BETA

21 Amendments of Enikő GYŐRI related to 2009/0142(COD)

Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) In order to ensure efficient and effective supervision and a balanced consideration of the positions of the competent authorities in different Member States, the Authority should be able to settle disagreements between those competent authorities with binding effect, including within colleges of supervisors. A conciliation phase should be provided for, during which the competent authorities may reach an agreement. The Authority’s competence should cover disagreements on procedural obligations in the cooperation process as well as on the intin that respect should be specified in the sectoral legislation referpretation and application of Community law in supervisory decisionsd to in Article 1(2). Existing conciliation mechanisms provided for in sectoral legislation have to be respected. In the event of inaction by the national supervisory authorities concerned, the Authority should be empowered to adopt, as a last resort, decisions directly addressed to financial institutions in areas of Community law directly applicable to them.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Within three months of receipt of the draft standards, the Commission shall decide whether to endorse the draft standards. The Commission may extend that period by one month. The Commission may endorse the draft standards only in part or with amendments where the Community interest so requires.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Where the Commission does not endorse the standards or endorses them in part or with amendments, it shall inform the Authority of its reasonsit shall propose reasoned modifications and send the draft standards back to the Authority. The Authority may amend the draft standards on the basis of the Commission’s proposed modifications and resubmit the draft standards to the Commission for endorsement.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 492 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to the powers laid down in Article 9, where a competent authority disagrees on the procedure or content of an action or inaction by another competent authority in areas wherecases specified in the legislation referred to in Article 1(2) requires cooperation, coordination or joint decision making by competent authorities from more than one Member State, the Authority, at the request of one or more of the competent authorities concerned, may assist the authorities in reaching an agreement in accordance with the procedure set out in paragraph 2.
2010/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 493 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to the powers laid down in Article 9, where a competent authority disagrees on the procedure or content of an action or inaction by another competent authority in areas whereindicated in the legislation referred to in Article 1(2) requires cooperation, coordination or joint decision making by competent authorities from more than one Member State, the Authority, at the request of one or more of the competent authorities concerned, may assist the authorities in reaching an agreement in accordance with the procedure set out in paragraph 2.
2010/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 620 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. The Authority shall ensure that no decision adopted under Articles 10 or 11 impinges in any way on the fiscal responsibilities of Member States. The respective decision by the Authority shall state that fiscal responsibilities are not affected.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 633 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
Where the Authority maintains its decision, the Council, acting by qualified majority as defined in Article 205 of the Treaty, shall, within two months, decide whether the Authority's decision is maintained or revoked.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 636 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6
Where the Council decides to maintain the Authority's decision, or where it does not take a decision within two months, the suspension of that decision shall be immediately terminated.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 638 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6 a (new)
Where the Council does not take a decision within two months, the decision shall be terminated .
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 644 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
The Council, acting by qualified majority as defined in Article 205 of the Treaty, shall, within ten working days, decide whether the Authority's decision is maintained or revoked.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 661 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The composition of the panel shall be balanced and reflect the European Union as a whole. Mandates shall be overlapping and an appropriate rotating arrangement shall apply.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 671 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. The Board of Supervisors shall act on the basis of qualifiedsimple majority of its members, as defined in Article 205 of the Treaty, for acts specified in Articles 7, 8 and all measures and decisions adopted under Chapter VI.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 677 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
All other decisions of the Board of Supervisors shall be taken by simple majority of members.deleted
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 687 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. The Management Board shall be composed of the Chairperson, a representative of the Commission, and fourive members elected by the Board of Supervisors from among its members.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 688 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. The Management Board shall be composed of the Chairperson, a representative of the Commission, and fournd six members elected by the Board of Supervisors from among its members.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 690 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The Executive Director and a representative of the Commission shall participate in meetings of the Management Board without the right to vote.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 751 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4 a (new)
The composition of the Board of Appeal shall be balanced and reflect the European Union as a whole.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 754 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
3. Two members of the Board of Appeal and two alternates shall be appointed by the Management Board of the Authority from a short-list proposed by the Commission after the hearing held in the European Parliament, following a public call for expression of interest published in the Official Journal of the European Union, and after consultation of the Board of Supervisors.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 762 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 5
5. The Board of Appeal may, within the provisions of this Article, exercise any power which lies within either confirm the decision taken by the competence of the At authority, or it may remit the case to the competent body of the Authority. That body shall be bound by the decision of the Board of Appeal.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 764 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) obligatory contributions from the national public authorities competent for the supervision of financial institutions;deleted
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 767 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) a subsidyfunding from the Community, entered in the General Budget of the European Union (Commission Section);
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON