BETA


1994/2213(COS) Recognition of qualifications for academic and professional purposes

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Committee Opinion ECON GAROSCI Riccardo (icon: FE FE)
Committee Opinion JURI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 132

Events

1997/02/03
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
1996/05/06
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council welcomed the outcome of the debate organised by the Commission in cooperation with the Member States and the opinion expressed by Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and other European and national organisations on the subject of recognition. It considered that the process that had been started was on-going and required the setting-up of a permanent dialogue with all the parties involved. To this effect it called on the Commission to ensure that the report on the results of the debate was given a wide circulation and to promote a greater discussion of this subject; stressed that the dialogue between the relevant authorities in the two areas of recognition concerned should be incorporated into the current activities of the existing national structures; called on the Member States and the Commission to promote better coordination between the national structures responsible for disseminating information on the two areas of recognition, namely NARIC, the Euro-Info-Centres, etc., and to build up the relevant databases, such as ORTELIUS, so as to promote greater transparency within the higher education systems; called on institutes of higher education, professional organisations and other relevant authorities to continue the dialogue in order to ensure that the study programmes made sufficient allowance for the needs of the professions at European level; called on the Commission: - to encourage the involvement of representatives from the business and professional world, the social partners and students in any appropriate subject network provided for by SOCRATES; - to carry out an assessment, in collaboration with the Member States, of the various suggestions that had been put forward in the course of the debate: = the feasibility of putting in place, on a voluntary basis, a European supplement as an administrative annex to the university degree. This annex would comprise a description of the studies completed by the degree holder and would be aimed at promoting transparency and providing greater recognition for the study course in Member States other than the country of learning; it would also take account of the experience acquired in this area by other organisations, such as the Council of Europe and UNESCO; = the appropriateness of identifying and promoting an awareness of the procedures at national or Community level, which could help in finding an amicable solution to the disagreement that existed in respect of the recognition of qualifications, in response to individual requests addressed directly or, preferably, through the NARIC network or the network of coordinators for the various directives; - to provide it and Parliament, before the end of 1998, with a report on the headway that had been made in this area and on the progress achieved on the different initiatives taken at Community and national level.

Documents
1996/05/06
   CSL - Council Meeting
1995/12/04
   Final act published in Official Journal
1995/11/15
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
1995/11/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
1995/11/15
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
1995/11/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Details

The rapporteur pointed out that many young people would like to be able to carry out part of their studies abroad and that other citizens wanted their qualifications to be recognised in another Member State. Mrs PACK regretted that the Commission communication was limited to measures on the recognition of university qualifications and neglected vocational training. The Commission did not make any mention of the possibility of the recognition of a qualification obtained abroad or a national qualification for working abroad. The rapporteur also regretted that the ECTS had not yet been extended to all countries nor to all types of training. The Commission communication should therefore as a priority define the remaining obstacles to mobility in the Member States. Finally, Mrs Pack welcomed the Commission’s proposal to develop new information networks, but she felt that it would perhaps be better in the first instance to refine those that already existed. Commissioner Deus PINHEIRO pointed out that the right to free movement within the European Union was one of the citizens’ fundamental rights. For this right to be applied, citizens’ qualifications should be easily recognised in host countries. He underlined the contradiction that existed between the theory and the practice, and he criticised the Member States that put up artificial obstacles to the recognition of qualifications. He called for a simplified system for the recognition of qualifications.

1995/10/24
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
1995/10/24
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
1995/10/24
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
1995/09/22
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
1995/05/24
   EP - GAROSCI Riccardo (FE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
1995/04/27
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Details

The Economic and Social Committee welcomed this Communication, the purpose of which was to give a focus to improving matters in the recognition of qualifications for academic and professional purposes, particularly with regard to the links between the recognition of both categories of qualifications. The proposals thus sought to improve the scope for the free movement of students and those in the higher professions in the European area. The ESC considered that the overall implementation and operation of the two General Directives of 1989 and 1992 should be reviewed in due course alongside the ESC’s suggestion for further proposals covering all levels of occupational skills groups in the European workforce.

