12 Amendments of Marisa MATIAS related to 2017/0003(COD)
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) it is strictly necessary to achieve the transmission of the communication, for the duration necessary for that purpose; or
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) it is strictly necessary to maintain or restore the security of electronic communications networks and services, or detect technical faults and/or errors in the transmission of electronic communications, for the duration necessary for that purpose.
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) it is strictly necessary to meet mandatory quality of service requirements pursuant to [Directive establishing the European Electronic Communications Code] or Regulation (EU) 2015/212028 for the duration necessary for that purpose; or _________________ 28 Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union (OJ L 310, 26.11.2015, p. 1–18).
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) it is strictly necessary for billing, calculating interconnection payments, detecting or stopping fraudulent, or abusive use of, or subscription to, electronic communications services; or
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) it is strictly necessary for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of an electronic communication over an electronic communications network; or
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) the end-user has been informed of the purpose for which his or her data are to be used and has given his or her informed consent.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to paragraph 1, where technically possible and feasible, for the purposes of point (b) of Article 8(1), consent may be expressed by using theprivacy-friendly appropriate technical settings of a software application enabling access to the internet.
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. End-users who have consented to the processing of electronic communications data as set out in point (c) of Article 6(2) and points (a) and (b) of Article 6(3) shall be given the possibility to withdraw their consent at any time as set forth under Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and be reminded of this possibility at periodic intervals of 63 months, as long as the processing continues.
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Browsers and similar software should, by default, present privacy friendly settings that limit online tracking.
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. The end user should be able to adopt the Do NoT Track setting in order to refuse its signal to be tracked.Do Not Track option should be applicable to all tracking technologies, including cookies and device fingerprints with exception for life emergency purposes.
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Tracking walls and similar take-it- or-live-it choices regarding privacy should be prohibited in public funded websites and sites with monopoly-like position. The visitors cannot be banned of using the website if they haven't given their prior consent to disclose data.