BETA

1728 Amendments of Iuliu WINKLER

Amendment 8 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Subject to an assessment by the Commission carried out in the context of the regular monitoring of the impact of this Regulation and launched either following a duly substantiated request from a Member State or on the Commission’s own initiative, it is necessary to provide for the possibility to take any necessary measures for imports of any products falling under the scope of this Regulation which are adversely affecting the Union market or the market of one or several Member States for like or directly competing products. There is a particularly precarious situation in the markets for cereals, oilseeds, poultry, eggs, and sugar and honey and that may harm Union agricultural producers if imports from Ukraine were to increase. It is appropriate to introduce an automatic safeguard for cereals, oilseeds, eggs, poultry, and sugar and honey products that is activated if quantities imported pursuant to this Regulation exceed the arithmetic mean of quantities in 2021, 2022 and 2023.
2024/02/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1– subparagraph 1
1. If a product covered by Article 1(1) or any other product originating in Ukraine is imported under conditions which adversely affect the Union market or the market of one or several Member States for like or directly competing products, the Commission may impose any measure which is necessary by means of an implementing act. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 5(3).
2024/02/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. In critical circumstances where delay would cause damage that would be difficult to repair, the Commission may provisionally impose any measure which is necessary by means of an implementing act. Such measures may only be imposed upon a duly substantiated request from a Member State pursuant to paragraph 3(a) of this Article and shall be adopted within 210 days after the request has been received. The implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 5(4). The duration of a provisional safeguard measure shall not exceed 120 days.
2024/02/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Subject to an assessment by the Commission carried out in the context of the regular monitoring of the impact of this Regulation and launched either following a duly substantiated request from a Member State or on the Commission’s own initiative, it is necessary to provide for the possibility to take any necessary measures for imports of any products falling under the scope of this Regulation which are adversely affecting the Union market or the market of one or several Member States for like or directly competing products. There is a particularly precarious situation in the markets for cereals, oilseeds, poultry, eggs, and sugar and honey that may harm Union agricultural producers if imports from Ukraine were to increase. It is appropriate to introduce an automatic safeguard for cereals, oilseeds, eggs, poultry, and sugar and honey products that is activated if quantities imported pursuant to this Regulation exceed the arithmetic mean of quantities in 2021, 2022 and 2023.
2024/02/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 26 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
7. If, during the period 6 June to 31 December 2024, cumulative import volumes of either common wheat, wheat flours, and pellets; barley, barley flour and pellets; oats; maize, maize flour and pellets; barley groats and meal; cereal grains otherwise worked; sunflower seeds, oil and meals; rapeseed seeds, oil and meal; honey; eggs, poultry or sugar since 1 January 2024 reach the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded in 2021, 2022 and 2023, the Commission shall, within 210 days and after informing the Committee on Safeguards established by Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/478:
2024/02/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 31 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) reintroduce for that product the corresponding tariff-rate quota suspended by Article 1(1), point b, until 31 December 2024 or in the case of sunflower seeds, oil and meals; rapeseed seeds, oil and meal; introduce a new tariff-rate quota based on the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded in 2021, 2022 and 2023, until 31 December 2024; and
2024/02/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) promote Ukraine in exporting any product that has reached the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded in 2021 and 2022, to markets outside the EU; and
2024/02/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 33 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) introduce from 1 January 2025 either a tariff-rate quota equal to five twelfths of that arithmetic mean or the corresponding tariff-rate quota suspended by Article 1(1), point b, whichever is highlower.
2024/02/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 39 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
If, during the period 1 January to 5 June 2025, cumulative import volumes of either common wheat, flours, and pellets; barley, flour and pellets; oats; maize, flour and pellets; barley groats and meal; cereal grains otherwise worked; sunflower seeds, oil and meals; rapeseed seeds, oil and meal; honey; eggs, poultry or sugar for the period since 1 January 2025 reach five twelfths of the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded 2021, 2022 and 2023, the Commission shall, within 210 days and after informing the Committee on Safeguards, reintroduce for that product the corresponding tariff-rate quota suspended by Article 1(1), point b or in the case of sunflower seeds, oil and meals; rapeseed seeds, oil and meal; introduce a new tariff-rate quota based on the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded in 2021, 2022 and 2023.
2024/02/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
For the purposes of this paragraph, the terms eggs, poultry and sugar refer to all products covered by the tariff-rate quotas in the Appendix to Annex I-A of the Association Agreement for, respectivelcommon wheat, flours, and pellet ; barley, flour and pellets; oats; maize, flour and pellets; barley groats and meal; cereal grains otherwise worked; sunflower seeds, oil and meals; rapeseed seeds, oil and meal; honey; eggs, poultry and sugar refer to all products covered by the tariff-rate quotas in the Appendix to Annex I-A of the Association Agreement for, respectively, common wheat, wheat flours, and pellets; barley, barley flour and pellets; oats ; maize, maize flour and pellets; barley groats and meal; cereal grains otherwise worked; sunflower seeds, oil and meals; rapeseed seeds, oil and meal; honey, eggs and albumins, poultry meat and poultry meat preparations, and sugars, and the arithmetic mean shall be calculated by dividing the sum of import volumes in 2021, 2022 and 2023 by twohree.
2024/02/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 46 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
If a product covered by Article 1(1) or any other product originating in Ukraine is imported under conditions which adversely affect the Union market or the market of one or several Member States for like or directly competing products, the Commission may impose any measure which is necessary by means of an implementing act. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 5(3).
2024/02/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 48 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. If a product covered by Article 1(1) originating in Ukraine is imported in the EU or transit by the EU, the destination for all consignments of that product should be determined prior to entry into the EU by Ukrainian authorities. Furthermore, Ukrainian authorities should provide to the European Commission the necessary documentation certifying that those consignments reached their destination.
2024/02/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
If, during the period 6 June to 31 December 2024, cumulative import volumes of either eggs, poultry orcommon wheat, wheat flours, and pellets ; barley, barley flour and pellets ; oats ; maize, maize flour and pellets ; barley groats and meal; cereal grains otherwise worked ; sunflower seeds, oil and meals; rapeseed seeds, oil and meal; honey; eggs, poultry, sugar since 1 January 2024 reach the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded in 2022 and1, 2022, 2023, the Commission shall, within 210 days and after informing the Committee on Safeguards established by Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/478:
2024/02/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 77 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) reintroduce for that product the corresponding tariff-rate quota suspended by Article 1(1), point b, until 31 December 2024 or in the case of sunflower seeds, oil and meals; rapeseed seeds, oil and meal; introduce a new tariff-rate quota based on the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded in 2021, 2022 and 2023, until 31 December 2024; and
2024/02/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 83 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) introduce from 1 January 2025 either a tariff-rate quota equal to five twelfths of that arithmetic mean or the corresponding tariff-rate quota suspended by Article 1(1), point b, whichever is highlower.
2024/02/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 89 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
If, during the period 1 January to 5 June 2025, cumulative import volumes of either eggs, poultry orcommon wheat, flours, and pellets ; barley, flour and pellets ; oats ; maize, flour and pellets ; barley groats and meal; cereal grains otherwise worked ; sunflower seeds, oil and meals; rapeseed seeds, oil and meal; honey; eggs, poultry, sugar for the period since 1 January 2025 reach five twelfths of the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded 2021, 2022 and 2023, the Commission shall, within 210 days and after informing the Committee on Safeguards, reintroduce for that product the corresponding tariff-rate quota suspended by Article 1(1) or in the case of sunflower seeds, oil and meals; rapeseed seeds, oil and meal; introduce a new tariff-rate quota based on the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded in 2021, 2022 and 2023, point b.
2024/02/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 104 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
For the purposes of this paragraph, the terms eggs, poultry andcommon wheat, flours, and pellets ; barley, flour and pellets ; oats ; maize, flour and pellets ; barley groats and meal; cereal grains otherwise worked ; sunflower seeds, oil and meals; rapeseed seeds, oil and meal; honey; eggs, poultry, sugar, refer to all products covered by the tariff-rate quotas in the Appendix to Annex I-A of the Association Agreement for, respectively, common wheat, wheat flours, and pellets ; barley, barley flour and pellets ; oats ; maize, maize flour and pellets ; barley groats and meal; cereal grains otherwise worked ; sunflower seeds, oil and meals; rapeseed seeds, oil and meal; honey, eggs and albumins, poultry meat and poultry meat preparations, and sugars, and the arithmetic mean shall be calculated by dividing the sum of import volumes in 2021, 2022 and 2023 by twohree.
2024/02/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 123 #

2024/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. If a product covered by Article 1(1) originating in Ukraine is imported in the EU or transit by the EU, the destination for all consignments of that product should be determined prior to entry into the EU by Ukrainian authorities. Furthermore, Ukrainian authorities should provide to the European Commission the necessary documentation certifying that those consignments reached their destination.
2024/02/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 5 #

2023/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that Chinese investments in Europe continued to decline in 2022, reaching a 10-year low of EUR 7.9 billion; recalls a shift in Chinese FDI from mergers and acquisitions (M&A) towards greenfield investments, primarily in battery technology, which is a key sector of the Green Transition1a; _________________ 1a https://rhg.com/research/chinese-fdi-in- europe-2022-update/
2023/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2023/2072(INI)

3. Is nevertheless convinced that the trade and investment relationship between the EU and China is of strategic importance and should be rules-based, with the multilateral trading system and the principle of reciprocity at its core; welcomes a strategy built on the concept of ‘de-risking’, alongside higher degrees of awareness as regard vulnerabilities linked to the possible weaponisation of economic dependencies and the foreign control or influence on critical infrastructure;
2023/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 21 #

2023/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that trade and investment are key drivers of sustainable growth, job creation and innovation and that the EU should therefore maintain its economic openness1 ; stresses however that a strategic balance must be found between the open character of the EU Single Market and the related security vulnerabilities, especially concerning economic coercion or threats to the integrity of European critical infrastructure; _________________ 1 Commission communication of 18 February 2021 entitled ‘Trade Policy Review – An Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy’ (COM(2021)0066).
2023/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2023/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the Commission’s proposed European economic security strategy2 , which aims to maximise the benefits of the EU’s economic openness while minimising the risks resulting from economic interdependencies; approves of the fact that the strategy explicitly recognises that risks to the physical and cyber security of critical infrastructure are key security vulnerabilities for European economies; is convinced that the protection of critical infrastructure should be a key element in the implementation of the strategy; _________________ 2 Joint communication from the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 20 June 2023 on ‘European Economic Security Strategy’ (JOIN(2023)0020).
2023/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 42 #

2023/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Underlines that EU responses must be built around an augmented understanding of the relevant strategic picture centred on cross-policy and cross- national threat assessments and vulnerability studies on critical infrastructure; is of the opinion that a decentralised or lacunar perception, lacking clear visibility and scrutiny over projects with strategic significance for Europe’s defence and security can greatly harm the Union’s geopolitical interests1a; recalls vulnerabilities linked to foreign interference, specifically in the information space, and the interplay between FDI projects and information manipulation operations by malign foreign actors; _________________ 1a Security implications of China-owned critical infrastructure in the European Union - DG EXPO in-depth analysis
2023/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 54 #

2023/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that the Regulation on the screening of foreign direct investments3 addresses risks to security and public order resulting from investments from outside the EU; notes that critical infrastructure is among the factors that may be taken into consideration by the Member States or the Commission in determining whether an investment is likely to affect security or public order.; reiterates the key added value of the screening mechanism as a pertinent tool giving the Union and its Member States a better strategic overview and situational awareness regarding trends, targets, means and methods deployed by foreign actors to increase their economic and political influence; _________________ 3 Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 establishing a framework for the screening of foreign direct investments into the Union (OJ L 79I, 21.3.2019, p. 1).
2023/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 56 #

2023/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Highlights the role of the EU as a promotor of quality infrastructure projects abroad, through initiatives such as the Global Gateway or through the G7 Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment; underlines the EU’s need to deliver on its value-based and sustainability-driven rhetoric of international infrastructure projects, acknowledging the vital geostrategic role such programs can have at the level of diversification, supply chain resilience, standard setting and regulatory alignment;
2023/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #

2023/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Argues that a key area of EU critical infrastructure is also its network of research institutes and R&D facilities, which play a pertinent role in the Union’s ability to deliver on its green and digital transitions, alongside key arenas such as space of defence; reminds of security vulnerabilities linked to forced technology transfers, IP-theft and knowledge leaks, both at home and abroad, and calls for increased vigilance in accounting for such threats to the EU’s ability to innovate and foster growth.
2023/09/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 5 #

2023/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas ports are not the final destinations of trade flows, but rather nodes in global value chain networks and regional trade flows, alongside rail-, road- , and air-transport links, which deserve an equal attention in terms of securtiy, resilience and competitiveness;
2023/09/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 11 #

2023/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that geopolitical tension and supply chain disruption, alongside Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, represent significant challenges for the efficient operation of European ports; highlights that while ports represent a key engine for growth, these can also be a strategic source of vulnerability that needs prioritised attention at EU level;
2023/09/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2023/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Emphasises the role of European ports as critical infrastructure in EU efforts to boost supply chain resilience, especially in key areas linked to the green and digital transformations and in boosting energy security; recalls the importance of the smooth operation of European ports in maintaining existing trade routes and providing alternative ones, in efforts to build resilience through diversification;
2023/09/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 21 #

2023/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that an open, sustainable and assertive EU trade policy, coupled with ambitious trade agreements, would strengthen the competitiveness and resilience of European ports, as well as European prosperity, growth and jobs;
2023/09/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2023/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the implementation of recent or pending EU legislation, including in the field of trade, will require investment and training for port operators and authorities; recalls the importance of a global level playing field in this key area;
2023/09/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2023/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that in certain cases foreign trade and investment can cause security vulnerabilities, in particular with regard to foreign ownership, control or access to EU critical infrastructure, including European ports; calls for increased vigilance and more coordination at EU level, including as concerns the facilitation of information sharing and relevant security guidelines for national and private operators;
2023/09/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2023/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that the regulation on the screening of foreign direct investments2 addresses risks to security and public order resulting from investments from third countries, including those concerning European ports; welcomes the upcoming review of the FDI Screening Mechanism and calls for a strengthened instrument, with increased coherence at the level of Member States; regrets that not all Member States benefit from a national FDI screening mechanism; stresses the importance of a transparent process of evaluation and revision, as well as clear guidelines for a possibly enhanced mechanism at EU level, as these will provide legal certainty and predictability to all implementing stakeholders; _________________ 2 Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 establishing a framework for the screening of foreign direct investments into the Union (OJ L 79I, 21.3.2019, p. 1).
2023/09/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 66 #

2023/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Emphasises the considerable role that the Global Gateway could play in strengthening the network of European ports with third countries, facilitating trade and expanding investment opportunities. recalls the role of economic diplomacy, including its parliamentary dimension, in promoting such European flagship initiatives and strengthening international partnerships for resilient, sustainable and diversified trade.
2023/09/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 70 #

2023/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Once again stresses the importance of the competitiveness of European ports, including the related technological innovations and skills for EU trade policy; argues that a comprehensive European Port Strategy must provide coherence, stability and predictability to a strategic area of growth, fostering the potential for development of European operators, shipbuilders and seafarers; is convinced that such a Strategy would be in line with the Commission’s Communication on Economic Security, boosting the resilience of supply chains by increasing internal strength, alongside the supply and demand dimensions of such critical infrastructure value chains.
2023/09/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 48 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) Access to raw materials is essential for the Union economy and the functioning of the internal market. There is a set of non-energy, non-agricultural raw materials that, due to their high economic importance and their exposure to high supply risk, often caused by a high concentration of supply from a few third countries, are considered critical. Given the key role of many such critical raw materials in realising the green and digital transitions, and in light of their use for defence and space applications, demand will increase exponentially in the coming decades. At the same time, the risk of supply disruptions is increasing against the background of rising geopolitical tensions and resource competition, with serious vulnerabilities linked to the possible weaponisation of supply dependencies and bottlenecks. Furthermore, if not managed properly, increased demand for critical raw materials could lead to negative environmental and social impacts. Considering these trends, it is necessary to take measures to ensure access to a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials to safeguard the Union's economic resilience and open strategic autonomy.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 55 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Firstly, in order to effectively ensure the Union's access to a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials, that framework should include measures to decrease the Union's growing supply risks by strengthening Union capacities along all stages of the strategic raw materials value chain, including extraction, processing and recycling, towards benchmarks defined for each strategic raw material. Secondly, as the Union will continue to rely on imports, the framework should include measures to increase the diversification of external supplies of strategic raw materials, including trough the ratification of new FTAs with third countries. Thirdly, is necessary to provide measures to reinforce the Union’s ability to monitor and mitigate existing and future supply risks. Fourthly, the framework should contain measures to increase the circularity and sustainability of the critical raw materials consumed in the Union.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) In order to ensure that the measures set out in the Regulation focus on the most relevant materials, a list of strategic raw materials and a list of critical raw materials should be established. Those lists should also serve to guide and coordinate Member States’ efforts to contribute to the realisation of the aims of this Regulation. The list of strategic raw materials should contain raw materials that are of high strategic importance, taking into account their use in strategic technologies underpinning the green and digital transitions or for defence or space applications, that are characterised by a potentially significant gap between global supply and projected demand, and for which an increase in production is relatively difficult, for instance due to long lead-times for new projects increasing supply capacity. To take account of possible technological and economic changes, the list of strategic materials should be periodically reviewed and, if necessary, updated. Moreover, the list will be based on a clear and transparent methodology, allowing for increased predictability and stability for European economic operators. In order to ensure that efforts to increase the Union capacities along the value chain, reinforce the Union’s capacity to monitor and mitigate supply risks and increase diversification of supply are focused on the materials for which they are most needed, the relevant measures should only apply to the list of strategic raw materials.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 58 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) Decarbonisation efforts in European industrial processes also require secondary raw materials. These are key for the development of technologies which will enable the green and digital transitions. A sub-list of strategic secondary raw materials should be established within the strategic raw materials in order to prioritise the supply of specific materials, in line with the following: their role in decarbonisation endeavours; forecasted growth in global demand; potential bottlenecks and dependencies; scarcity of supply in the EU or related technological difficulties; potential for recovery of critical raw material. The assessment should also take into account strategic forecast analyses to address future bottlenecks or supply disruption.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 63 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) To strengthen Union capacities along the strategic raw materials value chain, benchmarks should be set to guide efforts and track progress. The aim should be to increase capacities for each strategic raw material at each stage of the value chain, while aiming to achieve overall capacity benchmarks for extraction, processing and recycling of strategic raw materials. Firstly, the Union should increase the use of its own geological resources of strategic raw materials and build up capacity, including through innovative technologies and relevant skills, to allow it to extract the materials needed to produce at least 10 % of the Union's consumption of strategic raw materials. Keeping in mind that extraction capacity is highly dependent on the availability of Union geological resources, the achievement of this benchmark is dependent on such availability. Secondly, in order to build a full value chain and prevent any bottlenecks at intermediate stages, the Union should in addition increase its processing capacity along the value chain and be able to produce at least 40 % of its annual consumption of strategic raw materials. Thirdly, it is expected that in the coming decades a growing share of the Union's consumption of strategic raw materials can be covered by secondary raw materials, which would improve both the security and the sustainability of the Union’s raw materials supply. Therefore, Union recycling capacity should be able to produce at least 15 % of the Union’s annual consumption of strategic raw materials. These benchmarks refer to the 2030 time horizon, in alignment with the Union's climate and energy targets set under Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council29 and the digital targets under the Digital Decade30 , which they underpin. Furthermore, quality jobs, including skills development and job-to-job transitions, will address risks in the sectoral labour market and help ensure the EU’s competitiveness. These benchmarks must remain flexible, given the differing chemical properties, geological availability and overall specificities of the materials in question. _________________ 29 Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1). 30 Decision (EU) 2022/2481 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 establishing the Digital Decade Policy Programme 2030 (OJL 323, 19.12.2022, p. 4–26 )
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 69 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) Chemical regulation is a key component for ensuring a stable investment environment for the processing of critical and strategic raw materials in the Union; Therefore, the Union's chemical regulation must be better aligned with its raw materials supply agenda and the Commission should promote the timely use of Risk Management Option Analysis for relevant materials listed in Annex I and Annex II of this regulation;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 73 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) In exceptional cases, it is also necessary to put in place appropriate measures to support Strategic Projects aimed at the extraction, processing or recycling of critical raw materials in the Union that should, together with Member State efforts, contribute to increasing capacities; Such projects should be limited to those that make a significant contribution to the security of the Union's supply of critical raw materials;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 83 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) Imports of raw materials present in Annexes 1 and 2 of this regulation play a key role in efforts to diversify supply and increase the resilience of EU supply chains. Importantly, these imports must observe the principle of fair competition as the Union market operates on a level playing field. The Commission shall act swiftly and assertively when evidence suggests unfair trade practices, effectively implementing the Union's trade defence toolbox.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 126 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. When assessing the effectiveness of relevant measures to attain the benchmarks, including as concerns the review stipulated by Article 46, the Commission shall apply a tailored approach to the different raw materials, in line with their specificities, availability, use and recycling possibilities.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 145 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 36 to amend Annex I, Section 1 in order to update the list of strategic raw materials, in line with a clear and transparent methodology.
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 155 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) the project would make a significant contribution to the security of the Union's supply of critical raw materials;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 438 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Section 1 – paragraph 1 – point p a (new)
(pa) Ferrous scrap
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 442 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 2 a (new)
2a. whether the project contributes to significantly strengthening Union capacities as a share of the Union's annual consumption of any critical raw material;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 443 #

2023/0079(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 2 b (new)
2b. a significant strengthening of Union capacities as a share of the Union's annual consumption of any critical raw material would mean a project that would deliver at least 20% of the Union's existing annual consumption of the critical raw material in question;
2023/06/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 9 #

2022/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the European industry and SMEs are the foundation of the EU and its success; emphasises that the twin transition needs the involvement of European industry; underlines the need to fully support the industrial sector and SMEs in the twin transition by providing them i.e. with easier access to finance; and sufficient funds and support for R&;D and innovation; a large scale change can only be achieved if the necessary incentives are provided for innovative climate and digital solutions.
2022/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 17 #

2022/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Is concerned that both the current and the proposed EU legislation envisages too many administrative and bureaucratic hurdles for EU businesses; calls on the Commission to fully implement the principles of better regulation and ‘think small first’ in its legislative work, especially concerning the energy transition sector and export oriented economic areas;
2022/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 23 #

2022/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. reiterates its position to the Commission from its resolution of December 16th 2020 to adopt a roadmap for better regulation; notes that several Member States have set quantitative targets of up to 30% for reduction of administrative burden and calls on the Commission to set ambitious and binding quantitative and qualitative targets of at least 30% reduction of regulatory burden.
2022/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 27 #

2022/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that for the EU to keep a prominent place in the world economy as well as regain a strong position in important global supply chains and to be competitive in open markets, every sector must receive sufficient support in developing its respective technological base, and in promoting theincreasing and facilitating research and innovation efforts carried out by public and private stakeholders;
2022/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 30 #

2022/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Welcomes the intention of the Commission to issue guidance on public procurement; emphasises that public procurement is an indispensable instrument for national and economic security; stresses in this regard the need to signal to third countries that European public procurement markets will remain open whilst focusing efforts toward creating a level-playing field as well as toward limiting bureaucratic burdens for economic operators and contracting authorities.
2022/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 33 #

2022/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that the key European policy goals1 remain unchanged in spite of recent developments at international level; in particular in regard to Putin’s war in the Ukraine. _________________ 1 https://ec.europa.eu/info/priorities-and- goals_en.
2022/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2022/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for further negotiations to secure future-oriented, modern trade agreements and to continue with the reform of the World Trade Organization; points out that trade and access to third markets are crucial in supporting the EU’s economic recovery due to the Covid pandemic and resilience, with the aim of strengthening the EU’s autonomy, diversifying its supply chains and guaranteeing its independence from any single producer, especially concerning raw and intermediate products and materials;
2022/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 49 #

2022/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Strongly insists that the fight against illicit trade and the prevention of unfair competition, as well as strategic investment and takeovers by hostile actors, must remain a key priority in order to safeguard the EU industrial autonomy and competitiveness;
2022/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 64 #

2022/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Calls on the Commission to commence negotiations on trade and cooperation agreements with possible international partners for the production and trade of sustainable hydrogen in order to ensure the future supply of renewable fuels of non-biological origin to the EU's industry, heating and transport sectors;
2022/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 68 #

2022/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8 b. Stresses the need to upgrade and expand the existing EU gas infrastructure, including the necessary terminals with sufficient capacity to enable the import and transport of ammonia and hydrogen across the Union in order to enable the hydrogen economy;
2022/04/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 128 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) As a member of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the Union is committed to promoting a rules-based, open, multilateral trading system under the WTO. Any measures introduced by the Union that affect trade must be WTO compliant. Further, all measures introduced by the Union that affect trade must take into account the possible response of the Union’s trade partners and ensure that the enforcement of the measure is not perceived as a unilateral protectionist measure.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 147 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (’SMEs’) can have limited resources and ability to ensure that the products they place or make available on the Union market are free from forced labour. The Commission should therefore issue guidelines on due diligence in relation to forced labour, which should take into account also the size and economic resources of economic operators. In addition, the Commission should issue specific guidelines on forced-labour risk indicators and on publicly available information in order to help SMEs, as well as other economic operators, to comply with the requirements of the prohibition who will become affected by this Regulation, as well as other economic operators.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 148 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) Taking into account that this Regulation breaches the European Parliament's and Commission's interinstitutional agreement on Better Law-Making by excluding an impact assessment, and thus lacks significant estimates needed to evaluate cost-benefit, the one-in, one-out principle, and WTO compatibility amongst other things, the Commission should create an impact assessment six months after the Regulation's entry into force. The Commission should also submit a comprehensive report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the impact of the Regulation, three years after its applicability. The report shall evaluate the effectiveness of this Regulation in reaching its objectives, in particular, its impact on the eradication of forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 151 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 b (new)
(18b) Given that this Regulation will impose additional compliance costs on economic operators, action needs to be taken to prevent the total level of regulatory and financial burden from increasing. Therefore, in line with the Commission's Better Regulation agenda, and the 'one in, one out' principle, the Commission should present, before the application of this Regulation, proposals offsetting the regulatory and financial burdens introduced by this Regulation, through the revision or abolishment of provisions in other Union legislative acts that generate compliance costs for economic operators.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 170 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) Before initiating an investigation, competent authorities should request from the economic operators under assessment information on actions taken to mitigate, prevent or bring to an end risks of forced labour in their operations and valuesupply chains with respect to the products under assessment. Carrying out such due diligence in relation to forced labour should help the economic operator to be at a lower risk of having forced labour in its operations and valuesupply chains. Appropriate due diligence means that forced labour issues in the valuesupply chain have been identified and addressed in accordance with relevant Union legislation and international standards. That implies that where the competent authority considers that there is no substantiated concern of a violation of the prohibition, for instance due to, but not limited to the applicable legislation, guidelines, recommendations or any other due diligence in relation to forced labour being applied in a way that mitigates, prevents and brings to an end the risk of forced labour, no investigation should be initiated.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 173 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) In order to ensure cooperation among competent authorities designated under this and other relevant legislation and in order to ensure consistency in their actions and decisions, competent authorities designated under this Regulation should request information from other relevant authorities, where necessary, on whether economic operators under assessment are subject to and carry out due diligence in relation to forced labour in accordance with applicable Union legislation or Member States legislation setting out due diligence and transparency requirements with respect to forced labour. When requesting information from economic operators, competent authorities should follow the Commission’s Once-Only principle, through increased cooperation and dialogue between authorities who are engaged in overseeing product regulation. An economic operator should not have to submit the same information more than once.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 185 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) During the preliminary phase of investigation, competent authorities should focus on the economic operators involved in the steps of the valuesupply chain where there is a higher risk of forced labour with respect to the products under investigation, also taking into account their size and economic resources, the quantity of products concerned and the scale of the suspected forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 188 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Competent authorities, when requesting information during the investigation, should prioritise to the extent possible and consistent with the effective conduct of the investigation the economic operators under investigation that are involved in the steps of the valuesupply chain as close as possible to where the likely risk of forced labour occurs and take into account the size and economic resources of the economic operators, the quantity of products concerned, as well as the scale of suspected forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 204 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Competent authorities that establish that economic operators violated the prohibition, should without delay prohibit the placing and making available of such products on the Union market and their export from the Union, and require the economic operators that have been investigated to withdraw the relevant products already made available from the Union market and have them recycled, or should this not be possible destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including Union legislation on waste management. Agricultural products that cannot be recycled, should be donated, or, should this not be possible, destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including Union legislation on waste management.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 219 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) If the economic operators fail to comply with the decision of the competent authorities by the end of the established timeframe, the competent authorities should ensure that the relevant products are prohibited from being placed or made available on the Union market, exported or withdrawn from the Union market and that any such products remaining with the relevant economic operators are recycled, or should this not be possible destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including Union legislation on waste management at the expense of the economic operators. Agricultural products that cannot be recycled, should be donated, or, should this not be possible, destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including Union legislation on waste management.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 238 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) The Commission should issue guidelines in order to facilitate the implementation of the prohibition by economic operators and competent authorities. Such guidelines should include guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour and complementary information for the competent authorities to implement the prohibition. The guidance on due diligence in relation to forced labour should build on the Guidance on due diligence for Union businesses to address the risk of forced labour in their operations and supply chains published by the Commission and the European External Action Service in July 2021. The guidelines should be consistent with other Commission guidelines in this regard and relevant international organisations’ guidelines. The guidelines should include sectoral guidance such as the garment and textile sector, agri-sector and automotive sector, as well as type of supplier such as wholesale, manufacture or smallholder farm. The reports from international organisations, in particular the ILO, as well as other independent and verifiable sources of information should be considered for the identification of risk indicators.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 256 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) Where the competent authorities conclude that a product corresponds to a decision establishing a violation of the prohibition, they should immediately inform customs authorities which should refuse its release for free circulation or export. The product should be recycled, or should this not be possible destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including legislation on waste management, which excludes re-export in case of non-Union goods. . Agricultural products that cannot be recycled, should be donated, or, should this not be possible, destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including legislation on waste management.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 263 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37 a (new)
(37a) The Commission should take into due consideration the risk of disengagement by economic operators who are either related to products, regions or production sites in the data base, or who have had their product removed from the Union market, as well as the consequences on affected workers. The Commission should therefore, where appropriate, support economic operators in adopting and carrying out measures suitable and effective for bringing forced labour to an end.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 272 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42 a (new)
(42a) With acknowledgment of current developments in traceability technology and the use of blockhain to facilitate monitoring of supply chains, the Commission should support economic operators in the uptake of such technology, including through financial and technical assistance.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 282 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
(45) Since forced labour is a global problem and given the interlinkages of the global value chains, it is necessary to promote international cooperation against forced labour, which would also improve the efficiency of applying and enforcing the prohibition. The Commission should as appropriately cooperate with and exchange information with authorities of third countries and international organisations to create enabling environments to promote and protect human rights, including capacity building to support workers and local communities in their efforts to root out forced labour from global supply chains and enhance the effective implementation of the prohibition. International cooperation with authorities of non-EU countries should take place in a structured way as part of the existing dialogue structures, for example Human Rights Dialogues with third countries, or, if necessary, specific ones that will be created on an ad hoc basis. The Commission should further integrate this Regulation with existing trade measures such as free trade agreements and the Generalised Scheme of Preferences, to enhance the cumulative effect of EU trade measures in eradicating forced labour. This means that in the case where a product has been found to have forced labour, it cannot qualify for GSP tariff reduction. Furthermore, if third country authorities are found to be non-cooperative, or not taking measures to end forced labour within their national borders, the Commission should evaluate whether they should benefit from existing GSP trade facilitation. The Commission should ensure coherence and synergies between relevant external policies, in particular development cooperation and projects focusing on the eradication of forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 291 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules prohibiting economic operators from placing and making available on the Union market or exporting from the Union market products made with forced labour. This Regulation contributes to the fight against forced labour and promotes corporate sustainability due diligence standards.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 298 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation shall not cover the withdrawal of products which have reached the end-users in the Union market, or been transformed or integrated into another product and constitute minor component of the final product.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 334 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) ‘economic operator’ means any natural or legal person or association of personsbusiness with more than 1000 employees on average and a worldwide net turnover exceeding EUR 150 million in the financial year preceding the last financial year who is placing or making available products on the Union market or exporting products;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 352 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point n
(n) ‘substantiated concern’ means a well-founded reason, based on objective, factual and verifiable information, for the competent authorities to suspect that products were likely made with forced labour;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 355 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r – point 1 (new)
1) 'supply chain' means the network of organizations that cooperate to transform raw materials into finished goods (including the extraction, harvest, production or manufacturing)
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 356 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point s a (new)
(sa) 'mass balance model' means a chain of custody model in which materials or products with a set of specified characteristics are mixed according to defined criteria with materials or products without that set of characteristics;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 373 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Competent authorities shall follow a risk-based approach in assessing the likelihood that economic operators violated Article 3. That assessment shall be based on all relevant, factual and verifiable information available to them, including the following information:
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 385 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. In their assessment of the likelihood that economic operators violated Article 3, competent authorities shall focus on the economic operators involved in the steps of the valuesupply chain as close as possible to where the risk of forced labour is likely to occur and take into account the size and economic resources of the economic operators, the quantity of products concerned, the complexity of the supply chain as well as the scale of suspected forced labour.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 393 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Before initiating an investigation in accordance with Article 5(1), the competent authority shall request from the economic operators under assessment information on actions taken to identify, prevent, mitigate or bring to an end risks of forced labour in their operations and valuesupply chains with respect to the products under assessment, including on the basis of any of the following:
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 394 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
(aa) any industry scheme, third-party audit or certification from the economic operators' suppliers that guarantees the absence of forced labour;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 399 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Economic operators shall respond to the request of the competent authority referred to in paragraph 3 within 1530 working days from the day they received such request or make a justified request for an extension of that time limit. Economic operators may provide to competent authorities any other information they may deem useful for the purposes of this Article.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 424 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6
6. The competent authority shall duly take into account where the economic operator demonstrates that it carries out due diligence on the basis of identified forced labour impact in its supply chain, adopts and carries out measures suitable and effective for bringing to an end forced labour in a short period of timetheir supply chain.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 458 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) prioritise the economic operators under investigation involved in the steps of the valuesupply chain as close as possible to where the likely risk of forced labour occurs and
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 462 #

2022/0269(COD)

(b) take into account the size and economic resources of the economic operators, the quantity of products concerned, the complexity of the supply chain as well as the scale of suspected forced labour.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 476 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. When deciding on the time limits referred to in this Article, competent authorities shall consider the size and economic resources of the economic operators concerned as well as the complexity of the supply chain.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 488 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Competent authorities shall assess all information and evidence gathered pursuant to Articles 4 and 5 and, on that basis, establish and duly motivate whether Article 3 has been violated, within a reasonable period of time from the date they initiated the investigation pursuant to Article 5(1).
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 492 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, competent authorities may establish that Article 3 has been violated on the basis of any other facts available where it was not possible to gather information and evidence pursuant to Article 5(3) or (6).deleted
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 505 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) a prohibition to place or make the products or product component concerned available on the Union market and to export them;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 508 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) an order for the economic operators that have been subject to the investigation to withdraw from the Union market the relevant products or product component that have already been placed or made available on the market;
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 512 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) an order for the economic operators that have been subject to the investigation to dispose of the respective products in accordance with national law consistent with Union law or to remove or replace the component of the product that was made with forced labour.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 542 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6
6. Where competent authorities establish that economic operators have provided evidence to the competent authorities that they have complied with the decision referred to in paragraph 4, and that they have eliminatedadopted appropriate measures to address the risk of forced labour fromin their operations or supply chain or remediated forced labour cases in compliance with the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 with respect to the products concerned, the competent authorities shall withdraw their decision for the futurelift the market prohibition immediately and inform the economic operators of this decision.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 553 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the findings of the investigation and the information underpinning the findings;evidence that justifies the decision.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 579 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. Economic operators that have been affected by a decision of a competent authority pursuant to this Regulation shall have access to a court to review the procedural and substantive legality of the decision. Economic operators shall be entitled to compensation or damages for the prohibition, withdrawal or destruction of products arising from a wrongful decision by a competent authority.
2023/06/15
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 594 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) any court decision to annul competent authority decision referred to in Article 8(5);
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 598 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall make available the decisions, and the withdrawals referred to in the paragraph 1, points (c), (d), (e), (g) and (ga) on a dedicated website.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 613 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The competent authority shall, as soon as possible, diligently and impartially assess the information, including whether the claims are well-founded and, inform the person or association referred to in paragraph 1 of the outcome of the assessment of their submission.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 627 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall call upon external expertise to provide an indicative, non-exhaustive, verifiable and regularly updated database of forced labour risks in specific geographic areas or production sites with respect to specific products including with regard to forced labour imposed by state authorities. The database shall be based on the guidelines referred to in Article 23, points (a), (b) and (c), and relevant external sources of information from, amongst others, international organisations and third country authorities.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 642 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall ensure that the database is made publicly available by the external expertise at the latest 124 months after the entry into forcebefore the application of this Regulation.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 645 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. Economic operators placing or making available on the Union market or exporting products which are not mentioned in the database referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, or which come from areas that are not mentioned in that database, shall also be required to comply with Article 3in line with Article 4, risk-based approach shall not be considered to have a high risk of violating Article 3, unless serious proof of the contrary is available.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 661 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Member States shall confer on their competent authorities the necessary powers to issue an order requiring the providers of online marketplaces to remove products made with forced labour from their online interface, to disable access to it or to display an explicit warning. Such orders shall be issued in accordance with the minimum conditions set out in Article 9(2) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 692 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) within 4 working days of the suspension, if the competent authorities have not requested the customs authorities to maintain the suspension. In case of perishable products, animals and plants that time limit shall be 2 working days;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 706 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Where the release for free circulation or export of a product has been refused in accordance with Article 19, customs authorities shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the product concerned is disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union lawrecycled, or should this not be possible destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law, including Union legislation on waste management. Agricultural products that cannot be recycled, should be donated, or, should this not be possible destroyed, rendered inoperable, or otherwise disposed of in accordance with national law consistent with Union law accordance. Articles 197 and 198 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 shall apply accordingly.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 734 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) guidance to the economic operator on due diligence in relation to forced labour, which shall take into account applicable Union legislation setting out due diligence requirements with respect to forced labour, guidelines and recommendations from international organisations, as well as the size and economic resources of economic operators; , different types of suppliers along the supply chain, different sectors and the particular risks associated with forced labour imposed by state authorities. The guidance shall also include advice on how to identify indicators of forced labour in different areas of the supply chain;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 740 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) guidance to the economic operators on measures which are suitable and effective for bringing to an end different types of forced labour;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 741 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) information on risk indicators of forced labour, including a clear distinction for evaluation between forced labour risks in the private sector and risk of state-imposed forced labour, which shall be based on independent and verifiable information, including reports from international organisations, in particular the International Labour Organization, civil society, business organisations, and experience from implementing Union legislation setting out due diligence requirements with respect to forced labour;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 747 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) further information to facilitate the competent authorities’ implementation of this Regulation; which includes guidelines regarding the assessment of a notification and identification of indicators of forced labour in the pre-investigation phase and investigation phase. This includes benchmarks for the quantification of 'size of economic operator', 'resources of economic operators', 'quantity of products' and 'scale of forced labour' that will be assessed in order to establish substantiated concern for initiating an investigation. These guidelines should be clearly interpretable to ensure that implementation and enforcement of the measure is horizontal across Member States. Where relevant, the Commission should offer capacity building and training for staff of Member States' competent authorities;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 750 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) the guidelines should be consistent with guidance provided in accordance with relevant Union legislation;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 751 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) guidance for the practical implementation of Article 16 and, where appropriate, any other provision laid down in Chapter III of this Regulation, including with regard to the identification and evaluation of risks of forced labour linked to commodities sourced by economic operators through a mass balance approach.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 757 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 a (new)
Article23a Specific provisions for SMEs 1. SMEs shall be given special support and guidance in adapting to this Regulation. 2. This support and guidance shall include: a) SME-specific guidelines with due diligence checklist and toolkit on preventing forced labour b) capacity-building, training programme and administrative and technical support on the assessment and the prevention of forced labour; c) support in their outreach to relevant suppliers and other actors;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 759 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. A Union Network Against Forced Labour Products (‘the Network’) is established. The Network shall serve as a platform for structured coordination and cooperation between the competent authorities of the Member States and the Commission, and to streamline the practices of enforcement of this Regulation as well as other relevant due diligence legislation within the Union, thereby making enforcement more effective and coherent.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 774 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point f
(f) to promote the cooperation and exchange of expertise and best practices between competent authorities and customs authorities; as well as international organisations such as the World Customs Organisation and National Contact Points for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. The Network shall also maintain regular contact with the Commission's relevant services to receive relevant information from other EU initiatives that support the eradication of forced labour.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 779 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)
(fa) identify discrepancies between enforcement at the level of different EU Member States;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 781 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point f b (new)
(fb) provide recommendations to the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) to address identified systemic cases of forced labour in third countries and/or the Member States of the European Union;
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 784 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall organise and chair regular meetings of the Network and shall support and encourage cooperation between enforcement authorities through the Network and participate in the meetings of the Network.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 789 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 a (new)
Article24a Support The Network shall support economic operators under investigation to undertake corrective action in line with Article 4(6) and Article 6(6) where the risk of forced labour has been identified to: a) correct the potential risk of forced labour before launching an investigation and b) avoid the last resort of disengagement if the economic operator is deemed violating Article 3. This shall include having dialogue with authorities operating in the region where forced labour has been identified as well as on national level. In the case where disengagement must take effect and economic operators become victim to a third country punitive measure, the Commission shall provide political, administrative or financial support.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 796 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. In order to facilitate effective implementation and enforcement of this Regulation, the Commission mayshall, as appropriate cooperate, engage and exchange information with, amongst others, authorities of third countries, international organisations, civil society representatives and business organisations. The Commission shall have regular contact and cooperation with countries that have similar legislation in place, to share information of risk products or regions as well as best practices for bringing to an end forced labour. International cooperation with authorities of third countries shall take place in a structured way as part of the existing dialogue structures with third countries or, if necessary, specific ones that will be created on an ad hoc basis.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 806 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Cooperation with third countries shall be integrated with other EU policies and instruments that include measures to eradicate forced labour, including free trade agreements, the Generalised Scheme of Preferences, and development cooperation projects led by the Commission.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 811 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 a (new)
Article27a Regulatory monitoring and adjustment The Commission shall present, before the application of this Regulation, in line with the 'one in, one out' principle, proposals offsetting the regulatory and financial burdens introduced by this Regulation through the revision or abolishment of provisions in other Union legislative acts that generate compliance costs for economic operators.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 821 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3
3. The Member States shall, by [OP enter DATE = 2430 months from its entry into force of this Regulation], notify those provisions to the Commission, where they have not previously been notified, and shall notify it, without delay, of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 827 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 a (new)
Article30a Impact Assessment No later than 6 months after the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall draw up an impact assessment.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 831 #

2022/0269(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 a (new)
Article31a Review and reporting No later than three years after the application of this Regulation, and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall review the application, enforcement and impact of this Regulation and present a report to the European Parliament and the Council. The report shall in particular assess the following issues: a) the effectiveness of this Regulation in achieving its objectives of prohibiting products made with forced labour in the Union market; b) the cost-benefit and effectiveness of this Regulation; c) the overall impact on eradicating forced labour; d) the impact of this regulation on SMEs and micro enterprises; e) the alignment with other legislations, particularly on CSDDD, deforestation and batteries regulation; f) the impact on trade and the competitiveness of the Union’s industry; g) the impact in terms of administrative burdens for the economic operators and Member States' authorities. Where the Commission considers it appropriate, the report shall be accompanied by relevant legislative proposals or repeal of the existing regulation.
2023/06/09
Committee: INTAIMCO
Amendment 9 #

2022/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas Guyana needs to overcome challenges in order to improve the well-being of its citizens, such as fighting poverty, inequality and discrimination, particularly against LGBTI people and indigenous peoples, as well as combating corruption and racial and ethnic polarisation and violence, which remain persistent concerns;deleted
2022/10/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2022/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the conclusion of negotiations on the VPA between the EU and Guyana,; acknowledges that the VPA has a high significance for the country as well as potential for boosting EU-Guyana trade relations and believes that the successful negotiations of this VPA demonstrate the importance of the Union’s Delegations to third countries; which will ensure that only legally logged timber will be imported into the EU from Guyana, promote sustainable forest management practices and sustainable trade in legally produced timber, and improve forest governance, law enforcement (including labour and occupational, health and safety obligations), human rights, transparency, accountability and institutional resilience in Guyana;
2022/10/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 17 #

2022/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the high stakeholder participation throughout the negotiation process; Stresses that the implementation stage requires consultations and multi- stakeholder involvement, including the participation of civil society, business representatives and local and indigenous communities in decision- making; recalls the need to enhance transparency and ensure the effective public disclosure of information and the timely sharing of documents with local and indigenous peoples;
2022/10/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2022/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Calls to strengthen the role and participation of the private sector in the VPA implementation and to assist operators, in particular SMEs, in building capacity to ensure better clarity, understanding and compliance with the requirements of the agreement;
2022/10/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 19 #

2022/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the recent adoption of the joint implementation framework and calls on the Government of Guyana to follow a concrete, time-bound and measurable approach; calls on the Commission to report to Parliament regularly on the implementation of the agreement, including on the work of the Joint Implementation Committee;
2022/10/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 21 #

2022/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes Guyana’s efforts so far in making advances towards greater transparency and look forward to further positive cooperation in the fight against illegal logging; Stresses that the success of the FLEGT VPA also depends on tackling fraud and corruption throughout the timber supply chain; urges the Government of Guyana to continue to work to stop widespread corruption and address other factors fuelling illegal logging and forest degradation, with particular regard to customs and other authorities that will play a pivotal role in the implementation and enforcement of the VPA; stresses the need to end impunity in the forest sector;
2022/10/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2022/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. RecognisWelcomes that the process of negotiating the VPA has allowed sectors to identify shared goals and priorities to work towards sustainable forest management and trade cooperation, as well as offer an important opportunity for societies to allow for participative management of their forests at local, community and regional levels and even up to national or federal level;
2022/10/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 26 #

2022/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that the EU plays an important role in improving both the supply and the demand side of timber in order to reject illegally produced timber and assist exporting countries in their efforts to combat illegal logging and corruption, which results in the destruction of their forests, climate change and human rights violations; recognises that VPAs will continue to be an important legal framework for both the EU and its partner countries under the new proposal for a Deforestation Regulation; underlines that this has beenVPAs provide an important legal framework for both the EU and its partner countries, made possible bywith the good cooperation and engagement ofby the partner countries concerned; supports the Commission in finding additional potential partners for future FLEGT VPAs;tresses therefore that new VPAs with additional partners shall be promoted; recognises that the VPA with Guyana as well as those with other countries prove that trade agreements can work without threatening the imposition of sanctions, by including different means of control and cooperation; the Commission and the authorities of Guyana should conduct an exhaustive assessment on the impact of the VPA and the proposal of the Deforestation Regulation on the workers and small producers of the forest sector and other related sectors, which will be affected by the increased logging controls and checks.
2022/10/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 27 #

2022/0142M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Acknowledges the role of Guyana’s forests in the economy and job creation, contributing by 2% to the GDP and by 6% to job creation for economic growth; highlights that the VPA creates a great opportunity to boost job creation in the forestry sector.
2022/10/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 66 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation applies to craft and industrinon- agricultural products listed under the combined nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/8724with the exclusion of agricultural products protected by Reg. no. 2019/787, Reg. no. 1308/2013 e Reg. no. 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council. _________________ 24 Council Regulation (EEC) N0 2685/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff Regulation (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987 p.1)
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 68 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation does not apply to spirit drinks as referred in Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council25 , wines as defined in Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council26 , nor to agricultural products and foodstuffs as protected by Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 . _________________ 25 Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the definition, description, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks, the use of the names of spirit drinks in the presentation and labelling of other foodstuffs, the protection of geographical indications for spirit drinks, the use of ethyl alcohol and distillates of agricultural origin in alcoholic beverages, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 (OJ L 130, 17.5.2019, p. 1). 26 Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 347 20.12.2013, p. 671). 27 Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1).deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 69 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘craft products’ means products produced either totallymade by hand or with the aid of manual tools or by, mechanical means, whenever the direct manual contribution is the most important component of the finished productor digitized means, or whose design activity makes use of design tools, including those of a digital nature, under the direct supervision of the business owner (from design to manufacture);
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 72 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) ‘production step’ means any stage of production, processing or preparation, as illustrated in the product specification, up to the point, where the product is in a form to be placed on the internal market;
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 74 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) 'producer' means an operator engaged in anyone or more production steps of a product the name of which is protected as a geographical indication, including elaboration or processing activities, covered by the product specification;
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 83 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. An authority designated by a Member State may be deemed to be an applicant producer group for the purposes of this Title, if it is not feasible for the producers concerned to form a group by reason of their number, geographical location or organisational characteristics. Where such representation takes place, the application referred to in Article 11(3) shall state these reasons for such representation.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 131 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1
1. Article 35 is without prejudice to the use of a geographical indication by producers in conformity with Article 43 to indicate that a manufactured product contains, as a part or component, a product designated by that geographical indication provided that such use is made in accordance with honest commercial practices and does not weaken, dilute, or is not detrimental to, the reputation of the geographical indicationdoes not violate the protection afforded by Article 35.
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 132 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37
Generic terms 1. Generic terms shall not be registered as a geographical indication. 2. To establish whether or not a term has become generic, account shall be taken of all relevant factors, in particular: (a) the existing situation in areas of consumption; (b) the relevant Union or national legal acts.Article 37 deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 134 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 1
A name shall not be registered as a geographical indication where, in the light of a trade mark’s reputation and renown, registration of the name proposed as a geographical indication could mislead the consumer as to the true identity of the product.deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 141 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 4
4. Without prejudice to paragraph 2 of this Article, a trade mark the use of which contravenes Article 35, which has been applied for, registered, or established by use in good faith within the territory of the Union, if that possibility is provided for by the legislation concerned, before the date on which the application for registration of the geographical indication is submitted to the Office, may continue to be used and renewed notwithstanding the registration of a geographical indication, provided that no grounds for invalidity or revocation of the trade mark exist under Directive (EU) 2015/243632 of the European Parliament and of the Council or Regulation (EU) 2017/1001. In such cases, the use of the geographical indication and that of the relevant trade mark shall be permitted. _________________ 32 Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ L 336, 23.12.2015, p. 1).deleted
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 162 #

2022/0115(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. As provided in Art. 47(c), applicant producer groups as referred to in Article 6, which have obtained registration, shall be entitled to make reports to the authorities specified under paragraph (1) so that they carry out controls provided for in this title. In this case, at the request of the producer group, the authorities are required to provide feedback on the development of the process that began with the report itself.
2022/11/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 117 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) on obligations for companies regarding actual and potential human rights adverse impacts and environmental adverse impacts, with respect to their own operations, the operations of their subsidiaries, and the valuesupply chain operations carried out by third country entities with whom the company has an direct established business relationship and
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 120 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) on liability for violations of the obligations mentioned above.deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 127 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The nature of business relationships as ‘established’ shall be reassessed periodically, and at least every 124 months.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 130 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Member States shall not lay down, in their national law, provisions diverging from those laid down in this Directive unless otherwise provided for in this Directive.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 138 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the company had more than 5000 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 150 million in the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been prepared;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 143 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the company did not reach the thresholds under point (a), but had more than 250 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 40 million in the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been prepared, provided that at least 50% of this net turnover was generated in one or more of the following sectors: (i) the manufacture of textiles, leather and related products (including footwear), and the wholesale trade of textiles, clothing and footwear; (ii) agriculture, forestry, fisheries (including aquaculture), the manufacture of food products, and the wholesale trade of agricultural raw materials, live animals, wood, food, and beverages; (iii) the extraction of mineral resources regardless from where they are extracted (including crude petroleum, natural gas, coal, lignite, metals and metal ores, as well as all other, non-metallic minerals and quarry products), the manufacture of basic metal products, other non-metallic mineral products and fabricated metal products (except machinery and equipment), and the wholesale trade of mineral resources, basic and intermediate mineral products (including metals and metal ores, construction materials, fuels, chemicals and other intermediate products).deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 149 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) the manufacture of textiles, leather and related products (including footwear), and the wholesale trade of textiles, clothing and footwear;deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 154 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) agriculture, forestry, fisheries (including aquaculture), the manufacture of food products, and the wholesale trade of agricultural raw materials, live animals, wood, food, and beverages;deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 159 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) the extraction of mineral resources regardless from where they are extracted (including crude petroleum, natural gas, coal, lignite, metals and metal ores, as well as all other, non-metallic minerals and quarry products), the manufacture of basic metal products, other non-metallic mineral products and fabricated metal products (except machinery and equipment), and the wholesale trade of mineral resources, basic and intermediate mineral products (including metals and metal ores, construction materials, fuels, chemicals and other intermediate products).deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 184 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. This Directive shall also apply to companies which are formed in accordance with the legislation of a third country, and fulfil one of the following conditions:have a domestic branch office or subsidiary in a Member State and which normally have at least 5000 employees worldwide and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 150 million in the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been prepared;.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 188 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) generated a net turnover of more than EUR 150 million in the Union in the financial year preceding the last financial year;deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 193 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) generated a net turnover of more than EUR 40 million but not more than EUR 150 million in the Union in the financial year preceding the last financial year, provided that at least 50% of its net worldwide turnover was generated in one or more of the sectors listed in paragraph 1, point (b).deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 195 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the number of part-time employees shall be calculated on a full-time equivalent basis. Temporary agency workers shall be included in the calculation of the number of employees in the same way as if they were workers employed directly for the same period of time by the company.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 216 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ‘valuesupply chain’ means activities related todirectly necessary for the production of goods or the provision of services by a company, including the development of the product or the service and the use and disposal of the product as well as the related activities of upstream and downstream established business relationships of the company. As regards companies within the meaning of point (a)(iv), ‘valuesupply chain’ with respect to the provision of these specific services shall only include the activities of the clients receiving such loan, credit, and other financial services and of other companies belonging to the same group whose activities are linked to the contract in question. The valuesupply chain of such regulated financial undertakings does not cover SMEs receiving loan, credit, financing, insurance or reinsurance of such entities;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 222 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) ‘industry initiative’ means a combination of voluntary valuesupply chain due diligence procedures, tools and mechanisms, including independent third- party verifications, developed and overseen by governments, industry associations or groupings of interested organisthe Commission, governments, including the governments of developing countries, industry associations;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 227 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n
(n) ‘stakeholders’ means the company’s employees, the employees of its subsidiaries, and other individuals, groups, communities or entities whose rights or interests are or could bedirectly affected by adverse human rights impacts and adverse environmental impacts arising from the products, services and operations of that company, its subsidiaries and its business relationships;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 269 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) The behaviour of companies across all sectors of the economy is key to success in the Union’s sustainability objectives as Union companies, especially large ones, rely on global valuesupply chains. It is also in the interest of companies to respect and protect human rights and the environment, in particular given the rising concern of consumers and investors regarding these topics. Several initiatives fostering enterprises which support value-oriented transformation already exist on Union77 , as well as national78 level. Further, binding due diligence legislation has been implemented in several Member States such as France and Germany, which gives rise to the need for a level playing field for companies in order to avoid fragmentation and to provide legal certainty for businesses operating in the single market. _________________ 77 ‘Enterprise Models and the EU agenda’, CEPS Policy Insights, No PI2021-02/ January 2021. 78 E.g. https://www.economie.gouv.fr/entreprises/ societe-mission
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 271 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
As regards actual adverse impacts within the meaning of paragraph 1 that could not be brought to an end or the extent of which could not be minimised by the measures provided for in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5, the company shall refrain from entering into new or extending existing relations with the partner in connection to or in the valuesupply chain of which the impact has arisen and shall, where the law governing their relations so entitles them to, take one of the following actions if they are in the best interest of the potential victims of the potential and actual adverse impacts, in line with responsible disengagement, taking into account proportionality and the consequences of disrupting supply chains:
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 273 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) EWell-established existing international standards on responsible business conduct such as the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises clarified in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct specify that companies should respect and protect human rights and set out how they should address the protection of the environment across their operations and valuesupply chains. The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights79 recognise the responsibility of companies to exercise human rights due diligence by identifying, preventing and mitigating the adverse impacts of their operations on human rights and by accounting for how they address those impacts. Those Guiding Principles state that businesses should avoid infringing human rights and should address adverse human rights impacts that they have caused, contributed to or are linked with in their own operations, subsidiaries and through their direct and indirect business relationships. These international standards should be the basis for this Directive. _________________ 79 United Nations’ “Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework”, 2011, available at https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publicati ons/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 276 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) temporarily suspend commercial relationships with the partner in question, while pursuing efforts to bring to an end or minimise the extent of the adverse impact, if there is reasonable expectation that these efforts will succeed in the short- term. If there is no such reasonable expectation or the efforts did not succeed in the short-term, the company shall terminate the business relationship or
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 278 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) The concept of human rights due diligence was specified and further developed in the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises80 which extended the application of due diligence to environmental and governance topics. The OECD Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct and sectoral guidance81 are internationally recognised frameworks setting out practical due diligence steps to help companies identify, prevent, mitigate and account for how they address actual and potential impacts in their operations, valuesupply chains and other business relationships. The concept of due diligence is also embedded in the recommendations of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy.82, which should form the basis for this Directive. _________________ 80 OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, 2011 updated edition, available at http://mneguidelines.oecd.org/guidelines/.h ttps://mneguidelines.oecd.org/mneguidelin es/ 81 OECD Guidance on Responsible Business Conduct, 2018, and sector- specific guidance, available at https://www.oecd.org/investment/due- diligence-guidance-for-responsible- business-conduct.htm. 82 The International Labour Organisation’s “Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy, Fifth Edition, 2017, available at: https://www.ilo.org/empent/Publications/ WCMS_094386/lang--en/index.htm.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 285 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) International agreements under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, to which the Union and the Member States are parties, such as the Paris Agreement84 and the recent Glasgow Climate Pact85 , set out precise avenues to address climate change and keep global warming within 1.5 C degrees for states as signatory parties. Besides specific actions being expected from all signatory Parties, the role of the private sector, in particular its investment strategies, is also considered central to achieve these objectives. _________________ 84 https://unfccc.int/files/essential_backgroun d/convention/application/pdf/english_paris _agreement.pdf. 85 Glasgow Climate Pact, adopted on 13 November 2021 at COP26 in Glasgow, https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resourc e/cma2021_L16_adv.pdf.https://unfccc.int/ sites/default/files/resource/cma2021_L16_ adv.pdf.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 287 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall provide for the availability of an option to terminate and temporarily suspend the business relationship in contracts governed by their laws in accordance with the first subparagraph, except for contracts where the parties are obliged by law to enter into them.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 293 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) According to the Commission Communication on forging a climate- resilient Europe89 presenting the Union Strategy on Adaptation to climate change, new investment and policy decisions should be climate-informed and future- proof, including for larger businesses managing valuesupply chains. This Directive should be consistent with that Strategy. Similarly, there should be consistency with the Commission Directive […] amending Directive 2013/36/EU as regards supervisory powers, sanctions, third-country branches, and environmental, social and governance risks (Capital Requirements Directive)90 , which sets out clear requirements for banks’ governance rules including knowledge about environmental, social and governance risks at board of directors level. _________________ 89 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Forging a climate-resilient Europe – the new EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change (COM/2021/82 final), available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2021:82:FIN. 90 OJ C […], […], p. […].
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 295 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) The Action Plan on a Circular Economy91 , the Biodiversity strategy92 , the Farm to Fork strategy93 and the Chemicals strategy94 and Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a stronger Single Market for Europe’s recovery95 , Industry 5.096 and the European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan97 and the 2021 Trade Policy Review98 list an initiative on sustainable corporate governance among their elements. _________________ 91 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on A new Circular Economy Action Plan For a cleaner and more competitive Europe (COM/2020/98 final). 92 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 Bringing nature back into our lives (COM/2020/380 final). 93 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system (COM/2020/381 final). 94 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability Towards a Toxic-Free Environment (COM/2020/667 final). 95 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a stronger Single Market for Europe’s recovery (COM/2021/350 final). 96 Industry 5.0; https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and- innovation/research-area/industrial- research-and-innovation/industry-50_en 97 https://op.europa.eu/webpub/empl/europe an-pillar-of-social-rights/en/ 98 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Trade Policy Review – An Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy (COM/2021/66/final).deleted
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 296 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) This Directive is in coherence with the EU Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy 2020-202499 . This Action Plan defines as a priority to strengthen the Union’s engagement to actively promote the global implementation of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and other relevant international guidelines such as the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, including by advancing relevant due diligence standards OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises as clarified in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct as the relevant guidelines, including by advancing relevant due diligence standards. Therefore, these international standards should form the basis for the obligations on due diligence for companies set out in this Directive. _________________ 99 Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council on the EU Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy 2020-2024 (JOIN/2020/5 final).
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 297 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that companies provide the possibility for persons and organisations listed in paragraph 2 to submit notifications or complaints to them where they have legitimate concernssufficient evidence regarding actual or potential adverse human rights impacts and adverse environmental impacts with respect to their own operations, the operations of their subsidiaries and their value chaindirect upstream business partners.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 299 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) The European Parliament, in its resolution of 10 March 2021 calls upon the Commission to propose Union rules for a comprehensive corporate due diligence obligation100 . The Council Conclusions on Human Rights and Decent Work in Global Supply Chains of 1 December 2020 called upon the Commission to table a proposal for a Union legal framework on sustainable corporate governance, including cross- sector corporate due diligence obligations along global supply chains.101 The European Parliament also calls for clarifying directors` duties in its own initiative report adopted on 2 December 2020 on sustainable corporate governance. In their Joint Declaration on EU Legislative Priorities for 2022102 , the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the Commission have committed, to deliver on an economy that works for people, and to improve the regulatory framework on sustainable corporate governance. _________________ 100 European Parliament resolution of 10 March 2021 with recommendations to the Commission on corporate due diligence and corporate accountability (2020/2129(INL)), P9_TA(2021)0073, available at https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/p opups/ficheprocedure.do?lang=en&referen ce=2020/2129(INL). 101 Council Conclusions on Human Rights and Decent Work in Global Supply Chains, 1 December 2020 (13512/20). 102 Joint declaration of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on EU Legislative Priorities for 2022, available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files /joint_declaration_2022.pdf.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 301 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Companies shall be allowed to deal with notifications as a group, for example within a sectoral initiative, an industry programme or multi-stakeholder initiatives.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 304 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) This Directive aims to ensure that companies active in the internal market contribute to sustainable development and the sustainability transition of economies and societies through the identification, prevention and mitigation, bringing to an end and minimisation of potential or actual adverse human rights and environmental impacts connected with companies’ own operations, subsidiaries and value chainssupply chains. This Directive is without prejudice to the responsibility of Member States to respect and protect human rights and the environment under international law.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 307 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) In line with relevant EU and national law, all companies in the EU need to adhere to the protection of human rights and environmental standards. If that is not the case, Member States and their relevant authorities are required to enforce the legislation. Thus, there is no need for companies within the EU to control each other’s conduct. The goal of due diligence is to tackle risks in cases where human rights and environmental standards are not or cannot be enforced. Thus, tracing activities in the supply chain shall be focused on upstream level business relationships outside the EU.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 309 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14 b (new)
(14b) This Directive is without prejudice to obligations in the areas of human rights, protection of the environment and climate change under other Union legislative acts. If the provisions of this Directive conflict with a provision of another Union legislative act pursuing the same objectives and providing for more extensive or more specific obligations, the provisions of the other Union legislative act should prevail to the extent of the conflict and should apply to those specific obligations. Examples of these obligations in Union legislative acts include obligations in the Conflict Minerals Regulation, the proposal for a Batteries Regulation or the proposal for a Regulation on deforestation-free supply chains.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 310 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) Companies should take appropriate steps within their means to set up and carry out risk-based due diligence measures, with respect to their own operations, their subsidiaries, as well as their established direct anddirect business relationships outside the EU and in case of substantiated knowledge of risks, indirect business relationships throughoutoutside the EU in their valuesupply chains in accordance with the provisions of this Directive. This Directive should not require companies to guarantee, in all circumstances, that adverse impacts will never occur or that they will be stopped. For example with respect to business relationships where the adverse impact results from State intervention, the company might not be in a position to arrive at such results. Therefore, the main obligations in this Directive should be ‘obligations of means’. The company should take the appropriate measureMoreover, administering information on a large number of business relationships is difficult. Therefore, the main obligations in this Directive should be ‘obligations of means’. In addition, while companies can be asked to prevent or mitigate adverse impacts that they caused or contributed to, it is still the responsibility of states to combat human rights violations worldwide. Companies should take the appropriate proportionate and commensurate measures within their means which can reasonably be expected to result in prevention or minimisation of the adverse impact under the circumstances of the specific case. Account should be taken of the specificities of the respective company’s valuesupply chain, sector or geographical area in which its value chain partners operate, the company’s power to influence its direct and indirect business relationships,ize, risk factors including the sector and geographical area of activity, the likelihood and severity of the company's potential or actual adverse impacts and its specific circumstances, the company’s power, resources and leverage to influence its business relationships, whether they caused or contributed to the adverse impact or are directly linked to it and whether the company could increase its power of influencleverage.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 314 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) persons who are affected or have reasonable groundssufficient evidence to believe that they might bare affected by an adverse impact,
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 316 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) trade unions and other workers’ representatives representing individuals working in the value chain concernedcompany, their subsidiaries or their direct business partners, that are directly affected by an adverse impact,
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 317 #

2022/0051(COD)

(16) The risk-based due diligence process set out in this Directive should cover the six steps defined by the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct, which include due diligence measures for companies to identify and address adverse human rights and environmental impacts. This encompasses the following steps: (1) integrating due diligence into policies and management systems, (2) identifying and, assessing and prioritising adverse human rights and environmental impacts, (3) preventing, ceasing or minimising actual and potential adverse human rights, and environmental impacts, (4) assessing the effectiveness of measures, (5) communicating, (6) providing remediation.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 321 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) Adverse human rights and environmental impact occur in companies’ own operations, subsidiaries, products, and in their value chains, in particulaaspects particularly occur at the level of raw material sourcing, and manufacturing, or at the level of product or waste disposal in the upstream supply chain operating outside the EU. In order for the due diligence to have a meaningful impact, it should cover human rights and environmental adverse impacts generated throughout the life-cycle of production and use and disposal of product or provision of servicthe level of companies’ own operations, operations of their subsidiaries, atnd the level of own operations, subsidiaries and in valueir business relationships outside the EU in their upstream supply chains.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 323 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) civil society organisations active in the areas related to the value chain concerndeleted.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 323 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) Secondary raw materials can only be traced until the point where the recycled material is returned to the immediate supplier of the recycler and where the information is obtained and retained to demonstrate that the material is recycled. Therefore, due diligence obligations should not go beyond that point.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 328 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that the companies establish a procedure for dealing with complaints referred to in paragraph 1, including a procedure when the company considers the complaint to be unfounded, and inform the relevant workers and trade unions of those procedures. Member States shall ensure that where the complaint is well-founded, the adverse impact that is the subject matter of the complaint is deemed to be identified within the meaning of Article 6.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 330 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) The valuesupply chain should cover activities related to the production of a good or provision of services by a company, including the development of the product or the service and the use and disposal of the product as well as the related activities of established business relationships of the company. It should encompass upstream established direct anddirect and, in cases of substantiated knowledge of adverse impacts, indirect business relationships, both outside the EU that design, extract, manufacture, transport, store and supply raw material, products, parts of products, or provide services to the company that are necessary to carry out the company’s activities, and also downstream relationships, including established direct and indirect business relationships, that use or receive products, parts of products or services from the company up to the end of life of the product, including inter alia the distribution of the product to retailers, the transport and storage of the product, dismantling of the product, its recycling, composting or landfilling.directly necessary to carry out the company’s activities;
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 336 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) As regards regulated financial undertakings providing loan, credit, or other financial services, “value chain” with respect to the provision of such services should be limited to the activities of the clients receiving such services, and the subsidiaries thereof whose activities are linked to the contract in question. Clients that are households and natural persons not acting in a professional or business capacity, as well as small and medium sized undertakings, should not be considered to be part of the value chain. The activities of the companies or other legal entities that are included in the value chain of that client should not be covered.deleted
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 341 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
In order to provide support to companies or to Member State authorities on how companies should fulfil their due diligence obligations, the Commission, in consultation with Member States and relevant stakeholders, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, the European Agency for Small and Medium enterprises, the European Environment Agency, and where appropriate with international bodies having expertise in due diligence, may issue guidelines, including for specific sectors or specific adverse impacts. shall issue clear and comprehensive, guidelines, in digital, free of charge and easily accessible format, taking into account the needs of SMEs, including for specific sectors, specific adverse impacts. These guidelines shall also clarify how companies' obligations stemming from this Directive interact with obligations stemming from other Union legislation to ensure coherence and complementarity. The guidelines shall particularly take into account SMEs’ needs and shall enable administrative and financial assistance. The guidelines shall help companies, in particular SMEs, to fulfil their due diligence obligations in accordance with Articles 6 to 11, by providing guidance on how the requirements under different Union acts could be merged most efficiently. The Commission shall regularly review and update the guidelines taking into account the latest developments in the sectors concerned. Guidelines must be published 24 months before the provisions of this directive become applicable. These guidelines shall include the following: (a) for specific sectors or specific adverse impacts; (b) an overview on applicable industry initiatives, multi-stakeholder initiatives and industry schemes; (c) practical guidance on how proportionality and prioritisation, in terms of impacts, sectors and geographical areas, may be applied to due diligence obligations depending on the size and sector of the company; (d) lists of risk areas and non-risk areas whether sectoral or geographic such as a list of regions and countries where adverse human rights impacts and/or environmental adverse impacts are unlikely or likely to occur. Countries or regions, where adverse impacts are unlikely to occur, might be the European Economic Area, the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan. One criteria for this list shall be a free-trade agreement between the European Union and the third country or region.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 341 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) In order to allow companies to properly identify the adverse impacts in their value chainsupply chain that it caused or contributed to and to make it possible for them to exercise appropriate leverage, the due diligence obligations should be limited in this Directive to establisheddirect business relationships. For the purpose of this Directive, established business relationships should mean such direct and indirect business relationships which are, or which are expected to be lasting, in view of their intensity and duration and which do not represent a negligible or ancillary part of the value chain. The nature of business relationships as “established” should be reassessed periodically, and at least every 12 months. If the direct business relationship of a company is established, then all linked indirect business relationships should also be considered as established regarding that company outside the EU. In cases when there is substantiated knowledge of adverse impacts and the company has the means and leverage to influence those, meaning being directly linked to the adverse impact, companies should include indirect business relationships outside the EU.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 347 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Lists of non-risk areas and risk areas shall be updated continuously by the Commission and made publicly available, for example, in order to provide up-to- date information on the international Conventions and Treaties ratified by each of the Union’s trading partners. The Commission shall collect and publish trade and customs data on origins of raw materials, and intermediate and finished products, and publish information on human rights, environmental and governance potential or actual adverse impacts risks associated with certain countries or regions, sectors and sub- sectors, and products.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 347 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20 a (new)
(20a) The concept of a company’s involvement in an adverse impact should clarify that the actions to be taken to address potential or actual adverse impacts depend on the level of involvement of a company in an adverse impact. The company’s involvement in an adverse impact should be in the form of the company causing the adverse impact, contributing to the adverse impact, or the company being directly linked to the adverse impact, meaning it was caused by its direct or indirect business relationship in the company’s supply chain without the company causing or contributing to it. Although the concepts of the company’s involvement in an adverse impact of ‘contributing to’ and ‘being directly linked to’ also exist in international standards, they should receive an autonomous definition in the Directive. With a view to ensure an effective protection of human rights and the environment, ‘causing’ should be understood as the companies own sole activities, and ‘contributing to’ should be understood as a company’s own activities in combination with or intervention of the activities of business relationships or facilitating or incentivising a business relationship to cause an adverse impact.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 349 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) Under this Directive, EU companies established in the Union with more than 53000 employees on average and a worldwide net turnover exceeding EUR 150 million in the financial year preceding the last financial year should be required to comply with due diligence. As regards companies which do not fulfil those criteria, but which had more than 250 employees on average and more than EUR 40 million worldwide net turnover in the financial year preceding the last financial year and which operate in one or more high-impact sectors, due diligence should apply 2 years after the end of the transposition period of this directive, in order to provide for a longer adaptation period. In order to ensure a proportionate burden, companies operating in such high-impact sectors should be required to comply with more targeted due diligence focusing on severe adverse impacts900 million in the financial year preceding the last financial year should be required to comply with due diligence. Temporary agency workers, including those posted under Article 1(3), point (c), of Directive 96/71/EC, as amended by Directive 2018/957/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council103 , should be included in the calculation of the number of employees in the user company. Posted workers under Article 1(3), points (a) and (b), of Directive 96/71/EC, as amended by Directive 2018/957/EU, should only be included in the calculation of the number of employees of the sending company. _________________ 103 Directive (EU) 2018/957 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 June 2018 amending Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ L 173, 9.7.2018, p. 16).
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 353 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) In order to reflect the priority areas of international action aimed at tackling human rights and environmental issues, the selection of high-impact sectors for the purposes of this Directive should be based on existing sectoral OECD due diligence guidance. The following sectors should be regarded as high-impact for the purposes of this Directive: the manufacture of textiles, leather and related products (including footwear), and the wholesale trade of textiles, clothing and footwear; agriculture, forestry, fisheries (including aquaculture), the manufacture of food products, and the wholesale trade of agricultural raw materials, live animals, wood, food, and beverages; the extraction of mineral resources regardless of where they are extracted from (including crude petroleum, natural gas, coal, lignite, metals and metal ores, as well as all other, non-metallic minerals and quarry products), the manufacture of basic metal products, other non-metallic mineral products and fabricated metal products (except machinery and equipment), and the wholesale trade of mineral resources, basic and intermediate mineral products (including metals and metal ores, construction materials, fuels, chemicals and other intermediate products). As regards the financial sector, due to its specificities, in particular as regards the value chain and the services offered, even if it is covered by sector-specific OECD guidance, it should not form part of the high-impact sectors covered by this Directive. At the same time, in this sector, the broader coverage of actual and potential adverse impacts should be ensured by also including very large companies in the scope that are regulated financial undertakings, even if they do not have a legal form with limited liability.deleted
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 358 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission mayshall complement Member States’ support measures building on existing Union action to support due diligence in the Union and in third countries and mayshall devise new measures, including facilitation of joint stakeholder initiatives to help companies fulfil their obligations. as well as a non-exhaustive list of industry schemes the Commission deems fit.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 358 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) In order to fully achieve fully the objectives of this Directive addressing human rights and adverse environmental impacts with respect to companies’ operations, subsidiaries and valuesupply chains, third-country companies with significant operations in the EU should also be covered. More specifically, the Directive should apply to third-country companies which generated a net turnover of at least EUR 150 million in the Union in the financial year preceding the last financial year or a net turnover of more than EUR 40 million but less thanhave a branch or subsidiary in the EU, had 3000 employees on average and generated a net worldwide turnover of at least EUR 15900 million in the last financial year preceding the last financial year in one or more of the high- impact sectors, as of 2 years after the end of the transposition period of this Directive.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 361 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) For defining the scope of application in relation to non-EUthird-country companies the describcompany in question needs turnover criterion should be choseno have a branch or subsidiary in the EU as it creates a territorial connection between the third- country companies and the Union territory. TIn addition, turnover is a proxy for the effects that the activities of those companies could have on the internal market. In accordance with international law, such effects justify the application of Union law to third-country companies. To ensure identification of the relevant turnover of companies concerned, the methods for calculating net turnover for non-EUthird-country companies as laid down in Directive (EU) 2013/34 as amended by Directive (EU) 2021/2101 should be used. To ensure effective enforcement of this Directive, an employee threshold should, in turn, not be applied also be applied as a benchmark to determine which third-country companies fall under this Directive, as to create a level- playing field, while taking into account that the notion of “employees” retained for the purposes of this Directive is based on Union law and could not be easily transposed outside of the Union. In the absence of a clear and consistent methodology, including in accounting frameworks, to determine the employThat is why the nexus to the EU needs of third-country companies, such employee threshold would therefore create legal uncertainty and would be difficult to apply for supervisory authoritiesto be ensured through having a branch or subsidiary in the EU. The definition of turnover should be based on Directive 2013/34/EU which has already established the methods for calculating net turnover for non-Union companies, as turnover and revenue definitions are similar in international accounting frameworks too. With a view to ensuring that the supervisory authority knows which third country companies generate the required turnover in the Union to fall under the scope of this Directive, this Directive should require that a supervisory authority in the Member State where the third country company’s authorised representative is domiciled or established and, where it is different, a supervisory authority in the Member State in which the company generated most of its net turnover in the Union in the financial year preceding the last financial year are informed that the company is a company falling under the scope of this Directive.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 363 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
(25) In order to achieve a meaningful contribution to the sustainability transition, due diligence under this Directive should be carried out with respect to adverse human rights impact on protected persons resulting from the violation of one of the rights and prohibitions as enshrined in the international conventions as listed in the Annex to this Directive. In order to ensure a comprehensive coverage of human rights, a violation of a prohibition or right not specifically listed in that Annex which directly impairs a legal interest protected in those conventions should also form part of the adverse human rights impact covered by this Directive, provided that the company concerned could have reasonably established the risk of such impairment and any appropriate measures to be taken in order to comply with the due diligence obligations under this Directive, taking into account all relevant circumstances of their operations, such as the sector and operational contextOECD Due Diligence Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises as clarified in the OECD Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct, as well as the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights. Due diligence should further encompass adverse environmental impacts resulting from the violation of one of the prohibitions and obligations pursuant to the international environmental conventions listed in the Annex to this DirectiveOECD Due Diligence Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises as clarified in the Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct as regards the environment.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 365 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
(26) Companies should have guidance at their disposal that illustrates how their activities may impact human rights and which corporate behaviour is prohibited in accordance with internationally recognised human rights. Such guidance is included for instance in The United Nations Guiding Principles Reporting Framework104 and the United Nations Guiding Principles Interpretative Guide105 . Using relevant international guidelines and standards as a and should be made easily accessible to companies. Therefeorence, the Commission should be able to issue additionalissue guidance that will serve as a practical tool for companies. _________________ 104 https://www.ungpreporting.org/wp- content/uploads/UNGPReportingFramewor k_withguidance2017.pdf. 105 https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/ Business/RtRInterpretativeGuide.pdf.https: //www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Busine ss/RtRInterpretativeGuide.pdf.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 367 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. Companies may rely on industry schemes and multi-stakeholder initiatives to support the implementation of their obligations referred to in Articles 5 to 11 of this Directive to the extent that such schemes and initiatives are appropriate to support the fulfilment of those obligations. The Commission and the Member States mayshall facilitate the dissemination of information on such schemes or initiatives and their outcome. The Commission, in collaboration with Member States, mayshall issue guidance for assessing the fitness of industry schemes and multi-stakeholder initiatives.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 367 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
(27) In order to conduct appropriate human rights, and environmental due diligence with respect to their operations, their subsidiaries, and their valuesupply chains, companies covered by this Directive should integrate due diligence into corporate policies, identify, prevent and mitigate as well as bring to an end and minimise the extent of potential and actual adverse human rights and environmental impacts that they cause or contribute to, establish and maintain a complaintsnotification procedure, monitor the effectiveness of the taken measures in accordance with the requirements that are set up in this Directive and communicate publicly on their due diligence in line with competition law. In order to ensure clarity for companies, in particular the steps of preventing and mitigating potential adverse impacts and of bringing to an end, or when this is not possible, minimising actual adverse impacts should be clearly distinguished in this Directive.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 368 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Single Point of Contact 1.Each Member State shall designate a national single point of contact on corporate sustainability due diligence.Member States may assign this role to an existing authority.Where a Member State designates only one competent authority, that competent authority may also be the single point of contact. 2. Companies may seek guidance and obtain further support and information about how best to fulfil their due diligence obligations through this portal.3. The single point of contact may also exercise a liaison function to ensure cross-border cooperation of Member State authorities and with the relevant authorities in other Member States via cooperation with the European Supervisory Network established in Article 21.
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 372 #

2022/0051(COD)

(28) In order to ensure that due diligence forms part of companies’ corporate policies, and in line with the relevant international framework, companies should integrate due diligence into all their relevant corporate policies and have in place a risk- based due diligence policy. The due diligence policy should contain a description of the company’s approach, including in the long term, to due diligence, a code of conduct describing the rules and principles to be followed by the company’s employees and subsidiaries; a description of the processes put in place to implement due diligence, including the measures taken to verify compliance with the code of conduct and to extend its application to establishedits direct business relationships outside the EU. The code of conduct should apply in all relevant corporate functions and operations, including procurement and purchasing decisions. Companies should also update their due diligence policy annuallwhen relevant, meaning after a significant change occurs, such as operating in or sourcing from a new country.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 377 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) To comply with due diligence obligations, companies need to take appropriate measures with respect to identification, prevention and bringing to an end adverse impacts that it caused or contributed to. An ‘appropriate measure’ should mean a measure that is capable of achieving the objectives of due diligence, commensurate with the degree of severity and the likelihood of the adverse impact, and reasonably available to the company, taking into account the circumstances of the specific case, including characteristics of the economic sector and of the specific business relationship and the company’s influence thereof, and the need to ensure prioritisation of action. In this context, in line with international frameworks, the company’s influencleverage over a business relationship should include, on the one hand its ability to persuade the business relationship to take action to bring to an end or prevent adverse impacts (for example through ownership or factual control, market power, pre-qualification requirements, linking business incentives to human rights and environmental performance, etc.) and, on the other hand, the degree of influence or leverage that the company could reasonably exercise, for example through cooperation with the business partner in question or engagement with another company which is the direct business partner of the business relationship associated with adverse impact.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 379 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) Under the due diligence obligations set out by this Directive, a company should identify actual or potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts. In order to allow for a comprehensive identification of adverse impacts, such identification should be based on meaningful stakeholder engagement and quantitative and qualitative information. For instance, as regards adverse environmental impacts, the company should obtain information about baseline conditions at higher risk sites or facilities in valuesupply chains. Identification of adverse impacts should include assessing the human rights, and environmental context in a dynamic way and in regular intervals: prior to a new activity or relationship, prior to major decisions or changes in the operation; in respoWhen identifying adverse impacts that they caused or contributed to, the company should be able to first map areas of their operations, the operations of their subsidiaries and, where related to their supply chainse, to or anticipation of changesheir direct business relationships outside the EU inf they operating environment; and periodically, at least every 12 me in risk areas, and based on ths, throughout the life of an activity or relationship. Regulated financial undertakings providing loan, credit, or other financial services should identify the adverse impacts only at the inception of the contract. When identifying adverse impacts, companies should also identify and assess the impact of ae results, carry out an in-depth risk assessment prioritising the areas where the adverse impacts are most likely to be present or most significant. Indirect business relationships business model and strategies, including trading, procurement and pricing pshall be taken into account then there is substantiated knowledge of risks in those operactices. Whereons that the company cannot prevent, bring to an end or minimize all its adverse impacts at the same time, it should be able to prioritize its action, provided it takes the measures reasonably available to the company, taking into account the specific circumstancesis directly linked to, e.g. based on information gathered in the notification procedure. Identification of adverse impacts should include assessing the human rights, and environmental context in a dynamic way after a significant change occurs, throughout the life of an activity or relationship.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 384 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30 a (new)
(30a) Where the company cannot prevent, mitigate, bring to an end or minimise all the identified actual and potential adverse impacts at the same time to the full extent, it should be allowed to prioritise them based on the severity and likelihood of the adverse impact. In line with the relevant international framework, the severity of an adverse impact should be assessed based on its gravity (scale of the adverse impact), the number of persons or the extent of the environment affected (scope of the adverse impact), its irreversibility, and difficulty to restore the situation prevailing prior to the impact (irremediable character of the adverse impact).
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 385 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
(31) In order to avoid undue burden on the smaller companies operating in high- impact sectors which are covered by this Directive, those companies should only be obliged to identify those actual or potential severe adverse impacts that are relevant to the respective sector.deleted
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 388 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
(32) Where the company cannot prevent, mitigate, bring to an end or minimise all the identified actual and potential adverse impacts at the same time to the full extent, it should be allowed to prioritise them based on the severity and likelihood of the adverse impact. In line with the relevant international framework, the severity of an adverse impact should be assessed based on its gravity (scale of the adverse impact), the number of persons or the extent of the environment affected (scope of the adverse impact), its irreversibility, and difficulty to restore the situation prevailing prior to the impact (irremediable character of the adverse impact). In line with international standards, prevention and mitigation as well as bringing to an end and minimisation of adverse impacts should take into account the interests of those adversely impacted. In order to enable continuous engagement with the valuesupply chain business partner instead of termination of business relations (disengagement) and possibly exacerbating adverse impacts, this Directive should ensure that disengagement is a last-resort action, used only in cases of severe or repeated misconduct, after repeated attempts of bringing an actual adverse impact to an end have failed and only if it is in the best interest of those impacted (responsible disengagement), also in line with the Union`s policy of zero-tolerance on child labour. Terminating a business relationship in which child labour was found could expose the child to even more severe adverse human rights impacts. This should therefore be taken into account when deciding on the appropriate action to take. Moreover, responsible disengagement should also take into account possible impacts for those depending on the product or affected by disruptions of supply chains.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 392 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) Under the due diligence obligations set out by this Directive, if a company identifies potential adverse human rights or environmental impacts, it should take appropriate measureproportionate and commensurate measures within their means to prevent andor adequately mitigate them. To provide companies with legal clarity and certainty, this Directive should set out the actions companies should becan be reasonably expected to take for prevention and mitigation of potential adverse impacts where relevant depending on the circumstances. and leverage. Companies should be obliged to take measures within their means to prevent or mitigate the adverse impacts that they cause or to which they contribute. When companies are not causing nor contributing to the adverse impacts occurring in their supply chain (so called ‘being directly linked to’ the adverse impact), they should use their influence to prevent or mitigate the adverse impact caused by their subsidiaries or business partners or to increase their influence to do so.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 397 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
(34) So as to comply with the prevention and mitigation obligation under this Directive, companies should be required to take the following actions, where relevant depending on the circumstances and their leverage. Where necessary due to the complexity of prevention measures, companies should develop and implement a prevention action plan. Companies shouldmay seek to obtain contractual or other assurances from a direct partner with whom they have an established direct business relationship outside the EU that it will ensure compliance with the code of conduct or the prevention action plan, including by seeking corresponding contractual assurances from its partners to the extent that their activities are part of the companies’ value chain. The contractual assurances should besupply chain where possible. The assurances may be, where appropriate, accompanied by appropriate measures to verify compliance. To ensure comprehensive prevention of actual and potential adverse impacts, companies should also make investments which aim to prevent adverse impacts, and, where appropriate, collaborate with other companies to that extent. Companies should also provide targeted and proportionate support for an SME with which they have an established direct business relationship outside the EU such as financing, for example, through direct financing, low-interest loans, guarantees of continued sourcing, and assistance in securing financing, to help implement the code of conduct or prevention action plan, or technical guidance such as in the form of training, management systems upgrading, and collaborate with other companies.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 402 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
(35) In order to reflect the full range of options for the company in cases where potential impacts could not be addressed by the described prevention or minimisation measuresthere is substantiated knowledge of severe adverse impacts in indirect business relationships outside the EU, this Directive should also refer to the possibility for the company to seek to conclude a contract with the indirect business partnerrelationship, with a view to achieving compliance with the company’s code of conduct or a prevention action plan, and conduct appropriate measures to verify compliance of the indirect business relationship with the contract. This possibility should be taken into account on an ad-hoc basis and following the engagement with stakeholders.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 405 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
(36) In order to ensure that prevention and mitigation of potential adverse impacts is effective, companies should prioritize engagement with business relationships in the value chain, instead of terminating the business relationship, as a last resort action after attempting at preventing and mitigating adverse potential impacts without success. However, the Directive should also, for cases where potential adverse impacts could not be addressed by the described prevention or mitigation measures, refer to the obligation for companies to refrain from entering into new or extending existing relations with the partner in question and, where the law governing their relations so entitles them to, to either temporarily suspend commercial relationships with the partner in question, while pursuing prevention and minimisation efforts, if there is reasonable expectation that these efforts are to succeed in the short-term; or to terminate the business relationship with respect to the activities concerned if the potential adverse impact is severe. In order to allow companies to fulfil that obligation, Member States should provide for the availability of an option to terminate the business relationship in contracts governed by their laws. It is possible that prevention of adverse impacts at the level of indirect business relationships requires collaboration with another company, for example a company which has a direct contractual relationship with the supplier. In some instances, such collaboration could be the only realistic way of preventing adverse impacts, in particular, where the indirect business relationship is not ready to enter into a contract with the company. In these instances, the company should collaborate with the entity which can most effectively prevent or mitigate adverse impacts at the level of the indirect business relationship while respecting competition law.deleted
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 409 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
No later than … [OP please insert the date = 75 years after the date of entry into force of this Directive], the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive. The report shall evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of this Directive in reaching its objectives and assess the following issues:
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 409 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
(37) As regards direct andor where applicable indirect business relationships, industry cooperation, industry schemes and multi- stakeholder initiatives can help create additional leverage to identify, mitigate, and prevent adverse impacts. Therefore, it should be possible for companies to rely on such initiatives to support the implementation of their due diligence obligations laid down in this Directive to the extent that such schemes and initiatives are appropriate to support the fulfilment of those obligations. CompaniMember States cshould assess, at their own initiative, the alignment of these schemes and initiatives with the obligations under this Directive and assess their feasibility. However, membership of such schemes should complement, not replace company due diligence efforts. In order to ensure full information on such initiatives, the Directive should also refer to the possibilityquire for the Commission and the Member States to facilitate the dissemination of information on such schemes or initiatives and their outcomes. The Commission, in collaboration with Member States, may should issue guidance for assessing the fitness of industry schemes and multi-stakeholder initiatives.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 413 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
(38) Under the due diligence obligations set out by this Directive, if a company identifies actual human rights or environmental adverse impacts that it caused or contributed to, it should take appropriate measures to bring those to an end. It can be expected that a company is able to bring to an end actual adverse impacts in theirits own operations and inthose of its subsidiaries. However, it should be clarified that, as regards established business relationships, where adverse impacts cannot be brought to an end, companies should minimise the extent of such impacts. Minimisation of the extent of adverse impacts should require an outcome that is the closest possible to bringing the adverse impact to an end. To provide companies with legal clarity and certainty, this Directive should define which actions companies shcould be reasonably required to take within their means for bringing actual human rights and environmental adverse impacts to an end and minimisation of their extent, where relevant depending on the circumstances. When companies are neither causing nor contributing to the adverse impacts, meaning they are directly linked to the adverse impact, they should be obliged to use their influence to bring to an end or minimise the extent of the adverse impact caused by their subsidiaries or business relationships or to increase their influence to do so.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 417 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) whether the thresholds regarding the number of employees and net turnover laid down in Article 2(1) need to be loweredare appropriate;
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 418 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
(39) So as to comply with the obligation of bringing to an end and minimising the extent of actual adverse impacts under this Directive, companies should be required to take the following actions, where relevant within their means, where relevant depending on the circumstances. They should neutralise the adverse impact or minimise its extent, with an action proportionate to the significance and scale of the adverse impact and to the contribution of the company’s conduct to the adverse impact. Where necessary due to the fact that the adverse impact cannot be immediately brought to an end, companies should develop and implement a corrective action plan with reasonable and clearly defined timelines for action and qualitative and quantitative indicators for measuonitoring improvement. Companies should alsomay also, where possible and where deemed necessary following engagement with stakeholders, seek to obtain contractual or other assurances from a direct business partner with whom they have an established business relationship that they will ensure compliance with the company’s code of conduct and, as necessary, a prevention action plan, including by seeking corresponding contractual assurances from its partners, to the extent that their activities are part of the company’s valuesupply chain. The contractual assurances should beassurances may be, where appropriate, accompanied by the appropriate measures to verify compliance. Finally, companies should also make investments aiming at ceasing or minimising the extent of adverse impact, provide targeted and proportionate support for an SMEs with which they have an established direct business relationship and collaborate with other entities, including through industry initiatives, where relevant, to increase the company’s ability to bring the adverse impact to an end.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 419 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) whether the list of sectors in Article 2(1), point (b), needs to be changed, including in order to align it to guidance from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development;deleted
2022/11/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 423 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
(40) In order to reflect the full range of options for the company in cases where actual impacts could not be addressed by the described measures, this Directive should also refer to the possibility for the company to seek to conclude a contract with the indirect business partner, where appropriate, with a view to achieving compliance with the company’s code of conduct or a corrective action plan, and conduct appropriate measures to verify compliance of the indirect business relationship with the contract.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 425 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 41
(41) In order to ensure that bringing actual adverse impacts to an end or minimising them is effective, companies should prioritize engagement with business relationships in the valuesupply chain, instead of terminating the business relationship, as a last resort action after attempting ato bringing actual adverse impacts to an end or minimising them without success. However, this Directive should also, for cases where actual adverse impacts could not be brought to an end or adequately mitigated by the described measures, refer to the obligation for companies to refrain from entering into new or extending existing relations with the partner in question and, where the law governing their relations so entitles them to, to either temporarily suspend commercialbusiness relationships with the partner in question, while pursuing efforts to bring to an end or minimise the extent of the adverse impact, or terminate the business relationship with respect to the activities concerned, if the adverse impact is considered severe and only if this is in the best interest of those impacted (responsible disengagement). In order to allow companies to fulfil that obligation, Member States should provide for the availability of an option to terminate the business relationship in contracts governed by their laws.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 426 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 42
(42) Companies should provide the possibility for persons and organisations to submit complaintsinformation directly to them in case of legitimate concerns regarding actual or potential human rights and environmental adverse impacts. Organisations who could submit such complaintsinformation should include trade unions and other workers’ representatives representing individuals working in the valuesupply chain concerned and civil society organisations active in the areas related to the valuesupply chain concerned where they have substantiated and documented knowledge about a potential or actual adverse impact. Companies should establish a procedure for dealing with those complaintnotifications and inform workers, trade unions and other workers’ representatives, where relevant, about such processes. Recourse to the complaints and remedinotification mechanism should not prevent the complaininformant from having recourse to judicial remedies. In accordance with international standards, complaiinformants should be entitled to request from the company appropriate follow-up on the complaint andnotification. This can include to meet with the company’s representatives at an appropriate level to discuss potential or actual severe adverse impacts that are the subject matter of the complaintnotification. This access should not lead to unreasonable solicitations of companies nor to sanctions. Companies may deal with notifications as a group, for example within an industry initiative.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 431 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 43
(43) Companies should monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their due diligence measures. They should carry out periodiccontinuous assessments of their own operations, those of their subsidiaries and, where related to the valuesupply chains of the company, those of their established business relationships outside the EU, to monitor the effectiveness of the identification, prevention, minimisation, bringing to an end and mitigation of human rights and environmental adverse impacts. Such assessments should verify that adverse impacts are properly identified, due diligence measures are implemented and if adverse impacts have actually been prevented or brought to an end. In order to ensure that such assessments are up-to- date, they should be carried out at least every 12 months and be revised in- betweenwhen deemed necessary after a significant change occurs, such as operating in or sourcing from a new country or if there are reasonable grounds to believe that significant new risks of adverse impact could have arisen.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 439 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 44
(44) Like in the existing international standards set by the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD framework, it forms part of the due diligence requirement to communicate externally relevant information on due diligence policies, processes and activities conducted to identify and address actual or potential adverse impacts, including the findings and outcomes of those activities. The proposal to amend Directive 2013/34/EU as amended regardsing corporate sustainability reporting sets out relevant reporting obligations for the companies covered by this directive. In order to avoid duplicating reporting obligations, this Directive should therefore not introduce any new reporting obligations in addition to those under Directive 2013/34/EU for the companies covered by that Directive as well as the reporting standards that should be developed under it. As regards companies that are within the scope of this Directive, but do not fall under Directive 2013/34/EU, in order to comply with their obligation of communicating as part of the due diligence under this Directive, they should publish on their website an annual statement in a language customary in the sphere of international businessone of the official languages of the Union.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 442 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 45
(45) In order to facilitate companies’ compliance with their due diligence requirements throughas regards their valuesupply chain and limiting shifting compliance burden on SME business partners, in particular SMEs, the Commission should provide guidance on model contractual clauses.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 448 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 47
(47) Although SMEs are not included in the scope of this Directive, they could be heavily impacted by its provisions as contractors or subcontractors to the companies which are in the scope. The aim is nevertheless to mitigate the immense financial or administrative burden on SMEs, many of which are already struggling in the context of the global economic and sanitary crisis. In order to support companies in the implementation, including SMEs, Member States should set up and operate, either individually or jointly, dedicated websites, portals or platforms, to provide information and support to companies, and Member States cshould also financially support SMEs specifically and help them build capacity. Such support should also be made accessible, and where necessary adapted and extended to upstream economic operators in third countries. Companies whose business partner is an SME, are also encouraged tshould also support them to comply with due diligence measures, in case such requirements would jeopardize the viability of the SME and use fair, reasonable, non-discriminatory and proportionate requirements vis-a-vis the SMEs.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 450 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 48
(48) In order to complement Member State support to companies in their implementation, including SMEs, the Commission mayshould build on existing EU tools, projects and other actions helping with the due diligence implementation in the EU and in third countries. It may set up new support measures that provide help to companies, including SMEs on due diligence requirements, including an observatory for valuesupply chain transparency and the facilitation and assessment of joint stakeholder initiatives.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 452 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 49
(49) The Commission and Member States should continue to work in partnership with third countries to support upstream economic operators build the capacity to effectively prevent and mitigate adverse human rights and environmental impacts of their operations and business relationships, paying specific attention to the challenges faced by smallholders. They should use their neighbourhood, development and international cooperation instruments, including Free Trade Agreements, to support third country governments and upstream economic operators in third countries addressing adverse human rights and environmental impacts of their operations and upstream business relationships. This could include working with partner country governments, the local private sector and stakeholders on addressing the root causes of adverse human rights and environmental impacts.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 455 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 50
(50) In order to ensure that this Directive effectively contributes to combating climate change, companies should adopt a plan to ensure that the business model and strategy of the company are compatible with the transition to a sustainable economy and with the limiting of global warming to 1.5 °C in line with the Paris Agreement. In case climate is or should have beenin case climate is identified as a principal risk for or a principal impact of the company’s operations, the company should include emissions reduction objectives in its planclimate objectives in its due diligence policy regarding environmental adverse impacts.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 457 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 51
(51) With a view to ensure that such emission reduction plan is properly implemented and embedded in the financial incentives of directors, the plan should be duly taken into account when setting directors’ variable remuneration, if variable remuneration is linked to the contribution of a director to the company’s business strategy and long- term interests and sustainability.deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 460 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 53
(53) In order to ensure the monitoring of the correct implementation of companies’ due diligence obligations and ensure the proper enforcement of this Directive, Member States should designate one or more national supervisory authorities. These supervisory authorities should be of a public nature, independent from the companies falling within the scope of this Directive or other market interests, and free of conflicts of interest. In accordance with national law, Member States should ensure appropriate financing of the competent authority. They should be entitled to carry out investigations, on their own initiative or based on complaints or substantiated concerns raised under this Directive. Where competent authorities under sectoral legislation exist, Member States could identify those as responsible for the application of this Directive in their areas of competence. They could designate authorities for the supervision of regulated financial undertaking also as supervisory authorities for the purposes of this Directive.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 462 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 54
(54) In order to ensure effective enforcement of national measures implementing this Directive, Member States should provide for dissuasive, proportionate and effective administrative sanctions for infringements of those measures. In order for such sanction regime to be effective, administrative sanctions to be imposed by the national supervisory authorities should include pecuniary sanctions. Where the legal system of a Member State does not provide for administrative sanctions as foreseen in this Directive, the rules on administrative sanctions should be applied in such a way that the sanction is initiated by the competent supervisory authority and imposed by the judicial authority. Therefore, it is necessary that those Member States ensure that the application of the rules and sanctions has an equivalent effect to the administrative sanctions imposed by the competent supervisory authorities.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 464 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 55
(55) In order to ensure consistent application and enforcement of national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive, national supervisory authorities should actively cooperate and coordinate their action. For that purpose a European Network of Supervisory Authorities should be set up by the Commission and the supervisory authorities should assist each other in performing their tasks and provide mutual assistance.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 470 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 56
(56) In order to ensure effective compensation of victims of adverse impacts, Member States should be required to lay down rules governing the civil liability of companies for damages arising due to its intentional or gross negligent failure to comply with the due diligence process. The company should be liable for damages if thethat they directly caused if they intentionally or gross negligently failed to comply with the obligations to prevent and mitigate potential adverse impacts or to bring actual impacts to an end and minimise their extent, and as a result of this failure an adverse impact that it directly caused and that should have been identified, prevented, mitigated, brought to an end or its extent minimised through the appropriate measures occurred and led to damage.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 474 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 57
(57) As regards damages occurring at the level of established indirect business relationships, the liability of the company should be subject to specific conditions. The company should not be liable if it carried out specific due diligence measures. However, it should not be exonerated from liability through implementing such measures in case it was unreasonable to expect that the action actually taken, including as regards verifying compliance, would be adequate to prevent, mitigate, bring to an end or minimise the adverse impact. In addition, in the assessment of the existence and extent of liability, due account is to be taken of the company’s efforts, insofar as they relate directly to the damage in question, to comply with any remedial action required of them by a supervisory authority, any investments made and any targeted support provided as well as any collaboration with other entities to address adverse impacts in its value chains.deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 479 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 59
(59) As regards civil liability rules, the civil liability of a company for damages arising due to its failure to carry out adequate due diligencethat it directly caused should be without prejudice to civil liability of its subsidiaries or the respective civil liability of direct and indirect business partnerbusiness in the valuesupply chain. Also, the civil liability rules under this Directive should be without prejudice to Union or national rules on civil liability related to adverse human rights impacts or to adverse environmental impacts that provide for liability in situations not covered by or providing for stricter liability than this Directive.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 483 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 61
(61) In order to ensure that victims of human rights and environmental harms can bring an action for damages and claim compensation for damages arising due to a company’s failure to comply with the due diligence obligations stemming from this Directive, even where the law applicable to such claims is not the law of a Member State, as could be for instance be the case in accordance with international private law rules when the damage occurs in a third country, this Directive should require Member States to ensure that the liability provided for in provisions of national law transposing this Article is of overriding mandatory application in cases where the law applicable to claims to that effect is not the law of a Member State.deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 484 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 62
(62) The civil liability regime under this Directive should be without prejudice to the Environmental Liability Directive 2004/35/EC. This Directive should not prevent Member States from imposing further, more stringent obligations on companies or from otherwise taking further measures having the same objectives as that Directive.deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 485 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 63
(63) In all Member States’ national laws, directors owe a duty of care to the company. In order to ensure that this general duty is understood and applied in a manner which is coherent and consistent with the due diligence obligations introduced by this Directive and that directors systematically take into account sustainability matters in their decisions, this Directive should clarify, in a harmonised manner, the general duty of care of directors to act in the best interest of the company, by laying down that directors take into account the sustainability matters as referred to in Directive 2013/34/EU, including, where applicable, human rights, climate change and environmental consequences, including in the short, medium and long term horizons. Such clarification does not require changing existing national corporate structures.deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 486 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 64
(64) Responsibility for due diligence should be assigned to the company’s directors, in line with the international due diligence frameworks. Directors should therefore be responsible for putting in place and overseeing the due diligence actions as laid down in this Directive and for adopting the company’s due diligence policy, taking into account the input of stakeholders and civil society organisations and integrating due diligence into corporate management systems. Directors should also adapt the corporate strategy to actual and potential impacts identified and any due diligence measures taken.deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 493 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 70
(70) The Commission should assess and report whether new sectors should be added to the list of high-impact sectors covered by this Directive, in order to align it to guidance from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development or in light of clear evidence on labour exploitation, human rights violations or newly emerging environmental threats, whether the list of relevant international conventions referred to in this Directive should be amended, in particular in the light of international developments, or whether the provisions on due diligence under this Directive should be extended to adverse climate impacts.deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 495 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 71
(71) The objective of this Directive, namely better exploiting the potential of the single market to contribute to the transition to a sustainable economy and contributing to sustainable development through the prevention and mitigation of potential or actual human rights and environmental adverse impacts in companies’ value chains, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States acting individually or in an uncoordinated manner, but can rather, by reason of the scale and effects of the actions, be better achieved at Union level. In particular, addressed problems and their causes are of a transnational dimension, as many companies are operating Union wide or globally and value chains expand to other Member States and to third countries. Moreover, individuala growing number of individual and different Member States’ measures risk being ineffective, unworkable for companies to comply with, and lead to fragmentation of the internal market. Therefore, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 TEU. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 501 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
This DirectiveRegulation lays down rules
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 506 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) on obligations for companies regarding actual and potential human rights adverse impacts and environmental adverse impacts that they caused, contributed to or are directly linked to, with respect to their own operations, the operations of their subsidiaries, and the valuesupply chain operations carried out by entities with whom the company has an establishedtheir business relationships outside the EU and
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 512 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) on liability for violations of the obligations mentioned abovedamages that occurred in the operations described above which a company directly intentionally or gross negligently caused.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 519 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The nature of business relationships as ‘established’ shall be reassessed periodically, and at least every 12 months.deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 528 #

2022/0051(COD)

2a. Member States shall not introduce, in their national law, more stringent provisions than those laid down in this Directive, unless otherwise provided for in this Directive.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 536 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. This Directive shall apply to companies which are formed in accordance with the legislation of a Member State and which fulfil one of the following conditions:had more than 3000 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 900 million in the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been prepared;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 540 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the company had more than 500 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 150 million in the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been prepardeleted;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 549 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the company did not reach the thresholds under point (a), but had more than 250 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 40 million in the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been prepared, provided that at least 50% of this net turnover was generated in one or more of the following sectors: (i) the manufacture of textiles, leather and related products (including footwear), and the wholesale trade of textiles, clothing and footwear; (ii) (including aquaculture), the manufacture of food products, and the wholesale trade of agricultural raw materials, live animals, wood, food, and beverages; (iii) regardless from where they are extracted (including crude petroleum, natural gas, coal, lignite, metals and metal ores, as well as all other, non-metallic minerals and quarry products), the manufacture of basic metal products, other non-metallic mineral products and fabricated metal products (except machinery and equipment), and the wholesale trade of mineral resources, basic and intermediate mineral products (including metals and metal ores, construction materials, fuels, chemicals and other intermediate products).deleted agriculture, forestry, fisheries the extraction of mineral resources
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 596 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. This Directive shall also apply to companies which are formed in accordance with the legislation of a third country, and fulfil one of the following conditions:have a domestic branch office or subsidiary in a Member State and which had at least 3000 employees and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 900million in the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been prepared;.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 602 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) generated a net turnover of more than EUR 150 million in the Union in the financial year preceding the last financial year;deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 611 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) generated a net turnover of more than EUR 40 million but not more than EUR 150 million in the Union in the financial year preceding the last financial year, provided that at least 50% of its net worldwide turnover was generated in one or more of the sectors listed in paragraph 1, point (b).deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 635 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. In case of a group of companies: (a) the parent company, whether or not it meets the thresholds mentioned in paragraphs 1 or 2, may perform the Due Diligence obligations laid down in this Directive on behalf of any or all its subsidiaries which meet the thresholds in paragraph 1 or 2; (b) any subsidiary shall be deemed in compliance with the obligations laid down in this Directive where their parent company includes those subsidiaries in its due diligence corporate policy.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 667 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) ‘adverse environmental impact’ means an adverse impact on the environment resulting from the violation of one of the prohibitions and obligations pursuant to the international environmental conventions listed in the Annex, Part II; inciples set out in the OECD Due Diligence Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises as clarified in the OECD Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct as regards the environment and climate.;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 676 #

2022/0051(COD)

(c) ‘adverse human rights impact’ means an adverse impact on protected persons that may impair the full enjoyment of human rights resulting from the violation of one of the prights or prohibitions listed in the Annex, Part I Section 1, as enshrined in the international conventions listed in the Annex, Part I Section 2nciples set out in the OECD Due Diligence Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises as clarified in the OECD Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 682 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) ‘adverse impact’ means an adverse environmental impact and adverse human rights impact;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 684 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new)
(cb) ‘to cause an adverse impact’ means a company’s own actions that directly led to the adverse impact.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 685 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c c (new)
(cc) ‘to contribute to an adverse impact’ means a company’s own actions in combination with the activities of other entities cause an adverse impact, or if the activities of a company cause, facilitate or incentivise another entity to cause an adverse impact. Contribution must be substantial, meaning that it does not include minor or trivial contributions. The substantial nature of the contribution and understanding when the actions of the enterprise may have caused, facilitated or incentivised another entity to cause an adverse impact may involve the consideration of multiple factors. The following factors can be taken into account: – the extent to which an enterprise may encourage or motivate an adverse impact by another entity, i.e. the degree to which the activity increased the risk of the impact occurring. – the extent to which an enterprise could or should have known about the adverse impact or potential for adverse impact, i.e. the degree of foreseeability. – the degree to which any of enterprise’s activities actually mitigated the adverse impact or decreased the risk of the impact occurring. The mere existence of a business relationship or activities which create the general conditions in which it is possible for adverse impacts to occur does not necessarily represent a relationship of contribution. The activity in question should substantially increase the risk of adverse impact.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 687 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c d (new)
(cd) being ‘directly linked to an adverse impact’ means that there is a relationship between the adverse impact and the company’s products, services or operations through another business relationship. Directly linked is not defined by direct contractual relationships. Also, a direct linkage does not imply that the responsibility shifts from the entity causing an adverse impact to the enterprise with which it has a linkage.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 690 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e – introductory part
(e) ‘direct business relationship’ means a business relationship with a direct contractor, subcontractor or any other legal entities (‘partner’)ual relation for the supply of goods or the provision of services whose supplies are necessary for the production of the enterprise’s product or the provision and use of the relevant service, which is relevant based on the severity and likelihood of adverse impacts and is outside the European Union.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 697 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e – point i
(i) with whom the company has a commercial agreement or to whom the company provides financing, insurance or reinsurance, ordeleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 700 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e – point ii
(ii) that performs business operations related to the products or services of the company for or on behalf of the company;deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 711 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ‘establishedindirect business relationship’ means a business relationship, whether direct or indirect, which is, or which is expected to be lasting, in view of its intensity or duration and which does not represent a negligible or merely ancillary part of the value chaiich is not a direct supplier and whose supplies are necessary for the production of the enterprise’s product or the provision and use of the relevant service, which is relevant based on the severity and likelihood of adverse impacts and is outside the European Union;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 718 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) ‘substantiated knowledge’ means factual and verifiable information about potential or actual adverse human rights or environmental impacts, which can be based on stakeholder information received through the notification procedure or the supervisory authority, when there is knowledge of particular risk factors including sectoral or geographical or when there have been adverse impacts in the past;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 727 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ‘valuesupply chain’ means activities related to the production and supply of goods or the provision of services by a company, including the development of the product or the service and the use and disposal of the product as well as the related activities of upstream and downstream established business relationships of the company. As regards companies within the meaning of point (a)(iv), ‘value chain’ with respect to the provision of these specific services shall only include the activities of the clients receiving such loan, c as far as these activities are dit, and other financial services and of other companies belonging to the same group whose activities are linked to the contract in question. The value chain of such regulated financial undertakings does not cover SMEs receiving loan, credit, financing, insurance or reinsurance of such entities;rectly necessary for the production of the goods or the provision of the services.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 734 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) ‘leverage’ means the ability of a company, depending on size and importance to supplier’s revenue or the functioning of its business operations, to affect change in the wrongful practices of the entity that causes or contributes to the adverse impact in the supply chain;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 746 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
(ha) For the purposes of point (h), the Commission shall adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 28 to specify the minimum standards for the independent third-party verification;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 753 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point j a (new)
(ja) For the purposes of point (j), the Commission shall adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 14b and 28 to specify the minimum standards for the industry initiative to be recognised by one Member States as feasible;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 754 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point l
(l) ‘severe adverse impact’ means an adverse environmental impact or an adverse human rights impact that is especially significant by its nature, or affects a large number of persons or a large area of the environment, or which is irreversible, or is particularly difficult to remedy as a result of the measures necessary to restore the situation prevailing prior to the impact;deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 765 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n
(n) ‘stakeholders’ means the company’s employees, the employees of its subsidiaries, employees within its supply chain and other relevant individuals, groups, communities or entities whose rights or vested interests are or could be directly affected by the potential and actual adverse environmental and human rights impacts connected to the products, services and operations of that company, its subsidiaries and its business relationships;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 776 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point o
(o) ‘director’ means: (i) any member of the administrative, management or supervisory bodies of a company; (ii) where they are not members of the administrative, management or supervisory bodies of a company, the chief executive officer and, if such function exists in a company, the deputy chief executive officer; (iii) other persons who perform functions similar to those performed under point (i) or (ii);deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 781 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point p
(p) ‘board of directors’ means the administrative or supervisory body responsible for supervising the executive management of the company, or, if no such body exists, the person or persons performing equivalent functions;deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 785 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point q
(q) ‘appropriate measure’ means a measure that is capable of achieving the objectives of due diligence, commensurate with the degree of severity and the likelihood of the adverse impact, and proportionate to the size, reasonably available tources and capacities of the company, taking into account the circumstances of the specific case, including characteristics of the economic sector and of the specific business relationship and the company’s influence thereof, and the need to ensure prioritisation of actionleverage in that relationship, and the principle of risk-based prioritisation of action. Companies are not required to guarantee, in all circumstances, that adverse impacts will never occur or that they will be stopped. The main obligations in this Directive are obligations of means;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 795 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point q c (new)
(qc) ‘risk factors’ means enterprise- level risk factors, geographic risk factors, and sectoral risk factors. The Commission shall prepare a list of risk factors with accompanying guidance as described in Article 13;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 796 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point q d (new)
(qd) ‘Group’ means a parent company and all its subsidiary undertakings as defined by Article 2 of the Directive 2013/34/EU of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and83/349/EE;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 802 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that companies conduct risk-based human rights and environmental due diligence as laid down in Articles 5 to 11 (‘due diligence’) by carrying out the following actions:
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 804 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) identifying and prioritising actual or potential adverse impacts that they caused or contributed to or are directly linked to in accordance with Article 6;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 808 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) preventing andor mitigating potential adverse impacts that they caused or contributed to, and bringing actual adverse impacts to an end andhat they caused or contributed to an end or minimising their extent in accordance with Articles 7 and 8;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 812 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) establishing and maintaining a complaintsnotification procedure in accordance with Article 9;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 835 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that companies integrate due diligence into all their relevant corporate policies and have in place a due diligence policy. The due diligence policy shall contain all of the following:
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 848 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) a description of the processes put in place to implement due diligence, including, where relevant, the measures taken to verify compliance with the code of conduct and to extend its application to established business relationships;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 860 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that the companies continuously update their due diligence policy annuallywhen significant changes occur.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 865 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Companies shall carry out a due diligence policy which is proportionate and commensurate to the likelihood and severity of their potential or actual adverse impacts and their specific circumstances and risk factors, particularly their sector and location of activity, the size and length of their supply chain, the size of the company, its capacity, resources and leverage.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 872 #
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 876 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that companies take appropriate measures to identifywithin their means to identify whether they cause or contribute to or are directly linked to actual and potential adverse human rights impacts and adverse environmental impacts arising from their own operations or those of their subsidiaries and, w in their business relationships. Where related to their valuesupply chains, from their established business relationships, in accordance with paragraph 2, 3 and 4companies shall assess adverse impacts arising from their direct business relationships located outside the EU that they cause or contribute to. In case of substantiated knowledge, companies shall assess adverse impacts arising from their indirect business relationships outside the EU that they are directly linked to, in accordance with paragraph 2, 3 and 4. In cases where an enterprise has structured a direct business relationship in an improper manner or has engaged in a transaction in order to circumvent the due diligence obligations with regard to the direct supplier, an indirect business relationship is deemed to be a direct business relationship.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 884 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Companies shall identify whether they cause, contribute to or are directly linked to actual and potential adverse human rights impacts and adverse environmental impacts based on a risk assessment and risk-based monitoring methodology, taking into account the likelihood, severity and urgency of adverse impacts, the nature and context of their operations, including sector and geographic location based on the Commission guidelines set out in Article 13. Companies only need to assess business relationships outside the EU and only where risk factors are likely.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 888 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Where a company is not in a position to identify all potential or actual adverse impacts that it caused, contributed to or is directly linked to at the same time, it shall prioritise risk factors based on their severity. Risk assessments under this article shall take into account the perspective of stakeholders where relevant.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 891 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. If a company concludes that it does not cause, contribute to, or that it is not directly linked to any potential or actual adverse impact, it shall publish a statement to that effect on its website (in accordance with Art. 11) and shall thus be considered in compliance with the Directive. In particular, that company may conclude that it has encountered no adverse impacts on human rights or the environment if its impacts identification determines that its direct suppliers perform due diligence in line with this directive. That statement shall be reviewed in the event that new risks emerge or in the event of that company entering into new business relationships that can pose risks.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 892 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Companies are encouraged to take these measures in cooperation with industry initiatives.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 895 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, companies referred to in Article 2(1), point (b), and Article 2(2), point (b), shall only be required to identify actual and potential severe adverse impacts relevant to the respective sector mentioned in Article 2(1), point (b).deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 902 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. When companies referred to in Article 3, point (a)(iv), provide credit, loan or other financial services, identification of actual and potential adverse human rights impacts and adverse environmental impacts shall be carried out only before providing that service..deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 909 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that, for the purposes of identifying and prioritising the adverse impacts referred to in paragraph 1 based on, where appropriate, quantitative and qualitative information, companies are entitled to make use of appropriate resources, including independent reports and information gathered through the complaintsnotification procedure provided for in Article 9. Companies shall, where relevant, also carry out consultations engage with potentially affected groups including workers and other relevant stakeholders to gather information on actual or potential adverse impacts.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 916 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. In the event that not all the necessary information regarding its supply chain is available, the parent company shall explain the efforts made to obtain the necessary information about its supply chain, the reasons why not all of the necessary information could be obtained, and its plans to obtain the necessary information in the future.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 925 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that companies take appropriate proportionate and commensurate measures to prevent, or where prevention is not possible or not immediately possible, adequately mitigate potential adverse human rights impacts and adverse environmental impacts that have been, or shouldthey cause or contribute to and that have been, identified pursuant to Article 6, in accordance with paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 5 of this Article. Companies that are directly linked to potential adverse impacts without causing or contributing to them are required to make use of their leverage to the extent possible to mitigate adverse impacts.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 933 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) where necessary due to the nature or complexity of the measures required for prevention, develop and implement a prevention action plan, with reasonable and clearly defined timelines for action and qualitative and quantitative indicators for measuonitoring improvement. The prevention action plan shall be developed in consultationmeaningful engagement with affected stakeholders where relevant; companies are encouraged to develop their action plans in cooperation with industry initiatives;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 937 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) set up a prioritisation strategy on the basis of Principle 17 of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights based on risk factors. Companies shall consider the level of severity, likelihood and urgency of the different potential adverse impacts on human rights or the environment, the nature and context of their operations, including geographic, the scope of the risks, their scale and how irremediable they might be, and use the prioritisation policy in dealing with them. When prioritising their response to risks to human rights, companies shall treat the severity of an adverse impact, such as where a delayed response would make the impact irremediable, as the predominant factor.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 940 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new)
(ab) Companies shall apply best efforts to develop and use purchase policies that do not encourage potential adverse impacts on human rights the environment.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 945 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) seekmay seek, where appropriate, contractual or other assurances, from a business partner with whom it has a direct business relationship located outside the EU that it will ensure compliance with the company’s code of conduct and, as necessary, a prevention action plan, including by seeking corresponding contractual assurances from its partners, to the extent that their activities are part of the company’s value chain ( and by requesting information on their suppliers if possible; Member States shall ensure that the general due diligence duty prevails over contractual cascading).surances; When such contractual assurances are obtained, paragraph 4 shall apply;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 956 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) provide targeted and proportionate supportfinancial and administrative support, especially for an SME with which the company has an established business relationship, where compliance with the code of conduct or the prevention action plan would jeopardise the viability of the SME outside the EU;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 962 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) in compliance with Union law including competition law, collaborate with other entities, sectoral approaches or industry initiatives, including, where relevant, to increase the company’s ability to bring the adverse impact to an end, in particular where no other action is suitable or effective;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 972 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. As regards potential adverse impacts that could not be prevented or adequately mitigated by the measures in paragraph 2, the company that is directly linked to the adverse impact may seek to conclude a contract with a partner with whom it has an indirect relationship outside the EU that was identified in accordance with Article 6 due to substantiated knowledge of potential adverse impacts, with a view to achieving compliance with the company’s code of conduct or a prevention action plan. When such a contract is concluded, paragraph 4 shall apply.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 979 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
TheAssurances, contractual assurances or the contract shall beor non- contractual, may be, where appropriate, accompanied by the appropriate measures to verify compliance. For the purposes of verifying compliance, the company may refer to suitable industry initiatives or independent third-party verification.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 984 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
When contractual assurancesassurances, including contractual, are obtained from, or a contract is entered into, with an SME outside the EU, the terms used shall be fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory. Where measures are carried out to verify compliance are carried out in relation to SMEs, the company shall bearof assurances obtained from SMEs outside the EU, the cost of the independent third- party verification should be provided by public funds.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 990 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. As regards potential adverse impacts within the meaning of paragraph 1 that could not be prevented or adequately mitigated by the measures in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4, the company shall be required to refrain from entering into new or extending existing relations with the partner in connection with or in the value chain of which the impact has arisen and shall, where the law governing their relations so entitles them to, take the following actions: (a) temporarily suspend commercial relations with the partner in question, while pursuing prevention and minimisation efforts, if there is reasonable expectation that these efforts will succeed in the short-term; (b) terminate the business relationship with respect to the activities concerned if the potential adverse impact is severe. Member States shall provide for the availability of an option to terminate the business relationship in contracts governed by their laws.deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1015 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. By way of derogation from paragraph 5, point (b), when companies referred to in Article 3, point (a)(iv), provide credit, loan or other financial services, they shall not be required to terminate the credit, loan or other financial service contract when this can be reasonably expected to cause substantial prejudice to the entity to whom that service is being provided.deleted
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1019 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that companies take appropriate measures to bring actual adverse impacts that have been, or shouldproportionate and commensurate measures within their means to bring actual adverse impacts that they have caused or contributed to and that have been, identified pursuant to Article 6 to an end, in accordance with paragraphs 2 to 6 of this Article. Companies that are directly linked to the actual adverse impact without causing or contributing to it are required to make use of their leverage to the extent possible to bring actual adverse impacts to an end.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1027 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Where the adverse impact cannot be brought to an end, Member States shall ensure that companies take measures within their means to minimise the extent of such an impact.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1037 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) neutralise the adverse impact or minimise its extent, including by the payment of damages to the affected persons and of financial compensation to the affected communities. The action shall be proportionate and commensurate to the significance and scale of the adverse impact and to the contribution of the company’s conduct to the adverse impact, as well as to its resources and leverage;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1045 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) where necessary due to the fact that the adverse impact cannot be immediately brought to an end, develop and implement a corrective action plan with reasonable and clearly defined timelines for action and qualitative and quantitative indicators for measuonitoring improvement. Where relevant, tThe corrective action plan shall be developed in consultationthrough meaningful engagement with stakeholders;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1047 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(ba) set up a prioritisation strategy on the basis of Principle 17 of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights based on risk factors. Companies shall consider the level of severity, likelihood and urgency of the different actual adverse impacts on human rights or the environment, the nature and context of their operations, including geographic, the scope of the risks, their scale and how irremediable they might be, and use the prioritisation policy in dealing with them. When prioritising their response to risks to human rights, companies shall treat the severity of an adverse impact, such as where a delayed response would make the impact irremediable, as the predominant factor.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1052 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) seekmay seek, where appropriate, contractual or other assurances from a direct partner with whom it has an established direct business relationship outside the EU that it will ensure compliance with the code of conduct and, as necessary, a corrective action plan, including by seeking corresponding contractual assurances from its partners, to the extent that they are part of the value chain ( and by requesting information on their suppliers if possible. Member States shall ensure that the general due diligence duty prevails over contractual cascading)surances. When such contractual assurances are obtained, paragraph 5 shall apply.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1057 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) make necessary, where appropriate, investments, such as into management or production processes and infrastructures to comply with paragraphs 1, 2 and 3;
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1063 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point e
(e) provide targeted and proportionate supportfinancial and administrative support, especially for an SME with which the company has an established direct business relationship, where compliance with the code of conduct or the corrective action plan would jeopardise the viability of the SME outside the EU;
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1069 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point f
(f) in compliance with Union law including competition law, collaborate with other entities, sectoral approaches or industry initiatives, including, where relevant, to increase the company’s ability to bring the adverse impact to an end, in particular where no other action is suitable or effective.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1076 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. As regards actual adverse impacts that could not be brought to an end or adequately mitigated by the measures in paragraph 3, the company that is directly linked to the impact may seek to conclude a contract, where appropriate, with a partner with whom it has an indirect relationship outside the EU that was identified in accordance with Article 6 due to substantiated knowledge of actual adverse impacts, with a view to achieving compliance with the company’s code of conduct or a corrective action plan. When such a contract is concluded, paragraph 5 shall apply.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1080 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
TheAssurances, contractual assurances or the contract shall beor non- contractual, or the contract may be, where appropriate, accompanied by the appropriate measures to verify compliance. For the purposes of verifying compliance, the company may refer to suitable industry initiatives or independent third-party verification.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1084 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
When contractual assurancesassurances, including contractual, are obtained from, or a contract is entered into, with an SMEother company, the terms used shall be fair, reasonable and non- discriminatory. Where measures to verify compliance are carried out in relation to SMEs, the company shall bear the cost of the independent third- party verification should be provided by public funds.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1091 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
As regards actual adverse impacts within the meaning of paragraph 1 that the company caused or contributed to and that could not be brought to an end or the extent of which could not be minimised by the measures provided for in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 and despite repeated efforts, the company shall refrain from entering into new or extending existing relations with the partner in connection to or in the valuesupply chain of which the impact has arisen and shall, as a measure of last resort, where the law governing their relations so entitles them to, take one of the following actions and where the impact is considered extremely severe or irreversible, take the following actions, in line with responsible disengagement, taking into account the best interest of those impacted:
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1098 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) if suspension does not lead to a sufficient result, terminate the business relationship with respect to the activities concerned, if the adverse impact is consid. Member States shall provide for the availability of an option to terminate the business relationship in contracts governed severeby their laws.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1118 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 7
7. By way of derogation from paragraph 6, point (b), when companies referred to in Article 3, point (a)(iv), provide credit, loan or other financial services, they shall not be required to terminate the credit, loan or other financial service contract, when this can be reasonably expected to cause substantial prejudice to the entity to whom that service is being provided.deleted
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1134 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that companies provide the possibility for persons and organisations listed in paragraph 2 to submit complaints tonotify them where they have legitimate concernsinformation regarding actual or potential adverse human rights impacts and adverseand environmental impacts with respect to their own operations, the operations of their subsidiaries and their valuesupply chains. This can be done in cooperation with industry initiatives.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1142 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall ensure that notification procedures are legitimate, accessible, predictable, equitable, transparent, rights compatible and a source of continuous learning based on engagement and dialogue.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1154 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States shall ensure that the complaintnotifications may be submitted by:
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1164 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) trade unions and other workers’ representatives representing individuals working in the valuesupply chain concerned,
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1171 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) civil society organisations active in the areas related to the valuesupply chain concerned.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1177 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that the companies establish a procedure for dealing with complaintnotifications referred to in paragraph 1, including a procedure when the company considers the complaintinformation to be unfounded, and inform the relevant workers and trade unions of those procedures. Member States shall ensure that where the complaintinformation is well- founded, the adverse impact that is the subject matter of the complaintnotification is deemed to be identified within the meaning of Article 6. This can be done in cooperation with industry initiatives.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1183 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Member States shall ensure that complainants are entitledIn case the notification proves to be well founded, Member States shall ensure that informants are entitled to request appropriate follow-up on the notification from the company with which they have filed a notification pursuant to paragraph 1.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1192 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) to request appropriate follow-up on the complaint from the company with which they have filed a complaint pursuant to paragraph 1, andeleted
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1195 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) to meet with the company’s representatives at an appropriate level to discuss potential or actual severe adverse impacts that are the subject matter of the complaint.deleted
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1214 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that companies carry out periodiccontinuous assessments of their own operations and measures, those of their subsidiaries and, where related to the valuesupply chains of the company, those of their established business relationships, to monitor the effectiveness of the identification, prevention, mitigation, bringing to an end and minimisation of the extent of human rights and environmental adverse impacts. Such assessments shall be based, where appropriate, on qualitative and quantitative indicators and be carried out at least every 12 monthscontinuously and whenever there are reasonable grounds to believe that significant new risks of the occurrence of those adverse impacts may arise. The due diligence policy shall be updated in accordance with the outcome of those assessments.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1223 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that companies that are not subject to reporting requirements under Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU report on the matters covered by this Directive by publishing on their website an annual statement in a language customary in tone of the official languages of the Union. When sphere of international business. The statement shall be published by 30 April each year, covering the previous calendar yearignificant changes occur, the statement shall be updated.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1230 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The companies referred to in paragraph 1 may rely on the consolidated reporting of the group to which they belong in order to fulfil their reporting requirements under this Article.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1238 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2
The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 14b and 28 concerning the content and criteria for such reporting under paragraph 1, specifying information on the description of due diligence, potential and actual adverse impacts and actions taken on those.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1262 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
In order to provide support to companies or 1. to Member State authorities on how companies should fulfil their due diligence obligations, the Commission, in consultation with Member States and relevant stakeholders, including from third countries, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, the European Environment Agency, the External Action Service, the European Innovation Council and Small and Medium-sized Enterprises Executive Agency (EISMEA) and where appropriate with the OECD and other international bodies having expertise in due diligence, may issue guidelines, including for specific sectors or specific adverse impacts. shall issue clear and easily understandable guidelines in the form of targeted guidance where applicable to facilitate compliance in a practical manner: (a) in digital, free of charge and easily accessible format; (b) including on existing digital solutions to be used for the due diligence process and on the development of digital solutions; (c) including on the implementation of the human rights and environmental standards applicable to businesses based on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises as clarified in the Due Diligence Guidance as well as the UNGPs; (d) including lists of risk factors and accompanying guidance, including enterprise-level risk factors, geographic risk factors and sectoral risk factors; (e) including an overview on applicable industry initiatives; (f) including practical guidance on how proportionality and prioritisation, in terms of impacts, sectors and geographical areas, may be applied to due diligence obligations depending on the size and sector of the company; (g) including taking into account SMEs needs. 2. The guidelines shall be made available no later than ... [18 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive]. The Commission shall periodically review the relevance of its guidelines and adapt them to new best practices. 3. Country fact-sheets shall be updated regularly by the Commission and made publicly available in order to provide up-to-date information on the international Conventions and Treaties ratified by each of the Union’s trading partners. The Commission shall collect and publish trade and customs data on origins of raw materials, and intermediate and finished products, and publish information on human rights, environmental and governance potential or actual adverse impacts risks associated with certain countries or regions, sectors and sub-sectors, and products.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1278 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission in cooperation with Member States shall, in order to provide information and support to companies and the partners with whom they have established business relationships in their valuesupply chains in their efforts to fulfil the obligations resulting from this Directive, set up and operate individually or jointly dedicated websites, platforms or portals. Specific consideration shall be given, in that respect, to the SMEs that are present in the valuesupply chains of companies.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1282 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Commission in cooperation with Member States shall undertake efforts in order to provide information and support to stakeholders and their representatives to exercise their involvement in due diligence. This shall include setting up and operating individually or jointly dedicated websites, platforms or portals.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1288 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission mayshall complement Member States’ support measures building on existing Union action to support due diligence in the Union and in third countries and may devise new measures, including facilitation of joint stakeholder initiatives to help companies fulfil their obligations.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1290 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Commission may rely on its cooperation and trade instruments to support the development of the enabling environment in third countries, through capacity building and expertise that will reinforce their economic sector to comply with due diligence obligations as set out in this Directive.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1299 #

2022/0051(COD)

4. Companies may rely on industry schemes and multi-stakeholder initiatives to support the implementation of their obligations referred to in Articles 5 to 11 of this Directive to the extent that such schemes and initiatives are appropriate to support the fulfilment of those obligations. The Commission and the Member States mayshall facilitate the dissemination of information on such schemes or initiatives and their outcome. The Commission, in collaboration with Member States, may and the OECD as well as relevant stakeholders, shall issue guidance for assessing the fitness of industry schemes and multi-stakeholder initiativesinitiatives in line with Article 14c.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1307 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 a (new)
Article 14a Single Point of Contact 1. Each Member State shall designate a national single point of contact on corporate sustainability due diligence. Member States may assign this role to an existing authority. Where a Member State designates only one competent authority, that competent authority may also be the single point of contact. 2. Companies may seek additional guidance and obtain further support and information about how best to fulfil their due diligence obligations through this point of contact. 3. The single point of contact may also exercise a liaison function to ensure cross-border cooperation of Member State authorities and with the relevant authorities in other Member States via cooperation with the European Supervisory Network established in Article 21.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1309 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 c (new)
Article 14c Recognition of Industry Initiatives 1. The Member States shall ensure that industry initiatives, which offer systems for compliance with the due diligence obligation, can apply to the respective Member State for the recognition by that Member State of the systems that they have developed for compliance with the due diligence obligation in supply chain. Suitable evidence and information shall be enclosed with the application. 2. Supplementing this Directive, the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 28 where the methods and criteria are set out according to which the Member States can assess whether systems for compliance with the due diligence obligation in the supply chain facilitate compliance with the requirements of this Directive and its implementation by the Member States for the companies and enable Member States to recognise such systems. 3. Where a Member State determines, on the basis of the evidence and information provided according to paragraph 1 and according to the methods and criteria for recognition laid down in paragraph 2, that a system for compliance with the due diligence obligation in the supply chain enables a company, which effectively applies this system, to implement the requirements of this Directive and its implementation in the Member State, the Member State shall certify granted recognition of equivalence with the requirements of this Directive and its implementation. When taking a decision regarding the recognition of a system for compliance with the due diligence obligation, the Member State shall take into account the various sector- specific processes covered by the system as well as the risk-based approach and the risk-based method which are applied within the system to identify risks. A recognised system shall be mutually recognised in one Member State and Member States should not stipulate further obligations. 4. The Member State shall also verify periodically, as appropriate, that the recognised due diligence systems continue to meet the criteria that formed the basis for a decision on recognition of equivalence which was taken based on paragraph 3. 5. The Commission shall establish and update a register of recognised systems for compliance with the due diligence obligation in the supply chain. The register shall be made publicly available on the internet.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1313 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15
1. companies referred to in Article 2(1), point (a), and Article 2(2), point (a), shall adopt a plan to ensure that the business model and strategy of the company are compatible with the transition to a sustainable economy and with the limiting of global warming to 1.5 °C in line with the Paris Agreement. This plan shall, in particular, identify, on the basis of information reasonably available to the company, the extent to which climate change is a risk for, or an impact of, the company’s operations. 2. in case climate change is or should have been identified as a principal risk for, or a principal impact of, the company’s operations, the company includes emission reduction objectives in its plan. 3. companies duly take into account the fulfilment of the obligations referArticle 15 deleted Combating climate change Member States shall ensure that Member States shall ensured to in paragraphs 1 and 2 when setting variable remuneration, if variable remuneration is linked to the contribution of a director to the company’s business strategy and long- term interests and sustainability.hat, Member States shall ensure that
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1344 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
As regards companies referred to in Article 2(2), the competent supervisory authority shall be that of the Member State in which the company has a branch. If the company does not have a branch in any Member State, or has branches located in different Member States, the competent supervisory authority shall be the supervisory authority of the Member State in which the company generated most of its net turnover in the Union in the financial year preceding the last financial year before the date indicated in Article 30 or the date on which the company first fulfils the criteria laid down in Article 2(2), whichever comes last or subsidiary.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1400 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that natural and legal personsstakeholders as referred to in Article 9 para.2 are entitled to submit substantiated concerns to any supervisory authority when they have reasons to believe, on the basis of objective circumstances, that a company is failing to comply with the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive (‘substantiated concerns’)Articles 6 to 11 and Article 15(1) and (2) of this Directive (‘substantiated concerns’), if the notification procedure referred to in Article 9 did not have a satisfactory outcome.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1419 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall lay down the rules on administrative sanctions applicable to infringements of national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive, and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The sanctions provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. At least the following administrative measures and sanctions shall be provided for: (a) a public statement indicating company responsible and the nature of the infringement; (b) an order requiring the company responsible to cease the conduct constituting the infringement and to desist from any repetition of that conduct; (c) administrative pecuniary sanctions.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1430 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 2
2. In deciding whether to impose sanctions and, if so, in determining their nature and appropriate level, due account shall be taken of the legal framework applicable in the country where the adverse impact may occur or has occurred, the gravity and duration of the infringement, the importance of profits gained or losses avoided by the company, in so far as they can be determined the company’s efforts to comply with any remedial action required of them by a supervisory authority, any investments made and any targeted support provided pursuant to Articles 7 and 8, any previous infringements, cumulative effects of the different measures and sanctions already imposed on the company as well as the collaboration with other entities to address adverse impacts in its valuesupply chains, as the case may be.; any other aggravating or mitigating factors applicable to the circumstances of the case;
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1462 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Supervisory authorities shall share relevant information with the single point of contact as a means of ensuring that the single point of contact has the necessary information to perform its tasks.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1463 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. The ENSA shall also support the Commission in developing the Single- Reporting-Instrument.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1476 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) they intentionally or gross negligently failed to comply with the obligations laid down in Articles 7 and 8 and;
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1483 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) as a result of this failure an actual adverse impact that they caused and that should have been identified, prevented, mitigated, brought to an end or its extent minimised through the appropriate measures laid down in Articles 7 and 8 occurred and led to damage.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1495 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States shall ensure that where a company has taken the actions referred to in Article 7(2), point (b) and Article 7(4), or Article 8(3), point (c), and Article 8(5), it shall not be liable for damages caused by an adverse impact arising as a result of the activities of an indirect partner with whom it has an established business relationship, unless it was unreasonable, in the circumstances of the case, to expect that the action actually taken, including as regards verifying compliance, would be adequate to prevent, mitigate, bring to an end or minimise the extent of the adverse impact.deleted
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1509 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In the assessment of the existence and extent of liability under this paragraph, due account shall be taken of the company’s efforts, insofar as they relate directly to the damage in question, to comply with any remedial action required of them by a supervisory authority, any investments made and any targeted support provided pursuant to Articles 7 and 8, as well as any collaboration with other entities to address adverse impacts in its valuesupply chains.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1528 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 4
4. The civil liability rules under this Directive shall be without prejudice to Union or national rules on civil liability related to adverse human rights impacts or to adverse environmental impacts that provide for liability in situations not covered by or providing for stricter liability than this Directive.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1535 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that the liability provided for in provisions of national law transposing this Article is of overriding mandatory application in cases whmitation period for bringing civil liability claims concerning harm arising out of adverse the law applicable to claims to that effect is not the law of a Member Stateimpacts on human rights and the environment is five years.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1551 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 24
Member States shall ensure that companies applying for public support certify that no sanctions have been imposed on them for a failure to comply with the obligations of this Directive.Article 24 deleted Public support
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1559 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 25
1. Member States shall ensure that, when fulfilling their duty to act in the best interest of the company, directors of companies referred to in Article 2(1) take into account the consequences of their decisions for sustainability matters, including, where applicable, human rights, climate change and environmental consequences, including in the short, medium and long term. 2. Member States shall ensure that their laws, regulations and administrative provisions providing for a breach of directors’ duties apply also to the provisions of this Article.Article 25 deleted Directors’ duty of care
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1571 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 26
Setting up and overseeing due diligence 1. Member States shall ensure that directors of companies referred to in Article 2(1) are responsible for putting in place and overseeing the due diligence actions referred to in Article 4 and in particular the due diligence policy referred to in Article 5, with due consideration for relevant input from stakeholders and civil society organisations. The directors shall report to the board of directors in that respect. 2. Member States shall ensure that directors take steps to adapt the corporate strategy to take into account the actual and potential adverse impacts identified pursuant to Article 6 and any measures taken pursuant to Articles 7 to 9.Article 26 deleted
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1596 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
No later than … [OP please insert the date = 78 years after the date of entry into force of this Directive], the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive. The report shall evaluate the effectiveness of this Directive in reaching its objectives and assess the following issues:
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1598 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) whether the thresholds regarding the number of employees and net turnover laid down in Article 2(1) need to be loweredimpact of the Directive was justified and reached the targeted goals, including the associated indirect costs and the economic, social and environmental benefits thereof, including on SMEs;
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1600 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) whether the thresholds regarding the number of employees and net turnover laid down in Article 2(1) need to be modified;
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1607 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) whether the Annex needs to be modified, including in light of international developmentsdeleted
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1620 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall adopt and publish, by … [OJ to insert: 25 years from the entry into force of this Directive] at the latest, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1622 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
They shall apply those provisions as follows:from four years after national transposition as regards companies referred to in Article 2(1), point (a), and Article 2(2), point (a);
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1626 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) from… [OJ to insert: 2 years from the entry into force of this Directive] as regards companies referred to in Article 2(1), point (a), and Article 2(2), point (a);deleted
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1632 #

2022/0051(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) from … [OJ to insert: 4 years from the entry into force of this Directive] as regards companies referred to in Article 2(1), point (b), and Article 2(2), point (b).deleted
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 2 #

2021/2200(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 24 a (new)
— having regard to its resolution of 3 October 2017 on EU political relations with ASEAN,
2022/03/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2021/2200(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 24 b (new)
— having regard to the 29th EU- ASEAN Joint Cooperation Committee Meeting held on 11 February 2022,
2022/03/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #

2021/2200(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 24 c (new)
— having regard to the inaugural European Parliament-ASEAN Inter- Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA) Inter- Regional Dialogue held on 22 June 2021,
2022/03/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2021/2200(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
C a. Whereas the European Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) opened a new chapter in their longstanding relations by entering in a Strategic Partnership in December 2020;
2022/03/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 19 #

2021/2200(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
C b. Whereas enhanced inter- parliamentary relations and parliamentary diplomacy between the European Parliament and the parliaments of Southeast Asia – through the ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA) – should reflect the future agenda of broader and deeper EU-ASEAN relations;
2022/03/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 20 #

2021/2200(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C c (new)
C c. Whereas the European Parliament and the ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA) are natural partners with a significant potential to contribute towards strengthening EU-ASEAN relations;
2022/03/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 21 #

2021/2200(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C d (new)
C d. Whereas EU-ASEAN relations are based on the shared values and principles of a rules-based international order, effective and sustainable multilateralism, and free and fair trade;
2022/03/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2021/2200(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C e (new)
C e. Whereas EU-based entities are the largest provider of foreign direct investment to the ASEAN region; whereas the EU is ASEAN's third largest trading partner and ASEAN as a whole represents the EU's third largest trading partner outside Europe;
2022/03/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 23 #

2021/2200(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C f (new)
C f. Whereas negotiations on an EU- ASEAN Free Trade Agreement have been suspended by mutual agreement since 2009;
2022/03/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 106 #

2021/2200(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Recalls the importance of parliamentary diplomacy in accelerating FTA negotiations between the EU and ASEAN Member States;
2022/03/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 161 #

2021/2200(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for further engagement with ASEAN and its member states and for the development and promotion of the EU- ASEAN strategic partnership; calls on both sides to use the momentum of the planned EU-ASEAN Summit in 2022, on the occasion of 45th anniversary of the EU- ASEAN bilateral relationship, to present a new EU-ASEAN action plan for the upcoming period to promote increased multifaceted cooperation in key areas and explore the possibility of resuming negotiations of a region-to-region trade agreement once the conditions in terms of human rights and democracy are to the EU’s standardsmet; calls for a parliamentary dimension to the 45th anniversary summit and reiterates its intention to create an EU-ASEAN parliamentary assembly to strengthen the democratic dimension of the partnership;
2022/03/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 172 #

2021/2200(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Secretary-General of ASEAN, the Secretary-General of the ASEAN Inter- Parliamentary Assembly and the respective countries in the Indo-Pacific region.
2022/03/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas international investment agreements aim to ensure that EU investors enjoy a reciprocal level playing field when investing in a third country that is similar to the levels of guarantees enjoyed by third country investors in the EU;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 5 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas global foreign direct investment flows, which were already declining since 2015, have experienced a dramatic drop in 2020 (-30%) due to the COVID-induced crisis; whereas increasing outward and inward FDI will remain a key element of the path to recovery for the EU and for many other economies;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas FDI and the EU investment policy should play a key role in achieving the objective of open strategic autonomy, in terms of diversification of supply chains;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 25 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that the EU’s investment policy needs to meet the expectations of investors and beneficiary states, but also the EU’s broader economic interests and external policy objectives; considers that EU international investment policy needs to be reformed in order to address a variety of challenges and transform it into an integrated and coherent policy frameworkrecalls the European Parliament's call for an integrated and coherent policy framework, which promotes high-quality and sustainable investments; welcomes the efforts undertook by the European Commission since 2010 to reform the Union's investment policy in that direction; considers that EU international investment policy needs to pursue its reform efforts to better meet the current challenges of better protecting our investors and making our Single Market an attractive place to invest in;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 30 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that investment can and should have a positive impact on sustainable development; points out that inbound and outbound investments need to meet the needs of the real economy; calls on the Commission to review the EU’s investment policy to ensure consistency with the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Development Goals;deleted
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that the definition of investment as codified in EU IIAs covers not only greenfield investments, but alsoshould not cover financial instruments that can be held for purely speculative purposes or for the extraction of rent;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 48 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts to open up new markets to EU investors through the negotiations of chapters on investment liberalisation with third countries; calls on the Commission to seek the best possible conditions for EU investors abroad, reflecting the level of openness that foreign investors enjoy in the EU and covering all ranges of business activities, including services and manufacturing sectors;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 50 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls on the Commission to monitor and seek the removal of barriers to the establishment and operation of EU investors in foreign markets, including discriminatory practices and performance requirements such as technology transfer; welcomes the Commission’s focus on enforcement of existing commitments, and underlines that this should also apply to investment-related commitments;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 51 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Invites the Commission to use all available means to improve the investment climate in developing countries, both through development cooperation tools and through bilateral agreements; welcomes, in that regard, the focus on investment facilitation disciplines seeking to enhance transparency, streamline procedures and enhance public-private dialogue; highlights that those disciplines should benefit both EU and local investors;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 52 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Recalls that in the last decade, the Union signed several agreements containing investment chapters with third countries; regrets that mixed agreements and agreements under shared competences1 are either only applied provisionally or not in force at all; urges Member States to ratify these agreements as soon as possible so that all EU investors can benefit from greater market liberalization and stronger investment protection rules and standards; [1] Provisions on portfolio investment and/or ISDS are shared competence between the European Union and its Member States, according to the ECJ (Singapore Opinion).
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 53 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e. Recalls that in the last decade, the Union signed several agreements containing investment chapters with third countries; regrets that mixed agreements and agreements under sharedcompetences1 are either only applied provisionally or not in force at all; urges Member States to ratify these agreements as soon as possible so that all EU investors can benefit from greater market liberalization and stronger investment protection rules and standards; [1] World Bank. 2019. Retention and Expansion of Foreign Direct Investment: Political Risk and Policy Responses. World Bank, Washington, DC.
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 54 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 f (new)
3f. Underlines that investment can and should have a positive impact on sustainable development; is concerned that according to OECD, developing countries faced a shortfall of USD 1.7 trillion in 2020 due to the COVID- induced crisis in addition to the exiting USD 2.5 trillion funding gap; calls on the Commission to ensure consistency of the EU’s investment policy with the European Green Deal and the SDGs; calls on the EU’s investment policy to help developing countries, notably African countries, in reducing the funding gap to reach the SDGs;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 56 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 h (new)
3h. Welcomes the leadership role taken by the European Union in the World Trade Organization (WTO) plurilateral negotiation on Investment Facilitation for Development, which will improve the investment and business climate, and make it easier for investors in all sectors of the economy to invest, conduct their day-to-day business and expand their operations in developing countries; is encouraged to see that more than two-thirds of WTO members participate to this negotiation; supports the progress made so far by the parties, and strongly encourages parties to reach their stated goal of concluding the negotiation by the end of 2022;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 61 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. StressNotes that an alarming number of investment claims target environmental measurelegal proceedings before ISDS courts target environmental measures1, whether they be on fossil fuels or renewable energy investments; regrets the fact that various countries, including the Member States, are being sued in relation to policies on climate, the phasing out of fossil fuels, or the just transition; [1] 17% of all cases according to UNCTAD databases
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 69 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Urges the Commission to exclude invensure consistments in fossil fuels or any other activities that pose significant harm to the environment and human rights from treaty protections, in particular investor-state arbitration mechanismscy between IIAs and EU environment policies, labour rights, and human rights, notably through provisions on sustainable development aiming at improving the domestic framework in which foreign investors operate;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 71 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that even in the absence of legal proceedings, the explicit or implicit threat of recourse to investment arbitration can enhance the position of investors in negotiations with states (the ‘chilling effect’); however, stresses that modern EU IIAs do clearly recall the principle that governments have the right to regulate legitimate public policy objectives on matters of public health, social services, public education, safety, environment or public morals, social or consumer protections, privacy and data protection, or the promotion and protection of cultural diversity, including in a manner that may negatively affect the operation of an investment or an investor’s expectation of profits; calls on the Commission to strongly assert its right to regulate;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 76 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that IIAs do not contain investor obligations; stresses that only foreign investors can launch investment cases against states; regrets the fact that having a case dismissed is the best possible outcome for respondent states but includes provisions on trade and sustainable development whereby parties commit not to lower environmental and labour standards to attract investment, and to promote the uptake of responsible business conduct in their territories; stresses that under the majority of investment treaties only foreign investors can launch investment cases against states; invites the Commission to continue international discussions on how to make investment obligations more effective in the field of international investment law;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 80 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Is concerUnderlineds that recent EU IIAs still contain broadlimit protection standards which can be uto well-defined extreme caseds to challenge legitimate public polichat EU investors may face in third countries; asks the Commission to conly allowtinue protectiong against discrimination, direct expropriation and thand indirect expropriation, losses owing to war or civil unrest, breach of physical security, denial of justice, fundamental breach of due gpross denial of justicecess, manifest arbitrariness, targeted discrimination on manifestly wrongful grounds such as gender, race or religion, or abusive treatment such as harassment, and to ensure that foreign investors are not accorded superior rights to those enjoyed by domestic investors;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 86 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines the fact that EU IIAs negotiated after 2009 still include sunset clauses which prevent easy termination; points out that Member States and the other contracting parties can agree to neutralise sunset clausesunset clauses are standard procedures in EU IIAs as they are meant to protect investment on the long-term; however, notes that Member States and the other contracting parties can agree to shorter sunset clauses as is the case in recent negotiations where parties agreed to a five-year sunset clause with the possibility to agree on an extension of five additional years in case of no replacement; calls on the Commission to assess the benefit of negotiating shorter sunset clauses for EU investors;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 92 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Emphasises that under both customary international law and international human rights law, individuals are requiredoffered the possibility to seek redress before domestic courts before bringing international proceedings against the state for wrongful acts; regretspoints out the fact that international investment law, by contrast, usually does not require the exhaustion of domestic remedies; notices, however, that the requirement to exhaust domestic remedies would be inefficient in countries with flawed judicial systems; welcomes the Commission’s “no U-turn” approach that prevents investors from cherry- picking remedies using different tracks once they have opted for bringing a claim under the Investment Court System;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 94 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines that the considerable damages awarded by investment tribunals have imposed a significant financial burden on respondent states; points out that the use of valuation methods generally used by adjudicators is highly controversial owing to their very wide margin of discretion and reliance on highly complex and inherently speculative assumptions; invites the Commission to review theprovide safeguard within provisions governing compensation in EU IIAs; and the use of stronger clauses preventing the use of punitive damages; notes in that regard the benefits that a permanent multilateral investment court with well-versed adjudicators will bring; calls on the Commission to advocate for strict valuation methods in the ongoing UNCITRAL reform negotiations;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 101 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. StressNotes that the increasing recourse by investors to third parties to finance their litigation in exchange for a return in the outcome of an award (third- party funding) is adding incentives to increase the number of claims; invites the Commission to support the restric; welcomes the Commission's efforts for ensuring full transparency of third-party funding in EU investment agreements; invites the Commission to continue international negotiations ofn how to regulate third-party funding for investor- state disputes beyond EU agreements;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 108 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Member States to terminate or modernise anytheir bilateral investment treaties that contain ISDS, any treaties that contain protection standards beyond protection against direct expropriation, nationality-based discrimination or the gross denial of justice, and any treaties that protect fossil fuel investment(BITs) or modernise them as to put them in conformity with the reformed approach in EU IIAs; takes note of the fact that EU IIAs no longer protect old BITs standards and points out to the fact that a multilateral court system would solve such adjudication issues;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 110 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Member States to swiftly ratify already concluded EU IIAs, in order to replace bilateral investment treaties with modern provisions protecting all EU investors alike;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 112 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to ensure that all of the Member States’ bilateral investment treaties are fully compatible with EU law; supports the Commission in strictly applying the conditions for authorising the negotiation, signature and conclusion of new agreements by Member States; supports the Commission in issuing interpretative guidelines to be followed by Member States to ensure a unified interpretation of modernised EU investment policies;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 125 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Points out that the ECT is the most litigated investment agreement in the world today; welcomesupports efforts to modernise the ECT and the EU’s position to exclude protection for most fossil fuel investments; notes that investments considered ‘significantly harmful’ under the EU taxonomy would remain protected according to the EU’s position; underlines that amending the ECT requires unanimity of all contracting parties voting at the annual conference;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 136 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Urges the Commission to ensure that a revised ECT will immediately prohibit fossil fuel investors from suing contracting parties for pursuing policies to phase out fossil fuels in line with their commitments under the Paris Agreement; calls on the Commission and the Member States to start preparingconsider the option of a coordinated exit from the ECT with a view to formal submission to the Council in the event of the negotiating objectives not being achieved by June 2022;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 148 #

2021/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. NotWelcomes that in the context of the UNCITRAL Working Group III discussions, the EU and its Member States are pursuing the establishment of a standing mechanism to resolve investment disputes: the multilateral investment court; stresses, however, that this proposal does not covercalls on the Commission to promote the modernisation of substantive protection standards in appropriate international fora;
2022/03/17
Committee: INTA
Amendment 11 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Underscores the necessity to demonstrate the benefits of living in a democracy to citizens, especially those left behind by globalization; in that context, calls on the EU and the US to work together and align their strategies to create investment synergies, particularly to achieve sustainable and inclusive digital and green transitions of their economies;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point 1 (new)
(1) Notes that EU-U.S. common challenges are increasingly non-military in nature and lie within our economic partnership; calls for an increased legislative dialogue between the European Parliament and the U.S. Congress via committee-to-committee interaction and the Transatlantic Legislative Dialogue; suggests the creation of a Transatlantic Assembly, a consultative forum where members of the U.S. Congress and the European Parliament would share legislative initiatives and discuss cooperative actions;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 20 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the US support for the new Director-General of the WTO, the US’s return to the Paris Agreement, the WTO tariff rate quota agreement and, the temporary suspension of Airbus Boeing tariffs, and for opening discussions to address global steel and aluminium excess capacity;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 31 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recognises at the same time that some diverging interests remain; in this regard, urges both sides to resolve bilateral disputes; urges the US to remove unilateral trade measures and refrain from taking further ones; urges the removal of section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminium; calls for a rapid and lasting solution on aircraft subsidies; threats for additional measures on digital service taxes, and refrain from taking further ones, and focus on what brings us together; urges the removal of section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminium; calls for a rapid and lasting solution on aircraft subsidies; encourages both sides to use the EU-US Summit as a stepping stone to continue mending our trade relationship and discuss untapped areas for greater cooperation;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 34 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recognises at the same time that some diverging interests remain; in this regard, urges both sides to resolve bilateral disputes; urges the US to remove unilateral trade measures and refrain from taking further ones; urges the removal of section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminium; calls for a rapid and lasting solution on aircraft subsidies; calls for an extension of the current suspension of the retaliatory tariffs, should no agreement on aircraft subsidies be found before the deadline of 11 July 2021;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 46 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for enhanced cooperation on WTO reform, including reinstating the aAppellate bBody, regulating trade in health products, setting an ambitious climate and environmental agenda, concluding the fisheries negotiations, making progress in the electronic commerce negotiation, and agreeing on concrete deliverables for the 12th WTO Ministerial Conference (MC12); encourages both sides to stick torive for multilateral agreements or, if not possible, for open plurilateral agreements; calls on the US to renew its commitments to the WTO's Government Procurement Agreement (GPA);
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Advocates a joint strategic approach towards China, addressing the roots of unfair trade practices and tackling industrial subsidies, state-owned enterprises and human rights concerns, forced technology transfers, and human rights concerns; notes that such issues cannot be solved unilaterally or bilaterally and demand leading a coalition of like-minded partners at the international level within the framework of the WTO;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 64 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Draws attention to the importance of having a coordinated position with the US to tackle systemic structural and market distorting practices that endanger the global level-playing field; in that context, considers relevant the work done by the EU, US and Japan to strengthen existing WTO rules on industrial subsidies; urges the EU and the US to pursue this work and lead a coalition of like-minded countries at the WTO with a view to agreeing on new rules;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 66 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Recognises that unexploited opportunities to remove significant red tape and strengthen the transatlantic economic partnership remain; in the context of the ongoing technological race, stresses the importance of a close transatlantic regulatory space for our businesses, especially for emerging digital-, energy-, and climate-related technologies; is convinced of the potential for important investments to develop zero emission and climate neutral products for our EU and US businesses;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 70 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. In that context, calls for a stronger regulatory partnership through the Trade and Technology Council and encourages both sides to exchange best regulatory practices; urges the EU and the US to pursue their negotiation on conformity assessment to remove financially burdensome non-tariff barriers; stresses the importance for both sides to align and lead a coalition of like-minded partners to enhance the use of transatlantic standards by international standards organizations;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 72 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Calls on the EU and the US to work together and lead efforts to address the issue of vaccine shortage to ensure that vaccines are delivered worldwide and to the greatest number as fast as possible; recalls that the world is facing a global scarcity of vaccines; therefore, to achieve vaccine equity, calls on the EU and the US to work with manufacturers to increase global manufacturing capacity for vaccines and their components;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 73 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5d. While recognising the importance to protect European intellectual property rights to maintain businesses’ capacity to innovate, considers relevant to examine all relevant flexibilities within the TRIPS agreement with the aim to increasing global vaccines and vaccine components manufacturing capacity; stresses that finding solutions on intellectual property rights can only be one part of the common global response;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 84 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Encourages both sides to find a framework for joint action and look for selective agreements; calls for a stronger regulatory, green and digital partnership through the Trade and Technology Council and a coordinated approach to critical technologies, a carbon border adjustment mechanism and digital and global taxes.;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 98 #

2021/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Underlines that stronger partners make for stronger alliances; welcomes efforts being made by both sides to render their supply chains more resilient, especially with regards to critical raw materials; encourages both sides to consider the other as a partner of choice;
2021/05/28
Committee: INTA
Amendment 6 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that in 2020 China for the first time ranked as the EU’s largest partner for trade in goods, with the trade balance further deteriorating to the EU’s detriment; recalls however that the US, followed by the UK, are still the EU’s top two partners in trade in goods and services combined;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Is convinced that the EU-China bilateral trade and investment relationship is of strategic importance and should be rules-based, with the multilateral trading system at its core; it reiterates that while economic de-coupling is not beneficial for the EU, a more assertive enforcement and adherence to commitments is necessary in the overall trade and investment relationship;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Calls on China to play a more active part in the WTO and other multilateral initiatives and to fully comply with its WTO obligations, matching its acquired economic power with its level of development, and urges on the Commission to step up its efforts to work together with China on reforming and strengthening the rules-based multilateral trading system; urges for a specific focus on the reform of the WTO as a key tool to bring stability and legal certainty to the international trade arena, while tackling structural shortcomings at pluri- and multilateral levels; considers pertinent to specifically discuss the negative effects and possible remedies for distortions caused by the global excess capacity of steel and aluminum, alongside the importance of tackling industrial subsidies at the WTO level;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 40 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Repeats its deep concern about the many barriers that European businesses face when accessing and operating on the Chinese market; is worried that China’s ‘dual circulation strategy’ referred to in its 14th Five Year Plan will further deteriorate the business environment for EU companies; highlights again its particular concern about the market distorting practices such as, but not limited to, industrial subsidies, the beneficial treatment of Chinese state-owned enterprises, IP theft, forced technology transfers and data localisation, industrial overcapacity in sectors such as steel and the related dumping of exports, and other unfair trading practices;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 42 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Stresses the absence in reciprocity in public procurement and the need to improve the EU’s posturing in this field; recalls the importance of an assertive and effective International Procurement Instrument to open up external procurement markets, as well as an Instrument of Foreign Subsidies which can successfully tackle distortions on the EU internal market; highlights that these two instruments should complement one another in tackling different sides of the same coin, focusing on the external and the internal dimensions respectively;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 49 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Urges the Commission to place an increased emphasis on the issues linked to standardization and the normative elements ofa growing international competition; reminds, in this regard, of the links between, trade, patents and standards; calls on the Commission to intensify activity in all areas of standardization, IPR infringements, including patent infringements by Chinese companies in the fields of digitalization and communications, within all relevant bodies, including the UN’s International Telecommunication Union; urges for more policy discussions regarding the implications of Chinese initiatives such as Made in China 2025 or, increasingly pertinently, China Standards 2035;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 55 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4 c. Reiterates the increasing significance of the trade-security nexus in the EU’s international trade policy; urges the Commission and Member States to continue their efforts on monitoring FDI coming into Europe, particularly as concerns strategic assets and critical infrastructure, further strengthening the FDI Screening Mechanism and delivering swiftly on its commitments on an Anti- Coercion Instrument;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 56 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4 d. Underlines the importance of the EU strategic relationship with China and calls on the EU’s Member States and institutions to address China with one voice and in a coordinated way; considers that the 17+1investment format is promoted by China to weaken the EU cohesion regarding investment policy and calls for a higher degrees of transparency, coherence and coordination between Member States on matters related to bilateral investment projects and deals, particularly on FDI, where the EU has exclusive competence; draws attention to the links between economic dependencies and external political leverage at the level of Member States;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 e (new)
4 e. Stresses, in this context, the issues linked to strategic dependencies in the area of critical raw materials (CRMs) and the urgent need to augment the resilience of European supply chains; calls for efforts to diversify and consolidate the EU’s access to key strategic resources needed for powering the EU’s twin engines of growth, with a particular emphasis on the 30 elements present on the fourth list of CRMs updated in 2020; welcomes in this context the recently- adopted EU Action Plan on Critical Raw Materials;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 58 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 f (new)
4 f. Calls for increased attention to European SMEs that engage in commercial and investment relations with China and welcomes the Commission's support for SME-friendly initiatives such as the ‘Access to Markets’ portal, the Rules of Origin ‘ROSA’ portal or the China IPR SME Helpdesk, among others;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 59 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 g (new)
4 g. Is convinced of the vital significance of proper information regarding legislative and regulatory developments on the Chinese market, given its opaque and state-driven nature; recalls in this context the importance of frequent and frank discussions with EU institutions, the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China (EUCCC) and all our partners on the ground;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 h (new)
4 h. Urges China to make tangible progress towards improving its stance on sustainable development, including on climate protection and environmental- friendly production methods, corporate social responsibility, labor conditions and respect for human rights; considers important in this context concrete action towards the ratification and implementation of outstanding ILO core conventions;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 62 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the conclusion in principle, at the political level, of the EU- China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI); recalls that the CAI alone cannot solve all issues ailing our economic and political relationship, and thus has to be considered in the context of a strengthened EU toolbox of unilateral measures; underlines it will thoroughly scrutinise the agreement, with a clear focus on its benefits related to a rebalancing in market access, fair competition and level playing field, including its sustainable development section, and take stock of the human rights context, before determining its position; stresses that proper implementation and effective enforcement will be key determinants of the utility and success of the agreement in redressing structural asymmetries in the trade and investment relationship; highlights the role and relevance of structured and frequent exchanges with the office of the Chief Trade Enforcement Officer in efforts to evaluate the future implementation of the CAI; recalls and strengthens in this context the importance of parliamentary diplomacy in facilitating mutual understanding, transparent communication and frank dialogue;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 74 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Deeply regrets the unfair and unacceptable Chinese escalation of placing elected Members of the European Parliament andEuropean Union institutions entities under sanctions, as this further erodes trust and hinders bilateral cooperation; underlines that the ratification process of the CAI cannot start until the Chinese sanctions against MEPs and EU institutions are not lifted;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 98 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Considers relevant a discussion on the wider regional trade architecture and deems it pertinent to have timely and comprehensive reports from the Commission on RCEP and the CPTPP, in order to ensure a solid situational awareness of what is evolving on the ground; is particularly interested in the implications for EU strategic interests of matters such as standard-setting in the Asia-Pacific as well as Rules of Origin provisions;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 101 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Draws attention to developments linked to the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative, as a key geopolitical instrument of the Chinese government; underlines that projects related to infrastructure or development financing ought to be closely monitored, including as concerns the possible negative political and geo- economic effects; highlights the need for the EU to enhance its own Connectivity Strategy, built on transparency, sustainability and accountability, as a geopolitical tool to engage with third countries in infrastructure or development projects;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 104 #

2021/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Recalls, in the context of the regional dynamics, the importance of EU- Taiwan relations, the bilateral structural dialogue, including on matters related to multilateralism and WTO, technology and public health, as well as essential cooperation on critical supplies such as semiconductors; urges the Commission to move forward with the Investment Agreement with Taiwan, taking the necessary steps for a scoping exercise, impact assessment and launching a public consultation;
2021/05/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2021/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 15
— having regard to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the European Social Charter, the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Committee of Social Rights, the Council of Europe Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (FCNM) and the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages (ECRML) and the conventions, recommendations, resolutions, opinions and reports of the Parliamentary Assembly, the Committee of Ministers, the Human Rights Commissioner, the European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance, the Steering Committee on Anti- Discrimination, Diversity and Inclusion, the Venice Commission, the Advisory Committee on the FCNM, the Committee of Experts of the ECRML and other bodies of the Council of Europe,
2021/04/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 31 #

2021/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas respect for the rights of minorities is a part of the political criteria an accession-candidate country must fulfil at the time of accession; whereas while the Union has an important role in ensuring respect for the rights of national and linguistic minorities in candidate- countries, it so far hasn't yet adopted any benchmarks for its Member States in this area, thus making possible that Member States backtrack on their commitments; whereas the 2020 report, too, misses to cover the rights of national and linguistic minorities;
2021/04/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 32 #

2021/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
C b. whereas the European Parliament has already called on the European Commission to adopt a common framework of Union minimum standards for the protection of rights of persons belonging to minorities, which are strongly embedded in a legal framework guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights throughout the Union1a; _________________ 1aEuropean Parliament Resolution of 13 November 2018 on minimum standards for minorities in the EU (OJ C 363, 28.10.2020, p. 13)
2021/04/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 209 #

2021/2025(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Calls on the Commission to include in its next reports detailed analyses and recommendations on the situation of the rights of autochthonous national and linguistic minorities, including through the involvement of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights; stresses that this is an area where it should establish strong links and synergies with the Council of Europe, and in particular with its Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities and the Committee of Experts of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages;
2021/04/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 4 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the new EU Action Plan on Critical Raw Materials and stresses that EU t, the creation of the European Raw Materials Alliance (ERMA), and the emphasis on Critical Raw Materials (CRM) in the communication on the Trade pPolicy can play a key role as a vehicle for improving EU access to these materials; notes that the COVID-19 outbreak has expoReview (TPR); calls for an assertive trade policy emphasising the diversification and resilience of supply chains, and prioritising the improvement of global and EU mechanisms to create a favourable trade environment for European industry; stresses that EU trade policy plays a key role in improving EU access to all CRM, including base metals, industrial minerals, aggregates and biotic materials; notes that the disruption of worldwide supply chains caused by the lack of COVID-19 pandemic and the increasilience of global value chains for certain key products, showing the need for more robust and resilient supply chaing tensions between major powers has exposed strategic vulnerabilities for the EU, particularly in securing key resources necessary to deliver the Green Deal and to ensure the digital trans for critical raw materials; mation of the EU’s economy;
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 11 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the publication of the Updated New Industrial Strategy1a and its call to strengthen Europe’s strategic autonomy and new partnerships with industry and like-minded international partners; welcomes the Commission’s ongoing work on critical supply chains highlighting that critical raw and processed materials are essential to ensure the success of the clean energy and digital transitions; __________________ 1a Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a stronger Single Market for Europe’s recovery”, COM(2021) 350 final
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that demand for raw materials is projected to double by 2050 and that the EU is highly reliant on non- EU countriewith concern the International Energy Agency’s 2021 projection that the energy sector’s global needs for critical minerals could increase by as much as six times by 2040 from use in batteries, renewable energy technologies, and grid infrastructure1a and is convinced that the EU’s significant dependency on imports for CRM, including 100% import reliance for several specialty metals and rare earths, undermines its strategic autonomy and geopolitical objectives; stresses that, because the EU supply and investment plans for many critical raw materials, making diversified sourcing essential to increase the EU’s security of supply fall short of what is needed to meet internal demand and that CRM prices are globally set, the EU industry faces a high international competition in access to raw materials and is vulnerable to export restriction measures by third countries; calls, therefore, on the Commission to diversify the supply sources of critical raw materials as much as possible, and reduce current reliance on a few third countries; calls on the Commission to focus also on securing supplies by establishing strategic stocks and appropriate stockpiling of critical raw materials in Europe, particularly in light of the uncertainties linked to the evolution of the geopolitical situation worldwide and the potential trade tensions with rich non- EU producer countries; __________________ 1a https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of- critical-minerals-in-clean-energy- transitions
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to use bilateral Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) to help secure a sustainable and diversified raw materials supply, while using stricter rules of origin and promoting sustainability standards worldwide; welcomes in that sense the ongoing dialogue with Canada and Chile aiming to strengthen trade relations in the area of CRM; underlines that future EU trade and partnership agreements can provide not only greater supply security but also a reliable political and economic framework and that they should include specific provisions on critical raw materials to promote cooperation and avoid export restrictions; emphasises the need for closer cooperation with key international suppliers especially Serbia, Ukraine, Australia, the US, Africa, Mercosur, and China;
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 36 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Welcomes the Joint European Union - United States initiative on addressing global steel and aluminium excess capacity and calls for comprehensive and expeditious measures to hold to account countries like China that support trade-distorting policies; reminds the Commission, however, that for the time being the US Section 232 tariffs remain in full force and that this issue must urgently be resolved;
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 42 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines that future EU free trade agreements (FTAs) should include a specific focus on raw materials; cCalls on the Commission to further enhance the enforcement of FTAs to ensure that commitments and obligations on sourcing of critical raw materials are met by trading partners; calls on the Commission to strengthen cooperation on sustainable sourcing of raw materials with third countries under existing EU policies and instruments, including enlargement, neighbourhood, development and cooperation policies, and based on recognised international standards (e.g. OECD and UNGPs) and global industry initiatives on responsible sourcing; calls on the Commission to coherently align its actions on raw materials with other EU initiatives promoting sustainability in order to create a level playing field and to streamline the rule-book so that policies do not overburden industry;
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 54 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e. Requests that the Commission acts through the Waste Shipments Regulation review to prevent, through increased measures and a strengthened inspection system, the illegal and dubious exports of waste products containing critical raw materials to avoid improper treatment of electronics waste and batteries; calls for overall requirements that waste products containing critical raw materials are exported with a guarantee they will be treated under equivalent conditions to Europe in the destination country so that resources are not lost through informal recycling operations and which also supports the transition to the circular economy; considers that it is important to reinforce the availability of secondary raw materials, including ferrous scrap and rare earths, in order to improve the resilience and circularity of CRMs supplies;
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 f (new)
3f. Calls on rules of origin to be used in a stricter way to safeguard raw materials production and prevent circumvention from regions where operators are subject to less stringent sustainability and industrial subsidies requirements;
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 67 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that a fully functioning rules-based multilateral trading system is also key to ensuring open trade flows of critical raw materials; renews its call on the Commission, in this regard, to pursue its efforts for the modernisation, strengthening and substantial reactivationtowards an ambitious reform of the World Trade Organization to fight distortions of international trade and unfair trade practices, and guarantee effective competition worldwide;
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 70 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Highlights that the strong state- backed competition for access to raw materials in third countries hampers EU resilience and security of supply, therefore welcomes the Commission's plans to establish strong and supportive international partnerships by endorsing a global agenda on raw materials, aiming for EU partnerships that ensure both security of supply and developmental benefits;
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 71 #

2021/2011(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Welcomes the Joint Statement of the Trilateral Meeting of the Trade Ministers of Japan, the United States and the European Union Commission, and supports the proposed definition of industrial subsidies; welcomes that such definition extends beyond the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and EU Anti- subsidy Regulation, and provides a broader definition of a subsidy; believes that such measures are crucial in levelling the international playing field in the area of CRM as industrial subsidies, particularly in China, pose a serious threat to EU industry and workers as it distorts international competition;
2021/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 73 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The objectives of this Regulation, in particular counteracting third countries’ economic coercion of the Union or a Member State, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States acting on their own. This is because Member States as distinct actors under international law may not be entitled under international law to respond to economic coercion directed against the Union. Additionally, because of the exclusive competence conferred on the Union by Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Member States are prevented from taking common commercial policy measures as a response to economic coercion. Therefore, those objectives can be achieved with greater effectiveness atit is necessary that the means for achieving those objectives are created at the Union level.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 76 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) In accordance with the principle of proportionality, it is necessary and appropriate, for creating an effective and comprehensive framework for Union action against economic coercion, to lay down rules on the examination, determination and counteraction with regard to third countries’ measures of economic coercion. In particular, the Union’s response measures should be preceded by an examination of the facts, a determination of the existence of economic coercion, and, wherever possible, efforts to find a solution in cooperation with the third country concerned. Any measures imposed by the Union should be commensurate with the injury caused by the third countries’ measures of economic coercion. The criteria for defining the Union response measures should take into account in particular the need to avoid or minimise collateral effects, administrative burdens and costs imposed on Union economic operators as well as the Union’s interest. Any Union response measures should primarily take into account their likelihood and ability to induce the third country to cease the coercive measures. Therefore, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the objectives pursued, in accordance with Article 5(4) of the Treaty on European Union.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 82 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The Commission should examine whether third-country measures are coercive, on its own initiative or following information received from any source, including legal and natural persons, the European Parliament or a Member State. Following this examination, the Commission should determine in a decision whether the third-country measure is coercive. The Commission should publicly communicate any affirmative determinationthe result of this examination. In the case of an affirmative determination, the Commission should communicate to the third country concerned, together with a request that the economic coercion cease and a request, where appropriate, that any injury be repaired.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 92 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) Union response measures adopted in accordance with this Regulation should be selected and designed on the basis of objective criteria, including: first and foremost, the effectiveness of the measures in inducing the cessation of coercion by the third country; their potential to provide relief to economic operators within the Union affected by the third-country measures of economic coercion; the aim of avoiding or minimising negative economic and other effects on the Union; and the avoidance of disproportionate administrative complexity and costs. It is also essential that the selection and design of Union response measures take account of the Union’s interest. Union response measures should be selected from a wide array of options in order to allow the adoption of the most suitable measures in any given case.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 100 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) It is important to ensure an effective and regular communication and exchange of views and information between the Commission on the one hand and the European Parliament and the Council on the other, in particular on efforts to engage with the third country concerned to explore options with a view to obtaining the cessation of the economic coercion and on matters that may lead to the adoption of Union response measures under this Regulation.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 104 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) The Commission should evaluate measures adopted under this Regulation as to their effectiveness and operation and as to possible conclusions for future measures. The Commission should also review this Regulation after gaining sufficient experience with the existence or application of this Regulation., as well as to take account of the review of the Blocking Statute.1a This review should cover the scope, functioning, efficiency and effectiveness of this Regulation. The Commission should report on its assessment to the European Parliament and the Council, _________________ 1a Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 of 22 November 1996 protecting against the effects of the extra-territorial application of legislation adopted by a third country, and actions based thereon or resulting therefrom, OJ L 309,29.11.1996, p. 1–6
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 113 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1 a Definitions For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions apply: (a) "threat of coercion" means a substantiated threat of a third country action or measure that is credible, significant, and could be quickly and easily deployed; b) “failure to act” means failure by a third country to take measures or actions to implement existing agreements that are fully ratified with the European Union or a Member State affecting trade or investment; (c) “Union interest” means ensuring the social, political, and economic cohesion of the union, upholding its strategic and economic interests, and ensuring the integrity of the single market;
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 120 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
— by applying or threatening to apply measures affecting trade or investment. or failing to implement existing agreements that are fully ratified with the European Union or a Member State affecting trade or investment;
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 133 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) whether the third country is applying the measures as part of a broader pattern of behaviour against the interests or policy decisions of the Union or a Member State.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 139 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. The Commission shall carry out the examination referred to in paragraph 1 in the event of a substantiated request of a Member State or the European Parliament.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 143 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The Commission mayshall publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union or through other suitable public communication means withof the launch of an examination procedure and may include an invitation to submit information within a specified time limit. In that event, the Commission shall notify the third country concerned of the initiation of the examination.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 154 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission shall be open toproactively engage on behalf of the Union with the third country concerned, to explore options with a view to obtaining the cessation of the economic coercion. Such options may include:
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 164 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
The Commission shall keep the European Parliament and the Council informed of relevregularly informed and provide notice of anty developments.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 174 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) action pursuant to the Articles 4 and 5 has not resulted in the cessation of the economic coercion and, where appropriate, reparation of the injury it has caused to the Union or a Member State within a reasonable period of time;
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 183 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Where the conditions referred to in points (a), (b), and (c) are met in response to an affirmative determination of economic coercion by means of extra- territorial sanctions, the Commission shall only adopt an implementing act after it has exhausted the recourse to action provided by Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 of 22 November 1996.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 186 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The Union response measures shall apply from a specified date after the adoption of the implementing act referred to in paragraph 1. The Commission shall set this date of application, taking into account the circumstances, to allow for the notification of the third country concerned pursuant to paragraph 3 and for it to cease the economic coercion, as well as to allow sufficient time for business to adequately prepare for any anticipated effects.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 190 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall, upon adoption of the implementing act, notify the third country concerned of the Union response measures adopted pursuant to paragraph 1. In the notification, the Commission shall, on behalf of the Union, call on the third country concerned to promptly cease the economic coercion, offer to negotiate a solution including, where appropriate, the reparation of the injury caused by it to the Union and its Members States, and inform the third country concerned that the Union response measure will apply, unless the economic coercion ceases.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 194 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. The implementing act referred to in paragraph 1 shall state that the application of the Union response measures shall be deferred for a period specified in that implementing act, where the Commission has credible information that the third country haswill ceased the economic coercion before the start of application of the adopted Union response measures. In that event, the Commission shall publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union indicating that there is such information and the date from which the deferral shall apply. If the third country ceases the economic coercion before the Union response measures start to apply, the Commission shall terminate the Union response measures in accordance with Article 10.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 214 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Any Union response measure shall not exceed the level that is commensurate with the injury suffered by the Union or a Member State due to the third country’s measures of economic coercion, taking into account the gravity of the third country’s measures and the rights in question. economic impact that the measures are having on the Union or a Member State.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 220 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the avoidance or minimisation of negative impacts on affected actors by Union response measures, including the availability and cost differentiation of alternatives for affected actors, for example alternative sources of supply for goods or services;
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 230 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall keep under review the measures of economic coercion deployed by a third country that have triggered the Union response measures, the effectiveness of the Union response measures adopted and their effects on the Union’s interests and shall regularly keep the European Parliament and the Council informed thereof.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 241 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. A Member State or the European Parliament may request the Commission to amend, suspend, or terminate a Union response measure after 18 months of its application. The Commission shall respond to requests within six months and provide a justification for its decision.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 242 #

2021/0402(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. A Member State that has been subject to economic coercion shall have the right to request the Commission to review measures, if the Member State considers that the measures are no longer sufficient to counteract coercion or commensurate to the economic coercion imposed by the third country.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 65 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title 1
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the making available on the Union market as well as export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 (Text with EEA relevance)
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 66 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) Forests provide a broad variety of environmental, economic and social benefits, including timber and non-wood forest products and environmental services essential for humankind, as they harbour most of the Earth’s terrestrial biodiversity. They maintain ecosystem functions, help protect the climate system, provide clean air and play a vital role for the purification of waters and soils as well as for water retention. In addition, forests provide subsistence and income to about one third of the world’s population and their destruction has serious consequences for the livelihoods of the most vulnerable people, including indigenous peoples and local communities who heavily depend on forest ecosystems.18 Furthermore, deforestation and forest degradation reduce essential carbon sinks and increase the likelihood of new diseases spreading from animals to humans. _________________ 18 Commission Communication of 27 July 2019 ’Stepping up EU Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests’, COM(2019) 352 final.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 67 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Deforestation and forest degradation are taking place at an alarming rate. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations estimates that 420 million hectares of forest – about 10% of the world’s remaining forests and an area larger than the European Union – have been lost worldwide between 1990 and 202019 . Deforestation and forest degradation areis, in turn, important drivers of global warming and biodiversity loss — the two most important environmental challenges of our time. Yet every year the world continues to lose 10 million hectares of forest. _________________ 19 FAO, Global Forest Resource Assessment 2020, p. XII, https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/c a9825en.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 69 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Deforestation and forest degradation contribute to the global climate crisis in multiple ways. Most importantly, they increase greenhouse gas emissions through associated forest fires, permanently removing carbon sink capacities, decreasing climate change resilience of the affected area and substantially reducing its biodiversity. Deforestation alone accounts for 11 % of greenhouse gas emissions20 . _________________ 20 IPCC, Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems, https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 70 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Climate breakdown induces the loss of biodiversity globally and biodiversity loss aggravates climate change, they are inextricably linked, as recent studies have confirmed. Biodiversity helps mitigate climate change. Insects, birds and mammals act as pollinators, seed dispersers and can help store carbon more efficiently, directly or indirectly. Forests also ensure a continuous replenishment of water resources and prevention of droughts and their deleterious effects to local communities, including indigenous peoples. Drastically reducing deforestation and forest degradation and systemically restoring forests and other ecosystems is the single largest nature- based opportunity for climate mitigation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 72 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Union consumption is a considerable driver of deforestation and forest degradation on a global scale. The initiative’s Impact Assessment estimated that without an appropriate regulatory intervention EU consumption and production of the six commodities included in the scope (wood, cattle, soy, palm oil, cocoa and coffee) will rise to approximately 248,000 hectares of deforestation annually by 2030.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 73 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Member States have repeatedly expressed their concern about persistent deforestation. They emphasised that since current policies and action at global level on conservation, restoration and sustainable management of forests do not suffice to halt deforestation and forest degradation, enhanced Union action is needed in order to contribute more effectively to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), under the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which was adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015. The Council specifically supported the Commission announcement in the Communication ‘Stepping up EU Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests’ that it would assess additional regulatory and non-regulatory measures and that it would present respective proposals.31 _________________ 31 Council conclusions on the Communication on Stepping Up EU Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests (16 December 2019) 15151/19. Available at https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/41 860/st15151-en19.pdf.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 74 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Combatting deforestation and forest degradation constitutes an important part of the package of measures needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to comply with the Union's commitment under the European Green Deal as well as with the 2015 Paris Agreement on Climate Change33 , and with the legally binding commitment under the EU Climate Law to reach climate neutrality by 2050 and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55 % below 1990 levels by 2030. _________________ 33 Ratified by the EU on 5 October 2016, and entered into force on 4 November 2016.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 76 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The Union imported and consumed one third of the globally traded agricultural products associated with deforestation between 1990 and 2008. Over that period, Union consumption was responsible for 10% of worldwide deforestation associated with the production of goods or services. Even if the relative share of EU consumption is decreasing, EU consumption is a disproportionally large driver of deforestation. The Union should therefore take action to minimise global deforestation and forest degradation driven by its consumption of certain commodities and products and thereby seek to reduce its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and global biodiversity loss as well as promote sustainable production and consumption patterns in the Union and globally. To have the greatest impact, Union policy should aim at influencing the global market, not only supply chains to the Union. Pglobal net deforestation reduction by promoting sustainable production in high-risk areas and disincentivising new deforestation in all areas. Union Policy should also influence the global market, not only supply chains to the Union. A trade policy built on openness and rule- based free trade is the most effective tool to affect global change. Multilateral and bilateral partnerships and efficient international cooperation, including free trade agreements, with producer and consumer countries are fundamental in that respect.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 79 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) Halting deforestation and forest degradation is an essential part of the SDGs. This Regulation should contribute in particular to meeting the goals regarding life on land (SDG 15), climate action (SDG 13), responsible consumption and production (SDG 12), zero hunger (SDG 2) and good health and well-being (SDG 3). The relevant target 15.2 to halt deforestation by 2020 has not been met, underlining the urgency of ambitious and effective action.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 80 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) This Regulation should also respond to the New York Declaration on Forests35 , a non-legally binding political declaration that endorses a global timeline to cut natural forest loss in half by 2020, and strive to end it by 2030. The Declaration was endorsed by dozens of governments, many of the world’s biggest companies, and influential civil society and indigenous organisations. It also called on the private sector to meet the goal of eliminating deforestation from the production of agricultural commodities such as palm oil, soy, paper and beef products by no later than 2020, a goal that was not achieved. The Regulation should in addition contribute to the United Nations Strategic Plan for Forests, 2017-203036 , whose Global Forest Goal 1 is to reverse the loss of forest cover worldwide through sustainable forest management, including protection, restoration, afforestation and reforestation, and increase efforts to prevent forest degradation and enhance the contribution of forests to climate change. _________________ 35 https://unfccc.int/news/new-york- declaration-on-forests. 36 https://www.un.org/esa/forests/wp- content/uploads/2016/12/UNSPF_AdvUne dited.pdf.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 81 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) As a member of World Trade Organisation (WTO), the Union is committed to promoting a universal, rule- based, open, transparent, predictable, inclusive, non-discriminatory and equitable multilateral trading system under the WTO, as well as an open, sustainable, and assertive trade policy. The scopemeasures of this Regulation will thereforemust be WTO compliant i.e. proportionate, non-discriminatory and that they would not constitute arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade; All measures that affect imports into the EU is also a risk of giving severe countermeasures for European business; taking into account the possible retaliation of trade partners; ensure that the enforcement of this Regulation is not unduly restrictive nor disruptive to trade. The scope of the Regulation will include both commodities and products produced within the Union and commodities and products imported to the Union.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 85 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) This Regulation also follows the Commission’s Communication on “An Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy”38 which stated that with new internal and external challenges and more particularly a new, more sustainable growth model as defined by the European Green Deal and the European Digital Strategy, the EU needs a new trade policy strategy –one that will ensure a level playing field for EU businesses, support achieving its domestic and external policy objectives and, promote greater sustainability in line with its commitment of fully implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goals. and focus on implementing and enforcing trade agreements, all new trade agreements, including Mercosur and others, consist of provisions that promote sustainable management which leads to better conditions of the forests and the obligation to ensure multilateral environmental agreements, such as the Paris Agreement and the Convention on Biological Diversity, are implemented effectively; The Regulation should not be adopted without the ratification of the EU-Mercosur Agreement; Trade policy must play its full role in the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and in the green and digital transformations of the economy and towards building a more resilient Europe in the world.; _________________ 38 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European, Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Trade Policy Review - An Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy, COM(2021) 66 final, 18 February 2021.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 87 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) This Regulation should be complementary to other measures proposed in the Commission Communication ‘Stepping up EU Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests’39 , in particular: 1) working in partnership with producer countries, to support them in addressing root causes of deforestation, such as weak governance, ineffective law enforcement and corruption, and 2) strengthen international cooperation, with major consumer countries, to promoteby promoting trade agreements that include forest conservation provisions, encourage trade in agricultural and forest-based products not causing deforestation; and the adoption of similar measures to avoid products coming from supply chains associated with deforestation and forest degradation being placed on their markets. _________________ 39 COM(2019) 352 final.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 88 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The Commission should continue to work in partnership with producer countries, and more generally in cooperation with international organisations and bodies, and should be reinforcing its support and incentives with regard to protecting forests and transition to deforestation-free production, acknowledging the role of indigenous people, improving governance and land tenure, increasing law enforcement and promoting sustainable forest management, climate-resilient agriculture, sustainable intensification and diversification, agro- ecology and agroforestry. In doing so it should acknowledge the role of indigenous people in protecting forests. Building upon the experience and lessons learned in the context of the already existing initiatives, the Union and the Member States should work in partnership with producer countries, upon their request, to exploit the multi-functionalities of forest, support them in the transition to sustainable forest management, and address global challenges while meeting local needs and paying attention to the challenges faced by smallholders in line with the Communication to Stepping up Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests. The rules must aim to minimise the burden on smallholders in third countries and prevent barriers to their access to the market and international trade. The partnership approach should help producer countries in protecting, restoring and sustainably using forest, hence contributing to the objective of this Regulation to reduce deforestation and forest degradation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 91 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The Commission should continue to work in partnership with producer countries, and more generally in cooperation with international organisations and bodies, and should be reinforcing its support and incentives with regard to protecting forests and transition to deforestation-free production, acknowledging the role of indigenous people, improving governance and land tenure, increasing law enforcement and promoting sustainable forest management, climate-resilient agriculture, sustainable intensification and diversification, agro- ecology and agroforestry without neglecting the national frameworks on sustainable forest management. In doing so it should acknowledge the role of indigenous people in protecting forests. Building upon the experience and lessons learned in the context of the already existing initiatives, the Union and the Member States should work in partnership with producer countries, upon their request, to exploit the multi-functionalities of forest, support them in the transition to sustainable forest management, and address global challenges while meeting local needs and paying attention to the challenges faced by smallholders in line with the Communication to Stepping up Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests. The partnership approach should help producer countries in protecting, restoring and sustainably using forest, hence contributing to the objective of this Regulation to reduce deforestation and forest degradation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 94 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) Another important action announced in the Communication is the establishment of the EU Observatory on deforestation, forest degradation, changes in the world’s forest cover and associated drivers (“EU Observatory”) launched by the Commission in order to better monitor changes in the world’s forest cover and related drivers. Moreover, building on already existing monitoring tools, including Copernicus products, the EU Observatory will facilitate access to information on supply chains for public entities, consumers and business, providing easy-to-understand data and information linking deforestation, forest degradation, and changes in the world’s forest cover to EU demand/trade for commodities and products. The EU Observatory will thus directly support the implementation of this Regulation by providing scientific evidence in regard to global deforestation and forest degradation and related trade. The EU Observatory will cooperate closely with relevant international organisations, research institutes, and third countries.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 95 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23 a (new)
(23a) Given that this Regulation will generate additional compliance costs for affected sectors, compensatory actions should be taken in order to prevent the total level of regulatory burdens from increasing. The Commission should therefore be obliged to present, before the application of this Regulation, proposals offsetting the regulatory burdens introduced by this Regulation, through the revision or abolishment of provisions in other EU legislative acts that generate compliance costs in the affected sectors.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 96 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) The impact assessment of possible policy measures to address Union-driven deforestation and forest degradation, Council conclusions and the 2020 resolution of the European Parliament clearly identify the need to establish deforestation and forest degradation as the guiding criteria for future Union measures. Therefore, the new Union legal framework should address both legality and whether the production of relevant commodities and products is deforestation-free.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 97 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) The definition of “deforestation- free” should be sufficiently broad to cover both deforestation and forest degradation, it should provide legal clarity, and it should be measurable based on quantitative, objective and internationally recognised data.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 98 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) The Regulation should cover those commodities whose Union consumption is the most relevant in terms of driving global deforestation and forest degradation and for which a Union policy intervention could bring highest benefits per unit value of trade. An extensive review of scientific literature, namely of primary sources estimating the impact of EU consumption on global deforestation and linking that footprint to specific commodities, was carried out as a part of the study supporting the Impact Assessment and cross-checked via extensive consultation with stakeholders. That process delivered a first list of eight commodities. Wood was directly included in the scope as it was already covered by the EUTR. The list of the commodities was then further reduced via an efficiency analysis in the Impact Assessment. This efficiency analysis compared the hectares of deforestation linked to EU consumption, as estimated in a recent research paper44 , for each of those commodities with their average value of EU imports. According to the research paper used for the efficiency analysis, six commodities represent the largest share of EU-driven deforestation among the total of eight commodities analysed in that research paper: palm oil (33,95%), soy (32,83%), wood (8,62%), cocoa (7,54%), coffee (7,01%) and beef (5,01%). _________________ 44 Pendrill F., Persson U. M., Kastner, T. 2020.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 99 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) Bearing in mind that the use of recycled relevant commodities and products should be encouraged, and that including such commodities and products in the scope of this Regulation would place a disproportionate burden on operators; underlines the need to ensure the proportionality of regulatory burdens in the context of international trade, used commodities and products that have completed their lifecycle, and would otherwise be disposed of as waste, should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 101 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) Obligations concerning relevant commodities and products should be laid down by this Regulation in order to effectively combat deforestation, forest degradation, and to promote deforestation- free supply chains.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 102 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) Many international organisations and bodies (e.g. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, United Nations Environment Programme, the Paris Agreement, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Convention on Biological Diversity) have developed work in the field of deforestation and forest degradation and the definitions in this Regulation build on this work.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 103 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) A cut-off date should be set to provide a basis for the evaluation of whether concerned land has been subject to deforestation or forest degradation, meaning that no commodities and products in the scope of this Regulation would be allowed to enter the Union market or be exported if they were produced on land subject to deforestation or forest degradation after that date. It should allow for the appropriate verification and monitoring, correspond to existing international commitments, such as the SDGs and the New York Declaration on Forests, thus minimising sudden disruption to supply chains while removing any incentive to accelerate activities leading to deforestation and forest degradation in view of the entry into force of this Regulation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 104 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) To strengthen the Union’s contribution to halting deforestation and forest degradation, and to ensure that commodities and products from supply chains related to deforestation and forest degradation are not placed on the Union market, relevant commodities and products should not be placed or made available on the Union market, nor exported from the Union market unless they are deforestation-free and have been produced in accordance with the relevant legislation of the country of production. To confirm that this is the case, they should always be accompanied by a due diligence statement.and under the circumstance that it does not lead to a disproportionate administrative burden on operators, relevant commodities and products produced in countries with a high risk of deforestation should be accompanied by a due diligence statement. The Commission should make an ex-post evaluation to assess the financial and administrative aspect for operators that are requested to submit due diligence statements;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 109 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) On the basis of a systemic approach, operators should take the appropriate steps in order to ascertain that the relevant commodities and products that they intend to place on the Union market comply with the deforestation-free and legality requirements of this Regulation. To that end, operators should establish and implement due diligence procedures. The due diligence procedure required by this Regulation should include three elements: information requirements, risk assessment and risk mitigation measures. The due diligence procedures should be designed to provide access to information about the sources and suppliers of the commodities and products being placed on the Union market, including information demonstrating that the absence of deforestation and forest degradation and legality requirements are fulfilled, inter alia by identifying the country and area of production, including. The identification of geo-location coordinates of relevant plots of land. These geo-location coordinates that rely on timing, pos may impose a disproportionate burden to operators, the Commission should revise the definitioning and/or Earth observ the legislation cshould make focuse of space data and services delivered under the Union’s Space programme (EGNOS/Galileo and Copernicus)n a scale other than "plots of land". On the basis of this information, operators should carry out a risk assessment. Where a risk is identified, operators should mitigate such risk to achieve no or negligible risk. Only after completing the required steps of the due diligence procedure and concluding that no or negligible risk exists that the relevant commodity or product is not compliant with this Regulation, should the operator be allowed to place the relevant commodity or product on the Union market or to export it. The Commission should analyse the possibility to exclude operators that are not considered as a high risk country from the obligation of due diligence statements.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 122 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) For this reason, the Commission should assess the deforestation and forest degradation risk at a level of a country or parts thereof based on a range of criteria that reflect both quantitative, objective and internationally recognised data, and indications that the countries are actively engaged in fighting deforestation and forest degradation. This benchmarking information should make it easier for operators in the Union to exercise due diligence and for competent authorities to monitor and enforce compliance, while also providing an incentive for producer countries to increase the sustainability of their agricultural production systems and reduce their deforestation impact. This should help making supply chains more transparent and sustainable. This benchmarking system should be based on a three-tier classification of countries to be regarded as low, standard or high risk. In order to ensure appropriate transparency and clarity, the Commission should in particular make publicly available the data being used for benchmarking, the reasons for the proposed change of classification and the reply of the country concerned. For relevant commodities and products from low risk countries or parts of countries identified as low-risk, operators should be allowed to apply a simplified due diligence, whilst competent authorities should be required to apply enhanced scrutiny on relevant commodities and products from high risk countries or parts of countries identified as high-risk. The Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing measures to establish the countries or parts thereof that present a low or high risk of producing relevant commodities and products that are not compliant with this Regulation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 128 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
(53) Taking into account the international character of deforestation and forest degradation and related trade, competent authorities should cooperate with each other, with customs authorities of the Member States, with the Commission, as well as with the administrative authorities of third countries. Competent authorities should also cooperate with the competent authorities for the supervision and enforcement of other EU legislative instruments that set out due diligence requirements in the value chain with regard to adverse human rights or environmental impacts.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 129 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
(54) While this Regulation addresses deforestation and forest degradation, as envisaged in the 2019 Communication ’Stepping up EU Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests, protecting forests should not lead to the conversion or degradation of other natural ecosystems. Ecosystems such as wetlands, savannahs and peatlands are highly significant to global efforts to combat climate change, as well as other sustainable development goals and their conversion or degradation require particular urgent attention. To address this, the Commission should assess the need and feasibility of extending the scope to other ecosystems and to further commodities two years after the entry into force. At the same time, the Commission should also undertake a review of the relevant products as listed in Annex I of this Regulation by way of a delegated act.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 131 #

2021/0366(COD)

(54) While this Regulation addresses deforestation and forest degradation, as envisaged in the 2019 Communication ’Stepping up EU Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests, protecting forests should not lead to the conversion or degradation of other natural ecosystems. Ecosystems such as wetlands, savannahs and peatlands are highly significant to global efforts to combat climate change, as well as other sustainable development goals and their conversion or degradation require particular urgent attention. To address this, the Commission should assess the need and feasibility of extending the scope to other ecosystems and to further commodities two years after the entry into force. At the same time, the Commission should also undertake a review of the relevant products as listed in Annex I of this Regulation by way of a delegated act.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 132 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
(55) In order to ensure that information requirements with which operators have to comply and which are set out in this Regulation remain relevant and in line with scientific and technological developments, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of supplementing the information requirements necessary for the due diligence procedure, the information and criteria of risk assessment and risk mitigation with which operators have to comply which are set out in this Regulation and the list of goods set out in Annex I of this Regulation. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level and with stakeholders, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council should receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts should systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 133 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 56
(56) Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 prohibits the placing of illegally harvested timber and timber products on the Union market. It lays down obligations for operators placing timber on the market for the first time to exercise due diligence and for traders to keep a traceable record of their suppliers and customers, which should be applied at an appropriate and general level to not cause any disproportionate administrative burdens. This Regulation should retain the obligation to ensure the legality of relevant commodities and products, including wood and wood products, placed on the Union market and complements them with the requirement on sustainability. This Regulation and the related Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 607/2012 are therefore rendered redundant by this Regulation and should be repealed.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 135 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57
(57) Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 lays down Union procedures for the implementation of a FLEGT licensing scheme through bilateral Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPAs) with timber-producing countries. VPAs are generally intended to foster systemic changes in the forestry sector aimed at sustainable management of forests, eradicating illegal logging and supporting worldwide efforts to stop deforestation; VPAs provide an important legal framework for both the EU and its partner countries, made possible with the good cooperation and engagement by the countries concerned; new VPAs with additional partners should be promoted; To respect bilateral commitments that the European Union has entered into and to preserve the progress achieved with partner countries that have an operating system in place (FLEGT licensing stage), this Regulation should include a provision declaring wood and wood-based products covered by a valid FLEGT license as fulfilling the legality requirement under this Regulation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 139 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
(58) While this Regulation addresses deforestation and forest degradation, as envisaged in the 2019 Communication ’Stepping up EU Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests, protecting forests should not lead to the conversion or degradation of other natural ecosystems. Ecosystems such as wetlands, savannahs and peatlands are highly significant to global efforts to combat climate change, as well as other sustainable development goals and their conversion or degradation require particular urgent attention. An evaluation of the need and the feasibility of extending the scope of this Regulation to other ecosystems than forests should therefore be undertaken within 2 years of the entry into force of this Regulation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 140 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 60
(60) Since the objective of this Regulation, fighting against deforestation and forest degradation by reducing the contribution of consumption in the Union, and by incentivising deforestation reduction in producing countries, cannot be achieved by the Member States individually and can therefore, by reason of its scale, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 141 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 61
(61) Operators, traders and competent authorities should be given a reasonable periodsufficient time in order to prepare themselves to meet the requirements of this Regulation,
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 148 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) minimising the Union’s contribution to deforestation and forest degradation worldwide
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 164 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘forest degradation’ means harvesting operations that are not sustainable and cause a reduction or loss of the biological or economic productivity and complexity of forest ecosystems, resulting in the long-term reduction of the overall supply of benefits from forest, which includes wood, biodiversity and other products or services;deleted
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 170 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
(7) ‘sustainable harvesting operations’ means harvesting that is carried out considering maintenance of soil quality and biodiversity with the aim of minimising negative impacts, in a way that avoids harvesting of stumps and roots, degradation of primary forests or their conversion into plantation forests, and harvesting on vulnerable soils; minimises large clear-cuts and ensures locally appropriate thresholds for deadwood extraction and requirements to use logging systems that minimise impacts on soil quality, including soil compaction, and on biodiversity features and habitats;deleted
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 175 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
(a) that the relevant commodities and products, including those used for or contained in relevant products, were produced on land that has not been subject to deforestation after December 31, 2020entry into force of this Regulation, and
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 179 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b
(b) that the wood has been harvested from the forest without inducing forest degradation after December 31, 2020deforestation after entry into force of this Regulation;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 187 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 19
(19) ‘plot of land’ is an extension of land within a single real-estate property, as recognised by the laws of the country of production, and which enjoys sufficiently homogeneous conditions as to allow to evaluate on the aggregate level the risk of deforestation and forest degradation associated with commodities produced on that extension of land;deleted
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 222 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point 1 (new)
(1) The Commission has presented a proposal for a Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence (CSDD); the Commission should make a comprehensive impact assessment for the alignment of the Directive on CSDD and the Regulation to avoid any duplicates and to reduce the administrative burden; the Regulation shall also be revised if any due diligence obligations have stricter requirements than the Directive on CSDD; also take into account the results from the impact assessment in order to design rules that do not forego but enhance competitiveness for all companies, in particular SMEs; reminds the Commission of the "One in, one out" principle and demands that the proposal on due diligence will be paired with suggestions on reduced regulation for the industry; The Regulation shall foremost support well-functioning systems and ensure that already existing global forest certification schemes can be used.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 223 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The Commission shall analyse the possibility to exclude operators that are not considered as a high risk country from the obligation of due diligence statements.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 225 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) geo-localisation coordinates, latitude and longitude of all plots of land where the relevant commodities and products were produced, as well as date or time range of production;deleted
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 231 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission may adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 33 to supplement paragraph 1 concerning further relevant information to be obtained that may be necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the due diligence system.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 233 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Operators shall verify and analyse information collected in accordance with Article 9 and any other relevant documentation, and on this basis carry out a risk assessment to establish whether there is a risk that the relevant commodities and products intended to be placed on or exported from the Union market are non- compliant with the requirements of this Regulation. If the operators cannot demonstrate that the risk of non- compliance is negligible, they shall not place the relevant commodity or product on the Union market nor export it is not able to collect the requested or adequate information, they shall firstly be able to request assistance from the competent authority and secondly not place the relevant commodity or product on the Union market nor export it. This obligation must be analysed closely by the Commission and the regulation shall be revised if the required information lead to a disproportionate burden for the operator.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 239 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) prevalence of deforestation or forest degradation in the country, region and area of production of the relevant commodity or product;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 243 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) the risk of mixing with products of unknown origin or produced in areas where deforestation or forest degradation has occurred or is occurring;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 245 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point i
(i) substantiated concerns submitted under Article 29;deleted
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 246 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) complementary informationassurance onf compliance with this Regulation, which may include information supplied by certification or other third- party-verified schemes, including voluntary schemes recognised by the Commission under Article 30(5) of Directive (EU) 2018/200149 , provided that the information meets the requirements set out in Article 9; _________________ 49 Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (OJ L 328/82, 21.12.2018, p. 82–209).
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 249 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. Operators shall be able to demonstrate how the information gathered was checked against the risk assessment criteria set out in paragraph 2, how a decision on risk mitigation measures was taken and how the operator determined the degree of risk.deleted
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 253 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 8
8. The Commission may adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 33 to supplement paragraphs 2, 4 and 6 as regards relevant information to be obtained, risk assessment criteria and risk mitigation measures that may be necessary to supplement those referred to in this Article to ensure the effectiveness of the due diligence system.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 254 #

2021/0366(COD)

1. In order to exercise due diligence in accordance with Article 8, operators shall establish and keep up to date a due diligence system to ensure that they can guarantee compliance with the requirements set out in Article 3(a) and (b). The due diligence system shall be reviewed at least once a year and if necessary adapted to and accounting for revision or abolishment of provisions in other EU Regulations that generate compliance costs and administrative burden in the affected sectors or for new developments which may influence the exercise of due diligence. Operators shall keep record of updates in the due diligence system(s) for 5 years.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 273 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 12
12. Checks shall be carried out without prior warningnotification of the operator or trader, except where prior notification of the operator or trader is necessaryand in close cooperation with stakeholders, in order to ensure the effectiveness of the checks.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 276 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) examination of documentation and records that demonstrate the compliance of a specific product or commodity that the operator has placed, intends to place on or export from the Union marketthe operator with the requirements of this Regulation;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 279 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) any technical and scientific means adequate to determine twhe exact place wthere the relevant commodity or product was produced, including isotope testingare deforestation- free;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 280 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) spot checks, including field audits, including where appropriate in third countries through cooperation with the administrative authorities of third countries. Any checks must be carried without disproportionate bureaucracy. If a product has been accepted, it should not be necessary to do another check, in order to keep the administrative burdens to a minimum.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 293 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) destroying the relevant commodity or product or donating it to charitable or public interest purposes.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 305 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3
3. Customs authorities shall control the correct declaration of relevant commodities and products entering or leaving the Union market. Such controls shall be based primarily on risk analysis to ensure that the administrative burden is kept to an absolute minimum, with the purpose of identifying and evaluating the risks and developing the necessary countermeasures, and shall be performed within a common risk management framework on the Union level.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 312 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes a three- tier system for the assessment of countries or parts thereof. Unless identified in accordance with this Article as presenting a low or high risk, countries shall be considered as presenting a standard risk. For wood products listed in Annex I, the EU Timber Regulation shall apply until the Commission has assigned a country to a risk category. The Commission may identify countries or parts thereof that present a low or high risk of producing relevant commodities or products that are not compliant with Article 3, point (a). The list of the countries or parts thereof that present a low or high risk shall be published by means of implementing act(s) to be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 34(2). That list shall be updated as necessary in light of new evidence.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 316 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) rate of deforestation and forest degradation,
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 319 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) whether the nationally determined contribution (NDC) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change covers emissions and removals from agriculture, forestry and land use which ensures that emissions from deforestation and forest degradation are accounted towards the country's commitment to reduce or limit greenhouse gas emissions as specified in the NDC;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 321 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) agreements and other instruments concluded between the country concerned and the Union that address deforestation or forest degradation and facilitates compliance of relevant commodities and products with the requirements of this Regulation and their effective implementation;
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 325 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) whether the country concerned has national or subnational laws in place, including in accordance with Article 5 of the Paris Agreement, and takes effective enforcement measures to avoid and sanction activities leading to deforestation and forest degradation, and in particular whether sanctions of sufficient severity to deprive of the benefits accruing from deforestation or forest degradation are applied.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 336 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall engage with producer countries concerned by this Regulation to develop partnerships and cooperation to jointly address deforestation and forest degradation. Such partnerships and cooperation mechanisms will focus on the conservation, restoration and sustainable use of forests, deforestation, forest degradation and the transition to sustainable commodity production, consumption processing and trade methods. Partnerships and cooperation mechanisms may include structured dialogues, support programmes and actions, administrative arrangements and provisions in existing agreements or agreements that enable producer countries to make the transition to an agricultural production that facilitates the compliance of relevant commodities and products with the requirements of this regulation. To broaden the trade tool box and the cooperation with third countries, there is a need to also include free trade agreements in the Regulation; the Commission and the Member States must therefore engage further on implementing and concluding free trade agreements; all new trade agreements, including Mercosur and others, consist of provisions that promote sustainable management which leads to better conditions of the forests and the obligation to ensure multilateral environmental agreements, such as the Paris Agreement and the Convention on Biological Diversity, are implemented effectively; The Regulation should not be adopted without the ratification of the EU-Mercosur Agreement; Such agreements and their effective implementation will be taken into account as part of the benchmarking under Article 27 of this Regulation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 346 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall engage in international bilateral and multilateral discussion on policies and actions to halt deforestation and forest degradation, including in multilateral fora such as Convention on Biological Diversity, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, United Nations Environment Assembly, United Nations Forum on Forests, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, World Trade Organisation, G7 and G20. Such engagement shall include the promotion of the transition to sustainable agricultural production and sustainable forest management as well as the development of transparent and sustainable supply chains as well as continue efforts towards identifying and agreeing robust standards and definitions that ensure a high level of protection of forest ecosystems.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 349 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1
1. Natural or legal persons shall be entitled to submit reliable and substantiated concerns to competent authorities when they deem, based on relevant and objective circumstances, that one or more operators or traders are failing to comply with the provisions of this Regulation.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 358 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. No later than twoone years after the 1. entry into force, the Commission shall carry out a first review of this Regulation, and shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal. The report shall focus in particular on and in line with its communication on the application of the “one in, one out” principle, proposals offsetting the regulatory burdens introduced by this Regulation, through the revision or abolishment of provisions in other EU Regulations that generate compliance costs in the affected sectors. The report shall thoroughly assess any suggestions to broaden the scope in close cooperation with affected stakeholders. The report shall include in particular, based on specific studies, an evaluation of: (a) the need and thefor and feasibility of extending the scope of this Regulation to other ecosystems, including land with high carbon stocks and land with a high biodiversity value such as grasslands, peatlands and wetlands and further commodities. additional trade facilitation tools to support the achievement of the objectives of the Regulation including through recognition of certification schemes; (b) the impact of the Regulation on farmers, in particular smallholders, indigenous peoples and local communities and the possible need for additional support for the transition to sustainable supply chains. (c) The Commission shall consider possible amendments to this Regulation with regards to regulatory simplification. The Commission and the competent authorities shall continuously adapt to best practice administrative procedures and take all measures to simplify the enforcement of this Regulation, keeping administrative burdens to a minimum.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 372 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3
3. Without prejudice to the general review under paragraph 1, a first review of Annex I shall be carried out by the Commission no later than two years after the entry into force of this Regulation, and thereafter at regular intervals in order to assess whether it is appropriate to amend or extend the relevant products listed in Annex I in order to ensure that all products that contain, have been fed with or have been made using relevant commodities are included in that list, unless the demand for those products has a negligible effect on deforestation. The reviews shall be based on an assessment of the effect of the relevant commodities and products on deforestation and forest degradation, and take into account changes in consumption, as indicated by scientific evidence.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 374 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33
1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 9(3), 10(8) and 32(4) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of 5 years from DD/MM/YY. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power at the latest 6 months before the end of the 5 year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 9(3), 10(8) and 32(4) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. 5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 9(3), 10(8) and 32(4) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by [two months] at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.Article 33 deleted Exercise of the delegation
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 376 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2
2. Articles 3 to 12, 14 to 22, 24, 29 and 30 shall apply 124 months from the entry into force of this Regulation, with the objective to facilitate a smooth roll out of the Regulation, hence reducing the risk of disruptive impacts on trade.
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 391 #

2021/0366(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3
3. Country of production and all plots of land of production, including geo- localisation coordinates, latitude and longitude. Where a product or commodity contains materials, ingredients or components produced in different plots of land, the geo-location coordinates of all different plots of land shall be included;deleted
2022/03/31
Committee: INTA
Amendment 83 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The initiative for a carbon border adjustment mechanism (‘CBAM’) is a part of the ‘Fit for 55 Package’. That mechanism is to serve as an essential element of the EU toolbox to meet the objective of a climate-neutral Union by 2050 in line with the Paris Agreement by addressing risks of carbon leakage resulting from the increased Union climate ambition. The CBAM is also consistent with the EU's objective of Open Strategic Autonomy.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 88 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Existing mechanisms to address the risk of carbon leakage in sectors or sub- sectors at risk of carbon leakage are the transitional free allocation of EU ETS allowances and financial measures to compensate for indirect emission costs incurred from GHG emission costs passed on in electricity prices respectively laid down in Articles 10a(6) and 10b of Directive 2003/87/EC. However, free allocatExisting carbon leakage measures are based on strict benchmarks established by the best- performing installations. These measures also represents an incentive to reduce emissions under the EU ETS weakens the price signal that the system provideshile also providing a carbon price signal for emissions above the benchmark level; they have proven so foar the installations receiving it compared to full auctioning and thus affects the incentives for investment into further abatement of emissionso be effective in reducing the risk of carbon leakage, although in the context of lower carbon prices than those experienced recently and those forecasted by 2030.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 96 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The CBAM seeks to replacestrengthen carbon leakage protection in view of higher EU climate ambitions by 2030 and thereafter replace progressively these existing mechanisms by addressing the risk of carbon leakage in a different way, namely by ensuring equivalent carbon pricing for imports and domestic products. To ensure a gradual transition from the current system of free allowances to the CBAM, the CBAM should be progressively phased in while free allowances in sectors covered by the CBAM are phased out and by ensuring that EU products exported in the global market are not replaced by more carbon intensive products, which would undermine the objective of reducing global emissions. To ensure a gradual transition from the current system of free allowances to the CBAM, free allowances should only be phased out once the CBAM regulation has proven its effectiveness in terms of protection from the risk of carbon leakage both for imports and exports, not before 2030 and only following a three years test phase running from 2026 to 2028 during which the effectiveness of the mesure will be throughly assessed by the Commission. The combined and transitional application of EU ETS allowances allocated free of charge and of the CBAM should in no case result in more favourable treatment for Union goods compared to goods imported into the customs territory of the Union.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 114 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
(12 a) While the surrenderingof CBAM certificates for EU importers addresses the risk of carbon leakage on the EU market, it is essential that the CBAM would also seek to reduce the possibility of European low-carbon exports being replaced by carbon-intensive items on third country markets or by goods that are not subject to equivalent climate policy and carbon costs, undermining the goal of lowering global emissions. It is therefore necessary to continue addressing the risk of carbon leakageassociated with European exports to third countries that have not yet limited or priced GHG emissions at the same levels as the EU.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 116 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 b (new)
(12 b) This Regulation does not apply to goods exported from the EU and therefore does not address carbon leakage associated with exports. Consequently, the Commission should monitor and evaluate the mechanism’s impact on export markets and, if the assessment of the effectiveness of the CBAM in tackling carbon leakage on the EU market is positive, after the three year test period, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and Council accompanied with a legislative proposal to address the carbon leakage risk on export markets while starting the free allocation phase out as set out in the ETS directive.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 119 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 c (new)
(12 c) If European industries producing goods subject to the CBAM face significant difficulties as a result of its implementation, the Commission develops an in-depth assessment in close collaboration with the industrial secotrs. This assessment should be completed as soon as possible to determine whether the mechanism is effective and practible.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 121 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) As an instrument to prevent carbon leakage and reduce GHG emissions the CBAM should ensure that imported products are subject to a regulatory system that applies carbon costs equivalent to the ones that otherwise would have been borne under the EU ETS. The CBAM is a climate measure which should prevent the risk of carbon leakage and support the Union’s increased ambition on climate mitigation, while ensuring WTO compatibility. However, the CBAM should be combined with rules addressing the exports component, such as the implementation of full or partial export duty exemptions, in order to fully eliminate concerns of carbon leakage and protect the competitiveness of European exported goods. Such a mechanism would be in line with the rules provided by the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ASCM).
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 132 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) In order to exclude from the CBAM third countries or territories fully integrated into, or linked, to the EU ETS and where the carbon cost burden is equivalent to that under the EU ETS, in the event of future agreements, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amending the list of countries in Annex II. Conversely, those third countries or territories should be excluded from the list in Annex II and be subject to CBAM whereby they do not effectively charge the ETS price on goods exported to the Union.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 135 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
(16 a) The implementing act pursuant to Article 7(6) shall include all input materials that contribute significantly to GHG emissions. In the case of stainless steel (CN codes 7218-7223), ferro-alloys shall be included in the list of input materials as they fulfil this criterion.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 147 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) The CBAM system has some specific features compared with the EU ETS, including on the calculation of the price of CBAM certificates, on the possibilities to trade certificates and on their validity over time. These are due to the need to preserve the effectiveness of the CBAM as a measure preventing carbon leakage over time and to ensure that the management of the system idoes not add excessively burdensome administrative burden to EU companies in terms of obligations imposed on the operators and of resources for the administration, while at the same time preserving an equivalent level of flexibility available to operators under the EU ETS.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 156 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23 a (new)
(23 a) Given the unique nature of the CBAM and the need forclose EU coordination, a CBAM authority at the EU level should be established to properly implement and monitor the provisions contained in this regulation.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 157 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) In terms of sanctions, Member Statesthe EU Central Authority should apply penalties to infringements of this Regulation and ensure that they are implemented. The amount of those penalties should be identical to penalties currently applied within the Union in case of infringement of EU ETS according to Article 16(3) and (4) of Directive 2003/87/EC. However, in case of circumvention or absorption practices or in case of repeated infringements of the provisions of the present Regulation, stronger penalties should apply to avoid undermining the effectiveness of the CBAM regime.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 202 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52
(52) The Commission should evaluate the application of this Regulation before the end of the transitional period and report to the European Parliament and the Council. The report of the Commission should in particular focus on possibilities to enhance climate actions towards the objective of a climate neutral Union by 2050. The Commission should, as part of that evaluation, initiate collection of information necessary to prevent distortion of competition in the EU and in global markets and possibly extend the scope to indirect emissions, as well as to other goods and services at risk of carbon leakage, and to develop methods of calculating embedded emissions based on the environmental footprint methods47 . With regard to indirect emissions, the evaluation shall take into account the exposure of EU producers to carbon costs passed on in electricity prices due to the functioning of the EU energy market. _________________ 47 Commission Recommendation 2013/179/EU of 9 April 2013 on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (OJ L 124, 4.5.2013, p. 1).
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 216 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
(54) The Commission should strive to engage in an even handed manner and in line with the international obligations of the EU, with the third countries whose trade to the EU is affected by this Regulation, to explore possibilities for dialogue and cooperation with regard to the implementation of specific elements of the Mechanism set out this Regulation and related implementing acts. It should also explore possibilities for concluding agreements to take into account their carbon pricing mechanism, provided that they deliver equivalent GHG emissions reductions and carbon costs constraints.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 219 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) To prevent carbon leakage both in the Union and in third country markets, goods of Union origin that are subject to the CBAM and that are exported to third countries and territories should benefit from an export adjustment. That export adjustment should continue to incentivise Union producers to reduce their emissions and should apply until third countries adopt carbon prices and equivalent measures that are comparable to those in the Union, with special attention to interrelated carbon leakage protection measures, taking into account the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in the light of different national circumstances.
2022/02/15
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 232 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes a carbon border adjustment mechanism (the ‘CBAM’) for addressing greenhouse gas emissions embedded in the goods referred to in Annex I, upon their importation into the customs territory of the Union, in order to prevent the risk of carbon leakage from the EU and contribute to the reduction of global carbon emissions.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 235 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. The mechanism willshould progressively become an alternative to the mechanisms established under Directive 2003/87/EC to prevent the risk of carbon leakage, notably the allocation of allowances free of charge in accordance with Article 10a of that Directive, if it has been proven to be effective in preventing carbon leakage both for imports into and exports from the Union’s custom territory, and without prejudice to maintaining EU ETS allowances free of charge at benchmark level until a test period with actual surrendering obligation by declarants running until 2030 has proven such effectiveness.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 262 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 12
12. The Union, may conclude agreements with third countries with a view to take account of carbon pricing mechanisms in these countries in the application of Article 9. These agreements shall not lead to undue preferential treatment of imports from third countries as regards the CBAM certificates to be surrendered and they must not take into account any carbon pricing mechanisms that are considered to be circumvention practices under Article 27.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 290 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts concerning detailed rules regarding the elements of the calculation methods set out in Annex III, including determining system boundaries of production processes, emission factors, installation-specific values of actual emissions and default values and their respective application to individual goods as well as laying down methods to ensure the reliability of data on the basis of which the default values shall be determined, including the level of detail and the verification of the data. Where necessary, those acts shall provide that the default values can be adapted to particular areas, regions or countries to take into account specific objective factors such as geography, natural resources, market conditions, prevailing energy sources, or industrial processes. The implementing acts shall build upon existing legislation for the verification of emissions and activity data for installations covered by Directive 2003/87/EC, in particular Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/2067.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 298 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts concerning the principles of verification referred to in paragraph 1 as regards the possibility to waive the obligation for the verifier to visit the installation where relevant goods are produced and the obligation to set thresholds for deciding whether misstatements or non-conformities are material and concerning the supporting documentation needed for the verification report. Provisions laid down in such implementing acts shall be equivalent to the provisions set in Regulation 2018/2067.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 304 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The authorised declarant shall keep records of the documentation, certified by an independent person, verifier accredited pursuant to art. 18 and in line with the competences established in art. 8(1) concerning the verification of embedded emissions. The accredited verifier is required to demonstrate that the declared embedded emissions were subject to a carbon price in the country of origin of the goods and keep evidence of the proof of the actual payment for that carbon price which should not have been subject to an export rebate or any other form of compensation on exportation.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 313 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall, upon request by a register the information on operators of an installations located in a third country, register the information on that operator and on itsies and on those installations in a central database referred to in Article 14(4).
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 317 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6
6. The records referred to in paragraph 5, point (c), shall be sufficiently detailed to enable the verification in accordance with paragraph 5, point (b), and to enable any competent authority to verify and to review, in accordance with Article 19(1), the CBAM declaration made by an authorised declarant to whom the relevant information was disclosed in accordance with paragraph 8.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 322 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 8
8. The operator may, at any timefter 5 years and with previous notification, ask to be deregistered from the database.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 327 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. A central CBAM authority at the EU level is established for the purpose of implementing and managing this Regulation.Its composition and tasks shall be established by way of separate Regulation. Each Member State shall designate the national competent authority to carry out the obligations and cooperate with the EU CBAM authority under this Regulation and inform the CommissionEU CBAM authority thereof.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 331 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall make available to the Member States a list of all competent national authorities and publish this information in the Official Journal of the European Union.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 332 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall require that national competent authorities exchange any information that is essential or relevant to the exercise of their functions and duties through a network established under the responsibility of the EU CBAM authority.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 339 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
The CommissionEU CBAM authority shall be assisted by the competent national authorities in carrying out their obligations under this Regulation and coordinate their activities.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 342 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
All information acquired by the central and national competent authorityies in the course of performing itstheir dutyies which is by its nature confidential or which is provided on a confidential basis shall be covered by an obligation of professional secrecy. Such information shall not be disclosed by the competent authority without the express permission of the person or authority that provided it. It may be shared with customs authorities, the Commission and the European Public Prosecutors Office and shall be treated in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 515/97.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 349 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. The information in the database referred to in paragraph 2 shall be confidentialmade available to the public, unless it is proven that it is business confidential according to the relevant EU legislation. Non- confidential summaries must be included with confidential information. Information equivalent to the one made publicly available for EU producers under the EU ETS central database shall be made public.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 351 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. The CommissionEU CBAM authority shall establish a central database accessible to the public containing the names, addresses and contact details of the operators and the location of installations in third countries in accordance with Article 10(2). An operator may choose not to have its name, address and contact details accessible to the public.The central database should insofar as possible, mirror the ETS database
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 352 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. The CommissionEU CBAM authority shall act as central administrator to maintain an independent transaction log recording the purchase of CBAM certificates, their holding, surrender, re-purchase and cancellation and ensure coordination of national registries.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 355 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. If irregularities are identified as a result of the controls carried out under paragraph 2, the Commission shall inform the Member State or Member States concerned for further investigation in order to correct the identified irregularities. Identified irregularities shall be corrected as soon as possible from their identification and, where appropriate, penalties pursuant to article 27 shall apply.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 358 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The national competent authority shall assign to each authorised declarant a unique CBAM account number which will be registered with the EU CBAM Authority.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 359 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The national competent authority shall authorise a declarant who submits an application for authorisation in accordance with Article 5(1), if the following conditions are fulfilled:
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 366 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. Where the national competent authority finds that the conditions listed in paragraph 1 are not fulfilled, or where the applicant has failed to provide the information listed in Article 5(3), the authorisation of the declarant shall be refused.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 367 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. If the national competent authority refuses to authorise a declarant, the declarant requesting the authorisation may, prior to an appeal, object to the relevant authority under national law, who shall either instruct the national administrator to open the account or uphold the refusal in a reasoned decision, subject to requirements of national law that pursue a legitimate objective compatible with this Regulation and are proportionate.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 368 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. A decision of the competent national authority authorising a declarant shall contain the following information
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 370 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. The competent national authority shall require the provision of a guarantee in order to authorise a declarant in accordance with paragraph 1, if the declarant was not established throughout the two financial years that precede the year when the application in accordance with Article 5(1) was submitted.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 371 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
The competent national authority shall fix the amount of such guarantee at the maximum amount, as estimated by the competent authority, of the value of the CBAM certificates that the authorised declarant have to surrender, in accordance with Article 22.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 372 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 7
7. The guarantee shall be provided as a bank guarantee, payable at first demand, by a financial institution operating in the Union or by another form of guarantee which provides equivalent assurance. Where the competent national authority establishes that the guarantee provided does not ensure, or is no longer certain or sufficient to ensure the amount of CBAM obligations, it shall require the authorised declarant either to provide an additional guarantee or to replace the initial guarantee with a new guarantee, according to its choice.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 373 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 8
8. The competent national authority shall release the guarantee immediately after 31 May of the second year in which the authorised declarant has surrendered CBAM certificates in accordance with Article 22.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 375 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 9
9. The competent national authority shall revoke the authorisation for a declarant who no longer meets the conditions laid down in paragraph 1, or who fails to cooperate with that authority.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 376 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. In addition to paragraph 1, a national accreditation body may on request accredit a person as a verifier under this Regulation after checking the documentation attesting its capacity to apply the verification principles referred to Annex V to perform the obligations of control of the embedded emissions established in Articles 8, 10 and 38.deleted
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 378 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 28 for the accreditation referred to in paragraph 2, specifying conditions for the control and oversight of accredited verifiers, for the withdrawal of accreditation and for mutual recognition and peer evaluation of the accreditation bodies.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 380 #

