77 Amendments of Julie GIRLING related to 2011/0288(COD)
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Where a Member State accredits more than one paying agency, it is important that it designates a single coordinating body to ensure consistency in the management of the funds, to provide liaison between the Commission and the various accredited paying agencies and to ensure that the information requested by the Commission concerning the operations of several paying agencies is made rapidly available. The coordinating body should also be responsible for ensuring that remedial action is taken and that the Commission is kept informed of the follow-up and it should ensure homogeneous application of commoninternationally accepted rules and standards.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Only paying agencies accredited by the Member States offer reasonable assurance that the necessary checks have been carried out before granting Union aid to beneficiaries. It should therefore be explicitly laid down that only expenditure effected by accredited paying agencies can be reimbursed from the Union budget, and that these checks shall be carried out on the basis of single integrated sample.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Only paying agencies accredited by the Member States offer reasonable assurance that the necessary checks have been carried out before granting Union aid to beneficiaries. It should therefore be explicitly laid down that only expenditure effected by accredited paying agencies can be responsible for expenditure to be reimbursed from the Union budget.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) The farm advisory system should cover at least the requirements and standards forming the scope of cross compliance. That system should also cover the requirements to be respected in relation to the agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and the environment for direct payments, as well as the maintenance of the agricultural area under Regulation (EU) No DP/xxx of the European Parliament and of the Council of xxx establishing rules for direct payment to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy14. That system should finally cover certain elements related to climate change mitigation and adaptation, biodiversity, protection of water, animal and plant disease notification and innovation as well as the sustainable development of the economical activity of the small farms.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) With a view to ensuring that the amounts for the financing of the CAP comply with the annual ceilings, the financial mechanism referred to in Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/200316 whereby the level of direct support is adjusted when the forecasts indicate that the subceiling of heading 2, with a safety margin of EUR 300 000 000, is exceeded in a given financial year, should be maintained. In the same context, it is necessary to authorise the Commission to set those adjustments where the Council do not fix them before 30 June of the calendar year in respect of which they apply.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Budget discipline also demands a continuous examination of the medium- term budget situation. The Commission, when submitting the draft budget for a given year, should therefore present its forecasts and analyses to the European Parliament and the Council and propose, if necessary, appropriate measures to the legislator. Furthermore, the Commission should make full use of its management powers at all times to ensure compliance with the annual ceiling and, if necessary, propose appropriate measures to the European Parliament and to the Council or to the Council to redress the budget situation. If, at the end of a budget year, the annual ceiling cannot be complied with as a result of the reimbursements requested by the Member States, the Commission should be able to take measures allowing provisional distribution of the available budget, taking into account a margin of EUR 300 000 000 below that ceiling, among the Member States in proportion to their requests for reimbursement not yet paid, as well as compliance with the ceiling fixed for the year concerned. Payments for that year should be charged to the following budget year and the total amount of Union financing per Member State should be definitively established, as should compensation between Member States in order to comply with the established amount.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) When implementing the budget, the Commission should operate a monthly early-warning and monitoring system for agricultural expenditure, so that, if there is a risk of the annual ceiling being exceeded, the Commission may at the earliest opportunity take the appropriate measures under the management powers at its disposal and propose other measures if those measures appear to be insufficient, taking into account the margin laid down in Recital (19). A periodic report by the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council should compare the evolution of the expenditure effected in relation to the profiles so far and give an assessment of the foreseeable implementation for the remainder of the budget year.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) The rural development programmes are financed from the Union budget on the basis of commitments in annual instalments. Member States should be able to draw on the Union funds provided for as soon as they begin the programmes. Member States may indicate to the Commission within two months of this decision that it does not wish to receive a pre-financing amount. A suitably restricted prefinancing system ensuring a steady flow of funds so that payments to beneficiaries under the programmes are made at the appropriate time is therefore needed.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) The rural development programmes are financed from the Union budget on the basis of commitments in annual instalments. Member States should be able to draw on the Union funds provided for as soon as they begin the programmes should they so wish. A suitably restricted prefinancing system ensuring a steady flow of funds so that payments to beneficiaries under the programmes are made at the appropriate time is therefore needed.