80 Amendments of Riikka PAKARINEN

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4

4. Is of the opinion that support schemes, ~~if better used~~with more market-oriented approach, could be an appropriate tool to incentivise the development of renewable energy sources (RES) and energy efficiency; sees an important role for the Commission in providing guidance in this regard;

2013/11/15
Committee: ENVI ITRE

2013/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10

10. Sees an important role for cogeneration and district heating in increasing energy efficiency in the future;

2013/11/15
Committee: ENVI ITRE

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A

A. whereas expiry of the milk quotas will affect the entire European milk market, in particular dairy farmers in mountain areas, northernmost areas and outermost regions where it will not be possible to take as much advantage of the growth opportunities generated by deregulation as in other areas;

2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D

D. whereas in many of these areas milk production is the most important and most widespread branch of agricultural activity;

2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)

3a. Stresses the important role of coupled payments under the first agricultural policy pillar; points out that the Member States in these areas should be given additional possibilities to couple payments, national or EU-funded, as it was agreed in the current CAP reform;

2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4

4. Stresses the need for CAP provisions to focus on small and medium size farms in these areas, given that they are structurally more labour intensive and make a valuable contribution to sustained employment levels and rural development;

2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5

5. Calls on the Member States and regions to ~~formulate a specific~~address in their rural development programmes the challenges for milk production in these areas and thus ensuring a better targeting of the support;

2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6

6. Stresses that second-pillar measures such as compensatory allowances, agro- environmental premiums or investment aids are of great importance for sustainable milk production in these areas; urges therefore that Member States and regions be given the necessary opportunities to ensure the payment of adequate and clearly differentiated compensatory allowances and promote environmentally friendly, sustainable and organic forms of agriculture; calls for adequate compensatory payments from the second CAP pillar to offset the higher investment costs for milk production in mountain and northernmost areas occasioned by the particular nature of the terrain;

2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7

7. Calls on the Member States to promote in particular measures under the second pillar, such as cooperative ventures for ~~the rational use of~~more efficient use of available resources such as agricultural machinery or, buildings and infrastructure;

2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)

7a. Underlines the need to develop contractual arrangements in the milk sector to keep up a balanced milk production throughout the EU;

2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)

7b. Points out that if the milk sector in the EU is hit by crisis, the mountain and disadvantaged areas should be the first that are supported by different measures because of the vulnerability of these regions; calls therefore the Commission to develop specific tools to counter price or production quantity fluctuations in these areas;

2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8

8. Points out that, given the substantial logistical problems arising with regard to transport and the generally small quantities of milk produced on individual farms, collection costs in mountain areas and outermost regions are particularly high, placing them at a major geographical and competitive disadvantage; calls on the Member States and regions accordingly to earmark state subsidies for processing plant, so as to offset the higher costs of collection compared with those in more favourable locations; underlines the need of subsidies for the collection of milk from disadvantaged areas;

2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11

11. Points out that stockbreeding methods for efficient milk production are particularly cost-intensive on small farms; calls on the Commission to allow Member States and regions ~~accordingly~~ to provide state subsidies enabling dairy farms in these areas to breed their own high quality livestock in spite of this;

2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12

12. Takes the view that the formation of dairy producer organisations and cooperatives should be encouraged so as to ensure adequate market access for ~~small~~ farms; points out that the market position of producer organisations (POs) in disadvantaged areas is weaker than that of POs in other areas; asks the Commission to therefore consider altering the definition of a 'significant share' in the milk package for POs in disadvantaged areas

2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14

14. Calls on the Commission and Member States to extend joint research programmes to encompass grassland areas and milk production in less favoured areas and devote particular attention to them under joint research projects; calls for a better coordination between CAP and research policy encouraging innovative solutions for these areas;

2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI

2013/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)

14a. Calls on the Commission to follow closely milk production development in these areas and to review the economic impact of the expiry of the milk quotas on dairy farms in these areas; asks the Commission to submit to Parliament and the Council a report dealing with this issue as of 1 January 2017 and, if appropriate, put forward a legislative proposal if milk production has decreased significantly in these regions;

