approach to address the specific needs of geographical areas most affected by poverty or of target groups at highest risk of discrimination or exclusion, with special regard to marginalised communities, where appropriateand persons with disabilities, including the indicative financial allocation for the relevant CSF Funds;
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1389 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the contribution to the integrated approach set out in the Partnership Contract to address the specific needs of geographical areas most affected by poverty or target groups at highest risk of discrimination or exclusion, with special regard to marginalised communities, and persons with disabilities, and the indicative financial allocation;
2012/06/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1432 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 89 – paragraph 2
Operational programmes with support from the Cohesion Fund shall be drawn up at national level. Operational programmes focusing on vulnerable groups, such as youth, women, migrants, long-term unemployed, the elderly, people with disabilities and ethnic minorities, must be eligible to operate across the territory irrespective of the geographical limitations of reference.
2012/06/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1539 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 101 – paragraph 3 – point i
(i) progress in the implementation of measures to address the specific needs of geographical areas most affected by poverty or of target groups at highest risk of discrimination or exclusion, with special regard to marginalised communities and persons with disabilities including, where appropriate, the financial resources used;
2012/06/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 131 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) In line with the Commission Communication ‘A budget for Europe 2020’4 , which recommends rationalising and simplifying the Union's funding instruments and sharpening their focus both on Union added value and on impacts and results, this Regulation establishes a European Union Programme for Social ChangeProgress and Innovation (hereinafter ‘the Programme’) to provide for the continuation and development of activities carried out on the basis of Decision No 1672/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity – Progress5 , Regulation No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union6 and Commission Decision 2003/8/EC of 23 December 2002 implementing Regulation No 1612/1968 as regards the clearance of vacancies and applications for employment7 and Decision No 283/2010/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 March 2010 establishing a European Progress Microfinance Facility for employment and social inclusion8 (hereinafter ‘the Facility’).
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 142 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) In line with the Europe 2020 Strategy, the Programme should pursue a coherent approach to promoting sustainable employment and combating social exclusion and poverty. Its implementation should be rationalised and simplified, notably through a set of common provisions including, inter alia, general objectives, typology of actions, monitoring and evaluation arrangements. The Programme should also focus on large projects with clear EU added value in order to reach critical mass and reduce administrative burden for both the beneficiaries and the Commission. In addition, greater use should be made of simplified cost options (lump-sum and flat- rate financing) in particular for the implementation of mobility schemes. The Programme should be a one-stop shop for microfinance providers at community level, providing financing for micro-credit, capacity building and technical assistance. Lastly, the Programme should provide for budgetary flexibility through the establishment of a reserve to be allocated on an annual basis in order to respond to policy priorities.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Civil society organisations and social partners active at various levels can play an important role in meeting the objectives of the Programme, by participating in the policy-making process and contributing to social innovation.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 163 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) Lack of access to credit is one of the main obstacles to business creation, especially among people furthest from the labour market. Union and national efforts in this area need to be stepped up in order to increase the supply of microfinance and meet demand from those who need it most, and in particular unemployed and financially vulnerable people who wish to start up or develop a micro-enterprise, including on a self-employed basis, but do not have access to credit. As a first step, in 2010 the European Parliament and the Council set up the Facility.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) In order to capitalise on the experience of international financial institutions, and in particular the European Investment Bank Group, action involving microfinance and social entrepreneurship should be implemented by the Commission indirectly by entrusting budget implementations tasks to financial institutions in accordance with the financial regulation. Using Union resources concentrates leverage from international financial institutions and other investors, creates synergies between Member State and Community action, unifies approaches and thus improves access to finance for micro- enterprises, including the self-employed and social enterprises. The Union contribution thus assists in the development of the emerging social business sector and the microfinance market in the Union and encourages cross- border activities.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) In line with the Europe 2020 strategy, the Programme should tackle the problem of youth unemployment. Despite some positive signs of recovery in 2009, the employment growth was too weak to produce a steady reduction in the high unemployment rate. The average unemployment spells have lengthened, and youth unemployment figures have risen in many Member States, reaching more than 40% in some of them. Although the situation in European countries differs considerably, the average youth unemployment rate in the EU is more than twice as high as the adult unemployment rate. Moreover there are large regional disparities. Especially in rural areas, youth unemployment is raising. Young people aged under 25 years should therefore be given a future and the perspective to play a key role in developing society and economy in Europe, which is of particular importance in this time of crisis.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17 b (new)
(17b) Tackling youth unemployment and the precariousness of young workers would not only reduce societal costs but also promote social inclusion. Therefore, the Programme should put a special focus on youth employment, by introducing a Youth Initiative axis, which aims at improving the transition from education to decent employment as well as working conditions of young people and reduce early school leaving.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 186 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) Pursuant to Article 9 of the Treaty, the Programme should ensure that the requirements linked to the promotion of a high-level of sustainable employment, a guarantee of adequate social protection and the fight against social exclusion are taken into account in defining and implementing the Union's policies and activities.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 196 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes a European Union Programme for Social ChangeProgress and Innovation (hereinafter ‘the Programme’) which aims to contribute to the implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy, its headline targets and Integrated Guidelines by providing financial support for the European Union's objectives in terms of promoting a high level of employment, guaranteeing adequate social protection, combating social exclusion and poverty and improving working conditions.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 213 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) The Progress axis, which shall support the development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of Union employment and social policpolicy, social policy, social inclusion policy and policy in the area of combating poverty and legislation on working conditions and shall promote evidence-based policy-making and innovation, in partnership with the social partners, civil society organisations and other interested parties;
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 222 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) The Youth Initiative axis, which shall improve the employment and educational situation of young people, in particular those who are not in education, employment or training (NEET).
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 239 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) Promote workers' geographical mobility and boost employment opportunities by developing European Union labour markets that are open and accessible to all;
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 245 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) Ensure a good transition from education to decent employment, prevent early-school leaving and promote quality of traineeships and apprenticeships.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 270 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In addition to the financial appropriations mentioned in paragraph 1, funding shall be provided for the Youth Initiative axis set out in Article 3 (1) (ca). Over the Programme period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 financial appropriations dedicated to this axis shall amount to [EUR XXX] million.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 320 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13
With a view to regular monitoring of the Programme and making any adjustments needed to its policy and funding priorities, the Commission shall draw up an initial monitoring report after 1 year and thereafter biennial monitoring reports and send them to the European Parliament and the Council. Such reports shall cover the Programme's results and the extent to which gender equality and anti- discrimination considerations, including accessibility issues, have been addressed through its activities.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 341 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) EPublic and private employment services;
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 350 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) Develop services for the recruitment and placing of workers in sustainable employment through the clearance of job vacancies and applications at European level; this shall cover all phases of placement, ranging from pre-recruitment preparation to post- placement assistance with a view to the applicant's successful integration into the labour market; such services shall include targeted mobility schemes to fill vacancies where labour market shortcomings have been identified and/or help particular groups of workers such as young people.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 356 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) EPublic and private employment services;
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 358 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) Social partner organisations and other interested parrelevant parties including regional and local authorities.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 379 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
2. The information provided in these annual implementation reports shall feed into the biennial monitoring reports provided for in Article 13. Such monitoring reports shall include the annual reports provided for in Article 8(2) of Decision No 283/2010/EU.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 380 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Chapter III a (new)
Chapter III a (new) Youth Initiative Axis
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 382 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 a (new)
Article 26 a Thematic sections and financing 1. The Youth Initiative axis for people aged under 25 years shall support actions in one or more of the thematic sections listed in points (a), (b) and (c). Over the entire period of the Programme, the breakdown of the allocation referred to in Article 5(2a) between the different sections shall respect the following lower limits: a) Preventing early-school leaving especially through reintegration into training: 30%; b) Developing skills that are relevant to the labour market in order to bring together more closely worlds of employment, education and training: 20%; c) Supporting a first work experience and on-the-job training in order to offer the opportunity to young people to acquire both the relevant skills and work experience: 20%; d) quality of traineeships and apprenticeships: 20%.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 384 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 b (new)
Article 26 b Specific objectives In addition to the general objectives set out in Article 4, the specific objectives of the Youth Initiative axis shall be to: (a) Support the creation of specific innovative programmes in order to fight youth unemployment and promote the transition of young people from education to decent employment in particular in deprived areas and regions with exceptionally high youth unemployment; in this context special attention shall be paid to young people with fewer opportunities, including young women, young people not in education, employment or training (NEET) and young people from ethnic minorities, who might all face multiple discrimination; (b) Support the exchange of best practice and mutual learning in the field of fighting youth unemployment, including the possibility of introducing a youth guarantee which would offer every young person in Europe a job, further education or work-focused training at the latest four months after leaving education or after becoming unemployed; improving the quality of traineeships and apprenticeships and reducing early school leaving; (c) Provide policy-makers with financial support to test social and labour market policy approaches designed to fight youth unemployment, to promote the transition of young people from education to decent employment, improve the quality of traineeships and apprenticeships, reduce early school leaving and make the relevant knowledge and expertise accessible; (d) Provide Union, national and regional organisations with financial support to step up their capacity to develop, promote and support activities in order to fight youth unemployment, to promote the transition of young people from education to decent employment, improve the quality of traineeships and apprenticeships, reduce early school leaving and make the relevant knowledge and expertise accessible.
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 386 #

2011/0270(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 c (new)
Article 26 c Participation 1. Participation in the Youth Initiative axis shall be open to the following countries: (a) The Member States; (b) The EFTA and EEA member countries, in accordance with the EEA Agreement; (c) The candidate countries and potential candidates, in accordance with the general principles and the general terms and conditions laid down in the framework agreements concluded with them on their participation in Union programmes. 2. The Youth Initiative axis shall be open to all public and/or private bodies, actors and institutions, and in particular: (a) National, regional and local authorities; (b) Public employment services; (c) The social partners; (d) Youth organisations and other non- governmental organisations at all political levels; (e) Higher education institutions and research institutes; (f) Experts in evaluation and in impact assessment; 3. For the purpose of the implementation of the Youth Initiative axis, the Commission shall establish cooperation with the EU Agencies referred to in Article 16(2a). The Commission may also establish cooperation with international organisations referred to in Article 16(3) and with third countries not participating in the Programme as provided for in Article 16(4).
2012/04/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2011/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) The European Monitoring Centre on Change (EMCC), based in EU Agency Eurofound in Dublin, assists the European Commission and the Member State concerned with qualitative and quantitative analyses in order to help in the evaluation of an application for EGF funds.
2012/07/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2011/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 b (new)
(21b) The European Monitoring Centre on Change (EMCC), based in EU Agency Eurofound in Dublin, is well placed to conduct impact evaluations of active labour market policy measures. Evaluations of the added value of EGF in each restructuring case would require some early involvement and additional financial resources for Eurofound to perform this new task, if requested by the European Commission.
2012/07/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Efficient and effective implementation of actions supported by the ESF depends on good governance and partnership between all relevant territorial and socio- economic actors, in particular the competent regional, local, urban and other local authorities, umbrella associations representing the local and regional level, the social partners and non- governmental organisations in the strategic governance of ESF, from shaping priorities for operational programmes, including programmes whose management is entrusted to an intermediate body, to implementing and evaluating ESF results. It is therefore necessary that Member States encourage the participation of social partners and non- governmental organisations in the implementation of the ESF.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. The ESF shall benefit people, including disadvantaged groups such as the long- term unemployed, people with disabilities, migrants, ethnic minorities, marginalised communities, and people facingother groups of people facing or at risk of poverty and social exclusion. The ESF shall also provide support to enterprises, systems and structures with a view to facilitating their adaptation to new challenges and promoting good governance and the implementation of reforms, in particular in the fields of employment, education and social policies.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. The ESF shall benefit people, including disadvantaged groups such as the long- term unemployed, people with disabilities, migrants, asylum seekers, ethnic minorities, marginalised communities and people facing social exclusion. The ESF shall also provide support to enterprises, systems and structures with a view to facilitating their adaptation to new challenges and promoting good governance and the implementation of reforms, in particular in the fields of employment, education and social policies.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 222 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) Enhancing access to lifelong learning, upgrading the skills and competences of the workforce and increasing the labour market relevance of education and training systems, as well as formulas for the transition between education, professional training and the access to employment;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 233 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii a (new)
(iii a) Improving skills and competences through sports activities;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 257 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iv
(iv) Enhancing access to affordable, sustainable and high-quality services, including health care, community-based services and social services of general interest;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 289 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the strategy and actions set out in the Operational Programmes are consistent and focused on achieving the headline targets of the Europe 2020 strategy on employment, education and poverty reduction, including addressing the related challenges identified in the National Reform Programmes and the relevant Council Recommendations made under Article 148(4) of the Treaty, in order to contribute to achieving the headline targets of the Europe 2020 strategy on employment, education and poverty reduction.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 296 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. At least 20 % of the total ESF resources in each Member State shall be allocated to the thematic objective ‘promoting social inclusion and combating poverty’ set out in Article 9(9) of Regulation (EU) No […]. The investment priority "Active Inclusion" shall be included in all OPs. Prior to the drafting of partnership contracts and OPs, the Commission will provide guidelines on how the ESF should deliver on the poverty reduction target through integrated and socially inclusive approaches.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 323 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. The involvement of the competent regional, local, urban and other local authorities, umbrella associations representing the local and regional level, social partners and other stakeholders, in particular non- governmental organisations, in the implementdesign, the implementation, the monitoring and the evaluation of operational programmes, as referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No […], may take the form of global grants as defined in Article 113(7) of Regulation (EU) No […]. In such a case, the operational programme shall identify the part of the programme concerned by the global grant, including an indicative financial allocation from each priority axis to it.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 344 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. To encourage adequate participation of and access by non-governmental organisations to actions supported by the ESF, notably in the fields of social inclusion, gender equality and equal opportunities, theand the social partners in actions supported by the ESF, managing authorities of an operational programme in a region as defined in Article 82(2)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No [...] or in Member States eligible for Cohesion Fund support shall ensure that an appropriate amount of ESF resources is allocated to capacity-building for non-governmental organisationactivities.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 351 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8
The Member States and the Commission shall promote equal opportunities for all, including accessibility for disabled perswithout discrimination based on gender, race or ethnic origin, religion or convictions, disability, age or sexual orientations, through mainstreaming the principle of non-discrimination, as referred to in Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No […], and through...]. In addition, the ESF shall support specific actions within the investment priorities as defined in Article 3 of this Regulation, and in particular Article 3(1)(c)(iii). Such actions shall target people at risk of discrimination of all ages and people with disabilities, with a view to increasing their labour market participation, enhancing their social inclusion, reducing inequalities in terms of educational attainment and health status and facilitating the transition from institutional to community-based care.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 367 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall support transnational cooperation with the aim of promoting mutual learning and thereby increasing the effectiveness of policies supported by the ESF. Transnational cooperation shall involve partners, which can include local and urban authorities, from at least two Member States.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 371 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Member States in cooperation with regional, local, urban and other authorities may select themes for transnational co-operation from a list proposed by the Commission and endorsed by the ESF Committee.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 374 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may select themes for transnational co-operation from a list proposed by the Commission and endorsed by the ESF Committee and propose others considered of interest.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 385 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. By way of derogation from Article 1109(3) of Regulation (EU) No [...], the maximum co-financing rate for a priority axis shall be increased by ten percentage points, but not exceeding 100%, where the whole of a priority axis is dedicated to social innovation or to transnational cooperation, or a combination of both, or in the case of parts of programmes managed by non-governmental organisations or social partners.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 387 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. The ESF mayshould support community-led local development strategies, as referred to in Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No […], territorial pacts and local initiatives for employment, education and social inclusion, as well as Integrated Territorial Investments (ITI) as referred to in Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No […].
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 422 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – point 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)
People at risk of poverty (median income)
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2011/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) However, it must be recognised from experience gained with implementation of mandatory electronic identification in small ruminants that the current technology available to farmers is not able to achieve 100% accuracy. Farmers therefore should not be penalised for unintentional non-compliance with cross- compliance requirements when these result from failures of the technology in tag readability which are beyond farmers' direct control.
2012/04/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 44 #

2011/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 — paragraph 1 — point 7
Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000
Article 7 — paragraph 5 — point b
(b) enters up-to-date information directly into the computerised database within twseventy-fourtwo hours of the occurrence of the event.
2012/04/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 9 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
(B) whereas currently workers mobility rate is not sufficient to enhance labour markets efficiency in the European Union: only 2.3% of people in the EU reside in a Member State other than their own but 17% envisage working abroad in the future and 48% would consider seeking jobs in another country or region in the event of redundancies,
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
(E) whereas, despite EU legal acts and programmes aimed at promoting free movement of workers, there are barriers to the full implementation of this fundamental freedom (e.g. social, linguistic, cultural legal and administrative barriers, poor return policies that do not meet the needs of migrant workers, lack of recognition of mobility experience, difficulties concerning the employment of spouses or partners, and a delayed process for the recognition of diplomas and professional qualifications),
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
(Ea) considers that current procedures for recognition of professional qualifications represent a big obstacle to workers´ mobility in the European Union,
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
(1) Calls on the Commission to strengthen the current legal framework on recognition of professional qualifications set out in the directive 2005/36/EC
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that both EU and Member State legislation should be bridgedcoordinated more closely in order to prevent any types of barriers to implementation and use of the right of free movement of workers;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that an efficient implementation of the free movement of workers calls for coordinated action by the European and national authorities to facilitate and simplify administrative procedures on issues indirectly linked to this right, such as the transfer of vehicle registrations and medical records, provision of a comprehensive database on healthcare workers, avoidance of double taxation, clear rules on the reimbursement of medical expenses, etc.;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission to publicise the positive effects derived from labour mobility for the host and home countries and the EU, from a socio-economic and geographical cohesion point of view;, in order to increase European citizens' awareness of the positive effect of mobility and to fight the idea that labour migration reduces wages and takes jobs away from the local workers,
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2010/2273(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Considers that information to EU workers about the benefits, rights and obligations deriving from labour mobility should be further improved; calls on the Commission to coordinate its action with national authorities and make better use ofdevelop links between EURES and the SOLVIT online problem- solving network, in order to enhance the quality of the service provided to citizens exercising their right to mobility;
2011/03/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to Council Recommendation 98/376/EC of 4 June 1998 on a parking card for people with disabilities,
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council of 27 Apriluncil Decision of 21 October 2010 on ‘Gguidelines for the employment policies of the Member States: Part II of the Europe 2020 Integrated Guidelines’ (COM(2010)0193) and the European Parliament's position of 8 September 2010 thereto7 (2010/707/EU),
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas the European Union formally ratified the United Nation's (UN) Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities and it t has also been signed by all 27 EU Member States and ratified by 16 of these,
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas disabled people have the right to a sufficient level of community-based services favouring independent living, the right to personal assistance, the right to economic and social independence and full participation in society and the labour market,
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas disabled persons suffer from discrimination inthroughout their lives and in particular during the period of education and training, including thedue to a lack of early recognition and intervention for disabled children and pupils, which results in their employment opportunities being highly restricted,
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
H a. whereas disability is an evolving concept that results from the interaction between persons with impairments and attitudinal and environmental barriers that hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others,
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the financial expenditure and economic investment in people with disabilities is a long-term return investment for the well-being of all and an inclusive society resting on sustainable foundations;
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the need for a new efficient approach to disability starting from the creation of a European Disability Committee as a more effective mechanism to coordinate and monitor the implementation of the EDS;
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the respect of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the notion of Design for all;
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Calls on the Commission to take appropriate measures to promote the development of and access to universally designed goods and services as enshrined in Article 29 of the UN CRPD;
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls upon the Commission and the Member States to consider and evaluate the application of: to strengthen both sanctions and positive incentives for Member States to implement Article 16 of DirectiveRegulation 1083/2006/EC as well as the efforts on accessibility in light of the contribution that could be made by using the European Structural Funds, especially thend to respect its legally binding requirements; to reinforce anti- discrimination provision in the future Cohesion Policy 2014-2020; to monitor and assess correct implementation of the European funding programmes and use of European Social Ffunds;
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 142 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Acknowledges that free movement is a fundamental right within the European Union; stresses that it positively influences the quality of life and participation in society and the labour market of people with disabilities;
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Observes that a mutually-recognised parking card for people with disabilities and a unified EU charter for travellers' rightRecognizes the importance of Council Recommendation 98/376/EC of 4 June 1998 on a parking card for people with disabilities that states that this card should exist in a standard format and should be recognised by all Member States in order to facilitate the bearers' car use, and observes that a unified EU charter for travellers' rights and a European definition of disability criteria in relation to obtaining and renewing driving licences and any other permits or documents which may be required to facilitate mobility between Member States are relevant for the inclusion of people with disabilities in society; across EU Member States;
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Reaffirms that people with different disabilities should be able to have inherently-adjusted means ene need to guarantee universal and equal access for persons with disabiling them to purchase goods and servicesties to goods and services that must be affordable;
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 262 #

2010/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29 a. Calls on the Commission, in the light of their targets on poverty reduction, to disaggregate poverty figures in order to calculate the numbers of persons with a disability who are experiencing poverty so that comparable targets for poverty reduction of persons with a disability can be achieved within the framework of the EU 2020 strategy;
2011/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the financial and economic crisis has greatly added to the underlying demographic challenge facing the EU,
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the provision of adequate, sustainable and safe pensions is inextricably linked with higher levels of employment, greater productivity and economic growth,
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas risk mitigation and shock absorption need to be taken into account in the design of pension funds,
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas it is estimated that the annual pensions gap in the EU27 is €1.9 trillion, or 19% of 2010 EU GDP (the pensions gap is the difference between the pension provision currently in place and the pension provision that people retiring between 2011 and 2051 will need to maintain a comparable standard of living in retirement),
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D c (new)
Dc. whereas this pensions gap can be bridged by means of a number of different measures, which need to be clearly identified and developed at Member State level,
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that Member States face enormous challenges in ensuring that pensions meet citizens' expectations; and provide a standard of living in old age which is above the poverty threshold of the Member States;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Believes that pension funds should build on the advantages of collective insurance;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that long-term investment in pension systems requires a positiven enhanced approach as part of economic governance and more particularly inbelieves that the Stability and Growth Pact must take Member States' pension liabilities into account when monitoring the sustainability of public finances;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that pensions and pension systems are a primary responsibility of the Member States, but recognises that the Member States' economies are all interdependent; therefore calls on Member States to use soft law tools, such as the Open Method of Coordination, to guarantee the adequacy, safety and sustainability of their pension systems;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Regrets that the Green Paper does not devote anyenough attention to the gender issues, particularly bearing in mind that, because of disparities in careerthe interruptions to their careers, for example to fulfil responsibilities as carers, and because of their lower incomes, women have smaller pensions on average;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Recognises the need to address adequacy gaps which arise because of periods of unemployment, sickness, caring duties, short-term contracts and atypical work;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Does not cConsiders it possible to set an adequate pension at European level, because the amount required is very dependent on specific circumstances in the Member Statesagree on the principle of pensions adequacy at European level, while respecting the specific circumstances in the Member States and the full powers enjoyed by Member States to define the adequacy of their pension systems and ensure that older people have access to the necessary financial and in-kind resources to live a decent life in old age;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 172 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that, within the diversity of pension systems, the general systems (first pillar) combined with work-relatedoccupational systems (second pillar) afford the best guarantee of adequate and secured pension provision for all;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 192 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Believes that better sharing of information between Member States on the costs and effectiveness of forms of tax relief on private pensions would be very useful;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 203 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that national budgets are under severe pressure and that many Member States are reviewing the efficiency of expenditure; calls on Member States to consider introducing compensation so that all taxpayers who cannot achieve the level of ambition in the first and second pillars are entitled to a supplementaryn offset of pension contributions in the second pillar or of contributions to private pension schemes in the third pillar; notes that this could also help Member States to establish a three-pillar structure;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 231 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Considers that, in view of demographic trends and the need to ensure that pensions can be paid for, it is necessary for more people to participate in the labour market and to do so for longer; observes that life expectancy is growing and calls on Member States to consider linking the statutory retirement age to life expectancy; , however, that better occupational health is a precondition for longer working lives and calls on Member States to consider linking the statutory retirement age to the HLY (Healthy Life Years) Indicator; takes the view that the statutory retirement age should be debated at Member State level through an active dialogue with the social partners and relevant organisations;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 253 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Notes that there are major disparities in the statutory retirement age and in the actual age at which older people cease to be employed; calls on Member States and the two sides of industrysocial partners, therefore, to exchange information about good experiences and to conclude agreements leading to a prolongation ofon how to ensure more flexibility when prolonging working life, for example by rewarding people who work for longer, by developing comprehensive age management strategies at national and company level, and by developing new forms of work-life balance provisions adapted to the specific needs of the 50+ age group;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 298 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Considers that, if the 2020 Strategy is successful, this will mean that more people are in work and that economic growth will benefit from this, thus enhancing both the sustainability and the adequacy of pension systems;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 332 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Considers that the EU should introduce reporting mechanisms through the Social Open Method of Coordination to monitor progress in ensuring both the sustainability and adequacy of pensions in the medium and long term;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 389 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Considers that the second pillar must be available to all employees by right, without any discrimination on grounds of age, sex, sector and/or employment contract;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 408 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Member States to support the development of a social dialogue in the field of old-age pension provisionand civic dialogue concerning old-age pension provision and the statutory retirement age;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 438 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Is concerned about the inadequate information provided to the public by public authorities and bodies administering pensions concerning the necessity, possibilities, accumulated entitlements, likely results and actual state of affairs with regard to old-age pensions; calls on the Commission and Member States to launch campaigns to enable and encourage members of the public to take measures to ensure adequate pension provision for themselves, supports the development of an EU-wide tracking system to enable citizens to access information about their accrued rights from anywhere in the EU, based on existing Member State initiatives and experiences;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 443 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33a. Calls on Member States and the Commission to develop EU common rules to ensure that Member States provide citizens with regular, reliable updates about their future individual pension rights and general, standardised information on the potential risk of suffering a reduction in accrued rights and the administrative costs, payout options, internal and cross-border portability restrictions, default options, etc. of the various schemes and products available to them;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 448 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Considers that, when pension provision is reformed, or when there is a changeover from a promised pension to a promised pension arrangement, or from a final salary to a mean salary system, the public must be promptly and fully informed of the consequences, stresses that providing information to individuals is not enough and that they should be protected against insolvency risks regardless of the scheme they are involved in;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 461 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)
35a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to renew and strengthen the Social Open Method of Coordination, in order to develop a better understanding of what an adequate income in old age means and to devise common indicators to monitor the social realities faced by retired people and inform national debates on adequacy; when coordinating national policies on pensions, it will be essential to pay due attention to the impact of the reforms on vulnerable groups (women, informal carers, the long- term unemployed, young and older workers, disabled people and migrants with short careers in the EU);
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2010/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Recalls that the JEREMIE initiative has been very successful with more than six billion euro made available for SMEs, and suggests that a similar financial mechanism, which could be called JERICHO (=Joint European Rural Investment CHOice), is developed for the rural development programmes in the next programming period;
2011/03/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 36 #

2010/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls for improved policy coherence and better use of existing cohesion and research policy instruments in order to increase investments in agriculture and animal welfare related R&D of relevance for the rural community;
2011/03/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 45 #

2010/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Recommends that, as a matter of principle for the future, the level of EU co-financing should reflect the European added value of the different investments made under the rural development programmes;
2011/03/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 6 #

2010/2206(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3a (new)
3a. Believes that future rural and regional development programmes should effectively support the tourism sector. Special attention should be given to the promotion of knowledge transfer and cross-border exchanges of best practice, building upon the work of existing European networks such as NECSTouR;
2011/02/03
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 11 #

2010/2206(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4a (new)
4a. Underlines that tourism activities must always respect the landscape and the environment. The objective – as stated in the European Landscape Convention – should be a balanced and harmonious relationship between social needs, economic activity and the environment;
2011/02/03
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 18 #

2010/2206(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6a (new)
6a. Considers that there is a need to improve farmers’ marketing capacity and their access to local markets, thus enabling the catering sector to buy the local produce that they need more easily;
2011/02/03
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 21 #

2010/2206(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6a (new)
6a. Emphasises that, since food gives an understanding of local cultures and traditions, food tourism could contribute to a feeling of affinity within Europe;
2011/02/03
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 24 #

2010/2206(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Recognises the importance of the ‘ICT and tourism’ platform proposed by the Commission, but believes that greater efforts are needed to equip rural areas with the latest IT infrastructure (e.g. broadband Internet connection services) and provide training in how to use it, as well as further development, for instance in the framework of the CIP programme, of multilingual IT resources which could facilitate international tourism;
2011/02/03
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 34 #

2010/2206(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Proposes, in view of the success of the ‘European capitals of culture’ and the ‘European heritage label’ initiatives, that a similar initiative be developed to devise a European label for rural areas of tourist interest; calls for that label to be the centrepiece of the promotion measures contemplated.voluntary but based on commonly agreed standards inspired by, for instance, the European Landscape Convention;
2011/02/03
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 18 #

2010/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the credibility and reputation of the Union are drawn from the practice in the Member States andEU high standards for social protection and Human rights protection are decisive requisites of the European Union when negotiating on trade relations with non- member states,
2011/02/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2010/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the protection of trade union activirespect of the right of everyone to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests is an obligation for all Member States and all other States that have ratified the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations,
2011/02/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2010/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas globalisation facilitates the free movement of enterprises, notably of multinational companies,workers´ mobility between Member States and even to partnerto third countries,
2011/02/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2010/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas equality of mit is extremely important to prevent and women in remuneration should be promoted, ll sorts of wage discrimination, according to the principle of the right to equal pay for equal work, claimed in art.23 of the Universal declaration of Human rights.
2011/02/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2010/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Insists that the credibility and reputation of the European Union cannot be threatened by discrepancies between words and deeds of Member States and the European Union itselfUnderlines the importance of coherent action concerning social protection inside and outside the Union;
2011/02/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2010/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. AsksCalls on the Commission and the Member States to cooperate with the partner countries with the aim of making equality between women and men a reality each other and with third countries to enforce the framework strategy for non- discrimination and equal opportunities for all, in order to fight gender discrimination, discrimination against disabled persons and vulnerable groups within and outside the European Union;
2011/02/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2010/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Asks the Commission and the Member States to integratetake into account employment and social policies as a priority in all negotiationissues when negotiating agreements regarding global economic governance structures and macro-economic dialogues;
2011/02/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2010/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the national and international health authorities, including the WHO, were aware as early as May 2009 that the H1N1 influenza was nothad rapidly lost its initial high virulentce, with this moderate virulence being confirmed by the very low mortality rate observed as a result of this influenza ‘pandemic’ in comparison with the officially recognised figures for seasonal influenza,
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 20 #