2021/0214(COD)

1. The competententral and national authorityies may review the CBAM declaration within the period ending with the fourth year after the year in which the declaration should have been submitted. The review may consist in verifying the information provided in the CBAM declaration on the basis of the information communicated by the customs authorities in accordance with Article 25(2) and any other relevant evidence, and on the basis of any audit deemed necessary, including at the premises of the authorised declarant.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 382 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point 1 (new)
(1) The national competent authority shall inform the EU CBAM authority of the quantity and installation source of the exports. The EU CBAM authority shall inform the Commission of the data received so as to allow the Commissionto to make adjustments to the allowances to be surrendered for the intallation source of the exports.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 387 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. Where a CBAM declaration in accordance with Article 6 has not been submitted, the competent authority of the Member State of establishment of the authorised declarant shall assess the CBAM obligations of that declarant on the basis of the information at its disposal and calculate the total number of CBAM certificates due at the latest by the 31 December of the fourth year following that when the CBAM declaration should have been submitted.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 408 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. In case of repeated failure to surrender a number of CBAM certificates corresponding to the emissions embedded in goods imported during the previous year, or in case of submission of false information in the CBAM declaration, an authorized declarant, and any of its related parties, maybe automatically excluded from the register for a given period from the date of exclusion. The respective verifier – and any of its related parties - who has certified the accuracy of the information in the CBAM declaration should have its certification withdrawn by the central CBAM authority.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 412 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 5
5. Member StatesThe central CBAM authority may apply administrative or criminal sanctions for failure to comply with the CBAM legislation in accordance with their national rules in addition to penalties referred to in paragraphs 2 and 4a. Such sanctions shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 417 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. Practices of circumvention include situations where a change in the pattern of trade in relation to goods included in the scope of this Regulation whether slightly modified or not, stems from a practice, process or work, has insufficient due cause or economic justification other than avoiding obligations as laid down in this Regulation and consist in replacing those goods with slightly modified products, which are not included in the list of goods in Annex I but belong to a sector included in the scope of this Regulation.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 419 #

2021/0214(COD)

2 a. The practice, process or work referred to in the first subparagraph include, inter alia: (a) the slight modification of the product concerned to make it fall under customs codes which are normally not subject to the obligations of this Regulation, provided that the modification does not alter its essential characteristics; (b) false declarations as to the identity of the producer of the product concerned or of the nature of the product concerned or the production process involved in making it; (c) the consignement of the product concerned via third countries to which no or more favourable obligations apply; (d) the reorganisation by exporters or producers of their patterns and channels of sales in order to eventually avoid obligations as laid down in this Regulation,or undermine their effects, including on overall GHG emissions and on prices of the like products, for instance via practices of resource shuffling;For thepurpose of this point, resource shuffling shall be defined as any practice, process or work that have insufficient due cause or economic justification other than avoiding obligations as laid down in this Regulation, or undermining their effects, without delivering environmental benefits on global GHGemissions; (e) any other measure to eventually avoid or evade obligations as laid down in this Regulation, or undermine their effects, including onoverall GHG;
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 429 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3
3. A Member State or any party affected or benefitted by the situations described in paragraph 2 may notify the Commission if it is confronted, over a two-month period compared with the same period in the preceding year with a significant decrease in the volume of imported goods included in the scope of this Regulation and an increase of volume of imports of slightly modified products, which are not included in the list of goods in Annex I. The Commission shall continually monitor any significant change of pattern of trade of goods and slightly modified products at Union level.deleted
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 434 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Following a notification from a Member State, an interested party or on its own initiative, the Commission may decide, following an investigation, to extend obligations laid down in this regulation, in whatever way is necessary to prevent future circumvention of the mechanism, when circumvention of the measures in force is taking place.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 437 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 5
5. Where the Commission, taking into account the relevant data, reports and statistics, including when provided by the customs authorities of Member States, has sufficient reasons to believe that the circumstances referred to in paragraph 3 are occurring in one or more Member States, it is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 28 to supplement the scope of this Regulation in order to include slightly modified products for anti-circumvention purposes.deleted
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 445 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Decisions referred to in the third paragraph shall be subject to theappeal procedure as set out in Article 30.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 446 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. The Commission shall always investigate possible circumvention when notified by a Member State or an interested party. Initiations shall be made by means of a Commission regulation which shall also instruct customs authorities of Member States to subject imports to registration. The Commission shall provide information to the Member States once a party or a Member State has submitted a request to initiate an investigation and the Commission has completed its analysis thereof, or where the Commission has itself determined that there is a need to initiate an investigation.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 449 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 5 c (new)
5 c. Investigations shall be carried out by the Commission. The Commission may be assisted by customs authorities and the investigation shall be concluded in due time.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 451 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 5 d (new)
5 d. The Commission Decision finding circumvention shall impose a penalty pursuant to article 26 on an Authorised Declarant involved in the circumvention and, if appropriate, the operator of the installation located in the third country that is linked to the Authorised Declarant. Where appropriate, the penalty shall also entail the withdrawal of import authorisation and be extended to the operator.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 453 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 a (new)
Article 27 a Absorption 1. If any party submits sufficient evidence that, following the entry into force of this Regulation, an Authorised Declarant has been absorbing the cost of the CBAM Certificates, resulting in no or insufficient movement in the resale prices or subsequent selling prices of the imported product in the Union, and that such a situation has insufficient due cause or economic justification other than undermining the effects of the obligations as laid down in this Regulation, the Commission shall open an investigation. Once a party has presented sufficient evidence justifying the opening of an inquiry and the Commission hasfinished its study, the Commission will inform the Member States. 2. The investigation may also be opened, under the conditions set out in the first subparagraph, on the initiative of the Commission or at the request of a Member State. 3. During an investigation pursuant to this Article, any interested party shall be provided with an opportunity to clarify the situation with regard to resale prices and subsequent selling prices. 4. Investigations shall be carried out by the Commission. The Commission may be assisted by customs authorities and the investigation shall be concluded within in due time. 5. If it is concluded that the obligations as laid down in this Regulation should have led to movements in such prices, the Commission shall take appropriate measures to re-establish the effectiveness of the obligations as set out in this Regulation. Such measures imposed pursuant to this Article shall not exceed the amount of the penalties as set out in Article 26.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 473 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
2. Before the end of the transitional period, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Regulation. The report shall contain, in particular, an in-depthe assessment ofdeveloped in cooperation with the sectors at risk of carbon leakage covered by this regulation of the rules to be applied in the testing period established pursuant art. 30bis and the possibilities to further extend the scope of embedded emissions to indirect emissions and to other goods at risk of carbon leakage than those already covered by this Regulation, as well as an assessment of the governance system as well as an assessment of the impact on competitiveness of the EU downstream industry. It shall also contain the assessment of the possibility to further extend the scope to embedded emissions of transportation services as well as to goods further down the value chain and services that may be subject to the risk of carbon leakage in the future. Such an extension should be considered only if a clear calculation methodology has been established by the Commission and once the mechanism has proven fully effective in terms of achieving its objective of carbon leakage protection.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 494 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 a (new)
Article 30 a Before phasing out free allocation to sectors at risk of carbon leakage covered by this rule, the Commission will monitor and assess the mechanism's efficacy in terms of the risk of carbon leakage. To this purpose, the Commission shall publish a report to the European Parliament and the Council, following consultation with the sectors subject by this Regulation,evaluating: a. the first three years (2026-2028) of thesurrendering obligation pursuant to article 22; b. the risk of carbon leakage on export markets. If the assessment is positive, the report shall be accompanied by a legislativeproposal to phase out free allocation to sectors subject to this regulation and to adopt a solution to mitigate the risk of carbon leakage on the export market.
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 542 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 3 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Where AttrEmg are the attributed emissions of goods g, and ALg the activity level of the goods, the latter being the amount of goods produced in the reporting period in that installation, and EEInpMat are the embedded emissions of the input materials (precursors) consumed in the production process. Only input materials listed as relevant to the system boundaries of the production process as specified in the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 7(6) are to be considered. The implementing act pursuant to Article 7 (6) shall include all input materials that contribute significantly to GHG emissions. In the case of stainless steel (CN codes 7218-7223), ferro-alloys shall be included in the list of input materials as they fulfil this criterion. The relevant EEInpMat are calculated as follows:
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 547 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 6
6. Adaptation of default values based on region specific features Default values can be adapted to particular areas, regions of countries where specific characteristics prevail in terms of objective factors such as geography, natural resources, market conditions, energy mix, or industrial production. When data adapted to those specific local characteristics are available and can define more targeted default values, the latter may be used instead of default values based on EU installations. Where declarants for goods originating in a third country, or a group of third countries can demonstrate, on the basis of reliable data, that alternative region specific adaptation of default values are lower than the default values defined by the Commission the former can be used.deleted
2021/12/16
Committee: INTA
Amendment 794 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 a (new)
Article 10a Export adjustment to reduce the risk of carbon leakage and associated increases in global emissions 1. An export adjustment shall be granted to operators of installations subject to Directive 2003/87/EC for goods manufactured in the EU listed in Annex I and that are exported to third countries and territories other than those listed in Annex II, Section A. 2. The amount of the export adjustment shall be equal to the Euro value of the CBAM certificates published in accordance with Article 22(2) during the calendar week of export of the exported goods, multiplied by default values based on the average emission intensity of the 10 percent best performing Union installations for that type of good, multiplied by tons of goods falling within the scope of paragraph 1 of this Article. That calculation shall take also into account EU ETS benchmarking methodologies already established for which the denominator is not expressed in tons of goods, for example refined products and steam-cracking, as well as other alternative methodologies, to the extent applicable. 3. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, where goods within the scope of paragraph 1 are produced in Union installations with an emission intensity that is lower than the default value for that type of product as set pursuant to paragraph 2, the amount of the export adjustment shall be calculated based on the actual embedded emissions per tonne of product calculated in accordance with the methodology of points 2 and 3 of Annex III. 4.The export adjustment shall be reduced to reflect the extent to which EU ETS allowances continue to be allocated free of charge in accordance with Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC to operators of installations producing the goods listed in Annex I in the Union. 5. The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 29(2), establishing methodologies to define the amount of the export adjustment in accordance with paragraph 2 and 3 of this Article. 6. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 28, defining the procedures and requirements to grant an export adjustment under paragraph 1 of this Article in accordance with paragraphs 2, 3, and 4 of this Article and the methodologies defined in accordance with paragraph 5 of this Article. 7. When drafting the implementing and delegated acts referred to in paragraphs 5 and 6 respectively, the Commission shall give all interested parties and third countries an opportunity to comment. 8. The Commission shall regularly assess, on a third country or group of countries basis, whether Union producers continue to require the export adjustment of paragraph 1 in order to prevent the risk of carbon leakage. In doing so, the Commission shall monitor and consult with third countries on the extent to which they adopt carbon prices and equivalent measures comparable to that in the Union, with special attention to interrelated carbon leakage protection measures, taking into account the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in the light of different national circumstances. On the basis of this assessment, by [ end of transitional period] and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall present a report on the progress made by third countries and the extent to which a Union export adjustment continues to be necessary. Where appropriate, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament and to the Council a legislative proposal suspending the export adjustment or introducing any necessary modifications.
2022/02/15
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 353 #

2021/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) The scope of the Innovation Fund referred to in Article 10a(8) of Directive 2003/87/EC should be extended to support innovation in low-carbon technologies and processes that concern the consumption of fuels in the sectors of buildings and road transport. In addition, the Innovation Fund should serve to support investments to decarbonise the maritime transport sector, including investments in sustainable alternative fuels, such as hydrogen and ammonia that are produced from renewables, as well as zero-emission propulsion technologies like wind technologies, as well as projects dedicated to the supply of rare earths and permanent magnets. Considering that revenues generated from penalties raised in Regulation xxxx/xxxx [FuelEU Maritime]52 are allocated to the Innovation Fund as external assigned revenue in accordance with Article 21(5) of the Financial Regulation, the Commission should ensure that due consideration is given to support for innovative projects aimed at accelerating the development and deployment of renewable and low carbon fuels in the maritime sector, as specified in Article 21(1) of Regulation xxxx/xxxx [FuelEU Maritime]. To ensure sufficient funding is available for innovation within this extended scope, the Innovation Fund should be supplemented with 50 million allowances, stemming partly from the allowances that could otherwise be auctioned, and partly from the allowances that could otherwise be allocated for free, in accordance with the current proportion of funding provided from each source to the Innovation Fund. _________________ 52[add ref to the FuelEU Maritime Regulation].
2022/02/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1189 #

2021/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point g
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 a – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3
The Innovation Fund shall cover the sectors listed in Annex I and Annex III, including environmentally safe carbon capture and utilisation (“CCU”) that contributes substantially to mitigating climate change, as well as products substituting carbon intensive ones produced in sectors listed in Annex I, and to help stimulate the construction and operation of projects aimed at the environmentally safe capture and geological storage (“CCS”) of CO2, as well as of innovative renewable energy and energy storage technologies, as well as projects dedicated to the supply of rare earths and permanent magnets; in geographically balanced locations. The Innovation Fund may also support break- through innovative technologies and infrastructure to decarbonise the maritime sector and for the production of low- and zero-carbon fuels in aviation, rail and road transport. Special attention shall be given to projects in sectors covered by the [CBAM regulation] to support innovation in low carbon technologies, CCU, CCS, renewable energy and energy storage, in a way that contributes to mitigating climate change.
2022/03/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 93 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The Commission should takeseek a common European interest when taking into account the positive effects of the foreign subsidy on the development of the relevant subsidised economic activity. The Commission should weigh these positive effects against the negative effects of a foreign subsidy in terms of distortion on the internal market in order to determine, if applicable, the appropriate redressive measure or accept commitments. The balancing may also lead to the conclusion that no redressive measures should be imposed. Categories of foreign subsidies that are deemed most likely to distort the internal market are less likely to have more positive than negative effects. The Commission should develop guidelines with regard to the application of the balancing test.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 106 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The Commission should have the power, on its own initiative, to examine any information on foreign subsidies. To this end, it is necessary to establish a procedure consisting of two steps, namely a preliminary review and an in-depth investigation. The Commission shall publish guidance on the criteria to open such a procedure.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 127 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) Below the notification thresholds, the Commission could require the notification of potentially subsidised concentrations that were not yet implemented or the notification of potentially subsidised bids prior to the award of a public contract, if it considers that the concentration or the bid would merit ex-ante review given their impact in the Union. The Commission should also have the possibility to carry out a review on its own initiative of already implemented concentrations or awarded public contracts. The Commission shall provide instructions on the requirements that must be met in order receive such a notification.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 131 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) When reviewing a concentration, the assessment of whether there is a distortion in the internal market should be limited to the concentration at stake, and only foreign subsidies granted in the threfive years prior to the concentration should be considered in the assessment.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 162 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
(49) Where a concentration is notifiable pursuant to this Regulation, financial contributions to any of the parties to the concentration granted in the threfive years prior to the date of application of this Regulation should fall within the scope of this Regulation. In the context of a public procurement procedure, this Regulation should also apply to a financial contribution granted to an undertaking in the threfive years prior to the date of application of this Regulation,
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 210 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
(2) A foreign subsidy is unlikely to distort the internal market if its total amount is below EUR 5 million over any consecutive period of threfive fiscal years.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 240 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
(2) The Commission shall take into account the balancing between the negative and positive effects when deciding whether to impose redressive measures or to accept commitments, and the nature and level of those redressive measures or commitments. The Commission will publish guidance on how to perform the balancing exercise by the date of application of this Regulation.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 301 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(3 a) The Commission will set out the criteria to open such a procedure by the date of application of this Regulation.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 376 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) all the undertakings concerned received from third countries an aggregate financial contribution in the three calendar years prior to notification of more than EUR 50 million.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 392 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5
(5) The Commission may request the prior notification of any concentration which is not a notifiable concentration within the meaning of Article 18 at any time prior to its implementation where the Commission suspects that the undertakings concerned may have benefitted from foreign subsidies in the threfive years prior to the concentration. That concentration shall be deemed to be a notifiable concentration for the purposes of this Regulation. The Commission shall publish the instructions on the requirements that must be met in order to receive such a notification by the date of application of this Regulation.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 413 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2
(2) In addition, the Commission may impose by decision on undertakings concerned fines not exceeding 1 % of their aggregate turnover produced by the undertaking concerned in the preceding business year where they, intentionally or negligently, supply incorrect or misleading information in a notification pursuant to Article 19 or supplement thereto.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 414 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
(3) The Commission may impose by decision on undertakings concerned fines not exceeding 10 % of their aggregate turnover produced by the undertaking concerned in the preceding business year where they, intentionally or negligently:
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 417 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Foreign subsidies that cause or risk causing a distortion in a public procurement procedure shall be understood as foreign subsidies that enable an undertaking to submit a tender that is unduly advantageous in relation to the works, supplies or services concerned. The assessment of whether there is a distortion on the internal market pursuant to Article 3 and whether a tender is unduly advantageous in relation to the works, supplies or services concerned shall be limited to the public procurement procedure at stake. Only foreign subsidies granted during the threfive years prior to the notification shall be taken into account in the assessment.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 425 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
(2) For the purpose of Article 28, a notifiable foreign financial contribution in an EU public procurement procedure shall be deemed to arise where the estimated value of that public procurement, calculated in accordance with the provisions laid down in Article 5 of Directive 2014/24/EU and Article 16 of Directive 2014/25/EU, is equal or greater than EUR 250 million.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 431 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1
(1) When submitting a tender or a request to participate in a public procurement procedure, undertakings shall either notify to the contracting authority or the contracting entity all foreign financial contributions received in the three calendar years preceding that notification or confirm in a declaration that they did not receive any foreign financial contributions in the last three yearscalendar years. A calendar year begins on January 1st and finishes on December 31st of the same year, and corresponds to the criterion to assess the validity of the declaration notified by the undertaking. Undertakings which do not submit such information or declaration shall not be awarded the contract.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 434 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
(2) The obligation to notify foreign financial contributions under this paragraph shall extend to economic operators, groups of economic operators referred to in Article 26(2) of Directive 2014/23/EU, Article 19(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU and Article 37(2) of Directive 2014/25/EU, main subcontractors and main suppliers. A subcontractor or supplier shall be deemed to be main where their participation ensures key elements of the contract performance and in any case where the economic share of their contribution exceeds 30% of the estimated value of the contract.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 442 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 5 a (new)
(5 a) When the foreign subsidy was granted to a subcontractor who had not notified it to the lead operator, its substitution by the lead operator shall be sufficient to prevent the Commission’s review from being opened.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 445 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 6
(6) Where the Commission suspects that an undertaking may have benefitted from foreign subsidies in the threfive years prior to the submission of the tender or request to participate in the public procurement procedure, it may request the notification of the foreign financial contributions received by that undertaking in any public procurement procedure which are not notifiable under Article 27(2) or fall within the scope of paragraph 5 of this Article, at any time before the award of the contract. Once the Commission has requested the notification of such a financial contribution, it is deemed to be a notifiable foreign financial contribution in a public procurement procedure. The Commission shall publish guidance on the criteria to require such a notification by the date of application of this Regulation.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 464 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 4
(4) The Commission may adopt a decision closing the in-depth investigation no later than 20150 days after it received the notification. In exceptional circumstances, this time limit may be extended after consultation with the concerned contracting authority or contracting entity.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 478 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 6 a (new)
(6 a) Whenever contracting authorities make use of qualification systems complying to Article 77 of Directive 2014/25/EU, the undertaking’s obligation to notify the foreign subsidy received is observed at the qualification stage with reference to the previous three calendar years with respect to the qualification system and has a temporary validity of three calendar years after which it is necessary to provide an update of the notification.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 502 #

2021/0114(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 7
(7) An investigation pursuant to this Regulation shall not be carried out and measures shall not be imposed or maintained where such investigation or measures would be contrary to the Union’s obligations emanating from any relevant international agreement it has entered into. In particular, no action shall be taken under this Regulation which would amount to a specific action against a subsidy within the meaning of Article 32.1 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, except where the country granting the subsidy is not a WTO Member or where the Commission has well-founded indications that the country granting the subsidy is in substantial non-compliance with notification obligations under the Agreement or under other international agreements, at least with regard to the sector concerned. Provided that, regardless of the sector involved, actions may always be taken under this Regulation in relation to foreign subsidies which cause distortions on the internal market in public procurement procedures or in relation to concentrations. This Regulation shall not prevent the Union from exercising its rights or fulfilling its obligations under international agreements.
2022/02/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 64 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Artificial intelligence is a fast evolving family of technologies that can contribute to a wide array of economic and societal benefits across the entire spectrum of industries and social activities. By improving prediction, optimising operations and resource allocation, and personalising digital solutions available for individuals and organisations, the use of artificial intelligence can provide key competitive advantages to companies and support socially and environmentally beneficial outcomes, for example in healthcare, farming, education and training, media, mobility, infrastructure management, energy, transport and logistics, public services, security, justice, resource and energy efficiency, and climate change mitigation and adaptation.
2022/04/01
Committee: CULT
Amendment 68 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) At the same time, depending on the circumstances regarding its specific application and use, artificial intelligence may generate risks and cause harm to public interests, private data and rights that are protected by Union law. Such harm might be material or immaterial.
2022/04/01
Committee: CULT
Amendment 70 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) A Union legal framework laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence is therefore needed to foster the development, use and uptake of artificial intelligence in the internal market that at the same time meets a high level of protection of public interests, such as health and safety and the protection of fundamental rights, as recognised and protected by Union law. To achieve that objective, rules regulating the placing on the market and putting into service of certain AI systems should be laid down, thus ensuring the smooth functioning of the internal market and allowing those systems to benefit from the principle of free movement of goods and services. By laying down those rules, this Regulation supports the objective of the Union of being a global leader in the development of secure, trustworthy and ethical artificial intelligence, as stated by the European Council33 , and it ensures the protection of ethical principles, as specifically requested by the European Parliament34 with a human-centric approach and in compliance with freedom of expression, freedom of speech, media freedom, pluralism and cultural diversity. _________________ 33 European Council, Special meeting of the European Council (1 and 2 October 2020) – Conclusions, EUCO 13/20, 2020, p. 6. 34 European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on a framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, 2020/2012(INL).
2022/04/01
Committee: CULT
Amendment 79 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) For the purposes of this Regulation the notion of publicly accessible space should be understood as referring to any physical place that is accessible to the public, irrespective of whether the place in question is privately or publicly owned. Therefore, the notion does not cover places that are private in nature and normally not freely accessible for third parties, including law enforcement authorities, unless those parties have been specifically invited or authorised, such as homes, private clubs, offices, warehouses and factories. Online spaces are not covered either, as they are not physical spaces. However, the mere fact that certain conditions for accessing a particular space may apply, such as admission tickets or age restrictions, does not mean that the space is not publicly accessible within the meaning of this Regulation. Consequently, in addition to public spaces such as streets, relevant parts of government buildings and most transport infrastructure, spaces such as cinemas, theatres, shops, museums, monuments, cultural places, cultural institutions and shopping centres are normally also publicly accessible. Whether a given space is accessible to the public should however be determined on a case- by-case basis, having regard to the specificities of the individual situation at hand.
2022/04/01
Committee: CULT
Amendment 114 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) AI systems used in education or vocational training, notably for determining access or assigning persons to educational and vocational training institutions or to evaluate persons on tests as part of or as a precondition for their education or for determining the course of study a student should follow should be considered high-risk, since they may determine the educational and professional course of a person’s life and therefore affect their ability to secure their livelihood. When improperly designed and used, such systems may violate the right to education and training as well as the right not to be discriminated against and perpetuate historical patterns of discrimination. AI systems used to monitor students’ behaviour and emotion during tests at education and training institutions should be considered high-risk, since they are also interfering with students’ rights to privacy and data protection. The use of AI to check fraud at test or exam, such as plagiarism, should not be consider as high-risk.
2022/04/01
Committee: CULT
Amendment 130 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 70
(70) Certain AI systems intended to interact with natural persons or to generate content may pose specific risks of impersonation or deception irrespective of whether they qualify as high-risk or not. In certain circumstances, the use of these systems should therefore be subject to specific transparency obligations without prejudice to the requirements and obligations for high-risk AI systems. In particular, natural persons should be notified that they are interacting with an AI system, unless this is obvious from the circumstances and the context of use or where the content is doubtless used to form part of a creative, artistic or fictional cinematographic work. Moreover, natural persons should be notified when they are exposed to an emotion recognition system or a biometric categorisation system. Such information and notifications should be provided in accessible formats for persons with disabilities or other vulnerabilities. Further, users, who use an AI system to generate or manipulate image, audio or video content that appreciably resembles existing persons, places or events and would falsely appear to a person to be authentic, should disclose in a clear manner that the content has been artificially created or manipulated by labelling the artificial intelligence output accordingly and disclosing its artificial origin.
2022/04/01
Committee: CULT
Amendment 177 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the placing on the market, putting into service or use of an AI system that exploits any of the vulnerabilities of children or a specific group of persons due to their age, physical or mental disability, in order to materially distort the behaviour of a person pertaining to that group in a manner that causes or is likely to cause that person or another person physical or psychological harm;
2022/04/01
Committee: CULT
Amendment 239 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Users of an AI system that generates or manipulates image, audio or video content that appreciably resembles existing persons, objects, places or other entities or events and would falsely appear to a person to be authentic or truthful (‘deep fake’) , shall disclose in an appropriate clear, repetitive and visible manner that the content has been artificially generated or manipulated.
2022/04/01
Committee: CULT
Amendment 241 #

2021/0106(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
However, the first subparagraph shall not apply where the use is authorised by law to detect, prevent, investigate and prosecute criminal offences or where the content forms part of an evidently artistic, creative or fictional cinematographic and analogous work-or it is necessary for the exercise of the right to freedom of expression and the right to freedom of the arts and sciences guaranteed in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, and subject to appropriate safeguards for the rights and freedoms of third parties.
2022/04/01
Committee: CULT
Amendment 18 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the CCSI mainly comprise small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and self-employed entrepreneurs and freelancers, who often draw on irregular and mixed incomes from different sources;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 34 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the development of the European framework for working conditions in the CCSI will require coordination with EU policies on competition, the internal market, social policy, fundamental rights and equality, and copyright, fully respecting the fields of competence of the European Union and its Member States;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 35 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas since Parliament’s call for improvements to the situation of artists in its resolutions of June 2007, noNovember 2016 and September 2020, not much progress has been made and most of itstheir demands remain valid, also in the light of the great differences between support schemes for artists and cultural professionals in different Member States;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 42 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the COVID-19 crisis has made artists and cultural and creative professionals even more vulnerable, as the loss of earnings for non-standard workers, who make up the majority of the CCSI, has been often exacerbated by weak or absent national social security schemes and dedicated support measures;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 56 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas most of the Member States enacted substantial emergency measures to help the CCSI to survive the crisis; whereas, however, this support was not available or not suitable to some artists on account of their particular working status and was not sufficient to ensure sustainable working conditions;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 73 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas artists and cultural professionals tend to have atypical work patterns and often lack proper social security protection, notably in cross-border contexts, which often leads to their exclusion from pension and unemployment payments;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 90 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital P
P. whereas public grants are considered the most effective form of financial support for the CCSI, but are often difficult to access due to the lack of an overarching European funding strategy for the sector by the Commission, the diverse sources within the MFF and their lack of mainstreaming;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 125 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Urges the Commission and the Member States to recognise the fundamental role of culture for society, the well-being of EU citizens and the economy, and to translate this recognition into continuous financial and structural support;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 129 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Calls on the Commission to further develop and substantiate the industrial policy framework for the CCSI ecosystem into a coherent, competitive and long-term strategy in order to boost their competitiveness, their strategic value for the European economy and the European way of life, and enable them to meet their potentials in terms of jobs and growth creation; highlights the potential of CCIs regarding youth employment and reindustrialisation and in particular the growing opportunities in the cultural and creative sectors and industries created by the digital environment for young people
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 135 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to recognise the European added value of cross-border cooperation and to eliminate barriers to cross-border mobility in the EU and with third countries for artists and cultural professionals;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 138 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide workers and cultural professionals in the CCSI with clear information and guidelines on mobility opportunities and administrative requirements in all Member States, including on visas, taxation, social security and access to training; calls for specific programmes dedicated to the mobility of young creators and innovators to promote exchanges and innovation in the fields of culture and creativity;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 145 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the establishment of mobility information points to provide assistance to artists and cultural professionals and recommends that all Member States establish one;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 158 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Points out the importance of territorial licenses in the business model of a majority of CCS entities; reminds the mid-term review of the European Commission on the unjustified geo- blocking regulation; points out the necessity to take into account, before considering any follow-up measures, the voices of the rightholders in any discussion on copyright-protected content; reminds that revenue from copyright represents the core of the fair remuneration of artists and creators, but also of many small players of the CCS; reminds that any drastic change in this field could conduct to dramatic consequences for many of them;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 163 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Recalls the systemic importance that the digital sphere and platforms have acquired not only before but especially since the beginning of the sanitary crisis in the diffusion of artistic works; recalls that for some artists and creators who were mainly dependent on public events, this change in economic paradigm represents a challenge in terms of stability of revenue; is worried about the fact that many artists and creators cannot ensure in this new business model the same amount of revenue; asks therefore the Commission to evaluate and to take concrete measures to ensure that revenues generated by platforms and other content providers are duly and fairly redistributed to all creators, artists and right holders;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 173 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the Commission’s inception impact assessment and ongoing public consultation on collective bargaining agreements, which is designed to define the scope of application of EU competition rules in order to remove obstacles and improve working conditions through collective bargaining on behalf of solo self-employed workers in the CCSI; invites the Commission to further evaluate current state aid rules and their application for the CCSI and the possible needs for adaptation;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 179 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that the atypical employment (part-time and fixed-duration contracts, temporary work and economically dependent self-employment) of artists and cultural professionals, specifically in the media and culture sector, is commonplace; Underlines the urgent need to improve the working conditions in the CCSI; encourages the Member States to utilise upward convergence to establish minimum standards for artists and cultural workerprofessionals in relation to working conditions and social security;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 187 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Repeatedly recommends the creation of a European framework for working conditions in the CCSI; welcomes, in this regard, the forthcoming OMC discussions between the Member States on the status of artists while fully respecting the responsibilities of Member States and the EU in regards to labour market and cultural policy, through the adoption or application of a number of coherent and comprehensive guidelines with respect, but not exclusively, to contracts, means of collective representation and management, social security, sickness insurance, direct and indirect taxation, non-tariff barriers and information asymmetries; however underlines that a one-fits-all solution will not be plausible due to the large divergences between Member States in the beforementioned areas; welcomes, in this regard, the forthcoming OMC discussions between the Member States on the status of artists; appreciates the concrete actions laid down in the European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan and urges the Member States to undertake all necessary efforts to fulfil the promises made;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 203 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Urges the Member States to fulfil their obligation to defend and respect artistic freedom in order to uphold the fundamental right to freedom of expression and ensure that EU citizens can freely enjoy and consume artistic creations;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 230 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to facilitate access to public grants and loans by reducing administrative burdens at all stages of the application and reporting processes; emphasises the necessity to promote synergies between various EU funding schemes with specific amounts dedicated to the cultural and creative sector, like Horizon Europe, Creative Europe, InvestEU and Digital Europe;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 238 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates its call on the Commission and the Member States to include culture in the national recovery and resilience plans and to earmark at least 2 % of the budget envelope of the Recovery and Resilience Facility to culture and is alarmed about the lack of dedicated funding to the sectors and industries as proposed by some Member States;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 249 #

2020/2261(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Underlines that any action taken to help the CCSI for their recovery should not only be aimed at the economic recovery but also be used for the improvement of working conditions of artists and cultural professionals, for the up- and reskilling of those workers to engage in the digital era and world and for the investment into the green innovation power of the CCSI, which are a driver of sustainability, early adopters and enablers of disruptive technologies needed to tackle climate change; stresses the challenges imposed by digitisation on the CCSI and therefore the need for constant rethinking and reshaping business models in order to develop market-driven solutions based on big data, cloud computing, ICT, artificial intelligence and the strong role of internet platforms; underlines the importance for European CCIs rightholders of access to and transparency of audience data and content recommendation systems; emphasises therefore the importance of guaranteed funding for digitisation, preservation and online availability of cultural and creative content and our European cultural heritage;
2021/06/10
Committee: CULT
Amendment 2 #

2020/2244(INI)

1. Recalls the objective of a continuous improvement of the EU’s and the Member States’ education, training and skills policies in order to deliver quality education and comprehensive lifelong learning and the upgrading of skills and reskilling, notably of people with lower levels of education, and upholds the need to prepare for the future impact of artificial intelligence on the labour market and public spheres; whereas education is an investment in our common future, it positively impacts social cohesion as a pre-condition for economic growth, job creation and employment;
2021/01/20
Committee: CULT
Amendment 11 #

2020/2244(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Is of the opinion that the unprecedented EU financial support for a post-COVID-19 recovery should strive for sustainable economic growth that is inclusive and benefit all equally, addressing structural socio-economic disadvantages and emphasises that the European green and digital transition cannot be achieved without a gradual transformation of the education and training systems; emphasizes to learn from the Covid-19 crisis by applying the good practices (peer learning) of some countries in terms of using digital tools for education;
2021/01/20
Committee: CULT
Amendment 22 #

2020/2244(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Urges the Member States to develop National Recovery and Resilience Plans (NRRPs) with at least 25 % earmarking for social investment,and to prioritise, especially in the country-specific recommendations, targeted investments in digital infrastructure and equipment for educational establishments and learners in order to enable equal access to distance and online learning for children with disabilities, and children from disadvantaged groups and remote and rural areas and children with special educational needs;
2021/01/20
Committee: CULT
Amendment 32 #

2020/2244(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Commission and the Member States to use the Recover Resiliance Facility to establish the necessary conditions in order to ensure the possibilities for digital education across the whole European Union as a complementary tool for the in-person education, also with the aim of increasing the inclusiveness of education systems, with a particular focus on equal access to high-quality education and training for disadvantaged groups to compensate for the fact that socio-economic background is currently the most important determinant of children and young people’s educational outcome; calls on Member States, in this regard, to dedicate at least 10% to investments in quality and inclusive education from the Recovery and Resilience Facility’s funding;
2021/01/20
Committee: CULT
Amendment 36 #

2020/2244(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Encourages Member States to make use of the Recovery Package to invest in digital equipment for schools in the EU, notably in excluded areas as every child should get an opportunity to access education;
2021/01/20
Committee: CULT
Amendment 18 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Underlines that the digital transformation affects the field of education, which is about to undergo the most substantial change since the introduction of compulsory education; stresses that, according to some estimates, 65% of children entering primary school today will ultimately end up working in new job types that do not yet exist; highlights that digital literacy is an essential skill and there is a need to ensure equal access to these skills as well as to digital equipment as highlighted by the COVID-19 related challenge of remote teaching and learning;
2021/02/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 21 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that data access and processing are often indispensable to providing competitive digital services; calls on the Commission to adopt digital trade rules that increase the competitiveness of EU business and facilitate the free transfer of data flows across bordersglobally while respecting EU data protection rules; including by adding ambitious and flexible provisions on cross-border data flows in trade agreements that do not allow for excessive state intervention;
2021/02/01
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that AI can be an effective tool for enforcing the rules on online content, such as illegal content or fake news, through automated content filtering, and can also be used to implement the ‘notice, take down and stay down’ mechanisms; stresses, however, that AI may pose challenges to fundamental rights, in particular freedom of expression, as well as access to information, cultural diversity and media pluralism; points out that the digital single market should be driven by the principle that "what is illegal offline is also illegal online";
2021/02/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 48 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Notes that production and trade depend on digital information being transported, stored and used across borders;
2021/02/01
Committee: INTA
Amendment 52 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Highlights the EU data strategy’s role in building its own single market for data through legislation, including the Data Governance Act and the forthcoming Data Act;
2021/02/01
Committee: INTA
Amendment 53 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Underlines the fact that competitive access to data is of crucial importance for the development of AI technology, which will be increasingly important in several sectors in society; stresses therefore that researchers and businesses need to be given greater freedom to access and use data for AI development;
2021/02/01
Committee: INTA
Amendment 55 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6 d. Draws attention to the legal unpredictability faced by AI technology developers because of inadequate coordination of data protection and ethics issues relating to AI at EU level; asks the Commission therefore to submit guidance for pre-approved data usage procedures, as well as for pseudonymisation and anonymisation, in order to increase legal predictability for AI technology developers; considers that national authorities should follow that EU guidance, when exercising their public authority, as a way of ensuring consistent regulatory compliance and removing obstacles to the functioning of the digital single market;
2021/02/01
Committee: INTA
Amendment 56 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 e (new)
6 e. Recognises the ambition to make the EU a world leader in the development and application of AI and underlines the fact that the EU should position itself as a global leader in the development of ethical and legal norms and standards for the use of AI, potentially setting standards for the rest of the world;
2021/02/01
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 f (new)
6 f. Notes that SMEs are hardest hit by opaque bureaucracy and excessive regulatory burdens and, accordingly, underlines the fact that legislation needs to be simplified and clarified in order to promote the development and use by them of digital technologies, in particular AI;
2021/02/01
Committee: INTA
Amendment 58 #

2020/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 g (new)
6 g. Highlights the fact that the size of the single market constitutes the main potential for increased digital competitiveness and innovation in Europe and that therefore any fragmentation and any unwarranted border barriers to data flows, collaborative research and exports of digital goods and services between EU countries must be immediately eliminated so as to ensure that society reaps the full benefits of the EU market;
2021/02/01
Committee: INTA
Amendment 37 #

2020/2201(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Expresses its deep disappointment at the decision of the European Commission on the European Citizens’ Initiative Minority Safepack and its lack of consideration for the voice of over 1.1 million signatory citizens, its organizers and the European Parliament; highlights that the decision sends a wrong message to the expectations expressed by millions of citizens, despite the vote of a very large majority in the European Parliament expressing their strong support for the initiative and calling on the Commission to propose legal acts on it;
2021/02/03
Committee: CULT
Amendment 1 #

2020/2137(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. stresses that it is the sole responsibility of states and governments to safeguard human rights, their society, nature and environment in their countries and that this responsibility shall not be transferred to private actors.
2020/09/24
Committee: INTA
Amendment 2 #

2020/2137(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 a (new)
-1 a. recalls that the EU economy is facing the biggest global economic crisis since the Great Depression with companies all over Europe hit especially hard; stresses that especially at this time no legislative initiatives of economically inhibiting or damaging nature, such as those imposing higher administrative burdens or causing legal uncertainty, shall be taken.
2020/09/24
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2020/2137(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 b (new)
-1 b. requires that, before any initiative is proposed, an impact assessment is carried out focusing on: a) the administrative burden on business b) value added by EU companies c) employment by EU companies d) engagement of EU companies in international markets
2020/09/24
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #

2020/2137(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 c (new)
-1 c. recalls the importance of transitional periods in order to create legal certainty and good legislation ; stresses in this context the need for a transitional period of at least 7 years in order to allow companies to implement any new measures.
2020/09/24
Committee: INTA
Amendment 10 #

2020/2137(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates that global valuesupply chains are the key feature of the global economy and that trade policy mustcan contribute to a transparent production process throughout the valuesupply chain and demonstrate compliance with environmental, social and safety standards;
2020/09/24
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2020/2137(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that sustainable corporate governance can help the EU to build a more resilient and sustainable economy, improve the level playing field and protect EU businesses and citizens,in order to maintain Europe's international competitiveness and protect EU businesses from unfair competitive advantages of third countries resulting from lower protection standards and is therefore hugely beneficial to EU trade policy;
2020/09/24
Committee: INTA
Amendment 30 #

2020/2137(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the COVID-19 crisis has exposed the vulnerabilities of unregulatedin global supply chains, and that businesses withvoluntary better environmental, social and governance practices and risk mitigation processes weather the crisis betterbased on established approaches such as the UN Guiding Principles and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises can contribute to making companies more resilient in times of crisis;
2020/09/24
Committee: INTA
Amendment 35 #

2020/2137(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes with concern that less than 1 % of companies publicly list their suppliers, even in high-risk sectors;deleted
2020/09/24
Committee: INTA
Amendment 47 #

2020/2137(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that directors’ duties should encompass an obligation to develop, disclose and implement a corporate sustainability strategy for all aspects of the company’s operations, including its supply chains;deleted
2020/09/24
Committee: INTA
Amendment 58 #

2020/2137(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that theany new EU requirements to disclose information on how sustainability issues affect the company and how the company affects society and the environment should include the sharing of all relevant information on all actors throughout the entire supply chain; not overlap with existing reporting requirements (e.g. non financial reporting directive) and their scope and that any new EU requirements must be in accordance with the various international reporting standards like GRI, SASB, IIRC, etc to ensure a level playing field for European companies; reiterates the necessity of avoiding any additional administrative burdens for companies, especially SMEs;
2020/09/24
Committee: INTA
Amendment 70 #

2020/2137(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that sustainable corporate governance cannot reach its full potential without due diligence legislation that requires companies to identify, prevent, mitigate and account for human rights abuses and environmental damage in theire importance of discussing due diligence measures in the context of sustainable corporate governance in order to identify, prevent, mitigate possible human rights violation in global valuesupply chains.
2020/09/24
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2020/2135(INI)

A. whereas inclusive, quality education is the cornerstone of the green and digital transitions; whereas education is an investment in our common future, positively impacting social cohesion as a pre-condition for economic growth, job creation and employment;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 7 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas the content of teaching and the organisation of education systems is a national competence and must remain so; whereas however, new challenges require the mobilisation of European tools and supporting policies within the European Education Area;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 12 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas digital technologies are reshaping society, making basic digital skills and digital literacy now essential for all citizens; whereas digital technologies should be perceived as a tool to provide quality education and training: whereas in the future there will be an increased need for digital skills (coding, logistics and robotics) which will concern not only IT education courses but will touch upon the curriculum as a whole;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 16 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas the impact of new technologies, robotics and Al on employment needs to be fully explored; whereas the labour market will increasingly prioritise a focus on the STEM fields, meaning it is necessary to further develop practical solutions on career guidance, deterrence of student dropouts, online adult learning and requalification;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 30 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas digital tools can help the process of learning, but must remain complementary to the physical presence of educators as well as their expertise and judgement; whereas digital technology certainly cannot substitute the role of the teacher;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 35 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas access to high-quality digital infrastructure and equipment and high-speed internet that is adapted to educational needs is a prerequisite for digital learning; whereas the COVID-19 pandemic and the sudden digital transition in education have laid bare the gaps in access across the Union;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 43 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the shift to online and distance learning has exacerbated existing inequalities, leaving disadvantaged and vulnerable learners and learners with disabilities and with special educational needs further behind, increasing drop- out rates across education sectors, and revealing an absence of pastoral and social support in the digital environment; whereas special attention should also be paid to children with special educational needs who have a learning problem or disability that make it more difficult for them to learn remotely than for most children of their age;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 86 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Notes, that the new DEAP is now extending the scope of action and sets specific targets to address persistent gaps, for example in digital skills, the promotion of quality computer and information technology education, support for better connectivity in schools, online learning content and tools, and digital literacy of schools and higher education institutions;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 88 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes, however, that delivering the plan effectively depends on coordination across a broad range of programmes; calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure effective synergies between these programmes; emphasises the need to learn from the Covid-19 crisis by applying the good practices (peer learning) of some countries in terms of using digital tools for education;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 97 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Encourages Member States to make use of the Recovery Package to invest in digital equipment for schools and for pupils in the EU, notably in excluded areas as no child should be left behind;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 117 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Stresses the importance of a number of European instruments which can be used for the development of formal and non-formal education as well as investment in educational infrastructure and digital equipments in schools, such as the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), the Connecting Europe Facility, Horizon Europe, Erasmus+, the European Solidarity Corps and the new Digital Education Action Plan; points out furthermore that investments at national level are also essential;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 121 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Supports the Erasmus+ programme and the increase of its budget in order to make it more efficient and inclusive; supports volunteering as the key activity of the ESC;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 127 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Deplores the persistent digital divide in the Union; regrets the fact that in some Member States, like Romania, efforts to provide access to quality digital education have failed, leaving more than 30 % of pupils without access to education for several months; shares the Commission’s analysis that fast and reliable internet and quality digital equipment in educational establishments, non-formal settings and the home are prerequisites for effective digital education;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 132 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Insists that broadband should be considered a public good and be universally accessible as a critical step in closing the digital divide; calls for specific measures to enhance access for remote, rural and mountain areas with low connectivity and limited access to emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, blockchain, new educational devices or gamification, in the light of their growing importance and potential; calls for a new initiative on AI and robotics for education; recalls furthermore that an ethical and human- centric Al approach should be ensured by EU programmes and schemes;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 165 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Insists that greater attention be devoted to teacher training as the plan is rolled out so as to ensure that teachers not only possess digital skills, but can also teach them; calls for a pan-Union initiative to develop new pedagogical methods for the digital environment; underlines the increasingly important role played by parents, families and tutors in distance learning and calls for them to be given special training and support mechanismsthe need for them to have good internet, digital and technical skills and calls for them to be given special training and support mechanisms; stresses the need to assist all families with digital tools in order to grant access to remote education;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 169 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Calls on the European Commission, together with the Member States, to provide financial support for training courses designed for teachers in order to prepare them to carry out teaching activities using the new platforms; notes that the next generation of teachers needs to be equipped with digital skills and competences to prepare children for the future, while exploiting the potential of digital teaching methods;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 173 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11 b. Calls on the European Commission, together with the Member States to provide schools (teachers and students) not only with technical support and an Internet connection, but also with the necessary support on safe and reliable software, e-learning materials and platforms for best practice sharing to be able to continue with distance learning;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 175 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 c (new)
11 c. Calls for further enhancements to existing online education platforms which should focus on online education and provide teachers with best practices; calls, in this regard, for better promotion and development of programmes such as the Electronic Platform for Adult Learning in Europe (EPALE) and the School Education Gateway;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 181 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Underlines the challenge of cyberthreats, cyberbullying, data and privacy protection, dangerous online games and disinformation in the digital environment; highlights that any development in the field of digital education must go hand-in-hand with a robust framework of data protection; warmly welcomes, therefore, the increased focus on digital and information literacy in the revised plan; looks forward to the swift adoption of the Media Action Plan and the guidelines for teachers and educational staff; calls on the Commission to be more ambitious and to launch large-scale digital literacy campaigns;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 206 #

2020/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Supports dual education in VET, lifelong learning and adult learning with a view to a better adaptation to labour market developments and preventing social isolation;
2020/11/19
Committee: CULT
Amendment 13 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Whereas SMEs represent 99 % of all businesses in the EU, and in the past five years SMEs have created around 85 % of new jobs and provided two-thirds of the total private sector employment in the EU;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Whereas for the European Union, the average contribution to the economy by SMEs is around 56 percent;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 19 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1 c. Whereas SMEs represent 87 % of all EU exporters 1a, only 25% of EU-based SMEs export at all and an even smaller portion export beyond the EU1b; _________________ 1a https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissi oners/2019- 2024/hogan/announcements/speech- commissioner-phil-hogan-eurocommerce- webinar_en 1b https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/access- to-markets_en
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 20 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1 d. Whereas the COVID-19 virus and following lockdowns has caused profound disruptions to global supply chains and trade;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 21 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1 e. Whereas trade and investment barriers, administrative costs and bureaucracy affect SMEs disproportionally due to their size and limited resources to overcome them, SMEs benefit more from rule-based trade opening than large companies;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 f (new)
1 f. Whereas the purpose of the Small Business Act for Europe (SBA) and the Think Small First principle is to increase competitiveness and support entrepreneurship;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 23 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 g (new)
1 g. Whereas only 9 % of EU SMEs protect their intellectual property rights (IPR), partly due to differing national legislation within the EU;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 h (new)
1 h. Whereas already before COVID- 19, European competitiveness was lagging behind other developed economies, threatening Europe’s potential to generate wealth and prosperity;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 25 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 i (new)
1 i. Stresses that SMEs need clear, consistent and predictable legislation in order to grow and create jobs;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 28 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Encourages the Commission to fully support SMEs in overcoming all barriers that prevent their access to third- country markets; requests the inclusion of an SME chapter in every trade agreement as done in the EU-Japan agreement and the modernised Agreement with Mexico, and that they should be included when revising existing FTAs; underlines the need for the effective enforcement of trade agreements, especially for SMEs, as a priority task of the Chief Trade Enforcement Officer;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 62 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Calls for a particular focus on SMEs in the current EU trade policy review in order to create better opportunities for SMEs; asks the Commission to make the "Think Small First" principle a vocal point of European trade policy to spur growth and development of SMEs;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 64 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Reiterates its call on the Commission to monitor the effects of its trade policy on SMEs, for example by ensuring a good representation of SMEs in the public consultation process in order to make sure that their views are properly and adequately collected, analysed and represented in the impact assessments;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 67 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Calls on the Commission, Member States and local governments to make business climate and competitiveness paramount priorities on their political agendas, and foster an entrepreneurial culture throughout the single market, where innovation, problem solving, risk taking, job creation and contributing to the prosperity of the EU is rewarded;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 70 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6 d. Welcomes the Commission’s commitment to introduce a "one in - one out" principle when creating new laws as a first step to stem the tide of new regulation and cut red tape, but reminds that it merely maintains status quo, which is not a sufficient ambition; calls also for more clarity on how the Commission intends integrate this principle in terms of trade policy;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 73 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 e (new)
6 e. Calls on the Commission to present a roadmap towards achieving a reduction of at least 30 % of outdated rules and regulations affecting SMEs, in order to decrease administrative burdens and cost pressure, promote competitiveness and make a real impact for SMEs to grow and prosper within the EU;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 74 #

2020/2131(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 f (new)
6 f. Stresses the importance of IPR strategies for SMEs in order for them to protect their R&D investments and collect growth capital; calls therefore for a reinforcement of cross-border cooperation on IPR, for example through a wide territorial application of the new Unitary Patent (UP)/ Unitary Patent Court (UPC) framework throughout the EU, which could increase legal certainty and lower cost for SMEs to ensure IPR and operate on a European level;
2020/09/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I (new)
I. whereas the pandemic has exposed the vulnerabilities of global value chains, has created major challenges for international production, especially in combination with rapid technological change and digitization acceleration, and has highlighted the need for enhanced resilience and diversification at a global, regional, and local level;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J (new)
J. whereas the COVID-19 outbreak has further increased inequalities and has added to the already growing concern among citizens about job loss in certain sectors, the changing nature of work and the pressure on workers’ wages and rights, and these problems must be addressed in order to retain public support for global trade;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 14 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K (new)
K. whereas the divisions within the WTO and the urgent need for its reform, complicated the coordinated response to keep global supply chains open, and the priority now must be to rebuild trust in multilateral institutions being able to deliver global answers, by rapidly moving forward on the discussions on the WTO Trade and Health Initiative;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 15 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L (new)
L. whereas COVID-19 has caused a global pandemic, giving rise to an unprecedented global health, economic, social, and humanitarian crisis, which created bottlenecks and disruptions of an unseen scale to international trade, causing it to plunge as the virus spread and slashing global production and employment, decreasing the level of Foreign Direct Investment, and increasing geopolitical tensions;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M (new)
M. whereas the Trade Policy Review needs to be complemented with a realistic strategy to increase EU resilience and strategic autonomy, including tailored policy measures and instruments in the area of domestic production, nearshoring, diversification of suppliers, and stockpiling;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 17 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N (new)
N. whereas the EU’s large network of trade agreements makes it the biggest actor on the world trading scene and is a key driving force for the development of the European Union’s economy and for the achievement of its geopolitical objectives, including the implementation of EU standards, values, and sustainability frameworks in partner countries;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O (new)
O. whereas the COVID-19 outbreak risks creating a set-back in the worldwide fight against climate change, yet, we need global action and cooperation to develop policies and streamline climate action in internal and external policy, as the vaccine alone will not be sufficient to address the social, environmental and economic crisis COVID-19 has caused;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 19 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital P (new)
P. whereas the pandemic has demonstrated strategic vulnerabilities in the EU and global supply chains, including for critical raw materials, essential medical goods such as personal protective equipment and active pharmaceutical ingredients;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 20 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Q (new)
Q. whereas the Communication on the Trade Policy Review needs to be complemented with continued dialogue and transparency with the European Parliament, which will play a key role in its implementation;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 28 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the mainstreaming of the European Green Deal into the cCommunication on the Trade Policy Review (TPR) and calls for a concrete action plan to make this ambition a reafor an assertive trade policy geared towards multilateralism, resilience, and sustainability;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 35 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the incorporationat the EU will propose the respect of the Paris Agreement to be considered as an essential element in allfuture trade, and investment and partnership agreements; stresses that ratification of the International Labour Organizgreements; reminds the Commission that the respect and implementation (of ILO) core conventions and respect for human rights are requirements for concluding FTAcommitments of its recent trade agreements; asks for ambitious chapters on digital trade, gender, and on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to be included in allnew trade agreements;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 42 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the incorporation of the Paris Agreement as an essential element in all trade, investment and partnership agreements; stresses that ratification of the International Labour Organization (ILO) core conventions and respect for human rights are requirementimportant considerations for concluding FTAs; asks for ambitious chapters on gender and on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to be included in all trade agreements;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 48 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines that the post-COVID-19 recovery is a unique opportunity to set the agenda forpromote sustainable growth; calls on the Commission, therefore, to present its review of the 15-point action plan on TSD chapters without delay;in 2021 and expects the review to address the enforceability of TSD commitments as a matter of urgency, as it is not currently includedconsider the effective implementation and enforcement in trade agreements; recalls, in this regard, the non-paper from the Netherlands and France on trade, social economic effects and sustainable development11 ; suggests that, as a minimum, recent advances in enforceability should be applied to EU trade policy, namely the ability to tackle any non-compliance by partners through unilateral sanctions, including the introduction of tariffs or quotas on certain products or the cross- suspension of other parts of an agreement; __________________ 11 Non-paper from the Netherlands and France on trade, social economic effects and sustainable development, accessed at ‘the Netherlands at International Organisations (permanentrepresentations.nl)’.
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 53 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines that the post-COVID-19 recovery is a unique opportunity to set the agenda for sustainable growth; calls on the Commission, therefore, to present its review of the 15-point action plan on TSD chapters without delay; expects the review to address the enforceability of TSD commitments as a matter of urgency, as it is not currently included; recalls, in this regard, the non-paper from the Netherlands and France on trade, social economic effects and sustainable development11 ; suggests that, as a minimum, recent advances in enforceability should be applied to EU trade policy, namely the ability to tackle any non-compliance by partners through unilateral sanctions, including the introduction of tariffs or quotas on certain products or the cross- suspension of other parts of an agreement; emphasizes the role of the Chief Trade Enforcement Officer in this regard, calling for close cooperation with the European Parliament’s International Trade Committee in the monitoring and scrutiny of TSD enforcement; __________________ 11Non-paper from the Netherlands and France on trade, social economic effects and sustainable development, accessed at ‘the Netherlands at International Organisations (permanentrepresentations.nl)’.
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 55 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission to move away from a “brown/green” product distinction, which dictated “good” and “bad” goods and services, and instead promote life cycle analysis and impact assessments to achieve fair and accurate sustainable trade;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that brown goods still receive preferential treatment over green goods and that tariffs and trade barriers are working against sustainable trade; demandRequests that the Commission deviselooks into instruments to tackle these distortions and walk the talk ofhat support the Green Deal by implementing itation in all aspects of trade policy;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 63 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that high up-front costs, which will only repay themselves over time, and a lack of know-how and equipment are currently preventslowing developing countries from ‘going green’in their green and digital transitions; demands that the Commission use allits trade instruments at its disposal to increase financial support, technical assistance, technology transferscapacity building and digital penetration in order to empower developing countries and enable them toto support the achievement of sustainable and digital resilience;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 72 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the EU to take a leading role at awithin the multilateral level to end harmful subsidies by advocating transparency and strict regulation and disciplines framework to engage with like-minded countries and trade partners to pursue a strong environmental agenda, including trade agreements and at the World Trade Organization (WTO)he progressive development of disciplines against market distorting subsidies; stresses the importance of drawing up sustainability impact assessments on an ex- ante, intermediate and ex-post basis; stresses the need to develop a comprehensive framework with concrete targetsprovide guidance to advance the SDGs, the Green Deal and the ILO Decent Work Agenda in trade and investment agreements; emphasises that new agreements should only be concluded once these targets have been fulfilled and that existing agreements should be revised accordingly;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 75 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the EU to take a leading role at a multilateral level to end hmarmfulket distorting subsidies by advocating for a common rulebook, including transparency and strict regulation and disciplines in trade agreements and at the World Trade Organization (WTO); stresses the importance of drawing up sustainability impact assessments on an ex-ante, intermediate and ex-post basis; stresses the need to develop a comprehensive framework with concrete targets to advance the SDGs, the Green Deal and the ILO Decent Work Agenda in trade and investment agreements; emphasises that new agreements should only be concluded once these targets have been fulfilledcarefully consider progress in third country efforts to meet sustainability targets and that existing agreements should be revised accordingly in due time;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 85 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. EWelcomes the Access2Market gateway and the Commission’s efforts in promoting this tool across the Europe; emphasiszes that transparency and dialogue with stakeholders and citizens are key to creating support for trade policy; insists that the role and responsibilities of and to harness its benefits; insists that the EU must deepen its engagement with Member States, the private sector, civil society, and domestic advisory groups must be clearly defined in the EU’s international agreementsall other relevant actors, as well as with trade partner and developing partner countries, and that financial assistance must be duly accompanied by capacity- building measures to enable itin order for them to function effectively and with particular attention paid to SMEs taking better advantage of trade agreements and to trade facilitation measures;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 99 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the importance of fairresilient and sustainable value chains that respect human rights, labour rights and environmental standards; recalls that mandatory due diligence throughout the entire supply chain is a necessaryis an instrument to achieve this; stresses that more attention should be paid to the vulnerabile positiones of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), especially in developing countries, wheremarkets and in their manufacturing capacities as large companies are more likely to overcome a sudden drop in demandexogenous shocks;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 110 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that global value chains often involve an uneven distribution of risks, particularly in the garment sector; deplores the fact that during the pandemic this uneven distribution has led to European businesses offloading the costs of lower demand onto producers in developing countries by cancelling orders that were already produced and in some cases even shippedsymmetrical effects and distribution of risks; deplores that least developed countries (LDCs), low-income and middle-income (LICs and MICs) countries were hit the hardest in numerous sectors by trade disruptions triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic; calls the Commission to act as a global player and to tailor its support towards LDCs, LICs and MICs, while taking into consideration the particular circumstances of COVID-19; calls on the Commission to engage with Member States, local governments, the private sector and civil society to achieve a fairer distribution of risksnegative impacts and across the supply chains;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 115 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses the importance ofNotes that Member State investments are often drastically cut during crises and assets in strategic sectors, such as healthcare, are exposed to a risk of undervaluation and sale to foreign investors; stresses that, while openness to trade is part of the economy’s resilience and competitiveness, effective rules ensuring fair competition and a level playing field for European businesses in, both in the internal market and in third- country markets; stresses, in this regard, the importance of trade defence instruments and calls on the Commission to swiftly, are necessary to guarantee mutually beneficial trade relations with international partners and protect the single market from aggressive investment strategies from non-EU actors trying to take advantage of the current crisis; stresses that increased investments of state-owned enterprises from third countries may be even more likely to cause distortions in case of leveraging of their privileged position within a closed and non-transparent domestic market; calls on the Commission to swiftly fill the gaps of the EU’s regulatory framework and complete the EU’s trade defence toolbox througwith legislative proposals in 2021, giving priority to an to strengthen our strategic autonomy, where priority should be given to instruments tohat deter and counteract coercive actions by third countries and that tackle distortions caused by foreign subsidies and state- owned enterprises and to the conclusion ofding the negotiations on the International Procurement Instrument12 ; __________________ 12Amended proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 January 2016 on the access of third- country goods and services to the Union’s internal market in public procurement and procedures supporting negotiations on access of Union goods and services to the public procurement markets of third countries (COM(2016)0034).
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 123 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Is convinced that openness should go hand in hand with safeguarding our strategic sectors and should be closely connected with an ambitious, forward- looking industrial policy in line with the Green Deal and digital strategy, which can increase the EU’s capabilities to withstand future shocks in strategic sectors and ensure the competitiveness of EU businesses, creating quality jobs and ensuring that Europe plays a crucial role in the production of innovative goods and future services;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 128 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Is convinced that openness should go hand in hand with safeguarding our strategic sectors and should be closely connected with an ambitious, forward- looking industrial policy in line with the Green Deal and digital strategy, creating quality jobs and ensuring that Europe plays a crucial role in the production of innovative goods and future services; supply chain diversification and resilience should be a key priority for the revised EU Trade Policy; highlights the coupling of trade and security interests and calls for a proportional strengthening of FDI Screening, complementing Member State efforts to safeguard European strategic sectors, preventing the establishment of detrimental and exploitable economic dependencies with non-EU actors;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 134 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Is convinced that the EU is too dependent on a limited number of suppliers for critical raw materials, goods, and services, and that this undermines its strategic autonomy and geopolitical objectives; insists that the EU should overcome these undesirable dependencies via a horizontal mix of policies tohat incentivises companies to stockpile, increase manufacturing, diversify sourcing strategies and promotes nearshoring, where necessary, which could create new trading opportunities for partners in the Eastern and Southern Neighbourhoods; stresses that related policies need to be tailored to the specific characteristics of the sectors and global value chains(GVCs) under consideration, as no general policy approach exists, and that GVC configuration is a business choice;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 140 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Notes that fooagri-food markets and supply chains remained operational during the pandemic, but deplores that export restrictions and trade barriers have disrupted it; notes that the Agricultural Market Information System (AMIS), which brings together the principal trading countries of agricultural commodities with the aim of enhancing food market transparency and the policy response for food security, can be regarded as an example of good practice; calls on the Commission to explore whether this model could be used in other value chains as well; supports trade facilitating actions taken to promote food safety standards and sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS) in response to COVID-19; calls on the Commission to identify the most appropriate measures to ensure that this pandemic does not translate into a food crisis in the developing world;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 145 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to come up with a digital trade strategy to, which increases the market access of European businesses, strengthens digital infrastructure, harmonizes regulatory frameworks, modernises trade and customs tools, and protects EU citizens’ rights under the GDPR13 ; underlines the acceleration of the digital revolution due to COVID-19 and stresses the importance of the EU taking the lead in setting standards for a sustainable, digital-driven global economy and keeping international data flows open to rapidly overcome a range of trade barriers and bottlenecks; calls on the EU to facilitate the building and readiness of digital infrastructures, particularly in the e-commerce sector and its supply capacities with the aim of reducing face to face processes and allowing for efficient logistics and strategic stockpiling; calls on the Commission to support skills training to enable more businesses and consumers to use online services and digital platforms; stresses the importance of engaging with the United States and like-minded partners on setting a joint regulatory framework and standards at the WTO level; __________________ 13Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 150 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to come up with a digital trade strategy to increase the market access of European businesses and protect EU citizens’ rights under the GDPR13 ; underlines the acceleration of the digital revolution due to COVID-19 and stresses the importance of the EU taking the lead in setting standards for a sustainable, digital-driven global economy and keeping international data flows open; encourages in this regard meaningful progress in the e-commerce negotiations ahead of the WTO ministerial conference at the end of the year; __________________ 13Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 154 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls for incentiveslooking into providing incentives across the board for EU businesses to shorten or adjust their supply chains where it iscould be beneficial to do so, with a view to ensuring that external social, environmental and economic costs are fully internalised in the price in line with EU policies such as the Farm to Fork Strategy, the Circular Economy Action Plan, the Biodiversity Strategy and stepping up EU action to protect and restore the world’s foreststhe EU's economy, resilience, geopolitical objectives and/or strategic autonomy;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 157 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls for incentives for EU businesses to shorten or adjustfacilitating and enabling EU businesses to increase the resilience of their supply chains where it is beneficial to do so, with a view to ensuring that external social, environmental and economic costs are fully internalised in the price in line withEU supply chains can contribute to the goals of EU policies such as the Farm to Fork Strategy, the Circular Economy Action Plan, the Biodiversity Strategy and stepping up EU action to protect and restore the world’s forests;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 169 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines that international trade governance has an important role to play in the rapid development of medical treatments and vaccines, the rapid scaling up of production, the development of resilient global value chains and equitable market access for the whole world; stresses, in this context, that the COVID-19 pandemic must be used to provide impetus for more concerted international cooperation and to boost global preparedness for health emergencies;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 173 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Emphasises, in this connection, the detrimental effects of unilateral measures such as export restrictions and prohibitions and the lack of transparency on global stocks and the subsequent price speculation on scarce essential goods, not least for low and middle-income countries; calls, therefore, forthe EU to encourage the adoption of the WTO trade and health initiative by the end of 2021 and for greater transparency on the supply and production of essentialto encourage stronger global cooperation, including increased transparency, production of medical products, resilience of global healthcare system, and accessible and affordable medical products and services;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 178 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Is concerned about the recent rise in export restrictions on vaccines by the main manufacturing countries such as the US, the UK, China and, India and by the EU and emphasises that this might endangers the rapid global scaling up of vaccine production capacity; urges the Commission to engage with producing countries to swiftly eliminate export barriers and to replace the export authorisation mechanism with an export and import notification requirement; insists on having timely and comprehensive access to such data; ; reaffirms that the EU export authorisation mechanism is a temporary measure, only to be used as a very last resort, that should evolve in the long-term into a transparency mechanism; stresses, however, that for the time being a targeted export authorisation mechanism with criteria of proportionality and reciprocity works towards ensuring the safety and well-being of European citizens; emphasises that the increased transparency provided by the EU export authorisation mechanism has increased European citizens trust in the EU’s vaccine rollout and management of the COVID-19 pandemic while demonstrating the EU's cooperative approach as a vaccine export champion;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 187 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Underlines that the vaccines against COVID-19 and its variants are a global public good and that multilateral efforts should be focused on ramping up global production capacities and on promoting voluntary partnerships and technology transfer agreements, including in low and middle-income countries; strongly welcomes, in this regard, the Global C19 Vaccine Supply Chain and Manufacturing Summit held on 8 and 9 March 2021 and calls for the establishment of structural platforms to rapidly scale up vaccine production in more countries, which could take the form of a Public-Private- Partnership clearing house to bring together private and public parties to enable and scale up partnerships, monitor bottlenecks, and identify measures to support vaccine manufacturing and deployment;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 202 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Emphasises that international trade policy must play a proactive role in this endeavour by facilitating trade in raw materials, alleviating shortages of qualified and experienced personnel, solving supply chain problems and revisiting the global framework for intellectual property rights for future pandemics; insists, in this regard, on a constructive dialogue about a temporary wai; recognises the critical role of the existing intellectual property framework in enabling an unprecedented leverl of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) in order to ensure that countries do not face retaliation over COVID-19 related patent infringements during the pandemicspeed in developing vaccines and therapies against COVID-19 and in facilitating the broad collaboration amongst governments, research institutions, and pharmaceutical companies;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 204 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Emphasises that international trade policy must play a proactive role in this endeavour by facilitating trade in raw materials, alleviating shortages of qualified and experienced personnel, solving supply chain problems and revisit; insists, ing the global framework for intellectual property riis regard, that no concrete evidence has been broughts for future pandemics; insists, in this regard, on a constructive dialogue abouward showing that IP rights constitute a barrier to combatting COVID-19; considers that a temporary waiver of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) in order to ensure that countries do not face retaliation over COVID-19 related patent infringements during the pandemicwill not enhance vaccine production and technology/know how transfer and that destabilising the multilateral IP legal framework, which currently provides protection and incentives, will undermine EU preparedness against mutations and future pandemics; notes that LDCs already are exempt from a bulk of substantial TRIPS obligations;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 207 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Notes with concern that geopolitical competition and tensions have accelerated following the COVID-19 outbreak; stresses that the European Union still has to position itself in this new geopolitical environment and believes that the global pandemic has confirmed the need for a stronger and more effective international trade and development policy;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 209 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Invites the Commission to set out concrete and specific actions and a roadmap to implement the concept of open strategic autonomy; recalls the geopolitical significance of a strong, diversified and resilient EU trade policy; stresses that the EU’s market strength, values and adherence to cooperation, fairness and rule-based trade should be the basis of such openness; strongly recommends that the EU seeks out partnerships with like-mindednew and consolidates existing partnerships with like-minded partners; urges, to this end, the Commission to push forward and finalize ongoing bilateral negotiations with international partners; stresses, however, that where cooperation is not possible, the EU should pursue its interests through autonomous measures to protect its values and fight unfair trading practices;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 210 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Invites the Commission to set out concrete and specific actions and a roadmap to implement the concept of open strategic autonomy and to ensure that all soft and hard options are on the table, even calibrated threats; stresses that the EU’s market strength, values and adherence to cooperation, fairness, reciprocity, and rule-based trade should be the basis of such openness; strongly recommends that the EU seeks out partnerships with like-minded partners; stresses, however, that where cooperation is not possible, the EU should pursue its interests through autonomous measures to protect its values and fight unfair trading practices;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 215 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Urges the Commission to proceed with putting in place the Multilateral Investment Court, building on the EU’s approach to its bilateral FTAs, to fully exercise its prerogative at EU level concerning investments agreements, and to support Member States in implementing effective foreign direct investment screening mechanism;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 217 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 b (new)
21b. Urges the Commission to pursue an effective “vaccine & medical supplies diplomacy” for countries with limited access to them and to work effectively towards increasing the EU’s global standing and diplomatic visibility in this area as the acknowledgement of the EU’s leading role will strengthen its international credibility;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 218 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 c (new)
21c. Believes that tackling international issues arising from, but not limited to, the COVID-19 pandemic, should be handled at the multilateral lever and require further engagement by the European Union and its Member States, acting together as ‘Team Europe’;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 220 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the TPR’s affirmation of multilateralism and extensive proposals for the necessary in-depth reform of the WTO across all its functions; shares the Commission’s emphasis on economic recovery, digital trade, unfair state subsidies, and sustainable development in its vision for WTO reform and urges the Commission to bring to bear all efforts to implement a sustainable developmentits agenda; stresses the importance of taking forward the WTO initiative on trade and climate;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 226 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the TPR’s affirmation of multilateralism and extensive proposals for the necessary in-depth reform of the WTO; shares the Commission’s emphasis on sustainable development in its vision for WTO reform and urges the Commission to bring to bear all efforts to implement a sustainable development agenda; stresses the importance of taking forward the WTO initiative on trade and climate; stresses the importance of effective dispute settlement to establish stability and predictability in the multilateral trading system and the need to solve the current situation of the appellate body in cooperation with the United States, in order to make it operational again and in this way ensure that trade disputes can be properly solved;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 231 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Emphasises that reviving the WTO negotiating function will play a key role in any substantial reform of the organisation; highlights, in particular, the need to address competitive distortions caused by industrial subsidies and state-owned enterprises, particularly from China; calls for the Commission to actively pursue a solution to the mismatch between the level of development and the number of commitments undertaken within the international trading system; is convinced that EU leadership isand transatlantic cooperation are crucial for any meaningful WTO reform to succeed;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 237 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Shares the suggestion made in the TPR that the G20 should cooperate and take a leading role in achieving carbon neutrality worldwidestrengthen cooperation on carbon neutrality and other aspects of the Green Deal; stresses, however, that in order for this approach to be effective, some G20 members will need to raise their emission reduction commitments;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 247 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Supports the new, forward-looking transatlantic agenda based on common interests and shared values; urges the Commission and the US administration to cooperate closely in order to secure a level playing field and to agree on ambitious social and environmental standards and build on each other’s experience to enforce these more efficiently; calls for joint efforts to overcome the pandemic, speed up the economic recovery and facilitate trade in essential medical goods; reiterates that we should work together to achieve meaningful WTO reform and find common solutions to common problems; supports the Commission’s Communication on ‘A new EU-US agenda for global change’ and calls for the swift establishment of a new EU-US Trade and Technology Council;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 250 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Is aware of the importance of the EU’s multifaceted trade relationship with China; firmly believes that EU-China trade relations require a more balanced and reciprocal approach; stresses that the upcoming ratification process of the EU- China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment can only begin once the EU has the requisite autonomous measures in place, including a ban on products made using forced labour, an upgraded trade defence toolbox and a working sanctions mechanism on human rights; demands that the Commission move forward withhas to be accompanied by substantial progress in the elaboration of suitable and effective autonomous measures, to be deployed in efforts to counter market-distorting practices or to defend strategic EU interests, including a ban on products made using forced labour, an upgraded trade defence toolbox and a working sanctions mechanism on human rights; underlines that Parliament will carefully scrutinise the agreement, including its provisions on sustainable development and reminds the Commission that it will take the human rights situation in China, including in Hong Kong, into account when asked to endorse the Iinvestment Agreement with Taiwaagreement; deeply regrets the unacceptable Chinese escalation of placing elected Members of the European Parliament and European Union institutions under sanctions, as this further erodes trust and hinders bilateral cooperation;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 258 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Underlines the vital added value of engaging in consolidated economic and commercial relations with the wider Asia- Pacific region, manifesting the concept of Open Strategic Autonomy through a diversification of EU supply chains; stresses the strategic need of contributing to regional and global trade and investment standard-setting, recalling that the normative playing field is an area where the EU needs to exercise its influence, in line with its geo-economic ambitions;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 262 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 b (new)
26b. Urges the Commission to move forward with the Investment Agreement with Taiwan, taking the necessary steps for a scoping exercise, impact assessment and launching a public consultation; reiterates the importance of the bilateral structural dialogue, including on matters related to multilateralism and WTO, technology and public health, as well as essential cooperation on critical supplies such as semiconductors;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 265 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Welcomes the TPR’s engagement towards Africa and the Eastern and Southern Neighbourhoods and looks forward to concrete steps to deepen the EU’s relations with these partners; stresses the importance of engaging in an effective, sustained and constructive fashion the Eastern Partnership countries, consolidating existing DCFTAs and providing mutually beneficial economic cooperation with these actors of key geopolitical relevance for the EU’s strategic agenda; reiterates the importance of a strategic and sustainable partnership with Southeast Asia, India and Latin America;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 270 #

