3 Amendments of Enikő GYŐRI related to 2021/0402(COD)
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The objectives of this Regulation, in particular counteracting third countries’ economic coercion of the Union or a Member State, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States acting on their own. This is because Member States as distinct actors under international law may not be entitled under international law to respond to economic coercion directed against the Union. Additionally, because of the exclusive competence conferred on the Union by Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Member States are prevented from taking common commercial policy measures as a response to economic coercion. Therefore, those objectives can be achieved with greater effectiveness at Union level. This must not, however, have a restrictive effect on the scope of measures that may be imposed by Member States in other policy areas.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) It is of fundamental importance that, in counteracting economic coercion by third countries against the Union or its Member States, the Union must act in accordance with the provisions laid down in Articles 3 and 207 of the TFEU. Article 5(3) TEU provides that the principle of subsidiarity must apply in areas which do not fall within the exclusive competence of the Union.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 a (new)
- where, in accordance with Articles 3 and 207 TFEU, the measures adopted by third countries that aim to exert economic coercion and the measures adopted by the Union in response fall within the scope of the common commercial policy and, consequently, fall within the exclusive competence of the European Union.