2010/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the criteria for defining a ‘pandemic’, adopted by the WHO in 2009 and based solely on the propagationtransmission capacity of the virus while discounting the severity of the infection, distorted the meaning of the word ‘pandemic’ and triggered a false alarm worldwide, with that alarmism giving rise to inappropriate public health decisions and a disproportionate response among the public and administrations of the European Union and its Member States,
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 120 #

2010/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. That the ECDC be requested to assemble an expert and independent group of scientists and health care professionals are tasked with providing advice on non-pharmaceutical approaches that might be employed by Member States and the public to reduce the risk of infection or transmission and the severity of symptoms associated with infection;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 166 #

2010/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Expresses its approval of the introduction of a procedure enabling the Member States to make group purchases of anti-viral vaccines and medicinal products on a voluntary basis where the positive benefit-risk profile of their preventive/therapeutic effect is clearly demonstrated and indisputaindependently, conclusively and plausibley, in order to obtain, for a given product, advantageous rates approaching its cost price;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 169 #

2010/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Requests the development and release of an independent and comprehensive public health strategy including non-pharmaceutical approaches for the prevention and management of infectious diseases, including those caused by influenza viruses, in order to assist European citizens, health care professionals and health authorities in Member States;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 42 #

2010/2100(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Believes that the European Union should assist partner countries in establishing and operating social mechanisms in support of vulnerable population groups especially women;
2010/10/15
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 44 #

2010/2100(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Believes that the European Union should actively pursue projects that help mitigate the effects of, and adapt to, a changing climate;
2010/10/15
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 14 #

2010/2099(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. In all budgetary assessments, structural reforms undertaken by Member States should be taken into account, in particular pension and, health care and social protection reforms.
2010/09/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2010/2099(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. IStrongly consider the social consequences of implementing a sanctioning system which exwould includes budget lines aimed at improving the employment and social conditions of workers, in particular the European Social Fund (ESF) and the Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF).
2010/09/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2010/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation -1 (new)
- having regard to existing statistical instruments covering some dimensions of social progress, well-being and sustainable development in Europe such as the EU-SILC, the Labour Force Survey (LFS), Eurobarometers, the European Values Survey and the European Social Survey (ESS),
2010/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2010/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation - 1 a (new)
- having regard to the European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS), coordinated by Eurofound, which provides a comprehensive portrait of quality of life and living conditions in European Countries (covering all EU Member States and Candidate Countries) with over 120 indicators providing comparative data across countries1, _____________________ 1 EQLS covers the following core domains of quality of life concept: economic resources, deprivation; health and access to health care; employment and job quality; work-life balance; family relations and support; social inclusion/exclusion (community life and social participation); education and training; quality of housing and local environment; social capital and quality of society; quality of public services; subjective well-being (including happiness, life satisfaction, optimism about future)
2010/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2010/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation - 1 b (new)
- having regard to the Stiglitz Report (Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress1) which provides an overview of the seven dimensions to be taken into account when developing new indicators, _______________________ 1 http://www.stiglitz-sen- fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf
2010/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2010/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas GDP, while an important indicator of economic growth, is totally inadequate as an instrument for guiding policy to meet the challenges of the 21st century,
2010/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2010/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas coherent policy making needs a data framework that includes more inclusive indicators that incorporateing social and environmental gains and losses are needed to supplement GDP, as well as indices to measure sustainable development,
2010/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2010/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that there is an increasing gap between what official statistics say about economic performance and how people perceive their own living conditions and quality of life, and that this leads to a lack of trust in government and the democratic process;, notes that subjective well-being in Europe is not only influenced by income, but also by perceived quality of society1; _____________ 1 According to Eurofound findings between last quarter of 2007 and September 2009, the average level of satisfaction with life in general across the EU fell by about 4%. The pattern of change in life satisfaction reflects changes in GDP in countries like the Baltic States but does not correspond to the relatively small declines in GDP of countries like Malta or France. (Source: Trends in quality of life in the EU: 2003- 2009, Eurofound, 2010) Within countries income differences as well as perceived corruption have a considerable impact on trust in political institutions. (Source: Eurofound 2nd European Quality of Life Survey)
2010/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2010/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for both qualitative and quantitative metrics to be issued in a timely manner in order to enhance policy making and to enable monitoring of trends over time;
2010/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2010/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Calls for a new partnership between all relevant actors (Eurostat, National Statistical Offices, research organisations, national governments, EU agencies etc.) to develop indicators of well-being and sustainable development that provide policy-makers with an additional set of measures for the multidimensional phenomena of well-being and quality of life;
2010/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2010/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the need to measure quality of life in societies and notes that such measurement will require metrics from at least the following categories: health, education, employment, connectedness, political engagement, material wellbeing and, environment, social protection and social capital;
2010/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2010/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Suggests that the EQLS indicators, which cover the core domains of quality of life are built upon in further development of both qualitative and quantitative metrics;
2010/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2010/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls forNotes that social and economic cohesion are overarching objectives of the EU and these objectives require indices tohat reflect distributional issues in society in order toand facilitate the monitoring of social inclusion;
2010/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2010/2088(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for the adoption and promotion of the ILO Manual on the Measurement of Volunteer Work and its promotion by all Member States.
2010/10/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2010/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas dementia is not only a devastating disorder for the patients themselves, but also a very heavy burden placed on the shoulders of the patients‘ relatives and carers, given the emotional, physical and financial difficulties faced by the relatives and friends of those affected by all types of dementia,
2010/11/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 121 #

2010/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Invites the Member States to develop a Strategic Research Agenda establishing medium- to long-term research needs and objectives in the area of neurodegenerative diseases, especiallyincluding care provision needs, especially in the area of Alzheimer's; takes the view that the strategic research agenda should be further developed towards an implementation plan establishing priorities and timetables and specifying the actions, instruments and resources required for its implementation;
2010/11/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B (new)
(A) whereas the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) does not impose any active labour market measures on a Member State that have to be implemented in the framework of an application for the fund but to put in place a coordinated package of personalised services designed to reintegrate workers into the labour market in accordance with Article 3 of the EGF regulation[1] which preserves fully the flexibility of the Member States to adapt the measures targeting the redundant workers to the local and individual needs of each application, ([1] Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2009 on establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund as amended by regulation (EC) No 546/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009.)
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reminds Member States of the importance of taking immediate labour market intervention measures in parallel with their application to the EGF;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls onReminds the Member States that they are obliged, on the one hand, to involve the social partners right from the outset in the task of preparing applications in accordance with Article 5 of the EGF regulation and, on the other hand, to comply with Article 9 of this regulation which requests Member States to provide information on and publicise the funded actions and that this information has also to be addressed to the workers concerned, the local and regional authorities and the social partners and to standardise procedures;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Welcomes the Council conclusions for New Skills for New Jobs and underlines that the EGF provides the Member States with additional funding for the training of redundant workers for future oriented jobs and increased mobility;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States benefitting from the EGF to be very effective and to adopt a personalised approach to assistance for redundant workers, particularly in cases of large-scale redundancies, so as to improve workers' opportunities on a labour market that is undergoing profound restructuring; to this end, recommends that the Member States step up their exchanges of good practice, especially making use of Progress;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Member States to use the EGF to implement European objectives, to promote new skills for new jobs, to promote entrepreneurship and to promote lifelong learning, so as to allow workers to develop their individual careers and to contribute to improving the competitiveness of the EU in the context of globalisation;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Reminds undertakings of their social responsibility to do all they can to ensure that workers can, right from the start of their period of unemployment, authenticate their experience acquired, so as to ensure that their retraining is as specific and as rapid as possible and that they obtain new, stable jobs with a promising future;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Asks the Commission to provide the Member States with a set of guidelines for the design and the implementation of the applications for EGF funding seeking a fast application procedure and a broad consensus of the stakeholders for the strategy to apply and the measures to be put in place for an effective reintegration of the workers into the labour market;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2010/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Asks the Commission to provide assistance also to the Member States, the social partners and the workers associations during the process of implementation of the measures;
2010/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2010/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas regions that are – within their respective contexts – economically and culturally autonomous, with functional reghave functional distribution circuits, can react to global changes in a more stable way,
2010/11/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 33 #

2010/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that it has always been in the interest of European unification to support womenRecalls that the promotion of equality between men and women is a core objective of the EU;
2010/11/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 39 #

2010/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that efforts are needed to create living conditions in rural areas which correspond to those in urban areas while reflecting the realities of the countryside, in order to offer women the prospect of staying and making a successful life there;
2010/11/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 50 #

2010/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Insists on the fact that the wide range of rural businesses, including service- orientated businesses (e.g. farm tourism, direct marketing, care of the elderly and childcare), underpins service provision in rural areas and should be supported in a sustainable way via the CAP;
2010/11/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 59 #

2010/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls, in this regard, for further efforts to be undertaken to equip all rural areas with the most up-to-date IT infrastructure (e.g., above all adequate broadband) access;
2010/11/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 81 #

2010/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls for rural development strategies to place special emphasis on the role of women in helping to achieve the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy, in particular initiatives focusing on innovation, research and development;
2010/11/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 89 #

2010/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Is convinced that, given the circumstances of the rural world, training and counselling provision for women that has a specific rural focus must be maintained and developed; therefore considers it desirable to work towards the c, in particular relation of a European rural women's network (or a network of women's associations) and draws attention to the successes achieved through CAP second- pillar measureng to the financial management of farms;
2010/11/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 90 #

2010/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Considers it desirable to work towards the creation of a European rural women’s network (or a network of women’s associations) and draws attention to the successes achieved through CAP second-pillar measures;
2010/11/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 99 #

2010/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for social systems to make adequate provision for women in rural areas, taking account of their specific circumstances with regard to paid employment and pension entitlements;
2010/11/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 102 #

2010/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Points out the need, especially in rural areas, for sustainable strategies designed to maintain women's vocational skills while they are bringing up families or acting as ca work-life balance for families or caregivers in rural areras, with a view to enabling women to become or remain involved, and further develop their involvement, in various types of work;
2010/11/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 111 #

2010/2054(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for women's entrepreneurial spirit to be encouraged, for support to be given to networks of female entrepreneurs, and also for provision to be made in the financial sector forto affording rural businesswomen, including individually self-employed or part-time self-employed women with low earnings, access to investmencredit – thus empowering them more effectively in the marketplace and enabling them to develop businesses from which they can make a stable living;
2010/11/17
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 8 #

2010/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas services have become the largest sector in the European Union and over the past decade rising demand has led to net job creation in the services sector in most of the Euro area,
2010/09/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2010/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas a more dynamic and labour intensive service sector could help sustain growth,
2010/09/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2010/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. HopStrongly believes that the Services Directive will genuinely have a positive impact by creating jobs and improving the quality and safety of services provided;
2010/09/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2010/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that complete, coherent and timely transposition of the Services Directive is necessary in order to achieve its full objectives;
2010/09/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2010/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that there are still issues to be clarified regarding the scope of application of the directive; considers that a directive clearly definingcomprehensive overview of the sconcepts of "commercial services", "services of general economic interest" and "social services of general interest" is more necessary thpe of application of the directive will increase the effectiveness and ever in order to precisely delineatefficiency of the Sservice Directive's scope of application ands sector in Europe and of the law applicable to services not subject to the directive, with particular regard to authorisation schemes;
2010/09/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2010/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Invites the Employment Committee referred to in Article 150 TFEU to issue regular and timely reports on the effects of the directive's implementation on employment, from both a quantitative and a qualitative point of view.
2010/09/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2010/2027(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
– having regard to the Commission Demography Report 2008: Meeting Social Needs in an Ageing Society (SEC (2008) 2911),
2010/06/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2010/2027(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that as a result of demographic change there is a significant number of older potential volunteers which is a huge untapped resource in our communities; Calls on the Commission to promote opportunities for older volunteers and to develop a Seniors Action Programme for the increasing number of very experienced senior citizens who are willing to volunteer that might run in parallel with and complement the Youth in Action Programme and furthermore to promote specific programmes for intergenerational volunteering and for mentoring;
2010/06/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2010/2027(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Notes that as a result of changing demographics, it is estimated that by 2030 the ratio between active and inactive people will be 2:1, calls on the Commission and Member States to support the future role of family carers by developing policy initiatives that will enable women and men to achieve a balance between professional and caring responsibilities;
2010/06/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 248 #