2020/2117(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Calls on the EU to learn from its experience of the COVID-19 pandemic to better understand what it means to be a geopolitical actor in an increasingly tense global environment and stresses the importance of using strategic foresight in order to increase preparedness and resilience for the world emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic and for any future shocks and health crises, including the emergence of new disease mutations and future pandemics, aiming to develop future-proof strategies and responses;
2021/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 11 #

2020/2115(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Believes that under the Commission’s strategy of open strategic autonomy supply chain resilience will be heightened through a trusted network of actors who can be reliable partners to develop common risk coordination mechanisms, methods and standards for assessment, share information and expectations, and have an active dialogue with governments, firms, and investors. European and Asian states should retain multilateral efforts and region-to-region dialogue where possible to foster sustainable and rules-based economic networks in Eurasia.
2020/10/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2020/2115(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Underlines the importance of the EU strategic relationship with China and calls on the Members States and Institutions to address China with one voice and adopt a coordinated approach. Emphasises the need to ensure a level playing field, reciprocity and a non- discriminatory treatment of the respective parties, business communities and civil society. Reiterates calls on China to move forward on an ambitious reform of the WTO, including comprehensive rules on industrial subsidies, and recognises the concerns regarding market-distorting practices of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises, forced technology transfers and data localisation, overcapacities and related dumped exports, and other unfair trading practices. Believes that extending the level playing field to third markets is of paramount importance for the long- term opportunities of European businesses.
2020/10/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2020/2115(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Recognises the potential for EU to cooperate with China's “Belt and Road Initiative” (BRI) development strategy to build connectivity and cooperation across economic corridors and to connect the Eurasian continent from China to Europe. Believes that the EU should also try to engage China to ensure the BRI meets international standards. Securing fair competition on third markets by upholding multilateral economic governance practices is vital; Is of the view that the Commission should further analyse the potential to collaborate with China in connecting BRI in its TEN-T Corridor Studies to prevent possible bottlenecks and transport constraints: Expresses concern that China funded projects lack transparent bidding processes and are predominately completed by Chinese companies that are significantly less open to local or international companies; calls on China to increase reciprocity, especially in the infrastructure sector, to improve transparency, to prioritise high labour and environmental standards and to ensure debt sustainability.
2020/10/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 23 #

2020/2115(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3 c. Regrets that the EU’s Connecting Europe and Asia strategy has not attracted the same attention as the BRI in Central Asia in terms of connectivity in the region. Supports the Commissions efforts in dismantling trade barriers underpinned by sustainable, rules-based connectivity that includes tackling non- physical and regulatory barriers to movement as well as infrastructure. Countries in Central Asia have benefited significantly from increased integration into the global economy over the past two decades. Opines that the EU should play a much bigger role and become one of the key players in the region using trade and investment as a driver of growth, contributing to shared prosperity.
2020/10/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 25 #

2020/2115(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the importance of the existing network of bilateral, regional and multilateral trade agreements and the bilateral cooperation between the EU and Asian partners, with successful examples of strategic partnerships in Japan, South Korea and Singapore; Recognises that the ASEAN region is the EU's third largest trading partner outside Europe, after the US and China, and ensuring better access for EU exporters to the this market and enhancing cooperation through strategic partnerships and investment protection agreements should be a priority for the EU. In this respect, opines, that negotiations with Taiwan on a Bilateral Investment Agreement (BIA) should be conducted.
2020/10/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 37 #

2020/2115(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to ensure the enforcement of trade agreements and make existing ones more ambitious, in particular by promoting sustainable EU norms and standards; Calls on the Commission to implement fully trade defence instruments to ensure that European businesses are not subjected to unfair trading practices and tackle distortions in prices and costs that are not a result of free market forces.
2020/10/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 21 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets the lackBelieves that the harmonization and standardization of international and European standardnorms on waste quality as this hinders a viable trade policy that is conducive to the circular economy; calls on the Commission to presentwould highly contribute to integrating circular economy objectives into trade policy; calls on the Commission to lead the efforts at international level to harmonisedze standards on waste quality and agree on a legal definition of recyclable waste, and to include these in future FTAs;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 25 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that in the transition to a circular economy particular attention must be given to key supply chains where the EU’s environmental footprint is significant; insists that circular economy should not be implemented at the detriment of competitiveness and that the level playing field should be guaranteed for EU companies; asks the Commission to assist SMEs in integrating circular economy in their business model; in this regard, calls on the Commission to ensure that strong and efficient measures are put in place to assist EU companies in the transition towards circularity, including through incentives and facilitation measures; insists that no additional unnecessary administrative burdens should be put on companies, particularly SMEs;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 58 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Urges the Commission to ensure that FTAs reflect the objectives of the circular economy by inclurecommending strong, binding and enforceable sustainable development chapterimpact assessment mechanisms on sustainability, following WTO standards; suggests that the circular economy should be addressed in a cross- cutting manner in all relevant FTA chapters;
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 68 #

2020/2077(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Encourages the Commission to engage with the EU’s trading partners to further support the objectives of the circular economy; stresses that particular attention must be given toto keep track of how less developed partner countries can benefit from the circular economy, and make use of the already existing instruments, like Aid for Trade and GSP+; calls for an assessment of the impact of increased intra-EU recycling rates on countries strongly relying on waste imports.
2020/10/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. TUrges in light of the current crisis the Commission to focus on SMEs as the backbone of our economy, to boost the economic recovery and competitiveness of the EU; takes note of the Commission’s initiatives to support European SMEs’ access to international markets; stresses, however, that SMEs have to deal with too many regulations and burdens and excessive bureaucracy; stresses that SMEs are kept at a competitive disadvantage by investing in climate neutrality to comply with the Green Deal while trying to remain competitive and thrive on export markets; stresses therefore the need to further improve the business environment in the EU i.e. by facilitating easier access to finance; underlines that cutting red tape and easing of bureaucratic burdens should remain a priority and that legal certainty, evidence based policy, assessments of impact and cost efficiency must be ensured before introducing new EU rules; reminds the Commission of the One-in-one-out principle; highlights in this sense the importance of effective communication and awareness raising campaigns; welcomes the Commission’s objective to launch early in 2020 a dedicated rules of origin self-assessment tool for SMEs on the future Access2Market platform to help companies assess whether a product can benefit from preferences under a given EU trade agreement, in order to facilitate SMEs’ utilisation of preferences under EU trade agreements;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Takes note that between the years 2007 and 2017 global GDP increased with more than 70 percent; comparing however the EU increase of 17 percent to countries such as the United States (60 percent), India (80 percent) and China(315 percent), the EU was falling behind in global competitiveness already before; notes that world trade is expected to fall between 13 and 32 percent and EU GDP by 7,5 percent in 2020 due to the effects of COVID-19; stresses therefore that with rapidly declining global economies, a reindustrialisation of Europe is needed and the EU must gather forces to save companies and jobs to that end;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 19 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1 c. Notes that the COVID-19 crisis has emphasised the need for digital solutions, trade and business models; welcomes therefore the Commission’s aim towards EU digital leadership, for example by advancing the WTO negotiations for global rules on electronic commerce; calls for openness to a meaningful outcome of those negotiations to facilitate the flow of data across borders and address unjustified barriers to trade by electronic means, in full conformity with EU privacy and data protection law, including the GDPR, and to make use of the flexibility given by the negotiating directives;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to focus on domestic productivity within Europe, in order to establish less dependence on vulnerableBelieves that EU resilience can be achieved through the diversification of our trading relations, supply chains and strategic stocks; calls on the Commission to focus on securing the supply within Europe, by establishing strategic diversification of supply chains in core industry sectors such as the tech and telecommunications, medical products and, pharmaceuticals sectorand agricultural products, especially in times of global crisis, and to remain competitive on the global markets; welcomes trade agreements as a way to facilitate diversification of value chains and reinforce EU industry and production; calls on the Commission to continue striking ambitious free trade agreements, which focus on ensuring a level playing field and improved access to public procurement markets; expects in this regard to conclude the FTAs with Australia, New Zealand, Indonesia as well as the PCA with Thailand and encourages the swift ratification of the EU-Mexico and EU-Mercosur FTAs; proposes to the Commission a re-launch of ambitious negotiations with India and scoping exercise with Taiwan; stresses also the importance of including and further developing SME-chapters in all FTAs as a way to promote trade for SMEs;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 40 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Supports, in principle, the initiative to reinforce a rule-based multilateral trading system; expresses its concern, however, about the functioning of the WTO, owing to some international actors abusing their market power; calls on the Commission to ensure a rules-based multilateral system fit for a stronger EU in the world with open and fair trade, while aiming at sustainable economic recovery; stresses that fair and free trade can only function within a fully operational WTO; calls therefore on the Commission to focus its international efforts to mobilise international partners to reform the WTO, while creating a level playing field and combatting unfair trade and investment practices, and exploring the possibilities for a broader plurilateral initiative related to healthcare products as well as to e-commerce;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 52 #

2020/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Underlines its determination to establish a relationship as close as possible with the United Kingdom, a country that will remain a partner, ally and friend inside Europe; encourages the Commission to seize the momentum caused by the withdrawal to streamline our EU-policies, cut red tape and enhance competitiveness for European companies and SMEs; stresses that the FTA should aim to allow for market access and trade facilitation as close as possible in order to minimize trade disruptions, underpinned by level playing field provisions ensuring high standards in social, labour and environmental protection as well as competition and State aid policies; reiterates its calls on the Commission to make a new and comprehensive UK- EU strategic partnership agreement that goes well beyond trade, in line with the Political Declaration of October 2019;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 66 #

2020/2076(INI)

5. Calls for the reinforcement of the safeguard instruments in order to make them more efficient and better adapted to protect European industry and to tackle market distortions effectivelya review of the Union's international trade and investment policy and for the Commission to assess the EU trade toolbox, to actively explore the possibilities to tackle market distortions and defend the EU from abusive practices;
2020/06/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 168 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Notes that contrary to the UK’s claim of relying on existing precedents, many proposals in the UK draft legal proposals go significantly beyond what has been negotiated by the EU in other FTAs with third countries in recent years, for example in the area of financial services, mutual recognition of professional qualifications and conformity assessment, equivalence of the SPS regime, or the cumulation of Rules of Origin;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 7 #

2020/2018(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers it essential that parties with a legitimate interest have access to reliable information on the operators of information society services, including for intellectual property enforcement and the protection of minors; regrets that the information requirements in Article 5 of Directive 2000/31/EC are insufficient for these purposes; calls for intermediaries such as domain name registrars, web hosting providers, and online advertising services to be required to verify the identity of their commercial users;
2020/04/15
Committee: CULT
Amendment 14 #

2020/2018(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on platform operators to take their responsibility as content distributors and gatekeepers, as they play a crucial role in accessing news, audiovisual content and creative works; stresses that in order to safeguard and promote cultural and linguistic diversity, the promotion of European works, as well as media pluralism, the use of algorithms by such platforms should be transparent so that it is clear how access to content is granted, denied, ranked and/or undermined; calls on platform operators to not only to immediately delete illegal content after positive identification, but also to continuously transmit it to the law enforcement authorities for the purpose of further prosecution, including the metadata necessary for this purpose,;
2020/04/15
Committee: CULT
Amendment 22 #

2020/2018(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls for a strengthened legal framework to ensure that service providers take effective measures and act expeditiously to remove illegal content from their services and that such content stays down after being removed;
2020/04/15
Committee: CULT
Amendment 24 #

2020/2018(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Calls on the Commission to clarify the notion of expeditious reaction, which is already included in the E-Commerce Directive 2000/31/EC;
2020/04/15
Committee: CULT
Amendment 25 #

2020/2018(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Considers that for the infringement of live content, the reaction of service providers should be immediate when the notification from rights holders is received;
2020/04/15
Committee: CULT
Amendment 26 #

2020/2018(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 d (new)
2d. Draws the Commission’s attention to recent national court cases which oblige service providers to take down the infringing content within 30 minutes;
2020/04/15
Committee: CULT
Amendment 27 #

2020/2018(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 e (new)
2e. Stresses that voluntary measures taken by service providers to fight against illegal or harmful content should not lead to a limitation of their liability;
2020/04/15
Committee: CULT
Amendment 28 #

2020/2018(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 f (new)
2f. Recalls that any limitation of liability should remain applicable only to purely passive digital services, while active services should remain fully liable for the content on their services;
2020/04/15
Committee: CULT
Amendment 34 #

2020/2018(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Insists that the protection and promotion of freedom and diversity of opinion, information, the press and cultural forms of expression, the property rights, as well as the protection of the privacy of communication between individuals, must be balanced with one another, form the basis of liberal democracy and that this applies online without restrictionoffline and online; demands therefore that the use of all technologically feasible means of combating harmful or illegal content on the internet in this context be subjected to careful prior constitutional vetting and therefore rejects prior checks on content as disrespects the principle of proportionatelity;
2020/04/15
Committee: CULT
Amendment 57 #

2020/2018(INL)

4a. Underlines that illegal content online, including piracy and counterfeiting, represents a massive and continuous threat for European citizens and for the European cultural and creative industries, requiring that the legal framework remains adapted to the scale and virality that technological evolution now allows;
2020/04/15
Committee: CULT
Amendment 89 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Title 1
Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on adequate framework for promoting levels of minimum wages in the European Union
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Guideline 5 of Council Decision 2020/ 1512/EU on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States37 calls on Member States to ensure an effective involvement ofthe collaboration and/or cooperation with the social partners in wage-setting, providing for fair wages that enable a decent standard of living and allowing for an adequate responsiveness of wages to productivity levels and developments, with a view to upward convergence. The Guideline also calls on Member States to promote social dialogue and collective bargaining on wage setting. It also calls on Member States and the social partners to ensure that all workers have adequate and fair wages by benefitting from collective agreements or adequate statutory minimum wages, and taking into account their impact on competitiveness, job creation and in-work poverty. The Annual Sustainable Growth Strategy 202138 states that Member States should adopt measures to ensure fair working conditions. In addition, the Annual Sustainable Growth Strategy 202039 recalled that in the context of growing social divides, it is important to ensure that each worker earns an adequate wage. Several Country Specific Recommendations have also been issued to some Member States in the field of minimum wages. However, individual countries may be little inclined to improve their minimum wage settings because of the perception that this could negatively affect their external cost competitiveness. __________________ 37 Council Decision 2020/1512/EU of 13 October 2020 on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (OJ L 344, 19.10.2020, p. 22–28). 38 Commission Communication COM(2020) 575 final. 39 Commission Communication COM(2019) 650 final.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 138 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) Better working and living conditions, including through adequate minimum wages, benefit both workers and businesses in the Union and are a prerequisite for achieving inclusive and sustainable growth. Addressing large differences in the coverage and adequacy of minimum wage protection contributes to improving the fairness of the EU labour market and promote economic, social progress and upward convergence. Competition in the Single Market should be based on high social standards, innovation and productivity improvements ensuring a level playing field.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 147 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) When set at adequate levelsever levels are set, minimum wages protect the income of disadvantaged workers, help ensure a decent living, and limit the fall in income during bad times, as recognised in Convention 131 of the International Labour Organisation on the establishment of a system of minimum wage fixing. Minimum wages contribute to sustaining domestic demand, strengthen incentives to work, reduce wage inequalities and in- work poverty.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Minimum wage protection set out by collective agreements in low-paid occupations is adequate in most cases; statutory minimum wages are low compared to other wages in the economy in several Member States. In 2018, the statutory minimum wage did not provide sufficient income for a single minimum- wage earner to reach the at-risk-of-poverty threshold in nine Member States. In addition, the use of reduced minimum wage rates (variations) and deductions from statutory minimum wages negatively affect their adequacy.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 198 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) While strong collective bargaining at sector or cross-industry level contributes to ensuring adequate minimum wage protection, traditional collective bargaining structures have been eroding during the last decades, in part due to structural shifts in the economy towards less unionised sectors and to the decline in trade union membership related to the increase of atypical and new forms of work.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 213 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) The Commission has consulted management and labour in a two-stage process with regard to possible action to address the challenges related to adequate minimum wages protection in the Union, in accordance with Article 154 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. There was no agreement among the social partners to enter into negotiations with regard to those matters. It is, however, important to take action at Union level to ensure that workers in the Union are protected by adequate minimum wages, taking into account the outcomes of the social partners’ consultation.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 257 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Well-functioning collective bargaining on wage setting is an important means to ensure that workers are protected by adequate minimum wages. In the Member States with statutory minimum wages, collective bargaining supports general wage developments and therefore contributes to improving the adequacy of minimum wages. In the Member States where minimum wage protection is provided exclusively by collective bargaining, their level as well as the share of protected workers are directly determined by the functioning of the collective bargaining system and collective bargaining coverage. Strong and well- functioning collective bargaining together with a high coverage of sectorial or cross- industry collective agreements strengthen the adequacy and the coverage of minimum wages.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 275 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) In a context of declining collective bargaining coverage, it is essentialrecommended that the Member States promote collective bargaining to enhance workers’ access to minimum wage protection provided by collective agreements. Member States with a high collective bargaining coverage tend to have a low share of low-wage workers and high minimum wages. Member States with a small share of low wage earners have a collective bargaining coverage rate above 70%. Similarly, the majority of the Member States with high levels of minimum wages relative to the median wage have a collective bargaining coverage above 70%. While all Member States should be encouraged to promote collective bargaining, those who do not reach this level of coverage should,while being in consultation and/or agreement with the social partners, provide for or, where it already exists, strengthen a framework of facilitative procedures and institutional arrangements enabling the conditions for collective bargaining. Such framework should be established by law or by tripartite agreement.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 278 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Sound rules, procedures and practice for setting and updating statutory minimum wages are necessary to deliver adequate minimum wages, while safeguarding jobs and the competitiveness of firms including small and medium-sized enterprises. They include a number of elements to preserve the adequacy of statutory minimum wages, including criteria and indicators to assess adequacy, regular and timely updates, the existence of consultative bodies and the involvement of social partners. A timely and effective involvement of the latterA timely and effective collaboration and/or cooperation with the social partners is another element of good governance that allows for an informed and inclusive decision-making process.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 292 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) Minimum wages are considered adequatefair if they are fair in relation to the wage distribution in the country and if they provide a decent standard of living. The adequacylevels of statutory minimum wages isare determined in view of the national socio- economic conditions, including employment growth, competitiveness as well as regional and sectoral levels and developments. Their adequacy should be assessed at least in relation to their purchasing power, to the productivity developments and to their relation to the gross wage levels, distribution and growth. The use of indicators commonly used at international level, such as 60% of the gross median wage and 50% of the gross average wage, can help guide the assessment of minimum wage adequacy in relation to the gross level of wages.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 326 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) To promote adequacy of framework for minimum wages for all groups of workers, variations and deductions from statutory minimum wages should be limited to a minimumnon- discriminatory and proportionate, while ensuring that social partners are duly consulted in their definition. Some deductions to statutory minimum wages may bare justified by a legitimate aim, including overstated amounts paid or deductions ordered by a judicial authority. Others, such as deductions related to the equipment necessary to perform a job or deductions of allowances in kind, such as accommodation, may be unjustified or disproportionate.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 337 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) An effective enforcement system, including controls and field inspections, is necessary to ensure the functioning of national statutory minimum wage frameworks. To strengthen the effectiveness of enforcement authorities, a close collaboration and /or cooperation with the social partners is also neerecommended, including to address critical challenges such as those related to sub- contracting, bogus self-employment or non-recorded overtime. Moreover, workers should have easily access to appropriate information on applicable statutory minimum wages to ensure an adequate high degree of transparency and predictability as regards their working conditions.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 348 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
(25) Reliable monitoring and data collection are keyimportant to ensure the effective protection of minimum wages. The Commission should report every year to the European Parliament and to the Council its assessment of levels and developments in the adequacy and coverage of minimum wages on the basis of annual data and information to be provided by Member States. In addition, progress should be monitored in the framework of the process of economic and employment policy coordination at Union level. In that context, the Employment Committee should examine every year the situation in the Member States on the basis of the reports produced by the Commission and other multilateral surveillance tools such as benchmarking.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 359 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) The reforms and measures adopted by the Member States to promote adequate minimum wage protection of workers, while being steps in the right direction, have not been comprehensive and systematic. Moreover, individual countries may be little inclined to improve the adequacy and coverage of minimum wages because of the perception that this could negatively affect their external cost competitiveness. Since the objectives of this Directive cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can rather, by reason of their scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on the European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 371 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) This Directive lays down minimum requirementsa framework, thus leaving untouched Member States' prerogative to introduce and maintain more favourable provisions. Rights acquired under the existing national legal framework should continue to apply, unless more favourable provisions are introduced by this Directive. The implementation of this Directive cannot be used to reduce existing rights for workers, nor can it constitute valid grounds for reducing the general level of protection afforded to workers in the field covered by this Directive.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 392 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. With a view to improving working and living conditions in the Union, this Directive establishes a framework for promoting:
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 404 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) setting adequate levels of minimum wages;
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 452 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) ‘statutory minimum wage’ means a minimum wage set by law, or other binding legal provisions, with the exclusion of those set by a collective agreement made universally applicable;
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 473 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) ‘collective agreement’ means all agreements in writing regarding working conditions and terms of employment concluded by the social partners as an outcome of collective bargaining;
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 474 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5
(5) ‘collective bargaining coverage’ means the share of workers at national level to whom a collective agreement applies;deleted
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 482 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – title
Promotion of cCollective bargaining onminimum wages settingystem
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 488 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. With the aim to increase the collective bargaining coverage Member States that set minimum wages only through collective agreements shall take, in consultation with the social partners and in accordance with national laws and practices, at least the following measures:
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 502 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) promote the building and strengthening of the capacity of the social partners to engage in collective bargaining on wage setting, in particular, at sector or cross-industry level;
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 520 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Member States where collective bargaining coverage is less than 70% of the workers defined within the meaning of Article 2 shall in addition provide for a framework of enabling conditions for collective bargaining, either by law after consultation of the social partners or by agreement with them, and shall establish an action plan to promote collective bargaining. The action plan shall be made public and shall be notified to the European Commission.deleted
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 550 #
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 563 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States with statutory minimum wages shall takeestablish the necessary measures to ensure that theframework for setting and updating of statutory minimum wages ar. Such setting and updating shall be guided by criteria set to promote andequacy with the aim to achieve decent working and living conditions, social cohesion and upward convergence. Member States shall define those criteria in accordance with their national practices, either in relevant national legislation, in decisions of the competent bodies or in tripartite agreements. The criteria shall be defined in a stable and clear way.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 572 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The national criteria referred to in paragraph 1 shallmay include at leastsome of the following elements, whose relevance may be decided by Member States in accordance with their prevailing national socio-economic conditions:
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 580 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the purchasing power of statutory minimum wages, taking into account the cost of living and the contribution of taxes and social benefits;
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 601 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) labour productivity levels and developments.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 616 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall use indicative reference values to guide their assessment of adequacy of statutory minimum wages in relation to the general level of gross wages, such as those commonly used at international level.deleted
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 641 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure the regular and timely updates of statutory minimum wages in order to preserve their adequacy.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 658 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall establishnsure that consultative bodies are in place to advise the competent authorities on issues related to statutory minimum wages.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 674 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Where Member States may allow for different rates of statutory minimum wage for specific groups of workers. Member States shall keep these variations to a minimum, and or for deductions by law that reduce the remuneration paid to a level below that of the relevant statutory minimum wage, they shall ensure that anythese variation iss and deductions are non- discriminatory, proportionate, limited in time if relevant, and objectively and reasonably and justified by a legitimate aim.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 681 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may allow deductions by law that reduce the remuneration paid to workers to a level below that of the statutory minimum wage. Member States shall ensure that these deductions from statutory minimum wages are necessary, objectively justified and proportionate.deleted
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 708 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the selection and application of criteria and indicative reference values referred to in Article 5 (1) (2) and (32) for the determination of statutory minimum wage levels;
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 721 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the collection of data and the carrying out of studies for the information of statutory minimum wage setting authoritisupporting the consultation processes for setting the statutory minimum wage with information, data and analyses;
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 730 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Member States shall, in consultation and/or cooperation with social partners, take the following measures, where appropriate to enhance the access of workers to statutory minimum wage protection as appropriate:
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 746 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) develop guidance for enforcement authorities to proactively target and pursue non-compliant businesseemployers;
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 761 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
In accordance with Directive 2014/24/EU, Directive 2014/25/EU and Directive 2014/23/EU, Member States shall take appropriate measures to ensure that in the performance of public procurement or concession contracts economic operators comply with the wages set out by collective agreement, and their subcontractors, comply with the applicable obligations regarding wages in the field of labour law established by Union law, national law, collective agreements or by international labour law provisions for the relevant sector and geographical area and with the statutory minimum wages where they exist.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 769 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall task their competent authorities with developing effective data collection tools to monitor the coverage and adequacy of minimum wages.deleted
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 788 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii
(ii) the existing variations and the share of workers covered by them;deleted
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 794 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii
(iii) the existing deductions;deleted
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 798 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iv
(iv) the rate of collective bargaining coverage.deleted
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 814 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall provide the statistics and information referred to in this paragraph disaggregated by gender, age, disability, company size and sector.deleted
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 823 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
The Commission may request Member States to provide further information on a case by case basis where it considers such information necessary for monitoring the effective implementation of this Directive.deleted
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 828 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that information regarding minimum wage protection, including collective agreements and wage provisions therein, is transparent and publicly accessible.deleted
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 841 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. On the basis of the report issued by the Commission, the Employment Committee set up in accordance with Article 150 TFEU shall carry out every year an examination of the promotion of collective bargaining on wage setting and of the adequacy of minimum wages in the Member States.deleted
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 868 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that, 1. without prejudice to specific forms of redress and dispute resolution provided for, where applicable, in collective agreements, workers, including those whose employment relationship has ended, have access to effective and impartial dispute resolution and a right to redress, including adequate compensation, in the case of infringements of their rights relating to statutory minimum wages or minimum wage protection provided by collective agreements.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 889 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive or the respective provisions already in force. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 896 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Member States may entrust the social partners with the implementation of this Directive, where the social partners jointly request to do so. In so doing, the Member States shall take all necessary steps to ensure that the results soughet by this Directive are guaranteedcomplied with at all times.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 911 #

2020/0310(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. This Directive is without prejudice to any other rights conferred on workers by other legal acts of the Union.
2021/05/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2020/0112R(APP)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the role of the FRA as an independent and fully-fledged EU agency and fundamental rights watchdog should be further strengthened; in this context highlights the landmark judgment of the General Court of the European Union from September 24, 2019 which clarified that the rights of persons belonging to minorities is an EU value and respecting and promoting cultural and linguistic diversity in the EU is an EU objective;
2021/01/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 78 #

2020/0112R(APP)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point iii – paragraph 1 a (new)
Situation of national, ethnic, cultural and linguistic minorities in the European Union should be specifically mentioned as part of the mandate of the Fundamental Rights Agency; the Agency should conduct necessary research with regard to safeguarding their rights, preserving minority culture, regional and minority languages;
2021/01/20
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 30 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The Commission has, in its Communication of 11 December 2019 entitled ‘The European Green Deal’19 , set out a new growth strategy that aims to transform the Union into a fair and prosperous society, with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy, where there are no net emissions of greenhouse gases in 2050 and where economic growth is decoupled from resource use. It also aims to protect, conserve and enhance the Union's natural capital, and protect the health and well- being of citizens from environment-related risks and impacts. At the same time, this transition must be just and inclusive, leaving no one behind, aiming at reducing the development gap between regions. _________________ 19 Commission Communication - The European Green Deal, COM(2019) 640 final of 11 December 2019.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 47 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) The Union’s and the Member States’ climate action aims to protect people and the planet, welfare, prosperity, health, food systems, the integrity of eco- systems and biodiversity against the threat of climate change, establishing a balance between the need for development and the sustainable and climate objectives, in the context of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development and in pursuit of the objectives of the Paris Agreement, and to maximize prosperity within the planetary boundaries and to increase resilience and reduce vulnerability of society to climate change.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 80 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) The European Parliament called for the necessary transition to a climate-neutral society by 2050 at the latest and for this to be made into a European success story33 and has declared a climate and environment emergency34 . The European Council, in its Conclusions of 12 December 201935 , has agreed on the objective of collectively achieving a climate-neutral Union by 2050, in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement, while also recognising that it is necessary to put in place an enabling framework and that the transition will require significant public and private investment. The European Council also invited the Commission to prepare a proposal for the Union’s long- term strategy as early as possible in 2020 with a view to its adoption by the Council and its submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. _________________ 33European Parliament resolution of 15 January 2020 on the European Green Deal (2019/2956(RSP)). 34European Parliament resolution of 28 November 2019 on the climate and environment emergency (2019/2930(RSP)). 35 Conclusions adopted by the European Council at its meeting on 12 December 2019, EUCO 29/19, CO EUR 31, CONCL 9.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 182 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. The relevant Union institutions and the Member States shall take the necessary measures at Union and national level respectively, to enable the collective achievement of the climate-neutrality objective set out in paragraph 1, taking into account the importance of promoting fairness and, solidarity and just transition among Member States.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 183 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. The relevant Union institutions and the Member States shall take the necessary measures at Union and nat, national and regional level respectively, to enable the collective achievement of the climate-neutrality objective set out in paragraph 1, taking into account the importance of promoting fairness and solidarity among Member States.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 189 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. By September 2020, the Commission shall review the Union’s 2030 target for climate referred to in Article 2(11) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 in light of the climate-neutrality objective set out in Article 2(1), and explore options for a new 2030 target of 50 to 55% emission reductions compared to 1990. It will also have to include a cost-benefit assessment at Member State level. Where the Commission considers that it is necessary to amend that target, it shall make proposals to the European Parliament and to the Council as appropriate.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 213 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9 to supplement this RegulationBy 30 September 2025, the Commission shall set, on the basis of the criteria set out in paragraph 3 by setting out a trajectory at Union level tofor achieveing the climate-neutrality objective set out in Article 2(1) until 2050. At the latest within six months after each global stocktake referred to in Article 14 of the Paris Agreement, the Commission shall review the trajectory.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 238 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) best available and access to technology;
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 239 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) energy efficiency, energy affordability, reduction of energy poverty and vulnerability, assuring access to affordable energy, and security of supply;
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 242 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
(da) technological neutrality and the right of Member States to determine their energy mix
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 259 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point h
(h) the need to ensure a just economic and socially fair transition;
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 268 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point j a (new)
(ja) different national circumstances of the Member States
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 331 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall engage with all parts of society to enable and empower them to take action towards a climate- neutral and climate-resilient society. The Commission shall facilitate an inclusive, interactive and accessible process to ensure the broad participation at all levels, including at national, regional and local level and with economic and social partners, citizens and civil society, for the exchange of best practice and to identify actions to contribute to the achievement of the objectives of this Regulation. In addition, the Commission may also draw on the multilevel climate and energy dialogues as set up by Member States in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 340 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) 2018/1999
Article 11
Each Member State shall establish a multilevel climate and energy dialogue pursuant to national rules, in which local authorities, civil society organisation, business community, investors and other relevant stakeholders and the general public are able actively to engage and discuss and propose solutions for the achievement of the Union’s climate- neutrality objective set out in Article 2 of Regulation …/… [Climate Law] and the different scenarios envisaged for energy and climate policies, including for the long term, and review progress, unless it already has a structure which serves the same purpose. Integrated national energy and climate plans may be discussed within the framework of such a dialogue.;
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 904 #
2020/05/25
Committee: REGI
Amendment 905 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – table – column 1 – Outputs – row 1 – RCO 01 b (new)
RCO 01 b new - GDP/cap in the territory
2020/05/25
Committee: REGI
Amendment 906 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – table – column 2 – Results – row 1 – RCR 01 a (new)
RCR 01 a new - Gap between loss and created jobs
2020/05/25
Committee: REGI
Amendment 907 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – table – column 2 – Results – row 1 – RCR 01 b (new)
RCR 01 b new - Increase of GDP/cap in the territory
2020/05/25
Committee: REGI
Amendment 4 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges that Europe’s economy is showing signs of less dynamic growth; highlights that more must be done to support Member States which are experiencing slower growth and high unemployment, particularly where young people are concernedand those having to cope with wholesale depopulation, particularly where young people are concerned; points out that a shortage of labour in less-developed regions threatens to undermine the effective implementation of cohesion policy;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 32 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that the European Semester must consistently contribute to theincreasing competitiveness and elimination ofng social, economic and territorial inequalities and disparities between EU regions;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 42 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the European Semester should further economic and social convergence between regions and Member States by adjusting trade imbalances, reducing the excessive surplus and giving effect to existing sanctionsputting compensatory measures into effect; highlights the fact that the European goal of more inclusive growth means greater investment in infrastructure, education and training, health, and research and innovation; stresses that increases in productivity should lead to increased pay;a favourable climate for entrepreneurship, increased pay and attractive jobs.
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 58 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates the crucial role of cohesion policy, as the main investment policy in Europe, in the recovery process and recommends that the Member States act on the specific recommendations made by the Commission as part of the European Semester; underlines the need to increase the budget for cohesion policy for the 2021-2027 period, in order to maintain its European added value, thus contributing to economic growth, social inclusion, innovation and environmental protection;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 73 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the inclusion of the Sustainable Development Goals in the European Semester, and recommends that a balanced and stepwise approach be adopted with the aim of putting people, their health and the planet at the centre of economic policy; notes that, in this respect, special attention must be paid to the labour market, by safeguarding existing jobs and creating new ones; stresses that the New Green Deal must not hamper investment in basic infrastructure in regions where this is lacking;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 93 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the best response to citizens’ concerns is to support an increase in real earnings, seek greater investment in quality job, properly-paid jobs reflecting the developing fields of the future and new technological trends, boost domestic demand and ensure a fairer distribution of the wealth generated; considers that the Stability and Growth Pact should be more flexible so as to take into account cyclical conditions, structural reforms and government investment;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 108 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that the relationship between cohesion policy and economic governance processes under the European Semester should be balanced, reciprocal and focused on positive incentives; supports further recognition of the territorial dimension and expertise capacities at local and regional level, which would be beneficial for the European Semester.
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 31 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas the Common Commercial Policy, composed of trade agreements and legislative measures, should serve the objective of creating a stable, predictable and fair trading environment in which EU businesses can thrive and the interests of EU citizens are asserted;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B f (new)
B f. whereas 36 million EU jobs depend on exports outside the EU, out of which 13.7 million are occupied by women;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 46 #

2019/2197(INI)

B g. whereas according to a recent report by the European Commission exports to the EU from developing countries using special trade preferences (GSP) grew by 16.2 percent between 2016 and 2018 with an increase in its value from 158 billion euro in 2016 to 183.6 billion euro in 2018;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 71 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Welcomes the increase of transparency in trade policy; welcomes the decision of the Council to publish the mandate on the negotiations of Economic Partnership Agreements with the ACP regions on 13 December 2019; expresses satisfaction with the recent efforts of the new Commission to inform the EP more regularly about the state of play of ongoing negotiations, thus making the work of the Commission more transparent, such as making available detailed reports on specialised committees under CETA and South-Korea;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 75 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Strongly stresses that the Common Commercial Policy is an exclusive competence for the Union and that it requires the Union to speak with one voice in trade matters with the Commission as its negotiator;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 88 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for a substantive reform of the WTO, based on modernising its rule-book in order to make it more effective by providing structural and long-term solutions; encourages WTO members to reach an ambitious and balanced agreement on the long-standing issue of fishery subsidies during the ministerial summit in Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstanconference in 2021 and send out a clear signal that the WTO is still able to deliver on its negotiating function;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 95 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Regrets the lack of agreement in solving the blockage of the Appellate Body of the WTO, which materialised on 11 December 2019, and welcomes the initiative taken by the EU and 16 WTO Members to develop a temporary multi- party interim appeal arrangement that will allow the participating members to preserve a functioning and two-step dispute settlementsystem at the WTO in disputes among them; notes that the interim arrangement is a good step to overcome the current crisis; while encouraging a long-term solution including as many member states as possible; notes the Commission proposal for revisions to the Enforcement Regulation, commits itself to speedily find a position on the proposal;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 98 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Takes note of the dramatic change insignificant change of direction of the US trade strategpolicy over the past three years, which is focused on bilateral trade and often legally questionableand is concerned by the increase of unilateral trade measures; takes note of the limited progress made towards implementing the joint US-EU Statement of 25 July 2018; stresses the importance of relaunching the EU-US talks on the basis of the existing negotiating mandates adopted in April 2019 by the Councilstresses the importance of relaunching the EU-US talks to resolve issues of common concern, including disputes;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 117 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Invites the Commission to find negotiated solutions with the USA, which include the issue of civil aircraft subsidies, and recalls the agreement found on the allocation of higher share in the tariff rate quota for high-quality beef with the purpose of reducing tensions in transatlantic relations while safeguarding EU interests in the agricultural sectorengage US counterparts to find ways to de- escalate transatlantic trade tensions, including to find negotiated solutions with the US on the issue of civil aircraft subsidies;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 122 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Regrets the formal notification by the US on 4 November 2019 of its withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and recalls that the EU’s Common Commercial Policy should contribute to promote the realisation of the Paris Agreement;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 124 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11 b. Regrets that the current administration is considering withdrawing from the General Procurement Agreement; urges the administration to remain a party to that agreement;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 139 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Notes that, in the last report on the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights, more than 80 percent of the seizure of counterfeit and pirated goods originate from China, both in 2018 and 2019; calls on the Commission to explore further tools to address these issues and guarantee a full protection of IPRs;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 144 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14 b. Takes note of the recent bilateral agreement between the United States and China that could ease the current worldwide trade tensions; however is concerned about the possible impact of the agreement on the discriminations of the EU companies vis à vis US companies; in this context calls on the European Commission to conduct an immediate analysis of the text and take all the appropriate measures to defend the interests of our companies;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 149 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
Implementation of FTAtrade agreements
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 164 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Recalls that after the provisional entry into force of the agreement the two parties have created a solid partnership by accompanying the original text with important recommendation on trade, climate action and the Paris Agreement, trade and gender and small and medium- sized enterprises, that is the proof of the dynamic of a trade agreement in its implementation;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 167 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Reiterates its concern over the poor use oflow preference utilisation in the EU’s FTArate on EU exports reported by some of its preferential partners; notes, in particular, a large divergence in utilisation by the EUof preferences on the Union’s exporters ins to different agreementtrade partners and little divergence in utilisation between theof preferences on EU’s imports from different trade partners; calls on the Commission to further analyse preference utilisation; highlights the importance of flexible, streamlined, and easy rules of origin in this regard;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 184 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Welcomes the entry into force of the ESA and SADC EPAs and interim EPAs with Ghana and the Ivory Coast and regrets the lack of progress in ratification of remaining regional EPAs; expresses its support for the vision set out in the 2018 State of the Union address of a continent-to-continent trade agreement that should be an economic partnership between equals that would serve to support the SDGs;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 194 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Stresses that those three agreements consolidates the strategic dynamic of the European Union in a key area of the world characterized by a rapid growth of population and incomes with significant opportunities for our operators; furthermore by its stronger presence the European Union could create an alternative to the Chinese domination in the area;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 228 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Recalls its position expressed in its previous report on the implementation of the CCP; underlines that the 15-point action plan of 27 February 20188 set out by the Commission services represents a good basis for reflection in order to improve the mechanisms in trade and sustainable development (TSD) chapters; implementation; _________________ 8 https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/inde x.cfm?id=1803
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 233 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative for a European Green Deal and underlines that it should be comprised of a strategy that is ecologically, economically and socially balanced;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 238 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Believes that the current systemapproach already demonstrates some efficiencyallows to address issues of non- compliance with obligations, as seen in the framework of the EU-Korea FTA in which the EU has requested the establishment of a panel following South Korea’s failure to ratify International Labour Organisation (ILO) conventions on workers’ rights, notably on freedom of association and collective bargaining;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 243 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Recalls that the early efforts of the Commission and Parliament in the trade negotiations with Mexico and Vietnam paid off with the ratification by both countries respectively in November 2018 and Julyne 2019 of the ILO Convention 98 on the right to organise and collective bargaining;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 246 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Believes that TSD chapters in trade agreements should drivebe one of the drivers of the external dimension of the European Green Deal, aunderlines that any new carbon adjustment mechanism should be compatible with WTO rules as well as EU FTAs; stresses that EU companies that are users of intermediate goods should not be put at a competitive disadvantage;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 255 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31 a. Calls for a re-launch of negotiations for an Environmental Goods Agreement and calls for the Commission to propose unilateral modifications of applied tariffs for green goods if these can be identified to contribute to reaching the targets of the European Green Deal;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 270 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Recalls that the efforts to keep rules-based trade must play a crucial role in our trade strategy and in this context recalls the adoption on the modernisation package of trade defence instruments in 2018, and the new foreign direct investment screening mechanism; stresses that the new foreign investment screening mechanism should never be a tool for protectionism;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 286 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)
35 a. Welcomes the fact that these negotiations bring together a very large number of WTO members and calls for keeping them as open and inclusive as possible;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 296 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
37. Asks the Commission, in collaboration with Member States and business, to facilitate the use and understanding of rules of origin for SMEs; reminds the Commission of its objective to launch in early 2020 a dedicated rules of origin self-assessment tool for SMEs on the Access2Market platform, whereto help companies can calculateassess whether a product can benefit from preferences under a given EU trade agreement, as expressed in the letter of 13 November 2019 from Members of Parliament’s Committee on International Train order to the former Commissioner for Trade Cecilia Malmström, in order to improvfacilitate SMEs’ utilisation rate of EU FTAs, which is lower than the averageof preferences under EU trade agreements, and so that SMEs ultimately enjoy the full benefits of trade agreements;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 299 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38 a. Impact of the COVID-19 virus on trade Regrets the serious impact of the COVID- 19 virus and following lockdown of economies on global trade, both imports and exports to the EU being reduced and value chains interrupted and halted as a result;believes that the EU and its Member states needs to act swiftly to use trade policy as a tool to recover global economies and mitigate recession;is of the firm belief that the EU must ensure open, rules-based trade in time of crisis and avoid measures that restrict and/or distorts trade and similarly challenge such measures from third countries;all of which should be included in the foreseen review of EU trade policy in 2020; Strongly believes in the facilitating role of cooperation at international, multilateral, plurilateral and bilateral level alike;stresses therefore the importance of reforming and strengthening the World Trade Organisation, progressing on the current negotiations and in particular revamping negotiations for a swift conclusion of a plurilateral agreement on free circulation of medical equipment (Zero-for-zero), fulfilling the potential of a different and higher level of transatlantic trade relationship with the US and considering trade agreements as a way to help companies diversify their sources; Stresses that the EU must ensure open trade flows and sustained global value chains, and therefore refrain from export restrictions such as on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), of which the EU is depending on trade partners in third countries; urges those member states which restricts the flow of critical goods on the internal market to immediately lift their export restrictions and the Commission to apply a zero tolerance for such breaches against the rules of the Single Market; takes the view that the EU must carefully assess and identify critical sectors and societal vulnerabilities where the Union needs to secure its supply of products, and to seek effective and proportionate remedies in trade policy;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 306 #

2019/2197(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 a (new)
39 a. strongly believes that the current COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences on trade should be thoroughly analysed and should lead to a very rigorous lesson learnt process; emphasizes that some structural dependences revealed during the crisis notably in medical sanitary and pharmaceutical sectors would lead to a deep re-assessment of European strategy in this field having in mind the need for European strategic autonomy; is of the opinion that diversification of supply chains for medical products is certainly key to enforce this autonomy but other options cannot be excluded by principle and should be pragmatically considered, such as relocation of certain activities in Europe when economically and technically feasible;
2020/06/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #

2019/2195(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the COVID-19 crisis is having a dramatic impact on people’s everyday lives, including the economy, existing business models, mobility, education, physical access to culture and art; whereas the three programmes have also been significantly affected by the corona crisis; whereas in the aftermath of the pandemic it is important to preserve the cultural values of the European Union and to rebuild the European image for the future generations; whereas the cultural exchange and the connectivity that is facilitated through the three programmes will help Europe to come out of this crisis;
2020/05/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 10 #

2019/2195(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the Erasmus+, European Solidarity Corps (ESC) and Creative Europe programmes all have an impact on the daily lives of millions of Europeanpeople in the European Union, the Eastern and Southern neighbourhood, the Western Balkans and in other participating countries;
2020/05/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 41 #

2019/2195(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Highlights the importance of Erasmus+, the European Solidarity Corps and Creative Europe for the promotion of European culture; emphasises the positive impact of mobility, tourism and culture on our economies; encourages the participants and project developers of the three programmes to resume their activities post-pandemic in a sustainable way in order to engage with, and learn from, each other while improving local economies;
2020/05/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 43 #

2019/2195(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Deplores the Commission’s failure to propose environmental indicators for the new programmes; calls, therefore, for specific indicators to be incorporated into their operating rules to monitor the programmes’ contribution to environmental and climate goals in terms of objectives, financial and physical targets, guidance documents, communication, selection processes, forms of travel supported; calls for the data gathered to be made public once a year;
2020/05/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 49 #

2019/2195(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Commission to develop a common methodology to track and monitor climate-related expenditure that allows for a comparable calculation of the climate allocation to each programme;
2020/05/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 65 #

2019/2195(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the main stakeholders in the programmes to inform participants of, and actively promote, examples of good practice which they can employ in their everyday lives, as well as to inform the participants of the environmental impact of their actions, perhaps by means of a digital application;
2020/05/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 71 #

2019/2195(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Encourages the national agencies and project developers to improve the sustainability of their projects, such as by considering sustainable promotional material and by encouraging participants to create sustainable consumption habits;
2020/05/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 95 #

2019/2195(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission to investigate and promote synergies on sustainability between Erasmus+, European Solidarity Corps and Creative Europe and other European programmes and initiatives, such as LIFE, Horizon Europe and the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT);
2020/05/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 111 #

2019/2195(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Recognises that participants of Erasmus+ travel across their host country and beyond to explore the local culture; calls upon the national agencies and project staff to encourage ‘slow travel’, eco-tourism and the use of environmentally sustainable travel options for long-distance as well as local travel;
2020/05/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 115 #

2019/2195(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses the value of the ‘eTwinning’ network aimed at teachers, which enables them to develop and share training modules, particularly on sustainability and climate change, this year’s topics; calls on the Commission to disseminate as widely as possible the annual report on this priority as well as the handy kit for teachers;
2020/05/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 134 #

2019/2195(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the Commission and national agencies to promote projects in less popular destinations to stimulate the development of the local economy and sustainability while encouraging the exploration of new destinations;
2020/05/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 155 #

2019/2195(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Urges the Commission to investigate the scope for synergies with Horizon Europe and the new knowledge and innovation community focusing on the culture and creation sector in the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT);deleted
2020/05/07
Committee: CULT
Amendment 1 #

2019/2169(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that the EU institutions must evaluate existing programmes before drafting new EU legislation so that measures that do not work are not re- launchedCalls on the European Commission to evaluate existing programmes and data in the field of education, culture and media in order to be able to adopt a new Action Plan for Equality in due time, having a clear strategy on how to address persisting gender inequality in the cultural and creative sectors, in media, education and sports by implementing, among others, the measures proposed in the new strategy "A Union of Equality: Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025" from 5 March 2020;
2020/04/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 2 #

2019/2169(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that anti-discrimination 2. legislation for equal opportunities between men and women must be implemented using a practical approach that does not pit women against men; Notes with concern the persisting gender pay gap in the cultural and creative sectors, calls for increasing transparency of anonymous remuneration data to identify salary gaps, invites the Commission to assess whether equality of pay and transparency of pay scales could become conditions of funding from Creative Europe, asks the Commission to publish information of successful female- led projects funded under Creative Europe scheme; notes that a recent report by UNESCO, Gender Equality: Heritage and Creativity1a calls for strengthening the evidence base “through regular and systematic collection and dissemination by national statistical offices of sex- disaggregated data in all areas of the cultural sector; _________________ 1a http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/doc uments/gender-equality-heritage-and- creativity-2014-en_1.pdf
2020/04/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 3 #

2019/2169(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Considers it imperative to take care alls on the European Commission to build on past initiatives launched by the Creative Europe Media Sub-Programme to devise a strategy with indicators, objectives and monitoring sport that a change in gender identity does not lead to a biological man competing against a biological woman, because this would further disadvantage women in sportystem including the production of regular statistics assessing the evolution of the situation at European level, the adoption of specific measures fostering gender balance across the existing schemes, and a structured dialogue with relevant stakeholders;
2020/04/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 5 #

2019/2169(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that mothers and fathers should receive more social recognition for caring for their children and parenting, taking iNotes with concern that women are still underrepresented in sport, both in participation and in governance; emphasises that although the number of women actively involved in sport has significantly increased, only 20%-30% of all sports coaches in Europe are women; stresses that the gender pay gap in sport is persistento accountnd even greater thatn they are investing in the future of society by raising and bringing up their childrenverage gender pay gap at the highest levels; stresses that there are still significant differences in the media coverage of sport;
2020/04/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 6 #

2019/2169(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the view that the national statistical offices of thCalls on Member States to foster initiatives that encourage gender equality and equal participation in decision- making roles in sports, enable Mfember States should, if possible, check wheale athletes to reconcile their a gender-based value for invisible work in the area of solidarity between gefamily and professional sporting life, and seek to reduce the gender-based remunerations gap and the contribution of this work to national GDP is included in the respective national calculation systemaward disparities, as well as any kind of stereotypes and harassment in sports;
2020/04/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 7 #

2019/2169(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the importance of local and regional authorities in promoting equal opportunities for men and women should be emphasisedCalls on Member States, in cooperation with their gender equality bodies, to work closely with sports organisations to pay particular attention to the gender dimension by encouraging female participation in sports from the earliest age, as well as in its governance structures;
2020/04/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 8 #

2019/2169(INI)

7. Believes that the reservations expressed by some Member States against the Istanbul Convention should be respected, and Member States should not be Calls on Member States to strive for more gender balance in education as in most Member States women represent vast majority of education fields graduates and women are over-reprevsented from addressing the societal problem of gender-based violence between persons using existing tools.as teachers; empowering girls through education should find a balanced way across all sectors and fields, including STEM areas where women are under- represented;
2020/04/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 10 #

2019/2169(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Encourages the Commission and Member States to ensure the creation of mechanisms throughout the education system to facilitate the promotion, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of gender equality in educational institutions;
2020/04/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 12 #

2019/2169(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Highlights the fact that although women in the field of media at graduate level constitute a substantial workforce, they are underrepresented in management and top-level positions; considers that both public and private media services have a responsibility to ensure equality between women and men and prevent any discrimination; calls on the Member States to develop policy incentives to reduce barriers to women’s access to management posts and leadership in media organisations; Notes that female participation on an equal level with men in reporting content and serving information sources is crucial not only for reasons of representation, but also for reasons of equal opportunities and the full recognition of their expertise and knowledge;
2020/04/14
Committee: CULT
Amendment 7 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that cohesion policy is based on a policy of solidarity, pursuing its Treaty-posed objective of promoting and supporting the overall harmonious development of Member States and regions, and aims to reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between and within EU regions, to promote regional cooperation and to iensure that no region is left behind; considers that it creates growth and jobs across the Union as well as delivering key Union objectives and priorities, including its climate and energy targets, infrastructure and smart, sustainable and inclusive economic growth;
2041/01/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 12 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Calls on the Commission to also address the overseas territories of the Member States, in which more than 5 million Union citizens are residing, considering that the sport component of the Erasmus+ programme has been a successful endeavour, contributing to the cohesion and development of a common European society;
2020/01/28
Committee: CULT
Amendment 13 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6 d. Calls in this regard for a realistic increase of the budget lines under the 2021-2027MFF for the distance bands on the sport chapter, including towards transnational meetings within the Erasmus+ sport programme, accounting also for distances larger than 3000 kilometres;
2020/01/28
Committee: CULT
Amendment 14 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 e (new)
6 e. Considers therefore important an increased effort towards adapting the travel fees for the distance band of more than 3000 kilometres, in accordance with the budget of key action 1 in the Erasmus+ programme;
2020/01/28
Committee: CULT
Amendment 20 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and the Council to consider the lessons of this programming period and avoid any further payment crises; draws attention that delays in funded programme launches and late project implementation are resulting in a logjam of payment requests at the end of the programming period;
2041/01/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 26 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the Structural Reform Support Programme funding will be financed using the Global Margin for Commitments; warns that increases should come at no expense to cohesion policy; stresses that cohesion funding must be a priority following development of basic infrastructure, especially in regions that are lagging far behind;
2041/01/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 30 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for a reprogramming exercise for the Youth Employment Initiative, following the agreement in the 2019 budgetary procedure to increase the level of commitment appropriations; stresses the need to channel funding into specific measures aimed at limiting the exodus of young people from less developed regions;
2041/01/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 41 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure the transparent, fair and responsible use of Union resources.;
2041/01/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 26 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) In the face of blockage of dispute settlement and in the absence of a definitive judicial ruling, the Union will be unable to enforce international trade agreements. Therefore, it is appropriate to extend the scope of Regulation (EU) No 654/2014 to such situations.
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 27 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) To this end, the Union should be able to expeditiously suspend obligations under international trade agreements, including regional or bilateral agreements, when effective recourse to a binding dispute settlement mechanism is not possible because the third country has rendered it impossible for the Union to do so, provided the Union has appropriately challenged those measures in front of the relevant dispute settlement body.
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) Given mounting tension in international trade and in the context of the crisis facing the WTO, the Union should be able to react swiftly in the event of unreasonable or discriminatory measures taken against it. The Union should be able to impose provisional measures in the event of a clear violation of trade obligations by a third country, which causes or threatens to cause serious injury to the Union's commercial interests or jeopardises its strategic autonomy.
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 49 #

2019/0273(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point ba (new)
Regulation (EU) No 654/2014
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(ba) the following point (da) is inserted: (da) In the event of the adoption by a third country of unreasonable or discriminatory measures, a clear violation of its trade obligations towards the Union, which could cause or threaten serious injury to the Union's commercial interests or jeopardise strategic autonomy, provided that the Union has appropriately challenged those measures in front of the relevant dispute settlement body.
2020/06/05
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2019/0183(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) To mitigate the economic and social impact of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union without an agreement and to show solidarity with the most affected Member States in such exceptional circumstances, Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 should be amended to support related public expenditure.
2019/10/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 25 #

2019/0183(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8)8. To maintain the availability of the Fund for natural disasters, its original purpose, a budgetary ceiling for support related to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union without an agreement should be established. The Commission should introduce clear criteria regarding eligibility for support and ensure that the amount of expenditure incurred does not have a major impact on the budget earmarked by the Fund for initial measures.
2019/10/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 63 #

2019/0183(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002
Article 3 b - paragraph 1
(1) Assistance provided under Article 3a shall cover only the financial burden borne by a Member State compared to the situation where an agreement between the Union and the United Kingdom would have been concluded. Such assistance may be used, for example, to provide support to businesses and workers affected by the withdrawal without an agreement, including support to State aid measures for those businesses and related interventions; measures to preserve existing employment; and to ensure the functioning of border, customs, sanitary and phytosanitary controls, including additional personnel and infrastructure.
2019/10/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 72 #

2019/0183(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002
Article 4 a – paragraph 1
(1) The responsible national authorities of a Member State may submit a single application to the Commission for a financial contribution from the Fund in accordance with Article 3a by 30 April 2020 at the latest. The application shall include, as a minimum, all relevant information on the effects on the Member States and the financial burden inflicted on that Member State. It shall describe the public measures taken in response to the withdrawal without an agreement specifying their net cost until 31 December 2020 and the reasons why they could not have been avoided through preparedness measures. It should also include the justification concerning direct effect of the withdrawal without an agreement.
2019/10/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 17 #

2018/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates its full commitment to the enduring value of multilateralism and calls for a trade agenda based on free, fair and rule-based trade for the benefit of all, which supports the sustainable development agenda by including social, environmental and human rights, and ensuring that multilaterally agreed and harmonised rules are uniformly applied to all; stresses that the WTO must also contribute to promoting fair trade and combating unfair practices;
2018/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 37 #

2018/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Shares the view that, as a way to address the root causes of the current crisis, it is necessary for the WTO to develop new rules to address current gaps in the rulebook in order to level the playing as regards subsidies and state-owned enterprises, investment market access and regulatory barriers to services and investment; believes that in order to remain relevant, the WTO also needs to address new challenges in areas such as: e- commerce; digital trade; global value chains; public procurement; domestic regulation for services; micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs); and greater compatibility between trade, labour and environmental agendas; welcomes, in this regard, the joint statements that were adopted in Buenos Aires on e-commerce, domestic regulation, investment facilitation and women’s economic empowerment, as well as the work that has been done on these issues since then; stresses how important it is for its members to abide by and properly enforce the rules laid down by the WTO;
2018/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2018/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that the regulation of e- commerce represents a real challenge at international level and that digital technology must, therefore, be an integral part of the work carried out by the WTO, including during the process of modernising it; stresses that the European Union should emphasise its rules on privacy and data protection so that they may be promoted at international level and become a benchmark for the development of international and multilateral standards;
2018/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2018/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Recalls that access to public procurement is one of the European Union’s priorities in its trade negotiations and that, as such, the fulfilment of WTO members’ commitments to sign up to the agreement on government procurement, to improve the functioning of the agreement and compliance with its provisions is expected in a spirit of reciprocity and mutual benefit; notes that for any potential improvements in the oversight of state aid and the role of public companies to be fully effective, progress must be made in this area;
2018/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 59 #

2018/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Points out that SMEs are the driving force of the global economy and calls on the WTO to pay particular attention to SMEs and to include specific provisions for them at all stages of its work and in the drafting of multilateral and plurilateral rules;
2018/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 78 #

2018/2084(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses how important it is that the European Union and the WTO continue and redouble their international cooperation efforts with other international organisations such as the United Nations, the OECD, the World Customs Organisation and the ILO, given the wide variety of subjects and sectors that international trade currently encompasses;
2018/10/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 19 #

2018/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes with concern that commercial export-oriented agriculture remains the largesan important driver of global deforestation and that around half of all portion of tropical deforestation since 2000 has beens has occurred due to the illegal conversion of forests to commercial agriculture;
2018/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 40 #

2018/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Urges the EU to always include enforceable provisions in its TSD chapters to halt illegal logging and forest degradation, including through the possiblextensive use of sanctionsexisting enforcement mechanisms such as the dispute settlement mechanism; calls on the Commission to add such provisionmechanisms to already concluded FTAs through the revision clause;
2018/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2018/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for the EU to work towards a transparent, functioning and mandatoryeffective ‘social and environmental traceability’ labelling system for the production chain of timber and forest-risk agricultural commodities, in compliance with WTO provisions, and to promote similar action at international level;
2018/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 62 #

2018/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for the EU to develop provisions to enforce social and environmental standards for investors and to prevent investment activities which encourage deforestation and illegal logging.formulation of substantive provisions in TSD Chapters, including ambitious commitments pursuant of ILO Conventions and Multilateral Environmental Agreements, with a suitable civil society participation and an effective cooperation with local stakeholders
2018/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 28 #

2018/0358M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the EU’s new approach to investment protection and its enforcement mechanism (ICS), which has replaced the investor-to-state dispute settlement (ISDS); underlines the fact that ICS represents a modern, innovative and reformed investment resolution mechanism; notes that it marks significant change in the level of substantive protection afforded to investors and the manner in which investor-state disputes are resolved; recalls that the establishment of an independent multilateral investment court would give greater legal certainty to all parties; welcome the strong commitment of Viet Nam to the rules- based multilateral trading system;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 34 #

2018/0358M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the agreement will ensure a high level of investment protection and legal certainty while safeguarding the right of the Parties to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives, such as public health and environmental protection; emphasises that the agreement will ensure transparency and accountability; welcomes the EU’s new approach to Investment Protection and its enforcement mechanism of ICS which enhances the quality of individual approaches of bilateral investment treaties concluded by EU MS;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2018/0358M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the transparency rules applying to proceedings before the tribunals, which include provisions guaranteeing that case documents will be publicly available, hearings will be held in public, and interested parties will be allowed to make submissions; believes that increased transparency will help to instil public trust in the system, as well as ensuring that all human rights and sustainable development aspects are effectively heard by the investment tribunals; additionally welcomes the clarity regarding the grounds on which an investor can challenge, which ensures additional transparency and fairness of the process;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 66 #

2018/0358M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Encourages the Commission to continue its work on making the ICS more accessible to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs); underlines the potential for growth and significant benefits that are hereby made available to European Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, considering this sector of the economy of vital interest for European prosperity and innovation;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 36 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas Vietnam is also one of the fastest-growing countries in ASEAN, with average GDP growth of around 6.51 % from 2000 until 2018; whereas Viet Nam is estimated to continue growing at similarly strong rates in the upcoming years;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 37 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas the EU is currently Vietnam’s third-largest trading partner after China and South Korea, and the second-largest export market after the US; whereas EU exports to the country in the last ten years have been growing annually by an average of an estimated 5-7 %;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the EU-Vietnam FTA (EVFTA) is the most comprehensive and ambitious agreement ever concluded between the EU and a developing country and serves as a reference point for the EU’s engagement with developing countries; and especially with the ASEAN region;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 66 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that negotiations began in June 2012 and were concluded in December 2015 after 14 negotiating rounds, and regrets subsequent delays in bringing forward the agreement for signature and ratification; considers that any further delays can substantially undermine the EU’s geostrategic ambitions in the ASEAN region;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 72 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the economic and strategic importance of this agreement, as the EU and Vietnam share a common agenda and common values – to stimulate growth and employment, boost competitiveness, fight against poverty and make progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); emphasizes the geopolitical considerations that render EU partners in the Far-East as key players to engage with, in a complex local geo-economic environment;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 87 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Is convinced that the agreement will make further strides towards setting high standards and rules in the ASEAN region, helping to pave the way for a future region-to-region trade and investment agreement; stresses that the agreement also sends a strong signal in favour of open and free trade at times of protectionist tendencies and the questioning of multilateral rules-based trade; highlights the EU’s constructive engagement in the ASEAN region, remarking its strategic importance as a convinced supporter of the multilateral rules-based trading system;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 94 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines that the agreement will eliminate over 99 % of tariffs9 ; notes that Vietnam will liberalise 65 % of import duties on EU exports to Vietnam upon entry into force, with the remainder of the duties being gradually eliminated over a 10-year period; notes also that the EU will liberalise 71 % of its imports upon entry into force and 99 % will be duty free after a 7-year period; points out that the agreement will also contain specific provisions to address non-tariff barriers for EU exports; considers that the EVFTA can help in addressing the trade deficit of the EU with Viet Nam, tapping into the growth potential of the ASEAN country in the upcoming years; _________________ 9 EU exports to Viet Nam: 65 % of duties to disappear as soon as the FTA enters into force, and the remainder to be phased out gradually over a period of up to 10 years (for example, in order to protect the Vietnamese motor sector from European competition, duties on cars will remain for the full 10 years); Vietnamese exports to the EU: 71 % of duties to disappear on entry into force, the remainder to be phased out over a period of up to seven years.
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 105 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the fact that around 169 EU geographical indications will benefit from recognition and protection on the Vietnamese market at a comparable level to that of EU legislation, in view of the fact that Vietnam is an important export market in Asia for EU food and drink exports; underlines the potential for growth and significant benefits that are hereby made available to European Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, considering this sector of the economy of vital interest for European prosperity and innovation;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 107 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that some EU agri- sectors, rice among others, could be negatively affected by the provisions of the FTA; in that respect calls on the Commission to constantly monitor the flow of imports of those sensitive products and make a full utilization of the provisions of the safeguard clause regulation whenever the legal and economic requirements are met, in order to avoid any possible negative impact on the EU agri-sectors as a direct consequence of the enter into force of the FTA;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 115 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls that the EVFTA will help Vietnam go further in improving IPR protection, to the benefit of IPR owners and consumers, as Vietnam will accede to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) Internet Treaties, which set standards to prevent unauthorised online access to or use of creative work, protect the rights of owners, and address the challenges that new technologies and methods of communication pose to IPR; stresses the strategic importance of standard setting capacity in a region that is witnessing tendencies of decoupling on the normative and standardization fronts; reiterates that a lack of strong regulatory frameworks could trigger a race to the bottom and a negative competition on important legal provisions; highlights that a swift ratification of the EVFTA can guarantee the highest standards of production and best quality for consumers;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 130 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines that the EVFTA includes a robust, comprehensive and binding chapter on Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD) dealing with labour and environmental matters; stresses that the TSD chapter is designed to contribute to broader EU policy objectives, notably on inclusive growth, the fight against climate change and more generally in upholding EU values; emphasises that it is also an instrument for development and social progress in Vietnam to support Vietnam in its efforts to improve labour rights and to enhance protection at work and protection of the environment; stresses the importance of a swift establishment of broad and as independent as possible domestic advisory groups, which will play a crucial contribution in monitoring efforts meant to guarantee an effective implementation of the EVFTA;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 152 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses, however, that despite this progress, important challenges remain; welcomes in this regard the ratification of fundamental ILO Convention 98 (collective bargaining) on 14 June 2019 and the commitment by the Vietnamese Government to ratify two remaining fundamental Conventions, namely 105 (abolition of forced labour) in 2020 and 87 (freedom of association) in 2023, following the imminent adoption of the new Labour Code; recalls the significance of such commitments that portray truly positive trends in developing country, while stressing the vital role of effective implementation of the provisions on human rights and environmental protection;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 163 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the commitment to effectively implement multilateral environmental agreements such as the Paris Agreement on climate change, and to act in favour of the conservation and sustainable management of wildlife, biodiversity and forestry; recalls that the Agreement provides for specific measures to fight against Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU) and to promote a sustainable and responsible fishery sector, including aquaculture; recalls that Viet Nam is one of the most active countries in the broader ASEAN region in showcasing their commitment to the agenda of the Paris Agreement; emphasizes that a swift ratification of the EVFTA will contribute to ensuring the highest possible standards for environmental protection in the region;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 169 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point a (new)
(a) Acknowledges Vietnam’s engagement to address Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing by having become an official member of the Port State Measures Agreement (PSMA); notes that Vietnam has made clear commitments and has become a member on January 15, 2019 and that the PSMA is the first binding international agreement to specifically target illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing.
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 170 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point b (new)
(b) Notes that Vietnam has also adopted the revised Fisheries Law 2017; this law has come into effect on January 1, 2019 and considers the international and regional obligations, agreements and recommendations made by the European Commission.
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 171 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point c (new)
(c) Acknowledges that Vietnam has furthermore made various sub-law documents, implemented a national action programme on combatting IUU fishing, and intensified the dissemination on legal regulations to fishermen.
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 183 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines the crucial importance of implementing all provisions and chapters of the agreement, ranging from market access to sustainable development and enforcement of all commitments; highlights in this context the new post of Chief Trade Enforcement Officer, who will work directly under the guidance of the Trade Commissioner; reiterates the commitment of the International Trade Committee of the EP to assume an active role in the monitoring of the implementation of the EVFTA commitments;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 185 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Stresses that the entering into force of the agreement will create the conditions for a major and fruitful cooperation between the two parties in view of the effective implementations of the provisions on sustainable development which could bring about the improvement of the political and human rights situation in the country; underlines that a proper implementation of the EVFTA can advance Viet Nam in complying with European standards on environment, human rights, good governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR); welcomes in this context the commitment of Viet Nam to present its national implementation plan for complying with the provisions of the EVFTA;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 186 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Recalls previous experience which shows that correct implementation of FTAs and the presence of EU companies on the ground can lead to improvements in the human rights conditions, CSR and environment standards in less developed countries such as Sri Lanka or Cambodia; asks EU companies to continue to play a major role in bridging standards and good practices in order to bring about the most suitable and sustainable business environment in Viet Nam through the EVFTA;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 193 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses that the involvement of civil society in monitoring the implementation of the agreement is crucial, and calls for the swift establishment of domestic advisory groups following the entry into force of the agreement and for the balanced representation of civil society therein; suggest the establishment of an inter-parliamentary group between the National Assembly of Viet Nam and the EP for the speedy establishment of broad and as independent as possible DAGs; recalls the role of empowered DAGs in the pursuit of efforts to monitor and scrutinize the correct implementation of the FTA;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 205 #

2018/0356M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Acknowledges the institutional and legal link between the FTA and the PCA, which ensures that human rights are placed at the core of the EU-Vietn Nam relationship; points out that Article 1 of the PCA contains a standard human rights clause which can trigger appropriate measures, including, as a last resort, the suspension of the PCA, and implicitly of the EVFTA, or parts thereof, without delay;
2019/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 27 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) The Union is confronted with structural challenges arising from economic globalisation, the management of migration flows and the increased security threat, clean energy transition, technological change, access to digitalization, and an increasingly ageing workforce and growing skills and labour shortages in some sectors and regions, experienced especially by SMEs. Taking into account the changing realities of the world of work, the Union should be prepared for the current and future challenges by investing in relevant skills, making growth more inclusive and by improving employment and social policies, including in view of labour mobility.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 29 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Regulation (EU, Euratom) No [the new FR] (the ‘Financial Regulation’) lays down rules on the implementation of the Union budget, including the rules on grants, prizes, procurement, indirect implementation, financial assistance, financial instruments and budgetary guarantees and synergies between financial instruments. In order to ensure coherence in the implementation of Union funding programmes, the Financial Regulation is to apply to the actions to be implemented in direct or indirect management under the ESF+.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 46 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The ESF+ should promote flexible upskilling and reskilling opportunities for all, notably digital skills and key enabling technologies, with a view to providing people with skills adjusted to digitalisation, technological change, innovation and social and economic change, facilitating career transitions, mobility and supporting in particular low-skilled and/or poorly qualified adults, or affected by the globalization outcome in line with the Skills Agenda for Europe.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 71 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The ESF+ should support policy and system reforms in the fields of employment, social inclusion, healthcare and long-term care, and education and training. In order to strengthen alignment linked to the challenges identified by the social scoreboard within the European Semester,. Member States should allocate an appropriate amount of their resources of the ESF+ strand under shared management to implement relevant country-specific recommendations relating to structural challenges which it is appropriate to address through multiannual investments falling within the scope of the ESF+. The Commission and the Member States should ensure coherence, coordination and complementarity between the shared- management and Health strands of ESF+ and the Reform Support Programme, including the Reform Delivery Tool and the Technical Support Instrument. In particular, the Commission and the Member State should ensure, in all stages of the process, effective coordination in order to safeguard the consistency, coherence, complementarity and synergy among sources of funding, including technical assistance thereof.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 180 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall allocate an appropriate amount of their ESF+ resources under shared management to address challenges identified in relevant country-specific recommendations adopted in accordance with Article 121(2) TFEU and Article 148(4) TFEU and in the European Semester falling within the scope of the ESF+ as set out in Article 4.
2018/09/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 215 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new)
(b a) exchange of experience concerning the identification, transfer and dissemination of good practices in relation to sustainable urban development, including urban-rural linkages
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 356 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) In duly justified cases, where the Interreg programme cannot be implemented as planned due to serious problems in relations between the participating countries.
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 370 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
The co-financing rate at the level of each Interreg programme shall be not higher than 7085 %, unless, with regard to external cross-border or component 3 Interreg programmes, a higher percentage is fixed in Regulations (EU) [IPA III], [NDICI] or Council Decision (EU) [OCTP] respectively or in any act adopted thereunder.
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 396 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 5
5. Under external cross-border and component 2 and 3 Interreg programmes the ERDF and, where applicable, the external financing instruments of the Union shallmay also contribute to the external Interreg-specific objective 'a safer and more secure Europe', in particular by actions in the fields of border crossing management and mobility and migration management, including the protection of migrants.
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 425 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The Member State hosting the prospective managing authority, shall submit anone or more Interreg programmes for the relevant border are as to the Commission by [date of entry into force plus nintwelve months;] on behalf of all participating Member States and, where applicable, third countries, partner countries or OCTs.
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 431 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
However, an Interreg programme covering support from an external financing instrument of the Union shall be submitted by the Member State hosting the prospective managing authority no later than sixtwelve months after the adoption by the Commission of the relevant strategic programming document under Article 10(1) or where required under the respective basic act of one or more of an external financing instrument of the Union.
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 447 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point e – point i
(i) the related types of actions, including a list of planned operations of strategic importance, and their expected contribution to those specific objectives and to macro-regional strategies and sea- basin strategies, where appropriate, respectively the set of criteria and the corresponding transparent selection criteria for such operation;
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 476 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
The Member State may transfer during the programming period an amount of up to 510% of the initial allocation of a priority and no more than 35% of the programme budget to another priority of the same Interreg programme.
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 539 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. Technical assistance to each Interreg programme shall be reimbursed as a flat rate by applying the percentages set out in paragraph 2 to the eligible expenditure included in each payment application pursuant to [points (a) or (c) of Article 85(3)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] as appropriate.deleted
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 561 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 6
6. The managing authority shall publish the rules of procedures of the monitoring committee and all the datadecisions and information shared with the monitoring committee on the website referred to in Article 35(2).
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 593 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the values of output and result indicators for selected Interreg finalized operations and values achieved by Interreg operations.
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 617 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) as a flat rate in accordance with Article [50(1)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR].direct staff costs of an operation may be calculated at a flat rate of up to 20 % of the direct costs other than the direct staff costs of that operation, without the requirement for the Member State to perform a calculation to determine the applicable rate
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 646 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1
1. The managing authority of an 1. Interreg programme shall carry out the functions laid down in Articles [66], [68] and [69] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] with the exception of the task of selecting operations referred to in point (a) of Article 66(1) and Article 67 and of payments to beneficiaries referred to in point (b) of Article 68(1). Those functions shall be carried out in the whole of the territory covered by that programme, subject to derogations set out under Chapter VIII of this Regulation. By way of derogation from Article 68(4) of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], the management verifications may be carried out by bodies or persons responsible for such verifications in relation to beneficiaries on its territory (the “controller(s)”). The managing authority shall satisfy itself that the expenditure of each beneficiary participating in an operation has been verified by a designated controller.
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 659 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 3
3. By way of derogation from [point (c) of Article 70(1)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], expenditure paid in another currency shall be converted into euro by each partner using the monthly accounting exchange rate of the Commission in the month during which that expenditure was submitted for verification to the managing authority or the audit in accordance with [point (a) of Article 68(1)] of that Regulation. The method chosen shall be set out in the cooperation programme and shall be applicable to all beneficiaries. The use of the conversion rate as set by the programme shall be verified by the managing authority or by the controller in the Member State or third country in which the beneficiary is located.
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 664 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The audit authority of an Interreg programme shall carry out the functions provided for in this Article and in Article 48 in the whole of the territory covered by the auditors that Interreg programme, subject to the derogations set out in Chapter VIII.
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 671 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 9
9. The Commission and the audit authority shall meet on a regular basis and at least once a year, unless otherwise agreed, to examine the audit strategy, the annual control report and the audit opinion, to coordinate their audit plans and methods and to exchange views on issues relating to the improvement of management and control systems. with the participation of the Managing Authority
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 748 #

