BETA

10 Amendments of Yannick JADOT related to 2013/0048(COD)

Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) In the case of non-harmonised products, market surveillance authorities should take into account documentation provided by economic operators as per (EU) No [.../...] [on consumer product safety].
2013/06/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) For the purposes of this Regulation risk assessment should be carried out to identify products which have the potential to affect adversely the public interests protected by [Regulation (EU) No xxxx (on consumer product safety)], sector- specific Union harmonisation legislation and other Union legislation on products that are subject to this Regulation. It should include, where available, data on risks that have materialised previously with respect to the product in question. Account should also be taken of any measures that may have been taken by the economic operators concerned to alleviate the risks. The particular potential vulnerability of consumers, as opposed to professional users, should be taken into account as should the increased vulnerability of certain categories of consumer such as children, the elderly or the disabled. Market surveillance authorities shall continue to apply the precautionary principle in cases where scientific evidence does not give certainty of the safety of a product.
2013/06/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) Obliging the authorities responsible for the control of products entering the Union market to carry out checks on an adequate scale therefore contributes to a safer Union market for products. In order to increase the effectiveness of such checks, cooperation and exchange of information between those authorities and market surveillance authorities concerning products presenting a risk should be enhanced. Given the increasing importance of imports into the EU and worries expressed by stakeholders about insufficient border controls, the Commission will monitor and assess the overall functioning of external border controls and will address recommendations to Member States in case of relevant shortcoming.
2013/06/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. The implementation of market surveillance activities and external border controls shall be monitored by the Member States which shall report on these activities and controls to the Commission every year. The information reported shall include statistics regarding the number of controls carried out and, explanations of how checks and risk evaluations have been carried out and available resources. This information shall be communicated toby all Member States. Member States may make a summary of the results accessible to the public.
2013/06/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Market surveillance authorities shall be given the powers and entrusted with the resources and means necessary for the proper performance of their tasks. Member States will inform the Commission annually about the resources allocated to market surveillance authorities. On this basis the Commission will evaluate the appropriateness of resource endowment and will send recommendations to the Member States in case of insufficient resources.
2013/06/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Where appropriateIn case of known or emerging risk pursuant to Article 6(1), market surveillance authorities shall alert users in their territories within an adequate timeframe of products that those authorities have identified as presenting a risk.
2013/06/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
In the case of products that are not subject to Union harmonisation legislation, market surveillance authorities will take in due consideration protocols, checklists and other relevant documents that economic operators will have provided with regard the to risk assessment of products as per Directive [...] on consumer products safety.
2013/06/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Risk assessment shall be based on available scientific or technical evidence and, when there is a suspected risk of causing harm to public health in spite of lack of scientific consensus, the precautionary principle shall be invoked.
2013/06/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
In the case of products that are not subject to Union harmonisation legislation, authorities in charge of external border controls will take in due consideration protocols, checklists and other relevant documents that economic operators will have provided with regard the to risk assessment of products as per Directive (EU) No [.../...] [on consumer products safety], and which market surveillance authorities will have made available to them, in order to assess product risks.
2013/06/27
Committee: INTA
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. The Commission should ensure that authorities in charge of the control of products at external borders carry out checks in a uniform manner across the EU. The Commission should also evaluate whether authorities dispose of the necessary resources to execute their function effectively. To this purpose, Member States should send annually to the Commission a report explaining how national authorities have carried out checks and risk evaluations, reporting about available resources and including statistics regarding the number of controls carried out. On the basis of this reporting mechanism, the Commission may send recommendations to the Member States in case of important discrepancies and shortcomings.
2013/06/27
Committee: INTA