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Union aid should be paid to beneficiaries in good time so that they may use it efficiently. A failure by the Member States to comply with the payment deadlines laid down in Union legislation could create serious difficulties for the beneficiaries and could jeopardise the Union's yearly budgeting. Therefore, expenditure made without respecting deadlines for payments should be excluded from Union financing. In order to respect the principle of proportionality, the Commission should be able to provide for exceptions to this general rule. This principle, laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 should be maintained and apply to both the EAGF and the EAFRD. If Member States pay late, they should add interests on the principal amount at their own cost to compensate the beneficiaries. Such a provision could create an incentive to Member States to better respect payment deadlines, and could give more assurance to beneficiaries to be paid in time, or at least to be compensated in case of late payment.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Sectoral agricultural legislation requires Member States to send information on the numbers of checks carried out and their outcome within specified deadlines. Those control statistics are used to determine the level of error at Member State level and, more generally, for the purposes of checking the management of the EAGF and the EAFRD. They are an important source for the Commission to satisfy itself as to the correct management of funds and are an essential element for the annual declaration of assurance. Given the vital nature of this statistical information and in order to ensure that Member States respect their obligation to send it in time, it is necessary to provide a deterrent to late provision of the data required in a manner proportionate to the extent of the data deficit. Therefore, provisions should be put in place whereby the Commission can suspend part of the monthly or interim payments for which the relevant statistical information has not been sent in time.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) The Commission, which is responsible for the proper application of Union law under Article 17 of the Treaty on European Union, should decide whether the expenditure incurred by the Member States complies with Union legislation based where appropriate on an assessment of the actual risk to the Agricultural Funds. Member States should be given the right to justify their decisions to make payments and should have recourse to conciliation where there is no common agreement between them and the Commission. In order to give Member States legal and financial assurances as to expenditure effected in the past, a maximum period should be set for the Commission to decide which financial consequences should follow from non- compliance. The conformity clearance procedure should be , as regards EAFRD, in line with the provisions on the financial corrections by the Commission as laid down in Part 2 of Regulation (EU) No CR/xxx .
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) Provisions relating to general principles on checks, withdrawals, reductions or exclusions from payments and to the imposition of penalties are contained in various sectoral agricultural regulations. Those rules should be gathered in the same legal framework at a horizontal level. They should cover the obligations of the Member States as regards administrative and on-the-spot checks, the rules on the recovery, reduction and exclusions of aid. Rules on the reductions to checks where error rates are acceptable and checks of obligations not necessarily linked to the payment of an aid should be laid down as well.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) The main elements of that integrated system and, in particular, the provisions concerning a computerised database, an identification system for agricultural parcels, aid applications or payment claims and a system for the identification and recording of payment entitlements should be maintained. Member States may make appropriate use of technology when setting up these systems.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
Recital 42
(42) Payments provided for in Union support schemes covered by the integrated system should be made by the competent national authorities to beneficiaries in full, subject to any reductions provided for in this Regulation, and within prescribed periods. In order to render the management of direct payments more flexible, Member States should be allowed to pay payments covered by the integrated system in up to two instalments per year.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
Recital 53
(53) Statutory management requirements need to be fully implemented by Member States in order to become operational at farm level and ensure the necessary equal treatment between farmers. The Commission should issue guidelines on the interpretation of the rules on animal identification and registration for cross compliance purposes. Such guidelines should reflect, particularly in the case of electronic systems, that 100% accuracy is often not possible and therefore some tolerance should be built into guidelines. Guidelines should, where appropriate, such as in the case with electronic systems, provide for flexibility at farm level in order to strike the necessary balance between safeguarding the spirit of the legislation and applying proportionate administrative penalties only in the case of non-compliance directly and unequivocally attributable to the beneficiaries, in particular in respect of repeated failure of the technology in use.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
Recital 54
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57
Recital 57
(57) The cross compliance system implies certain administrative constraints for both beneficiaries and national administrations since record keeping must be ensured, checks must be carried out and penalties have to be applied where necessary. Those penalties should be proportionate, effective and dissuasive. Such penalties should be without prejudice to other penalties laid down under other provisions of Union or national law. For the sake of consistency, it is appropriate to merge the relevant Union provisions into one single legal instrument. For farmers participating in the small farmers scheme referred to in Title V of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx[DP], the efforts to be made under the cross compliance system may be considered as exceeding the benefit of keeping those farmers under that system. For reasons of simplification, those farmers should therefore be exempted from cross compliance and in particular from its control system and from the risk of cross compliance penalties. However, that exemption should be without prejudice to the obligation to respect the applicable provisions of the sectoral legislation and to the possibility to be checked and to be imposed penalties under that legislation.
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57 a (new)
Recital 57 a (new)
(57a) Member States should be required to report annually about the implementation and results of the cross compliance and the greening measures. On the basis of the national reporting the European Commission shall submit an annual report to the European Parliament regarding the effect of these measures on agricultural production and their environmental impact in the Member States.
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 65
Recital 65
(65) The rate of exchange of the euro into national currency may vary in the course of the period during which an operation is carried out. Therefore the rate applicable to the amounts concerned should be determined taking into account the event through which the economic objective of the operation is achieved. The rate of exchange applied should be that of the date on which this event occurs. It is necessary to specify this operative event or to waive its application, observing certain criteria and in particular the rapidity with which currency movements are passed on. TSubject to derogation in this Regulation those rules are laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 2799/98 of 15 December 1998 establishing agrimonetary arrangements for the euro31 and they complete similar provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005. In the interests of clarity and rationality the relevant provisions should be integrated into the same act. Regulation (EC) No 2799/98 should therefore be repealed.
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 65 a (new)
Recital 65 a (new)
(65a) By way of derogation Member States may convert the amount of aid expressed in Euro into the national currency on the basis of the average of a maximum of the five most recent exchange rates set by the Member States' national central bank [ or the European Central Bank ] prior to 1 October for the year for which aid is granted.
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. "sectoral agricultural legislation" means any applicable acts adopted on the basis of Article 43 of the Treaty within the framework of the common agricultural policy as well as, where applicable, any delegated or implementing acts adopted on the basis of those acts;
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Paying agencies shall be dedicated departments or bodies of the Member States responsible for the management and control of expenditure referred to in Article 4(1) and Article 5.
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) to ensure that remedial action is taken as regardsas the case may be, take or coordinate actions with a view to resolving any deficiencies of a common nature and thatkeep the Commission is kept informed of the follow-up;
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) to promote and ensure harmonised application of the Union rules.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The certification body shall be a public or private audit body designated by the Member State which shall provide an opinion, drawn up in accordance with internationally accepted audit standards, on the management declaration of assurance covering the completeness, accuracy and veracity of the annual accounts of the paying agency, the proper functioning of its internal control system, the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions, as well as the respect of the principle of sound financial management.
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. In order to respect the principles of proportionality and administrative burden reduction, the certification body shall: (a) integrate samples as much as possible and maximize the efficiency of transaction testing, including on the spot checks; and (b) select the smallest numbers of populations and transactions necessary for testing to provide the level of assurance required.
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, lay down rules concerning the status of the certification bodies, the specific tasks, including the checks, which they have to carry out on a single integrated sample as well as the certificates and the reports, together with the documents accompanying them, to be drawn up by those bodies. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 112(3).
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point c
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the sustainable development of the economical activity of holdings other than those referred to in paragraph (2)(d);the small farms as defined by the Member States, of the farms participating in the small farmers scheme referred to in Title V of Regulation (EU) no xxx/xxx[DP] and of other holdings
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(ba) the minimum requirements or actions in the field of climate change mitigation and adaption, biodiversity, protection of water, animal and plant disease notification and innovation, as laid down in Annex 1 to this regulation
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 2
However Member States may determine, in accordance with objective criteria, the categories of beneficiaries that have priority access to the farm advisory system. Member States shall nevertheless ensure that priority is given to one of which shall be farmers whose access to an advisory service other than the farm advisory system is most limited.
