29 Amendments of Dominique RIQUET related to 2017/2067(INI)
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the positive trend in road safety that the EU has witnessed over the last decade has slowed down, and whereas 95% of road accidents involve a certain degree of human error; takes the view that road transport is still responsible for the bulk of transport emissions, in terms of greenhouse gases and air pollutants;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the combination of C-ITS and environmentally-friendly cars will lead to a higher level of sustainability;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the system of C-ITS will allow road users and traffic managers to share and use information and to coordinate their actions more effectively;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas C-ITS are fundamental to the development of autonomous vehicles and driving systems;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the potential of digital technologies and related business models in road transport and recognises the Strategy as an important milestone towards the development of C-ITS and, ultimately, automated mobility; notes that cooperative, connected and automated vehicles can boost the competitiveness of European industry as well as reduce energy consumption, congestion and emissions from transport;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Urges the European Union, for the sake of economic growth and competitiveness, to support its leading global position in the field of C-ITS through the promotion of European standards at international fora; encourages all stakeholders to speed up the deployment of C-ITS technologies; underlines, in this respect, the need for high-quality, safe, competitive, accessible, continuous and reliable services throughout the Union;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that, while the communication constitutes an important milestone towards an EU strategy on cooperative, connected and automated vehicles, there should be no confusion between C-ITS and the different concepts;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that automated vehicles are vehicles capable of operating and manoeuvring independentlyon their own in real traffic situations and where one or more of the primary driving controls (steering, acceleration, braking) are automated for a sustained period of time;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission to consider how to address the issue of cooperative, connected and automated vehicles sharing the roads with non- connected vehicles and drivers, taking into account the fact that the age of the vehicle fleet and the residual percentage of people who are not connected means that provision needs to be made for a persistently large number of vehicles not being part of the system;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Regrets the absence of clear time scheduling for recommended Day 1.5 services and beyond, as well as the absence of a full impact assessment and precise information on the deployment initiatives in developing C-ITS services and potential service extensions;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Urges all Member States to join the C-Roads Platform, as it is intended to play a significant coordination role in implementing the Strategy;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Points out that the Member States would do well to take the deployment of C-ITS services into account within a broader perspective of mobility as a service (MaaS), integrated with other modes of transport, in particular in order to prevent any rebound effects, i.e. an increase in the modal share of road transport;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Draws attention to the importance of privacy and data protection of C-ITS and connected ecosystem data, which should be used for C-ITSthose purposes only and not be retained or used for other ends; stresses that smart cars vehicles should comply fully with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and related rules, and that C-ITS service providers must offer clear terms and conditions to drivers, enabling them, in particular, to give their freely informed consent to any processing of their personal data;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on car manufacturers to inform consumers adequately and in a clear manner about their rights as well as the benefits and limits of new C-ITS technologies in terms of safety; calls furthermore on them never to sell, keep, use or process for any other purpose in- car data without explicit prior consent;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Emphasises that it is difficult to couple C-ITS cyber-alerts to a vehicle with that vehicle's autonomous driving systems, as there is a risk that a hacker could take control of the vehicle;
Amendment 119 #
14a. Stresses the need to develop a common policy on the security of C-ITS communications, including strict security standards, in order to protect the transport system against hacking and cyber-attacks;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that the hybrid communication approach, combining complementary communication technologies is the correct approach and that the most promising hybrid communication mix appears to be a combination of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute’s ETSI ITS-G5 and existing cellular networks (C-V2X), which will ensure the best possible support for deployment of the basic C-ITS services;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Welcomes the fact that a firm decision has been taken to allocate the ETSI ITS G5 spectrum to C-ITS, providing related protection measures that are vital, at both European and international level, when it comes to the standardisation, conformity and interoperability of the system; points out that it would also be appropriate to ensure it can coexist with electronic smart tachograph and toll systems;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Stresses the importance of technology neutrality, backward compatibility, technical harmonisation and standardisation of data and definitions regarding C-ITS;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Takes note of the mention of the link between connected cars and the European satellite navigation systems, EGNOS and GALILEO, and underlines that vehicles’ capacity to communicate with 5G and satellite navigation systems canmust be included in the hybrid communication mix at a later stage;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Considers interoperability to be essential for both safety and consumer choice; asks the Commission together with the competent authorities of the Member States to ensure a successful roll- out and interoperability at all levels;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to continue to provide funding for research and innovation (Horizon 2020), in particular to pave the way for the development, in the long term, of infrastructure that is suitable for the deployment of C-ITS;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Emphasises that, in the context of EU policies designed to support investment in transport infrastructure (the CEF, regional funds, various financial instruments), there is a need to include, in projects receiving support, the digital infrastructure required to deploy C-ITS, by means of a cross-cutting thematic approach;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Welcomes the strategy’s focus on user involvement; encourages the Commission to facilitate the exchange of best practices; underlines the need for dedicated cross-border C-ITS pilots, supported by adequate funding; encourages Member States to join urgently the C-Roads Platform, to jointly work on interoperability;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses that a truly multimodal transport system should be created, integrating all modes of transport into a single mobility service, allowing people and freight to travel smoothly from door to door and enhancing overall transport efficiency; points out that in order to do this, it is essential that sufficient effort be made in terms of research and development, but also in terms of investment, in order to integrate smart transport systems into the various modes (STI-C, ERTMS, SESAR, RIS);
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Calls on the Commission to adopt a global approach to technical harmonisation and standardisation of data, in order to ensure the compatibility of cooperative intelligent transport systems, economies of scale for manufacturers and improved consumer comfort;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Underlines the importance of opening a dialogue with the social partners at an early stage in order to establish an atmosphere of transparency and confidence and ensure that there will be nofinding a proper balance between positive and negative effects on social and employment conditions;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Welcomes the Commission proposal for the extension of the time frame of the mandate to adopt delegated acts under the ITS Directive 2010/40/EU;