2010/2027(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)
35a. Calls on Member States to address the issues faced by family carers - including the right to choose freely whether they want to be a carer, the possibility to combine caring with paid employment and access to social security schemes and old age pensions in order to avoid impoverishment as a direct result of caring;
2010/06/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2010/0242(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
(4) Successive European Councils have recognised the need to tackle the effect of ageing populations on European social models. A key response to this rapid change in the age structure consists in promoting active ageing and thus ensuring that the baby boom cohorts, who are, on the whole, healthier and better educated than any such cohort before them, have good opportunities for employment and active participation in societyfamily, social and community life, such as volunteering, lifelong learning, cultural expression and sports.
2011/02/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2010/0242(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
(5) The growing proportion of older people in Europe makes it more important than ever to promote healthy ageing and to sensitise the awareness of European citizens to problems connected with an ageing population. Healthy ageing can help raise labour market participation of older people, enable them to be active in society for longer and to participate in socially beneficial activities such as volunteering, improve their individual quality of life and curb the strains on health, pension and social care systems and to live a decent life in old age.
2011/02/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2010/0242(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 6
(6) The Commission presented its views on the demographic challenges the EU faces and on opportunities for tackling them in its communications on ‘The demographic future of Europe from challenge to opportunity’ of 12 October 2006 and on ‘Dealing with the impact of an ageing population in the European Union’ of 21 April 2009. One of these challenges is the growing number of older people in need of care; most of this care is being provided by unpaid carers. This important resource is under pressure.
2011/02/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2010/0242(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
(9) The Council adopted on 20 November 2009 Conclusions on ‘Healthy and dignified ageing’, inviting the Commission, inter alia, ‘to develop awareness-raising activities to promote active ageing, including a possible European Year on Active Ageing and Intergenerational Solidarity in 2012’. These conclusions also stress the importance of taking account of issues related to informal care and carers, which is highly important in the context of intergenerational solidarity.
2011/02/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2010/0242(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) The Commission proposes to launch an Active and Healthy Ageing Innovation Partnership (AHAIP) under the Europe 2020 flagship initiative ‘Innovation Union’ which will address individuals as patients and consumers by developing innovative solutions, clinical tests, medicines and treatments to combat and address major chronic and rare diseases. The AHAIP will focus on social and health care systems by developing innovative policies and business models for more integrated care systems for older people (including home-based and self- care ones). The AHAIP will also target EU-related markets, contributing to enabling older people to lead independent and active lives by promoting the development and deployment of innovative products, devices and services, including ICT-based, specifically suitable for older people. As the objectives and planned activities of the AHAIP and the European Year are closely linked, synergies between the two initiatives will need to be ensured.
2011/02/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2010/0242(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 15 b (new)
(15b) Synergies between the European Year of Volunteering 2011 and the European Year for Active Ageing 2012 should be promoted.
2011/02/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2010/0242(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1
The year 2012 shall be designated as the European Year for Active Ageing: Promoting intergenerational solidarity (hereafter referred to as ‘the European Year’).
2011/02/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
(5) The Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs helped forge consensus around the broad direction of the EU's economic and employment policies. Under the strategy, both broad economic policy guidelines and employment guidelines were adopted by the Council in 20055 and revised in 20086. The 24 guidelines laid the foundations for the national reform programmes, outlining the key macro-economic, micro-economic and labour market reform priorities for the EU as a whole. However, experience shows that the guidelines did not set clear enough priorities and, that links between them could have been stronger and that Member States failed to take ownership of those guidelines. This limited their impact on national policy- making.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 7
(7) The Commission proposed to set up a new strategy for the next decade, the Europe 2020 Strategy8 , to enable the EU to emerge stronger from the crisis, and to turn its economy towards smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Five headline targets, listed under the relevant guidelines, constitute shared objectives guiding the action of the Member States and of the Union. Member States should make every effort to meet the national targets, to take ownership of such targets, and to remove the bottlenecks that constrain growth.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 75 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
(9) Within the Europe 2020 strategy, Member States should implement reforms aimed at "smart growth", i.e. growth driven by knowledge and innovation. Reforms should aim at improving the quality of education, ensuring access for all, and strengthening research and business performance in order to promote innovation and knowledge transfer throughout the EU. They should encourage entrepreneurship and to prevent a European "brain drain". They should encourage entrepreneurship and small and medium sized enterprises (SME)development and help to turn creative ideas into innovative products, services and processes that can create growth, quality jobs, territorial, economic and social cohesion, and address more efficiently European and global societal challenges. Making the most of information and communication technologies is essential in this context.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 11
(11) Member States" reform programmes should also aim at "inclusive growth". Inclusive growth means building a cohesive society in which people are empowered to anticipate and manage change, thus to actively participate in society and economy. Member States" reforms should therefore ensure access and opportunities for all throughout the lifecycle, thus reducing poverty and social exclusion, through removing barriers to labour market participation especially for women, older workers, young people, carers, disabled and legal migrants. They should also make sure that the benefits of economic growth reach all citizens and all regions. Ensuring effective functioning of the labour markets through investing in successful transitions, appropriate skills development, rising job quality and fighting segmentation, structural unemployment - in particular youth unemployment and inactivity while ensuring adequate, sustainable social protection and active inclusion to reduce poverty should therefore be at the heart of Member States" reform programmes.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – Guideline 7 – paragraph 1
Member States should integrate the flexicurity principles endorsed by the European Council into their labour market policies and apply them in a balanced way, making full use of European Social Fund support with a view to increasing labour market participation and combating segmentation and inactivity, gender inequality, whilst reducing structural unemployment - in particular youth unemployment. Measures to enhance flexibility and security should be both balanced and mutually reinforcing. Member States should therefore, by taking into account the demographic challenges, introduce a combination of flexible and reliable employment contracts, active labour market policies, effective lifelong learning, policies to promote labour mobility, and adequate social security systems to secure professional transitions accompanied by clear rights and responsibilities for the unemployed to actively seek work.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 181 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – Guideline 7 – paragraph 2
Member States should step up social dialogue and tackle labour market segmentation with measures addressing temporary and precarious employment, underemployment and undeclared work. Professional mobility should be facilitated and rewarded. The quality of jobs and employment conditions should be addressed by fighting low-wages and reducing the number of working poor by ensuring adequate social security also for those on fixed contracts and the self- employed. Employment services should be strengthened and open to all, including young people and those threatened by unemployment with personalised services targeting those furthest away from the labour market.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 198 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – Guideline 7 – paragraph 3
In order to increase competitiveness and raise participation levels, particularly for the low-skilled, and in line with economic policy guideline 2, Member States should review tax and benefit systems and the capacity of public services to provide the necessary support. Member States should increase labour force participation through policies to promote active ageing, gender equality and equal pay and labour market integration of young people, disabled, carers, legal migrants and other vulnerable groups. Work-life balance policies with the provision of affordable care and innovation in work organisation should be geared to raising employment rates, particularly among youth, older workers and women, in particular to retain highly-skilled women in scientific and technical fields. Member States should also remove barriers to labour market entry for newcomers, support self-employment and job creation in areas including green employment and care and promote social innovation.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 227 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – Guideline 8 – paragraph 1
Member States should promote productivity and employability through an adequate supply of knowledge and skills to match current and future demand in the labour market. Quality initial education and attractive vocational training must be complemented with effective incentives for lifelong learning, second-chance opportunities, ensuring every adult the chance to move one step up in their qualification, and by targeted migration and integration policies. Member States should develop systems for recognising acquired competencies, remove barriers to occupational and geographical mobility of workers, promote the acquisition of transversal competences and creativity, and focus their efforts particularly on supporting those with low skills and increasing the employability of older and younger workers, while at the same time enhance the training, skills and experience of highly skilled workers, including researchers.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 242 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – Guideline 8 – paragraph 2
In cooperation with social partners and business, Member States should improve access to training, strengthen education and career guidance combined with systematic information on new job openings and opportunities, promotion of entrepreneurship and SME development and enhanced anticipation of skill needs. Investment in human resource development, up-skilling and participation in lifelong learning schemes should be promoted through joint financial contributions from governments, individuals and employers. To support young people and in particular those not in employment, education or training, Member States in cooperation with the social partners, should enact schemes to help recent graduates find initial employment or further education and training opportunities, including apprenticeships, and intervene rapidly when young people become unemployed. Regular monitoring of the performance of up-skilling and anticipation policies should help identify areas for improvement and increase the responsiveness of education and training systems to labour market needs. EU funds should be fully mobilised by Member States to support these objectives.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 289 #

2010/0115(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – Guideline 10 – paragraph 1
Member States" efforts to reduce poverty should be aimed at promoting full participation in society and economy and extending employment opportunities, making full use of the European Social Fund. Efforts should also concentrate on ensuring equal opportunities, including through access to affordable, sustainable and high quality services and public services (including online services, in line with guideline 4) and in particular health care. Member States should put in place effective anti-discrimination measures. Equally, to fight social exclusion, empower people and promote labour market participation, social protection systems, lifelong learning and active inclusion policies should be enhanced to create opportunities taking into account the various needs and responsibilities at different stages of people's lives and shield them from the risk of exclusion. Social security and pension systems must be modernised to ensure that they can be fully deployed to ensure adequate income support and access to healthcare thus providing social cohesion whilst at the same time remaining financially sustainable. Benefit systems should focus on ensuring income security during transitions and reducing poverty, in particular among groups most at risk from social exclusion, such as one- parent families, minorities, people with disabilities, children and young people, elderly women and men, legal migrants and the homeless. Member States should also actively promote the social economy and social innovation in support of the most vulnerable.
2010/06/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2010/0074(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 1
1. "Citizens" initiative" means an initiative, submitted to the Commission in accordance with the present Regulation, inviting the Commission, within the framework of its powers, to submit any appropriate proposal on matters where citizens consider that a legal act of the Union is required for the purpose of implementing the Treaties, which has received the support of at least one million eligible signatories coming from at least one thirdquarter of all Member States;
2010/11/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 95 #

2010/0074(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. The signatories of a citizens' initiative shall come from at least one thirdquarter of Member States.
2010/11/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 97 #

2010/0074(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. In one thirdquarter of Member States, signatories shall comprise at least the minimum number of citizens set out in Annex I.
2010/11/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 21 #

2009/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas it is necessary to draw a clear distinction between concerns about unfair trading practices which are related to the imbalances in bargaining power of contracting parties and concerns about anti-competitive behaviour,
2010/05/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 22 #

2009/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G b (new)
Gb. whereas the asymmetry in bargaining power between contracting parties can lead to unfair trading practices as larger and more powerful actors seek to impose contractual arrangements to their advantage and whereas such practices can occur at every link in the chain,
2010/05/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 41 #

2009/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recognises the need for a stable and secure food supply chain in which all actors enjoy security and the potential to make a fair profit;
2010/05/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 47 #

2009/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to further develop the food price monitoring tool to ensure among other things e.g. the coverage of a greater number of food products and chains and clear visibility of the link between consumer, producer and agricultural commodity prices;
2010/05/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 63 #

2009/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal for introducing mandatory annual reporting by the top 20 traders, processors, wholesalers and retailers on their market shares (with data on private labels) for key food items and on their monthly sales volumes so as to allow all market partners to estimate trends in demand, supply and price developments in the food chain;deleted
2010/05/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 79 #

2009/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on national and European competition authorities to take action against abusive buyer practices of dominant wholesalers and retailers which systematically put farmers in an extremely unequal bargaining positioany actor in the food supply chain;
2010/05/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 92 #

2009/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to submit a report to Parliament by the end of 2010 providing data on buyer power abuse in the EU, anticompetitive behaviour and unfair contractual practices throughout the food chain and to proposing suitable proportionate responses;
2010/05/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 99 #

2009/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to submitinvestigate the need for a legislative proposal on the better implementation of competition rules in the food chain so as to effectively limit the development of dominant market positions and strengthen farmers" bargaining power through efficient producer organisations and SMEs;
2010/05/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 120 #

2009/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to amend Europeanensure that EU competition law so as to prevent damage caused by concentrationdoes not allow distortion in the food market caused namely by merger control and resultant buyer power abuse in the food chain, for example through which can result in late payments to farmers, forced discounts, resale at loss, high volume requirements and unjustified listing fees and if necessary to amend such legislation;
2010/05/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 148 #

2009/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission and Member states to promote fair contracting based on terms negotiated with farmers" and producers" organisations so as to ensure best product quality and fair prices, and to provide for an easily accessible system to guard against breach of contracts by buyerspractices and to work together with all the stakeholders to prepare sets of standard contracts whose use would be voluntary taking into account the diversity of the food chain;
2010/05/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 159 #

2009/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Commission to give special attention to the EU's food security requirements in light of the commodity price spike of 2008;
2010/05/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 166 #

2009/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on the Commission to improve the oversight and the overall transparency of agricultural commodity derivatives markets and also to enhance the transparency for over the counter activity in the context of the upcoming review of MiFID and other relevant legislation;
2010/05/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 54 #

2009/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas since the background to the reform is one of economic crisis and serious financial difficulties facing Member States, taxpayers, farmers and consumers, we must set out a coherent and credible way forward for the CAP post-2013;
2010/04/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 100 #

2009/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas the EU must continue to ensure food securitythe availability of supplies for its citizens as well as help feed the world's poor through free and fair trade; whereas the number of hungry people now exceeds 1 billion and in the European Union today there are over 40 million poor people who do not have enough to eat,
2010/04/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 115 #

2009/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital R
R. whereas according to the latest Eurobarometer, while most Europeans do not know what the CAP is, 90% of EU citizens surveyed consider agriculture and rural areas to be important for Europe's future, 83% of EU citizens surveyed are in favour of financial support to farmers and, on average, they believe that agricultural policy should continue to be decided upon at European level,
2010/04/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 162 #

2009/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls that the CAP is, together with the trade policy, one of the most integrated of all EU policies and therefore logically accounts for the largest share of the EU budget; recognises that its share of the budget has steadily decreased from about 75% of the total EU budget in 1985 to 39.3% by 20135 , representing less than 0.45% of total EU GDP6 , whilst at the same time support is more thinly spread today with 12 new Member States joining the EU;
2010/04/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 198 #

2009/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that the global energy crisis and increasing energy prices will drive agricultural production costs up, leading to rising food prices and growing market price volatility for both farmers and consumers, which will have a detrimental effect on the stability of food supply and will seriously constrain the ability to maintain and increase current production levels; considers, however, that energy self-sufficiency for the agri-sector could increase its sustainability;
2010/04/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 306 #

2009/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Points out, most importantly, that in the future European agricultural policy must remain a common policy and that only a harmonised level of support across the EU with a common set of objectives and rules can deliver the appropriate level playing field for farmers and a properly functioning Single Market with fair competitive conditions for agricultural products within the EU;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 353 #

2009/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Believes, in line with the latest research available, that without a common agricultural policy, unbalanced and Good Agricultural Practice, unsustainable modes of production would develop across the EU (extreme intensification on the best land and widespread land abandonment in disadvantaged areas), causing serious damage to the environment; insists that the cost of support through a strong CAP is nothing compared to the costs of no action and its negative unintended consequences;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 355 #

2009/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Believes that agriculture is well placed to make a major contribution to delivering the new EU 2020 Strategy priorities of tackling climate change and creating new jobs in rural areas through green growth whilst at the same time continuing to provide basic food security for European consumers by producing safe and high- quality food products;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 385 #

2009/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Insists that the maintenance of farming activity across the whole of Europe is fundamental to maintain diverse and local food production and prevent the threat of land abandonment across EU territory; considers that the specific challenge of subsistence farming must be addressed in a wider policy context;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 470 #

2009/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. Notes that the market fails to reward farmers for protecting the environment; therefore believes that the CAP must become greener by incentivising farmers to maxoptimisze the delivery of eco-system services to further improve the sound environmental resource management of EU farmland;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 478 #

2009/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
42. Believes that farmers are well placed to contribute to green growth and respond to the energy crisis through the development of green energy in such forms as biomass, biowaste, biogas, second-generation biofuels and small-scale wind, solar and hydro energy, which will also help create new green job opportunities; considers that all materials, with the exception of raw materials for food and feed, may be used in this context.
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 580 #

2009/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48 a (new)
48 a. Believes that the single farm payment is a key element in maintaining as many family farms as possible for both social and economic reasons.
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 598 #

2009/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 51 a (new)
51 a. While recognising the need to incentivise the next generation of young farmers with direct payments, every Member State should have flexibility in deciding on the distributing of the single farm payment and to whom it should be paid.
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 751 #

