Activities of Filiz HYUSMENOVA related to 2011/2312(INI)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on optimising the role of territorial development in cohesion policy PDF (219 KB) DOC (134 KB)
Amendments (10)
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recognises that cohesion policy can make a valuable contribution to delivering EU2020 targets, especially in employment, education and poverty reduction; notes, however, that cohesion policy, as a permanent and legally binding objective of the EU, must not be used solely as a means of implementing EU2020;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Points out that territorial cooperation and macro-regional strategies could be useful instruments for identifying and combating regional disparities, such as access to education and employment, and for promoting convergence between European regions;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Stresses that responding effectively to many problems in the area of social exclusion and poverty requires an adjusted and differentiated approach that has to take into account the specific needs of a given territory, such as metropolitan areas or rural areas;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Believes that mobility of workers and young graduates could be a possible solution for regional and local labour market shortages and encourages Member States and regions to use it more effectively in order to encourage territorial development and cohesion;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4 c. Considers it essential to coordinate the actions supported by the ESF at different policy levels in order to enable an efficient territorial approach; in particular, considers it necessary to link the educational services and facilities at the local level to the labour market needs;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Considers this instrument to be an excellent way of encouraging bottom-up participation from a cross-section of local community actors working towards territorial objectives; welcomes, in this respect, more capacity-building actions that will improve the participation of both the regional authorities and the local social partners;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Believes that operational programmes and projects must be designed and implemented at the appropriate level and attention must be paid to the role of cities, functional geographic territories, and areas facing specific geographical or demographic problems;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Considers that institutional capacity at different levels of intervention is a significant element ensuring the success of applying the territorial approach;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
Subheading 5
24. Underlines the need to look at examples such as the integrated use of EARDF, ESF and EFF funds through community-led local development in the future programming period as a way of developing synergies between all funds covered by the CPR; Joint action plans
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Welcomes further clarification on the scope of ITIs and the potential for the instrument, if it fits local needs, to be used in non-urban areas, in order to improve economic and social cohesion, not only among regions, but also among urban and non-urban areas within the regions;