2018/0199(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) where the beneficiary is a contracting authority or a contracting entity within the meaning of the Union law applicable to public procurement procedures, it shall apply national laws, regulations and administrative provisions adopted in connection with Union laws;deleted
2018/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 144 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The ERDF should help to redress the main regional imbalances in the Union and to reduce disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions including those facing challenges due to the decarbonisation commitments through financial support for the transitional period. ERDF support under the Investment for jobs and growth goal should therefore be concentrated on key Union priorities in line with policy objectives laid down in Regulation (EU) 2018/xxx [new CPR]. Therefore support from the ERDF should be concentrated on the policy objectives of 'a smarter Europe by promoting innovative and smart economic transformation' and 'a greener, low-carbon Europe by promoting clean and fair energy transition, green and blue investment, the circular economy, climate adaptation and risk prevention and management'. That thematic concentration should be attained at national level while allowing for flexibility at the level of individual programmes and between the three groups of Member States formed according to respective gross national income. In addition, the methodology to classify Member States should be set out in detail taking into account the specific situation of the outermost regions.
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 158 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) This Regulation should set out the different types of activities the costs of which may be supported by means of investments from the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund, under their respective objectives as set out in the TFEU. The Cohesion Fund should be able to support investments in the environment and in TEN-T. With regard to the ERDF, the list of activities should be simplified and it should be able to support investments in infrastructure, investments in relation to access to services, productive investments in SME's, equipment, software and intangible assets, incentives during the transition period of regions in the process of decarbonisation, as well as measures with regard to information, communication, studies, networking, cooperation, exchange of experiences and activities involving clusters. In order to support the programme implementation, both funds should also be able to support technical assistance activities. Finally, in order to support provide for a broader range of interventions for Interreg programmes, the scope should be enlarged to also include the sharing a broad range of facilities and human resources and costs linked to measures within the scope of the ESF+.
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 187 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Within the framework of sustainable urban development, it is considered necessary to support integrated territorial development in order to more effectively tackle the economic, environmental, climate, demographic and social challenges affecting urban areas, including functional urban areas, while taking into account the need to promote urban-rural linkages. The principles for selecting the urban areas where integrated actions for sustainable urban development are to be implemented, and the indicative amounts for those actions, should be set out in the programmes under the Investment for jobs and growth goal with a minimum target of 610% of the ERDF resources allocated at national level for that purpose. It should also be established that this percentage should be respected throughout the programming period in the case of transfer between priorities within a programme or between programmes, including at the mid-term review.
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 205 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
(a) 'a smarter Europe by promoting innovative and smart economic transformation' ('PO 1') by: (-i) reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion of the Union
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 208 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
(a) 'a smarter Europecompetitive and a smarter Europe by strengthening its economic, social and territorial cohesion and by promoting innovative and smart economic transformation' ('PO 1') by:
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 270 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii – point a (new)
a) supporting the transition period in regions affected by decarbonisation
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 324 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) contributing to developing a sustainable, climate resilient, intelligent, secure and intermodal TEN-T ( Cohesion Fund for core network and ERDF for comprehensive network);
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 329 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii
(iii) contributing to developing sustainable, climate resilient, intelligent and intermodal national, regional and local mobility, including improved access to TEN-T (ERDF) and cross-border mobility ( Cohesion Fund for core network and ERDF for comprehensive network and outside the networks);
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 339 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iv
(iv) promoting sustainable multimodal urban mobility (Cohesion Fund for metro lines);
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 429 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. The Cohesion Fund shall support PO 2 set out in points((iv), (v) and (vii) of paragraph 1(b) and specific obejectives under PO 3 set out in points (ii), (iii) and (iv) of paragraph 1(c).
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 512 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) Member States of group 3 shall allocate at least 325 % of their total ERDF resources under priorities other than for technical assistance to PO 1, and at least 320 % to PO 2.
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 519 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 6
6. Where the ERDF allocation with regard to PO 1 or PO 2 or both of a given programme is reduced following a decommitment under Article [99] of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxxx [new CPR], or due to financial corrections by the Commission in accordance with Article [98] of that Regulation, compliance with the thematic concentration requirement set out in paragraph 4 shall not bebe accordingly re- assessed.
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 546 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
(e a) the socio economic integration of marginalised communities through integrated measures including housing and social services;
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 549 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e b (new)
(e b) the transition period in regions affected by decarbonisation
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 580 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) investments in TEN-T core network including access to the core network ;
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 596 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The amount of the Cohesion Fund transferred to the Connecting Europe Facility23 shall be used for TEN-T projects in accordance with Regulation(EU) 2018/... of the European Parliament and of the Council(CEF). _________________ 23 Reference
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 605 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) investment in airport infrastructure except for outermost regions;deleted
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 642 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) investment related to production, processing, distribution, storage or combustion of fossil fuels, with the exception of investment related to clean vehicles as defined in Article 4 of Directive 2009/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council26 and related to district heating; _________________ 26 Directive 2009/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles (OJ L 120, 15.5.2009, p. 5).
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 709 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
At least 610% of the ERDF resources at national level under the Investment for jobs and growth goal, other than for technical assistance, shall be allocated to sustainable urban development in the form of community-led local development, integrated territorial investments or another territorial tool under PO5.
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 716 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. Where the ERDF allocation is reduced following a decommitment under Article [99] of Regulation (EU) No [new CPR], or due to financial corrections by the Commission in accordance with Article [98] of that Regulation, compliance with paragraph 2 shall not be re-assessed.deleted
2018/11/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 771 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 1 – Policy objective 1 – Column 1– title
1. A smarter Europecompetitive and a smarter Europe by strengthening its economic, social and territorial cohesion and by promoting innovative and smart economic transformation
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 772 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 1 – Policy objective 1 – Column 2 – Outputs – RCO -01 (new)
RCO -01 - Regional average income
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 774 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 1 – Policy objective 1 – Column 2 – Results – RCO -01 (new)
RCR -01 - Increase of regional income ratio as defined in Article 3(3)
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 776 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 1 – Column 1 – Policy objective 2 – title
2. A greener, lowzero-carbon Europe by promoting clean and fair energy transition, green and blue investment, the circular economy, climate adaptation and risk prevention and management
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 797 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 1 – Policy objective 2 – Column 2 – Outputs – RCO 98a (new)
RCO 98a - Support transitional period regions effected by decarbonisation
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 806 #

2018/0197(COD)

RCO 34a – Number of converted jobs
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 826 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 1 – Policy objective 3 – Column 2 – Outputs – RCO 42 a (new)
RCO 42a - Additional socio-economic hubs with broadband access of very high capacity
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 827 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 1 – Policy objective 3 – Column 3 – Results – RCR 54 a (new)
RCR 54a - Socio-economis hubs with broadband subscriptions to a very high capacity network
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 828 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 1 – Policy objective 3 – Column 2 – Outputs – RCO 43
RCO 43 - Length of new roads supported - TEN-T2 (core and comprehensive networks)
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 829 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 1 – Policy objective 3 – Column 2 – Outputs – RCO 45
RCO 45 - Length of roads reconstructed or upgraded - TEN-T (core and comprehensive networks)
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 830 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 1 – Policy objective 3 – Column 3 – Results – RCR -55 a (new)
RCR -55a - Ratio of completion of the TEN-T corridor on the national territory
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 831 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 1 – Policy objective 3 – Column 2 – Outputs – RCO 47
RCO 47 - Length of new rail supported - TEN-T3 (core and comprehensive networks)
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 832 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 1 – Policy objective 3 – Column 2 – Outputs – RCO 49
RCO 49 - Length of rail reconstructed or upgraded - TEN-T4 (core and comprehensive networks)
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 833 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 1 – Policy objective 3 – Column 3 – Results – RCR -57 a (new)
RCR -57a - Ratio of completion of the TEN-T corridor on the national territory
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 835 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Column 1 – Policy objective 1 – title
1. A smarter Europecompetitive and a smarter Europe by strengthening its economic, social and territorial cohesion and by promoting innovative and smart economic transformation
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 836 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Policy objective 1 – Column 2 – Specific objective – point -i a (new)
(-ia) reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion of the Union
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 839 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Policy objective 1 – Column 3 – Outputs – CCO -01 a (new)
CCO -01a - Enterprises supported for sustainable economical activity
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 841 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Policy objective 1 – Column 4 – Results – CCR -01 a (new)
CCR -01a - Increase of regional income ratio
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 846 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Policy objective 2 – Column 2 – Specific objective – point iii a (new)
(iii a) Supporting the transition period in regions affected by decarbonisation
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 848 #

2018/0197(COD)

CCO 08a - Development of replacing enterprises
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 849 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Policy objective 2 – Column 4 – Results – CCR 07 a (new)
CCR 07a - Number of jobs created
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 853 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Policy objective 3 – Column 2 – point ii
(ii) DContributing to developing a sustainable, climate resilient, intelligent, secure and intermodal TEN-T (Cohesion Fund for core network and ERDF for comprehensive network)
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 854 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Policy objective 3 – Column 2 – point iii
(iii) DContributing to developing sustainable, climate resilient, intelligent and intermodal national, regional and local mobility, including improved access to TEN-T (ERDF) and cross-border mobility (Cohesion Fund for core network and ERDF for comprehensive network and outside the networks)
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 857 #

2018/0197(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Policy objective 3 – Column 3 – Outputs – CCO 16
CCO 16 - Extension and modernisation of tram, trolleybus and metro lines
2018/11/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 150 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) Particular attention shall be paid to rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition, and regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 183 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Part of the budget of the Union allocated to the Funds should be implemented by the Commission under shared management with Member States within the meaning of Regulation (EU, Euratom) [number of the new Financial Regulation] of the European Parliament and of the Council12 (the 'Financial Regulation'). Therefore, when implementing the Funds under shared management, the Commission and the Member States should respect the principles referred to in the Financial Regulation, such as sound financial management, transparency and non- discrimination. Member States at the appropriate territorial level, in accordance with their institutional, legal and financial framework and the bodies designated by them for that purpose, should be responsible for preparing and implementing programmes. _________________ 12 OJ L […], […], p. […].
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 210 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) At Union level, thea reformed European Semester of economic policy coordination is the framework to identify national reform priorities and monitor their implementation. Member States develop their own national multiannual investment strategies in support of these reform priorities. These strategies should be presented at the beginning and in view of the mid-term review of the programming period, alongside the yearly National Reform Programmes as a way to outline and coordinate priority investment projects to be supported by national and Union funding. They should also serve to use Union funding in a coherent manner and to maximise the added value of the financial support to be received notably from the Funds, the European Investment Stabilisation Function and InvestEU.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 252 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) The combination of a shrinking share of the working population and an increasing proportion of retired people in the general population, as well as the problems associated with population dispersion, are expected to continue to place strains, inter alia, on Member States' education and social support structures and thus on the Union's economic competitiveness. Adapting to such demographic changes constitutes one of the core challenges that Member States and regions are to face in the years to come, and as such should be given a particularly high level of consideration for the regions most affected by demographic change.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 320 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 61
(61) Objective criteria should be established for designating eligible regions and areas for support from the Funds. To this end, the identification of the regions and areas at Union level should be based on the common system of classification of the regions established by Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council23 , as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 868/201424the latest available list of NUTS II regions for which the necessary data can be provided by EUROSTAT. _________________ 23 Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) (OJ L 154, 21.6.2003, p. 1). 24 Commission Regulation (EU) No 868/2014 of 8 August 2014 amending the annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) (OJ L 241, 13.8.2014, p. 1).
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 392 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) a smarter Europecompetitive and a smarter Europe by strengthening its economic, social and territorial cohesion and by promoting innovative and smart economic transformation;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 487 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Each Member State shall organise a partnership with the competent regional and local authorities. That partnership shall include also at least the following partners:
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 552 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The Member State shall submit the Partnership Agreement to the Commission before or at the same time as the submission of the first programme, but not later than December 31, 2021.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 561 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. Interreg and AMIF, ISF and BMVI programmes may be submitted to the Commission before the submission of the Partnership Agreement.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 582 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the selected policy objectives indicating by which of the Funds and programmes they will be pursued and a justification thereto, and where relevant, a justification for using the delivery mode of the InvestEU, taking into account, among others, relevant country-specific recommendations;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 601 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) complementarities and synergies between the Funds and other Union instruments, including LIFE strategic integrated projects and strategic nature projects;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 606 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) where relevant, the breakdown of financial resources by category of regions drawn up in accordance with Article 102(2) and the amounts of allocations proposed to be transferred between categories of regions pursuant to Article 105;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 612 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) if this is the case, the amounts to be contributed to InvestEU by Fund and by category of regions;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 624 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(g a) h) where appropriate, an integrated approach to address the demographic challenges of regions or specific needs of geographical areas which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps as referred to in Article174 TFEU.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 643 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall assess the Partnership Agreement and its compliance with this Regulation and with the Fund- specific rules. In its assessment, the Commission shall, in particular, take into account the provisions of Articles 4 and 8 and, if this is the case, relevant country-specific recommendations.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 650 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission may make observations within threewo months of the date of submission by the Member State of the Partnership Agreement.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 653 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. TWithin one month the Member State shall review the Partnership Agreement taking into account the observations made byreceived from the Commission.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 657 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall adopt a decision by means of an implementing act approving the Partnership Agreement no later than four months after the date of the first submission of that Partnership Agreement by the Member State concerned. The Partnership Agreement shall not be amended.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 660 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall adopt a decision by means of an implementing act approving the Partnership Agreement no later than fourthree months after the date of submission of that Partnership Agreement by the Member State concerned. The Partnership Agreement shall not be amended.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 681 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The amounts referred to in paragraph 1 shall be used, under the appropriate InvestEU window, for projects implemented by the respective Member State
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 685 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. The amount referred to in paragraph 1 shall be used for the provisioning of the part of the EU guarantee under the respective Member State compartment.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 700 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
For each specific objective, prerequisite conditions for its effective and efficient implementation ('enabling conditions') are laid down in this Regulation. Enabling conditions shall apply only to the extent and provided that they contribute to the specific objectives pursued within the priorities of the programme and that they can be influenced by those in charge of the programmes.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 740 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Member State, in close cooperation with the territorial level administering the programmes and by fully respecting the Code of Conduct of Partnership and Multi-level Governance, shall establish a performance framework which shall allow monitoring, reporting on and evaluating programme performance during its implementation, and contribute to measuring the overall performance of the Funds.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 752 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. For programmes supported by the ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund, the Member State shall carry out a mid- term review. The Member State and the territorial level in charge of the programme shall review each programme, taking into account the following elements:
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 785 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) the revision of the indicative allocations of the financial resources by priority including the amounts for the years 2026 and 2027;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 804 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) to support, as the best solution, the implementation of a relevant country- specific recommendation adopted in accordance with Article 121(2) TFEU and of a relevant Council recommendation adopted in accordance with Article 148(4) TFEU, addressed to the Member State concerned;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 805 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. A request by the Commission to a Member State in accordance with paragraph 1 shall be justified, with reference to the need based on an evaluation to indicate that is the best solution to support the implementation of the relevant recommendations and will include and shall indicate the programmes or priorities which it considers are concerned and the nature of the amendments expected.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 806 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. The Member State shall submit its response to the request referred to in paragraph 1 within two months of its receipt, and in case that the implementation of the relevant country- specific recommendation was not completed through other solutions, the setting out the amendments it considers necessary in the relevant programmes, the reasons for such amendments, identifying the programmes concerned and outlining the nature of the amendments proposed and their expected effects on the implementation of recommendations and on the implementation of the Funds. If necessary, the Commission shall make observations within one month of the receipt of that response.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 810 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 6
6. Where the Member State fails to take effective action in response to a request made in accordance with paragraph 1, within the deadlines set out in paragraphs 3 and 4, the Commission may suspend all or, gradually, part of the payments for the programmes or priorities concerned in accordance with Article 91.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 816 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission shall make a proposal to the Council to suspend, gradually, all or part of the commitments or payments for one or more of the programmes of a Member State in the following cases:
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 839 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The suspension of commitments shall be subject to a maximum of 215 % of the commitments relating to the next calendar year for the Funds or 0,215 % of nominal GDP whichever is lower, in any of the following cases:
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 864 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall prepare programmes to implement the Funds for the period from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2027. Programmes shall be drawn up by Member States, in cooperation with the partners referred to in Article 6 and in accordance with the Code of Conduct for Partnership and Multi-level Governance.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 989 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission may make observations within threewo months of the date of submission of the programme by the Member State.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 993 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3
3. TWithin one month, the Member State shall review the programme taking into account the observations made byreceived from the Commission.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1002 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall adopt a decision by means of an implementing act approving the programme no later than sixfour months after the date of first submission of the programme by the Member State.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1012 #

2018/0196(COD)

2. The Commission shall assess the amendment and its compliance with this Regulation and with the Fund-specific Regulations, including requirements at national level, and may make observations within threewo months of the submission of the amended programme.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1018 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. TWithin one month, the Member State shall review the amended programme and take into account the observations made byreceived from the Commission.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1023 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall approve the amendment of a programme no later than sixfour months after its first submission by the Member State.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1044 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
The Member State may transfer during the programming period an amount of up to 15 % of the initial allocation of a priority and no more than 310 % of the programme budget to another priority of the same Fund of the same programme. For the programmes supported by the ERDF and ESF+, the transfer shall only concern allocations for the same category of region.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1059 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 6
6. The approval of the Commission shall not be required for corrections of a purely clerical or editorial nature that do not affect the implementation of the programme. Member States shall inform the Commission of such corrections. The managing authority shall notify the Commission of any decision amending the elements of the operational programme not covered by the Commission decision referred to in Article 18(4) within one month of the date of that amending decision.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1133 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Selected operations ensuring contribution to the specific objectives from which they receive financing shall comply with the territorial strategy.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1216 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) for the ERDF support under the Investment for jobs and growth goal, and for the Cohesion Fund support: 2,5 % for each payment application, but no more than 2,5 % of the total allocation;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1239 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) for the ESF+ support: 8 % for each payment application, but not more than 4% and for programmes under Article 4(1)(c)(vii) of the ESF+ Regulation: 5 %;
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1353 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1
1. The managing authority shall ensure that, within six months of the programme's approval, there is a website where information on programmes under its responsibility is available, covering the programme’s objectives, activities, timetable for calls for proposals, available funding opportunities and achievements.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1522 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 67 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
At all stages, procedures shall be implemented electronically and be fully transparent.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1749 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new)
(ca) in the case of state aid, the payment application may include advances paid to the beneficiary by the body granting the aid under the condition that those advances do not exceed 40 % of the total amount of the aid to be granted to a beneficiary for a given operation.
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1764 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 90 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) there is evidence to suggest a serious deficiency and for which corrective measures have not been taken;
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1787 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 99 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall decommit any amount in a programme which has not been used for pre-financing in accordance with Article 84 or for which a payment application has not been submitted in accordance with Articles 85 and 86 by 26 December of the seconthird calendar year following the year of the budget commitments for the years 2021 to 2026. In the event of payment stops on a legal or precautionary basis, an extension shall also be applied.
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1824 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 103 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
That decision shall also set out the annual breakdown of the global resources per Member State under the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg). The minimum overall allocation from the Funds, at both national and regional level, should be equal to 76% of the budget allocated to each Member State or region over the 2014-2020 period.
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1864 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 5
30% of the resources transferred to the CEF shall be available immediately after the transfer to all Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund to finance transport infrastructure projects in accordance with Regulation (EU) [the new CEF Regulation].deleted
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1866 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 6
Rules applicable for the transport sector under Regulation (EU) [new CEF Regulation] shall apply to the specific calls referred to in the first subparagraph. Until 31 December 20232, the selection of projects eligible for financing shall respect the national allocations under the Cohesion Fund with regard to 70% of the resources transferred to the CEF.
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1871 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 104 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 7
As of 1 January 20243, resources transferred to the CEF which have not been committed to a transport infrastructure project shall be made available to all Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund to finance transport infrastructure projects in accordance with Regulation (EU) [the new CEF Regulation].
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1888 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 105 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission may accept a proposal by a Member State in its submission of the Partnership Agreement or in the context of the mid-term review, for a transfer: of not more than 15 % of the total allocations.
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1895 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 105 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) of not more than 15 % of the total allocations for less developed regions to transition regions or more developed regions and from transition regions to more developed regions;deleted
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1900 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 105 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) from the allocations for more developed regions or transition regions to less developed regions.deleted
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1905 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) 70 % for the less developed regions;: - 85 % for economic projects providing sustainable jobs and growth - 70 % for other projects
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1920 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) 7085 % for the less developed regions;
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1929 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) 5570 % for the transition regions;
2018/11/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1962 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) 450 % for the more developed regions.
2018/10/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 2086 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Table 1 – Policy objective 1 - title
A smarter Europe bycompetitive and a smarter Europe by strengthening its economic, social and territorial cohesion and promoting innovative and smart economic transformation
2018/10/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 2155 #

2018/0196(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – Policy objective – row 2 – column 1
1. A smarter Europe bycompetitive and a smarter Europe by strengthening its economic, social and territorial cohesion and promoting innovative and smart economic transformation
2018/10/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 45 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that lower EU co-financing rates might result in difficulties for beneficiaries in the regions to access EU funding, as well as for the public budgets of those Member States bound by the Stability and Growth Pact;
2018/09/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 55 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses that decommitment rules should reflect the complexity of long- term investment programmes and should not result in additional burdens, so as to ensure effective budgetary implementation in line with single market objectives and the reduction of disparities;
2018/09/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 59 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Believes that the new provisions on thematic concentration should be more aligned to local and regional needs in the Member States, promoting genuine internal economic, social and territorial cohesion.
2018/09/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 62 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Indicates that the provisions should ensure an appropriate balance between national funding levels or as an alternative option for extending the scope of the fund where appropriate;
2018/09/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 68 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that, following the Paris Agreement, climate-related spending should be significantly increased compared to the current MFF and should reach 30 % as soon as possible and, at the latest, by 2027.
2018/09/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 21 #

2018/0138(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Notwithstanding the necessity and binding timelines, experience has shown that many investments aiming to complete the TEN-T are confronted with complex permit granting procedures, cross-border procurement procedures and other procedures. A single framework should therefore be introduced to monitor the synchronisation of procedures across cross-border projects. This situation jeopardises the on time implementation of projects and in many cases results in significant delays and increased costs. In order to address these issues and make synchronised TEN-T completion possible,, harmonised action is necessary at Union level.
2018/10/16
Committee: REGI
Amendment 24 #

2018/0138(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In the legal frameworks of many Member States priority treatment is given to certain project categories based on their strategic importance for the economy. Priority treatment is characterised by shorter timelines, simultaneous, simplified procedures or limited timeframes for appeals while ensuring that the objectives of other horizontal policies are also reached. When such a framework exists within a national legal framework, it should automatically apply to Union projects recognised as projects of common interest under Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013.
2018/10/16
Committee: REGI
Amendment 36 #

2018/0138(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The implementation of infrastructure projects on the TEN-T core network should be also supported by Commission guidelines that bring more clarity as regards the implementation of certain types of projects while respecting the Union acquis and striking a balance between development needs and the EU's climate change goals. For example the Action Plan for nature, people and the economy23 foresees such guidance to bring more clarity in view of respecting the Birds and Habitats Directives. Direct support related to public procurement should be made available for projects of common interests to ensure the best value for public money24 . Additionally, appropriate technical assistance should be made available under the mechanisms developed for the Multi-Annual Financial Framework 2021-2027, with the aim of providing financial support for TEN-T projects of common interest. _________________ 23 24COM(2017) 198 final. COM(2017) 198 final. 24 COM(2017) 573 final COM(2017) 573 final.
2018/10/16
Committee: REGI
Amendment 44 #

2018/0138(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) the responsible authority shall coordinate with the Member States on cross-border projects
2018/10/16
Committee: REGI
Amendment 7 #

2018/0095M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
C a. Whereas Singapore is the number one location for European investment in Asia, with bilateral investment stocks reaching €256 billion in 2016;
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2018/0095M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas it is arguable whether developed economies withwhile properly functioning judiciary systems should need to avail themselves oflessen the need for investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms, the establishment of an independent multilateral investment court would give greater certainty to all parties;
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2018/0095M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the EU’s new approach to investment protection and its enforcement mechanism (ICS), which has replaced the highly controversial investor- to-state dispute settlement (ISDSimproves the individual approaches, followed by the EU Member States, in existing Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs);
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2018/0095M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. NotesConsiders it essential that the agreement will ensure a high level of investment protection while safeguarding the Parties’ right to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives, such as public health and environ of both the EU and Singapore, and stresses that the new EU approach to investmental protection should ensure these principles in future agreements.;
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2018/0095M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the transparency rules applying to proceedings before the tribunals, which will help to instil public trust in the system. Additionally welcomes the clarity regarding the grounds on which an investor can challenge, which ensures additional transparency and fairness of the process;
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 53 #

2018/0095M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that the agreement represents an improvementbuilds on the investment protection provisions in CETA, as it incorporates provisions on obligations for former judges, a code of conduct to prevent conflicts of interests and a fully functioning Appellate Tribunal at the time of its conclusion;
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 54 #

2018/0095M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Emphasises that the long-term objective should be the establishment of an independent international court and therefore welcomes the Council mandate for the establishment of a multilateral court for the settlement of investment disputes(MIC) and encourages the Commission to continue its efforts reaching out to third countries to establish this Court as soon as possible;
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #

2018/0095M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes Singapore’s commitment to the establishment of this multilateral investment court, a public international court which should be empowered to hear disputes on investments between investors and states that will have accepted its jurisdiction over their bilateral investment treaties, and whose ultimate goal is to overcome the current, unbalanced and fragmented investment protection regime; considers the agreement a crucial stepping stone towards that end;
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 72 #

2018/0095M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Highlights that the agreement will replace the existing bilateral investment treaties between 13 EU Member States and Singapore, which are based on outdated investment protection provisions and include the controversial ISDS; considers that this constitutes an important step in reforming global rules on investment dispute settlement and, it is hoped, will progressively lead to the removal of ISDS from bilateral investment treatiestowards the modernisation of the approach to investment protection globally through an independent international court;
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 74 #

2018/0095M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Welcomes the agreement’s commitment by the EU and Singapore to sustainable development, workers’ rights and environmental standards. Highlights generally the importance of the Sustainable Development Chapters in free-trade agreements and considers them suitable and effective tools to promote international standards in labour and environmental protection, human rights, and good governance, while avoiding red tape for EU companies;
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 77 #

2018/0095M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Regrets the lack of provisions on investors’ obligations, including binding corporate social responsibility standards; calls on the Commission to propose legislation laying down mandatory due diligence standards in sectors other than conflict minerals and timber, such as the garment industry;deleted
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 89 #

2018/0095M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Encourages the Commission to continue its work on making ICS more accessible to SME, particularly for SMEs and smaller companies;
2018/11/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) has a strategic dimension and is the most important bilateral trade agreement ever concluded by the Union as it covers nearly a third of world GDP and over 600 million people;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 49 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Considers this agreement to be of major strategic importance and that it represents a timely signal in support of open, fair and rules-based trade, while promoting high standards at a time of challenges to the international order; stresses that this agreement will improve productivity, accelerate GDP growth and create jobs in the EU;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 69 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes in particular the ambitious level of tariff liberalisation (tariffs on more than 90% of the EU's exports to Japan will be eliminated at the entry into force of the EU-Japan EPA), combined with measures to safeguard the most sensitive products through duty-free quotas, reduced duties or staging periods; points out that the EU tariff on automobiles will be phased out over seven years;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 84 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that Japan will, notably, grant non-discriminatory access for EU suppliers to the procurement markets of 48 “core” cities, remove the ‘operational safety clause’, which has in practise prevented EU rail suppliers to access the Japanese market, and maximise transparency in tendering for public contracts;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 90 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. WConsiders that Japan is a highly valuable export market for European farmers and food producers, and welcomes that the agreement provides significant export opportunities for EU agri-food products, such as wine, pig meat and cheese, and that it protects 205 European geographical indications;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 126 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Highlights the fact that the agreement includes the commitment to pursue the ratification of fundamental ILO conventions; regrets that Japan has not yet ratified two ILO core conventions (on discrimination and on the abolition of forced labour) and expects, in light of commitments made in the EPA, concrete progress on the part of Japan towards the ratification of these conventions;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 140 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the inclusion of a review clause in the chapter on trade and sustainable development and calls on the Commission to trigger this clause as soon as possible in order to strengthen the enforceability and effectiveness of labour and environmental provisions, which should include the possibility of sanctions as a last resort;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 163 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. BConsiders that the agreement will make it easier for EU firms to provide services on the highly lucrative Japanese market and believes that market access commitments in cross-border services, including e-commerce, maritime transport, postal services and telecommunications, will give a significant boost to trade in services while safeguarding the pursuit of legitimate policy objectives;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 213 #

2018/0091M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Notes the draft Commission Implementing Decision of 5 September 2018 pursuant to Regulation 2016/679/EU on the adequate protection of personal data by Japan and notes that the agreement includes a rendezvous clause to assess the issue of cross-border transfer of data provisions within three years; calls on the Commission to fully respect the EU law on data protection and on the protection of privacy and stresses that any future outcome must be subject to the consent of Parliament;
2018/10/03
Committee: INTA
Amendment 10 #

2017/2285(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas in the 2007-2013 period, EUR 81 billion, or almost one third (31 %) of the ESIF was invested in transport infrastructure, which had a clear impact on GDP, business creation, industry, employment, exports and tourism; whereas the strongest impact of transport infrastructure investment was recorded in Eastern Europe and, more particularly, in the new Member States, to which 69 % of the total transport funding was allocated;, despite which investment in the European transport network has brought similar user benefits to all Member States.
2018/02/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 49 #

2017/2285(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the intervention logic behind EU transport infrastructure investment should remain a well-balanced construction of centrally managed and shared management sources in order to address policy and funding needs; recalls that the CEF aims to address centrally the EU-wide priority of TEN-T corridors, including safety and environmental aspects; recalls also that the ERDF and CF havehas a strong regional dimension that responds to local demand and they support the connectivity to TEN-T and mobility through secondary and tertiary nodes and multimodal terminals; stresses the importance of intermodal transport in terms of greater economy, sustainability and adaptability to local and regional needs and calls on the Member State authorities to support the development thereof; underlines, in this context, that the relevant budgetary envelopes for the three funding sources need to be strengthened in an even manner in order to avoid asymmetric distribution of investment between the levels;
2018/02/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 78 #

2017/2285(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for the creation of an EU transport infrastructure index as an additional eligibility criterion in order to accurately reflect regional and local demand; calls for account to be taken, in principle, of regional traffic volumes and the economic, social and environmental impact thereof in establishing infrastructural investment priorities. proposes that the index help determine the overall envelope of investments as well as the co-financing rates; suggests that the EU transport scoreboard could be the basis for the proposed index with complementary elements such as road safety, regional specifics and environmental impact, which could contribute to the accuracy of the assessments;
2018/02/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 81 #

2017/2285(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Expresses the view thatNotes the need for investment in basic transport infrastructures in the less developed regions with negative demographic trends or remote ones with low accessibility, which should also be targeted more intensively by ERDF and CF transport infrastructure investments, while additional sources and delivery methods should be expanded in the transition and more developed regions;
2018/02/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 119 #

2017/2285(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for a common European transport policy based on a funding framework that is integrated and coordinated with the EU transport instruments; considers that thematic concentration should be preserved in order to permit synergies between different funding sources at project level; proposes the creation of a single set of rules for all financing sources related to the thematic objective of ‘promoting sustainable transport and removing bottlenecks in key network infrastructures’; considers it necessary to streamline and accelerate both procurement, in particular by reducing delays and expediting complaints procedures in this connection, and state aid compliance procedures through standardised public procurement;
2018/02/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 126 #

2017/2285(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the work of the Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions (JASPERS), the European Public- Private Partnership Expertise Centre (EPEC) and the European Investment Advisory Hub (EIAH); urges the national authorities to avail themselves of the Commission and EIB support programmes ; expects, however, that the transport infrastructure operations of the EIB Group within the EU devote significantly more resources to providing comprehensive advisory assistance to authorities locally and to smaller municipalities at an earlier stage in the identification and pre-assessment of projects;
2018/02/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 9 #

2017/2282(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes with satisfaction that some new products have started to be exported to the EU; recommends however the consideration of a diversification strategy as concerns the basket of products exported to EU markets;
2018/05/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #

2017/2281(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Salutes the creation of some 1,500 jobs through support for small businesses and reiterates the need to continue incentivising the SME and start-up sectors, especially given their important contribution to economic growth, employment, innovation and business creativity;
2018/05/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 5 #

2017/2281(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that the ultimate objective of the DCFTA is to make tangible and sustainable improvements to the living conditions of ordinary citizens in Moldova, and as such urges the authorities to undergo effective reform processes to improve standards of living to this end;
2018/05/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 7 #

2017/2281(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Expects Moldova to continue its reform path not only in strictly trade- related areas but also in the rule of law, public administration, the justice sector, the management of public finances, media freedom, gender equality and stepping up the fight against corruption; encourages concrete steps in all sectors mentioned, in line with the expectations emphasized in the European Parliament´s Resolution on Macro-financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova (2017/0007(COD), recalling the several debates on the situation in Moldova and Parliament´s pleas for transparent reform efforts and strict conditionalities linked to tangible results in areas identified as needing improvement;
2018/05/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2017/2281(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls for an effective compliance with Trade and Sustainable Development clauses and international committments, specifically the proper implementation of ILO core conventions;
2018/05/04
Committee: INTA
Amendment 86 #

2017/2279(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises that efforts to consolidate the territorial dimension of cohesion policy require greater attention to be paid to peri-urban and rural problems, with a particular focus on to medium-sized towns; recognises that municipalities have the expertise necessary to coordinate major projects involving partnerships for developing urban-rural joint cooperation initiatives;
2018/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 96 #

2017/2279(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the importance of supporting rural areas in all their diversity, by valuing their potential, improving transport connectivity and very high-speed broadband and providing support to help them meet the challenges they face: rural desertification, the destruction of city- centre communities, the need to ensure access routes, areas without health care, etc.;
2018/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 104 #

2017/2279(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for greater account to be taken of certain specific territorial characteristics, such as those of island, mountain or border regions that are isolated and not readily accessible, when investment priorities are set;
2018/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 125 #

2017/2279(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Is convinced that a major challenge for future cohesion policy will be to provide appropriate support to these regions, and that cohesion policy must both reduce disparities and prevent vulnerable regions from falling behind, by taking account of the different trends and dynamics; urges the authorities of these regions to concentrate on establishing a favourable climate to attract investment;
2018/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 167 #

2017/2279(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Supports a strong thematic concentration on a limited number of priorities linked to major European political objectives, leaving managing authorities the task of drawing up their territorial strategies on the basis of their needs; stresses that employment, innovation, support for SMEs, transition to new technologies, climate change and the circular economy should constitute priority areas for cohesion policy in future;
2018/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 176 #

2017/2279(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Welcomes the adoption of the European Pillar for Social Rights, which represents a step forward in building a social Europe; reiterates its commitment to the ESF, the Youth Guarantee, the European Solidarity Corps and the Youth Employment Initiative in view of their role in meeting the challenges of employment, social inclusion, learning and vocational training;
2018/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 191 #

2017/2279(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Notes that vulnerability to climate change varies widely from one region to another; considers that the ESI Funds should be used as effectively as possible to help the EU meet its commitments under the Paris Climate Agreement; insists that funding under the solidarity instruments for use in the event of natural disasters should be made available as rapidly as possible; stresses the need for increasing convergence between the EU Civil Protection Mechanism and the European Solidarity Fund;
2018/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 277 #

2017/2279(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Supports a shift in cohesion policy towards a greater focus on results and greater public investment management accountability, moving away from an accounting-based approach towards one which focuses on performance and allowing managing authorities more flexibility as to how to achieve targets;
2018/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 290 #

2017/2279(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Stresses, at the same time, the need to make operational programmes genuine strategic documents which are more concise and more flexible by avoiding excessive regulation, establishing a simplified procedure for their modification during programming;
2018/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 353 #

2017/2279(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 a (new)
41a. Stresses the advantages of cohesion policy externalisation in highlighting the benefits of investment in less developed regions by Member States that are net contributors;
2018/02/28
Committee: REGI
Amendment 12 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that Chinese companies, including state-owned enterprises, are benefiting from widely open markets in the EU;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that EU outward foreign direct investment in China has steadily decreased since 2012, while China’s investment in the EU has grown exponentially over the past years; notes that since 2013, the flow of Chinese investment to the EU has surpassed that of the EU’s to China, with an increased activity in sectors of strategic or public safety importance for European Member States;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls that the current debates on an FDI screening mechanism represent one the EU´s efforts to adapt to a changing global environment, seeking to protect strategic sectors and areas of public security concern, without clearly targeting any of our international trade partners specifically;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for coordinated cooperation with China on the Belt and Road Initiative on the basis of open and transparent rules, in particular regarding public procurement, in order to deliver benefits to economic operators from both sides; recalls the Memorandum of Understanding signed by the European Investment Fund (EIF) and China’s Silk Road Fund (SRF) in June 2017, and looks forward to its tangible impact as concerns the establishment of a more beneficial business environment;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Supports the ongoing negotiations on a comprehensive EU-China Investment Agreement; calls for further reciprocity in market access; calls for further engagement on sustainable development;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 65 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the Notice on Several Measures on Promoting Further Openness and Active Utilisation of Foreign Investment, issued by China’s State Council in 2017, but regrets the lack of timeline for achieving its goals and therefore calls on Chinese authorities to swiftly materialise those engagements;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 69 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Recalls that EU companies face a growing number of restrictive market access measures in China due to joint venture obligations in several industry sectors and further discriminatory technical requirements and regulatory rules for foreign owned business operators, as portrayed by reports from EU businesses in China;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 84 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Expresses concern about the number of restrictions that European companies continue to face in China, especiallyincluding the 2017 Foreign Investment Catalogue and the 2017 Free Trade Zone Negative List, as well as in sectors covered by the ‘Made in China 2025’ plan;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 99 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Welcomes China’s decision to delay by one year the implementation of new certifications for imported food and drink, which would have dramatically reduced food imports from the EU; also welcomes the delay in implementation for the new standards for electric vehicles and calls for substantive dialogue and increased coordination regarding such initiatives;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 103 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Notes that a new Chinese Foreign Investment Law is in the process of being drafted; urges the responsible Chinese parties to strive for transparency, accountability, predictability and legal certainty, taking into account the proposals and expectations of the current EU China dialogue on the trade and investment relationship;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 106 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10c. Welcomes the ongoing negotiations for an ambitious EU-China agreement on geographical indications based on the highest international standards; noting that the negotiations started in 2010, recognises the need for substantial progress and calls for their early conclusion;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 107 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 d (new)
10d. Express concerns about the foul use of direct or indirect subsidisation of Chinese companies;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 108 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 e (new)
10e. Express concerns about the new Cybersecurity Law, which includes new regulatory barriers for foreign companies that sell telecommunication and IT equipment and services;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 109 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 f (new)
10f. Calls on China to submit an accession offer to the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA); regrets that the Chinese public procurement market remains largely closed to foreign suppliers;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 110 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 g (new)
10g. Notes that in 2016 China surpassed the Eurozone as the world’s largest banking system; calls on China to allow foreign banking enterprises to compete on an equal footing with domestic institutions and to cooperate with the EU in the area of financial regulation;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 111 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 h (new)
10h. Underlines the consequentiality of the new Social Credit System for the business environment, and calls for its implementation in a transparent, fair and equitable manner;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 112 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 i (new)
10i. Reiterates support for a bilateral investment agreement between the EU and Taiwan; recognizes that Taiwan, while being a major EU trading partner in East Asia, could also act as a springboard to China for EU businesses;
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 113 #

2017/2274(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 j (new)
10j. Calls on the European Commission to coordinate together with the EU Member states and under the consultation of the European Parliament to formulate a common foreign trade and investment strategy towards China
2018/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 34 #

2017/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that several regions have used their smart specialisation strategies to set priorities related to the circular economy and guide their investments in research and innovation through cohesion policy towards this objective; calls on the regional authorities to endeavour to implement these smart specialisation strategies.
2018/04/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 56 #

2017/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the importance of the partnership principle and the important role of stakeholders during the drawing up of partnership agreements and operational programmes; calls for a genuine involvement of partners in policy processes, with the creation of cross- cutting partnerships, and for circular economy-related objectives to be adequately incorporated into programming documents;
2018/04/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 63 #

2017/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that projects related to the circular economy which have received cohesion policy support have brought greater benefits to more developed regions; therefore encourages less developed regions torecognises the limited administrative capacity of less developed regions and therefore encourages them to request expert assistance and increase their efforts to achieve technological leapfrogging by implementing more projects that meet circular economy principles;
2018/04/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 68 #

2017/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines the potential of the bioeconomy for the regional development ; calls for greater use to be made of ESI Funds to be made for the implementation of existing innovations, through policies to encourage potential beneficiaries, while further fostering innovation in the development of bio- based, biodegradable and compostable materials produced from sustainably managed biofeed stocks;
2018/04/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 73 #

2017/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for better access to finance for local authorities to enable investments in green jobs and in local energy transition, including energy efficiency, decentralised distribution of energy and the circular economy; calls for financing programmes to be tailored to suit regional profiles, and for these to seek to exploit the regional potential for sustainable energies;
2018/04/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 82 #

2017/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Points out that, out of a sample of 32 operational programmes reviewed for a study on the integration of environmental concerns in cohesion policy funds, nine address the circular economy and six green jobs; welcomes the existing efforts made by national and regional authorities but at the same time calls on Member States to better integrate the circular economy in their operational programmes and partnership agreements; urges that support be granted to the regions to ensure as smooth as possible a transition to the circular economy;
2018/04/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 99 #

2017/2211(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Reiterates its views on the importance of adequate capacity building and maintenance in local, regional and national public authorities, which is also highly relevant for the transition to a circular economy; points to the important role technical assistance might play in this field; stresses the role that 'smart cities' initiatives can play in the circular economy by promoting green technology models as part of sustainable urban development strategies;
2018/04/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 35 #

2017/2070(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the Common Commercial Policy, as suggested by the Trade for All strategy, is a value-based policy meant to promote, among others, good governance, transparency, sustainable development and fair trade practices;
2018/01/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2017/2070(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Takes note of the growing might of Asia and of the USA’s gradual withdrawal on the trade front, generating uncertainty for trade internationally; calls on the Commission to adapt its trade policy to address developments at international level and to be more responsive; underlines that in this changing global context, the role of the EU in promoting a value based trade agenda is increasingly more important for European citizens;
2018/01/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 76 #

2017/2070(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Highlights that mutually beneficial trade and investment relations with EU strategic partners should be further promoted and enhanced; calls for renewed efforts to advance negotiations on the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment with China, particularly concerning reciprocity in market access treatment and progress on sustainable development;
2018/01/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 89 #

2017/2070(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Points out that the Commission has announced on more than one occasion the launch of negotiations about investment with Hong Kong and Taiwan, and deems it regrettable that no such negotiations have yet begun; urges the Commission to finish the preparatory works and to formally start negotiations on investment agreements as soon as possible;
2018/01/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 90 #

2017/2070(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Points out that the Commission has announced on more than one occasion the launch of negotiations about investment with Hong Kong and Taiwan, and deems it regrettable that no such negotiations have yet begun; urges the Commission to finish the preparatory works and to formally start negotiations on investment agreements as soon as possible;
2018/01/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 152 #

2017/2070(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the entire toolkit for SMEs, with a view to developing a more integrated overall approach and a real SME internationalisation strategy, supporting them in becoming exporters; encourages the Commission to promote this approach in international forums; supports the engagement in efficient information campaigns for SMEs in an effort to improve preference utilisation rates in EU FTAs; highlights the importance of multilingualism in addressing SMEs from all EU Member States;
2018/01/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 171 #

2017/2070(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 a (new)
40a. Emphasises the potential added value of a more structured and transparent relationship with Domestic Advisory Groups in trading partners, recognising their key role in a better comprehension of the local imperatives and local ambitions; considers that DAGs are vital in contributing to the processes required for a better monitoring and implementation of TSD chapters;
2018/01/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 173 #

2017/2070(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. Welcomes the review of the Aid for Trade strategy and supports the aim of capacity building for developing countries so that they can take greater advantage of the opportunities offered by EU trade agreements; emphasises, too, that the strategy must help to promote fair and ethical trade and work towards becoming a key tool in combating rising global inequality;
2018/01/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 181 #

2017/2070(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
45. Welcomes the adoption of the Conflict Minerals Regulation with its aim of contributing to more responsible management of the global value chain; calls on the Commission, Member States and other stakeholders to press ahead with preparations for the regulation’s entry into force; calls on the Commission to ensure the efficient devising of the accompanying measures, providing Member States and national stakeholders involved with the necessary expertise and assistance, having a special emphasis on accompanying SMEs in enhancing their capacity to fulfil their due diligence requirements, as stipulated by the Regulation;
2018/01/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 7 #

2017/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 4 (new)
– having regard to the Copenhagen criteria, and the body of Union rules that a candidate country must fulfil if it wishes to join the Union (the acquis),
2017/09/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 14 #

2017/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 11 (new)
– having regard to the Council of Europe’s Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities and the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages,
2017/09/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 15 #

2017/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Citation 12 (new)
– having regard to the study commissioned by the Policy Department C of the European Parliament at the request of the LIBE committees in 2016 entitled “Towards a Comprehensive EU Protection System for Minorities”,
2017/09/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 47 #

2017/2069(INI)

Ea. whereas experience shows that, pre-accession countries are more willing to respect the Copenhagen criteria on democracy, rule of law and fundamental rights and to advance the situation of minorities; whereas at present there is no adequate framework to guarantee the fulfilment of these criteria after accession and thus to protect EU citizens from the effects breaches of the Copenhagen criteria would entail;
2017/09/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 49 #

2017/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas, when laying down the citizenship of the Union, article 9 of the TEU expressly mentions that the Union shall observe the principle of the equality of its citizens, who shall receive equal attention from its institutions, bodies, offices and agencies; whereas, despite the fact that equality and non-discrimination are key principles of the European legal framework, European citizens belonging to minority groups can be treated differently, depending on which EU Member State they live in and contingent on their country’s history, on national and international political contexts etc.;
2017/09/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 51 #

2017/2069(INI)

Ec. whereas at present, except for infringement procedures, the EU has only tools of limited efficacy to respond to systematic and institutional manifestations of discrimination, racism and xenophobia against minorities across the EU Member States; whereas infringement proceedings do not cover threats falling outside the scope of EU secondary law;
2017/09/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 52 #

2017/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital E d (new)
Ed. whereas the Roma citizens of the EU make up the largest and most vulnerable minority group in the EU; whereas the Roma face multi-layered discrimination and social exclusion in Europe; Whereas EU soft law tools, such as the EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies (NRIS), have played only a limited role in ensuring that Member States respect their obligations to comply with fundamental human rights standards on minority protection and addressing institutional manifestations of discrimination;
2017/09/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 101 #

2017/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Is of the opinion that, in order to fill with substance the reference made to minorities in article 2 of the TEU, and to the equality of all EU citizens in article 9 TEU, the aim of the EU should be to lay down high standards of minority protection, starting from those codified in international law instruments, such as those of the Council of Europe. Such standards should be strongly embedded in a legal framework guaranteeing democracy, rule of law and fundamental rights across the EU;
2017/09/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 104 #

2017/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Believes that observation by the EU of the TEU requirement to respect, safeguard and enhance Europe’s cultural and linguistic diversity in the EU both among and within Member States would greatly reinforce the links between citizens and the European project;
2017/09/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 109 #

2017/2069(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6d. Believes that the systematic discrimination of Roma citizens in their home countries, as well as their evictions and expulsions when they exercise their right to free movement to and residence in another member state are in contradiction with the fundamental right of non- discrimination on the basis of ethnic origin and the right move to and reside in another member state and put the foundations of EU citizenship rights to the test;
2017/09/19
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 6 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas regional cohesion policy is one of the EU’s core policies, bringing Europe together with a high added value, fostering solidarity and bringing the benefits of European integration directly to EU citizens in all regions and strengthening its economy, and it is therefore key that sufficient funding for cohesion policy is provided for in the MFF;
2017/09/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 97 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for the Commission to look into the possibilities for greater synergies between the different EU funds, including cohesion policy, Horizon 2020 and EFSI because similar projects should not be governed by different rules merely because they are implemented through different EU tools;
2017/09/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 110 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that it is essential, in the context of the new MFF, to ensure that budgetary rules, and rules on cohesion policy spending, are at last simplified. so as to be beneficiary-friendly, result-oriented and flexible; calls on the Commission to extend the offer of capacity building support for local, regional and national administrations and beneficiaries;
2017/09/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2
– having regard to Articles 8, 10, 153(1), 153(2), 157 and 15207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 2 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
– having regard to the Commission’s report of 13 September 2017 on the Implementation of the Trade Policy Strategy ‘Trade for All’;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 60 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the impacts of trade liberalisation on individuals depends also on their geographical localisation and the sector of their economic activities;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 87 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas, according to the International Trade Centre, 40% of the world’s SMEs are owned by women;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 89 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas a review of current EU multilateral and bilateral agreements shows that only 20 % of the agreements with non-European trading partners make reference to women’s rights, and thatstudy recently published by the Commission shows that a gender gap persists in terms of opportunities for access to jobs and that, in 2011, only 40 38% of these agreements include references that aim to promote gender equality; whereas references in these agreements to promoting women’s empowerment are voluntary and almost all relate to non-trading aspects of the agreementsjobs supported by exports to the rest of the world were occupied by women; whereas another study shows that promoting women’s equality could increase global GDP by USD 28 billion by 2025;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 101 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas strong movements have evolved in several countries, criticising, in particular, provisions on investor-state dispute settlement / the investment court system (ISDS/ICS) and intellectual property rights (IPR), as well as non-tariff rules in TTIP, CETA and TiSA, that could lead to breaches of women’schapters on sustainable development should be included in any trade agreement negotiated by the EU, and whereas the purpose of such chapters is to ensure respect of and protection for human rights, labourthe rights, of the environmental protection, consumer rights and public services and good and workers’ rights; whereas the EU’s trade policy should not imply the lowering of any of the EU’s standards, and whereas public services should be excluded from trade negotiations;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 120 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas events such as the International Forum on Women and Trade organised by the Commission on 29 June 2017 enable many economic stakeholders and representatives of civil society to exchange and launch initiatives on the impact of trade on gender equality;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 129 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas special attention must be given to the negative consequences of trade liberapublic services, existing or future services of general interest, and services of general economic interest should be excluded from the negotiations on, and scope of appliscation as regards basic public services and goods, such as water and sanitation, education and healthcareof, any trade agreement concluded by the EU (including, but not limited to, water, health, social services, social security systems, education, waste management and public transport);
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 143 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that fair and inclusive international trade policies require a clearer framework aiming to enhance women’s livelihoods, strengthen gender equality, protect the environment, and promote social justice and international solidaritytrade can contribute to the development of sustainable growth and job creation; recalls that the EU’s trade policy contributes to the promotion and protection of human rights and the values of the European Union, including gender equality; notes that Article 8 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union stipulates that ‘in all its activities, the Union shall aim to eliminate inequalities, and to promote equality, between men and women’;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 152 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses that the EU’s trade strategy entitled ‘Trade for All’ does not mention gender equality; calls on the Commission to take this dimension into account in the conduct of its trade policy and stresses that trade negotiations may make it possible to promote gender equality on the international scene and ensure that both women and men can benefit from the advantages of trade liberalisation and be protected from its negative effects;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 158 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses how few data are available on the impact of trade on gender equality; with that in mind, calls for more data to be gathered on this topic; stresses that collecting this type of information will make it possible to improve analysis of the situation, establish a methodology and improve the definition of the objectives and measures to be taken to ensure that women benefit more from trade;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 161 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Notes that the Report on the Implementation of the Trade Policy Strategy ‘Trade for All’ of 13 September 2017 mentions gender equality in trade and specifies that it is essential to improve our understanding of the impact of trade instruments on gender equality; further notes the view expressed in the report that addressing gender equality would help ensure that the benefits of trade reach everyone, and by the same token maximise the overall gains from trade opportunities; calls on the Commission to continue its work on this matter and supply information and data as soon as possible;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 164 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Insists that all international trade policies must be based ontrade policy could make it possible to promote the relevant international standards and legal instruments on gender equality, such as the CEDAW, the Beijing Platform for Action and the sustainable development goals (SDGs);
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 186 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. InsistRecalls that all international trade agreements must include safeguard clauses enabling the contracting parties to regulate and also reverse liberalisation in order to protect fundamental objectives such as gender equality, human rights, public health and environmental sustainabian ambitious sustainable development chapter with the aim of enhancing social and environmental standards, as well as respect for human rights, which also encompass gender equality;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 195 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the need to recognise the risks inherent in trade agreement mechanisms such as ISDS and ICS, which undermine the capacity of individual governments to change their laws to include measures to promote gender equalityRecalls the ongoing process led by the EU to develop a new system for settling disputes between investors and states; recalls that the European Parliament advocates the need to ensure, among other things, stronger labour and consumer rights and advancement in environmental policiesansparency and the right to regulation on the part of the states which will be responsible for carrying out this reform;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 202 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that IPR provisions in trade can have a significantn impact on women’s health which must be taken carefully; calls for this aspect to be taken into consideration;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 204 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for regular events and meetings to be held on gender equality in EU trade agreements with the participation of representatives of the institutions and economic and civil society stakeholders with a view to creating synergy on this issue, holding discussions and setting common objectives;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 209 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines that basic public services and goods, such as water and sanitation, education and healthcare (notably acPoints out that current and future public services, services of general interest and servicess to sexual and reproductive health and rights services),of general economic interest should be exemptcluded from the scopening up of public procu of application of the agreement and the trade liberalisation agenda, and that safeguards must be put in place to reinforce states’ capacities to provide bas(including, but not limited to, water, health, social services, social security systems, education, waste management and public transport); points out that EU, national and local authorities must retain the full right to introduce, adopt, maintain or repeal any measures with regard to the commissioning, organisation, funding and provision of public services for all;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 249 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Insists that binding instruments are needed in EU trade policy to ensure that deccertain elements of EU trade policy, such as the presence of a chapter on sustainable development work standards, women’s rights, human rights principles and environmental protection are at the core of all types of EU trade agreements and that EU trade policy is coherent with the Union’s overarching aims of GSP+ systems, and the monitoring thereof, help promote and uphold human rights, including gender equality, workers’ rights and environmental protection; recalls the overriding importance of consistency between EU trade policy and Union policy as a whole; stresses that EU trade policy contributes to the pursuit of many aims, including sustainable development, poverty reduction and the promotion of gender equality;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 256 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission to take gender equality into account when preparing and drafting impact assessments for the purpose of opening trade negotiations; stresses that taking this into account will provide a first glimpse of the benefits that could be gained from a future trade agreement and predict the impact of new trade relations on gender equality;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 274 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. StressesPoints out that trading commitments in EU agreements should neverot overrule human rights, women’s rights or environmental concerns; stresses the importance of enforcing the provisions of agreements on these issues, including chapters on sustainable development;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 279 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Recalls the importance of SMEs in the EU’s economic structure; calls on the Commission to continue its efforts to support SMEs – particularly in public procurement, with a view to ensuring that micro enterprises and SMEs play a greater role – and to develop specific measures for SMEs owned by women;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 298 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Acknowledges thatStresses the importance of monitoring the implementation of the EU’s Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP) and GSP+ systems need to be improved by linking economic incentives to the effective adoption and constant monitoring of core human, gender and labour rights conventions, particularly in respect of the implementation of core conventions; points out that among the GSP + conventions that are pending ratification and implementation are the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women of 1979 , Convention No 111, concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation, and Convention No 100, concerning Equal Remuneration for Men and Women Workers for Work of Equal Value; points out that the upholding and implementing such conventions helps further gender equality;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 312 #

2017/2015(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for EU legislation similar to UN binding due diligence obligations to ensure respect for human rights, including women’s rights, and adequate social and environmental standardsUrges the EU to foster international cooperation on gender equality in trade relations and encourages the WTO to take this dimension into account in its trade policy; stresses the importance of also addressing this issue in other international and multilateral organisations and forums, such as the UN, World Bank or OECD, with a view to ensuring that women derive greater benefits from international trade;
2017/10/26
Committee: INTAFEMM
Amendment 274 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – indent 3
- the security of supply of critical inputtrategic autonomy of the Union, the security and the continuity of supply of critical inputs, such as commodities, rare earths, farming and farmland, energy and water; in order to ensure the functioning of the value chains of the Union based on strategic industries; or
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 356 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. Where the Commission considers that a foreign direct investment is likely to affect security or public order in one or more Member States or the Union’s interest, it mayust issue an opinion addressed to the Member State in which the foreign direct investment is planned or has been completed. The Commission may issue an opinion irrespective of whether other Member States have provided comments. The Commission's opinion shall be forwarded simultaneously to the other Member States. The Commission shall systematically assess the market compatibility of the FDI operations notified by the Member States, including screening of the degree of state influence and state aid.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 455 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall evaluate and present to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the application of this Regulation no later than 3 years after its entry into force. The evaluation shall extend to the possible inclusion in the scope of this Regulation of other long term economic control capabilities other than foreign direct investment which result in the acquisition by means of a public contract of lasting and direct influence capabilities permitting the management or control of projects or programmes of Union interest as defined in Article 3(3) of this Regulation. Member States shall be involved in this exercise and shall provide the Commission with necessary information for the preparation of that report.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 466 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – indent 6 a (new)
- -Research Fund for Coal and Steel COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2017/955 of 29 May 2017 amending Decision 2008/376/EC on the adoption of the Research Programme of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel and on the multiannual technical guidelines for this programme.
2018/04/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 10 #

2017/0007(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 17
(17) The Union's macro-financial assistance should support Moldova's commitment to values shared with the Union, including democracy, the rule of law, good governance, respect for human rightsan independent judiciary, respect for human rights, the freedom and pluralism of the media, sustainable development and poverty reduction, as well as its commitment to the principles of open, rules-based and fair trade.
2017/04/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2017/0007(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 18
(18) A pre-condition for granting the Union's macro-financial assistance should be that Moldova respects effective democratic mechanisms – including a multi-party parliamentary system – and the rule of law, and guarantees respect for human rights. In addition, the specific objectives of the Union's macro-financial assistance should strengthen the efficiency, transparency and accountability of the public finance management systems, ensure an effective fight against corruption and money laundering, the governance and supervision of the financial and banking sector in Moldova and promote structural reforms aimed at supporting sustainable and inclusive growth, employment creation and fiscal consolidation. The Union's macro- financial assistance to Moldova should also include measures to support the implementation of the Association Agreement, including the DCFTA. To ensure that such conditions are properly assessed, it is crucial that they are set out in a verifiable and measurable manner. Both the fulfilment of the preconditions and the achievement of those objectives should be regularly monitored by the Commission and the European External Action Service.
2017/04/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 14 #

2017/0007(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 19
(19) In order to ensure that the Union’s financial interests linked to the Union’s macro-financial assistance are protected efficiently, Moldova should take appropriate measures relating to the prevention of, and fight against, fraud, corruption and any other irregularities linked to the assistance. Moldova should regularly inform the Commission about the implementation of the macro- financial assistance on the basis of full disclosure and strict compliance with Union financial rules. In addition, provision should be made for the Commission to carry out checks and for the Court of Auditors to carry out audits.
2017/04/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 15 #

2017/0007(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 24
(24) The Union's macro-financial assistance should be subject to economic policy conditions, to be laid down in a Memorandum of Understanding. Such conditions should be linked to the disbursement of each of the three instalments. In order to ensure uniform conditions of implementation and for reasons of efficiency, the Commission should be empowered to negotiate such conditions with the Moldovan authorities under the supervision of the committee of representatives of the Member States in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. Under that Regulation, the advisory procedure should, as a general rule, apply in all cases other than as provided for in that Regulation. Considering the potentially important impact of assistance of more than EUR 90 million, it is appropriate that the examination procedure be used for operations above that threshold. Considering the amount of the Union's macro-financial assistance to Moldova, the examination procedure should apply to the adoption of the Memorandum of Understanding, and to any reduction, suspension or cancellation of the assistance,
2017/04/06
Committee: INTA
Amendment 2 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that palm oil accounts for about 40 % of global trade in all vegetable oils and that the EU, with around 7 million tonnes per year, is the second largest global importer; calls on the Commission, in this connection, to reduce the amount of imported palm oil from third countries by applying different customs duty schemes for certencourage the production and imports of sustainable palm oil, while assisting palm-oil producing countries in the elaboration and implementation of relevant incentive policies and regulatory frameworks with commodity specifiedc sustainable palm-oil products; ility standards and codes of practice aiming at minimizing the impact of the industry on deforestation, loss of biodiversity and climate change;
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that Malaysia and Indonesia are the main producers of palm oil, with an estimated 85-90 % of global production, and that the growing demand for this commodity puts pressure on land use and has significant effects on local communities, health and climate change; stresses, in this context, that the EU- Indonesiavital provisions of the Trade and Sustainable Development Chapters of current and future Free Trade Agreements should not cover palm oil and its derivatives within the current negotiatioprovide for a comprehensive framework in addressing sustainability concerns;
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 25 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Additionally underlines the importance and compelling need for further complementary multi-stakeholder actions and multilateral, EU level or national initiatives aiming for the gradual phasing out of trade in unsustainable palm oil, in accordance with WTO norms and regulations; reiterates that, in order to ensure the highest degree of effectiveness, these initiatives should take into account the different production systems and country specific factors in assessing the degree of socio-economic and environmental concerns;
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Accordingly, urges the financial sector to include sustainability considerations in their investment and lending operations;
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 37 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the importance of improving the situation through appropriate certification, easily accessible forand without discriminating against SMEs, confirming that the palm oil in question has been produced without undue harm to the environment and society and that the product is effectively and transparently traceable throughout the entire supply chain;
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 39 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Highlights that in order to avoid a disruptive impact on international trade, these certification schemes should be developed through an inclusive participatory process comprising of all the relevant actors along the supply chain, from all countries involved;
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. In this regard, strongly welcomes, among other initiatives, the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), yet stresses the need for its continuous enhancement through, but not limited to, the broadening of its stakeholder representation by better inclusion of SMEs, and a strengthened audit and enforcement capacity;
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 50 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ban EU imports of biodiesel derived from palm oil and to introduce a mandatory labelling schemecomprehensively scrutinize the application of sustainability criteria for biodiesel ingredients and their origins, and for other palm oil products;
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that sustainability of palm oil is legally defined in the Renewable Energy Directive for bioliquids and in the Fuel Quality Directive for biofuels while no criteria exist for palm oil used in food industry; calls on the Commission to extend the sustainability criteria for other uses of the same crop in line with WTO regulation and OECD guidelines;
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 66 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that, under the Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade Regulation and Voluntary Partnership Agreements between the EU and timber producing countries, the first fully operational licensing scheme is with Indonesia as of 15 November 2016; considers such initiatives to be highly beneficial and calls for their further promotion and expansion to other commodities as well.
2016/12/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 1 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Takes the view that excellence and competitiveness should remain the underlying principles of the EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, while the ESI Funds should target regional growth and cohesion; is therefore opposed to any criteria or quotas in the new Framework Programme which aim to influence geographic distribution or cohesion;aking into consideration the objective to widen the participation of researchers from all Member states. The ESI Funds should target regional growth and cohesion; considers important to avoid any discriminatory effect of the Programmes’ implementation and to ensure a balanced development of research activities across the European Union as well as equal opportunities for all EU researchers.
2017/02/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 3 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Takes the view that excellence and competitiveness should remain the underlying principles of the EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, while the ESI Funds should target regional growth and cohesion; is therefore opposed to any criteria or quotas in the new Framework Programme which aim to influence geographic distribution or cohesion; nevertheless the selection of Project should be based on objective criteria and not on subjective criteria related with the perception of the graphical development of a Member State.
2017/02/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 18 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes the divergences in aims and focuneed to enhance synergies between the Framework Programme and the ESI Funds; takes the view, howevrecalls in particular the difficulties due to the different state-aid rules which are applied depending on whether, that efforts must be made to maximise synergies at programme level;e Union funding is centrally managed or not; recommends that the same state-aid controlled rules are applied for all EU funding for RDI, whatever the sources of funding
2017/02/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 43 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Takes the view that effective investments in R&I from the ESI Funds can only take place if Member States have their framework conditions in order; calls, therefore, for a closer linkage between country-specific recommendations for structural reformsconcerning R&I and investments in R&I;
2017/02/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 53 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Recognises that the ceilings of the researchers’ salaries are a barrier for Cohesion countries to apply for Horizon 2020 projects and calls on the Commission to eliminate the difference in ceilings of salaries of European researchers and eliminate the current brain drain.
2017/02/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 69 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. For example, there should be identical rules regarding cost reporting/eligibility of costs for the priority area “innovation and research” in ESI funds and for FP9. The approximation of rules regarding the use of ESI funds and of the Framework Programme would lead to considerable simplification. Regarding project implementation, the Participant Portal of the Framework Programme should also be used for R&I projects funded by ESI funds, since the research community is already used to it.
2017/02/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 75 #

2016/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Welcomes the simplification initiatives introduced for the implementation measures; however, it points out that Horizon 2020 is still too complex and strongly recommends further improvements to simplify the future FP and to ensure a uniform implementation of it. In the next Framework Programme specific attention should be given to achieve a simple, clear and explainable structure of the FP and of all the initiatives funded by it; it should comprise a clear and easy to comprehend structure and a single set of instruments.
2017/02/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 3 #

2016/2097(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Annual Report of the Commission and recalls that the goal of enhancing regional cohesion should always be accompanied by the protection of the EU’s financial interests; stresses that the fight against fraud is a joint responsibility of the Member States and the European Commission; notes that the fight against fraudulent or non-fraudulent irregularities also increases the general effectiveness of EU fund management;
2016/11/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 15 #

2016/2097(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to enhance the harmonisation of classification, detection and reporting of irregularities between Member States; stresses the importance of having a standard definition of errors in the Member States and of establishing the difference between errors and fraud; welcomes, however, the preventive and corrective measures taken by the Commission to avoid fraudulent or not fraudulent irregularities; stresses the need to step up efforts aimed at the early detection of errors and to set up a working group to correct irregularities;
2016/11/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 21 #

2016/2097(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Welcomes the Member States’ initiatives to adopt a joint anti-fraud strategy, and calls on the Commission to step up efforts to extend the strategy to all the Member States;
2016/11/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 25 #

2016/2097(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Appreciates the efforts made by the Member States to detect, evaluate and report irregularities and to implement effective and proportionate anti-fraud measures; stresses that action to combat fraud should not be an obstacle to development; calls on the Commission also to use technical assistance in order to help strengthen the technical and administrative capacity of managing authorities to ensure effective control systems able to reduce the risks of fraud; invites the Member States to identify ways of guaranteeing investments with a view to recovering losses caused by fraud;
2016/11/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 38 #

2016/2097(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recommends that steps be taken to improve the uptake of simplification measures for 2014-2020 with a view to the post-2020 regulatory framework for ESI Funds as a tool to reduce the risk of irregularities caused by errors; asks the Member States to remedy the problems linked to the late reporting of irregularities; stresses that the detection of minor errors should not lead to the suspension of funding programmes;
2016/11/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 44 #

2016/2097(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Points out that the bureaucratic burden and lack of consistency between EU and Member State legislation are contributing to the increase in the number of errors; regrets that strict rules and complex procedures are making financing from EU funds less attractive;
2016/11/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 48 #

2016/2097(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need to conduct communication campaigns and take awareness-raising measures to inform citizens of the effectiveness of the anti- fraud measures put in place so as to avoid misconceptions regarding error rates and the number of frauds committed, also taking into account examples of communication best practices in the Member States; recommends improving transparency and facilitating access to information on irregularities; stresses the importance of a more efficient exchange of information between Member States.
2016/11/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1 #

2016/2064(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), which is used toaiming at financeing risky and innovative projects, canmust be used as a tool to boost EU growth and promote the development of strong, sustainable and competitive industry; in this regards, calls for the increasing of EFSI's role in the cohesion agenda through improvement of the sectoral and geographical balance of the investments done under this frame; takes the view that barriers to combining EFSI with other EU instruments (mainly European Structural and Investment Funds) should be removed and EFSI's eligible sectors need to be expanded;
2016/10/19
Committee: INTA
Amendment 25 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the post-Cotonou process should offer a framework within which to discuss trade issues with all the ACP countries taking into account their specifics deriving from their different traditions, culture, development and geographical location; calls for a strengthening of trade cooperation, with a values-driven approach and improved Policy Coherence for Development; believes that inclusive growth, job creation, the development of the private sector, inclusive growth, job creation and regional integration mustshould be central in a future economic partnership;
2016/06/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 51 #