2009/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 62
62. Insists that, to complement market measures, there is an urgent need to strengthen the primary producers' position in the food chain through a range of actions to address transparency, contractual relationships and commercial practices; takes the view that possible adjustments to competition rules should also be investigated to allow the primary producer organisations to grow in scale and sizework more efficiently, equipping them with the power to stand up to major retailers and processors;
2010/04/30
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 55 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Endorses the recommendation in the Monti report that broadband internet and banking services be new universal services, which should be acknowledged in European legislation;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that the principle of solidarity and the strengthening of the European Union require that the crisis, with its growth in unemployment and poverty, must be addressed by a greatly enhanced EU budget, by strengthened structural funds, in particular the European Social Fund, and by a new European debt agency;deleted
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 123 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that the delivery of quality SSGI requires Member State governments to ensure a financial framework for SSGIproper conditions which guarantees continuity of services and stable financing, as well as decent incomes and working conditions and training for those who delivering the servicesm;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 150 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the fact that Member States and local authorities must be free to decide how SSGI are funded and delivered, whether directly or otherwise, using all available instruments so as to fully ensure that the Union's social objectives are not weakened by single markete interests of service users and in full respect of existing single market and competition rules, while at the same time supporting an environment that promotes quality, accessibility and efficiency in the delivery of the services;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for the 2005 Monti-Kroes response to the Altmark case to be broadened so as to simplify the rules, improve flexibility in their application, and expand the derogations. The de minimis threshold should be raised to at least EUR 500 000 over a three-year cycIs looking forward to the results of the evaluation of 2005 Monti-Kroes response to the Altmark case that will demonstrate if and where additional steps are needed to further clarify and simplify the rules;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 210 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Believes that local authorities must be involved in an ongoing bottom-up process of overhaulevaluating procurement rules to avoid discrepancies between the rules and modes of organisation on the ground;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 212 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Calls for redefinition of the concept of ‘most economically advantageous offer’ so as to make national and local social and quality criteria for the delivery of SSGI an obligatory requirement in procurement contracts, including subcontracts;deleted
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 237 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Proposes the establishment of a high- level multi-stakeholder taskforce – initially with a two-year mandate – that is open, flexible and transparent, to pursue implementation of the policy initiatives identified in this report and in the 3rd Forum recommendations, the Commission's second Biennial Report and the SPC reports, as well as any other relevant proposals; to initiate a full review of all rules, particularly state-aid and procurement rules, which impact on SSGI and to evaluate how they need to be redesigned so as to respect and support Member States' responsibilities in the definition and delivery of SSGI, taking account of the current Commission review of rules;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 245 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Considers that, as part of its mandate, the proposed taskforce would also consider innovations such as a European resource centre for SSGI, a Member State registerdata base of SSGI, a pilot scheme on elder care, and action programmes based on the European Voluntary Quality Framework (VQF);
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 252 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Urges thatProposes the taskforce be chaired by the Commission's DG Social Affairs; that its membership include DG Competition, DG Single Market, DG Environment and DG Sanco, the European Social Affairs Council (EPSCO), the social partners and civil society organisations active in SSGI; that, in view of their democratic mandate, both Pto comprise representatives of Commission's DG Economic and Monetary Affairs, DG Competition, DG Single Market, DG Social Affairs, DG Environment and DG Sanco, the European parliament and, the Committee of the Regions must be centrally involved; and that social economy enterprises and stakeholders including voluntary associations, as well as local authorities, must be represented, the European Social Affairs Council (EPSCO), local authorities, organisations representing users of SSGIs and other relevant stakeholders;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 280 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Considers that the VQF principles shcould be used to help define obligatory quality criteria for application to revised public procurement rules;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the need for flexible employment has been underlined on several occasions,
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. Whereas it is estimated that one in six workers has care responsibilities for an older or dependent relative or friend,
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to continue the efforts made by the Mission for Flexicurity to assist Member States in promoting flexicurity principles, and points out that mutual learning and exchanges of good practice, as well as the open method of coordination, are essential tools for coordinating Member States" different policy approaches; however, notes that in order to successfully implement the agreed Action Plans Member States must be effectively incentivised to take ownership of the OMC;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Recommends that the priorities for labour law reform, where it is needed, should focus on: extension of the protection of workers in atypical forms of employment; clarification of the situation of dependent employment including preventative action with regard to health and safety of atypical workers; action against undeclared work; and the facilitation of transitions between various situations of employment and unemployment;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Welcomes some Member States introduction of provisions to allow employees with care responsibilities to reconcile their responsibilities with more flexible working arrangements; Calls on the Commission and Member States to actively support carers in the workplace through flexible working conditions including leave entitlement, flexi-time, part-time and home working arrangements which would allow more carers to remain in or return to paid employment throughout all Member States;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that the increase in the proportion of non-standard or atypical contracts has a strong gender and intergenerational dimension, as women, older and also younger workers are disproportionately represented in non-standard employment; calls upon the Member States and the Commission to combat and monitor the imbalance;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Encourages the Member States to develop early and active intervention policies giving workers who re-enter the labour market an entitlement to individual support during the period strictly necessary for them to become more employable through training, up-skilling and requalification; unemployed people should re-enter the labour market quickly even if their contracts are atypical, the most important consideration being to keep people in the labour market;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls upon the Member States to implement policies that enable people to balance flexible work, care and family life better, by ensuring that the opening hours of childcare facilities are financially accessible, available and tailored to working hours;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 237 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Notes that collective bargaining is the most common way of determining pay in Europe - two out of three workers are covered by a collective wage agreement wither at company or higher level;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 245 #

2009/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32a. Is convinced that successful social dialogue in the workplace is strongly determined by the facilities that the employee representations have in regard to quality information provision, regular training and sufficient time;
2010/03/31
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2009/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Insists that, whilst working effectively with the ILO and other treaty bodies, the Commission should continue to meet its responsibility to evaluate the impact of trade negotiations on social, environmental and human rights and to consult trade unions and environmental and social NGOs in a transparent manner throughout the process of negotiating and implementing trade agreements, guaranteeing them a clear right to raise violaconcerns or objections;
2010/02/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2009/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the use of Sustainability Impact Assessments, but deplores failures to act fully on their findings, as in west Africa; in the case of Colombia and the wider Latin American regions; emphasises the EU's leverage to pursue concrete improvements in respect for human rights, labour stand human rightsards, sustainable development and good governance in advance of trade agreements, as well as during their implementation;
2010/02/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2009/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Recognises that current and future trade agreements are being negotiated in the context of an economic depression; that off-shoring accounts for a high proportion of job losses; and that EU trade policy should seek to prevent an excessiv disproportionate or over-rapid decline in EU market share and employment levels in any given sector and ensure greater market access for EU exporters; calls for trade agreements to be concluded in the light of the scope for the EU's Globalisation Adjustment Fund to provide adequate assistance towards restructuring;
2010/02/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2009/2201(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas corporate and social responsibility (CSR) is a concept whereby companies voluntarily incorporate social and environmental concerns into their business strategy andfor their interaction with stakeholders over all well- being of stakeholders by actively engaging with public policy as an important aspect of value-driven social change,
2010/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2009/2201(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas CSR can help human rightto support efforts to eradicate human rights violations in developing countries,
2010/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2009/2201(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital D a (new)
D a. Whereas CSR should not replace the State in the provision of basic public services,
2010/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2009/2201(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital D b (new)
D b. Whereas CSR can play a key role in improving standards of living in disadvantaged communities,
2010/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2009/2201(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Considers CSR to be an effective tool for improving competitiveness, skills and training opportunities, occupational safety and the working environment;
2010/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2009/2201(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Notes that the CSR agenda must be adapted to the specific needs of the region and of each specific country in order to contribute to improving sustainable economic and social development;
2010/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2009/2201(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the promotion of CSR internationally, and calls on the Commission to integrate CSR better in its trade policies and to draw up more binding rulstringent guidelines for European companies operating in developing countries directly or through subcontractors;
2010/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2009/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
- having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Communication from the Commission, delivered on 17 December 2009,
2010/02/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 10 #

2009/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas the proposed eight biophysical criteria might not prove to be sufficient and the proposed threshold value of 66% of the area are not anticipated to bemight not be found suitable in all cases for determining the actual handicap, as this partly depends on the crop grown in a manner respectful of the great diversity of EU rural areas; whereas the crop grown, the level of investment, the combination of soil types and climate are, among others, also factors relevant for the purpose of determining the actual handicap in a given area,
2010/02/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 12 #

2009/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the importance of an appropriate compensatory payment for less-favoured areas in order toas an indispensable tool to secure the provision of high-value public goods such as maintaining the management of the land and the cultivated landscape in these regions; emphasises that less-favoured areas, in particular, are often of high value in terms of the cultivated landscape, biodiversity preservation and environmental benefits, as well as rural employment and the vitality of rural communities;
2010/02/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 17 #

2009/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that support for areas with natural handicaps is aimed in particular at ensuring that 'extensive farming activity' is maintained, and consequently at countering the risk of abandonment of the land and migrationdepopulation, which would be likely to have negative consequences for the environment, biodiversity and land risk management (prevention of floods, fires);
2010/02/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 29 #

2009/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that, in contrast to agri- environmental measures, compensatory payments for less-favoured areas must not be subject to additional specific conditions regarding the method of land management which would go beyond cross-compliance requirements; recalls that the LFA scheme must in principle offer compensation to farmers who are also land managers operating with significant natural handicaps which the market does not compensate for as such;
2010/02/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 32 #

2009/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the view that the eight biophysical criteria proposed by the Commission may be suitableight not be sufficient for delimiting areas with natural handicaps; moreover, is of the opinion that additional criteria which address major constraints faced by farmers situated in these areas should also be considered;
2010/02/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 43 #

2009/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. In particular, the inclusion of a geographical criterion referred to as 'isolation' would address the specific natural handicap stemming from distance from the market, remoteness and limited access to services;
2010/02/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 47 #

2009/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. To acknowledge the limitations of wet unworkable soils, the inclusion of a 'field capacity days' criterion would allow the interaction between soil types and climate to be taken into account (for instance to adequately reflect maritime climate difficulties);
2010/02/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 48 #

2009/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Asks the Commission, therefore, to pursue its research efforts and analysis with a view to including potential additional criteria in the new LFA scheme in order to further adapt its proposals to practical difficulties farmers are facing and build a robust set of criteria which will remain suitable in the long term;
2010/02/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 53 #

2009/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses, in particular, that in order to address the interactions between many influencing factors in a practical manner, the cumulative use of the adopted criteria might prove necessary; it could enable those disadvantaged areas which accumulate two or more small to medium- scale natural handicaps to be classified as LFAs even when individual criteria would not trigger that classification;
2010/02/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 56 #

2009/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises that a final opinion on the basic territorial unit chosen, the criteria and threshold values proposed by the Commission can only be given when the detailed maps drawn up by the Member States are available; stresses that in the absence of such simulation results, the 66% proposed threshold as well as the thresholds defining the criteria themselves must be viewed with considerable caution and can only be objectively and appropriately adjusted once the national maps are made available; recalls that the national mapping exercise results should be made available to the European Parliament as soon as possible;
2010/02/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 61 #

2009/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Considers a degree of fine-tuning of the criteria for support for areas with natural handicaps to be necessary in order to be able to respond appropriately to particular geographical situations and crops grown and to exclude areas in which natural handicaps have been offset by human intervenwhere natural handicaps have been offset by human intervention; however emphasises that when land quality has been improved, the burden of high investment costs and the ongoing associated maintenance costs such as drainage and irrigation must be taken into consideration; proposes that farm data (such as farm income and productivity of the land) be used inter alia for this purpose; emphasises, however, that the decision on the criteria to be used for fine-tuning must lie with the Member States;
2010/02/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 70 #

2009/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Urges the Commission, in consultation with all relevant stakeholders, to develop a common framework for farm-level eligibility criteria; points out that Member States and regional authorities should be free to choose, on the basis of that framework, which criteria are best suited to fulfil their priorities and needs;
2010/02/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 76 #

2009/2156(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Taking into account the fact that the new criteria might exclude certain areas that are currently eligible, points out that an adequate phasing-out period should be defined, in order to allow a smooth transition for farmers to adapt to the new support regime;
2010/02/09
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 5 #

2009/2155(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas a new CAP should allow farmers to concentrate on the core objective of providing safe, quality and traceable food while also supporting them to deliver non market public goods,
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 14 #

2009/2155(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas a new CAP should be sustainably competitive,
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 16 #

2009/2155(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the distribution of the single farm payment should ensure fairness,
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 68 #

2009/2155(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need for the CAP to be simpler, and more transparent and more equitable; in this respect a single flat rate payment would be preferableto deliver a fair outcome for all farmers, and in this context single farm payments need to take into account the wide diversity between Member States in terms of land use, land values, productivity, costs and incomes;
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 84 #

2009/2155(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that the basic aim of inspections is to give advice to farmers and put them on the right track in order to better comply with the legislative requirements; re is a need to simplify cross-compliance but also to recognise that the basic aim of inspections is to check compliance with legally based instruments and in this context, while there needs to be a minimum threshold for applying penalties, financial controls and accountability are core to ensuring that CAP expenditure delivers for everybody from producer to consumer;
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 136 #

2009/2155(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Believes that, in order to simplify the rules for the single payment scheme, the provision of the same detailed information on an annual basis should be abolished if there is no material change in the information;
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 153 #

2009/2155(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Considers that the future single payment should be based on a simplified flat rate basic support system based on uniform payments in order to make the CAP simpler, fairer and more transparent;deleted
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 27 #

2009/2139(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Believes that tracking down infringement proceedings by following the Commission's press releases and matching them to certain petitions would unnecessarily waste the Committee's time and resources, especially in the case of horizontal infringements and asks that the Commission informs the Petitions Committee of any relevant infringement proceedings;
2010/05/10
Committee: PETI
Amendment 35 #

2009/2139(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Acknowledges that the growing tendency for petitions to be of limited relevance to EU activities is perhaps related partly to the growing number of electronic petitions as, for the second year in a row, electronic petitions have outnumbered those submitted by post;Deleted
2010/05/10
Committee: PETI
Amendment 3 #

2009/2120(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Is concerned about the findings of the ECA as regards the lack of transparency in recruitment procedures; considers this a serious matter and requests a full and complete explanation of this situation; draws attention to the sensitivities of the matter at hand and the damage ihe EU's Employment Guidelines and in particular Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment can do to the European Union’s reputation and also, on grounds of equal opportunities, draws attention to the fact that the same rules must always apply in recruitment procedures; wonders how long these problems have existed ind occupation1 with regard to selection criteria and recruitment; expects all EU agencies to adhere at a minimum to such Guidelines and calls on the Foundation to set an example by implementing fair, transparent and comprehensive recruitment procedures in the future; 1 OJ L 303, 2.12.2000, p. 16.
2010/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2009/2111(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Regrets that the ECA has once again discovered weaknesses in the procurement procedures; notes the shortcomings to which attention was drawn in the previous year; calls for a stronger commitment toand greater vigilance in monitoring the structures and processes required for proper procurement procedures;
2010/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2009/2068(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the level of errors does not necessarily refer to fraud and calls therefore for a clear distinction to be made between fraud and error rates in the future;
2010/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2009/2068(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Notes that such simplification procedures are key to reducing administrative burdens at national, regional and local levels; stresses the importance of ensuring that such procedures do not lead to a greater rate of error in the future;
2010/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) There is a need to introduce an effective instrument to establish harmonised technical standards in financial services to ensure, also through a single rulebook, a level playing field and an adequate protection of depositors, investors and consumers across Europe. As a body with highly specialised expertise, it is efficient and appropriate to entrust the Authority, in areas defined by Community law, with the elaboration of draft technical standards, which do not involve policy choices. When drafting the technical standards the authority shall adhere to the principle of proportionality by taking into consideration the different structures and risk profiles of financial institutions. In particular, the authorities shall seek to ensure that an unnecessary burden is not placed on democratically controlled cooperatives, which play an important role in respect of combating social exclusion at the level of local communities. The Commission should endorse those draft technical standards in accordance with Community law in order to give them binding legal effect. The draft technical standards have to be adopted by the Commission. They would be subject to amendment if, for example, the draft technical standards were incompatible with Community Law, would not respect the principle of proportionality or would run counter to the fundamental principles of the internal market for financial services as reflected in the acquis of Community financial services legislation. To ensure a smooth and expedited adoption process for those standards, the Commission should be subject to a time limit for its decision on the endorsement.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 270 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The Authority shall act within the scope of Directive 2006/48/EC, Directive 2006/49/EC, Directive 2002/87/EC, Directive 2005/60/EC, Directive 2002/65/EC and Directive 94/19/EC, including all directives, regulations, and decisions based on these acts, and of any further Community act which confers tasks on the Authority. The Authority shall only act within the scope of these acts to the extent that they are applicable to credit and financial institutions.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 365 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Before submitting them to the Commission, the Authority shall, where appropriate, conduct open public consultations on technical standards and analyse the potential related costs and benefits. The Authority shall take into consideration the different effects of the standards on democratically controlled cooperatives, within the meaning of Article 2.5 (a to e) of Directive 2008/48/EC on Consumer Credit Agreements, which play an important role in respect of combating social exclusion at the level of local communities. Technical standards shall reflect the principle of proportionality.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 521 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) contribute to developing high quality and uniform supervisory standards, including reporting standards and taking into account the principle of proportionality;
2010/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 23 #

