5 Amendments of Tatjana ŽDANOKA related to 2014/2252(INI)
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. HighlightWelcomes the fact that 2012 saw national parliaments show their first ‘yellow card’ in the context of the subsidiarity control mechanism, in response to the proposal for a regulation on the exercise of the right to take collective action within the context of the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. regrets that the Commission proposal for a regulation on the exercise of the right to take collective action fell short of what is needed to create legal certainty for all actors; reminds the Commission of the importance of full stakeholder consultation on such sensitive matters;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Firmly believeconsiders that the ‘Think Small First’ principle iscould be a key element in the policy process and can play an important role in job creation and growth by reducing the costs of regulation for businessefocussing on smart regulation which can be implemented in a way that ensures a level playing field for SMEs and micro- enterprises who have less administrative capacities than big enterprises; rejects any attempts to automatically exempt micro- enterprises or SMEs from European legislation; reminds all actors that UEAPME, the European Association of craft, small- and medium-sized companies considers the exemption of SMEs or micro enterprises of European legislation as a general rule as going against SME interests;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. WelcomNotes the increasing emphasis placed by the Commission on the policy cycles, and calls on the committee responsible to systematically review Commission impact assessments and to review Parliament’s ex-ante impact assessment analysis as early as possibleon impact assessments; nevertheless , believes that Commission and Parliament's impact assessments should be considered as a simply tool to allow a well-informed political decision and should never replace political decisions or cause delays in the legislative process.