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. With a view to ensuring that the annual ceilings set out in the Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx [MFF] for the financing of the market related expenditure and direct payments are respected, an adjustment rate of the direct payments shall be determined when the forecasts for the financing of the measures financed under that subceiling for a given financial year indicate that the applicable annual ceilings, taking into account a margin of EUR 300 000 000 below that ceiling, will be exceeded.
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 6
Article 25 – paragraph 6
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 2
2. If, on drawing up the draft budget for financial year N, there appears to be a risk that the amount referred to in Article 16 for financial year N will be exceeded, taking account of the margin laid down in Article 25 (1) of this Regulation, the Commission shall propose to the European Parliament and the Council or to the Council the measures necessary to ensure compliance with that amount.
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29
Article 29
Without prejudice to the eligibility for support under Article 29 and 30(2) of Regulation (EU) No RD/xxx, expenditure financed under the EAFRD shall not be subject of any other financing under the EU budget.
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1
Article 34 – paragraph 1
1. Following the Commission decision approving the programme, an initial prefinancing amount for the whole programming period shall be paid by the Commission, unless the Member State concerned notifies the Commission within 2 months of the decision that it does not wish to receive a pre-financing amount. This initial pre-financing amount shall represent 4% of the EAFRD contribution to the programme concerned. It may be split into a maximum of three instalments depending on budget availability. The first instalment shall represent 2% of the EAFRD contribution to the programme concerned.
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44
Article 44
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 49 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall give sufficient prior notice of an on-the-spot check to the Member State concerned or the Member State within whose territory the check is to take place and shall coordinate checks with a view to reducing the impact on paying agencies. Agents from the Member State concerned may take part in such checks.
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 2
Article 54 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall assess the amounts to be excluded on the basis of the gravity of the non-conformity recorded. It shall take due account of the nature and gravity of the infringement and of the financial damage caused to the Unionamounts excluded shall be based on an assessment of the risk to the Agricultural Funds consequent on the infringement.
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 54 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall base its financial corrections on individual cases of irregularity identified, or by taking account of the systemic nature of the irregularity to determine whether an extrapolated or flat rate correction should be applied. Flat rate corrections shall only be applied where it is impossible, due to the nature of the case, to either identify the extent and amount of the irregularity found or to extrapolate the amount to be corrected
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 54 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
If agreement is not reached, the Member State may request opening of a procedure aimed at reconciling each party's position within four months. A report of the outcome of the procedure shall be given to the Commission, which shall examine it before deciding on any refusal of financingtake into account the recommendations of the report before deciding on any refusal of financing. The Commission shall give reasons if it does not decide to follow the recommendations in the report.
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the conformity clearance provided for in Article 54 with regard to the measures to be taken in connection with the adoption of the decision and its implementation, including the information exchange between the Commission and the Member States and, the rates of cofinancing corrections to be applied, the deadlines to be respected as well as the conciliation procedure provided for in that Article, including the establishment, tasks, composition and working arrangements of the conciliation body.
Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 2
Article 61 – paragraph 2
2. As regards the on-the-spot checks, the authority responsible shall draw its check sample from the entire population of applicants comprising, where appropriate, a random part and a risk-based part in order to obtain a representative error rate, while targeting also highest errorthe areas in which the risk of error is highest. When selecting the sample for checks, the Member State may take account of the following factors: – the size of the sums involved; – the outcome of earlier audits of the management and control systems; – voluntary participation in management schemes certified on the basis of recognised international standards.
Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 61 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Member States may reduce checks where the error rates are at an acceptable level.
Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 64 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the rules on the minimum level of on- the-spot checks, which shall be set at the rate of 1% for schemes covered by a operational IACS or, in other cases, at the minimum rate necessary for an effective management of the risks, as well as the conditions under which Member States have to increase such checks, or may reduce them where the management and control systems function properly and the error rates are at an acceptable level;error rates are at an acceptable level, including time limits by which the Commission should respond to an indication that the MS intends to reduce its on-the-spot checks
Amendment 456 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 68 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Member States may make appropriate use of technology when setting up their 'integrated system'.
Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 69 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) a single system to record the identity of each beneficiary of the support referred to in Article 68(2) who submits an aid application or a payment claim.