2013/09/18
Committee: AGRI

2013/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F

F. Whereas cohesion policy will continue to be the main source of EU public funding in the context of the multiannual financial framework 2014-2020, and whereas cohesion policy new framework is putting all the emphasis on the need to concentrate investment in those few areas deemed to be most important, such as job creation, employment (in particular youth employment), training and education, SMEs, innovation, energy, environment, and urban development and cities;

2013/12/03
Committee: REGI

2013/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1

1. Considers that ~~there is now enough evidence that~~ policies of budgetary consolidation are in themselves insufficient to enhance growth and promote investments that generate good-quality, sustainable jobs, which require as well measures that support the economy and encourage the progress – still fragile and timid – made towards recovery;

2013/12/03
Committee: REGI

2013/2008(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6

6. Considers that cohesion policy is best placed to give the Europe 2020 Strategy the necessary territorial dimension needed to try to tackle both the very relevant growth differentials within the Union, and within Member States, and the fact that differences in institutional capacities means that the different regions cannot use the given targets as references in the same way;

2013/12/03
Committee: REGI

2013/2008(INI)

George LYON, Riikka PAKARINEN, James NICHOLSON

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8

8. Insists on the role of the ESF in reducing the disparities in human capital among regions, and in the context of implementing the social dimension of the Europe 2020 Strategy, as this fund, in parallel with the ERDF, has ~~been~~sought to contribut~~ing significantly~~e to the fulfilment of some of the current major priorities of the Union, namely boosting youth employment and the labour market, promoting sustainable economy and growth, reducing the number of early school leavers, and combating poverty, discrimination and social exclusion;

2013/12/03
Committee: REGI

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4

(4) In order to comply with the competition rules, measures targeting the internal market should be limited to providing information on the specific characteristics of agricultural production methods in the Union or on themes which are relevant to the Union, such as the European quality systems established by Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council16 and national quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs. __________________ 16 Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1).

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0398(COD)

Sylvie GOULARD, Marian HARKIN, Riikka PAKARINEN

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8

(8) Over the period 2001-11, barely 30 % of the budget earmarked for information provision and promotion measures under Regulation (EC) No 3/2008 was spent on measures targeting third-country markets, even though these markets offer major growth potential. ~~With the aim of reaching 75 % of estimated expenditure, s~~Specific arrangements are therefore required to encourage a larger number of information provision and promotion measures for Union agricultural products in third countries, in particular through increased financial support

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – title

Measures on the internal market and in third countries

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0398(COD)

Sylvie GOULARD, Marian HARKIN, Riikka PAKARINEN

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 - point a

(a) information measures aimed at stressing the specific features of agricultural productions methods in the Union, particularly in terms of food safety, ~~authenticity~~traceability, transparency of the food supply chain, authenticity, gastronomic traditions, nutritional and health aspects, animal welfare or respect for the environment;

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3

The eligible measures in third-countries are as follows: (a) information measures aimed at stressing the characteristics of agricultural and food products and on the themes referred to in Article 5(4); (b) promotion measures aimed at increasing sales of agricultural and food products from the EU.Article 3 deleted Measures in third countries

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2

2. Information measures shall not encourage the consumption of any product on grounds of its origin. Nevertheless, the origin of products may be visible on information and promotional material subject to compliance with specific conditions ~~to be adopted pursuant to~~mentioned in Article ~~6(b)~~5a.

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new)

(ca) Community or national quality schemes for agricultural products listed in Annex I to the Treaty or other similar measures providing a guarantee for high quality and safety of food products.

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 a (new)

Article 5 a The origin of products can be mentioned with regard with the measures mentioned in article 2 paragraph 1. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with Article 24 concerning the specific conditions for indicating the origin of products.

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b

~~(b) the conditions for indicating the origin of products, as referred to in Article 4(2).~~deleted

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0398(COD)

George LYON, James NICHOLSON, Riikka PAKARINEN

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1

1. Information provision and promotion measures shall contribute to strengthening the competitiveness of European agriculture both on the internal market and in third countries. The objectives to be attained shall be set out in the annual work programme referred to in paragraph 2 and sent for information to the European Parliament and the Council.

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

The implementing act referred to in the first subparagraph shall be adopted in accordance with the ~~advisory~~examination procedure referred to in Article 24(3).