2016/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the involvement of the representation of entrepreneurs and employers, including SMEs and civil society involvement is a must throughout the implementation of the EPAs and the post- Cotonou process; notes the importance of a renewed ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly and, which defends strong parliamentary oversight of the future framework; asks for results-oriented periodical monitoring of ACP-EU cooperation, especially with regard to trade and sustainable development;
2016/06/22
Committee: INTA
Amendment 14 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In the light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriate to clarify the circumstances in which significant distortions affecting to a considerable extent free market forces may be deemed to exist. In particular, it is appropriate to clarify that thissuch a situation may be deemed to exist, inter alia,takes place when reported prices or costs, including the costs of raw materials, energy or other factors of production, are not the result of free market forces because they are affected by government intervention. It is further appropriate to clarify that in considering whether or not such a situation exists regard may, due account must be hapaid, inter alia, to the potential impact of the following: the market in question is to a significant extent served by enterprises which operate under the ownership, control or policy supervision or guidance of the authorities of the exporting country; sacrificing of fact and law an adequate corporate governance, state presence in firms allowing the state to interfere with respect to prices or costs; public policies or measures discriminating in favour of domestic suppliers or otherwise influencing free market forces; and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives. I, the lack of a transparent and effective functioning company law and a bankruptcy regime that prevents the exercise of property laws, the failure to apply or comply with international accounting standards, foreign exchange transactions not carried out at market rates, wage rates not the result of free bargaining between labour and management; the absence of a transparent set of laws produces discriminatory effects with regard to joint- ventures and other foreign investments; failure to comply with international and multilateral commitments on social, environmental and fiscal standards by the exporting country and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives and any other circumstance the Commission considers appropriate in order to evaluate the existence of significant distortions. The existence of significant dis further appropriate to provide that the Commission services may issue a report describing the specific situation concerning these criteria in a certain country or a certain sector; thattortions in the economy as a whole or in a sector or sectors of the economy of the exporting country should lead automatically to the use of undistorted international, third country or EU prices, costs or benchmarks for each factor of production in calculating the normal value. However, if an exporting producer from a country that does not meet those conditions clearly demonstrates that its costs of one or more individual factors of production are not distorted, those costs should be used in calculating its normal value. The Commission services should draft or update a comprehensive, in-depth report describing the specific situation concerning these criteria in a certain country or a certain sector. For those countries for which a substantial number of anti- dumping cases have been recorded, the report should be completed and adopted before the entry into force of this regulation. The EU’s industrial sector should be consulted during the process of drafting the report; the specific economic and commercial characteristics of SMEs, as well as the sectors they cover, shall be taken into account in drawing up the reports. All such reports and the evidence on which it isthey are based may be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector; and that interested parties should have ample opportunity to comment on the report and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used. , and to provide information demonstrating the existence of a significant distortion. Particular attention shall be paid and support shall be provided to SMEs in these investigations. The European Parliament shall monitor the report drafting process. On the request of the European Parliament or on the Commission’s own initiative when the circumstances in a specific country or sector have changed, the Commission shall draft or update the requested report. In any event the European Commission shall update the report every two years.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 15 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In the light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriate to clarify the circumstances in which significant distortions affecting to a considerable extent free market forces may be deemed to exist. In particular, it is appropriate to clarify that this situation may be deemed to exist, inter alia, when reported prices or costs, including the costs of raw materials, energy and other factors of production, are not the result of free market forces because they are affected by government intervention. It is further appropriate to clarify that in considering whether or not such a situation exists regard may, due account must be hapaid, inter alia, to the potential impact of the following: the market in question is to a significant extent served by enterprises which operate under the ownership, control or policy supervision or guidance of the authorities of the exporting country; state presence in firms allowing the state to interfere with respect to prices or costs; overcapacity leading to overproduction, a deliberate policy of exchange rate manipulation leading to an undervaluation of the national currency, non-respect by the exporting country of international environmental, social or tax commitments of the exporting country leading to a distortion of competition, public policies or measures discriminating in favour of domestic suppliers or otherwise influencing free market forces; and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives, the lack of a transparent and effective functioning company law and a bankruptcy regime that prevents the exercise of property laws, wage rates not the result of free bargaining between labour and management, the absence of a transparent set of laws producing discriminatory effects with regard to joint- ventures and other foreign investments, and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives, as well as any other circumstances which the Commission considers appropriate for ascertaining the existence of significant distortions. The existence of significant distortions in the economy as a whole or in a sector of the economy of the exporting country shall lead automatically to the use of undistorted international, third country or EU prices, costs or benchmarks for each factor of production in calculating the normal value. However, if an exporting producer from a country that does not meet those conditions clearly demonstrates that its costs of one or more individual factors of production are not distorted, those costs should be used in calculating its normal value. It is further appropriate to provide that the Commission services may issue a reportdraw up a report, in collaboration with the EU’s industrial sector, describing the specific situation concerning these criteria in a certain country or a certain sector; that such report. For those countries for which a substantial number of anti-dumping cases have been recorded, the report should be completed and adopted before the entry into force of this Regulation. The EU’s industrial sector should be consulted during the report drafting process. All such reports and the evidence on which it isthey are based may be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector; and that i. Interested parties also should have ample opportunity to comment on the reports and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such reports or evidence is used. The European Parliament shall monitor the report drafting process. On the request of the European Parliament or in the event of a change of circumstances in a specific country or sector, the Commission shall draft the report, or if one already exists, update the report. In any event, the European Commission should carry out a review of the report every two years.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 36 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) It is further appropriate to recall that costs should normally be calculated on the basis of reliable records kept by the exporter or producer under investigation. However, where there are significant distortions in the exporting country with the consequence that costs reflected in the records of the party concerned are artificially low, such costs may be adjusted or established on any reasonable basis, including information from other representative markets or from international prices or benchmarks. In the light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriate to further clarify that, for the purposes of applying the provisions introduced by this regulation, due account should be taken of all relevant evidence, including relevant assessment reports regarding the circumstances prevailing on the domestic market of the exporting producers and the evidence on which they are based, which has been placed on the file, and upon which interested parties have had an opportunity to comment.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Absent any other specific transitional rules regulating the matter, it is appropriate to provide for the application of this Regulation to all decisions on the initiation of proceedings, and to all proceedings, including original investigations and review investigations, initiated, on or after the date on which this Regulation enters into force, subject to Article 11(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. Furthermore, by way of specific transitional rule, and having regard to the absence of any other specific transitional rule regulating the matter, it is appropriate to provide that, in the case of a transition from a normal value calculated pursuant to Articles 2(7)(a) or 2(7)(b) to a normal value calculated pursuant to paragraphs 1 to 6a of Article 2, the reasonable period of time provided for in the first sub-paragraph of Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 should be deemed to elapse on the date on which the first expiry review following such transition is initiated. With a view to reducing the risk of circumvention of the provisions of this Regulation, the same approach should apply with respect to reviews conducted pursuant to Article 11(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. It is also appropriate to recall that a transition from a normal value calculated pursuant to Articles 2(7)(a) or 2(7)(b) to a normal value calculated pursuant to paragraphs 1 to 6a of Article 2 would not in itself constitute sufficient evidence within the meaning of Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. Such transitional rules, enabling the continued application of measures to defend against subsidised imports, should complete a lacuna that would otherwise risk to generate legal uncertainty, should provide a reasonable opportunity for interested parties to adapt themselves to the expiry of the old rules and the entry into force of the new rules, and should facilitate the efficient, orderly and equitable administration of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 52 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point a
(a) In case it is determined, when applying this provision or any other relevant provision of this Regulation, that it is not appropriate to use domestic prices and costs in the exporting country due to the existence of significant distortions in a given sector or the economy as a whole, the normal value shall be constructed on the basis of costs of production and sale reflecting undistorted prices or benchmarks. For this purpose, the sources that may be used include undistorted international prices, costs, or benchmarks, or corresponding costs of production and sale in an appropriate representative country with a similar level of economic development as the exporting countryproducer country in which the prices and production under review are the result of free market forces, provided the relevant cost data are readily available. The constructed normal value shall include a reasonable amount for administrative, selling and general costs and for profits. In the event that data are not available, or reliable or that the exporter or the authorities in the exporting country obstructs the investigation, the normal value calculated shall be increased by a reasonable surcharge as a punishment.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 59 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(a) In case it is determined, when applying this provision or any other relevant provision of this Regulation, that it is not appropriate to use domestic prices and costs in the exporting country due to the existence of significant distortions in the economy as a whole or in a given sector, the normal value shall be constructed on the basis of costs of production and sale reflecting undistorted prices or benchmarks. For this purpose, the sources that may be used include undistorted international prices, costs, or benchmarks, or corresponding costs of production and sale in an appropriate representative country with a similar level of economic development as the exporting country, provided the relevant cost data are readily available. The constructed normal value shall include a reasonable amount for administrative, selling and general costs and for profits.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point b
(b) Significant distortions forin respect of the product concerned within the meaning of point (a) may be deemed to exist, inter alia, when reported prices or costs, including the costs of raw materials, energy or other production factors are not the result of free market forces as they are affected by government intervention. In considering whether or not significant distortions exist regard may, due account must be hapaid, inter alia, to the potential impact of the following: the market in question is to a significant extent served by enterprises which operate under the ownership, control or policy supervision or guidance of the authorities of the exporting country;, sacrificing of fact and law an adequate corporate governance, state presence in firms allowing the state to interfere with respect to prices or costs; public policies or measures discriminating in favour of domestic suppliers or otherwise influencing free market forces; and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives. , the lack of a transparent and effective functioning company law and a bankruptcy regime that prevents the exercise of property laws, the failure to apply or comply with international accounting standards, foreign exchange transactions not carried out at market rates, wage rates not the result of free bargaining between labour and management; the absence of a transparent set of laws produces discriminatory effects with regard to joint- ventures and other foreign investments; failure to comply with international and multilateral commitments on social, environmental and fiscal standards by the exporting country and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives and any other circumstance the Commission considers appropriate in order to evaluate the existence of significant distortions. The existence of significant distortions in the economy as a whole or in a sector of the economy of the exporting country shall lead automatically to the use of undistorted international, third country or EU prices, costs or benchmarks for each factor of production in calculating the normal value. If an exporting producer from a country that does not meet those conditions clearly demonstrates that its costs of one or more individual factors of production are not distorted, those costs shall be used in calculating its normal value.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 61 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point b
(b) Significant distortions for the product concerned within the meaning of point (a) may be deemed to exist, inter alia, when reported sale prices or costs, including the costs and sale prices of raw materials and energy, are not the result of free market forces as they are affected by government intervention. In considering whether or not significant distortions exist regard may, due account must be hapaid, inter alia, to the potential impact of the following: the market in question is to a significant extent served by enterprises which operate under the ownership, control or policy supervision or guidance of the authorities of the exporting country; state presence in firms allowing the state to interfere with respect to prices or costs; public policies or measures discriminating in favour of domestic suppliers or otherwise influencing free market forces; and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives. , overcapacity leading to overproduction, a deliberate policy of exchange rate manipulation leading to an undervaluation of the national currency, non-respect by the exporting country of international environmental, social or tax commitments of the exporting country leading to a distortion of competition, the lack of a transparent and effective functioning company law and a bankruptcy regime that prevents the exercise of property laws, wage rates not the result of free bargaining between labour and management, the absence of a transparent set of laws producing discriminatory effects with regard to joint- ventures and other foreign investments, and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives, as well as any other circumstances which the Commission considers appropriate for ascertaining the existence of significant distortions. The existence of significant distortions in the economy as a whole or in a sector or sectors of the economy of the exporting country shall lead automatically to the use of undistorted international, third country or EU prices, costs or benchmarks for each factor of production in calculating the normal value. If an exporting producer from a country that has been accused of not meeting those conditions is able to demonstrate clearly that its costs of one or more individual factors of production are not distorted, those costs shall be used in calculating its normal value.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 82 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point c
(c) When appropriate, tThe Commission services may issue ashall draft or update a comprehensive, in-depth report describing the specific situation concerning the criteria listed in point (b) in a certain country or a certain sector. Such report and the evidence on which it is based may be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector. Interested parties shall have ample opportunity to supplement, comment or rely on the report and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used. The determinations made shall take into account all of the relevant evidence on the fileFor those countries for which a substantial number of anti-dumping cases have been recorded, the report should be completed and adopted before the entry into force of this regulation. The EU’s industrial sector should be consulted during the process of drafting the report; the specific economic and commercial characteristics of SMEs, as well as the sectors they cover, shall be taken into account in drawing up the reports. Such report and the evidence on which it is based may be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector. Interested parties shall have ample opportunity to supplement, comment or rely on the report and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used; they will thus be able to provide information demonstrating the existence of a significant distortion. Particular attention shall be paid and support shall be provided to SMEs in these investigations. The determinations made shall take into account all of the relevant evidence on the file. The European Parliament shall monitor the report drafting process. On the request of the European Parliament or on the Commission’s own initiative when the circumstances in a specific country or sector have changed, the Commission shall draft or update the requested report. In any event, the European Commission shall update the report every two years.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 87 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point c
(c) When appropriate, tThe Commission services mayshall issue a detailed report describing the specific situation concerning the criteria listed in point (b) in a certain country or a certain sector. For those countries for which a substantial number of anti- dumping cases have been opened, the report shall be completed and adopted before the entry into force of this Regulation. The Union industry shall be consulted during the report drafting process. Such report and the evidence on which it is based may be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector. Interested parties shall have ample opportunity to supplement, comment or rely on the report and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used. Particular attention must be given to SMEs in EU industry. The determinations made shall take into account all of the relevant evidence on the file. The European Parliament shall monitor the report drafting process. On the request of the European Parliament or in the case of a change of circumstances in a specific country or sector, the Commission shall draft the report, or if one already exists, update the report. In any event, the European Commission shall carry out a review of the report every two years.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 98 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6 a – point d
(d) The Union industry may rely on the report referred to in point (c) for the calculation of normal value when filing a complaint in accordance with Article 5 or a request for a review in accordance with Article 11. When the conclusions of the report show the existence of significant distortions, the report pursuant to the paragraph 6 (b) shall constitute sufficient evidence in order to justify the calculation of the normal value pursuant to the methodology referred to in subparagraph (a). In any event, no additional charge should be imposed on EU industry, and specific support must be provided for and made available to SMEs in view of the difficulties that they can face. The absence of a report shall not prevent the Commission from using any available information or data to establish the existence of significant distortions and use the methodology referred to in subparagraph (a) if the relevant requirements are met.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 99 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6 a – point d
(d) The Union industry may rely on the report referred to in point (c) for the calculation of normal value when filing a complaint in accordance with Article 5 or a request for a review in accordance with Article 11. When the conclusions of the report show the existence of significant distortions, the report pursuant to the paragraph 6 (b) shall constitute sufficient evidence in order to justify the calculation of the normal value pursuant to the methodology referred to in subparagraph (a). In any event, no additional burden should be imposed on EU industry, and in particular on SMEs, which must receive guidance when they require it. The absence of a report shall not prevent the Commission from using any available information or data to establish the existence of significant distortions and use the methodology referred to in subparagraph (a) if the relevant requirements are met.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 114 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6 a – point e
(e) The parties to the investigation shall be informed shortly after initiation about the relevant sources that the Commission intends to use for the purpose of point (a) and shall be given 10 days to comment. For this purpose, interested parties shall be given access to the filevalidation to access the file after they have registered on a register maintained by the Commission, including any evidence on which the investigating authority relies, without prejudice to Article 19.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 116 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6 a – point e a (new)
(ea) In order to prevent any occurrence of disloyal competition, the Commission must put in place an information exchange mechanism with the countries applying anti-dumping measures.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 122 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
In the case of imports from countries which are, at the date of initiation, not members of the WTO and listed in Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2015/755, normal value shall be determined on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy thirdn appropriate representative country, or the price from such a third country to other countries, including the Union, or where those are not possible, on any other reasonable basis, including the price actually paid or payable in the Union for the like product, duly adjusted if necessary to include a reasonable profit margin.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 128 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
An appropriate market economy thirdrepresentative country shall be selected in a not unreasonable manner, due account being taken of any reliable information made available at the time of selection. Account shall also be taken of time-limits; where appropriate, a market economy thirdn appropriate representative country which is subject to the same investigation shall be used.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 132 #

2016/0351(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
The parties to the investigation shall be informed shortly after its initiation of the market economy thirdappropriate representative country envisaged and shall be given 10 days to comment.
2017/05/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 65 #

2016/0308(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – table 1 – row 3
3102 10 10 Urea, whether or not in aqueous solution, containing more 3% than 45% by weight of nitrogen on the dry anhydrous product (excl. that in pellet or similar forms, or in packages with a gross weight not exceeding 10 kg) deleted
2017/02/13
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2016/0284(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The development of digital technologies and internet has transformed the distribution of and access to television and radio programmes. Users increasingly expect to have access to television and radio programmes both live and on- demand, using traditional channels such as satellite or cable and also through online services. Broadcasting organisations are therefore increasingly offering, in addition to their own broadcasts of television and radio programmes, online services ancillary to their broadcast, such as simulcasting and catch-up services. Retransmission services operators, which aggregate broadcasts of television and radio programmes into packages and provide them to users simultaneously to the initial transmission of the broadcast, unaltered and unabridged, use various techniques of retransmission such as cable, satellite, digital terrestrial, closed circuit IP-based or mobile networks as well as the open internet. On the part of users, there is a growing demand and need for access to broadcasts of television and radio programmes, including catch-up services, not only originating in their Member State but also in other Member States of the Union, includingespecially from members of linguistic minorities of the Union as well as from, persons who live in another Member State than their Member State of origin as well as persons who study other languages than their mother tongue.
2017/06/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 40 #

2016/0284(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) A number of barriers hinder the provision of online services which are ancillary to broadcasts and the provision of retransmission services and thereby the free circulation of television and radio programmes within the Union. Broadcasting organisations transmit daily many hours of news, cultural, political, documentary or entertainment programmes. These programmes incorporate a variety of content such as audiovisual, musical, literary or graphic works, which is protected by copyright and/or related rights under Union law. That results in a complex process to clear rights from a multitude of right holders and for different categories of works and other protected subject matter. Often the rights need to be cleared in a short time-frame, in particular when preparing programmes such as news or current affairs. In order to make their online services available across borders, broadcasting organisations need to have the required rights to works and other protected subject matter for all the relevant territories which further increases the complexity of the rights' clearance.
2017/06/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 61 #

2016/0284(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Council Directive 93/83/EEC17 facilitates cross-border satellite broadcasting and retransmission by cable of television and radio programmes from other Member States of the Union. However, the provisions of that Directive on transmissions of broadcasting organisations are limited to satellite transmissions and therefore do not apply to online services ancillary to broadcast while the provisions concerning retransmissions of television and radio programmes from other Member States are limited to simultaneous, unaltered and unabridged retransmission by cable or microwave systems and do not extend to such retransmissions by means of other technologies. _________________ 17 Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993 on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission OJ L 248, 6.10.1993, p. 15– 21.
2017/06/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 70 #

2016/0284(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Therefore, cross-border provision of online services ancillary tof broadcasters and retransmissions of television and radio programmes originating in other Member States should be facilitated by adapting the legal framework on the exercise of copyright and related rights relevant for those activities.
2017/06/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 78 #

2016/0284(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The ancillary online services covered by this Regulation are those services offered by broadcasting organisations which have a clear and subordinate relationship to the broadcast. They include services giving access to television and radio programmes in a linear manner simultaneously to the broadcast and services giving access, within a defined time period after the broadcast, to television and radio programmes which have been previously broadcast by the broadcasting organisation (so-called catch- up services). In addition, ancillary online services include services which give access to material which enriches or otherwise expands television and radio programmes broadcast by the broadcasting organisation, including by way of previewing, extending, supplementing or reviewing the relevant programme's content. The provision of access to individual works or other protected subject matter that have been incorporated in a television or radio programme should not be regarded as an ancillary online service. Similarly, the provision of access to works or other protected subject matter independently of broadcast, such as services giving access to individual musical or audiovisual works, music albums or videos, do not fall under the definition of ancillary online service.
2017/06/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 164 #

2016/0284(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) In order to prevent circumvention of the application of the country of origin principle through the extension of the duration of existing agreements concerning the exercise of copyright and related rights relevant for the provision of an ancillary online service as well as the access to or the use of an ancillary online service, it is necessary to apply the principle of country of origin also to existing agreements but with a transitional period.
2017/06/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 203 #

2016/0284(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) "ancillary online service" means an online service consisting in the provision to the public, by or under the control and responsibility of a broadcasting organisation, of linear and non-linear radio or television programmes before, simultaneously with or for a defined period of time after their broadcast by the broadcasting organisation as well as of any material produced by or for the broadcasting organisation which is ancillary to such broadcast;
2017/06/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 236 #
2017/06/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 247 #

2016/0284(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
(1) The acts of communication to the public and of making available occurring when providing an ancillary online service by or under the control and responsibility of a broadcasting organisation as well as the acts of reproduction which are necessary for the provision of, the access to or the use of the ancillary online service shall, for the purposes of exercising copyright and related rights relevant for these acts, be deemed to occur solely in the Member State in which the broadcasting organisation has its principal establishment.
2017/06/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 272 #

2016/0284(COD)

Exercise of the rights in retransmission and in re-use of broadcasting organisations' on-demand services by right holders other than broadcasting organisations
2017/06/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 300 #

2016/0284(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 a (new)
(5 a) The principles of paragraphs 1 to 5 shall apply also to the integral re-use of the broadcasting organisation’s on- demand services by a party other than the broadcasting organisation under whose control and responsibility such services were primarily made available.
2017/06/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 132 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a
“(c) an estimate of additional public and private resources to be potentially raised by the financial instrument down to the level of the final recipient (expected leverage effect), including as appropriate an assessment of the need for, and levelextent of, differentiated treatment to attract counterpart resources from private investors and/or a description of the mechanisms which will be used to establish the need for, and extent of, such differentiated treatment, such as a competitive or appropriately independent assessment process;”
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 138 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b – point i
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 38 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) a publicly-owned bank or financial institution, established as a legal entity carrying out financial activities on a professional basis, which fulfils all the following conditions:
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 141 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b – point i
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 38 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point iii – indent 1a
– does not conduct retail banking transactions on a commercial basis which can direct benefit from this direct entrustment;
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 143 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b – point i
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 38 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point iii – indent 2
– operates under a public policy mandate given by the relevant authority of a Member State at national or regional level, towhich should include carrying out economic development activities contributing to the objectives of the ESI Funds;
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 144 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b – point i
– carries out its activities including development activities in regions, policy areas andor sectors for which access to funding from market sources is not generally available or sufficient;
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 145 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b – point i
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 38 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point iii – indent 3
– carries out its economic development activities contributing to the objectives of the ESI Funds in regions, policy areas and sectors for which access to funding from market sources is not generally available or sufficient;
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 148 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b – point i
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 38 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point iii – indent 4
– operates on a non-profit maximisation basiwithout primarily focus on maximising profits in order to ensure a long-term financial sustainability;
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 153 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b – point i
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 38 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point iii – indent 6
– is subject to the supervision of an independent authority in accordance with nationalapplicable law.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 154 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b – point ii
“When implementing the financial instrument, the bodies referred to in points (a) to (d) of the first subparagraph shall ensure compliancecomply with applicable law, including rules covering the ESI Funds, State aid, public procurement and relevant standards and applicable legislation on the prevention of money laundering, the fight against terrorism, tax fraud and tax evasion. Those bodies shall not make use of or engage in tax avoidance structures, in particular aggressive tax planning schemes or practices not complying with EU tax good governance cpriterianciples, as set out in EUthe Union legislation including Commission recommendations and communications or or any formal notice by the latter. In this context, the bodies implementing financial instruments shall take the utmost account of the policies of the Union. They shall not be established and, in relation to the implementation of the financial operationinstruments shall not maintain business relations with entities incorporated in jurisdictions that do not co-operate with the Union in relation to the application of the internationally agreed tax standards on transparency and exchange of information. Those bodies may, under their responsibility, conclude agreements with financial intermediaries for the implementation of financial operationinstruments. They shall transpose requirements referred to in this paragraph in their contracts with the financial intermediaries selected to participate in the execution of financial operationinstruments under such agreements.”
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 157 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point d a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 38 – paragraph 9 a (new)
(da) The following paragraph 9a is added: “9a. Notwithstanding Articles 70 and 93(1), contributions pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article may be used for the purpose of giving rise to new debt and equity finance in the entire territory of the Member State without regard to the categories of region, unless otherwise provided for in the funding agreement.”
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 167 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 39a – paragraph 2
2. The contribution referred to in paragraph 1 shall not exceed 25 % of the total support provided to final recipients. In the less developed regions referred to in point (b) of Article 120(3), the financial contribution may exceed 25% where duly justified by the ex-ante assessments in either Article 37(2) or paragraph 3 of this Article, but shall not exceed 50%. The total support referred to in this paragraph shall comprise the total amount of new loans and guaranteed loans as well as equity and quasi-equity investments provided to final recipients. The guaranteed loans referred to in this paragraph shall only be taken into account to the extent that ESI Funds resources are committed for guarantee contracts calculated on the basis of a prudent ex ante risk assessment covering a multiple amount of new loans.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 170 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 39a – paragraph 4
4. Reporting by managing authorities under Article 46 on operations comprising financial instruments under this Article shall be based on the information kept by the EIB for the purposes of its reporting pursuant to Article 16(1) and (2) of the EFSI Regulation, supplemented by the additional information required under Article 46(2). Requirements under this paragraph shall allow for uniform reporting conditions in accordance with Article 46(3) of this Regulation.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 171 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 39a – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) entrust implementation tasks to a financial institutionbody, which shall either open a fiduciary account in its name and on behalf of the managing authority or set up a separate block of finance within the financial institution for programme contribution. In the case of a separate block of finance, an accounting distinction shall be made between programme resources invested in the financial instrument and the other resources available in the financial institution. The assets held on fiduciary accounts and such separate blocks of finance shall be managed in accordance with the principle of sound financial management following appropriate prudential rules and shall have appropriate liquidity.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 172 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 39a – paragraph 6
6. When implementing financial instruments under point (c) of Article 38(1), the bodies referred to in paragraph 25 of this article shall ensure compliancecomply with applicable law, including rules covering the ESI Funds, State aid, public procurement and relevant standards and applicable legislation on the prevention of money laundering, the fight against terrorism, tax fraud and tax evasion. Those bodies shall not make use of or engage in tax avoidance structures, in particular aggressive tax planning schemes or practices not complying with EU tax good governance cpriterianciples, as set out in EUthe Union legislation including Commission recommendations and communications or any formal notice by the latter. In this context, the bodies implementing financial instruments shall take the utmost account of the policies of the Union. They shall not be established and, in relation to the implementation of the financial operationinstruments shall not maintain business relations with entities incorporated in jurisdictions that do not co- operate with the Union in relation to the application of the internationally agreed tax standards on transparency and exchange of information. Those bodies may, under their responsibility, conclude agreements with financial intermediaries for the implementation of financial operationinstruments. They shall transpose requirements referred to in this paragraph in their contracts with the financial intermediaries selected to participate in the execution of financial operationinstruments under such agreements.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 180 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 39a – paragraph 8
8. Where, for the purpose of implementing financial instruments referred to under point (c) of Article 38(1), managing authorities contribute ESI Funds programme resources to an existing instrument under point (c) of Article 38(1), the fund manager of which has already been selected by the EIB, international financial institutions in which a Member State is a shareholder, or a publicly-owned bank or financial institution, established as a legal entity carrying out financial activities on a professional basis and fulfilling the conditions set out under Article 38(4)(b)(iii), they shall entrust implementation tasks to this fund manager through the award of a direct contract.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 184 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The authorities designated in accordance with Article 124 of this Regulation and with Article 65 of the EAFRD Regulation shall not carry out on-the-spot verifications at the level of the EIB or other international financial institutions in which a Member State is a shareholder, for financial instruments implemented by them.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 185 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
However, the designated authorities shall, taking into account the risks identified, shall consider whether to carry out verifications in accordance with Article 125(5) at the level of other bodies implementing the financial instruments referred to in Article 39 in the jurisdiction of their respective Member State and, where necessary, at the level of the final recipient.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 187 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt an implementing act concerning the models for the control reports and the annual audit reports of the firstthird sub- paragraph of this paragraph.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 188 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The bodies responsible for the audit of the programmes shall, taking into account the risks identified, shall consider whether to carry out audits of operations and of management and control systems at the level of other bodies implementing the financial instruments referred to in Article 39 in their respective Member States and at the level of the final recipients when conditions of Article 40 (3) are fulfilled.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 191 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 40 – paragraph 5a – point b
(b) where the irregularity that gives rise to the cancellation of the contribution is detected at the level of the financial intermediary within a fund of funds, the contribution cancelled may be reused only for otor at the level of the body implementing financial instruments where financial intermediaries or for other final recipients within the same financial instrumentstrument is implemented through a structure without a fund of funds, the contribution cancelled may be reused only for other financial intermediaries.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 197 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 15 d (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 41 – paragraph 2
15d. In Article 41, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: “2. As regards financial instruments referred to in point (b) of Article 38(1) implemented in accordance with point (cd) of Article 38(4), the applications for interim payments and for payment of the final balance shall include the total amount of the payments effected by the managing authority for investments in final recipients as referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 42(1).
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 209 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 43a – paragraph 1
1. Support from the ESI Funds to financial instruments invested in final recipients and gains and other earnings or yields, such as interest, guarantee fees, dividends, capital gains or any other income generated by those investments, which are attributable to the support from the ESI Funds, may be used for differentiated treatment of privatemarket economy investors, as well as the EIB when using the EU guarantee pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/1017. Such differentiated treatment shall be justified by the need to attract private counterpart resources.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 210 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 43a – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The assessments referred to in Article 37(2) and Article 39a(3) shall include, as appropriate, an assessment of the need for, and the extent of, differentiated treatment as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and/or a description of the mechanism which will be used to establish the need for, and extent of, such differentiated treatment.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 217 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 43a – paragraph 3
3. The differentiated treatment shall not exceed what is necessary to create the incentives for attracting private counterpart resources. It shall not over-compensate privatemarket economy investors, and the EIB when using the EU guarantee according to Regulation (EU) 2015/1017. The alignment of interest shall be ensured through an appropriate sharing of risk and profit.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 218 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 43a – paragraph 4
4. Differentiated treatment of privatemarket economy investors shall be without prejudice to the Union State aid rules.
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 221 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 18 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
18a. In Article 46, in paragraph 2, point aa is added: (aa) identification of the bodies implementing financial instruments, and the bodies implementing funds of funds where applicable, as referred to under point (a), (b) and (c) of Article 38(1);”
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 222 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 19 – introductory part
19. in Article 46, in paragraph 2, in the first subparagraph, points (c), points (g) and (h) are replaced by the following:
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 232 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 61 – paragraph 3 – point aa
“application of a flat rate net revenue percentage established by a Member State for a sector or sub-sector not covered under point (a). Before the application of the flat rate the responsible audit authority shall satisfy itself that the flat rate has been established according to a fair, equitable and verifiable method based on historical data or objective criteria.;;
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 261 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 265 – paragraph 1 – point 57
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013
Article 140 – paragraph 3
“Where documents are kept on commonly accepted data carriers in accordance with the procedure laid down in paragraph 5, no originals shall be required, except at least for the cases where fraud suspicions exist.”
2017/03/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 29 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) For the period after 2020, the Commission intends to put forward the necessary proposals to ensure that strategic investment will continue at a sustainable level, while continuing to ensure complementarity between structural and investment funds.
2017/01/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 35 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The extended EFSI should address remaining market failures and sub-optimal investment situations and continue to mobilise private sector financing in investments crucial for Europe’s future job creation – including for the youth –, growth and competitiveness with strengthened additionality. They include investments in the areas of energy, environment and climate action, social and human capital and related infrastructure, healthcare, research and innovation, cross- border and sustainable transport, as well as the digital transformation, taking account of the need to adapt to current trends by facilitating collaborative economy instruments. In particular, the contribution of operations supported by the EFSI to achieving the Union's ambitious targets set at the Paris Climate Conference (COP21) should be reinforced. Energy interconnection priority projects and energy efficiency projects should also be increasingly targeted. In addition, EFSI support to motorways should be avoided, unless it is needed to support private investment in transport in cohesion countries or in cross-border transport projects involving at least one cohesion country. For reasons of clarity, although they are already eligible, it should be explicitly laid down that projects in the fields of agriculture, fishery and aquaculture come within the general objectives eligible for EFSI support.
2017/01/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 41 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Due to their potential to increase the efficiency of the EFSI intervention, blending operations combining non- reimbursable forms of support and/or financial instruments from the Union budget, such aspporting innovation through the use of financing covered by the Horizon 2020 programme along with those available under the Connecting Europe Facility, and financing from EIB Group, including EIB financing under the EFSI, as well as other investors should be encouraged. Blending aims to enhance the value added of Union spending by attracting additional resources from private investors and to ensure the actions supported become economically and financially viable.
2017/01/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 52 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) In order to reinforce the take-up of the EFSI in less-developed and transition regions, the scope of the general objectives eligible for EFSI support should be enlarged, bearing in mind that the need for development in these regions confirms the potential available for investment.
2017/01/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 66 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) In line with the exceptional market demand for SME financing under the EFSI which is expected to continue, the EFSI SME Window should be enhanced. Particular attention should be paid to social enterprises, including through the development and deployment of new instruments and the diversification of financing sources by encouraging multiple financing such as crowdfunding.
2017/01/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 71 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The EIB and the EIF should ensure that the final beneficiaries, including SMEs, are informed of the existence of EFSI support, by identifying instruments to measure the degree of visibility of EFSI investment, so as to enhance the visibility of the EU guarantee granted under Regulation (EU) 2015/1017.
2017/01/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 112 #

2016/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a – point i
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – first part
Such support shall include providing targeted support on the use of technical assistance for project structuring, on the use of innovative financial instruments, taking account of current economic trends, and on the use of public-private partnerships, taking into account the specificities and needs, needs and investment potential of Member States with less- developed financial markets.; (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.) Or. ro (Article 14 – paragraph 1 – first part)
2017/01/31
Committee: REGI
Amendment 348 #

2016/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part 2 – PFC 1(A) – paragraph 2 – indent 1
- Cadmium (Cd) 1,580 mg/kg dry matter,P2O5
2017/03/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 392 #

2016/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part 2 – PFC 1(B) – paragraph 3 – point a – point 2 – indent 1
- As of [Publications office, please insert the date of application of this Regulation]: 680 mg/kg phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5),
2017/03/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 404 #

2016/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part 2 – PFC 1(B) – paragraph 3 – point a – point 2 – indent 2
- As of [Publications office, please insert the date occurring three years after the date of application of this Regulation]: 40 mg/kg phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5), andeleted
2017/03/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 417 #

2016/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part 2 – PFC 1(B) – paragraph 3 – point a – point 2 – indent 3
- As of [Publications office, please insert the date occurring twelve years after the date of application of this Regulation]: 20 mg/kg phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5),deleted
2017/03/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 478 #

2016/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part 2 – PFC 1(C)(I) – paragraph 2 – point a – point 2 – indent 1
- As of [Publications office, please insert the date of application of this Regulation]: 680 mg/kg phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5),
2017/03/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 489 #

2016/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part 2 – PFC 1(C)(I) – paragraph 2 – point a – point 2 – indent 2
- As of [Publications office, please insert the date occurring three years after the date of application of this Regulation]: 40 mg/kg phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5), andeleted
2017/03/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 502 #

2016/0084(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part 2 – PFC 1(C)(I) – paragraph 2 – point a – point 2 – indent 3
- As of [Publications office, please insert the date occurring twelve years after the date of application of this Regulation]: 20 mg/kg phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5),deleted
2017/03/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 90 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) In order to make the regional cooperation feasible, Member States should establish a cooperation mechanism within each region. Such mechanism or mechanisms should be developed sufficiently in time and ensure a high degree of transparency to allow for conducting the risk assessment and drawing up meaningful plans at regional level. Member States are free to agree on a cooperation mechanism best suited for a given region. The Commission should have a facilitating role in the overall process and share best practises for arranging regional cooperation such as a rotating coordination role within the region for the preparation of the different documents or establishing dedicated bodies. In absence of an agreement on the cooperation mechanism, the Commission may propose a suitable cooperation mechanism for a given region.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 103 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) Demand-side measures, such as fuel switching or reducing the gas supply to large industrial consumers in an economically efficient order, may have a valuable role to play in ensuring energy security, if they can be applied quickly and significantly reduce demand in response to a supply disruption. More should be done to promote efficient energy use, particularly where demand-side measures are needed. Priority should be given to investments aimed at exploiting the sustainable energy potential at local level. The environmental impact of any demand and supply-side measures proposed must be taken into account, with preference being given, as far as possible, to measures that have least impact on the environment. At the same time, security of supply and competitiveness aspects must be taken into account.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 110 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
(41) One of the Union goals is to strengthen the Energy Community that would ensure effective implementation of the Union energy acquis, energy market reforms and incentivising investments in the energy sector by closer integration of the Union and Energy Community energy markets. This entails also introducing common crisis management by proposing preventive and emergency plans at the regional level including the Energy Community Contracting Parties. To this end, forecasts should be drawn up of consumption at regional level and the available reserves, which would make it possible to strengthen the ability to respond in the event of a crisis. Furthermore, the Commission Communication on the short term resilience of the European gas system from October 2014 refers to the need to apply internal energy market rules on the flow of energy between the Union Member States and the Energy Community Contracting Parties. In this regard, in order to ensure an efficient crisis management on borders between the Union Member States and the Contracting Parties, the necessary arrangements following the adoption of a Joint Act should be set so that specific cooperation with any individual Energy Community Contracting Party can take place once the required mutual provisions have been duly put into place.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 112 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
(43) Where there is reliable information on a situation outside the Union that threatens the security of supply of one or several Member States and that may trigger an early warning mechanism involving the Union and a third country, the Commission should inform the Gas Coordination Group without delay and the Union should take appropriate action to try to defuse the situation. Where the situation allows and adequate infrastructure exists, the Commission and Member States could grant temporary aid to third countries in crisis.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 136 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The competent authorities within each region shall agree on a cooperation mechanism to conduct the risk assessment within the deadline provided for in paragraph 5 of this Article. Competent authorities shall report to the Gas Coordination Group on the agreed cooperation mechanism for conducting the risk assessment 18 months before the deadline for the adoption of the risk assessment and the updates of the risk assessment. The Commission may have a facilitating role overall in the preparation of the risk assessment, in particular for the establishment of the cooperation mechanism at bilateral, interregional and cross-border level and through cooperation with third countries. If competent authorities within a region do not agree on a cooperation mechanism, the Commission may propose a cooperation mechanism for that region.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 140 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The competent authorities of the Member States of each region as listed in Annex I, after consulting the natural gas undertakings, the relevant organisations representing the interests of household and industrial gas customers, including electricity producers, and the national regulatory authorities, where they are not the competent authorities, shall establish jointly a coherent framework at EU level:
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 144 #

2016/0030(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The competent authorities within each region shall agree on a cooperation mechanism, bearing in mind the principle of European territorial cooperation, sufficiently in time to establish the plans and allow for their notification and for the notification of the updated plans.
2016/06/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 3 #

2015/2285(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges the new approach for a more streamlined European Semester organised in two successive phases, including publishing the recommendations for the entire euro area early on, together with this annual growth survey (AGS), preceding the country-specific recommendations (CSRs), thus giving Member States the opportunity to take the euro area recommendations into account in national policymaking; stresses that the Member States should draw up responsible budget policies that take account of the priorities set at regional level;
2016/01/19
Committee: REGI
Amendment 9 #

2015/2285(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Expresses concern that despite moderate signs of recovery, the EU economy is still in a period of slow growth, high long-term and youth unemployment, increased poverty levels and widening regional disparities in terms of GDP per capita; stresses that the unprecedented inflow of refugees and asylum seekers over the last year has represented a great challenge in some Member States; stresses that the Member States’ specific recommendations should pursue achievable objectives, in the light of the new challenges;
2016/01/19
Committee: REGI
Amendment 16 #

2015/2285(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Urges the Commission to take better account of the Europe 2020 Strategy and its key targets by improving its implementation and carrying out a further review, in the context of the European Semester, as well as by proposing measures and methodology for better monitoring of the EU Funds expenditures related to Europe 2020 goals; believes that the forthcoming Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) review will provide an opportunity to analyse and therefore enhance the value added by EU funding to the goals of Europe 2020 Strategy; insists on the need to gradually increase the involvement of local and regional level actors in the early consultation process in the context of the mid-term review;
2016/01/19
Committee: REGI
Amendment 36 #

2015/2285(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Member States and the Commission to ensure adequate administrative capacity in order to increase the quality of service to firms and citizens, and to ensure improved transparency, efficiency and accountability in public procurement, by utilising e-procurement and tackling corruption; calls, in this context, for the efficient use of ESI Funds to reform structures and processes, human resource management and service delivery; insists on setting performance criteria in the field of budget execution and calls on the Member States to identify participatory methods of budget implementation;
2016/01/19
Committee: REGI
Amendment 3 #

2015/2284(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to conduct thorough impact assessments of all trade agreements. Sectors identified as vulnerable should be closely monitored. Impact upon Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) should be carefully evaluated. Social partners and Member States with sectors at high risk should be duly informed and assisted in the process of application;
2016/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 33 #

2015/2284(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission only to grant market economy status to trade partners where they meet the five criteria which it has set.deleted
2016/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 7 #

2015/2128(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Commission to prepare an impact study concerning payment discontinuation, both on the Member States and with regard to the effects on the delay of the cohesion policy.
2015/10/21
Committee: REGI
Amendment 14 #

2015/2128(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes, on the one hand, that once again cohesion policy is not the area with the highest number of irregularities reported as fraudulent, and, on the other hand, that the largest proportion of such irregularities in this policy area concern the European Regional Development Fund; calls on the Commission to prepare an impact study on the impact of the irregularities related to the delays in the implementation of the cohesion policy.
2015/10/21
Committee: REGI
Amendment 24 #

2015/2128(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that measures to detect irregularities continue to vary between Member States, mainly on account of differing definitions of irregularities; calls on the Commission to impose all Member States to adopt the same concepts when defining errors and the distinction between error and fraud; welcomes the preventive and corrective measures taken by the Commission to avoid fraudulent irregularities, including by interrupting 193 payments under the cohesion policy;
2015/10/21
Committee: REGI
Amendment 37 #

2015/2128(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that the Common Provisions Regulation requires managing authorities to put in place effective and proportionate anti-fraud measures; calls on the Commission to reinforce preventive action, in particular by strengthening the technical and administrative capacities of managing authorities to ensure more robust control systems able to reduce the risks of fraud and increase detection capacity; welcomes the establishment of the system for the early detection of irregularities and calls on the Member States to implement an emergency mechanism for dealing with deficiencies.
2015/10/21
Committee: REGI
Amendment 44 #

2015/2128(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Appreciates the Commission’s decision to carry out a mid-term assessment in 2018 in order to establish whether the new regulatory architecture for the cohesion policy prevents fraud and reduces the risk of irregularities; calls on the Council to endorse the proposal for a directive on the fight against fraud to the EU’s financial interests by means of criminal law. Calls on the Commission to adopt a coordinated regulatory framework for the Member States concerning the recovery of the damages, in order to increase the solvency of beneficiaries.
2015/10/21
Committee: REGI
Amendment 11 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises that persistent problems such as financial barriers result in a lack of investment within the EU and the urgent need to mobilise investment in order to boost the real economy; welcomes, in this regard, the proposal for an Investment Plan for Europe and the new European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) through its contribution to the relaunch of private investments; recalls that there is a need to ensure consistency and complementarity between the EFSI and other EU policies and instruments, in particular the ESI Funds;
2015/10/21
Committee: REGI
Amendment 18 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Takes note of the EIB Operational Plan for 2015-2017; welcomes the fact that it recognises that speeds of recovery differ between the Member States and that it has set economic and social cohesion as a cross-cutting policy goal; calls on the EIB to consider measures aimed at encouraging entrepreneurs by facilitating financing after the first failure, as well as support measures for developing business;
2015/10/21
Committee: REGI
Amendment 37 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Considers administrative burdens and a lack of administrative capacity a serious obstacle to successfully achieving cohesion policy goals; stresses the importance of the EIB’s advisory role and recognises the efforts undertaken in this context; welcomes the partnership between the Commission and the EIB in setting up the fi-compass advisory platform; calls on the EIB to provide the Commission and the Member States with a set of suggestions regarding administrative streamlining and capacity-building, given its acquired experience with public funding;
2015/10/21
Committee: REGI
Amendment 45 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the EIB to increase its support to projects covered by the EU macro- regional strategy; stresses the importance of continuing to support the traditional economic sectors in the EU, such as agriculture, shipbuilding and tourism, the interconnection of Europe by means of support for the development of regional airports and intermodal transport; calls, furthermore, for the establishment of financial and investment platforms in order to enable the bundling of funds from various sources and the mobilisation of investments needed for such macro- regional projects;
2015/10/21
Committee: REGI
Amendment 47 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Emphasises the results-oriented approach for cohesion policy for the 2014- 2020 programming period; calls for more information, within the context of EIB annual reporting, on the results and the contribution of EIB activities to cohesion policy objectives; calls, in this context, on the Commission and the Member States to make full use of the possibilities afforded by Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 to increase the use of the financial instruments, where appropriate, for the period up to 2020 and calls on the EIB to further promote its instruments and the beneficiaries' good practice, in order to enhance their attractiveness;
2015/10/21
Committee: REGI
Amendment 3 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the cohesion policy represents the main EU investment policy in the real economy; highlights that in some Member States it is the main source of funding for investments developing synergies and having a multiplying effect in economic growth and job creation; stresses that the main objective of financing through the structural and investment funds is to close the gap between regions;
2015/05/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 9 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that the cohesion policy, which accounts for almost a third of the total EU budget, provides – through the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) – the appropriate framework for meeting the smart, sustainable and inclusive growth objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy; stresses that the role of the European Fund for Strategic Investments is to attract private investment into the public sector, providing a supplementary contribution to cohesion policy investments, and accordingly calls on the Commission to expand the entities eligible for EFSI financing to include public authorities;
2015/05/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 15 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Is seriously concerned about the recurrent problem of the backlog of payments, especially under the cohesion policy, which creates a de facto debt in the EU budget, and stresses that there is a danger of perpetuating the ‘snow ball’ effect of accumulating unpaid invoices at year’s end unless a tangible and sustainable solution is found, as fast as possible, by the budgetary authority together with the Commission; regrets that the suspension of payments after errors are detected leads to payment deadlines being delayed, and calls on the Commission to study the possibility of continuing payments where minor errors have been detected;
2015/05/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 29 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Demands that the payment plan to be agreed between Parliament, the Council and the Commission, in line with the joint statement of December 2014 of the Parliament and of the Council in the framework of the agreement reached on 2014 and 2015 budgets, be implemented without any further delay; calls, to this end, for sufficient payment appropriations to be provided under heading 1b within the 2016 budget, with a view to decreasing the level of the backlog as much as possible by the end of the year; underlines the urgency of addressing this issue in a proper way, as the situation of outstanding payments undermines the credibility, effectiveness and sustainability of the policy; points out that delays in launching the cohesion policy in the current programming period are leading to payments being deferred, and calls on the Commission to consider staggering payment appropriations in 2016 so as to prevent them from accumulating.
2015/05/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 14 #

2015/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the bureaucratic burden and lack of administrative capacity are the main factors that create a gap between commitments and payments;
2015/05/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 87 #

2015/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Recalls that the interpretation and application of Article 23 CPR must comply with the horizontal principles provided for in the CPR, in particular with the principles of partnership and multilevel governance, and with the Regulation and the Common Strategic Framework as a whole; takes the view that local and regional authorities should play a more visible part in cooperation on horizontal principles;
2015/05/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 99 #

2015/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Asks the Commission to evaluate, beforehand and in close cooperation with the Member States, the impact at regional and local levels of any measures adopted under Article 23 CPR; stresses, in this context, the significant contribution made by the private sector and civil society through public consultations;
2015/05/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 115 #

2015/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Welcomes, in the context of the criteria for determining the programmes to be suspended and the level of suspension under the first strand, the cautious approach adopted in the guidelines whereby account will be taken of the economic and social circumstances of Member States by considering mitigating factors similar to those envisaged in the suspensions under Article 23(9) CPR; regrets that the suspension of payments creates a gap and leads to the decommitment of funds, and calls on the Commission to review the criteria and avoid suspensions where minor infringements are detected;
2015/05/22
Committee: REGI
Amendment 17 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Citation 1
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 172, 173, 174 and Article 175(3) and Article 182(1) thereof,
2015/03/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 26 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Comprehensive action is required to reverse the vicious circle created by a lack of investment and still increasing disparities between regions. Structural reforms and fiscal responsibility are necessary preconditions for stimulating investment. Along with a renewed impetus towards investment financing, these preconditions can contribute to establishing a virtuous circle, where investment projects help support employment and demand and lead to a sustained increase in growth potential.
2015/03/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 35 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The purpose of the EFSI should be to help resolve the difficulties in financing and implementing productive investments in the Union and to ensure increased access to financing. It is intended that increased access to financing should be of particular benefit to small and medium enterprises, creating a proper environment for innovative start-ups. It is also appropriate to extend the benefit of such increased access to financing to mid- cap companies, which are companies having up to 3000 employees. Overcoming Europe's current investment difficulties should contribute to strengthening the Union's economic, social and territorial cohesion.
2015/03/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 63 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) Provided that all relevant eligibility criteria are fulfilled, Member States may use European Structural Investment Funds to contribute to the financing of eligible projects that are supported by the EU guarantee. The flexibility of this approach should maximise the potential to attract investors to the areas of investment targeted by the EFSI. The Commission should provide guidelines for coordinating the different instruments in order to facilitate the participation within the framework of investment platforms.
2015/03/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 65 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 a (new)
(21 a) EFSI and European Structural and Investment Funds are instruments of different nature and scope, but full complementarity is needed to maximise synergies, enhance competitiveness and to boost development. Such complementarity is highly important in particular for less developed and disadvantaged regions where it can bring an increased added value.
2015/03/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 138 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Provided that all relevant eligibility criteria are fulfilled, Member States may use European Structural and Investment Funds to contribute to the financing of eligible projects in which the EIB is investing with the support of the EU guarantee. The Commission shall provide, immediately after the entry into force of this Regulation, guidelines to coordinate the instruments and facilitate the participation within the framework of investment platforms.
2015/03/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 179 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The purpose of the EFSI should be to help resolve the difficulties in financing and implementing productive investments in the Union that provide an immediate boost to Europe's economy and to ensure increased access to financing. It is intended that increased access to financing should be of particular benefit to small and medium enterprises. It is also appropriate to extend the benefit of such increased access to financing to, small mid- cap companies, which areand mid-cap companies having up to 3000 employees, but should not be limited to these types of companies. Overcoming Europe's current investment difficulties should contribute to strengthening the Union'closing the innovation divide in Europe, strengthening the Union's innovation potential, competitiveness, economic growth and employment, as well as economic, social and territorial cohesion.
2015/03/19
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 208 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) Taking into account that small mid- cap companies with up to 499 employees and mid-cap companies with up to 3000 employees represent the most innovative segment of companies in the private sector, generating on average a higher number of patents, process innovations and product innovations as well as higher returns on investment, while still facing similar problems as SMEs regarding access to finance, the EFSI should tailor some of its financial products towards small mid-caps and mid-cap companies in particular.
2015/03/19
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 211 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 c (new)
(11c) In order to ensure that the EFSI fulfils its purpose it is imperative that an amount of at least EUR 5 500 000 000 from the EFSI is allocated for EIB funding to the EIF to be used specifically for the benefit of Small and Medium Enterprises and small mid-cap companies as well as innovative SMEs and innovative mid-caps.
2015/03/19
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 231 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Many small and medium enterprises, as well as mid-cap companies, across the Union require assistance to attract market financing, especially as regards investments that carry a greater degree of risk. The EFSI should help these businesses to overcome capital shortages and market failures by allowing the EIB and the European Investment Fund ('EIF') to provide direct and indirect equity injections, as well as to provide guarantees for high-quality securitisation of loans, and other products that are granted in pursuit of the aims of the EFSI.
2015/03/19
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 239 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The EFSI should be established within the EIB in order to benefit from its experience and proven track record and in order for its operations to start to have a positive impact as quickly as possible. The work of the EFSI on providing finance to small and medium-sized enterprises and small mid-cap companies should be channelled through the European Investment Fund ('EIF') to benefit from its experience in these activities.
2015/03/19
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 611 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1a Definitions 1. For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply: a) 'small and medium-sized enterprises' or 'SMEs' means micro, small and medium-sized enterprises as defined in Recommendation 2003/361/EC. b) 'small mid-cap companies' means legal entities having up to 499 employees which are not SMEs. c) 'mid-cap companies' means legal entities having up to 3000 employees which are not SMEs. d) 'additionality' means the support by the EFSI of operations which address - Market failures or - sub-optimal investment situations, and which could not have been carried out - in that period, or - under reasonable conditions, or - to the same extent under instruments offered by - regional promotional banks - national promotional banks, - commercial banks, and by - the EIB under their normal investment policies Consequently, the EU guarantee can be combined with, or can be used to complement, accelerate or strengthen existing EU financial instruments.
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 968 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) investment in education and training, health, research and development, information and communications technology and innovation; 25% of investments in research should be realized in small or medium sized companies;
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 1040 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
The EU guarantee can be combined with, or can be used to complement, accelerate or strengthen existing EU financial instruments.
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 1042 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 b (new)
At least 35% of the EU Guarantee shall be granted to support projects fitting with the objectives referred to in Article 2a.2(a) and 2a.2(e). Or. en (See AMD 60 by Christian Ehler on Article 2a(new).)
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 1104 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. The EU guarantee to the EIB shall be of an amount equal to EUR 16 000 000 000, of which a maximum amount oft least EUR 25 500 000 000 mayshall be allocated for EIB funding to the EIF in accordance with paragraph 2. Without prejudice to Article 8(9), aggregate payments from the Union under the guarantee to the EIB shall not exceed the amount of the guarantee.
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 119 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the manifestations of extreme nationalism, racism, xenophobia and intolerance have not yet disappeared from our communities; on the contrary, especially after the recent terrorist attacks they appear to be on the rise in many Member States which affects traditional minorities and new national minority communities as well;
2015/05/18
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 148 #
2015/05/18
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 322 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on promoting understanding, acceptance and tolerance between the different national communities in the Member States through the principles of equality, non-discrimination and respect for diversity; calls on particularly the condemnation of hate speech and all forms of aggression;
2015/05/12
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 402 #

2014/2254(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Deplores the fact that even today people belonging to minorities are still victims of discrimination; calls for more consistency of the European Union in the field of minority protection; strongly believes that all Member States as well as candidate countries shall be bound by the same principles and criteria in order to avoid the application of double standards; Calls therefore, as a part of resolving the so- called Copenhagen dilemma, for the establishment of an effective mechanism to monitor and ensure fundamental and acquired rights of national and linguistic minorities both in candidate countries and in countries already admitted to the European Union;
2015/05/12
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 23 #

2014/2246(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas there is a growing need for stronger co-ownership of the strategy by the different levels of governance and for shared responsibility with the corresponding rights, obligations and sanctions at all levels of project implementation; whereas multi-level governance should be enhanced;
2015/07/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 100 #

2014/2246(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the flagship initiatives are considered to have served their purpose, but also highlights the fact that their visibility is considered to be rather low; notes also the mitigated progress towards the strategy’s headline targets; welcomes the conclusion drawn as to the need to enhance ownership and involvement on the ground, by consolidating vertical and horizontal partnerships, with a view to improving the delivery of the strategy;
2015/07/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 101 #

2014/2246(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes Eurostat’s regular publication of progress indicators as regards the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy; calls, nevertheless, for greater regional detail in respect of the data provided at the NUTS II and NUTS III levels; recommends that the national authorities embark on regional reforms in relation to the competences, organisation and functioning of the regions where shortcomings have been found in relation to attracting Community support;
2015/07/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 155 #

2014/2246(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Highlights the importance of the new EU investment instrument, the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), and emphasises that it should be complementary and additional to the ESI Funds; points out that the EFSI is not clearly linked to the Europe 2020 strategy, but that through its objectives it contributes to the implementation of the strategy; is convinced that the EFSI is an efficient instrument that guarantees responsible public spending; stresses, moreover, the imperative of ensuring full coherence and synergies between all EU instruments, in order to avoid overlapping or contradictions among them or between the different levels of policy implementation; appreciates that the review of the Europe 2020 strategy, as the EU’s long-term strategic framework for growth and jobs, must address this challenge with a view to using all the available resources effectively and achieving the expected results as regards the overarching strategic goals;
2015/07/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 34 #

2014/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Strongly believes that the Commission’s Platform on Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans should provide strong support for cities and regions for the design and implementation of the SUMPs; stresses the importance of considering all cities for investment in urban mobility regardless of size, as well as of the key role that European cities and regions have to play in boosting and promoting sustainable urban mobility; takes into account the major investments in boradband internet and calls on the local and regional authorities to develop coordinated action plans in relation to urban mobility;
2015/05/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 38 #

2014/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the authorities to promote the use of clean vehicles and clean fuels, along with the development of intelligent transport systems ensuring a territorial continuum between urban centres and their periurban areas; calls on the local authorities to promote policies to encourage green transport, by providing facilities, reducing taxes and establishing green certificates;
2015/05/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 59 #

2014/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the efforts by the Commission to coordinate and consolidate EU initiatives in the field of urban mobility, such as CIVITAS 2020 for research and innovation, the Urban Mobility Observatory for exchange of best practice and experience, or the Platform on Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans; calls on the Commission to reinforce its efforts to reduce fragmentation and lack of coordination between the relevant EU initiatives and programmes and to take into account the success of programmes such as URBAN and URBACT; calls on the Commission to encourage the authorities in Member States to create networks of excellence in the field of urban mobility;
2015/05/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 64 #

2014/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Advocates a strong link between mobility plans and urban sustainability and other initiatives such as Smart Cities or the Covenant of Mayors which are oriented towards a more sustainable and self- sufficient city; considers that the voluntary commitment established in the Covenant of Mayors may be a valid model for the promotion of the mobility and sustainability plans; welcomes the initiative ‘CITIEs- of tomorrow investing in Europe’ and calls on the Commission to create communication platforms bringing together the stakeholders of sustainable urban development;
2015/05/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 67 #

2014/2242(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that the Juncker Plan can play a key role in financing sustainable urban transport projects; believes, therefore, that it is essential to establish strong strategic planning and coherence between urban mobility projects to be supported by the European Fund for Strategic Investment and the objectives and priorities related to urban mobility already developed by national, local and European authorities; therefore, calls on the Commission to include public authorities as potential beneficiaries of ESIF funding.
2015/05/13
Committee: REGI
Amendment 23 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 12 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 6 April 2011 on the future European international investment policy19f __________________ 19f Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0141.
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 12 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 6 April 2011 on European international investment policy19g __________________ 19g Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0141.
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 13
– having regard to its earlier resolutions, in particular those of 23 October 2012 on trade and economic relations with the United States20, 23 May 2013 on EU trade and investment negotiations with the United States of America21, 12 March 2014 on the US NSA surveillance programme, surveillance bodies in various Member States and their impact on EU citizens’ fundamental rights and on transatlantic cooperation in Justice and Home Affairs22, and 15 January 2015 on the annual report on the activities of the European Ombudsman 201323, __________________ 22 Texts adopted, P7_TA- PROV(2014)0230. 20 21OJ C 68 E, 7.3.2014, p.53. OJ C 68 E, 7.3.2014, p.53. 21 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2013)0227. Texts adopted, P7_TA(2013)0227. 23 Texts adopted, P8_TA- PROV(2015)0009.
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 89 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas we are faced with an unregulated constantly evolving picture of globalisation and a well-designed trade agreement could contribute to harnessing the far-reaching effects of liberalisation; whereas such an agreement should not only focus on reducing tariffs and NTBs but should also be a tool to protect workers, consumers and the environment; whereas a strong and ambitious trade agreement is an opportunity to create a framework by strengthening regulation to the highest standards at a global level in order to prevent social and environmental dumping;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 116 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
whereas manythe various economic impact studies on TTIP should be taken with caution as they are built on computable general equilibrium economic models with very optimistic predictions about the capacity of the EU and the US to reduce regulatory barriers to trade; whereas the TTIP alone will not resolve economic problems in the EU and no false hopes and expectations should be raised in that respecarried out up to now are naturally only able to provide forecasts at this point, it can be seen at the same time, however, that all studies project a generally positive impact;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 143 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the wellbeing of ordinary citizens, workers and consumers has to be the benchmark for a trade agreement; whereas TTIP should be a good model for a goodfuture trade agreement responding to these requirements;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 163 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the secret character of negotiations ason they have been conducted in the past has led to deficiencies in terms of democratic control of the negotiation process TTIP agreement should offer the maximum possible transparency; whereas Parliament fully supports both the decision of the Council to declassify the negotiating directives and the Commission’s transparency initiative; whereas the new Commission’s new transparency offensive promotes democratic control of the negotiation process and has already successfully eliminated transparency deficiencies; whereas the negotiations will also always require a certain degree of confidentiality in order to be able to achieve a high-quality outcome;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 196 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas President Juncker has also clearly stated in his Political Guidelines that he will not accept that the jurisdiction of courts in the Member States is limited by special regimes for investor disputes; whereas now that the results of the public consultation on investment protection and ISDS in the TTIP are available, a reflection process – taking account of critical and constructive contributions – is needed within and between the three European institutions on the best way to achieve investment protection and equal treatment of investors;deleted
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 213 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas many critical voices in the public debate have shown the need for the TTIP negotiations to be conducted in a more transparent and inclusive manner, taking into account the concerns voiced by European citizens; whereas Parliament fully supports both the decision of the Council to declassify the negotiating directives and the Commission’s transparency initiative;deleted (See consolidated letter G)
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 228 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas since July 2013 talks between the US and the EU have been going on, but up to now no common text has been agreed and it is now exactly the right time to undertake a reflection on the state of playyet;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 264 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) to emphasise that while the TTIP negotiations consist of negotiations on three main areas – ambitiously improving reciprocal market access (for goods, services, investment and public procurement at all levels of government), reducing NTBs and enhancing the compatibility of regulatory regimes, and developing common rules to address shared global trade challenges and opportunities – all these areas are equally important to be included in a comprehensive package; TTIP should be ambitious and binding on all levels of government on both sides of the Atlantic, the agreement should lead to lasting genuine market openness on a reciprocal basis and trade facilitation on the ground, and should pay particular attention to structural means ofsures for achieving greater transatlantic cooperation while upholding regulatory standards and preventing social and environmental dumping;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 365 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point iv
(iv) to increase market access for services according to the ‘posind adopt a ‘negative list approach as a basis in services liberalisation whereby all services that are not to be opened up to foreign companies are explicitly mentioned and new services are excludedexcluded, it being ensured that previously unknown or innovative service sectors must not be automatically excluded from the market, while ensuring that possible standstill and ratchet clauses only apply to non- discrimination provisions and allow for enough flexibility to bring services back into public control;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 399 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point vi
(vi) to ensure an adequate carve-out of sensitive services such as public services and public utilities (including water, health, social security systems and education) allowing national and local authorities enough room for manoeuvre to legislate in the public interest; awelcomes the joint declaration reflecting negotiators’ clear commitment to exclude these sectors from the negotiations would be very helpful in this regard;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 449 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point viii
(viii) to ensure that the EU’s acquis oEuropean data privacy is not compromised through the liberalisation of transatlantic data flows, in particular in the area of e-commerce and financial services; to ensure that no commitments on data flows are taken up before European data protection legislation is in place;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 458 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point ix
(ix) to ensure that European competition law is properly respected particularly in the digital world;deleted
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 477 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point x
(x) to keep in mind that the agreement should not risk prejudicing the Union’s cultural and linguistic diversity, including in the audiovisual and cultural services sector, and that existing and future provisions and policies in support of the cultural sector, in particular in the digital world, are kept out of the scope of the negotiations;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 529 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xiv
(xiv) to ensure that the negotiations on rules of origin aim at reconciling the EU and US approaches and establishing effective rules of origin; given the conclusion of the negotiations for the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between EU and Canada and the potential upgrade of the EU-Mexico free trade agreement, the possibility and scope of cumulation will need to be considered;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 553 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point i
(i) to ensure that the regulatory cooperation chapter promotes an effective, pro- competitive economic environment through thea transparent, effective and efficient regulatory cooperation chapter and coherence promote and facilitation ofe trade and investment while developing and securing the high levels of protection of health and safety,, the consumer, labour and, the environmental legislation and of the and cultural diversity that exists within the EU; negotiators on both sides need to identify and to be very clear about which regulatory measures and standards are fundamental and cannot be compromised, which ones can be the subject of a common approach,areas will be the subject of regulatory consistency or regulatory cooperation and which ones will be excluded, and which are the areas where mutual recognition based on a common high standard and a strong system of market surveillance is desirable and which are those where simply an improved exchange of information is possible, based on the experience of one and a half years of ongoing talks;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 575 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) to base negotiations on SPS and TBT measures on the key principles of the multilateral SPS and TBT agreements; to aim in the first place at increasing transparency and openness, strengthening dialogue between regulators and strengthening cooperation in international standards-setting bodies; to recognise, in negotiations on SPS and TBT measures, the right of both parties to manage risk in accordance with the level either deems appropriate in order to protect human, animal or plant life or health; to respect and uphold the sensitivities and fundamental values of either side, such as the EU’s precautionary principle;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 595 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iii
(iii) with regard to the horizontal regulatory cooperation chapter, to give priority to fostering bilateral cooperation between regulatory bodies through enhanced information exchange and to promote the adoption, strengthening and timely implementation of international instruments, on the basis of successful international experiences such as, for instance, ISO standards or under the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe’s (UNECE) World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29); to establish that the prior impact assessment for the regulatory act, as defined in the horizontal provisions on regulatory cooperation, should also measure the impact on consumers and the environment next to its impact on trade and investment; to handle the possibility of promoting regulatory compatibility with great care and only without compromising legitimate regulatory and policy objectives;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 602 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iv
(iv) to define clearly, in the context of future regulatory cooperation, which measures concern TBT and redundant administrative burdens and formalities and which are linked to fundamental standards and regulations and should not be altered;deleted
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 624 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point i
(i) to combine negotiations on market access and regulatory cooperation with the establishment of ambitious rules and disciplines, inter alia on sustainable development, energy, SMEs, and investment and intellectual property;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 638 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point ii
(ii) to ensure that the sustainable development chapter aims at the full and effective ratification, implementation and enforcement of the eight fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and their content, the ILO’s Decent Work Agenda and the core international environmental agreements; provisions should be aimed at improving levels of protection of labour and environmental standards; an ambitious trade and sustainable development chapter should also include rules on corporate social responsibility based on the Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and a clearly structured civil society involvementagreement supports the drafting and enforcement of legal provisions and political measures in the area of labour and environmental law and promotes the consideration of core standards and benchmarks laid down by the International Labour Organisation (ILO); calls for the harmonisation of standards in the area of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR);
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 643 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point iii
(iii) toit must be ensured that labour and environmental standards are not limited to the trade and sustainable development chapter but are equally included in other areas of the agreement, such as investment, trade in services, regulatory cooperation and public procurementthe horizontal dimensions of the provisions of labour and social law in the sustainable development chapter are integrated in the relevant operational parts of the agreement in order to ensure a coherent and comprehensive approach;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 670 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point vi
(vi) to ensure that the economic, social and environmental impact of TTIP is examined through a thorough trade sustainability impact assessment with clear involvement of all stakeholders and civil societyupon conclusion of the negotiations;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 744 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiii
(xiii) to ensure that investment protection provisions are limited to post- establishment provisions and focus on non-discrimination and fair and equitable treatment; standards of protection and definitions of investor and investment should be drawn up in a precise manner; free transfer of capital should be in line with the EU treaty provisions and should include a prudential carve-out in the case of financial crises;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 764 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiv
(xiv) to ensure that foreign investors are protected and treated in a non- discriminatory fashion and have a fair opportunity to seek and achieve redress of grievances, which can be achieved without the inclus; ensure that a disputes resolution mechanism is established in order to ensure that the conditions of an ISDS mechanism; such a mechanism is not necessary in TTIP given the EU’s and the US’ developed legal systems; a state-to- state dispute settlement system and the uthe agreement on investment are respected, but only on the condition that the mechanism guarantees the right of states to regulate, fulfils requirements for transparency, includes clear and precise definitions of legal concepts such as ‘indirect expropriation’ and ‘fair and equitable treatment’, an appeals mechanism, respect for rules on ethics and prevention of conflicts of interest, prevents abusive recourse to the courts, is accessible to SMEs and does not affect rights of recourse tof national courts are the most appropriate tools to address investment disputes; to ensure that the establishment of the dispute resolution mechanism forms part of medium-term thinking on the establishment of an international organisation responsible for such questions in relation to investment;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 793 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xv
(xv) to ensure that TTIP includes an ambitious Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) chapter that includes strong protection of precisely and clearly defined areas of IPR, including enhancedthe protection and recognition of European Geographical Indications (GIs), and reflects a fair and efficient level of protection such as laid out in the EU’s and the US’s free trade agreement provisions in this area, while continuing to confirm the existing flexibilities in the Agreement on Trade- Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), notably in the area of public health;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 21 #

2014/2214(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas previous initiatives have confirmed the success of EU cooperation mechanisms in the countries of the Danube River Basin and Baltic Sea;
2015/07/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 45 #

2014/2214(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fact that the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) and the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance for 2014-2020, and in particular the Adriatic-Ionian Cooperation Programme 2014-2020 (ADRION), provide significant potential resources and a wide range of tools and technical options for the strategy; supports the fact that other funds and instruments relevant to the strategy pillars are available, in particular Horizon 2020 in respect of all pillars, the Connecting Europe Facility in respect of Pillar II, the LIFE programme in respect of Pillar III, as well as in respect of climate change mitigation and adaptation, and the COSME programme for SMEs in respect of Pillar IV, as well as the INNOVFIN programme for innovation funding;
2015/07/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 57 #

2014/2214(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the EIB, in cooperation with the Commission, to examine the possibility of setting up a dedicated investment platform for the Adriatic and Ionian Region that would enable the mobilisation of funding from public and private sources, as well as the accessing of private finance for energy efficiency (PF4EE) managed by the EIB; calls for the creation of a transparent and publicly available project pipeline for the Adriatic and Ionian Region, which would increase the visibility of current and potential projects as well as attract investors;
2015/07/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 81 #

2014/2214(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Emphasises that particular attention should be given to remote and geographically disadvantaged areas such as islands and mountainous regions with the aim of unlockidentifying and exploiting their vastspecific potential, especially in the tourism sector; calls, moreover, on the Commission to propose a European Year of Islands and Mountains;
2015/07/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 129 #

2014/2214(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Notes with concern the rate of fish stock depletion in the Adriatic and Ionian Seas as a result of overfishing; stresses that fisheries are one of the key components in the economies of the coastal areas and islands; deems it necessary, therefore, to consider the protection and preservation of fish stocks to be a paramount objective of the strategy, to take decisive action in the form of aligned third-country fisheries legislation, data sharing, joint monitoring platforms and fishery management plans, and to further develop the aquaculture sector;
2015/07/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 191 #

2014/2214(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Urges the participating countries to continue their efforts to diversify energy supply sources, a process which will not only improve the energy security of the macro-region but will also increase competition, which will have important benefits for the economic development of the region; underlines the importance of developing liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals in the macro-region, thereby helping to achieve enhanced independence and energy security, in particular in Croatia and Albania;
2015/07/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 217 #

2014/2214(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Points out the need to tackle historical and trans-border pollution in a responsible manner and clean up the sites affected by the industrial contamination of soil, water and air, and, where applicable, by pollution resulting from military conflicts; supports all active measures for the reduction of the pollution of the sea from chemical and conventional weapons;
2015/07/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 231 #

2014/2214(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Urges the establishment of a regional centre for disaster preparedness in order to create an early warning system to prevent natural disasters and those caused by industrial, transport and other activities, such as floods, fires and exploitation activities in the Adriatic; stresses the importance of preserving the ecosystem and the biodiversity of the region and underlines the importance of fostering support and urgent measures against natural threats such as Xylella fastidiosa, which affects olive trees, the pest Dryocosmus kuriphilus and the fungus Cryphonectria parasitica, which affects chestnut woods; stresses in this regard the need to step up import and marketing controls so as to contain these natural hazards;
2015/07/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 17 #

2014/2209(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to continue identifying the main obstacles and to initiate policies which would encourage SMEs to invest in green growth and eco- innovation, in order to promote opportunities for employment and the enhancement of sustainable growth; recognises that sustainable development has a significant growth potential and accordingly urges the Commission to make financing instruments as accessible as possible;
2015/03/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 23 #

2014/2209(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recommends to the Member States that they include, when drafting the selection criteria for EU-funded projects, elements that should incentivise projects geared towards sustainable and smart growth, and ensure a balanced representation of environmental stakeholders when establishing the monitoring committees; recommends Member States to take into account the specific characteristics of sustainable development in establishing these selection criteria;
2015/03/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 29 #

2014/2209(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Encourages the Member States to address – within their operational programmes – their national and regional needs when making use of ‘green’ public procurement, in order to promote green growth opportunities for SMEs (such as recycling, green energy production, energy efficiency and energy saving schemes); calls on the Commission to inform Parliament on the percentage/number of SMEs that are financed through the operational programmes in each Member State; calls on the Commission to provide SMEs with technical assistance for developing sustainable projects; urges the Commission to facilitate financial instruments for sustainable investment in order to attract private capital;
2015/03/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 44 #

2014/2209(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to support and promote the creation of thematic and geographic/regional platforms, through which incremental or breakthrough eco- innovative projects would attract private investments, and to encourage stakeholder cooperation in order to enrich the European value chain; welcomes the environmental initiatives proposed by the Commission for 2015 and stresses the positive impact of circular economy measures and the local and regional air quality package;
2015/03/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 45 #

2014/2209(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to support and promote the creation of thematic and geographic/regional platforms, through which incremental or breakthrough eco- innovative projects would attract private investments, and to encourage stakeholder cooperation in order to enrich the European value chain; calls on the Member-State authorities, together with the business sector and civil society, to set up sustainable growth innovation partnerships;
2015/03/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 16 #

2014/2149(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission, in the context of the Juncker investment plan and the revision of the Europe 2020 strategy, to support European cultural heritage projects, including large-scale projects, on the grounds that they create jobs in the regions, particularly for young people; notes the multiple benefits of investment in the cultural heritage and stresses the need to consolidate public- private partnerships for funding purposes;
2015/04/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 37 #

2014/2149(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that this ceiling, in particular because it relates to total costs, rather than total eligible costs, could seriously limit Member States’ ability to finance such projects; notes the rapid improvement in access to digitisation and urges the Commission to review eligible project costs in the light of recent developments;
2015/04/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 43 #

2014/2149(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights the fact that ERDF cultural heritage projects are a practical example of multilevel governance and of the principle of subsidiarity; stresses the importance of cross-border cultural projects that contribute to increasing economic and social cohesion and encourage inclusion
2015/04/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 46 #

2014/2149(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Takes the view that, thanks to joint funding under the Joint Strategic Framework and the Juncker initiative, investments for the development of EU cultural infrastructures will have a major economic impact and will contribute to increasing employment;
2015/04/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 49 #

2014/2149(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that projects of this kind often provide examples of good practice in carrying out integrated projects in urban areas, thereby contributing to the development of the urban agenda; stresses the urban dimension of the European cultural capital initiatives, which contribute to the development of cultural networks in cities and promote creative initiatives in the long term;
2015/04/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 446 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 a (new)
Article 7 a Industry schemes 1. During the transitional period, relevant industry associations may submit an application to the Commission to have an industry scheme accredited under the requirements of this Regulation. Such application shall be supported by evidence and information. 2. Applications referred to in paragraph 1 may only be made in respect of industry schemes existing at the time of entry into force of this Regulation. 3. Where, on the basis of the evidence and information provided pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article, the Commission determines that the industry scheme, when effectively implemented by a responsible importer, enables that responsible importer to comply with its obligations under Articles 4, 5, 6 and 7, it shall grant the accreditation. 4. Interested parties shall inform the Commission of any changes or updates made to industry schemes for which the accreditation has been granted in accordance with paragraph 3. 5. The Commission shall withdraw the accreditation where it has determined that changes to an industry scheme compromise a responsible importer's ability to comply with its obligations under Articles 4, 5, 6 and 7, or where repeated or significant cases of non- compliance by responsible importers relate to deficiencies in the scheme. 6. The Commission shall establish and keep up-to-date an internet-based register of industry schemes to which the accreditation has been granted. 7. Responsible importers of minerals and metals that can be proven to have been sourced exclusively from parties that have been certified by an industry scheme for which the accreditation has been granted or that have themselves been certified by an industry scheme for which the accreditation has been granted shall be exempted from the independent third party audit. Such certification shall then be sent to the competent authorities.
2015/03/24
Committee: INTA
Amendment 9 #

2013/2708(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Calls on the Government of the People's Republic of China to reform its labour camp system, in close cooperation with the relevant international organisations, and make this process in a transparent way;
2013/09/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 10 #

2013/2708(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to carry out a feasibility study, and consequently submit to the European Parliament a legislative proposal on an effective traceability mechanism for the goods being produced through forced labour;
2013/09/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2013/2708(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Considers as crucial for traceability the cooperation and dialog between the Chinese Government and the EU;
2013/09/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 5 #

2013/2674(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 12 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution entitled 'EU and China: Unbalanced Trade?' (2010/2301(INI));
2013/08/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 7 #

2013/2674(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 12 b (new)
- having regard to the common decision of EU and China, taken at the 14th EU- China Summit held in February 2012 in Beijing, to launch negotiations on a bilateral investment agreement;
2013/08/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 11 #

2013/2674(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. Whereas even if the labour costs have been increasing by 10% per year in the past years, China is still among the top three markets worldwide to invest;
2013/08/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 15 #

2013/2674(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the negotiation of this investment agreement can give rise to public concerns and thus requires the highest possible levelis the first one which is going to be negotiated by the EU as its overall competence after entering in force the Lisbon Treaty, these negotiations have to follow the principle of transparency;
2013/08/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 28 #

2013/2674(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that China, having acceded to the WTO in 2001, should show more emphasis towards liberalizing its trade and opening its market in order to ensure a more level playing field and accelerate the artificial impediments that companies face in accessing Chinese market;
2013/08/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 52 #

2013/2674(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that a clear timeframe of negotiations should to be established, and reasonable and meaningful transitional periods should be considered;
2013/08/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 53 #

2013/2674(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 – introductory part
Considers that the investment agreement with China should be based on the best practices drawn from Member State experiences, bring more coherence and include the following standards:
2013/08/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 63 #

2013/2674(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the expected improvement in certainty will help SMEs to invest abroad, and notes in this regard that the voice of SMEs must be heard during negotiations; the involvement of EU's new SME Centre in China, the EU's IPR SME Helpdesk and the EU Chamber of Commerce in China is welcomed and their activity needs to be further developed;
2013/08/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 69 #

2013/2674(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that investment agreements concluded by the EU must respect the capacity for public intervention, in particular when pursuing public policy objectives such as social, environmental, human rights, security, workers' and consumers' rights, public health and safety, industrial policy and cultural diversity; calls to include respective specific clauses into this agreement;
2013/08/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 72 #

2013/2674(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Recommends that wWith regard to market access, both parties may exclude certain sectors from the libera stresses that interventionist industrial policies, inadequate protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs), ambiguities in substance and in appliscation commitmentsof rules and other non-tariff and technical barriers to trade should be addressed;
2013/08/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 81 #

2013/2674(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that nothing in the agreement shall prevent theallow Parties fromto defininge and implement maing policies for the promotion and protection of cultural diversity;
2013/08/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 88 #

2013/2674(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates its call for a binding corporate social responsibility clause and effective social and environmental clauses;
2013/08/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 102 #

2013/2674(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Expresses its deep concern regarding the level of discretion of international arbitrators to make a broad interpretation of investor protection clauses, thereby leading to the ruling out of legitimate public regulations;deleted
2013/08/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 112 #