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 70 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
This database shall in particular allow consultation through the competent authority of the Member State, of the data relating to the calendar and/or marketing years, starting from 20010. It shall alsoThis does not apply for those Member States who have a unit value of payment entitlements calculated in accordance with Article 22(1) of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx [DP]. For all Member States the database shall allow direct and immediate consultation of the data relating to at least the previous fiveour consecutive calendar years.
Amendment 463 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 2
Article 70 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may set up decentralised databases on condition that these, and the administrative procedures for recording and accessing data, are designed homogeneously throughout the territory of the Member State and are compatible with one another in orderin such a way as to allow for cross- checks.
Amendment 465 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 1
Article 71 – paragraph 1
The identification system for agricultural parcels shall be established on the basis of maps or land registry documents or other cartographic references. Use shall be made of computerised geographical information system techniques, including aerial or spatial orthoimagery, with a homogenous standard guaranteeing accuracy at least equivalent to cartography at a scale of 1:510,000.
Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 73 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) a farmer does not have to declare his agricultural parcels with landscape features or buffer strips. That farmer shall however indicate in his application that he has these agricultural parcels at his disposal and shall, at the request of the competent authorities, indicate their location.
Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 73 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States may decide that an aid application or a payment claim that fulfils the requirements laid down in Paragraph 1 is to remain valid for a number of years provided that beneficiaries concerned are under the obligation to report any change to the information they first submitted.
Amendment 481 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 74 – paragraph 1
Article 74 – paragraph 1
The single system to record the identity of each beneficiary of support referred to in Article 68(2) shall guarantee that all aid applications and payment claims submitted by the same beneficiary can be identified as such.
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 75 – paragraph 1
Article 75 – paragraph 1
1. In accordance with Article 61, Member States, through the paying agencies or the bodies delegated by them, shall carry out administrative checks on the aid application to verify the eligibility conditions for the aid. Those checks shall be supplemented by on-the-spot checks whose purpose shall be to monitor compliance with the provisions of the aid schemes and the level of inherent risk and whose number shall be adjusted in the light of inherent and control risks.
Amendment 507 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 76 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 76 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. By way of derogation from paragraph 2, Member States may decide, taking into account the risk of overpayment, to pay up to 75 % for the support granted under rural development as referred to in Article 68(2) after finalisation of the administrative checks provided for in Article 61(1). The percentage of payment shall be the same for all beneficiaries of the measure or set of operations.
Amendment 543 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 91 – paragraph 3
Article 91 – paragraph 3
Amendment 544 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 91 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 91 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Where a beneficiary referred to in Article 92 is a legally registered non-profit organisation whose primary legal constitutional purpose is to actively protect and manage land and/or the historic environment for conservation and public benefit, a Member State may choose to recognise their holdings or a group of their holdings as individual and separate businesses for the purposes of this Title.
Amendment 553 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 92 – paragraph 2
Article 92 – paragraph 2
However, Article 91 shall not apply to beneficiaries participating in the small farmers scheme referred to in Title V of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx[DP] and to the beneficiaries receiving aid under Article 29(9) of Regulation (EU) No RD/xxx.
Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 3
Article 93 – paragraph 3
Amendment 609 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 3
Article 96 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall carry out on-the- spot checks to verify whether a beneficiary complies with the obligations laid down in this Title. Member States shall submit an annual report about the implementation and the results of the cross compliance and greening measures. The European Commission shall submit an annual report to the European parliament regarding the effects of these measures on agricultural production and on their environmental impact in the Member States.
Amendment 615 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 97 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The penalty provided for in Article 91 shall be applied when the rules on cross compliance are not complied with at any time in a given calendar year (hereinafter referred to as ‘the calendar year concerned’), and the non-compliance in question is the result of a wilful act or omission which is directly attributable to the beneficiary who submitted the aid application or the payment claim in the calendar year concerned.
Amendment 652 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 106 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. By way of derogation from paragraph 3, Member States may convert the amount of aid expressed in euro into the national currency on the basis of the average of a maximum of the thirty most recent exchange rates set by the Member States' national central bank or the European Central Bank prior to 1 October of the year for which aid is granted.