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1

1. The Commission shall assess and select proposals for simple programmes further to the call for proposals referred to in Article 8(3)(a), having first delivered a list of applications to the Member States.

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1

1. The Union's financial contribution to simple programmes shall not exceed 50 % of the eligible expenditure. The Member States may cover up to 20-30 % of the costs. The remaining expenditure shall be borne exclusively by proposing organisations.

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new)

2a. The Union's financial contribution may rise up to 100% in the event of crises.

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18

The maximum rate of co-financing shall be set at 60 % of the total eligible costs for the multi programmes. The Member State may cover up to 20-30 % of the total cost. The remaining expenditure shall be borne exclusively by proposing organisations.

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0398(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new)-

The rate of financial contribution of the Union may rise up to 100 % of the costs in the event of crises.

2014/02/17
Committee: AGRI

2013/0137(COD)

Sophie AUCONIE, Dagmar ROTH-BEHRENDT, Riikka PAKARINEN, James NICHOLSON, Bart STAES

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d

(d) exchanged in kind between persons other than professional operators or where the activities in question are of an amateur nature and on a very small scale and are aimed at end users who are not professional operators.

2013/12/18
Committee: AGRI

2013/0136(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 155

(155) The rules laid down in the legislative acts referred to in recital 154 are to be replaced by this Regulation and by subsequent Commission acts to be adopted pursuant to this Regulation. Accordingly, those legislative acts should be repealed~~. Howev~~, except very recent and still under negotiation ones. In order, to ensure legal clarity and avoid a legal vacuum, the repeal should only take effect when the relevant delegated and implementing acts are adopted pursuant to this Regulation. It is therefore necessary to provide the Commission with the empowerment to determine the dates when the repeal of those legislative acts should take effect.

2013/11/28
Committee: ENVI

2013/0136(COD)

Sophie AUCONIE, Dagmar ROTH-BEHRENDT, Riikka PAKARINEN, James NICHOLSON, Bart STAES

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 158

(158) In order to ensure legal certainty as regards the application of rules for identification and registration of animals, disease control measures for certain zoonoses and non-commercial movements of pet animals, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the date on which Regulations ~~(EC) No 1760/2000,~~ (EU) No XXX/XXX [Ex-998/2003] and (EC) No 21/2004 and Directives 92/66/EEC, 2000/75/EC, 2001/89/EC, 2002/60/EC, 2003/85/EC, 2005/94/EC and 2008/71/EC cease to apply.

2013/11/28
Committee: ENVI

2013/0136(COD)

Sophie AUCONIE, Dagmar ROTH-BEHRENDT, Riikka PAKARINEN, James NICHOLSON, Bart STAES

Proposal for a regulation
Article 258 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1

~~– Directive 64/432/EEC,~~deleted

2013/11/28
Committee: ENVI

2013/0136(COD)

Sophie AUCONIE, Dagmar ROTH-BEHRENDT, Riikka PAKARINEN, James NICHOLSON, Bart STAES

Proposal for a regulation
Article 258 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – indent 19

~~– Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000,~~deleted

2013/11/28
Committee: ENVI

2013/0136(COD)

Sophie AUCONIE, Dagmar ROTH-BEHRENDT, Riikka PAKARINEN, James NICHOLSON, Bart STAES

Proposal for a regulation
Article 259 – title

Transitional measures related to the repeal of Regulation (EC) ~~No 1760/2000, Regulation (EC)~~ No 21/2004 and Directive 2008/71/EC

2013/11/28
Committee: ENVI

2013/0136(COD)

Sophie AUCONIE, Dagmar ROTH-BEHRENDT, Riikka PAKARINEN, James NICHOLSON, Bart STAES

Proposal for a regulation
Article 259 – paragraph 1

1. Notwithstanding Article 258(2) of this Regulation, Regulation~~s (EC) No 1760/2000, and~~ (EC) No 21/2004 and Directive 2008/71/EC shall continue to apply until the date to be determined in a delegated act adopted in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article.