1995/04/07
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
1994/12/13
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
1994/12/05
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
1994/12/05
   CSL - Council Meeting

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
1995-04-27T00:00:00
docs
summary
The Economic and Social Committee welcomed this Communication, the purpose of which was to give a focus to improving matters in the recognition of qualifications for academic and professional purposes, particularly with regard to the links between the recognition of both categories of qualifications. The proposals thus sought to improve the scope for the free movement of students and those in the higher professions in the European area. The ESC considered that the overall implementation and operation of the two General Directives of 1989 and 1992 should be reviewed in due course alongside the ESC’s suggestion for further proposals covering all levels of occupational skills groups in the European workforce.
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/0
date
1995-04-27T00:00:00
docs
summary
The Economic and Social Committee welcomed this Communication, the purpose of which was to give a focus to improving matters in the recognition of qualifications for academic and professional purposes, particularly with regard to the links between the recognition of both categories of qualifications. The proposals thus sought to improve the scope for the free movement of students and those in the higher professions in the European area. The ESC considered that the overall implementation and operation of the two General Directives of 1989 and 1992 should be reviewed in due course alongside the ESC’s suggestion for further proposals covering all levels of occupational skills groups in the European workforce.
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:323:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:323:TOC
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:323:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:323:TOC
events/2/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4/type
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
New
Committee report tabled for plenary
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19951113&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=19951113&type=CRE
events/6/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Decision by Parliament
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 142
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132
committees/0
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: GAROSCI Riccardo date: 1995-05-24T00:00:00 group: Forza Europa Group abbr: FE
committees/0
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy
committee
ECON
date
1995-05-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GAROSCI Riccardo group: Forza Europa Group abbr: FE
activities
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1811 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1811*&MEET_DATE=05/12/1994 type: Debate in Council title: 1811 council: Education, Youth, Culture and Sport date: 1994-12-05T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 1994-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=596 title: COM(1994)0596 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:51994DC0596:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 1995-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: FE name: GAROSCI Riccardo body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights committee: JURI
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 1995-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: FE name: GAROSCI Riccardo body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights committee: JURI docs: type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A4-0261/1995 date: 1995-10-24T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 1995-11-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19951113&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1995-11-15T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T4-0544/1995 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 1995-12-04T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1920 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1920*&MEET_DATE=06/05/1996 type: Debate in Council title: 1920 council: Education, Youth, Culture and Sport date: 1996-05-06T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
committees/0
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy
committee
ECON
date
1995-05-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GAROSCI Riccardo group: Forza Europa Group abbr: FE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ECON
date
1995-05-24T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy
rapporteur
group: FE name: GAROSCI Riccardo
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights
committee
JURI
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Education, Youth, Culture and Sport meeting_id: 1920 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1920*&MEET_DATE=06/05/1996 date: 1996-05-06T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Education, Youth, Culture and Sport meeting_id: 1811 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1811*&MEET_DATE=05/12/1994 date: 1994-12-05T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 1995-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0410)(documentyear:1995)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0410/1995 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:155:TOC title: OJ C 155 21.06.1995, p. 0016 summary: The Economic and Social Committee welcomed this Communication, the purpose of which was to give a focus to improving matters in the recognition of qualifications for academic and professional purposes, particularly with regard to the links between the recognition of both categories of qualifications. The proposals thus sought to improve the scope for the free movement of students and those in the higher professions in the European area. The ESC considered that the overall implementation and operation of the two General Directives of 1989 and 1992 should be reviewed in due course alongside the ESC’s suggestion for further proposals covering all levels of occupational skills groups in the European workforce. type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 1995-09-22T00:00:00 docs: title: PE214.191 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 1995-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:323:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 323 04.12.1995, p. 0004 title: A4-0261/1995 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:323:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 323 04.12.1995, p. 0027-0048 title: T4-0544/1995 summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, single reading body: EP
  • date: 1997-02-03T00:00:00 docs: title: PE214.577/DEF committee: ECON type: Committee opinion body: EP
events
  • date: 1994-12-05T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1811*&MEET_DATE=05/12/1994 title: 1811
  • date: 1994-12-13T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=596 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(1994)0596 summary:
  • date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-10-24T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 1995-10-24T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: title: A4-0261/1995
  • date: 1995-11-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19951113&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament summary: The rapporteur pointed out that many young people would like to be able to carry out part of their studies abroad and that other citizens wanted their qualifications to be recognised in another Member State. Mrs PACK regretted that the Commission communication was limited to measures on the recognition of university qualifications and neglected vocational training. The Commission did not make any mention of the possibility of the recognition of a qualification obtained abroad or a national qualification for working abroad. The rapporteur also regretted that the ECTS had not yet been extended to all countries nor to all types of training. The Commission communication should therefore as a priority define the remaining obstacles to mobility in the Member States. Finally, Mrs Pack welcomed the Commission’s proposal to develop new information networks, but she felt that it would perhaps be better in the first instance to refine those that already existed. Commissioner Deus PINHEIRO pointed out that the right to free movement within the European Union was one of the citizens’ fundamental rights. For this right to be applied, citizens’ qualifications should be easily recognised in host countries. He underlined the contradiction that existed between the theory and the practice, and he criticised the Member States that put up artificial obstacles to the recognition of qualifications. He called for a simplified system for the recognition of qualifications.
  • date: 1995-11-15T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: title: T4-0544/1995 summary:
  • date: 1995-11-15T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 1995-12-04T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
  • date: 1996-05-06T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1920*&MEET_DATE=06/05/1996 title: 1920 summary: The Council welcomed the outcome of the debate organised by the Commission in cooperation with the Member States and the opinion expressed by Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and other European and national organisations on the subject of recognition. It considered that the process that had been started was on-going and required the setting-up of a permanent dialogue with all the parties involved. To this effect it called on the Commission to ensure that the report on the results of the debate was given a wide circulation and to promote a greater discussion of this subject; stressed that the dialogue between the relevant authorities in the two areas of recognition concerned should be incorporated into the current activities of the existing national structures; called on the Member States and the Commission to promote better coordination between the national structures responsible for disseminating information on the two areas of recognition, namely NARIC, the Euro-Info-Centres, etc., and to build up the relevant databases, such as ORTELIUS, so as to promote greater transparency within the higher education systems; called on institutes of higher education, professional organisations and other relevant authorities to continue the dialogue in order to ensure that the study programmes made sufficient allowance for the needs of the professions at European level; called on the Commission: - to encourage the involvement of representatives from the business and professional world, the social partners and students in any appropriate subject network provided for by SOCRATES; - to carry out an assessment, in collaboration with the Member States, of the various suggestions that had been put forward in the course of the debate: = the feasibility of putting in place, on a voluntary basis, a European supplement as an administrative annex to the university degree. This annex would comprise a description of the studies completed by the degree holder and would be aimed at promoting transparency and providing greater recognition for the study course in Member States other than the country of learning; it would also take account of the experience acquired in this area by other organisations, such as the Council of Europe and UNESCO; = the appropriateness of identifying and promoting an awareness of the procedures at national or Community level, which could help in finding an amicable solution to the disagreement that existed in respect of the recognition of qualifications, in response to individual requests addressed directly or, preferably, through the NARIC network or the network of coordinators for the various directives; - to provide it and Parliament, before the end of 1998, with a report on the headway that had been made in this area and on the progress achieved on the different initiatives taken at Community and national level.
links
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CULT/4/06300
New
  • CULT/4/06300
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.40.07 Recognition of diplomas, equivalence of studies and training
New
4.40.07
Recognition of diplomas, equivalence of studies and training
activities
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1811 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1811*&MEET_DATE=05/12/1994 type: Debate in Council title: 1811 council: Education, Youth, Culture and Sport date: 1994-12-05T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 1994-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=596 title: COM(1994)0596 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:51994DC0596:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 1995-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: FE name: GAROSCI Riccardo body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights committee: JURI
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 1995-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: FE name: GAROSCI Riccardo body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights committee: JURI docs: type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A4-0261/1995 date: 1995-10-24T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 1995-11-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19951113&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1995-11-15T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T4-0544/1995 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 1995-12-04T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1920 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1920*&MEET_DATE=06/05/1996 type: Debate in Council title: 1920 council: Education, Youth, Culture and Sport date: 1996-05-06T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 1995-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: FE name: GAROSCI Riccardo
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights committee: JURI
links
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CULT/4/06300
reference
1994/2213(COS)
title
Recognition of qualifications for academic and professional purposes
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Commission strategy paper
type
COS - Procedure on a strategy paper (historic)
subject
4.40.07 Recognition of diplomas, equivalence of studies and training