BETA

12 Amendments of Sandra KALNIETE related to 2011/2051(INI)

Amendment 450 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that Member States which currently apply the simplified Single Area Payment Scheme (SAPS) should switch to the single farm paymentbe able to use it as an alternative to the system with entitlements; calls for support in making the conversionfor Member States changing system;
2011/03/21
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 470 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses the need for an adequate basic allowance for small farmers, which Member States can optionally determine in those Member States where these farms help to stabilise rural development; calls for these Member States to decide, in accordance with subsidiarity, what percentage of the direct payments to be incorporated in the new subsidy system should be made available to their small farmers; stresses, however, that this should be combined with a simplification of the system and must not hamper the necessary structural change;
2011/03/21
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 567 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Observes that, for historical reasons, farms in the European Union have a very diverse structure as regards size, employment arrangements and legal form; is aware that direct payments are moving away from a historical basis to area-based payments and that the provision of public goods is independent of farm size; rejects, therefore, measures which discriminate against particular types of farm; takes the view, however, that capping of support for the largest farms should be considered, at least with reference to that portion of direct payments that serves as income support, and should be degressive above a given support threshold;
2011/03/21
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 740 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Realises that resources from the first pillar (as for a top-up model) should be used to pay for this environmental component; believes, however, that Member States where direct payments lie below the EU average should be given the option of making the payment by means of cofinancing from the first pillar or instead by means of financing entirely from the second pillar; observes that the Member States must notify the Commission of their decision on the financing by 31 July 2013; notes that individual Member States' modulation resources should be used;deleted
2011/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 875 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Recalls that market-orientated production and direct paymentcompetitiveness are at the heart of any insurance against risk, and that it is farmers who are responsible for risk prevention; supports the Member States, in this context, in making national risk insurance instruments available to farmers;
2011/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 901 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
37. Considers that the use of these instruments which have been described should be triggered only by a political assessment by the EU legislature;deleted
2011/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 921 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
39. Continues to support the Commission’s proposal to lower the intervention thresholds for market crops to zero, maintaining a – possibly reduced – intervention threshold only in the case of wheat;deleted
2011/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1006 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
45. Advocates that the 2006 sugar market reform be extended to 2020 in its existing form in order to develop a system for the subsequent period which can operate without quotas;deleted
2011/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1077 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
48. Is aware of the importance of the second pillar, in view of its environmental, socio-economic, modernisation and structural improvement achievements, but also for attaining political objectives, which should also benefit farmers; calls therefore for second- pillar measures to be better suited and targeted to their objectives, so that the effectiveness of growth, employment and climate measures and measures for the benefit of rural areas can be increased; considers that, in this context, particular attention should be devoted to assisting young farmers and the convergence regions of the EU;
2011/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1096 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48 a (new)
48 a. Calls for fair, objective and measurable criteria to be clearly defined for the allocation of funds across the EU for rural development objectives, e.g. utilised agricultural area, GDP per capita, gross value added, NATURA 2000 territories;
2011/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1234 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 56
56. WelcomeRequests greater coordination at EU level of EU funds; advocates, however, that the funds be preserved as politically autonomous instruments;
2011/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1261 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 57 a (new)
57a. Considers that the Commission’s proposal concerning the definition of the term ‘active farmer’ should be supported and that, if an appropriate definition (taking due account of the specific features of farming in each country) is arrived at, it will be an appropriate criterion for the granting of support, which will go to people carrying out farming activities rather than, as is currently the case in some Member States, land owners alone;
2011/03/22
Committee: AGRI