2013/11/28
Committee: ENVI

2013/0136(COD)

Sophie AUCONIE, Dagmar ROTH-BEHRENDT, Riikka PAKARINEN, James NICHOLSON, Bart STAES

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3

They may be combined with visits for other purposes. Notwithstanding paragraph 1 of this article, a Member State may apply for a transitional period until the end of the following programming period, the year 2020, if a requirement to conduct animal health visits is a fundamental precondition for an animal welfare payment under the rural development programme of the Member State.

2013/12/09
Committee: AGRI

2013/0136(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1

Directive 64/432/EEC This Regulation Article 1 - Article 2 Articles 4 (partially), 150(3) and 220(3) Article 3(1) Articles 121 and 123 Article 3(2) Articles 121 (2), 123(1) and 146(3) and (4) Article 4(1) Article 121(1) Article 4(2) and (3) Article 122(1) and (2) Article 5(1) Article 140(1), 142 and 143, Article 5(2) Article 146(3) and (4), Article 5(2)(a) Article 144(a) Article 5(2)(b) Article 141(1)(b), Article 5(3) Article 146(3) and (4), Article 5(4) Article 150, Article 5(5) Articles 130, 132 and 150 Article 6 Articles 127, 128, 129 Article 6 a - Article 7 Articles 129, 130, 131(a) and 132 Article 8 Articles 16, 17, 18 and Articles 16(3), 17(3), 18(3) and 19 Article 9 Articles 30(1), 31, 32 and Article 30 (3) and (4), 31(2) Article 10 Articles 30(2), 31, 32, 36, 41, 42 and Articles 39, 40, 41(3) and 42(5) and (6) Article 11(1) Article 89(1)(a), 92, 93 and Article 92(2), Article 11(2) Articles 97, 100 and 101 Article 11(3) Articles 93, 94 Article 11(4) Article 95 Article 11(5) and (6) Article 92(1)(d) and (2)(d) Article 12(1) Article 122, Article 12(2) Article 99 and Article 100 Article 12(3) Article 122(1)(a) and (b) Article 12(4) Article 140(3) Article 12(5) and (6) - Article 13(1) and (2) Articles 89, 92, 93, 94, 97, 100 and 101 Article 13(3) Article 95 Article 13(4) - Article 13(5) and (6) Article 96 Article 14(1) and (2) - Article 14(3)A and B - Article 14(3) C Article 103 Article 14(4) to (6) - Article 15(1) Article 256 Article 15(2) to (4) - Article 16 - Article 17 - Article 17 a - Article 18 Article 103 Article 19 - Article 20 - deleted

2013/11/28
Committee: ENVI

2013/0136(COD)

Sophie AUCONIE, Dagmar ROTH-BEHRENDT, Riikka PAKARINEN, James NICHOLSON, Bart STAES

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 18

Regulation (EC) No1760/2000 This Regulation Article 1 Article 102 Article 2 Article 4 (partially) Article 3 Article 102(2) and 105 Article 4 Articles 106(a), 108, 114, 115 and 117 Article 5 Article 103(1)(a) Article 6 Article 104, 106(b), 108, 114, 115 and 117 Article 7 Article 97, 100, 101 and 106(b) (i) and (c) Article 8 Article 105 Article 9 - Article 10(a) to (c) Articles 114, 115, 117 Article 10(d) to (e) - Article 10(f) Article 258 Article 11 - Article 12 - Article 13 - Article 14 - Article 15 - Article 16 - Article 17 - Article 18 - Article 19 - Article 20 - Article 21 - Article 22 - Article 23 - Article 24 - Article 25 - deleted

2013/11/28
Committee: ENVI

2013/0136(COD)

Riikka PAKARINEN, Nils TORVALDS

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24

~~Article 24 Delegation of powers concerning animal health visits The Commission shall be empowered to adopt~~ delegated acts in accordance with Article 253, concerning: (a) supplementing: (i) the criteria laid down in Article 23(1) to be taken into account when determining: - which type of establishments must be subject to animal health visits; - the frequency of such animal health visits; (ii) the requirements laid down in Article 23(2) as regards the content and frequency of animal health visits for the different types of establishments, to ensure that the purposes of the animal health visits are achieved; (b) determining the types of establishments to be subject to animal health visits.