2013/2674(RSP)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Takes the view that the agreement should provide forboth state-to-state dispute settlement procedures, but no ISDSand investor-to-state dispute settlement mechanisms;
2013/08/23
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2013/0325(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. It shall apply from 1 January 2014.
2013/11/07
Committee: INTA
Amendment 2 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Recalls that, more than bigger businesses, SMEs benefit from internationalisation through exposure to best practices, better absorption of excess production, improved supply of inputs through imports, and thereby higher competitiveness, to the point that exporting SMEs consistently perform better than non-exporting peers and cause higher welfare gains for the whole of the economy and of the consumers;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 3 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Rejects the belief that sheltering EU SMEs from international competition could help them to grow and perform better on the international stage; believes rather in a positive agenda of the EU for its SMEs in international negotiations in order to lower barriers on a reciprocal basis in the interests of SMEs globally;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 5 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the proposed mapping of the EU's and the Member States' strategies for providing services supporting the internationalisation of SMEs; expresses its hope that this long-awaited initiative will be followed by actions to ensure a harmonised approach that is in line with the principles of subsidiarity and efficiency to promote a rational sharing of actions between the public actors and prevent more administrative red tape from arising;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 14 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to draft a legislative proposal laying down binding commitments on the part of the Member States to simplify all national procedures pertaining to policies in support of the internationalisation of SMEs; believes that this proposal must be frontloaded; recognizes that the issue of simplification could be tackled partially through the SME test and competitiveness proofing of regulations and procedures that the Communication foresees;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Regrets thatConsiders that although the Communication does nottry to address the difficulties that SMEs facefaced by SMEs in identifying foreign business opportunities, and that it does not proposeemphasize sufficiently that providing SMEs identified by governments with guidance and suggestions on internationalisationzation is a possible path of public action, which could fall within the responsibilities of the Member States; believes that the EU should support incentives to develop SMEs in strategic sectors in a proactive fashion, especially when it concerns high-value-added manufacturing activities offering a competitive edge over emerging economies; stresses the need, therefore, to identify promising niche-markets, which has already started to be integrated in other EU policy documents such as the report of the high-level group on Key Enabling Technologies;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 26 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the Member States to adopt single export helpdesks at a local and regional level, run in cooperation with businesses, so that SMEs can receive, in their own language and for immediate use, information regarding assistance, export opportunities, barriers and competitors in third markets;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 27 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Recommends that more information be targeted to small and micro-enterprises, these being the SME grouping that is least active internationally and least aware of its export potential and of the benefits it would gain from internationaliszation;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 28 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Emphasizes that the Communication should have recognized the differences between sectors since services SMEs' internationalization is fundamentally different from manufacturing SMEs' internationalization; notes that many services SMEs, which represent the bulk of SMEs, often do not need to reach a critical size for starting exports and would benefit mostly from more open regulations and access to ICTs in the target countries whereas industry SMEs would benefit more from enhanced conditions in transport logistics and in trade facilitation;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Notes that most public policies in support of EU SMEs' internationalization are focused on manufacturing and recommends therefore that they are readjusted to take into account services SMEs' different needs; supports in particular rethinking the minimum size requirements for SME trade support programmes, which have usually been based on the industry SMEs' export model in which the potential of the firm for internationalising arises from reaching a critical size;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Regrets that the Communication does not foresee EU-level solutions to help SMEs in overcoming the shortage of working capital, especially capital to make the initial investment required and to start financing exports, which could take the form of EU solutions if the mapping deems that it is necessary and feasible;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for a clearer definition of SME priority markets on the basis of the agenda for the EU's trade negotiations; recalls that priority markets should of course include high growth markets such as the BRICs but also take into account SMEs' perception of opportunities for internationalization in developed countries and neighbouring regions; therefore sees the growth of host markets and gaps in existing support structures as the main criteria for making the list of priority markets; recommends that EU's neighbouring countries be added to the list, since most SMEs initially export to trading partners in neighbouring countries, such as the Republic of Moldova and countries in the Western Balkan, such as Serbia, recently recognised as an EU candidate country;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 15
15. Urges the Commission to ensure that the specific needs and interests of SMEs are reflected in all trade negotiations; observes that this would imply identifying the areas of negotiations where problems affect more SMEs than other categories of businesses and focusing on them in the process of negotiating commercial agreements with third countries; supports a reform of the multilateral framework for involving SMEs at the WTO and for ensuring faster arbitration and settlement of disputes for SMEs;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 46 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Stresses that investing abroad is the most challenging form of internationalization for SMEs; recommends that, when the EU comes in the future to negotiate bilateral investment treaties, the needs of SMEs to benefit from a higher safety of their foreign direct investments should be taken into account;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 52 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for concrete initiatives on the part of the EU to improve the protection of SMEs' intellectual property rights (IPR) in third countries, such as has been achieved with the SME IPR helpdesk in China and is now being extended under pilot testing for a selection of ASEAN and South America countries;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 54 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 17
17. Expects the Commission to take an initiative to ensure that EU SMEs enjoy access to public procurement on third markets on an equal footing with other companies; hopes that the recently published proposal for a regulation on the EU public procurement market will foster reciprocity in openness which would benefit to EU SMEs;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 55 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Recalls that international cooperation on regulations and standards is highly beneficial to SMEs' internationalization by removing part of the upfront costs that these firms must invest in order to sell goods or services on third markets;
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2012/2042(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 18
18. Appreciates the initiatives to foster business-to-business contacts foreseen in bilateral free-trade agreements; recalls that the challenges of locating and contacting potential customers overseas, and of establishing reliable supply chains, pose high hurdles for SMEs wishing to enter export markets and that in particular smaller and micro firms rely on intermediaries to sell goods abroad.
2012/05/11
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) The current use of different reporting formats makes it difficult for manufacturers and importers to fulfil their reporting obligations and burdensome for the Member States and the Commission to compare, analyse and draw conclusions from the information received. In this light there should be a common mandatory format for the reporting of ingredients and emissions. The greatest possible transparency of product information should be ensured for the general public, while ensuring that appropriate account is taken of the commercial and intellectual property rights of the manufacturers of tobacco products and fulfils the Union’s international obligations contained in the WTO treaties.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 14 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) The likelihood of diverging regulation is further increased by concerns over tobacco products, including smokeless tobacco products, having a characterisingnon-tobacco dominant flavour other than tobacco, which may facilitate uptake ofr tobacco consumption or affect consumption patterns. For example, in many countries, sales of mentholated products gradually increased even as smoking prevalence overall declined. A number of studies indicated that mentholated tobacco products can facilitate inhalation as well as smoking uptake among young people. Measures introducing unjustified differences of treatment between flavoured cigarettes (e.g. menthol and clove cigarettes) should be avoidedraditional flavours such as menthol, which may facilitate uptake of tobacco consumption or affect consumption patterns..
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 25 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) In order to ensure the integrity and the visibility of health warnings and maximise their efficacy, provisions should be made regarding the dimension of the warnings as well as regarding certain aspects of the appearance of the tobacco package, including the opening mechanism. The package and the products may mislead consumers, in particular young people, suggesting that products are less harmful. For instance, this is the case with certain texts or features, such as ‘low-tar’, ‘light’, ‘ultra-light’, ‘mild’, ‘natural’, or ‘organic’, ‘without additives’, ‘without flavours’, ‘slim’, names, pictures, and figurative or other signs. Likewise, the size and appearance of individual ciga. In case the package cretates cana mislead consumers by creating theing impression that they cigarettes are less harmful. A recent study has also shown that smokers of slim cigarettes were more likely to believe that their own brand might be less harmful. This should be addressed, health warnings must be adapted accordingly.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 40 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
(40) A Member State that deems it necessary to maintain more stringent national provisions for aspects falling inside the scope of this Directive should be allowed to do so, for all products alike, on grounds of overriding needs relating to the protection of public health. A Member State should also be allowed to introduce more stringent provisions, applying to all products alike, on grounds relating to the specific situation of this Member State and provided the provisions are justified by the need to protect public health. More stringent national provisions should be necessary and proportionate, not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States and consistent with WTO international obligations. Stricter national provisions require prior notification to, and approval from, the Commission taking into account the high level of health protection achieved through this Directive.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 41
(41) Member States should remain free to maintain or introduce national legislations applying to all products alike for aspects falling outside the scope of this Directive, provided they are compatible with the Treaty and do not jeopardise the full application of this Directive. Accordingly, Member States could, for instance, maintain or introduce provisions providing standardisation of packaging of tobacco products provided that those provisions are compatible with the Treaty, with WTO obligations and do not affectwith the WTO provisions, and do not jeopardise the full application of this Directive. A prior notification is required for technical regulations pursuant to Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and on rules on Information Society services44.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 50 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 43 a (new)
(43a) This Directive should not lead to deterioration in the living conditions of people whose livelihoods depend on tobacco growing in Europe and who often live in disadvantaged areas. Given that the aim of the Directive is solely to discourage consumption of tobacco products, any decisions concerning ingredients and additives should take due account of the possible socioeconomic repercussions for groups whose livelihoods depend on tobacco growing. The European tobacco growing sector should be protected because it accounts for only a very small proportion of consumption in the EU and, at the same time, contributes to the economic stability of certain European regions where the range of alternative crops is limited. A decrease in or an end to tobacco growing in the EU would have no impact on consumption levels, but would lead to an increase in imports from third countries and a reduction in quality standards.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 62 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) ‘characterisingnon-tobacco dominant flavour’ means an overt distinguishable aroma or taste other than tobacco or menthol, resulting from an additive or combination of additives, including but not limited to fruit, spice, herb, alcohol, candy, menthol or vanilla observable before or evident upon intended use of the tobacco product;
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 68 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
(13) ‘flavouring’ means an additive that imparts aroma and/or taste; except for menthol
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 80 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to adapt the maximum yields laid down in paragraph 1, taking into account scientific development and internationally agreed standards.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 83 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall notify the Commission of the maximum yields that they set for other emissions of cigarettes and for emissions of tobacco products other than cigarettes. Taking into account internationally agreed standards, where available, and based on scientific evidence and on the yields notified by Member States, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to adopt and adapt maximum yields for other emissions of cigarettes and for emissions of tobacco products other than cigarettes that increase in an appreciable manner the toxic or addictive effect of tobacco products beyond the threshold of toxicity and addictiveness stemming from the yields of tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide fixed in paragraph 1.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 84 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to adapt the methods of measurement of the tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide yields, taking into account scientific and technical developments and internationally agreed standards.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 85 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall notify the Commission of the methods of measurement that they use for other emissions of cigarettes and for emissions of tobacco products other than cigarettes. Based on these methods, and taking into account scientific and technical developments as well as internationally agreed standards the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to adopt and adapt methods of measurement.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 87 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall prohibit the placing on the market of tobacco products with a characterising flavourdditives that create or release a flavour which is not predominantly that of tobacco or menthol, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 92 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. In case the experience gained in the application of paragraphs 1 and 2 shows that a certain additive or a combination thereof typically impart a characterising flavour when it exceeds a certain level of presence or concentration the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to set maximum levels for those additives or combination of additives that cause the characterising flavour.deleted
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 98 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 9
9. In case scientific evidence and the experience gained in the application of paragraphs 7 and 8 shows that a certain additive or a certain quantity thereof amplify in an appreciable manner at the stage of consumption the toxic or addictive effect of a tobacco product the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to set maximum levels for those additives.deleted
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 107 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22: (a) to adapt the wording of the health warnings laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2 to scientific and market developments; (b) to define the position, format, layout and design of the health warnings laid down in this Article, including their font type and background colour.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 123 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to: (a) adapt the text warnings listed in Annex I to this Directive taking into account scientific and technical developments; (b) establish and adapt the picture library referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1 of this Article taking into account scientific and market developments; (c) define the position, format, layout, design, rotation and proportions of the health warnings; (d) by way of derogation from Article 7(3), lay down the conditions under which health warnings may be broken during unit packet opening in a manner that ensures the graphical integrity and visibility of the text, photographs and cessation information.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 135 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22, to withdraw the exemption laid down in paragraph 1 if there is a substantial change of circumstances as established in a Commission report.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 140 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to adapt the requirements in paragraphs 1 and 2 taking into account scientific and market developments.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 144 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) refers to flavour, taste, any flavourings or other additives or the absence thereof;deleted
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 146 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Prohibited elements and features may include but are not limited to texts, symbols, names, trade marks, figurative or other signs, misleading colours, inserts or other additional material such as adhesive labels, stickers, onserts, scratch- offs and sleeves or relate to the shape of the tobacco product itself. Cigarettes with a diameter of less than 7.5 mm shall be deemed to be misleading.deleted
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 154 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13
Article 13 Appearance and content of unit packets 1. A unit packet of cigarettes shall have a cuboid shape. A unit packet of roll-your- own tobacco shall have the form of a pouch, i.e. a rectangular pocket with a flap that covers the opening. The flap of the pouch shall cover at least 70% of the front of the packet. A unit packet of cigarettes shall include at least 20 cigarettes. A unit packet of roll-your-own tobacco shall contain tobacco weighing at least 40 g. 2. A cigarette packet can be of carton or soft material and shall not contain an opening that can be re-closed or re-sealed after the opening is first opened, other than the flip-top lid. The flip-top lid of a cigarette packet shall be hinged only at the back of the packet. 3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to define more detailed rules for the shape and size of unit packets in so far as these rules are necessary to ensure the full visibility and integrity of the health warnings before the first opening, during the opening and after reclosing of the unit packet. 4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to make either cuboid or cylindric shape mandatory for unit packets of tobacco products other than cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco if there is a substantial change of circumstances as established in a Commission report.deleted
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 186 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 9
9. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22: (a) to define the key elements (such as duration, renewability, expertise required, confidentiality) of the contract referred to in paragraph 6, including its regular monitoring and evaluation; (b) to define the technical standards to ensure that the systems used for the unique identifiers and the related functions are fully compatible with each other across the Union and (c) to define the technical standards for the security feature and their possible rotation and to adapt them to scientific, market and technical development.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 218 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to update the nicotine quantities set out in paragraph 1 taking into account scientific developments and marketing authorisations granted to nicotine- containing products pursuant to Directive 2001/83/EC.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 220 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to adapt the requirements in paragraphs 3 and 4 taking into account scientific and market developments and to adopt and adapt the position, format, layout, design and rotation of the health warnings.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 223 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22
Article 22 Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 3(2), 3(3), 4(3), 4(4), 6(3), 6(9), 6(10), 8(4), 9(3), 10(5), 11(3), 13(3), 13(4), 14(9), 18(2) and 18(5) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from [Office of Publications: please insert the date of the entry into force of this Directive]. 3. The delegation of powers referred to in Articles 3(2), 3(3), 4(3), 4(4), 6(3), 6(9), 6(10), 8(4), 9(3), 10(5), 11(3), 13(3), 13(4), 14(9), 18(2) and 18(5) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 5. A delegated act pursuant to Articles 3(2), 3(3), 4(3), 4(4), 6(3), 6(9), 6(10), 8(4), 9(3), 10(5), 11(3), 13(3), 13(4), 14(9), 18(2) and 18(5) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.deleted
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 230 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. However, a Member State may maintain more stringent national provisions, applicable to all products alike, in areas covered by the Directive, on grounds of overriding needs relating to the protection of public health. A Member State may also introduce more stringent provisions, on grounds relating to the specific situation of this Member State and provided the provisions are justified by the need to protect public health. Such national provisions shall be notified to the Commission together with the grounds for maintaining or introducing them. The Commission shall, within six months from the date of receiving the notification, approve or reject the provisions after having verified, taking into account the high level of health protection achieved through this Directive, whether or not they are justified, necessary and proportionate to their aim, compliant with the Treaty and the EU’s international obligations, including WTO obligations, and whether or not they are a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between the Member States. In the absence of a decision by the Commission within this period the national provisions shall be deemed to be approved.
2013/05/29
Committee: INTA
Amendment 157 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) When assessing whether restrictive and/or discriminatory procurement measures or practices exist in a third country that could result in the impairment of access of Union goods, services or economic operators to the procurement or concession markets, the Commission should examine to what degree laws on public, rules or other measures on procurement and concessions of the country concerned ensure transparency in line with international standards in the field of public procurement, and do not result in serious and preclude any discriminaurring restrictions against Union goods, services andor economic operators. In addition, it should examine to what degree individual contracting authorities or contracting entities maintain or adopt discriminatoryrestrictive practices against Union goods, services andor economic operators.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 174 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) The determination whether an investigation is in the interest of the Union should be based on an appreciation of all the various interests taken as a whole, including the interests of the domestic industry, users and consumers. The Commission should weigh up the consequences of starting an investigation against its impact, and the potential measures that could be adopted under this Regulation, on EU’s broader interests. The general objective of opening third country markets and improving market access opportunities for EU economic operators should be given special consideration. The objective of limiting any unnecessary administrative burden for contracting authorities and contracting entities as well as economic operators should also be taken into account.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 431 #

2012/0060(COD)

Article 8a IPI Measures 1. Where the Commission finds, following an investigation and consultations pursuant to Article 6, that a third country measure or practice exists, it may, if it considers it to be in the interest of the Union, impose an IPI measure by means of an implementing act. An IPI measure shall only apply if the main object of the procurement procedure falls within the scope of the implementing act, as specified in accordance with paragraph 6 point (a). The design of the procurement procedure shall not be made with the intention of excluding it from the scope of this Regulation. 2. The IPI measure shall be determined on the basis of the following criteria, in light of available information and the Union’s interest: (a) proportionality of the IPI measure with regard to the third country measure or practice; (b) availability of alternative sources of supply for the goods and services concerned, in order to avoid or minimise a significant negative impact on contracting authorities or contracting entities; (c) the engagement of undertakings from the targeted third country in procurement activities in the internal market, benefiting from the lack of reciprocity. 3. The IPI measure shall only apply to procurement procedures with an estimated value of at least EUR 10 000 000 net of value-added tax for works and concessions, and of at least EUR 5 000 000 net of value-added tax for goods and services. 4. The IPI measure shall also apply in the case of specific contracts awarded under a dynamic purchasing system, when those dynamic purchasing systems were subject to the IPI measure, with the exception of specific contracts the estimated value of which is below the respective values set out in Article 8 of Directive 2014/23/EU, Article 4 of Directive 2014/24/EU and Article 15 of Directive 2014/25/EU. The IPI measure shall not apply to procedures for the award of contracts based on a framework agreement. The IPI measure shall also not apply to individual lots to be awarded according to Article 5 (10) of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 16 (10) of Directive 2014/25/EU. 5. In its implementing act, the Commission may decide, within the scope defined in paragraph 6 of this Article, to restrict the access of operators, goods or services from third countries to procurement procedures by requiring contracting authorities or contracting entities to exclude tenders submitted by economic operators originating in those third countries. 6. The implementing act, adopted in accordance with Article 14(2), shall specify the scope of application of the IPI measure, including: (a) the sectors or the categories of goods, services and concessions based on the Common Procurement Vocabulary set out in Regulation (EC) No 2195/2002 as well as any applicable exceptions therein; (b) specific categories of contracting authorities or contracting entities; (c) specific categories of economic operators. 7. The Commission shall impose an IPI measure, according to paragraph 5, only when the third country measure or practice is sufficiently severe and the potential negative impact due to the limited availability of alternative sources, as provided for in paragraph 2 point (b), is comparatively small. 8. The Commission may withdraw the IPI measure or suspend its application if the third country takes satisfactory corrective actions or undertakes commitments to end the measure or practice in question. If the Commission considers that the corrective actions or commitments undertaken have been rescinded, suspended or improperly implemented, it shall make publicly available its findings and may reinstate the application of the IPI measure at any time. The Commission may withdraw, suspend or reinstate an IPI measure in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 14(2) and followed by the publication of a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union. 9. An IPI measure shall expire five years from its entry into force or its extension, unless a review shows a need for continued application of an IPI measure. Such a review shall be initiated, by a publication of a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union, on the initiative of the Commission nine months before the date of the expiry, and shall be concluded within six months. Following the review, the Commission may extend the duration of an IPI measure for a period of another five years in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 14(2).
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 438 #

2012/0060(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 a (new)
Article 9a Additional contractual obligations upon the successful tenderer 1. In the case of procurement procedures to which an IPI measure is applicable, as well as in the case of contracts awarded based on a framework agreement where the estimated value of those contracts is equal or above the values set out in Article 8 of Directive 2014/23/EU, Article 4 of Directive 2014/24/EU and Article 15 of Directive 2014/25/EU, respectively, and where those framework agreements were subject to the IPI measure, contracting authorities and contracting entities shall also include, among the conditions of the contract with the successful tenderer: (a) a commitment not to subcontract more than 30% of the total value of the contract to economic operators originating in a third country which is subject to an IPI measure; (b) for contracts whose subject matter covers the supply of goods, a commitment that, for the duration of the contract, goods supplied and/or services provided in the execution of the contract and originating in the third country which is subject to the IPI measure represent no more than 30% of the total value of the contract, whether such goods and/or services are supplied or provided directly by the tenderer or by a subcontractor; (c) an obligation to provide, upon request, adequate evidence corresponding to points (a) and/or (b) to the contracting authority or the contracting entity at the latest upon completion of the execution of the contract; (d) a proportionate charge, in case of non-observance of the commitments referred in points (a) or (b) between 10% and 30% of the total value of the contract. 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1 point (c), it is sufficient to provide evidence that more than 70% of the total value of the contract originates in countries other than the third country subject to the IPI measure. The contracting authority or contracting entity shall request evidence in case of reasonable indications of incompliance with points (a) or (b) of paragraph 1 or if the contract is awarded to a group of economic operators comprising a legal person originating in the country subject to an IPI measure. 3. For tenders submitted by autonomous SMEs, as defined in the Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, originating in the Union or in a third country with which the Union has concluded an international agreement in the field of procurement, the Commission and the Member States shall make available guidelines for best practices to ensure the efficiency of this Regulation and the consistency of its implementation. Those guidelines shall take into account, in particular, the information needs of SMEs. 4. Contracting authorities and contracting entities shall include a reference to the additional conditions laid down in this Article in the documents for procurement procedures to which an IPI measure is applicable.
2021/10/18
Committee: INTA
Amendment 1 #

2011/2294(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to Articles 2 and 3 of the Treaty on European Union,
2012/02/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 78 #

2011/2294(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that higher education is a public good that fosters culture, diversity and democratic values and prepares students to become active citizens and which supports native language education of native ethnic and language communities living in the Member States;
2012/02/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 87 #

2011/2294(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that public funding is of primary importance for higher education; emphasises that investment in higher education in Europe is crucial to overcoming the current economic crisis; calls on the Member States and higher education institutions to develop innovative funding mechanisms that also ensure native ethnic and language communities and persons belonging to minorities living in the Member States have access to education in their native language;
2012/02/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 94 #

2011/2294(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Reiterates that higher education has the potential to promote social inclusion and upward social mobility; calls on Member States and higher education institutions to widen access for students from all social backgrounds, including access for native ethnic and language communities living in the Member States to higher education in their native language, and to recognise multiculturalism and multilingualism as a fundamental value of the EU that needs to be fostered;
2012/02/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 124 #

2011/2294(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Encourages higher education institutions to engage with their regions and establish collaborative actions with local councils, in those regions where there are significant native ethnic and language communities and minorities, including their representation organisations, with non-governmental organisations and small and medium-sized enterprises to enhance regional development;
2012/02/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 155 #

2011/2294(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Emphasises the importance of language skills as a prerequisite for increased mobility within the EHEA and employability; supports the development of language teaching, and the teaching and development of local and regional languages;
2012/02/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 170 #

2011/2294(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Points out that the persistent disparities between western and central-eastern European higher education systems must be addressed through real integration measures, in the interest of this encouraging and supporting cross-border collaboration between institutes of higher education;
2012/02/02
Committee: CULT
Amendment 23 #

2011/2288(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that in the world of global competition, an option of cohesion policy support provides added value for companies when deciding in which world region to develop their operation capacities and where to transfer their knowhow; acknowledges that investments from third countries can contribute to lessening the effects of the economic crisis and to achieving the objectives of the cohesion policy; stresses the importance of these investments for the regions that face difficulties, by creating jobs and attracting foreign investment;
2012/03/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 29 #

2011/2288(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Endorses the economic rationale of a place-based development policy rooted in the fundamental logic that the interest of the Union’s less-developed regions is likely to increase, should they be able to offer competitive comparative advantages as well as firm sets of incentives; in this context requests the Commission to support Member States and regions to pursue their own investment incentives policies; notes with regret that less developed regions of the EU are constantly losing their attractiveness to the detriment of third countries; it calls on the competent authorities to draft urgent measures aimed at maintaining the current investments and attracting new ones;
2012/03/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 39 #

2011/2288(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines that high taxes and public debt are among the key concerns identified by companies investing in Europe; would be particularly concerned by any effort to harmonise corporation tax conditions inevitably giving rise to higher fiscal burden in some Member States, and would deny individual regions to remain fiscally competitive; draws attention to the fact that the diversity of the fiscal systems in the Member States is the factor that reduces the attractiveness of investing in the EU;
2012/03/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 45 #

2011/2288(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises that the EU has an enormous strength in its cities, and that major urban infrastructure projects, and innovative business parks, provide the strongest appeal for investment; urges the Member States to provide large-scale investments in infrastructure and technology in order to enhance the liveability and competitiveness of Europe’s cities; emphasises the importance of the integrated and durable development of multimode transport systems that increase the mobility level and stimulate economic growth.
2012/03/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 54 #

2011/2288(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6a (new)
6a. Emphasises the need for horizontal and vertical coordination that would allow cities to collaborate with other levels of governance and to consolidate their cooperation by networking with other cities.
2012/03/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 56 #

2011/2288(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6b (new)
6b. Believes that governance is needed, based on the empowerment of citizens, the participation of all relevant partners and the innovative use of share capital
2012/03/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 42 #

2011/2051(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the CAP should take greater account of the potential, problems and needs of small family holdings; stresses the need to diversify the incomes of such holdings and to develop entrepreneurial skills and create new jobs in rural areas; notes that the majority of the EU population lives in urban areas and takes the view that the CAP should contribute to the development of intelligent agriculture in urban areas, and in particular to the regeneration of abandoned industrial sites;
2011/03/25
Committee: REGI
Amendment 55 #

2011/2051(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the potential of regions and rural areas is not confined to the natural resources that enable them to play a social and economic role, given that such areas are first and foremost a place where the food required in order to ensure food security is produced and that they provide key raw materials for industry and renewable energy generation, as well as constituting a source of environmental, ecological, landscape and tourism assets and non-material assets including traditions and cultural features such as culinary heritage in the form of regional products; considers that promoting regional labels by means of the CAP, both at EU level and in third countries, would offer economic advantages at local and regional level;
2011/03/25
Committee: REGI
Amendment 74 #

2011/2051(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to identify mechanisms aimed at facilitating access for agricultural producers to credit and insurance systems;
2011/03/25
Committee: REGI
Amendment 298 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Takes the unequivocal view that efforts under Objective 3 (European Territorial Cooperation) need to be stepped up at all EU internal borders and at all three levels of such cooperation (cross-border, inter- regional and trans-national) and calls for the relevant share of the Structural Funds to be increased to 7%; stresses the importance of the border regions in terms of achievement of the EU 2020 objectives; considers there is a need for closer linkage with the TEN networks – in line with European priorities – and with cross-border infrastructure, and calls for a corresponding increase in funding for all border regions; calls for simplification of the implementing rules governing Objective 3 programs, based on the principle of proportionality, as well as for the development of a common set of eligibility rules, all of which are pre- conditions for these programs to become more effective and more visible;
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 317 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Draws attention to the synergies achievable through integrated approaches, notably linking the ESF and the ERDF, and calls for common eligibility rules and for the option of cross-financing between these funds – specifically with a view to integrated development planning – to be increased and facilitated;
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 341 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Calls, in the interests of efficiency, for the elimination or merger of funds relevant to both regional development and cohesion; recommends that the Globalisation Fund be abandoned as a stand-alone instrument and that appropriate provision for its functions be included in the Social Fund; calls for consideration of whether a merger of the Cohesion Fund and the Regional Development Fund would be compatible with the European Treaties; points out that, as a rule, monies from the Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund are spent on the same types of project;
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 437 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. Considers that the maximum level of support must not exceed 785%, otherwise applications will be driven less by the case for the projects than by the prospect of the funding they can attract; calls for it to be made easier for regions to use private co- financing and market-oriented credit options to cover their share of project financing;
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 463 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44
44. Emphasises that the provision of subsidies must always be retained as an option and that it must be the responsibility of those involved on the ground to use the funding mix best suited to regional needs; considers that subsidies should continue to dominate in regions lagging behind;
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 496 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 51
51. Calls, in respect of Member States that are falling significantly short of the EU stability criteria requirements and also have a poor record on the use of monies from the Structural Funds, for a proposal for the automatic application of more stringent rules in order to monitor the use of such monies in accordance with the law and the relevant objectives;deleted
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 546 #

2011/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 56
56. Supports the Commission's proposal that the N+2 rule should be applied systematically except in the first year of funding and that any other derogations from it should be abolishedshould only reflect the administrative burdens required by the programming process; considers this will guarantee that a balance is struck between high- quality investment and smooth and speedy programme implementation;
2011/04/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 29 #

2011/2034(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that cooperation between regions in the Member States and in the EU is a necessary component for successful implementation of EIPs and takes the view that macro-regional strategies can serve as cooperation platforms for cross-border projects; stresses the importance of increasing the interconnective capacity of energy networks at a cross-border level, through the appropriate financial allocations, in order to achieve territorial cohesion;
2011/03/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 6 #

2011/2019(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that cohesion policy has a complex vision that covers both the economic development of the less- developed regions with support for vulnerable social groups, and increased competitiveness and sustainable development in keeping with the EU2020 objectives and specific regional characteristics; takes the view that this vision must also be reflected in the budget appropriations;
2011/04/18
Committee: REGI
Amendment 40 #

2011/0302(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects, in particular cross-border ones, with a high Union added value, part of the Cohesion Fund allocation (EUR 10 billion22 ) should be transferred to finance transport projects on the transport core network in the Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund under the Connecting Europe Facility. The Commission should support Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund to develop an adequate pipeline of projects in order to give greatest possible priority to therespect national allocations under the Cohesion Fund.
2012/09/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 46 #

2011/0302(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) The Connecting Europe Facility should propose financial instruments to promote substantial participation by the private sector investors and financial institutions in infrastructure investment. To be sufficiently attractive to the private sector, financial instruments should be designed and implemented with due regard to simplification and reduction of administrative burden, while with a level of flexibility in mind to be able to respond to identified financing needs in a flexible manner. The responsible management authorities shall create the necessary incentives for attracting private investors. The design of these instruments should draw from the experience gained in the implementation of financial instruments in the 2007-2013 Multi- Annual Financial Framework, such as the Loan Guarantee instrument for TEN-T projects (LGTT), the Risk Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) and the 2020 European Fund for Energy, Climate Change, and Infrastructure (the ‘'Marguerite Fund'’).
2012/09/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 54 #

2011/0302(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Connecting Europe Facility shall enable the preparation and implementation of projects of common interest within the framework of the trans-European networks policy in the sectors of energy, transport and telecommunications. In particular the Connecting Europe Facility shall support the implementation of projects aiming at the development and construction of new or upgrading of existing infrastructure in the field of transport, energy and telecommunications and giving priority to missing infrastructure. To this end, the Connecting Europe Facility shall pursue the following objectives:
2012/09/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 59 #

2011/0302(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) enable the Unioncontribute to achieve itsthe Union targets of a 20% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions42, a 20% increase in energy efficiency and raising the share of renewable energy to 20% up to 2020, while ensuring greater solidarity among Member States.
2012/09/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 68 #

2011/0302(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) promoting the further integration of the internal energy market and the interoperability of electricity and gas networks across borders, including by ensuring that no Member State is isolated from the European network, to be measured by the number of projects effectively interconnecting Member states‘ networks and removing internal bottlenecks by taking into account also the future sources of energy available in the Member states;
2012/09/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 87 #

2011/0302(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) actions implementing exclusively the core network according to Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines], including the deployment of new technologies and innovation according to Article 39 of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines];
2012/09/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 97 #

2011/0302(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7
7. VAT shall not be an eligible cost.
2012/09/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 101 #

2011/0302(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i
(i) rail and inland waterways: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 230% of the eligible cost; the funding rate may be increased to 340% for actions addressing bottlenecks; the funding rate may be increased to 450% for actions concerning cross-border sections;
2012/09/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 105 #

2011/0302(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii
(ii) inland transport connections to ports and airports, actions to reduce rail freight noise by retrofitting of existing rolling stock, as well as development of ports and multi-modal platforms: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 230% of the eligible cost.
2012/09/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 152 #

2011/0302(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part 1 - section b – row - 1 (new)
Bucharest to Republic of Moldova border – Cross-Border – Rail – studies ongoing
2012/09/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 468 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Each CSF Fund shall support the following thematic objectives in accordance with its mission in order to contribute to, in compliance with its mission to achieve economic, social and territorial cohesion, as stipulated in Article 177 TFEU, shall support the following thematic objectives of the Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth:
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 577 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) a summary analysis of the ex ante evaluations of the programmes justifying the selection of the thematic objectives and the indicative allocations of the CSF Funds; the thematic objectives could differ from one region to another and they stem from the identified needs of each region.
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 699 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 18 – paragraph 1
5% of the resources allocated to each CSF Fund and Member State, with the exception of resources allocated to the European territorial cooperation goal and to Title V of the EMFF Regulation, shall constitute a performance reserve to be allocated in accordance with Article 20.deleted
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 710 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 20
[...]deleted
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 730 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 21
[...]Deleted
2012/06/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1093 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 59 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) value added tax. However, VAT amounts shall be eligible where they are not recoverable under national VAT legislation and are paid by a beneficiary other than non-taxable person as defined in the first subparagraph of Article 13(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC, provided that such VAT amounts are not incurred in relation to the provision of infrastructure.
2012/06/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1155 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 74 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The payment deadline for an interim payment claim may be interrupted by the authorising officer by delegation within the meaning of the Financial Regulation for a maximum period of ninesix months if:
2012/06/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1323 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 85 – paragraph 1
1. The total appropriations allocated to each Member State in respect of less developed regions, transition regions and more developed regions shall not be transferable either between each of those categories of regions. within a given member state, or among the member states;
2012/06/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1402 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 2 – point f – point iii
(iii) a non-exhaustive list of major projects for which the estimated start date for the execution of the main works is before 1 January 2018;
2012/06/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1451 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 91 – paragraph 2
2. Major projects submitted to the Commission for approval shall be contained in the non-exhaustive list of major projects in an operational programme. The list shall be reviewed by the Member State or the managing authority two years following the adoption of an operational programme and may at the request of the Member State be adjusted in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 26(2), in particular to include major projects with an expected completion date by the end of 2022.
2012/06/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1457 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 92 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall adopt a decision, by means of implementing act, no later than three months after the date of submission of the information approving a major project in accordance with Article 91. That decision shall define the physical object, the amount to which the co- financing rate for the priority axis applies, physical and financial indicators for monitoring progress, and the expected contribution of the major project to the objectives of the relevant priority axis or axes. AnThe approval decisionby the Commission under 92(1) and 92(2) shall be conditional on the first works contract being concluded within two years of the date of the decision, or in the case of operations implemented under PPP structures the signing of the PPP contract between the public body and the private sector body, within three years of the date of the approval. At the duly motivated request of the Member State, in particular in the case of delays resulting from administrative and legal proceedings related to the implementation of major projects, and made within the three year period, the Commission may adopt a decision, by means of an implementing act, on the extension of the period by not more than two years.
2012/06/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1524 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 101 – paragraph 1
1. By 30 AprilJune 2016 and by 30 AprilJune of each subsequent year until and including 2022 the Member State shall submit to the Commission an annual implementation report in accordance with Article 44(1). The report submitted in 2016 shall cover the financial years 2014 and 2015, as well as the period between the starting date for eligibility of expenditure and 31 December 2013.
2012/06/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 1612 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 110 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The co-financing rate at the level of each priority axis of operational programmes under the European territorial cooperation goal shall be no higher than 785%.
2012/06/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 279 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) at least 530% of the total ERDF resources at national level shall be allocated to the thematic objectives set in out in point 1, 3 and 4 of Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No […]/2012 [CPR] .
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 321 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The ERDF shall support the following investment priorities within the thematic objectives set out in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No […]/2012 [CPR] in accordance with regional needs and potentials described in partnership contracts:
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 332 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
(a) enhancing research and innovation infrastructure (R&I) and capacities to develop R&I excellence and promoting centres of competence, in particular those of European interest;
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 345 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
(b) promoting business R&I investment, and developing links and synergies between enterprises, enhancing R&D centres and higher education, in particular product and service development, technology transfer, social innovation and public service applications, demand stimulation, networking, clusters and open innovation through smart specialisation;
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 363 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) Developing appropriate links and synergies with Horizon 2020
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 371 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
(a) extending broadband deployment and the roll-out of high-speed networks and supporting the development of future and emerging technologies and networks for the digital economy;
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 376 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
(c) strengthening ICT applications for e- government, e-learning, e-culture, e- inclusion and e- health;
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 392 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part
(3) enhancing the competitiveness of entreprises and in particular SMEs :
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 410 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
(b) developing and implementing new business models for SMEs, in particular for internationalisation;
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 422 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b a (new)
(b a) supporting the creation and the extension of advanced capacities for product and service development
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 429 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b b (new)
(b b) supporting the capacity of SMEs to engage in growth and innovation process;
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 446 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
(b) promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy use in SMEenterprises;
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 464 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point d
(d) developing smart distribution systems at low and medium voltage levels;
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 481 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point e a (new)
(e a) promotion of high-efficiency co- generation of heat and power
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 503 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – introductory part
(6) protecting the environment and promoting resource efficiency including cultural and natural assets:
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 533 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point e
(e) action to improve the urban environment, including regeneration of brownfield sites and reduction of air pollution including the areas located in the immediate neighbourhood of the urban areas;
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 541 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point e a (new)
(e a) promoting innovative technologies to improve environmental protection and resource efficiency in the waste sector, water sector, soil protection or to reduce air pollution,
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 542 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point e b (new)
(e b) supporting endogenous growth potential of specific areas by enhancing accessibility to and use of specific natural and cultural resources and developing sustainable regional and local tourism
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 562 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b a (new)
(b a) investments in national and local roads not included in TEN-T network;
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 570 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
(c) developing environment-friendly and low-carbon transport systems and promoting sustainable urban mobility;
2012/06/07
Committee: REGI
Amendment 175 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the strategy and actions set out in the Operational Programmes are consistent and focused on addressing the challenges identified with the contribution of regional and local authorities in the National Reform Programmes and the relevant Council Recommendations made under Article 148(4) of the Treaty, in order to contribute to achieving the headline targets of the Europe 2020 strategy on employment, education and poverty reduction.
2012/06/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 181 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Member States' national, regional and local authorities shall pursue thematic concentration according to the following modalities:
2012/06/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 29 #

2010/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the cost in administrative and planning terms of implementing national and European broadband support programmes and improving exchanges of good practice at regional level is considerable; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to simplify conditions for support as well as procedures as far as possible, in order to step up the flow of fund and to encourage public-private partnerships, in order to step up the use of European funding earmarked for the diversification of ICT services;
2011/03/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 47 #

2010/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that the definition of basic provision will have to be adjusted in future in line with changed requirements; calls, therefore, on the Commission, in view of the likely failure of the market to supply rural areas with NGA networks, to incorporate new organisational models for the provision and financing of high-speed and ultra-high-speed networks as an option into the broadband guidelines; calls for the use of Wi-Fi support networks for the development of broadband infrastructures, especially in more isolated rural areas, a move which could help reduce costs and installation times;
2011/03/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 58 #

2010/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Member States to establish what measures can be taken to facilitate market penetration by new operators with a view to encouraging a competitive environment;
2011/03/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 59 #

2010/2304(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Welcomes the EU action plan for critical infrastructure protection in the field of information technology and calls for measures to improve online safety.
2011/03/24
Committee: REGI
Amendment 4 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 14
– having regard to its resolution of 24 April 2008 on ‘Towards a reform of the World Trade Organization’5 ,deleted
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 6 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 a (new)
– having regard to the Commission Communication to the Council and the European Parliament entitled 'EU – China: Closer partners, growing responsibilities' (COM(2006)631) and its accompanying policy paper 'Competition and Partnership - A policy for EU-China trade and investment' (COM(2006)632),
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas bilateral trade relations between the two regions have developed considerably since the signature of the EU-China cooperation agreement in 1985, and the agreement should therefore be renewed; the European Commission adopted its major policy strategy on China in 2006, as part of this strategy the ongoing negotiations on a comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation Agreement have been started in January 2007; negotiations aim to further improve the framework for bilateral trade and investment relations and also focus on the upgrading of the 1985 EC-China Trade and Economic Cooperation Agreement;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 19 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas trade relations between the two regions have developed considerably since the signature of the EU-China cooperation agreement in 1985, and the agreement should therefore be renewadapted;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 20 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas trade between EU and China has been growing rapidly and continuously in the last three decades, reaching a peak amount of total trade of 395 billion euros in 2010, and whereas the imbalance in bilateral trade between the EU and China has been in China's favour since 1997, and whereas this trade deficit amounted to 168.8 billion euros in 2010 compared to 49 billion in 2000;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 23 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas the divergent social, economic, and democratic models in China and in the EU, as well as their respective demographics and natural resources, play a large role in the trade imbalances between the two regions;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 27 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas economic growth in Europe is weak at an estimated 0.5% in 2012, but strong in China atestimated to be much weaker than the growth in China, which is expected to reach around 9 % in 2012;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
E a. whereas internal economic imbalances are affecting the European economies, such imbalances are growing also in the Chinese economy, including the real estate and most recently the housing bubble;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 33 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas China is obliged since its accession to the WTO, in 2001, to respect WTO rules by liberalising its trade and opening its market;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 35 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
F a. whereas China's accession to the Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) should be eased by the revision of the GPA's rules and the broadening of its scope agreed on 15th December 2011 during the last WTO Ministerial Conference;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 37 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the undervaluation of the yuan continues to creates artificial trade advantages for China and whereas G20 member countries have promised to facilitate greater exchange rate flexibility;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1
Making reciprocity a principle of EU trade policy with China
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 52 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Considers that it is of interest for the European Union to ensure an improved market access for European companies in China, possibly via an ambitious and balanced economic partnership agreement on which negotiations would take into account the commercial requests of both sides, including the recognition by the European Union of China's market economy status;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 62 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets the existence of numerous tariff and non-tariff barriers to the Chinese market, such as certain forms of discrimination against foreign operators, particularly in the banking, insurance and telecommunications sectors, the complexity of the tariff structure and technical barriers to trade such as the lack of transparency of technical rules and conformity assessment procedures or the Chinese Compulsory Certification System (CCC); notes that China, contrary to the provisions of the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ASCM), does not systematically give notification of specific subsidies;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 72 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Is concerned about the problems foreign businesses encounter in accessing Chinese public procurement whereas access to European public procurement is guaranteed; regrets that China has not acceded to the plurilateral Agreement on Government Procurement (AGPA) even though it committed to do so in its protocol on accession to the WTO; welcomes in the same time commitments made by China recently in December 2011 regarding its willingness to join the new GPA agreement, however the scope of this commitment shall be further developed; calls on the Commission to make haste in developing a European instrument to ensure better access for European businesses to foreign public procurement markets and to encourage the EU's trading partners, such as China, to open up their public procurement markets and eliminate protectionist measures;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 76 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Is concerned aboutNotes the problems foreign businesses encounter in accessing Chinese public procurement whereasile substantial access to European public procurement is guaranteed; regrets that China has not acceded to the plurilateralwelcomes the revision and the broadened scope of the Agreement on Government Procurement (AGPA) even though it committed to do soagreed on 15th December 2011 during the last WTO Ministerial Conference; therefore encourages China to make an accession offer to the GPA which is comparable to the level of other Parties to the GPA in line with its commitment in its protocol on accession to the WTO; calls on the Commission to make haste in developing a European instrument to ensure better access for European businesses to foreign public procurement markets and to encourage the EU's trading partners, such as China, to open up their public procurement markets and eliminate protectionist measures;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 91 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the EU to make use, wherever necessary, of trade defence instruments that are consistent with WTO rules, such as anti-dumping, anti-subsidy and safeguard measures, in the event of illegal trade practices by China and to also make greater use of the WTO dispute settlement rules in order to ensure a level playing field for EU-China trade;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 97 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Deplores the inadequate protection of IPR in China and regrets the lack of specific means available to European businesses, and particularly SMEs, to counter IPR infringements effectively; welcomes the Commission's decision to proposer a review of the directive on the enforcement of IPR; wants China to continue to transpose current international law on the protection of IPR into its national legislation, and more specifically to combat counterfeiting, and urges the Chinese authorities to apply it correctly; regrets that China iwas not taking part in the negotiations on the next international agreement to combat counterfeiting (Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA); calls on China to make efforts in order join ACTA); urges the Commission and the Member States to step up customs cooperation in the EU and with third countries, particularly on the seizure of counterfeit goods, and to simplify customs procedures;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 99 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Deplores the inadequate protection of IPR in China and regrets the lack of specific means available to European businesses, and particularly SMEs, to counter IPR infringements effectively; welcomes the Commission's decision to proposer a review of the directive on the enforcement of IPR; calls on the Commission to better defend IPR in all the multilateral organisations where China is a member (the WTO, the World Health Organisation and the World Intellectual Property Organisation); wants China to continue to transpose current international law on the protection of IPR into its national legislation to close the substantive IPR protection gap between the EU and China, and more specifically to combat counterfeiting, and urges the Chinese authorities to appensure enforcement, especially iat correctlya regional level; regrets that China ihas not takingen part in the negotiations on the next international agreement to combat counterfeiting (ACTA); urges the Commission and the Member States to step up customs cooperation in the EU and with third countries, particularly on the seizure of counterfeit goods, and to simplify customs procedures; asks the Commission and the Member States to cooperate more closely in third countries on copyright issues and licensing;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 108 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that China produces 97 % of the rare earths used in the world and calls on it to guarantee the fair and sustainable supply of these rare earths to its trading partners; calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to any potential restrictions by China on the export of its raw materials; recalls in this context the WTO ruling of 5 July 2001 against China for having placed restrictions on the export of certain raw materials; calls on the Commission to develop a European strategy for the proper management of raw materials involving increased energy efficiency, recycling, lowermore efficient use of resources and the development of industrial cooperation in the green economy growth sectors;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 110 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that China produces 97 % of the rare earths used in the world and calls on it to guarantee the fair and sustainable supply of these rare earths to its trading partners; calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to any potential restrictions by China on the export of its raw materials; recalls in this context the WTO ruling of 5 July 20011 against China for having placed restrictions on the export of certain raw materials; calls on the Commission to develop a European strategy for the proper management of raw materials involving increased energy efficiency, recycling, lower use of resources and the development of industrial cooperation in the green economy growth sectors; calls for negotiations aiming to adopt common rules and principles on trade in raw materials, thereby creating a framework for the use of export restrictions at the WTO but also at the G20, as this issue mainly concerns industrialised countries and China;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 116 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Urges the Commission to negotiate an ambitious and balanced EU-China investment agreement that seeks to create a better environment for EU investors in Chinaas well as improved market access for EU investors in China and greater transparency regarding the governance of Chinese businesses which invest in the EU whilst increasing the level of Chinese capital flows to the EU;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 118 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Welcomes the inauguration of the EU Centre for European Union Small and Medium Enterprises (EU SME Centre) in Beijing in November 2010, which opened its door to SMEs in March 2011, with competences on helping European SMEs to overcome challenges they face when operating on the Chinese market, in particular at their early stages of business development; also the Centre highlights areas of opportunities for EU SMEs in China and assists them in doing business in the Chinese regulatory environment;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 119 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10 b. Stresses the importance of business- to-business cooperation, setting up partnership between Chinese universities and EU companies in order to enhance innovation in China; calls on the advantages offered by the EU Market Access Database, which contains information for EU businesses on market access conditions, such as import tariffs, product requirements, trade barriers, formalities and documents and statistics; welcomes the activity of the European Chamber of Commerce in China;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 129 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4
Reforming trade organisationdeleted
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 130 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4 a (new)
Towards a new institutional framework of the EU-China trade relations
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 137 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the EU to propose a reform of the rules on the organisation of trade governed by the WTO, including binding social and health standards, drawn up in conjunction with the WTO, the ILO and the UN;deleted
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 142 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Deplores the fragmented and uncoordinated institutional framework of the EU-China trade relations; calls on the Commission to urgently revise the bilateral relation's organisational chart, to pursue better coordination and eliminate the redundancies at the level of the countless working groups, dialogues and other formal - and informal - bodies; calls on the Member States, individual regions and municipalities to coordinate better their own China policies, making urgent steps towards an operational consensus aiming the realisation of the common EU objectives;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 149 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Emphasises China's growing influence in the theatre of international trade; calls on the EU therefore to remain vigilant concerning the economic, social and environmental impact of increasing Chinese investment in developing countries, particularly in Latin America and in Africa;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 168 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 6
EquippMaking the EU to cope with globalmore competitionve
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 172 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the EU to develop an long-term based ambitious common industrial policy based on stimulation of research and innovation that benefits from innovative financing arrangements such as project bonds and supports the development of SMEs, particularly via access to public procurement, in order to maintain its competiveness vis-à-vis new major players in industry and research; calls on the EU to enhance the value of European production, by providing better information to consumers and particularly through improvements in 'made in' labelling;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 176 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Urges the EU to strengthen its economic, budgetary, fiscal and political governance to give it a credible and imposing voice on the international stage; calls on the Council and the Commission to speak with one voice in order to prevent partnerships and bilateral agreements weakening the EU position; urges the EU to implement a long-term strategy with regard to China, ensuring the operational coordination both between EU institutions and between the EU and the Member States;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 178 #

2010/2301(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Urges the EU to strengthen its economic, budgetary, fiscal and political governance to give it a credible and imposing voice on the international stage; calls on the Council and the Commission to speak with one voice in order to prevent partnerships and bilateral agreements weakening the EU position; urges on the Member States to work closely with the Commission when defining their commercial policy; asks the EU to implement a long-term strategy with regard to China;
2012/02/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 31 #

2010/2160(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to examine the most effective ways of increasing synergies on the ground; suggests, in this respect, that consideration be given to the possibility of allowing the Member States to choose to have a single operational programme per region, encompassing different funds (ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD and EFF) with a single managing authority; suggests that the national management authorities in the Member States draw up future operational programmes geared as closely as possible to local and regional objectives;
2011/03/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 36 #

2010/2160(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission to encourage the Member Statesdraw up the European guide to multilevel governance and encourage the Member States to implement it in line with specific local and regional objectives and to extend the cohesion policy governance mechanisms (i.e. programming, funding and implementation in partnership between national, regional and local levels) to those funds covered by the planned Common Strategic Framework, in order to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of public spending;
2011/03/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 32 #

2010/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights that it is to a great extent urban areas that translate European policies into on the ground implementation; stresses that urban areas generate around 80% of the GDP of the EU and significantly contribute to the economic growth of Europe; on the other hand they also bear the costs of economic productivity (urban sprawl, congestions, pollution, exclusion etc.) that put their role as ‘motors of growth’ into risk; considers therefore that there is a clear justification for common engagement towards the urban areas of the EU; takes the view that the urban agenda must seek to develop sustainable, smart and inclusive investments so as to strengthen the role of cities as part of the EU 2020 Strategy and as a growth factor;
2011/04/18
Committee: REGI
Amendment 47 #

2010/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to make it obligatory for Member States to formally involve political leaders of key urban areas and associations of local and regional authorities into all stages of Cohesion Policy decision-making (strategic planning, definition of and negotiation on the foreseen ‘National Strategic Development Contracts’); calls on the local authorities accordingly to draw up concrete programmes of action under their specific development strategies; welcomes the Covenant of Mayors and stresses the importance of using available funding to implement programmes of action to promote the exploitation of local renewable energy potential;
2011/04/18
Committee: REGI
Amendment 59 #

2010/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that urban areas are not islands within their regions and their development must therefore be closely linked with the surrounding functional or rural areas; considers that multi-level governance and the partnership principle are the most effective tools to prevent sectorialisation and fragmentation of development policies; urges the Commission to call on the Member States specifically to set out urban-rural dimensions in planning documents and earmark funding for measures to ensure good rural-urban links;
2011/04/18
Committee: REGI
Amendment 70 #

2010/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the fact that local elected authorities have direct political accountability in terms of strategic decision-making and investing public resources; therefore for reaching the goals of Cohesion Policy and EU 2020 Strategy there must be obligatory involvement of local elected bodies in the strategic decision making process and the broad use of the option of sub-delegated responsibilities in the implementation and evaluation of the Cohesion Policy; stresses that the priority of the local authorities is the welfare and quality of life of their citizens who, together with all stakeholders, must be involved in local development strategies;
2011/04/18
Committee: REGI
Amendment 76 #

2010/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recommends that in the next programming period one of the following options shall be used in implementation of urban dimension on national level: independent operational programmes managed by particular urban areas or joint operational programmes covering the urban areas of particular Member State or global grants or ring-fencing of urban measures and resources within specific regional operational programmes; recognises the importance of drawing up specific operational programmes in future for certain urban areas seeking to realise their development potential;
2011/04/18
Committee: REGI
Amendment 79 #

2010/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Advocates for the integrated strategic planning principles as they can help local authorities with stepping up from thinking in terms of ‘individual projects’ to a more strategic inter-sectorial thinking to use their endogenous development potential at the same time, regrets the vague common definition resulting only in formal application in some cases; urges the Commission to call on the Member States to ensure support for the development of local administrative capacities for the purposes of integrated strategic planning;
2011/04/18
Committee: REGI
Amendment 83 #

2010/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Invites the Commission to prepare a study comparing the to-date practice of individual Member States in this area concluded by specific EU guidelines for integrated urban development planning practise clarifying relations between these plans and other planning documents as well as promoting efficient partnershipand legally regulated partnerships, including cross- border urban partnerships; calls on the Commission to make integrated urban planning legally binding if EU funds are used for co-financing projects; urges the local authorities of the Member States to initiate new public-private partnerships and innovative urban infrastructural development strategies so as to attract investment and stimulate business activity; calls for improved coordination between the local and regional administrations, so as to facilitate new partnerships between urban and rural areas on the one hand and between small, medium and large cities on the other, with a view to ensuring balanced regional development;
2011/04/18
Committee: REGI
Amendment 92 #

2010/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to create more flexible conditions for cross- financing between ERDF and ESF funds so that these rules do not create obstacles when designing and implementing integrated urban development plans/strategies; points out that the pooling of existing European funds could substantially increase available financing;
2011/04/18
Committee: REGI
Amendment 95 #

2010/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Commission to incorporate environmental protection considerations in integrated urban development plans/strategies, given the high pollution risk in urban areas and the need for European funding for all projects with a view to achieving the EU 2020 objectives;
2011/04/18
Committee: REGI
Amendment 99 #

2010/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses the promising role of new financial engineering instruments put in place during the current programming period; calls on the Commission to evaluate the experience with these tools and adapt them where necessary to improve their competitive position on the financial market in comparison with common commercial products; calls on the Member States, in view of the positive results obtained from the use of existing financial engineering instruments, to constantly ensure that the most effective use is made of the potential benefits to be derived from these financial instruments;
2011/04/18
Committee: REGI
Amendment 7 #

2010/2087(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the Black Sea Synergy (BSS) initiative, presented in 2007, did provide new impetus to regional cooperation in the Black Sea region, but deplores the fact that the administrative and fiscal resources allocated for its implementation have been insufficient; considers that EU regional initiatives should not be duplicated and that the strategy for the Black Sea should not be overshadowed by similar regional initiativesthe future strategy for the Black Sea, as well as the Eastern Partnership and Union for Mediterranean, has to be complementary to the European Neighbourhood Policy; recommends that all partners in the Black Sea region should be included in a future Black Sea Strategy;
2010/10/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 8 #

2010/2087(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the BSEC needs to be reformed in order to meet new challenges efficiently, and considers that the 20th anniversary in 2012 would be a good occasion for proposals to that end, including for revision of the BSEC Economic Agenda, adopted in 2001, organisational reform and increased operational efficiency, as well as an upgrade of related bodies, such as the Black Sea Trade and Development Bank (BSTDB) and the BSEC Business Council; recommends that the strategy for Black Sea has to coagulate all financial support in the region, from European Neighbourhood Policy Funding, structural funds or pre-accession funds orienting them to the critical sectors which will thus benefit of a sound financial perspective in the future;
2010/10/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #

2010/2087(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the project-based approach under the BSS, notably the Environment Partnership, and considers that the planned partnerships on transport and energy are crucial for sustainable development in the region which should be driven towards integration into the new European internal energy market; considers that the region could be a joint area of the energetic projects such as the Nabucco, South Stream, AGRI, PEOP oil pipeline; considers that green development and energy efficiency, which can drive market incentives and long-term investment, should be further prioritised and that renewable energy sources have the potential to make a large contribution to a future global energy security; takes the view that the Black Sea Ring Highway and the Motorways of the Sea would considerably increase the opportunities for trade and development in the region; underlines, however, the need for thorough environmental impact assessments and improved marine safety;
2010/10/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2010/2087(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Emphasises that the development and capacity enlargement of Black Sea ports, especially ConstanŃa should be a priority for both the Danube Strategy and the BSS, in order to ensure a better use of the trade route provided by the Danube, which is one of the most important inland waterway of Europe;
2010/10/12
Committee: INTA
Amendment 1 #

2010/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. considers that EU cohesion policy plays a crucial role in developing the job potential of a sustainable economy, as it helps eliminate regional differences and create a society with fullthe best possible employment; stresses that the European Structural Funds can encourage the regions to take initiatives to create new, sustainable jobs; recommends that regional and local authorities should have appropriate, permanent contacts with the business environment, employers' organisations, trade unions and NGOs with a view to projecting the needs of the labour market in the medium and long term;
2010/05/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 16 #

2010/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. recognises the important role of local and regional authorities in the education and training of young people, which forms the basis for the acquisition of further skills; points out that the general conditions governing education and further training in many countries are the responsibility of the regional authorities; therefore encourages the regions to use the Structural Funds to create sustainable jobs in the fields of local transport, urban mobility and education; recommends that local and regional authorities should encourage educational establishments to correlate the school curriculum in line with labour market trends;
2010/05/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 50 #

2010/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. reiterates its support for the pilot project ‘Erasmus for elected local and regional representatives’, which could help local and regional authorities to exchange best- practice models, including by encouraging local initiatives, and could also have a multiplier effect in the area of labour market policy.
2010/05/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 52 #

2010/2010(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. recommends that the regional authorities adopt development strategies in line with the objectives of the EU 2020 Strategy with the aim of creating new jobs in a sustainable economy.
2010/05/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 62 #

2010/0101(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 - paragraph 3
3. The EIB shall progressively increase its activity in social sectors, such as health and education; as well as in strengthening administrative capacity and efficiency of local authorities.
2010/10/08
Committee: INTA
Amendment 17 #

2009/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Warmly supports the key priorities of the EU 2020 strategy: exploiting new sources of growth via the digital economy, improving the regulatory framework for strengthening territorial cohesion and promoting better conditions of competitiveness, entrepreneurship and innovation for all the regions, developing SMEs and supporting their growth potential; calls for these policies to be strengthened further, including measures to capitalise on the advantages offered by Europe’s single market, within the framework of the forthcoming deepening of the EU 2020 strategy;
2010/03/26
Committee: REGI
Amendment 45 #

2009/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to monitor, on a continuous basis, the impact of the crisis in various structural and development fields and the use made of the opportunities offered by the financing instruments earmarked for Objective 2 primarily to support competitiveness and employment, with an emphasis on entrepreneurship and SMEs, increasing their access to financial engineering instruments (Jaspers, Jeremie, Jessica, Jasmine);
2010/03/26
Committee: REGI
Amendment 63 #

2009/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Supports the proposed changes to the implementing rules aimed at strengthening the flexibility of the Structural Funds and their adaptation to meet the need, under the exceptional economic circumstances, for immediate implementation of 455 programmes under the cohesion policy, in particular as regards Objective 2 programmes, while still taking account of the need for national and regional institutions and managing authorities to adapt to this new situation; calls for the managing authorities to propose solutions to make the implementation of Objective 2 operational programmes more efficient;
2010/03/26
Committee: REGI
Amendment 26 #

2009/2232(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines the need to formulate regulations and implementing rules in such a way that procedures are transparent, provide better access to the Structural Funds for potential beneficiaries and reduce administrative burdens for participants; calls on the managing authorities in the Member States to present, in transparent fashion, all stages of projects financed by the Structural Funds; reiterates its view that transparent and clear procedures are factors of good governance, and welcomes in this context the efforts made by the Commission to present simplification proposals;
2010/03/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 16 #

2009/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that multi-level governance allows better exploitation of the potential of territorial cooperation thanks to the relations developed among private and public actors across borders; urges those Member States which have not yet done so to adopt as soon as possible the necessary provisions allowing the setting up of European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation; recommends that the Commission promote exchange of information and, especially, of best practices between the EGTCs already created and those in the process of being set up;
2010/07/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 22 #

2009/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Recommends that the Committee of the Regions use the 2010 Open Days as an occasion to promote and deepen the debate on identifying the most suitable means of promoting multi-level governance; suggests that a European multi-level governance label be launched and put in place in the CoR member regions as from 2011;
2010/07/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 46 #

2009/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Invites the Commission to put in place additional technical assistance mechanisms to promote knowledge at regional and local level on implementation-related problems, especially in the EU12,for those regions which are as yet relatively less informed and experienced with regard to the rules governing the cohesion policy;
2010/07/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 52 #

2009/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Welcomes the ongoing simplification of the Structural Funds regulations; calls for a simpler architecture for the Funds after 2013, not as a consequence of the economic crisis but as a general principle of the future cohesion policy, in order to avoid discouraging potential partners from taking part in projectfacilitate absorption of the funds;
2010/07/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 60 #

2009/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to take on board the principles of differentiation and proportionality in future regulations and to adapt requirements according to the size of programmes and nature of partners, especially when small public authorities are involved; asks for wider use of lump- sums and flat rates for all Funds, in particular for overheads and technical assistance; proposes that provision be made for more flexible evaluation criteria forwith a view to encouraging innovative projects and softer control requirements for pilot projects;
2010/07/15
Committee: REGI
Amendment 71 #

2009/2230(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Draws attention to the fact that the Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region should be seen as a process in which the principle of action and cooperation is constantly developed, and that the overriding goal is to find optimal mechanisms that can be transferred to future macro-regional strategies; underlines, in this respect, the importance of promoting successful initiatives with a view to using them to inform future macro-regional strategies;
2010/03/30
Committee: REGI
Amendment 3 #

2009/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the diversity of models of SSGI among Member States needs to be respected in line with the principle of subsidiarity; advocates the dissemination of best practice and the transfer of know- how from those Member States and regions with most experience in providing such services;
2011/03/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 11 #

2009/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to support and strengthen the involvement of local and regional authorities in cross-border cooperation and the related management structures to enhance cooperation through the establishments of the enabling legislative framework;
2010/02/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 15 #

2009/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the conclusion of the feasibility studies for Georgia and Armenia in May 2008, showing that deep and comprehensive free trade agreements (DCFTAs) would bring significant economic benefits to these countries and the EU, thereby allowing the Commission to enter into a preparatory phase for future negotiations on DCFTAs; calls on Azerbaijan to accomplish its accession to the WTO as soon as possible, as WTO membership is a prerequisite before any FTA negotiations can be considered; calls on the Commission to give Azerbaijan technical assistance in order to accomplish its accession to the WTO; encourages Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan to improve their progress in fulfilling their respective ENP Action Plans and the Commission’s recommendations, particularly in terms of improving their administrative and institutional capacity and implementation of regulatory reforms (especially regarding the poor levels of intellectual property protection in all three countries), which is one of the necessary preconditions for effective implementation and sustaining the effects of such ambitious FTAs;
2010/02/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2009/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission to support, by means of adequate assistance mechanisms, the strengthening of the financial and banking system in the South Caucasus states in order to respond to the demands of the business environment and investors;
2010/02/25
Committee: INTA
Amendment 72 #

2008/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Notes the importance of competitiveness in the internationalisation process of SMEs in the present economic environment; in this sense welcomes a set of new legislative proposals included in the Small Business Act, regarding areas that affect SMEs: a new General Block Exemption Regulation on state aids, which will simplify procedures and reduce costs for SMEs; a new statute for a European Private Company which will be created and operated according to the same uniform principles in all Member States; a new proposal on VAT which will offer Member States the option to apply reduced VAT rates for locally supplied services; and, an amendment to Directive 2000/35/EC on late payments, to help to ensure that SMEs are paid within the 30 day time limit stipulated for any commercial transaction;
2008/11/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 83 #

2008/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Stresses the importance of promoting economic and trade relations between the EU and third countries that are members of CEFTA and calls on the Commission to pay special attention to SMEs in its trade relations with such countries;
2008/11/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 6 #

2008/0800(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) Expanding the scope of the EGF represents a solidarity commitment aimed at reducing the major effects of the global economic and financial crisis on the possibilities of ensuring the sustainable development of regions and furthermore of preventing disparities between them from widening.
2009/02/18
Committee: REGI
Amendment 2 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
1a. having regard to its resolution of 15 November 2007 on the European interest: succeeding in the age of globalisation1,,
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 b (new)
2b. having regard to its resolution of 25 October 2006 on the annual report from the Commission to the European Parliament on third country anti- dumping, anti-subsidy and safeguard action against the Community (2004)1,
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas in the framework of the Doha Development Agenda, the WTO rules on trade defence are subject to multilateral negotiations which have not yet been resumed; whereas, the vast majority of WTO member states do not intend to introduce new trade defence rules which would lead to more free and fair trade without protectionism
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 20 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C c (new)
Cc. whereas the European Parliament has already stated its opposition to a unilateral dismantling of the TDIs and its preference to maintain the existing level of stringency,
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas, in TDI investigations, a balance has too often failed to be attained among taking timely action when unfair trade is injuring EU industry, the need to maintain the quality and thoroughness of Commission investigations and the maintenance of transparency and opportunity for all interested parties to contribute,
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 30 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas, European competitiveness depends on the ability to shelter European companies from uncompetitive and unfair trade practice, whereas European production and manufacturing play a crucial role in the creation of economic growth and employment,
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 31 #
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 36 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas, in a globalised world, EU companies need a reinforced mechanism to combat unfair commercial practices, allowing them to create jobs and stimulate growth in the EU,
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 42 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Stresses the importance of enhancing the competitiveness of EU industries by eliminating unfair trade practices in international trade; underlines the importance of effective TDIs;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 a (new)
-1a. Stresses that the TDI system must continue to be a quasi-judicial procedure, based on objective and factual considerations, while any assessments which jeopardise legal certainty and may lead to the politicisation of the system, should be strictly avoided;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 49 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the current TDI system in the EU needs to beminor updateds to provide a suitable answer to unfair behaviour which affects international trade in a globalised world;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 51 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that, in the absence of internationally recognised rules on competition, the current European TDI system is the best response to ensure a level playing field for all actors and to avoid distorting effects in international trade;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 52 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Recalls that negotiations are currently taking place on multilateral disciplines concerning TDIs within the framework of the DDA ; welcomes those negotiations but regrets US opposition to reforms of the WTO’s framework for TDIs; Notes that the worldwide increase in the use of TDIs, particularly by advanced industrial countrie and, calls for new and more stringent rules at WTO level so as to ensure free and fair world trade is maintained;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 53 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Warns of the danger of unilaterally weakening the EU to such an extent that it is unable to counteract unfair trading practices in an international context marked by the proliferation of such practices and the intensive, and often abusive, use of trade defence measures by third countries against imports from the EU;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 57 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates the belief in the benefits of an open trading system, based on free and fair competition, offsetting its potentially disruptive impact, and contributing decisively to the stimulation of growth and the creation of jobs; takes the view that the EU should continue to promote increased global liberalisation and free and fair trade and resist any protectionist temptation;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 59 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines that the EU already has a TDI regime with higher standards, resulting in more stringent application, than other trading partners especially with regard to the initiation, course and subsequent outcome of these investigations;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 62 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the TDI rules lack clarity in procedure which causes unnecessary uncertainty both in regard to the initiation, procedure of investigations and in the outcome of these investigations;deleted
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 64 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the TDI rules lack clarity in procedure which causes unnecessary uncertainty both in regard to the initiation, procedure of invesTDIs are not intended to serve the general economic interests of the EU, but to protect the interests of producers and employees against impairment caused by dumping or illegal subsidies; stresses that compared with those of other WTO members, EU TDI rules have a quasi-judicial character and EU standards are characterised by sufficient clarity in procedure especially with regard to the initigations, course and in the subsequent outcome of these investigations;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 67 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Emphasises that TDIs are not intended to serve the general economic interests of the EU, but to protect the interests of producers and employees against impairment caused by dumping or illegal subsidies;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 75 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Believes that the current EU TDI system already takes due account of the rightful and legitimate interests of all European stakeholders, as was stated by the majority of governments and stakeholders during the public consultation on the above-mentioned Green Paper;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 76 #
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 78 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to take into more serious consideratioincorporate in the overall EU strategy on development whenthe principles of free and fair trade in order to support the least developed countries (LDCs) to establish a competition environment which prevents unfair trade practices and helps to reduce the opening of anti-dumping (AD) investigations against developing countriethe LDCs;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 80 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Urges the Commission to demand a strict application of the existing WTO rules on dumping and subsidies to the emerging economies such as China; asks the Commission to engage in bilateral talks on free and fair competition with these countries;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 82 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Is worried about the lack of coordination between the internal policies of the EU, especially those dealing with industry related matters (including the anti- competition law) and trade defence remedies;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 86 #
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 89 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Believes that the EU TDI system should address all increasing unfair trading actions that hamper the ordinary course of trade, such as fraud, circumvention and dual pricing, which greatly affect fair competition in international markets;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 94 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Urges the Commission to reviseuphold its standards of initiation for new TDI investigations andwhich ensure that the complaining industry provides prima facie evidence that all the AD basic requirements (dumping, injury, causal link) have been met and that measures are not overly and clearly against cthe Community interest; believes that, compared to those of the EU´s trading partners, current TDI rules ensure a balanced consideration of all interests involved;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 100 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Believes that it responds to sound legal and logic principles that complainants in TDI investigations have to substantiate their allegations and prove that these measures are in the broader Community interest;deleted
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 101 #
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 103 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Believes that the current application by the Commission lacks clarity with regard to the initiation of investigations; stresses the need to concentrate the investigations in this phase on gathering evidence of dumping and injury;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 106 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the commission to reconsiderBelieves, that the standing requirement for the initiation of new AD and countervailing duty (CVD) investigations (currently fixed at 25%) of the Community production of a given item, by taking inspiration from applicable European competition legislation is necessary to ensure access by European SMEs to these instruments;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 107 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls for the creation of a special TDI-helpdesk for SMEs for advice on the preparation of complaints; asks further to provide a simplified questionnaire for SMEs; asks the Commission to grant open access to Eurostat and access to information collected on site by EU representations in third countries concerned;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 110 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that a modernized definition of “Community industry” should take the value added in Europe through the new and global supply chains into consideration; calls on the Commission to reconsider the present definition of "Community industry", by laying down objective criteria to grant the status of Communitythere is no reason to reconsider the definition of “Community industry”; reminds the Commission of Article 4 of the Agreement on the implementation of Article IVof GATT 1994 , which refers to "the domestic producers as a whole of the like products or to those of them whose collective output of the products constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of those products" and which excludes all producers "related to the exporters or importers or are themselves importers of the allegedly dumped product" for the definition of the term "domestic industry";
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 117 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on Commission and the Member States to take into account the long-term impact of TDI measures on consumers, by assessing their consequences in terms of price level, quality, availability and choice as well as sustainable competition in the markets;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 122 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Regrets the fact that theBelieves that there is no real alternative to the current decision- making process concerning the award of country- wide market economy status to third countries in TDI investigations often lacks transparency and logic; urges the Commission to ensure that the choice of the "analogue country" is based on realistic and duly motivated criteria; urges the non- market economies to engage in internal reforms aimed at guaranteeing free and fair competition;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 124 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Takes the view that the countervailing duty instrument should be used in preference to the anti-dumping instrument in all cases where this is legally and economically feasibleand the anti-dumping instrument are two distinct instruments that should be used in a complementary way respecting their own scope of application;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 126 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Believes that there is no reason to reconsider the current definition of "Community industry" to take greater account of the interests of those companies which have moved or subcontracted part of their production outside the Union in so far as those companies are not affected by the duties unless they engage in dumping or receive subsidies;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 128 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Urges the Commission to open anti- dumping and countervailing procedures and to impose provisional duties as soon as possible when all the legal requirements have been met, including a threat of injury for the industry concerned;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 129 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Considers that anti-dumping procedures should always give priority to the need to restore a level playing field, as the effects of unfair competition in the long run are against the interests of all participants in the Community market;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 130 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Considers therefore that the analysis of the impact on other interests can only justify the non-imposition of anti- dumping measures in exceptional cases, where it is obvious that defence measures will not be able to improve the situation of Community producers, and in any event cannot justify a downward adjustment in the level or duration of the duties imposed;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 137 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Endorses the creation of the Hearing Officer within the Commission’s DG Trade to assist interested parties; calls on the Hearing Officer to submit, following an independent analysis, to the European Parliament periodic reports in particular on the handling of cases by the Commission, including the conformity of the administrative practices with the basic regulations, and on the synthesis of its activities; stresses that for the sake of transparency and ensuring a meaningful role for the Hearing Officer, his/her reports following individual interventions should be made known to interested parties and the Antidumping Committee;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 140 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls on the Commission to increase the transparency and predictability of the procedure of TDI investigations in the EU, to accelerate and simplify procedures, as well as to facilitate the accessibility of TDIs for SMEs, as they constitute the majority of the European industrial sector;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 144 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Commission to improve the quality of and access to non- confidential information provided by other parties during the investigation and improve access to confidential information in order to strengthen defence rights;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 145 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Commission to make public and available the agenda of the Anti-Dumping Committee and non- confidential documents concerning trade defence investigations on its internet site in a timely manner;deleted
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 146 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Urges the Commission to grant stakeholders the necessary time to react to the initiation of a new investigation and register themselves as interested parties;deleted
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 153 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Stresses that the EU current de minimis thresholds that apply to dumping and injury should not be set at a higher level; states that for the dumping de minimis threshold, even low levels of dumping can have very significant effects in the market, in particular on price sensitive and seasonal products;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 156 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Takes the view that AD and countervailing duty measures applied by the Commission should take the alternative form of quotas or tariff-quotas when this is deemed appropriate and that a phase-in or phase-out system similar to the one implemented in the footwear case is put into operation in new cases involving products suitable for final consumpform of tariffs in order to comply with the relevant WTO regulations;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 157 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Takes the view that AD and countervailing duty measures applied by the Commission should take the alternative form of quotas or tariff-quotas when this is deemed appropriate and that a phase-in or phase-out system similar to the one implemented in the footwear case is put into operation in new cases involving products suitable for final consumpform of tariffs in order to comply with the relevant WTO regulations;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 159 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Stresses that the investigating authority should introduce a "shipping clause", to exclude from the scope of measures products that have been shipped on or before the day of the entry into force of those measures;deleted
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 163 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure the fullest possiblto ensure the transparency and objectivity of the decision-making process in TDI investigations;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 166 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Calls on the Commission to act forcefully against fraud, circumvention or non-respect of IPR;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 169 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Stresses the importance of a transparent and democratic process in the Council based on the rules of majority voting;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 173 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Underlines that the legal certainty and the legal framework within which TDI investigations are conducted, are fundamental, taking into account that the standard court procedure takes too long to properly address possible flaws in TDI investigations; underlines the need to ensure that interested parties have recourse to expedited judicial review;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 194 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 a (new)
36a. Calls on the Commission to enhance the competitiveness of producer industries in the Union by eliminating all competitive distortions which occur in international trade so as to ensure workable international competition;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 197 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37 a (new)
37a. Urges the Commission not to change its administrative practice before a revision of the basic legislation has taken place;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 202 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38a. Urges the Member States to uphold a European common approach and solidarity on this issue which would enable a better use of TDIs in the Community in favour of European industry and its workers when they are confronted with unfair competition;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA
Amendment 205 #

2007/2198(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
39. Calls on the Commission to pursue with coherence and determination the objective of modernising TDIs and making them more suitable to face new globalisation challenges while refraining from any protectionist behaviourstrengthening and modernising TDIs; Urges the Commission to consider the outcome of ongoing WTO negotiations and the consensus among Member States before reforming the European regulation on TDIs;
2008/03/26
Committee: INTA