Amendment 658 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 110 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 110 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 665 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 110 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 110 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall define, by means of implementing acts, the set of indicators specific to the objectives referred to in the first subparagraph. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 112(3).The indicators shall be linked to the structure and objectives of the policy and shall allow for the assessment of the progress, effectiveness and efficiency of the policy against objectives.
Amendment 666 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 110 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 110 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The monitoring and evaluation framework shall reflect the structure of the common agricultural policy in the following way: (a) For the direct payments provided for in Regulation (EU) No DP/xxx, the market measures provided for in Regulation (EU) No CMO/xxx, and of the application of the cross compliance provided for in this Regulation, the Commission shall monitor these instruments based on reporting by Member States in accordance with the rules laid down in this regulation. The Commission shall establish a multi- annual evaluation plan with periodic evaluations of specific instruments to be carried out under Commission responsibility. Evaluations shall be carried out timely and by independent evaluators. (b) The monitoring and evaluation of rural development policy intervention will be carried out according to Art. 74-86 of Regulation (EU) No RD/xxx. The Commission shall ensure that the combined impact of all common agricultural policy instruments referred to in paragraph 1 will be measured and assessed in relation to the common objectives referred to in paragraph 2. The performance of the common agricultural policy in achieving its common objectives shall be measured and assessed on the basis of common impact indicators, and the underlying specific objectives on the basis of result indicators. Based on evidence provided in evaluations on the common agricultural policy, including evaluations on rural development programmes, as well as other relevant information sources, reports on measuring and assessing the joint performance of all common agricultural policy instruments shall be prepared by the Commission.
Amendment 668 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 110 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 110 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall provide the Commission with all the information necessary to permit the monitoring and evaluation of the measures concerned. To the extent possible, such information shall be based on established sources of data, such as the Farm Accountancy Data Network and Eurostat.
Amendment 670 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 110 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Article 110 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, rules on the information to be sent by the Member States, taking into account the need to avoid any undue administrative burden, as well as on the data needs and synergies between potential data sources. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 112(3).
Amendment 672 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 110 – paragraph 4
Article 110 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall present a first report on the implementation of this Article to the European Parliament and the Council every four years. The first report, including first results on the impact of the common agricultural policy, to the European Parliament and the Council not later than 31 December 2018. A second report including an assessment of the impact of the common agricultural policy shall be presented not later than 31 December 20217.
Amendment 676 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 110 a (new)
Article 110 a (new)
Article 110a Chapter IV Regionalisation Where appropriate and in accordance with their constitutional arrangements, Member States may implement provisions of the common agricultural policy at regional level
Amendment 725 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II — Main Issue "Soil and carbon stock" — GAEC 6
Annex II — Main Issue "Soil and carbon stock" — GAEC 6
Maintenance of soil organic matter level through appropriate practices including ban on burning arable stubble
Amendment 734 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II — Main Issue "Biodiversity" — SMR 2 — last column
Annex II — Main Issue "Biodiversity" — SMR 2 — last column
Article 3(1), Article 3(2)(b), Article 4 (1), (2) and (4), Article 5(a), (b), (d)
Amendment 742 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II — Main Issue "Biodiversity" — SMR 3 — last column
Annex II — Main Issue "Biodiversity" — SMR 3 — last column
Article 6 (1) and (2), Article 13(1)(a)
Amendment 749 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II — Main Issue "Landscape, minimum level of maintenance" GAEC 8
Annex II — Main Issue "Landscape, minimum level of maintenance" GAEC 8
Retention of landscape features, including where appropriate, hedges, ponds, ditches, trees in line, in group or isolated, field margins and terraces, and including a ban on cutting hedges and trees during the bird breeding and rearing season and possible measures for avoiding invasive species and peststake all reasonable steps to avoid encroachment of unwanted vegetation, such as invasive species on agricultural land.
Amendment 757 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II — Main Issue "Identification and registration of animals" SMR 6 —last column
Annex II — Main Issue "Identification and registration of animals" SMR 6 —last column
Articles 3, 4 and 5