2009/0096(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 3
(3) The ongoing Community and national efforts need to be strengthened to increase the supply and accessibility of micro- credits to a sufficient scale and within a reasonable time-frame so as to address the high demand of those who need it most in this period of crisis i.e. unemployed or vulnerable people, including the young who want to start or develop a micro enterprise including self- employment but do not have access to credit.
2009/10/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2009/0096(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
(4) The Commission Communication "A Shared Commitment for Employment"11 underlined the need to offer a new chance to the unemployed and open the road to entrepreneurship for some of Europe’s most disadvantaged groups, including the young.e. persons facing difficulties accessing conventional financial services. In addition to existing instruments, specific action is needed to further strengthen economic and social cohesion by reinforcing activities undertaken by the European Investment Bank and the European Investment Fund and other international financial institutions without prejudice to the activities of the Member States. The Commission therefore announced a proposal for a new EU microfinance facility to deepen the outreach of microfinance to particular at- risk groups and to further support the development of entrepreneurship, the social economy and micro-enterprises.
2009/10/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2009/0096(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 - point c
(c) micro-enterprises in the social economy which employ persons who have lost their job or which employ disadvantaged persons, including the youngpersons who face difficulties accessing conventional financial services.
2009/10/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2009/0096(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. The Facility shall be open to public and private bodies including democratically controlled cooperative financial institutions established in the Member States which provide microfinance to persons and micro-enterprises in the Member States.
2009/10/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2009/0096(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. The international financial institutions referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall conclude written agreements with the public and private providers of microfinance including democratically controlled cooperative financial institutions referred to in Article 4 (2) laying down their obligations to use the resources made available from the Facility in accordance with the objectives set out in Article 2 and to provide information for the establishment of the annual reports referred to in Article 8 (1).
2009/10/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2009/0096(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall receive annual implementation reports from the international financial institutions referred to in Article 5(2) setting out the supported activities in terms of financial implementation, distribution and accessibility of funding with regard to sectors and type of beneficiaries, applications submitted, contracts concluded, actions funded, results and, where possible, impact.
2009/10/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2008/2337(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that there are still no clear procedures in place to effectively pursue a Member State before the Court of Justice for an infringement of Community law which has since been remedied and to obtain reparation for previous failures and omissions; urges the Commission to come forward with new proposals (by the end of 2010) to complete the current infringement procedure in such a way as to take account of this inequitable situation;
2009/03/10
Committee: PETI
Amendment 20 #

2008/2334(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3a (new)
3a. Highlights the important role that grass-root organisations play in promoting social cohesion and inclusion particularly during times of an economic crisis; calls on the Commission to ensure that any simplification of the Structural Funds will include measures to reduce administrative burdens on such organisations;
2009/01/26
Committee: REGI
Amendment 30 #

2008/2334(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5a (new)
5a. Stresses the importance of social economy enterprises such as cooperative financial institutions in contributing to sustainable economic models and promoting financial inclusion; calls on the Commission to support such enterprises by reducing bureaucratic obstacles in obtaining Community funding;
2009/01/26
Committee: REGI
Amendment 34 #

2008/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas carers are an indispensible but largely unrecognised part of our social and health care systems,
2009/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 114 #

2008/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses the importance of social economy enterprises such as cooperative financial institutions in contributing to sustainable economic models and promoting financial inclusion; calls on the Commission to support such enterprises by reducing bureaucratic obstacles in obtaining Community funding;
2009/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2008/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes the Commission 'Demography Report 2008:Meeting Social Needs in an Ageing Society' (SEC(2008)2911), which recognises the pivotal role that informal carers play in society, calls on the Commission to consider the strong social arguments for the inclusion of carers in future policy formulation;
2009/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2008/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Stresses the importance of ethical recruitment from third countries, particularly with regard to health-care professionals and calls on those Member States that have not already done so to develop a Code of Practice for international recruitment;
2009/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 177 #

2008/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Notes that a European Year of Volunteering would be an ideal opportunity for the EU to connect with civil society; calls on the Commission to prepare the ground for 2011 to be declared as the European Year of Volunteering by submitting an appropriate legislative proposal to this effect as soon as possible;
2009/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2008/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Stresses the importance and value of the consultation process as an effective tool in empowering citizens by enabling them to directly input into the policy process at EU level; calls on the Commission to take further steps to raise awareness of future EU consultations via the media and other appropriate forums at national, regional and local levels;
2009/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2008/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas failure to cooperate actively and in a timely manner with the work of the responsible committee in the interest of the correct application of Community law raises doubts about the desire and intent of the Member State concerned to correctly apply EU policies and objectives and therefore exposes the authorities to measures in the form of sanctions and penalties which are available under the terms of the Treaties as well as to public criticism,
2009/03/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 20 #

2008/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the involvement and contribution of petitioners at each meeting of the Committee on Petitions which allows for a direct and open dialogue with European Parliament representatives and continues to encourage individual EU citizens and community associations to come forward with issues which concern the area of activity of the European Union and which affect them directly, believing that this process enables the European Parliament as an institution to monitor the implementation of Community law in the Member States and to better defend and promote the fundamental rights of all EU citizens as defined in the EU Treaty;
2009/03/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 22 #

2008/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Urges EUnational and regional parliaments as representatives of citizens to remain vigilant in relation to the way in which Member States apply the Treaties and EU legislative acts, notably as regards issues related to the environment, social and employment rights, the free movement of persons, goods and services, financial services, citizens' fundamental rights including their right to legitimately acquired property, recognition of their professional qualifications and all forms of discrimination; and calls on the European institutions to communicate effectively with the citizens so that they are aware of their rights and the duties of the national and local institutions;
2009/03/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 24 #

2008/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, Parliament cannot regard as admissible petitions which seek to appeal against decisions of competent authorities or judicial bodies of Member States and that such information is communicated in a clear and understandable way to the petitioners;
2009/03/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 26 #

2008/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls for the recommendations adopted in the 2007 Annual Report which have not yet been implemented to be implemented within a reasonable timeframe;
2009/03/12
Committee: PETI
Amendment 5 #

2008/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 22April 2008 on the role of volunteering in contributing to economic and social cohesion *, _____________ P6_TA(2008)0131.
2008/11/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2008/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that the social economy plays a primordial role in the European economy, by combining profitability with solidarity, enabling high-quality job creation and strengthening social, economic and regional cohesion, active citizenship, solidarity and sustainable development;
2008/11/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2008/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Points out that that the measurement of the social economy is complementary to the measurement of non profit institutions (NPIs), calls on the Commission and Member States to promote the use the UN Non Profit Handbook and to prepare satellite accounts which will improve the visibility of NPIs and civil society organisations;
2008/11/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2008/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Notes that the social economy will help the Commission meet its employment goals set out in the Lisbon Strategy, notably by improving employability;
2008/11/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2008/2248(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Requests the Spanish authorities to make sure that no administrative act that would oblige a citizen to cede legitimately acquired private property would find its legal base in a law which has been adopted after the construction date of the abovementioned property. This would indeed infringe the principle of non- retroactivity of administrative acts which is a general principle of Community law (ECJ, January 29th 1985, Gesamthochschule Duisburg, 234/83, p. 333) and guarantees for the citizens legal certainty, confidence and legitimate expectations of the protection within EU law;
2009/01/28
Committee: PETI
Amendment 3 #

2008/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Regards communicationactive dialogue between the European Union and its citizens as importanessential so as to realise the principles and values of the EU project, but recognises that the communication has not so far been very successful;
2009/01/26
Committee: PETI
Amendment 4 #

2008/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the first requirement for the improvement of communication is to understand the nature of communication and to considereffective dialogue is to have a two-way communication system which means that the voices of citizens are heard and their concept that 'actions speak lourns responderd than words'o in a genuine way;
2009/01/26
Committee: PETI
Amendment 5 #

2008/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Highlights the importance of engaging with grassroot organisations who have a unique opportunity to see on a first hand basis the real issues that are of core concern to citizens, draws the Commission's attention to the partnership principle enshrined in both the Community strategic guidelines for rural development and the Community strategic guidelines on cohesion which is not always adhered to at national level and therefore urges the Commission to take appropriate administrative and institutional steps to ensure that its own polices, procedures and protocols are actually observed and enforced during Structural Fund consultations, negotiations and subsequent operations;
2009/01/26
Committee: REGI
Amendment 6 #

2008/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Given that, according to the Eurobarometer, 85% of adults know they have a right to petition the European Parliament in the 23 official languages, considers that petitions submitted by citizens and the work of the Committee on Petitions are key avenues of direct communication by the EU with its citizens; points out that this is reflected in the rapid growth in the number of petitions submitted by citizens and believes that the importance and number of petitions will further increase in the future;
2009/01/26
Committee: PETI
Amendment 9 #

2008/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that the Committee on Petitions is the only political body that allows a proactive dialogue to take place by receivesing input and feedback from citizens relating to their daily concerns and provides a forum so that those concerns can be resolved; suggests, therefore, that the EU give a proactive message to its citizens by emphasising the importance of the work of the Committee on Petitions;
2009/01/26
Committee: PETI
Amendment 10 #

2008/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Proposes that, in order for this to be done, increased resources be givenshould be allocated to the already overworked Secretariat of the Committee on Petitions, so that the handling of petitions sends a clear message about Europe through actions andis done in an efficient, effective and timely manner which sends a clear message to the citizens about Europe and in this way communication is improved through action;
2009/01/26
Committee: PETI
Amendment 12 #

2008/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the web-streaming of proceedings of the Committee on Petitions as a positive and responsive development which will enhance contact, understanding and transparency in communication and will most probably lead to an increase in citizens' participation andin the EU project, as evidenced by the annual increase in the number of petitions; considers that this prospect further underpins the need to allocate additional human resources to the Committee on Petitions;
2009/01/26
Committee: PETI
Amendment 16 #

2008/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the importance and value of the consultation process as an effective tool in empowering citizens by enabling them to directly input into the policy process at EU level, calls on the Commission to take further steps to raise awareness of future EU consultations via the media and other appropriate forums at national, regional and local levels;
2009/01/26
Committee: REGI
Amendment 19 #

2008/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that a European Year on Volunteering would be an ideal opportunity for the EU Institutions to connect with citizens, points out that there are over 100 million volunteers across the EU, calls on the Commission to prepare the ground for 2011 to be declared as the European Year by submitting an appropriate legislative proposal to this effect as soon as possible;
2009/01/26
Committee: REGI
Amendment 20 #

2008/2224(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Notes the significant role structural funds has played in fostering cross border co-operation through community projects and programmes, highlights that this has encouraged the development of active citizenship and participatory democracy in border regions, calls on the Commission to continue to support and work in partnership with such projects and programmes;
2009/01/26
Committee: REGI
Amendment 3 #

2008/2186(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that such simplification procedures are key in reducing administrative burdens at national regional and local level; however, stresses the importance of ensuring that such simplification procedures do not lead to a greater rate of error in the future;
2009/01/26
Committee: REGI
Amendment 4 #

2008/2186(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the importance of the Action Plan adopted by the Commission on 19 February 2008 on strengthening the supervision under shared management for structural actions, which is designed to reduce errors in payment claims from Member States; is confident that this new Action Plan can significantly improve the situation, not least by assisting Member States to develop their ability to ascertain the eligibility of project expenditure; notes that the initial results contained in the first progress report concerning the Action Plan show good progress; however, stresses that it will be 2010 or later before any tangible progress can be evaluated;
2009/01/26
Committee: REGI
Amendment 9 #

2008/2186(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the Commissions Transparency Initiative which could play a greater role eradicating errors in the future;
2009/01/26
Committee: REGI
Amendment 12 #

2008/2186(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses the point that the level of errors outlined in the ECA report does not necessarily refer to fraud and therefore calls on the Commission and the ECA to make a clear distinction of this in future documents;
2009/01/26
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1 #

2008/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, originally proclaimed in December 2000, was signed on 12 December 2007, and reconfirmed by the Presidents of Parliament, of the Commission and of the Council, and whereas the commitment to a legally binding Charter, contained in the Treaty of Lisbon, reflects a growing awareness that citizens should be placed at the centre of Europe's concera transparent, accessible and contactable Europe which is aware of the concerns of its citizens,
2008/08/28
Committee: PETI
Amendment 5 #

2008/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the term 'maladministration by the European Union' should be broadly interpreted so as to include not only unlawful administrative acts or infringements of binding legal rules or, norms, principles and customary law within the state but also, for example, cases where the administrative authorities have been sloppy, negligent in their duty to their citizens or lacking in transparency or have infringed other principles of good administration;
2008/08/28
Committee: PETI
Amendment 6 #

2008/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Regards the role of the Ombudsman in enhancing openness and accountability in the decision-making processes and administration of the European Union as an essential contribution towards a Union in which decisions are taken 'as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen', as provided for in Article 1(2) of the Treaty on European Union, in collaboration with the ombudsman authorities within each Member State, so that the EU is in closer contact with the citizens of Europe;
2008/08/28
Committee: PETI
Amendment 8 #

2008/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. ExpStresses its satisfaction withthe need to further enhance the public profile of the Ombudsman, whose aim is to provide citizens, companies, NGOs and other entities with information, and considers that high-quality information may help to reduce the number of complaints which do not fall within the Ombudsman's terms of reference; at the same time, calls on the Ombudsman to forward immediately those complaints which do not fall within his terms of reference by way of the most appropriate network at national and local level;
2008/08/28
Committee: PETI
Amendment 12 #

2008/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Recognises the useful contribution made by the European Network of Ombudsmen, in line with the subsidiarity principle, in securing extra-judicial remedies; welcomes the collaboration between the European Ombudsman and ombudsmen and similar bodies at national, regional and local levels in the Member States and urges further strengthening of the exchange of best practice, thereby allowing for the harmonisation of best practices between Member States;
2008/08/28
Committee: PETI
Amendment 2 #

2008/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas Parliament has received more than 400 petitions, mainly fromreflecting only a fraction of small businesses, who claim to have fallen victim to misleading advertising by business- directory companies and consequently suffered psychological stress, feelings of guilt, embarrassment, frustration and financial loss,
2008/10/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 3 #

2008/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas these complaints reflect a widespread and concerted practice of misleading business practices amounting to fraud applied by some business directory companies affecting thousands of businesses in the European Union and beyond, with a significant financial impact on businessethat are organised across frontiers and thus involve activity in two or more Member States (with the companies having different legal identities, therefore avoiding liability) in the European Union and beyond, with a significant financial impact on businesses, and whereas there is no administrative mechanism or legal instrument enabling the national law-enforcement agencies to work together across borders,
2008/10/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 5 #