2013/12/09
Committee: AGRI

2013/0117(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph -1 a (new)

Regulation (EU) No [...] [HZ]
Article 113 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1a (new)

In Article 113(1) of Regulation (EU) No [...][HZ], the following subparagraph is inserted after the first subparagraph: "However, Article 44a of Regulation (EC) 1290/2005 and the relevant implementing rules shall continue to apply to payments made for financial years 2013-2014."

2013/09/10
Committee: AGRI

2013/0117(COD)

Petri SARVAMAA, Riikka PAKARINEN, Albert DESS

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph -1 b (new)

Regulation (EU) No [...] [HZ]
Article 114

The following Article 114a is inserted: "Article 114a Derogation from Regulation (EU) No 966/2012 By way of derogation from Article 59(5) of Regulation (EU) No 966/2012 and Article 9(1) of this Regulation, the certification body's opinion for the years 2014 and 2015 does not need to confirm the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions."

2013/09/10
Committee: AGRI

2013/0117(COD)

Riikka PAKARINEN, Nils TORVALDS

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7

Regulation (EU) No [...] [HZ]
Article 115 – point c a (new)

(ca) Chapter IV of the Title VII for payments made as from financial year 2015 onwards"

2013/09/10
Committee: AGRI

2012/2294(INI)

Riikka PAKARINEN, Eija-Riitta KORHOLA, Petri SARVAMAA, Sari ESSAYAH, Hannu TAKKULA, Kent JOHANSSON, Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2

2. Highlights the untapped environmental- benefit potential of eco-innovation, given that it is expected to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions through, inter alia, increased use of recycled and renewable materials and production of quality products with less impact on the environment and the facilitating of more environmentally friendly production processes and services; stresses the need to target actions on bottlenecks and barriers in the way of the commercialisation of eco- innovation, and the internationalisation of these products and services;

2013/05/31
Committee: REGI

2012/0288(COD)

Riikka PAKARINEN, Sari ESSAYAH, Julie GIRLING, Hannu TAKKULA, Kent JOHANSSON, Petri SARVAMAA, Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4

(4) Where pasture or agricultural land previously destined for the food, feed and fibre markets is diverted to biofuel production, the non-fuel demand will still need to be satisfied either through intensification of current production or by bringing non-agricultural land into production elsewhere. The latter case represents indirect land-use change and when it involves the conversion of high carbon stock land it can lead to significant greenhouse gas emissions. Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC should therefore include provisions to address indirect land use change given that current biofuels are mainly produced from crops grown on existing agricultural land. The aim of this Directive should be to tackle these problems and promote the use of non- food feedstocks as biofuel feedstocks.

2013/05/31
Committee: ENVI

2012/0288(COD)

Riikka PAKARINEN, Petri SARVAMAA, Sari ESSAYAH, Julie GIRLING, Hannu TAKKULA, Kent JOHANSSON, Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7

(7) In order to ensure the long-term competitiveness of bio-based industrial sectors, and in line with the 2012 Communication "Innovating for Sustainable growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe" and the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe, promoting integrated and diversified biorefineries across Europe, enhanced incentives under Directive 2009/28/EC should be set in a way that gives preference to the use of ~~biomass feedstocks that do not have a high economic value for other uses than~~ second generation and advanced biofuels.

2013/05/31
Committee: ENVI

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11 a (new)

(11a) Forests provide a wide variety of environmental, economic and social benefits and services of key importance to humanity, such as maintaining biodiversity, providing low emission feedstocks and ecosystem functions and protecting the climate system. Sustainability criteria for forest-based biomass already exists in RES-directive and the European Commission will also make further recommendations concerning the sustainability criteria for solid biomass in order to address the concerns regarding the growing demand of imported wood biomass. EU Member States have the relevant instruments and regulations in place which safeguard the sustainability of forest biomass. In order to avoid double regulation and bureaucratic burden it is not necessary to define new sustainability criteria for forest biomass in this directive.

2013/05/31
Committee: ENVI

2012/0288(COD)

Sari ESSAYAH, Riikka PAKARINEN

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 1 a (new)

Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 2 – point p a (new)

1a. In Article 2, the following point is inserted: "(pa) "processing residue" is a substance that is not the end product(s) that the production process directly seeks to produce. It is not a primary aim of the production process and the process has not been deliberately modified to produce it."

2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI

2012/0288(COD)