2008/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas neither specific EU legislation nor national legislation exists in Member States (except in Austria where contractual and criminal remedies are available) concerning directory companies in business-to-business relationships, and whereas Member States have a discretion to introduce more comprehensive and far-reaching legislation,
2008/10/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 6 #

2008/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas Directive 2006/114 also applies to business-to-business transactions and defines “misleading advertising” as “any advertising which in any way, including its presentation, deceives or is likely to deceive the persons to whom it is addressed or whom it reaches and which by reason of its deceptive nature, is likely to affect their economic behaviour or which, for those reasons, injures or is likely to injure a competitor”; whereas, however, different interpretations of what is "misleading" seem to be a major practical impediment in combating such practices of directory companies in business-to- business relationships,
2008/10/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 9 #

2008/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices does not apply business-to- business misleading practices and therefore, in its current form, cannot be relied upon to help the petitioners; whereas, however, that Directive does not preclude a system of national rules on unfair commercial practices that is equally applicable under all circumstances to consumers and enterprises, of the kind implemented in Austria,
2008/10/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 11 #

2008/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas Regulation (EC) 2006/2004 on co-operation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws defines “intra- Community infringement” as “any act or omission contrary to the laws that protect consumers’ interests … that harms, or is likely to harm, the collective interests of consumers residing in a Member State or Member States other than the Member State where the act or omission originated or took place, or where the responsible seller or supplier is established, or where evidence or assets pertaining to the act or omission are to be found”, and whereas Directive 2006/114/EC provides for the possibility of administrative fines and cross-border cooperation in relation to unfair practices by directory companies,
2008/10/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 13 #

2008/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas most petitioners name the business directory known as “European City Guide”, which is based in Valencia, Spain (the activities of which directory have been the subject of legal and administrative action), but other business- directory companies such as “Construct Data Verlag”, “Deutscher Adressdienst GmbH” and “NovaChannel” are also mentioned, whereas, however, other business-directory companies engage in legitimate business practices and should not be prevented or discouraged from exercising their right to engage in the business of directories by the incompatibility or complexity of legal and administrative systems in the Member States,
2008/10/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 15 #

2008/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas the business-directory companies are often established in a Member State other than the victim's, making it difficult for the victims to seek protection from national authorities due to the existence of different interpretations in Member States of what is considered misleading, whereas victims also often find no redress from national legislative frameworks and consumer protection authorities because they are told that the law is intended to protect consumers and not businesses, whereas being small businesses, most victims often lack the resources to pursue an effective remedy through litigation, and self-regulatory mechanisms for directories are of little relevance as they are disregarded by those that engage in misleading advertising,
2008/10/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 16 #

2008/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M
M. whereas a number of Member States have adopted initiatives, notably of an awareness-raising nature, among potentially affected companies and whereas this includes information sharing, advice, alerting state enforcement authorities and in some cases maintaining a complaints register in order to tackle this problem,
2008/10/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 18 #

2008/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the cross-border nature of this problem places responsibilia duty on the Community institutions to provide an adequat reasonable remedy to victims, such that so as to allow for bona fide commercial operations to continue through advertising between SMEs, in tandem with allowing the validity of contracts concluded on the basis of misleading advertising could be effectiveand inducements to be effectively and efficiently contested and, annulled or terminated, and that victims cshould be able to obtain a reimbursement of the money that they paid;
2008/10/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 19 #

2008/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Urges victims to report cases of business scams to national authorities, and tocalls on Member States to provide SMEs with the "know-how" needed in order to enable them to file complaints with governmental and non-governmental authorities, by ensuring that communication pathways are open and that victims are aware that advice is available so that they can seek appropriate advice before they settle fees demanded from them by misleading business-directory companies; urges Member States to set up and maintain a centralised database of these complaints;
2008/10/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 21 #

2008/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the efforts made by European and national business organisations to raise awareness among their members and calls on them to intensify their efforts in collaboration with grass-roots organisations so that fewer people become victims of misleading business directories in the first place;
2008/10/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 24 #

2008/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to address the problem of business scams in the context of its “Small Business Act for Europe” initiative, as proposed in its communication entitled "A Single Market for 21st Century Europe", and to engage with the Enterprise Europe Network, the SOLVIT network and the relevant DG portals as a further means of delivering information and assistance regarding these problems;
2008/10/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 27 #

2008/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls that, whereas the Commission has no power to enforce the Directive directly against individuals or companies, it does have the duty, as the guardian of the Treaty, to ensure that the Directive is adequately implemented by Member States; therefore calls on the Commission to ensure that Member States fully and effectively transpose Directive 2005/29/EC so that protection is guaranteed in all Member States, and to influence the shape of the legal and procedural tools available, as in the case of Directive 84/450/EC, which provided tools to Austria, Spain and the Netherlands, thereby fulfilling its duty as guardian of the Treaty in terms of protection for businesses whilst ensuring that the right of establishment and freedom to provide services are not impaired;
2008/10/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 30 #

2008/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Regrets that Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair practices does not cover business-to- business transactions and that Member States appear reluctant to extend its scope; notes, however, that Member States may unilaterally extend the scope of their national consumer legislation to business- to-business transactions and actively encourages them to do so and also to ensure cooperation between Member States' authorities as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 in order to make it possible to track down cross- border activities of this kind engaged in by actors established within the EU or third- country actors;
2008/10/17
Committee: PETI
Amendment 6 #

2008/2115(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. Whereas carers are an indispensable but largely unrecognised part of our health care systems and society,
2008/05/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2008/2115(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes, however, that in order to facilitate the mobility of health-care professionals and ensure patient safety throughout the European Union, the sharing of information between Member States and their regulatory bodies for health-care professionals is essential;
2008/05/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2008/2115(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission not to overlook the role that carers play in society and asks the Commission to take adequate measures to ensure that carers are included in the future formulation of policy;
2008/05/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2008/2115(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Notes that in order to support carers in future policy initiatives, up-to-date data and statistics on carers should be compiled by the Commission;
2008/05/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2008/2098(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Urges the Commission to prioritise horizontal and vertical streamlining of administrative practices and administrative cooperation so to allow synergies between national institutions and authorities, whose interaction is decisive when trying to resolve recurring problems between Member States efficiently;
2008/08/29
Committee: PETI
Amendment 4 #

2008/2098(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need for close cooperation between national administrations in order to identify and eliminate injustices in the field of taxation, such as while respecting national competencies, such as direct and indirect discrimination of foreign nationals and double taxation;
2008/08/29
Committee: PETI
Amendment 8 #

2008/2098(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the Commission's European Union Network for Patient Safety project (EUNetPaS) is the first step amongst many aimed at encouraging Member States and EU stakeholders to collect and exchange information concerning patient safety at Member State level; however, regrets that it does not encourage the exchange of information between Member States' regulatory authorities responsible for health-care professionals; calls on the Commission to encourage the exchange of information between such regulatory authorities in order to facilitate the mobility of health- care professionals and patient safety throughout the EU;
2008/08/29
Committee: PETI
Amendment 255 #

2008/2085(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Therefore welcomes the Commission's statement from 3 April 2008 which clearly states that they will continue to fight social dumping and that the freedom to provide services is not in any way superior to the fundamental rights of trade unions;
2008/06/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2008/2064(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Aa (new)
Aa. whereas social capital in the form of active volunteering is positively linked to regional economic growth and is an important factor in reducing regional disparities
2008/07/25
Committee: REGI
Amendment 10 #

2008/2064(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Ab (new)
Ab. whereas the non-profit sector is a crucial element in the partnership process in many countries and it accounts for approximately 5% of G.D.P.;
2008/07/25
Committee: REGI
Amendment 60 #

2008/2064(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to promote the use of Article 56 of the General Regulation of the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund , which allow for contributions in kind to EU co- financed projects,
2008/07/25
Committee: REGI
Amendment 63 #

2008/2064(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the European Commission to draw up a guide designed to facilitate the implementation of effective partnerships, and to ensure stronger engagement of people and grassroots organisations in local democracy in a multi-level partnership in keeping with the institutional framework specific to each Member State;
2008/07/25
Committee: REGI
Amendment 73 #

2008/2064(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the partnership process can work only with partners which have the necessary capabilities and resources, and calls on the managing authorities to contribute to the strengthening of those capabilities; in particular the building up of social capital;
2008/07/25
Committee: REGI
Amendment 75 #

2008/2064(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8a (new)
8a. Notes the important role that volunteering plays in the partnership process and calls on the Commission and Member States to support and facilitate the valuable work done by volunteers in contributing to this process;
2008/07/25
Committee: REGI
Amendment 5 #

2008/2047(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. Whereas noeither specific gender guidelines remain in the EES nor the equal opportunities pillar remains in the EES,
2008/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2008/2047(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital D d (new)
Dd. Whereas the work life patterns of women are characterised by truncated periods of working activity caused by deep-seated stereotypes of the roles of women and men in work and in the family, which have an impact on the ability of women to remain in work and to make progress, make them potentially more vulnerable in the employment market and have long-term implications for pension provision,
2008/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2008/2047(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital D e (new)
De. Whereas the Framework of Actions on Gender Equality of the Social Partners of 2005 (Framework of Actions) proposes several actions to encourage girls to consider a broader spectrum of career possibilities, mainly in technical and scientific professions,
2008/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2008/2047(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Asks the Commission and Member States to develop instruments that will ensure that high educational qualifications of women will result in "better jobs", better remuneration and increased career opportunities;
2008/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2008/2047(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Notes that as a result of changing demographics, it is estimated that, by 2030, the ratio of active to inactive people will be 2:1; calls on the Commission to support the future role of carers by developing policy initiatives that will enable women and men to achieve a balance between professional and caring responsibilities;
2008/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2008/2047(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that specific policies are developed to achieve equal economic independence for women and men, the reconciliation of private and professional life, equal representation in decision- making, the eradication of all forms of gender-based violence and the elimination of gender stereotypes;
2008/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2008/2047(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 f (new)
3f. Reminds the Commission of its roadmap for equality between women and men – 2006-2010;
2008/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2008/2047(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 h (new)
3h. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to cooperate in particular with SMEs to develop structures that enable SMEs to offer work life balance schemes to their employees;
2008/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2008/2047(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Agrees with the proposal in the Social Partners' Framework for Action for the creation of non-linear career development paths in which periods of greater professional involvement alternate with periods of greater family responsibility, as an alternative to a culture of unnecessarily long working hours for women and men;
2008/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2008/2047(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on Member States to pursue the objective of equal economic independence for women and men;deleted
2008/06/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2008/2039(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Points to the need for specific policies and goals aimed at achieving equality between women and men (equal pay, parental leave, access to high- quality jobs with rights, equal representation in decision making and the elimination of gender based violence in the work place) and organising work and working time in ways making for a better work- life balance for women and men;
2008/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2008/2028(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AB a (new)
ABa. whereas if the operations of the Petitions Committee are effective and efficient it sends a clear signal to citizens that their legitimate concerns are being dealt with and establishes a genuine connection between citizens and the EU, however if there are unacceptable delays, and an unwillingness on behalf of Member States to implement the required recommendations then it merely serves to increase the distance between the EU and its citizens and in many cases confirms their view that a democratic deficit exists,
2008/07/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 30 #

2008/2028(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Recommends that top priority be given to ensuring an effective and efficient Petitions Committee in all aspects of its operation from start to finish as this is a real and tangible commitment to its citizens indicating that the E.U. is willing and able to respond to their legitimate concerns;
2008/07/02
Committee: PETI
Amendment 21 #

2008/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) The Commission and Member States should exchange best practices in order to identify and eliminate false self employment;
2010/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2008/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) The Community legislation is only efficient and effective if it is properly implemented by all Member States, applied equally to all actors concerned and controlled on a regular basis and in an efficient manner and if appropriate action is taken when infringements occur.
2010/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2008/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Monitoring compliance is a complex task with multiple actors and therefore it requires cooperation between Member States and the Commission, as well as between Member States themselves. The contribution of the social partners with regard to monitoring and compliance and enforcement should be considered.
2010/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2008/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) It is therefore appropriate to modernise Directive 2002/15/EC in order to remedy shortcomings in the implementation, application and enforcement of the rules by clarifying its scope, reinforcing administrative cooperation among Member States and promoting the exchange of information and goodbest practice.
2010/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2008/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – subpoint a
Directive 2002/15/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. The Directive shall apply to mobile workers, as defined in Article 3(d) of this Directive, employed by undertakings established in a Member State, participating in road transport activities covered by Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 or, failing that, by the AETR Agreement. This Directive shall also apply to mobile workers as defined in the second sentence of Article 3(d).
2010/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2008/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 2 – subpoint a a (new)
Directive 2002/15/EC
Article 3 – point a – paragraph 2
(aa) ‘user undertaking’ means any natural or legal person for whom and under the supervision and direction of whom a driver is employed by;
2010/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2008/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 2002/15/EC
Article 11 a – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall organise a system of appropriate and regular monitoring and controls including multi-agency cooperation in order to guarantee the correct and consistent implementation of the rules contained in this Directive. They shall ensure that the national bodies responsible for enforcement of the Directive have an adequate number of qualified inspectors and shall take whatever measures are appropriate.
2010/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2008/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6
Directive 2002/15/EC
Article 11 a – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) to reinforce administrative cooperation between their competent authorities, through the adoption of effective systems of exchange of information, the improvement of access to information and the promotion of exchange of information and goodbest practices in enforcement of working time rules;
2010/02/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2008/0142(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. The Member States of affiliation shall ensure that there are mechanisms in place to provide patients on request with information on receiving healthcare in another Member State, including information outlining the risks associated with receiving healthcare in another Member State, and the terms and conditions that would apply, inter alia, whenever harm is caused as a result of healthcare received in another Member State.
2008/12/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2008/0142(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In addition to the information outlined in paragraph 1, information on health professionals and healthcare providers shall be made easily available via electronic means by the Member State in which the health professionals and healthcare providers are registered, and shall include the name, registration number, practice address of the healthcare professional, and any restrictions on their practice;
2008/12/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 182 #

2008/0142(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) competent healthcare regulatory bodies in each Member State shall define and share transparent and relevant information with other competent healthcare regulatory bodies with regard to the mobility of health professionals; this information shall include information that covers sanctions and undertakings arising from criminal behaviour, professional misconduct and sanctions imposed as a result of impaired fitness to practice;
2008/12/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 197 #

2008/0142(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) measures enabling a pharmacist or other health professional to verify the authenticity of the prescription and whether the prescription was issued in another Member State by an authorised person through developing a standardised Community prescription template, and supporting interoperability of ePrescriptions;
2008/12/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2008/0142(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall collect statistical and other additional data needed for monitoring purposes on the provision of cross-border healthcare, the care provided, its providers and patients, the cost and the outcomes. They shall also monitor trends and patterns in relation to adverse incidents or systems failures in respect of cross-border care. They shall collect such data as part of their general systems for collecting healthcare data, in accordance with national and Community law for the production of statistics and on the protection of personal data.
2008/12/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) Persons with disabilities include those who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which in interaction with attitudinal or environmental barriers may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others.
2008/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) Effective non-discriminatory access can be provided by a variety of means, including through 'design for all' and through facilitating the use of assistive devices by persons with disabilities, including aids to mobility and access, such as recognised guide dogs and other assistance dogs.
2008/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Member States are, being responsible for the organisation and content of education, shall ensure adequate protection against discrimination in the field of education. The Commission Communication on competences for the 21st Century: An Agenda for European Cooperation on Schools draws attention to the need for special attention to be paid to disadvantaged children and those with special educational needs. In particular national law may provide for differences in access to educational institutions based on religion or belief. Member States may also allow or prohibit the wearing or display of religious symbols at school.
2008/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 - paragraph 7
7. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, in the provision of financial services Member States may permit proportionate differences in treatment where, for the product in question, the use of age or disability is a key factor in the assessment of risk based on relevant and accurate actuarial or statistical data. The Member States concerned shall inform the Commission and ensure that accurate data relevant to use of age and disability as a determining actuarial factor are compiled, published and regularly updated. Such Member States shall review their decision five years after transposition of this Directive.
2008/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 - paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Member States shall ensure, in the case of compulsory financial services, where the product in question is required by law, that a person can not be refused access to such a service on the grounds of their age or disability except where it can be justified by a legitimate aim or if to provide such a service would be contrary to the public interest;
2008/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 - paragraph 1 - point a
(a) The measures necessary to enable persons with disabilities to have effective non-discriminatory access to social protection, social advantages, health care, education and access to and supply of goods and services which are available to the public, including housing and transport, shall be provided by anticipation, including through appropriate modifications or adjustments. Such measures should not impose a disproportionate burden, nor require fundamental alteration of the social protection, social advantages, health care, education, or, telecommunication and electronic communications, information including information provided in accessible formats, financial services, culture and leisure, buildings open to the public, transport modes and other public spaces and facilities, shall be provided by anticipation, including through appropriate modifications or adjustments. Where discrimination arises from practice, policy or procedure, measures need to be taken so that it no longer has that effect. Such measures should not impose a disproportionate burden, nor require fundamental alterations to the nature of the goods, services, trade, profession or business in question. An alteration is fundamental if it alters the goods andor services in question or require the provision of alternatives theretoor the nature of the trade, profession or business to the extent that the provider of the goods or services is effectively providing a completely different kind of goods or services.
2008/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 - paragraph 1 - point b a(new)
(ba) For the purposes of paragraph 1, effective non-discriminatory access involves the identification and elimination of obstacles and barriers, whether attitudinal or environmental, and the prevention of new obstacles and barriers that hamper the access of persons with disabilities to goods, services and facilities available to the general public, irrespective of the nature of the obstacle, barrier or disability. Subject to the provisions of this Directive, and regardless of the measures chosen to remove the obstacles or barriers, effective non-discriminatory access for persons with disabilities must be provided under the same terms and conditions as for persons without disabilities wherever possible, and the use of assistive devices by persons with disabilities facilitated, including aids to mobility and access, such as recognised guide dogs and other assistance dogs wherever necessary. Where effective non-discriminatory access cannot be provided under the same terms and conditions, and subject to the provisions of this Directive, a meaningful alternative to ensure access must be provided.
2008/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 - paragraph 3
3. This Directive shall be without prejudice to the provisions of Community law or national rules covering the accessibility of particular goods or services. However, wherever possible, Member States shall take measures to encourage providers of services and goods, in particular manufactured goods, to design accessible solutions, for instance through public procurement practices. Accessible products and services are those designed so that they can be used by all users.
2008/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 a (new)
Article 9a Assessment of alleged discrimination 1. Where an individual alleges that he or she has been the victim of multiple discrimination on the grounds of two or more of the characteristics referred to in Article 13 of the EC Treaty, the judicial or administrative authority shall compare the individual alleging discrimination with an individual who possesses none of the characteristics covered by Article 13 of the EC Treaty which the complainant alleges motivated the discrimination. This provision applies to instances of alleged direct and indirect discrimination. 2. Harassment and an instruction to discriminate which is motivated by two or more of the characteristics covered by Article 13 of the EC Treaty shall be regarded as discrimination and fall under the scope of this Directive.
2008/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11
With a view to promoting the principle of equal treatment, Member States shall encourage dialogue with relevant stakeholders, in particular non- governmental organisations, which have, in accordance with their national law and practice, a legitimate interest in contributing to the fight against discrimination on the grounds and in the areas covered by this Directive and such consultation should also include monitoring of the implementation of the Directive.
2008/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Member States arebeing responsible for the organisation and content of education, shall ensure adequate protection against discrimination in the field of education. The Commission Communication on Ccompetences for the 21st Century: An Agenda for European Cooperation on Schools draws attention to the need for special attention to be paid to disadvantaged children and those with special educational needs. In particular national law may provide for differences in access to educational institutions based on religion or belief. . Member States may also allow or prohibit the wearing or display of religious symbols at school.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 181 #

2008/0140(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Member States shall ensure in the case of compulsory financial services, where the product in question is required by law, that a person can not be refused access to such a service based on the grounds of their age or disability except where it can be justified by a legitimate aim or if to provide such a service would be contrary to public interest.
2009/02/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 6 #

2008/0105(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 11
(11) In accordance with Article 9(4) and Article 10(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No XXXX/XXXX of XX/XX/2008 [establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers] financial resources raised by way of the additional modulation are to be used for rural development support. It is appropriate to ensure that an amount equal to those financial resources should be used to support operations related to the new challenges, although care must be taken not to disincentivise farm production where its contribution to rural development is vital.
2008/08/18
Committee: REGI
Amendment 7 #

2008/0103(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Furthermore, in order to avoid the abandonment of agricultural land and ensure that it is maintained in good agricultural and environmental condition, Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 established a Community framework within which Member States adopt standards taking account of the specific characteristics of the areas concerned, including soil and climatic conditions and existing farming systems (land use, crop rotation, farming practices) and farm structures. The abolition of compulsory set aside within the single payment scheme may in certain cases have adverse effects for the environment, in particular as regards certain landscape features. It is therefore appropriate to reinforce the existing Community provisions aiming at protecting, where appropriate, specified landscape features. While taking account of the need for the highest standards in ensuring water quality as laid down by EU legislation, no further restrictions should be imposed which would impede desirable rural development.
2008/08/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 8 #

2008/0103(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 - paragraph 1
1. A farmer receiving direct payments shall respect the statutory management requirements listed in Annex II, and the good agricultural and environmental condition established under Article 6. Derogations from this paragraph shall be considered where persistent problems caused by natural phenomena such as flooding and land slides occur.
2008/08/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 9 #

2008/0103(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 - paragraph 1
1. Any amount of direct payments to be granted in a given calendar year to a farmer that exceeds EUR 520 000 shall be reduced for each year untilin 2010 and 2012 by the following percentages: (a) 2009: 7%, (b) 2010: 9%, (c) 2011: 11%,10: 6% (db) 2012: 137%.
2008/08/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 12 #

2008/0103(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 - paragraph 2
2. Member States shall give prioritySuch advice shall be free of charge to theall farmers who receive moreing less thatn EUR 15 000 of direct payments per yearin single farm payments.
2008/08/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 13 #

2008/0103(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15
By 31 December 2010 at the latest, the Commission shall submit a report on the application of the farm advisory system, accompanied, if necessary, by appropriate proposals with a view of rendering it compulsory. No costs shall be borne by farmers receiving less than EUR 15 000 in single farm payments.
2008/08/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 14 #

2008/0103(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 - paragraph 2
2. In case of negligence, the percentage of reduction shall not exceed 5% and, in case of repeated non-compliance, 15%. In duly justified cases Member States may decide that no reduction shall be applied where, given its severity, extent and permanence, a case of non-compliance is to be considered as minor. Cases of non- compliance which constitute a direct risk to public or animal health shall however not be considered as minor. Exceptions shall be considered where problems are caused by exceptional climatic conditions. Unless the farmer has taken immediate remedial action putting an end to the non- compliance found, the competent authority shall take the actions required that may, where appropriate, be limited to an administrative control, to ensure that the farmer remedies the findings of non- compliance concerned. The finding of minor non-compliance and the remedial action to be taken shall be notified to the farmer.
2008/08/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 15 #

2008/0103(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 - paragraph 2
2. Member States shall define the regions according to objective and non.- discriminatory criteria such as their institutional or administrative structure and/or the regional agricultural potential. Member States with less than three million eligible hectares may be considered as one single region. The Commission shall provide an appeals mechanism for affected parties who wish to challenge the definition of regions.
2008/08/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 18 #

2008/0103(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 - paragraph 2
2. The new Member States shall define the regions according to objective and non- discriminatory criteria. The Commission shall provide an appeals mechanism for affected parties who wish to challenge the definition of regions.
2008/08/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 17 #

2008/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The second subparagraph of Article 1 of the Treaty on European Union enshrines the concept of openness, stating that the Treaty marks a new stage in the process of creating an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe, in which decisions are taken as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen. This is reaffirmed in Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Declaration No 17 annexed to the Treaty of Maastricht and the Laeken Declaration, which linked improved transparency of the decision- making process to improved public access to information as set out in Article 255 of the EC Treaty, which in turn confirms the democratic nature of the institutions and the public’s confidence in the administration.
2008/12/18
Committee: PETI
Amendment 20 #

2008/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation shall apply to all documents held by an institution, namely, documents drawn up or received by it and in its possession concerning a matter relating to the policies, activities and decisions falling within its sphere of responsibility,direct and indirect responsibility and competence in all areas of activity of the European Union.
2008/12/18
Committee: PETI
Amendment 24 #

2008/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – point a
(a) "document" means any content whatever its medium (written on paper or stored in electronic form or as a sound, visual or audiovisual recording) drawn-up by an institution and formally transmitted to one or more recipients or otherwise registered, or received by an institution; data contained in electronic storage, processing aconcerning a matter which falls within the institution's direct or ind iretrieval systems are documents if they can be extracted in the form of a printout or electronic-format copy using the available tools for the exploitation of the systemct sphere of responsibility or competence;
2008/12/18
Committee: PETI
Amendment 25 #

2008/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording
1. The institutions shall refuse access to a documentAny refusal by an institution of access to a document shall take into account the principle of proportionality and shall be based exclusively on the content and timing of release of the document; the institution shall provide a justification for such refusal where disclosure would undermine the protection of the public interest as regards:
2008/12/18
Committee: PETI
Amendment 27 #

2008/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) documents relating to a matter where the decision has not been taken and the rules of transparency are complied with;
2008/12/18
Committee: PETI
Amendment 28 #

2008/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) documents containing opinions for internal use as part of deliberations and preliminary consultations within the institutions concerned, even after the decision has been taken and within a reasonable timeframe.
2008/12/18
Committee: PETI
Amendment 30 #

2008/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. In the event of a total or partial refusal, where the applicant questions the reality of harm to the interest allegedly affected and/or argues that there is an overriding interest in disclosure, the applicant may call on the European Ombudsman to give his independent and objective view on the question of harm and/or overriding public interest. If, following delivery of the European Ombudsman's opinion, the total or partial refusal is upheld by the institution, the applicant may, within 15 working days of receiving the institution's reply, make a confirmatory application asking the institution to reconsider its position. , to which the institution shall be required to reply within 15 days, granting or refusing the request. Or. eenen
2008/12/18
Committee: PETI
Amendment 31 #

2008/0090(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. Documents shall be supplied in an existing version and format (including electronically or in an alternative format such as Braille, large print or tape and in one of the official languages of the EU) with full regard to the applicant's preference. Access to documents shall not be limited by any software or operating system used in the institution's IT environment.
2008/12/18
Committee: PETI
Amendment 174 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) The indication of the country of origin or of the place of provenance of a food should be providedmandatory whenever its absence is likely to mislead consumers as to the true country of origin or place of provenance of that product. In other cases, the provision of the indication of country of origin or place of provenance is left to the appreciation of food business operators. In all cases, the indication of country of origin or place of provenance should be provided in a manner which does not deceive the consumer and on the basis of clearly defined criteria which ensure a level playing field for the industry and improve consumers’ understanding of the information related to the country of origin or place of provenance of a food. Such criteria should not apply to indications related to the name or address of the food business operator.
2009/01/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 275 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 –paragraph 5
5. Food business operators within the business under their control shall ensure that information relating to non-prepacked food shall be transmitted to the operator receiving the food in order to enable, where appropriate, the provision of the mandatory food information specified in Article 9(1) points (a) to (c) and (f) and (i) to the final consumer.
2009/01/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 309 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 –paragraph 3
3. The Commission may amend the list of mandatory particulars laid down in paragraph 1. Those measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation by supplementing it shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 49(3).deleted
2009/01/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 426 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. In the case of foods which, from a microbiological point of view, are highly perishable and are therefore likely after a short period to constitute an immediate danger to human health, the date of minimum durability shall be replaced by the ‘use by’ date and in the case of meat and poultry products the date of slaughter.
2009/01/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 603 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 - paragraph 4
4. For poultry and meat, other than beef and veal, the indication on the country of origin or place of provenance mayshall be given as aonly as the single place only where animals have been born, reared and slaughtered in the same country or place and not the place of processing or packing. In other cases information on each of the different places of birth, rearing and slaughter shall be given.
2009/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 40 #

2007/2290(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Notes that as a result of changing demographics, it is estimated that by 2030 the ratio of active to inactive people will be 2:1; calls on the Commission and Member States to develop policies to ensure that carers many of whom are obliged to withdraw from the labour market due to caring responsibilities are not adversely effected by pension insecurity;
2008/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2007/2290(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop educational programmes aimed at young adults to highlight the importance of investing in private pension schemes early which could play a significant role in reducing public spending on pensions in the future and could reduce the risk of falling into the poverty trap after retirement;
2008/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2007/2290(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes that although it may be necessary to increase the legal retirement age as part of future pension reforms, calls on Member States and the Commission to take adequate measures to ensure equal access to quality health care in order to promote healthy aging;
2008/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2007/2290(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on the Commission to take the necessary steps to ensure that EU citizens working and residing in another Member State do not lose out on some or all of their social security rights;
2008/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2007/2290(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Given that Carers are an indispensable but largely unrecognised part of our health care systems and society, calls on the Commission not to overlook the role that Carers play in society and asks the Commission to take adequate measures to ensure that Carers are included in future policy formulation;
2008/07/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2007/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas it is vital that peace building programmes, in particular those involving community and voluntary groups, continue to be financially supported when the PEACE funds come to an end;
2008/03/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 13 #

2007/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
La. whereas many community and voluntary initiatives funded under PEACE II are operating on an ongoing basis providing essential community services for marginalised groups in particular and are awaiting confirmation of funding so that they can continue providing these services;
2008/03/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 18 #

2007/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that the cooperation between participants in programmes financed by PEACE and IFI should not stop when the programme comes to an end; calls on government departments to consider maintaining that work, which proved to be effective, in order to ensure mainstream funding continues for this invaluable work once EU funding comes to an end;
2008/03/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 19 #

2007/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4a (new)
4a. Calls on the governments of both the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland to put in place temporary funding arrangements for community and voluntary groups in particular in order to bridge the gap between the end of PEACE II funding programmes and the beginning of PEACE III funding programmes;
2008/03/04
Committee: REGI